HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff Report 161-09TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
BUDGET
FY 2010 -FY 2011
FINANCE COMMITTEE
CITY MANAGER
MARCH 31, 2009
DEPARTMENT: UTILITIES
CMR: 161:09
Recommendation to City Council on Proposed Changes to the Electric
Fund's Calaveras Reserve Guidelines
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Calaveras Reserve is used to provide funds to the Electric Fund's operating budget to cover
costs that are above the value of certain assets (known as stranded cost). Since completing the
assignment of a transmission asset and an energy exchange contract whose costs were higher
than their benefits, staff reassessed the level of funding necessary in the Calaveras Reserve.
Staff's current assessment is that, under many scenarios, the Calaveras Reserve may have funds
in excess of what is needed to cover stranded cost. However, the stranded cost needs are highly
sensitive to changes in wholesale electric market prices and hydroelectric generation conditions.
Over the past few months, staff has met with the UAC, Finance Committee and Council to
discuss alternatives for managing the Calaveras Reserve going forward including the use of
excess funds for other purposes within certain parameters. After evaluating several alternatives,
on January 12, 2009, the Council provided direction to staff on how to manage the Calaveras
Reserve. Staff's recommended changes to the existing Calaveras Reserve Target and Guidelines
are necessary to implement Council's direction and to provide for a dynamic and transparent
methodology to assess the Electric Fund's stranded cost and potential excess funds.
RECOMMENDATION
The Utilities Advisory Commission (UAC) and staff recommend that the Finance Committee
recommend that the City Council adopt new guidelines to manage the Calaveras Reserve through
changes to the existing Calaveras Reserve Target and Guidelines as follows:
• Eliminate the existing Calaveras Reserve drawdown schedule;
• Require the calculation of the stranded costs for the electric supply portfolio during the
annual budget process for the upcoming budget year(s) and set the minimum transfer
from the Calaveras Reserve to the Electric Supply Operating Budget equal to this
amount;
• Require the calculation of the stranded costs for the long-term (until 2032 when
Calaveras debt is paid off) of the electric supply portfolio during the annual budget
CMR: 161:09 Page 1 of 6
process and ensure that the Calaveras Reserve balance will be sufficient to cover this
amount;
• Calculate stranded cost based on the above market cost of the Calaveras Hydroelectric
Project and the California Oregon Transmission Project; and
• To the extent that there are funds available in excess of long-term stranded cost needs,
staff will work with the UAC to identify and recommend projects for Council
consideration and approval. Such projects shall be to the benefit of electric ratepayers.
BACKGROUND
In 1983, the City Council established the Calaveras Reserve in the Electric Fund to help defray a
portion of the annual debt service costs associated with the Calaveras Hydroelectric Project,
which was put in service at that time. As originally established, the Calaveras Reserve policy did
not provide for a target balance and depletion of the reserve was anticipated by 2002.
California Assembly Bill 1890 was adopted in 1996, which provided for the deregulation of
California's electric industry effective January 1, 1998. A key element of deregulation was the
provision for Direct Access, which would allow electric customers to choose their electric
commodity supplier. The City of Palo Alto Utilities (City), along with other California utilities,
were faced with the prospect of losing customers and load to Direct Access and being saddled
with expensive generation assets purchased or built to serve these customers. In response to such
risk, Pacific Gas and Electric Company and other investor- and municipally -owned utilities
established stranded cost surcharges to collect funds from ratepayers to cover the amount that
these uneconomic assets were projected to cost above their market value in the future (i.e.,
"stranded cost").
Council changed the purpose of the Calaveras Reserve in 1996 (CMR: 214:96) and authorized
collections from electric ratepayers to cover the amount that certain electric assets' costs were
projected to be higher than their market value in the future (i.e., stranded cost). In addition,
Council approved a new Calaveras Reserve policy linking the reserve balance to an amount
sufficient to cover potential stranded costs. The assets identified as stranded included the Seattle
City Light Exchange contract, the Calaveras Hydroelectric Project, and the California -Oregon
Transmission Project (COTP). In 1999, Council ceased collecting funds for these stranded costs
and established the Calaveras Reserve Target and Guidelines with a schedule to draw down the
funds and manage electric rates through the end of FY 2032-33 (Attachment A).
In May 1997, Council revised the reserve target level to cover above -market, or "stranded," costs
to $93 million by December 31, 2001 to be collected from a stranded cost surcharge imposed on
electric rates (CMR:219:97). When the Calaveras Reserve balance reached $71 million in 1999,
stranded costs were deemed fully collected. At that time, Council authorized the cessation of the
collection of the stranded cost surcharge and established the Calaveras Reserve Target and
Guidelines (CMR 222:99) with a schedule to drawdown the funds and manage electric rates
through transfers from the Calaveras Reserve to the Electric Supply Rate Stabilization Reserve
(E-SRSR) through the end of Fiscal Year (FY) 2032-33, when the Calaveras Reserve would be
exhausted.
In 2001, the California electric industry faced an energy crisis triggering wholesale power price
spikes and rolling blackouts throughout the state. The crisis was blamed on poor deregulation
CMR: 161:09 Page 2 of 6
market design and market manipulation by energy suppliers. As a result, Direct Access was
suspended in California for the investor -owned utilities and subsequently, the City suspended its
Direct Access program. Further, as a result of changing market conditions and the assignment of
certain electric assets, the estimate of the City's stranded cost is lower now than when stranded
cost collections stopped in 1999. Since then, electric market prices have increased significantly,
reducing the stranded cost associated with the Calaveras Hydroelectric Project. In June 2008, the
City permanently assigned away its share in the Seattle City Light Exchange. Further, a long-
term assignment of the City's share in the COTP has been executed. The assignments of the
COTP and Seattle City Light Exchange effectively eliminate stranded costs associated with these
two electric assets.
At the December 2007 and February 2008 UAC meetings, staff discussed the background and
rationale for developing the Calaveras Reserve, provided an assessment of the current need for
the Calaveras Reserve and options for managing the Calaveras Reserve in the future. In
November 2008, staff presented a proposal to the UAC for the use of the Calaveras Reserve
funds including allocating $10 million to return to the Rate Stabilization Reserve and provided
an estimate of future stranded costs from Calaveras and COTP. At that time, the estimate for the
potential need for funds for stranded costs was $32.5 million. Since the balance of the Calaveras
Reserve will be $64.5 million as of the end of FY 2009, the Calaveras Reserve would have about
$32 million (by the end of FY 2009) that may be no longer needed to cover future stranded costs.
At its November 2008 meeting, the UAC provided the following general feedback on staff's
proposal:
• Agreement with staff's assessment that the current estimate of stranded cost is likely lower
than the $64.5 million in the Calaveras Reserve and recognition that staff's stranded cost
estimate of $32.5 million is a prudent amount of funds to reserve for stranded cost.
• Recognition that the Calaveras Reserve has about $32 million more than is needed to cover
stranded cost.
• No support for transferring funds to the Electric Supply Rate Stabilization Reserve (E-SRSR)
because such a strategy sends the wrong price signal to customers and only defers the need to
raise electric rates to cover cost. The UAC noted that E-SRSR funds were drawn down in
FY 2007-08 and are planned to be drawn down in FY 2008-09 resulting in retail rates that do
not fully cover operating costs. An additional transfer would continue to defer the alignment
of retail rate revenues with costs.
• Support of the use of funds in the Calaveras Reserve that may not be needed for stranded
costs to pay for capital improvement projects to the benefit of electric rate payers and
identification of several types of projects which may be funded. However, the UAC did not
support the idea of creating a new fund to do so.
• Recognition of market price and hydroelectric generation uncertainty as reason for careful
deliberation of the use of the Calaveras Reserve.
• Support of use of funds in the Calaveras Reserve that may not be needed for stranded costs
for capital project development only after reviewing and concurring with a specific project
recommendation by staff.
As a result of the UAC's input, staff revised its preliminary proposal and decided not to
recommend an immediate transfer of some of the excess funds to the Electric Supply Rate
CMR: 161:09 Page 3 of 6
Stabilization Reserve and not to create a new reserve for potential capital projects that benefit
electric ratepayers.
At its December 2, 2008 meeting, the Finance Committee reviewed the recommendations from
the UAC and staff's revised proposal (CMR: 449:08). The Finance Committee generally agreed
with staff's revised proposal to retain some funds in the Calaveras Reserve for stranded costs and
to begin a thorough review of potential capital projects that could benefit electric ratepayers.
These project ideas would be considered for at least partial funding from Calaveras Reserve
funds. The Committee agreed with the UAC that potential projects for the funding might
include:
• Development of local and/or distributed generation to reduce transmission charges and losses
and save costs of local capacity requirements;
• Upgrade of transmission voltage from PG&E to the City's distribution system to reduce
transmission system losses;
• Development of smart grid elements and purchase of smart meters to optimize the
distribution system;
• Purchase of land from the City which the electric utility currently rents to reduce the cost
exposure to changing property values; and
• Loans to other Utilities funds and/or the General Fund in order to save financing costs related
to issuing bonds for capital projects.
On January 12, 2009, Council approved the Finance Committee's recommendation
(CMR:110:09) to direct staff to:
1. Continue using the Calaveras Reserve to cover stranded cost, which is currently
calculated to be $32.5 million;
2. Continue the annual transfer from the Calaveras Reserve to the Electric Supply Rate
Stabilization Reserve as budgeted for Fiscal Year (FY) 2009; and
3. Work with the Utilities Advisory Commission (UAC) to review possible projects that
would benefit electric ratepayers for consideration of funding from the calculated
"excess" Calaveras Reserve funds and to return to the Finance Committee with staff's
and the UAC's recommendations for use by the Finance Committee to formulate a
recommendation for Council action.
DISCUSSION
The current Calaveras Reserve guideline consists of a schedule for the target reserve balance
until the reserve is completely exhausted by the end of FY 2033 (Attachment A). Changes to the
guidelines must be made in order to implement the Council direction.
Staff has identified two alternatives that could be considered for changing the Calaveras Reserve
guidelines. The first sets a new target reserve balance schedule so that $32 million is reserved
for capital projects that are identified and selected for funding. This alternative provides
certainty for long-term financial planning for the electric utility because the amount that can be
expected to be transferred from the Calaveras Reserve is known.
CMR: 161:09 Page 4 of 6
The second alternative is a more dynamic guideline that establishes a minimum transfer from the
Calaveras Reserve based on the stranded cost estimate updated in the annual budget process. In
this alternative, the amount transferred from the Calaveras Reserve would be determined
annually and could take into account the five-year financial plan measures such as reserve levels,
projected rate adjustments, and updated stranded cost estimates.
Staff recommends the second alternative, which requires an annual recalculation of the electric
utility stranded cost estimates during the budget approval and rate setting process. Staff's
proposal contains several aspects:
1. Annually, during the budget approval and rate setting process, the stranded costs for the
upcoming budget year and for the long-term would be estimated. The calculation would
be based on the updated cost and generation estimates for the Calaveras Hydroelectric
Project and the California -Oregon Transmission Project (COTP) and electric market price
projections.
2. The minimum transfer from the Calaveras Reserve to the Electric Supply Operating
Budget for the upcoming budget year would be equal to the stranded cost estimate for
that budget year. An additional amount could be transferred depending on the overall
financial circumstances of the Electric Fund.
3. The updated long-term stranded cost estimate would be used to establish the amount that
should remain in the Calaveras Reserve to cover these costs. The amount of money
available for an alternate use would be equal to the Calaveras Reserve balance minus
these updated long-term stranded cost estimates.
4. The use of any funds available in the Calaveras Reserve that are in addition to the funds
needed for the long-term stranded cost as calculated in the annual budget process would
require Council approval.
5. Staff will work with the UAC to identify and recommend projects to Council that benefit
electric ratepayers to use funds from the Calaveras Reserve.
If the proposed method were used for FY 2010, then the minimum transfer from the Calaveras
Reserve would be $2.6 million for FY 2010. This is based on the assumptions and market prices
used to develop the FY 2010 budget. Using these assumptions and an estimate of long-term
contingencies, the long-term stranded cost estimate would be $48 million. This would be the
amount that should remain in the Calaveras Reserve to cover these potential stranded costs.
Therefore, if the Calaveras Reserve balance was $64.5 million, then $16.5 million could be used
for an alternate use.
Depending on how much of the funds in the Calaveras Reserve remain after being used for
projects, the Calaveras Reserve could be insufficient to cover stranded costs as determined by the
annual recalculation. In this case, the remaining balance in the Calaveras Reserve may not have
funds available for new projects.
COMMISSION REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The proposed changes to the Calaveras Reserve guidelines were presented to the UAC at its
February 4, 2009 meeting along with an update of short- and long-term stranded cost and
potential excess funds. The UAC discussed whether there were risks of the proposed changes
whereby cumulative transfers from the reserve would result in inadequate reserves to cover
CMR: 161:09 Page 5 of 6
stranded costs. The Commission agreed with staff's explanation that, although this could
happen, the real risk exists only if Direct Access were reinstated.
The UAC voted unanimously to recommend that the Council approve staff's recommendation.
The notes from the UAC meeting are provided as Attachment B.
RESOURCE IMPACT
Implementation of the proposed changes to the Calaveras Reserve Target and Guidelines does
not impact FY 2009. The changes, if approved, will be incorporated in the FY 2010 and FY
2011 Operating Budgets and FY 2010 electric rates for Council's review and approval.
POLICY IMPLICATIONS
This recommendation is consistent with the Council -approved Utilities Strategic Plan with
regard to 1) managing supply portfolio risk to preserve a supply cost advantage; and 2) to
provide low and stable rates, adequate reserves, and budgeted transfers to the General Fund.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Changing the Calaveras Reserve guidelines does not constitute a "project" pursuant to Section
21065 of the Public Resources Code, thus no environmental review under the California
Environmental Quality Act is required.
ATTACHMENTS
A. 1999 Council -Approved Calaveras Reserve Target and Guidelines
B. Excerpts — Final Minutes from the February 4, 2009 UAC meeting
PREPARED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
DEPARTMENT APPROVAL:
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:
MONICA PADILLA
Senior_ Resource Planaer
E O. RATCHYE
lities Assistant Director, Resource Management
vi it(
VALERIE O. FANG
Director of Utilities
S
Mana
ger
KEEN
CMR: 161:09 Page 6 of 6
ATTACHMENT A
1999 Council Approved Calaveras Reserve Target & Guideline
Ending
Reserve Target
(M$)
Minimum
(M$)
Maximum
(M$)
FY 06-07
71.8
64.6
89.8
FY 07-08
70.3
63.3
87.9
FY 08-09
68.9
62.0
86.1
FY 09-10
67.4
60.7
84.3
FY 10-11
65.1
58.6
81.4
FY 11-12
62.0
55.8
77.5
FY 12-13
58.8
52.9
73.5
FY 13-14
55.5
49.9
69.4
FY 14-15
52.0
46.8
65.0
FY 15-16
48.4
43.5
60.5
FY 16-17
44.6
40.1
55.7
FY 17-18
40.6
36.5
50.8
FY 18-19
36.5
32.8
45.6
FY 19-20
32.2
28.9
40.2
FY 20-21
27.6
24.9
34.6
FY 21-22
22.9
20.6
28.7
FY 22-23
18.0
16.2
22.5
FY 23-24
12.9
11.6
16.1
FY 24-25
9.8
8.8
12.3
FY 25-26
8.6
7.7
10.7
FY 26-27
7.3
6.6
9.2
FY 27-28
6.1
5.5
7.6
FY 28-29
4.9
4.4
6.1
FY 29-30
3.6
3.3
4.5
FY 30-31
2.4
2.2
3.0
FY 31-32
1.2
1.1
1.5
ATTACHMENT B
EXCERPTS from Final Minutes of UAC Meeting of February 4, 2009
ITEM 2: ACTION ITEM: Proposed Changes to the Calaveras Reserve Guidelines
Utilities Director Valerie Fong presented staff's proposed changes to the Calaveras Reserve Target and
Guidelines and requested that the UAC recommend to Council the adoption of the proposed changes.
The recommended changes as presented included:
• Eliminate the existing Calaveras Reserve drawdown schedule;
• Require the calculation of the stranded costs for the electric supply portfolio during the annual
budget process for the upcoming budget year(s) and set the minimum transfer from the Calaveras
Reserve to the Electric Supply Operating Budget equal to this amount;
• Require the calculation of the stranded costs for the long-term of the electric supply portfolio during
the annual budget process and ensure that the Calaveras Reserve balance will be sufficient to
cover this amount;
• Calculate stranded cost based on the above market cost of the Calaveras Hydroelectric Project
and the California Oregon Transmission Project; and
• To the extent that there are funds available in excess of long-term stranded cost needs, staff will
work with the UAC to identify and recommend projects for Council consideration and approval.
Such projects shall be to the benefit of electric ratepayers.
Fong also presented an update of stranded cost and possible excess Calaveras Reserve funds in a
manner consistent with the proposed changes to the guidelines, including:
• Stranded cost equal to minimum transfer requirement for FY 2010 and FY 2011 at $2.63 and
$1.99 million, respectively based on market value and cost assumed for FY 2010 budget
development;
• a range of long-term stranded cost scenarios which are dependent on market price and
hydroelectric generation of $31.5 to $52.5 million; and
• a potential Calaveras Reserve excess in the range of $12 to $33 million, given the range of
long-term stranded cost and the projected ending FY 2009 Calaveras Reserve balance of $64.5
million.
Assistant Utilities Director, Jane Ratchye added that in the event a project is identified for possible funding
with excess Calaveras Reserve funds, the long-term stranded cost calculation would be updated prior to
expending the funds to ensure adequacy of the Calaveras Reserve. Ratchye also clarified that the
stranded cost transfer calculated for FY 2010 is the minimum amount recommended and that it is Council's
discretion to approve greater transfers from the Calaveras Reserve.
Commissioner Waldfogel expressed concern that the short-term calculation did not look at contingencies
for low hydroelectric output for which Ratchye clarified that such contingencies would be included in the
long-term calculation.
Chair Dawes expressed his desire to annually true -up the transfer from the Calaveras Reserve based on
actual performance of the stranded assets, however none of the other commissioners expressed their
support for this idea as it would not add to rate stability and could be administratively burdensome.
Commissioner Melton asked what staff would do if the Calaveras Reserve is used to fund projects and
stranded cost increases above the amount available in the Calaveras Reserve. Fong explained that staff's
response would depend on whether or not Direct Access was available to customers and that any
recommendation would be provided in the context of overall rates.
Action on this item was deferred until after Item Number 6 — Long -Term Financial Projections and Revenue
Adjustment Targets for the Electric Fund.
RETURN TO ITEM 2 FOR ACTION: Proposed Changes to the Calaveras Reserve Guidelines
Commissioner Melton motioned to recommend to Council the adoption of the changes to the Calaveras
Reserve Target and Guidelines as presented by staff. Commissioner Rosenbaum seconded the motion.
The motion passed unanimously (5-0).