Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11131939Th.eC'oi ?c..5. .,: 'fof.. the City of ''_Palo Alto met in regular set sionon this :;date'. at ',.. p'.N.., uwith.::MayorCoste 1'? pr' - r 011 c.a, 3.. as:.' follows • -� ?resent: :Bentr'otts Blois„' 'uw1:ei,, COS.telo,' Cyp .er', rodda_'r'� Mrs s ` . erne', : "Richards;. Souta"xw C%.od, Wood . Q t.)roveG' ('letter was received fro J ? k �.Y District o:.,.Y : � �'.eCfi�tt.S S j ZE.� Engirneer of the State, Division 'of Highways, enclosingoncloSing copy of the reuulatiCh"'2: adon44n - d ate. active nark/ ngs f o st ate i�Z?Ty'a no-- dri'v ng to the left thereof, as approved by the �, rt rks .o. the State of -California on � Director of P.�hl:c, r�Tn�. � .Se tember l9„ 1935, and requesting the 'cooperation of 'the City 1. iz prov.idin.,,g for 'u i.'" or :ity In marking and ,enforcement by the adept .bn . of an ord nance requiring' r.p g the 'same markings of --,ha ••`.. �S �, is 4 ... ��. l., �i.A J. Vi..Lv Jt7.� la. �FAGs... �i - �.... � �✓t«yi Y. 7 the tae - ju.'''iAdicti .on of the City and _ unlawful to of such m :'kinzs . This' C a s . referred e rr , i the B : t, A'�. 'W,,.,� .k C; � ?- ,v �c to 't_.�c.. Board �j. Safety, end the: City Attorney. • e aest -ox Veterans 'Welfare Board for Cancellation of Taxes f�r o:?'.zuun.ication was received from the Veterans' 7,:e1 11---; enc ns'.n : a petition for the 'cancellation of certain tti?.'f,F'`^.s no'rr appearing on the tax ;'ec'rc:S as Lt'tier: against owned by the Bea d. This petition requests the cancellation '^. taxes atounting to:$13.52'. on Lots 5 and 6, Block 3}, College deeded': ,to the Veterans' ;Telfare Board or. July. 7", 1933. This matter vas referred to the , City attorney for a report at the next Meeting.. Tax • Deeds A- :cCmmUnica- tion vas received from the Tax. Collector transmitting; -tax deeds on, twenty parcels of f3 i-�i c city �i S ? �,rg. �. tI��J22'S,f ..,.. � y �� taxes -have. y 4J been -delinquent fo a period. of five years. These deeds: a1 duplicate of ve tv of thethirty-threewhich Fire acceptedat the Council meeting ng of June 29th but never The -Attorney other thirteen parcelshave beenf redeemed. ':.e City �: -..?rrlained that the first advert Lseten for the deed':n of these Properties to the City vas Lade about three days be c„ the f ive -year eriod had elapses. and ; r -'or r+ correct //��y/{�}r�/� .j�.��♦ ;:p�A,/��y elapsed, .� Q. dye, y4�0� correct ., .. ,.._ record It as �necessary .V'o re-adver ise. L nd prepare. new Leee.s. These." deeds cover the following properties Name De s c r° i t- or W. R. Bartley ?,.. R.': Bartley Margaret Shannon FlYorine�1 7ti.;, 1F° etLrenbacher .1;ony Mouret e.V and JeanL. .Bordew Fa,ve . P.. Bartley, . M. S. 'o•cd:ha s and L.Obie Portion. of Lot 8, Pain Subdivision Lots 8 and9,. Block 15, Evergreen - Lot 11, Block 7, • South Palo Alto Lot 35, Block -37 University Par -,� ""-: Porti.o . Lots l and 3, Paul Sub. Portion Lot 38, Paul Subdivision T^� On r,o on ro..`..1 ob i Pet'_. - v 8v,.:al7,.: Avenue. up,A.rc►h,a n 4 that t:r to use ^, on the that th� A Avl.or»�e entirely is let, City a -,z. sA4 po3tr o7_e the a neyn of WorS the Stet Carried . Li b that 't Plans .fo: subm4t a Prefer • rot y.Lr, 'Bartley and Madel-ine B., Towne'. BartIcy' "r. R. Bartley . W. R.. -:Bartley: E, P. Pourer ay:: M• ?tich.rond W. ,rR.- Bartley' W".---.R„, Bartley B.- .Bartley W. . Bartley - Bartley E.. G . Wilcoxon. RW. . Bartley Are.;e. Y. Batchelor Description .. Portion 'of Lot, "`12, Paul Subdi vis ion Lots '2;3 .and 4, Block 3, Bartley Trac 'Lots Sand. na 3, '.'Block 1, Bartley Tract Lot 17, Block 12, Sunnyside Addition Lot , , Block 9, Sunnysi'de Addition Lots 50 and 51, Block 5, Bartley .TractLots i:' and '2, Bloc'_ 4,. Bartley Tra t IAA; 11, Block y Bartley Tract dot 22:, Block 6, Bartley Tract 'Lot: ~21, Block 6, Bartley, Tract • Lots 19.', and 20, Block. 6, Bartley Tr ac a Lot:, 10; Block 5, Stanford City Lots- 20, 21, 22, 23, Block 7, Bartley - Lots 59,'and 5, Block 7, Bartley Tract ^got, on of .Wood and Mrs.. Merner,, . individual resolutions utions .cc€pting each of these tax deeds Y,rere'adepted.`by unani:sous vote on eel, cal7. University Avenue Underpass A telegram was•, received from the Northern. Pacific ar o:r,�rt ies, ?rc.., owner 'of' property at 125 University Avenue, o'cj ecti:.;g to the co :enceme nt ` of the underpass prior to a~' ,ary 1, 1.940, as such construction work would greatly injure their tenant:'z business and, injure property values on 7zniversity ^,`tench? A letter .was received= in this connection fro the' Terche vs' Co aittee; of the Chamber of Commerce, requesting t'rel t the ouncil: ask the ` Board of.: Works` and the City Enz reer.: to use their influence- with the:contractor and the State Eighv,sy Commission to see that the minimum of inconvenience is caused er', ee to the Christmas . holidays. The. 'City ; ineereadvisedthat he thought the work on the underpass- r i be ,, .. �e_ pass might > commenced sh���;t. Bece�ber l .. t, and that �the program provides for the. ix mediate of osina of University eeeeeze. froze - pl-: Camino Real to the railroad tracks. The. City froze ,..f 'l.�/yK.A�.A Real' ..b 4.w r- .tto,_:.ey explained :that .there: is nav%irz, the City or State can.. ^:o officially to postpone construction, ',a.s' the 'matter will be entirely n the hands= of the : contractor as soon: as the contract Yet, but, offered the; suggestion that the Board of Works and City E ineer: might be. requested' to confer with the contractor :gee if he -would consent to delay the conmiencemen.t of the work. x+ras moved by R{ chards thattr e Board of Works and ^s t �.. �y Eng5neer'be directed . to use every:` reasonable means to pestrone the commencement of the underpass until after the Christmas -holidays,4 The . motion vas seconded by Cypher,.' with the amendment ent that, in addition to the. reference to the Board ,corks and City Engineer,, the _Mayor' be authorized to `address communication on behalf of:, :the Council to the contractor .,and the State Highway. Co'. mission.e- As thus amended, the motion was Library: Addition A report was received f'ro! the: Board of Works ad.visi' tee wt: has met with the Libraite Board ;fora discussion of the r= ;:o. for the proposed' addition . s ad:-ethat the Library Board will :on:I t a 'sera.rate communication e reset gig in detail why they :'l'ef er that the westerly wing be built . without the proposed It ra tions to the entrance if .,'t . is not .Possible to construct w.; n s.,, s the:es-me time. The Board reported that t the • ::a estimated cost of: building the library addition including one wing andthe remodeled entrance, is $15,4:01. 00; the cost of constructing, the wing alone is $iu,73'-.X10. the' A : coi ication :dated -:October 27th wacw received fr;_ c Lre Li.braz f.-,: oar stating, that it::does , not t favor making ng any alterations ,;to- ;the interior of the ` librar-, bitildinosat this time: a.d, that Its position in respect to' this matter is the say a:s stated in Its' letter of February 7th.: There was also a supplemental lettFr< ofr,November,, 3.rd from the Libraryr. Board, stating' that, while -they adhere to their opinion that two w s and interior:: 'alter at {ons.:: would 'serve the greater public ccnvrenience-,'` neverthelesso should the Council conclude that it is:,possible t:o,.construct.:on... one wing they will 'gladly ve1co;�a t . . They do not favor the, interior alterations at this t» for: the;,: reason :they..would. absorb ? z ch of the space now to use and: the ::net gain: of floor Space: would. be very small. A ,,report- wasreceived from. Conrmittee No. 3 stating, that, , ,,t -:favors the construction ; of the 'Westerly wring only, • without"'the alterations to the entrance, in accordance with the wishes of the Library Board. Committee..Nc, 4 recommended that a SILT. not to exceed $1l;000.00 be appropriated from the unappropriated balnice for the .constrauetiorzof the westerly wing of the Library build{ K,, in accordance Frith the estimate furnished. by the Board of wore:=. On motion of Mrs. Nern_er and Bentrott, and by o a.ni a .,S vote on x ,o11 call,. the recommendation of Committee No. 3 fa.vorir3, : the construction of the westerly: winsf only, and. the reeornexzdatioz of Committee No. 4 for the appropriation. of $11,00,i00. were approved. On motion of Mrs. Merner and Foy, ) the. Board of Works was directed to proceed with the construction of the Library addition. University Avenue. Underpass „A report was received from, the Board of Works i r`'orni : the Council that' it ,is impractical: to maintain a crossing over the Southern- Pacific tracks' at uni vers ty Avenue cl uri ng the construction of the umierpass, in view ef' the expense involved and the: : pract.ieabIlity of maintaining a t.erporary:•crossi:rC because tof;< ;the. necessity: of havi r7 .tw< railroad levels. The Board' .advised=- that the officials of the State Department of Public Works:; and the: Bureau of. Public ' Roads object to the maintenance — Of a:'temporary crossing. It:was:. pointed out by the City Engineer that a pedestrian crossing will be maintained., but that vehicular traffic ri.l.l: have..:to ,use Palo Alto Avenue or r' barcadero Roe.d. He advised —that —the Board of Works is now, studying plans for the', handIing of:: traffic. and.. ,is considering, the advisability or: installing 'st op' and go s igna l s at Embarcadero Road, and Ei Camino;' Real ;;, A .report was received from. the Board. of Works recd' °y.- ing that the Mayor. and City Clerk be authorized to initial the change In ?aragraph 1'7, Page 3, of the agreement between the, Southern -Pacific Railroad Company, the Southern Pacific Conrosr. , the _State o•f;.: California and the City of Palo .3.to relat:` f to the `constr tion :and maintenance of the underpass, which has been. executed b all . parti.es concerned.. The word "State” has beenOchanged to the word "City in the next to the last of Para �ra h,.l l cing 'on the City to obligation f reno'�f' �"' t7 � 4> s � ra' a v t� . :� j the of underpass in.; the event of its discontinuance or aba.n_conreolt- as a public way City CI vote on and Cit' an a �re1 permi tt' Universi of .`"t.f_'.� t �e con `^aces v w J a V .,f the and on LI 'vote Sr 1 because u;fit t -n the. plans `' -7. th out t- - srm .T.Ive beer he co Ease 5wv the. a from Mal.),.?: fr on n+ J.._t7 tJra-c, these `cra u . these of 7L Loh: { C;or ittee ;No.„ I also ree,onmende6,that the Mayorand' City clerk "b t o ed ® te a thi$ change .tn the 'agreement. On motion on of W'o'od, and l rs..':Ylerner, a.nd by Unanimous Y Cte ©a•` " ro'. ca Reso1ution No. 1258 authorizing the Mayor City Clerk to ititie i., :th.s change was adopted.,,, There .teas presented for the Cacanc1 , s consideration;. azreement betwee _:;S.anfcrd University, and: the City of Palo alto ne-r ,.afro t ,e',use of •'ertein ? rco'oert ' ::? ase'. to the Ci-ter t1)",e T„-rvers-! ty..for• -121e pu.rpo se of the construction uction c the , _.n e?': ass, .","!aa,:ing slopes of the' entrance cu- of the u d.er. a4s and for the cc. sti;rtion.- of- sidewalks and "roadways for- access to parking - n ces Or" ther. side of the underpass. Co ttee :To. , Hewn eYade,d, that u ]c.S agreement: be approve and that the Mayor 3� •�. Y_.4 C4t7 Clerk. k b :-author ed. to execute .}. agreement ll. on behalf .. - �cCt:uG t, r ��s ^)f the !+{ v Y ¢.g�,. �1 ��qr 9[� a�z ho City - - �. - - . "�.»iv.7. �.�:,Gr .�.r�Ja.1..:�rrQ y`- �'-".5;i'9 -. � ,fi�4 ��r �'-.:9:_rj T�3.�.o.�,r. ,+�Y'1„�'... vs '�: Ly Clerk to si'(7nth 4s, :agreement, on behalf of - he City,. vas r d, on -,ot4 on of, :„ of +:rn_cr :and Wo:od, vas adopted c- unanimous ,rn 4 r,Yi r01a cal . Z Hospital. +1' A report^'nYas'' reo.e.'L'.'ed;from tytilte Board of Works y9�,dv�•t.3%;'j;q on.,. tile �Tiosp...UaJ. 'addition..is pre7recai`ng, _ sat1 fa.c o .",.1: y � •-�. m r! delay-, and '..tha v the •.coat rF,a. et4w?"L h K. E. Parker ra t ?�1,.s , o,ef out �lim t of, 300 days for the ��•o.rk. Th_e. Br^ar F�a;ints ot.t that -30�l .d yS,.-'"rir:aJ f' ive +1-'41 /e ovntr 7 ." M4' e-' of the amount r remodeling r. k J. �-o y� Qa++;yy../�`rYiO�{�7.C4'��.j�.....�w♦�*: "��rC�°� .necessary�a A1• the ys��L? _Y �,r✓ Z�'Vr raj .7.a canJrre.c;lior mLisLr-'wor»c t '•.t the 'ospita v n order to cause the, least irconvenle21. , and has' -little cr^tro: over hen. he can do m ..�_ �.. �, ' ;tic : xie._.rJtha i n r w ov,? �, It `;7as f"or tt4s »F'ew'er. that he vas : F,iven as. `-1onz as ?n(} :., s in ',which rhii to ccm-r)late he. work. This report vas p?ace. on fi_es (Councilman Thoits came, tFlt this. v L,''"' e, 8 ' during.-the,: P.M.., axzd as rese at. during. th.e rest of the. meet ) y�gyf i� �i lrie Station. ��.eoort ;a st brnitted by the;:Boa.rd, of :nTor g ks the Co'rici1 that' it- has'.authori zed, zed the Cty arzf rneeto prNapa.re he p1.an s and.' spec f'1 (' .t 'ons. for the 1y� y f", F� y, �,.� ,. ,,.. w. . .ii. f.; ,,,8.� �L..?_C. .. � c Station +*_ahoua the .employment of an architect. The Bo ,,d advised that the z.r.zi a,i owed by the Co .rci''l for architect's fees wcYuJ.d n.ot been suf fic? ent,, as the usual . fee, is h `''tr,er than. 3 per cent of the cost of the work. Easernet's:. for Pole., Lines A report :: Yas received.. from the Bard: of Zti arks recommend - t2 --..e acceptance' of rants '•c easements '1 or nole. �.;,»w, p'..rposes fro -m � ,��� S.: L a, zieis 'et, ceorsre L. end,, A ce -y 2,,,s r and rr Alfred a.' d len.,A. Johnson, covering, property ` in St .rforc ' tract: Co`''mil.' .'c?'€ No. 1 also recommen,ded the acceptance of l es.? grants . �psen y�`t ^ `'w �-'. ��. ti?t3'�.en W V. - - �� On motion Thcr.gts and R chards„-escljttons accepting e senent s were adopted 5 by unanimous vote o' roll call. Lot Cleanin,g Refwards �- ,� report was r�e,cey,-i ved 'Prom the' Board (o�ar ',.•� of Works rks [�/''e, '�{' �'o7"=�'eP:f17,1ric- that the' following In, l o Y le r t.J re i.,-nds be c,ranted • 'Ulysses A. Scha. l , $3.50, Tax f..17. No. i.`'l2i Llnea: 3. F `Ber tty, 61.65, Tax Bill No. 5708 of 7. R. 0. .'_'rol:"..Fn, .2.20', Tay 1 No. 237 ,,,,11 ,1 R. ,O.. Bol ai=, ei,2 C5, Tax r Bill No. ?58? first P. J. "Perirase -, $:..5, Tax Bill "'c. 53;� J These, charges,, which were billed in error, cover 1 cleaning I'g for, the year 1938-39 .:and appear on 1939-40 .a?- O"r_s. :A report waS received from Committee No. 5 et•,• ZwT 'recommendation -4' * 1 �,� � t��e,,, � � of t2�� ��o�,�. a�. Works be th.A t theserefunds b,o granted. re^or -car- t otiof of ;. hog" ts and Hoy„. -and by unanimous vote ro cela the . recommend.atior±s of the' Board of Works and 'Corr, ittee T o 5' were 'approved and .the refunds allowed. r.1Lighting of Rio . Grounds A report -vas port...alas received tramthe ,Board or Works ks o,-,..,, in ,t prop;'r';j.2� t.Lo. i o ' $13 OO be ' nad.e for the ',1 e.t. l 1 t w��r, i✓i ica..L 4'n1 J.:. ��� A i .t. t� ��y � • t, -[.� J tr %? y, •� n• cif ,f O d lights at the Hospital parking areas Committee i°o. ,, re:COmmende< .that t1- s report be referred. to the Hospital n .T�t. 7+t ,A ,Tv.anao. even y T..4 approval r' 9 a. this t' • l r i t T Tv �'� t .tI^� the �;.?�, �. ova.�t. of the Council to �_ j ,.� r�x��,,,c`i t. F :from Hasnital _.funds. On motion' of Bois and: Bentrott, the reco`''.::endatie'_ `r Co- 1t/tee No. A was adopted. Offer. to. Pu'r char e �Oit "-Pr'oper may •A rep.. c'rt was ;rece1Vel from the -Board of ;iiorks tr'an - Mi t -t ;;g BuUetir' . o relatl_ g to the offer to purchase the c:Lt; propert on' Ba.rnos a Stre! 't oPpo s t e the City u H.al l , with inforestion: In• "regard. Ao the' ass es:red v&iue of t .e property. the : pi ans .:previous .;y . >repared `or the use of this property for a public works billing and `Plats for the remodeling or he City • .. The 'Board advised that .` i.t is Making a study of housing. needs, . including' ;both the and a public wor's buildin„ .- d`''�r Ll trans it- ,a further -'report to. the Count i at a later: ,date. It :eras. pointed ou:t that this 'matter is also before Committee N 1. and CoMr'tttt;eo No. 4 'whichThave deferred action. pending further report frot.the Board of Works. The matter. contir_aed "and :a'o•t ion ;d&Lay ed:. by the Council, awaiting final .reports -from -the Boar d and. committees. Buildina report was received from the Board of Safety st.;t-L. that it; bas i:?".spected the garage located on the northerly C,;;rn..r of ;P:.; . Street' and Washington Avenueibn property `iOY 'L- the, --.sr... c tzae,.'Cit:'y o•z 'Palo-'Jl-to by tax sale,..and declares it to be a ;ouub1, c t.uisanc:e The Board reror ender that. the Council -apprropri.ate - the n -The nd s . fov: the- removal of this '.e Deputy. City Engineer' .Lni'orned the Council that building, has . ;ust been moved to tno Se%age Treatment t Plant. . O .notion, of Cypher and F oy , the action of the Board iT^cr 4i �+ t:. a;;s building ? s SpprUVed and the matter of .taki.ng care' of the expenses in connection with the removal of the bui:ldi: g:: wa.s referred to Committee ,No. CZaxe of Setback` Line .:. z%el?Ort Wag received from the Planning Commission recommending `that.the setback flr.!e, on they-•gouto.ea..ter1y s`t' the a,: the c7 coa c sett1 recomn Inc. tior: U the n' $2:81 a of the the co -in acc on acc bey on ex p? < f ^wai-. of the sed , 1 was f c' cape : purpose made wi ever rei „ Co -nc-r" repre_ . ' She ��VJ ha C ompa.^ y 'M s eerie„: e r'' - . =oard o? e AuC s'ti av iy y c03Mter the name e • be a '. but/ding. that ..t Plant. Board : t"te' ''.ncel Avenue' changed from 11 feet 'to '7 feet for a .distance of ? feet-, no Qheas.�erl y. fr..oy ' itebsryte -Street �.re �$ a The proposed ordinance ,;; A ng:' thi-s ' .etback 'line: -" as e 7 f . rs . reading. _ c'o, ter_ded 'gas .given: report.,was; received .fr m• Committee ittee 7lo, .3. re -commending the .approval of the:. recommerdatio:, f �., s r of ��' `7'ta the ...�L`..�.�„ Ci •�n!o?"%ks that the claim of 'the. 'PaloAlto-Properties; for refund of the .acs t of the .installation of the storm . sever on:Seale Avenue be , settled for $2 °1O. ,o ded : that in o 0©, ; �o�ti x �.ec�.r. dance with, the ,.ecerpmend.et oxz. of e .Board of; Works .. the; Palo Alto :Proper -ac, waive . thei r.cla.`4r nor � any. � t�:ens j damages' on 'account of the exec va.�- t yor of a. ditch for s�;o�'' water purposes beyond the limits of . ;.. W Storm ,s.ewer on Seale..A venue.. $2,810.00 Co ittee No. :;recozrzer:c�eci Vaal; an appr oprietion of $2) 8ln. 4© ;'k r..ade-`from the: Yunapprep,riated balance in settlement c.f the claim oft ;e, Palo Aitd •prorert$es, . Inc". for refund of the cost of . the insta lation •ot. the store sewer on Seale Avenue inw an accord ce 'w ,th..the reoom endat4 ons ofth :e Board,' of Works and Oo�:~,ittee No. 1:,, provided the waive their, claim for any damages on account of the 'excavati"or of -a 'ditch for storm water purposes beyond the'- limits. cf - thee nez ' $'t:orm "Sever on Seale Avenue. d the 'V ews of ;t 3ca :�i7ard :if'Mrf�ks or. having recoiz eno. pftenW/'. ref .r. h �.-. .. fw <'"•. $% ���•,'} _� /� y,, .c. .y `. i,f w+„+.� u.�1i�,t //"a i' 6fe - sei t 4/�:er� "f , r. .$I�P?`t O.:. C i o io a ce T3�r 'yy .t. , 1 +�,.... �:: C.�.,. v �.- ��1, V .. .L L '�NY.�, d � Y^' d'` opinion r> '� + ; c ,.abor, f it'y yc�afd yd�one—,t ,wor, _�tsel.f it ,would have } 1'1 d :.a or �/ A.L '' .l L'aa s jw .+Y,. felt. e..I . t . that $2810.00 2 Y' 0 or was tAi V 7:11,f �;, �, t+ -Y �:ure',thr.: �,+ rt .s +i/7• a.r �. v GS.✓ �!-.1� ! '. VO-"pe4: �y L�i`t�. e. 'fi ,ty. � ho l pay. "tiov:o ���.;.Lrtorne 'for Palo Alto J ` .7 'for the _. .:. :i-t1 Properties, ,.,b ?y�i1T 1r'y i n.y .,vGi.w., �.-L :-• He ,��'ev.1. weii. .8✓he natter -'ai'id. oT,t9 {;' J ,ry , , {. � y µti ..L ., 1 c .. l-�: 'o t o the. 1'1 ]. o 4.t' y1 ? of the c Ury't"a x"'C3',�.: z' t the L t U -..t w s p en f' f .c. , �^ eager type Y� construction ., � r RN ""'+` ���.a. .4,v;� «+'� *7�1v . �?'t+y'�u�jri � Of c w ruc t ;oar -woo the `^a L He.. adv S" sedgy.- tha`t_r :1'Yd1'.s.� e„ .no definite e a c ry..ent ;was Company's the J of >'sork ,:the • t -, .'•;F -`� -.:.�� gof1'L�:"-.y'�j�? t: -q ."�yi''FLw ":lf����. expectation fj^{ company .{.. .L`..,...i.. money on the h c vat J.on that w they would 1 be .,, ,. t s ?.ernes, a riember of Committee o in.f ,�.M:. , c h?t vhf co=m .it't'ee.. had 'discussed the .natter er o��..�C` the ','+'!'C,'Zv;.L�.'J..(v �,. '-�1 the J.r.. with .. , a„ e l tZ , e company and also with the ry' po , n t t a.. e ...sewer wO.s. e,,tsi,�c the City, that Works. City'', ��"' s +4A-.ld��, w� :- ., �,q .'.. y S ,[. to .a. ,+ .A, s,.+. . that the .;r✓.:.".T, "•�. "'Y '1•, -: egal! o.'1,ligaii.fir.o,'«•:' construct .at and that the had proceeded rith the. ' cens tr uc;t ion. of the sewer with no . agreemen . After, careful Con s. -5 -.de a ., _.on it ' the r�'.` CCjv '; of the Board,of Works '-,:.7.-;, City It wa.�sz,moved by 'Mrs. .141erner s cos: ed h Blois, wAr, 7 s sec..ended � 3 S -F' h�a �F tiJ o E'er be a'ithor".,,;zed - t.o .s.ottl.e the ? i,... f Eoax,d of sv ,.:0 -ac.cordr�,,nce ►ith •t''he recommendations of the ,} n. s' 'Cc.�r .wee No. -,1 and CO:l_m ttee :`;o. and that C,..,.r6�. .. �?uth Gr�..Z ed li• w ? ,�y r 7 - li ,. ai+ rc3 a o•,'pa ,r i�«v oTi �r _�i the event //•,, F' such yy a was f hr v�r' Palo. � e e ence ISM .,l?;yr C:o�x�"�ci,ia,n. :' o v :.sJ to the, !�f f`E; Alto pro +erti s • r= s 3 pQr Ce�':t- � ecs t�" ..{y.,w,� �t the � byt. df "$3820;95, a having s a the t'n 4i�� t�.1o�..:,n .L paid ,them v .J J -jh �g ,been estimated by -the- E g eerint* Department that only cent ofthe capacity; of. '.the, csewer�wou d :`t :,:� e by the �` is pointedout that the Cityused the 14xaf: 'e,h r on other prcvec s, and. the Cou,2.,ci? i.forue ' d„,;by*thaCitwr Engineer, r£?Upc?nsf; to a question by ar Tho'tts, that the City cotl.:.r. not .,.4Ve done the ¥o'„`74 at the time the co +ar_ ' Wanted " it done 'because there was no 1, .A 'p *: -wr available - "a t .'that Patt ic•u? £, r time. .Thotts stated that,al t ough there was nc legal obligation for the. City to pay for the sewer, he felt that e City had 'a:moral; obligation to take care of the storm, water frce the 'city: d. shou d not: <expect neighboring property o,, -hers to -take tare of' t,,, that, the City :as a moral obligation It s::cu�o. not :try to avoid, . and 'that in settling an obligation. of this �.. not 'kind the City so ld 'deal' with the property owners. affected In c. fair 'felt that the reasoning : advanced by the Board Works t 'kat'. the City ',could h,a,TJ e saved ,' TrIoney by. uSZing h'PP was not sound,' as all available WP't? }.aoor. was used on other p oiectsr He Pointed out -that the store': sewer whic_^_. ."me be done.'by the City in the near future will be 's*.: r c ent to t; s.e . �i . ava, labl e labor for ~Name W me . to co:ie . W J ,C.ou ici azi Goddard spoke of the, need for the sewer z.lnd in .favor Pay'= The :.e nt,ire.' amoun t , it was ,moved by T'hoits, as a gz.hst,.t to motion,, that an appropriation ation. of ' $382,0.95 be made from the unappropriated balance .of the general fund for the purpose of settlir.g, the of ' -the ; Palo .Alter Properties, ' Inc. in connection. with the sto,!„ e ,'er,,. pn, Seale Avenue, ei ue, provided the c';ompa~n. r waive their Clair for any A;`rlages On' accCmt+''of " the excavation of ,a ditch for st 'water' purposes beyond the Limits of the new storm sever n' -vas" secorred by Godda o.. `ter further d .scassicn, a ;: ot!on vas made by Wood, seconded iy Richards„ that the entire ::'latter be ;tabled ,wnt=1 the next meeting,. This _. ti the 'Bentrott, Costello, Godda.:'d, _'R: chards, Scut.^_T'C`��r MO it s,: ,Wood. Noes: Blois, Cashel, Cypher, ?goy, Mer er, C°oZ..u"Z.ZL'ilma.;i Woc': ? rt at,. this time, s 9 , and was :absent:for he rest of then .rzeetir. ; xt-ensicr o'' Webster- Street .repert was received fr',.-:,na the.<>?lan.°:ing Conr,issio^ reporting that . attention. ton. has beer c l d', to the fact tat a residence. i 'now .being constructed within. the proposed extension of Webster Street .at Oregon Avenue, and' for -this reason the e C'ort,2{-ss? on. wishes: to go ` on record as favoring th.e extension of '"'.�ebst.e.r. Street "beyond :Oregon, Avenue in L3 r-,� 1 e with -p_ e ' i c'..:° action of; the P ccc� ,,.a.:c w .,. :. �, lannirw Commission, The Con.., iss5on does feel' that the. e ' ense of .this extension, estimated to be $7.;:: should be:.'a eneral expense 'but be {e s�. that th praoper: .. general ii 'city `� :./ wu ..�.,-i.e � e 7 'i+.. e.'7i V Vim.- proper:: "o'WRne,i- s-sh7':..l d Work out some plan t o finance e the. expense of : -extendingthis. _street; Count`„ it an Cypher, Chairlaan of the -.,Pl.ar� iz v�=,�'�•'-Cs •r~. explained the', t"titide of t::e Co n^i ssion on. this-a+te_r, .andpointed, out that 'the hip cost of �ex ten ding the street is the 'fact that there are three _= 'uses in the 1.i..ne of the extension.1%hIch would• have to oe .Temowed. He also pointei; out .thaw Webster Street,- e'•; un if it- Is extended, wo l d not ,? - through' street,-` aid, for this reason th e -Commission ission felt _ r** :•�, . e.X'_?e'i .s.e should not :7e borne b the City. The ?matter was. re feA »ad to the *4c .rd o Works to ascertain the atti.,.ode of the property T the i _ct affected.. recur The ex It Board o Coiora.5 Pr C o =piss. the ?la. Real that -t.e dA +5iot limits .r= the C o!. the pl-i,.. t771.1t no sr,;, t rat ^enz a copy o vCdv":CA� abor. the ' .frcrx .=as ex" oot, ote utliWoo ion a .tiensi is he • On. ,0 rot. � lertp: arm due --to -ted t=b�e s -at ,the Width ..'of:;Co :oradQ,Av je e bac es: 'on; :4o.'ora o :Avenue A• report ovas'received: fret'. the CormisSi_"on recor eY c,ix:gA a fdilo�rs:. (1) 'That_ the port.ion...of Colorado �7en e between Alma and W'ay.erley' Street's- remain, at the established :width of , 80 'feet,: dueto the: fact' that the :street ?ua's been established; at an 8.0--'"oot i dth�. for a ntutber of ye:ars ;any. several homes w,;.a •e . ben built con .Ormir,g to .the ;fir e'sent, 20 -foot setback; also 'sidewalks have been built confor+`"+ r*,, with those oP ar. 80 -foot street, Thit recom.--,len anon, is made because the previous recommendation of the Co s"sion to the' Counc±1 fn reference to the :width' of,. Colorado Avenue was not intended to apply to any portion of Colorado Avenue which ts excess of a ,'n0. -foot tdth. ( That Colorado Avenue between ds"aver1ej and Cowper strewts. be :made .a 60 -foot street.. the center line ow this portion of Colorado Avenue conforming to the :center 1 rie of the portion between Ala and W .ver? ey Streets. (3) That. the Portion:' of Colorado. Avenue between Cowper Street` and:Middlefield Road be established at a y uniform width of': -60. fee.t, :.the 10 feet additional w5;dth to be obtained: front, she property owners on Bach "side : of the. street (4) bat the setback ,1jne' on thesoutheasterly side •of Colorado ,Avenue betveen Cowper Street and :,:VIddlefleldRoad'be;:changed' from 44 feet to 34 feet. (1)' That ;tr e setback ] ine- on the northwesterly p side of Caior ade .Aver ue saUtht ester .y from Middlefield Road! tae Ohara e fr'osr A. ; feet't0 to 34 Peet vo %P ir_'t 85 feet a:ort'heaterly. from Cowper Street. The entire report of . the Diaz inn' Comr ission was referxed to the C?. Boar of Works and' Cit7I11Mit:�.."4Q? .1\io".` 1 . .. ' A ?ranosed. ordinance "Chan, ng the setl)ack lines an S r Lorado Avenue as above recommended was 7iven, first reading. Protest 4r in st: Tract Development Co uuncil w+an Cy r'6`w ,' Chair'7Zan of `L- Co.._. ssi.oat ,:.1nfo ed the Council that a protest is being ,de by the -.Planning Ring Co; ,l ssio <to the Board of. Supervisors and the Real state :.Corzaiss 'Cjn .against the develonment o:f'the: property : :;t v the ..s� dero Avenue in the Baron. . Tract. He advised _ that , n the ::::,-Lon,th of August . , u an' was - presented for t the / r 2. omer.t of this property which is just outside, }S�.`J�.ski.. N : city and /�" a_ d ad oi�n s the property o:. Stanford ni .rs t_z, . that ss i on felt there were several 'cxn features f to 'e i_� _ the Dian and had so: 7 foY e .rya Count;,- '� ry. "^.c m s n., o r �} c�1 e p�. o `� n Commission that ��� received Q. d' fro�i �'t��' County .��.1.0 'r4.L►y'�':-S' ':4iQ 6�`^sg ^�'�'r Y th t i.,. has just. been learned' -. 4� w �o_.t /1/1 ... ��}�• S�' .tF_ d'rwe-•� y�Vy��,p}y ••-j . the- �+developmentY� Y ,� �. . 7 cco1�. oL ' ce 1'.Y Yw ... t 'e or N �:1C�. -�l..L 1n. Y r.! t .{,. copy of the letter : of protest would be transmitted to the ,. d` to ;other' 1rit.erested` bodies. §Piihkier . Sate !izuni .enter ) report, was receive froa`2,`.. Lo...i''.a ittee Q.' 1 .dvi s z1c• that it" -,doe , not fionsi der tY_c es t tested cost for the ad di tihn.s to -.;tre spr per , 's steM . •at Cor..zwan:x: t Center to be uhreasoriab.1e for the amount of work to ?edo:.e and theme' amount of" fire protection -te' be gained. Arepo;vt y:as.::Cece sale _: ?'o"�"c,.' 'the -.Deputy City Engineer stati. " that the ' :r ea, tro be: ,covere 'by 'the additional spr i.Ier:..ry'st:e ` is 2900: square` feet -and:'thpt 8i sprinkler heads' e submitted e.; Plan: showing the proposed ;iocatior: of the ..new sprinkler: system.' , reco ez ded ,that pan. ~apprepri at1on no tc exceed ' ,71a ®, e !`ad e from the unappro riated- halance" for thepurPose of',:'install-in additions. to the ,sprinkler systems the-; Co muni.t~, en era ^ jjll p��}� y.{.Cn. t� %t�i21: .Lj�yJ,•h+stn.._, �'.^�i,X`.Sa.�. .�i t i�..:.��''.�.1J».3ry,,.'� the, eiyiy :....1.�.a.?a�':7:v..�_'(�i: of -01'2, m G liee No:, .•�'P. ``'4ia S -app 1. c. ev`r.'. by unanimous vote on roll Call. Ribber eats.?:(Comm, ri1 Cuter) repo t; a a e. '.'fie,t e J f'v' ry. c.. `n yte"e 3�.'o. Zi recommend- ` t �f l;. approp"r.{.a atiO '':.. not t'. "er:"~".eed $1775'. 00 e made'�'H(.7Y?t the;, urxa rotriated balance for thepurch ase> of rubber Y attirz for had i , s". at -th.e:: C"o u- .tv Center. Or ,"'mot -11.07,1'1:01: ?i.chard+s'- nd Bentrott. the recormerdaticz of .'the •: comMittee Was; appre ed and the aDpropri at: -'_or authorized by >„tea inotxs'. °,rote 'onr r' cell .. .::i C•-Oort C.'W re e•.:.4Y e j; from Comm t ee. Akio• 2."'adv Si.n .L. .4, ,{ 4 , . '.th N the " A ` i .Y e+h�`�,.'� ;,_u�;� .ot)�r�-6 L'��'� �:��01-� +.s..:e". Lr �. F' safety conditions - near the ante.?" ef:4ion , of"; b'arcadero .: .ndt' Middlefield_ el Roads are such that two t in.z.s .are:'esser.tial to eliminate ;;.;'fie., ' a ffi c hazards arc d tare "care` of : the situation:- ono i the Construction of circular.. c:r. iveva ' on t.e gro',a.nc? s of the Walter ays Schoo'. 'c-. the loading.; anc3 ur.loa.c' in.g • of school ot.�' ild en , and he other i the ina�caliati;on af' .electri ca.11y controlled siq-na?.s at ` the fi!'4 points c'or ve"rg g •o t- Er^'o.:.rc.'t?ero and Middl e f i+ Z d Roads The co:t"!'ti ttee '. recom; end d. t ia' . If the .hoard '6f, T;(.a.'•..;,cP,t , on -7.-Alt.". -`n i l 1 a a; the Council p +yt With then {�a..�: c:.rc.��:ax d'Y;Lvcw��,�y:,, ?�r,,,�.,..,.w.. cooperate: •r .�.� .,��rn by `i stain„f.,ng th,e si:g: a.ls.. letter,.. addre s"o p to the Chairman of .� he 4.�oar 5�.n' a -receiver. '�'ro.:, J. R. Cv' rt1 rf' -CAA "".L Gti.�^'er*. of �.74rf et��� '.'la'r,...-`,S a . . i i .L. 7 '. v �fsa. i.it .. Schools., strtif:C*: thatthe Boar ol' Education has. ta'xen ste toward thef.constr1.1ction of ' s driveway at the Walter Hays <.rr.. ,o , On' lotion. of Mrs, Merr er and Goddard,' the : eco ;T'en'="? of C '^'.'tte: To 2 was' appro�reC? The matter vs s 7neferre tO, J onr�l�l�iit.�.- J G..., �y ,for - matter .-the Board Of :Wo: r.4cs .Jor cost est.0.'.'%x?t s .and. to Committee' "'nom 4. Ordinance Reguziati.n., Subway Traffic A , report.. was received from COmmitt ee No. n r eco7+7 ng i n"e, i.do t�';on 'ofan an ordinance cc re7:t3:ati?':t subway tr f ",, ;hichrprohibits;.pedestr`?an^ from crossin7 a roadway f.r e rce�t at.' a pec3.estrIar Gros walk.; Ord•.. c ry r 'Y7 . ^.a t 7'1 ' =C ��:an...e "� c. � 8c�6, c� .�1�_.. � i' ..�:...���,�� traffic, fir, , ven ' secondreading,,.: and on motion of Richards 'a To `c7. -4T. adopted by unantthouS, vote on roil call. Anse: the rec o be amer. amendment f'`G-mI ttF.E Recc that the Codif ed not to e:'r to nay b rt_ "copse`s Comm" ttec Burl from e, t . to e d.or s. rescluti study o'r' ce v i. s ed resolut t== =t. t_.F, )O iC - . V ?.nd Thoit < ="S re^' that th corrsn' ttee snd that i 9 C 'tin of v o.ime.» c ».yY rrr 0 Clai .•,.,+ ra• � t _ x•e e t r e : y tea` te-e the nl-r'S._Ca, Amendment_:. to 7►+I.lk . Ordinance :• yenort was rece ived fro'r: Committee ro. 2 anprovtnv ,�. rec^.m endat✓±owi of ':. e Boaz of: S'afety that the rallkordnance tended to *provide. that all milk 'sold locally., except Certified 71.n., be required- to he pa,'vte rlized., and co?" erdin .that th/ s -).:-endmnt.be incorpor,.ated in the .nee,* Codified Ordinance No, iz Or motitn,of Cypher andGoddard„ this ?"nr•{timnlen f �;-777.f t t ee No.: (.: w S .: .dopted► - - - - Recodif ied Ordinances .A report ;,ra.s 'submitted Comm }ems'. *o !L c ,: -.hat the bid of the Coa :st Printing Company for . the rint `?4�f''!^ Inz ^✓.?1r_ +► i 2od".f'.cd: Ordinance :No`. 4 -be accepted..^- and iet a t and. appropriation not to exceed $850.00 be made trom the unappropriated balance to r.,.y the cost 'o.f ' printin 5OC' co yes o.' t -'e ordinances, plus or ^ copies _n Zoo°ie f binders..: CA Cn motion. of Blois and Cashel, the r �. . f -_C w+,�;i,L. � o(".L'%....w.dt..,:tr:� v.«-%.::. �.�.1 =n W ee No. 4: eras adopted by.unanimous vote or. ,r,o/l ea'' Bur1in ame Chamber ,of.. Commerce Resolution _ L t' f ' l t -:; �e -'S "'1 fh° �Y�1 C Yh '+ f -1 \ ♦ J . . .� �.� 3.S � ,�..�..�.� .�� `G .e' �rOi,i.. i .t.. � �'« r 'F,?„t,veQ & c'+J_"."±k?'.u';if.'c?,t? 4n rz'' 7n - the B rae Cho 'tier: Cf ,CoMme;rce, reCTue:"vins •the � u. -,,,f a",1 ti.'n /1 nYfC e � � "11♦ .c „. - w L�%w..�. .. u _ e ;r e..olw.t „ons basscd by that body or. to. w t .P r rosolut/Ons:concerhir theatTointtentofoommitteeS study o f. r n n t '� f e��. " �, ei �� tra�spaat�.,�.�0?1 3^r�' �ii�,e;s, The �;{t s,tto;I��ti y ,:^_'at ..L v 'yys that --..the '.h'� pa,.sf3'a; e of �' �;�,ch :' 1,s«� tionQ _s ent're.ld-�'rth ''�},. 4heW. r Lion -of.. vhe. CO UY1re-`e I ^.' the 4m tto n .off ire3 ro 1 eggl. q ea;-i^ 1. },mod cond; iA'ned -wi.th ..� M� Resolution. T o.. .'�! 2E0." wa,r ready 'ni d �i�::"`' ,.`?:'o ior. (:.f' p,.rd. .. i ts> was, ado !te,d- unanirio:'s vole or roil cC'....'? resol .,_ t e .+ s ....,.'_ V 1' ti • w�" i�h.4v e+ f°) 4 rte. r 3 ; 1 C'^ `� the C 1 Yt o .T b ..� -. f'.�..,��?r.�eo"` „ :.T:'� �'':C"�=^CC%'.;.,Y`��iY.-�'�"'�,�'`. `.�"� .C�y' mac-;. v y ^:3','} ip.rr1vemP.,.A`Y Go.";...:.:,teea .npori,'n't",ee b t 2 r �4 ,, ,� , �' V• �• `T r 1, }�� r� rr�� �. ��..yy r�-�., rry� �y� � rr, iii d" { ` `c Co M ✓y . o.i. �Sa'» FraAJ�G;is�io. '<:Y `fi.. Sa1:, i�aG 4c'v County-- c m,m c �t`n •r 4r / .y, � .i. +. V .e....:. •.1..4+x.% _ r. c7.aLG S:.r';dd .-of the- r.«"'Y,i\rovemen-t, of .. ar' ri r'H 'Dti�.+.. oA, ., Ov ide.d11 eaC',-f; ,-Zoir,ernir (5' br r y for ' i s - - 3 t� C!v!.,, ` of -Santa Sant? .. �.n bj' ✓ ww.rd'r tai a ei '- arrU-i Y'. 6,i a v;.w+a's'*`'QP t o l d?^'lM.. t y o -- . r 1 n ^JY"?'" o v: it. .t rle.. GOmM t' eeS '.of• SF3.n FrP.,ne Sc o an,d Sin Mat ec ter, ,ntr s3.I �j ic. d�reCts :that,. c,op{ G`' _ .,GY _ .,. ;.� y✓.y�.'.,� 'ti.S t`�e w'j?.SG'�?'.:1.t:L<?::Mbr•Sr,:r;s t^ �7 Ei'\r-3.SC?�'u 6'?' u��...'A'Gr'?` C'�i-aye Civ��.?.�:'s�,�`� �.,�`�!' .'s�,r2n�'�`.�'�'v- ?L�4'�;. Q_ ,�",_ .,' y �;3 ✓yam...t� a f• �- � ... .0f.....i `n fy o Sa :.F re,ncl.3coV ✓he ' Sa k ranc / Sco ChaYnber od'1 "rtub..-to .° J_ 'ri..ri.c'�.rIoe�'s Y.o.f 'esn?1merce ^ �>o Cou tY . a, xd the' nort.r'arn ,ortior` ' f Santa '..c "a -Co minty Th, reports ..o f the. D.. enart~,ert of ,; l c ' o Sl the c y "*r--,.-,rt, emt 1'�f.'?tblic-_,;Safety^fir ti '_ r .,. the'h �d.:. r ♦d r.:'P`s r r f t of. Cctoberi 1939 'vOrc,.;rece.Lved,.:.''w .d. p' aced on f'i~ e Claim of `Grace Lass ' report vas receiveo frot'_":..' v -^Se' ,v f-ty Attorney -r at:7 .;7' _fir h,as investizated the-Ola,.SL :of ..Gra.c 1%as ' 4.:"?-dL ' F .r:oiv Lass aa ;nze iw;' Vhe,aripunt of $ 662l3 r. co r,t f ,,_, 1,7 - red by_ fir Lass. when, she, ffe�,;1.'or �,.;.h'e y,'f.dewal'C '' OS:' .-�F'et :t-y"e n Univers y Av"enire��. that he ,naffs._ 'c✓ont- to the conclusion natd ✓.i,. tV� d .r[ +. l aW..i. �✓�.'.d ue to'. vh'e" .. n'.s.c``.'�J shat: homer fall, frory. ^y si ca]: f'r:ctS and. ''from ;.the,. testitlon% of �S itvy. sees 'was., .L^'d,?; :p v'.. _ er o nnreef. ,ire ce. on y. H T:con ended, that 4 _,IS"' C:la r Vie. A report vas s . rece'Tved from ' Co it we r+eCor-r.end' ,,"c.c ?� r uhe recomrzeisciation,-of;the City- Attorney be apprr ved„ - rrio ton of .' .oitws and Richards, the Aecor",!ter.: e...io»Q of the -0 :'t Atto er and- ttee Zro. 5 were trove the c ei • Ea a .o at Mayfield eld; Branch ,i raa . te'.:,. » c iv Deputy n t'tom vi''rix� spy.. ,A,.;. -report W�. , e ,. �, ... , F �, from, ' t�'"e .:> �QL'�t"c � ,� a �. ;� � . .�.;,..,�,....E y conc'e 5�. ;:: v :L • dda., awe to. the;: Niyf l.,eld.."Branch: Library ci,i fZ�n s .grout and advising that. e -s l ,- c,> �a �^ ..r °ti%�. cost"=;of x �'U�.».r_.z�.�, damag vas ' $,7'G5j^ 05. r''" e ',Ccun.c a ;? o . A.i;gus t "Had. appronr..iated' I:OOO400 for tho purpose of repa1r5n the r.~_°ya e. rn_?4e question of :maintenance and e:p :T.1 ` .'r pointed l `4'. yp accordance rd an c e Y'�_ .was;:brought'; Y,��,�;';arc� �.t was 8..c�;��.�te�c out �_ p.t in c,cc? . � th the charter ' the .Library Board. has Control over tie mal.n er:u ce of library Abu 1di ns 9 vhile the Board of Works has charge or the' ' 4 nt er_8,nce: of all .o ;her c-ity buildings. .motion of Cyohei' and. Richards, the LL5br. ary Board vas requested to :?3ake r"epo:.r,ts hereafter :;o the P,oard or Works in regard- to,repairs to any b .iidinF;sunder t t-3, control of the) L ib.r.}aoryj Board.report yV /q ua It+ had � been ; ry�ro' .gyht�_ out in,*r:.n.eDe-o L;,7 C . vy ,Mani eeiv ''��\.T J.:ed,!or``-h✓� that no renoi.. iJ of the fZ {?'U; . condition was made at the time c{(retain re s,irrys were made t,<, the f'oor of `.the building some T':'.o'it ;a ear: i.ei , and that if : ucl ,,,eport had been made it r i ht; have "peen noszib?e to make the .r4=f ?.srs at less ' exrense On 'motion V. oh_ards and Bentrott, and by :vote on roll .calla the following bills were approved =warrants „authorized it payment of the same:: Banorofit"I,hitne Company Bank; of A=erica Paul -B. ` Blake ke City ':of 'Palo Alto 'Mayor , C'istel _1.o IfIrs. :0 ; are sder ud a ,.k.,e ' Neilson' So' - - <3;Io Alto Tines S1 on j,ke '.? s Pri..n.tinF, House . Stanf'orad. ?'r, .versi.Us Press rave'le'rs InsuranceC . . Travelers ' ln,surr.nce CO.. Luriber Co. tiLd'erwbod_E,",.,, i fit t Fisher C.o• 3.Qnal;e.ri t s Print i n . House Mr. ?~ ost r Service & Wilson Palo Alto Hcspl t7l Pernau.--Walsh Printing Co. Jonn .E.''` SpriCep';Police" Judge Tr-avelers Insurance Co. Fred '74. WyckOff anti? 2.04 r.`a0) 26.7 lo.s•5 25. 30.111. ,ryT a .00 90'r.40 o_ 7.87. 151.5.15 80.00, 200.00 t00.00 r� 476.00 40.35 16.5-11 129.65 An appli atior for,.,,, coVeri. :the ;r,roup hospital insurance :no' `carrs:ed -by the City for• city `'e'ploy eet vas sub. sitted;by the TraVe er .:Insurance: Commany, ' with the r€o•�.es' :shat . t is : ,application g b the �" .' t s�Yti1'ks be :"�?L� �i3e Mayor.' The :At for :ey : re:oonmended ..t . tho , _Mayon' be: ,authorized to sir , �.s for ?Wh ..0 ?h' Is..a r'ere fO,r :al.ty :a s t,h-. 'r:.'") .e, policy has 1)=-.)e,, . authori oua b Gr also •-s yor f present are eli The wit,' dei erre certain "ATTEST {rs e:ffeC: 1, 939. an :wti o f .M„rs o . ?ate nerr arld; T: o! s., ti•e Mayor vas to . tho ized'to:slegn4he,,applioat4onform it cor ection vlth the wx'C`.un h(Jsp i...'~4 . ,:_inSu`.anCe .p'oii;cy. GroupLife Iasa.rauc€ Po iov A rider to ;be .attacJhed ,to t le ;grout : life. oi_ ict ;has; a so subr s,;ttedA,� . h 'thhe .request .th&t t be a1gred by the : a cr for the rider , nr Ov des a char e . ! ! tie, policy :w th-r spect #,o t:re dates upon 'which employees e i ci.ble t`o a.e - iPzured utd;er the :; roe x life plan. The Tiity ttorney : reca, .aced ed ha.t &cti or or' the > rider be: • rfCrr_ed urtf:. Com"iitt'ee cw 5` coz p1etes it considerationof cert. n .reposed :C 641,Ces ri t gtrou p F..' .'e policy;