Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05231960347 City' RaZl, Palo Ait0,'California May 23, 1960 session- :Thp Council of a this date ci the City of Palo Rofl on- as 7:30 P.14. , with' Alto met inr presiding. follows, 'ox Porter pxeaid�g sPresent,: gals, BY.xbee, Davis, Zvana • Giffin, ' hi Zeng,�j avie� Porter',' $te araet ;ll," Rodgers, phei18, ' Woodward, *Absent: Bishop,, Haight. approved as distributed. -The:m.tautes of she meeting cf`hefty 9, 1960, were .Pro tact 59 1 Hirch:Str 3213 , -...fs was the time set far ;of intention"i or a heariax tar .3 rf der ac.quisitl02;�e ° Re anti®� No. fec'�$��3, 'Birch Stt�o+et".. :and construct # repprt from the staff Before `p e • mro enienta report d aff .was Presented p "e hearing, th; plans _aatd cost, by the City a eItiznates far the project.- �i-'�mer w+ho 363.:H a written Protesf was rocaoive tanfiard !,wr.it the ire,. , a proper d, from ejohnat, o Posed Widening t7a' ovab ,r- art Birch Machado, g of -Birch -ix excess of Street, who °PPaaed The hearing sixty -a�i, adrlretxerd the;; was adeciare,� iddree ed t C+ cil protesting open. Among thane who . add. Gilbert' were the fall=tiwin $ the proposed' f insprove 1�[esa, 333. y g: Paul' with, 365 =`neat" ne the 14t"l211te shet'i don Avaalue • Foley, Ade� r 0' ,_ Geax�e.�Y��atr� , hdxs. R. v uta;,' Avenue; , 3�:. F. scar l 418 , ddeli Grant Aaenue • errant 33 'Gratioa McClure, representing,+Oscar ` mere, ; Stet,Street , . owners of, property the Pa7,m;C,� arid. Clay Rolland, ty at 291 Grant Ave 'Dell i to .- and told , director of Palm Ot True and, 2265 Birch. , the'' Couaicil that Deis Corp<%Yation. wideniaag ayf, Hirsh ,g has oxg�isati�zn� but the treat to the nor does not" ob je c:t Page protest "widiet in" exCess.'pf b0;feet, street he pastor. gf.. . � Mill 'Methodist 6Q feet Several Mill 'Church objected to the aiss. es a tf °f the well net of th Ptote$tants. etated that they rrfde for of meets,: w ny benefit -to theme feel the Widening would be a k refit - ;" and that the of birch of' • the �dwarib Cam Pon the proper ersn�ent of representative oe ' d p .owners; of property at s, .a i' Street, ' propel at Pr`eseniative for street widening'. dtsd the t ' Cslfforui$ arty g skim of ten: feet k their oststr e t give them a of - those protesting Propertbe tiaur about the:'pra an opportunity to'get g aak+ed ts;, . ac ioo be ,sect," '� more facts aard inforiaza_ The City Plans -which: ham. b 'M agez reviewed the r had been well et ifdersd 'project and the various the subject: Puhlici"a�ed`.atnd`that,mand 'pointed out that the matter 3ecx. �.._;� aid�sed. Y meets s e'ki�' district . that the City had been' hen on The " ere, participating a' co the fortheCaliforniaextra method of :allocation in the' cast the Averth. T K 'method OfaocaU of coats was' explained ext a width, of the bride.Wilson, ►rsfeld.:and Wallace, enneth Jones, on ,tha a "xpec rent proceedings., Re lace the that City's ttacc ru, a Ys °' mendation'o!' a.cpuncil doted out that in t of lsnce �ttee, the cast of the norrnal 60 -foot street is being spread over the area within one-half block,of-BirchStreet, .se `that =the property owners fronting on Birch. are not paying, quite:: as much as they would under the norfna1 procedure. • Mr. Jones reviewed the general relation of the assess-` ments to the valve of the property. The Mayor noted that. in any mprovement project: such: as this one, the value of the properties will be increased::' After".' discussion, Resolution No. 3215 overruling protests on the Resolution of ;lntention_ ,wa:s introduced, and on motion of Mitchell and Woodward' :was _adopted by unanimous voice vote. Resolution, No. 321.6ordering acquisitions and improve- ments and confirming assessment, Resolution. No. 3217 calling for sealed proposals, and Resolution No. 3218 determining that the public' interest and necessity require the acquisition of easements for streets and the taking of im,zriediate possession thereof, . were introduced.: On motion of Mitchell and Woodward, these resolutions were adopted''. by the following vote on roll call: Ayes Ball, Byxbee, Evans, Giffin, Mitchell, Navis, Porter, Rodgers, Stephens, Woodward, Zweng. Noes': Davis and Marshall, (Councilman Bishop: arrived at this time, 8:30 P. M , and was present for the rest of the meeting.) Re nest -'for Laura Lane Inn rovement A _coixxznunication was .received from owners of property abutting Laura Lane requesting that the opening and improvement of this road,which is now, a private road, be considered as a part of the next major. -street' improvement program of the City. It was moved, seconded and carried that this be referred to the City Engineer'soffice- for consideration when the next assessment .district program -is ;prepared. Closing ,Portion: of Pepperr 5.treet A letterwasreceived; from. Hewlett-Packard Company requesting that a portion of;:Pepper Street, being 30 feet wide by 200 feet in length, be ;closed, It was explained that Hewlett-Packard Company owns the land on:.both"sides of this portion of Pepper Street, and that a -portion of the .street was previously abandoned.' The City ,Engineer advisedthat there areno problems involving utilities, and that no'easements are needed in the event the street is closed. The. City: Attorney.,; reported on the street abandonment. procedure, advising that.a resolution declaring intent to vacate a certain, portion of the street-mus°tbe adopted and date set for a . public,•hear;ing,-: if such is the desire of the Council. Resolution -No. 3219, declaring intention of the Council to vacate a portion ofPepper Street, and Setting , June 27, 1960 at 7:30. P,M. as time of hearing:on ;the. matter, was introduced, and on motion_:= of Byxbee... duly: seconded,;.was adopted by voice vote. Mayor Porter did not vote on the re=solution. rr atgw.a,..v-v, •... :.. ,� Water:. Bond. Act':; A letter was received from the Santa Clara Valley Water Conservation District enclosing. copy of resolution adopted:by their Board of Directors supportingand urging 'adoption of the Gelifornia Water Reaources .Developinent Bond Act at the November election. This was 'or information of the Council and noaction was required. Free Saturday Park;na.on. Downtown Lots -ffirmoommen flasimommimpierimmo. . A letter was received from Joseph M. O'Donohue, Executive' Director of Downtown Palo Alto, Inc , , concerning the experiment of free parking on Saturdays in the downtown parking lots, and requesting that this, experiment, which had previously been extended:. to May 31, 1960, be continued until such time as a final determination is made with regard to the Downtown Palo Alto plans, The City Manager suggested that rather than continue free Saturday parking as an experiment, the Council establish free unlimited parking on Saturdays in the downtown lots, if that is: the wish of the .Council, pointing out that the situation can always be revzewed and the procedure changed in the future . He advised that request has been made for the installation of signs by the City, which requires expenditure of city funds, and that it is a mistake to continue to classify the program as an experiment. Mr. O'Donohue advised that Downtown Palo Alto, Inc. would have no objection to adopting the City Manager's suggestion. It was moved by' Byxbee,.-,seconded and carried that free parking .be continued indefinitely on the downtown, parking lots on • Saturdays, until the Council should establish some other procedure, and Resolution 3220,"'providir g free 'unlimited Saturday parking on Lots A, ,B, C, D, E,' ', G. H, 3, X, L, M. N, P, Q, R and S. wasintroduced and adapted by unanimous voice vote. • A report, was made ,by the City Manager on the problem of. signing the" parking tots to publicize the fact that the parking is free on Saturday's, :and.:display►esl,pictures of three signs to show:how.they would appear when .mounted ori, the existing. signs. He advised- that Mr. :O'Donohue :has;.requested sign reading "Free Parking on Saturdays" whichare 3' x 5' in size, . erected above the existing parking lot signs which are 2' high and 6' long. The City Manager advised: thatthe. staff favoreda sign 1' x - 6' which would fit in better with the existing signs. - He .reported that 22 signs are required; that the 1' x-6°: signie..would cost $175.00 for the 22 signs needed,. plus: installation cost, 'and the 3° x 5' signs would cost $325.00 plus installation' charges. It was moved by Ball, seconded and carried that the - Manager ;be authorized to have the 1' x 6' signs installed.. Gift of Globe: for .Library Use The City Manager reported that Mrs. William H. Radcliffe, President Hotel, Palo Altos has-offeredas a gift to the City an 18" Hammond International World Globe, complete with black wrought iron stand with ,brass fittings for use in the Library. He advised that the globe is -compatible with the furnishings in the Main Library, and recommended acceptance ._.._ sir� _ _ ,._ ._...._ .: - __. ........-_. _ _ ...,�...,_..... _ - __-_ ._ y _ -=It was moved, seconded and carried that this gift be accepted and that a letter of thanks be sent to Mrs. Radcliffe Easement - Veterans Administration The Assistant City Manager advised that an easement is., required through the Veterans Administration property in Palo Alto by the Department of. Light and Power for a public utilities easement,, and requested that the Council consider a, transfer of $1500.00:frorn theUnappropriated Reserve 01 the Electric Fund to Account 3342 to pay for the easement. It,was moved ':by Byxbee; seconded by Ball, and carried that this transfer of -funds be authorized by unanimous voice vote. WaverleyThrough Street at Lincoln The City Manager presented a recommendation from. the Staff Traffic Committee that •Waverley Street be designated as a through street at its intersection with Lincoln Avenue. He reported that the committee had received a letter from Mrs. R. F. Duryea, 405'Lxncoln Avenue, asking for the installation of stop signs'at this intersection, and thatafter consideration of the matter, the committee had` recommended that Lincoln be stopped for Waverley. Mr. James H. Stone, 365 Lincoln Avenue, addressed the Council stating that other_fannilies in the area, who are concerned with the traffic problem at this intersection, feel that real safety would be_providedby a.four-way stop sign instead of making Waverley.. an arterial. at this pointers proposed. Mr. Stone stated that in his opinion it:would ,be desirable that action in regard to Waverley Street be: r�elated`to the total program to be reported on in the near future by-the'Citizens' Advisory ;Corxirnittee on Traffic, and asked that action be °delayed unless a four-way stop is established. The City Manager advised that the' -Staff Traffic Committee had considered four-way stops but did not recommend them ira this instance." It was anoved, by Stephens, seconded by Rodgers, and carried that action on the matter be withheld until the report from the Citizens'; Advisory, Committee on Traffic is received and reviewed.: Parking Restrictions on Ash Street The City Manager reported that the Staff Traffic Committee has recommended removal of the panting restrictions from the east side of Ash. Street between Lambert and Portage Avenues, as such restrictions. are no longer necessary. Resolution No. 3221 removing parking restrictionsfrom the, east side of Ash Street between Lambert Avenue and Portage Avenue was introduced, and on motion of Zweng and Byxbee, was adopted' by unanimous voice' vote. Amendment to Buildin Code Relocation Permits The City Manager presented a proposed amendment: to Subsections (1) and (j) of Section 4408 of the Building Code to provide that -a permit to ;move a building from one location to another may be. granted without a hearing where the parcel upon or to which the move is to be made is two acres or greater in size. T. A pr35po'seC finance amending. Section 4408 Of the Buildsng.'Cade: as recommended: was introduced, and was accepted for first. reading by unanimous `voice vote. A report was made :by the City Manager on the bids received`on May 20, 1960, for the demolition of buildings at 228, 230 and, 238 Sherman Avenue and 2484 and 2458 Park Boulevard, Project 55--5; and for the demolition of buildings at 2540 Birch Street, Project 58-5. It was recommended by the staff that award of contract be made to BayshoreWreckers, incorporated, in the amount of. $1, 815.00 for the demolition. of buildings in Project 55-5, and to K.;T . K Wrecking Company in the amountof $460.50 for the demoli- tion of buildings in Project 58-5. On motion -of Byxhee and Rodgers, the low bids were accepted as recommended,and the Mayor was authorized to sign the contracts San Antonio Road` Grade Separation The City Manager reported that he had received a telephone call late this afternoon from the City Manager of Mountain View who advised that the City Council -of, Mountain View had met today and had unanimously gone on record favoring the submission to Santa. Clara County and to the cities of ,Los Altos and Palo Alto of a proposal for financial participation in the>San Antonio Road grade separation; I project, with the suggestion that if the formula for cost allocation. is .. agreeable to all parties,`. then the Public Utilities Commission would, be askedto cancel the hearing schedulerlfor June 13, 1960 regarding apportionment of construction costs among various public agencies. The cost allocation formula proposed by the City of Mountain -View provides -for a contribution of $285,000 by Santa Clara County :from the expresswayfund and $300, 000 from general. County funds. $15, 001o:. from the City of Los Altos, $100,000 from the City of. Palo Alto, and $.200,000 from the City of Mountain View; The City Manager advised:that the :entire project isestimated to cost around $2.000,000; that the ,Southern Pacific Company will _,contribute 10, per cent of the cost, and the State has agreed to contribute one- half, of the balance or':45-per cent of the total cost. The City Manager advised that if the formula: proposed by Mountain View is acceptable to the other parties involved, a forxnal agreement will be worked out. A'motion wasmade by Zweng, seconded by Davis, that the matter be referred to Committee No. 3 for study. Councilman Navispointed out that.. there could not be a report to the Council from Committee No...;3 until the June:, 13th Council meeting and that :is the date of the Public Utilities Commission hearing. A roll call vote was ,::taken on the'motion to refer: the matter to Committee No. 3, as follows: Ayes: Davis, Mitchell, Rodgers, Stephens, Woodward, Zweng. Noes: Ball, Bishop, Byxbee, Evans, Giffin, Marshall, Navis, Porter,' The :notion was declared lost. ed 1yY �vv�tng► seCoaeu -. ex be instructed to them "� Manager the earliest It waa t the City M n s b voice vote tha t back -to Council Council meeting that a special �° to test matter opportunity, by reg'°r nc negotiate further understanding consideration, Frith the - give further opportur�itY�' tog ' and called if �ecesse`xY Q R.2� P.�•0 will be en. at :this time, :25 ecess was taken at 9:30 t'• the Council 'reconverted xeco ,end� Committee No. nmen s) m Crricstz teaching; P s received fr° xed ans t be A fxcatxan �[asPitai fxnancx 1 pxxvate patients se and eco e d both as expense and tha side, c , xtal spar ale to the �°9t' the has xcceived Starford �, 'sad tYsa f the gain Vito •. �• an. of x ht �axnert, the x ens . �,'�%1�► g :, �tatzng ''in vx+����of x�.corr�e ax�'d e�P on . ,ittad the. Patients g;os ital `� xepart wa of.�,Patxe?�t (author), ta£f -p ,ysxcx al the `" a + .Clas a al, o p lta i ail A to war de d sng that . of F' income to she F+ be fax adati°n who .aae to:. x en t this x allocated as Gat. ieciges f the 13 P ,' letter from lee Mayor a xnastxata' o t xecoxxxmcntl x recent es. ;Ceri Centex , Stanford ytai aliocati it!te 19= that the +, ++ jatYents iphxtransferred fxaxn Can' . with ..called. 'r . Psicians) e ans fzQt so.. Assoc:: xi ate. Phi secoxn * xeCtax.8 .of sexvi: tend i P of additional for Board end of t caching vied' methods, a revised Ala Alta,~mod ixx txc�h preparing will to F in alloca xis prep ' at -which o,s ital C the: 1:.:)60-61 ribudget r ente r�tanfaxa reofconce axne a: - . ensee;f°x. the Palo Alto;" d ,axp , aliocatton of axxca Committee that the 4 shortly. mitts! to C cilrnax' ' gc,eli . forwarded to be submitted. Coup d hatt was rx,,acl� �,., e acce3ea tcixsg ion ef, i,ttee o' 4 A. Motion consideration. of Carnes their cozi ttee;feels e:n txcin- . 'request for the atio hauld rccoxsaxn witty rq advised that lt° dactarra . mil Baaxd Z; ,tchell d Palo �, the he, me fro rx}a r atients of P' l.to doctors the motion*: fxo private was. seconded h�' rx�C° $: vxaed that that' th'e Alto:' The �ataon been ad • go tea' fsa ra that he has dvi.se)* * Manager deported axe no longer effeatTess starting The Cityent . Co itte a I4°i more or and it figures presented and ad ninxstratYon are or for less ar -the, g itai Board tion of expense xP the. end of this Hose ali+�ca ttee i� a to i • and the d t with gad will be resolved by he en n of is week. the °ycr ag n a recomm v9 Corn it is op+�dthat tl°e GcePt tine xeaented. pre ,xs that out tkiat. in a on figures p $ aiousl d inted acting txaallcx d reel he inistr is City Controller ee an rio . ' . > the C° �btx ati�n r d e and t d to hospital cedes c Langer, be u ed, at t,ts will be charge th K°cep can ti : these figures with teaching P Ctfarges in connection w x _ b � baer -= ion it was moved to contribute s.� � T..�.- - . thax :discus• Ito agree tax of Palo A. axatie Px o ntr on �gall� that the �}� xade seP that the tex�"t's sec 0,,00 ` Y n AW. rii0 R°ad g said Tlae °n roll io �° th the ccept the pro'po the t $10�.. satisfae " othex '�p�tia s � foxy ti.on the : x ee'meAt gre eo�sdi of the ag i. 1$ *ans Avis. °xtex " aad P follows : Ci ffin, call vrs� a° xbee, ' ns, Savis, n, AY Bai•L j op e . ll tchell, Rodger s , de • �,sxshali, Mi foes yis a Zwax�g 'rhe. motion was declared lost. • �_,..� ._.,...,..C.L�.J.C—L"��,....,,IJ,'.".^'G.'1Ir'.`_",..._-.ey-........_,.e...:._..._..._�-••.xa. �",.._ .,..-. ...__ ...__.. _....._,..�w.....�.., w�._._..__._.._..__..._...._...`.y:.v:� Cityof Palo Alto in: determining expense of this service. The City Manager suggested that action be taken with the understanding the City will -have the right to determa whether there will be any "T" patients. Counciltnaxa Dorris asked, Councilman Navis, a member of the Hospital Board, why the Council was not informed earlier in regard to the allocation ;affecting ;teaching patients.. Councilman Navis replied that it, was in the current budget which had been reviewed and adopted by the Council. He advised that in transferring "T.'" patients from one side of the ledger to the other, all of the expense items were not transferred. He stated that: the situation has resulted from a misunderstanding, and that in his opinion: whatever, is done for the corning budget could be made retroactive, for they present"year During further discussion, Councilman .Davis stated that he thinks the Council shouldinstructthe four members of the. Board • appointed by the Council to make the change in theallocation as to teaching patients, instead of :just requesting there to consider it. He moved that the motion be amended to read that the City of Palo Alto representatives on the Hospital Board be irLstructed that the recommendation of Committee No. 4 represents the desire` of the Council and that they are; to put it into effect. The, amendment was seconded by Rodgers and carried, and the r lotion as amended was then .carried A report ws.s received from the Planning Conunissicr unanimously recommendinga change of district from. R-4 and C-2 to P -F (Public;Facilities District) for; Loi 86 of the Paul Survey, being a portion of the site for the new North County Court House. A proposed ordinance amending the Zone Map to provide for this 'zone dihange ;;was introduced, and on motion of Mitchell, duly seconded, was accepted forfirst reading by unanimous voice vote. A.report';was submitted by the Pla_-Laing Commission unaniimously,reconimending an'amendxnent of the Zoning Ordinance to add;the following: under uses permitted in Section 9.02, R-4 District:: "(b) Stock brokerage offices when property is contiguous toproperty in the;;C-2` District." A motion was made; by Zwezig and seconded that a proposed; ordinance +axn.end ng Section 9.02 of the Zoning Ordinance as recommended be accepted for first reading. Daring the ensuring discussion Councilman Byxbeeexpressed opposition to' such action Which was proposedin order to permit a stock'broker's office tobe established on the property at the southerly corner of University Avenue and Webster Street in: Block 38 on a site adjacent to, the C-2. district.. Councilman Byxbee suggested the Planning Corrunissipn be anetructed to review the zoning of University Avenue in the wholearea from Cowper Street to Middlefield Road. Mr.' Walter Stroxnquist, Vice Chairman of the Planning Commission, spoke of the :sincere desire to have a particular firm incite . iYl' Pgl�q..A.lta .He referred to uses already permitted- in the R,-4: zone and pointed, out :that' a stock ckb broker' e 'office c to m y��to auch Uses . He' advised that the. s, end be thought �- whole"area in connection: with downtown- zoning plane, the part that the, action recom mended :vess an appropriate of the " Planning g. Commission. The _motion to,accept the proposed ordinance amending 5ection19.02. Of the Zonidg Ordinance for first reading was carried by voice vote A motion was made . by Byetbee' that the Council refer to the ?Waning Coa'tuxai scion far study the matter of rezoning all the area au: Universiiy`AvenUe from Cowper ;Street to Middlefield Road to;C-2. A Motion week made by Zvans to amend the motion by leavin out the reference to- C.-2: The amendment was seconded by g: d was then Bali end carried, and the motion as axnende far Inclusion of A letter was received, from Colin Peters, attorney for D. T. Lepers,, requesting that the property on the sontherty corner of University Avenue and Webster Street in Block 38 be includedtherein Parking, District 52-14. Mr. Peters spoke in support The City Manager called attention to a similar request ro r . in Parking District 52-1, which. for inclusion of: certain g pe ty was previously refereed to Committee No. 3. lie suggested it ee r both item might be in order to have the rruniAdattion to�theeCowtcil at itsane�rt same :time ;and submit a r regular meeting. The request `fox inclusion of the Lepera property in ParkingDiWt1 t Z-14 was referred to Committee No. 3. It was pointed out that in order to make additions to: the; parking districts, it will be necessary .for the Council to pass formal r.e,solntions of .intention' to make such m cationeo o s and e. a public hearing, on the matter. It was agreed on of intention will be considered at the next Council set fargJ+�ane � June 13, 1960,; ':with the suggestioir that the hearing.. e1960. ectivea A report was received from the' Planning Commission requesting clarification and direction from the Co cilf as e to the activi ies 'and re ign to the Pl g. Conu1 e al commeittee 'vacantly appointed by the Mayor to consider:. goals and objectives in confnectiou`with revision of the General Plan. Reference was made to the minutes of the Council meeting of March 14, 1960 which state that "before a professional planner is ice of councilman and planning employed a.'special; cooai�ittoe cox�apx � � establish sails aand" commissioners be appointed. by the May lanxer t .objectives' ffor the .City,. and that ,the professional p - employed be met ted as to the goals and objectives desired:" g►ir;.11trentettist, Vice. Chairman of the Planning Commis■ion, :ad/listed-Abet,the:• ;,coi arnfssies ere hid" guaawta ens regarding the 'assfgnm.nt to the special committee and had asked whether the ;CcerM2issieet is to ;continue to work on the General Plan. The Mayor : aad`Se nuncllinaas<- Byzs:'bee, 'Who had rcnkde the motion to set Alp' the► 1pecial ceznuiittee, stated that they could nee no conflict in the work silks PlanninrCominissien and the consideration by this con ralti* of goh mind objectives for the, City: that the; object was to have the special committee report back to the Council and } havethe report .reviewed at a. Council or committee meeting. Zone"Shange- Sylvania :Electric Products: Com ua= .. #-C Iievelaonmeni Mans and. ScTiadlele Or e' ;N+s 14'1, amending the gene niap to provide for change of -district: of portion of the, Rancho' El Corte Madera, of approximately 77 amass,' from k. E:A to P.0 for use as a research_ center, and approving. ,PC: Development. Plans and Schedule,' was. given second ree.dtng, end on;motie ' of 'Byxbee: and Afitchell, was adopted by unanimous voice vete. Amendment to Zoning 4xdinance .' i,-M$ District) Ordinance Na. 1942 amending the Zoe Ordinance by the addition' -of Article ,15B, L -M-5, Limited Manufacturing -Large Site District -'Regulations, was given second reading, and &Motion was 'made by Byxbee; seconded` by Bishop, 'that the orciinaixce be adopted. Councilman. Evans advised that he felt more, consideration should be given to this; natter before action: is taken, and moved that it be referred to "Committee No. ,1. The'motien taros seconded 9 y Giffin but was 'lost on: voice vote.; The ordinance wad then adopted by majority voice vote. of Stanford Xxinexation No. Ordinance No. 1943, establishing the zoning of the area described as Illtsuiford Annexation No. 9°' and a grow strip of .: Foothills Annexation No. 1-A bisecting the Stanford No. 9 area, as L•�M-5, O -A and A..R. ;in accordance with action of the Coincil: at, its: teat'meeting, , was given second reading. ;t was moved by Mitchell ;and seconded that the ordinauze: be adopted, Mr. Prentiss Carle asked Mayer Porter and Councibnan !Mitchell if they intend to disqualify themselves free= voting on this- matter. Cowicilinauletchell replied that he intended to vote on. the ordinance and Mayor Porter declined to answer. The ' motion .wa.s carried and the `nr,dinan c e 'adopted by Atha following irate a `roll call: es: Bail, Bishop, Byxbee, ,Davis, Marshall, Mitchell I�farrls, Porter; 'Stephens, Woodward, Zweng, ' . - .� V 1ZaL1 �€' J lay- for iort . £x ate' the City Attorney ttor ey in,re with; .�er'n�� which coli.ded' _ xt ��� received o�a_�''`�`'` x po V yin. ,?gar craze xo t A of the 3. bile wstx de the � of a, clam' gaxar�a��.:ia corns' o£ � and �a'�`1' ing +£ems 35.as for b -at tie ,�t,ra t cy£ �+: a� wee lam � �,otian: a� 8yc%.ice denied, ' Ituiin d d th ah a tto o aleva<x as accepted at'' City Attorney's. stY atav Gas dtna ,;pares A .a•-x°c° �r�ey cax"ce, d£, xe ontr a rep, ed by the Ciao£ t Sections 412 c�.ti •�t was gbrnatt provisions bidding A rep, cl Cati°'a of tb e p ision � r f ons S. ,wed o£ v el' ting .o .contracts, a to ,a tee be. renewed. ue stior tai a `Gads :relating before mist men the a 4$tha tter, is. now' e paxixo, and s have wh ver ag tw sections t .the o£ tk� ��a. icb ' coverages o es �x ��e ° � rova.!�e the bidding xre' r at a tixirte as: ; : 4 e to,p er), p d t a td e1 ,ctiap Q£ the x��►ee advise ,n 7/5. end :4 4 pax is a£, a'. nxea tiax� xerxit t,..of... dr gabl to intended to Ed a p . „ to the da se ciproteed �,t ss anca t$ tern end , 3,a9vtaee e c ce �t`t a£ ii•a`: at`1. tAttorneyeptie 4£, insurance a • coxes• :`T ,;'the_ -p cex oxnbiddingproud pxa c the "er as ot�txacts f->.. £oxxza. od+�• ;ddixap ' rtaa itteh emergency " xcelstix�g a. lq!94; vx of r seconded, was ures. 1 41 secax� adei p�dax s'ce. , a£ cSCC.ti°"' a - vats, $iced otion o£ BYXb e cblly sa onde �taan .(.el $ ted an emergency it , cr..-ernex ency forrb was- also dia$t' e n A yixxaa` °r :for Si at da�naacce'pe., a�trod�°G f p g. ,. for April a`��� arts «r oiler y4pnthl x.GP^xti. of .becoxrww thlY an taker' r ',,��,e �oz� on action report end £i1ed. p£a•ccx °nth1Y_. was received s rt o£ the "d the ti ,tyatx �; report viaian o£ lots in April an alpp The ax +tie s £ar xe a;c:iaz, taken, d placed on fire. i ii °nsa ,P se liet°r;ts; „were receav a£ tha °x Pl use firma! for ��art��� s � Consultant 4 be requested wio , ; exzaeat tree °« t £ix'a It -Writ t Ga i t Cans lta report �°s ' b Davis the ��e�err and ,;�. vd h;,�ity °f "' dnvyatxatia d� caxs►d+ex c ent ate cies °�' hons�aa a a,vaala�bl��a� the abd 1? i�vestig ici r) and 1044.e tx • � Skilled, '�'' the ;i� ,£ with Go�c� � $ervce to xd�ospi �' 1ike to, - , �� �► � C,��cil�xnp and s�galo 1to..5�� ��t�d hE woad like baok the 1oY A. n. Davis stated, had a d of�� tha . ad oenda a _of the a e7� ioxz Co xxscalxn . one which haMtcs �''� xi�d: ap��.daVtaan the�`�s •e'm� with ��'� �d by dish p' nd carried. i s,thereon.- ley o£ a �c ecist £arm th seconded. that any, ah.gas seG arried. with stapul�`te or :G�$taa�� �° �� � J'�he '�` business toca a before the Staraorclllb.i £u'xtlxt�ed at � 1'4' There 1;614%10 red adlour, 0 tab s dec ILO ,' ICY°x the<'�''