Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout12111961City Hall; Palo Alto, California' December 1 1, 1961" The Council.' of the City of Palo Alto met in regular session on this date at 7:30 p.m., with Mayor Haight presiding. Roll call as follows: Present:Arnold, Byxaee, Debs, Dias, Evans, Haight, Marshall, Porter, Rodgers, Rohrs, Rus; Stephens, Woodward, Zweng. Absent: Bishop. The riinutes of the meeting of November i7, ] 1, were' approved distributed: Derno'Ltt on •of f uildan . 444" High Street This was the time -set for hearing upon the 1'', .iiding Insaecr,cr's determination that; the building at 444 High lyre e.' should be a.bated`as a pu'Dlic ntiisanc.'c. It was Stated.for the record that• . notice, of this bc_ari .g has been posted and z;-iailed aS provided by law. and that the affidavits of posting and mailing are on file, he following testimony was given by J. Stewart F'otterna', . 'the Chid I'.uil.cding Inspcctor, in support of his determination th tt. the bi:'ilding.'-should be abated as a public nuisance: the t uildin at.g'r High t - _ F•± ..� S, r'ar ('f. W"a�. or .con tr-u'ct`'d-in. 3916. It: was used primarily ;'t =) _osI.,aura.n.: ontil approximately i9 .Q .:1h �n :;lip, u.;-ie was rii con! The buildil:g, !-,as .rem..a:ned vacant from 1950 to _be present tit nt date. • In I95' durirlt' the time when this prope.cty ss in the ownr„rs.hip of Jule H. llernbeim, this office had clise'us ecl with Floyd [.u\4'e . .agent for Mr. Bcrnbcirri, the unsafe and nuisance state >of.t: ne building. A: that time Mr. ,:o•.':,� a tiAI�id us n he that �4JhC? t' S1:1:p5o:'!.• Motors building was taken down,, building at 444 High Street ! g. would also be removed. Upon this assurance no formal proceedings were initiated ft,r the removal of-this-building.. The walls are :'uns'rue •_'c 'o c)�'!"srick a .d. apparently without r.ei nforcingIsti el. 'rho . ',O' leaks an,! _,:wry'• ccunsideroSly and thereby creates a l);1 , been : damaged and_comistitut_.. ;a vie!;et..,n of •.'1• A;; Orriia..arc_e. in nmariv 1r. ceS 1 coiling if. C':;-";zi{C''t'I the present wiring n an nxtrercie :: r', ilci4 srd, �'h. 711;r -H,•;1 -I.4 er.c, slvei e!2. .rt-t:a ''e(. and c' ' :, T i� r removed. Tn many 7r,st':inces tli, )1�;•1)f)i 1� :n confo"rin1:`-.,� _ "✓ltl1 the Palo lll:7l))1.1.. nc,) sanitary :aci1i.. 'S. ;. C• %. .r'lry wa.11s•have been r'..n,'7ov ,', ...-. -'v C t1aY,a r'C%.ti13.t the too "l'r 7,iY1'15:1 „•, ilic'•. ,1 roof and adjoining ,wa l` coil,a:ise supporting...members are decayed and rotted „ b covering -has. beef: removed. The oronlis_e, `' served with. water, 'gas of 'lrctric prior to 1 'l!. The front c of the building of .settling and resultant cracking between the bricks and creates a hazard to public safety. 'Flues and cimneys required ' y.the Palo Alto Building Code have been removed. Holes have been 1:e:ft in the N.valls and root, and the interior of the buildinghas been directly exposed to the weather. Ventilating equipment has been removed from the building. and ventilation is ,ina.dequate under the provisions of the Building Code. The building is in need of repairs and altera- tion5required by the Palo Alto Bui . �•xceeclizi lding Code in an amo�;int far g the,.5O% value of the existing building. Cannot:be- reasonably The building repaired so that it will either be a safe building or so that it will no longer exist in violation of the Palo Alto.1'3uilding Code. The building constitutes a public nuisance which can effectively be abated only by demolition or :removal of the .same." The City Attorney introduced 19b1 is photographs t:alcen on :Novemberr 7, xto the record six of the buildin of the interior. and exterior'g. He asked Mr, Botte::na whether the pictures fairly depicted the present state of the building ring irdicated on the bottom of the pictures n and d parts ctternf the build - that they did. The Chief Building Inspector Rthat t eyid damage to. »he corner of the p' � pointed out that the damage to building (picture marked "N. E. Front ). was done by the contractor at the time of demolition of. the adjoining building. The photographs were received and circulated among the council members for their inspection. The City Attorney pointed out that the Building Inspector, haddetermined that the build- ing was in a state of disrepair and in an unsafe condition before the demolition of the adjoining; building. The owner of the building was now should to _show cause wily the building g should given an opportunity not be condemned as a public nuisance. and the nuisance abated by demolition or removal of same. Miss Dorothy ,Kendall, owner of the property, the Council She .stated 1 - perty, addressed ssed at_d th'at.he;r residence address is 1285 N. Cres— cent li fights. Los Angeles, Gali:fornia, and that her business address i's '225 ,S`. Oxford Avenue, Los Angeles. Sheadvised rothirg was said to her about, d�•rnolitiori of the building th that sheparchasud the.builrlinl; 'tw. at the time. bhen ocr i; a years ago: that the building had not pied for long ti c before she bought it and it is not in use now.. Miss Kendall stated that she would like very muchto have beautiful bUildin cn-i the g l o: ero:.s+_;, .and Sec :air' ,file agree d th tt tnc t to have it o<cup:ed, askew ,,. a ilding ,Nos in need of r repairs but hat t nattered if the )uli{:''i:lg i5 + as it,i�; n0+.' occupied. t, ra�:y., in .�oc>rl condition t p She scat._ , as long by the 'contractor r G that 2n her <>pi7)7R t}1+' S; 2Yi.i.�tic dCYlh �: �'cix�'of ct interior the.. corner cf the building is the CaLI C of the coed t: of the builds $1`t UO( 3 not. think She should building. 5C<y ;old the Council that made the previous hi k :d b responsible for any commitments p- ut owner. asked to as it is` until �r, that the 1>> it+:.iR be a.l lclu { c get can ge a tenant or a purchaser for the, property. ty. She thought the building should no;. be condemne its condition:wa,s"cau s d by %a cOntractor enga e(, b <i wt} a� ",k e Cistv or the Cont. 4ct.az r �' y the City: that. should renal,' the damage, as the rain comes th ougri the hole and damages the interior., She stated that she did?" of expec.t:the City to pay the entire cost and that she willing to pay one?_half the coast or tti,ere G.it� was , of settling and; restiltar.t cracking between the bricks and creates a hazard topublic safety. Flues and chimneys required by the Palo Alto Building Code have been removed. Holes have', been left:.in the walls and roo4 and the interior of the building has been directly exposed to the weather. Ventilating egaiprrient has been removed from the building and ventilation inadequate under the provisions of the Building. Code. The building is in need of repairs and altera-- lions regUi,reel by the Palo Alto Building Code in an amount far exceeding the SO% value of the existing. building. The build:ing cannot be reasonably repaired so that it will either be a safe building -or so that it will no longer exist in violation of the Palo 'Alto Building Code. The buildi,rg constitutes a public nuisance which can effectively be abated only by demolition' or removal of the ,same The City Attorney introduced into the record six photographs taken on November 7, 1961 of the interior and exterior of the building. He asked Mrs; Bottema whether the pictures fairly depicted the present;s,tate'of the building and the parts of the build- ing indicated on..the bottom of the pictures, and Mr. Botterna said that they did. The Chief Building Inspector pointed out that the damage to the corner of the building (picture marked "N. E. Front Elevations"') was', done by the contractor at the time of demolition of the adjoining, building, The photographs were received and circulated among the council members for their inspection, The City Attorney. pointed out that the Building Inspector had determined that; the build- ing was in a .state: of, disrepair and in an unsafe condition before tl-;e demolition of the adjoining building. The ownerof the: building was now given an opportunity, to show cause why the buildir..g should not be condemned as a public nuisance,: and. the nuisance' abated by demolition or removal of same, Miss Dorothy Kendal, owner of the property, addressed the Council. She:stated that her residence address is 1285 N. Cres- cent Heights, Los .Angeles.' Czalfor• nia, and that her business address is 22.5 Oxford Avenue, Los Angeles. She advised that nothing was said to her about demolition of the building at the time: she purchased the building two years ago; that the building had not: been occupied for a long time before she bought it and it is not in use now. Miss Kendall stated that she would like very much to have a beautiful building on the premises and to have it occupied. She said she agreed that the' bi1ding was in need of repairs but asked what it mattered if the building is not in good condition as long as it is not occupied. She stated that in her opinion the damage done by the contractor to the corner of the rbiiiiding is the c ose of the condition of the interior of the building, She told the Council that she does riot think she should be responsible * or any commitments made by the previous owner She asked that the buiidinf be hallowed to remain :s it is until she can get a tenant or a purchaser for the property. She thought the building should not be condemner! when its condition, was caused by a contractor engaged by the City: that the City or the contractor should repair the damage, as the rain comes through the hole and damages the interior. She stated that she did not expect the City to pay the entire cost and that sale was willing to pay one-half the cost or thereabouts. Building a ed < J C? t11C contract Attorney i`� i had Yet 'rbe Y ^ ,.�}terabe 7 " the City .LS' rr and that h she wa r ,5• . that s building, \e of t G a litter �. rJa� a� nn i,�atar in state iv 5h • �S t,hditic), x�,G' which �a��l h Street ��'a- dernolition o� the' a�3�GL;'Ttt L"� •� such condition t,t x in a,kned.bY;her at 4/1�# Wig' begin '`" to of , .l nandha b�£�' condition t be abated. �C time in � '•.,'�t the Since. 1structure that t t i ian mug, and.ixx d until `� t rctef,v eplie ix .and t ia. the receive ive the letter and she did not. in City �» 195 . ` d1LIet,ter' • sdire ted October c. 3in�:r - ,Ghat.; she. � ay'misdirected rt7'-. Alto iT^ �17.f.t; ,.etieT iza 'aic, A letter contained replied e , October., that t to the city. kxdl , the registered siw• t`�` e • ,+ta until she carne that rs receipt Ai'R` » marked for �. halt) Alto Attorney all"; na'��='•n the � one irnn' tht: �xtYxazh� nua no 0 after Mi;;� he 11 �t�,Cett that building un. .�.�� City to t • CY.�7ill .C) the kJl r t"ti � y �� Cilt11 ivfs;0 ' e , 4 ec . employed . the ?he ` tts created " with respect. the contractor m loved t)1.1•. -Ls sortie She il she ever, t�;rit�.� �1: c:Tt'' "1iS1`, 1t�t7SE • e CO r�Gtt�� tY11t was maii�,h t'"'° ddl�e City a,• by the conclusion or th v �Y t c,nC? repaired for yt fie. 0 1 -tut that the , once:.k�'.4 productive Y>Liintt't. ti. b ti,nxTyti'y C""� t.• �bt. the huildirw cannot it �;i.ttn� i Z'` that lace bnil< n, ,1�%xt�_.tl }, 7Y pit'= c n Inspector . 111 t)^ a i he Building that �+ W Ct4C.tt�r^ y cl a py can. �''. ca repaired yry,T1G�' which �.t:ly L�l"J.iC'T? C. public ��t�w, { there ''r dczY)cali�lb� re aava,. ,'t;V.Seci 1.\:-.3.t. �a� tc,r ,..:1-,(.) it or CtaYt�' y .•i the contractor 1 5L that e by �' il,)yc made .,�r e. 'the 13tr,1�+r g; 1.. :;hc�u,<i be rx indamagi done try r the <: f:�.ia'z� and the y'i7;;;:Zti: 'ClU.1i. h� th 'Ut. tie the, City one l s . anti zaot t f :,.).0.1 The 'Mayor hearing was • rY ' o' t411 there OfLC, the k�ei^r r>;.r, i approving I -1,42;.,, S' ^ `•t ran z`yty. •� .J 1, `i''-� , C•17i;t?Y,l, . � ardit h",rilt:inp: ' �- lay F �'� �.t: .7\ r, adopted g the T �troda' d, w'11K� i�� arM"`', fodNA,'ard, duly `e ri.1;� Ci ar` zz� ,tiara t.. x111]:`� �1ttG ' t: C) r "dTl. . intxotluc y vtl-pct, vUx•c • by pr1t �)� C V.� gist . h L+, t' r x ;,a, ring Eli,.,._'`n.=r-.�.��,�;,"" .. r � CJ :r >'• c• i o.y y or �.:,:-��= "" � was the time. .�1' an the cos*, any c'?%}r'�t ,-z`�lc• thy. b City f„C1 1nt together tarty t`'�'rtit ytt.,). rt by the City, to any property h �ztt< , upon a r�17if 3.ny,j •yr' 1, i'2 b raised by and ro C'1 � `�11 tyG;:t bl.C^ d� be as d S" t ch n' y h repair ie,,- e ,te. �?y�,,, env, tiJ� �.G of a that •` j�Crt , that th'` �''' pxcrs ns 15h , 1or the �• : r the, record laQv, ,,.ze . t , ta, be g5C" y,�, t.i ti to provided ?�Y Wa d provided , file. XLiled, and posted h • fi has inee 's report has abeen placed 'n, a ;u nT.' �T r `ter•his ,ue were report, k.`l�,ne' .. City Enf�inteY'having� abandonediling s �;, 1': `', y ,•�^ ,c sta ii ers le „i � otl�� of the ail ti} 8\3,01 .-::'',.'ace SC f,. , -2atTlt�t. �� ,,a'w��"�'�t, �-•„� t .^ t7 tits _ ' airs, 'Ille C,�t 'of.. `+, .LHv Of the uxn ji r �, r owna make, their optiont� • '.he two properties whose owners did not n ake. the curb and sidewalk repairs are located as follows: 1) Parkizig lot on the Hamilton Avenue side amiark ,lon .. and Bryant, Lot 37, Block 1, University Lien No., 504,. Z) Safeway Parking lot, Florence Strc et side, Block w0, tJniversity Park, Lien No. 746. , advised that after due r+o<.ice was giver. The City Fng,inecr, by mailing and, po".sting on :he property, bids were taken for the repairs and contract awarded to the low bidder, and the work has , .• ',The unpaid ass<::;sments which will be made a been coiYspl,ete<:. X141..0 for the work clang in lien against t.he:properties are Block 1Z (Lieri,No 504) and $165.25 for. the work done: in Block Z^, (Lien No. 746). a or asked if any property owner or other. interested 1 The Mayor t proposed person wishes to present a'ry, objections or protests to the assessments. 1hCre' being no one presentwho wished to speak on: the matter, the hearing was closed, o gers. seconded and carried that the 1t�va,s moved byl� d�, report of the City Engineer be,:approved as submitted, and that the cost of repair~ .be assessed against the respective properties and turned over to the City' A sscssc>r and City Treasurer for collection • as provided in.the Streets and H"ir'hwaYs Code, Section 562.S. • Protect b r Caf:n no Rea ;.:,SS, rlc.termi:^ir.�, unpaid assessment Resolution.N0 of Project Eel i w,�.5 issuance bonds, and providing . for the . , ti(C �[1 (?! r� , intro4l'.tc,ed., arid a^ zr1a;-xc,. G:, ./.wt, c..:_y by .rnou vc; Gi` v.otk , it` Ii (_,.'.`' ;it s. a"i°iSU .V:-i `+ � Ice- the r. . �, . ...1 f1 -`_� .I). the'1.,� ti tit. o r.eceivezi at amount (.)1::.$30',.96 , QS, as o < ,. ridderr r sltt<'.'.::Cli:. ^c>dc51.' GO. J`. B..1-ittn.auer. Yt Co Stone &" Youngberg First California. Company S'. C. polllrnar_ Company Crowell, WeedO.i Co:r pa.% yr It was _r cc ornxnEr"tcicii th:1t t'„• 1r,w 1:id. of 1 . by Cruttenden, Podesta Co. Resolution No. 3.453, - ,vrl, Cirltt" ' tenden•. pod s.t & Ctr. 5 Zwcng, duly seconded, ..v.,1 de.r ., Darn l '�' ct, , (fit' t4�.r ?1.'' � ,ff.... t. enl dec-;,sift;, rt3 re. A s ,t+,__ wa`, received Rivers and ;,Harbor r ; 4 regarding �. ":..ac era D; --,.m, and stating, that,' in. .. l.lgnt of this deve%opme.-1.+, he- arould appreciate a nevi and official statez 1 rxt of. poticy from the C.ouneil, The City Manager reviewed the public notice', received from the Board o: Engineers for Rivers and Harbors, announcing that' the Board is not convinced that the improvement proposed in the report' on'Sa:`; 'r'ralaciscui'o Creek (I_zder a Harr. Project) should` ne undertaken by the Corps of Engineers at this time. The i �.- - notice' • reviewed the recomrncndations of the repori:ic:g officers fo approval. of the project for flood control. and allied purposes, eluding recreation facilities and water storage, xncl the estirn•'.tcd• •. costs of the project. The notit:e included a statement regarding the Board views advising that the Board after, eonsidenition of the report a'd;,other 1:?fortrlatlfl aVail,able, 1a not C<irivi:tce'd that the proposed improvement Should be undertaken, and that their poshion results from the Conihirtatjo 1 of: lack of conviction t''at the water supply Purpose is justified; d:it:bt as to the compatibility of recreational activity adjacent to the linear accelerator being planned by the Atomic En.ergy Condmission; possible elfec'.s '>n the estabJsned Jasper Ridge,Biologicai'Fxperir:cr;t,il Area of S<ar;ford University; and substantial division of local opinion a.; to the ,.:, sirab;liry of the proposed i..rnprove rnent; The notice invited all interested partite:: to ;;ubmit new and addition_:.? data before December ? 1 . 19(, 1 . '.i'hc City Manager presented .,ornc ot)otograplis of San F. anc:sduito Creek and the heavily nc,t>:i. 1t% ,i are,a v.'hi< h > t passes through, the pictures show ;,.; the situation c;ur ,rt+ t}:,• l '> ->c, and !95S floods, I'.he City Manager stated that the t;;ottn ,? dIrect the staff as t.o what sho.uid be done now that- the Corps c',; Engineers has made its >r ejiminar. report. suggestions for ri a.r>,res ,!ci irac'.>fications to t' stated that . he Il ]�L'i been :advised by elir e. ti.<,.-.t;_t L;',, , ., , .. the C �>r� 1~:n.gin.,0: e that if ;any r';::anres �,+�1:,-it.»oc.�vr+. yr,,, ; ,i .. 111 ,�;iu :> :111 as now proposed, is>r even, if -al; parties got t t(7 f,,e"tl.. . :tC>C: recommended changes . `heret would- be a delay of thre, to four v-nr.. i>1 the, t' ' project. The City Manager rcc:alled that the C` y asked e Corps of Erig;.nr, rV s for help to 1955, and 010V ,.',C1 :.,t'd ,, t t.� , i ;iI:^e that it would, take a minimum of ten years to got the tr? . ' )'e ':?';cr required. He:said the. staff is concerned ;1Jout , ,:c' :i i, ;r Ct thai.t' it is a complicated project l e,!cal.s. of tile' ;(iC,itlr>�' ;i� �l the jurisdiction of the; Creek. He a,,ivis.7,3 that rrorciific.:tt,t>n... made in the future to the project but Any chant e ti:,s time will create delay. The City Manager recommended that t.l>r, Council advi:3e Gubser that there :s no change in the City's Y it n and that the improvements } >x>�.. :c^ Council`is stii.l anxious for impr. o ement>; to be cons':rueted- to protect the City. The City.Mariager pointed out that parties :-:vorin, th r project :ire rot getting any help from the public, and advised that; if the people in. the area who are. subject to inundation do .not wri!;c: to their congressmen, the project is doomed. He suggested that the Council ask fora public hearing to be held. in. Palo .A.1to ao th tt the Board of could E='tg="cers coa ( inspect the site of ;he proposed dam and the area affected; and that if a local hearing is not granted, the Council ask for a hearing in Washington. It was moved. by Byxbee, seconded and carried that the Council restate its firm policy on the Ladera Darn Project and request that a local public hearing be held in Palo Alto. The City Manager, advised that the staffs of the City and. the two counties will worktogether to see that this matter is called to th.e attention of the people affected and attempt to get their interest and help. Councilman Evans :referred to Stanford's opposition to the project, and said he thought some effort should be made to see if Stanford would modify their program and contribute something affirrnat.ive.y to the project. The City Manager advised that Stanford had enginer=xs on their staff study the matter and they believe the situation can be resolved by extensive lining and widening of the • Creek without constructing; any dam. He comrnen.ted that the Cops of Engineers :feel that lining and, widening of the :,reek channel would cost about $12,000,000 as compared to over $8,000,000 for the darn project. . The City Manager pointed out that if the City agreed to a pan for lining and widening the Creek, the project would be delayed three to four years. The City Manager 'stated thathe would continue his efforts for agreement on the flood control proje‘. t. C ancellation of Taxes A requestwas received from. the State Division of High— ways for ' a: Bell ttior: of taxes on ;;erta'.n property rty :acquired ov the • State for purpose's from ;Metro f itti`.'t;l et al, Parcel No. 278'x4. On''':"iotio1 of %Werig, duly seconded, the cancellation, of taxes on said 'property was-acd:hori (d by majority voce vote. Validation I)arkin, ; t or,:r ai,n A letter was received from L. Coe Reed, Reed's Electric Company, 621 High Street:. objecting 10 they validation parking progra.m recently established and rttcotnmenr.?:ng that the m.t`tcr s be removed and free"par'ki gig established in the downtown area. The letter was sited. Cal forria Avenue Bea.utification A letter was received from Mrs. James Conklin, 2842 Fordharr. Street. ,East Palo Alto; complimenting the City on the California Avenue beautification project and on the efforts to keep the City beautiful. Foothill Expressway A letter was received from the Board of Supervisors with copy tyf a resolution adopted by the Board deterrining that an existing City street be made a County Highway, and a new County Highway be established on new alignment within the t.;ity of Palo Alto', to be a portion of the Foothill Expressway. The ead a suggested resolution submitted City Manager t�e-r r requested 5e passed by the, by the Board of. Supervis°rs which they Council of Palo Alto, consenting to the establishment of a portion Serra. Boulevard and Miranda Avenue as County. . portio:i of'Junzper°"�= Pnt�,�f a County l-iighway ar, ne�v., alignment - within of the Foothill Falig :Se t N��}tway� and. the. establishment .ofP"aloAlto, tobeap w.thun th'e. City Mapsshowing plan lines for the Foothill E;;presswaY right : ar s way is outside the dasplayei3.: It was noted �,hatZion ofall eJ�an pexo Serra Boulevard city limits except.. for a small and a sma11 portion of Miranda"A.venue. seconded that the resolutionIt'was moved by Porter and Supervisors, be uoer.vA.. adopted., of,consent, as suggested by the Board of S rated on t}xF. matter, stating Councilman Byxbee commented , 5 Expressway will carry traffic from Cupertino. Los the Foothill o r xpr Y highway. communities northward to the P,a.yshore llag Los Altos a:id.otlxer c.o.nm :situation if the 1" Foothill l;,xpressws.y �a:cpre�scd concern over the , on Avenue, is do ze to improve or widen Oregon and nothing so that it is developed as the No. expressway which i1 C: said was dcsighrd could take C ra er of the traffic corning from other roads and going to thought that if the deve lopr) °n.t• of theChc Bayshore. Mr. I3y�bec encouraged \ ithout any improvement of Foothill Expressway as c will created. He recommended real r>xoo.c:r: ?. be t�E, deferred any further •- Foothill Expresswaythat any furthc r consideration of ���t. F' ti Oregon until a decision is made <x s to what is going to be done Nvttb Avenue,: . t. he did not agree . Councilman Debs stated with Mr. Byxbee thz,.t the O7:ego Expressway w1` OpOS OH, 1. take car �I suggested y�, �,d t;}.¢ ilit` ;,way. , tract. Foothill Foothill ) hL>;1'? :121!. movedof traffic. from the : studied in rOTT::fl tic t, •�- ;, va_�P' matter. �t ��ncic•?1 i7y it beref.r;rxr-,,x to �:;c):s).:�1 itteC No. Mrs, Dias. to Committee No, carried ye`s; rnod, Byxbee, Debs• A Rodgers Rus, 'vvot,dwarci. v�c Marshall, or'ti^r, \OC�t Grossing_ ate- .�,ktc,r ratore disci:ss'Ion, t.,,, • )ry 1 r?>11 ,-all vote; �.�...r......._,��,,,,._...._ tom. - Yr`.:t;r .�S C.U:'XlT'.":;`:. ;?' ") A c,mmunicatio -!,nth,. b'? It fc.)r supror ng '•h Gi'�y of t'<_l�o :� L .,> o:� the comrncnciin� �= c,t �. : c•p�)rt croSsinp gat.; pxograrn, �xs teansmitt. ..g ��rn n their: s.he Pen:-uta lint <,f t�<< Soutl. accident eyckier.ic�nc4•-dic•_ng Company, was received and..fi'.ed. M.ount,3in View 1r:x�1',ions to ,he . - - f Mountain i�otiC�s Af �,Teypr),3rd �.:.. Y � "?4,:.c.'cilFs.ie-;r: ;Vc. � Vic Kr, c;e,-,ignated a; "Nit�irllef:eci No. 3 " and were received and 'E;led. Yr1b E ;t3tc� t the last of P Ope =" meeting - �>st m.: action. at property at The Council had dete�rx�eddecc:ased� offering P- ev,,corrilr! , r pert and bequest of Walter .� a neighborhood ghborhoc�d pia} g staff had' r1^;�, bes to, the City for that yg t);1 •• Emerson Ji;.T4C't,. ger advised recreation atio� s. The City Manage rd he ut.sirat thet refer d ose wool xecreation- parposes.. and believed it ,;tuc?y, reviewed this ma ? for furttae- l:ommittee No. matter was back to duty seconded, the motion of l�yxbc:c> back t Committee No. �' reiC=r4` poothll�, P�i�z_ AG y t that legislation Th M _ Assistant C Z,l;acn�.r.ger reported rn y for Federal 1. City 1 i nu beenenacted to er.able� cite and that the staff c de C r n,..i.t .., submission Sion fun recently' c e' the Open. Space 1,and . o"- 4 authorizing the rcc0 under passage of a resolution �0 per Cent of of an recommended. Grant to pay parcel next year ta3n.'f�r a Feder:, -),I. another, p! ei:ment cost an application and r li ! a parcel this, year rrdance with the ag, ac raid i , se l Lee in acct k ice with Assistant ree year of 4 Mrs. Ruy v; tttia f fir_ and Foothills Par.. )" Parcel nroq>rrrtY. (Foothills ` r�r. cha e on P-, next year for puxci�ad r>t. . con arcel l F wo of. the purchase years. Manager advised that °�a he+prat. of `7^ x'00 for the two o, ono, , , o of _..� application at this time would 17 C: � �/l,(jti{), or a mAt" amount .lt to, a Tsubmission ati �T,y' C ti out that the be \vould the, City t to help He p4 n.ted City nor is to attempt does not tbindhat the G f the new law is �: +v that e pit is he purpose c+ r Yc��="a��' r before that tF F e de- c p,- city .y rrexlts; and the � k�„• met %y -areas et ,ter'' e xrs must create open what requirements 4U1»�.r ., et t known .a�,�' ' A r 4 } c r, o, atec submission of an funds would the ;r }>n,i.. f Title 1 r app }�e.,c:.Licnn No.3460 "'�c.cr 'th<, pn'c;� ;�.c>n; r} portion t�: the 1pr.a to �^ n; :i Fer�k r.a 1 !r ,c, �, fi a`'` oc,zcco .,b H. usi for , .196i for tb L>1:. lh Park, wasg po u5i /a�? a_ 1 ., F' 'i OOth the resolution il'le � � �4�- f' iipC.C:;i and t� seconded Cj, by the acid n� :0<2 ° S Made by 1.vc�,. r c 1cn was ad het4 anti �. '''a20 d. :4.f S` Cession. the ^_e:,ta.. c�-�L�: d� ,.o..„c" di � r be apt x roll call; lowing vote or. rv;-.t, Portt'z! z.),. Debs, ova. fiy bc`"'�T /,wen�;- �, e'..: rR .old, Woodward, ar u Y y� Stephens, Dias, Mar shall, ILodge.r s , Rohr 5 . Noes; LLnd carrs-ed- t Woodward, seconded ci to 7t was then. moved bybtWOity 'gat -lager he authorized C i}�,t �: *icier tY' . .e.r unanimous option Vqt• u c'na L' p„rc.elNo. ..11G ,,fnibi 1E'4�.s ei �. Y,,,, . t�) `the p_ top fron-1 Dr . ! author u.s exc rci:+� r4l:a�e �f property this parcel `'' i. rrd thatia 'e 2 0 000.fcc this p and that naY cr_t c�, $ and'a� } x� c. irt•� JCL — a. S'P ,u.5 :j.e .-- Ja-.:... er to S�1.e�,�r.----•-`" a.zt City tt Assistant 4 ty ..� called by the aCe,-�ixz�; surplus or t July ca. Gc�ci1'1�.•' of Guxtr..ez l�.utrt�ur Yrzade to lev, corner ...; that ',report �: f,e, OtiB,til " Park frou;,Fvaxci at the not made an c,ffe. which .ns authorized the continuance a.lc�;tg �'a` cis' a had zxxa . , abutting , ; iarn the Goon Who - a that the xo xte owners . Manager advised and the accC?t_ p .,sistaxxt City QO for the property rty ac opera 'b iThe �'` offered. $$5, 500. property bvr'Aic'.r. s �,avc offe. 'i. staff recommends that the proposal be accepted. A z'esolutior,, authorizing the Mayor to execute a Grant Deed to Don S. Sevy and Carolina :levy, and Herbert F. Mills and. Delia Mills,'for this property which is surplus to the: City's needs, being a portion of Dots 15 and 16, J. J. Morris Real Estate Company's. Subdivision of the Wiliam M. Curtner Tract, was i.itroduc.cd, and o-i rnotion.of Stephens, duty seconded, was ;adopted by unanimous' voice vote. Riders to Grou Insurance Po!icic:s The City Manager r ccornrnended that the M.ivor be authorized to sign. riders to t;ne City's group insurance pol•ciee providing minor xnocai:fica.tion;s of the propr<,.zn, explaining that t onang :> wer «^mend -d'oy the staff to facilitate payroll preparation., the' a"nerdriti:ztts changing the effective: date of coverage so that :it coincides with he b: -weekly pay period. , .3t auas moved by.Byxben, seconded and carried: that the Mayor be authorized to sign the riders to the group rned?ica' and life insurance policies. Sub:'+,tatti oiiSite There w, s'co, t nu.c d :it the last meeting the report of. C'oznmi te,e Nn l rec omtrt dinh acc;uisition ,>. theS.imbecet0 propc)r;ty on ;:4ra:stradc_o Ro:,dy being :;. portion of Lot:. 16 and 23,. Mavocsll Tract, as a sUbstation Site. Acton on th,:; matter had been deferred'by the CounCTI., in order to give ;:,n opportunity to, representatives.of the Grr e•.S :A,cres .irnprover:ment Association to meet with the st,-iff for di of location.- . 15..' 7C: the ;,C.1;�t:;)t:0^, site rl•}e .A psis (Tl Z 'ity Manager r reported that :l meeting was held by the taff with a number of :1dj._oent property' owners and representatives of thF- Green. Acres :r^Zprovemey., Association, and that it was the staff's s c;7;jeCtive at the meeting to .•wnits.::t the purpose the site would serve and the reasons why it was needed,. and to outli ae the alternate .sites which had been consi h re d and attempt to show why this particular . .te, Cr: t? . 3 ,.:)dcro Road had been recontimenied. The. F, y istant City Man tger advised d believed there was a better une)e "stn tyii g as a result. of the meeting. .again,recomn'iended in • :'h. staff ,. behalf c ,� ;.,? rhr:,. this p1rti4•t:l:ar parcel be acc?'uircd for a su,hsta.tior Mr. John Albt r, , Fa, rTnecic' Way , Apr! s,:•n,:ng the Green. Acres I iprove�rrle .t Association, addressed :)r Council. .. r esse , He stated that the residents we 4 c COO need that a new substation site was needed principally because of the new ,:c,t7irn!:'rc:ni establishrnen.t's alon-g El Camino Real, and they were not convinced that this ideation i.s:the most f e.. _nab:c one. Mr. stated that it was apparent that the reason the other sires were rejected was because of the cost of the. property. He asked the Council to take into consideration the :interests of the citizens ard not put the sub- station in a residential area, but Sel.eC`t i)^^ of the other sites. The Assistant City Manager pointed out that a TlC '-W sub- station is needed, not only for 'servicing commercial establishments along El Ca.mir.o Real but to serve the F t 0o htlisri No. 2 area. He advised the site recommended m3reL' nC!(°r,'. would probably cost about $25,.000.00`les•' than. any of the other sites considered. He reviewed the, alternate site and d:iisplayed a map to show their locations. Aftcr`discussion, it was moved by Rohrs, seconded and carried that the,staff'make further studies and a report on Sites No. 2 and No. 3 which are located near El Camino Real, westerly of El Camino and northerly of Arastrad.ero Road. (A recess was taken at this time, 9:30 p.m., and,the Council reconvened at 9:40 p.m.) Amendment of P -C Development Plan �CizanninE douse A report'was received from the Planning Commission unanin ously recommending approval of the application of Channing House to;:amex d the P -C .Development Plan for the property at 850 Webster Street by increasing the building height to 142 feet and by extending the Development Schedule for start of construction to February 15 '1962. R'asol.r,tion No. 3461, amendir.g Ordinance No. 2007, being the Deveiopment Plan for the property at ;i50 Webster Street, Chairing Hoe:_7t', was intredt ed, and on motion of �)!it�;,t duly seconded; was'ado') e.d:b)' is t721i Q',I� Vn;C.' Vote. of ai rn,! >'zners voting. CCiu'iCil7nan. Z rv.,i'. ;; asked th;it the r`co-•i that no part in the di,scu: .ion i)r tR'1,: )' 7:?:: •:r2atter-. ',et, Divisi0-! r1 pt: 4270 Et Camino Re!ai. ..;z Westbrook W:).s :natninlou-si7 reCOrnrnoildir� . )ti,-,,. , r., . - 's r- J. C .. t ��ai e:: v)b of Ernest. Westbrook fC.l. tits` 7rOUe. :,t 9 I. (.,...,.:?i1 subject' to-f!:-.f:l.'::ne.n.t a) Comp,(•;:or of tn. ^c., ....:c...� cY ..i)')roval of Lot ?: s;on 57- .. "i x.; apt shall be proN'icled 'h ;r ...Fans of ra 0 -toot dedicated 'r : • y?"I t. ti E. `.: ;�,'1 �F` : 1•, h r. C.> 1? �. r u g OT's t:' . i h. t S l t (f b} Cerri'pt iO, of t it ._`"C:c1u;.irt`:iielntS (; :dpptoval of I.:c t '1Tie 1?la�r, �,n .Office r Vie Wed the la:Jet ground and n s.ory.'invol,vi:d in the prop.erty it question, noting t;i )t there have.. beery sever a1, property di'/. ions 2:lade: but no dove :e''pr exit completed. He advised that the pu.rpose`of hhe lot ,:livision appl;.c`d for re t.) divide the rear %:'-•'5 portion of the.property front the C.:- '5..S portion, which fronts on El Camino and on which .t rnotel i:: :)c:ing construc,teu. A,mot:io,»i was made by Rodgers and seconded t i'i the rc;corntrierrdation of; the Pla:in.itz C C.'Ol rte.:gb7Ur'1 be adopted. The City Man,.3ger r^..:ninclec'. the Council s! ,,t if actign i.s falcon as red:omrnendeci; a?to vin: a 40• -foot ,i..rc,et for access. to rear. a,p,a.;.tments;, ' •r'neltiple d-:ve1)irigs and cornr_-icrcial .:)r.itt�* �� o.zi;? be Per:nitted ev, th street 51:aiidards below that required in t'ne foothill.: gnat tbe city o d11:trec.c re'.elt;.irC a ..;Y)irriurn Y•i.w1t of v of 50 feet., He oointcc' o'ut that, there v ould be a :)Dace problem in enfor•ccrnent r of the no Darking,'re t.rie.tion or the! nropc d r0 -foot street. Mrs. Philip Towle, Chairman of the Planning Comrrlissio:i, advised that the Planning Corn ni:ssion felt there were extenuating circumstances in tliis'pa.: ocular situation.; that there could only be nineteen apartmert.units in .the rear. She said the Planning Commission did':'ot consider the problem of policing the no parking re st, fiction. It was moved by py'xree, se -prided by Stephens, and carried that the matter, be referred to Committee '.7o. I for further review a.nd'cOnsid.e'rat:.on, of the question of long cu1-deg-sacs, and that members .of the Planning Cornmi-,sion be asked to attend the meeting when t't7i'.S is considered. Mr;" Colin Peters, attorney for the applicant, then. addressed the Council, starirg that the owner would be willing to insta3l a 4.S. -foot street which was previously approved by the Council,' as he was ready to start development and did not wish to have a fur. the;r',cic lay. z"lor•ed by Rodgers, seconded and carried that th-e motion .tc; rr£c r: th-e .;.,utter to Corninittee Nc>. 1 be reconsidered. was' then-m.oved by .Byxbee, that-t.he•r.ecorrir:(rdati.o:i of the P annir,4T, 40 -foot street be •icnit•d, . a,ld that the lot accordance with the rest of the 7eport of 'seconded and ca.r ri d Co;n . sic:n to permit a. division be approved irz the Planning Comrni5-sion Z0n( C 'see Casa l Your?t:e IOC ! f Wilkie Way:. .�1 block t' F� :i 4 e:St_,d:.•risio:•i-'Man. - "ia.rTav� (7 ;lre' A7. 7.7cport waS received from the x is nij^r Commission'. d. ",ii? of the application of Casa P.rop .hies :or a ct?w .nt tf district ;Sr o' l P •l:f -i .1\ to ' -1)UP > -. h 1. for r .pp oil r it'(`..Itj 3, ice: .a.cr.e`, 7(I. ::S (` c ")0 block of Wilk;e W:ay beingbeiri •a ho'-aor of the R:yn',7:ho 'Fi r., ;. �. . S;;:. 71. FA :.iyctuit.o. Ci " P ' Co :fir-ni,ssio lsc. e,_:07 ,..menrirt., approval` n,fthe towt.a.ti o .,.;.bd.v}si(> map of F;nrklay Square" pr's_,,;ented: by Casa PrOpe tir'-'s for the property in question, subject t< a) Providing a 10 -for.:!: pedestrian wa1k'.v;,v :.)%•tweeri L is 4 and 5 to servo aece.:s to titayfiv d Park. <'asc'.'"nea"-,i - s,hown in red on the map, as w(cli as ea:,e7nY' t shown on ^•tap by the snbdividcz. A letter was r( ,.g'ived ;.turn Casa Properties stating they will'!. to w11;b?draw t: t: - 'tpp:icatlor: .for the C_riange of /.one LU avoid taking any. further tirnc of zr,;cmbe:rs of the Council or staff on this :Matter, in view of the :r_!^lii:,,r,;; of the Plrir:ri-:rg Commission and residers*:g o£ the area; however they aCvisc:('i that they wish to continue with the sub<i.i,vi:i'ior_. City Manager stated that he believes it would be advisable to deny, the appii .'atz , - rather than to pc:rn it the applicant,: to withdraw it. The Mayor announced that letter:, had been received from the Ver..•ura School Parent'"e .. aCi`_Qr fLa5( C. ti,c>ri and t}'1t:. Charleston Meadows, T_'lOrneow-.crs Association ob ceting to any change of zone. It was moved sec coded and carried that the recommend- ation of the Pl u it,'-Conimission for denial of the zone change -application be upheld. t-n;t. S!«t r� d :.ti � � ':ld�J \!/.: C (1-nsi ered.. *4r. Roy Stevens; Ca9.3. Pb cpt,. s sp:-.);.:ic to the Council advising that t�1C,y wishto po t:txe of the property Under the existing '�'-i iC �� x 6t tti fit <ct,:t er1 ,tL the Cc»-. (.:t reject the rCgl::rfrne7-.t. as e t r.:f:'` ( ...et} )/. � ;< �' tT<71 .r Corn.` .1`.;iio!1 ior•.'a Iry .foot perie5 z,:2 v,::1}CN1y: ) r vt:er: ..o•.. 4 :).;:c: 5 to sa;r e as an acec s .o'May{(:7(l 'F'. 'r:c.' Ti(,- .attic' t'^.'Jt the property has been vacant for. a ior g time "?d n0 One ?'; . ti<r( for :at.C<': S try the park; th. i, \v<�u`:.d C -� Lc <c Y:) :�i"ri ;la. -e cl .:dl.kv,,;iy between tile, two lots i .City ..i\ a:a];ye:` :.ad ,.-i <: that {.f tric is e rovidd P' the : City v✓U:i?tl .."t�q:.: rc .h),t . .. :�•• improved ,and fe.nced according 1.n .c:t.y'`(�t:i''`-t:..:,7<.. ✓1 _ <,'•' .lam11y:4'':r: ', i ';Vi`k.t... 4b',t'�', 11- tii:,, the \Nall;; \+.-4 h <l ( -'ern' A ,_ ell t-._::•; ( ,''. , ., wiz:. .-nl,,<•,1 b i'urIc4', St'l'or hd-arid carried tn, t the- :ctic,e .: ,d1,'i, :(,r, ;nap ('., ' y. i!, t(). he .'f, c,'.'(:. -<r, - l - 'rti' . .). ' , ice. i), (.1'.:y E .. .p; .v>- -c 1 , , i:J. NU Ikor ♦ �•r; }�''. .rr,, rn.t r AJ� ]ti f\ < t t vii propperty of ,.,7t. 1 rid( n �(� 01;11 0.7.4.• \ tht' ;t•\ .r,ri7<•., (l; that l)t . ti . ., 1N/ft.. J)a r,•'•} S1, ' .. [: -,< , . ; re,:-. • _ , ! 0 / H cc,,,,,,,,p,- sin....,,.; . t. ,',d , r• was r)i;9.dr- at ;,1-.1e et: , elc) '' - - � . .. ., .` l 5 C,, „_.; , r . 1[i U:: Fit (1 the Co-: c- to Vote i,L. a ni..i ,,e en<' < Ii .. L<)1,1=, Ai I1'.r,n (-. , - [)1• }')t"(�;A'- - ,/ - - '�'l) F,;. -es; A%l'Tilit•, 01,;'),), '1i1 ar..y ch'"s,'e 1t:CY.M.., O's.v hrc:-.en; <:t, :ur, ,-r .,_.- '<;r:; ) ",,tr 'l , rine O'Shea, 720 Cr.wpc. S,.:-< ... _. k. ' . ., :n, t. the comet rci ` i,oT)e. -°o defy • ,. -Yr)i:r ( (:;.1.., r • . p. ,r; t'n.,.t 1 '[ ri< ,. r.",, JI f .. . CO. < . . .. pr Cs pi -, ., ?lt . ,t 45, f. o, -n. 1,') ., -0..;1 i.- (1';;,1.. 0:'., on . :, ' , ,v ^ ('' f! ")' .•.,r ,' (� .. ..,ti i,<'.•l !e -r_al: 1- Ave!, ...:ti Co',.., :,,,-;.- h r.c.( t+ fit. ;i; iz ;Fie ('; i, . _��i<.w<V ,.,r➢ ; . . ')� ,-t) .. i• ,.'"7 L 4: d (Jr ti' O }" •t Y.nF �a r'•"4'4 y f M v� proposed change han ,.. po�yl in that of �oXze« e nP3 po e d beat of z ne. She spoke of t}� building is developed. Ic+ be inc a�� traffic and parking the applicants, iur. L. if an 21 -unit nb for addressed Long, 4015 to except that of C Rth e Counc, l in Laguna Way, R rezoning ' • e '� ptir o 4' pointing support of th representing erzti. to R -4 would u l e reducin tion with ants othe be out that no that hey a application ` of C_, Su.tants' Isla xat the change After f. area. n a the for motion to accept c� then discussion, i c s ton they firstreading.fto p an The ordinance a toll car} voteproviding was talc .9y�es..Ar say fo.low;>; the rove Cl)ane°T� "o'iu, ,)iaS WOOdwar. ct,. jw:ans, nfi Ivjaz shajl, St Ur Y: Stephens, LIS. �=lai h. "Yz{)t, w; Porter, Rodgers, Rohr An ost, X27 �' t L TM ,) i, t' t .` v C -.fnt lt:, ir"�`� r)(, '� , � ): 2jgc ,`,4 )� e ;,, r.14,!)of,'r: :Ile ( r7S•.-('r) ✓ })r- Cr •t "'' t.r;, ti S Il •(7„ to .Pire `'f th,e; a � f r�nn c,�,, , J �.. z. c,,,(.,, ,.'.n•-, a ?hc .rt�C ., �(w of the; Suitt o} ` )c ,,�, { ' f.-, ,,!„ r %W-, C�)t r7 lL't 2' f, t,t 13] �. < _ t 1 j 3 �t tir , 7n t ,, tr. or: /� 11.11>. ) r :Tst ,,,,%1" `� Ir„ �t az, y t�� n,, tilt,, t J it {. i_ ' T :'L , ,. i!!{?:'n I_ ta .r•j )(., '1t`Il It t C" No. ti �4 Ot CL A f7t:+ tit ��t1 rt)f, �) { it ..:-.,,,t. t C7ti a LCtciei.io t' tCi!. W r'iJt'' �: s1 1`- 1t.t,'r• 'I.'• p �Tty �,rr Id. ii•x n. a r. <)„) mac, f> �. fYp t.� Tyr t( A",er tr_;. c,r,I r c :. f C3 11 r P :t G XC ' n , wa2k�L:1 + L %>tc.t yc t •I t• jtt S7 .j , �'lf1;GS n tt { Ito . w ?(?� F> t�, c,. ��j zr»:,,,,rye( ,;q� _t�'t,�; to rf �~t�Y• �ic� � t `�o � . ., ^` -,',I iU , rid �( st atC itlt 2 j, `i bt':. "r r•�t, %.ti t,}3 r . ( the Z; - a it f t . tt) rj,,,� .�,,i,5 jZtSt ')-2:]f1x•t, :p S C fir;, t c, r: tst, i- ( " t t %., t o S t.'''µ try t r�yt„ ,1C •a<•,",,)�; 1t , It 1v Z.r�1.S, irl (t s.tC( S :'rte f'l.,, ti{-. SJ t" ir7c, ,�I{cj t tJz2 l''' ., RR1 —._ y,� )y 'y){' i�E:.r(a t 1 t1); t tilt.: ~ �~ 11t'' c~ n, b t r�Xr)rzt,ti-,ic>I . t c u.:,:•:t:. n� ,fir �t:��w , , c r}) .+rr ,. "' t :>ic tt hay( t'"t tr�ti�• t' of parkin;,- -4 T n ki c. t......12- :in • a tendin, .par,;cl g program, was int•rc)duced, and on motion duly math and ec:'o-tdc:ci vas adopted by rna.jorityvoice vote, Wit.hd;awzel. of Annexed Area, from Fire District R.esOi+ ".10'1 .\o7 3463 .t•Tthcirawing pro )ert✓ rrorn the x'rtmo;rt 1 °r 17 5trlc t (l'i i, shcrr -San Antonio A:inc:•xa :on)because of it8 ari' xa.`c '0 a.rci inclusion sion within tl_e City of F>alc.i Alto, w, -is in..Groduced; c'1Itt'i 0 Y,Ot1OY2'of X3y)'C.!�f e, (ally ai`concled, lt•d �:CtO?)t(�r1 by, o1Yt.,It: rni.,)i1s. tioic,'C'• 'vote . X13:�•`i:,..'f<ii" A,r Port. tl r(icoiv' ': f;;{>rn the City Attorney ',T) t;'c t'J1 t;'Vinc,' IosepCt ):? 1 ,r _,i1') (?I h] J_rt)_ '' for darria t• to his ;t!1tomob_le, a .4.d ir-' -the t.: i.:.7x1 >� `7 f.,:` `tf V`v .ti .1C .,•1rn i)l is ; 7.00 da1 t"'t.'� of his _ both d."'. hii.< .. '✓ .n ol d n a cr,ilis)o- with a city� CtA ,_ruck�ry pd..rkod in tt.t .40() f l,1 !� { r.' c>t � 1i ail Av(`n:1e. 1•r,(• city Att(J1•Itey. • acv Se„d that. hi his `c oncit .+c d that n.< claims are not a proper Charge against st the' City, and' rerorrrrle tdc•cl they be denied. He stated that t ii C- Clty.�truc,k t;,,= t'< r'z'] iV parked, .and that one c)4 the claimants while driviri1^, a),o•,rr'."the stzee, had s "+'t�i•: t) t k -_ �•; t'a .r+1C r?. forcing )t. into the .other aiY.. • O:J >e ton :Of i y xi c•.ily seconded, tha City Attc,r ney' • • : i'l.t)ort V.`�1� i)C'f ( rl ed .tiid i)ri�C, ..A r,i)`; - t' ,C'�'�- . .• ••:f) Nlhri.th tv R e'`nr's , , . r repo): . I,f ,lt •, .7C_ ,;•�T.- - ti rr : t xnpl r cin nc ;'iFed r ' ! *,1 1`..), : ». . for di —,;-l> .. . r , of ,) .. . , ' ! : a) i, , Mrs.. Add,: -t-,..,„-.:(... -. , ' ,‘•,,,,r,.., .. Avcnus( c oi „�. ', cis ,� �) ' , . ti,� i> ,., he placed +.1-.1s talk withthe fi a.), , the next COan,_CCiI r1 ' (•} The :Mayor ca', •e! Council IY:t:ct.a \/1:.' ( i " . a::(1 r is OIJ1 ^< c d h � '. ti .x „ `old its t.•:ext o -h c.in' or, , ^ :r:eet:ng in Jar ary". the Dec e rri• ie•. ) `s . ') r.+ ) l , 1a ^,' the Coun_ci '�c.. '� + r`r . •Tt n_�_ _ . y � ' ��.._. �; e_______ral Plan General P/an T� October, Stzbz�z� Y".bee,ca Co w, and to the tt a by C},x� rt ?led attention Co sSion as eight �u^srro�s � c man .a the Pry'}i �` � Vinci addres outlined ;� letter n.�, directed d to Associates in m277ary � Planning 'Corn' sad to rbe:2�i �- <>i` twos � the Planning har the 7;ssi©;� 3Y]212�rs tr mittaI date ob decisions.,: o ncl� is, trying to ccrr d point //, the rtMr. c going to.ha , r�.solvo e stated er �etter and �Y�eb-'e rioted t e to make some o: the that the it Might p''�Zi z1 ed that two some of points, Comm" b �FSx�,ab} rY to 1 h. o months the gone zter' a a to-rt;, have be S have „ rec eu/ the at outhem s requested n e6 fat the appropriate pprop situation heived,ir:dire do hb t� incr. Y Char/es ate" t.i the F� aufiht �,urkm_ me the directions Planning an Associates mans and su:Cow�re 7 ha rUpon a b�asked b�(t may e �-or the tile Mayor z of writ ~Lean r'nake anning r a"zaz^'T o th cCounci P✓t s mee a�Testi}n, s�. , rc,{.� tin cti jant ztr 8, 1962. She reF er, h the advisede that Phx}ip 'le'�siarz�7ns ��t ilspl v<: t{,, �'"ratL>,; that �' Council at at she is ave r� ., rxy tcie by c ti by the of bash. :{�rn �1tiS2{l n jgtr(' Sr, J3.�()t Si,lti ��'t t �11I2�r ('G.rllI"tltiy {�Council f -`L Council. '1. 'O W le ,t J t r,� i' I. CY t 1 }�� Ci C'f �.t)C1Y ; r ` �..� x r. � n �. lk; � � t{, ,.� N10. 'e'er k '�'•'te;� or that �'ti , 1e t' if < , 'thr• nrlir., rnee f , (y �Counti eze rC .f. t,, W c,"�, .at `� 1n linty X10. 2 2 3p4 � G,L r eci to the ue.,-t9i{`r(1?,{ ..,0.; •� 17.rn� inry t ?> '» the T a t:02ti z y "',71 forth ,11 It, t ,, n7:rtc .1 ti ).F)i` fin, - �� tS��, �� �'rC1{� rt � ,i4fti :-}, ter of 01 .�2zr74aG.t itik U iC , rf3(1t. i 7 C{•Jw {>1 "I C. -- the aV' l t.,,.:,. --at. ci� �r� iC rf ' 0 c'`7_,,,, ,,., oy P0f' a''F. t )t`tf .',i/P 1') the f�� ii{t, ,1Zf 7. x•961 G or .y Ct>n� tl z 1c! "�t t ��: t,; j Vii. t Cn' ha-c`Sked S4tworxie a o �l�` ‘.1.- go f s '1ti •',f r c7 ti7c; b x. 1 , ' :. C}. q{. ,57..,1 t"�ah �.11 �� ICy .[ final r ] {YG'!? y f { ' ^<{i {)C{';,yl`nf ?71 ill2{jy S�tGiat ro p`a>z 'in advised t(71�1rj z y ,, 15' 4:,': ' oi.2 C{;�Jw t..O r� r`)U: t r«2: ;�1,.GC, u^A',,,Z71.0' r,. taut �;i1 i 2"t�7} , eedir,,Y }1`' l C "GL.IC `y . , 2 air c.,g* {'.,,er vvee,i0ar; o7` �112 iL l Gfl 11 w]C 2 a`r ,rte Y ,re ~itt.r7 d �ti 1 2,E that C e did r2ot i"`)1Til .ts tiL��r tt L ,; r .a, t f,,-, No. �o r.Zdt .- to 'hcdu?�` V;r s VAnti,, to ;-..1' 1 i r'rn i L zr�. 1 � ,t„It 1961;.! ult. 6b L`' ' 7: G� ,,, ••,..:_,, ci seci that e ry1C ira v a ,, t.t t,, ve t, olirn eiaraa, a , : their M,rrie,ll..i:rt r : }7t,,c C -y y 'ktr-� 4k 61 '1rt:rlr C,tt r,s a?` fiTCC,., 71 s tlnir �=caxzr, £� �`� x`61;, ryx ?��y 1{,�} � the ',:�tit,.�• �:"r Gn >._ `''t cx.x�e�:Ls g on t ZC "l'he r i; ;G 5ac`f Avenue f(.^ i >' �ir,l e'' Gn'.rn t1, {-'RUC 1 R +, "tilry �Ss:a� Ertl:,»,d",t a:-� t `t JCL[ r": 2 on r�lt?ta.x1 U ^ _vc r:u}n2C, Alter further d- t st,on, no Vote: was taken on the 'Ttot or do .;a.slt the P«1r'n rr,hC -'-n-ii5 -'or to l'+,".JQr t at a rrieet1Clh Of Conn t: .e'. NO. • . 1:' h1 tt, iti ;sire.: ci that '.r.1t Planning C..ar:liniss1or, will, present. d pror,rt ss report and time schedule of :Pa:zirir.�; C-Pri ziis5:c' n,eet ng; •,o 's1e Co'lztcil at .t� n.axt z+ eetir. on :!antra.: y.8. 196'2, t'Ct, hC.; 2W, t1U :h_ the, r to „once beto` .. t};, (1#7-c: ::*et': ''O; -..(I at , i •.00 I','V . Mayor 1 -t- r s s v }M Y„ i. �'u �,} a %`" Wig!' '�" A r�`•%, d" . .