Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08081966316 8/8/66 City Hall Palo Alto, California August 8, 1966 The Council of the City of Palo Alto met on this date at 7:30 p. m. with Mayor Dias presiding. Present: Arnold, Beahrs, Comstock, Debs, Dias, Flint, Person, Rus, Sher. Absent: Cooley, Rohrs (arrived 7:35), Woodward (arrived?:36), Worthington (arrived 7:50). Approval of Minutes - July 18, 1966 Councilman Comstock requested that the word "comment" in line 8, of the second paragraph on page 305 be changed to "subject". Councilman Pearson requested that the narne "Debs" in the first line of the last paragraph on page 302be changed to "Pearson". The Minutes of July 18, 1966 were approved as corrected. Approval of Minutes- Board of Equalization �LL1ALJ, X965 _ .,.��.__.__.._...._.. The Board of zqualization Minutes of July 25, 1966 were approved as submitted. Approval of Minutes - Jul 25, 1966 Councilman Comstock requested that "from" in the fourth line of Councilman Pearson referred to the Page Mill Road item on page 314 and requested the vote be changed to indicate that her motion had carried unanimously. The.Minut.es of July 25, 1966 were approved arc corrected. El Camino Real-Ernbarcadero Intersection Councilman Beahrs moved, seconded by Arnold, to continue the matter of modification to ti -1.. El Camino Real-Ernbarca.dero inter- section (returned to the Council without recommendation by the Finance Committee) until the current traffic report is received from taff. The motion carried on majority voice vote. Community Thrsatre Councilman Beahrs :roved, seconded by Rus, to continue the matters concerning improvements at the Community Theatre, construction of 317 8/8/66 a new performing arts center a.rd consideration of cultural facilities and activities until after the Special Election of September 13, 1966 (returned to the Council without recommendation by the Finance Com- mittee). The motion carried unanimously. Hotel -Motel Tax • Councilman Arnold moved, seconded by Rus, that no action on hotel - motel tax or cigarette tax be taken at this time as recommended by the Finance Committee. The motion carried unanimously. Sewer Rate Increase Councilman .Arnold moved, seconded by Rohrs, that rates schedules 5-1, 5-1-0, S-2 and S-2-0 be adopted by the Council effective with the September 1966 billing as unanimously recommended by the Finance Committee. The motion carried on the following roll call vc A ye s: Noe::. Water Rates Arnold, Beahrs, Comstock, Dias, Rohrs, Rus, Sher, Woodward, Worthington. Debs, Flint, Pearson. C eunci:.rh r3 Arnold moved, seconded by Rohrs, that no change be made in the water rates for this fiscal year in accordance with the recommendation from the Finance Comrr,ittee. The motion c.arriPd en majority voice vote, Councilmen Debs and Flint dissenting. F n nce Committee Study of 1967-68 Bud et The Finance Committee reported that it is their understanding that the Committee small study items to he presented in the 1967-68 budget and proceed to do so unless directed otherwise. Dit,- cus ioie followed as to procedure regarding items to be studied by committees. Councilman Arnold moved, seconded by Rohrs, that the Council in- struct the Finance Committee to consider all items referred to it by Council,,. After further discussion; Councilman Arnold questioned the appropriateness of voting on what the Committee is already in- structed to do. The motion carried on the following roll call vote: Ayes: Comstoci:, Debs, Dias, Flint, Pearson; Rohrs, Rus, Woodward. Noes: Arnold, Beahrs, Sher, Worthington. 18 /8/66 Change of District - Seven Parcels Land O�nei by City and t.ounty -ZC-11) Councilman Beahrs introduced the following ordinance and rnr •ved its approval for first reading in accordance with the unanimous recom- mendation of the Planning Commission (Resolution No. 40): Ordinance entitled: "Ordinance of the Council of the City of Palo Alto Amendir.4 Section 3.02 of Ordinance No. 1324, the Zoning Ordinance, Changing the Zoning of Seven Parcels of Land Owned by the City of Palo Alto and the County of Santa Clara to P -F. " The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Development Plan 449-45 'tsiChar-leston Road (65-ZC-4) Councilman Sher introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption in accordance with the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission: Resolution No. 3914 entitled: "Resolution of the Council of the City of Pale Alto Amending the Development Plan Approved by Ordinance No. 2236 for the Property at 449-455 East Charleston Road to Extend the Development Schedule." Councilman Debs seconded the motion and it ca.rie:ed unanimously, Variance at 2657 Greer Road (66-V-10) Councilman Beahrs moved. Sae nnde,t_hy Comstock, to uphold the --Planning Commission recommendation and deny the application of Gilbert H. Brittain for a variance at 2657 Greer Road. The motion carried unanimously. Subdivision - 2085 East Ba shore Road rlva a aaernen a .arrra ane -1 1l Planning Commissioner Stroniquist requested permission to handle both the matter of the application of Anthony Sanchez, Jr., for a Subdivision of Less than Five Lots, Greer Subdivision, 2085 East Baysi7 re Road, and the matter of the private easement known as Laura Lane br_r..g included in the next improvement assessment district ft r improvement as a public, dedicated street at the same time as they are related Mr. Stromquiat stated that the Planning Commission recommended approval of the application and also that Laurz. Lane be included in the next improvement assessment district. 319 8/8/66 Councilman Comstock moved, and it was duly seconded, that both matters be continued until Council members were provided with detailed reports and maps of the area involved. The motion car- ried by majority voice vote. Improvement Assessment District rest Avenue (66-LD-12) Councilman Beahrs moved, seconded by Rohr'', to accept the recommendation of the Planning Commission to include in the next improvement AS3beves-nnet-et district for improvement as a public, dedicated street the existing 20 -foot private road and turn around on Forest Avenue, vicinity of Hale Street, serving 1017, 1019; 1021, 1023 and 1025 Forest Avenue. Councilman Comstock moved, seconded by Pearson, to continue the matter until a more detailed report, including maps, was fur- nished to Council members. The motion to continue carried on majority voice vote. Plumbing Code Ordinance Councilman Arnold moved, seconded by Beahrs, the adoption of the following ordinance: Ordinance No. 2303 entiticd "Ordinance Of the Council of the City of Palo Alto Repealing Section 19.84 of the Palo Alto Municipal Code and Sections 1111-1119 of the Plumbing Code." The motion carried unanimously. Sidewalk Elevators Councilman Arnold moved, seconded by Beahrs, the adoption of the following ordinance: Ordinance No. 2304 entitled "Ordinance of the Council of the City of Palo Alto Amending Section 20. 66 of the Palo Alto Municipal Code Regulating the Use of Sidewalk Elevator.,." The motion carried unanimously. Health Officer II / Councilman Arnold moved, seconded by Beaters, the adoption of the following ordinance: Ordinance No. 2305 entitled "Ordinance of the Council of the City of Palo Alto Adding Section 2.222 to the Palo Alto hlun ci- • pal Code. Amending Section 27.17 and Repealing Sections ZS. 02 Thereof Relating to the Powers and Duties of the Health Officer." The motion carried unanimously. 20 /8/66 Defining Certain Terms in the Municipal Code Councilman Arnold move 1, seconded by Rohrs and carried unani- mously, the adoption of the following ordinance: Ordinance No. 2306 entitled: "Ordinance of the Council of the City of Palo Alto Adding Section 10.04 to Chapter 10 of the Palo Alto Municipal Code Defining Certain Terms." (Councilman Debs left the Chambers at 8:19) Fees for Filing Subdivision M Councilman Arnold moved, seconded by Beahrs and carried unani- mously, the adoption of the following ordinance: Ordinance No. 2307 entitled: "Ordinance of the Council of the City of Palo Alto Amending Ordinance No. 1316, the Subdivision Ordinance, by Amending Sections 3. 10, 3.33 and 4. 11 Thereof and Adding Section 4. 50 Thereto, Changing the Fees for Filing; Suhdiv:3ion Maps." (Councilman Debs re►urne.d to the Chambers) Precincts and Election Officers bpe'—"c:�ai"7Ere- .aan Sep€en her .r, 1966 Councilman Arnold introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: Resolution No. 3915 entitled: "Resolution of the Council of the City of Palo Alto Designating Precincts and Naming Election Officers for the Special Election to be Held on September 13, • 1966." Councilman Arnold pointed out that the Election Code requires Council approval of the precinct locations and election officers 30 days before the date of the election. t;souncilman Pearson stated she had noted the list of election officers included a city employee and a councilman's wife and asked for an explanation. City Attorney Michalski explained that all cf those listed as election officer a- are levelly qualified to hold that position according to the Registrar of Voters of the County of Santa Clara who is the final authority in such matters. Councilman Rus seconded the motion which carried on majority voice vote, Councilman Pearson dissenting. City Streets Base Failure Repair Pro;rarn City Manager Morgan referred to his report of July 28 concerning city streets base failure repair program. Questions from Council members followed regarding the life of the average base and 321 8/8/66 whether or not studies had been made correlating the types of traffic, i.e. trucks versus light traffic, to the life of the base. City Engineer Witbeck replied that while no specific studies have been made, it has generally been observed that truck traffic reduces the life of the street, but that also weather, age of the street and water in the subsoil were among the contributing factors involved in determining the life span of particular streets. Mayor Dias asked to let it be noted that the Council acknowledges receipt of the report with thanks to the City Manager and the staff. Proposed Agreement for Community Recreation Services - 3-0.o Alto 'Unified School District City Manager Morgan read his report of .August 3 concerning the proposed agreement for ceeerni pity recreation services for the Palo Alto Unified School District. He recommended that Council consider the agreement and, if acceptable, the Mayor be authorized to execute it in time for the fall of 1966 when school opens. Councilman Beahrs moved, seconded by Rus, that the agreement be approved and the Mayor authorized to execute it on behalf of the City. Councilman Sher asked if a school board representative had asked the staff to prepare the agreement, and if so, wished to question their authority to direct extensive work by the city staff. Mayor Dias stated the matter of negotiations along the recreations line had been brought to the attention of the Council in March and April of 1966, and that the school district, not the City -School Liaison Committee had made the request for the agreement. Mr. Morgan stated that there is an on -going committee to handle such matters with the schools, and that discussions with staffs of the school dis- trict and the City were held, and the proposed agreement is the re- sult of those disc saicns= --- Councilman Sher stated he believed it would have been appropriate for our representatives to have reported back to Council for approval before proceeding with a proposed agreement. He moved the proposed agreement be referred to Finance Committee for re- view and report back to Council. Councilman Debs seconded the motion. Councilman Reba move-`, and it was dull seconded, to amend the motion to refer to include that the City Attorney be directed to pre- pare an analysis of the contract, especially with regard to existing written and genera►1*. accepted policies in effect. The amendment failed on the following roll call vote: Ayes: Noes: Comstock, Debs, Flint, Pearson, Sher. Arnold, Beaters, Dias, Rohra, Rus, Woodward, Worthington. 322 8/66 The motion to refer the proposed agreement to the Finance Corn- mittee then tailed on the following tie roll call vote: Ayes: Comstock, Debs, Flint, Pearson, Sher, Worthington. Noes: Arnold, Beahrs, Dias, Rohrs, Rus, Woodward. Councilman Debs discussed whether it was correct procedure for the staff to prepare a proposed agreement without being directed to do so by the Council. Councilman Rohrs raised the point of order that Councilman Debs' remarks were not onthe motion be- fore the Council and Mayor Dias so ruled. Councilman Debs challenged the ruling. Mayor Dias' ruling was upheld on the following roll call vote: Ayes: Arnold, Beahrs, Comstock, tijas. Rohrs; Rus, Woodward. Noes: Debs, Flint, Pearson, Sher, Worthington. Councilman Arnold moved, seconded by Rohrs, that the item be continued until the next Council meeting on August 22 so that Coun- +1 members would have an opportunity to review the proposed agreement. The motion carried on the following roll, call vote: Ayes: Arnold, Dias, Flint, Pearson, Eobrs, Sher, Woodward. Noee: Beahrs, Comstock. Debs, Rus, Worthington. Alleged PubliL Nudsance, 4127 El Camino Real City Manages- Morgan read his report of August 4 concerning the +status of the alleged public nuisance at 4127 El Camino Real. Councilman Pearson moved, seconded by Beahre that the staff report back to the Council in three months on whether or not the owner/ope.ator of the A b. W Root Beer Stand has complied with his obligations and also any violations reported during that time. The motion carried unanimously. (The Council recessed from 9:10 to 9:22 p.m. - Councilmsro Worthington did not return at that time.) South Palo .# lto Neighborhood Park City Manager Morgan referred to his report of August 4 and the wall chart indicating location and development c.f the South Palo ,c3 8/8/66 Alto Neighborhood Park. He recommended the Council approve the ordinance involved for first reading. Councilman Debs introduced the following ordinance and moved its approval for first reading: Ordinance entitled "Ordinance of the Council of the City of Palo Alto Approving and Adopting a Plan for the Development of South Palo Alto Neighborhood Park, Project No. 65-13." The motion was seconded by Sher and carried unanimously. NO RIGHT TURN - Middlefield-Ernbarcadero City Manager Morgan referred to his report of August 3 and recom- mended the NO RIGHT TURN sign at Middlefield-Ernbarcadero be removed. (Councilman Worthington returned to the Chambers at 9:27) Councilman Arnold moved, seconded by Russ the; the NO RIGHT TURN aign be removed as recommended by the Staff Traffic Com- mittee. 1 Councilman Comstcck moved, and it was duly seconded, that the matter b: referred to the Planning and Procedures Committee and the staff be directed to report to the Committee on alternate methods for protecting pedestrian traffic from right turns at Middlefield-Ertxbarcadero, the; report to include a NO RIGHT TURN sign for specific hours of the day or signalization timing control and any other methods the staff may sex-fit-=o--susrgest. The motion carried on the following roll call vote: Ayes: Comstock, Debs, Flint, Pearson, Sher, Woodward, Worthington. Noes: Arnold, Beahrs, Dias, Rohrs, Rus. Yacht Harbor Lease and Airport Lease Councilman Rus moved, seconded by Beahrs, that the City Attorney1s analyses of the Cathay of Santa Clara's proposed lease agreements for the yacht harbor and the airport be referred to the staff for the{. review with members of the County staff and the recommendations of the City staff be submitted to the Council for further consideration. Councilman Sher raised the point of order that these two matters cannot be handled on one motion. Mayor Dias ruled that the two proposed leases could be acted upon at the same time. Council- man Sher then asked City Attorney Michalski for his opinion. Mr. Michalski replied that the procedural ordinance does not -specifi- cally cover this point and gave his personal opinion that Council action 324 8/8/66 can be considerably e:tpedited by handling related items in one motion, particularly for purposes of staff referral. Councilman Sher then challenged the ruling of the Chair. The ruling 'was reversed by the following roll call vote: Ayes: Noes: Beaters, Dias, Rohrs, Rus, Woodward. Arnold, Comstock, Debs, Flint, Pearson, Sher, Worthington. Yacht Harbor Lease Councilman Rus moved, seconded by Beahrs, that the City ,Attorneys analysis of the County of Santa Clara proposed yacht harbor lease agreement be referred to the City staff for their review with mem- bers of the County staff and the recommendations of the City staff be submitted to Council for further consideration. Councilman Sher moved, seconded by Beahrs, an amendment that the staff should attempt to have the Board of Supervisors present to the City Council a revision of the proposed lease agreement for the yacht harbor that more closely complies with Article Vill of the Charter and with Resolution No. 3881 and eliminates other problems listed iri the City Attorney's analysis. Councilman Rus then declared he would like to restate his motion and include all the aspects of Councilman's Sher's motion to amend. The motion, then carried unanimously. Airport Lease Councilman Rus moved, seconded by Beahrs, that the City Attorney's analysis of the County of Santa Clara's proposers airport lease agree- ment be referred to the City staff for their review with members of the County staff and the recommendations of the City staff be submitted to Council for further consideration. Councilman Sher offered a substitute motion that the Mayor be authorized to execute the lease agreement for an airport subject to certain conditions. Mayor Dias ruled that the mOC.on to refer had precedence and Councilman Sher withdrew his criztion. The motion to refer failed on majority voice vote. Councilman Sher moved, and it was duly seconded, that the Mayor be authorized to execute the lease agreement proposed by the County of Santa Clara subject to the following conditions: 1) the lease agree- ment is to provide with respect to lands dedicated for park purposes that it is subject to approval by the people in accordance with Soc. 3. Article VIII of the Charter; 2) the lease will include a pas+rtgrapb 325 8/8/66 referring to requirements of Section 8, Article VIII of the Charter; 3) the lease will include provision with regard to landscaping, simi- lar to paragraph 6 of the Yacht Harbor Lease; 4) that paragraph 10-d of the lease agreement will include gas service; and 5) that paragraph 14 of the lease agreement be deleted. The motion carried on majority voice vote. Councilman Debs complimented City Attorney Michalski on the very complete analyses presented of both the yacht harbor and the ai-port proposed lease agreements. Councilman Sher moved, and it was duly seconded, to reconsider the proposed airport lease agreement just voted upon. The motion carried unanimously. Councilman Sher then stated that he wished to add a sixth condition to those included in his motion which gad just carried. He moved that the new lease agreement provide for rights -of -way for addi- tional outfall lines and sanitary sewer lines. Discussion followed c cacerning possibilities of there being other questionable sections in the proposed lease which might come to light under study. Councilman Sher then withdrew his motion that the Mayor be author- ized to execute the agreement subject to six conditions and moved, seconded by Rua, that the City staff be authorized to discuss the proposed lease with the County staff and attempt to see that the same six points are incorporated into the discussion as well as any others that might be considered desirable. City Manager Morgan stated that the matter would be handled as Promnpt.ly as _possible, and no definite tirinetable_vvas_added to the motion. The motion carried unanimously. On -Sale Beer and Wine License a s rive -m, i efield Road Councilman Rohrs moved, and it was duly seconded, to file without action the application of Woody's Drite-in for on -sale beer and wine license. The motion carried unanimously. (Councilrrian Woodward left the Chambers at 10;14 and did not return. Councilman Rue left the Chambers at 10:14.) Ada front Develo inent Committee Councilman Flint :roved, seconded by Pearson that the Council direct the Mayor to write Mr. Frank Crist, Chairman of the Bay. front Development Committee, asking for a clear statement of the 326 8/8/66 p•,rpose and scope of this Committee. Among other things, it is desired to know the following concerning the Committee's assign- ments: 1) Is it limited to North County proper? 2) Is to cover marine parks along the entire shoreline of the County? 3) Is it to cover planning of the total development (not just recreation) of the entire shoreline? Councilman Flint then moved, and it was duly seconded, an amend- ment that the Council ask the Mayor to write to the velopment Committee rather than to Mr. Crist. The motion as amended carried on the following roll call vote: Com took, Debs, Flint, Pearson, Sher; Worthington. Arnold, Beahrs, Dias, Rohrs. Proposed Stanford Extension of Willow Road - efete Dedication Requirement Councilman Arnold moved, seconded by Beahrs, to delete the con- dition that Stanford dedicate to the City of Palo Alto as a public road that proposed section of Willow Road extending wester'y from El Camino Real, from the approval given by the Council to this project on June 27, 1966. (Councilman Rus returned at 10:20) Mr. Dave Casto from the Business Office of Stanford University asked to speak. He stated that Stanford's trustees were disap- pointed tkaat the Council's approval of the Willow Road extension included dedication of the property and were not prepared to pro- needsubiect to that conditto n. PP_ot,t ;.-.a.� Ce.....f..rel ...es__ _ _..e o_ - :::::wu vtssu�vrc3-a-trrJ�J�C.Lat313$- to dedicating the property as a public road, since it is anticipated the property would be purcha.sed by the State at some later date when there are definite plans for a Willow Road freeway. Councilman Flint asked Mr. Casto how much of the roadway was expected to be included in the freeway. Mayor Dias ruled that Councilman Flint was not speaking on the subject before the Coun- cil. She asked for directioe as to -whether the Council desired to hear further from him. The roll call vote was as follows: Ayes: Noes: Comstock, Debs, Flint, Pearson, Sher, Worthington. Arnold, Beaters, Dias, Rohrs, Rus. Councilman Flint was then permitted to ask his question as to how much of the roadway under discussion would be expected to be pant of a possible Willow Road freeway. 327 8/8/66 Mr. Casto replied that while the freeway was not expected to be exactly where the road is, all the property would be involved. The motion was defeated on the following roll call vote: Ayes: Arnold, Beahrs, Dias, Rohrs, Rus. Noes: Comstock, Debs, Flint, Pearson, Sher, Worthington. Rinconada Park Improvement Councilman Debs moved, and it was duly seconded, that the City Manager be directed to present plans to the Council within 60.days 'or use of the proposed $100, 000 improvement to Rinconada Park, especially in regard to use of houses and lots at the corner of Hopkins and Pine and on the tie-in with the substation and park plan. The motion carried on majority voice vote. Summary for Froposal for sans or .aTionTn Sail -a ara County Councilman Flint -rno;ed, seconded by Pearson, that the Council direct the representative on the Transportation Policy Committee, Col ncilman Cooley, to implement this transportation policy before said Committee (Summary Proposal submitted by Councilman Flint). Councilman Beahrs moved, seconded by Rus, .4o continue the matter until Councilman Cooley is present. The motion failed on the fol- lowing roll call. vote: Ayes: Arnold, Beabrs, Dias, Rohrs, Rus. Noes: Comstock, Debs, Flint, Pearson, Sher, Worthington. (Councilmen Rohrs and Beahrs left at 10:40 and did not return.) Councilman Flint's motion then carried on the following roll call vote: Ayes: Comstock, Debs, Flint, Pearson, Sher,Worthington. Noes: Proposed, igreernent for Community Recreation Services Arnold, Dias, Rua. Councilman Sher moved that the City Attorney be directed to pre- pare for the next packet an analysis of the proposed school agree- ment particularly where it des provision for increased reciprocity between the City and the school district in the use of facilities and See Page 330 28 /8/66 equipment and consolidates all existing written and generally accepted policies currently in effect between the two jurisdictions and pertain- ing to recreation service exclusive of those relating to swimming pool programs and activities. Councilman Arnold raised the point of order that a non -agenda item would require seven votes for carriage. The motion was duly seconded and failed on the following roll call vote: Ayes: Noes: Comstock. Debs, Flint, Pearson, Sher, Worthington. Arnold, Dias, Rus. Civic Center Ballot Argument Councilman Pearson: referred to the Ballot Argument (copies of which were. distributed to Council) in support of Proposition A, "Shall a combined high-rise City Hall -Public Safety complex be constructed at the Downtown Library site in the block bounded by Hamilton, Ramona, Forest and Bryant?" She stated that the section of the Argument entitled "Bonus Reasons" included reference to a "Downtown branch library" and "public rest rooms", although in- clusion of the library in the plan was defeated and : ublic rest rooms had never been included as part of the plan or of any discussion. Councilman Pearson moved, seconded by Debs, that the City Clerk be instructed to send a copy of the Minutes covering her statement together with copies of the Minutes of various dates since June 14, 1965 whichsupport her statement to the Palo Alto Times and the San Jose Mercury. The motion carried on the following roll can vote: .Ayes: Comstock, Debs, Dias, Flint, Pearson, Sher, Worthington. Noes: Arnold, Rus. Wr itten C ornmulaications Letter from Mr. Jack F. Liberatore and others requesting the new park on Amarillo Avenue be named the "Charles E. Guenther Park." Mayor Dias moved that sht, be given approrat to set up a committee consisting of Councilman Beaters and Deba and her- self to return to Council with recommendations for names for parks, fire department stations, substations and any other such City peoperty and recommended that Mr. Liberatore's letter be referred to the Committee. The motion carried on majority voice vote. 329 8/8/66 Written Communications (Cont'd) Letter from Mr. John Grant regarding the planting reserve at 3583 South Court. City Manager Morgan referred to his letter of July 28 to Mr. Grant and stated that the matter had been handled and Mr. Grant has obtained the permit he requested. Councilman Comstock moved, seconded by Worthington, that the itern be filed subject to receipt of the anticipated report from staff on the entire problem at the Fairrneadow area. The motion carried unanimously. Economic Opportunity Commission Mayor Dias annoenced that in accordance with the direction of Council she wished to appoint Councilman Worthington as the Coun- cil's representative to Service Area 9 of the Economic Opportunity Commission. Councilman Arnold moved, and it was duly seconded, to ratify the s.ppointrfent of Co.arcLman Worthington. The motion carried unani- mously. Condolences On behalf of all of the members of the City Council of Palo Alto, Mayor Dias expressed condolences to Mr. William M. Brophy of the Planning Commission upon the death of his wife Mary. Allejed Public Nuisance, 4127 El Camino Real Mr, Paul Hardy, 4129 El Camino Way: asdcaal_ tospeal� crr+rerning the-lleged public nuisance at 412? El Camino Real. He stated that he arrived too late to contribute his comments when the City Manager's report was under discussion, but wanted to comment that the ei.tuaticn is not under control. Mayor Dias replied that since the matter is being continued for three month. during which time another status report will be pre- pared, that Mr. Hardy should address any complaints to Police Chief Hydie. She .asked the City Clerk to provide Mr. Hardy with copies of the City Manager's report and of the Minutes of the August 8 Council Meeting. .Adjou nrnent The Councilmeeting adjourned at 11:12 p. m.