HomeMy WebLinkAbout04121971M1NUTES
city of palo alto
April 12, 1971
The Council of the City of Palo Alto met on this date at 7:30 p.m.
in a regular meeting with Mayor Wheatley presiding.
Present: Arnold, Beahrs, Berwald, Clark, Comstock, Dias,
Pearson, Spaeth, Wheatley
Absent: Gallagher, Norton
Report Regardr. Santa Clara
County Water Commission
MOTION: Councilman Pearson moved, seconded by Spaeth, to
continue the item to the next meeting (April 19, 1971).
The motion carried unanimously on a voice vote.
Election Officers and Polling
Places - General Municipal Election
MOTION: Councilman Berwald introduced the following resolution
and moved, seconded by Arnold, its adoption:
Resolution No. 4440 entitled "Resolution of the Council of the
City of Palo Alto Designating Precincts and Naming Election
Officers For The General Municipal Election To Be Held On
May 11, 1971"
The resolution was adopted on a unanimous voice vote.
1971-72 Cit .n r s Budget
1971-7 Consrnurii Ian rovement Pro ram
SoneermineemOk
MOTION: Councilman Beahre moved, seconded by Berwald, to
refer to the Finance Committee the 1971-72 City Manager's Budget
and the 1971-76 Community Improvement Program.
The motion carried unanimously on a voice vote.
Mayor Wheatley urged members of the Council other than Committee
rnembera to attend the Finance Committee budget meetings.
52
4/12/71
Park and Recreation Building Use
Regulation Amendments (CMR :786:1)
MOTION: Councilman Beahrs introduced the following ordinance
and moved, seccnded by Dias, its approval for first reading:
"Ordinance of the Council of the City of Palo Alto Amending
Chapter 22,04 of the Palo Alto Municipal Code (Parks) to
Provide for the Payment of Fees for Park and Building Usage,
to Prohibit Hunting or Molesting of Animals in Parks, Pro-
hibiting Animals in Certain Posted Areas of Parks or Buildings,
Closing All Parks Between 3:►0C A. M. and Sunrise and Pro-
hibiting Parking at the Golf Course, Midnight to 5:00 A.M."
Discussion followed regarding various sections of the ordinance.
MOTION: Councilman Berwald rnoved, seconded by Pearson, to
refer the proposed ordinance regarding Park and Recreation
Building use regulations to the Public Works Committee.
The motion to refer carried on the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Arnold, Beahrs, Berw.vald, Pearson, Spaeth
Noes: Clark, Comstock, Dias, Wheatley
1
Liciuor License - Palo Alto Club
567 -Melville Avenue (CMR:783:1)
Mayor Wheatley, Councilman Arnold and Councilman Spaeth, as
members of the Palo Alto Club, refrained from discussion or
voting on this item.
MOTION: Councilman Dias moved, seconded by Pearson, to file
without action the application for an original "Social Luncheon Club"
license for the Palo Alto Club, 567 Melville Avenue.
The motion carried on a majority voice vote.
Executive Session
4115 11,1111111.
MOTION: Councilman Comstock moved, seconded by Wheatley, to -
hold an Executive Session for the purpose of discussing personnel
matters during the recess or at the end of the meeting.
The rnotion carried unanimously on a voice vote.
Unive• ".ity Avenue District Street
Li kiting and Beautification Projects
(CMR:787:1)
City Manager Morgan briefly reviewed his re?ort of April 8th
identifying some of the objectives to continuation of the project in
a modified form. He stated that if there is interest in moving ahead
with the project, new hearings should be held but if there is no
interest, the project should be terminated.
Mayor Wheatley stated if there were no objections the Council
would hear from representatives of. Downtown Palo Alto, Inc.,
and others who wished to address the Councilon this matter,
There were no objections.
Don Klages, President of Downtown Palo Alto, Inc., stated their
Board of Directors had rnet and voted unanimously to move ahead
on the Lighting and Beautification programs as proposed and were
in favor of the program heinp phased over a three year period of
time.
Ray Witt, 769 Aden Court, stated he was employed at. Z40 Hamilton
and spoke in favor of the lighting and beautification project.
Iiiacussion followed as to the impact this project would have on the
budget and other priorities.
In response to question as to how his item can be kept open, City
Attorney Stone advised that the appropriate action, if the Council
wishes to refer, would be first a motion to retain jurisdiction and
continue the item for a period of 60 days followed wit`1 a motion
for referral to the Finance Committee.
Regarding the City's corrxnitment, City Manager Morgan stated
that the commitment is of no importance unless the Council orders
the work to be done and the improvements constructed. He stated
the assessment costs are spread one. front foot basis to properties
benefited.
MOTION: Councilman Spaeth rnoved, seconded by Clark, that the
Council retain jurisdiction of the University Avenue District Street
Lighting and Beautification projects and continue for sixty (60) days.
The motion carried unanimously on a voice rote.
MOTION: Councilman Spaeth moved, seconded by Clark, to refer
all financial aspects of the University Avenue District Street
Lighting and Beautification projects to the Finance Committee for
review concurrently with the budget and Community Improvement
Program.
The mot -inn ra rri od !Jraatsi graesu!Iy on a voice vote.
54
4/12/71
MOTION: Councilman Clark moved, seconded by Arnold, that the
plans for the University Avenue District Street Lighting and Beauti-
fication projects be referred to the Public Works Committee for
review and participation by the downtown property owners.
The motion carried unanimously on a voice vote.
(The Council recessed to an Executive Session for the purpose
of discussing personnel matters from 8:45 to 9:23 p.m.)
Lytton School Site Proposal by
Community Housing, Inc.
Mayor Wheatley asked representatives of Community Housing, Inc,
to present their proposal.
Marshall Virello, 727 Northampton Drive, President of Community
Housing, Inc. , gave a brief background of the Corporation and
introduced Mr. Reese, a member of their Board of Directors.
David Reese, 2073 Sandalwood Court, presented slides showing the
proposed development, elderly population of Palo Alto and proposed
financing. He stated that their proposal is that, contingent upon
receiving a P -C zoning for this project and funding through Section 236
by HUD, the City of Palo ?`alto sell the Lytton School site to Com-
rnunity Housing, Inc., payable as follows: $455, 000 at the time of
the initial loan closing which immediately precedes the start of con-
struction, plus $300, 000 to be paid over a three year period at the
end of the mortgage term. He stated it was their hope the City
would furnish a letter of intent which they could give to HUD saying
the City would enter into a binding contract for the sale of the for-
mer Lytton School property subject to its development for low in-
come housing and also that the City give favorable consideration to
P -C zoning.
Discussion followed with Mort Schaffran, 311 California Street,
San Francisco, consultant for the proposed project, answering
questions from Council as to the possibility of a long term lease.
MOTION: Councilman Clark moved, seconded by Pearson, to refer
to the Finance Committee, for Council Agenda consideration as soon
as possible, the proposal of Community Housing, Inc. for purchase
of 7 ytton Se_hnnl Rife,
the ie� ... -
The motion carried unanimously on a voice vote.
Stanford Land Use Policy Hearings
MOTION: Councilman Pearson moved, seconded by Comstock, that
the Mayor be directed to write a letter to Chairman Ernest Arbuckle,
Stanford Trustee's Committee on Land Development, requesting
[. L. t L Ran-mss:c =L: S w.nio Land ITBP__ o ry a! d plan as prepared
prep,.ax ed
by Livingston and B1a•,niev be open public hearings,
55
4/12/71
Mayor Wheatley asked if there were any objections to hearing from
the public at this time although there is a motion before the Council.
There were no objections.
Dorothy Reed, 632 Glenbrooke Drive, speaking for the League of
Women Voters, spoke; in favor of open public hearings by Stanford.
Mayor Wheatley referred to a letter dated April 12, 1971 from
Kenneth M. Cuthbertson, Vice President for Finance of Stanford
University, regarding open public hearings held with adjoining
jurisdictions and their plans to appear at similar hearings in
Palo Alto.
The motion failed on a majority voce vote.
See Page 69
Ap iication for Liquor License
530 R arnona Street (CMI :785:1)
Councilman Dias drew attention to the report from the City Manager
dated April 7, 1971 regarding an error in .information given to
Council relative to the application for a liquor license at 530 Ramona
and noting that a permit for a third on -sale liquor establishment
in that block would have to be denied if the proposed ordinance
were in effect.
MOTION: Councilman Dias moved, seconded by Beahrs, thst the
Council rescind their previous action to file without action the
application for an ' On Sale General (Eating Place)" license at
530 Ramona Street and direct the Planning and Procedures Com-
mittee to report back to Council on the proposed ordinance es-
tablishing liquor permits by the next meeting in April.
Discussion followed regarding the difference between wine and
beer licenses and a general license for a restaurant, with City
Attorney Stone advising that the proposed ordinance covers all
"On 'Sale Licenses."
In response to questions, Mr. Stone advised that the City has until
the end of April to protest this particular application. i% protest
under that specific provision of general law which provides a pro-
test can be made on the basic that the issuance of the license
would violate a coning law,requires that the ordinance be in full
force and effect at the time of the hearing on the protest. If the
protest is made on that basis and that basis manna, the ordinance
would have to be in effect at the time of the protest hearing. He
pointed out that the purpoec of the ordinaAce is not to control or
regulate the dispensation of liquor per sae. It is similar to the
zoning ordinance regulating ea rtvi c e stations in certain areas.
The motion carried on a majority voice vote.
56
411Z/71
Lands Below .Foothills mark -
Designation
City Manager Morgan referred to comments by Councilman Comstock
concerning a Tentative Subdivision Map near Page Mill Road and
Monte BeiioRoad, noting that the lands below the park within the
corporate limits of the City are not precisely defined. He com-
mented that as the City approaches acquisition a definitive area is
necessary in the City's applications for funding. He added that the
Council ?night want to exclude some areas because of the cost of
acquisition. With this area clarified the City could deal with building
permit applications more effectively.
MOTION: Councilman Berwald moved, seconded by Comstock, to
refer to the Planning and Procedures Committee the matter of pre-
cise designation of lands below Foothills Park.
The motion carried unanimously on a voice vote.
Rinconada Park - Naming
of Redwood Grove
Councilman Dias referred to a letter dated March 31, 1971 from
the Edith Ellery Patton Menorlal_ Committee requesting that the
redwood grove in Rinconada Park be named iiThe Magic Forest"
and requesting permission to have a sign erected.
MOTION: Councilman Dias moved, seconded by Comstock, to
refer to the Public Facilities Naming Committee the request for
naming the redwood grove in Rinconada Park.
The motion carried unanimously on a voice vote.
Fire Protection erations--
a�cta Cara unt
Mayor Wheatley stated he had received a letter from Howard W.
Carnpen, County Executive, requesting that the attached report on
Fire Protection Operations in Santa Clara County be reviewed.
MOTION: Mayor Wheatley moved, seconded by Comstock, to
refer the Fire Protection Operations in Santa Clara County report
the '-a Proc '"4i1Mittee for review and policy
to the s- a.`i._i is i.-#g- and �' • V�,���ia- 7G ii 4t. ii,., p y
recommendations.
The motion carried unanimously on a voice vote.
Adjournment
The meeting adjourned at 9:35 p.m.
APPROVED:
Ma or
ATTEST:
J
Acting City Clerk
Se
4/12/71