Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04241972MINUTES city of palo alto April 24, 1972 The City Council of the City of Palo Alto met on this date at 7:30 p.m. in a regular meeting with Mayor Comstock presiding. Preset: Beahrs, Berwald, Clark, Comstock, Henderson, Pearson, Rosenbaum, Sem«r.. Absent: Norton Minutes of Aril 3, 1972 Mayor Comstock noted that on Page 554, sixth paragraph, and also on Page 558, third paragraph, the name "Freda Jackson" is incorrect and should read "Freda Johnson." He noted also that on Page 559 "Cordon Newall" should read "Gordon New�l1." Councilman Henderson referred to a note dated April 24th, from the City Clerk, which confirmed that an Agenda item "Site and Design Control -- Standard Oil of California, 2160 El CaniLo Real" had been omitted from the Mtnu es of April 3rd and should be inserted on Page 565, directly after the paragraph commencing "(Councilman Berwald left the meeting...)". The insert to read: "Site and Desi n Control - Standard Oil of California. 21 0 El Canino Real "MOTION: Mayor Comstock moved, seconded by Beahrs, that Council uphold the recommendation of the Planning Commission and approve the application of Standard Oil of California for Site and Design Control approval of building modifications at 2160 El Camino Real, Zone District C -3-S. "Councilman Henderson noted that the specifications contain three new landscape areas which apparently are not included in the iequest for design approval. He asked if there is any way the City can have solid assurance that the landscaping will be put ii, as shown on the map. "Mrs. Mary Gordon, Chaff, rraan of the Planning ° Coimissioa, advised that this matter waa raised at the Planning Commission meeting and they were assured the landscaping would be put in as shown on the map. "The motion passed on a unanimous voice vote." >OTlON: Councilman Henderson moved, seconded by Berwald, that the state- ment reproduced above be made a part of the record of the April 3, 1972 Council Meeting. The motion passed on a unanimous voice vote. NOTION: It was moved, duly seconded, that the Minutes of April 3 ba approved as corrected. The motion passed on a unanimous voice vote. 4 4 4/24/72 Minutes of April 10, 1972 On Page 14, Mayor Comstock made a correction to the spelling of Mrs. E.L. Artemas Ginzton's name. Councilman Henderson referred to Page 7, the last paragraph, third line, and noted that this should read "...that about a $ .20 per month in- crease..." rather than "2O%", as shown. It was moved, duly seconded, and on :t ,,nanimous voice vote that the Minutes of April 10, 1972, be approved as corrected. Public Hearing - Appeal of afrry J. Be er for eliet rocs Or inane No. 2647 (CMR:244, 2) Mayor Comstock stated this is the time and place for a Public Hearing on the application of Harry J. Beyer for relief from Ordinance No. 2647 es- tablishing a moratorium on subdivision and development in the Palo Alto foothills. He stated that members of the public wishing to speak to this cutter would be heart` and asked the City Clerk to confirm that notice of this hearing had been published as required. City Clerk Tanner stated that the notice of the Public Hearing was pub- lished on April 20, 1972 and the affidavit of publication is on file in the City Clerk's office. Mayor Comstock asked the Director of Planning and Community Development Fourcroy to speak to this issue. Mr. Fourcroy stated that Mr. Harry Beyer's appeal concerns 22.27 acres of land near the intersection of Page Mill Road anct. Montebello Road. The applicant, Harry Beyer, claims that he will endure great hardship if his appeal for relief from the ordinance is rejected because he is a ;tingle property owner and the hardship of maintaining carrying costs, such as taxes, assessments and mortgage payments, affect him to a greater degree than other foothills' property owners. Staff's recommendation is that this application be denied, as to grant relief to Mr. Beyer would present a serious threat to those features in the foothills which the City Council has indicated it wants to preserve. In addition, it is felt that Mr. Beyer has not demonstrated that he has suffered an extraordinary hard- ship by having his detelopleent delayed. -M Responding'to a question from Councilman Beahrs regarding the right of the applicant to take the Council's decision, whatever it may be, to court, City Attorney Stone said no one is ever denied the opportunity to trial. Mayor Comstock stated that Council would now hear from the applicant and those members of the public who wished to speak. Roger Crist, Attorney, 550 Hamilton Avenue, representing Mr. Harry J. Beyer, reiterated the fact that compliance with the ordinance would cause an extreme hardship on Mr. Beyer. His client, a retired airline pilot, has been forced to sell other vacation property in order to meet the expenses of this land. Pleading for Mr. Beyer, Mr. Crist noted that, under the terms of the moratorium, the owners of larger parcels are in a better position than Mr. Beyer. Mayor Comstock decl red the public hearing closed. MOTION: Councilman Pearson moved, seconded by Henderson, that Council deny the appeal of Harry J. Beyer for relief frceo Ordinance No. 2647 establishing a moratorium on subdivision and development in the Palo Alto foothills. Councilman Berwald raised questions for Mr. Fourcroy concerning Mr. Beyer's application and whether it was for the same 19 lot subdivision applied for before. Mr. Fourcroy replied thet Mr. Beyer's petition did not indicate dates, but it vas assumed that his application for relief was for the purpose of subdividing the land in a similar manner to that applied for before. Councilman Berwald indicated that he did not see any unique hardship being imposed on Mr. Harry Beyer. The motion passed on a unanimous voice vote - A. ligation of Board of Trustees o t e i eland Stanford Junior �n� 7t y - Change of District 7f1'iiperty, 26S0j 274 and 2 80 El Camino Peal MOTION: Mayor Comstock moved, seconded by Beahrs, that Agenda item 8 be considered out of order at this time for purpceies of continuance. The motion passed on a unanimous voice vote. MOTION: Mayor Comstock moved, duly seconded,, that the application of the Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University for a change of disc.7ict of property at 2650, 2740 and 2-W1 El Camino Real from P -F and C- e S to C-3: S -t) be continued to June 19 . 1972 as requested by the app li c::,- t . The mot;.on passed on a unanimous voice vote. Re,ort;from Re resentative of Santa c: ara County Planning Policy Commit te e ommigiMM I4,.1.0 Mayor Comstock asked Councilman Pearson to F:port. Councilman Pearson referred to her memo to t:.Rtncil dated April 20, 1972 regarding the Planning Policy Committee General Funding; Committee meeting with HUD officials and the proposal for a ceoutywide general funding program. Councilman. Pearson noted that the oemo received by the PPC General Funding Committee from the Santa C1.z, r a County staff, dated April 12th, had also been forwarded to Counc:1 and she said the Committee had asked each repres'entative to get their Council's reactions. Councilman Clark th:;: ked Councilman Pearsc;: for attending the meetings held by the General ''ending Committee and sefd that as alternate dele- gate to the PPC she 'read taken on this duty for attendance at four or five meetings. The Council received Councilman Pearaon's report and took no action on this item. 46 4/24/72 Skyline Joint Powers Committee Manor Comstock asked Councilman Pearson, Council representative to the Skyline Joint Posers Committee, to report. Councilman Pearson referred to her memo to Council dated April 20th, and noted that each Councilman had received the minutes of the Skyline Joint Powers Committee and the newly adopted Skyline Route, plus some standards to be applied to the route. Councilman Pearson said her recommendation was that the standards adopted by the Joint Powers Committee be sent to the Planning Commission and staff for comparison with the City's own standards for Skyline. NOTION: Councilman Pearson moved, seconded by Seman, that the standards adopted by the Joint Powers Committee be sent to the Planning Commission and staff for comparison with the City's own standards for Skyline. The motion passed on a un.nimous voice vote. Urban Bicycle Rolfe -stem - Pian -E" (CMR:2 :2) MOTION: Mayor Comstock moved, seconded by Eeahrs, that. item 10 on the Agenda (Request of Councilman Sez a.t to amend the resolution establishing Plan "SE") be considered out of order at this time, concurrently with second reading of the ordinance. The motion passed on a unanir:ous voice vote. Mayor Comstock noted that Agenda items 4 and 10 were now both before Council. MOTION: Mayor Comstock introduced the following ordinance and moved, seconded by Semen, its adoption: Ordinance No. 2652 entitled "Ordinance of the Council of the City of Palo Alto Establishing Bicycle Lanes and Paths on Certain City Streets and Authorizing Implementation Thereof; and Amending Sections 10.04.040, 10.64.100, 10.64.180, and 10.64.190 of the PAMC, Repealing Sections 10.64.110 and 10.64.150 of the PAMC, and Adding Sections 10.64.185 and 10.64.187 to the PAMC Providing for the Regulation of Bicycle Licensing and Operation." (first reading 4/10/72) The ordinance was adopted on a unanimous voice vote. Mayor Comstock asked Councilman. Se( to present her amendment to the resolution adopted 4/1C/72 concern.it_.'Plan "E". Councilman Semen stated that in her opinion the 12 hour parking ban along one side of Route "E" streets was unnecessarily restrictive to the resi- dents. She would therefore propose amendments to change the 7 a.e. to 7 p.m. parking restriction to 7 a.m. to 9 a.m. and 3 p.m. to 7 p.m. which would offer protection to the cyclists during the hours most hazardous to them because of the increased motor vehicle and bicycle traffic, and at the same time provide relief to the residents along the route. Councilman Seman stated that she did not believe that enforcement of these periods would be more difficult, nor would it make the signs less attractive or more difficult to understand. Part-time parking prohibitions are customary, readily understood and enforceable. 4 7- 4/24/72 MOTION: Councilman Sem.an moved, seconded by Berwaid, that the reso- lution establishing Plan "E" be amended to change the 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. parking restriction to 7 a.m. to 9 a.m. and 3 p.m. to 7 p.m. Mayor Comstock stated that Council would hear from those members c'f the public who had requested to speak on the different points raised by Councilman Seman. Steve McMillan, 574 Addison, outlined his "unique" problem, :stating that his home is the only one west of Middlefield with no garage and no driveway. The only parkin3 available for his two cars is on the street. Parking on the south side of Middlefield is totally banned. He suggested removi.tg the parking ban to the north side of the street and "passing the problem on to someone else", since a physical survey of the area indicated that there are no other fatally residences with this problem. Bruce Ball, 161 B, Escuela, Mountain View, President of the Santa Clara Valley Bicycle Association, spoke in favor of the bike routes. He said if lanes are to be used reasonably effectively, should z��itieiy, the restrictions Ci«v:cs be made less- complicated. 7 a.m. to 9 a.m. and 3 p.c:. to 7 p.m. would have a small effect on the actual parking along those streets. Re- moving bike lanes on the weekends relegates bicycles to a r ,ore second class mc;de of transportation, he added. Marjorie Bayha, 1729 Middlefield Road, spoke to the subject of shorter hours for enforcement of a parking ban and said the suggested reductions would make it easier and lessen the restrictions. People are used to partial parking bans, she noted. Jean Slocum, 550 N. California Avenue, indicated that a survey taken on California Avenue between 7 and 9 a.m. revealed between 36 and 42 bi- cyclists. Between 9:30 and 3:30 the average figure was six bikes go- ing either way on Middlefield. These statistics were gathered on 4 separate days. Mrs. Slocum noted that the frequency of cyclists in- creases again after 4 p.m. and a ban at that time is feasible. However, she said the frequency definitely decreases between 9 a.', and 2 p.m. Mrs. Slocum made further remarks regarding frequency counts taken by the staff on bicycle traffic. Councilman Clark indicate" to Mrs. Slocum that Council had before them detailed figures supplied by the Traffic Engineer indicating the number of cars versus bikes in tha affected areas. Mrs. Slocum stated that she had not known these figures were available. Roy Petersen, 420 Felton Drive, Menlo Park, President, Western Wheelers Bicycle Club, nnted that there will be more bicyclists on the streets during the summer vacation and what happens then will be importai:t. He cited figures from the City of Davis, California, which has an esti- mated 31,000 bicyclists, and 22,000 registered bikes which are used for transportation. Davis has found its bike lanes extremely effective and sucr.-essful. There have been few auto and bike accidents. Councilman Rosenbaum raised questions aboutttaetraffic situation on Middlefield Road on Sunday mornings, particularly in relation to the parking ban existing at that time when people are going to ehurch. Acting Assistant City Manager Walker indicated that there are no easy answers to enforcing the parking ban on Sunday. One alternative might 4 8 4/24/72 be to exempt Sunday morning parking or for people to park on streets other than Middlefield. He cited other areas in the City where churches are located on Oe bicycle route system, and the same problem might be experienced, such as North California. Councilman Clark stated that although he had attempted to include limita- tions on the parking times when this subject was first discussed, he now found .hat he was moving in the op,osite direction and supported the feeling indicated by the statistics that the full restrictions are best from the safety point of view. Councilman Beahrs stated that he, too, would oppose this amendment to the resolution. He said he still believed that the best plan would be a simple one with fewer variables, which would be less confusing to all concerned. Cout►cilman Henderson quoted statistics showing that 421 of all auto- mcbile accidents on Plan "E" streets occur between 12 noon and 3 p.m. He noted also that it has been recorded that there is a higher number of accidents in June and July when there is no school. He said he would prefer no parking ban at all rather than see the amendments sug- gested by Councilman Seman passed. He reminded Council that the plan can always be modified later, but said he would prefer no exceptions at this time. The motion failed on a majority voice vote. 1 1 MOTION: Councilman Seman moved, seconded by Clark, that the resolution establishing Plan "E" - Bicycle Routes and Improvements - be amended to exempt Sundays and Holidays from the parking prohibitions. Further discussion ensued regarding the possibility of exempting Middle- field Road from the parking ban on Sunday mornings, with Acting Assistant City Manager Walker stating that the alternatives would he to exempt all day Sunday from the restrictions. However, he pointed out that if this action is taken in respect to Middlefield Road, there would certainly be other areas of the City that would expect equal treatment. Jeff Kahrs, 342' Janice Way, Palo Alto, indicated that he rides his bicycle everywhere. He spoke in opposition to putting hike lanes on the sidewalks, stating that it is dangerous, and said he would be opposed to any ban on sidewalks or streets. The motion failed on a majority voice vote. MOTION: Councilman Seman moved, duly seconded, that the resolution establishing Plan "E" - Bicycle Routes and Improvements - be amended to restore tke lanes along certain sections of Middlefield Road to the street instead of the sidewalk. - 1. At Loma Verde to East Meadow. The motion passed on a unanimous voice vote. MOTION: Councilman Seman moved to =end the resolution establishing Plan "E" - Bicycle Route and Improvements - to zt:store tite lanes along certain sections of Middlefield Road to th>> stre.>.t instead of the side- walks - 2. Addison to Oregon Expressway. The motion died for lack of a second. Underground Utility District No. 15 MOTION: Councilman Berwald introduced the following ordinance and moved, seconded by Beahrs, its adoption: Ordinance No. 2653 entitled 'An Ordinance Amending Section 12.16.020 of Chapter 12.16 of Title 12 of the Palo Alto Municipal Code by Establishing Underground Utility District No. 15" (first reading 4/10/72) The Ordinance was adopted on a unanimous voice vote Reduced Transit Fares for nnior Citizens CMR:245:2) Mayor Comtack asked City Manager Sipel to report: City Manager Sipel stated he had nothing to add to his report to Council of April 20, 1972 recommending that the' Council authorize the continuation of the reduced fare program for senior citizens for the next six months, June 1 through December 31, 1972, at a total cost of $2,940. MOTION: Councilman Pearson moved, seconded by Councilman Henderson, that Coueci1 authorize the staff to continue the reduced fare program for senior citizens through Gee er.:i er 31, 1972. Councilman Rosenbaum commented that it was interesting to see that the number of senior citizens' bus trips tripled in the month of March, 1972. The motion passed on a unanimous voice vote. South Bay Dischargers Study (CMR:242:2) Mayor Comstock noted that Council had received the staff report of April 20, 1972,_which recommended that the issues contained in this report be re- ferred to the Finance and Public Works Committee. MOTION: Councilman Clark moved, seconded by Berwald, that the South'Bay Dischargers Study be referred to the Finance and Public Works Committee for review within 45 days. The motion passed on a unanimous voice vote. Palo Alto Af cart Naster Plan - Yte erral to Planning Commission bated 4/3/72 - Mayor Comstock asked Councilman Clark to speak to this item. Councilman Clark referred to his memo dated April 20th, and stated that he felt that the Council's referral on April 3, 1972 to the Planning Com- mission of the Airport Master Plan was inappropriate at a time when the Planning Commission and staff are overwhelmed with assignments. He said that the Planning Commission had formerly reviewed the plans approved by the Council on September 22, 1969, and for this reason he felt it would be appropriate to reconsider ;he Council action of April 3rd. 50 4/24/72 MOTION: Councilman Clark moved, seconded by Beahrs, that Council action of 4/3/72 to re -refer ,the Palo Alto Airport Master Plan to the Planning Commission be rescinded. Councilman Pearson urged the Council to let this matter remain before the Planning Commission so that they can look at the total plan. She ex- pressed particular concern about landscaping plans for the Baylands, and chat plants supposedly living in the area be compatible with the area. Councilman 3erwald stated that while he shared Councilman Pearson's con- cern regarding landscaping plans he would look to staff to take necessary action on any landscaping plan and to follow a careful list !Mayor Comstock expressed the thought that he felt there is a need for a landscape architect on the staff and that there be coordination of plan- ning in this area. City Manager Sipel responded stating that if the problem concerns the type of materials present in the Baylaads and a judgment to be made of the pro- perness of these materials, then he thought there should be someone on the staff who could judge these kinds of matters. If the City does not retain a ;staff person then a contract should be made with someone in the private sector. However, he said he did not think it would be appropriate for the Planning Commission to review these kinds of things. He said it seemed evident that staff should be doing a better job in this direction. Councilman Clark urged Council to support the motion, stating that he felt there should be some mechanism at the staff level to approve landscaping plans. Councilman Pearson agreed that these things should appropriately be handled at the staff level and urged City Manager Sipel to take action in this respect. The motion to rescind the action of April 3, re -referring the Palo Alto Airport Master Plan to the Planning Commission, passed on a majority voice vote. Pea_ Esibilit of Usi Southern Paci is Rights -o -Way as Bicycle Path M TION: Councilman Seman moved, seconded by Comstock, that Council direct the staff to explore the feasibility ,,f using the Southern Pacific right- of-way along Alma .as a bicycle path. Speaking to the motion, Councilman Selman indicated the difficulties_ in the Alga area and she said she felt that there was a better solution than putting bikes on the street and she would therefore suggest that staff explore the feasbility of using the S.P. right -of= -w ay as a bike path. Mayor Comstock said Council would hear from the public on this proposal. Jeff Kahrs, 3421 Janice Way, suggested using a creek area behind Colorado and Louis as a bike path. He further requested that something be done about the storm drains - he has run into them twice on his bicycle. Speaking to the suggestion of utilizing the S.P. right-of-way, Mr. Kahrs aaid the trains whizzing past tended to be a "scary experience" for the bicyclist. 5 1 4/24/72 Larry Rairden, 3340 Cooper Street, suggested putting a bridge next to the S.P. right-of-way for pedestrians and bicyclists. He felt that it would be a good idea to utilize the S.P. right-of-way for this purpose. Mr. Rairden discussed the hazards of crossing El Camino onto Alma, from Menlo Park when entering Palo Alto. Councilman Berwald expressed the desire to hear from staff on this subject. He noted that a proposal had been made to Southern Pacific several years ago regarding use of the right-of-way and at that time the S.P. Company said "no". Councilman Berwald said in his opinion it would be a haz- ardous route for younger cyclists to use. Acting Assistant City Manager Charles Walker said staff would investigate further with Southern Pacific. He indicated that the staff has tried to discuss this problem before and noted that the problem seems to be not in getting answers to this kind of question from Southern Pacific, but finding somebody to talk to. Regarding the mention of storm drains, Mr. Walker indicated that for the past 3 to 4 years the City nen been replacing grates on an annual basis. Councilman Pearson raised the question of a 20' right-of-way existing in the south part of the City. Planning and Community Development Director Fcurcroy responded to Councilman Pearson that to his knowledge there is no specific 20' right-of-way. The notion passed on a majority voice vote. wontrollinL Deli.very of Unsolicited �snniwrarow� iw�a�.��wrs®. is.r s.�raw.v and Dan erous Samples to Residents of Palo Alto Mayor Comstock asked Councilman Pearson to speak to this item. Councilman Pearson read aloud her memo to Council dated .Aril 20, 1972 concerning a recently receiven sample which was attractively wrapped and easily opened by curious young children. The memo expressed the concerns of the danger and annoyance of receiving unsolicited goods in the mail and asked what can the City do to prevent this deluge of dangerous and unsolicited products upon its cir.izer1s. Mayor Comstock said the Council would now hear from the public, Mrs. R. H. Carlstead, 147 Walter Hays Drive, Pa10 Alto, referred to two letters she had written to the City Council dated April 20, 1972. To illustrate her remarks she displayed a snail eamsple box of Clorox which was recently delivered to her home. Mrs. Carlstead described an earlier episode involving her small daughter and referred to a Bill (HR 3499), now pending in the House, which would ban all manufactured samples being delivered through the mail. Councilman Beahrs stated that he would support such legislation and would like to see the staff draw up a resolution referring to this Bill. He said that he would further like to see some form of licensing required for distribution of any such materials, not only through the mail, but throughout Palo Alto. MOTION: Councilman Pearson moved, seconded by Beahrs, that srgff be requested to investigate what action can be taken by the Ci :and report back to Council on May 1st with a resolution expreaaing sy>port for HR 3499, and including a reference to door-to-doov solicitors without licenses. The motion passed on a unanimous voice vote. 5 2 4/24/72 T islation Re MTC A rova1 :,cm� a* tort Bridge .rru� rrrpnr r�ur. Mayor Comstock asked Councilman Rosenbaum to speak to this item. Councilaan Rosenbaum noted that SB 495 is scheduled for hearing before the Senate Transportation Committee on May 1st at 1:30 p.tn. This 13i11 requires approval of the Metropolitan Transit-k,cnzliesion before replace- ment of any bridge crossing the San Franciscs= ;=_ ;- .cific appliration rAlates to the proposed construction of the new = 2r_ Bridge. :►.'ION; Cou cilman Rosenbaum introduced the following resolution and u rfi:d, seconded by Henderson, its adoption: Resolution. No. 4587 entitled "Resolution of the Council of the City of Palo Alto Support•.g SB 495 (Dumbarton Bridge)" The resolution was adopted on a ur:rnirous vaqcc vote. Reouest of California Avenue Area Development Association Mayor Comstock referred to a letter dated April 18 from the California Avenue Area Development Association, Inc., requesting an opportunity to present Stage II of the California Avenue Beautification Plan to the City Council. MOTION: Mayor Comstock moved, seconded by Henderson, that the California Avenue Area Development Associatior's letter of April 12 be referred to the staff for review ani comment. The motion passed on a unanimous voice vote. Feasibility of Designating Cowper Street and/or Other Streets as lxclusive Bic c1e Streets Mayor Comstock recognized Councilman Henderson who wished to present an item of new business. Councilman Henderson referred to earlier discussion; on the bicycle route and made the following motion. WYFION: Councilman Henderson Moved, seconded by Semen, that Council direct the staff to conduct a study and report back on the feasibility of designating Cowper Street and/or other streets as exc1 sive bicycle streets with all through automobile traffic prohibited. The motion passed on a unanimous voice vote. Emergencx.!esolutian Supporting HR 14055 vow Mayor Comstock recognized Councilman Pearson. Councilman Pearson stated t%at in 1971 the citizens of Palo Alto, through the ballot proposition at the Municipal Election expressed their concern about the Viet Nam War. She stated that she felt it was time to take action again ar.d introduced a Resolution, which she read aloud. 5 3 4/24/7r MOTION: Councilman Pearson introduced the following resolution and moved, seconded by Seman, its adoption: Resolution No. 4588 entr tled "Resolution of the Council of the City of Palo Alto Urging the :resident and the Congress of the United States to Halt and Reverse Any Escalation of the War and of the Bombing in South Viet Nam and Supporting HR 14055 Pending in the United States Congress" The resolution was adopted on the following roll call vote: Ayes: Comstock, Henderson, Pearson, Rosenbaum, Seman Noes: Beahrs, Berwald, Clark Oral Communications Mayor Comstock stated that now is the time when Council will. hear from the public. 1. Kenneth J. Freiberg, 842 Clara Drive, referred to the Council Minutes of March 27 and the discussion concerning the City Theatre. Mr. Sipel, City Manager, responded to Mr. Freiberg and invited hire to meet with Al Longacre, Arts Director, and the City Manager to discuss the subject in detail. 2. Eugenia R. Sorensen, 1127 Greenwood Avenue, spoke in support of the resolution adopted tonight concerning the Viet Nam War. 3. Councilman Henderson stated that he wished to thank Mayor Kirke Comstock fo. writing a i.etter to President Nixon advising him again of the City Of Palo Alto's 1971 vote on the Viet Nam War and urging attention to this matter. - 4. Bruce Emmons, 169 Walter Hays Drive, stated that there was a large group°oi Palo Alto High School students present this evening and anxious to address the Council -about the April 21st High School utrike and demonstration against the war. He said that he would like the opportunity to speak later when the students had been heard. 5. Jo --Ann Philo, 2076 Harvard, read a statement suggesting that legislation, which would "go further" than the resolution adopted tonight, be considered. She noted that in May, 1971, the citizens of Palo Alto voted for withdrawal of the United States from Viet Nam. The group she represented would like: 1) that the City of Palo Alto endorse the PRG seven point proposal for peace in Viet Nam; 2) the United States end its invasion of Viet Nam and place on a Council Agenda an i,em which would prohibit any cor- poration from establishing new offices for the defense industry in Palo Alto; 3) that the Folice should not be used to intimidate or harass the students of Palo Alto. 6. Marcia Hall, 1224 Webster Street, read a statement. She said that on April 21st Palo Alto High School student decided to strike to demw►nstrdte their opposition to the Viet Nam War. The demonstration was a peaceful one as it progressed north'on. El Casino, towards Stanford. She described further the events of April 21st and demanded sor. responae from Council. 5 4 4/24/72 7. Peter Kusnierczyk, 4005 Ben Lomond Drive, Palo Alto, explained his participation in the anti -war march and indicated that high school students were attacked by Police when marching peacefully towards Stanford. He also spoke to the rights of juveniles when arrested and asked that Palo Alte Police officers be banned from taking any action against anti -war marches or demonstrations. 8. John Bay, 2261 Columbia, stated that he had not been advised that he was breaking the lair and said he felt that the Police had used 'excessive force," The demonstration began in a peaceful manner, but then the students began to prepare to deal with the Police on a "not very friendly level." He noted that the crowd was tame and mostly liberal, not rac;ical, high school students. John Bay added that his experience of April 21st had "radicalized" him. 9. Laura Dow, 461 Ferne, commented on the April 21st march and said child beating is illegal. Our parents are not allowed to do it, why should the Police be allowed to beat us, she asked. She said she was among these arrested and she was searched without being charged. Something should be done about mass arrests, she continued. 10. Alison Holman, 747 Dolores, said she noticed a junior high school student being shoved and run onto the sidewalk by the tac squad. ThE Police had no right to do this because the march was legal, she said. 11. Barbara Cohen, 820 Lathrop Drive, Stanford, said that she did not hear the Police tell the demonstrators that they could occupy only one Jane. Some of the demonstrators heard that they were to move up onto the sidewalk, but she did not. She also saw a junior high school student clubbed. She asked Council for a response to the remarks this evening. . Karl Collins, 321 Addison, Palo Alto, stated that she was taking children to a child care center on April 2lst when they'saw high school students walking down El Camino in front of them. She stayed behind them,-, cruising slowly, and said she saw kids be- ing clubbed and beaten. Later, she went to Stanford and, with- outh realizing what was going on, was placed under arrest and was told that she would find out what the charges were at the arraignment. She indicated that she felt this action was illegal and Asked for a response from Mayer Comstock. 13. Stanley Kusnierczyk, 4005 Ben Lomond, stated he thought the Council should engage in dialogue with tonight's speakers. He said Thursday, April 20th, at the torchlight parade, a tae squad offi.;er started beating him. They were beating not only young children but gray haired old men too, he said. He also spoke of the "outrage" and "frustration" of the situation. 14. Kari Stangenes, 4.5 Colorado Avenue, likened the evening's events to a book called "Riot Makers." She said the resolution passed by Council. this evening is a disgrace to the U.S.A. and every freedom -loving human -being and said she would like to request that Council protest the invasion of North Viet Nam. 15. Marcia Reaven interrupted at this point and askeil Council foe a response. 16. Dr. George Thomson, 461 Ferne Avenue, said he was distressed by the opinions expressed here tonight and the events of April 21. He was arrested and was not informed of his rights before be- ing taken to the adult facility in Milpitas. 17. Mike Fox, C. W. Noble; Ted Salo, Jean Dolly, and Jim Mumford asked for responses from the Council before addressing Council. 18, Bruce Emmons, 10 Walter Hays Drive,, stated that he felt the march from Palo Alto High Schocl was badly handled by the Police, In his opinion, Students were treated in an excessively rough manner for the circumstances and people involved. 'He asked Council to look carefully at the manner in which Police handled the situa- tion. 19. Annie Gerard, 2243 Greer Road, ci.r.ed the case of a friend of hers who le a diabetic and was arrests.. and then not permitted to get proper food during the time that :she was detained. Annie said she was arrested with other dery :stratore and was taken to Elmwood. Her parents were not :'ntacted as she had been told they would be. The march was :t :ors -violent demonstration and she actied Council to take action so that arrests such as those that occurred ,-41 April 21st will not happen again. The next demon- stration might not be non-+:ioledt, she added. 20. Mike Salo, 3178 Ross Road, Pad. been arrested before and "sett people have been converted co the system will be torn down f Alto, stated that he had never tactics do not work". A lot of radicalism by this experience, and the Council does not take action. 21. Ted Salo, 3178 Ross Road, fatL r of :Bike Salo, stated Oat handling of demonstrators by the Po1ic' during the April 21st demonstration was very poor. 22. Patricia Cox, 651 Lowell Avecie, stared she did not participate in the march but vas at Star:: surd when the march left Eneina Hall walking to El Camino and Etr r_adero, Demonstrators were walk'ng peacefully, arms linked and',inging. She indicated that when the demonstrators got to Ts.:'! & Country Village, the tac squad moved in and threw women oNe' r fences and then clubbec: her. She said there was no excuse f :'°: this kind of behaviour and the tac squad should nut have beer,, ailed in in the first place. 23. Marian Dunckel, 1231 Wilsr, Street, described the events of Thursday, April 20th, at ^.e torchlight demonstration and said she didn't know torches illegal. When she heard that they were illegal she saw pee s putting their torches out on the grass, rather than in a %re place. She indicated that she saw a man get beaten badly. 24. Mary Clark, 488 University, said she- went to Lytton Square on - Thursday night, April 2( h. About 8:10 p.m. she was on the. Stanford campus and saw orches all over the grass. There were police all over the cae2us. She said she was- appalled. at what she saw happening and was sorry that she lived in a place where - people act this way with young peoo14. 5 6 4/24/72 25. Dr. Duane Bay, 2261 Columbia Street, indicated that, in his opinion, the crowd would have been responsive to zeq=pests Lo move without any violence or aggression on the part of the Police. Dr. Bay said that when the demonstrators reached El Camino and Embarcadero the Police went through the inter- section and several of the Police got out of their cars and pushed the students onto the sidewalk much more aggreasiveiy than they should have. He indicated that_on Palm Drive the demonstrators moved in an orderly way. 26. Jean Dolly, 931 Scott Street, said she was behind the high school students and two Police officers when the students were asked to move into one lane. She said the demonstrators cooperated. Later, she saw the tac squad "running on theae kids". She spoke of a citizens' group set up to discuss Police/community relations with the Police and said she was a member of this group which was formed to create rational dialogue between the citizens ant; the Police. 27. C. W. Noble, 933 Scott Street, indicated that one of the seminars mentioned by Mrs. Dolly was to have been held on April 19th. He said the r uncil did not appear to have any control over the Pot . e llepar _r.ent . 28. Mike Fox, 3381 Park Boulevard, said he didn't think that the Police actions scared the demonstrators. On the contrary, they had stayed together and were on the side that is winning. He spoke ir, opposition to the "brutal fascist tactics by the Police against 300 high school students". 29. Bill Strubbe, ?750 University, indicated that he is a Paiy High student and a member of the YAC. He said he would resign from the YAC if Mayor Cerristock did not respond to the demonstrators this evening. They have to know what is going en in the Counc' l's heads, he said. 30. Jeff Youdelman, 720 Waverley, reiterated Mike Fox's comments and urged the demonstrators to go on demonstrating." 31. Simon Hassett, 1537 Louis, described the march and said, that the Police did not inform people they should get out of the street. If Council did not respond to the speakers this evening, it would be assumed that Council condoned the Police actions of Friday, April 21st, he said. 32. Eric Cockroft, 930 Colorado, said Council apparently had no defense for the Police actions. He took several photographs of the City Council, 5 7 4/24/72 D1,i t.. 207 i L .. ,.. ...4�.., :6 hi rv-Ird S rSi.r nt, sail the soeaKe s had �s - `hu �: '+6_.b CLZ' �Q'V�riO ' He quizzes eaca rh't there were some Police officers present eau ▪ renuestea cnet t.:�- x anti 2xnl▪ aat� �: _ -2�r c' The audience rose to its feet and continued hand -clapping for approxi- mately three minutes, making it impossible for speakers to be heard. Adjournment Mayor Comstock declared the meeting adjourned at 11:10 p.m. APPROVED: /J 11_1 Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk, / 5 8 4/24/72