HomeMy WebLinkAboutRESO 99281
Resolution No. 9928
Resolution of the City of Palo Alto Opposing the Valley Transportation
Authority’s 2016 Measure B 10-Year Outlook
Base Scenario
WHEREAS, in 2016, the Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) Board of Directors placed
before the voters of Santa Clara County Measure B, a one-half cent sales tax measure operative
for 30 years that would fund nine program categories, with the primary goals to provide
meaningful congestion relief throughout the County and improve road pavement conditions;
WHEREAS, the nine program categories included in 2016 Measure B are: Local
Streets and Roads, BART Phase II, Bicycle/Pedestrian, Caltrain Grade Separation, Caltrain
Corridor Capacity Improvements, Highway Interchanges, County Expressways, State Route 85
Corridor, and Transit Operations;
WHEREAS, BART Phase II is just one of the nine programs authorized in the Measure
and is limited to a maximum of 25 percent of the total Measure B revenues;
WHEREAS, in November 2020, VTA administration began presenting VTA Board of
Directors’ advisory committees with a proposed 2016 Measure B 10-Year Outlook Base
Scenario, covering program allocations for Fiscal Year 2022 to Fiscal Year 2032, that contain
built-in assumptions that are unacceptable to the City of Palo Alto;
WHEREAS, the built-in assumptions are that the BART Phase II project is the highest
priority for the next ten years, providing it with first call on the Measure B revenues, and that
minimal bonding will be used to fund BART Phase II, which results in little to no Measure B
funding being available for the majority of the other Measure B programs during this 10-year
period;
WHEREAS, under the Base Scenario, the six program areas that are currently identified
for zero Measure B funding over the ten-year period are Local Streets and Roads, Caltrain
Grade Separation, Caltrain Corridor Capacity Improvements, Highway Interchanges, County
Expressways, and State Route 85 Corridor;
WHEREAS, this approach is inconsistent with the promises made to the voters in 2016
because it will not result in meaningful progress being made for all nine programs over the first
fifteen years of the measure; rather, progress will be deferred on most programs until the
second fifteen years of the measure which violates voters’ and taxpayers’ trust and
expectations in approving the Measure;
DocuSign Envelope ID: 2A2F542C-CE04-4D6D-8807-494AF3760DBF
2
WHEREAS, in approving Measure B, voters countywide agreed to pay an increased half
cent sales tax for thirty years, thereby instituting one of the highest sales tax rates in the Bay
Area and State, yet under the proposed 2016 Measure B 10-Year Outlook Base Scenario only a
small portion of the County will benefit and the bulk of county taxpayers will be paying
increased taxes and see few significant benefits for a ten-year period;
WHEREAS, eliminating and/or significantly reducing investments in the other programs
will result in worsening congestion throughout the entire County, worsening pavement
conditions throughout the entire county, increased costs due to project delays, and increased
delays for long lead-time projects;
WHEREAS, front-loading BART Phase II as proposed in the 2016 Measure B 10-Year
Outlook Base Scenario programs the project to received nearly $2 billion in tax revenues
(presumably in inflation-adjusted year of expenditure dollars), without providing similar
inflation-adjusted funding for other programs, and notwithstanding the fact that anticipated tax
revenues are down (thereby reducing the 25 percent share);
WHEREAS, it is imperative that the Measure B 10-Year Outlook serve the needs of the
entire county to the greatest extent possible and not be focused on a single project to the
exclusion of the other essential Measure B programs;
WHEREAS, the VTA Board of Directors should consider a range of options for the BART
Phase II project so other Measure B programs also receive funding during this 10-year period,
including approaches such as more aggressive bonding, borrowing other funds, and/or using
other funding sources for BART Phase II, as well as the possibility of further phasing or slowing
the BART Phase II project.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Palo Alto urges the VTA Board of
Directors to support a Measure B 10-Year Outlook that balances investments among all nine
Measure B programs, including avoiding or minimizing reductions in the annual formula
programs (Local Streets and Roads, Bicycle/Pedestrian, and Transit Operations) and maintaining
progress for the capital projects in the other programs that are already under way during this
10-year period, thereby ensuring countywide benefits as promised in the 2016 ballot measure.
INTRODUCED AND PASSED: November 30, 2020
AYES: CORMACK, FILSETH, FINE, KNISS, KOU, TANAKA
NOES:
ABSENT: DUBOIS
ABSTENTION:
DocuSign Envelope ID: 2A2F542C-CE04-4D6D-8807-494AF3760DBF
3
ATTEST: APPROVED:
_________________________ ___________________________
City Clerk Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________ ___________________________
City Attorney City Manager
DocuSign Envelope ID: 2A2F542C-CE04-4D6D-8807-494AF3760DBF
Certificate Of Completion
Envelope Id: 2A2F542CCE044D6D8807494AF3760DBF Status: Completed
Subject: Please DocuSign: RESO 9928 Opposing The Valley Transportation Authority’s 2016 Measure B 10-Yea...
Source Envelope:
Document Pages: 3 Signatures: 4 Envelope Originator:
Certificate Pages: 2 Initials: 0 Danielle Kang
AutoNav: Enabled
EnvelopeId Stamping: Enabled
Time Zone: (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada)
250 Hamilton Ave
Palo Alto , CA 94301
Danielle.Kang@cityofpaloalto.org
IP Address: 199.33.32.254
Record Tracking
Status: Original
12/7/2020 8:48:14 AM
Holder: Danielle Kang
Danielle.Kang@cityofpaloalto.org
Location: DocuSign
Security Appliance Status: Connected Pool: StateLocal
Storage Appliance Status: Connected Pool: City of Palo Alto Location: DocuSign
Signer Events Signature Timestamp
Molly Stump
Molly.Stump@CityofPaloAlto.org
City Attorney
City of Palo Alto
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
(None)
Signature Adoption: Pre-selected Style
Using IP Address: 174.222.9.16
Signed using mobile
Sent: 12/7/2020 8:53:14 AM
Resent: 12/10/2020 2:36:09 PM
Viewed: 12/10/2020 3:20:30 PM
Signed: 12/10/2020 3:20:44 PM
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Not Offered via DocuSign
Ed Shikada
Ed.Shikada@CityofPaloAlto.org
Ed Shikada, City Manager
City of Palo Alto
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
(None)
Signature Adoption: Pre-selected Style
Using IP Address: 199.33.32.254
Sent: 12/10/2020 3:20:46 PM
Viewed: 12/10/2020 4:31:05 PM
Signed: 12/10/2020 4:31:25 PM
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Not Offered via DocuSign
Adrian Fine
Adrian.Fine@CityofPaloAlto.org
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
(None)
Signature Adoption: Pre-selected Style
Using IP Address: 108.228.10.70
Signed using mobile
Sent: 12/10/2020 4:31:27 PM
Viewed: 12/10/2020 4:34:39 PM
Signed: 12/10/2020 4:34:52 PM
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Not Offered via DocuSign
Beth Minor
beth.minor@cityofpaloalto.org
City Clerk
City of Palo Alto
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
(None)
Signature Adoption: Pre-selected Style
Using IP Address: 199.33.32.254
Sent: 12/10/2020 4:34:54 PM
Resent: 12/14/2020 7:52:17 AM
Viewed: 12/14/2020 7:52:47 AM
Signed: 12/14/2020 7:53:02 AM
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Not Offered via DocuSign
In Person Signer Events Signature Timestamp
Editor Delivery Events Status Timestamp
Agent Delivery Events Status Timestamp
Intermediary Delivery Events Status Timestamp
Certified Delivery Events Status Timestamp
Carbon Copy Events Status Timestamp
Witness Events Signature Timestamp
Notary Events Signature Timestamp
Envelope Summary Events Status Timestamps
Envelope Sent Hashed/Encrypted 12/7/2020 8:53:14 AM
Certified Delivered Security Checked 12/14/2020 7:52:47 AM
Signing Complete Security Checked 12/14/2020 7:53:02 AM
Completed Security Checked 12/14/2020 7:53:02 AM
Payment Events Status Timestamps