Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06041973CITY COUNCIL I MINUTES June 4, 1973 The City Council of the City of Palo Alto met on this date at 7:30 p.m. in a regular meeting with Mayor Comstock presiding. Present: Beahrs, Clark, Comstock, Henderson, Norton, Pearson, Rosenbaum, Semen Absent: Berwald Mayor Comstock annour:ced that this evening Council would be addressing itself to several matters which had engendered high public interest. He said that Council would allow people who wished to express themselves to do so. After the public had spoken, the matter would be returned to Council for consideration. He stated that no one would be allowed to interrupt the business before Council and the conduct of the meeting. Penal Code Section 403 prohibits the disc.uption of a public meeting, and he hoped there would be no violation. If disruption did occur, he would announce the disruption and ask that the meeting be brought back to order. If the meeting were not brought back to order, Council would adjourn or recess until order was restored. Persons violating Section 403 of the. Penal Code would be prosecuted. Minutes of May 14, 1973 MOTION: Mayor Comstock moved, seconded by Norton, that the minutes of May 14, 1973 be approved as submitted. Fhe motion passed on a unanimous vote. 1973.74 Budget MOTION: Vice Mayor Norton moved, on behalf of the Finance and Public Works Committee, that Council set Monday, June 18, 1973 at 7:30 p.m. as the date and tie for a public hearing to consider the 1973-74 Budget. The motion passed on a unanimous vote. Gene Revenue Sharing Fu,tds �nw,,,ri u�a�+w�namn�+W®wru�� Vice Mayor Norton, chairman of the Finance and Public Works Committee, stated that there are $580,000 available to Palo Alto from the outset of the federal revenue sharing program which began a year ago through - the end of the fiscal year 197.3-74. Of that $580,000 staff recommended appropriation of all but $68,500. The Finance and Public Works Commit- tee modified staff's recommendation by recommending an unallocated amount of $149,50'1. There were a number of requests for funds by different interested organizations, The staff recommendation does not answer a number of the requests and appears as shown on the agenda. In the Operating Programs, the Finance and Public Works Committee accepted the staff recommend,stiona. With respect to Capital Projects, two deletions were wade by the committee on a 3 to 1 vote, Norton opposed. They were Foothills Fire Protection, $37,000, and Fire Radio Systems Improvements, $44,000. The net result was to add $81,000 to the staff recommendation of $68,500, making a total unallocated balance of $149,500. Vice Mayor Norton moved, on behalf of the Finance and Public Works Com- mittee, with respect to use of revenue sharing funds the following staff recommendations be adopted and funds allocated as foliews: Operating Programs Library Books $12,000 Crime Prevention Program 38,000 Comprehensive Plan 35,000 Dog License Enforcement Program 5,000 Mini --Bus Study 15,000 Capital Projects Kitchell Park Library Expansion College Terrace Library City `:ini-Park System $200,000 35,500 S0,000 leaving an unallocated balance of: $149,`00 Councilman Henderson co7a7ented that it became apparent at the Finance and Public Works Committee Electing that everyone had different ideas on how the revenue sharing money should be allocated. He thought it should be used for operating programs that are already approved or one- shot special programs or capital Improve:vents which are one-shot pro-- gra7s , and the city s:iould not initiate new ongoing programs solely b:.: use some federal money is available. New programs should stand on ..heir own merits and be funded through the general fund. He felt that most of the programs recommended met his criteria. An unallocated. balance was left for consideration of apecial needs that might appear early in the next fiscal year. He had his personal ideas about what to cover from revenue sharing and would have left a larger unallocated balance, but he felt Council should approve the committee's recommPn- dation and not worry about what should be covered and what should not. Councilwoman Seman stated that during the recent election campaign, she heard a lot of dissatisfaction from people about dangerous inter- sections, speed, and accidents. When asked what she was doing about it, she realized Council did not know :ghat the problems were. The City Manager has said that the Traffic Engineering Department iu coo small and overworked to enter into a study. With the current workload, this group has to wait for t'ne pressure to copse and then ,ut all of their efforts into dealing with one situation. AMENDMENT: Councilwoman Semen moved, seconded by Henderson, that 20,000 be allocated to the Traffic Department from revenue sharing funds to be used in a traffic operations grogram which would provide an analyais of traffic accident problems, Councilwoman Pearson noted that there is an increase in the 1973-74 Budget allocated to the Traffic Engineering Department, and City Manager Sipel stated that there was an increase in personnel, but this increase was to get at some of the backlog that already exists. It would be a year or two before the department would be able to do the kinds of things Councilwoman Seman is suggesting. 3 9 b 6/4/73 Councilman Clark asked if the $20,000 would really permit staff to complete an assignment. Is it a realistic figure toward achieving the worthwhile goals? City Manager Sipel replied that he thought $20,000 was a realistic figure in that it would provide about one man year if they hire some- one to work for a year in this area. If a consultant is hired, $20,000 would probably buy one-half a man year. It would get 20% to 25% of the major problem areas identified and identify acceptable solutions. Many of the proposed solutions would be fairly easy to implement, while some will be fairly difficult to resolve and can only be resolved with the expenditure of substantial additional money. There was a study in 1968 or 1969, and a number of improvement projects implemented in the last two or three years were a result of that study. Councilman Clark asked if the funds should come out of the unallocated portion or if something else should be reduced that amount. Nt. Sipel thought it was more important for Council to decide to do the project than where the funds come from. If it is a question of whether the unallocated reserve should remain at the recommended level or not doing some other project, he would prefer to see something changed, such as coney allocated for the comprehensive plan. Councilman Rosenbaum commented that it is a question of how such policy is to be made by the Finance Corz^ittee. He would like to see more in- formation fro -1 staff and to treat this suggestion in the same way as any other new proposal. SUBSTITUTE AMENDMENT: Councilman Rosenbaum moved, seconded by Beahrs, that the matter of allocating $20,000 to the Traffic Department from revanue sharing funds be referred to the Finance and Public Works Co- ittee. Councilman Beahrs stated he wa.; inclined to think the problems for which solut.'+ons would be sought would exist forever. Conditions change; habits of driving change. He wondered if the city had an adequate permanent staff in this type of effort. Adequate staff would make more sense to him than a one-shot deal which would have no value after five years. He thought it should be discussed at the committee level where it could be considered in more detail. In response to Councilman Henderson, Mr. Sipel stated that if revenue sharing funds are not allocated for a traffic study, Council would have to approve inclusion of the program as part of the 1973-74 Budget on June 18. Because of the nature of the program and the fact that it has come at the eleventh hour of the Ludget process, staff would furnish Council with a scope of the work so that Council would under- stand what would happen at the end of this particular effort. Councilman Henderson said he did not believe the finance Committee would be discussing the budget any further, and it would come back to Council. He did not see what the committee could do prior to that time, The substitute amendment failed on the following vote. Ayes: Beahrs, Norton, Rosenbaum Noes: Clark, Comstock, Henderson, Pearson, Seman 397 6/4/73 The amendment to allocate $20,000 to the Traffic Department passed on the following vote: Ayes: Beahrs, Clark, Henderson, Pearson, Rosen'.,aum, Semen Noes: Comstock, Norton AMENDMENT: Councilwoman Seman moved, duly seconded, to delete the comprehensive planning program from the revenue sharing allocation. The amendment passed on the following vote: Ayes: Beahrs, Clark, Henderson, Pearson, Semen Noes: Comstock, Norton, Rosenbaum Councilman Beaters commented that he had attended the last for con- gressional conferences in Washington, and the last two or, tnree were pretty much devoted to federal revenue sharing. In all of the dis- cussions in Washington, he was impressed with the fact that the central intention is to give cities relief in the carrying of many social bur- dens which are increasing, particularly in the highly urbanised areas. With there discussions in rind, he again wished to say that he felt the city would be creating false impressions if it takes r:onies that ray not be available in future years and assigns them to operations that should be funded out of general property taxes and general revenue of the city. For example, the dog license enforcement program should be self-supporting. The proposed rani --bus study is appropriate, be- cause this is not typically a municipal function. The Mitchell Park Library expansion should be financed by general funds of the city. He supports the improve:7;ent of the College Terrace Library largely with the thought these improvements =could contribute to the probable and necessary use of this facility in combination with the child care program. The mini -park system should be properly financed by general funds of the city. He felt it was living dangerously to take federal funds and apply them to other than socially oriented problems. it is inflating apparent general city income and creating false ispressions> He said he regretted he would have to oppose the amended motion because of the general difference in philosophy. Councilwoman Pearson asked if Council would have an opportunity to submit proposals for the use of the unallocated funds, and Mr. Sipel responded affirmatively and said the latest date the funds could be allocated would be March of 1974. The motion as amended passed on the following vote: Ayes: Clark, Comstock, Henderson, Norton, Pearson, Rosenbaum, Seman Noes: Beahrs Councilman Rosenbaum referred to the bus study proposal and said he thought it was another situation where Council should give closer con- sideration to precisely what is planned to be done with the $15,000. MOTION: Councilman Rosenbaum moved, seconded by Seman, that staff be directed to prepare a work program for a bus study and that this pro- gram be submitted to the Finance and Public Works Committee for review. Replying to Vice Mayor Norton, Mr. Sipel indicated staff could probably respond in about ninety days. 3 9 8 6/4/73 Joseph D. Cooney, a resident of Menlo Park, addressed Council in opposition to using revenue sharing funds for library books and the dog licensing program, and generally un-American ways the money is being spent. The motion passed on a unanimous vote. Child Care Program Councilwoman Pearson, chairman of the Policy and Procedures Committee, stated that the committee had held two meetings for a total of ten hours reviewing the Child Care Task Force report. She commended the task force and staff on the excellent unanimous report which was con- cluded In record time by a devoted group of people. The report recom- mends $240,000. The Policy and Procedures Committee is recommending $135,250, hoping for the remainder to be funded thrcugh revenue sharing, business and industry, and any other means the Child Care Task Force might find available. She said she would revise the order in which the recommendations were shown on the agenda. MOTION: Councilwoman Pearson moved, on behalf of the Policy and Procedures Committee, that Council a. adopt the policy statement that the City Councii recognizes the growing need for quality child care for all those who live and work in Palo Alto, with a priority determined by needs and payment dependent upon economic ability; that the City Councii hereby accepts responsibility to support the development implementation, and cc,rdination of a compre- hensive child care program in Palo Alto; b. thee the matter of use permits and zoning mentioned on page 6 of CMR:721:3 and page 24 of the Task Force Report be referred to staff; c. that the staff add to the four items under the Palo Alto Unified School District heading on page 9 of €'1R:721:3 another item: 'that the Palo Alto Unified School District explore possibilities for joint City -School District funding and implementation of any other portions of the recommendations of the report entitled 'Plan for Child Care in Palo Alto"; and to add to item three the phrase, "and further additional Besse Bolton centers, if possible."; d. that centers be opened t� both residents and the city; workers within e. the use of the College Terrace Library for a child care center with staff to ascertain the acceptability of this particular use to both the neighbors and to the overall communiey that currently uses the facilities; f. that use of the house at 920 Middlefield Road be discouraged and an alternative site sought for the infant care center; g, the following program content and auggeeted budget: 3 9 9 6/4/73 g. (cont'd) Mobilizer - $22,000 Infant -toddler center -- startup expense $5,000 operating expense $15,000 Two pre-school centers - startup expense $10,000 operating expense $26,000 both centers) Part-time centers - $8,450 Sick chid program - $5,300 Two existing non-profit centers - $26,000 Day care homes - startup costs at $100 per home for 35 hones ($3,500) New day care hones - $6,000 for purpose of -acquiring new day care homes Renovation of College Terrace Library for a center - $8,000 (Total - $135,250); (figures include the above suggested budget to be considered a potential budget and reviewed by the Finance Committee; and the above subject to acceptance by the Counc? 1 of an approved program which would contain content, program objectives, standards, and control on the allocation of funds. Councilwoman Pearson referred to page 12 of the Policy and Procdures Commitl.ee minutes and pointed out that the committee retained in com- mittee for further consideration an important part of this program -- the matter of what kind of board will control the child care program for the city and how it would relate to the staff and City Council. Staff will come back to the Policy and Procedures Committee with recommendations to be forwarded to Couaril. Mayor Cos :took noted that if the Council itself takes a policy position about child care and about certain fund allocations ar.d approves the recommendations, the effect would be that on June 18 Council would find before it the necessary material to amend the budget recommenda- tione to add these items. Even when they are approved, the program will not start to move until the policy and control procedures are recommended by the committee and approved by Council. Councilman Clark asked if there had been any updating of the May 11 letter from staff regarding county revenue sharing funds. Mr. Walker indicated staff had had no response from the county and did not expect one for thirty to sixty days. Staff's estimate of the proportion of the program that would be eligible for federal revenue sharing funds is $35,000. If the program were bigger and included elements that met the guidelines established by the federal government, primarily relating to low income, it would be eligible for more funds. Councilman Rosenbaum remarked that the program recommended by the Policy and Procedures Committee is potentially larsier in terms of children served than the program recommended by the task force. He asked ghat makes it leas eligible for county revenue sharing money. Mr. Walker responded that staff's estimate is based on a projection of 35% of the people in the five centers being eligible for the revenue sharing money under the federal standards plus the sick child care program plus the renovation costs for the College Terrace Library. 400 6/4/73 Those added together come to about $35,000. 35% is based on the ex- perience that the Palo Alto Unified School District has had in its program, Councilman Rosenbaum commented that the full operating cost of the five centers would be in excess of $100,000 with the anticipation that this was to be a joint effort where county revenue sharing funds would be spent along with the city funds that have been recommended. Mr. Walker said his comments related only to that proportion of the program that would be participated in by the city. Councilman Rosenbaum asked if he were saying that the additional funds that would be required above and beyond what is being proposed that the city provide could be provided by county revenue snaring funds. Mr. Walker indicated that is possible. Those costs over and above the city's participation might be eligible for, revenue sharing, If the centers themselves or whoever is operating the centers pursued that money, they might be able to secure additional money. Councilman Henders.:n commented that most of the differences between the report and the committee's recommendation are dollar differences. There is one program content difference. He asked shy the desire for two pre-school centers. Is this to get more people involved? Councilman Rosenbaum replied that he thought there was more than a dollar difference. There is a philosophical differnce as to whether the city should plan to provide /00A of the funds for a few centers or should act as a facilitating mechcnism to encourage the develop- ment of a large number of centers and do that by offering 25%. The two pre-school centers is an arbitrary number. If they were organized successfully plus an infant care center in the next year, the city would be doing quite an outstanding job. Councilman 3eahrs commented that he thought Councilwoman Pearson had suggested she would like to have all of this financed out of revenue sharing. Councilwoman Pearson said she did not. If it comes out of revenue sharing, which is not guaranteed, the city will eventually get stuck. She thought revenue sharing should be one-shot things and social services should be an ongoing thing. Councilman 3eahrs said he disagreed --that child care programs should be funded out of revenue sharing just as the drug abuse center should be, and if the city doesn't get any money, it all folds. Virginia Debs, 3145 Flowers Lane, coordinator of the task force, referred to the budgets presented in the task force report and noted that the summary of budgets reflects costs for programs including start up and operating, but does not reflect user fees that are included in the individual budgets which could bring in $110,610. She said it should be kept in mind that the premise is that all users will pay fees on a sliding scale. The program was brought before the county revenue sharing program on the basis that approximately 35% of the costs would be attributable to low-income users. The task force feels that one third of the costs should be borne by Title IVA funding or other federal or state equivalent to support the welfare -income user. One of the reasons that the two budgets are different is the day care home component, which the task force saw as a way to give more child care to more children at less cost than institutions in a day care center. Once you drop the support for low-income parents in licensed 4 0 1 6/4/73 day care homes, you could not ask for county revenue sharing funds for the welfare -income users, because the cost would be prohibitive to them in a home situation. The welfare -income user would not have an alternative in care but would be directed to a day care center where the task force had hoped that families would do what is best for the children and wanted that alternative across the board regard- less of income level. R. M. Kemp, 14654 Placido Court, Saratoga, member of the task force, said he would be glad to answer questions. Councilman Henderson asked when industry could be expected to respond to this problem by contributing funds. Mr. Kemp responded that at the time the task force approached industry, the report was not com- pleted; so they were talking in generalities. Industry was receptive to the idea of child care and said they would like to participate in the program. They were also receptive to the idea of lending employees and flexible scheduling in the plant. Above all, they seemed to be most concerned about child care for sick children. In response to a question from Councilman Henderson, Mr. Kemp estimated that it was within the realm of possibility that 10% to 15% of the budget might be expected to be received from industry, civic groups, and Thdividuals. Leslie Conley, 910 Boyce, meriber of the task force, indicated that some civic groups were interested and had said they would be interested in talking specifics after the budget was ;yet. Ilene Abrams, 426 Matadero, a member of Vencex•emos, read a statement supporting the full funding of centers and programs as outlined by the task force. H4.1ne S. Wheeler, 362 Diablo Court, president and representing the League of Women Voters, read a statement endorsing the Policy and Procedures Committee recommendation and suggesting the addition in the policy statement of the words "with participating parents included." Walter Bougere, 2139 Williams Street, member of the task force, stated he had placed at Council members' places tonight a proposed budget which was different from that recommended by the Policy and Procedures Committee. He discussed some of the differences in the budgets. Pamela Walker, 1371 Rollyburne, East Menlo Park, addressed Council in support of child care. Mel M.alinowski, 920 Los Robles Avenue, member of the task force and associate director of Ellen Thatcher Child Care Center, said he was available for questions Council might have about what it takes to run a center. Councilwoman Semen asked for clarification of the difference between the task force budget and that recommended by the Policy and Procedures Committee with respect to the percent of city funding for the infant, toddler, and pre-school centers. Mrs. Debs responded that she was simply saying that the summary page did not reflect the fact that almost one third of the costs of the program would come from user fees. It should be clear that the task force has always talked about some funding coming from users and ne one should talk about 100% funding from other sources. Councilwoman Seman commented that that was the first overall philosoph- ical difference between the budget that Mr. Bougere presented versus 4 0 2 6/4/73 the Policy and Procedures Committee recommendation. Item d also con- tained philosophical differences from the task force report as well as the dollar differences. She saw the philosophical differences: first that the program should start with two pre-school centers rather than one, and secondly, that support should be provided for existing nonprofit centers rather than support for low-income children in scholarships. There is only one known facility available in which to put a pre-school center, and there is a far better chance of build- ing in a successful pre-school program if ono facility is started at a tine. There are two existing nonprofit centers which have their own structure, staff, and socio-economic mix of families. To receive support from the city program, it would be simpler to provide scholar- ships than to ask them to receive money if they are willing to meet the requireraents for the programs the city would set up in providing city support. There are really two programs included in the heading of day care home program --Enfant and toddler and pre-school age. With some children, the small horse setting is preferable and a full day costs about half as much as in a center. In the case of the child needing care before and after school and during vacation, the neighborhood homes keep the child related to friends, recreational opportunities and school. It is an exciting area for city and school. cooperation. She opposed vigorously the philosophical difference in cutting the day cate program. Aa..4WE:a. : Councilwoman Seman moved, seconded by Henderson, to amend the motion by substituting the program content and budget guidelines as suggested by Mr. Bougere as follows: Mobilizer $ 22,000 Infant -toddler center 46,000 Pre-school center 40,000 Part-time center 8,450 Day care homes 35,000 Sick child project 5,300 Scholarships for low-income children in non-profit centers 18,000 Start-up funds for other new centers 18,000 College Terrace Library renovations 8,000 $200,750 -611400 County revenue sharing $139,350 Ibis presumes a $200,750 program contingent upon receipt of county revenue sharing funds of $61,400 and the city commitment of $139,350. Councilwoman Seman commented that even though $200,750 is budgeted, she did not expect this amount of money to be spent this year, but she saw it as a policy -statement of the level of the city's interest in a child care program. Reducing the figures now might hinder imple- mentation of one of the programs. °he -preferred to leave the budget figures to provide maximum flexi bilfty and opportunity for success in implementation of the program. Councilman Beahrs asked Councilwoman Susan if she firmly intended that the city's commitment be only $139,350, which would indicate that she prefers there be no indication at this time as to how the deficit would be finEnced. Councilwoman Semae responded that since the city See Pg. 466 4 0 3 6/4/73- is asking the county for revenue sharing funds, it is important that it not demonstrate it is going to give any additional funds at this point. When an answer is received about the county revenue sharing funds, the program will have to be discussed further and be brcught back to Council if it is felt the $139,350 is insufficient. Councilman Beahrs said he was discouraged, because staff anticipated a maximum of $35,000 from the county. Mr. $calker commented that staff's estimate of the account that might be received under the pro- gram recommended by the Policy and Procedures Committee was $35,000. If you assume the city is going to pick up all of the low-income costs, you might be able to increase the estimate. He did not know what cri- teria the county would use in applying federal standards to the local program. Councilwoman Se:xan stated she had discussed the budget in her motion with Mrs. Bed'well of the City Manager's office and in applying the federal guidelines to it, they came up with the $61,400 figure. Councilman Beahrs stated that he had always hoped Council would re- serve the revenue sharing funds for this type of activity; yet he had to express alarm at the program's probable cost and added to the amount allocated for the drug abuse _enter, the total was over $500,000. Therefore Council rust look f'rward to the idea of using revenue sharing r-,,ney almost exclusively on this type of activity. He said personally he ;;cui_d give the child care program priority over the drug center. Cvunci lr:a n Henderson commented that he was disturbed at the low figure the committee recommended for day care home,. He felt it was erroneous thinking to downgrade day care homes and think more of centers for low-ooderate income children. He very much favored higher support fc,r the no: -..es. He would not a_•bi rarity set 25% support for the pro - gran. Until the program is funded, he cannot see any granting agency being really interested. He hoped that if the programs is approved at the higher figure, an effort would be made to get information out to various agencies. DAzen_s of organizations in this country support day care centers. Vice Mayor Norton asked if the Policy and Procedures Committee recom- eendation of $135,000 anticipated additional funds from the county to make the program go. Councilman Rosenbaum responded that the committee assumed there would have to be additional funds or additional volunteer labor to make the program go. $1.35,000 was the committee's intention with regard to city funds. Vice ?Mayor Norton referred to the $35,000 as recommended in Couneii- woman Seman's motion for day care homes and asked that the committee's position on that issue be discussed. Councilman Rosenbaum said the committee fully recognized it was not putting in at this time the scholarships for day care homes. They felt they did not have infor- mation as to how much this should be. Councilman Rosenbaum felt that if a program of this aort is undertaken, there is a responsibility to offer it uniformly. They kept it in committee to determine hew much might be required to subsidize day care homes. It was not the com- mittee's intention that that part of the program would not be funded. In fact, the committee went further than the task force and recommended that there be start-up expenses offered, because they recognized the great virtue of day care hones. Vice Mayor Norton asked if Councilman Rosenbaum were persuaded by Councilwoman Sun's additional reasons that her position is the final 4 0 4 6/4/73 answer to that question or did he feel it should still be studied by the committee. Councilman. Rosenbaum said he did not think there was any legitimate basis for the number that had been picked. It is not known what is required for the existing day care home. Everybody is now paying roughly $100 per month, but maybe they are really pushing it to pay that much. In further response to Vice Mayor Norton, Council- man Rosenbaum said he would oppose the amendment. It is a matter of philosophy. When the task force was set up, Council said the city was not to be regarded as the sole source of funds out of recognition of the fact that it does not have the resources. He understands the task force's problem. They wanted to propose something that they knew could be done. By asking for this amount of city money, a few day care centers can be provided and support for a few children can be provided. There are, according to the task force report, 503 children currently receiving day care center care. To suggest the city spend $3.00,000 to provide support fot 4n itore is not valid. He suggested the city follow the model of the two centers that recently opened. In these instances people decided day care should be provided and did it. There are no city funds involved. Hz did not believe it made sense for the city to set up two centers with budgets on the order of $50,000. The alternative is to encourage people to do what Ellen Thatcher did and offer them 25%. He suggested that the city offer assistance uni- formly so that existing centers are not undermined by fancy city centers. Vice Mayor Norton suggested the initial question the city must answer is what level of funding they are able and willing to proceed with. One approach is to look at the budget submitted by the task force, and another is the reasonable number of dollars the city can part with, then ask that the program be scaled down or revised in whatever manner the board of directors sees fit to live within that budget or find another coney to :Hake it the full program. :He said he really limed the level of budgeting recommended by the committee and would oppose the amendment. Councilwoman Pearson stated that as Chairman of the committee, she found herself in an awkward position. She supported the Child Care Task Force Report and their request for funding. She pointed out to the Policy and Procedures Committee that in order to get funding from inch stry, business, foundations, or government they had to have an ongoing program to which people could address themselves. She felt for the city to give the 25% and tell them to get the other 75Z was unrealistic. She had supported Councilman Rosenbaum's recommendation, knowing that she cupported a total program. She felt that the task force would be back at Council level asking for further funds, and she was glad Councilwoman Semen had come with a budget and asked the city to support a fully funded program. Also, she would like to see more centers but feels there aren't places where they could he located at the moment. Once they get their programs going, they will be in a position to get more centers. She felt extended day care hoaxes were an important part of the program, and the city must spend some money supporting there. She supported the amendment. Councilman Clark noted that there is a heavy interest in supporting day care. He did not think that would have been said a year ago. If this premise Is correct, he thought it was extremely important that whatever is done has a positive certainty of succeeding and getting into operation. He had great concern about being able to get a couple of centers going in the manner the committee's recommendation suggests. He was also concerned that the stimulus for other means of day care provision might be snuffed out or subdued by the city's taking too 4 0 5 6/4/73 positive a role. He feels it is urgent that the board that is formed sees that volunteers are brought in and costs kept down. Quality is a key word. It is paramount that whatever kind of provision for care is made that it be quality in the best sen a of the word. In the pro- cess of doing this, if the city takes it over entirely, he did not see how it could be done at a cost that could be considered reasonable for any but a few pets Ole being able to pay their own way. One of the hazards is that when the bill gets totalled up down the line, it will be so great that people are not going to know what way to turn. Whether to continue or to cut it off will be the question. It is important to remember that new ground is being plowed as the munici- pality goes into social services which, until recently, have been the responsibility of county, state, and federal government. The city must Le sure it is doing the job it sets out to do in a reasonable fiscal framework. He hoped that Council, staff, and the board would have a most critical evaluation, because he wa.e concerned about start- ing into a program that is just a drop in the bucket. Councilman Clark added that unless there is tore support from outside sources than he visualizes, the program will cost several times the suggested amount. Councilwoman Seman said she felt sure people in the audience heard and respected and responded to the danger flags that are being raised. When the Task Force was given its charge, it was for a small city pilot program. It must be remembered that this charge was given to the Task Force in a different historical time when there was a possibility of fur.dirg from state and national sources. She felt it was an unfair comparison to call on the zeal and dedication of the private groups as a model for quality child care. It is not fair to start a city program with that as a model. Vice Mayor Norton's suggestion to give a board a certain amount of dollars to live with instead of a program would negate the careful work of the Task Force which went InLo work- ing out a quality child care program. Councilman feahrs reiterated the need for caution. According to the estimate of the Social Planning Council's study of child care needs in Palo Alto dated July, 1972, if you talk in terms of $100 per month, you are talking about $13142,000 a year. He was disturbed by the fact that the subject is being dealt with in theoretical points and counts, because the Social Planning Council's study indicates there are 1,142 children who could use a child care center, and roughly 50X of those people preferred care in the Child's own home. He wondered how many children would be included under the programs idealized here. He thought Council should be more cautious and follow the admonitions of Councilman Rosenbaum. Councilwoman Pearson urged Councilman Eeahrs to read pp. 44 and 45 of the Child Care Task Force Report where the number of children needing child care is discussed. Consideration is being given to the city's own family of at least 1,2000 children and the program will not help nearly enough of those. Julie Isaacs, 526 Addison, addressed Council in support of a child care center in the downtown area. Linnea Woodward addressed Council in support of allocation of money for centers to operate with instead of scholarships. Carol Peterson, 755 Chauning, member of the task force, addressed Council in support of the larger budget. 406 6/4/73 Edith T. Eddy, 2579 Cowper Street, member of the task force, addressed Council in support of the requested budget. Ellen Wyman, 546 Washington, said many people have real reservations about the city providing child care and question the overall long- term good of this kind of child care. The last time the subject was discussed by Council, the charge of the committee was to try to encour- age a small pilot program with very little city funding. The thrust tonight is entirely different. If funds are made available on this scale, the city could never back down. Mel Malinowski addressed Council about having more flexibility in the application of funds and supported increasing the: support for the two existing centers from $18,000 to $26,000. Margaret Jackson, 947 Moreno, addressed Council in support of Council- woman Semen's amendment. Nancy Seldin, 720 Menlo Oaks Drive, spoke in rebuttal to some of the points made by Ellen Wyman and in support of the $26,000 for the ex- isting cento_rs. Mayor Comstock pointed in the motion that the Council of an approved objectives, standards, Secondly, the proposed the budget vhich would out to members of the audience the stipulation provisions were subject to acceptance by the program which would contain content, p-Logran and control on the allocation of funds. amounts of money would be additional items to be heard on June l8 in Council Chambers. Vice Mayor Norton asked if the suggested appropriation were $139,000 or. $200,1'00, and Mayor Comstock responded that for purposes of the budget in two weeks, what will be shown is $200,750. The amendment passed on the following vote: Ayes: Clark, Comstock, Henderson, Pearson, Seman Noes: 8eahrs, Norton, Rosenbaum AMENDMENT: Mayor Comstock moved; seconded by Pearson, to include the recommendation of, the League of Women,Voters and add the phrase "with participating parents included" making the last phrase of "a" read: "that the City Council hereby accepts responsibility to support tht development, implementation, and coordination, with participating parents included, of a comprehensive child care program in Palo Alto." The amendment passed on a unanimous vote. AMENDMENT: Councilwoman Pearson moved, seconded by Comstock, to add to "d" the stipulation that "this policy as it relates to nonresident workers is dependent upon the active involvement and participation of twa or more major industries in the program and contemplates the appli- cation of eligibility guidelines for nonresident school -age children similar to those used for children's centers in the Palo Alto Unified School District." The; amendment passed on a unanimous vote. Aasistsnt City Manager Walker noted that there would not be time for the Finance Committee to consider the budget before June 18. 40 7 6/4/73 . Fe : Mayor Comstock moved, seconded by Henderson, that the paragraph "the above suggested budget to be considered a potential budget and reviewed by the Finance Committee; and" be deleted. The amendment passed on a unanimous vote, Councilman Rosenbaum stated that he supports the committee's recom- mendations and feels the city should take a strong hand ¢n child care but cannot vote for the program in its current form. Vice Mayor Norton stated that his reasons for voting "no" were the same as Councilman Rosenbaum's, and he would have supported the Policy and Procedures Committee's recommendation. Councilman Beahrs said he echoed their statements. The motion as amended passed on the following vote: Ayes: Clark, Comstock, Henderson, Pearson, Semen Noes: Beahrs, Norton, Rosenbaum (Council recessed from 10:05 le 10:20 p.m.) „ r„ t na Barrie to the Ph vsicallz ?iardicapped (C?IR:744:3) MOTION: Mayor Comstock moved, seconded by Clark, that item 14 be considered out.: of order. The motion passed on a unanimous vote. Mayor Comstock expressed appreciation to the City Manager for his re- port and interest in this program, MOVION: Mayor Comstock introduced the following resolution and moved, seconded by Seman, its adoption: RESOLLTPION NO, 4764 entitled "RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALO ALTO ENCOURAGING THE ELERINATION OF BARRIERS TO IHYS1CALLY HANDICAPPED PERSONS" The resolution was adopted on a unanimous vote. AILLati: Mayor Comstock moved, seconded by Pearson, that the tasks outlined in the City Manager's report of May 31 to (1) work toward the elimination of existing architectural barriers in city facilities; (2) develop guidelines to assist the Architectural Review Board in its review of publicly oriented private projects so that access for the handicapped is provided; (3) develop basic training procedures end guidelines for building inspection personnel to aseisl them in imple- menting requirements for barrier free architecture, and upon completion the above tasks to be eeferred to the human Relations Commission for review and subsequent recommendation to the City Council for consider- ation. The motion passed on a unanimous vote. Councilwoman Pearson commented that she thought there should be spots in curbs downtown where people could get up Without assistance. She would like to see staff start on that immediately. City Manager Sipel 4 0 g 6/4/73 said that the downtown beautification project would try to speak to that issue. The architect has beer. furnished with material relating to this subject. Beyond that it is a subject staff will be looking into but will not be ready to take action on for awhile because it is a fairly complex question dealing with drainage and design problems that have to be worked out. Mayor Comstock asked in conjunction with the beautification project, what would be the estimate of timing, and Mr. Sipel thought it would be early next year. Councilwoman Pearson said that amount of time was unresponsive to the need, and asphalt ramps could be put in in front of banks and major grocery stores. She would not like to wait longer than two months. Youth Adviso Council ssues emeemmeg Councilman Henderson, Council liaison to the Youth Advisory Council, noted that Council members had received a copy of the Youth Advisory Council's resolution. YAC realizes that its primary function is to advise the Council on matters of importance to the youth of Palo Alto, but members feel that on rare occasions they should be able to express themselves without Council approval. . J : Councilman Henderson moved, seco:ded by Pearson, that Resolution No. 4635 be amended to add the followix;g sentence to Section 1 immediately prior to the last sentence thereof: It shall have the power to study, analyze, make recommendations, and take public stands on public issues on behalf of the youth of the City of Palo Alto. Councilman Beahrs rsocalled that last year he had an unpleasant episode with the Youth Advisory Council resulting largely from the YAC's be- coming involved with partisan politics. He said he had no serious objection to this proposal but wanted it understood that he thought it inappropriate for the YAC to participate in a public sense in partisan politics unless they have had a plebiscite or vote of their own peers in the schools. AMENDMENT: Vice Mayor Norton moved, seconded by Henderson, to instruct staff to revise the resolution to add the following to the motion made by Councilman Henderson: ; provided, that when the Council (Youth Advisory Council) takes a public stand on other than a local issue, its statement shell indicate that its position is not necessarily that of the city or of the City Council. The amendment passed on a unanimous vote. The motion as amended passed on the following vote: Ayes: Cl:rk, Comstock, Henderson, Norton, Pearson, Rosenbaum, Sewn Noes: Beahrs Resolution ►i S& 81.8 re Advertises ac ` renaortat �u ys "�""'"�'"'""'""""" - n x� ems m Councilman Rosenbaum introduced the following resolution and moved, seconded by Pearson, its adoption: 4 39. 6/4/73 RESOLUTION NO. 4763 entitled "RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALO ALTO OPPOSING SENATE BILL NUMBER 818 CONCERNING ADVERTISING ON PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS" Councilman Rosenbaum commented that it was his understanding that there would be a committee hearing tomorrow morning so that a telegram should be sent to the appropriate committee members indicating Council's oppo- sition. City Attorney Stone informed Council that his office had spoken with Senator Mill's office and informed them as to the possible action of Council, and his staff would be transmitting that position to the committee unless instructed otherwise. The motion passed on a unanimous vote. �A a sent cc lex" Redefined 1511.1.0: Mayor Comstock introduced the following ordinance and moved, seconded by Pearson, its adoption: ORDINANCE NO. 2720 entitled "ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALO ALTO AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2709 OF THE CITY OF PALO ALTO 70 REDEFINE THE PHASE "APARTMENT COMPLEX" IN CHAPTER 4.15, SECTION 4.15.010(1)" (first reading 5/14/73) The ordinance was adopted on the following vote: Ayes: Clark, Comstock, Henderson, Pearson, Rosenbaum, Semen Noes: Beahrs, Norton Alcoholic Bevera,e Control Re 4i1ation.s: Review of Standards (CMR:708:33) Councilman Henderson commented that he placed this subject on the agenda last July because of possible uses of the Old Police/Fire build- ing 'et revealed the shortcomings of the present regulations governing issuance of liquor licenses in Palo Alto. He said he does not want to increase the total number of licenses permitted. He had hoped restric- tions might be imposed to limit licenses to certain types of business, but apparently that is not possible at this time. He thought staff had done a good job on this study. It will not alter the number of licenses in the downtown area, but it will make a more equitable dis- tribution. AOT10 Councilman Henderson moved, seconded by Clark, that the staff report on alcoholic beverage control regulations review of standards and proposed ordinance be referred to the Planning Commission. The motion passed on a unanimous vote. milTiaa; Councilman Henderson moved, seconded by Pearson, that the subject of review of standards for alcoholic beverage control be re- ferred to staff for inclusion in the current comprehensive review of the zoning ordinance. The motion passed on a unanimous vote. 410 6/4/73 Mandatory Presale Inspection Program for Sin 1e-Famil Dwelling Units (C R :733:3) MOTION; Councilman Clark moved, seconded by Rosenbaum, that the matter of mandatory presale inspection of single-family dwelling units be re- ferred to the Policy and Procedures Committee. City Manager Sipel stated that there seems to be unanimity in the com- munity that a presale inspection program is undesirable for a number of reasons. The problem of increasing deterioration still exists and will ger worse as the years go by unless some specific things are done to stop it. It has been proven historically throughout the United States that people will not take their own remedial action; It is time to find some way to attack the problem, and it must be done before it gets to an advanced stage. The kind of major surgery that has been applied in the past has been redevelopment and urban renewal. No one here favors those programs. It is the kind of grim reminder thet if something isn't done, the city will have a big problem. If the item is referred to coemittee, he hoped the committee would address it as soon as possible to develop a program to meaningfully attack the prob- lem. He hoped those organizations who have opposed the staff's pro -- gram will help staff develop good programs to take care of the problem, which is a commaunity problem. Now is the time to come up with positive and effective ways to deal with it. The motion passed on the following vote: Ayes: Seahrs, Clark, Comstock, Henderson, Pearson, aosenbaum, Semar; Noes: Norton Councilman Rosenbaumn commented that Council had received a report from the staff which he thought might have some relation to presale inspec- tion, whether mandatory or voluntary. He thought the real property conveyance tax offered` a natural way to pay for these inspections. M IO.i Councilman Rosenbaum moved, seconded by Comstock, that the subject of real property conveyance and construction taxes be referred to the Finaince and Public Works Committee for consideration as a means to finance a housing inspection program or as a general revenue source. Councilwoman Pearson stated that she would support it for a general revenue source, because there is a bill in Sacramento relating to open space acquisition and financing, and one of the means of financing open space is through this kind of real estate conveyance tax. Councilman Henderson stated that the staff report was informational and is already a part of Finance and Public Works Committee material. Making a special referral indicates immediate interest iri this new revenue source and was virtually making a commitment to a mandatory presale inspection program. He thought the referral was premature. Councilman Rosenbaum said he did not think it had anything to do with mandatory inspection. Evert a good voluntary program is going to cost money. This is a natural way to finance it. He did not think there was any implication to be drawn. The motion failed on the following vote: Ayes: Seahre, Comstock, Pearson, Rosenbaum Noes: Clark, Henderson, Norton, Sean 4 1 1 6/4/73 1972-73 Sidewalk Re air: eortoon� s 3) MOTION: Mayor Comstock moved, seconded by Pearson, that the City Council eliminate the requirement that property owners must share equally with the city the cost of replacing hazardous sidewalks damaged by causes other than street trees. The motion passed on a unanimous vote. MOTION: Mayor Comstock moved, seconded by Norton, that the City Council. find that the 1972-73 Sidewalk Repair project has no signifi- cant environmental impact. The motion passed on a unanimous vote. t TIQ is Mayor Comstock moved, seconded by Henderson, that Council authorize the Mayor to execete a contract with Andero Construction in the amount of $14,706.14 for the 1972-73 Sidewalk Repair project. The motion passed on a unanimous vote. Chemical industrial Waste (C`fi1:141:.'s) Assistant City Manager Warren Deverel stated that the existing indus- trial waste ordinance was devei4ner, in the 196C0's. The new water quality control plant makes it necessary to develop a new ordinance to control industrial wastes. He felt that the new ordinance was quite complete and would set the needed standards. City Attorney Stone suggested that there be an amendment to delete from 16.09.11O(n)(2) the words "Fluoride 1.5 mg/.liter" and to add a subsection. (2) which shall state "The maximum concentration allowable of fluoride for discharge into the system shall be 1.5 mg/liter." Councilman Seaters noted that the staff report indicated there was con- sultation with industry. He said he had had several complaints to the effect that this was not so. He asked to what extent industry was consulted and said he thought they were entitled to a public hearing. Mr. Deverel replied that the industrial Waste Management Association had been discussing this subiect for a long period of time. In addition staff has been canduc Ling a thorough visitation program of local industry so that staff could become familiar with their practices and discuss their discharges and the need for control and their impact on the city's system. The proposed ordinance has not been circulated through- out indestrry, but the essence of it has been discussed with a wide variety of industrial representatives. Councilman Beahrs stated tha: the people who are most involved should have a chance to look at so=mething like this before it comea to Council. Hr. Deverel suggested this was the purpose of first reading, anc it was staff's intent to circulate the ordinance, and it would be appropriate for anyone to contact staff and rake proper representations. - Councilwoman Pearson commented that it was her understanding that the Regional Water Quality Control District had mandated certain standards, =and Mr. Deverel replied that their regulations apply to those things which the city permits to leave the plant into the bay. The provisions of the ordinance sake it possible for the city to accommodate discharges coming into the plant and meet standards for the receiving waters, 4 1 2 6/4/73 Charles H. Anderson, 2362 Santa Catalina, representing the Industrial Waste Management Association, said he had only seen the ordinance in its final form today. A number of other people have seen the ordinance at various stages, but to his knowledge, no one had been invited to suggest cieanges that would make the ordinance more suitable for appli- cation immediately. He asked that consideration be given to setting up some mechanism so that interested parties could make suggestions to rephrase some of the ambiguous portions and clear up some of the problem that would result if it is implemented in ics present form. Mr. Deverel indicated that stall intends to provide wide circulation of the ordinance. It has been developed in conjunction with the cities of Mountain View and Los Altos and is being brought to their councils. He felt the first reading was appropriate tonight; then staff can re- ceive further comments and make amendments. Mayor Comstock asked if this ordinance was urgent or could be continued for one week, and Mr. Deverel replied that a week's delay would not be inappropriate. City Manager Sipel suggested two weeks. AOTLQN; Councilman Rosenbaum moved, seonded by Person, that first reading of the proposed chemical industrial waste ordinance be con- tinued for two weeks to June 18, 1973. The motion passed on a una ftous vote. Purchase of Scott Street F;ro et tz (Cr1R: 752: 3) _MOT1Oj, Mayor Comstock moved, sec :tded by Pearson, that Council find that the project has no adverse environmental impact. The motion passed on the f :i1owing vote: Ayes: Seahrs, Clark, Comstock, Henderson, Pearson, Rosenbaum, Susan Noes: done Abstain: Norton `m,: Mayor Comstock moved. seconded by Pearson, that Council approve acceptance of offers to sell real property from Restored Properties and First American Title Co. and authorize acceptance of deeds and payment of $67,000 to the property owners. The motion passed on the following vote: Ayes: Clark, Comstock, Henderson, Pearson, Rosenbaum, Semen Noes: 6eahrs, Norton -MOM Mayor Comstock introduced the following ordinance and moved, seconded by Henderson, its approval: ORDNANCE NO. 2722 entitled "ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALO ALTO AMENDING THE BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 1972.73 TO APPROPRIATE $80,000 TO PROVIDE FUNDS FOR SCOTT STREET MINI -PARK AND IMPROVEMENTS" -4 1 3 6/4/73 Councilman Henderson Stated that the proposed capital improvement budget for 1973-74 contained an item for improvement of $100,000. The Finance and Public Works Committee revised the figure downward to cover purchase and some improvements. The ordinance was adopted on the following vote: Ayes: Clark, Comstock, Henderson, Pearson, Rosenbaum., Semen Noes: geahrs, Norton Sin A grovai Clement Chen 3 Associates 625 El Camino Real Zone District P -C (Holiday► Inn_ CMR:746:3 Planning Director Knox commented that normally the sign control in the P -C district is governed by the sign ordinance for the residential zone unless other action is taken by Council. In the case of the Holiday Inn, Council indicated its desire to approve the signs. He described the proposed signs. Councilman Rosenbaum expressed disappointment in the proposal and said he regarded the signs as unacceptable. There are no signs like these anywhere else in Palo Alto. They are exterior billboards. It has been pointed out that sign 2 is desired to indicate where the front door is. Signs 3, 4 and 5 are to be mounted up on the buildings, and he thought those were the really objectionable ones. The problem is going to be to get to the Holiday Inn even if you see where it is. Making the correct turn Is going to be the problem. What should be considered is some small directional signs. Councilwoman Pearson said she was not disappointed, because it was what she expected to happen. She said she would certainly object to the neon signs on the side of the building and to li„hted signs on the building totally. Unless directional signs are coordinated with the new down- town beautification, she would object to thus. Vice Mayor Norton thought the signs should be referred to the Planning Commission with an indication Council would like for them to look at size, placement, and level of illumination. If half the wall of the building is lighted, the effect could be quite bothersome and out of Character. MOTION: Vice Mayor Norton moved, seconded by Beihrs, that the matter of the signs for the Holiday Inn, 625 El Camino Real, be referred to the Planning Commission with the request that they look particularly at the size, number of signs, placement of signs, and level of intensity of illumination. Councilman Rosenbaum agreed with the motion but felt there should be some policy decision made as to whether Council wanted the exterior wall signs. Vice Mayor Norton asked if Councilman Rosenbaum meant by wall signs numbers 3, 4 and 5, leaving the low sign. Vice Mayor Norton said he stilt wanted a reading on the level of illumination. Councilman Rosenbaum had suggested that sign number 2 be 'educed in size, which would result in two signs on the project. 4 1 4 6/4/73 Councilman Rosenbaum stated that two of the five signs he regarded as acceptable. He was not necessarily saying there should not be more than two signs. Council still has a right of approval of signs, but he thought Council should make a strong statement of the thing that is going to be acceptable. A policy statement should be made that signs 3, 4 and 5 are not acceptable. Vice Mayor Norton said he would accept that as part of the motion, but he understood also it would not preclude some alternative recommendations by Mr. Chen to the Planning Commission or by the Planning Commission to the Council. He restated the motion. �.N RESTATED Vice Mayor Norton moved, seconded by Beahrs, that the mater of signs for the Holiday Inn be referred to the Planning Commis- sion with a statement that signs 3, 4 and 5 are not acceptable and Planning Commission to look particularly at the size, number of signs, placement of signs and level of intensity of illumination. Councilwoman Pearson stated that if there were going to be more signs or directional signs, the Planning Commission should know they have to be coordinated with signing for the new downtown beautification. She would. like to have tat incorporated into the motion and that lighting be considered a negative, Vice Mayor Norton responded that he would not accept this suggestion as part of the motion, because it sounded like Council was suggesting that signs be coordinated with some nonexistent standard. Councilwoman Pearson said there are going to be standards for downtown and she thought the signs should be coordinated. Councilman Clark asked for clarification as to what the motion says, because he thought there had to be identification for people coning off Bayshore down University Avenue to know where they are going. Vice Mayor Norton replied that the motion does not preclude additional signs, but the signs as shown on the wall in addition to numbers 1 and 2 would be unacceptable. Councilwoman Seman stated that she supported the motion and the idea of deleting brightly lighted signs between the third and fourth stories of the building. She would hate to see Palo Alto become the kind of place where looking down University Avenue you would see commercially lighted neon signs at the end of the street instead of the stars. C,.unzil a.n Beahrs stated that public safety has to be considered. If people are looking for the Holiday Inn and can't find it, there will be accidents. Easy access is important to public safety. Mr. Chen reminded Council that the city would share in the revenue from this hotel. He did not feel Council would like to see a development that is inconvenient or so inconspicuous that it cannot be seen by the public it intends to serve. There is a strict regulation in the Holiday inn system that there must be a sign. If the standard falls below the required standard, they eliminate the hotel from the system. The people who will use this facility will mostly be from out of town, and in the winter, it will be hard to locate the hotel at night. He said they had spent a considerable amount of time in planning the signs, and their only intention is to help people who want to locate it get there. He showed slides of existing hotel signs in the city. He said they do not want 4 1 5 6/4/73 to have gaudy signs, but because of their confusing traffic location, there must be something to help people locate the hotel. The motion passed on a unanimous vote. Coon ervatioii of Gas, Electricit1a and Water Resources Councilman Henderson referred to the memorandum he had sent to Council regarding a study on possible means of encouraging conservation of gas, electricity, and water resources through utility rate structures. He emphasized that he was not now proposing any particular rate schedule changes but thought it was important to know what rate schedules might be proposed and what estimates on consumption and revenue would accrue. MOTION: Councilman Henderson moved, seconded by Rosenbaum, that Council direct staff to study and report to Council on possible means of en- couraging conservation of gas, electricity, and water resources through utility rate structures r+nd other conservation methods. Councilman Beahrs commented that he supported the idea; however, he wished an equivalent effort could be made on private automobiles, especially in two- to five -car families which are causing 95% of the loss of energy in this country. The motion passed on a unanimous vote. 75th Anniversary of Sunset Magazine ,C,; Mayor Comstock moved, seconded by Henderson, that staff be directed to prepare a resolution co=mmending and co ierorating the seventy-fifth anniversary of Sunset Magazine. The motion passed on a unanimous vote. MetraEoli�car. Trans ortation Commission eY �.�a . ry Councilwoman Pearson stated that the final hearing of the MTC would be held next Monday, June 11, 1973 in the Board of Supervisors' chanters at 7:30 p.m., and she thought it was important that a Council aver or staff member appear at this hearing and emphasize the city's position on the Dembarton Bridge and an bicycles as an alternative means of transportation. Mayor Comstock said he would see that someone is there to represent the city. .Clean Air Act Councilwoman Pearson indicated that the final recommendations regarding the Clean Air Act would be presented on June 20 and 21 at the Tahoe Sands Motor Lodge. If the city can get a copy of the recommendations, staff can make sure plans to increase use of bicycles are included. If not, a representative should appear to make this recommendation. She was advised that a staff member would attend. 4 1 6 614/73 BCDC Hearing re Dumbarton Bridge Councilwoman Pearson stated that the BCDC would hold a hearing regarding the proposed new Dumbarton Bridge and its environmental impact sometime in August. Staff should be alerted to be sure they are going to present the city's own social impact study and environmental impact study. The Toll Bridge Authority is goin►g to be presentees the impact study. She thought it was important for the city to get a copy of that report. Mayor Comstock asked staff to follow through, and City Manager Sipel said staff would consider it a part of their responsibility to react to £ny proposed environmental_ impact statement, but he needed clarifi- cation on preparing the city's awn environmental impact statement. Councilwomen Pearson responded that she thought there was information that could be put into a report to give them Palo Alto's total position. Mayor Comstock asked staff to obtain other environmental impact reports on the bridge and bring them to Council. Oral Communications x. Valerie Good, 239 Cowper Street, addressed Council regarding a need for e redistribution center and showed samples of items collected from disposal bins which were in good enough con- dition to be used by people in need who cannot afford to purchase. 2. Joseph Cooney, Menlo Park, addressed Council expressing his opinion regarding various police matters. Executive Session Council recessed to executive session from 12:00 midnight to 12:45 a.m. to discuss personnel matters. _ „ AdJ ournmes_ The meeting adjourned at 12:45 a.m. APPROVED: ITURA) Mayor .� ATTEST: =.41: 4 1 7 6/4/73