HomeMy WebLinkAboutRESO 9894
1
2020060301
Resolution No. 9894
Resolution of the Council of the City of Palo Alto Adopting
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Thresholds of Significance for
Transportation Impacts in Compliance with SB 743
R E C I T A L S
A. Senate Bill (SB) 743, signed into law in 2013 by Governor Edmund G. Brown,
directed the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) to develop updated criteria for
measuring transportation impacts under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) using
alternative metrics that promote a reduction in greenhouse gases, the development of
multimodal transportation, and a diversity of land uses, all towards achieving the State’s
climate action goals.
B. OPR prepared proposed updates to the CEQA Guidelines and a Technical
Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts using vehicle miles traveled (VMT) as the metric
to evaluate the transportation impacts of a project under CEQA. OPR’s CEQA Guidelines update
was approved by the California Natural Resources Agency in November 2018 and the
Governor’s Office of Administrative Law on December 28, 2018.
C. Section 15064.3 of the CEQA Guidelines, added as part of the 2018 update,
identifies VMT as the most appropriate measure of transportation impacts under CEQA, and
states that a project’s effect on automobile delay shall not constitute a significant
environmental impact. Lead agencies are required to begin using the VMT metric by July 1,
2020.
D. The mandate on lead agencies in Section 15064.3 requires the City to update its
CEQA transportation thresholds of significance.
E. CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.7(b) allows lead agencies to adopt thresholds of
significance for the lead agency’s general use in its environmental review process.
F. On May 18, 2020, the Council held a study session to review the State
requirements for the evaluation of projects for transportation impacts and to review the
recommendations of staff and the City’s consultant Fehr & Peers regarding the revised CEQA
thresholds. The Council discussed potential thresholds, screening criteria, and other matters
related to the transition to use of the VMT metric for CEQA purposes, as well as the anticipated
use of level of service (LOS) analysis for local transportation analysis separate from CEQA.
G. On June 15, 2020, the Council held a further public hearing on the proposed VMT
thresholds of significance.
H. Notice of the project and public hearings was posted on the City’s website for
both Council meetings. Evidence, both oral and written, was presented at the public hearings.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 5E3A7CE7-FF2A-421F-B7E1-79FDB973E0D0
2
2020060301
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Palo Alto does hereby RESOLVE as
follows:
SECTION 1. The Council finds and determines, based upon staff and consultant
reports and research as well as testimony in the record, that the revised CEQA thresholds of
significance under consideration are consistent with State requirements as to how
transportation impacts should be evaluated for purposes of CEQA review of projects. The
revised thresholds are based upon the VMT metric that is specifically required in CEQA
Guidelines Section 15064.3. Additionally, the City is setting the new CEQA thresholds at a level
and in a manner consistent with and based upon review of OPR guidance.
SECTION 2. The adoption of new CEQA thresholds of significance for transportation
impacts is consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan.
Specifically, the new CEQA thresholds of significance for transportation impacts are consistent
with Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element and Transportation Element goals and policies as
follows:
i. GOAL T-1: Create a sustainable transportation system, complemented by a
mix of land uses, that emphasizes walking, bicycling, use of public
transportation and other methods to reduce GHG emissions and the use of
single-occupancy motor vehicles.
ii. Policy T-1.3: Reduce GHG and pollutant emissions associated with
transportation by reducing VMT and per-mile emissions through increasing
transit options, supporting biking and walking, and the use of zero-emission
vehicle technologies to meet City and State goals for GHG reductions by
2030.
iii. GOAL T-2: Decrease delay, congestion and VMT with a priority on our worst
intersections and our peak commute times, including school traffic.
iv. Policy T-2.3: Use motor vehicle LOS at signalized intersections to evaluate
the potential impact of proposed projects, including contributions to
cumulative congestion. Use signal warrants and other metrics to evaluate
impacts at unsignalized intersections.
v. Program T2.3.1: When adopting new CEQA significance thresholds for VMT
for compliance with SB 743 (2013), adopt standards for vehicular LOS
analysis for use in evaluating the consistency of a proposed project with the
Comprehensive Plan, and also explore desired standards for MMLOS, which
includes motor vehicle LOS, at signalized intersections.
vi. GOAL T-3: Maintain an efficient roadway network for all users.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 5E3A7CE7-FF2A-421F-B7E1-79FDB973E0D0
3
2020060301
vii. Policy T-3.3: Avoid major increases in single-occupant vehicle capacity when
constructing or modifying roadways unless needed to remedy severe
congestion or critical neighborhood traffic problems. Where capacity is
increased, balance the needs of motor vehicles with pedestrians and
bicyclists.
viii. Policy L-1.9: Participate in regional strategies to address the interaction of
jobs, housing balance and transportation issues.
ix. Policy L-2.3: As a key component of a diverse, inclusive community, allow
and encourage a mix of housing types and sizes, integrated into
neighborhoods and designed for greater affordability, particularly smaller
housing types, such as studios, co-housing, cottages, clustered housing,
accessory dwelling units and senior housing.
x. Policy L-2.4: Use a variety of strategies to stimulate housing, near retail,
employment, and transit, in a way that connects to and enhances existing
neighborhoods.
xi. Program L2.4.7: Explore mechanisms for increasing multi-family housing
density near multimodal transit centers.
xii. Policy L-2.5: Support the creation of affordable housing units for middle to
lower income level earners, such as City and school district employees, as
feasible.
xiii. Policy L-4.2: Preserve ground-floor retail, limit the displacement of existing
retail from neighborhood centers and explore opportunities to expand
retail.
xiv. Policy L-4.5: Support local-serving retail, recognizing that it provides
opportunities for local employment, reduced commute times, stronger
community connections and neighborhood orientation.
xv. Program L4.5.1: Revise zoning and other regulations as needed to
encourage the preservation of space to accommodate small businesses,
start-ups and other services.
SECTION 3. Based upon the foregoing, the Council hereby adopts the revised CEQA
Thresholds of Significance for Transportation Impacts and Screening Criteria for the City of Palo
Alto, attached hereto as Exhibit A.
//
//
//
DocuSign Envelope ID: 5E3A7CE7-FF2A-421F-B7E1-79FDB973E0D0
4
2020060301
SECTION 4. This project is categorically exempt in accordance with CEQA Guidelines
Section 15308 (Actions by a Regulatory Agency for Protection of the Environment). The revised
CEQA thresholds comply with a State mandate (SB 743) and will be used in a regulatory process
that involves procedures for the protection of the environment.
INTRODUCED AND PASSED: June 15, 2020
AYES: CORMACK, DUBOIS, FILSETH, FINE, KNISS, TANAKA
NOES: KOU
ABSENT:
ABSTENTIONS:
ATTEST:
____________________________ ____________________________
City Clerk Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED:
____________________________ ____________________________
Assistant City Attorney City Manager
____________________________
Chief Transportation Official
DocuSign Envelope ID: 5E3A7CE7-FF2A-421F-B7E1-79FDB973E0D0
5
2020060301
EXHIBIT A
City of Palo Alto California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
Thresholds of Significance for Transportation Impacts
Consistent with State CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3, the City of Palo Alto has adopted the
thresholds of significance set forth in Table 1 to guide in determining when a project will have a
significant transportation impact.
Table 1: VMT Thresholds of Significance by Project Type
Land Use/Project Type Threshold of Significance
Residential Projects A proposed project exceeding a level of 15% below existing
(baseline) County home-based VMT per resident may indicate a
significant transportation impact.
Office Projects A proposed project exceeding a level of 15% below existing
(baseline) regional home-based work VMT per employee may
indicate a significant transportation impact.
Retail Projects A proposed project that results in a net increase in total
(boundary) VMT may indicate a significant transportation impact.
Mixed-Use Projects Each component of a proposed mixed-use project should be
evaluated independently and apply thresholds of significance for
each project type separately (i.e., residential, office, and retail).
Other Project Types The City will either develop an ad hoc (i.e., project-specific) VMT
threshold for a unique land use type or apply the most applicable
of the above thresholds depending on project characteristics.
Redevelopment
Projects
Where a proposed project replaces existing VMT-generating land
uses, if the replacement leads to a net overall decrease in VMT,
the project may cause a less than significant transportation
impact. If the redevelopment project leads to a net overall
increase in VMT, it may cause a significant transportation impact
if proposed new residential, office, or retail land uses would
individually exceed their respective thresholds.
Certain projects may qualify for vehicle miles traveled (VMT) screening based on the criteria
presented in Table 2. Projects screened from requiring a VMT analysis would not have an impact
under State CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3
//
//
//
//
//
DocuSign Envelope ID: 5E3A7CE7-FF2A-421F-B7E1-79FDB973E0D0
6
2020060301
Table 2: Screening Criteria
Land Use/Project Type Screening Criteria
Small Developments Projects that generate fewer than 110 trips per day. This may
equate to non-residential projects of 10,000 sq. ft., or less and
residential projects of 20 units or less.
Projects in Low-VMT
Areas
Residential and office projects located in low-VMT areas1 that
have similar features (i.e., density, mix of uses, transit
accessibility) as existing developments in these areas.
Projects in Proximity to
Major Transit Stops
Projects that are located within a half mile of an existing or
planned high-quality transit corridor or major transit stations,
and meet the following additional criteria: (1) is high density
(minimum floor area ratio of 0.75), (2) does not exceed parking
requirements, (3) is consistent with Plan Bay Area 2040
(http://2040.planbayarea.org/), and (4) does not replace
affordable units with smaller numbers of moderate- or above
moderate-income units.
Affordable Housing 100% affordable housing projects in infill locations.
Local-Serving Retail Retail projects of 10,000 sq. ft. or less.1
Transportation Projects Roadway, transit, bicycle and pedestrian projects that do not lead
to a measurable increase in vehicle travel.
1 Residential projects located in areas where baseline VMT is 15% below the existing county average per resident,
and office projects located in areas where baseline VMT is 15% below the existing regional average per employee
could be considered to be in low-VMT areas and presumed to have a less than significant VMT impact.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 5E3A7CE7-FF2A-421F-B7E1-79FDB973E0D0
Certificate Of Completion
Envelope Id: 5E3A7CE7FF2A421FB7E179FDB973E0D0 Status: Completed
Subject: Please DocuSign: RESO 9894 Adopting VMT CEQA Transportation Threshold.docx
Source Envelope:
Document Pages: 6 Signatures: 5 Envelope Originator:
Certificate Pages: 2 Initials: 0 Kim Lunt
AutoNav: Enabled
EnvelopeId Stamping: Enabled
Time Zone: (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada)
250 Hamilton Ave
Palo Alto , CA 94301
kimberly.lunt@cityofpaloalto.org
IP Address: 199.33.32.254
Record Tracking
Status: Original
6/23/2020 11:28:24 AM
Holder: Kim Lunt
kimberly.lunt@cityofpaloalto.org
Location: DocuSign
Security Appliance Status: Connected Pool: StateLocal
Storage Appliance Status: Connected Pool: City of Palo Alto Location: DocuSign
Signer Events Signature Timestamp
Sandra Lee
Sandra.Lee@CityofPaloAlto.org
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
(None)
Signature Adoption: Pre-selected Style
Using IP Address: 199.33.32.254
Sent: 6/23/2020 11:31:07 AM
Viewed: 6/23/2020 11:49:01 AM
Signed: 6/23/2020 11:49:48 AM
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Not Offered via DocuSign
Philip Kamhi
Philip.Kamhi@CityofPaloAlto.org
Chief Transportation Official
City of Palo Alto
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
(None)
Signature Adoption: Pre-selected Style
Using IP Address: 199.33.32.254
Sent: 6/23/2020 11:49:50 AM
Viewed: 6/23/2020 11:50:57 AM
Signed: 6/23/2020 11:51:16 AM
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Not Offered via DocuSign
Ed Shikada
ed.shikada@cityofpaloalto.org
Ed Shikada, City Manager
City of Palo Alto
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
(None)
Signature Adoption: Pre-selected Style
Using IP Address: 199.33.32.254
Sent: 6/23/2020 11:51:18 AM
Viewed: 6/23/2020 6:09:38 PM
Signed: 6/23/2020 6:09:45 PM
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Not Offered via DocuSign
Adrian Fine
adrian.fine@cityofpaloalto.org
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
(None)
Signature Adoption: Pre-selected Style
Using IP Address: 108.228.10.70
Sent: 6/23/2020 6:09:47 PM
Viewed: 6/23/2020 6:29:01 PM
Signed: 6/23/2020 6:29:11 PM
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Not Offered via DocuSign
Signer Events Signature Timestamp
Beth Minor
Beth.Minor@CityofPaloAlto.org
City Clerk
City of Palo Alto
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
(None)
Signature Adoption: Pre-selected Style
Using IP Address: 199.33.32.254
Sent: 6/23/2020 6:29:14 PM
Viewed: 6/23/2020 6:30:20 PM
Signed: 6/23/2020 6:30:29 PM
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Not Offered via DocuSign
In Person Signer Events Signature Timestamp
Editor Delivery Events Status Timestamp
Agent Delivery Events Status Timestamp
Intermediary Delivery Events Status Timestamp
Certified Delivery Events Status Timestamp
Carbon Copy Events Status Timestamp
Witness Events Signature Timestamp
Notary Events Signature Timestamp
Envelope Summary Events Status Timestamps
Envelope Sent Hashed/Encrypted 6/23/2020 6:29:14 PM
Certified Delivered Security Checked 6/23/2020 6:30:20 PM
Signing Complete Security Checked 6/23/2020 6:30:29 PM
Completed Security Checked 6/23/2020 6:30:29 PM
Payment Events Status Timestamps