Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff Report 14974 City of Palo Alto (ID # 14974) Utilities Advisory Commission Staff Report Meeting Date: 2/1/2023 Report Type: VII. NEW BUSINESS City of Palo Alto Page 1 Title: Discussion and Status Update on the One Water Plan From: Director of Utilities Lead Department: Utilities This item is for discussion and no action is requested. Staff seeks input from the Utilities Advisory Commission (UAC) on progress to date developing the One Water Plan for Palo Alto. Staff will use this input to guide the development of its water supply and conservation options and the process of screening and packaging those options into potential water supply portfolios. The attached presentation (Attachment A) provides an overview of the One Water Plan, water supply and conservation options, screening process, draft evaluation criteria and community survey results, and water supply portfolio themes. Attachment B provides a detailed list of water supply and conservation options. Staff plans to return to the UAC during a joint meeting with the Stormwater Management Oversight Committee to present initial results in the second quarter of 2023. Attachments: • Attachment A: Presentation • Attachment B: Supply Options • CITY OF PALO ALTO February 1, 2023 www.cityofpaloalto.org One Water Plan Update Utilities Advisory Commission Staff: Lisa Bilir • CITY OF PALO ALTO 2 www.cityofpaloalto.org Outline •One Water Plan Overview •Discussion: One Water Plan Strategic Direction •Supply & Conservation Options and Screening Process and UAC Ideas for Additional Options •Evaluation Criteria and Engagement Meetings Results •Discussion: Portfolio Themes •Next Steps • CITY OF PALO ALTO 3 www.cityofpaloalto.org One Water Plan: Roadmap in an Uncertain Future The One Water Plan: •Is a Key Action in Sustainability and Climate Action Plan​ •Is a long-term 20-year (through 2045) Water Supply Plan •Addresses future uncertainty such as SFPUC supply reliability, droughts,and climate change​ •Includes robust and meaningful stakeholder engagement​ •Is being completed by an outside consultant Carollo Engineers, a National One Water Thought Leader​ •Builds on existing plans/work​ What the One Water Plan does not directly address: •Current ongoing drought •Short-term emergencies such as earthquakes and wildfires – addressed under separate emergency plans​ • CITY OF PALO ALTO TITLE 40 FONT BOLD Subtitle 32 font 4 www.cityofpaloalto.org One Water Plan Project Overview Data Gathering Water Supply & Conservation Options Community Needs and Priorities {Sept 2022) Assessment of unknowns Sharing Initial Results {-Feb 2023) Supply & Conservation Portfolios FW1dlng strategy • CITY OF PALO ALTO Recommended Supply Strategy Trigger-based Implementation Strategy Supply Options Screening Evaluation Criteria Exploring Water Supply Options (Dec 2022) TITLE 40 FONT BOLD Subtitle 32 font 5 www.cityofpaloalto.org Water Conservation Regional Comparison • CITY OF PALO ALTO Average Residential Water Use in BAWSCA Region in FY 2012/ 13 was 71 GPCD BAWSCA Member Agency SFPUC Purchase and Residential Capita Per Day Use in FY 2012/2013 O Brisbene/GMIO r-fWS.SSF U O Hsywarcf We5lboroogh O O • o =n Bn.100 Q Millbfae North Coa•I O .Bu~ingam& H,llsoorougt,. A .E51ero ., .ACWD CWS-Mi<lfen Mid Pen • d edwOOdQ\)' .~nloParl< CoaslsldeQ 0 easl Palo AIIO SFPUC Purchases 0 1 mgd Q 2 .5mgd 0 5mgd 0 10mgd Residential Per Capita Use e > 75GPCD 65-75 GPCD 48-65 GPCD e <48GPCD • NA - Palo Alto Q Mdpllas San Josi! SianfotdQ Mountain View 0 CWS-Bear Gulc11-0 • •sani;,Cfara •Purlss,ma Hills Sunnyvare Soon:e; 8AWSCA-FY 2012/2013 Annual Survey 0 2 _5 5 I I I 10 MIies I I A 24133 Sources : BAWSCA FY 2020/2 1 Annua l Survey and SFPUC 2020 UWM P • No agencies us i ng < 48 GPCD • 9 agencies us ing 48-65 GPCD • 12 agencies us ing > 75 GPCD • 49 GPCD SF Reta i l Res idential Use (avg.) Bay A:reA Water Suppi:v & CaNIMVatlon Aga-n.ey TITLE 40 FONT BOLD Subtitle 32 font 6 www.cityofpaloalto.org Water Conservation Regional Comparison • CITY OF PALO ALTO Average Residential Water Use in BAWSCA Region in FY 2020/21 was 66 GPCD BAWSCA Member Agency Sf PUC Purchase and Residential Capita Per Day Use in FY 2020/2021 Daly City • O Br-..b;mo/GMI0 •CWS-SSF O Hayward Westbofough • •S•nBruno Q Mllbrae North Coast O Burlrigame 0 Hillsborough . 0 O Estero CWS-MidP n Mid Pen O O Redwooc! City Q MenloPatk Coastslde Q .East PatoAllo O ACWD SFPUC Purchases O 1 mgd Q 2.5mgd 0 5 mgd 0 10 mg<I Res idential Per Capita Use • > 75 GPCD 65-7 5 GPCD 48-65GPCD • <48 GPCD • NA CWS-Bear GUich-- Polo Alto Milpitas san Jose Stanford O Mountain View • Q Source ; BAWSCA-FY 20201202 1 Aonual Survey 25/33 Q o O santa Clore •Pu,lsslma Hits Sunnyvat~ Sou rce s: BAWSCA FY 2020/21 An nua l Su rvey and SFPUC 2020 UWM P N 0 2.5 5 I I I 10 Mi les A • 9 agencies us i ng< 48 GPCD • 8 agencies us i ng 48 -65 GPCD • 4 agencies us i ng > 75 GPCD • 42 GPCD SF Retail Residential Use (avg .) TITLE 40 FONT BOLD Subtitle 32 font 7 www.cityofpaloalto.org Discussion: Recommended One Water Strategic Direction 1.Prioritize actions that reduce Palo Alto's Water Demand without compromising tree canopy health 2.Develop sustainable, resilient water supply portfolios to meet the remaining demand • CITY OF PALO ALTO 8 www.cityofpaloalto.org Supply and Conservation Option Screening • CITY OF PALO ALTO Potential Water Supply and Conservation Options Themed Project Portfolios Recommended Implementation Strategy □ ■ ■ -□□ ••• ■ ■ ■ □• □ •• □□ ••• ■ ■ □• ~25 options ■ Ongoing/Already Planned ■ Not feasible ~Obht time ■ Moving forward ■ ■ D o □■ ■ ••• ■ ■ □• ~15 options Project Screening Criteria ■ Estimated Yield (afy) ■ Life Cycle Costs ($/acre-ft) ■ Increases supply reliability in drought years? ■ Other? A B C D "C" 4 portfolios 1 supply portfolio ■ Supply Availability ■ Supply Resilience ■ Community Benefits ■ Environmental Benefits ■ Life Cycle Cost ■ Ease of Implementation 9 www.cityofpaloalto.org Supply Option Pre-Screening Ongoing or already planned Not feasible at.this .time ■ Planned/ongoing conservation ■ Advanced metering program ■ Distribution system water loss reduction ■ Non-potable reuse ■ SFPUC imported water supply Deemed Infeasible in Previous Studies • Temporary dewatering sites • lnteragency transfer agreement ■ Excessive Cost or Complexity • Blackwater capture and reuse • Atmospheric water generators • Local surface water reservoir • Valley Water treated water (via new pipeline) Outside of City Control • Indirect potable reuse at Lake Lagunita (groundwater recharge) • Regional storage • CITY OF PALO ALTO 10 www.cityofpaloalto.org Supply Option Pre-Screening ■ New conservation actions ■ Converting emergency supply wells ■ City park groundwater irrigation ■ Direct potable reuse (via regional facility or City facility) ■ Indirect potable reuse via groundwater injection ■ Expanded non-potable reuse ■ Permanent dewatering (as part of reuse options) ■ Graywater capture and reuse ■ Stormwater capture (residential/commercial-scale or GSI) ■ Multi-source below-ground storage (e stormwater detention) ■ Desalination ■ Other ideas from today: _________ _ • CITY OF PALO ALTO . :twi!ERE?­ HUW ! WHO? ---­' WHAT? HOW? WHY? ~HOW?.¥ --- 11 www.cityofpaloalto.org Evaluation Criteria Supply Availability • Norm a l year re liab il ity • Dry year re li ab il ity enefits • Wa t er qual ity • Wa t er equity • Vu lnerabi lli ty risk score (res iilience to uncertai nt ies) Environmental Benefits • Tree canopy health • Sustainab le water supp li es • Waters h ed hea lth • CITY OF PALO ALTO Life Cycle Cost • $/acre-foot cost of each portfolio • Implementatio n t ime li ne • Ope rationa l co m plexi t y • Alignment wi t h ot he r effo rt s • Publ ic acce pt ance • Regu latory comp lex iity • Fund i ng oppo rt un it ies 12 www.cityofpaloalto.org Evaluation Criteria Survey –Community Results • CITY OF PALO ALTO Scale these crit,eria on relative importance. il\llentimeter Supply Availability Supply Resilience Life Cyc le Cost Community Benefits Environmenta Benefi ts -----------_-_,6.6 Ease of Implementation 7.3 ~wJ!ERE?.., HUW!WffO? WI? 111111m,,11n 10M? , WHAT? HOW? WHY? ~HOW?~ --- 13 www.cityofpaloalto.org Discussion: Proposed Portfolio Themes Required Baseline Portfolio Business as usual, only implementing already planned projects and programs . Baseline for Portfolio comparison I Minimize Cost What mix of options will have the lowest combined supply cost? Maximize Local Supplies What mix of options further increase the City's local water supplies the most? Requesting your inputl I Maximize Drought Resilience What mix of options enable the City to best mitigate the impact of droughts? • CITY OF PALO ALTO Sustainable Water Supplies What mix of options are renewable , equitable, and protect the environment the most? ♦ Other Themes 14 www.cityofpaloalto.org Next Steps 1.Stakeholder Engagement –Initial Results 2.UAC Initial Results/ Stormwater Oversight Committee Joint Meeting 3.City Council Initial Results –Information Only 4.UAC Final One Water Plan 5.City Council Final One Water Plan March 2023 Q2 2023 Q2 2023 Fall 2023 Fall 2023 • CITY OF PALO ALTO Palo Alto One Water Supply Plan Draft - Supply Options Matrix November 2022 Category #Supply Option Description 1 Planned/Ongoing Conservation Continuation of ongoing water conservation programs that will continue to meet state efficiency legislation. Includes customer rebate programs for implementing efficiency measures. Includes continuing to implement AMI (advanced metering infrastructure) for water meters to detect and reduce water leaks. Program is ongoing and expected to be complete in 2024-2025. 2 Enhanced conservation Conservation efforts that go above and beyond current conservation measures. Could include more aggressive building codes and/or alternatives for serving the needs of Foothills Nature Preserve, including irrigation and filling of Boronda Lake. Includes customer side water loss reduction. Outdoor conservation mechanisms could include incentives for transitioning to native, drought tolerant trees; banning or reducing lawns, while maintaining tree canopy. 3 Converting emergency supply wells Converting the 8 wells constructed/rehabbed in 2015 from emergency to potable use. 4 City park groundwater irrigation Construct new small wells to irrigate city parks. Conservation Groundwater DRA F T Palo Alto One Water Supply Plan Draft - Supply Options Matrix November 2022 Category #Supply Option Description 5 Expanded NPR NPR Phase 3 pipeline extended into the foothills and Los Altos Hills (Northwest County Recycled Water Strategic Plan, Option A2) 6 Direct potable reuse (City facility) AWPF constructed near the RWQCP to provide a local DPR source. (Northwest County Recycled Water Strategic Plan, Option D1) 7 Direct potable reuse (regional facility)Send water to Valley Water’s regional facility (tertiary treated wastewater) in exchange for purified water. 8 Indirect potable reuse (groundwater injection) AWPF constructed near the RWQCP to provide a local IPR source. AWPF water would be conveyed to five injection well sites to augment groundwater supply (Northwest County Recycled Water Strategic Plan, Option C1) 9 Indirect potable reuse (Lake Lagunita groundwater recharge) Send IPR treated water to Lake Lagunita on Stanford campus to percolate into aquifer to augment groundwater supply. 10 Graywater Capture and Reuse On-site use of graywater (relatively clean wastewater from baths, sinks, washing machines, other kitchen appliances) either on a customer-scale or at City facilities. 11 Blackwater Capture and Reuse On-site use of blackwater (wastewater from toilets) either on a customer-scale or at City facilities. Water Reuse DRA F T Palo Alto One Water Supply Plan Draft - Supply Options Matrix November 2022 Category #Supply Option Description 12 Residential or commercial-scale Stormwater/Rainwater Capture Expand upon current City rain barrel program. Potentially work with larger sites such as schools to implement larger scale rainwater capture. 13 Green stormwater infrastructure Increased implementation of green stormwater infrastructure, including bioretention areas, pervious pavement, green roofs, etc. Could include large scale stormwater capture at parks for reuse. 14 SFPUC supply Water purchased from San Francisco's Regional Water System. 85% of this water comes from Hetch Hetchy and 15% from local watersheds in Alameda and San Mateo Counties. 15 Valley Water treated water Extend Valley Water treated water pipeline to connect to SFPUC pipelines and serve Palo Alto at the Page Mill turnout. Water source undefined. 16 Interagency Transfer Agreement This would include purchasing additional water from another water agency. 17 Atmospheric water generators (AWGs) Extract water by condensing humidity from ambient air. This alternative would consider both home and commercial-scale AWGs. 18 Local storage This would include building surface storage within the City's boundaries and/or a local watershed. 19 Regional storage This would include partnering with other agencies in the region to build or expand surface storage (i.e. Los Vaqueros) Stormwater Capture and Use Imported Water Other DRA F T Palo Alto One Water Supply Plan Draft - Supply Options Matrix November 2022 Category #Supply Option Description 20 Multi-source storage Storage to store stormwater, recycled water, or dewatering water (from permanent sites) dependent on time of year and water source availability. Would be limited to City-owned facilities. 21 Regional desalination Regional or local desalination project utilizing either brackish groundwater or bay intake. 22 Temporary dewatering sites Trucking water from temporary dewatering sites (such as basement construction) to City parks for irrigation. 23 Permanent dewatering sites Redirect discharge from permanent dewatering sites (Oregon Expressway and City Hall) to RWQCP to increase flows for future potable reuse project. Other (cont.) DRA F T