Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06121967City Hall Palo Alto, California June 12, 1967 The Council of the City of Palo Alto met in an adjourned meeting on this date at 7:30 p.m. with Mayor Dias presiding. Present: Beahra, Berwald, Clark, Comstock, Cooley, Debt', Dias, Gallagher, Pearson, Rohrs (arrived 8:05 p.m.), Wheatley Absent: Arnold, Ruts Expanieion of Electric Station S MOTION: Councilman Cooley moved, on behalf of the Finance Com- mittee, that the necessary property be acquired for Electric Station 5, and introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: Resolution No. 4002 entitled "Resolution of the Council of the City of Palo Alto Finding and Determining that the Public Interest and Necessity of said City Require, for Public lJse for Public Grounds, Certain Land Located in the City of Palo Alto, County of Santa Clara, State of California, for the Ec- pansion of Station S." The resolution was adopted on the following roll call vote: Ayes: Beahra, Berwald, Claxk, Comstock, Cooley, Debs, Dias, Gallagher, Pearson, Wheatley Noes: None MOTION: Councilman Cooley moved, seconded by B;ahrs, that the matter be referred to the Planning Comninission in accordance with PANIC section 2. 251. 3(e) . The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. Solicitation - Hours and Unordered Merchandise MOTION: Councilman Comstock introduced the following ordinance on behalf of the Manning and Procedures Connmittee and moved its approval for first reading: Ordinance of the Council of .the City of Palo Alto Adding Sub- eection D to Section 4.04 of the Palo Alto Municipal. Code re Hours for Soliciting. The ordinance was approved on the following roll call vote: Ayes: Beahrs, Berwald, Clark, Comstock, Cooley, Debs, Dias, Gallagher, Pearson, Wheatley Noes: None MOTION: Councilman Comstock introduced the following ordinance on behalf of the Planning and Procedures Committee and moved its approval for first reading: Ordinance of the Council of the City of Palo Alto Amending Section 20. 04 of the Palo Alto Municipal Code to Prohibit Leaving Free Samples or Unordered Merchandise upon any Private Premise Facept as Provided. The ordinance was approved on the following roll call vote: Ayes: Beahrs, Berwald, Clark, Comstock, Cooley, Debs, Dias, Gallagher, Pearson, Wheatley Noes: None im ersonation of Public Officials MOTION: Councilman Comstock introduced on behalf of the Plan- ning and Procedures Committee the following ordinance and moved its approval for first reading: Ordinance of the Council of the City of Palo Alto Adding Section 7. 14 to the Palo Alto Municipal Code Prohibiting Impersonation _____ of Certain Public Officlals. The ordinance was approved on the following roll call vote: Ayes; Beahrs, Beewaid, Clark, Comstock. Cooley; D .b's, Dias, Gallagher, Pearson, Wheatley Noes: None Charitable Soliciation lepor} MOTION: Councilman Comstock rnoved, on behalf of the Planning and Procedures Committee, to direct the staff to prepare a report and proposed ordinance regulating charitable solicitations within the City, report and ordinance to be returned to committee. Discussion followed concerning the desirability of not interfering with operations of legitimate church groups or charitable organiza- tions while at the same time discouraging less worthy solicitations. The motion carried unanimously by voice vote. 207 6/12/67 Old Trace Road Pro osed Assessment District Councilman Cooley stated he had inquired of Bond Counsel Jones and City Attorney Hildebrand concerning his eligibility to participate in discussion and vote in connection with the proposed Old Trace Road assessment district in view of his recent purchase of property in the area and had been advised that no conflict of interest eeiets. Planning Officer Fou.rcroy outlined the Planning Cornmission recom- mendation fez- parts of the proposed assessment district. (NOTE: Planning Commission recommendation is as follows: 1. That street standards be: Manuela Avenue Oakhill Avenue Mesa Avenue Robb Road 60 foot right-of-way - 40 foot curb - to -curb paved width 5J foot right-of-way - 30 foot curb - to -curb paved width 50 foot right-of-way - 30 foot curb - to -curb paved width To remain as existing - 50 foot right-fo-way - 36 foot curb - to curb paved width Unnamed cul-de- 25 foot right-of-way - 20 loot curb -to - sac curb paved width Z. That on Manuela Avenue, Oakhill Avenue and Mesa Avenue, 8 feet be provided o.; one side of the paving for a rustic pathway suitable for pedestrian and bicycle us$ -and -a2_ ----- - feet be reserved -'u the other side for possible future equestrian use. 3. That on the unnamed cul-de-sac, in addition to the 25 foot right-of-way, 5 feet be provided for municipal utility easement adjacent to the right-of-way; and that of the 25 foot right-of-way, 20 feet be paved for vehicular use, a one foot non -access strip be provided on. the south side, and the remaiairig 4 feet be used for a rustic footpath.. 4. That curbs be concrete. 5. That where trees occur within the parking lanes and/or pathways, these be preserved if at all possible. The Comxreission further, by unanimous vote, wishes to indi- cate that in the course of the General Plan review special attention will be paid to possible redesignatioa of all or por- tions of the Old Trace Road proposed assessment district area from three dwelling units per acre to one dwelling unit per acre and requests that this possibility be taken into account in projecting utility requirements for this area.) (Councilman Rohrs arrived at 8:05 p.m.) MOTION: Councilman Cooley moved, seconded by Rohrs, approval of the Planning Commission recommendation except that Manuela Avenue be 32 feet curb to curb paved with with parking on the west side only. Discussion followed as to requirements in order to qualify for gas tax expenditures, the City's contribution to the proposed project, and the need for some direction to the staff in order that costs of alternate widths might be compared. AMENDMENT: Mayor Dias moved, and it was duly seconded, to accept the Planning Commission recommendation with a paved curb - to -curb width of 40 feet. The amendment failed on the following roll call vote: Ayes: Beahrs, Debs, Dias, Rohrs Noes: Berwald, Clark, Comstock, Cooley, Gallagher, Pearson, Wheatley AMENDMENT: Councilman Pearson moved, seconded by Debs, to retain the existing right of way of 40 feet to 50 feet, with 30 feet of paving curb to curb and no parking on either side of the street. The amerdmex.* failed on the following roll call vote: Ayes: Debs, Pearson Does: Beahrs, Berwald, Clark, Comstock, Cooley, Dias, Gallagher, Rohrs, Wheatley The _e rr cd or _ _ -- -- -- -��� the roll tali erut+c:- Ayes: Noes: Beahrs, Berwald, Clark, Comstock, Cooley, Dias, Gallagher, Rohrs, Wheatley Debs, Pearson MOTION: Councilman Cooley moved, and it was duly seconded, to support the Planning Corrunission recommendation of a general plan for Old Trace Road except that the road widths be 30 feet from, curb -to -curb. (NOTE: P1. —fining Commission recommendation is as follows: 1. The road widths be 24 feet from curb to curb. Z. The road leading to the park property be 30 feet from curb to curb. 3. Curbs be concrete. 209 6/12/67 4. Parking be allowed on only one side of the streets. 5. An additional 8 feet be provided on one side of these roads for a rustic pathway suitable for pedestrian and bicycling purposes and that a 12 foot area be provided on the other side of the road to be used for equestrian traffic primarily. 6. A public pedestrian and bicycle pathway and equestrian right-of-way be provided from Manuela Court to the park property by providing connections between the Manuela Court cul-de-sac and the nearest cul-de-sac on Old Trace Road, and between the other cul-de-sac on Old Trace Road and the road leading to the park property.) AMENDMENT: Councilman Pearson moved, seconded by Debs, that the road width from curb to curb bF 24 feet. Dis cussion followed as to the recommendation of the Fire Chief for streets wider than a 25 -foot minimum. The amendment failed by majority voice vote. The motion carried by majority voice vote. MOTION: Councilman Pearson moved, seconded by Debs, that the possibility of redesignation of all or portione of the Old Trace Road propose d assessment district area from three dwelling units per acre to one dwelling unit per acre and that this possibility be taken into account in projecting utility requirements for this area. In reply to question, City Manager Morgan stated that the subject had been discussed and the only change in cost would be in regard to service- i ea. — — MOTION: Councilman Cooley moved, seconded by Beahrs, to table the motion. The motion to table carried on the following roll call vote: Ayes: Beahrs, Clark, Cooley, Dias, Gallagher, Rohrs, Wheatley Noes: Berwald, Comstock, Debs, Pearson Country Club Associates Subdivision Planning Officez Fourcroy outlined the Planning Commission recom- mendation regarding approval of the tentative subdivision map sub- mitted by Country Club Associates for a subdivision of property adjacent to the Palo Alto Hills Golf and Country Clui) and referred to a wall map of the property. Mr. Fourcroy replied to question from the Council concerning details of the plan. Howard S. Burnside, 2211 Park Boulevard, Palo Alto, an attorney representing Palo Alto Hills Golf and Country Club, recommended further review and study involving the owner, the Club and the City. He replied to questions from the Council concerning the difficulties which might be encountered in altering the golf course to permit the necessary access road to the subdivision. Gerald Dunn, President of California Lands Investment Company and a member of the Club, stated his company had an agreement regarding an access road being provided which did not involve Council decision and urged approvalof the subdivision map. MOTION: Councilman Rohrs roved, seconded by Wheatley, that the Council approve the recommendation of the Planning Commis- sion subject to theconditions listed in the recommendation and urging- the developer to avail himself of the services of a Soils En- gineer or Geologist, all subject to the r' aA being decided upon be- tween the subdivider and the Club. (NOTE: Planning Commission recommendation as follows: 1, That the portion of "A" Street which traverses the golf course be realigned to provide for two future standard lots on the south side of "A" Street; that the relocation and design of the golf course facilities be achieved in such a manner as to eliminate any hazard to the street; and that "A" Street- e dedicated and improved to City standards. 2. That the subdivider provide the right-of-way for and im- prove the turnaround area at "D" Court and "A" Street. 3. That approval be subject to obtaining easements from ...3 of ne owner - - as --,��}vjas:�.�-_���� �--tor utilities, sa�i�zy-__wens and stovxn_ sewers. 4. That electric, telephone and all other utility facilities shall be constructed underground. 5. That all streets have a 50 foot right-of-way. 6. That, with the exception of cul-de-sacs, the paved sections of the streets shall generally be offset such that there will be approximately 8 feet on one side for a rustic pathway suitable for pedestrian and bicycle purposes and approxi- mately 12 feet on the other side for possible future eques- trian use; and that on cul-de-sacs there should be a rustic pathway suitable for pedestrian and bicycle purposes on at least one side. Discussion followed concerning the desirability of possible review of their recommendation by the Planning Commission, and in reply to question, Planning Commission Chairman Stromquist stated he did not know how a further study could be made. MOTION: Councilman Comstock moved, seconded by Pearson, to refer the matter to the Planning Commission for further review in particular regard to the density and access of the subdivision. The motion to refer failed on the following roll call vote: Ayes: Berwald, Comstock, Debs, Pearson Noes: Beahrs, Clark, Cooley, Dias, Gallagher, Rohrs, Wheatley The motion then carried on the following roll call vote: Ayes: Beahrs, Berwald, Clark, Cooley, Dias, Gallagher, Rohrs, Vi heatley Noes: Comstock, Debs, Pearson (The Council recessed from 10:05 to 10:16 p.m.) General Plan -Park, Ope�i Space and Beautification .1 ®1R1 �.i..M RAY ale �• ./� .�dtiAi Planning Commission Chairman Strornquist outlined the content of the resolution adopted by the Commission amending and adding to the General Plan a section dealing with Park, Open Space and Beautification in the Greater Downtown Area and rea:o;nrnending its adoption by the Council. See Page 230 MOTION: Councilman Rohrs moved, seconded by Comstock, to re- fer the resolution to the Public Works Committee. Discussion followed concerning the downtown park atuiay currently before the Commission. MOTION Councilman Rohrs, with the consent of his second, changed the motion to refer the resolution to the Public Works Committee for consideration along with the downtown parks study. The motion carried unanimously by voice vote. Setbacks from Creeks Planning Commission Chairman Stromquist outlined the Planning Commission recommendation against notification of property owners and an informal public hearing in regard to a propcaed ordinance requiring setbacks from creeks. MOTION: Councilman Comstock rnoved, seconded by Beahrs, to accept the Planning Commission recommendation and the City Attor- ney be directed to place the ordinance on the next Agenda. The motion carried unanirtousiy by voice vote. 212 6/12/67 Report on Bids Park Irrigation SYatema, Project No. 67-4 City Manager Morgan referred to his report of May 26 regarding park irrigation systems Project No. 67-4. MOTION: Councilman Comstock moved, seconded by Berwald, that the bid of Co,llishaw Sprinkler Company in the amount of $10,769.00 for Berkeley, Etoii,and HamptaiParks and the bid of Dennis R. Gibson Company in the amount of $8,390.00 for Hollywood Park and Embar- cadero Underpass be approved for award, pending the signing of the contracts and furnishing of required bands, and that the Mayor be authorized and directed to sign the contracts for and on behalf of the City. The motion carried unanimously by voice vote. House Relocation and Propert y .A.;:. uieition City Manager Morgan referred to his report of June 1, 1967 On the proposed house relocation (1415 Hopkinej and property acquisition. MOTION: Councilman Debs moved, seconded by Beahrs, to authc r ize the staff to purchase the unimproved property at 3188 Ross Road. The motion carried unanimously by voice vote. Lease Arrannernent - Old Fire Station No. 2 City Manager Morgan referred to his report of May 31, 1967 con- cerning a lease arrangement for Old Fire S ►tion No 2. — MOTION: Councilman Pearson moved, seconded by Debs, to refer the matter to the Planning Connsrtisoion for recommendation for M -1:S zoning or any other zoning they may wish to recommend. Discussion followed as to the desirability of offering the property to a prospective tenant before or pending zoning of that property. SUBSTITUTE MOTION: Councilman Wheatley moved, seconded by Beahrs, that tho City Manager be authorized to solicit lease pro- posals and negotiate a suitable agreement for lease of the property to be approved by the usage to be established by the Planning Com- mission and the City Council. The motion carried by majority voice vote. Five Year Prelirn_inar 1l I ovement ro�rarn - 1967-72 City Manager Morgan submitted the Five Year Preliminary Capital Improvement Program for the Fiscal Period 1967-1972. 213 6/12/67 MOTION: Councilman Pearson moved, seceded by Beahrs, to re- fer the Program to the Planning Commission and to the Finance Committee. The motion carried unanimously by voice vote. Golf Course Restroorres _ City Manager Morgan referred to his report of May 31, 1967 re- garding the golf course restrooms, Project No. 66.20. MOTION: Councilman Debi introduced the following ordinance and rnoved, seconded by Comstock, its approval for first reading: Ordinance of the Council of the City of Palo Alto Approving aria Adopting a Plan for Construction of Additional Reetroom Facilities at the Municipal Golf Course, Project No. 66-20. The ordinance war approved on the following roll call vote: Ayes: Beahrs, Berwald, Clark, Comstock, Cooley, Debra, Dias, Gallagher, Pearson, Rohrs, Wheatley Noes: None MOTION: Councilman Rohrs moved, seconded by Pearson, to accept the bid of Gary Thompson in the ahount of $9,295.00 and authorise the Mayor to execute the contract on behalf of the City. The motion carried unanimously by voice vote, Aatltrust Actioni - Ce Crete wad -Steel Pine City Attorney Hildebrand referred to hir report of June 1, 1967 re- gardins antitrust actions in connection with concrete and steel pipe indicating the City would receive two settlements totalling $68,864.79. MOTION: Councilman Debs moved, seconded by Beahrs, to accept the two settlements and direct the Mayor to execute the settlement documents which will be forthcoming. Mr. Hildebrand indicated that some of the settlement documents will be in resolution form and that unites instructed otherwise ha would interpret the Coins t's action as authorizing the Mayor to sign such resolutions without returning them to the Council. The motion carried unanimously by voice vote. Park Dedication f?�rclii agar p City Attorney Hildebrand referred to his report of June 1, 1961 re- gard• atn ordinance amending the Park Dedication Ordinance is 214 6/12/67 order to comply with Charter requirements to complete the abandon- ment for park purposes of the lands within the new airport lease. MOTION: Councilman Pearson introduced the following ordinance and moved, seconded by Wheatley, its adoption: Ordinance No. 2351 entitled "Ordinance of the Council of the City of Palo Alto Amending Ordinance No. 2252 to Delete Therefrom Certain Lands Dedicated for Park, Playground, Recr` *ation or Conservation Purposes." The ordinance was adopted on the following roll call vote: Ayes: Beahrs, Berwald, Clark, Comstock, Cooley, Debs, Dias, Gallagher, Pearson, Rohrs, Wheatley Noes: None Parking Spaces - ll�ltrlti.nle Farnil Zones MOTION: Councilman Debs moved, seconded by Pearson, that the Planning Commission reexamine and make a recorrunendation to Council regarding the number of parking spaces per dwelling unit znultiple family zones (apartments and duplexes). The motion carried unanimously by voice vote. Charter Review Committee MOTION: Councilman Rohrs moved, seconded by Cooley, that the Mayor be requested and authorized to appoint a Charter review corn- miUee. Discussion followed during which it was brought out that the scope of the proposed committee would be the entire Charter and that a speci.fic.1 deadline had purposely been omitted from the motion be- cause of the present vacancy in the position of Assistant City Attorney. AMENDMENT: Councilman Debs moved, seconded by Pearson, that the committee exclude review of the Charter provisions relating to referendum and initiative. The amendment failed on the following roll call vote: Ayes: Debs Noes: Beaters, Berwald, Clark, Comstock, Cooley, Dias, Gallagher, Pearson, Rohrs, Wheatley The motion carried on the following roll call vote: Ayes: Beaters, Berwald, Clark, Comstock, Cooley, Debs, Dias, Gallagher, Rohrs, Wheatley Noes: Pearson 215 6/12/67 Council Minutes Distribution MOTION: Councilman_ Debs moved, seconded by Pearson, that copiers of current Council Minutes be available in the Council Chambers for pickup by the public. The motion carried by majority voice vote. Phase I Expressway Funds City Manager Morgan reported that in accordance with Council di- rection he had addressed the Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors regarding the request for Phase I Expressway Funds for use in con- nection with El Camino Real Widening Project No. 64-1 and was told such +use would not be allowed as had been indicated in regard to the F, ` i rue similar request. Human Relations Council MOTION: Councilman Pearson moved, seconded by Wheatley, that the Council reconsider its previous action regarding: (1) the Coun- cil appointing a member to the Human Relations Council who resides outside of Palo Alto; and (2) the Council consider in executive session the subrnittal of the list. of three names mentioned by Mr. Keller to the FEPC for appointment to t?le Palo Alto }hunan Relations Council; and (3) in light of the recent resignations this Council request the three members who recently resigned to reconsider their resigna- tions and continue to serve on the Palo Alto Human Relations Council. In response to a request from Mayor Dias, Councilman Pearson offered a motion to precede her first motion (above). MOTION: Councilman Pearson moved, seconded by Comstock, to rescind previous action regarding allowing a non -City person to serve on the Palo Alto Human Relations Council. The motion to rescind carried on the following roll call vote: Ayes: Noes: Berwald, Clark, Comstock, Debs, Pearson, Rohra, Wheatley Beahrs, Cooley, Dias, Gallagher Discussion followed concerning the need for an emergency to be stated in order for the Council to take decisive action on a non - Agenda item, and Councilman Pearson indicated that her motion was urgent in view of the resignations of three members of the PAHRC (NOTE: Consideration of first motion above now before Council) 16 /12/67 MOTION: Councilman Berwald moved, seconded by Beahrs, to con- tinue the reference to adding members to the PAHRC, and to con- tinue forwarding suggested names to the FEPC. Discussion followed concerning the possibility of adding to the mem- bership of the PAHRC, the fact that the staff will proceed with ne- gotiations on a contract with Stanford Research Institute per Council direction and in accordance with the recommendation of the PAHRC, and the status of the pending appointment of Mia3 Helen Flack to fill the vacancy on the PAHRC. The motion to continue carried by majority voice vote. Discussion followed concerning the lack of previous direct communi- cation to the Council from the PAHRC and possible misunderstandings particularly in regard to regular City procedures which rriight have contributed to, the resignations of the three PAHRC members. The motion requesting reconsideration of the resignations carried on the following roll call vote: Ayes: Be,-Kald, Clark. Comstock, Cooley, Debs, Pearson, Rohrs, Wheatley Noes: Beahrs, Dias Abstain: Gallagher Council ld?eeting Schedule MOTION: Councilman Ftohrs moved, seconded by Wheatley, to can- cel the regular_ Council meeting_scheduied for June l9, 1967, Discussion followed concerning the possibility of the lack of a quorum on June 19 because of the Mayors Conference and vacations. The rnotian carried by majority voice vote. MOTION: Councilman Cooley moved, seconded by Beahrs, that the Council meeting of July 3 be cancelled and a special meeting called for July 5, 1967 to consider the items which would normally appear on the July 3 Agenda. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote, Councilman Rohrs abstaining. Building PerMit Moratorium Councilman Comstock requested permission to take up at this time as an urgency matter the Planning Commission recorrur►cndation made 'at their Jura 7, 1967 meeting that a 60 -day moratorium be placed on buildings and uses not conforming to L -M regulations in certain "M" zones. 21.7 6/12/67 There were no objections. MOTION: Councilman Comstock introduced the following ordinance and moved; seconded by Pearson, its adoption: Ordinance of the Council of the City of Palo Alto Suspending issuance of Certain Building Permita in Certain Zones Pending Planning Commission Study and Recommendations to the Council, and Declaring an Emergency. In reply to questions from the Council, City Attorney Hildebrand stated that there have been no real steps taken to effectuate a zoning change as far as Philco Eord Company is concerned and his advice to the Council still stands that that company may be able to make a factual showing of substantial reliance o-.. existing zoning that would make it the duty of the Building Inspector to issue a building permit. to Philco if their planned construction is in accord with the General Plan and the present zoning of their property: Ile cited relevant cases in support of his advice. Discussion followed concerning the background of the present zoning and the possibility of adopting the ordinance excluding reference to Philco and therefore not directing it toward one specific property. In reply to question, Mr. Hildebrand stated that such action would be acceptable. AMENDMENT: Councilmaan. Beahrs moved, seconded by Rohr°, that the Pbilco environmental space chamber be excepted from the ordinance. Ai the suggestion of Mr. Hildebrand that the azeiendment have general application, Councilman Beahrs, with tht consent of his second, re- -_ stated his Amendment as foil-rw s: AMENDMENT: Council saza Beahrs moved, seconded by Rohrs, that construction be limited to a distance of 500 feet from the nearest R-1 zoning. Discussion followed concerning the ziesirability of "patchwork" plan- ning and CaunclIn an Buhr* withdrew his amendment. ent. AMENDMENT: Councilman Deb* moved, seconded by Pearson, to insert in Section 2, line 5 following "located" the words "in M-1 or M. 2 zones which exceeds the building height permitted under L -M district regulations." The amendment carried on the following roll call vote: Ayes: Berws.id, Clark, Comstock, Debi, Pearson, Rohrs, Wheatley Nees: $eab e. Cooley, Dias, Gallagher 218 6/12/67 Bernard Mahon, Palo Alto, presented an endorsement of the resi- dents of the area in favor of a 60 -day moratorium and spoke in favor of adoption of the ordinance. Harold S. Avery, Manager, Facilities Engineering Department, Philco-Ford Corporation, Palo Alto, spoke, stating in detail the amount of vested interest his company has in the planned construc- tion and added that there would be no increase in traffic as a result of the construction. Only ten to twelve people would operate the eq-,xipment to be housed in. it. Mr. Avery replied to questions from the Council regarding the extent to which Philco's contracts were based on the availability of the planned space chamber. The ordinance failed on the following roll call vote: Ayes: Comstock, Debs, Pearson Noes: Beahrs, Berwald, Clark, Cooley, Dias, Gallagher, Rohrs, Wheatley Oral Cornznunications David Mitchell, 791 Christine Drive, Palo Alto, stated that he is an attorney and expressed concern about the failure of the ordinance calling for a 60 -day moratorium on building permits in certain zones. 4.0...c..1 Lournment Loa!, There being no further business the Council adjourned at 12:35 a.xn. ************* The Council of the City of Palo Alto met on this date at 12:36 a.m. with Mayor Dias presiding. Present: Beahrs, Berwald, Clark, Comstock, Cooley, Degas, Dias, Gallagher, Pearson, Wheatley Absent: Arnold, Rohrs, Rus Adjournment MOTION: Councilman Cooley moved, and it was duly seconded, to adjourn. AMENDMENT: Councilman Beahrs moved, seconded by Berwald, to adjourn to June 13, 1967. The amendment failed by majority voice vote. AMENDMENT: Councilman Comstock moved, seconded by Pearson, to adjourn to June 26, 1967. The motion carried by majority voice vote. The Comci1 adjourned at 12:39 a.m. APPROVED: 220 6/12/67