Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09141959• City Hall, Palo Alto, California September 14, 1959 The Council of the City of Palo Alto met in regular session on this date at 7:30 P.M. with Mayor Porter presiding. Roll call as follows: Present: Bishop, Byxbee, Davis, Evans, Giffin, Haight, Marshall, Mitchell, Navis, Porter, Rodgers, Stephens, Woodward, Zweng. The minutes .of the meeting of August 24, 1959, were approved as distributed. This was t1 a time for a hearing on Resolution No. 3129 of Preliminary Determination for improvements on various city streets. No written protests were receive. There was no one present to speak on the matter and the hearing was closed. Resolution No. 3130 determining to proceed without compliance with the Investigation Act was introduced, and on motion of Woodward and Navis, was adopted by unanimous vote on roll call. Resolution No. 3131 directing the preparation of Engineer- ing Documents: was introduced, and on motion of Woodward and Bishop, was adopted by unanimous vote on roll call. League of Women Voters .Observers A letter was read from Mrs. Arthur A. Spar, President of the League of Women Voters, introducing Mr s . ,; o s eph Herr and Mrs Seymour. Cohn: who are serving as observers of the League at City Council meetings for the, year 1959-60. Re nest' to Alter Frame Buildin Z00 Homer Avenue A letter was .received. from Harry B. Sturgeon, proprietor of the American De Luxe Dry Cleaners, requesting permission to make alterations to the front of the building at 200 Homer Avenue, including the removal of the corner of the building to provide customer, parking off the street. It was reported that the building in question is a Type V wood frame building in Fire . Zone No. 1, and that the Building Code prohibits alterations of exterior walls of such business or commercial buildings in Fire Zone No. 1. The City Attorney advised that it is not possible,for the Council to grant an exception to the Code, but it is possiblefor the Council to amend the Code if it so desires to allow the applicant or any other person who makes a similar request to make alterations to their buildings. On motion of Bishop and Zweng, the matter was referred to Committee No. 1 for consideration and report. '174,711":",:+741t • Annexation: to Mountain View A. notice was',received from the County Boundary Commission; of the proposed annexation of an area to the City of Mountain View, designated as "'Middlefield No. 11". Water. Problems: A; letter was received from the Santa Clara Valley Water Conservation District referring; to their previous request in July that the Council .'appoint a representative to serve on an advisory cornmittee'to consult with. the District on water problems, and asking that the Council appoint its representative at an early date. The City Manager reported that this matter had been discussed at a Meeting of the Inter -City Council of. Santa Clara County, and that it was voted unanimously to take ro action on the request to appoint representatives to serve on an. advisory committee. He also called attention to the water advisory committee set up by the Board of. Supervisors whi'ch was organized to try to determine how to handle water. Aroblenis, and to the fact that Councilman Davis is the City's representative on this committee. The .Council"decided to take no action on the request of the Santa Clara Valley Water Conse,evation Disteict. Chamber of Commerce Re uests Traffic"Intercianges �� SeniorCitizen Recreation Center nW A letter was received from the Palo Alto Cheariber of Commerce renewing their statement of policy concerning the reed for advance planning of traffic interchanges at c.r•iticalcity inter- sections' included in the City and County piaster traffic studies to take advantage of possible participation by other government agencies. A letter was also received from the Chamber of Commerce recommending that the Council re -activate studies .for. a Senior Citizen Recreanon. Center., On motion. of Zwerg, this matter was referred to Committee No. 2 for further study. Amendrnent to'Yacht. Harbor Fee Schedule A recommendation. was made by the City Manager for an addition, to the Yacht .Harbor. Fee Schedule to provide for a temporary mooring fee of $1.00 per day, to be applicable to craft staying temporarily in the harbor'. area longer than three days but less than thirty days the fee to be collected by the Harbormaster. On xnot"ion of Bytxbee. and Navis, this addition to the Yacht Harbor Fee Schedule was approved. Redemption.; Fee. on Tax -Deeded Property A: recommendation was made by the City Manager that the redemption fee charged for each parcel of tax -sold or tax- deeded property be reduced from $2.50 to $2.00, to conform to the provisions of the State Revenue Code. On motion of Navis and Byxbee, this recommendation was approved. As this change requires an amendment to Section. 465 of the Administrative Code, it was, directed that the necessary ordinance be presented for first reading • '" '` of the rotaax x otGGtin the ......------4_4:-... E next xeula Comet Ent between the connection �xn ,pacsfic an easel-00X Alto the 5onth agGx ?resented City oi. Palo cit C 1 4aa y and the Seger ''i E lexxten 13. c Goyim '. ita y; alt% cat thexn a,aif � a pan Pre rtont 'Woodward, dock Sanwitt the axistal g tip serving the the exe cL't� ats of tCsand x a,i1x �,ad xx Eck �� y�dthox�x'� motao�' '�§, Y �' Faaal����oduceci.te on x roll call. Mao as :rno`aa vote bpithe d:bY 'i State ": Inc . to the clax e � ado gto Attorney � en ` x a w ate' fos re'A e$ c by the City ttorneMill-Oregn l eg Glairtt Gl ,; Ce ,� ac , mad Page e tor tor the - 61 for dam' �,ai�-• foster e` Q tx ohe of $2.►75 '. aasizla es, co ie'� frtcP . l ,� soot es tor xe� ux�i�luf�KGd denied. bor , , Inc nt sn the si•al charges a an , g a.d ot canoed* * pra3e t and o mar l 1 n .1959, ine o. u xe.°rted thatthe a 'A . v3 i an �4x ation of A.tty'x tt tb tort to flood- ing, labor • aq flooding Inn p Goa 'The City co„tx d the o���Ea ti'`I 1� °xt x ec 195 � conditions which. cansea. f,�th$x e cle a a. i,Ly s • an of• the d stern staff , a the cl;eitn the' city water diatxihntaon sex and his ncansex to the ood- detaeen by t t Diin the City i' °f r Gex. ox'G a: in t't e i a , t. t'`� the t o s had led t of the Ptn� ey d Cat e el -Large b� ox► a collations 4 a bi af.f. lore tto d as a had of th ilitY '' aid conk o trot d dntat th claim be allowed v° obna e � airt to aha�yld ,bays banded tt►ati :the d by U•ys,ani �°�o f the now re ' the � jGot. hie aid Nat to an a Y s Xvote agaans t �otiox� � � �,�' ,ti.o�:: W a$ a char �e a� axno"x'.t cit. �� tlhle Zak' �aw1y. that � th laid as be a . oaths a "� loyalty u ended 4oit" eagle +� ,xt • Ca , .�nagGx: x!s��s�Office, "p f 'the t"arL the , e• s xof signing l GtaxY , r?Os ent pl t�ai�te e4x fox the ,?la P'tto' xr' alp city Ge` . b the ty of depaatY xed by ` and ai�l't. ,,vho are � • adletield `V'o aa per �, to. RG� iy this a -point red at the. ado?tea, be n txactcd tioti to the sesolntidyile £xQ h tart' was called. �ar•lr�in`� ho`'^x s poet' _ . x:otut)tting , xaxa ea .avid' twain aeeean ven�`,�s do 6 �L xo ,ate eno � _, to signed by a vx�Gal to tar �', 1 n. 1nd.t. tioxn A4` stitiar t the ° Est is k►a , toad' r a 'aging Street of. l� .t;Q xt'Manageretielti toad a , area, 'ns as,�A d the effect e, ve G e ,ddl , . t ail su feted . OA „ of t1� eat Wined• - a efield lag r talky p olutia' slip V, , lot' c+oznp :v;': x obj trtg ax zop. 2 d, eca ott 1 etvino ef�eld as x I -re Vi cap a throw {TOP, l` • 3b N! id a ►a' , wa exlp o tece-'T �;. azna,s, 9 tl an the etveet. arestxictea. parlx.'ng ..- tar, ciai nthorizea aoa A coxrunurucatzon was also :. _ - _�` -� -..,....; �v_:_ .=;,_ Chairman received from a ~~ man of'the Middlefield' Donald S. f hairm . Road Area. Geou requesting the g a.ctions;_be taken.= ,I, t p, sed that the. resolutson:. ) That the xecentl be rescinded 2) ;that. Y pissed na nc$rcatin signs and/ox parking'', indicatingpeed l atta�.:"be in pavement mitsin stracxl :: installed, arid that the speed � Y �ced, 3):.that Signs: p limits be RoadCtly" strateg'xcally locate: _ dive. tine tracks faroaxa r bethrough tar •arid 4) that.: the. Middlefield traffic be" discouraged, use of Middlefield Road.,. Mr app: whose :address is 2240 Mr. Leen.H. lorzybyla,' '2101'Middlefield Road Mr.. Cell Rata 650 Santa Rita Avenue, , M. Carl W Santa , ;and Mr..Rudo1 - Watts, , addreseed;the'Goune:il p,zx'au � J. Scholz, 702 Tennyson, the nuee a T'a .r, ecent action ter' support of the , t durxn petition. id eld R that g peak_ traffic •hou; s; 1? c cud it parking on lt�fiddlefihld Road zepres+e ea t be Xescinded. Mr. G. E. representingthe he C'entral�''Palo Alto Monson,; -: the' Council t®.,r v Residents Association reverse its" dcciaiori. ,also a+sked> designed ouncilznan Byxbee pointed out' , g ed.,as a through that Middlefield Road w years a o. g. street front Redwood City to ere ago., but unfoartuiiatel*r it:'e?va.s not made wide Mountain �,arr the present tx^affxc de enough `'ter He noted: that no-parking g casxy portion: of Middlefield , restriction on the Aventate Road from: San F xancisquit4 Creek to which ilea semi -residential area r Charming e He agr,eed with:. ,has worked out. vex wr probable r that the .statements of some of the petitioners that it s ell. Middlefeld.Road is. r traffic. during cQnstru,ctaoxa;�oi tlie' Car.. underpass. ying part of the Alma Street present Middlefield Road :traffic may and that some of,�the Bayshore:Freewa .,.w e by-pass the City when it is completed. t3'' and use the Councilman,. Byxbee stated that orlon as a temporary solution, that Resolution would he g p willing to g on Middlefield,Road, as adopted b . the otxNo. 3128 restzict24, 1959 be "rescinded, and the lotion was seconded b �c re August 24,. Y Rodgers. vote on roll call: After discussion, the rnotio:zwas carried .by the following Ayes: s:eh© p, Byxbee, Davis, Haight, Marshall Porter,, Rodgers, Stephens, Zweng. , Navis, Noes: Evans, Giffin, Mitchell, Woodward. Councilman Navis stated. that the basic decision as to whether ti its Council must or abandon ,all make a planning, in this respect, ping far thattrpro planning n� must be made not .onl .for the, ,' p , pointing out provision future citizensandy present city and its citizens but for the:xioture t the;C "'the entire community. Council should yY• is l expressed his the- whale make a very critical a problem and establish a appraisal of continued study af,the" policy, ir_c;Y;�di,;, further Middlefield Road situation. g then and be referred to Committee No. 1-le moved that the seconded by Woodward and carried, 1, and the motion was Mr. Roberta'. Debs, actin c, Lion known as the Palo Alto Resid g haarrnan of a new oe neighborhood rot " _s y group ents Association. , g 'iza" g P , suggested that an advisor a council i. of zens be appointed to. assist the Council in oup of citi n its study of this problem,. .a.tion No. 12 The City Manager :recommended approval of an amend-; meat to: Rule: and Regulation No. 12 of Utilities Rules and Regula tions, to include the action- recently authorized by the Council for a refund to developers when they, place the electrical system under ground On<motion Of :'Byxbee and Navis, the amended Rule and.: Regulation No. 12 was .approved::.; Sale of ;Proper 418 Fernando Avenue The Assistant City Manager recommended the sale of the property at 418 Fernando . Avenue for the sum of $12,750.00, advising that this is the last parcel which the City had for sale. Resolution No. 3,132,; authorizing the sale of this property,was introduced and on motion of Haight and Bishop, was adopted on roll call of all members present. (Councilman Davis was absent during this roll call.) Subdivision May of ".Walnut Grove" Grade Separatoa. Charleston 'toad and Alma Street ���r�wrewrww�wn Councilnnan Bishop advised that he had a personal interest in this item, and left the room during the discussion. A report was submitted from Joint Committees No. 1 and No. 3, stating that after consideration of the tentative subdivision map of ",'.Walnut:,Grove" located -on Alma Street near Charleston Road,' ; in light of plan:' for -a. future grade separation at this intersection, the joint committees recommended that the City of Palo Alto's representative to the Santa Clara. County Traf£icways Committee be instructed to request at the September 9, 1959 meeting of said committee,subject to. subsequent Council approval at the meeting of September 14th,,` that this project be placed on the priority listfor. participation in the $1, 000',,000 fund which has been budgeted by the County for;acgwsition of certain;critical properties required in the implementation of thetrafficways program; and that the subdivision. map be re -.evaluated at the. time reports are received with reference to the foregoing Councilrnan'Woodward, the City's representative on the County, Traffieviay. a Com nittee; reported that he and the City Manager attended the Meeting of the committee on September; 9, 1959, when the deadline for'preisenting requests for consideration of critical;isite.s: was extended. He advised that there is already ,a long list of requesta to be:placed on the priority list for participa- tion in thefund; that,it is evident -that the $1, 000.000 is being set up for acquisition of very: critical sites, and he felt that Palo Alto wouldnot-be allowed any ofthie.Money this year; that if Palo Alto wished to go ahead with acquisition of a site for a future grade separation at Charleston and -Alma, it would have to do so with city: funds The. Mayor pointed out that the De Leuw, ,Cather' & Company report is not a detailed study but a general report, and stressed that the -subject under consideration is only the advisability of acquiring land' Which might be needed some day for an underpass. Mr. Joseph Ehrlich, 4225 Park Boulevard, spoke briefly, referring to the De Leuw, Lather report which propose& a six-laneoverpass. at Charleston Road, to which people in: his area object Mr.. John Beckman, 229 Ely Place, urged that the zoning and general plan be not changed. and Opposed aay plan for a grade separation at this- location. The ` Mayor announced receipt of a communication from) Mr.. 'William Thernan,; Chairman of the Charleston Meadows Horne Owners Associati on, 4253 Park Boulevard, submitting resolutions adopted by members of the association to the effect that they feelan interchange at ;Charleston. and Alma, with a six -lane right-of-way , would be entirely unsuitable for the residential area_, because of the hazard to students attending. the several high schools" and elementary schools on and near Arastradero „Road and Charleston Road,, and to patrons of the Mitchell Park Branch Library, Mitchell, Park and Mayfield .Park. They asked that a study be made to consider all factors in the situation in- addition to traffic flow before the De Leuw, Cather. recornmendati X1 18 adopted, and they suggested that San Antonio Road, r which, is on the periphery of residential areas, be considered<the ;major: throughway between the proposed Juniper° Serra and"Bayshore Freeways Cotn cilsnan Zweng advised that he had received a letter from ,,the Ventura Parent-Teacher Association, addressed to the Council,_ going on _record as opposingthe proposed grade separation at Charleston and; Alma Ir Harry ,Tennison„' 3770 Wright Place, submitted: figures on school' enrollinent;, and Mr. C. Minor Moore, principal of Ohlones School, pointed out the need for considering the safety ; of children; who Must cross Charleston Road. Mr. Ben Parkinson,, 3855. Mumford Place,:. objected to an underpass at Charleston and: Alma because of. the fine residential areas, schools and parks in that part of. towns irk' asked that top priority be given to the proposed underpass at;;San Antonio Road before any ft:rthel• consider.- ation is 'given to an undrpass at Charleston Road. Councilman Woodward.: stated that it does not appear that;. the County will contribute any funds to such a project in the foreseeable future, andin view of this fact he moved that the Council, approve the: tentative,: subdivision_rnap of "Walnut Grove" in accord-, ance with the recommendation of the Planning Commission, and that the matter of the proposed grade separation at Charleston. Road be referred to a citizens: committee to be appointed. The motion was seconded by Zweng and carried. The Council took,; a;recess at this time, 9:05 P.M and reconvened at 9:20 P.M.) Electrical Contract with Lockheed Aircraft Coaeoration .gym A report :was received from Joint Committees No. 1 and No. 3 recommending approval of an electrical contract with Lockheed Aircraft ,Corporation,: Missileaand Space Division, providing for special service. A resolution authorizing the City Manager to sign this agreement on behalf of the City was introduced, and on motion of Zweng, duly seconded, was adopted by unanimous vote on roll call. Amendment AA•drnimxatrative Code Section. 701 A report was snibznitted by Joint rr Co rnittees No.. 1 and No :3 recornrrnending approval of -an amendmentto Section 701 of the. ` Adruinistrative Code pertaining ;to the passage of ordinances :dele:te the pre.eent provisions to:'the effect that ordinances can not be ,adopteel at a sPecial,Council rrneeting and that titles of all ordinances ;an3 resolutions Must be ,read when introduced.. he proposed ordinance amending Section 701 of the. Adrninistrative::Code was introduced, and on :motion of Navis and Zweng, was accepted' for first reading. A report- was received from the Committee of the Whole reconu ending that the salary of the City Controller be established -at $925.00 per month; effective", as of October 1, 1959. On motion :of Mitchell and Woodward, -the recor rzxnendation was adopted. meat Plan 'Harmon Pontiac , Inc A report was received from. the Planning Commission unanimously rec'o'mmending'approval of the application of Harmon Pontiac, Inc , for change of district of a portion of Rancho Rincon de San Franci 'quits, consistingof a ;3.77-a.cre area on West Bayshore Road between Colorado and .Amarillo Avenues, from R•-1 to. P -C; and that the P -C Development Plan covering location of an office building. be given approval, calling for completion of construction by November, 30, 196:0, A proposed ordinance a.rnendir,.g the Zone Map to provide for this zone change, ; and approving the P -C Development Plan, was introduced, and on motion of Mitchell and Rodger. s, was accepted for first reading. Zonin and Street Pattern - 2990 3040-3060 -Middlefield Road A. report was submitted by the Planning Co;rmission. unanimously recommending that the properties of Ravenswood Realty Company (the former Sequoia Insurance property), Leonetti and Bliss, located on; the southwesterly side of Middlefield Road adjacent to Matadero Canal': otherwise known as 2990, 3040 and 3060 Middle- field Road, be changed from A -R to R -3:G and R-1; that a general subdivision, zoning and street pattern be adopted as shown on map entitled "Pattern No. 2' and a reasonable length of time be given to the respective property owners to develop. If this is not achieved within a reasonable time, the Commission recommended that the City include ;the streets "in a ;street project assessment district in order to assure reasionable and orderly development. The proposed zoning and street pattern: were reviewed by the Planning Officer. Mr.,Andrew Spears, attorney for Mr. Burton Blackwell of the Ravenswood Realty Company, owner of rrnost of the property. involved,addressed the. Council stating that the plan is not acceptable to .Mr. Blackwell who objected to having his land taken for street purposes and to being assessed for the cost of the street improvement. He advised that Mr. Blackwell does not need the proposed street, and asked that there "be no change in the present A.R. zoning. Mrs, Philip' Towle, Chairman of the Planning Commission;; coznmented that there axe three separate ownerships in the area proposed to be 'rezoned; that when the property was zoned A -R negotiations ;were 'pen -ding fats combining the two 80 -foot parcels, but these .negotiations were not completed and the property could not be developed. She pointed out that there has also been a problem of the street pattern. and traffic 'circulation which the. Planning Commission- has been trying' to solve over a three-year period. Mr. Edouard Guldoux, representing members of his family who own property at the rear of the parcels proposed for rezoning, spoke to -the Council in favor of the proposed- general" subdivision and street pattern which would permit the Guidoux family to develop their property. It was moved by Byxbee, seconded by Woodward, that the report and r.ecoxnmendations of the Planning Commission be accepted:, Councilman Navis stated that he is in accord with the recommendeapropasak but was:; concerned with the street pattern and felt that, in order to assure the development of the property, an attempt should be made to work out with the property owners a.program whereby the burden of the street improvement costs could be shared equitably. , It was moved by Navis, seconded by Stephens', and carried that the matter be referred to Committee No. 1.. Record of Survey eFraser; A report was received from the Planning Commission unanimously` recommending approval of the Record of Survey as submitted byDaisy M., Fraser covering a portion of Lot 125, Wooster Subdivision, being a parcel on the easterly corner of Louis Road and Colorado Avenue, subject to: a) Granting a 5 x 20 ft. anchor' `.easement: as shown the cost of relocating pole and anchor to be borne by, subdivider if work is required; and b) payment' orsegregation of Assessment Nos. 335-C and 335-D, Bond Series "YY",.and furnishing evidence of payment of all payable city and county taxes and weed abatement charges. On motion of Mitchell and Bishop, this Record of Survey was approved in accordance with the recommendation of the Planning Corninission, eal Portion Block 68 urkhard) A report was submitted by the Planning Commission unanimously.recommending` denial of the appeal of W. E. Burkhard from the deca3on of the Planning Officer for a division of a portion of Lot .1, 'Block 4t, University Park, located on the northerly corner of Unsversxtg Avenue and Hale Street, inasmuch as the proposed lot of X7;0 :X‘100 feet facing Hale Street does not meet the 10,000' sq, ft. minimum: lot area requirement for this R -1:B:10 District. It was further'recommended that consideration be given toestablishing a;legally acceptable procedure requiring the City of Palo Alto to record with the. County all illegal lot splits as they are brought to light. A letter was received. from Mr. Burkhard submitting facts to substantiate consideration of his appeal and requesting favorable action. on his application. C, 2.T ,oved s to 1 x . auxl�'>9'ax�tivf ��'�'ce��a�$ vat of each of it . 0'. ftao _ +� t' ° A" ex' e 9 1t�be possible f�c�'' ° it. .l�ee s and. eld and t w �tx��t and 10.pp0�� e�,,y �Y be ugh l more. fhb g ecrr. o x� xox cQ,htat�ti d not th Pllanninr� was xnave xeoozxtm • ied° t1he tot.h.e iSiOn is �pxr .the 1° t xne f P pp or try r eq`n:gtzn% f �' �o and x � cosrduct arid .xta' d his ee to �; xe d";.: wt o to xx,4 st 1 1p0. It �sgibLe g i7ntvex. 0146;14'• a that den, issar t dt� re '1`'La�'t co discuss th�� lea $pBF ODA 4 � xecetved ��xcarrittee �o rims�xY F'�"x�° �s ot* n xiaxt iee ing ,Nita G fax the . x,,= cx'd" i. ��;'ft�. mcco� 1aLxc Y} xt al� . ne st wa ce aQ4 hoP� the "�4 mit endva an d. ex r �"� the ot� on of PaY� mill tse hE c Xo �.; the; Oft ch join clitdti zx�N the dis Ga �spxevio�`g xp red a,1. gx� to i d t'%_ I.. tiQ with , acc gt�b�.e 3W -roved t;} ,�a . :: , c ore ie ai~:.Y a-�.n Y �t:s:ii Co. ,ittito x sione 3'•-' lx= a e1'N; t1tfireGoln� m`e,�tx �pxs °�` t1?� n ire ��v ex� t �� p,,LtO t° x light, j mex' eratis p Ra +01x$ sec° t ,t. ca'r91 fhe City" e bxo't ht ;stern,a,�cc'xe�l' pits as th y ar gtrc to li• Vic, the P al �a fx ox ertY ix ox�t Nif 3,11 t1L1e� o its a catd to �as�. x awrix�� f,.. or iise ithara withdrawing tt Rio • 3133, ict bec� �y5 in �0d Xl °o� vote ' e$ptxe -t: :s s ?alp teci by ,ro T• ram. �'ax ' dsthix'tdNiaxe'hall.9 was fxs v to d �''d i��lo� �°tlgex � �'' wir � �x oPc"' t�cx�txQn to and ofiox� tindra of its rt a he 011'call; tiltiOa o_ 1 4� ct beca��e irtxod ccdvote °�` roll, p.e eon Protection a Palo Alto, was axirt� 0�5 Cit wayadopted n'1 Altos - T• the vtaxd t n clu�xon d V7 wad ' of , adgex s trade' --� �tia cal%�� �'� � �y the xx,attexil hid dexeat, , that Wf , xce1,. � 5.8 �'=ors and.�ip a' ow t' a '- 1, £ t ►� vrerty se er years a �0ry the os n. e t tl, t fh a p o a ileg jpt wtst � tine f thi axe '��,axd'► tittle L do bo , t�,o 1ct de 11..' tlna ce � 4'� csL advising, Ld �s residence, e$x le to the hboxt'a of dxv?�"o ahead �,�d rtiitt� �'' • �u �chased te ���,t 36 d �' ct u a . n�` QB '��`'' axe, �Xkhaxdh�t cpxxe e a GLY . inS t �,en wt yo xtY • f' Late'. tk�G ° ed to..bu? a?S�I�c` is t'i'e x'e ox - n-- of ad rToa ck s t 't $friction _ ide c.ee . aL �vatx � ,y xs v+hx the xe . t a ae t the oxxgin Ow hex o btr lot u tiara a a s.'re ea y tha lion ° t,� ctiQn i ans azt ar a t f>�e: tklex ft lot ax, aL lot divi at fns res ~ buwn a f' fox t than r (}00 � l dank .a . Q rh welted dead ,�, r y,ts lei the h :nY ' . 1d o r .fx 0xx� ii�.voL��d �x�na'rd cO'� the �eA �° �1 a,�,so y ion +.:ta,�t foot 'fax that salss e and ° �,,� �,'x�'�' �' the 't q ��� s � •px apex• 7' are fay It ��e��°'a'g� �u;.chaa�x�to the c4='��� naidan��hith �o� 1.70 from rastr $eo District _ _ �� •4 a intien , -re of Pala Alto, l� strict� ucstzx rhdxaw ty v'ard, was ad was troduced., and o o ion o xty ann I from the . b annexed to y nnc►as vote an ro z ca/l. aad � �. . ood- Car-den .'r etrace Annexation:I-A. tea ritor da xece- No Y designated • � I�683 a regular finance A Gard .. approving the second -raiding, desixtaaace wet Terrace anion N on of . atdlar hour emergency''� provision., Annexation No, inhabited adopted ,.by g, andor motion caf;Ma al provisions wrd, was, as us vote ...- shall and �oadw given roll` call, az'd was Claix.nfor . es of 3t A report was, xecesv service Stocking ad; #taxi, the ce for ort f°xxeg City, the peat and of asserted �ittor y o t allowed and three years overcharges - he claim e denied; Paid' � the�axmo . ... ..'xec.a�.en� for. It wagbrought ng that the c garbage' c'harB�d far out in � �`� •l 5 and claim be . . ,. twice a Weeks discussion that the he balance be a week., The City service but w claim than refund.for ty Attorney advise as only 8'ettir, �t had been could a ninety d that in his g service _ or Id be allowed• ty days preceding opinion e y ° ding the receipt o � �i� re o# the City motion of I+ia authorized Attorney Was vi,s, . duly seconds axed by accepted, and a r d, floe 'o vote on refund of 3 I endaign roll call. as Claim for Dn Oirezehat . Cook Bros. Are merit Gook Bros. p°rt was made b Co.) claim Pmt y the City Attorney on the .Alto °n a newer that a { lhtsag mac amount of$683.29,ciaixn;of the .coat nzachiru"Wazs him traded the of"re ma delivered in complete report as $Gd3, �9• an ino in by the City of pork, the pa r the The City Ferable advised �°mp� Matter indicated t}' Attorney press and that it �' the condition ated that the ed that ;a He recv enriot operating at thon of the trade-in a representative of dedlexeiaZ of the chime it was picked by th and knew report was maticn of.g a coxnPa:xy: ore accepted and the yxbee end 'Woodward, the City m denied, tY '�ttarney,s... 14onthl . Re its The znoathly,r,epo .t of the was received and fit ed. The in,August : .a monthly report of the PI re nt of the a monthly epk• xeth a g officer FPlicationa Zonieg;A, zssiarr of lots, °n actaran.takex fox. ?`istrator !and the variances acct, � on .action takers i monthly use. permits, were xen August on. GeiVed and filed. t t :re to Committee �u of occi ItTo,:.3 trans- portation in: forrequest the Councilman Zweng, the Pam Alto and problem Council mea m ofvenexisting referred. �tcd nor for its imPx`ovemen PubhC trans e troller for August, 1959, Use of Coxsimuni Center S ue stun brought up" at Pavia referred to the question. regarding the use of Comma Z several weeks ago the offices a rnee apace tha COMttce No. the Boy Scouts and unstY Center by at which time the staff of tpace in or COMMunity of Boy Scouts, ea council ace at the Camxn�t� o£ the Stanford Ar rt on the use of $p re xc a.r�p° Manager advised that the staff has a wasn asked t. p Si t City 2 when at meets. a . Center . Thb Assiatax� .- '�' Committee No complete report to submit to'Commi The coxr.mstt ee,. was asked to meet soon for consideration of this matter; �r enc Facilities Ytos atas. funds for Davis: raised a question regarding will _ Couixel}xan. Hospital which encyfacilitie;s at the new Hosp been equipping the emex$ understands no funds have be soon died b t sating that he_un " of equipped.. the C a,id<that the facilities are ". furnished by;.; � t;. -xis matter � and, if The City Manger aa'aslted .to Check o- necessary, :s efertbe. quea ion. to Committees No. 3 and No. 4. Use of Bituminous Fibre Pi Amendment tb Pluxnbin •"lman Davis referred to action of the Council on the Council tabled the propose Counc� g to house.. 1 59, when, upon his motion, Code pe;tairin July . 27 , 9 amendment to Section. 1103 of the Plumbing seconded and carried that.., It was moved by Committee sewer materials.' the` table and referred to this zsia�tter'be removed from No. 1. Antonio Road Grade Se oration the report of suggestion of Councilman Bvans' Antre Road At the sugg . , 'on the proposed San De ,LeuSw, Gather &' Company� the City of Mo'�ntain View Separation, a letter:from ittee No. 1. Grade ena concerning the project, were referred to Comm no farther. business to come ef Pore .M. There ;being � Darned at 1 Council, the meeting, was declared ad.3 // •