The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About06091958' :� t7 Alto, --..-,g-,,; 'Hall, Pa Cal .fornIA The CcauYic.�.d of :`the :Cit of lo Sucre 9, 1958 ontom$dateat7:30p. y F. Alto met guZsr j as follows: : wit presiding. ae:ssia. Present Bisho Pa p, Byxbeei C.reaa�. Davis,Porter Rodger$ .. A, �. Marshall, RUPpen:thald :,Stephens Mitchell, Ab�ert : Corco y Woodward.. Win, Evans ` Giffin, Mavis. The minutes of the meeting of M 26, 1958, we distributed re May nds approved'. ed re o.E. of second Division Pro Hct 2..x,2 this: dale fo 4 rt was reaclved;an .the bids oP s da r the saleLLofUn1versit. received at : g p ecand Iii,vision zz .t . . Pict ,Bark » . , or Parkin o Avenue Dist,, 8 roJect 3, ':as. tollowsm4 �'f f�Sv''�00, C�S'�",str eet �2-1 g $oh.cis:- Bidders .First California ComOa iy 9w.sora, Levy, - Williams & S.tern �• Hanauer &Cora 3.9917% p3nY. and . Associates T., ,i 1, end Cosa 4.08245% Aany and Associates Resolution No k.0662% the, best bidder 3008.+ awardin bid, es bbdreducedrst Ca1i1forr la Companthe sale of said bonds to i Adopted b y and, on motion of B 9',- in daccordanceRodgers, os with �. Y ananlmou9 vote on roll yxbee and their call.; Rodgers, was Le- r re Law;W ter pressure Avenue A letter was received f stAtint that the water, room George J. Briggs, areaAve and is view..ha thhe w t t pressure in his are al 11 Dake. Axe. and l.n. order to _ ha't apartments .and progide ads t are to be little too Sarderrs goats,. wa ter built i7 that canslder the dens n g°od condition pressure for keeil quest fon . , ;e u»bed that the Council .The sCity -Nana er madeto tize 71e C1r s g advised that Improvements are- to be taken yster�„,.will correct situat , proposed to tie next. month. for the situation, and that be if � i+rrprgvements. the Construction of water dlstribu$ ' Y .The Cit yManager WAS requested to ans wer Mr. Briggs' letter. (Councilmen Evans and Giffin ca .and were Present for me at 7:35the rest of the P.M. R_esaest- for Refund of Dum in meeting.) Cher es Chvners Avsocletter. �vas`N'.received :from Sa. to or -sat Papa' Alto.;the University Village consideration of their= u ,askniom? cons o re uest .'for a re and or a County, enking t eni-E -s iir the.. amoeint of °bass to r the:ao $17.50,' Co�.erin non-resident offt dumping d e Alto, city refuse dis og 1. are loads wing 1osi0. fro the> site: of A sal area by debris by aremoved deb isrr. the T vo�unteert • ay3or home which wag wno �� ' •, destroyed. Counc�:l - Forted by�`-the Aa , such a does was have the Ay the. yor: nd City refund souls- t * to:: cocci 1 . With h Manager gut the be cons d a g3:ft of Y. public the request s 1 erect" i; The Citl► 17�►n� e. Q ,. public funds. Win& the oTho, 'cl posna en,w,, asked to reply to .the letter ex ! ; -�--+...__::.,.," plain - Average Interest Rate 3.89o49r% Change :of Street.'NaMe. • Communications were. received from A. F. BAi1ey, Patricia =F.; ;Kuz1a and. _Mrs..:R. C:, Hemingway protesting the change of name of Elrod".le ``Drive .to Moreno; Avenue. - Attention was called to the ordinance Adopted, by:"the °Council on April 28, 1958, changing this street name which had been !re:comrended,by : the Planning Commission It WA s explained by the Planning -Officer that: -due tosubdivision development in the area, .Moreno. Avenue had 'beenextended northeasterly to Greer Road and from thatepoint the street- ' was:; called Elmdale Drive; that it had been :pointed:: out to ,.the 'Planning _Commission by the Fire Chief and 'others. that it _wou id be logical, to ; continue the name of Moreno Avenue:, and for this reason -the, change had been recommended. -The'Coun.cl agreed that this change of street name should stand, land,. naked the City Manager to reply to the letters and esx- J plain why the, action was taken. Bus', Trarisporta Lion And . Rates A letter:was received from Mrs. Josephine O'Hara, 1119 ,Byron .Street,' concerning the recent increase in bus fares, and Asking .the Couacile.to consider municipally owned buses or the grant- ,ing of A: subsidyto local bus company so that more reasonable fares could be charged . The.. Mayor commented that the bus company has made requests a number of times,. -.for a, subsidy but the City Attorney has advised that 'the City -cannot legally subsidise the bus company. - He stated that the #rhol,e bus _transportation problem is under study, ancd sug- gested that Mrs O'Hara be so informed. Cancellation of Takes Communications were received from the Santa Clara County.. 'Flood Controle and Water. Conservation District requesting the CAncel- "! anion of taxes on:;.the°•N'adsen property on Matadero Creek," and on troperty of the Palo Alto Unified School District on Dry Creek, which ,have been acquired by the District for flood control- purpo4 es. Can motion of`.Byxbse and Bishop, the tax.' or said properties .were cancelled by unanimous vote on ro,. call. Bids `. for Hospital': Site Improvements A report ,was made by the City Manager on the bids taken on May 23, 1958, on site improvements for the Palo Alto -Stanford Hospital anc Stanford ; University; School of Medicine, and for the completion-. of Psasteur .Drive, ; with recommendations of staff members: representing the City and Stanford' University who have reviewed the ; bids; And various A 1ternAteg : .•� It was their recoQnmc:•i.'tdation that ' the �. -;.ward for'the work be made to the low bidder, Carl N Swenson Company, on the of their base bid. of $466,046.35, rejection of Alternate No 1, (Pa3rking Area No. 3) and Alternate No. 3- (changes' in, irrigation ;system), and Acceptance of Alternate No.. 2; for- sub- stitution of plant -mix surfacing, and Addendum No. 1 four' completion ;of Pasteur Drive, the ; ;,d dusted total being $503,627,.85.. On motion.' of Mitchell and Byxbee, and by unanimous vote : on rol le,`C .i1., the :award was:. made to the low bidder, Car], N. ,Swenson 1 ': ?Toriary, as recom errnaed and,. the Mayor was authorized' to sign ;-the contract ,-1n be'.hscld of the City. ';Transfer Fof 'Refuse Disposal Accounts• `, Upon recommendation tion " of the City Manager, it was moved ,by Bishop, seconded bi Mitchell, and carried` by unanimous vote : on roll amount. of $,12',_000.00 be transferred from:the Ur+apn_ropri?,,ted BA.lance of the Refuse Disposal Fund to _account 58)47, Ce .ontr t Collections , eat. te�� fax and several �FFI.-�. reF° °n � ,�o.�t�. P� � eee�'�e�` ��.or to su��a�at�ox� �� rC,ect. t , ZAs na st b taken',rp ., . for ode.: scion � P.P.. *Pant). to t tt The. r� t Cord► 9 St ell ar'1r i - ; tyi Palo ` Alto are ,try S oa to to the nt�1 �o State -, Sou . �, ppa yr3::W also Cou t4 the• e ...tr the of, 4'300, 1 can e a1D Pant). t Dec- * \ that 1.:t heat. t � that the pr at . lie the n f� �c�me d � � � t s ri. on po Grade: caxss�� "day .gtie plans- �rtid' �. a Sr' �'e'�ent �ntins amt tYi� is -,i� + og:h F the ana P 'd cc. er a1 yed the P basis thatto ,ghre o pct: fpm �_� r�'� and. revte: c1 an ec�rp.CC as of the: Fpu o..' The - and' ate. C , cost CmF been reF. af- 123 mated from the om. r �.r��A' su� ota.1 esti� �ce�.�e��.he grade ate: tce..'� r� of \t());:t.:„V;e•-'"Valertfereli(?:1-1Fiti contr'b that s beon V'.��,3� adv:ieed pe lt an�t�oti, cty��mF ,� ; Ke (y} thst a j n the; �!�( r�yQag .1�+..29M'I' r .e jy(�' a `^ utYlor�4iA+i o a� • ✓ •d eg iJ,(�_ `�' ,'� aa�;pzl �Esolat. City of i a +fee Cam coed , to t,�� on venue� 1 ae'aeration + �, t� °X,s wex' as x�e v Goet o Qyutia t, nt:' ots �a $v f f a ?r ` es' ima d ,end 3w of i, ;....: ° Q . ttant :,?ra e to a� ax` v i1 be od of ffyin -h : shams fieFa eg4isi beep ' n her t. vet 4 toy g ' dd ep P c have ed NJ/thin ran t .Aft 'Road 'matters: xo�e a�a q Mtge f he that • ct OT of tra�;t car► application PS c t l verifying- , .,t'i�.�'z'1 q41'�.. �.E�'�+'i`'�'� �� s1:b�'�"�'''rr'�n�' for, to c� ,gtruc the I - y d �' t the ,4evteiged by the fun t� to tPa mQnth� Ma?e ?a C�mm�gsi tgan of they estimated Vin. sSx t ,� s y of an �,x 4 T -e C SiJ ie`Ki.ge ueat.1. s a e�haIf f .. t`�xe - to toe � n` C o' ded`� sent` r .N sir o eot ten iAi a ire xequ o � , Ml f, the, 'D0 , P , a°'d Qm h' moue atructox� gad com° dy G '.'"?300,0000e it +re t r, o i� Can aride that ti �ogbe ';node .b.�.'tY�e = �� ., e��t :ec, r��etae � d ��t� � � type ��u`. tch tx>� �ut�� t • t�? Y. Wad• moved b/ c,,1� t3on r �ocete or r, P,epara eat 0,e r allth betweenRat th vote ps :Z: the prod tie ag`e' . and tc.? . v i - tIth r a to'. ,he Qr Apr {ecp,te uor eme S 1:cs•T �-f:ither ' .-'for: to oMP ny 'be plans �Xid � ��r?� :the': Faq�^"�'C .. ar'� :and rued. ,•r-,t�.��` � le.5.1,16cn utha ;c�utY�ez'n..C:be rm. t:ea?Fi3 t thou ma', : beti.t� az',d .h 009 -and 30 aed e *+a �atQ ,�e t;nf� C o. � ��,��' �'��tl�mme � ., � Com;��,�s �'1-. ar' t '? ba ex� �i�S Y'�'kzc _,n ; ;, , t. thy, St la tom'' ,eg.�ax"Y dao end;,o` 6 ' r ct'�°�' ort.z�.ng' ' cua °n t p 25 ,.lure oe ;, . 1. on Ski Grde CroS � 4"dr,�r��`0':tss. p��it9h``� for ust tQ C fgr ,bcc► �Ed•,xe�lic Utl �.t= a�K� t?e C z. +� wyKe u,a.t,__fto ♦t'�e a 1,c::11. �? t. o Mk�/��; �w,a trr . � The. j,. I1 `- 4�'ty, 1 ':01 )'.��+O�L?+:, - {+y-•y� .at �� w� 1 V�Y iV 1 a t aat�Gx'F °mod to hep�,c �e"':. l` ,r r �'li'tt°�, VI?:r�,atkat -o F°pay^ ' - t' • �. r-.".3., t'r..1•G(Y'gdr �Ci.� n��JL�X'r�g'�a' +►�� ,, �yj ,.'�y'r,JGn�+� ,I. �„� �'�r � �. ,y - Y - - .',Cr If'�'� ,t� � _ ote vii y � :e°,1; li4^�J �red bl Ainan m �y rr�~ aS.n a+dop � ". _ L;br�`s"ies r,�d �'��•�. � o�.att�r:�; th' �� of er �''�%q � `� � l'I Y� �- 1\ tlatter'p,r,7",a;11,.€.1:,,,L: :•Cor ,:the 7,...ge libraries ' r.,3 -branch into 'operation. eVr s the name ra .the o Chance in he na -,,e.� ---.�. ). cnc ^,.nl ��ri b the Comr'UhM — "� • College:'Terrace' Branch (formerly the South Palo Alto Eranch) Park 'ranch (new branch library on Middlefield Road a j cent 'to,'4itchell Fa„rk) .P'ownto rn Branc: ; (for the present main library - building at Hamilton and .Bryant). Mitehe' l er,.tative Map of -Eleanor Court At report'°was received from Committee No. 1 stating that it has given "further consideratiori to the tentative. map, of Eleanor Court providing ior..•..,tie subdivic.i:on of a portion of -`R: rcno Rincon de 'San. FrancisqUitoo being the property of George Tsukugawa located between Dinah's Shack andActobe Creek, and to proposals for street development in the ,area-. The. committee recommended chat the pro posed -"street to 'serve the subdivision be extended to connect with W11.kie way,. that- the width of the street be 5 feet less than original- ly proposed with the:understan;ing that a 5 -foot easement for utili-; ties and planting would ;be' provided on the southerly side of the treat. A motion wa:s made by Byxbee, seconded by Cresap, that the: plan lforextensiOnot the, street from El Camino Real to Wilkie Way.,: b.e adopted as a condition' -for the development of the area, including the properties,: of George..Tsukugawa and of Short and Schmidt. Reference` was made to the previous recommendation of the ?1 .ruing Commission. for approval of the tentative map of Eleanor Court, subject-to.the following conditions: 1) that the street.name shown on the ma,;p,be::changed; 2) that a public utilities easement'be provided across.ndjoining property owned by Short and Schmidt at the "end'of.Wilkie„ ".ay; and 3) that the first 15 feet from the rear ;property line be dedicated to the Santa Clara County Flood -Control, .District::with the balance_of right-of-way required by the Flood Control District to be reserved for future acquisition by the District. There was considerable discussion of the street development `and traffic circulation problems, grid consideration was given to the proposed, through street as recommended by Committee No. 1 and to -the -proposed long cul-de-sac to serve: the subdivision as shown on the tentative'map_.and As: recommended by the Planning Commission. It was -pointed 'out*by E. _V. 4rb'uckle, vice: chairman of the Planning`>Com- mis.si,o;n., that., the Commission: -dohs not feel that Wilkie Way should- be extended to ,ma ke . a. through :street . Mr.. Fra"nk Crist, attorney for the developers of the: sub- diy si'on, :addressed tre:.Council . stating that they are willing, to "a.ccept..a. -:reasonable plan and -to Abide by . the conditions :;re.commended by.the "P1Rnni'ng; Commission for dedication of land to the Flood . ContDal, District anti "obtain. an easement, over the adjoining ;property. Mr. Willlai-rsa E:: Short informed the Council that he'and Mr Schmidt R,re wi111rgto.work out an agreeable easement for publicl u'tillties over .their property. The City Manager -pointed -Out that it: s:houldry be understood that the. eset ent would have to be; a,greep_cle to the ;Public"WorksDepartirlent .and Utility . 'Departments; of the Clty. C,ourzc:i.lmem T 1tc ie11 moved an' amendment to :the motion th t e ,ori gira"l reccmmeradation of , tre 'Plannin-g Commi.ss .on ror app.rova 1 of the map; provid1ng fora c=al-ue-snc from El Camisro Reel, and s-ub,�ec,t vo the uond.itions rs set forth in their report" be' adoptµd h ,the 7Qment 'wPS seconded by'Y; Davis' An ' Was 'clr'C'1ed by"the, fo11owing ^te or.; roll val1: Bishop,, :Da -v1 , Evans, Giffin, Mitchell, Porter, Rodgers, RuPpenthnl , Stephens. ,Noes: By1cbee, , Cresap, Marshall, Woodward. The;motion.as amended was the adopted by unanimous Venn. On motion : of.;Davis : and Marshall, the Council ;adopted the rec"ommendation..of;•Committee No: • 1 that the width of the street be five 'feet less than originally` proposed with the understanding that a five ...foot easement for utilities 'and planting would be provided, on. the southeasterly side of'_the.street. Amended Off -Street :Parking Program, SouthPalo ,alto A report_ was..received from ,Committee No. 2 stating:that it; --has considered the proposal to a. -mend t°he off-street parking program - a suggested by Santa Cla.ra.C-Onty and the California Avenue pre* 'nevel'opment Association;: to,.provide :for; the, acquisition by ' the City of :property :on the;..soUtherly:-`corner .of Birch and -Sherman in place of the westerly` corner as previously authorized. , The committee advised t:hat;it_ had passed- a- ,motion_instructing the staff not to procee& with acqui cit.ion until, more information is submitted,, and asked the staff> tee ; urnish answers- to • t the f �ollowi:ng questions: • 1 Whether a: parking lot in the assessment district, which 'has already.been acquired- (such as the lot on the northwesterly aside of Sherman between Birch' and Ash- Streets') can be taken out of the district, disposed of ;by • sale.or _exchanged ,for other property, 'so that the original parcel ' could be' used for commer- cial purrposes. The number of _parking spaces which could be, provided on the 'property on the southerly corner as co:mpared with 'the ; number of spaces which can 'be put on the weste;rXy`..corner ''The cost of the three'parcels on the southerly,; corner As compared. with the cost of the property on -the westerly; corner. In answer to ,the first question, the City Attorney advised that he had discussed tho problem :with Kenneth Jones of the firmof Kirkbride, Wilson Harzfeld-&c° Wallace,. the counsel for the .City on ;improvement proceedings, `and--: that .after consultation with other members of the fi, rm., Mr Jones,. had informed him that it was . t.heir opinion that as long: as' the perking 'lot' proceedings are pending_ =the C,'ouncil:has the ;right=to make, a change, i.n 'the, parking lots=ites and -could remove ,a lot from, the: assessment district and acquire` another, in- itsi place. within_ the. di strict l n reply. tc the ,second :and third questions, the Assistant City Manager reported ,'that;: the parking program contemplates that the,zitmprovemen:t of: the property on the> westerly corner of. Birch -and :Sherman woulcx provide ?40_ parking spaces,, and that the proposed alternate' -site :on' the southerly corner ,would ."provide 48 spaces If' three'' parcels, are acquired...He also- reported that in the opinion :of; ,the staff the three- parcels ont;he--southerly� corner would not cost.' more< than,'. 70 per cent 'of the cost of the parcels on the westerly .cornea' After discussion,: 1:t was moved „by • Mitchell, seconded by Stephens,:- ,that' -the-;'off street parkingx;progra,m be amended-. as requested -.by Santa CLara County 'and .tne California Avenue Area Development Association,'•and'_that property ;on the southerly corner, of Birch and Sherman be::acquired;; for parking purposes instead of. - I property on the, westerly-- corner, that in order_ to carry out this ; -emended program the Ccuncil` adopt` a resolution (Revolution. Igo.' .3012 ) rescinding Res.olutior No;. '2980•..p-assed on April 14, 1958, and direct ' ing .acquisition -of certain parcels for off-street parking, purposes .including 'Parcels :7-A, 7-B and- 7-C on the southerly corner of Birch and Sherman,; and eliminating Parcels 5A. -1 And 5A-2 on the westerly corner from the' program. The motion: was carried and Resolution No. 3012 adopted J by the 'o,llowing vote on ;roll ea:1l: •Ayes-:- Bishoo Byxbee Davis Giffin, Mitchell, Porter, Rodgers, • rtuppentha 1, Stephens, Woodward . • Noes : Cresa Evans,,:4la.rsha:ll. The_` Council' tooka_ recess Pt this time, 9.:00, 'P. reconvened at 9:10 P.M.) (COUnc11men ::Mar-sha1l and: Rupper.tha1 did rot return and• were .absent for the restof the' ;eeting. ) Revised __ e1oprnet t: Plan (Enge1m n: Amarillo and Bayshore A report, was,'received from the Planning Comriiss ion .recommending that the reviser' development plan ;as submitted be .approved, to allow construction of not to exceed 92 apartment units rot exceeding two stories in height'. The Commission further recommended a.1 development ,scheduJ.e recurring construction to start within six -months':.on at least* one-half O,P the project with cempie- tiOri within two year','"ard the remaincie r to be started within too' ;rears with an additional two years for completion. The City.. Manager advised that the staff was concerned about the length, of time tobe allowed for development of the project . and felt that four_. years for completion of the total project was "too long Mr. Arbuckle stated` that the applicant had not :a:,ked for t''h t length of time but _ that was the time specified in the -or: ginal schedule and .=t're Commission had cor,tinued it. Mr. Barnett Xcrr,off, representing the. applicant, WP , present a, rd told the Council that :he would agree :to a two-year period for completion or the 'project if the Council so. desired. Resolution No.. 3,03.3, approving the revised P -C Development Plan for 'the ,property Of Theodore Engelman at corner of emarillo Avenue and Beyshore Higiway)with a development schedule requiring complet'►on of the entlrt. project within two years, was introduced, and on motion_ of Byxbee area Rodgers, was adopted by unanimous vote C11 roll call: P -C' Development P'an, Charleston and Middlefield (Witt) A report:wa:s"submitted by the Planning Commission recom- menaing that= the" development' plan submitted by the applicant for the proPerty on the easterly corner of Charleston and Middlefield Roads e approved subject. to., the following conditions: That the apartment buildings be single -story. That -there be no more than a total of 36 units. Builraipg coverage to be no more than 35$ of the area That parking' spaces be provided at the ratio of le spaces.fore3.ch_one and two -bedroom unit, and one space for each .studio: unit. 5)' That ;driveways be :amended to eliminate dual er.trar.ce on Charleston Road. 6) Development schedule to be : Construction to Start within 150 days= after Council approval, with completion! by January pry .1.;,.1.960. Mr Al W:i ;t, the ».pplicent, stated that he. was not happy with. the limitation_ of .;one-story buildings` out he is, willing to accept this condition Hea.sked the Council to consider the re- qua cement of" on'e ,parking space. for each one -bedroom unit instead of 1 * : spa_'ces- :as re'commer�ded.: by `the. Planning. �'on:mission He, pointed out! that- the 'owners, of thiS...property P130 own the shoiprag:.area across the street: And::" twat;" tenant:$' of the apartment units `could use the parking -:,area at, the`'.shoppirig ;center if necessary.. After discussion,Resolution No. 3014 approving the P -C Development P1an iii;'kac_corda.nce with the recommendations of the Pla'rining -Commission; was' -introduced, and on motion of ;Rodgers and Byxoee,,::was a'dapted-,by unanimous vote on roll cP11. • :rsa` , Map of Tract 13302 Martin Manor :A report ,was:.received from the Planning Commission recomthending that -the fiz)a1. map of Tract No. 1330, Martin. Manor, being: essentially the sane as the- .a.pproved ,tentative. map, be approved subject tooth_ :follows rag conditions 'a s set forth in . Engineering 1 -Construction of ”60 -foot street. improvements. 2. Provision for 5=foot planting' and public utilities easements on each' side' -of street (as shown in green on :map );. 49: Granting or public utili tiesseasements PS shown in red. Por setback -purposes, the front of each corner lot to be on .Cri,stine =Drive. Resolution No. 3015 approving the, final ► ap of Tract No. 1330,- .Martin Manor, portion of_ Lot 93, Wooster. Subdivision, was introduced;, and on motion or> Cresap and Byxbee, 'was adopted by unanimous- vote -on roll calk.,' Amendments to%Zoning Ordinance A report ,:wa.s received from . the Planning Commission recom- mending that Article 13 (M 1, Light Industrial District Regulations) of --the.; Zoning .Ordinance be'. -Amended,, torequire use permits for commercial .uses and •to; eliminate residential uses-. A proposed o i,ra,nce', amending'- Article 13, of the Zoning Ordinance, was acceptedfo `r first reading and referred to. Committee No . I.:. - The Planning Commission ., recommended ghat Section 22`.09 -(:enera1 Provisions') of :the Zoning' Ordinance be_amended to establish provisions for the :control. and' regula,tion of off-street parking areas in. such_ matters as paving, lighting, - fencing,:.,etc. A proposed,ordinanc\e amending Section 22.09 of the Zoning Ordinance.,Was., accepted for fret .,readi'ng and `referred to Committee • Annual Meeting of : Bos , to l Board:. The Mayor,: a.ppoi.nted` C,ounci men, Mitc.hel'l and Woodward a.,r�d` City Mana.ger,.Xe,tthley to` attend.•the Annual meeting of. tie Board.. of ios.pi ta.l` Directors to b =:held o,ri :June`::2.6, • 195 Hospital '<Board Membership The Mayor asked the Cc%:ncI1 s a.pprcva? of the re app-oin ►neat' of Henry L. Mclntyre as .a menbr of. the Board of Hospital_ .Directors of the Palo. 1 o -Stanford Hospital' Center for ,a', term ;.of, - four-'years� comnienci�rg July 1,. 1.958 it, was ;moved, seconded and- carried that Mr;. :McIntyre be :re 'appoir ted to the Board for_ a four- year: , rm' Monthly Reports: The; -=moat :ly report; of the Controller for May, 1958, w'as' received and ed -The .montly report:'o ,..-eY.Planning Officer on action taken in }May on applications for .lot divisions, and the monthly report o t re Zoning `Administrator' on • a.cti,on taken on in May' o applications for • vriarces=.:`and 'use pexmi'ts,• were received and filed. `THe'14, toeing "no further business to come before the Council, the: meeting was dec'l-ared=.Adjourned at `9:30 P.M: APPROVED: ATTEST: