Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03281955City Ilan, Palo Alto, California,, March 28, 1955 The Council of ,the -City of, Palo. Alto'mt. in regular . aesaion on thia' date at ' 7.30' P.li. with- Dior Simpson presiding, Roll. call` aa. follows,: Present: Byabee, Cashel, Corcoran, Cummings, Drysdale, Huston,:;llarahall, Mitchell, Porter, Rodgers, Siae'on, ,Wicxett.: Absent : Bishop, Hanley, Ruppenthal. The :minutes of the. meeting of March lit, 1955, were ap-. Abandonment of Easement, Lot 72, Wooster Subdivision This was the tine set for a hearing on the proposed abandonment of: a portion of the "Mayfield.'0.utfall Sewer" easement." in Lot 72, Wooster "Subdivision, in accordance with Resolution of Intention No 2603 previously adopted It was reported that the City Clerk: has filed - an affidavit of publication of the notice of this hearing._ The hearing was declared open. There being no one pre- sent who wished to speak on the matter, the hearing was closed. Resolution No 2607 ordering the -abandonment of this easement was introduced, and on motion of Porter and Drysdale, was adopted on roll call,: with 11 Ayee, Cashel voting No. Initiative Petition for Leash Ordinance An initiative petition was presented, requesting the Council to ,adopt an ordinance requiring all dogs to be held under leash or to submit the ordinance to the electorate at the next general municipal election A certificate was submitted by the City Clerk, certi- fying that the petition contains the signatures of more than ten iper cent of the number of qualified and registered electors voting at the last` general municipal election. Ordinance No. 1598'; providing; .for the submission of the '. proposed ordinance to the voters at the general municipal election to be held . on May 10, 1955, was introduced, and on motion of Mar- shall and Rodgers, wasadopted by unanimous vote on roll cal) Initiative; Petition Against :"Fluoridation of Water Supple; An initiative petition was `submitted, requesting the Council to adopt an ordinance, prohibiting the fluoridation' of the Palo Alto Municipal ;Water Supply and repealing the ordinance adopted by the people on:,November '2,'1954, or to submit the ordi- nance to "the electorate at the :next general municipal election, -A certificate was filed` by .the City Clerk certifying that the petition contains the. _ eignatu.ree of more than ten . per cent..of .the number .of qualified- and registered electors voting at' .the. last general municipal election. Ordinance ; No 1599 providing for the submission of the proposed ordinance to the, voters at. ,.the next general municipal election on May 10, 1955, wasintroduced, and on motion of Rodgers and' Porter, was "adopted by unanimous 'vote' on roll call. Dr. 'Carl .H . Ellertson, 'Jr , :thanked the -Council on be- - half of'. the Palo Alto' Dental `;Health' Council` for- placing the clues- , tion<on-the ballot. '�+�tt+'�' � �t� �a'�tior' � �t gtiD�► . �t+i�"�i �tttion 4x' ° t � e ,,Irons, i 4r 1, 4 s t Viso'. ri��' 'ly. 'd?� SrC�'�� �t'� and. 'x'� � ]+r►ttt i s t tottb$ n t1'a on a,;. tt�4n�. tiny tasicabs ttng �i �ti isit- at . °� Cow tte'� Va tiop of test # cr. 1 fi x. of xy This t>i► tt� + � tlt� cpn reaoseptn4a � fan' . of n xt Yid Sx' o,� tie i,r,ffiti t+a . ate mat oY ;� r,�e�"�-� o� of a �� t�i�t �x �;u .. � ��'�� +t't�r � o,at��rs o '�tito � �� � Ado . 4 .$9'.� t3�' .tt�.: �: dal l ffi 't�'�', Ca' .t�e at 74 tr-'4 a0ear' �.:to �st'x't ��� t�tx�. �'� .. concerning t�a� s � qO; ts'' `' '�,$,.; 'M�`� C{?t�,a ''.1-1-Si � . r7 �, . �,tta►�.t �l 4}f t'� � �`` sr, visit �n ,� �� ��% 8 Avon tuts i8 �' 'flan �` �rc'� 1� o�. ��tt p�'�'� 0Gt , at s f �t� property: n., � ;® pack o; tie 1atte� nr ; ' 'll g'r' the plan y`t ' �, o>�ai an' �a o an eaa price, ' i - as p7t' 8� pip Ottre: a, relisi. avid tuts i hils plats i _ i at �► City: as �ov►1 , b the .pro $ta�� a�` � ; 8 rrbt" " 0:� app bloat, t+ r° ` ti :. s the,„appraiser ,,cat id to':52,;;-.1k..- sd 4 a0V 1' ` 4 t bar n .� t4 �`pO roPerVt tO: ��i resiltieuat Cif.. d� ite . t't , air', �. p ,,:p ri atret ss to .1 h , ia�1.a - .tp�tn ar<.of t itoP. P O A : to , .cat*- it . �.' '.thts fix: � :: tp ,,,, 4101 'the rat t � t, '_ it: St an .Par C .t�1 ip n : ttt a lite ro aairi the i _ ate► t ttile' uorthi.: om` 11 i t, er that g ' o 0�1+ \� pi °�` '�' � attar.' ,�s..i�' ��o��- ����� p and �� � �� pa w' t +e1? r t tt 5 a ill `Ci'�'! proposed a`� Aso a►n att e� t CQ o . �C �` ,��` '�; �,;8!', b'�' ', „ tit '� � R ` � 'b� �'' ffi�a+� '� for o� o ' rt7i to " �s� �-' Qn: Sx ;, . 1 �a .�a� � Wilding \ savrtus also Oases avoluits ' o$ tip ®r o �, recoils/WA/10S!C:' a Vied. frost Coosittee IV:). 2. t vas res. toes proposal 5..h 911xtti-Ple that; the Council Woe" ��� ,bit. �,�,�. � essarl ttp+� t a� also �o ae� � c -t mss' that totAS lot �' 't° tab 11 the aoctIzasitice and WS. ss. 353 too for, tt►X at of tt� zoo '* "Welt t9 . tt �p� pit '�„p, :BY° lada� - �:� ol tha 7���r �` 1 f iris cy � it opts a �i�i as vie of tt , fin ROA$+� - 814 s p 'o' tioC ' to t'1 Ga 'b ant a ;pot tenor o� : CQ Gt7. s rt- ‘`"'-',03,7040.-!..-.-41; `► h t "t ... a s the fit_$ to prof , , laternatir area iatter,re v° ` asc" ttr%el rt_itrikes s ;::both . tltt l s s> 1c17; -."4:.r tom, o p no \1 111; its. ili4" . tiaa'�t de Wit" : tb ab . sell a .a . could e have t 1 Mi to s� ' 'sofa 'negotiate rti 1. . an d. to. would be and obi upon. o stated *atter , ►� ps i► �� �--„r..- solu t oan of the 'Dx .._ it ,ask rs " a • tea' et '4 r oetebl of tie tor t -.tail/ 't : tU 11Qv Oa -tee costs�., p � to } a,�e,.°,�e a ,�� _ � ��a p�tt� 'to �r®mod'' tron� � - 11�. ,�, 1C a ` 9� �"�' �� r�',�,� i�l� g�nd for '� "..."11-"(176, ; tci' tie ° e e d d and the. e" tt'a .. br to pa�G' �Ua*'� y l tatee t tea eatto cal , siq1' a 1' o� the a�s%� -, = the Council 1955-- , .ar . be ,, ed ge° ,off a es' tolout ct 'bile land 9eig t gees' , r irti ce , a park fslte eig►� . � id ',, e�� tc � end the 1�� a reads eae tp��� XisPsdrrhaistain G ��'�.d. via t�t�a; d� i�i"�' charter- buprovision ,� i�C+tun .buts eh ,� a,$ta 0 andhva totee n �,aba' 1 e stablis reea Qrpares not Co cpposes in a' .ip ie the ro a`);a R�to tbe in tort p�,lesd �r � ta�e tes '�°'������,a. '�°�suggested �,t� adstat p1a �►�ae�t• �,da 1�Y nt,bea��1� �°A r�+�t'i°n�.rt°�e' alttb everal Prir Coll � ��ting, t� e�,a�, tarot- a�*ar�. ioxig an � sit �, Y3'G , lam_ sric n `° ` one abbe t saoa . ng the � �� t� a the' he �� land 14t1Y ,p�,gni wed .. reed �, o� Drysdale, VA for Wei 11,, seconded by ,sad des other i �, ' r oA.e: wa$ .rtQ tier be t�.on . ��` �► ax t the a � ider�!Vavld lilts . � r� S+�d tt�tl� - t + fOrtjnsr addi the. ,,�,n ape ts ttee ,d ring �� tbs� � xltl°n e;an ,��' que� t tea cWi er 1 � ,e ,ta ici'Pa on r tlaf �;g a rt ;evee'�' <sg ��,ty t tang;;.urges e,Caan nt "��` peg on t t�� �elm ibl aae: e totes ie'� ax�c at tlg '� to.put n o ln oee. palte a it .. ord. to .a ,apt: a °t� s t ra . r props*. ''i� or � 2. t opne, ps expo tine !, .'� � t e cities charter bu �4r 'a'� � people ��d t re- rtit 'budgeted,. it meted a ea that 'the .Cov�n+�i m it'ad sat and p vsit'�' or9 p 4 in a act dale, vn�ie�`�o�or�,°u�:�,�sa °db� I�'9�'tit$e,�►p, ngs= tocodin the h�. ties that the proposedSoth stated that t an = 3n developing �` de the question. neidab�e mot ,spa n + tb the proper *ay does . sae eo ars eed r be dot t is mere stated,att10 er a should i abeam t �, c► eore'p areasb sand before ,�1'� •ZnK stir ,gel that apt C4r policy acquire nnGil is ine�'• parlt to c Council; rltter t. raettr`r s $ tial. to if . Council. Park e p handle plan is it Se. ®ts She +'y6! the last 'S!e to rX9 that purposes. to ca ��,gn+cil 'rticular�'r+� *aster ce a the in a acquired bt on . o p sae b•Se an accepted la/ tour sites 1on , anal st dCoappropriateco n 'tit thatWm/8'10e, opine acquisi- tion ��.�►�'�' acres, place tY1 developswat ,tb°`' ebicb t' a proposed Corcoran about ll a lion to o, . a; t°,� ling a t as . very eooxs vote belle, vas 11 it sal a 1 s : , raiae le" doent on a n t, ca r Corcoran = CuelsInga' _ � ��$ West, _, , C�be3� ��� on,• °eii4� IrPtbe*, Itod. ,' rtaa rtaea _ _�► .� oss Councilman Porter asked the citizens' committee to 'wet -with the Council on the matter before' they continue with a petition for a spacial election on a charter amendment, to see if there is a better approach to the problem. Councilman Marshal: suggested the citizens' group discuss the whole matter with Com- mittee No. 2. (see Page 206) On motion of Huston and "Mitchell, Committee No. 3 was instructed to allow a sufficient sum of money in the next budget for the acquisition of park sites according to the park acquisi- tion and development' plan presented to the Council last year. Cashel voted No on the motion. (A recess was taken at this time, 9:40 p.m., and the Council reconvened at 9:50 p.m.) (Councilman Cashel left at this time and was ab- sent for the rest of the meeting.) On potion of Huston and Mitchell, the park question was referred to Committee No. 2, to meet with the citizens' group interested in the park program and establish a priority list of proposed park sites for reference to the budget committee. Relocation of Adobe Creek A report was received from Committee No 1 recommending that the necessary steps be taken to proceed as quickly as pos- sible with the acquisition of property for the relocation of Adobe Creek in accordance with the plan previously adopted by the Council, and that the necessary funds be transferred for this purpose. The City Manager pointed out that the project has been previously approved by the Council, and the procedure should be started if the work is to be done this summer. He advised that a transfer of $20,000.00` can be made from the Special Projects Fund, Account 123, to Account 132-5, Storm Drainage Account, to cover the initial acquisition` and construction costs for the realignment of Adobe : Creek. On motion'` of Porter and Byxbee, and by unanimous vote on roll call, the recommendation was adopted and the transfer of $20,000.00 from the Special Projects Fund to Account 132-5 was autaori zed . Resolution. No 2608 determining that the public interes and necessity require certain land for the relocation of Adobe Creek and for drainage "purposes was introduced, and on motion of Porter and Byxbee, was adopted by unanimous vote on roll call Limited` Parking Zones on University Ave. and Waverley St. The City Manager presented a proposal for the extension of the two-hour limitd parking zones to include university Ave. between Webster ` Street(" and Middlefield Road, and Waverley Street between Porest,and Homer Avenues. On:, motion of Byxbee and Huston, a proposed ordinance amending Ordinance No; 1433 to provide for two-hour parking limit on these portions of University Avenue and Waverley Street, was accepted tor first iwading and referred to Committee No. 2 Parking, Lot in Block 29 (Meter Rates) The City Manager called attention to the parking lot in Block 29, located in the interior of the block with access from Hamilton Avenue. He advised that because ` of limited visibility into the parking lot it is not easily accessible to ; the public_ and is not being uaed as uch as other lotsin the parking pro- I grass. It is now a two-hour" lot at a rate of five cents per hour. The City Manager suggested that it would be desirable to change • f � Mhe,thtrIto-Arse � and.-rate � �"� lip � . ®pn hh h "thed ' b'° Q iota b $� five rate:- e�,d . eacpr. atuthorl a tha rotio cents- per -:,,,hour. o hour;, ,go' ' ot� x basis, rofe�,$ ' de to experiment Cam, r tire eea bxitn is of '`end t with .Parted ar f°ur aa Gii �AeriaeratP rt et the d s �st y er tae. the Par for ac w ��e�.e 'lit � �; �� re , er .pra Tee- Ind s$ t° the � s appointedd.gre 2 est: of: f t nag° 'a absence ect, �,� or$e City Manager, act-, t1,City Manager �, assistant.- and on urdlo 2 city f e A o T � at to the, of nce s n ox�•.p$ 1�r x 3 t A the City&na$er the! Alto .:Chapter; x8 April x�' 155• it . cif at ' of ad ;fr• Bond sdop xo . � t t. was o' f sraet Deivic8 �,' , 'esi e ttan of the S.t&ni►�. the,"C h sttte igt�t' prppos$1 °d hoapi to rs of- Ca nt I pc eiderrt of , f adoption by report Ax`°$r$� d e a h e ap te$ b e �� ,� -PraSrs� y the ,�o yes r'ece�y�d , s°ccom�e�dr''�?,�c$ed�' �" 1 Nei �P� 1 t $ pr'ein o'#i' Z of a fr,p o Iog y"int/loin :the" e a .' etag r r� ex , aid hr '� e a ;No. 3 outiin a °f cp x">: di ' ` e 0 nd ne. exectloh I. o PrQAos$ . $ .boa 14,0 1114 th o�? `' / it „ bcy . to. hey No , . �� .: d iceadvantages-. ed the - Cam int hd d o ce rr is pa i z ,. r: di r°d rced deb a ;!�►y i4? ii$ , a '� ' tha$�ce ;cexx• a •t, tie' P f®• $dd ' t4 a - ::;i t1° ' ose a the, t10 fit n to ixrc of tob spacial- ,et ohunan e x hoapt thy Para bond sdi cam qtr ...bonded' acidz::d ectivh.. is t °giio Ad 41e °o. dad,1 the rithe Po i ti.ea1 ^l `s$i �,,� o,�t �ci e C ,e..b Hasa ° °f P construction. indebtedness mpleti x. : -e Soft Ile t of ssld nt., o wi 0 ►` to --bet edoes i r'ov ��t1a n2c $ acquisition, �t3' a P�' pond to e, l -declaring xImprovement., ® 1 t oo Proms _ t, f i : th thereon,- -incurred the z'„ og the' Prove t . or said' % -arid-providing- r "Art a date h;. plans -for theft, t n f a ti ,toe ttpn. j hiding 'pr of said xj nt Use , :principalc! �� nd Jh 4o mot notice. the pt'rr; a anti -operation .° @ a snit to of Isaid' �� e�gctiata committee 'Mitchell.- ' of. oxi a$ tzeo re• st he Audi adopted byo. ' act 'Ordinance kiekett 'e s$ aP Acca an�° '' tie stgta unts ' that the " Aar ate an roll' Vc$�x °„ ?'ecnm_ *2gp a° fos$i. of S eeivsd 4p the C it -received- from., Comm' � � p�@ �t r -the,-,/954-55 � �r1�p °pp� j,�te, $ acre d� g for he 1gp for thm . tea, 3 rec t .E1 Carolno,-11- ePProyed • motion, a f Nit t 1`jecel of th 8 drag chant 'for` a fee 0° t$ ti �$ !�z ve .repOr,t .� dale, the rec4 o'd'� ti arr • Camino p4r Sn hC .ther8t consideration � AIy.4 Adp l:er,am$, re arr celtit) a .Cam naiod :uni a ' a dis.ta 1tpry-alOat°the rhea Nos amin-District.- -RealCot- -dl App i northeasterly a° tare t for h of that ict • :that' .I,t . �* Lizi_:Councll mately ��Q teed side P ;� ,. „�� Alto Unified The :City tanager. reported that he ,had received a letter from theSchool. District requesting the area be included in the Palo' Alto school district if it is annexed to.=the City: Resolution No-. 26.09• giving, notiee of the proposed an- nexation:, ,of the "" area,. to. be 'designated as 'RI Camino Real An- - _ nexatior No,. 2", - and.; fixing , April :e5.,:1955, at 7:30 P.M'. as time for hearidg, was introduced, . and a: motion.' was made by, Mitchell, 'seconded' by Maraba1 -; that the resolution be adopted. "The question'was: brought up as to the possible annexa- tion'of the balance- of the Monroe Park area between Adobe Creek and San Antonio Road: Mrs Corcoran moved that:_the entire matter be referred to t2 a Planning• Com mission = for study _ and recommendation Mr Philip Di Maria, attorney representing the appli- cants of:the petition to annex the highway frontage, asked that- the_annexation of this uninhabited territory be kept separate from the .rest of the .Monroe. Park aarea, as proceedings ,would: be `de ayed if the entire area is to be considered at this time Mr. Di Maria pointed out that all the property owners atfeoted by the, petition -:now before the Council are unanimous in their re- quest to be.annexed to',Palo Alto, -and would,. appreciate it if the broader queation of'annexing the. inhabited territory in that general area is.not involved.: The Mayor announced that a letter has been received from -Mr.. Grover Moore, representing- Ars . Cora Taylor, one of the property owners concerned, requesting approval of the annexation. The motion to refer the whole matter to the Planning Commission was seconded by Byxbee. The vote on roll call. was as folic/4a:: Ayes: Byxbee, Corcoran. Noes Cummings, Drysdale, Huston, Marshall, ;~Mitchell, Porter, Rodgers, Simpson, Wlckett. The motion was declared. lost. Resolution Na: 2609,. giving notice of the annexation of "El Camino Real. Annexation No 2"'and fixing April 25,.1955, aa` date of hearing, was then_ adopted by unaniu ous vote on roll` cal]. . Comaittee No. 3'waa requested to study the advisability of inviting the :residents of the Monroe Park area to Submit. - another petition for annexation to Palo Alto. Amendment to Business License Ordinance A report was received from Committee No. 3 recommending forfirst reading a proposed ordinance amending Part II of Codifie Ordinance No•: ':5 regarding business licenses. On ,motion of ;Porter and Byxbee, the proposed ordinance was accepted for first reading. On motion of Mitchell and: Rodgers, and by unanimous cote on roll call, the Controller was authorized to refund the following duplicate tax payments: Second installment of Tax Bill No. 6170 in the amount" of $18.56. Second installment of Tax Bill No. 11745 in the amount of $2.87 Second installment of Taxi Bill No. 2211 in the a une,-ef X2.60 a W'. 204 Second installment of Tax Bill No. 11758 in the amount of $3.17.. Prohibiting Parkins on Lytton Avenue A'report was received from Committee No. 2 advising that it has given further consideration to the proposed ordinance pro- hibiting parking on Lytton Avenue between Cowper and Webster Streets between thehoursof' 8:00 A.M.' and 6:00 P.M. except Sundays and holidays. -`-The Chairman stated that the committee was divided in its views on the matter, and returned the ordinance to the Council for second reading without recommendation. A motion was made. by Mitchell for adoption of the ordi- nance;. There was no second to the motion, and no action taken. Stop Signsn_Waverley and Seale A report was received from Committee No. 2 recommending the adoption of the proposed ordinance establishing stop signs. on Waverley`Street .at'its intersection with Seale Avenue, thus making this intersection a tour -way stop. Ordinance No. 1801, establishing these arterial atop signs, was given second: reading, and on motion of Marshall and Rodgers, was adopted on roll call with 9 Ayes, Simpson voting No. (Councilman Huston was absent during this roll call.) Application for Zone Change.;, Loma Verde Avenue A report was received from Committee No. 1 advising that it concurs with the recommendation of the Planning Commission for denial 01' the application of William Cooper and Chester C Wrenn far rezoning . of a portion of Lot '78 Wooster Subdivision, at 779 Loma' Verde Avenue,' from R-1: A to ' R-4. on motion of Porter and Marshall, the recommendation of the committee was'.adopted and the application denied. Height Limits in R -3-G and R -5.-P Districts A report was submitted by Committee No. 1 recommending adoption of an ordinance amending the Zoning ordinance to limit the height of buildings in an R -3-G' district to one story within 100 feet of an R1 district, and to limit the height of buildings in an R -3-P district to ; two stories within 200 feet of an R-1` district and to one story within ';100„feet'of an R-1 district: The committee reported that the Planning Commission has considered these, proposed amendments ' and favors their ` adoption. On motion of Porter and Marshall, a proposed ordinance amending the Zoning Ordinance regarding height limits in the R -3-G and R -3-P districts was accepted for first reading. Amendment to Building Code (Signs) A report was received from Committee No 1 recommending approval of an amendment to Section 4602-B of the Building Code to provide that only one free standing sign shall be permitted for each place of business.; A proposed ordinance amending Section 4602-B of the Building Code was introduced, and on otion of Porter and Cummings, was accepted' for first reading. Street-Name:Changes k report was.received from Committee No 1 recommending for' -first reading -a proposed ordinance providing for street name changes,:•. with "East" and !'West`'. deeigirnations for certain streets which crows the' railroad - E barcadero Road, Churchill Avenue, California -Avenue, ' Meadow;Drive, Charleston Road and San Antonio Avenue. The Chairman of Committee No. 1 suggested that first reading be given to the proposed street name : changes at -this time, b.ut.that plenty of time be given for consideration of the matter before second reading. The Planning Officer : explained .the plan ` for the "East" and "Went" ,designations of the streets involved, and advised that a`separate ordinance has been proposed for the name changes on''Char.leston,_ Road, pointing out that ,a post card poll has -al rready, been eondvioted; on. Charleston Road and the people on that street ".inforaed"" of ;the` proposed "change . 0n`motion of Porter and Marshall, both ordlnancei(were accepted:: for first reading. Abandonment of Easements, Tract No, 1055 Resolution ofIntention No. 2610 to abandon easements over portions of: Loot 1 , Block 1, and Lot 1',, Block 2, Tract No. 1055, ": the Bell Tract,. and setting April , 25, 1955,as date of hearing on the `proposed'abandonment, was introduced, and on motion -' of : Byxbee ; and Porter, was'adopted adopted by unanimous vote on roll call. 'Project 52-J k, `Call for Bids on Parking Lot in Block 38, :Reaolution.No. 2611 calling for sealed proposals, for the improvement of the parking lot in Block 38, Project 52-14, was introduced, and on " motion of Marshall and Byxbee, was: adopted:`by=unanimous vote' `on roll call. There being no further business, the Council adjourned at 11:00' APPROVED: