HomeMy WebLinkAbout12131954California,
December
Sall, ?alo Alto,
131 1951k,..
Ito met_ In pX �& �.ding'
M of 'Palo Alto
et Simpson
cif of ,..3 1? , wttb Yad .uitor
Abe G Sate ,t '..� zago , inr.e ethal,
lar
eS t to fc, qws Cbel , Cum"i Odgers , Ru -
se �� a� o �3 e o tex'
go7t
SImpSon, 1 s were�n 'pr;Yda1e • tuber �2'
C reor ng of tea of be.m ti
Abe mina c'�ax�' f i ca�.
n and that revel: . information
yY1�'� fit; p c:Y� % Jl �'� t ry
alp gc9u1 ,•ed. was c"aC�
•
Gh re e " �o � mee meeting. c urn o
Gas. the : umm�ng le .
�� ��, xea"� in gas Co�nG�g�C Gas ���,�� � e able
Go Cte S.nc tY',e
re�,exwt � tom..°?�t h�;cb the ��'acGo�,d�,nc� b�. G��,p�,r
o the es a� . p r .te w d tbat 'a Alto w asi . S ctr
t Om an iched� ' e aee v a . a-`, b Palo and n
test a �n;_t'�e o6' , the - etal. rate ectrr' o Core
acre seed` tie y - Gas
r oni�an lea o�-C ?ao c
taol te, Hof .' ion t. ,
tYi ; ra ,� erg o
•
to: , n �;rea eta Dr the •eer be C ltd
round g ace se" f o .ve x? i; cf
and n � ����, t�. �d�:'v'-t - the
Os tY�e me orti.o" 'of alloy Vin, f end fl -O
�, �.,,,��, Qf - � �� reer�me has c e�.ng
na e�� � ell • : '.
p .Aced a1�a * r :6 ��a *.he o tY� red r. n • a c o on
tj
.. car � ��to; �,n e. �,ot�:"... .� :� ec�a �e��.,�ng �.� ppr
�� p . O t�'h�ay�'yxl. ,mod,, the t G ter'
r> c'SbS'�C3 men "�O
nitbl�c�. - Tn�. do h��. ,�'�.. R o� '�,c�.n 1eY�
Cit: C� k c "-ibd to o;.d�ry�=g ton
of Sea t a nn 7. an Q �on mo t:
ding
R�so-����on �,nta�od°;ell on � � � ca
a,ota ve aritoxls vote e r' �o e 2� ti r com n
� Yh tGd ,bg ,�,nBYaC a r p : 1 �onng
was �'a0� y �p� Committee �� p•� �'Yk��'r- u� '��F+��. �l
Gin to ° �: ,�'�',C„ l.r f�x+t'i .}.0 "' r ,� V�} V�1i�:1i�.1��-
Andes i fiG en�r g Amendmenta annng
P. retpr' Qrdt e P dcedure for b?� ck try the
ba tixt� °S I;:a.t _t 1p dr of e ed� ,C3aomMi
teat �} _ �ti �e atr� c a be an • prt �a� 'm
at nanGe t- i n, 0 lest B; shon i ;� ab the n' -.'- g Co
C1" ur
and Sion f o� . of- �or��� er ell 'oaCk •'
' r t� old Y?afGe red t�pn 1nF�1"dS rg
ro�oed +1+� e ' �o reo° dnz''' ��r3
•yd, t17e •` a ,it s. �t.tt d?fled Otkp�`
o tS'�it�e'' G��:4'd from ye of f �rat� ec3 turd
d wag' r 6dt.ng ment the pI
stabli p i rG; Ce Mme the management
ewe , e
an o d�=Y ,� e� �?r'Porter an p ell 1,3t1-1,
ado °na i �''ylPg mdt� p '' 0� ;c`li '�i • r, GhG, ?lib -15 ,,
ip �. '�� 5 Ori E��st opts -on of
the ��� ��f�se �ti.
D d i oce. -_ fog' - mmenoed bm3 tted ec i, com-
Ga a s R: . re.c �,ecent�.y ,10. 2C , oy i�he s � es�
',ranee. '�� t3.on �'u.;''�•+�'Cr l�t��. ,
c,ompt'tt egu at onand Regval be reviewed be Pubs G tp ar o tied' . -
e m of lr9� will Rodger , t �C' were
1,
, and the ,eke io a't,•on pf v'o' ter ce'Ction o}
;vti on n mUti ova with the �x o*men ri,g . .
recommending:_
ec t� re�1ent
��titee � t�r�ns. � ��
',and Reg a Committee . 3 r s re ;
- ,3$ �gCB' V1) from Tea v ' , L . S. A �'��� fny�ows•
CokIncil
•
1
t
as, City Assessor'be p.ostooned'to February 1, 1955; and (2) That
Mr. Harold L. Marty he anpointed to the position of City Assessor,
• upon the retirement -of Mrs- Taylor, at a salary of $525.00 per : month:
On motion of Mit?c:hell and Huston, Mr. Taylor's retirement
will become .effecti;ve asof 'February 1, 1955.
,on motion of Mitchell and_'uusten, the Council adopted
the -recommendation of Committee Igo°. 3 for the appointment of Mr
Marty as City. Assessor;unon'the retirement of Mr. Taylor, at a
salary of $525..00;per month.
(Mrs. Corcoran and Mr Drysdale came at this time,
7:50 P.M. and were present for the rest of the
meeting.)
Appplication'for Zone Change on San Antonio Ave. (Bonnet)'
A rebort:was received ,from Committee No. 1 advising tsar`;
it. concurs with the previous recommendation of the Planning Com
mission for denial of'.the application of R.'D'Arcy Bonnet and
Zone' W Bonnet, -et a1 -for. the ..rezoning of portions of Lot 8, M.
S . Loucks ' Tract, known as :235 and, 2;5San Antonio. Road, from
R 1;:A:B-8 to aft=? C, Residential, Garden Apartment District.
On motion of Cummings and Byxbee, the recommendation for
denial of the application'wss adopted.
Application
for Zone Change,
Middlefield and Loma Verde (Nisi)
A.report vas received -from:: the Planning Commission re-
commending denialcf the application; of Enrico and Evelyn Nisi for
change, of zone from "R-1, Single ,Family Residence District,
General .Commercial; District, of: a portion of .Lot 51, C. M. Wooster;
Subdivision., located -on the northwest corner of Middlefield Road
and Lois Verde Avenue:. The:Commission reported that its denial
was based or the grounds that the proposed use would not be bene
ficial to the surrounding residential area.
A motion was made by Mitchell, seconded by Cummings, that
the recommendation of tre:Planning Commission be accented.
Mr.. Frank Crist, representing the anolicants, asked per --
mission to present their case at this time or to appear before a
committee, if the matter is referred to a committee.
Councilman Porter, Chairman of Committee No. 1, advised .
that an application.for change of zone on the southwest corner of.
Middlefield Road.and Loma Verde Avenue is also under consideration
by the Planning Commission, and suggested that the application of
Mr. and Mrs. Nisi be held over until the Planning Commission has
reported on the -other request so that both can bra considered at the
same time-.
• The motion to accept the Planning Commission's recom-
mendation was withdrawn.
On motion of Porter and Mitchell, the matter was referred
to Committee. No. 1 for consideration, after the Fanning Commission
has submitted its report and recommendation on the application for:
change of zone on the other -corner, the committee to consider both
applications at the same time.
Mr. James t3. C'.Grady,.attorney representing adjoining
property owners, filed a petition which he stated contained ap-
proximately 330 signatures,:` recuestin:g the change of one be
denied:. Mr. O'Grady asked that he benotified of the meeting of
Committee, No. 1:when the'question, is to be considered.
Application for Zone =Change` on Alma and Greenmeadow (Eichler)
A report was received. from;the ?fanning Commission re-
commending approval of the application of Eicher Homes Construe-
53
tion..Company for -the rezoning of portion of Lot 3, Me2S, Loucks
Tract, ` at ;3961 Alma Street, scorner of Alma Street and ,GreerSnieado
Way, from, £. x A:E,-& to P. -C,• Planned Community. An.vroval was re.-
commended'by the C:ommtssi.on.subject to adherence to the architec-
ture.bronosed in tie o an submitted for a market and accessory
shops, coverage" by`:the proposed structure not to exceed 20 net-
cent of >:t' e: total . available area, provision for oarking, at _a - r, atio
"�f not -less than 3.:1, -`and. egress and ingress to the shoo ing certe
restricted;; to GreenMeadow Way,.
A.,'motion _was made :by Mitchell, seconded by Huston, that
an ordinance amending . the Zone Man to provide for the recommended
change of zone be accepted for first reading.
Mr'. A. J., Stern of Stern & Price addressed the Council
asking that; the matter be referred to a committee for further con-
sideration . of .all the facts and the need for further commercial
zoning in the area. . He said he would like to Present to the com-•
mittee additional information and plans for the development of a
shopping center on the Stern & Price nrooert,T on Alma Street and
East Meadow Drive, construction of which is expected to bein
within the next thirty days.
The motion was amended to read that the or000sed ordinance
providing for the, Change of zone as recommended by the. Planner Com-
mission be accepted for first reading, and that Committee No. 1.
consider and ;report on the matter before final action is taken on
the ordinance. The motion as amended was adonted .
Mr. Stern asked that he be notified of the meeting of Com-
mittee No. 1 when the question is to be considered.
Zonin$ of, El Camino. Real Annexation No. 1
Amendment to Article -of Zonin Ordinance
A reoort was received from the Planning Commission rocom-
mending a aoroval of the, proposed zoning of tho ,area known as El.
Camino Real .Annexation No. a. as •,presented by the Planning Depart--
sent to the Commission' at its meeting; of December 1, .1954E together
with aonroval of a .pronosed ordinance zmendirc' Article 9 of the
Zoning Ordinance to eliminate the word ''hotel -s" from Section 9:02
(p) and :adding Section 9.:03 (b) to read "hotels, and rrotele ehen
nronerty; is contiguous to orooerty in the C-3, M--1 or M-2 districts.
It Gras pointed out that no official action can be taken
at this time on the zoning nronosal because the annexation of the:
area has not been completed, but that the Comm it si.on wished to ore
sent. its recommendation for the . zoning of the area if It,is annexed.
Byxbee 'a .dDrysdale,t e Cour.
�7x~ motion �;o'' r.� ,. .,. Council concurred
in the, Planning Commission's recommendation for the zoning of the
area ..designated as El Camino '`Real Annexation No. 1.
Cr motion of Bi.shbio and Drysdale, the nronosed ordinance
amending A:rtacle 9 of 'tile. boring Ordinance as accepted:f'or first
read"ing
Appointment of Site Planner
A .-repdrt was submitted. by Committee No. 2 - recommending'
that. the fir m of Eckbo, Royston° &Williamsbe crrgaged assitee
tanner- and landscape= ,architect'` :in connection with the "develor'ient
of the 18-a_ cre,.oark' on `Ea"st Meadow Dri.va , at a ee of $6000-00'
lulus a fee for uoe'rvisdor., in: ,accordance with their pr000sal.-
Councilman MarshaILe Chairman of Committee fro. 2, reported_
that the ,City'Manager's, s.taff_-.c.ommittee had asked fornr.`000sals and
had interviewed applicants, <ard it Was their 'unanimous. re_commenda-._
ti'on to. Committee; 1' o. 2 :that the firm of E.ckbo, Royston �ailli.ams
?be selected The Assistant to the City Manager reviewed'the orocc-
?ores .fol1'owed by the -committee tee in. interviewing applicants
154
J
It was moved by Marshal1,:seconded by Mitchell, that the
firm of Eckbo, Royston & Williams, be engaged and that the Mayor be
authorized to sign the contract for : their services.
An ,amen,dmen.t was Proposed ,by -Huston to provide that the
Council sagest to ,Eckbo, Royston.. & 'Williams that they collaborate_
witha local landscape: architect; on, t"his project for the promot.i'on
of civic Interest ` .nd= the advantage : of having local participation
the -project. .Mr Huston, stated that he did rot intend this to,
be a provision•or the central b;ut that theCouncil offer such ad-
vice 'too the firm. ' .The: amendment , Was .c seconded by Mrs. . Corcoran
After discussion', _ t .was: agreed `to consider separate motions and
the amendment. was withdrawn
. " The original motion to accept the recommendation of Com_
mi ttee i•o. 2 for the employment oi'., .the firm of Eckbo, Royston. c°iI
} i,lliams as - site olanner,.ii _accordance with their oroposal, and ,to
authorize the Mayor; to execute'the contract, was adopted on roll'
call , with,13 Ayes, •iianley and' Rodgers vot;i.ng I o.
•
It was then:moved _oy>-Huston, seconded, by Drysdale, and
carried that -the C:it'y Manager. ,be` instructed to convey to uckbo,
Roy .ton & 'vl i J.l'i:ems the .feeli.ng : of; trc Council that it would be
desirable,; if they woul.d,:'associate themSelves with a local landscape.;
r.
acYitect ;on this'project
Appeal on Variance fro "S`" Zone
A- reoort..Vas received: from the ?lanni.ng Corar^i.ss3on -re-
cotthe ding denial _of ; the aooeal...of Taylor ?eery from the deci.^ion
o; the, :onrn,gPdmini.strator.:;to' deny a variance from the' "S'; ,
Special -Parking District -.Requirements of the zoning Ordinance, to
construct a nuilc i g at`•204. Rl:.Camino Real without meeting said
requirements.' The'_ Commissi`on's 'recommendation for denial was'
.based.- on the .estat l shed ;oolicy: -of denying applications for
mar :a.nce from the '"S'requirements.
On, .moti.on' of Huston- and Cummings, the recommendation was
adopted and th:e,application.d.enied
On motion of Husto;; and . Bis hots . Committee No. 2 was re-'.
.
ted to restudy',the provisions Of -the "S" one requirements 'at
earliest conVerience of -. the committee.
(The_ Cowncil.:tookc -a. recess at this time, 8:5:0 P.M.,
:and reCorvened. a.t 9-:00 P.M
Final Maw, 'Tract ho . 1461 pl Oreenmeadow Unit No. 2 ,
A rewort, w.*as rece 'ved i"rcm tie Planning Commission r ecom�
mending ao.iroval. o:" the :,final man ,o,f Tract No. 1301, Greenmeadow,
2,, be..ng a. portion of- °Lota .5 ..and 6, M. S. 'Loucks Tract,
:(coated at 4-00.0''Alma, Street, subject -.to revision of easement 1 oca-
tion's,`as indicated on: the map.
Resolution approving this map was introduced,
and_".on.'mot. on of- Dry; dale,'ano M.r Corcoran, was adopted by unara.
rnous vote on roll call.
Final Map,'Trac No 1402 .
-The Planning Commission recommended approval of the final
man of -portion of Lot 4, Kook 6, Seale Subdivision ' o. 5, Tract
NO. -102,, located on the southeasterly side of Oregon `.venue be-
tweeri Louis and Greer Roads
Resolution * o 25$3 approving the man was introduced,
and on mot;:on.of Drysdale and Mrs. Corcoran, was adopted by unani-
mous vote on",roll call;
Final Map of Tract No. 12
The Planning Commission recommended approval of the Final
F Man bf .Tract .,o. 125;,-, be .ng a portion of Lot,'4Q, _Wooster s:a kiv
located -at -560 Loma Verde Avenue, subject to ;provision `of
n'an? is uti ties aid ,tree: c7antirg easement, outsize.. the tract
boundari:es':as marked'onthe .man.
2584approving the map was :introduced,
and, -on motion 'ofDryadale and Mrs. Corcoran, was adopted -by urani-
moos. vote' on: Troll a11.-
Tentative -Map (Coastwise Construction Co.)
.IL'report `was received 'from the Planning Comm. ssi:on re_
commend1n€ 'deni:al of the tentative subdivision map of a Portion
-
of Rancho Rircon de San Francj squito, located on .the ,nort: ex•l j
side of 'Charleston Road;=.east of San Antonio Avenue, a^ .presented
by the Coast ise. Cone tr uc tionCompany. Denial was recommended
' pending, submiSs on of. -a oroPosal for the .method of draining this
area' and°provision Of public utility easements and dedication of
street' xights of way .along Charleston Road and San Antonio -Avenue;
as recOmmende'd by the amity Engineer.
A letter'tvas .rec•eived from Leo W. Ruth, civil engineer
for the: Coastwise Construction Company, requesting that actionbe
withheld, -on this tentativemap until such time a.s they are able:to
furnish -the City Engine er and the 'Manning Cornmi ;lion; with suffi-
cient -evidence to shoW that the property can be adequately drained.
It was: moved seconded and carried that an extension of
ninety 'gays 'be.,granted to the subdividers on this tentative ma.o to
give'them° an opportunity to work out the drainage or6blem.
Tentative Man, Lots 109, 111 112, 113 and 114, Wooster- Sub..
A r. ep.ort' was- submitted by the Planning Commission recam-
mending approval of the tentative map of the subdivision oaf s.
Portion of Dots 109, 111, 112, 113 and 11.4, Wooster Subdivision,
located ,in the block bounded by Louis and Ross Roads, Matadero. Creek'
and Loma Verde AvenUe., subject to Provision for rer,uired storm
drainage and public utility easements 'riot;; within and outside the
tract and to the further `orovis ton of the elimination of Tot 6 and
the addition of that area to the adjoininq, lots.
On motion of:Hanley and Drysdale, this tentative -map was
' approved in accordance wi'tn the recommendation of the Planning Com-
mission.
Tentative Map, Block 52, University Park
The Planning Commission recommended a.00rov.al, of the ten-
tative map of Lots, 6, 7 and part of Lot 3, Block 52, University
Park, located at ?a10 Alto Avenue and Hale Street, subject tonro-
vision for easements for Public utilities and .sanitary sewers as
shoun on: t.he. ;nap and to. the revision of Lots 6 and 7 az indicated
. in ,oe ^c':t l on. the man .
St wat moved; seconded and carried that this tentative.
maps be aoonaved; in accordance with the recommendation.
Tentative`Map, block 6, Seale Sub. No,
The ,Planning Commission recommended approval of tyke, ter.-
tative map - of Lot 3 ;.a`�d portion of Lot 4, Block 6, Seale -Subdivision
No 5, located;,°on ,Oregon Pvenue- between Louis and Greer goads':
:twas-moved,.,seconded and carried that the zec:ommenda-
tion`be adopted and the man anoro red .
Design .' Contro l
A report .was ,s bhitted by the Planning; Commission recorn
-mend_tng a'yproval of (design control plans for the cOnst'uction of --
apartments on- Lots - 6: and 7 and nart of Lots 2) ' and 25, Block 9,
Stanford ' City, located on Emer3on Street between El Carmelo Avenue '
and Loma Verde Avenue, subject to anoroval by the Building Insnec-
tor.
ad onted
On motion -of Marshall and Hanley, the recommendation w
Councilman Huston suggested that Committee No. I give
consideration to arevision of the design control provisions of
the: Zoning Ordinance.
Willow Road Extension
A renort was received from the Planning Commission re-
commending nassage of a, resoli;tion that the City of Palo Alto
adopt as a principle the' -need to connect the Road-Bayshcre
Freeway. Interchange' with the Alpine-Sandhill Road extension on -the
Stanford- lands in order to provide a through route for inter -city
traffic; and further resolving that this end can best be served by
the inclusion of thisHroute intheState Highway System so that'
determination of the moat logical; exact location for completion
of' said route, precise engineering of the structures required, and
construction -may proceed at an early date.
Committee''No. l'reported that it concurred in recommending
that the Council adopt as a principle the need for a connection be-
tween the Willow Road-Bayshore Freeway Interchange and the Alpine-
Sandhi7l Road extension.
There was a long discussion on the clue: tion. The Plan-
ning Officer read a letter which Harold Wise, planning, consultant,
had received from an Assembly Committee of the State Legislature
rel.ative to the procedure for designation of routes in the State
Highway System.
Mr. C. R. Pettit, 390 Palo Alto Avenue, spoke in opposi-
tion to the extension of any ':route.. through Palo alto which would
take his property and other homes in that area. Mr. R. B. hackley
ob ;acted to nutting the road through Palo Alto, and Mr. Denis Baker,
a, resident on Palo Alto Avenue, asked that the quest ion be very
carefully considered before any . action is taken.
I Resolution No. 2585 adopting as a orincinle the need to
connect the Willow RoadBayshore` Freeway Interchange with the Al--
/ pine-Sandn3.11 Road extension or. the Stanford lands was introduced,
7 and a motion was .made by Mitchell, .seconded by Bishoo, that the
resolution be adopted.
It was pointed ` out >in ' the discussion which followed that
the resolution does not specify any oart=_cu].a„ route, but declares
the need for a connecting route, and is the first s -ten in trying to
find a volution to a problem ;which affects both San Mateo County
I and Santa Clara. County and the cities of Menlo Park and Palo Alto.
The vote : on roll call was as follows:
Ayes: Bis'ron,' Corcoran.: Drysdale, Huston, Mitcn li.,
Porter,` Ruopenthal;- ,5lmnuon, 1%'ickctt
noes: Byxbee, Cashel, Cummings, Hanley, Marshall, Rodgers..
The resolution' s -as .declared -adapted .
Withdrawal of .Annexed' Area.;from Fire District
--Resolution No. 2586 declaring certain territory known as
San Antonio Road Annexa t:ions = No 2. and. -No . 3 withdrawn from the
.Fremont Fire District was rtroauced,; and on motion of Marshall Pr41
Ruppenthal, was; adopted b , unar.iMous , vote on roil call.
Resolution rwo: 2587 declaring the. result ,-f the special
-' - ,,,n. �vt?'�Wr+�wrw„err,.rt�..�Y^.*w',^•,`+ur,+t+"iww"�9''rn,`,!:�.1'�`S4T-'�r"�FG�'�w'iti at='�lr+✓�+o ;
157
election held on=November. 2, 1954, upon an initiative ordinance
autaorizir1g the, f1;.oridat�.or` of the City of Palo Alto municipal
water supoly vas introduced, and on motion of Bishop and Huston,
as:adopted by unanimous vote on roll, call. There 'ere:7883votes
cast in .favor of: t.re ordinance, and 6330 votes against it, and the
re^olUtion declares. trzat.,`t,he ordinance is adopted and is a valid
.and bi.T�di:n' : ordinance, of` the City of Palo Alto. r�—`� 4y�'
I `f
(Councilman Ca:she. left at this time and was absent,.
for, :the, rest of the meeting.)
Easements and= Deed
A resolution accenting a grant of easement for -utility
Land %end ,tree .o1; ,nting p'urnoses, a' resolution accepting grant of a
utility' easerte t-, ,ar:d a'`resolut3.on accepting a deed of dedication
from Joan, E: Dake, Sr. and Marguerite E. Dake, said easements and
deed covering -property in Block 1, Tract 1122, were introduced, :and
on motion of Mitchell' and Huston, were adopted by unanimous vote -on
;r011 call.:
Tract 1122
A report vas ' received from the City Attorney-regarding,the
cla:Lr� fired by Earle Wr1.ght & Son in behalf of the Allstate Insuranet2
Company in -the sum of $5022.28. ±or damage done to the n_ome_ of.'"+i:1
at.,1575 Har i'1ton; Avenue on October 20, 1')54, ,:hen a
coonoctior,; to the. automatic dis hwasher was broken and. flooded t1:e
:euce: The City Attorney adv sed that in his opinion there- is no.
'liability an the` part. of - the City and recommended that the claim b
deniers
0n ,motion ` of ' Byxbee and Bishop, t?-' Attnrney's recomr�en-
dati on was accepted -., and the claim denied.
Tax —Refunds:
request was received from the Controller for :au thor1za
, ti.on to snake refunds ofthe following duplicate tax oriyrlents .
1 Tax Bill.No: 1.512, Refund $88.94 - excess payment
:ott'$58.94 on December. 6, 1954.
Ta.v 3i.11 No. 5522, refund $2.86 - first installment
of.Assessment No. 1998A, Bonds "AAA".. C:t:ncel
payment of ,February 3 1954, which was credited
tea Assessment No. 1998A and charge to Assessment
No. 1999A, $24..65.
TaxBill No. 8719A. Refund ;;272.50 - duolicate
oayrie.nt of December 3, 1954, oni7;inally oai.d on
November 30, 1954.
2.
k+
Tax Bill . No. 8178, Refund 16590 - duplicate pay—
ment merit of October 25, 1954, cr _ 7ina 1 lynn. id by
Valley Title Company.
5. Tax B111 No. ' 10718, Refund $19.93, - duplicatement of first installment December 6, 1954-,
ginally paid November 2, 194.
On motion of Mitchell and Byxbce, these refunds were
tharired by unanimous vote on roll call.
Monthly Report • of Planning Officer
The' monthly_ re'part of the Planning Officer 'gin .action
taken in November on arao?icationc for redi.v ,s -ion of :Lots ,zss ':•e-
cei.ved,and; placed.'on,
•
. . . . . - a . x � � d j
.{\« 75« / : .ƒ? ' . . \ ..
, . . ; �
»tom tg�
taken m�#ynƒ . ,.
received \ �t+%5� ;f 9\/6#:dam\/~ .: ..
!A± glace &6y /¥{ƒ6rf`� Zoning Administrator
- »- «/n a.On yy » f f0»variances ue
� � /k£ ar<�� 2 or action
Re56rkof::-Controller''
tro 00f% y£ » ^
Of\C6\{a�1\■� � »%�
ei ve) ?\\ \0/\�
and placed on ®ile. • /he:
\, 'y \ ƒ} \\\r\lle 00/ November was
urned at 0:There 15 p.6%: 9t §� .
l0:15 p.m.
f �buein S2, the meeting was' dew &>/§\
.A P /7 i