Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
12091957
City Hall, Palo Alto, California December 9, 1957 The'Council of the City,of'Palo Alto met in regular, session on this date at 7:30 P, M:, with Mayor Porter presiding. Roll tali as follows appr'ov'ed.. Bishop,;Byxbee, Corcoran, Cresap, Davis, Evans,, Giffin; Marshall, Mitchell, Porter, Rodgers;- Ruppenthal, Stephens; Woodward. The Minutes' -Of t'he' meeting or November 25, 1957, were Project -5T-1 _ bian Way, et al This was the time,and place for a. public hearing on Resolu tion ;No : `293,2 "of - Prelimi•nsry Determination and of Intention to make changes aid ''modifie its-ons .: A ' notice=`of the hearing was published es required by law. The City Clerk reported that no written pro- tests, have bean receivedThe hea•:rirg was declared oven . There being nc one, pre sent who wished -to speck on the matter, the hearing was closed. Resoluti:an Na' 2.938 ordering changes :and modifications was i,.ntrodueed, and on motion of' Bishop and Giffin, was adopted by., unanimous-vote'on, ro13;ca :, (Councilman .Mavis-; came; at this time, 7:40 P.N. and' was ,pres;ent f-or;1"•the"rest Of the meetings. Abandonment Portions of -Streets Mayview Homesites This- wa;s..the time and place for a hearing on Resolution No:. 2928 -of Intention to abandon portions of public streets in Tract. 1.9•,-Mayview =Hoirdey:i_tes, being a, portion. of Grove Avenue and, a portion of, Lot 1k previously deeded to the City for street pur- poses. A letter; was received from Murray W. Rich, 3832 Grove, 'Avenue, calling attention to`:.the. dedication of portions of Lots 11 to 17 in ].953 a; ;f "for uture roadway, and asking for the return of a portion .of Lot: 17 to him if the City has no intention of using':. this strip fox a street:.'' An affidavit of publicationof the notice of this hearing was 'filed -for the record. ` :A report was made by the Planning Officer who submitted a.: map .showing the property involved.. He advised that the abandon- ment ..of the : portion ` of` Grove Avenue is no problem, as this is being • done to' conform :to she new, alignmert of the street. He explained, .that:portions of ; Lots. 11 to - ],7. were deeded to the City several years ago ::when .it Was planned to have a.. cul de-saac at the rear of these lots,• since then, Adobe Creek has been relocated and the cul-de-sac could trot be used unl_ ess, a bridge is constructed over the creek. The Planning :O_fflcer advised _that, in his opinion the portion of " Lot -14 should not.; be abandoned unless the entire cul-de-sac is abandoned. He:pointed' out that. there has been some division of lots in the northerly'poxtior of the block which might make it difficult to extend a street through to Mayview Avenue. The hearing was declared open. There being no one present wha wished'to speak on the matter,..the hearing was closed. It was moved,by Byxbee,-seconded and carried that the • portion of Grove Avenue be abandoned_, but that the portions of Lat 1 and Lot 17:be :not:abandonedand,that the Planning Depart went'be" requested to -review the entire block and report on the. possibility of deve1oping better. ingress:.and egress .to ,the area, : giving consideratiOn: to,; the extension of the dedicated strip-- t Mayview. Avenue`: ,Resolution No 293,9.ordering theabandonment of.portion:,' of .public ::street {Grove `Avenue} in; Tr et 1.9,. Ma.yview: Homesites, .wail { introducedand;"pas.s;ed by< unanimous vote; on' roll call: C»ricsll _tion of Taxes oo State Property A ,letter ,vas received from the', State Division of Highways; •`•requesting canc`elle.tion of taxes om'prope;rty a:cquired:by the State, for Highway purposes., being a`; parcel conta:'ining•.0.017 of a:n RC -1 :• conveyed by the -City of Palo -Alto to the'State, designated -Deed No . 20933,:., _ 'It::was: moved`by Byxbee, seconded and carried that the.: taxes on said:property be cancelled and that the property be 'moved from the assessment -.rolls. >Caneellation-;o.f Taxes- on Church. Property A•communicat.ion was received from the First Baptist T Church' requesting cancellation of taxes or' the property at; 2185= Bryant:. Street owned .by :the Church and used for Sunday ,School. pur- poses, stating they thought the exemption filed in April, 1957, covered a11':=the ehurr•h, property. A report was received from the City Aasea or adv'ising::. that the description :of the property acquired by the -Baptist Church at 2185 _Bryant Street was omitted on the exemption form; -filed by the; church;' however; a;s the `property is used exclusively for religious purposes,.'he rec:onrn2ended' the matter be considered a clerical -error and ghat -all the church property be exempted and that Tax: Bi17: No. 5329`be cancelled. It was moved by Byxbee, seconded and carried that the { recommendation-o.f the .Assessor be adopted and that Tax Bill No. S3291 covering theChurch property at 2185 Bryant Street be cancelled. - ParkingLRestrictions at 3163 Middlefield Road A lettEr was received from Freeman A. Ingelson, owner and! operator .of. Freeman's Market, 3163 Middlefield Road, referring to (, Declaration of Restrictions affecting property required.for=off- street parking. executed by,.Pietro Buttitta, owner of -the property, in June`, 1953, reserving; "a., 30 -.foot parking strip in the .rear of the I market. Mr. IngelsoY; requested that,- inasmuch as he has -acquired additional property on the north side of the building; for a parking -- area, the 30 -foot reserved s trip be reduced to 20 feet which would 1 be sufficient area.in..whi-ch to place refrigeration compressors and to`provide.gin accessway along the rear of the store for:l:oading purposes At the suggestion of the City Manager, it'was moved by Rodgers, seconded: and carried that this matter be referred to the :Planning Department for study -and report. San Antonio: Road= Crossing Gates The City- MMzager called attention to the fact that the City of :Palo, Alto' is: ,sharing: in the cost of the installation :of crossing gates :at the San• Antonio Road crossing; that no funds were budgeted. for the City'•s.' share of the project which amounts.to .$2,464,46, and that .a 'transfer of funds is necessary. : O.n .motion of.:Nav1s- and Marshall., and by `unanimous_:vote on roll call, a',transfer was authorized from the Special Projects Fund to..Accocnt 132F in:the amount of $2»464,1+8, to pay the City's share of the cost of crossing -gates at San Antonia :Road :' rsy*ve ye , ".w, _: fY^; wr .,.x Y'U'14v`.1 ��.,,". •J,"i:b?:Y'r+:yf� �rh.r[•}'. v\ � dip Zncity-wide $ CO was slxh they trepntract w mhtted cost �°� �a:t�c � � �study � � � � ��C C �� ee No, 2 contract withx was med $8000.':00 :. ,Qp �p?� pce with t© 4 s, yct°m �n fern owed' �i De .Le� , rather &: e City submitteder conduct th ed d -:-a execute ' Cs then, o, $eco the e rSexo-1Ceshe ,,�pecia2, o e t ed t Marshall - way eat City t:t to co' e f3 Op that dy b �t The s fund $ Q0 fc the uncle s'ned The City the po, hte unt z3�C t t� rs, ::a fiend tha;�pAroxz��ek 1;7'$8,40000, s auto out that •'�Y;�o�;. vote q ten thy$ uflzrn w& 040 pp� �n the h n ttQx' str tact, on roll c� s zd #one the mtiAS not. re�nd he wanted2tau t e on rol the ti40 tai auto carded ceiling. I t�. �d ,q to. p�umb�r� ho�'��'ed to bs1 un�'n�rncus ( :Section,'ap ox e rt ,Was de Sn the can_ l drains; 702 702 - �` '°�.o .e ei 'ed r f Sao,. 1 o co. the ,�u cd ° n orn :Com�ait J ttsly a t d ect `sn & �8 C' ce mend tee N. 2 ' secs t� on . err rin :the wording to ing Subsection pre -•- I nd x l n c 3 � 3 rd n$ o traps � ' of recommending r� ur7animo S' ote :- ` n on 17? Mme g57. the amendment z oor ' Zone CI, �,. '°. aZ on • of BYxb a mbg prey. �; �o.1C na ,av,; bode s i the r � 'pro ton �s was adopted to , zon posed o' Avg pled :-by , ii, . Adflhe prop r"d1n �2o'enc Creek si� R. to pce 06664;461it a '1'S ,: .. c. ,tsamending omw gas �s.s c n /T-$ a;e zone, ;p � = . Co 1444' ,,l'4 �pprov � �� �.or��eo�s � �o� ty lAg�4 u��e mm ;t tee None? for Yacbee o th 700n n �e; r Leo a Et. �d rSe iaLl:,17 .":„.g. eon�,�desskedtn. �hsngeg. .The that h Mr gran rsthan att S app='�c ' • � mrnIt e° ee;�Z �e CrI� 'rat . . �th the o r`be Iiefe ; N consi nep': Pdr di vision rred to 7,:.:p0:.4.t"y::cil:v4:!tt::::;::.a:h : t dg�� ', the s �are�ble' ,.ct � t:: ct t this t e4.1csnts z'o guyr n he e caner l`n .d eke some ndn°t0 �o� �?�o;�t� ar s2��p � t d�''c z aAme�,� e to Weirt2370:3;•-::- )1 � d: Zved� he p sn n accevs : been executed but Atha 'e' Ong: �� �mme„�Q� Sth��t �� su , nt to ,�� �� ed and �� ,� Con-�:��d; J eA x eat hl�s tgi,�t, Chi par. e� hmlt`t d m�. a Real ' - 1 the ant bux hod. •fie' $;greet-, is spPro ms�a, ,�, �. 13 gt n8 It PQ t ''t p t :IP4 b 74. e :7X7:01: bra C at,, ux+store dtthe 5d, be re�rAr�ant itser arxs espec Y n der hisa hjgQr tr�cyTe e � o `be sn se er tlo ger ad sed .the, dea 13 than:- .,._ rnen - a .�s access pry-w.te t$ er.eA t e nt .p�, ?�d be s lot split ass to t h , . Arcs a ".brad. 'die 81ven as ra ft the he area no pert toms 1n:providing steel -street, to whether an a most it- SeaSemeetd c �xt t.414:.,,t-40 °v id1 ng fir a pointing the s that 'o Duxes s is jn. Artier, Ing' b discussed -this S e yrut i access xo`'d bnd Ica sere `� .,hsa� preferably ' that on` Mo ge .o'v mentioned, eet n ;sv�,. Y � dedicated Via. end pe parlha d e xo,e eel, � Z Mr Grist d cz�ted st e 1 --- ..x ect,. sn ek to. acing sever t. streett ct c� cat Aossibl rough the, Av�tla W�I�Cjt.�eC F , ,¢ roext e fir, Way, • 947 „ „. Real.. Mx Crist.a id.he thought his clients would prefer to have a dedicatedstreet rather.than.a 50 -foot easement to El Camino. He urged that action be taken on -the zoning, and that the street patte and lot division be considered later after plans have been developed 'After more discussion, it was moved by Cresap, seconded by Rodgers:,, that the recommendation _ of the Planning Commission for the: rezoning of;.the property -:'be approved and theordinance amending the Zone .:Map'.acc'ordingly be adopted The vote on roll- call was as follows ._. Ayes: Cresap, ::Evans, 'W'oodward . :Noes:: _ .Bishop, `Byxbee, Navis,' Rzppent Mitchell, Porter, Rodgers, Stephens, Corcoran, Davis, Giffin,:. hat. The ordinance was -declared lost. was then moved, by Bishop, seconded by Mrs:. and carried that,: :the matter be reconsidered. Cn.moti.on of Navisand Marshall, the matter was ref to Committee No. 1. for consideration. Lot'Divi-sior.- (Hardy) At its last,.meeting the Council had postponed':;action on a report.. from. the. Planning` Commission_ advising that it hag 'econ- sidered the sppli,cat;ion submitted by Paul Hardy for ,a diviejon of. P portion ,Of : Rancho.; Rincon : de San Francisquito, on E1. - Camino- Wray: north of James Avenue 'known as x+129 El Camino Warr'. The :Commi sion recommended that the:application be denied and that the ,30 -foot.: strip, remain as a. part, of the rear parcel until such time ,as the,, proposed'street, Valmonte' Way, adjoining the 50 -foot access right- of-way, 'is improved and becomes a dedicated street. A representative' of Mr. Hardy was present andadvised that Mr. Hardy isprepzred to enter into an agreement with the City whereby he .agrees' that he will never relinquish or cancel his rights tc'the 50 -foot access easement in consideration of grant by: the City of the. lot splitto enable him to sell the 30 -foot parcel facing El Camino Way.. It was :moved by. Rodgers, seconded by Nevis, `tha,t the application .be granted and that the Mayor be authorized to sign the agreement 'i.n -behalf of the City. The City Manager,call.ed.attention to the recommendation of the Planning Commission for denial of the application,.: pointing out that-th&easement referred to is not owned by Mr.: Hardy; that it'is a-publ,i,c utilities easement and if a street is ever constructed there, it -would require the lowering of a high pressure gas main at an estiiaated expense-.; of $k,000.00. The Council was informed that the rear parcel owned by`Mr.. Hardy could eccor.Yrnodate about twenty apartments, and: that a::.street or proper access to serve the area should be taken into considez _tion. Mr.._:.Hardy's representative advised that Nr. Hardy would be willing topay for his share of improving a 50 -foot street. After more:.discuss:.on, it was moved by Ruppenthal,, seconded by Mrs.. Corcoran, that the matter be referred to. Committee No, 1 for- thorough study. The motion was carried by the :following vote on roll.`eall: Ayes: Bishop, Byxhee, Corcoran, Davis, Giffin, Marshall,-- - Navis,,P.orter, Ruppenthal, Stephens, Woodward. - Noes: Crews, Evans, Mitchell, Rodgers. Interest of Public'0fficers in Contracts layor Porter read the. following statement and. asked that it be entered in the, record' of :this -meeting: • three �3, �r►�r'ex p�t'�e ec��11einto an -flab' Alt .e cam, G° nerectprop�nt r of ,The J� �Yllent tr. N ofthe: paSinny' ASO pert gnat e1��theQ o pa., c pot t. Rm ote,d. inte Codeest in re ,� r, con k��,ti =of pRg � gem ment ore riffs°d n �? n9 `1 u of the move sc�o9ed �,e f o�' in.tY�se cOn~-rr i i652 n exert'rtilee*ef ore'snte eetC ern�'ert :Sr $ucn` is emote. tree phis ten.ftra 0 3 s. defin ve n�9`,ao 36` 26of nas mare pry °r mere rode rd test Yom. in cctS d Co0npAny eastrie ore cun e,..1rea°1.aye ... s , ett�eonempl`'yedby e7.e�ted tom f r�Y.trsct threeaeve b+ r.to.,y besnx Of theDodd Y cif theemp�°ye��� ye�r€s p��`�� s�tr�r► rlose' � ecnd a,emen d �'e" wee the letter I own � t [ha esved d bat ... geed Ab t he r s�elr8 arlRnd ted the p.�ote �t "��$ ex'e e $ Garland D i.veA he awns that thxe an - CS�:; Att"o� � lat :wY�sc�t e propo�ct ��e 10t "�ha r B. LS8 i y s had' do rota rood spraying ` pro o f Verret �� � �' the men Drive sbc r. t' ��' . -fie .cancelled. a y�� :1;1111 �, Q: h� thefxom rgeof � tY�t►reuea;�s°nn��ed; �,ts��ted et tc t'�n� 4 X►Ce j nve therQd� d ° gent d M x ox of p �� , that he e or, dv�.s rt �° the �e � 1 The � view of � he/ a�'�'ied. by unanimous � �e� mous matter;that lly sprAY ca Gelled' ce ,ded end charge be cancelled.. c y u Bill N 6fi�14' be �y Cr s9p seconded meat No. Bill Iy w m that this weed Control District, Deed 'whereby �� 07.3 csl r fat s Claim C� t SA :tA are x dust to the cnd j � t4 .�.ppe D� Z' r� � not were__.. t � � �s. chcxs�eke Att° ,game the Conservation A,�t°�'eY ��� certain gerv�,ts° ute the doe • Tre Alto quitclaims and We authorized t d end a 1 City nito�c ter. ° o exec �1�har�-�'" f ?alo Control s �utrar lm deed is°n of City County 'Flood he �yo� be �, gust claim or motion cell. Clara the � approving intr° unanimous vote °'� recommended A re�olut}the lAa'�ar` 'red by un uticn d *as d p saved �yXbee: °rtr by unanimous nc refer by adopted by �,.r,S its exec seconded, vote.. duly sec Controller, � t n��°�'s' ded r. d ttOn;: Of d cr"�-ed eyments be Aer�.c�n -�,"--s a ► el t al, 'Gal palm 1: �'° the $e5 71., , Upan x'ec by guppen duplicate : l -7 a • 140981 seconded fa7: Bill No • 13555. $25 Tax 'Bill N X111 call, that the t. of Talc. tet' mend Branch. roll �r�t� fsrst .�.?� South �a7.o � !; First - Company; America', you Trust of the Ban .U. pe,�ox' Mater . , The aeon. r *AS received and :Gantt°l1e n monthly ex' onaction .,l�,rirint� Officer , crrx the sn. Node' t• of the, lot dsvlf's trod "rake received and \ monthly o c monthly plic tions forAdministrator a were The :an applications Adminis ril u permits, o N0� t en�nr�p bet or : November the Zoning -report ° applications' for variances t f slog * ?.t4• this time, 9:1.0 s ct c�7' took ll 25 ?.14.) r�x �,oxte ��� d (The: Council fit ' y tha3 , dh;l ,ve ?'" reconvened.. ed cs roc• Davis ee yw ' `' Wken the � t,C ,e1 p se ' e � �. �x°Voma o .,m des ec V yes: rcoran y Rma the �"e rep bra ° .. chc� r.• a Alto �og O�n ndsri tc°'� the ��.t i� gee �.��'�'�MM;,.,...---�-"� axt etc reee'v� � y� �.�- -- �;.�'Y17Y'fSl•••:!j;:: (�.1^I;"Y �V'� �^: ^'Y.'J1�4'.'hf,�'W{\ that the case of :City of Palo Alto vs. Emma, in connection with the acquisition of a; lot on. Sherman Avenue, Project 55-5 be settled for the.sum of $16,600.00, such settlement to include possession rent ;free until , March .31., 1958, with n suitable guaarantee ' in the amount of $1,000.00 that: possession w.11 be delivered on that date. It;wa.8. moved by Evans, seconded rind carried that the .recommendation be -adopted -and the case be settled on said basis. Themeeting wasdeclared adjourned :t 11:45 P.M. APPROVED: y(. c�-�� /�-� Mayor