Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11251957City Hall,.Palo Alto, California November 25, 1957-.. The Council of the City of Palo Alto met In regular session on this :date at ;7:30 .P. M, , with Mayor Porter presiding. Ro11call as follows Present;: Bishop, Byxbee, Cresap, Davis, Evans, Giffin,, Marshall, Na=v s-, Porter, Rodgers, Ruppentha 1, Step hens Corcoran, Mitchell,, Woodward. approved, Pro Ject 5643„Wilkie .Way) the Meeting of November 12, 1957, were, Sale of Bonds -A report was;.submitted on the bids received at k:00 P.M. on this cdiate for the,sale 0f street improvement bonds, Series "GGG' Project 56-8, Wilkie Way,, et al, in the amount of $351,987.88, as follows: :Bidders and Associates B. Hanauer & Co. Youngberg. and Associates First California Company and Juran & Moody, Inc Resolution No":. 2930 awarding the sale of these bonds to J. B, Hanauer & PO,.an Associates, the best bidder, was introduced,. and on ;motion of Byxbee and Navis:, was adopted by unanimous vote on roll call Average Interest Rate. 4.6297% 4.7 5.047% Project 2-13 off Street:Parki.ng This was`. the time and '`place set for a hearing on Resolu- tion No. 2929 of Preliminary' Determination and of Intention to make changes and modifica.ti;ons, to='include'the acquisition of the south easterly 12.5 feet of Lot 7, ,;B3,ock 4, in District 52-13. Notice of, the hearing wa.s public ed pis; required by y law. It was announced that no written protests heave. been received. The hearing was, declared open. There being no one present.: who. wished to Speak On the matter, the hearing was closed. Resolution -No. 293.1, determining convenience ..nd neceas,- ity and ordering changes .and modifications, and determining that; <, t"ne public interest -requires t:he .a;egaisition of certain off-street parking :places and directing the , filing of eminent domain proceed- ings, was -introduced,, and'on- motion of Bishop and Giffin, was adorned on roll; ca11 with 12 Ayes,, Woodward. -not voting on the motion. (Councilman"Woodward had arrived at 7:35 P.Nc. during the diSeussion of this item., and was present for the rest of the meeting:.) Protect 57-11, Fabian Way 'et al Resolution No. 2932,. -of Preliminary Determination and of Intention to make .Changes and .Modifi.cations, and setting Decem- ber 9, 1957; at 7.30 P:M ee time of hearing on the proposed changes and modification3, was intvoduced,-and on motion of Navis and Byxbee•,. was_ a."dopted ` by unanimous 'v.ote ;on roll call. ddieixe� the 0 l, e R a d •C ' ° ncil ►s =,�� er �'ns..�`" •-� McGrath Protest , R_���,. AraAert :than of ��.ived fr r atest On niot1ofl c; ? 2Q fiber 28° 1 ryant 0• 62o Ri 6#o ,tai of reZan aalr. ; t tiOn . ©miry xfnc K ris t'h ROa t. . protesting • (pot ° t 0 .h .nd Coon the �e der w ' 'tnoct o�e�, het jn,. M'., ,end c�,lman P11ed. res s Rotel , �. } sere present pe e _thrmit Ch,a ,A .iett,r .: Use Per`,��t Ltte sent for the ,b Ili e.Qnd1 on ; ad: , s rsoei v� r from J'os the 411+1 n ; ti on . Ae.» $" Rome d from , g. ges tat�n tainln o the asp Joseph �hr Ehrlich' direct' 1 ght t' 3e a $ the the 1lghtol tIon, 1concnine � to 1b1e" sh1 d tlar is a� R� eo re nt of fir: to aten CZtY 'Manager from t o• Charleston be b g's�' w fuse until dot hx � s;t��:����Retr�reported s,,on �"e�d used to nom' render a. in a oar his th At • 1n Is. ri�a�y kc� ,attthat he had b dent�nl. are ett�r` ''om Lea: c�1v d• ,sand ton'Pnd • �tion were his matt er. Voters t r fin • �� Women nnder3on4 than were n ez�v1 e$ concerning un a,• , Voters �,e deferred' pnd � for p thajr. w�$ re .�lbrar of the A. °'� �° Alto,'' n ,w art; ceT ved f use a concer ng ' Including o adequate tr, branch the t to tne, Council a U l ve to Il e e4nuLeae noh _library' merits_, o ��1 ins n'��ers1 '�ra{",� fa of omen mpar • I g library' P proposals tltute R tY 4venue di ta d tfo to Camro On xis building: and the Pro oc which have el ins o. c mmr1ot bona Re j t tee .,Na�. 2',.- , of R�AAeri tha � a 1 to erect � �� for ��� dYil' s lu. and 'downtown �. tnons BYxbee, this 1e. (7f ��3�a# letter 4 the s�rtoillX son Vfn�ty nR on to het jr was resax tlon erC:t y ent an g 'and 'Manuelpresented resolutions n hmola�ep Bide hell were -'adopted by h n tOh p an a ' Yx on the./ retirement fp''e 1a 0ve�br:' '� ©us .,ate ro duly- call. t.on cmo to be 10 1,` 1957: was 'made these °f, .the P�� fed. �n Peers n d'r111 bythe C e 1, 19 ision Dy�1 Park, testing and ty deer on b g Co w. th c�ey zds on th 1 0� � .�gt�bh :¢�..� mAanY be accepted. ���p��g. A:r�y� received an e she u Ate n tar Mayor' did, of -the Apen� d • that the well, kr. 3 autha fed Precision Kayla a ?o�, bldi Beds on 'r0a n and' Ric to execute the cng Cob, t '� 'thi wild `�57, Cty Ana ant otn ho contract -with :a ete Ir, zn moving, fez• use this d, laterhad at X961 Ra' reported t �`-�.. fi�. 1 ter to be ee' rr 'relocating an that bids so be $01 moved" h 3�:; na d reconstructing �, this- Bros. end 6 the asuge (now .Par Bottl re ta,en ; a s the s CZ of the' k ion .. B l. a rd oid bidand f.:;t5,.$3.2,;00. n/y one extension e . o ota.- .men' �" ,. ra ?:°:nr eo e 'bpd' Pr 11- ncie It ne� , es f wil. tho ,, off on "giros y'bee, . and ee t, t.: ` is;�rs �� t was accepted by ura j The TimeZiMi far 'this z� the.,11aYor Was a�. ` a you . ... Citz Manager advised `Tvm�nts , ,. 4N . ;qtr .'' t". w.'�a C''';.,h5,_. °d...x• - M. re: ,being constructed -on eity prnrking lots on the'southeesterly corner of : Hamilton Avenue and Rmona. Street, on the southeasterly corner ofLytton Avenue and Bryant; Street, 'and on the easterly side of the 500 block of Emerson Street,' thatthese lots will provide 72 parking; speces.and:it is the intention to.'improve them so they can be used during the Christmas season; however there is not sufficient time -to. instzll permanent improvementsand the lots will not be metered, but: it is proposed to restrict -the: parking time to two hours. Resolution No 2933` amending Resolution No. 2788 regulating' parking and the; use 'of certain streets, to provide for two-hour restricted parking on theser:particular sots, was introduced, and on motion of Ruppentha l "and, Byxbee, .was adopted by unanimous vote on= roll call . .Subst.atjor.. Site Ac `uisit,on Resolution -No- 2934, authorizing the acquisition of an elec-' trio sub -station site :ea3;sterly- of,-Louls Road aad jecent to Dry Creek was introduced, and on motion of Byxbee and Marsha, l,l, was adopted' by. unanimous' vote on roll call.' L1brar; and City EAU Site Plans A report was received from Committee No. 2 stating that it has reviewed the Library and City Hall site plans as presented by Eckbo, . Royston and: Williaa`ms, la>~adscaape architects., showing three. stages of" development . ;The committee recommended the approval of Stege " One torthe development Y o.f . the Library site, plus thetwo fountains neer>Newe,li. Road "as; shoes on the plan for Stage Two, pro- vided ;the `total cost. does" rot exceed -$53,000.00, the deveiopmert" • plan to give: consideration to anticipated bicycle traffic. The plans ;were explained by the Assistant City Mranager. It. wa_s moved _by Davis, secondedby .Mitchell, that the plans be adopted as recommended by the committee. Mrs. W. T:. Neikirk, civic ch 1man of the Garden Club, told the. Council that members of -the Garden Club feel that the proposed -- fountains,"with colored lighting would; be out of keeping w1.tt the present --landscaping ;of the city hell . and would be too ;garish e dis- play. It we.s moved:: `by: Byxb:ee, seconded by Rodgers, and carried that. ;the Motion be" amended 'to provide: for asking for a basic bid .on, Stage 1 of the plan and for- alternative bids on each. of the two fountains. . Mrs. Corcoran suggested :thaat action be delayed and that the. matter be _returned' to Committee No. 2, for further consideration expressing concern over:the distance to .the library from the parking area She thought it:might. be ad' 1sable to enlarge- the parking area rind driveway off .Newell Road a3long the .side of the library, instead:..,of of ,:having- the_ parking: area :in'the rear, leaving more -undeveloped land back: of ::the library`. .The City MMnnger advised that it is important that be;a approved- so ,;that the working drawings .and- specifications prepared. He repOrte& that "it was. ,the feeling •of both the arch: teats: for t:he .building and for "the 1 nd'sta�pin "g that to bring ng the curb closer tothe building ,would destroy some of the beauty of the site, and that :it" would, still be necessary to ;.have a driveway back of the building to' -serve- the "library, and the "architect feit it wns ,edvan tegeous_:to have the: parking area"there -also. :-Mrs.. Herbert Browne told the Council that she feels very strongly that the existing landscaping around the City Hall should.: -be continued; that the fountains arenot needed and she would rather have the. 'money which-fountaajns. would -cost spent on books. Mrs :attention to !the fee ;of a . Ralph Wallace, President of the Garden Club, called the faact that the, GardenClub had contributed funds for laandscApe architect to prep ►re the lends-cep/11g, plan for . or the- parking lot in;:front:.of the,; city hall entrance, and to colored lights on fountins. Councilman Cresap•pointed'out that at the time the City. Kahl :eras constructed,p .the:: driveway send parking area in front 'of the building -was .the northern boundary of the city property and there W 8 no ;plan > t that , tiiae for development of the property north of- that which ways_ later acquired by ::the City. Councilman Davis advised that under,: the tslan recommended by Committee No. 2, there. would be no :change in the"'.pretsent laandacaaping of the City Hall except the remo'al of ,s:ome: of the :shrubs between. the City Haa11= nand the Libraary;' that:t`he plan" recommended lb ,' the committee does not provide for any! change. -in the,driveway-or parking area in front of the city -hall..` The City Manager pointed out that there is, no definite design as -yet for the proposed. fountains; that lighted' fountains Mar be less objectionable :to . the; Garden Club members after,plans acre lm.ore,'.complete., :He stated that the City must start lighting the area around the City Han at night. A motion was made,by Mrs. Corcoran, seconded by Stephens,: that the matter..be referred back to Committee No. 2 The -..motion was lost by a voice °vote;. The original=motion to approve the plans as Committee 'No. 2, as amended ,; was then carried. Councilman, Byxbee pointed out that both the Library:, arch- itect nand :the ' bandscape architect have recommended . some type of plazm arrangement He, suggested that the Garden Club be.-al.sked to review the; overall'; plan and, later present their ideas for the ulti- maate' 1a.ndsca.ping _:of the whole area. The representatives of the Garden: Clubsaid. ;this :suggestion met with their approval end they would study the. overall :plan Hoover :Park Site' A report was received from Committee No. 2 -stating. thatit has considered; the- plain : for the development of the existing Hoover Park site, prepared by Stedman, Reid and Kopp, landscape- architects and alternate development plans for the utilization of properties to the north of -.the, present site and to the south across Maatadero Creek . The :committee:. Pointed out that the plans were .presented 'to show a stage type Of -development which would be feasible if the additional properties were acquired by the City. Committee No.: 2 recommended :that the.City proceed to develop the first stage of the plan, including the .exis•tingg park site plus the undeveloped -rear portions of the adjacent-two;lots on the north at 2881 and 2885 Cowper Street, now' owned by>Koeppe and White. Committee No,22 further recommended that the undeveloped rear portion of the McGovern property at 2855 Cowper Street also be j acquired,' provided funds aare available. The -Assistant City Manager reviewed the plans.-. A motion was made by Davis,' seconded by Mitchell, that the first -stage of the plan: be developed and thatthe rear portions of the properties at 2881 and 2895 Cowper Street: be acquired. Mr Walter White, owner of the property at 2895 Cowper Street, addressed the Council, stating that his home:'is'immediately� adjacent to ,the existing ;pa:rk site, that he likes his home -and wants to.s'ta:r there,,;: that he'a.pproves.the City's policy of neighborhood parks, although. `he feels that haaving-`a, park next to his home rnsoy be troublesome; that if .the City-taxke&the rear part of his: property,, he. would like:. to. hive at least ten feet left for his use:back of the existing fence,' ana thaa;t. Mr. ' Koeppe, owner of the property at 2881 Cowper.Ztreet would also like to keep ten feet back of his fence 'or::his'-own ;use It `was pointed out' that the fence referred to is 12.5 .feet back,y.from Cowper Street. It wars moved by Mitchell that the motion to acquire the the City Hall before it:.was 'constructed; that she -objected to any ;plan ;which would: -require removal of any of the existing landscaping; . rr..0 .,.... rear portions oil the. Koeppe and Wh3.te; properties And to proceed with the. development of . the first: stage of.` -:the plan be amended to -prop videvidethatint purchasing the, land, .ten 'feet be left behind ,the- Ore- -sent sent fence for ;the useof the ownere, and that the balance o'.f the; undeveloped rear PortiOnS::.bet acquired, The amendment was seconded by Davis and :carried 'The motion, as amended was then carried.: It was moved by Davie ,"seconded by Mitchell, that the r,;.ear,:port:ioty .of the' MoGovern',property at _ 2 55.. Cowper, with the ex-, eeption 0.,the firs t ten feet, be ac,c.:d = - s provided funds able. The City Manager advised. that funds are available if the Council determines it wishes to,;_spend them for this purpose; that there pis s'tS13 unencumbered money.in' the Special Projects Fund which would be "the >appropriate fund to; use. A motion was made,, byt Navis to amend the previous motion to delete the .words_ "provided funds are available" and add the words "with" funds from the Special Projects' Account". The amendment was seconded by Ruppentha'l and carried. The motion as amended was then carried. Resolution :'No. 2935, authorizing the acquisition of adds tiona1 parcels of property for Hoover Park, was introduced, and on motion." of Mitchell and Na.vis, was adopted by the following vote on roll ca 11: Ayes: Noes:' Byxbee, Cresap Woodward. Bishop, Corcoran,. Davis, Evans, Giffin, Marshall," Mitchell, Navis, Porter, Rodgers, Rup?oentha 1, Stephens. Mr. Terry McGovern, :owner of_' the property at 2855 Cowper Street, told the Council he ,hoped the matter would be settled immedi- ately and stated that,_nt.. one had approached him ' regarding the purr - chase of his property :It wags explained that the resolution ,just adopted would ,authorize city officials to have appraisals made and.. I st?,rt"negotiations to purchase the :property:. -Remova 1.. of "S"Zone A report was received fromCornmittee No. 2 recommending. that : the "S" Zone be removed from all remaining portions of District: 52-14 A, motion was made by- Davis,, .seconded' by Rodgers, that the recommendation ,he adopte.d.. . Mr. Arthur Cathcart,- attorney :representing Mr. Victor Zechariah, proprietor of 'Zack1s' Radio..Supply Company, addressed the Council, urging` -that the "S" Zone be removed also from District_ 52- 13. He pointed, ;out thatwhile the physical improvement ` of the ,park ing lots in this district isnot :'completed, the litigation on the, lots in District ,52-13:will be completed within .the next two months. Mr.. Cathcart advisee that his 'client, whose business is located.'on_: property in the 500- block: on High Street which has been acquired tor t parking lot; proposes ."to :build' an the southwest aide of High Street ,cibe'tween Hamilton, and:Forest Avenues,. Councilman Byxbee moved'to ,amend the notion to provide that S" Zone be removed: from both. Districts 52-14 and 52-13. The amendment ;.was seconded by :Rodgers'.' { Councilman_ Navis asked if there is. any hazard in taking steps to.'..remove' the S Zone from -District 52-13 at this time. The City ' 'Attorney- replied that the City has :acquired or 1s in the process of ;acquiring ;ail -the parcels:which= they..Council has resolved to take in: the district.; A motion was made by- Bishop that the matter of removing "S"Zone from,District 52-13 be referred to Committee No. 2 for ;further study. There wa."'s `no_ second to' the: motion.. Councilman ROdgers pointed out that. the "S" Zone was es`c'ab- dished as a -temporary measure;.'that it has been in effect for at least.six years a.nd in.::his opinion amounts to a partial confisca- tion of -property. ,He -urged the Council to make a decision now. After discussion, the amendment to provide:that the "S" reroved.fromboth Districts 52-13 and 52-14 was carried. Zone be • Resolution No:'.2"936 removing the "S" District require- ments from all property in. Projects No. 52-13 and 52-14 was intro- duced and adopted; on roll call with 12 Ayes, Bishop and Mitchell voting No. (Co.uncilman, Ruppenthal had left during the discussion of the above, item,: end was absent for the rest of the meeting.) (The:;Counc:il took a. recess at this time, 9:10 P.M., and reconvened at 9:20 P.M.) :?•orie Change.Application (Tsukagawa ) A report_: wes .; received from the Planning Commission unanimously recommending the -approval of the application for s zone change submitted: by; George.and Florence Tsukagawa for their .property located adjacent to -Adobe Creek and Dinah's Shack, from R-1 to C -3;:S: and -R-54- .'Councilman Byxbee advised tha a :-lot division is involved .and..asiedthat this matter be referred to- Committee No.l,. A proposed- ordinance 'mending the Zone Map to provide for change_ as recommended by the Planning Commission was -for first reading ' a id referred to. Committee. No. 1 the zone 'accepted that the, division Mr.. Frank Crist, attorney for the applicant, suggested matter be not oonside'red by Committee No. 1 until. the lot plan., is worked out :and presented - t Divisions (Boland.er" and Fra er) A report was received from the Planning Commission unanimous.1y re'ommending the approval of the lot division. of a `portion of Lot: 150,; Wooster ::Subdivision, as applied for by Edwin J. Bolander, ;subject `to the ; requirements of Engineering Bulletin' 57- ))1 for thefurnIshirig;of a,5' x 20' public utilities easement shown °in' red :_on the: map,. payment or segregation of bond assessments, and, furnishing' evidence of' -payment of all payable city and county taxes •'and "weed : abatement charges. he P:la.nning,C.ommission also unanimously recommended approval f t o he lot .division of portion of Lot 125, Wooster :Sub- division,. ,corner of "Louis Road and Colorado Avenue, as app:iied .for: by Mrs. Daisy M Fraser,; .subject to amending the northern' lot of 6800 sq ft as shown in:red on the:map°by moving therear and side' 1.0 lines toincrease the size of the rear parcel, and sub .ect to. the ,recxuiremen`s Of Engineering: Bulletins 57-125 and; 57-136. for granting ,public" utilities easements; payment or segregation of bond asaeSSMentS:y ''nd to;'furnishi'g" evidence of payment of all pay}able city' and county , taxes... It was 'suggested: that these' items be referred to Committee 1. however, after further discussion, it was ;loved, ,seconded end carried.'.that these lot division applications be approved in accordance' with.the recoamendatiorrs of the Planning Commission. Lot:,Div'isicr (Hardy A report‘was received from the Planning Commission advis- ing° that it has . reconsidered the application submitted::by Paul Hardy for a division of. a portion of Rancho Rincor, de Sr.,a Francis- Quito; on El Camino Way north of James Avenue, known, as 4129. El Camino Way; that the Commission unanimously recommends that the application be denied and that the 30 -foot strip remainPS a part of the, rear parcel until such time -as the proposed street, Valmonte -way) (Adjoining the 50 -foot access right of way) is improved and becomes a dedicated street. The Mayor announced that the applicant has asked that 1S, be postponed, and it was so ordered. A .report.was ;submitted by the Planning Commission recom- mending: that. the application- Ore Charles R. Baer for division of: portion of Lot ' 78, Wooster Subdivision, be approved, subject to the.' requirerients `.or Engineering Bulletin 57-14:6 for granting 5 -foot and . 20 -foot . public :utilities, easements` as: shown, payment or segregation .of bond asseasmente,e and.: to furnishing evidence of payment of ;all payable city and county 'taxes and , weed abatement charges; also sub- Ject to furnishing a 30 -foot wide: access easement to the firsttwo lots andproviding an adequate tt'n -around area, and to the recom >mendat ons of`'.the Lire ":Chief. The Commission advised that this action :we..s taken by 'a .vote; o.f :4 :Ayes: and 3 Noes, that the negative votes cast were ° unanimous in' .the opinion that the access easement should be 24 feet wide: rather than 39 feet. A . report was: also: received -from the Planning Commission unanimously recommending that the;den'iel by the Planning Officer be; overruled and that, the :application as submitted by Frank R. and - Josephine Jerv.i-s for a division, of portion of Lot 114, Wooster. Sub- division, on Ross Road near Matadero-Greek, be granted, subject to l' :requirements of Engineering Bulletin 57-145 for granting public. utilities easements shown "in red` on the map, payment or segregation of :bond; assessments, and, to furnishing' evidence of payment of all Payable:city and county taxeR subject: further to the following conditions:, _(1) : the 12 -foot access 'to the ream lots to be pared to standards as: required, by the: City, Engineer,, and that an Pdeouate 'turn= -around area .be:provided;' and. (2) „a 6-:+.:3ch;water main and fire hydrant:`to beinstalled to the` satisfaction of the City Engineer and Fire Chief,. with :a time' ].imitation imposed of six months to meet the last two conditions Councilman Byxbee suggested these two lot division items be referred to:;Comrittee; No 1. far' study. The. City Mina. ger advised that he thought .it was important for the committee to consider these matters and for ;;the Councii. to be;:a,ware of the policy involved if the recommendations of the Planning Commission are adopted, as the City Engineer.' would., be` setting specifications and standards for work on, private prOpertyandY fire. hydrants 'would be installed on private property; that these -Are not lot divisions as originally intended. .but a,re:actually S.Mall:.subdivisions. It was moved seconded and carried that these lot divi- sion items be referred to Committee No. 1. Amendment to Zoning Ordinance A report Was received' from the Planning Commission unani- mously -recommending' the adoption. of a proposed amendment to the Zoning Ordinance, to add Section 24.09 pertaining to resubmittal o.f, applications for variances or use, permits, and Section 27.13 per-., taining to resubmittaI of applications for change of district. e. It was moved by Mitchell, seconded and carried thet proposed ordinance amending the Zoning Ordinance by adding Sections 24.09 and .:27:. a.3 .as. recommended was accepted for first reading and referred to. Committee No. 3. Mr. Bryant G. McGrath indicated that he wished to speak on the proposed ordinance and it.: was suggested that he attend the ' meeting of Co.mmittee..No. 3, when the =matter will be considered. The City. Attorney advised that the proposed ordinance would not apply to :Mr. McGrath in connection :with.. hi,s::recent zone change application as it was 'made when the .ordinance 'was not in effect. �i�_ mimQ Street ''Midtown Court" Ordinance No. 1771 designating the street extending ,from eol: rado Avenue to the new Midtown . Parking ] of as "Midtown Court'' was given second reading,. and ;on , notion of Na'sis -and Byxbee,., was Adopted by unanimous _vote on roll -call. 9 Amendment to Fire Prevention Code Ordinance' No< ,1772', amending Section 17.701 of Codified Ordinance:No. 5 pertaining ' o standards for installation of lique- fied.,petroleum :.ga:s<, ;_wa;s ,;given. second' reading, and on:, motion of Navin and Marshall, Was 'adopted by unanimous vote on roll call. Amendment to-Setb^ok Ordinance Ord n+snce No.. 1773, amending the Setback Ordinance to remove the. setback: restriction of 25 feet on Park, Leland, Stan- ford', Oxford and:'College Avenues,, between. El Camino Real And Park Boulevard, ::Allowing; ,the Zoning Ordinance to govern setbacks on these streets, -'was given second reading, And on caption of Byxbee and Navis, was adopted by unanimous vote on roll call. Abatement of Nuisance (3BuWldin at 4130 Cambridge Ave. Resolution No,. 2937,,setting public hearing a.t which Mr and' Mrs.. Clark should show cause why the building at 480 Cambridge Avenue:Should not be declared a public nuisance, was introduced, and pn:motion of Mitchell, duly seconded, was adopted on roll call,:with.13 Ayes, Marshall not voting on the motion. The resolution sets')ecember 23, 1957, As date of hearing on the matter. 'Cancellation of Taxes request was received from the. Controller for a.uthorizra- tion to oencel .taxes • of. $9.0:62 on Tax Bill No. 12k11,., being a 'duplicate'assessment of -`.RR" bonds. It was moved, seconded and carried that.sai,d taxes be cancelled. There being no further business to come before the Councilr, the meeting'was declared adjourned at 9.40 P.M. APPROVED/ ATTEST': -, c-c%x-cam f'vC- -Gt� C1.�.c- City C-1erk,,