Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1112195722 City Hall, Palo Alto., California November 12,_ 1957 The Council of :the City of Palo Alto met in regular session on this date. at 7:30 ;P.M., with Mayor Porter presiding. ,Roll call as follows: Present: Bishop, Byxbee, Cresap, DAvis, Evans, Giffin,. Marshall, Mitchell, Navis, Porter, Rodgers, Ruppenthal, Woodward. Absent,. Corcoran, Stephens. The minutes of the meeting of October 28, 1957, were This was the time And place set for hearingof objections to the proposed destruction or removal of weeds. The hearing was declared open.: ; There, being, noone present who wished to ‘ speak on. the matter, the hearing was closed. Resolution. -No. 2922;, ordering weed nuisance; abated, was introduced, and on motion of Ruppenthal and Bishop, was adopted by unanimous vote on roll call'. The ::City Attorney advised that the contract with John C. Throckmorton,:Jr., doing business A3 the Nu. -Lawn Chemical Company, for the Abatement of weeds provides that billing shall be on the basis of gallonsg a of chemicals used, and it has been recommended that an amendment:, be made to the contract to provide- for billing to be on the basisof the square foot area of the lots that are sprayed. It was moved' by Mitchell, seconded And carried by unainimous vote on roll call, that. the Mayor be authorized to execute an amend- ment to Mr. > Throckmorton's contract as recommended. (Councilwoman Corcoran came at this time, 7:35 Y.M. and was present for part of the meeting.} Cancellation` of.'Taxes Communications were -received requesting cancellation of taxes on the -following. properties acquired for public use: . Property,ac:qu .red by the State of Cnl'ifornia for Highwaypurpose8,.. being a portion of Lot 6, Block 116, Crescent Parkenntquired from Charles M. Manning et al, and. 3.6k9'acres;"acquired from the Mackay Radio and Telegraph Company. Property acquired by the City of Palo. Alto -from` the :Pacific -Gas -and Electric Company in El' :Camino No 1 and El Camino No. 2 annexation areas (Bill; No.14518-B) . Property acquired by the Palo Alto Unified School Di'etrict:,,a portion of Santa Rita Rancho,` in Tract No." 1310,E Greenmeadow. On motion of Byxbee and Bishop, and by unanimous vote:on I roll c11, it was directed that.the taxes on these properties'be c>}n- celled, and that said properties be removed from the essissment rolled 'Bids on; Project :56-24 A report was made by the City Manager on the bids received on November 8, ;1957, for Project 56-24 for the construction of a concrete bridge : over Drys -Creek at Park Boulevard and:. adjoining street; improvements, with therecommendation that the low bid of Howard R. Bru in the amount "of $14,500.00 be accepted. !presFiot�1 t, a audit ented. �re.,�e cCGun report() o#�, ne is foe, _' of sk !Operation tAI .e w.is p he .. () nner ' thA�, 4jan. of �ota� a�ned that ar.-enHammond on a o°pY oft `a1.o' lb aCeo t the report agreement ge the Pala e" redo 1. ta-Stamp w 't. t Was ch57, pr ovides ee�e to the s r n t� far � Eaa � ,..: t Mr' 4 'p d thmotie on o .R b :-__. o•r the s.. r �t, u 4 nd p2 ....�. 7_ by unlit 02zed to a , gym r, pese pluti Ac Ulelt1on off^Land/ vo a on rol Call. c"nt ct ,Re,� certe i tyrequi�» � No , 2' ;#'or W� th introduced. ntr duc. n land de 18r,�o public determinl at t Se°ar'atso �'�t.,.a�. way p .the .has .as expo r e1 1,6reet : the public e o* grade aep.,pat ,n nd t c pater :On 'that. 5 �. ;� oh Interest by unanimous ¢f Yxbe ' weet of parcels are Project 57-5, Tx�� are roll � 'end - � the r� a r`e for 57-5� n of Fuz�ds tall. fshop the resolution i1r4,ad the t� � : tom-- Ins�z��nc as a parerThe-City was $i ' of `d n�ger Vie' .�„e Accounts adopted "�Health,' �: Utz .; - " " f �'Od! i?O,�+ted 3 . ft as np d p r z - L :; a bras Special the Controller o to dical. 2n nsu fns : p r' ce q ca'�ects Account his ter Un r� $or�nc�e pz* Ccaunt to -cover and �n the the :6 p Op "° the °tJ1 cost of the new' i Ato p a iarro of ' c'COVE, -mot h u R gers nan�ous ayr �e hes ��� x�aZ2 call. t „eport be ac ept d As ode ould=;be auen tea G. e t ansfers of funde=; Oyed.' by Eya v 4. Thus an sec d a vote an ron�� ct hat' rs Glfflnr Rodgers',.;tc'h�,11.. Navls tt r Pane on p roll" o�,,a�he Palo � � er t° committee fl io glt4;, ��' uaeiaa. tr e was declared Ayes: ' hop y • Aav1a par Noss ; orear n . Bodges , Ru f pent ors Not. V���ag� , Evan. ppenthal, °fldwa� tchel,i, D41113-. ,project S6-8 ' Wilkie W� 1tal;.' t e CBS • b to accept Yxbee by following ter Dress ate ;v d eea.lctt r 351 #n8 i'or o188t1f Na; 1 wA$ p ed �b wee Introduced, bonds e.ter�1nln P R by r s c% nd °n- m Je t 56 id ag`�es$m d' r`p,�ec t 56�$ oiut it 41'r; 4• a" , an rol l ac I n of the a 4U» and J uc and , b#�s. 292 , hell tar �e an 0lI ~®otivn o#� e r � �r ; ng and EYxbee, �1 C:a12 M2tohe.lx anti �YXbembex, �n dale of ban $. wad adapt 5fi' twos ds Pn ed b �7ar� . Y un.4nlious 1 :,`, �1 .02011' and the City. which gra d e dsctz8s�a seconded t 1e`e2'red t theaudit 3 Resolution; No'..: 2926:, approving the Official; Statement prepared _tiy: bond couriel relating to the sale of these improvement bonds, nd :authorizing :mailing of.,s9id statement to -prospective bidders, was i'ntroduc:ed - and, on motion of Mitchell and Byxbee, was adopted. by unanisaousa` vote on' roll c"a ll Audit A report -was • received from Committee No. 3-, recommending aacceptance of;the report of Skinner & Hammond on their audit of the city accounts —and records for the fiscal year ending 'June 30, 1957• On •;motion: of Bishop and' Byxbee, this audit report was` accepted by unanimous vote- "on roll call A report was also received from Committee No. 3 recommend- ing acceptance ofthe proposal of Skinner & Hammond for the Audit for the year ending June 30, 1958, for a total fee of $3,600.00, which is the same;: fee as paid for last year's audit;, '.On motion of Bishop andMitchell, the recommendation was adopted and the proposal, of Skinner & :Hammond was accepted Plans for Newell Road Frontage Improvement A report -was submitted by Committee No. 3 recommending that the plans prepared by Eckbo, Royston and Williams for the improve- ment- of "the Newell Road frontage opposite the City Hall be Accepted„ And that the City Manager be, authorized to call for bids for this work. After a review of the plans, it was moved by Bishop, seconded by Byxbee,:And carried that the recommendation of the committee be adopted and .that bids on the work be taken. Civic- Center= Sete'. Plan A report was received from Committee No. 3 recommending that the Civic Center site plan as submitted by Eckbo, Royston and Williams be be accepted in -principle. It was explained that the plan as submitted includes the landscaping for the new main library now under construction, and schematic drawings for landscaping, parking Areas and other features of a suggested development tom: provide a coordinated program for the entire city hall area. The City Manager advised ` that Committee. No 3 liked the plans and had recommended that they be accepted ,in principle, with the understanding' that the architect would .consider ideas and suggestions discussed at the meetings -and work further with the staff on details of the plan which would' be -submitted' for final approval later. It was ' also reporte'd to the Council that the committee felt that :`landscaping plans: for the Library should be acted on; separately, and":that the proposed peripheral road should be constructed in con-' nection with the Libr,.arysite development. The City Manager -'advised that the detailed Library site plans are not yet complete: and it was intended to bring`them up at a later meeting for approval. Mrs., Corcoran: Asked why the plans had been referred to Committee No 3;. stating she. felt it would have been logical to have them considered by; Committee No..2 which normally. reviews library matters, Councilman Ruppent-a1 suggested that,the wording of, the committee's recommenda=tion be changed to read that the plans be 'accepted for'=turther'_'study. Mr. Allan :Reid, a landscape architect, addressed the Council at this tiiieArging that the Council not adopt at..this meeting the recdsaMandmtion of Committee No. 3 for acceptance of the plan in .principle . He said, he 'felt that such actiorn,at this= time would be without:: due __considera=tion of- all the factors involved ' that the : plan wou Ld ;bps ' expensive ' to accomplish and would not provide future, needs :for -"a Livia .Center site; that a' better. solution is possible, -end: he urged ' the- Council ; toreject the: proposal, to adhere to a procedure- recently-�adonted` .in .principle by Committee No.. 3 for hiring professional help, and,"'further urged .that no large expends- tux a ;, be made -or policy be determined,, that will . jeopardize the use . provisions were expla3ined" by:' the f:ity�;Attorney. After_ disausson;. 'arcd on motion of Mitchell and Bishop, ordinance was a adopted by' unanimous vote on roll call. Settlement`.af :Claim. (Chishoi: l A -:report :was received from Committee No. 3 recommending acceptance of the .recommendation.of the City Attorney for settlement. of "'the. case of Lois Evelyn Chisholm :vas;.: the City of Palo Alto for the sum; of $500.00. 0n motion: of "Bishop and Rodgers, the settlement of phis case in accordance with. the'City Attorney's recommendation was futhorized by unanimous vote on roll call. Reclassification in' Control .er's. Budget of a-ll present open areas at theelty_.hall site. until more considers tion :is given to •ncompaaa.s practicable future: needs.. In answer to a -:question by Councilman Cresap, Mr. _Reid: advised that he thinks tie library landecaping' casn be done without an overall plan. In further discussion, Mr. 'Reid_ -objected to: the 'procedure° used in obtaining' rofee8ionaa l services for the, project and objected to the hiring of the same . fiz'm for . several. projects He stated that he thought a" com- piete'study of -civic needs should to made. After chore discussion it was' ;Moved by Evans, seconded and' carried th>At the motion be amended :to aceept the plan, other than the Iportlon relating to the library,' for s.tedy. the It was rnoved"by Mrs Corcoran, seconded and carried that entire plan be referred to Committee No. 2 for study Amendment -to Building Code A report was received from . Committee ` No. 3 recommending he adoption of theproposed ordinance adding Section 4612 to the puilding Code, pertaining to"s.igns' on streets. Ordinance No'. 1769, amending the Building Code, was given.. second reading, and after discussion and. on motion of Mitchell and Iiahop, was adopted:by unanimous vote_of all council members present. (Creaap 'was absent during this roll; call. ) Amendment to Codified Ordinance No.' 5 re Ie,su=rnce of Citations A: report ;was .submitted by'Comcittee No. 3 advising that t. hags considered the proposed:ordina+nce adding Section 1.07 to_. odified.0rdinance 'No. 5,".,providing:.for the iseuaance of citations- for 'violations of -city ordinances; that >3 ,;notion to recommend adoption- of the ordinance received 3 Ayes" and 3 Noes+., and the committee returned the ordinance to the .Council without recommendation. Ordinance No. 1770, providing for the issuance of citations. for.: violations of city ordinances was - given second reading, and its— . A report wae'received-from Committee No. 3 recommending a.pprov»1 cf the following reela,ssi-ficetion in the budget of the Conianiler's office . That one intermedia3.te clerk (C-52) be upgraded to t ,,billing_ clerk- classification: _(c-29), effective November 18, 1957. To 'ddition8 1 funds are : required . On motion of - Bishop. send Navin, . the recommendation was dopted -and. the_ reclaa.ssification was approved by unanimous vote on 'roll caali.., Pronerty. Acquisition A report was receivead frem'Committee No. 3 recommending _ that`:,the staff be instructed to .participate in the bidding for the urchase of property. own'ed;, by't1W ta:te- of Helen Wright in Block 8, .tanford City, located °on .the 'northerlyside of Loma Verde Avenue at he corner of Emerson ,Street, in. 'an amount not in excess of 10% over he :appraised value set by the <Court. It was moved by Bi.shop, seconded by Mitchell, that the • recommendation'be adopted The Assistant City Manager advised that the property is being considered as a slte;_on which to relocate apartment buildings which have to be: moved frol the right of way of the _grade separa tion project; that it would accommodate ten units, i nd .is now zoned R -3-G, that: a rezoning to' R-3 or.>R-3 .D which is the zoning,. of ad- jacent property. would be necessary in order to relocate the' build- ings on the -site. The Council was informed that the bidding will:: take place on November 21,-1957 instead of.November '15th;' gs: pre v'iously stated in the meeting of Committee No 3. The Planning --Officer was asked to comment .on.the matterof rezoning:the'property in ,question, and stated that it seemed logi- cal to :ave_;:R-3 zoning at that particular location -After. considerable; discussion of the matter, particularly. .se to the._ problem of- rezoning the property if it is cquired by the City, the mot1on :to adopt the acquired of Committee No. 3 and authorize participation ins the bidding was carried by the following vote on roll c 11:: Bishop, Corcoran, Cresap, Giffin, Mitchell, Porte ,, liodgere, Woodward; Noes: Byxbee, Davis, Evans, Marshall, Nabis,'Ruppenthal. ;(A recess;-was.;.taken at this time, 9:15 P.M., .and. the•Council:reconvened at 9:25 P.M.) (Councilwoman :Corcoran left at this time and"was absent for.the rest of the meeting.) Zone. Change Anplic'>a-tion (Lasing) A report-was.received from the Planning Commission unani- mously recornmendi.ng the'.denial of the ,application for a zone change submitted 'oy Paul La-ning-for the property located on the southwest - corner of : Sin ;Antonio :and Middlefield Roads from L-M:S :D to . C-2- :5, the Commission.recommendi:ng that the present zoning pattern be retained.. Mr. Arthur: Cathcart`, attorney representing the applicant, asked that the matter be deferred to the regular meeting of Decem- ber 23,_ 1957, so that . P -C zoning may be considered. Or, motion of Rodgers: and ' Ma.rsha]:1, the matter was continued to the Council meeting 0±' December 23, 1957, and the question was referred back to the Planning Commisaion,;.with the suggestion that if necessary it be studied by Committee -No. 1.;: Zone Change Application (De Franco) A report was received from the Planning Commission recom- mending denial of the application of S. J. and Elise De Franco and John B. and Wilma K.'De Franco, as submitted, for change of district; of the property located,on the southerly corner of High Street and . Hawthorne Avenue, from -R-4 to C -3-:S, with the information that this; action: was taken by,a vote of 4 Ayes and 2 Noes. It was moved by :Mitchell and seconded that the recommenda- tion of the Planning Commission be adopted and the zone change application be denied`.-.-` Mr.. John De Franco. addressed the Council in support of the application, showing picturesof the property and presenting a. petition from property owners in the area approving the change of zone as requested:. He pointed out that half the property is in the C-3 district: and half in the R-4 zone,• that the portion: of the :-building in the R-4 district is:occupied by a non-conforming,uae at the. -present time, And. if the building should be destroyed it could not be. replaced. The Planning Officer explained the views .af the Planning Commission on the. matter, stating that the applicant can continue the non=conforminguse and the" Commissiole felt no hardship''is: in - v.olved at :. the -;;present time; that if, the building were destroyed it wouldbe possible �td, use:the property in a reasonable manner, end_: e 'variance could be `considered = if necessary for the proper use of the property, The motion to uphold the, recommendation of the Planning- Commission for denial -.of theapplication was carried by the follow--' ing' vote on -,roil call.: Ayes .Bishop; Cresap,-Davist Evans, Giffin, Mersha,ll, Mitchell, Nevis, Ruppent'hal, Woodward. -=Noes Byxb.e.e, Porter, Rodgers Design Control A report was received:from the Planning Commission recome mending: approval of the application' for design control as sub- matted by Neal Lindstrom; Architect, for Dr. Nathanie3 Handy, for a medical building 'to be Iodated at`k50 San Antonio Road. On motion of" Mitchell and Byxbee, the appiicetio:i WAS Approved as recommended "by the Plenni.ng Commission. Lot Diviiior (Paul Hardy) A report -:was submitted by the Planning Commission recommend- ing -that -the denial by _ the Planning "Officer of the application of Paul H, Hardy fore a- division:. of portion of Rancho Rincon de S,en. Francisquito,:located on: El Camino Way north of James Avenue, other- wise known as k,29 EI Camino' Way,` be upheld. Tar Hardy spoke in support'of,his application, advising that he :has an opportunity to sell the;30-foot parcel facing on. El Camino -Way, and that he hasees'sements providing: adequate access to the rear parcel on;which his. office buiiding ee located. The PThnning Officer reviewed ;the matter, showing a map; of the .property involved, and advised that the Planning Commission felt that there should be :ac'cess to the rear parcel from El Cemino,:Way. - He ,cA11ed attention`: to the. -fact ..that at one time consideration..hed been:_. given to :the:; dedication of a; street, to beknown as Ve lmonte Wey, adjacent -to .Mr' Hardy's property but that the street was never -dedicated Mr. `'Hardy stated that he feels the Planning Commission did not realize that he has adequate access to the rear portion of his property when they recommended denial of his application. A motion was made byByxbee, seconded by Rodgers, that the lot division :be granted as requested by .Mr. Hardy, subject to tie ,Engineering Bulletin. Other .council `'members felt that if there 1s: a misunderstanding on the part of the Plannlng Commission, the matter should be sent back to the Commission for reconsideration. It was moved; by Mitchell;' seconded by Marshall, and carried: that the question be -referred -back to the Planning Commission. Lot Division (Voorhies-) A report was received -from the Planning Commission recommend=- ing that the, approval by the Planning: Officer of the application. -of .W . H-.: Voorhies for a: division of portion of Lot 114, Wooster Sub- division,:, on.'R oss Road near. Mat.adero Creek, be upheld, subject to the following conditions as set forth by the Fire Chief and Planning Officer,- with a'`time limitation imposed of six months ,to Meet -the' requirements (1) %That the 15 -foot access to the lots be paved to standards ,<es :required by the City Engineer, ande(2) That a ` 6 -inch-. water' -main" and a fire . hydrant be -installed teethe satisfaction. of the City Engineer and the,Fire .Chiefe, and subject further to -the. requirements set.forth in. Engineering:Bulletin -57-165, for payment or segregation Of bond assessments, .furnishing evidence of payment of.all.city and county taaxes, and granting or obtaining for the City 'arpublic utilities easement 15 feet wide to Ross Road from the northeasterly, line of this parcel for the purpose of installing underground'water,.'ga.sand; sewer lines. On. motion- of Mitchell and Cresap, this lot division was approved, in accordance with" the recommendation of the Planning Commission. Lot tivision'(Drewes)' The. Planning.Commi'ssion submitted a report' recommending that the -approval: by' the-, Planning Officer of the a plication of W . E Drewess 'for, 'a division of a portion of Lot 114,, Wooster Sub- division, on Ross Road near Matadero'Creek, be upheld, subjectto the following. conditions with' a a' six months time limit imposed to meet the' conditions:... (1 )' That the : 15 -foot access to the rear lots be paved to' standards as required by the City Engineer:, and that an adequate turn -around area.:be provided; and (2) That a 6 -inch watermain and a. fire hydrant be installed to the aatiSfaction of the City Engineer and the. Fire Chief, also subject to requirements of Engineering Bulletin' :572k for the granting of pubile: utilities easements and. to furnishing evidence of payment of all payable city '`and. county - taxes. On motion of Mitchell and Cresap, this lot division was a approved in `accordance with the recommendation of the. Planning Commission. Final Pap of Tract "No. -1984 Grove Park A report was received from the Planning -Commission recommending approval . of 'the final map of Tract No 198k,, Grove: .' Park,- being, Lots 14;.39. aand::AO, Tract No. 19, Mayview :Romesites, located on_ Grove Avenue : near Adobe Creek, subject to granting of public utilities easements .and to the abandonment at,cost 'of the subdivider of a. portion of'existing Grove Avenue, the mapto be amended to;"eliminate 25: feet on the southwesterly boundary of the property which.isan existing dedicated right of way: Resolution 'No.: 2927. approving the map of Tract -NO. 1984' WAS introduced and:on motion 'of Rodgers and Mitchell was adopted or., roll cal1,..vwrith" 12 `Ayes, Cresap voting No. Letters were received from. J. Cyril Johnson, owner: of the tract,: requeating abandonment, of portion of Grove "~enue=and a portion Of,Lot"14 previously dedicated for a public road,' and agree- ing to ,pay all costs of the abandonment .Resolution No.:2928` of Intention to abandon portions of public: s:treets= in Tract' 19 Mayview Homesites, was introduced, and on -•motion of ::Rodgers, and -,Mitchell, was adopted on roll call, with 12, Ayes:, Cresap voting, No:: The resolution sets a hearing on the proposed abandonments for -December 9, 1957, at 7:30 P.M. Record of. Survey, :Portion- Lot 140, Wooster Sub. A report was submitted by the Planning Commission recom- mending approval of -the Record' of Survey, portion of Lot 140, Wooster Subdivbion, located on Louis Road near Greer-Roa4d, subject to providing' 15 -foot drainage easement, to granting a' 10 -foot publid utilities; easement:, to abandonment of the easterly 15: feet of the 30-foot-pubiio utilities easement parallel to the line dividing Lots 8 and 9;' to payment or segregation of all special assessments., ' ping evidence -of` "payment of all payable city and :and _to furnishing county taxes -On:motion Hof. Byxbee and Mitchell, this Record: of Survey was approved:in'ac:cordance with the recommendation of the Planning C ommiss ion , Naming: Street "Midtown Court" The Planning;Commission recommended that the street'extend-1 ing: from Colorado. Avenue to the De'*' Midtown parking lot be named ".:Midtown Court",.: It Wee Moved by Mitchell, seconded- and carried that ,a. ; proposed ordinance; naming this ::street ":lidtow!: Court" be accepted; for first reading: Amendment to Setback Ordinariee A report was 'received from the. Planning Commission .recom- mending that. an amendment be made to ordinance. No. 1330, the S:etba.ck': ,0rdinance, to -remove the setback restriction of 25 feet on Park Avenue y, , Leland Avenue; Stanford, Avenue, Oxford Avenue and College Avenue, 'between ElC'ainino Real and> Park Boulevard, allowing the set= back requirements . of , the zoning Ordinance to govern. It ,was :moved by, Mitchell, ,seconded and carried that a. pro- posed o'rdinance"aiaending Ordinance No. .1330 be accepted for first. reeding. -Project 52-13, No Resolutio to make:,Changes an southeasterly',12.5 introduced, "and: on- roll 'Call, -with 12 November25, 1.957, modification. Off -Street -Parking v21.2q,, o reliminary Determination and of Intention Modifications , ;:Pro ject 52-13, to include the . feet , of Lot'..7, Block 4, in the acquisition, was motion'.,of_ Mitcohe:ll, duly seconded, was adopted on Ayes, .Marah».11'vo.ting No. The resolution fixes at 7;:30 -P.M. as,..time of hearing on the proposed. Amendment to`-Fire'Prevention Code. A proposed ordinance amending Section 17.701 of Codified' Ordinance No.. 5 pertaining to standards. for installation of lique- fied petroleum gas was`.iintroduced and accepted for first reading, Amendment to Build s Code 'A proposed. ordinance amending. Section 1506 of the Building Code, regulai:ing helgbt of fences at street intersections was accepted for first reading, and referred to Committee No. 1. Amendment to Sec. . 2 ..13 Codified' Ordina:r_ce No . A proposedordinance amending Section 32.13 of Codified Ordinance No. 5 regulating. planting" a:t street intersections was accepted for first -reading and referred to Committee No. 1. Amendment to ' Plumbing Code A proposed ordinance amending Sub -section (a) of Section 702 of the Palo Alto Plumbing' Code pertaining to traps for floor drains" wa,s .accepted :for first .reading and referred to Committee No.1. Monthly Reports The monthly report; of the Controller for October, 1957, was received and filed.' The -monthly report of the -Planning Officer on action taken in October ` on 'applications for. redivision of lots, and the monthly report of ; the Zoning Administrator on action taken in October on app1ica,tions for variances and use permits, were received a.ndplaced. on -file. Procedure` re.Professional Services Councilmen. Rupperitha7 called attention to the procedure adopted in principle by Committee .No: 3:. on.,November k, 1957, for . committee guidance,' pertai"ning to selecting people for professional - services,, stating"that he thought the.Ceuncii should be informed of the action since all Committees -are involved. It was'directed that a. copy- of the procedure be sent each -council member. ter-•,. ,_Sv1^..1V 14.1.' �, I•+`�IAR�tia�Ap.'�s. ��W Plantin ,of Islands on Pa e Mal Read The City Man$ e�* g advised that some professional is desired in; connection with planting of the islands on, Page Mill_ guidance Road, and a small;, fee would'be involved He asked if'it was the Councll,'s wish that the procedure of advertising for applicants, be ' followed in this•case .' etc.; 'ii'was moved,b eag:loy ent of a lsndseape architectee, sefordtedheand devecarriedlopmenttoft tge Road be left to the discretion of the City Manager. Page Mill j There being:.no further business to come before the. Council, the meeting was adjourned at 10:15 P.M.