HomeMy WebLinkAboutRESO 4688• • ORiGINAL
RESOLUTION NO. 4688
RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALO ALTO
FINDING AND DECLARING THAT A MAJORITY PROTEST HAS NOT
a·EEN MADE TO THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN UNI~HABITED
TERRITORY LOCATED AT THE IHTERSECTION OF PAGE MILL
ROAD AND PETER COUTTS ROAD, AND PETER COUTTS ROAD,
DESIGNATED AS "FRENCHMAN'S TERRACE ANNEXATION," TO
THE CITY OF PALO ALTO
WHEREAS, on the 25th day of September, 1972, the Council of
the City of Palo Alto did pass and adopt Rt-solution No. 4664
giving notice of the proposal to annex certain uninhabited ter-
ritory to the C~ty of Palo Alto, said territory being therein
designated as "Frenchman's Terrace Annexation," and said resolution
described the boundaries of the territory proposed to be annexed;
and
WHEREAS , on the 11th' day of December, 19 7 2 , the Council of
the City of Palo Alto did pass and adopt ResolutioL ·No. 4687 setting
December 18, 1972, as the date of a public hearing on the petition
to annex said territory; and
WHEREAS, said Resolution No. 4687 deals with an amendment and
expansion of the territory described in Resolution No. 4664; and
WHEREAS, said Resolutions Nos. 4664 and 4687 did contain a
notice, hour, and place when and where the Council of the City of
Palo Alto would hel\r protests made by any person owning property
within the City of Palo Alto, said annexation having been consented
to by the owner of all of the real property proposed to be annexed,
and the time of said hearing being not more than thirty days from
the date of passage of said Resolutions Noa. 4664 and 4687; and
WHEREAS, on the 18th day of December, 1972, at the hour of
7:30 p.m. in the cou~cil Chambers in the City Hall of the City of
Palo Alto, County of Santa Clare.., State of California, said time
and place being the day, h0ur and place fixed in said Re•olution
No. 4687. and the continued day, hour and place of heating fixed
. '.
; .
•• •
in Resolution No. 4664, for hearinq protests to the said annexation
said City council did hear and pass upon all protests made to the
proposed annexation and did determine that protest had not been
made by public and private owners of one-half of the value of the
territory proposed to be annexed; and
WHEREAS, said territory is contiguous to the City of Palo Alto,
and is uninhabited territory_ in the County of Santa Clara;
NOW, THEREFORE, the council of the City of Palo Alto does
RESOLVE as follows:
That the council does hereby find and declare that a majority
protest has not been made by public and private owners of one-half
of the value of the territory proposed to be annexed.
INTRODUCED AND PASSED:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
UNANilviOUS
NONE
NONE
APPROVED AS 'l'O FORM:
December 18, l 97Z
APPROVED:
~40~
Mayor
~·--s?. Asst. City Attorney
APPROVED:
cit~
. fl' , ·-r~., (J>·---. ,, ..... __ .
~ .T..1...,'
r·/~)