HomeMy WebLinkAboutRESO 3762M V
RESOLUTION 110. 37"
RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL or THE CITY OF PALO ALTO •
`v t
FIN4lin AND bgCLAillIC tkiT 'A T FROM? HA Nor
DID MADE TO THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN UNINHABITED
8OItICATFA Ag
TO THE CxTt" or'Mid Attb
4i1a& b, as the 13th day qi 4u y,, 1964, the Council of the
City of Pa10 .Ato did pass „ *d a dopk,,pea9lwtipp No. 3751 giving
notice a the proposal to jnsx coz a ,Wainhabi,Cad territory
mo 6thi. Cfty of Paloalto 04# ,$*rriEpry btigg theFeia designated
es "Arastradero-Maybell Annexation", said Resolution describing
the boundaries of the territory proposed to be annexed; and
WHEREAS, said Resolution 3751 `did contain a notice of,.be
day, hey r lz$ place when and where the C!hapil. o .:the City would
;;:ear protests made by any person owning rte, Property within the
territory proposed to be annexed, the time of said hearing being
leas than forty not more than sixty days from the date of
passage of said Resolution; and
WHEREAS, on the 24th day of August, 1964, at the hour of
7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers in the City Hall of the City of
Palo Alto, County of Santa Clara, State of California, said time'
and place being the day, hour and place fixed in said Resolution 3751
for hearing protests to the said annexation, said City did hear
and pass on said date upon all protests made to the proposed
annexation and did determine that protests had not been made by
the owners of one-half of the value of the privately owned terri-
tory proposed to be annexed as shown by the last equalised assess-
ment roll, nor by the public owners of one-half of the value of
the publicly owned territory proposed to be annexed as determined
by said legislative body; and
WHEREAS, said territory is contiguous to the City of Palo
Alto, and is uninhabited terr-£iory in the County of Santa Clara.
- 1 -
•
••
•
NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Palo Alto does
RESOLVE as follows:
sEcroo lJ That the Council does hereby find and declare
that at no time prior to final adjournment of said hearing on
protests, did any owner of property within said territory to be
annexed make protest against the annexation.
SECTION 2. That the Council does hereby find and declare
that a majority protest against said annexation has not been made.
INTRODUCED:AND PASSED: August 24, 1964. by un* lrnoui vote.
ATTEST: APPROVED:
city' 117
AP OVED AS '+ FORK:
ty torn*
yor
-2-
•
•