HomeMy WebLinkAboutRESO 3193RESOLUTIONS° 3193
=mums of TOE
1,01 UNIVRAS11101
WALCSUart SW alink gm*,
`WA
taboos TO TSB cxn s w AMMO AOF PSIS
NALOF THE TIME AND PUCE FOE ARAMS dt
MSS, pursuant to the "A nnot ati on of Uni nh abited T er ritory
Ant of 1939," there has been present ed to the Co uncil of the City
of Pala Alto a petition . executed by S unny l eadi aed R obert R. T ayl or
reque sting an imation of that cert ai n pr operty Situated in the
Co unty of Santa Clar a, State of California, *ad d esc ribed on Exhibit
A a ttac he d hereto and made a pa rt hereof.
W ERLIS „ said terr itor y is un in habited, u ni ncorporated t er ri-
tory contiguous to the City of Palo Alto; and
WHIRLS, said petition is ex ecutsd,by the owne rs of not less
than o ne-fou rth of the lan d in such te rritor y by area and assessed
value as shown on the last equalized asse ssme nt ro ll of the Cou nty
of Rasta Clar a, State of Ca lifornia, in w hich such ter ritory is
situate d; and
M IL'S, the County Boundar y Co mmission of Santa Clara County,
California, ha s approved the proposed annum/it-Lon bo undar ies et said
pr operty;
NOW, THEREP RS, be it resolved by the Coun cil of the City of
Palo Alto;
Section 1. That pursu ant to the "Anne xation of Unin habited
Te rr ito ry Act of 1939" the Co uncil of the City of Pa lo Alto here by
gives notice of said proposed annemation.
Se c*iop 2. Said terr ito ry her eby is designate d for ide ntifi-
cation as "Sayshore-Sa n Aaton io An nexation".
Section 3. The 28th day of Mar ch, 1980, at the hour s of 7:30 p. m.
of said day, in the Council Chambers in the City Hall in the City of
Palo Alto, County of Sa nta Cla ra i Seat*, of Ca lifornia, is hereby
fixed aa the time a nd place when an d where an y per son owning rea l
pro per ty within the un in habited ter rito ry above deseribed a nd proposed
-1-
to be annex ed to the Citj► Ofth1io'Y1' ttittio having diay. Objections
to the proposed annatatiafti tigy APpesr' boJorI th* C o%tmciI of the
City of Palo Alto and show ca us e why such u ninhabited territo ry
should not be so anne xed to said .City of Pal o Alt o. Such pr ot est
must be in writing, may be fil ed at a ny time bef or e the h our set
for hearin g objections to the pr oposed annexation, and shall st at e
the n ame or name s of the own er or owne rs of pr ope rty affected and
the descriptio n and area of such property it konar al t erms.
Section 4, The City Clerk of the City of P al o Alt o is h ereby
authorize d a nd dire cte d to cause a copy of this r es oluti on to be
published At 1e*vt ,twic e, bu t not oftene r than o nce a week, in the
NUR Alp Tinos, a newspaper of general circulati on publish ed in
odd 114ty of Palo Lito, the city to whic h it is proposed to a nnex
the afore sa id territory, an d also in the San Jose Mercury, a nmws-
paper of ge neral circulation published o utside the City of Palo Alto
but in the County of Santa Clara, Califo rnia, the county in which
is located the territor y proposed to be annexed to the city, s aid
publication to be complete at least twenty days prior to the date
set fo r the hearing.
And the said City Clerk is fur ther autho rize d and dire cted to
cause written notice of su ch propo sed annexatio n to be mailed to
each per so n to who m land within the territory proposed to be an nex ed
is a ssessed in the last equalized coun ty assessmen t roil available
on the date the a bov e said proceedin gs were initiated, at the
addr esses shown on said asse ssment roll or known to said Cle rk, and
to any perso n who has file d his na me and addre ss and the de signatio n
of the lands in which he has an interest, either legal or equitable,
with said Cler k, such no tice to be giv en not less than tw enty days,
before the fir st public hearing on the pro po sed annexatio n;
And the City Clerk is dire cted to cause wr itten notice to be
given to su ch o ther persons as may be legally en title d thereto in
the manner re quired by law.
The above and forego ing r esolutio n wa s duly and re gular ly
-2-
C
(e—
tr. a'
.a 0 VG
introduc ed and passed at a regular m eeti ng of the Council of the
City of Pal o Alto held on Monday, the .$a day of February , 1960,
by the following v ote: By unanim ous voice vote .
ATTEST:
CI' y le
APPROVEDE
BAYSHORE - SAN ANTONIO ANNEXATION
TO THE CITY OF PALO ALTO
All that cer tain real property situat ed in the County of Sa nta Cl ara,
State of Ca lifornia, and bound ed by the following described liner
Beginning at an iron pipe set through a redwood post at the Easterly
co rner of that cer tain 2.416 acre parcel of land conv eyed by Lette W.
DeFor est et al to Giacomo Ar manasco by D eed d at ed Dec ember 14, 1934 and
recor ded De cember 29, 1934 in Bo ok 715 of Official Records, at p age 238,
Re cords of said County, sa id iron pipe being set at a point in the com-
mon boundary line between the City of Palo Alto and the City of Los Altos;
thence a long the Corporate Limits Line of the City of Los Altos S outh-
we sterly and !Southeasterly to the point of inte rsection the reof with th e
Co rpo rate Lim its Line of the City of Mountain View , said Corpo rate Limits
Line be ing also the Northeasterly prolon ga tion of the center line of San
An tonio Avenu e; the nce S. 60 00' W. along said cen ter line 1174.26 feet
to a monument in the Southwesterly line of Bayshore Highw ay as described
in the Dee d to the State of Californ ia, dated December 1, 1932 an d re-
corded Au gust 12, 1933 in Book 662 of Official Records, at page 130,
Reoo rde of said Coun ty, said Southwe sterly line being also the Co rpo rate
Limits Line of the City of Palo Alto; thence alo ng the last named City
Limits Line Northwester ly, Northea ster ly a nd Southeasterly to the poin t
of be gin nin g, conta in ing 32.2 acre s, more or less.
i
1