Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1979-04-09 City Council Summary MinutesRegular Meeting April 9, 1979 ITZM PAGE Oral Communications 6 1 0 Minutes Of March 19, 1979 6 1 0 Consent Calendar - Action Items 6 1 1 Gas Rate Study Grant (ray:216;9) 6 1 1 Airline Limousine Service, Inc. Proposed Fare Increase 6 1 1 (CPR:214:9) University Avenue Southern Pacific Depot Project (CMR:213:9) 6 1 2 Request of Vice Mayor Henderson re South Bay Dischargers 6 1 3 Authority Request of Mayor Carey re Art in Public Places 6 1 4 Counc 11 ember Witherspoon re Letter from Mrs. Gifford re Opera 6 1 Councilmember Sher re Firefighters` Written Position Statement 6 1 6 Oral Commun'catfons 6 1 6 Adjournment to Executive Session 6 1 6 Adjournment 6 1 6 609 4/9/79 Regular Meeting April 9, 1979 The City Council of the City.of Palo Alto met on this date in the Councilchamber, at 7:40 p.m., Mayor Carey presiding. PRESENT: Brenner, Carey, Eyerly, Fazzino, Fletcher, Henderson, Scher Witherspoon ABSENT: Clay Mayor Corey announced Cat the meeting would be quite short, inasmuch as a long executive session had been scheduled for personnel and litigation matters. ORAL COMMJNICATIOMS 1. Tim Bruer, Stanford University Radio Station KZSU business manager, Box 5788, Stanford, thanked Councilmembers for their support of YZSU. He donated tee shirts to rnunri is ambers, _ with the rtdio station call letters of KZSU imprinted on them. 2. Tony Spitaleri, president, Palo Alto Professional Fire Fighters Union, said he was appearing before Council to bring them up to date on negotiations. The union had been negotiating since last September. On Thursday, April 5, negotiations had broken off. The Fire Fighters' Union, Mr. Spitaleri said, had proposed a package that was in line with the President's guidelines, that is, he said, not inflationary, and the union had also proposed an additional drop in vacation block to save the City some money --in overtire a cost of about $26,000. The union, he said, was prepared to sign an agreement, but talks had broken down because the City negotiator wanted the fire fighters' union to co-author and co-sign an agreement which the union thought would drop the level of service and risk community safety. Mr. Spitaleri said "We feel it's not our position to negotiate the type or level of service the citizens of Palo Alto are enjoying. We feel that that issue should be left up to the citizens cr the Council." He said the fire fighters' union Was prepared to cone to agreement but it would not sign or co-author an agreement that called for a drop in the level of service. He had brought copies of the fire fighters' union proposal to Councilors because "...we were told in our last negotiating session that our proposal will not be presented to you. So that makes me also think that maybe our past proposals that we have made over the last six or seven months have not been fully explained to you. We had offered the City a two-year agreement calling for a 7 per cent wage increase each year exactly as the police officers received and signed, and we were turned down. We don't know why we were turned corn. It appear% that when we want a shorter contract or we want a contract to start with the October date, demand for the level of service cows into question. . ." The union, he said, did not want to go to arbitration, though it had fought for and won the right to go to arbitration when talks broke down. MINUTES .. 19 7 on 979) Vice Meyer Henderson referred to page 566, ninth paragraph, andasked that the third sentence read instead: 'He did not see much traffic at 610 4/9/79 CIO the station/shopping center at the Middlefield entrance and exit next to the station." Vice Mayor Henderson referred to page 570, thirteenth paragraph, and asked that the second sentence read instead: "It was even worse than that a party was guilty until proven innocent; it was saying that the party was guilty even though proven innocent." Councilmember Brenner referred to page 560, and asked if it was the length of Barron Park itself, or the length of Mdybell Avenue that was referred to by ryr. Schreiber. Councilmember Brenner referred to page 562, ninth paragraph, end asked that the fourth sentence read instead: "The proposal would substitute the much -criticized P -C zone without giving any benefits that the P -C could give." Councilm ber Brenner referred to page 562, ninth paragraph, and asked that the ninth sentence read instead: "She thought that an R-2 could be good, for it more nearly approximated the idea of a single-family zone with a cottage owned by the main family on the same lot; in other words, it did leave a_subdivision of eight single living `units." MOT ION : Councilmember Fazzi no moved, seconded by Fletcher, that the minutes of March 19 stand approved as corrected. The notion passed on a unanimous voice vote, Councilmember Clay absent. CONSENT CALENDAR Referral Items None Action Items GAS RATE STUDY GRIT ( : 21 S: 9) Staff recommends that Councf l authorize the player ::to execute the contract with the State Energy Resources Conservation, ind Development Commission. MOTION: Council ►er Fletcher moved, seconded by Henderson, that Council approve the following contract: CONTRACT: CALIFORNIA STATE ENERGY RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION The motion passed on a unanimous voice vote, Councilmember Clay absent. AIRLINE LI SI I INC 9) George Long, business manager, Airline Limousine Service, Inc., 1 Martin Avenue, Santa Clara, sad there had been no rate increase in service since 1969. He had bought the service and since the.co any prior to his purchase had not kept records he had no record of loss or profit. But, in the last eight ths, _ he said, the cony had 'lost smi 45,000 to $►50,0 0. 4e had apiied for the rate increase about four months ago. If the City protested the rate increase there would be another 90 -day delay, withresultant delay and possible closing of the service. Airport Limousine of Sunnyvale was his nearest competitor. 1/M9 1 1 i Vice Mayor Henderson said he had confused Airline Limousine Service with the Airport bus service. He acknowledged that Mr. Long's figures gave ample proof of need for the increase. haphtali Knox, Director of Planning and Community Environment, added there were two more private limousine services. Airport Limousine of Sunnyvale presently charged $13 for the -ride fon Palo Alto to the airport, the Airline Limousine Service charged $14 for Oat run. MOTION: Councilrr ber Sher moved, seconded by Witherspoon, that Council take no action on the matter. The motion passed on a unanimous voice vote, Counci lmnember Clay absent. UNIVERSITY AVE E +` HEM P CIFIC Counci lmember Pletcher said she read put the matter of improving the Southern Pacific Railroad Depot at University Avenue on the agenda to show that there was some activity toward improvements. A staff level advisory co ni ttee and a Palo Alto Citizens' Advisory Co mi ttee had been set up. She was chairperson of the Citizens' Advisory Committee, under the auspices of the Santa Clara County TrarsitOistrict. Some time ago legislation had been enacted to fund a reconstrdctian project on that property with the end of making bus transfer more feasible. She thought the amount legislated had been for about $8O,000_ That had been part bf a comprehensive transit bill in 1978. She said her committee had met once and would meet again April 26, 7:30 p.m. in the Councilchamber. Some analyses and recomendetions that the committee was currently working on would be reviewed. She asked for evidence of interest on the part of other Counci lrmembers . Councilor Brenner said she thought improvements to make the SP depot more comfortable for waiting would be worthwhile. The SP depot was becoming a larger and larger transfer point between San Mateo and Santa Clara counties' transit systems. She noted that the objective of the study was to construct ".,.a major, inter-rodUlar transfer and transportation center." She said that it perhaps had riot yet been decided that that was the best place for a major transportation center. Some years ago a switching area on that property had been eliminated. She had heard that the number of buses going to that point might_be doubled. Since the SP point would be end -of -run for buses, there eight be need for additeona1 automobile parking. She asked if California Avenue was not really the center for employment and commuter needs. There was, with the University Avenue SP station, impact on University Avenue and the Alma Circle, and there would be more cars coming to such a main transfer point. She said she did not want to slow down the idea of a more comfortable station; she did. however, question viewing the -University Avenue SP depot even ideal major transportations center. She favored California Avenue for that. Countilmember Fletcher agreed that statistics showed there would be mere advantage to making ng California Avenue the major transportation point, and there was more potential growth. The talks had progressed on the base of the University Avenue depot before she had betook involved; county staff had been involved in the legislation but not the committee which she now chaired. Palo Alto had told county staff that It would' be asking for better facilities at the -University SP depot. Counci 1u ember f l etcher said that after her committee had made a decision on what needed to be done at University Avenue it would get to work en the 6 I 2 4/9/79 California Avenue depot as a possible major transportation point, where workers at Industrial Park would find it mere convenient to transfer. Councilmenher Eyerly said his immediate concern was that some pressure. be brought to bear on SP to keep the University Avenue depot in better repair; he had had two complaints about graffiti and broken windows within the past month, at that location. Councilmeiber Fletcher said that Mr. Hoguchi could perhaps respond to CounciImember Eyerly in more detail than she had. It had come to her attention that the transit center there drew hangers-on, who caused vandalism and SP indicated it would like to shut the depot down because it was unecono+ri ce 1 to sari nta i n . Mr. Neguchtsaid some complaints about the SP underpass had been passed on to the SP staff. and it would report back on April 19. As a result of SP's request. one East Palo Alto run had been changed "...so as net to interface with the depot Amen- this was as a result __e►f_SP's __ request. However. I don't know if there was unanimity on the part of the technical committee on that point." Councilor Brenner ascertained that $80.000 had been set aside for work toward a major transportation center at the University Avenue SP depot. She agreed that the station should be maintained, "...and t don't like to see SP taken off the hook in any way." She said that in vier of the problems bus drivers said they had in going around the circle at the SP turnabout, she wondered if it would be wise to put twice as many buses there. She thought it would be good for Palo Alto's Planning Commission to have something to say. on that. Mr. Knox said that the Comprehensive Plan showed both downtown and California Avenue SP depots had been shown as transportation terminals. He added that the county was now constructing a transfer center at El Camino and Page Mill were same SamTrans and some Santa Clara County buses would both connect. There was also automobile parking. Therefore, staff was dealing with three transfer points. The transportation load should be distributed among them: downtown would attract pedestrian with likelihood of bus -to -bus and train -to -bus transfer, rather than car -to -bus -or -train transfer; a study was needed to determine the amount of traffic at those places. "The whole point is to bring all of the various transportation arms together in place were people can transfer easily. That's one way that we can use transit." Corncilme ber Sher said Mr. Knox's remarks about the transit natter coming up for review with the Comprehens 1 ve Plan had allayed his fears about the various p ssibf lities for an intermadal major transportation center being foreclosed. Me thought it would be good for Cowell 1 to. ask Councilmenber Fletcher to communicate Counci1's_concerns related to car parking and the like. Mayor Carey noted that the matter had been an information item, and no Council action was needed. Vice Mayor Henderson said Palo Alto had to approve the budget. for the . CORRECTED South Bay Dischargers Authority by Wednesday or the project would stop. SEE PAGE The budget itself was $1741000 and that figure should appear at. the top. 619. of the budget page. The only expenditure would be S14,000 to keep the 513 4/9119 board going. For participating in the Bay Area Regional Waste Water Project there was an expenditure of $25,000. Participation was a requirement if there were to be any alternative to installation of the pipeline. The figures the Councilmembers had before them on the South Bay Dischargers Authority budget showed the kind of money that would be needed if the project went forward. The $174,000 would be not only the expense, but was also the balance in the fund. MOTION: Vice Mayor Henderson moved, seconded by Fazzino, that Council approve the South Bay Dischargers Authority 1979-80 Administrative Budget. Councilmeiber Witherspoon asked what would become of the "contingency reserve" of $135,000 if the South Bay Dischargers Authority terminated. Vice Mayor Henderson replied that major studies had been undertaken with federal and state money but whatever the City had in the fund would be returned. A hearing was being held in mid -Play at which time he hoped the Auttiorite_would end withthedecision that the proposed pipeline would not be installed. MOTION PASSED: The motion that Council approve the South Bay Dischargers Authority 1979-80 Administrative Budget passed on a unanimous voice vote, Counci lmember Clay Asent. RE UEST OF MAYOR CAREY RE Mayor Carey said he was incensed about the ordinance, Section 2.2b.050(b), requiring that owners of properties whose walls were going to be used for public art be required to "...assureiistallatlon,..to protect the work of art and to maintain it in good condition and to provide. for 'appropriate insurance and indemnification'." that seew d to him to be outrageous. Carieen Bedwell, Director of Social and Community Services, said the Section in the Palo Alto Municipal Code was intended to set out general guidelines for works of art before they were installed, such as outdoor sculpture. The application with regard to murals could, the City Attorney had told her, be applied with flexibility, and when provisions far insurance and indemnification were not appropriate they could be waived. She said she was now working on two mural- locations, and agreement with the respective property owners made no provision for indeannification. Stanford was not one of the property Owners, though, an earlier situation with Stanford had provoked the section Mayor Carty alluded to. A Cr>m- prehensive Education Training Act (CETA) artist was now part of the City staff which fact activated the aural project again. One of the properties contacted for a possible location had been Stanford -owned, at California Avenue. A copy of the section had been sent to Stanford, without the qualifications she had just state,l, and so Stanford had reacted negatively. Now the election had been modified within the list three weeks. Mayor Carey said that he thought Stanford would like to cooperate; why had she not returned to them? Ms. Bedwell said "I don't think -there's anything that prohibits our going back to them. I can't speak for the staff directly involved but that would surely be a possibility." Mayor Carey he would think there was every reason to go back to Stanford. Councilmember Witherspoon said that in view of the fact that the artist was employed by the City and the work was to be a mural there was no reason to insure tt. It was not the same as if it were a piece of sculpture owned by a second party. Mayor Carey said he questioned whether or not insurance en a mural could even be obtained. Councilmember Brenner asked if the subject ordinance was the one drawn up to protect the artist's right to copyright. Mr. Abram replied that this was not the ordinance. A copyright proviston was included in each individual agreement for artwork which inured to the benefit of the City. Mayor Carey said the ordinance, which not all Ceuncilm rbers had, had been introduced November 17, 1975, and had been passed Decenber 8 of that year. by unanimous vote. The ordinance had been drafted by. the Visual Arts Jury; it was about six pages long. Mayor Carey said that ...tucked away in the back of this ordinance there was a sub -paragraph 'Private Sites for Art in Pub1i Places'." He read that passage listing 'Private v V . J • ! Y.n the strictures. Mayor Carey said that he had approved the ordinance. He had thought the section applied to portable works of art; he did not know how insurance, for example, could be applied to paint on a wall. He thought that if the City wanted murals to be a part of public art it would have to remove those requirements for insurance and the like. 11 Vice Mayor Henderson said he thought the matter should be cleared up within the shortest time possible. Mayor Carey said that since the artist and private sites were available now the ordinance should be clarified now, Councilmember Eyerly asked if murals were also included in the ordinance that applied to public art. Mr. Abrams replied that they were, The ordinance was being applied in two recent agreements for mura t s ; there had been no requirement for insurance or indemnification, as Mrs. 8edwell had indicated. Also there was a i x tnth acceptance clause, which gave the property owner, &this his expense, the right to remove the work of art within that period. After that six-month period there was' to be a three-year agreement that the art remain in place. MOTION: Councilmember Sher moved, seconded by Henderson, that Council request the City Attorney to prepare an amendment to the ordinanc exempting from the ordinance's ce's previsions those murals installed'‘.; the City's request on private property, and report back for the April 23 meeting. Counci lmem er Sher clarified that the exemption was to be frcm those provisions of the ordinance that required insurance, indemnification and the like. The motion passed on a unanimous voice vote, Councilmember Clay absent, Councilmember Witherspoon said she had received a letter from Mrs. Gifford who was chairperson for the South Peninsula chapter of the San 615 4/9119 1 Francisco Opera Guild asking that those awkwardnesses in relation to the autumn opera previews last fall did not reoccur in the coming fall. She had detailed her anxieties in a letter to Council some months ago. Counci lmonber Witherspoon asked for such assurance from Mrs, Bedwell, and also the name of someone on the staff who Mrs. Gifford could use as a contact person. Mrs. Bedwell said she had received a letter from Mrs. Gifford that day also and she was concerned that City facilities might not be available on the dates which had been set by Mrs. Gifford, which, in spite of the City's best efforts. could cause difficulties. Councilor Witherspoon said she thought possible inconveniences would be facilitated with one single staff member being.appointed to work with Mrs. Gifford pr coordinating the event. Counci'lmember Eyerly said that Mrs. Gifford had told him that it was impossible to make reservations with theCity as far ahead as September and__October.-She i,ad_beert o d_that_she_cou1 3_reserve_ov ly 90_dayc_a lead of time. He asked that Mrs. Bedwell summarize for Council her department's policy on reservations, and the like. Mrs. Bedwell said she would have the information for Counciln ers' packets next week, COUNCILMEMBER SHER RE POSITION STATEMENT Councilmember Sher said that though he could not, during oralcommunications, respond to Tony SpitaTeri of the Firefighters' union, he wanted to state at this time that he was glad to have the written statement; he assured Mr. Spitaleri that Councflmeembers would review it, ORAL COMMUNICATIONS None J TO XECUT1VE SESSION Council adjourned to Executive session re litigation and personnel tatters at 8;30 p.m. ADJOURIMENT The Executive Session and the meeting adjourned at 11:00 p.m. ATTEST: aft.41 de,i1/4.44-t„ 61 6 4/9/79