Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRESO 2228f 290 ~ ~ ~ (, I t ii i l; ~· I. ' ' l , .. ,. ~: i;' ,,. ,' }· f'· ~: i .!f~ -:or 2228 !1~01.!!!!0N !Q .. - CONPIJUmiG .uutrmKD ABSBSSMINT SAN ANTONIO ANND SBVIRS PROJECT NO. 51-5 •• ,.~-·--, ............ I_ •• ,~~M~, RESOLVBD, by the Council or the City or Palo Alto that WHEREAS, said Council did on the 28th da7 or January, 1952, order the City Engineer to make and. rile with aa1d Council an amended asseeament ot the parcels or propert1 the tormer assessment upon which under Resolution ot Intention No. 2004 ot said Council 18 designated upon the original aaaesnment and diagram and confiraed by sa1d Council on June 11, 1951, and recorded 1n the orr1ce or the Superintendent or Streets of' said City, as diagram and assessment numbers 623 and 955-B; WHEREAS, said City Engineer did on the 29th day of January, 1952, pursuant to said ord.er, tile with the Clerk of said City a diagram and amen.ded aaeeesment; WHEREAS, eaid Council fixed Monday, the llth day or February1 1952, am the t1me for hearing said amended assessment and cau~ed notice or said hearing to be published twice in the Palo Alto Times, ae appears from the affidavit of publication on r11e in the office or the Clerk or said City; and lfHBREAS, at the time and place fixed tor ~aid hearing, no protests or objections were made or presented to the proposed amended assessment, and all matters and things pertaining to aai.d amended aseesament were fully heard and considered by ea1d Council; NOW 1 THXREPORE, IT IS ORDERED tha:t said amended assessment filed with the Clerk of said City pursuant to Resolution ordering sa~, be and the same is hereby rat1t1ed, approved and confirmed. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the Clerk of said City shall deliver said amended aasesament ;;o the City Engineer~ together with a certified copy or thia resolution thereto attached., and said City Engineer eha.11 thereupon record zruch amended aeaessment w1 th a cert1f1ca·te at the end thereof by the Clerk of said City that 1t is the amended assessment approved by the City Coune11. The City lbg1neer shall note opposite the assessment in said original diagram and aasessment·Number~ 623 and 955-B that they have been displaced by said amended assessment, giving the date, and shall credit upon such amended asaeaament, all pa:yments theretofore made upon the ~r1g1nal assessment. When said amended aesessment ha.a been reeord.ed, the City Engineer shall cause the original assessment involved to be cancelled. I hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council or the City of Palo Alto at a regular meeting thereof held on the llth day or 1ebruary, 1952, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Bishop, Blois, Bowden, Bower, Cashel, Cathcart, Gaspar, .Hill, Marshall, Miller, Mitchell, Montrouil, Simpson. None. Dr78dale, Wicltett. ,_L ~ , APPRO\TllDt . . . ~ ~~~;<-- ty ~ler (C 00 0:: c... -c i l IJ ) ' ' ... .J ~ ~ i J ! ' i :? ! ' : " ; ! l ~ l } 1 :\' t ~ ~ _, j ~ t I u I i l