HomeMy WebLinkAboutRESO 1273·~ ... ··--·--·-.......... _..,. ............................. ~· -. -·' ··-····· ... , ..... _.,..._ ..... -~-....... --.~ ........ "'-----.. -.. ... ~~---------.. ·--~--·· .... ,.-~:fi'~''1":1F,~~~
I I
I:~
1__
RESOLUTION
~----................ .... N 0 ,, 1273 -
RBSOLUTION DISAPPROVING THE PASSAGE OF PROPOBD SJ.I.l!'B
CONSTITUTIONAL AM.l.!lfDimlf1' NO. 9
Whereas the Council ot the City ot Palo Alto ia
1ntormed of the text ot Senate Conat1tutimal Amendment No. tt
relative to the appeal to the Superior Co\U·t ot deciaiona ot
adm1niltrat1ve bo•rda throughout the State ot Cal1tornia; and
whereas it has rece1Ted tne opinion ot ita Cit7 Attorney to
the et.rect tr.a t thE!I adoptim of euch an amendment might
jeopardize the rulinga or the several adm1n1atrat1ve boards of the C1t1 ot Palo AltOJ '
How therefore, the Council ot tne City ot Palo Alto, DO RESOLVE as follows:
Tl:18.t :laid Council does, by the x:aaaage of this reso-
lution, go on record as being opposed to tbe adoption of pro-
posed Senate Constitutional Amen&nent No. 9, relative to appeals
tram dee1s1ona of admin1etrat1ve boards throughout the State ot California.
The abov~ and foregoing resolution waa duly and
regularly introduced and passed at a regular 100eting ot the
Counoil of the City of Palo Alto held on Monday, the 8th day
of April, 1940, b7 the following votea
AYBSa
NOES a
ABSENTs
Bentrott, Blois, Caahel, Cypher, Goddard, Hoy, Herner,
Mitchell, Reed, RiChards, Southwood, Thoite, ThomAs.
None.
Coetello, Wood.
APPROVEDa
~ /. ~11-L. ATTESTJen
271
•
.J
•, J
,,
j
I ..
. $ ! •
•