The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutRESO 5518• ·' .. , .• • • ORIGINAL RESOLUTION NO. ..~5 .. 1 ... 8_--- RES0Lt1l'ION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALO ALTO AMENDING THR OPEN SPACE PLAN MAP OF THE CITY OF PALO ALTO TO CONFORM WITH THE LAND USE MAP OF THE PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WHEREAS, on April 23, 1973, the council of the City of Palo Alto did, by Resolution No. 4728, ~dopt Th~ Open Space Plan of the City of Palo Alto including an-Open Space Plan Map; and, WHEREAS, on November 29, 1976, the Council did, by Resolution No. 5291, adopt the Palo Alto Comprehensive Plan, including a Land Use Map1 and, WHEREAS, the Council desires to make certain amendments to The Open Space Plan to have it conform with said Land Use Map. NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of t~e City of Palo Alto does ~SOLVE as follows: SECTION 1. The Open Space Plan Map of the City of Palo Alto is hereby amended by redesignating those certain parcels of land shown on the map attdched hereto as EXHIBIT •An ar1d incorporated herein by thi_s reference to and from the various o~en space designations of the Open Space Plan Map as show~ on said EXHIBIT "A". SECTION 2. The Counci 1 hereby finds that the adoption of_ this resolution will not have any signific;alit environment.al effects. INTRODUCED AND PASSED: February 13, 1978 AYES: Brenner, Carey, Clay, Eyerly, Fazzino, Fletcher, Henderson, Sher, Witherspc'.:m NOES: None ABSENT: None ABST~IONS: None ATTEST: · ~j~ City Cle(! R AS TO ~; ~~-~~'- ssistant city Attorney APPROVED: ~·kt(~ ~annin9_ community Environment a.~. Go..-.~: -. APPnOVED: " ·~~?DSe,. w I I- ---·......---------' AR.'EA~ ADDED 10 OPJ::N I ~ .•. t.DN11WLJ.-~0 V~~t.or>.1EN11 AfZf,AS ADt:>B:D '10 f?U0iL1~ G ON~~V.CC'110N L.AND~ Afa;>.6 OEL.&1""~t> ~ OF'r:M ~ ~ON1'""~oa.J..&O Olt\'t:l.Cf1t-.i\~ ~ ~O WMptlEHE~tVE. 'f'l...AW •crrvPAR~ · P1.Jf?LI l.L-Y-OWNED -CITY @A Cet:JSIT'Y CONSER- \ATl()N LANDS fSiil SfREAMSIDE OPEN SPACE D BOULEVARD OPEN SPACE • SCHOOL DISTRICT LANDS CJ OPEN ~··· CO\ITRCl.LED DEVELC>Pfv1ENT - -., , ,llOOO DEPARTMENT OF Pl..Af'N'JG APRIL 23, 1973 ' . . 't.• Janu~ry 19, 1978 HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL Palo Alto, californis Attention: Finance and Public Works Commiltee • 1978 -79 Community DeveloEE!ent Block Grant Application (CDBG) Members of the Council: In this report:, we are forwarding the staff recoilllllendations for: I. · Palo Alto's 1978-79 Community Development Block Grant Program. II. Use of $112,000 fo:c a project in Palo Alto's sphere of influence (unincorporated parts of Stanford University) to be applied for ._by Santa Clara County. lII. A three-year Community Development Plan for Palo Alto. IV. The 1978-79 Housing Assistance Plan for Palo Alto. Items I and II are covered in this report. Items IIt"and IV are attached. Also attached are: V. Preliminary environmental assessments for all proposed projects t~at do not ~lready have environmental clearance. VI. Copies of all submittals for CDBG funds. HUD has advised that Palo Alto'& en entitlement for the 1978-79 fiscal year has been increased f.rom $595,000 to approximately t'319,000. The final Ug.ure is expecteJ by the end of January but sh~uld vary little, if any, from this amount, This incr~ase is due to a recent change in the funding formula. In the past~ the for111ula considered the condition of a city's· housing stock, \iftcrt'!as the new· formula takes into account: the age of housln~. This variable> along with growth lag and extent of. poverty, are used to detcrm.i.ne the funding ruuount. Io add it ion, Palo Alto is ngain el1.gib!c to i·cceivc CD. funds through Santa Cfrrn C('lunty' s -npplic:ation :for the unincorporated portior.. of Palo Alto 1 s l'iphcrc o! influence. Stnt1:!c:i:-d University is the only major, populatnrl~ 111\incorporatcd arcn, «nd the app;·oximately $42 tooo is to lie used for an ~licihlc project there. om:565: 7 I . ' ' • • PART 1. !ccommendcd Projects Staff tecommcnds that Palo Alto's 1978-79 Community Development Block Grant funds be used as follows: (l) Palo Alto Citywide RehabiU Lat: ion -a cont·inuation ar;d ruc.pansion cf the Housing Im~rovement Program (2) Senior Center renovation (3) Senior Home Repair Service (4) Contingency It 1& recommended that.onp of the following programs be funded . with CD funds (see pp. 6-7, 84 and 15). (5) Housing Ac'cruisitlon Program or (6) Housing Land Bank '.IOTAL !!_ocedure for Developing Recommended Program $300,000 90,000 20,000 29,000 380,000 . ~819,000 The process of reviewing and selecting recommended projects was as follows: Information packets on the CommunJ.ty Development Program were distri- buted to all known n~ighborhood organizations, special interest atoups, managers of subsidized hou~ing developments, and intei:ested individuals. Two public meetings were adverti&ed in the Palo Alto Timas. Seven persons attended the first meeting; fifteen attended the second. At those ro~c~)n~s, the objectives and requirements of the CD progr4m and ideas for using the graut JIY.)ney were discussed. Project: ptoposals were submitt.:!'.':d b{ local agencies and orglmizations by Decemb.~r 2, 197 7. The staff then reviewed all proposals. The new Housing and Community D~velop~ent Act of 1977 and !ts corresponding regulat ious have rood i.f 5.ed the o·r ig1oal CD legislation. Some changes add to the typE'.S of cl1glbie projects (especially in housing); c.thet changes plac~ rest-;-Jc.tions on the c.ompoi:.ltion of nc1ghhorhoods and the.types of projects ~h1c.h can receive funding (e.g., social scrv1ceR). nccausc of the new fend- ing l fmltatlom:., the number of proposals receive-a has· dec.r~ased from 12 in past years to only 7 this-~~ar, including the Stanford proposal. CMR:565:1 2 l/'i9/78 . ·' . • • The entire list of projects proposed and the amount requested by each applicant is: (1) Palo Alto City-wide Rehabilitation (continuation)--$300,000, submitted bv Public Works Department. (2) Senior CP.nter--$90,000, submitted by Senior Cooroin~ting C~uncil. (3) Senior Home Repair Servlce-$20,000, submitted by Senior Coordinating Council. ~ ·:-~ .f·~ (4) Housing Acquisition Program--$300,000, submiit~d by Palo Alto Housing Corporation. (5) Housing Land Bank--$300,000, submitted by Planning Depal·tment. (6) Monroe Pa~k Street !mprovements--$75~000, submitted by ~.onroe Park Association. (7) Curb Cuts and Handicapped Ramps--$42,000, submitted by Stanford University for sphere of influence funds. The following criteria were used by staff to eveluate the propcbals: (1) Does the project meet the primary objectives of the Community Develop- ment Program: a. Aid low-moderate income persons; b. Develop a viable urban community through the elimination of slums and blight?_ (2) Is the project eligible accordint to stated HUD criteria? Are there any HUD requirements that would pr.event use of funds in this way (e.g., facilities must be open to pub~ic)? (3) Is the project consistent with curr~nt adopted Council p0licies sue}\ as: a. the adopted Comprehensive Pl'lll; b. the Capital Improvement Program; c. other Council-adopted policies? (4) Does it meet a community need as stated in Palo Alto's CoJJBtUnity Development Plan? (5) Regarding funds: J CMR:565:7 . 1/19/78 • • • a. Will the amount of CD funds that can be allocated to the project be adequdte to have an impact, either with or without other fund!ng souTces? b. Will CD funds decide the success of a project? c. lf other funding sources are to b~ used, are the funds av3ilablr? d. Can the project go forward in FY 78"779? (6) Are othe1 substit~te funding sources available, especially those that ate aimed tll\)r~ specifically at this trpe of project? (7) Will the projec~ lead to future commiti:ients.tr. operating costs? The above staff evaluation ~ssisted in placing priorities on projects, A certain ~mount of subjectivity is inh~rent in analyzing diverse projects with non-quanti- fiable cYiteria. Most important frcm the staff •s viewpoint wa~ the first criter- ion: Does the project meet the primaxy objectives of ~he Community Development Program? Once it could be E:stablished that this criterion was met, a determination had to be made as to th~ eligibility of the project (the second criterion). Most projects prop9s~d apoeaTed to be eligible, but not all met the intent of the pro- gram (criterion 11), The other criteria relate to funding factors. A number of projects had par~ial funding or werE: seeking panial fund1ng from O"?tside sources or from the Ctty. Others were entirely dependent on Community Dev~lopment funds for implementation. A d~scTiption of all pioject& proposed, the application of the criteria to them, and the reasons for the staff's recommenda~ions are summarized in the following section. 1. Palo Alio City-wide Rehabilitation CMR:565:7 Staff reco:mnends $300~000 be ma.de available to continue and expand the City's currenL Housing lmprov&~ent Program. It is proposed that the focus of the Pr~g(am shift from specific neighborhoods to a city- wide efiort. New HUD r~gulat1ons (as they are currently proposed) will allow for city-wide rehabilitation ~ith the condition that all Tecipie.nts outsit:le of target neighborhoods be "low/moderate income." Thus a city-wt.de program allows the City to open up its program to all low and modcrCt.te income homeowners. Such a program. also fully meets the intent ~nd objectives of the CD Act to provide program& which."principally serve low and moderate income persons.11 The housing rehab1Utat10.1 staff, in working with the College Terrace neighborhood, has found it increasingly difficult to secure enough applications hom low or moderate income re&idents to permit a full scale rehabilitation program. 4 1/19/78 • .t • . .. • • Under the present Houstng Improvement ProgTam,·HUD requires a minimum ot ~1 pe1~ent of the recipients in a neighborhood to be low or moderate incom(:. Modii1c.atlcn of the Housing Imptovement Prcgram to a city-wide effort wculd a!lvw all low 01 modecate income residents to take advan- tage ot tht progrdm. This city-wide effort would continue to serve those low oc moderat~ in~ome rebidents in College Terrace and Pepper- We&t Me&do~ who desize to participate in the program. The $300,000 would p1ovide for a-1978-79 Revolving Loan Fund for hou&ing rt:habilication. Apptoximately thin:y houses could be rehabili- t~ted with these funds. Program administration for the pre.sent 2.5 perEoon &taff wculd b.o: paid from unexpended 1977·-78 Housing Improvement Progtam carry-over funds. The loan p~ofile (attached to the proposal) provides a review of loans alrea:ly approved and those pendirag. The rehab program is implementing Policies 2 and 5 end Program 8 in the Housing Sec..tion of thE: Comprehens.tve Plan anc:l has assisted the City in me~ting its Housing Assistance Plan objectives. 2. Senior CeoL~c Staff rec.omm~nds $90, 000 be made available for the continued· renovation of the "old police-fire building" for a senior center~ 1he City has c.utrenc.ly connnit;ted $100,000 to this project (in addition to leasing the structure to the Senior Coordinating Council). lhe requested CD funds are to be used for site development and landscaping associated with the builciing site ($60,000) and r,,novation of the ai>andon€:d ga.cage on the premis~s for a "fix-it" shop ($30,000). As thei1 proposal indicated, the Senior Coordinating Counttl already has xaiaed $1,043,000 (including the $100,000 of CD fund:r.) o! the $1,200,000 requized for the c.ompleted project. The Senior Centet meets the objectives of the CD Act in that it would aid 111any lcw and modexate income elderly persons, and construction or a Senior Center is specifically aligible under the CD program.. 3. Seniol H~m~ Repatr Service CMR:5b!:i:7 Staff re~omm~nds $20,000 be.made avatlable to supplement the City's cun .:ot grant to the Sc.nior Coordinating Council for the ad!ninis- tn.t..ion of chi.s progr.u1i, The program ii;; designed to provide minor hc,111e r~pcd1 &t!rvic.:& ($200 max1mttlii per job} to Senior home owners 1n th~ City wno h~ve low jn~omes and currently cannot affoyd the cust& of these sei:vic;es. $15,000 is being provi<lec:i from the City's General Fund• (ot which $1,000 is tor administration). There is a De~d ior <JO ioc:eased entitlement to meet the gcowing need. This prClposal is c;,n E!llgible program and muets a number of objectives of t.h~ CD legislal:l.on. lt should be noted, however, that CD .funds cannot b~ u5e~ to replace th~ City's on-going effort ($15,000) but o~ly to bupplt=mt:!nt t.h~ p1ogcc1llls's funding. 5 1/19/78 • • l Of the following two programs, staff recommends that only one be funde1 with $380,000 of CD funds. Both housing programs have merit but staff feels that proportioning the funds benreen these two programs would severely impede the effectiveness of each. Both programs are eligible under HUD's guidelines, and both meet the Jncent of t.he CD Act. A brief description and assessment of each follows. 4. Housing Acquisition Program In April of 1974. this concept was presented to the City Council and was proposed to ha implemented by a "sub-col'poration" of the Palo Alto Housing Corpor~tion. PARC would acquire, rehabilitate (if necessary), and tent existing housing in Palo Alto. 'fhese rental units would be managed by the Santa Clara County Rousing Authority (which has expressed a willingness to do so). CD funds would be used for down pdyme.nts, clos:l.ng costs, and any expenses incurred in finding suitable units for purchase. These units wo:.ild "assist in providlng and pi:esei:ving the Tental housing supply for persons of low and moderate income." All units would be self-supp~rting because rents would be set at fair market prices and Section 8 subsidies would be obtained for eligible tenants. The p~oposed new CD regulations allow the use of CD funds for this purpose and also perm.it private non-profit agencies to implement such programs. No~ only does this ~~ogram meet the intent of the legislation but also would assist. the City in meeting Housing P~ogram 21 of the adopt.ed Comprehensive Plan. Although the merits of the program are quite evident, there are a number of issues which must be resol-ied to insur.a the success of the program: a. There is a questic.n whether HUD's property a.c.quisition poli- cies apply to the purchase of these units, although the units would not be purchased directly by the City. HUD requires a 90 day notice of "interi.t to acquire" prior to the ac_q'1isition. Such a procedure would produce a majot barrier to property acquisi~ion in Palo Alto. b. Th~re is a question as to whether the City or the PAHC (or both or neither) would have the responsibility t:o relocate those residing in the units acquired. (Relocation is costly.) c. Although not the ptim~ry proble.tll, there remains a question as to whether there ate suitable unJts available for purchase. If these issues can be resolved, it is projected that $380,000 in the Housing Acquisit.ion Program could purchase from 40 to 70 rental units at nn approximate cost of $1,500,000 (base.d Ol\ a 20% downpayment). -- CM!t:565:7 6 1/19/78 I I ' .. • . ' • • 5. ~o~s1ng Land Bank '.l'.'his pre.gram has proven successful (Lytton Gardens I and II, Webster Block aud tne Power Parcel), and Program 15 of the Comprehensive Plan c.allii ..tc-r lhe "cont1nuat:ion of the Land Bank Program for pur- chasing parcels tor housing development for low-moderate income families and beniors.n This program has been well rectlved by HUD, for it mE:tt:s th•~ intent and objectives of the CD Act. The Santa Clara Cc.unty Hm.1~iog Task Force Report--Housing: A Call for Action (Oclotler, 1977} rec.eommends that "local public revenues and Community Development Block Gtdnl Funds should be extensively used for land- hankin6'' (p. 13). The landbanking program adds to the housing aupply, whereas the "Housing AcquiE<ition Program:; ma.intains existing housing. There- fore, although landbanking has been successful, its impact on hcusing low income households would not be as immediate as the Hous1ng Acquisition Program. Likewise, there js always the uncer- tainty ryf the availability of a suitable parcel--where, whe~, and how much. As was ttue in the City's earlier acquisitions, HUD's acquisition and relocation procedures would apply. 6. Monroe Park Street Improvements PART IL Staff is ~ot rec.ommend1ng the $75,000 requested by the Monroe Park Assoc1ation fox installation of street improvements on a short section of Monroe Drive. Although street improvemen~s are sn eligible item under the CD r6gulations, staff ~ust base its recommendations on the eligib1li~y of the neighborhood (low/moderate income) and the City's past funding practices for such projects. First, neither the 1970 Census nor the 197S Sant •• Cla-ra County Census reveal the neigh- bochood to be "low/modei:ate income.11 Because HUD also utilizes the Census :tor its inc.ome data, the City would need to substantiate in some other way Lhat the residents were indeed low or moderate income. S~Londly, it i& the city's policy to finance street improvements t:h1ough the formation .:>f assessment districts. Detailed Pruject De~~Tiption -Sphere of lnfluence (Stanford University) ·~curb Cuts and Handicapped ~am~ Staff recomm~nds the use of the approximate sum of $42,000 to continue Stdntord 1s piojeLl tor: CHR:565:7 (1) Co~struct1on of curb cuts to assist in the mobility of persons 1n wheel~hairs; and 1 1/l.9/78 . . .. • • (2) Provision of ramp access for handicapped and elderly individuals in buildings of public ass~bly. Curb cuts will continue to be made in the high density areas of the campus. The buildings in which access will be improved include Memorial Auditorium, Dinkelspiel Auditvrium, Hoover Tower, Cubbcrley Auditorimn, Tresidder Union, the Post Office and the Book.~tore. Staff, as in the past, di.scussed proposals with the Stanford staff but could find no other project proposals that would fit both the require- ments of the CD Act and Stanford's ne~d6. Projects directed to the "te:noval of material ac.d architectural barriers which restrict the mobility and accesi::.ibility of elderly and handicapped persons" are specifically eligible. Stanford has restricted its project pToposal to areas and build- ings thaL are used by the general public, as opposed to those that just serve Stanford students and staff. PART Ill, Community Development Plan Attached to this report is a proposed 3-year COlllJllunity De··elopment Plan, w~ich must accompany the City's application for Community Development Block Grant funds to meet HUD requirements. This is to be "a SU!Dil1ary of '1 three-year plan which idP-ncifies community development needs, demon- strates a comprehensive strategy for meeting those needs, and specifies both short and long-te11n community development objectives ••• " In preparing the 1975-76 grant application, staff thoroughly studied all City goals, policies, and ptogra:ms and incorporated th2m into a thzee- year plan. The Council adopted the Plan. Essentially tne same Plan was adopted in 1976-77. That Plan was updated f~r 1977-78 to incorporate goals, policies and programs of the Comprehensive Plan. The currently proposed 3-y~ar plan makes no toajor changes from the Plan approved last year. The Commuoity Development Plan describes nine areas of need and a brief Slmllll3ry of related objectives. PART IV~ Housing Assistance Pl:!n Also attached is the proposed 1978-79 Housing Assistance Plan which must be sumbitted with the appHcation for block grant funds. The Housing Assistance Plan must include a survey of the condition of housing stock in the community, an estimate of the housing needs of lower income per- sons, and a realistic annual goal plus a three-year goal for the number of clJelling units or persons to be assisted, stating the relative propor- tion of new, rehabilitated and existing dwelling units. CMR:565:7 8 1/19/78 , . . .. . . ' • • Recommendations Slaff recommends that the Finance and Public Works Committee recommend that the Ccuncil take the following actions: (1) Find that the proposed 1978-79 CD Program will not have a signifi- cant en" 1tonmental impat:t; (2) That project l ~htough 4 plus either project 5 or 6 on page 2 be jncluded in the 1978-79 CD Pibgram; (3) 1'hat staff be suthorized to submit an application to HUD including the ~978-79 CD Program, the 1978-79 CD Plan, and the 1978-79 HAP; .... :. (4} That staif be authorized to submit a project, consisting of removal of architectural barriers to the handicapped on the Stanford campus, to Santa CJ.ara County for the County to include in its CD appli- cation. DAN lEL I • FRED Management Assistant NAPHTALI H. KNOX Directo: of Planning and Community Environment CMR:56S:7 Attachments 9 1/19/78 . \ .. ••• II!. Three-Year Communtty Development Plan l. Preserve and enhance the natural beauty, safety and functional utility of City parks antl recreation a-rc:ls, provide for effective planning and develop111ent of park facilities including neighborhood pcirk facilities in residential.and retail areas and well located di~trict park facilitie~. Existing Parks and Grounds Neighborhood and Mini-Park.Development District Park.Development 2. Preserve places and buildings which hava hlstoric and/or architectural aerit. Old Police-Fire Building Preservation Veterans' Building Tmplementation ~£ Comprehensive Plan Recommendations 3. Increase the supply of good quality housing, located throughout the community, for people of low and moderate income; pr.eser-.re and enhance the existing supply of hou~ing and character and physical quality of residential neighborhoods; and work toward elimination of racial and other barriers that prevent free choice in.housing. Specific quantifie~ goals are in the Housing Assistance Plan. · Revised zoning regulations and incentives Rehabilitat:lon -Buildin~ code enic;rcement Pre-sale inspections CondomjnJum conversion ordinance Land bank pro gr am Piggyback· Privately-provided bel{\w~market··rate units Palo Alto Housing Corporation Webster Block Lytton Gardens Power Property Frenchman's:Tcrrace -Gencral-residcntlnl development -~-Fair Jlousing Program 4. Serve present and future trans0portotion dcrr_ands safely, efficiently) and reliably while reducing overall growth of ~~affic, reducing peak-hour. traffic congestion, serving the transit-dependent population, increasing efficient use 0¥ nutomobilcs. protecting residential neighborhoods from throuch traffiC and meeting the needs of bicyclists, pedestrian~ and handicapped. ' . Page 2 • Street and hi9-hway facilities Transit Pat king Pedestrian and bicycle facilities Transpoztation needs of physically handicapped • 5. Insure that-sufficient, reliable and low cost water, gas and electric power is available to meet the City's existing and future requirements in a safe manner. Water, Gas and Power ·system Acquisition and Construction 6. Provide a high quality sanitary collection system and treatment and disposal of residential and industrial waste in an environmentally sound manner. Sanitary Sewage System Acquisition and Ccnstruction Wastewater Treatment and Disposal 7. To provide for safe, rel !able, environmer-illy sound, and economically and technologically feasible disposal of ~olid uastes with particular emphasis on resource and energy recovery and reduced dependency on landfill. Implementation of the Santa Clara County Solid Waste Management Plan Recycling Center Door-to-door collection of newsprint 8. Provide facilities for the eldeYly and disabled members of the com- munity. Senior Center 9. Provide and encourage provision of child care facilities especially for low and moderate income households. Child care services . . •• •• IV. 1978-79 HOUSING ASSlSTANCE PLAN Background Submissicn oi .a Housing Assistance Plon .is required as part of the Com- munity Development Block Grant applicatior.. The -Plnn must include: a survey of the condition of the housing stock in the comto.unity; an estimate of the housing assistance needs of lower-income house- holds; realistic annual·and three-year goals for the number of dwelling units or households to be assisted; and an indication of the general locatioos for new and substantially rehabilitated assisted housing • . The purpose of the Plan is thre~fold. First. the federal government wants to insure that communities become involved in assessing their h~using needs and setting goals for filling these needs. Once set, the needs and goals serve the·second purpose which is co.provide the U. S. Department of Housiag and Urban Development with a guide for use in ·allocating housing assistance funds to local CQIWllunit:l.es. Finally, the. ·Housing Assistance Plan will·be used by HUD to evaluate individual proposals for federal housing assistance; HUD '!Jill approve only those ·. housing proposals which are ccnsistent with the adopted Housing Assistance Plan. IlUD will determine if a proposal is .consistent by checking the n1;1111ber, size, type and location of the proposed units against the number, . size, type and location goals set by the comnrunity in its Rousing Assis- tanc.e Plan. Condition of.the Housing Stock -.;~ Since Palo Alto adopted its 1977 Housing 'Assistance Plan, the total number of houi:;ing units has increased by about 200 to 23,600 units. Palo Alto remains a predom~nantly single-family community (2/3 of the units are single-family houses) in which juot over half of the housing is owner- occupled, There is a grea~er demand for housing than can be met in Palo Alto1 which };as led to high housing costs and low vacancy rates.. Ttae median house va~ue iaabout $62,000 3;nd the median rc.nt for· an apartment is about $240. Despite ~he high costs, the overall vacancy rate in Palo A1to is und~r 2%. About 3% of Palo Alto~s housing is estimated to be physically substandard. Substandard units are predominantly older rental units. There are, however, a signif1cant number of owner-occupied un!ts.whic~ are also in need of sub- . -· etantial rt:hahU1t.atlon. · ... ·.-"' • • Page 2 U&e of 1975-76~ 1976-77, and 1977-78 Community Development Bleck Grant funds for a housing rehabilitation progrma in the Pepper-West Meadow neighborhood was aimed at encouraging rehabilitation 1n an area where a significant amount of rehab1i1tat1on activity might not otherwise occur. Th~ first, second and part of the third years' funds have been used to Yehabilitate more ~ban 40 units having major code violations in this neighborhood. At this ti.met all of the units have been ownez-occup1ed. The remaincier of the third year's !unds are being used to rehabilitate about 30 units in College TerTace, also O~"ller-occupied. Condition of Feder~lly-Assisted Housing HUD has required that information on the condition of low-~ent public housing and HlTD-in&ured subsidized multi-family housing also be included in the 1978Housing Assistance Plan, The 48 privately-owned units now leased by the County Rousing Authority under the Section 8 program, the Section 23 program and the Palo Alto Piggyback Program are required by Council Resolution 4062 to "meet and comply with all Palo Alto Municipal Code provisions relative to building and health standards in existence at the time the initial lease is executed.11 ·Only one of the five HUD-insured subsidized multi-family housing develop- ments in Palo Alto is more than five years old, and all are in excellent c:ondit:ion. The vacancy rate 1n eac.h development is negligible and all have waitinr lists of cvo year& or 11:0re. Of the 615 units available for eligible tenants, 801 are reserved for the elderly and/or handicapped. Housing Assistance Needs Detailed information from the 1970 Census indicates that in 1970, 3600 Palo.Alto households (over 15% of the total) fit the federal standards for lower income and were living in inadequate housing conditions, that is: occupying units lacking some or all plUIDbing; occupying units D1Cre than 30 years old and valued at less than $10,000; with more than 1.25 persons ver Toom; or paying -.X>re than 25% of their income for rent. Since 1970, 366 unJts of assisted housing for elderly or handicapped and 131 units for general occupancy have been built in Palo Alto. Rental of privately-owned existing units through Section 8, Seccion 23 and the Piggyback Program provides adequate housing for an additional 48 house- holds, most of whom are cldetly. An additional 185 lower-income Palo Alto households have been assisted this past year through the • • • Page 3 new Section 8 Program in privately-owned existing units. T3k1ng into account these assisted units provided since 1970. a reasonable estimate of housing assistance needs Jn Palo Alto j,u 1977 is: 800 elderly or handicapped households l3ov i~dividuals and families of four or fewer persons 60 large f am1.lies of five or more persons This totals about 2160 Palo Alto households in need of housing assistance. Annual and Thr~e-Year Housing Assistance Goals Palo Alto's 1978-79 housing assistance goals fot assisted new and existing units are based on what are seen as realistic, achievable expectations. This curre~t y~ar, we should see the completion of three assisted housing developments -Lytton Gardens II (100 units), Webster Wood (68 units of which 58 will be assisted) and Sheridan. Apartments (54 assisted units). In addition, the Santa Clara Cotmty Hov~1ng Authori~y provides Palo Alto with an annual allocation of Section 8 Jnits. In all new assisted family housing develop.DU:!nts, at least ~0% of the units should be built to accommodate large families. This past year, HUD provided an additional allocatiOll of 145 Section 8 subsidies to Palo Alto. These subs:idies wex·e p:tovided in the Lytton Gardens, Arastradero Park and Coiorado Park ·developments. It is hoped that additional or bonus subsidies of this type ~ill be forthcoming in the upcoming year. Over the three-year period, housing· assistance vill be allocated in Palo Alto in close proportion to the needs summarized above. The propor- tions are 30% elderly and/or handicapped, 55% families, 15% large fami- lies. Because of the low vacancy rate, a ~ix of new and ex~sting housing will be assisted. Loca~ions fot New Assisted Bou~1ng In assessing appiopri~~e locations for new assisted housing, availability of sites is the major constraint. Should a Land Sank and/or Housing Alqu1sit1on Pzogram be 1mpiemented, sites should be lndivid~lly eval- uated as to their suitability for family and elderly oi.: handicapped housing on the baJ>is of proximity to services and employment, envb:on- mental factorsa zoning, land use, low 1nc0i.:e concentration and size of possible development. . . •• • V. CoLmiu~ity Development Block Grant 1978 -79 Environmental Asscssme~ts Seven projects have been proposed for ·en funding of which five already have had preliminary environmental assessments. The environmental impact that would result if any of these projects were implemented has not been found to be sif,Tl~fi~ont. Therefore, n~ full environmental impact reports would be necessary, and a negative declaration may be made for each project that is chosen. After the final selection of projects is made, more complete environmental review records will be prepared for these ,chosen_ projects.· The two attached environmental asses~mGnts which have not received prior clearance are: I 1. Senior Home Repair Service . . 2. Housing ~cqu1sition Program • Chy of, _________ is m:l.de in th~ light of t~1~ follo· . ..-ir.z recitals= A. ., !J. ~h~t the Congress of the United States h~~ enact~tl the nr.J C~~r..unity Develcpm:nt Act o~ 1977; That Title I of the Act provides.for a ne~ pro~ra~ of coQ- C.. Th~t Title I of the Act m~kes entitle~er.t gra~ts ~vailable to citi-=s with a population of 50.,000 or mor~ persc~s and to coun- ti~s thet qualify as urban counties; D.. ·That. County did qualify as an u.rban county applicant :for- th:; }'isi:al Year 1977·78; E.. That County is endeavoring to qualify a.s an urban cov.nty ~-P~licant · to receive entitlement funds under Title r of' .t~1e ft.ct ·l:or the Fiscal Year 1978-79; F.. That. u9on. receipt of :funds, (;ou.."lty. int.ends to give City its sp~~re of i!"l.fluence share of entitlement funds to the exten~ and in the canner set ~orth herein. :mm, TiL::~:ORE, THE PA.~IES HERETO AGREE AS FOLLO~·JS: 1.; Definitions Tha de:initions belo~ are intended to assist the parties in for purposes o:f simplicity and clearer the definitions belm-r have been shnrtened set forth in the Act and Regulations there- u~5~r.. In the event of any conflict bettteen the definitions in t:·. ~ :.: aj·:·:::·=~~: . ..:::-.t and tho~e set .forth in the A~t a.r:d Regulations_, the l~~t~r ~hall gov~rn. (u) "Act" 1neans '1'itlc I cf the Housine r;.nd Cor.un1.inity (L) D.:?velop'.;:.:mt Act of 1977,; P.I .. 95-11.8. !I II C"' 1 .• '' ., n t If r ... l"'~J..'-'~·•"" as an urh~n county. -1- (<·) ,. !\·:!··~··j 0~:;11 f!~c:tn~ tt11! n1l,n; :1.l'•~i~lll~t~j:on:.: or th~ U··p:u·~,!::.!n!-of HCJll:iLn:·4 an:! Urh'.!:'°\ J)(!•;;.:!opr:L·:!~t; p:.t!'t.ic- ul~.-c r"~f"t~r .. mc~ .i::; r..=:.::f: to tho~ ... : i·e:t.o:i.:.l~ticn:; i.'ound ln :;>!~ Cc::i ~ of FPdcl'lll n~0ulutlo:l%; h.1:rt 570 ( cont'!inin;i_ th~ Gene c..il rcgulca.tion3 on Co:n:r:unl t.y Develop:~-ent block grants} and Fart 58·(containlng the regulo- t.ions or! the Fcd~ral !::nvi ro~w1ent1l Re~rie~·r Procedures). ( d} •:county': means tha Coun_ty of Snntr!. Clara. (c) "City11 m2an3 the Cit~~ that is a party to this agree- ~ent. (f) ::Entitle~'.1.ent c~ty" means a city with a population of 50.,oco or more which can directly apply i'or or receive entitlement grants under the Act. (g) ";.:etropoli tan City" means a city which ca.n directly ap;>ly f.'or and receive entitlement grants under the Act. (h) uUrban County" means a county that is ~1) in a metropolitan area; (2) authorized under state law to v.ndertake essential '.!ommunity development and · housing ·assistance activities within its ilnincorpora-- ted areas; and (3) has a population o~ 200,000 or r.:.ore wi.thin its unincorporated areas or within its unincorporated areas and t;._1its of general. local gove:rra~~nt t"ithin the cot:.nty (cities) with which it h~s ~ade cooperation agree~ents to undertake or to assist in the undertaking of essentia1 activities. { i) ",Pop1..tle,tio~1 11 means the total. resident population based on data compiled and published by the United States Burc~u of the Census for 1970. (j) ~Application~ means the application for a grant to b::: sui.mltted by the County, as an urban Count~l, 'f'or entitlernent funds under Title I of the JI.ct. -2- op:cu11t. (1) t'HUD FClr'r.t'llo." is th·~ n~~t.hod b.:; u:ilc.:h HUD ~-;ill dc.!':..!'!!'- r.~i:i~ th1.! ba~!.c c;ntrlt. ~:7'.0 1.l:":t to b~ <tllo=at·~tl to an u·t"b~.n couf1ty; it is a for~ula bo.~co on such f<J.c. to:c:::; n.n population, extent of poverty a~d extent of hous- 1 nr, ove rr; ro:.;d ing. (rn) 11 Spherc of influ~nc:e share" is that. portion of the grant allocat~d to the unincorporated area of County that is r.omputca by c~pplying the HUD formula to the sph~re of influ~nce area of a city as such sphere of influence hao been approved and ~.dopted b:r the Sant.a Claca County Local Agency Formation Coiil.lllissicn, af'ter deducting County's ad~inistrativ2 expenses and costs from sphe~e of influence funds. (n) •= li.dministra:;ive expense_s and costs" means the actual costs incurred by County in the pla?:lning and prepara- tion of the application and in the ad~inistration of g~ent funds received undar such application. 2. Pur902~ of the Agreement This ·~gr~e~ent is being made ~o establish the respective.rights an~ coligatio~s of the parties hereto to the sphere of influence sh~re of Cou.~ty 1 s entitlenent grant under Title I of the Act. This agree~ent shall become effective upon execution by the go~~rning bodies of County and o~ City end it shall remain in rull fo:·:~ a'."'l.d effect· until Jur.e 30, 1979 or u0til the end of the pro- gr:,:.: y2ar co·:-:::·:-·~d by the Fisccvl Year "78-79 applicati.on for federal c-.s~ ~;:;tancc un::ler the Act, '·rhicheve~· is later~ It is understood t~:~ applicet!ons for funds shall be made yearly; accordin~ly, Co:.;:-:ty shall y<.!rtrl~, elect to qun.l ify as an urban cou.nty applicant ~:·: : Co1mty ~:h.'1.1 l yP.D. rly ck t<.H'ndne ~·:he th~ i: to e;·:p~'!n:l" the sphe1·c. of in!'lu~nce shnro on clig;lble acttvlticc determined by County or -3- i. ~lvc !P ... H.fum!~ to Clty to fl!)~n:1 .c:li~iulc :ictl·1tt.lc:. b~.-said "t..r in its sphi::rt; or i nflu::ncH are~. -~· C~nnt Dict~r~~~ents • City . ... l. "!I sp~-:er·.:: of ini'lu·~r-ce share of entitle- r.:·:·::~ furid.~ urv:l-:?r Title I of the A<:t less City•::; proportionate share n: ::'.··: ·:·\·1 r-·c~µ~1·-'ltion of the ~.pplic::.!.t.ion and in th~ administration o~ th<i:: ~0~11 gr~nt fu::ids to be recei\~eo f'or the Fiscal Year 1978-79. Ci:::• s ::;9h::? re of inf lu~<?.-=e sh~n:e shall be cumpt!ted by applying the HU:.> fo~·:::ula to the sphere o: influence area of' City as such araa. h2s b~an cp9roved and adopted by the Sa~ta Clara County Locai Agency Fo~-m.:?.tio:1 Co;;:.izs ion as of the effective date of this agreenient, after having deducted County's administrative expenses and co3ts. fro:·n the tot.al portion o:t: the grant amount designated as sphere of influence funds. City ~grees that such sphere of influence sh!ire, l.ess City's "proportionate share of administrative expenses and costs~-is the sole ~~= exclusive obligation of County and that sucn obligation of Cc:.:.:~:::,-is dependent upon Cou...11ty' s quali:f;ication as an urban cou.n-~y· a9;>licant and upon the availability of federal :r~.mds to · irr.ple~~~~ ~itle i of the Act •. c:. :~: assures the Cowity that the sphere o:f influen~e funds re~ei•.~=-: oy the City purRuant to the agree~ent will. be expended \·rithi:-~ -c:ie unincorporated areas or will directly benefit residents cf sue~ ~~incorporated areas of the County. ~~e o~~icers anj agents of both parties Nill cooperate in .r·.; .·:1 ~s'.::::.::; i~~f'o!'matio:1 e.~d a~sist~~"!.cc r:~cessa.ry :for the prepa.ration, CC .. c~lletio:-t F-nd fili11g of County's. application t·ii th HUD in accordance \·:: ~h th-?.. rcc;uirerocntn · o:f the .Act. and of V°H:! Hegulations. In accord- a:-~::~; •:i t!1 such coope rt t ion, City egraes to submit to Cour:t:r, on or t1·..:f"0;.·,; December I, 1977, a cop~ cf the application for entitlement -. . n.1:·.-?~; u·\l·.~r '.l•j tlc I of t!i~ P.c:t. th:J.f'. Clty w!.ll .CiJ. .. ~ wt th HULi, L~.~ n T.t~ t t 0 -:>ro11.:.. 'l!l c i. t:r,, e,o :·r~ng t. h ·.: '"r: ti v 1 t. i .. !:; :;·~. t·.:..! b,;," City f o.c-tho ir~tc Ccunty' s a.ppllcation a.s ~n ur'b.:,n CO'.lnt.y. City agrees that it sh~11 not :;pend. sphere of influ·~nc~ fur:d~ on o.cttvities otl'l.cr th.~n CJ:": el iGib.l" activities n.s de!in~d in the Act and Regulations. City fu~t?'l~r agrees that it shall co:1~ly in nll other respects wt th the ~ct and Regulations'nnd ~ith the terms of this • .&. a.gr-e:emen-... Should City :fail to do so, City1 s sphere or infJ.uence share of money ro.a_y ·b':? tercinated, r'~duced or otherwise limited in ca.ccordance t·Tith the ~ct and Regulations and in acco.rdance '·iith the ter.1?s of this agree- m2nt. 6.. f.uthority in Sphere vf Influe.nce Area Since at the time of' its execution, the parties to this egree- ment are unable to determine th~ specific power or powers,. if' a.ny, _.whicn City may need to exercise within 'the unincorporated area of' City's sphere o~ influence in order to comply with the requirements of' thE: Act and Regu1ations and.in order to comply with the terms or this agree~ent, the parties sha11 enter into an addendum. to this agreema~t authorizing City to operate uithin the unincorporated area of City:s sphere of influence to the extent required by Cou~tyrs grant application and by the terms of this agre~ment, and only to such extent. The addendt.!2 agreement shall be made prior City's ex ere is~ of jurisdiction or powers within the unincorporated area or City's sphere of i~fluence in connection with projects f'u::.j~j 'by sph~rc of in!'luence funds. 7. Citiz~ns' Particination In co:nplying with the r~quirenents of the Act and of' the Regu- l :;.~io·1c, City sh::?.11 certify to County (t.t) that citizens wlthin· the Cl :y 1 s zp~1e n:~ of -influence arcD. have been informe:-d end allowed to -. p~'! :·t tc .ipr~.:-.'= i.n the plcnn.lng procezr. of Ci Ly's clrJ~·ints ot th~ appl ic-~.tion tr the sa:nc £!xtent Ctnd in the sama 1.:uinncr as citlzens -5- r'.·~:idi•ri:;, t·:ithir\ th ... • \Joun~L·.t'l•!:: or City nnd (t.!J...t.h~t. ~·1ith rc:.p·:.!cl:. tr> :•.f!l.:.l~;.ltll~r. fun<.~·in •,;(,"'1-.: oi· in p~~rt by JJlitlr.?men~. f'u~c!n u:\".!..::r t! .~·~t,_•d in th':.! sr.i.:r.t! m!!.nner as those .l'."esiding '.dthin the boundaries ct City. 8. Ce ct if .i.cc::. t toas Cn or before Dece.mber I, 1977, City agrees to furnish Cou.nty ~·•.!.th copy of assurances listed on Forr.t O~·!B 63-R11!71, a blank copy of \·:h ich, r.iarked Append ix f.., is· be i:ig e.t t.ached here to and r..ad~ a. p a!"'t hereoi' by· reference. Further, City a.grt~as to :furnish Co~""l ty with such other assurances as HUD cay require County to f'urni.sh th era. 9. Records • City and County shall maintain appropriate books, records, files end accou~ts relating to the receipt and disbursement of the ·gr~!'l~ funds, including records in accordance with Federal Manage-· ~ent C~~culars 74-4·and 74-7 a$ they relate to the application> acce;: t·~!:·:.~ · and use of federal funds for this f'ederal1y assisted pro,sraz. C.!:d any other records imposed by County• s contract \·rith HUD. All such books, records, files ~nd accaunts shal..1. be made ave.ile."::::2 fo!" inspection at reason?..'b:le times and places by autho·r- iz.cd r~;.res~rrtatives of City and County to authorized re-p.resenta- tiv~s of City, County, the Departm~nt of Housing and Urban Develop- . t::e:1t o~ ::.r.y oth2r parson authorized by the Act or· the Regulations .. ?r~.::: :::i!::·::·::t;o!.~ of Fina.nee or· County shall receive and have custody c.·t =<.l :"":J; .. :;:~ U!:til disbursal of su-~:1 :fu:-:ds to be r.!ade in a m::tnner :.ft.~c.· rec~i-P~ oJ' the· current year funding coney~ notify City of the r.·~'",:':.:~r cf diobtu·so.l of such funds. 10~ IJ.il_~.i lity and Ind~mn·~fic~tiot~ C<.ntnty .tl.f.; su:n'3s n<J rt:::;pon::;lb tli ty f'o r t'.ny fa i.lur.a to qualify \11~·.!·:~ r· the r~c t a5 nn urlrn.n county; further,, County t1 ssum~s no -6- • )'<::·i .1:•~.:_blli~.'/ frn-:.iiiii f:1:.i.h~·~··: t.o ln 1 :lr.4.!·~ Cit.~. !ffc,j·:~t:; tn th":: n:. .. ,.1 ~:it,ion ~s :~ rc~t. oJ: C:iL:,"::; f:;,llun~ t.~ ~m~1;,l:r Coitnl":y •,.;1:-.h O!' .: :., ,. l'C;;.]i..llt ol' Clt!,'':::: .failu.r~! to CC::!f)ly ~:it.h ti·~~ Act an1 n·~gtl- C i .... , •• "'.:i sh'lll inU~r:mif y ~nd ho l·l C:ov~~r h~ ?::7:.l~ .::an f ror,i any l iabil.- it.;:: 10.~.:> or d:.lT!H!ge su.f f c red ~s a result of c l~i:'.13, d".?m:?.nds, cos ts o-r ~:l!:l,:;~:cnts against Co1~1ty ari.!'.>ing out of the f'ailure of: City to co::'.'·.:.ir~ to the requirer..•::n.ts of th; J..ct, Regul~tion:;; or other a.ppl.1- ca~le la"Ns \dth respect to the projects funded b·y the City's sphere of influ~nce share of the grant funds; or arising out or anything don~ or omitted to be done by City under or in connection with the Wo?'".:~ done on any of City's projects :funded by sphere of: in:fl.uence share of the grant funds. 11. Sevcrabili~ Should any part, term,. or provision or this agreement be decided by the Courts to be illegal or in con:f'lict with any law of 'the St-=?.te or Cali:fornia or any law of· the United States, er sho~ld any part, term, or provision of this agreement be other\-rise rend~red u..~eni'orceable or ineffectual., the validity of th~ remain- ing po!"tiona or provisions shall not be affected thereby. 12. Section Headings All sectio:i headings contained herein are for the convenl:!rice of l·eference ori..ly and are not in tended to def'ine or lirai t the scope of :: .... :1Y provisio~ of this agreement. r:: ~·:1·:;;=.SS ~·:-~E;r20F :-parties hereto irn.ve executed this -7-l f ' I ' I f agreement on the d01tes • forth below. Date: ATTEST: DONALD M. RAINS Clerk, Board of Superv!sors APPROVED AS TO FOR.~: Counsel ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Deputy City Attorney • COUNTY OF SA."ITA CLARA By -=-~----~~~~~~------Chairperson, Board of Supervisors CITY OF------------ . . ... • .E'ARTMINT OF HOUSING ~O URBAN OIV.M&NT ASSURANCES Th •Prl11;1111 herct.y a•Rt lftd eullfla •1111 rupKI lo the pant lhat: 0) II poUUlfj\ icaal llllholitt lo IPJ'l. tot lhcr l'lftl, and lo tU;vte tht piopo!itcl pfOSrM\. (2) Ifs sowtmini bodr >ut d11l1 1doprn or inned as alt oma..: .u:l a 1~l11tio11. motiun or simibr ntion iutharhin1 lhc lii1111 of IM 1pplieallon, inc:hid"'I Ill undcnu.nd1np and uairancu COftbincd lhetein. and iu~cti.t1 artd ilclliJll.UDl& lht autl\oriztcl 1tptur11ta1ht ctl IM •PP~I lo acl In connecho• wttll lti. 'i'Phcalion and ta ptO'tidc suc:h addition.at Won'UlioA "mar bt rtq11ited. Cl> It hu eompl914 w;m u\ lht rtq11iftfl'Mn1t of 0~8 Circulw No. A·9S " !Mdified by Section' 570.JOO(c) HDf en1ille11M11C applic:uu) or 570.400(d) (101 d"'nlion;ary 19pl.:.anu) and Cllal ttlhlt · (I) anr COfltmnU and ~ecnunencfaliont rnidc bf or ih"'uJh clarill~~· '" aUadl~ and hn• been c:o1uidc-rird priot 10 tubnri~ of tht application; or (ii) die r'!'Cl11ind ptoeed\lre1 haff been t'ollo~ Pd 110 comnwnt1 or tWc:ommtndtlioot haYe bcrn reaiY!fd. (4) Frior 10 submission or \U appliahcm. th• applicHI h-as: (i) pto.idcd dm!lfls .,i1l\ ideq11a1e information c:onotmins 1h11 amo.ant of (und1 a•aiLable for propo5C"d community developmea1 a1'd hociJitts U°til'ille~ Ills nnp of actiwil•11ha1 m11 be undatU.n, aftd ot.m imporunt propam 1equkanmu; • · fll) held at ielSl 1'#0 public h"rmp to oltblin rhe ""'or atl::ens oa t'Of!'lmuniry ~to,Tne111 and b®""' Dffds; and Cw) provido;d eibunt .an adeq~tt opponwnil)' 10 aniC\lt.lc n1Nd'9 CXP"'" p~rftftlCCI ab..i111 proposed Kti'litics, assist in the ~leetion of P'ioril,.,, ar.d ottu1riwuc 10 P"'rtic:ipalt in the d~lapn'l'tat or t"• applic:ation. ($) hs chic( uecuti'f't orncn or othef otrlce1 .;.f •pp8unt app~"e4 by HUD: (l) ConMl'lb to aaa-. U. stal\lt of a fr.'paMible Federal dficia' 1-* tM NaUOMl Enrircntllf'fttal Policy Act c.f 1969 iraolt1r aa tM ~iom d Such Act af"Pl1 to U'le ~icm1•1 po;t.»ed ~'-f'l" .. nl to 24 CF'R 5'1l).60J; •nd (U) 1A a.aborUed --4 .:~ Cft 'bothaU cl ~ .pplicane ;.,_, W-•!t ~o .ccqt u. J~iaclic11an cl 1~ Fedenl c~ for~~· d ~~ ot l'-...b l'ftpmmiblliU.H,,. aur:h M Clf'f~S. r6) The Community Dewlopmen1 J>rosnm !i.u ~n de-..eloped '° .u to &i~ l'l\alim11r.1 rca.Rblo priority to adi9itin whkl\ wiD t..mfil low or mod~me incornc r•m.ilies or .U.S i11 the pre~Uoo or eUminar>on or shuns ot bKiflt. Whc:re •ll or~ of 1be comrt1ur-j1y dr.~klpmcnl p.tolRfll ~cfrtjti~ are desisned to ITK'fi c•IMr comr:s1U1ity ~lopmenl needs h::i.mt 'll p:11rkular urgeney. sudf Melis are specifkalit de-scri~ in 1~?• apptic..tioa under d-.c Commu.iil)' OC'ldop'lftet'I\ P!:m S.mmaq. (7) 11 'l'ill i:omply 'rilh IM reiubriuns. pulicie~ fUidciinn ind retivimMnts or f~rd Managemeftt CiJ:ubri 74-4 a."'ld 74-7. ill they rclac. tow .ipr.liacion. IC\.-epunc-c •nd uw .,( t-·~ luttd1IM1hiJ fedcrally~ed pn>anm. Cl) h wiH admin'"n •nd enforce tbc b.bor sm14ards requin:aie1us tct rorua ita S«tiolt S70.6!1S and HUD repbtion1 lswcd to ilrlplclMttt mch rtq1tiri:mnst1. t9l It will comply with an ~uinmmrs impollf:d by HUD eoncemir., ~ req•hm1enu orb•, p1oSDJ't requimnents. and c :hc:r admini111ative requnments apptoYCd in aceorlbnai •i°' Federal Manaicmcnt CiKul-1"-1. f If)) II will (OJnpJy with llw PtOYisioltS of Eir.~tive Order 11196. relatiq to er.r.tu.iioa er nood luibrds. Cl I) I& will cotnply widl: Ci) Titk VI of the OvH RiJ.-.r1Actor1964 (P.L. !3-l.51) and the regub!iQllS issued pvm;aant thereto (14 CFR f'art I), whidl prmidn t!uc no pn10n ia the Vrutcd Stll~ 1h~I on l~e pou?ld of ~c:c. color. or l':Hional oripn. be e•chaded from parlicipllion in. be denied·~ ~fits or. Of i,. otl'ierwisc s1.1bjttted lo dUCrirnlnalion under~, progrun or acurity for "'hK-h the appiic:u'lt nCllifts Fedenl ruuncW 11sht:1n~ and wiD ilflmed!ately tan any me:all.ltCS necnsa11 lO err~·· Chi• • ...-nc.. Ir any ;eal proptrty 0, sttu<l111'1 tlli=iM>ft is pt"OY~ed or improved with .-a.i4 of f~tn.I rmaricW :Witlance t:''te'l'd-' '"the apPlic:aut, lhh ~unn~ m:UI oblipte tlie .1pplic:ant, or in lb. n1e c.r any truider or such FMperty. any tniuferee. for the ~riod during which tbs red pt>7perry or suucture is used ror 1 p&upoM for which t.'11: feder:il fltlanm! a~isrvt:s it e~rJtdca 01101 .anolbcT purpose involrin1 ct.e prowisioa of simitu MrYka or bcnefin. (ii) Tille Vlll or 1h1 Civii J(.ights Act of 1968 (P.L 90-284) u J.mendd, ~inisterina aH prop.,, :and Kttritin r~la1ii1s to h0tt'inB and community dh'dcpmenl in a :nann<r to affirm:umly !url!IH bir l\ousinz; :tn.J w;l! take attion lo .. rrumaci\ody fon:i.,r f:air h0tnilill in the sale ur rientdl or tlousie1.11. ''" fiiunang of housins. and th-t frovi5ion of broke;J5e stl'YiceJ wiU;in the ll,P~liant0\jur"1sdic1ion.. • • tUO S.CU. 1.i. Ho ... 1114 ~ ~' Act~. an4 I.he .,..W.ricina c-..1 ~' themo (1 '70.601._ wllldl p,.,.,.... &"91 tw» l'"Wft in Sl.atd lllalt. °" lhe pound or r.U. · coJot • ..,.; Oli&Ja or ••· bl nduJeJ fro• pa1ricip&tloll iat, be enied th.9 bieMf\H of, or ~ tld>jKtM 10 dixrilftiliaU-laadet, ... , ~or acliwity r~--"' •holot CH in part wit.ti Tit• I f\lllda, (iw) btc11iM 0nar l l06l QI\ CilUl oppumai17 iii i.outiaf. aaiJ ao-4bcrilninatioe lft lhe WI or natal of "-sift& INill widl Ftcknl UIU~ (•) Eaecuti'4 Otdu 11244, uwl aU 1~laUoet b84llllll pun&Y•l tlMreto n~ OR Put UO>. wlllth P")wid• tt\at no pttto111 sll.ll be diJcrimlnatell 1131inst oa tJw b,uu of 1¥t, 'ol<H, rt:liiio11. "'"' 0t naUoad onJl.ll in aU ptia..s of ~,_.t durifts IM ptlfctrrnane-e or Fedenl Ot c .. an,. • aubted C'ODiUC:U. S"d!. (OntT~h~n and ... bco11tncton t!YU take .n\nft.ative ai;tioa tO intut• f:tU trutnleal irt employmeat. upguJing, ~emotion, or trutlcr: rtcntltmtnl or t.a'llllmt•t ad•atws; byoCt or tcnninaliol\. ra&n ol '81 or ot~r form.a of com~ u4 •MctioA Im tnillilla ILlllll apprnlicnl\ip. t-O Seclioll J of &!IC Hou.U. ud Ur~ 0-lo,mc.t A.:i ol 1%1, u ~·rcqulr?fts Uuit to the r.rcareu utoftt IUJiblt opporl\lnhiH fgr trainiJl.11 an4 cm9kl)'tMlll be gln11 lowet tncomc ruid.;ata ol I.he project an.a aA4 contracts 101 work in a>l\Metbtl with the SJiOi-cl b9 awarded to elipble bu.sinn1 QOfK:lftlli wllldl ate lo.:ated In. or owntd la lllbtun(ill part b)o. fftlOltl ,~"' lhl >IN or lht pco~ (12) H wiV.: (i) In*-~ ... 1 ~ in c~kln •lib ztw c--it1 d.-\cp!lenl bic:ck er-' ~ ~ ~ \o lhit sr-test nt9N ~tico~le ~ Star.. la'W, ti,' U.., f'ftl proprftJ er41isit.iQd polii:=IH Mt OIA i.ire.r Sectim 30\ 0.-u.. tNlorftl J<irloc.tica A...li.&tuic~ ~ ~ ~ ~s\&ioft Potk:t.n AA:l of l97'0 (P.1-91-646) ~the SW-isiiol9 cl Section 3ll'l u-.ot: (i.I) hy or n:imbu1~ property OWftCfS ror l\«:emJY e:itpOllott as SS*'iritd iill Section )OJ~ J()4 Qf the Act; Utd (Iii") lrtform alt~ pcnoas 0: llw beMflts, poUciin,. ud p~m pcO'tidcd (04 11nckt H".Rl rerul&!ioM (2' Cfll Puc 42). (1)) It wtU: a> Providt f.alr aad ~bis l'lloalion P"ymeo.ta :al'ld a\lli:t~ntt iii accofCbm: "'1th SeaioftS 262. 203. and :l04 or llie Unilor.n Rdoa1ion AsistU1ca and It.eat !i'ropi.Jt1 Aq11ilitioft Po!M:M-s Act or 1970 and applicabi. HLID rq:1.1laliocU U4 a:P. Pnt •1>. IO or r-1n '•"'ilics. h.dMduab. p:artnnshipt.. co~ralioal ot 2uociatiet\!' dU;~ll:Cd U • muk of all)' acq11uirio11 o( raJ J'!Operl7 lor an XIM1)' a.s-s".S4ed Wtdcr the propam; (li) Pt0<7ide mocaUon a.uittance .-.run• oll'crina UM wnices dcscribild tit Sttti.a 20$ of IM At' 10 Nch c!U?bced famitirt. ~ par~etlflift, cocponlionl or asmc;!atkons in t~ ManMf pr-W.4 udct ~i:;ptic:abk HU!J ~dau (iii) A.UH 'bat. 'lri1blft a l'CUQAdla tialo priot to db~!lheOI, d-t. :ar .. .nd 'WW"7 ~t d•e~ will bo aw:i.illble lo 1uch dUplaad taA'i~ Clld Uldlftjub ill a~ wilb Sectio." 205(~) (J) of t."9 A~. a"4 mar MICb ho~ wiU be :ua1fab1¢ jQ lbe Umt ttnp or d1~ IO 0111 ~Is ciHP'";d Ji'Cl10M rcp.&dku or tl\c)r nu, C'Otor, ~. n.alioNI uripn, "''-ut 'SOU"-'t of iMOMt; ('f) em, "' !he relocaliufl JINC'ISS "' such • !Mlllllet ti 10 prv.W• wcl\ displa(od por.iollt .-ilh "nifwln ad COlltb:•iat ~ mc!udins anr t.erYlccs reqllil'ed to insu" t~t rbe reloalioe ptx=sa-. nci nsllh ill diffcret1f Of .,.1a1, tl'Qtmml to sucll di.tptaud petsGN oa ~nt of r:ieir ~ i:oao.. rel~ uUoaal o~. •x. °'source or inc'a-. (14) le will ..ubtwt JJcpwdJ to prohibit _..p1o1e.s Crom mini Po$itioa1 for • rurpo• ~' ii or pv. the :a~ of lleq mori\-atcd bf a ditlire for priqtc s.ati for tMm•l¥n or olhers. pMfti;,alady lM!!e wiU. wboaa U.,. Ute !.uni&J. tiuinest. 01 olbet" tin. (IS) h wUI ==r.'7 'lri: the p~a of tht lbleb Act wi\idl Dlllit tJie political a1:tirii?' of~~ (16) h wlD Pe HUD md 11\it Compttober ~ttenl throusla anr a1&Ulotited reprnmta!M ~to and Uw ri;ht lo eumm. ID tecordt, books. papnt-, °' docum.:ftll rela1'4 10 the annt. f -, I t