The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutRESO 5100that • -.JML:KJ~ 5-21-75-60 HF.SOLUTION NO. 5100 A RESOLUTION CON~lRMING ENGINEER'S REPORT AND ASSESSMEN'r ROLL CALIFORNIA AVENUE AREA PARKING PROJECT NO. 65-9 ORIGINAL RESOLVED, by the Council of the City of Palo Alto, California, WHEID:AS, after pr'oceedings to that end duly had and taken pursuant to the Palo Alto Municipal Code, a public hearing has been duly held .Jn the Engineer's Report and assessment roll prepared for the fiscal year ' 1975-76 to pay the principal and interest on bonds issued pursuant to Resolution of Intention No. 3950, adopted by the Council of the City of Palo Alto on January 3, 1967; WHEREAS, this Council has heard all persons having an int~~est in any real property within the parking assessment district; has heard all objections, protests or other written communications from any per- sons interested in the real property within said district; has taken and received oral and documentary evidence pertaining to the matters contained in said report; has remedied and corrected any errors or informalities in the report and revised and corrected any of the acts or determinations of the various City officials as contained therein; and is fully informed in the premises; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, as follows: 1. That said Engineer's Report and assessment roll, and each of' the assessments therein as duly revised and corrected, is hereby ap- proved and confirmed. 2. That said report together with the certif'icate of the City Clerk as to the fact and date or approval by this Council, shall forthwith be delivered to the County of Santa Clara, and the proper County officer shall cause to be posted to the tax rolls, in the column provided therefor, the amount or each or the assessments proposed to be levied and collected for said fiscal year as set forth in said report as confirmed. • • I I • • . . • • I hereby certify chat the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of a resolution duly passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Palo Alto, California, at a meeting thereof held on the 9th June day of , 1975, by the following vote of the members thereof: ------- AYES, and in favor thereof, Councilmembers: Beahrs, Berwald, Clay, Comstock, Henderson, Norton, Pearson, Rosenbaum NOES, ABSENT, APPROVED: Approved: Councilmembers: None Councilmembers: Sher City Clerk of the C of Pal:) Alto PREVE:-~TIO:,; DY PHEDICTtm! .~~--~-~---·-----·-Proj cc L :io. V G::7,;t' l•r:J"cd - -------· -··---------·-------------: .. _}tl::lG . ...t..o k.10.::J.l .-~---.-P:ro jcct Din~c~o:::: {:.;a;;.<!, 1.~dres s, 'i«:: lep:10:-.c) 1·cu(;!-7: l -~-:: .~:..:.:;-~-----·--~-- Lt. c. B. l!au.ser 275 Forest AvGnue Palo Alto, California 94)01 $103, 53 :"> ------------------· State Hui' in $ 5, ·152 ~·~--,-~~~~~~....-i-Loc c'.l l Hartl l·~.ll:.:h ------·---------+--~ s' 7_r-__ , __ 1 ______ ,, --·---·-··- 'f'inancial Officer (•:a:.1~, Addrc.:::s, 'i'clcphcne) tit.her :-::\:..ch (415) 329-2331 Alfred J. Hitcheil 250 Har.ii 1 ton I.venue Palo Al to, California 9·1301 (415) 329-2458 . -0-:::-:...-=--=-=..·:"'.-. ';'"" .. :"'_-........ ~~ .. -..:.::;,&.:· ... ;· .. ·"! ._ ........ ':; ;"3,.~~-~-.· .. -.... · ~otnl P1uj~~t Co~t . $115,038 ..._ ________________ . __________________ _,_ _____ -----·---·--._.~------ 'i'h:i.t: grant c;.•,,·<!.::d consists of thi.s t.itle p:!.g~, th~ a?plic(ttion fer th~ gril.f:t '.\hi<.:h i!"; •~V~: lh}>.·cto us httac:--.: ..... c::~t: ~\ z-.:~1 t:'.?.tit~ a part l&erco::, and t!"l~ st .. :.~C.:il"'d G:-,.t:it ;\\,·u:-d f..:n:;.Jiti.on::; •r,·~ nrc <1ttach['d h~:?:;.;to as ;.v.:~~d:;;;.e:nt n 2-r:d r~.01.dc a p:trt hc-r:iof. The 'i:li':~ J:;y ~t:b-;:rantc~ 'hr:rr.:>~{ si9nifj cc it.s acccptr:.:1ce of this 91;ant a'n\~:."'<l r..t~ll ~~·;r.,;• ...... ~ ~·o ~:~1.~,1 tr~ t ".1..: gr~nt. :r>:rojcc~ .i.:1 2.cc:..~!.-,:anc~ ;·.·ith tfiie terr,s ~fi:: co:~clitic:-i~ r.c:t f.~rt.!1 !.:1 (.tL i!1Col·; .. ·cr.:.~"":<€·· rcf(?rc::~~ ir? th:.$ grz:nt m·:ard t:.•:d the ap?licc:tblc pi~ovision$ .of th·:! S~;i:c St•_·c.:-ts ;;.ct. ............ ~-1~-(' I I 11FZ0..'.:1'1!1L J.:\'D:· S'i'A'IE Ft.NIE P.i::C31V2D \•TII.L NO-i' BS USED 'IO R::i:'L~CE Il.:'C..'-L YtS'!!'B Tw\'i' ViOUID, IN !"iE A~~~q:: O? fi!)CiI P:-~D3R:;L N~D S'T~;.'ra !JD, B.8 ;.~lil)::! AV.~1~·\"!3IB 1:\.1~< 'IEE J..Ci'IVITY n.:::r;·.:G SlE1PORilii) U~D~R THIS P.G?3.E.:·!:2iT. II Piscal Yea:: ',Jp £.SJ -!-'01· "vis-:.·<l ·1;1s SP:f.CI.:'1L o;:~r-·OSIT i-·u~u Ll::N\ Ey ~~-.~·-~---'-·1--: 1'! ~:'cf::'.~-· ._7 [•1'.'.i';-: _J:':.J...Ll~-7( Of:fici.::l r..ut:;orizcc t~v ~:..g:-1 ; ,_,r S•.:h:rl."fi.:.t.S.-~ Ne>.!nO: Titlo: 1.ddrc.:.s: George A. Sipcl City !la.nagcr 2 50 Uar,1il ton lwenuc! Palo ~!to, California ~4301 Executive Direc:or, CCJ? I'IT.H -----------------·----·- -------·------·-------·-----. --- -------·~-----~ ... _ $:,O,OCQ or li"ore. ..L".'.5 a casczcc 1sm1.1:u19, ne:cc.in~u.~c~ cc~J.gncr.~'-''-' \A.:.Jll'·, m:.:i;eoy 1>1a.Kcs , ..-9ri:nt awclrd of ru ... "l.ds to -~__Qf_Rillo J\lt_o~---~·~------,~----~-----hcrc~nv.ftcr dc:;ig:Htt:d the •·su~ru•,ltpo'' under the pro·1ir.ir.ms oi '.l'.it.lc l, p.:lrt C ~:\.'lib'.>s Criti~e Ccmtrol <1n'1 £ufe StrcC?ts /\c:t of ll)~G (l"L ~)0-JSlJ "s o.-:i.·~i:clcd (PL -9-l--6-r.-,..i,-,-,- . bcrcin01ftcr dc:;i9n;:itcd uSaf~ St:rC!ctS 1,ct", in thu i"J':'::,.)\ln\: And for tho pur,?OSe und durati set forth in this sri?nt il'o:ard. Pz:ojcct: Title . ' BURGLARY REDUCTION . ~ ... •. Project Director U~a::i.c, Address, Telephone) Lt. c. B. Hauser 275 Forest Avenue Palo Alto, California 94jo1 (415) 329-2331 ~ Gra~t. Period i-'cdera. k..o~rt. .$.80,1.32" . Stato Buy in $ 4 ,452 Other :-:atch -77 l'ii:>ancial Of ficc?:' (N~~o, Address, Telephone) Alfred J. Mitchell -o-; c.-=::-=:o==:.:=======-=::=:it==~="".,........,_,,._. 250 Hamilton Avenue 'l"Otal Project CO$t • Palo Alto,. California 94301 (415) 329-2458 . . $ 89,035 Thi$ grant nward consists of this title pa9e, tha applicatl9n for the 9rant which is att. )1er{!to ii.S ;.ttac!-.:::c~t ?-. and tt1ar\;~ a part 'hereof, nnd the Standard Grant A\;a:r;d Conditions ~: are attached hereto as Attach.":lent B and •~adc a pact hereof. The Subgrantce h~rehy si9nif lcs its acceptance of this 9rant award And "~recs to ad!:lini$ the grant project in accordDnCC! with the terns c\r.d conditiol'\~ set forth in or incorporat by r.cfcrcnco in this 9rant award and the applicabl~pro'Visions_,o.f ~he Safe Streets _Act. By ____ ,..,~,":J"'·'/.((;i"r:ti DATE _q-/ 7 7(. "FEIERl\L J\1'-TD:s'm'l'E Fl.NI:S REtErvm WIIL·NCfl' BE t!SED 'ID RE:PJ...Z\Cr! I.O:AL · FlNCS '.Iff'..T Yn.lID, IN 'mE ABSWCF.: OF ._ SUlI FEDEPAL A'® STl~ AID, BE .H71D?: • AVA.II.ABIE. FOR THE: ACT"IVI.T'i BEING SUPPORT'd> U.'nE~ '1HI5 AGRCX·~. "· .. SPECIAL DEPOSIT FU1-t1l LEi\..~ Official ~uthorizod to Si9n for Subgra.~tee Neut\es • George A. sipel Title: City Hanag~r . Address: 250 ijamilton Avenue • Palo ~lto, California ~4301 . ., ... By ---------------DATE Executiv~ Director, OCJP ~· 653 -FoJ: us~ O:!!.'/ w!1cn TO'£;l~ Pt:O.J:CT CO::JT is $50,000 or more. 5.scd 7/75 • I Tho Off ice of Cd:.1in.1 l Jus ti co Pl<inainq, hcrcinn!tcr dcsigna t.cd ltCCJ? .. , hcrr.b~· nakcs 9r.zmt awanl o~ f1:.;~d s to City o_f_P_a_l_o_A_l_t_o _________ -=---=-------.,,,----- bcrc ina ftcir dc!:ig:\.1ted the ''Sl<!>gr.:intcc" under -t...'ic provi!iion::o of '.ritlc 1, pn:::t C , Omnibus Crime Co:1t.:-ol <:l:<l S.-ifc Streets 1'\ct of 1968 (PL 90-351) ilS a.-nan~fe:d (?L ~l-6.:t·!}, hc:rcinil.ftcr cl~;:;ig~"tcd "Safe Streets i\c"", ln the anount and fer the purpose c'.lnd dw:atic: sat fo:cth in thi:; grant .:i.'.:ard. Project Tit.:lc BURGLARY REDUCTION -PRE~NTION SY PREDICTION Project Dircct.o::-(~;c;.;:-.c, /~cidress, '.1. ... elcphone) Lt. c. B. Hauser 275 Forest.Avenue Palo Alto, California (415) 329-2331 94301 Financial Office::-(!;a.-:i.~, Address, Telephone) Alfred J. Mitch~ll 250 Hamilton Avenue Palo Alto, California (415) 329-2458 94301 Contr.:::.ct ::o. Project Eo. Grant Period 7,..o;-l.:.76 to 6-30-77 $23,403 ·. State :Duy in $ 1,300 Local linrd l·!atch $ 1,300 Other :-: a tch -o- Total Project C?st • $26 t QQJ This grant award co:15ists of this titl~ page, the applici"".ticn for the grant which is ~t~.:1 h~rieto &S l'.tt~c:-:.Q:"":.~ ]\_ rend r.~ti'1 a part hereof I and the St~ncard Grant A\·.'c"lrd Co:1diticns ..... , • are attached here; to as i\ttacl~;;?ent B and r:iatlc a part hereof. The Subgr-ant-::~ h'::rc:)y sic;nifics its acceptance of t~n:-; grunt aw.:n:d .'.>.r.d ngr-:!c::> t::> il(!:.'t.-:~r.~. the grant projct:~ .i:l z.ccc~dancc with th~ te::T:i5 ar.d con;:!itions set fo::th in or inccr.por.:.:•:: by r.:?fercncc in this gr.:int award and the applicable revisions ~he Safe Strc~0:5 Ac;:. . By&,~~-DATE~'/~ "FEDERAL A...'-'D STATE FUNDS RECEIVED . fficial Aut!"!orized to Sign fo: Sci;grimtc>c WILL NOT BE USED TO REPLACE LOCAL ?~ar.ie: George A. sipel I FUNDS TH.?\T WOULD, IN THE ABSENCE Title: Ci.ty ?•!anager OF SUCH FEDERJ\L Ai.~D STATE AID, aE Address: 250 Hamilton Avenue 1 MADE AVAILABLE FOR THE ACTIVITY · Palo Alto, Californ.ia 94301 BEING SUPPORTED UNDER· THIS AGREEMENT." . • • OCJP SUPPLANTING STATEMENT . . DATE By ------~--~--~~~~------~~ ~--------- Fiscal Year SPEClAL DEPOSIT FUND LE.i\l\ ~~~~--~~~~~--------~ Fiscal Officer Ex cc u ti v~ Dircc~or, OCJP ITE."1 ~~--~----~~~-------------------------- !p GSJ -l'or us~ ~'!. ;.::1cn TQ7;\!.. P?.oJ::CT ~ is $50 ,000 or more. •i!:Cd 7/75 . ~ . CAUt-ORN!A COUNCIL ON CRiM!NAL JUSTiCc ~pplication for a grant under Section 301 (b) of tt:e Omnibus Crirr.e Control and Safe Street~ Act of 1968 \PL-90-351), as amended by Pl-91-644. Requested Start. Date: State Clearinghouse #75052029 ~}\tt \ ~ \'j +1 . Part B _ Part C Part E _ Pre-Agreement Effecti:/e Date -~--~-~~- Grant Extension Approved io l. Title: BURGLARY REDUCTION -PREVENTIC~ BY PREDICTION 2. Reqio:i: J 3. Type of Appilcation Year: 1st 2nd 3rd_ 12. Applicant: - [iiJ Original (Date) 4/25L75 Palo f\lto Police CE:part!Tl.ant 275 Fcrest AVenue [!!) Revision (Date) 6/9/75 Palo Alto, California 94301 (415) 329-2555 4. Grant Duration: 12 fl.onths 13. Project Director:and/or Contact Person: ; 5. l engtn t>f Pro~: r 24 Months Lt. C. B. Hauser (415) 329-2331 275 Forest Avenue Support 6. Federal 7. State Buy-In 1 s. Local Hard Hatch ,9, Ot~er Match & In-Kind i 10. Total Project Cost .6. Pruject S~;r:rur_y Dollars $103.535 52752 -5,751 -0- $115,033 Perc~nt 90% - 5% 5cf --..l!.- -0- 10CJ% Burolarv Redur:tion -Pre·1ention _!?y Pr~diction Pa1c Alto, California 94301 14. financial Officer: Alfred J. Mitchell City Ccntron er 250 Hamilton Avenue Palo Alto, California 94301 (415) 329-2458 ~~-~----~--~--~----~---------~----15. Officiai Authorized to Sign h~2licJti0n: (41!:i) 329-2563 The proposed project will e;:ip1oy a computer-aided system to predict the time anrJ locati'J11 of rcsic!eiltial and cc1m~rcia1 burgldrfos. Using these predictions, pote!ltial victims wili be persona 1 ly contacted and given i nfcrmation on how to reduce their vulnerability. ~xperi~Pntal ~videnc~ strongly indlcate3 that households that have had a physical security in- spection or a mear.ir.gfol contact with police represer.tatives to d~scuss security are sevc!"a1 times less vulnerable ti1C1.t those \·lhi::' have net heen provide_d_1h_i_s service. . .. . - The pro~ect:s specific objective will be to lower, by 251, the rate of burglar·ies in house- h<.11ds contactQd versus the burglary rat.? in thr-sc nt>t contucted. · l:he r:'~thodology \Jil) -:,·,1- ploy a predictive corr.puter prog,·c\ii1 (presently being dc-bu9gr.d) to lo'cate th£: potential victims in one of 92 ~Eogr~phical zo~es. Burglary Reduction Tea~i~ will be depl0yed to the indica~edLZQnss ~nd wil]_aQgressiv~ly pursu2 personal household contacts. It is estimatrd that arou~ ~3~ or the c1~y s housenolds can be rca~hed during the project 1s -first year. Evaluation of the project's succ.9-ss ~r failt:rc ~!ill be a fairly sir:;yle mltter of analvLiug recC'lrds kept of househo~d~ contac.ted ver-sus i!ouseholds victimized. · -1- CCCJ Fonn 502 (Rev. 6/73) 16. project SulTITlary (Cont.) Research--Field Services Division and Investigative Services Division managers will be provided detailed computer predicticn read-out material to plan and deploy police perso~nel in pr-0jected problem locatior.s in order to investigate suspicio•.JS persons and apprehend suspects, thereby, deterring, preventing and clearing burglaries. -la- : yr n'o u;. REpUESTCO ruNDSTART 19ZQ_ ..!_ 16. f-U~OS Dt.:RA"TION ~Montl>sl .. . I 17. ESt. PROJECT START • t8. e:>t. PROJECT OIJ~ATION 2$.8RjiF TITU: OF .,,. mo 19 76 .!__ .!.?,_(Months) 19. Af'HICANT TY.PiI ~ Enter Lauer A. Sr.no f. School Oi>trict N/A FINJDS 11£00£STED/For 1."t>.,ogo.·s $11<,w (>lo•11 ""'t ol i~ri•J;-:-i~.:-7. 10.ltvtRAL ( J$ 124,1.7?_..(, 8. I n1crs1a1• G. Ct>nvnunity Action Agenc~ 11. STATE 6 89<'.J I JS _______ •_._.,_.c i 1$ 6,~2_ __ .~ .. C. Sutl St:11teOi>• O. County e. CiW H. Sponi.ored Organl? .. tion I. lndi•n :n. LO<:At 23. OTllEll: J. Oth•tr (Specifv in Aemark\ ~,, TOTAl r7o. :n. n. 2Ji { '$ -0--. = 11r~·91s~--~ ' '$=--==========-·=-=-:=-~·~~: BURGL~RY REDUCTION: PREVENTION BY PREDICTION : APPLICANT'S PROJECT • --~.,.--.,...--,-.-=-c:-=,-:-,-=-:--c~-----26. D<:fCFilPTION CF A?PLICANl 'SP HOJl:CT (Purpool") l USil:G A COMPUTER PHEDICTION OF BURGlf,RY OCCURREHCE B"f OJ\Y ~ TmE, AND LOCATION. POTEfHl/\.l i VICTIMS UILL BE COHTACTEO Arm ADVISED O\{ V£THOOS TO REDUCE THEIR 'JIJLNERA3IUTY • • . I I . -. I r • IT£.MS :3'2·38 TO Bi: C0~.4PLETEO BY CL€ARINGH0l'Sf MU:...Tlt'LE I I ---,-~~--, -10 CLEA!'UNGHOUSE 33, • ~CTION llASEO ON ~tv1ew Of I iC 0 No,il!c.tion i: 0 A<>nlication 3:1. b ACTION TAl(t;N • D With Comment c 0 Wai11cd b 0 WithO\.lt Comment d 0 Unl.,...or.,~lc STATE APPLICATIONi L ! I I I lJ_J_J 34• IDENTIFIER CSAI! ~ ~ LJ____l_l__ - I Suite Number i STATE WIDE County/ Ci1Y Countv/ Cny Countv/ City Coun1y/ C1tv Cc>u..-ty/ C.1ry :;:aunty/ C•'" 1:~~·s:-.-::c-::~:-::f,~::".:'.:"'~-:::~-G-;-::g".'"0_u~;:-e:-"--O::-_v_.,_•_O_. __ N_o__.~P-1_n_9_A_•e .. • 1 ___ ...__Pl-ng_A_•_~ .... l·_~_..._P\_n_9_A_re..,i ___ _._P_lng_.A_r_e..._al ___ .._P_1"_.o;_A_•eL_,._'"_9_"_""~lt. ___ ,_ 36. STr-TE PLAN REQUIRED 31. RECEIVING or.n yr mo day 33.a SIGNATURE OF CH OFFICIAl t AT CLE:J\Rlt,(.tlOtlSE 19 _____ _ i ovfl ONO 38.f!NALCH/\Cr!ONOATE y• mo O•v Hl ____ -- .~ 18. Acknowledgement of ~otfce of Intent Clearinghouse card not yet received. -3- .. I April 25, 1975 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION BURGLARY REDUCTION: PREVENTION BY PREDICTIDr~ PALO ALTO POLICE DEPARTMENT I. Project Description A. Type of Grant -Action; improve and s trength•:?n law cnforcement/16502 B. Type of Project -Designed to reduce burglary problem in Palo Alto C. Location -City of Palo Alto D. Surrounding Area -Other suburban co~nunities~ Foothills,·San Fr~ncisco Bay II. Does the proposed action confonn to all locul, state~ and fed2ral plans, policies, and controls for the affected area, including the Clean Air Act and the Federal Water Pollution Act of 1972? Yes III. What alternatives are there to the proposed action? None IV. Environmental Effects Will the implementation of the proposed projects or program produce the following effects: 1. Lead to a significant increase in air pollution? No 2. Lead to a significant increase in water pollution No What is the ability of waste wat~r system to me~t demand without degrading water quality? N/A How will water supply be affected? N/A 3. lead to a significant increase in the ambient noise level for a substantial number of people? No 4. lead to poor incompatible land use, soil erosion, or soil pollution? No 5. Destroy or derogate from an important recreaticn area? No 6. · Substantially alter the pattern of behavior of wildlife or interfere with important breeding, nesting, or feed- ing grounds? -No ·~- -4- . . 7. D~~turb tho ecological balance of land or water area, or impact critical areas su:h as flood plains, wGt- lands, beaches and darns, unstab1e soils, steep slopes, • and aquifer recharge arcus? No 8. Have significant effect upon areas of historical significance, archaeolo~ical si~nificance, cultur- al significance, or educational scientific signi- ficance? No v. 9. Have an adverse aesthetic or visual effect? 10 •. Have a detrimental effect on the safety of the corr.mun i ty? ls there op~osition to the proposal? Who? N/A Why? N/A After evaluation of the above question, it has been determined that? There are no si~nificant envirvnmental impacts. ,/_James C. Zurcher /~ Police Chief // ( // ' I / I/ . / -4a- No No No « : I . I ~---- ' Apri 1 25, 1975 NEGATIVE OECLARATI on Gentlemen: In accord with the procedures for the preparation of environmental impact statenents, an environmental assessment has been performed on the· proposed agency action below: Burglary Reduction: Prevention by Prediction The assessment process did not indicate a significant environ~ental impact from the propo:;ed actions and the project will not involv~ any of the follow- ing: - a. New construction projects. b. The renovation or modification of a facility which · leads to an increased occupancy of more than 25 per- sons. c. ·The implementation of programs involving the use of pesticides and other harmful chemicals. d. The implementation of programs involving microwaves or radiation. e. Research and technology whose anticipated or intend- ed future application c~uld be expected to have a potential effect on the environment. Consequently, an env-..-onmental impact stater.ient wi 11 not be prepared. An environmental impact appraisal, which sunmarizes the assessment and th~ reasons why a statement is not required, is on file at the above office and will be available for public scrutiny upon request. -4b- • \n • 20. 5JDGET S~~~~RY FOR GRA~T PROJECT If it is anticipated that fu~ds will be requcst~d for second and/or third year ~ctivities, fill in those spaces. If this application is for second year funding, then f·ill in the "Total"First Yeur'' i,.,,~i\ the aporoved amounts for that pericd, and the anticipJtC!d c:...:1ounts fer third yc.:ir funding. . . 1. Budget should be based en~ grant year (12 ~~~th or shorter period if the project is less than 12 ~onths} r~thcr th:rn cal ~nd<:r year or fiscal year. 2. Includin1 State Buy-In funds. ] -...,..,..._...., - I TOTAL FIRST YEAR l TOiAL SECO~m Y~ltR l iOJ,~t T".CID .yrAp, l tlJ" . .... • _ _,_,_i __ .................... C,Nnt -t:atchi nq 2 I Grant 1Mat'.ching2 r. t f·1. ... . . 2 Budget ~rc?!'l L"'ccnny _ I Cat€gory Total Funds Funds lotal Fur.ds ·Funds. Toti.il Fur.ds Funds -_ _,I .-. ---- r Perso:1a 1 $11,503 $90t027 $i2 ,099. I $17 ,973 J .Services $81,843 $70,340 I ' , .._......--:C" F a -.--~ 7 .soo I l I I I I ' Travel 7,800 8,580 I 8,5!30 I ( . I _I 10,458 [ 10,458 t . I Consultant I 11.504 11,504 Services I l ] Equipment. 6~745 6,745 700 700 I . . . . I. ~ Su~pi fos ~ 8,,1921 8,192 9,011 11 'Jperating 9,011 E~penses I I l ~ ri ,•. --1 iW~~&.efJ -·· --~~~y_i%-~1 l~~-wg;p4.:-~<:;~f-;;:~:r<~ ... / /. -~if.f,·"A " '':;0 :I .••.•••• /;;.-:~ :--.• 0r:;:.% ···0 ~~-~ -~.. ~-;.-: ;~. v .-%,r· .... z "'··-:f·~'l')··.;-/ ''Z/ a~ ~:-·x // ... ~~,,. ;.". , ... ·~~-. ,' ,../, • . .. .,.... . . .. ; -· "'. "~' z . •• ' .. BUDGET CATEGORY 21. Personal Services I A. Salaries ! Burglary Reduction Specialists (4) $10,400 x 4 x 100% I I Secretary/Clerk (1) $9,000 x 100% I Project Coordinator (1) $16,320 x 100% TOTAL SALARIES I ! I I i I I I ' ! B. Benefits In-lieu Holiday 2.8% Allowances l.3% Disability 2.9% Retirement 11.4% DETAILED PROJECT 6UDGET TOTAL $41,600 9,000 16,320 $66,920 I I FEDERAL FUNDS $30 ,097 9,000 16,320 $55,417 . I I Insurance 3.9%\/ 22.3%-$14,923 I $14,9~3 I I TOTAL I $81,843 1 $10!340 I . ~6- ..... . . HARO MATCH S E BUY-IN $5,752 $5,752 $5,752 I } i I I I ~ L HARO MATCH $5,751 $5,751 I ' $5,751 I j OTHER I I I I I l I i ' I I I I I I I I I I I ; 1 J I I I I i • I I I -1 I J r•~' FEDERAL HARrl P.f\TCH II BUDGET CATEGORY ·roTl\L Fu:ms ..--s,,.,,T"""'A=->TE LOCAL BUY-JU HARO J'.J\TCH OTHEJ:: ~-~~---~-~-~---~-~--~~--~~~~--~---'--~_...__ ____ __..__~- 22. Travel Lease expense for three {3} vehicle~ @ $175/month $ 6,300 $ 6,300 Vehicle oper~ting and maintenance expense@ $500/year 1,500 1,500 TOTAL $ 7,SOO $ 7,800 23. Consultant Services Evaluation Consultant $10,458 $10,158 ------------------+----------1-----·------+------ ._I _______ . ___ T_o_T_AL ___ ~$_10_,_4_58_,__$_1_0 __ ,4_58 _________ .,. ___ . ____ · j ____ _ 24. Equipment . _ Equi,ment Detail in Budget Narrative $ 6,745 $ 6,745 : TOTAL $ 6,745 ----------------·------------·-·-~·------------··-----·-····- -7- . ut.IAll~U r'KUvt.'-I ~UUut.t \\.IJ:l.:} . . ~ L ! FEDERAL HARO AATCH -l BUDGET CATEGORY TOTAL FUNDS STATE LOCAL I OTHER BUY· IN HARD f{l.TCH ' i I 25. Supplies and Operating Expenses Detai 1 in Budgef Narr~tive $ 8,192 $ 8,192 . I I I ( I I . -- TOTAL 8,192 8,192 26. TOTAL PROJECT COST ~ US,038 $103,535 $ 5,752 $ 5,75l=F=-- 27. Percent of Total Project Cost l 00~~ gm; J 5% 5% --·-- ·8- -. • • 28. Bu~t Narrative: Begin below and add as many continuation pages (n ered 8-A, a-e, etc.) as may be necessary to relate the items budgeted to project activities and complete the required Justification and explana- tion of the project budget. Explain the sources the grantee will utilize for its matching contribution. Enumerate those proposed expenditure items that require prior approval, as specified in Bureau of the Budget Circular A-87, and 1n CCCJ Fiscal Affairs Manual, so prior approval may be considered at the time application is made. 28.l PERSONAL SERVICES 28.1.l Salaries 28.1.1.1 Burglary Reduction Specialists (4) $10,400 x 4 x 100% = These non-sworn individuals will be organized into teams of two and will be the prime rr.eans of reaching housP.- holds to impart security information and make security inspections. 28.1.1.2 Secretary/Clerk (1} $9,000 x 100% = This person will provide secretcrial and clerical support to the project. 28.1.1.3 Project Coordinator (1) $16,320 x 100% = This individual will function as the day-by-day project manager and wili handle all contract administrative duties, perform liaison with other divisions and departments and will serve as the prime contact between grant activities and other agencies such as the Region 11J 11 Staff. ·' $41,600 16,320 The Project Coordinator's duties will include direction of all other staff, hiring and firing of person- nel and contractors, report \'!riting, and general management of project resources. trl~o "-'"ut't1'•"\r <1tLf 13v~Tt!i &'/fe.1A.dc'f"W*'.S ~6. vec..ovd~ S'(S'fvlt TOTAL SALARIES $66,920 • • . ' 28. ~-et !lar:_r?.tiv~_: Begin· belm·1 and add as many continuation pages {numb~red 8-A, 3-B, etc.) as ~ay be necessary to relate the items budgeted to project uctivitics ar.d com?lete the required Justification ar.d expiana- tion of the project budget. Explain the sources the grantee will utilize for its raatching contribution. Enumerate those proposed expenditure items that require prior approval, as specified in Bureau of thi Budget Circular A-87, ar.d in CCCJ Fiscc:1 Affairs Manual, so prior approval may be considered at the ti~e application is made. 28.2 BENEFITS Services of the four Burglary Reduction Specialists, the Secretary/ Clerk, and the Project Coordinator will .be obtained through a pro- fessional services-type contract. Equivalent paym~nt in lieu of benefits at the City rate of 22. 3% ~Ii l l be included in total con- ? tract value. - Contract Services $66,920 x 22.3% = 28.3 TRAVEL. 28.3.1 Leased Vehicles Intermediate-sized vehicles (3) @.$175/rnonth X 12 months = These vehicles will be used by the Burgla~Y Reduction Team in their daily field activi- ties. 28.3.2 Vehicle Cpe.ration and Maintenance (3) ·x $500/year = TOTAL TRAVEL 28.4 CONSULTANT SERVICES $14,923 . 6,300 1,500 $ 7,800 $10,47B Project Evaluation -a consultant to conduct an evaluation of the project's effectiveness will be chosen by competitive bid. The RFP will describe the methodology and objectives of the project and invite bidders to design an evaluation component At this time, it is unknown what type of consultant will be hire;:. ·• We cannot, therefore, determine exact costs i nvo 1 ved. Hc.;1ever, the rates shall not exceed those specified in the OCJP Fiscal Affai~s- Manual. · ·9-A- • . . 28. -.-------· ·-·-.. - Budoet r:~..r:.r:~~ive.: Degin· belm·1 tind add as many continuation pages (nuf.~!Jereci 8-A, C-B, ~tc.) as r.iay be necessary to relutc the it~s budgeted to project ilCtivitics ~~d complete the required Jus~ification and explana- tion of tha project budget. Ex,l~in the sources the grantee will utilize for its r,:)tching contribution. EnUi:-:cratc those proposed expenditure iter.lS that require prior approval, as specified in eurcau of the Budget Circular A-87, and in CCCJ Fhc~l Affa·;rs Manual, so prior approval may be considerc.'Ci at the ti~e application is made. 28.5 Equipment 28.5 .1 16r.m Film Projects (2) Bell & Bowel Automatic $750 x 2 = To be used to project. burglary-·oriented .films at neighborhocd meetjngs. 28.5.2 Cornnunications Equiixnent . Fix~d Portable Radios {l) . $900 X l = .$ 906 · Vehicle Charging Units (1) $225 X I = $ 225 V.ehicle Antennas (1) $ 2~ X 1 = $ 25· Total Corrmunications· ~quipment = :· Tllis corm1unications equipment wfll be mounted in the vehicle assigned to· the BRSs and will be utilized to faci- 1. itate their efficient deployment and inter-corrrnunicaticns in the field by a sworn supervising officer. . . 28.5.3 Magnetic Vehicle Signs, 17 11 X 34 11 (6) " Signs--$25 X 6 = $150 Set-Up Charge = $ 15 Tot~l cost of· signs= These signs will be poited on the Crime Prevention unmarked vehicles indicating to public that these are PAPD Crime Pre- vention vehicles. 28.S.4 Films (6) $325 x 6 = -:. .. · Crime Prevention films yet to be selected describing the best methods of improving home security will be purchased for pub- 1 ic viewing. -9-B- . $ 1,150 $ 165 '· $ 1,950 , . . 28. ~-C't flarrative_: Begin· bclm·1 and add a! many continuation pages (n~~~bcred &-A, 0-B, etc.) as may be n0ccssary to relate th~ items budgeted to project uctivities u.nd t(J:n?lete the required Justification and explana- tion of th~ project budget. Explain the sources the grantee will utilize for its raatc!1in9 contribution. Enu~~rdte tho~e proposed expenditure ite~s that require prior approval, ~s sp~cified in Bur~au of the CudgQt Circular A-87, ~nd in CCCJ Fiscal Affa~rs Manualt so prior approval may be considered at the tice applic~tion is mJde. 28.S.5 Office Furnishings For (4) Burglary Reduction Specialists: Desks (2).3-drawer metal $200 X ~ = $400 Chairs (2) s\'ri~el-type .$ 70 X 2 = $140 . For (1) .Project Coordinator: . $200 $ 70 $ 540 .. - .. Desk (l)' 5-drawel" metal = Cha.fr (1) swi ve 1-type = Calculator (1) = . _ . $f50 .... . For {l) Secretary/Clerk Desk (1) 3-dra~er.metal with. typewriter stand = Chair (1) swivel-type = Typewriter (1) IBM Standard Selectric = File·c~binet (l} 5-drawEr metal ; ' Total Office Furni~hings TOTAL EQUIPMENT . . $200 $ 70 $600 $150 ·28.6 SUPPLIES AND OPERATING EXPENSES ' 28.6.1 Publications .- It is anticipated that (4} useful publications related to burglary \':ill be availe.ble during the grant year. At the proj)Os~d rate of HH confract. { 5 ,500 per year), the eJCpcnse of purchasing them ~or dtstribution will be: I, - -9-C $. 420 .. $11020 $1~980 $ 6,745 .. . .• • . . ' I 28. Bud::i_ct NarrD~iv?.: Begin· belo~·1 and add as many continuation pages (nu~bcred 8-A, 0-B, etc.) as may be necessary to relate the items budgeted to project ilctivitics and com;:>lete the required Justificiltion and explana- tion of the project budget. Explain the sGurces the grant~e will utilize for its r.::itching contrib:Jtion. Enw:-:L:rate thos~ proposed expenditure itc~s that require prior approval, as specified in Bureau of the Budget Circular A-87, ilnd in CCCJ Fisc()l Affairs Manual, so prior '1ppro·1al may be considered at the tiD~ Gpplication is made. 28.6 . 28.6.1 2R.6.2 28.6.3 .. ' Publications (continued) (4) publications x 5,500 x .20 = $4,400 to h6usehclds contacted. · It is expected that approximately _ SO~OOO copies of.various leaflets ·and bulletins will be generated )n-house for general pub1ic. 50i1000 x .05· . $2 ,5,00 .. . . TOTAL PUBLICATIONS Carrying Cases . .. The four Burglary Reduction Specialists will use "salesperson's sam[}le1'-type briefcases.to carry films, p~blications,· etching toe ls, leaflets, etc; -. $35 x. (4) .cases = · Mailing. Exp~nse Informational bulletins mailed to ~ontacted · households quarterly: -First Quarte1'.' = . 288 x .10 ="$ 29 (2 wks in field @ 144. HH/wk) : Second Quarter = 1,728 (12 wks x 144 HH/wk) 2,016.x .10 = $202 Third Quarter = -~ 1,728 (12 wks x ·144 l!H/wk) 3,744 x .10 = ·s31~ Fourth Quarte~ = 1,728 {12 wks x 144 HH/wk) 594'7?. x .10 = $547 Total ~~ailing Expense = $1,152 TOTAL SUPPLIES PND OPERATING EXPENSES -9-D- .$ 6,900 $ 140 ... . .. $ 8,192 . 29. . Graphic itepresentation of Costs .. By Month PROJECT MONTH .·.ti \0 9 8 7 -~-0 5 4 3 2 l llf)_Q~ 1st 2nd 3rd 103,534 ~,030 I 80.527 --CO O?'t _ VJ'""------------ t#,519 . 46 ,015 34 ,511 ) I 23 .. 008 ' . 11.503 / -/ 30. Other Sources of Funding DATE AGENCY RCQUESTED 4th -5th 6th ,V v / v • .. FUNDS I REQUESTED s $ $ $ $ -s 7th 8th 9th 10th / ,/; / v .,, STATUS OF REQUEST 11t}'a 12th. '" _/." / . ·- - 1001 901 sos sos 30% 20% lOS OS . ' RESOLU'l'ION OF THE COUNCIL Or· TFE CITY OF PALO ALTO AUTHORIZING THE F.XECOTION OF .\ GRANT AWAI'.D CONTRACT .AND EXPEt;orTURE OP ~..ATCHING FUNDS FOR. A BURGLARY REDUCTION PROJECT SPONSORED IN. PAR'I' BY AND THROUGH THE OMNIBUS CRIME CONTROL AND SAFE STREETS ACT OF 1968 WHEREAS, the City of Palo Alto desires to undertake a certain projP.ct designated Burglarv RediJction: Prevention by Prediction, to be funded in part from funds made available through the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Stree~s Act of 1968, PL 90-355, as amended, PL 91-644 (hereinafter referred to as the safe Streets Act) , administered by the California Council on Criminal Justice (hereinafter ref ~rred to as CCCJ) 1 NOW, THEREFORB, BE IT RESOLVED that th.,e City Manager of the City of Palo Alto was authorized, on its behalf, to submit the attached Application for Grant for Law E.1force1nent Purposes to CC~J and is authorized to execute on behalf of the City of Palo Alto the attached Grant Award Contract for law enforcerner.t purposes, including any extensions or amendments thereof. BE IT FURTHEa RESOLVED that the City of Palo Alto agrees to provide all matching funds required.for said project {including any exte:nsion or ame:idrnent thereof) under the Safe Streets Act and the rules and regulations of CCCJ and the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration and that cash will be appropriated as required thereby. BE IT FURTHER"RESO~YED that grant funds received he~eunder shall not be used to supplant ongoing law enforcement expendi- tures. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Palo Alto in a meeting thereof held on ~~-ta~y;._1_9_,~~~~~~~' 1975, by the following vote: AYES: Com~tock, Henderson, Norton, Fearson, Ro~enbaum, Sher NOES: Beahrs, Berwald, Clay ABSENT: None APPROVED: ~~ .. ~ fl / ~ • t-faYor AssiS'iilltCi ty At torne~· APPROVED: .. ·'\ / .. ~ 1·· • ,· ·-......___ ,( .. t· ... , ,, .L . . • -'( "· . -L '-. 1... L· • °"\... /C:hi9f of Police .. u. / . APPROVED: City Nailager •. • • • 32. PROBLEM STATEMENT The number of burglaries annually occurring in Palo Alto is increasing at an increasing rate. Since 1969! thP. number of burglaries reported per year has almost doubled (92%). Unchecked, this explosive trend could be expected to doubl~ again during the next two years alone. (Appendix--Item 1) Unlike the ma.lorfiy--0TcoTT111unities in Santa Clara-County, this high rate of incidence in Palo Alto is not related to population growth. In fact, the demographic characteristics of the City have been effec- tively stable since the mid-sixti~s as the result ~f geographical limitations and land usage planning. In 1971, the Police Department initated a program directed toward pre- venting burglaries. The main thrust of this effort was to reach citi- zens in their homes and places of business to offer advice on improving physical security. Approval by-citizens se~Tied almost unanimous, but actual effectiveness was unclear. The total city burglary rate wcs increa5~~~ ~t ~n increasing rate each year; and the question was: Would the burglary ratu have been even worse without this effort? In late 1973~ an evaluation method was developed to ascertain if the program was reaching its planned objectives. A recordskeeping system was developed to keep track of who, what, when, where, and how each household or business was contacted. Burglaries, as they occurred, were cross-correlated to the "client" households/businesses. A year-end comparison of burglaries occurring in client vs. non-client households/ businesses would be made to indicate effectiveness. __ In calendar year 1974, of the 22,000 residences and 2,400 businesses, 694-reslJe~ts a~d 416 businesses were burg1ar·i~id. rh~ $tat1stica1 comparison was quite clear--the program was definitely effective. -0~iy 1.28% of the "clients11 were burglarized subsequent to contact. For non-clients, the rate was 4.95%. It should be noted that the clier.t population was significant--over 6% of the City's structures. It is recognized that the 4:1 ratio of increased security in client 1s homes could be the result of other unknown factors in addition i.:o po1i.:.e per- sonal contact. However, even if these "unknown factors" contribute to, say, half of the improvement, it still appears that the personal contact system wil 1 improve the household 1s safety by a margin of 2: 1. At the expected rate of incidence during fV 1976: 6% of the City's structures will be burglarized; $514,000 of property will be taken; 3,735 persons will be exposed to the unsettling personal impact of a felony being corrmitted on their property; c·~urglary) 3,077 patrol officer-hours will be expended in initial investigatory procedures; {Appendix-- Item 2) 12,500 officer-hours will be consumed in follcw- up work. (Appendix--Item 2) As an indication of the extent of the problem, police resources allo- cated to bur91ary alone will amount to 5.8% of the department's total resources measured by expense--the most expensive crime in the com- munity, both in dollars and in its negative effect on the total delivery of police services. -12-- .. 33. APPROACHES CONSIDERED Burglary Reduction by Enforcement: Past experience in Palo Alto, as in most other jurisdictions, indi- cates that field patrol and investigative operations are not enough to hold the line against the burglar. The basic nature of the crime, being one of opportunity and availability, mitigates against the ef- fectivity of enforcement efforts at less than total saturation level. Investigative Services Division currently has three officers assigned to burglary investigation. They average about 100 case reviews per month, further investigated about 35% of these cases, and have a cur- rent clearance rate of about 13%. Field Services Division averages eight to nine field units per shift, handling all calls for services and investigations, plus self-initiated contacts, investigations, and follow ·ups. The approach selected for implementation is described in the methodo- logy section. -13- • • 34. PROJECT OBJECTIVES 1. To reduce, by 25%, the number of burglaries occurring in house- holds and cormiercial establishments that have been personally contacted by members of the Burglary Reduction Project during the grant year, as compared to burglaries occurring in non-con- tacted households durng the same period. 2. To evaluate the operating reliability of a computer-assisted data analysis program intended to predict the time and location of burg";aries. 3. To implement and test a Burglary Reduction Project that can be used as a model by other jurisdictions and whose methodolqgy can be easily adapted to other crimes where citizen knowledge and action is important, e.g., purse-snatch, fraud, prowlers, etc. 4. To increase apprehension and clearances effecting additional pre- vention objectives by taking the burglar out of circulation. -14- 35. METHODOLOGY 35.1. Surrmary: A computer-aided tool will be used to predict the location of potential burglary victims. Based on weekly updates and read- outs, trained non-sworn personnel will be deployed in the indi- cated zor1es to urge that the residents and/or business people upgrade their security. 35.2. Burglary Prediction Tool: The Burglary Probability Factors program is a data system designed to statistically compute from burglary files the mathematical chances of when, where, · d how a future burglary wi 11 occur. The original source document is the form which is filled out by the initial investigating officer at the scene of a burglary. Once completed, the fQni1 is transmitted to the Police Corrmunity Services Division where it is held to accumulate with ethers for one week. The collected fonns are then transferred to data processing where the infonr~tion is keypunched on IBM punchcards and subsequently entered into the computer to upgrade the data file. The data file is then coupled with the computer program which analyzes the infonnation and prints out the results. These results are the projections of future burglaries which are then delivered to Police Co.11nunity Services. One copy is retained by Police Corrmunity Services for comparison with actual burgiaries as they occur. Data will be sent to the Research Section for analysis. The Field Services Coordinator and the Investigative Services Coordinator will be provided with copies of the prediction so they may adjust their daily assignment schedule as necessary for special field deployment to effect apprehension, deterrence, and surveillance in problem locations. The Burglary Probability Factors (BPF) program is presently in the test-and-de-bug phase. It is expected to be operational by September 1, 1975. The flow of data through the Burglary Probability Factor program from source to readout of 459--predictecl-zones_ is -as _follows: 35.2.1. Officer responding to burglary scene fills out -input sheet at scene. Seventeen factors .are described. (Appendix--Item 3) 35.2.2. Input sheets are collected, reviewed for errors, and logged daily. 35.2.3. Input sheets are accumulated and key-punched weekly. -15- • 'I 35.2. Burglary Prediction Tool: (Cont.) 35.2.4. Cards are validated and read into BURGHISTRY by BURG 01 (Appendix--Item 4). 35.2.5. BURG 02 extracts current data from BURGHISTRV and writes into BURGEXTRCT. 35.2.6. BURG 03 SORT sorts BURGEXTRCT by day, time, weather, and zone. 35.2.7. BURG 03 generates weekly probability report (Appendix--Item 5). ----At the o~tset-of this proposed project~ the Burglary Proba~-. bility Factor data base will consist of all burglaries from January, 1972, to December, 1975 (the 1975 cases are being input currently; burglary reports from the earlier years are bei_ng gradually coded end read-in). The weekly prediction -15-A- -----------------------------··-- •• •• I 35. MEl~ODOLOGY (Continued) will localize the expected 459 1 s to a day, time, weather, and one of 92 zones, as well as describing other relevant factors, such as structure, fencing, method of entry, etc. The zones _are a further brea~dcwn of the 13 (approxi~ate) census tracts within Palo Alto. Alignment with the established tractt w~s felt desirable in that demograpiic data is available at that level for further analysis. The zones are roughly equal in structure density and are of manageable size for the preven- tive field operatio11s to be performed by this project. Addi- tionally, for cross-reference ease, all Palo Alto police data are sorted by these zones. A similar, though unrelated burglary rediction project was undertaken by the City of Seaside in 1972 and is coming to its completion this year. The primary differences between Seaside's effort and this proposed project are: -Seaside predicts to the census tract level, an area possibly ten times the size of Palo Alto's zones. -Action taken in Seaside 1 s predictions is aimed toward apprehension of suspects by undercover officers and is not oriented toward preventive efforts by the citizen- ry. Though Seaside Police Department encountered m~ny prograrrming and procedural difficulties {their data prct~ssing is handled by a local junior college) and excessive equipment do\'m-time, they experienced a marked reduction in the numi::er of reported burglaries during 1972-73 and feel that this is mostly due to their Crime Prevention project. 35.3. Achieve~ent of Objec~iv~ il--Reduction of Burglaries: Strong evidence exists that households 1, whose adult members have attended a security seminar or HH which have had a physical security inspection, are significantly less susceptible to burg- lary. In 1974 of the 1,473 households that had received a 11valid11 contact~, only 18 were subsequently burglarized (1.28~). Of the 22,051 HH not contactedt 1,092 became victims (4.95%). Some portion of the above 4:1 ratio of reduced vulnerability can pro- bably be CP~rged off to other unidentified factors; but with the fairly large sample size and the random geographical distribution of the client HH, it seems reasonable to conclude that the client HH are truly more secure because of the valid personal contact. 1For simplicity, the term 11 Household11 (HH) is used herein to include all structures--both residential and co11111ercial. (22,000 resid~ntial and 2,400 non-residential. 211va11d'1 contact, for the purpose of this project. is defined as an adu 1 t • s attendance at a neigh~rhood seminar i.wol vir.g a meanin~tul interchange on home phys ica 1 security and ~ecure 1 iving habits, and/or having an actl1al physical security inspection of the HH performed. -.... 35. lJE'l1{000ID::;Y (COntinued} Acc:X>nlingly, the follcwing nethcdology will be enployed by the Field (peratioos Section of the project: 35.3.1. Four nm-sworn perscns will be hired and trai.'led as Burglary Reduct.ioo SE:ecialist.s (Bro} to perfonn HH security insi:ections -. and advise people as to daily living habits that will reduce their vulnerability to burglru:y. 35.3.2. 'lhe BRS will be assigned to working hours that will penni.t liH CXllltacts to be made on \rw'eekdays, evenings , and wee.1<ends for best coverage of 459-pre<iicted zcnes. 35. 3.3. 'Ille BRS \\'ill he deployed into the 459-pre- dicted zcnes (and, to the eA-tent poss:ihle, the zcr.es surrounding the predicted area}, and will use one or rrore of the follcw.ing n-ethods to cbtain the maxi.nun mimer of valid ca,,tacts with HH: 35. 3. 3.1 [b:)rstep offers to perfOll'!l -security inspections; 35.3.3.2 Nei~1bori.ood semi...;.ars by ~int rrent and invi tati.a1 to discuss the burglary proolem and inpart advice en upgrading securi cy. ('Ihese seminars can be a:xmercial or resi- dential in nature, repend.ing en the neighbol'.hood's rrakeup). 'Jhe four BPS's will be assist.ed in the: call-backs a11d follc:MUPS resulting frcm the above nodes of operation b-_i the two super- vising p:>lioa officers who will be assigned to the pro~ect. Based c.n a a:nservative estimate of the rate of client a::r-tact per hour, it is mcpec..1:£...>d that the project will ootain approxi- 1rately 5 ,500 client HH (about 23% of tr.e City• s HR} durilq t.l-ie first U m:nths of the grant (Appendix-Item 6). During the -17- . • 35. METHODOLOGY (Continued) second year's operation, the client level should increase con- siderably, since there will be minimal training required (as- suming a low employee turnover) ar.d a learning-curve effect should be observable. The Data Analysis Section of the project will accumulate and monitor statistics resu~tin~ from the field effort for evalu-ation purposes. The follow1ng data will be gathered: -Quantity of client HH; -Client HH address and zone; -Type of contact made; !one, address, day, date, time of 459's occurring to clients; Zone, address, day, riate, time of 459's occurring to non-clients; -Person-hours worked by Field Operations personnel; -Clients obtained per hour; -Cost per person-hour (including project i~-house overhead); -Cost per client ob~ained; -Other data as required by the evaluation consul- tant's final design. The basic evaluation of whether Objective #1 is being attained or not should be a simple comparison of the quantity of burg- laries occurring in client HH vs. those occurring in non-client HH. 35.4. Achievement of Objectives #2 and #3: Objectives #2 and i3, analysis of Burglary Probability Factor Program and development of a model Burglary Reduction project, respectively, will be accomplished by an on-going systCins analysis. 35.5 Personnel: (See Appendix--Item 7 for Organizational Structure and Job Descriptions) 35.5.l. Project Direct~r -An existing department staff lieu- tenant will oversee the project reporting directly to the Chief of Police. 35.5.2. Project Coordinator -A Project Coordinator to perfonn the day-by-day grant management will be hired. -18- . a • 35. METHC-OOLOGY (Continued) 35.5.3. Fieid Operations: -Four Burglary Reduction Specialists will be hired from the local area. -Field Operations will be supervised by 3n existing Police Officer. 35.5.4. Data Analysis and Evaluation: -A Secretary/Clerk will _be hired. -An independent evaluation consul- tant 1 s services wil 1 be put under contract. -Supervision of the Data Analysis effort will be performed by an existing Police Officer. 35.6 Achievement of Objective 14 (Increase :>:pprehension and clearance rates): Weekly ccmputer probability data predictivs infonnation on poten- tial burglary locations based on location, tir1~e, and day will be sent to Research Section for analysis and information provided to managers for planning and deployment operations of personnel to apprehend and detei-burghrie:s in a giv2r1 area. There would be not significant cost increase, but rather a more objective and scientific method of manpower deployment based on computer pro- jected burglary "hit" areas. -19- -----··-· • • . • ' 36. WORK SCHEDULE Prolect Weeks L _J Act1vHv 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 I I 52 36. l PROJECT COORDINATION: 36. 1. 1 Secure City-owned office s2ace * J .l J .\ 36. 1. 2 Recruit and hire Project Coordinator * Li 'l 3t::.1.3 Establish budgetary ' control S,lStem I " I J. 36.l.4 Procure furnishings & eauioment I .1 .1 l 36. l. 5 Prepare RFP for Evalu- ation subcontract j .I .1 l 36. l. 6 Bid cycle and award of Evaluation subcontract* L. J l 36. 1-. 7 -Vehicle bid cycle and ----·------·- I delivery j ... I l 36. 1.8 Coordinate project, in-~-, J -A cludina reoort oreoaration J .a 36.2 FIELD OPERATIONS: 36.2.1 Recruit and hire Burg- larx Reduction S~ecialists J le • l 36.2.2 Deveiop training program & conduct traininQ ~ l I. .l 36.2.3 Deployment of BRS in 459-I I -11 predicted zones J .\ ~7 I 36.3 DATA ANALYSIS: 36.3. l Recruit and hire Secretary/ •. Clerk J ..I J l 36.3.2 Soecify data to be collected J 1\ 36.3.3 Design data recording and dis~lal sl'._stem j .I l .l 36.3.4 Conduct data accumulation I _j -A and anal~sis l .l. '} I L _J 11 36.3.5 Perform project evaluation I I I '• ., *Assumes preliminary activity prior to contract award. -20-' r f , --v ... --... ' ~ _...,_;;..:: ' 37. MANAGEMENT RECORDS -·-~.~ .... --·· .... . . Records to permit cffP.ctive monitoring cf the project's fiscal and schedule status, and to contribute to its evaluation, will be main- tained. Accounting records ~ill be in accordance with the City of Palo Alto's existing system. Specific project records, such as the foliowing, will also be kept: -Quantity of HH contacted; -Quantity of clients obtained; -Address, zon~ and tract of clients; -How contact was made; Number of refusals of service; -Tract, zone, address, day, date and time of burglaries occurring to clients; -Tract, zone, address~ day, date and time of burglaries occurring to non-clients; -Field hours worked (time cards); -Office hours worked (time cards); -Clients per field hour; -Person-cost per field hour; -Cost per client. -21- . \ 38. PROJECT EVALUATIOH The project evaluation task w111 be subcontracted to an independent consultant. This consultant's methodology will be integrated with the basic data system and progress monitoring tasks. 38.1 Measuring Achievement of Objective #l--Bur2lary Reduction: This will be accomplished by an on-going analysis of project data to answer such questions as: -Are burglaries in client HH 25% less than non-clients? -Are field per5onnel able to cover 459-predicted zones on a timely basis? -Are a signifi~ant number of valid HH contacts being made? -If a client HH is a victim subsequent to contact, had the client taken any positive steps to improve security? If not, why not? -What is the ratio of forcible to non-forcible entries to client HH as compared to non-cliei1ts? -What is t~e burglary rate change (pre-and post- project) of our client group compared to_ the bur- glary rate change (pre-and post-project} of non- clients? 38.2 Measuring Achievement of Objective 12--Evaluation of BPF Program: The operating reliability of the Burglary Probability Factor Program can be evaluated by analyzing day-by-day operations to answer questions such as: -Is the field report-coding-keypunch-run time cycle efficient enough to produce prediction~ on a timely basis? -Will the BPF program generate enough 11 hits11 (predic- tion of zone by day and time) to efficientiy deploy field personnel? If not~ how modify--grouping of zones? expansion of data base? expansicn of time slot? change progranming concept? -Is data processing and program maintenance cost excessive for results obtained? 38.3 Measuring Achievement of Object #3--Project as Model for Other Uses: The usefulness of this project as a model for other juris- dictions and types of crime can be evaluated by examining the day-by-day operating procedures and analyzing data to answer such questions as: · -What is the cor.munity 1 s reaction to the use of civilian personnel as representatives Qf the Police Department? -Will the client follow advice givf'n? -22- . . .. 38. PROJECT EVALUATION (Continued) -Do other types of crimes fit a pattern of occurrence by location and time that could be considere1 predictable? -Are project operating proce(ures properly established such that another jurisdicti .... 1 could implement a similar project with a minimum of training? -23- APPENDIX -24- -· -----~--------------..-.--..,.. - • • 100 80 PER- CENT 60 40 20 . YEAR 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 BURGLARY STATISTICS -PALO ALTO 1969 -1975 (Projected) QUANTITY % INCREASE 730 802 817 879 928 1, 1l0 1,399 POPULATION GROHTH · + Baseline 10% 2% 8% 14% 20% 26% (Pr!ljected) J> I / / / -..cio~_;__---ter ----E> --------~o~-------ee~~-e 1970 1971 1972 YEARS -25 1973 1974 1975 ,- .. APPENDIX-·ITEM 2 BURGLARY COST BREAKDOl-IN 1. FJELD SERVICES DIVISION: Quantity of Burglaries (Projected} 1,399 Officer-Hours/Burglaryl x 2.2 Total Field Hours 3,078 Cost Per Officer-Hour2 x $10.12 TOTAL FIELD SERVICES COST $ 31,149 2. INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES DIVISION: It is estimated that only 60% of burglary cases are fully investigated. The rt;iiJaining 40% are those that do not con- tain eno•Jg~ information to make further fol low-up productive. This results in tha following projection: Not Investigated Investioated Quantity of B.irglaries (Projected) Officer-Hours/Burglary3 Total Hours 560 x 1.0 560 Cost Per Officer-Hour 840 x 14.3 12,012 x 10.12 x lo. 12 TOTAL INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES COST TOTAL COST FOR OFFICERS RESPCNDING TO AND INVESTIGATING BURGLARIES = 3. DEPARTMENTAL RESOURCES ALLOCATED TO BURGLARIES: $ 158,377 $2,717,387 = 5.8% 1source: Called-For Service Statistics 2source: Departmental Budget for FY 1976 3source: Service Management System $127,228 $158,377 •• APPENDIX--ITEM 3 Page 1 of 2 BURGLARY PROBABILITY FACTORS LOCATION _____________ VICTIM---·------------ A. DATE 8. TIME C. 70NE 0. REPORT FROM TO UNK DD-DD-DD ODDO-DODD D DOD DD-DDDDD E. DAY OF THE WEEK 01. MONDAY 02. TUESDAY 0 3. WEDNESDAY 0 4. THURSDAY 0 5. FRIDAY 0 6. SATURDAY 0 7. SUNDAY 0 8. 1800 FRI.· 0800 MON. F. WEATHER CONOfllONS 0 1. CLEAR 0 2. RAIN G. TYPE OF PROPERTY 0 1. HOUSE 0 2: APARTMENT 0 3. RETAIL BUSiNESS 04. OFFICE !BUILDING) 0 5. COMMERCIAL'!NDUSTR!AL 06. SCHOOL 0 7. PARK (RECREATIONAL) 08. OTHER H. LOCATION OF ENTRY 01. FRONT 0 2. REAR 03. SIDE 04. ROOF 05. OTHER 06. UNKNOWN I. POINT OF ENTRY 01. WINDOW 02. DOOR 0 3. SKYLIGHT 04. AIADUCT 0 5. OTHER 06. UNKNOWN J. METHOD OF ENTRY 0 1. GREAT FORCE 0 2. SLIGHT FORCE 03. NO FORCE 04. UNKNOWN -27- K. TOO LS USED 01. SMALL PRY 0 2. LARGE PRY 0 3. BOLT CUTTERS 04. DRILL 05. SAW 06. WRENCH 0 7. BLUNT INSTRUMENT oa. OTHER 09. NONE l. VISIBILITY OF POINT ENTRY 0 1. VISIBLE TO PATROL VEHICLES 0 2. VISIBLE TO FOOT PATROL 03. NOT VISIBLE M. BUILDING EXTERIOR 01. LIGHTED 0 2. LIGHTS AVAILABLE BUT NOT FUNCT!ON!NG 03. NO LIGHTS AVAILABLE 0 4. NOT APPLICABl E -DAYLIGHT N. BUILDING INTERIOR 01. LIGHTED 0 2. UNLIGHTED 0 3. NOT APPLICABLE ·-DAYLIGHT 0. FENCE -TYPE 0 1. SEE-THROUGH (CYCLONE) 02. SOLID 03. NONE P. FENCE -USE 0 1. PREVENTS ACCESS TO BUILDING 0 2. ADMITS ACCESS TO BUILDING 03. NONE 0. ALARM 01. SILENT 02. AUDIBLE 03. NONE . • . . BU-t..GU•i::'!.' l'FJ'):l:''.B!LI'!".l Ft1.CJ'O?S ~·1~ Q.):JJ1l'G OJIL~ Page 2 of 2 A--curacy a."1d CO."'f?let.J.!Z:C!:'S arc cssentinl in fillin:J out th~ form. !n U1c C\.'elt t::o rt?S~>:>::se:.3 i!p:-X?ar rca.so:1:.l:.l0, select th:~ en~ t-;hich r:cst accurately des crib·:!.'; th·.: f i.ct. !·:Ctr:~ o:ily G ff: ~/':-'. F.<"!r C...'1.lf:·_;o:ry. Eudl cate":J'Ory r.ru::; t Le OA"plt:t.:d \dth the e:;.:c·::1_,tions no6YJ b::!lo .. 1; BlocJ: C. N~m: 00 ~:0l' p::epare a Durglru:y P1:t:::x·1bility Factor Sheet for the follo:1in3 C:1Ze£: 1) .3u.spicious Ci::c:-,r..s t.:l.'1c:s 2) l'nto Burglary 3) Burglary (Sho?lift) VIC'ITVi: B. TI~E: -- c. za~: D. REPOFT: DAY OF ---·---------O::X:ml'J'JnG: 'lhe stn .. X!t address of the o::currence. Inch .. 'dc the a~t m.nber or letter if appliec-:.hlc •. last n::i.TC:, first na.~, middlG initial of porsons. Ccnpany narre, if bus.iness • Enter the date of tie occm..~.-:;:-.cc. If this cannot he. d~i:cr mfr~.ed (vucation, \·:eekend, etc.) enter the date of di~o::::v~iy. 'lhc fin.,_ l: two blc~::ks are for the rrcnth, the next h-ro for tr:~ d"3.y, and the last. b.-10 are u~c ye ... 1r. E>;a.-rple: Jan\k-u:y 5, 1~75 01-05-75 August 11, 197:i 08-11-75 ~or 28, 1975 -10-28-75 • ~is is-entered as :oer the 21.~0 hour clock. 'Ihe ti.'l'e spa.'l Jri'.ISt he within a single 21.. hoar p:!riod; if not, leave block B. blan.~. 01eck this blo::k i:f: 1) 'J.he ti.Ire sp,~m of OCCU-.r:!'enc~ cannot be <lete.x:nrined. 2) '..ihc burglary OCC"urred over a week.end betwzcn the approxi- na.tc hours of 1800 Friday and 0 800 H::n<lay. 'Jhis is ·the prchability zone. I.eave this block blanl' us it will~ ccupletcd by records. ~e case nurrber for ~e burglmy report. Cbtain ca-.;e nurh!r and c:n•plcte appropriate blCK;ks. Clleck t.1-ie d:ly of the we<>...k that U1e burglmy occurred. If the tiJrc SJ:XU1. cncc>..<?<--c:.;ses lwo cbys, check ·::.he first &y of or.;cur- rcnre. If the thn~ span cncc~~ses the wcci~end with the appro:;.:.inate hours of 1000 Fi:iday through 0800 M:>n<l.,y, d1eck box 8. Select the n\'.Xlt applic:cblc weather cle;rcnt when: t!1e burc;J.a:....-y occurred. -28- .. . . • G. T'lfr~ 0? Proi!i:!Zd: H. lD":..i:rlCN OF i::fI·i,:1·: . I. ronrr K. 'I(X)I.S IBE6; r~. visrrn r; roill'1;;.Ehi~Y: M. BrJIIDI;-;G EXillkJUR: N. DUILDili'G ~J:'EIUO:{: 0. F'.ENffi 'l"il'k:: Select the 1:r.>s l u.ccuri.! tc (:·~:;cript.im. If "Ot.hcr" is d1eckcd, bricily dc.:.:;criJy3 st.t-uc:..urc. S~lect thi:! Hr: .. st c:iccur~·t.c c.1·)Scriptic:1. If "Other" is dleckcd, b.r.:.c·fly c'!G.ScdJ.>::. {i.e. tu .. -mcl). Select the? n·:-x. t a.ccm.atc d.::scripUoa. If "OLllei." is c.hec."ed, bricfl~· describe. Select the nnst ~ccurate de.:>cription. "Great Fore~;'' \.;·ould h~ typifie-.i t.y a kicked in door. "Slight Force" would b::~ t'fpific<l Ly ~ pried c~t.r.y. "No Force" i~ tl1e tot.:-:.1 c:bSC·1a:? of any force, such as C.L"1 open w.tnda.·: 0r a.'1 u1~ :y_·kcd UJ?!". "Unkno,m" is a conflic;; h-~t.·:~ t:.1e P.P's statcr:-c..Tlt of a CO.iplcrely secured building i.md the .:ipp:t.n:nt lac.i.: of ~ force crl.b.y; or if U1c nethoJ. f;i.rr~ly ca'liY.Jt re &~tr;.nnined. Select tlK! !':C3t accJr<:tte <lescdption. If "<Y-.ller:i is d'1ccl:cd, brit~fly d::_;cri~. (i .c. / !'Ja5t_l~ ~h .. ;re). Select the r.ost aCCUJ:ate de3criptio11. Select the rrost accncate descriptio!l. Select the irost accurate description. Select the rrost accurate descriptia1. A "See-'.lhroua)l (C"jcl0!"1.:?)" is primarily designed for st.-curity rather than p:d vacj. A 11Solid11 fc11cc is t.ypified by residential !"id::? .md bad-;: pn. . .pcrty line fencl?.s, erected }:.>ri.r.urily fer privilC.f u.nd usually of visibilit.l' restrictive construction. Select the m:::st acci.u:ate dcs.::ription. Select the Il()St accurate dcscriptio;1. If an alarm is tk1th locally audible <md CT.J;'1n0ct<::Xl to ~i thcr an al"-m1 coa1xmy or Police Comt1UnicltiOi1S1 d1Qclc audible. -29- .. SrJl?&tltA'f ~'eltr el4,tt>J -~0- lJuP.~/..4"'/ P"!e!J AB1i Ir/ S"(~IE.M JAtJ "17(". i 4 1 • . .l '· i I I ~- ) ·1 . ' . C> .~SEGMENT OF TEST /DEBUG RUN--INOICATES FORPAT ONLY} " U~J UA1~ ~u~ o~-11•75 .l DAY T lME . l'IEAlHE.~ ZONt TYPC: -----------.. ......... --·------··----·-. -· ----. -...... -- • ----~-ON OOOl•UcCO CLEAR OGO OTHER CllJ01•vc?OO RAlN 000 OTHER ------------·--·· ------.......... -. ·---0::01-0'iOO Cl..E. AR OTH!::R ., 0201•0400 QQO.\ RAIN /·013 RETAll uus '--~_,, • • • • . • • -- O~Ol·O~U~ C~EAR COO OTH~~ ______ Q~O-~-JbOO. _._kAIN ______ ooo ___ ._O.TH~l't ...... --· -·---···· .. _ Oovl•J800 OoOl•"oOO -·--------- __ .. __ -- OSCJl•lUOO Od01•1000 10~1-1200 1001-1200 1201•l'tU0 1201•1"!00 --------i 40 l • l t>CIO l'+U1•lo00 ··----·--·----· -- 1&01•1800 1601•1800 ______ .., __ . 1601-2000 .. . . ·--------1801 •4?00(t tLf t.~ OiJO R.\JN 000 CLEAR 000 RAIN 000 (;TrifR UTHSi. C~EAR 000 OTHER RAlN_ ____ Q~.Q._ . __ OTHC.R ___ .. _ CL~AR ______ 000 OH1£R RAIN 000 OlHcR ---CLE.AR -o·oo -----· OlHER RAIN 000 OTHER -...... ----- CLEAR 000 OTHER ~A_I N 000 OTri~ R -......... ----· .. ... .. -- C~EAR 000 OTHER RAIN oou OTril:.:~ L oc; ----- UNI\ U·'iK ··-UN!<. FRONT Ul'.IK UNi< l.)NK uNK liNK Ut-..K l>NK l.it.jK lJ f\i( U:'lt:< APPENDIX--ITF.M 5 HUIH.iLt.l.:Y .-.1-dJt.'AIJlllT'( FACTOR!; l\Ut~:Jl..ARY PRU~ AS lL. ll '( FACTIJnlS PUlNT Ml THO!) TOOL.S USED L. : AL.>\ i~M t) ............ -------...... -----·-----... -------·-- UNK IJt:KNlH~" w:i< I l;N .... f\O\.iN ----·---UNK UNt<.NOhN otil NOOio! (, ~Ql{Ct: U!\I'\ ut; i(:\ J ;,; N ul'.K Ur..r<flOl-IN l,.li-.K !.J!, K t:U~-; 'J ljl'\: i{ !..::•'1' D~t .'; UNi< ur~KNOWN l.J r~ I<. l.Jt,~hmiN UNK U~K~O~~ UlloK. __ -~-· Uf·H<l'oO~ ~ I.)!>: I( LJl\l<f'> Oh 'Ii UNI( UNi<NUw:--.1 Ut.!i< Ut.KNOW :'II UN!< UNKNOWN UNK UN~NOw.'i UNI( U:'l.l(N01toN iJNI( vr. <.., o .. " ti,. .. ,..., ... UN~ .. NONE !\Qt-;£ -.. NONE S11ALL PRY ' NQNC.: NONE NDN( r..;c:·iE NQ!l:C: NONE NQ!'.oE NONE NQt~C:: !'llOfl.IE NONE NONE NON£ NO,.t: .. : ..... --· ·--· .. P\!C;-iE NLJ~4£ ~--. NO~lE Sil.C.~T NQ1\C. NONE r~tF•E ~C·~~ tHPiE: !'.;"1 '~~ !\IQ.-..E N(J ~J£ ~c-"' ........... ... ·: ... : .J M --.1 . "'" ti .. l\t Ye . , ••'II , .. ,. ... NC .... .. ' . .. QUANTITY OF EXPECTED CLIENTS 1. Assumptions: APPENDIX--ITEM 6 Page 1 of 2 1.1 Work schedules will provide coverage in the field on weekdays, evenings, and weekend days. Exact hours will be adjustable to provide best c1i~nt production. 1.2 An eight-hour working day will result in six effective hours in the field allowing for morning briefing and trans;t and afternoon transit and reporting. 1.3 Neighborhood seminars will be held four nights per week, with representatives of eight HH expected to attend each seminar. 1.4 Considering that a security inspection takes anywhere from 15 to 45 minutes and that the same applies for meaningful contact at a neighborhood van display, a client production rate of one per hour has been as- sumed. 2. Field Operations Schedule: Based on the abc•ve, a typical week 1 s schedule f'or the four BRS could look like the following: #1* #2 13 #4 4 4 EFFECTIVE FIELD ~:OURS TUE 4 6 10 WED 4 6 6 __§_ 22 THU 4 6 6 6 22 6 6 __§_ 18 SAT 6 6 6 -2. 24 6 6- 12 = 112 Hours *Assumes afternoon work in field and evening attendance at neighbor- hood seminar. -32- ,. 3. guantity of Clients Expected: 3.1 Clients per week: 3.2 112 Field Hours/Week @ 1 HH Per Hour = 4 Neighborhood Se~inars Per Week, @ 8 HH Per Hour·= TOTAL PER WEEK = Effective working weeks: Total Weeks Available ; Recruit, Hire, Training = 6 weeks Holiday$ an~ Miscellaneous Leave, Z weeks x 4 = 8 14 Effective working weeks = Clients Per Week = Clients Expected During First Year .,. ··33- Page 2 of 2 112 HH 32 HH 144 HH 52 14 38 x144 52472 ... DATA ANALYSIS , _____ _ -Accumulation, display and analysis of field statis- tics. -BPF input/out- put • .. Evaluation Subcontract • PROJECT DIRECTOR PROJECT COORDINATOR CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION -Response to contract requirements.-_ -Budget -Reports -Staff and Clerical support. FIELD OPERATIONS -BRS Teams. -HH Contacts. I ~ (") I ... • .. ~. desaipt10 ...._ _______ ___ PROJECT COORDINATOR REPORTS TO: Project Director BASIC FUNCTION: Performs all management ft1nctions related to day-by-day project operations. Is re$p~nsible for budget prepara- tion and control, preparation aric coordination of pur- chasing documents, review and approval of sub-contract negotiations, control of labor and fiscal expenditures, monitoring of project schedule progress, preparation of contractually required reports, and acting as liaison between the project and outside agencies. MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS: l. Combination of education and experience in program management and/or contract administration to manage a federal grant.project. 2. Familiarity \'1ith law enforcement administration and management techniques. 3. Able to pass a thorough background chec~. -----------city of paio atto __________ __)_ ·35- POLICE BURGLARY REDUCTION SPECIALIST REPORTS TO: Supervising Officer, Field Operations Section BASIC FUNCTIONS: Performs physical security inspections of ho~es and co111r.ercial estab- 1 ishrnents to ascertain adequacy of the structure's resistance to burg- lary. Gives advice to owners/occupants regarding appropriate types of locking and alarm devices available to upgrade physical security. Con~~cts neighborhood-type seminars to discuss safer daily living and working procedures, as well as augmented physical security. In general, the Police Burglary Reduction Specialist's responsibility will be to .increase people's awareness of ~he means by which they can help pre- vent burglary. MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS: 1. Over 18 2 · A oatbinati.oo of educaticn and e>:pe.rience eqili.valent to ~ years of college. 3. Experience in public contact work required. 4. Ability to represent the Police Department in a profes~ional manner. 5. ~ust be able to pass a thorough background check. ~----------city of pa.lo alto----------- -36- • • GENERAL CLERK A REPORTS TO: ------Supervisort Data Analysis Section BASIC FUNCTION: Performs responsibl~ clerical duties requirinq independent analysis, exercise of judgment, and a detailed knowledge of organization and/or project procedures related to the work performed. Specific work per- formed can vary considerabiy to include work with figurest and the operation of simple office machines {e.g., adding machine, calculator, typewriter, etc.). PRIMARY DUT!fS: Processes complex documents to assure completeness, accuracy, and the fulfillment of organization r2Quirements. Maintains records and compiles regular reports in accordance with project procedures. Campi les special reports, as requested, from available records and by re~uesting information from other areas. May have contacts with outsid~ agencies to exchange Jiro_ject- related information. MINIMUM guALIF!CATIONS: 1. High school graduate with some college or business school preferred. 2. Three years general office experience. 3. Typin~ speed of 65 ~~m. 4. Able to pass a thorough background check • ............_ ___________ , <'jty of ~lo alto--·----------- ·37- .• • t • Police Lieutenant The Lieutenant will serve as Project Director in his capacity as a member of the Chief's Staff. Salary for this position will be absorbed as part of normal department budget. Police Officers (2) One officer will supervise the day-by- day field operations. The second of- ficer will be responsible for data collection and correlation, develop- ment of infonnational bulletins, and will provide field support when re- quired. Salaries for these positions will be absorbed as part of norw4l department budget. General The expense associated with office space, telephones, office supp1ie~ and data processing, will be ab- sorbed as a part of the nonnal de- partment budget. -38- -... . ' .- .. ,l" ACKNO'l'\'LED:_; E ~'~ENT Project Not::irati'-'n ;,.-,.; ht:1;1M1 System Ofli::.e of th~ Gr·.-~r;;or PROJECT: B:_n·:ilary Rsc!:ictim;: Pn::vc::·tion b) Prediction N ( 7505~~29 State Clearir.£Jh·:.~'se umber S·::Hl ----~ _;c.;;.._ __ The above St.?1'.: Cl,>.-.:in2hous·~ Nurnber must b·~ u~.c;d on future cv~resfr.)ndence with this office and muH l..: brought to th.' ;;tl~:'ltion o! I.ii~ c:Jt-11cy ta'-in1: ~::lior. on your p:ajec:t. Dctte Recei\·er!: _____________ 5/: !__,~.-_s ___ _ Date Rev:ew _12..-. ;:·r:s: F n:ls_;_ __ _ _ 5./ 2'.:.f.7..5_ ___ _ .:rtre Statt> re-.-\~;"":·~i-;-c.·_,,. ?f'O;:_ .:°'."'"i ,; ~ £""-:'.!'•;:_,., :-.~: ---::. :-_ -<l~Y'"' iii:; c:1 d DO i::.s NOT v~:ify compH.J~fce \..,·,:.~ r,;-i-':jp;->!icati::1' r..i:"'i-:Jr rn~.'i!'t.1:.-:. :·;\:~: f'! .. ,\:un-·.·~:i~ · ·:;r:,-/'1 r£quiH:m::nts~ P. l!?tter cont~!r:i::._:t Pie StJte's <.--:--.n...-·1·::·rJt~ Ct a •ct:•:r c~~ntt:mtr1t; t.::.-~i n·J ctHramcn~s v·.:~e scnc-fatcd will L~ fr,1ward"::l :.·. so::>r, ;;!tcr the re..,,.:; :s co:n;,!,;;t-::.J o~ IK·<;~io1e. OPR 2 Ae11. 2/75 Sate of California ·-.._/· ·. . _. { !. ... _ ··' • . ·• . ~tafc nf <!Taliflttnia GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OFFICE OF PLANNING ANO RESEARCH 1400 TENTH STREET SACRAMENTO 9~814 EOMUNO G. BROWN JJt. GO'Wf.fllPiilOR ~. -.-v-.......... ~.· ·- Lt. c. B. Hauser PCS Coordinator 275 Forest Palo Alto, CA 94301 June 4, 1975 S1JBJEC,": SCH 75052029 BURGLARY REDUCTION: P.REVENTION BY PREDICTION fJeo L-Lt. Hauser: The ~!!Jove -1 ::.;ted µrojcct was submitted by the State C lct1 !' ~ ns:1ou~t.· to numerous State aser.~ies for revi...:·.v. The :-~~vie.·: h,13 t)f•en compl..: L.:--{i, and t~H~ r-e wer·::.> 110 con.men ts 0n u·10 ; l r 0 j (:-::-t. • 'f·:1is lette:: vt>ri_::i£>5 yout· compliunc.:.: ~-;ith prea:}r.1.1cation r.:v i p~.; n"'qui n'nm t ~. Pl ease at tac!1 i. L to your ro rTP<:f! dpj·l!.c,1tion. W2 re.;:'..lcst that ·::·cu us.:? t:he State Cle-3rin,:i- houst 111.:.m~ ... ~~r assigned tc your pro }ect on t.hc cover page of ~·our <trt'Iic.::.tion .md on all sl!!)scquent refcrencP.s L.O this application, since it will be used b",:' the fundin9 r'l<JC')':-:_..,· i..;hr•:-: Uw State Clearin-.1house is :-iotificd of the d.'·.'ard1 ::9 ~1 f ynur grant. ·r:1u11K you fc i.-~··::>ur co0peration. S in ce ~-e l y , Willia~ S. Kirkham !'-1an.Jger11ent systcr:ls Offi ccr StQte Clearinghouse -----------------~--------- .. I • • # .... , '' . -~··-···-··~ ........... -~ .... a:Rr.U"ICATICN CF FOPMIJI.A'l'ICN AND AVAilABILIT'i CF ~ EM?~ CPPORIWI'IY PR.JGRAM filing the applicatiai) CP..rtify that the ~~~~~~~~~~~ Palo Alto Police Depart::ien\ (~iminal justice agency) has fonratlated an equal enploynent q:iportunity prograrrt in accordance with 28 CFR 42.301, et seq., subpart E, and that it is oo file in the off ioe of Charles 4alker 250 Hamilton Avenue, Palo Alto (rume)' (address}, Assistant City fl.arutgf!r (ti tie) , for review or audit by officials of the rognizant state planning agency or the I.aw Enforcenent Assista."lce 1\drn:i.nistratioo~ as required by relevant laws an<'l regulatic.os • (T tle) / OJCP-74-EEO (12-1-73) 1 l I