HomeMy WebLinkAboutRESO 9739DocuSign Envelope ID: 4BE27EFA-3DFB-4689-BODD-CA26436951E6
Resolution No. 9739
Resolution of the Council of the City of Palo Alto Continuing the Evergreen
Park-Mayfield Residential Preferential Parking District (RPP) Program
Established By Resolution No. 9663, Adjusting the Number of Permits
Available, Clarifying Specific Provisions, and Restating the Program Provisions
RECITALS
A. California Vehicle Code Section 22507 authorizes the establishment, by city council
action, of permit parking programs in residential neighborhoods for residents and other
categories of parkers.
B. On December 15, 2014, the Council adopted Ordinance No. 5294, adding Chapter
10.50 to Title 10 (Vehicles and Traffic) of the Palo Alto Municipal Code, which established the
city-wide procedures for (RPP) Districts in the city.
C. On May 9, 2016, the City Council directed City staff to implement a Residential
Preferential Parking program in the Evergreen Park-Mayfield area.
D. In July 2016, a stakeholders' group comprised of Evergreen Park residents and
business interests met two times and made its recommendations to the City on the particular
rules to be applied to the Evergreen Park-Mayfield RPP District.
E. On December 14, 2016, the Planning and Transportation Commission held a public
hearing to consider the proposed Evergreen Park-Mayfield residential preferential parking
program.
F. On January 23, 2017, the Council adopted Resolution No. 9663, which established
the Evergreen Park-Mayfield Residential Preferential Parking Program pilot and rescinded
existing parking restrictions that conflicted with the restrictions established by this RPP district.
The pilot program will expire on March 31, 2018.
G. In October and November 2017, the City conducted a parking occupancy study in
the Evergreen Park-Mayfield Residential Preferential Parking Program District and met with
residents and stakeholders to receive program feedback. The study found occupancies below
60% in Employee Parking Zones A and B, with areas of higher occupancy closer to businesses.
In addition, some businesses were unable to receive Employee Parking Permits under the
current limits.
H. It is the goal of the City to reduce the impacts of non-resident overflow parking
from the commercial areas on the surrounding neighborhoods.
I. The Council desires to extend and continue the Evergreen Park-Mayfield
Residential Preferential Parking Program established by Resolution No. 9663 with modifications
to address issues identified in the pilot, and to restate the applicable Program provisions for
this District in the subject Resolution.
1
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4BE27EFA-3DFB-4689-BODD-CA26436951 E6
NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Palo Alto RESOLVES, as follows:
SECTION 1. Findings. The criteria set forth in Section 10.50.030 of the Palo Alto Municipal Code
for designating a Residential Preferential Permit Zone have been met as follows:
A. That non-resident vehicles do, or may, substantially interfere with the use of on-street
or alley parking spaces by neighborhood residents in that based on observation there
are few available parking spaces available midday, while the streets are relatively
unoccupied at midnight thus demonstrating the parking intrusion is largely by
nonresidents.
B. That the interference by the non-resident vehicles occurs at regular and frequent
intervals, either daily or weekly, in that the parking intrusion is most severe during
daytime hours during the regular workweek.
C. That the non-resident vehicles parked in the area of the District create traffic
congestion, noise, or other disruption (including shortage of parking spaces for residents
and their visitors) that disrupts neighborhood life in that based on information from
residents and other city departments the vehicle congestion is interfering with regular
activities.
D. Other alternative parking strategies are not feasible or practical in that the City has
implemented a series of alternative parking strategies in the past and concurrently and
there is still a shortage of parking available.
SECTION 2. Definitions.
A. "Dwelling Unit" shall have the same meaning as it is defined in Palo Alto Municipal Code
Section 10.50.020.
B. "Evergreen Park-Mayfield Residential Preferential Parking Program District" or "District"
shall be that area as shown in Exhibit A to this Resolution.
C. "Parking Zones" shall be those areas within the District as shown in Exhibit A to this
Resolution.
SECTION 3. Parking Restrictions within the District.
A. Two-hour Parking Limit and No Re-parking. In the areas within the District listed in
Table 1, no person shall park a vehicle adjacent to any curb for more than two hours.
Re-parking a vehicle more than two hours after initially parking on the same day in the
same Parking Zone is prohibited. These restrictions shall be in effect Monday through
Friday from 8:00 AM to 6:00 PM, except holidays as defined in Palo Alto Municipal
Code Section 2.08.100. Vehicles properly displaying a valid Parking Permit as described
in Section 4 of this Resolution are exempt from these restrictions.
TABLE 1
STREET BLOCKS
Park Blvd. 1700, 1800, 1900, 2000, 2100, 2200-
2211,2555-2599,2600
2
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4BE27EFA-3DFB-4689-BODD-CA26436951E6
Park Ave. 100
Leland Ave. 200,300,400
Stanford Ave. 200,300,400
Oxford Ave. 200,300,400
College Ave. 200,300,400
Birch Ave. 1800, 1900, 2000, 2100, 2200-2288,
2518-2575, 2600
Ash St. 1800, 1900, 2000, 2100, 2502-2599,
2600,2700
Grant St. 100,200,300,400
Sheridan Ave. 200,300,400
B. Exempt vehicles. Vehicles exempt from parking restrictions as described in Palo Alto
Municipal Code Section 10.50.070(d) are exempt from the restrictions in this section.
SECTION 4. Parking Permits.
A. Emolovee Parking Permits. The City may issue Employee Parking Permits for use by
-employees working in the District. Employee Parking Permits shall be subject to the
following regulations:
a. Duration. Employee Parking Permits shall be available in the form of annual
permits and one-day permits.
b. Form of Permit. The City may issue Employee Parking Permits in any form it
deems practicable, including stickers or hangtags.
c. Commuting Only. Employee Parking Permits are valid only when used by
employees who are working within the District on the day the permit is used.
d. Zones. Employee Parking Permits shall be specific to one of the Parking Zones as
specified in Exhibit A and shall entitle the permit holder to park only in the
Parking Zone designated on the Employee Parking Permit.
e. Maximum Number of Permits Issued. A maximum of 250 Annual Employee
Parking Permits shall be granted at any given time to employees who work
within the Evergreen Park-Mayfield Residential Preferential Parking District. An
additional 40 Annual Employee Parking Permits (maximum) shall be granted to
employees that work outside of the California Avenue Business Assessment
District but within the Evergreen Park-Mayfield Residential Preferential Parking
District, which Permits shall be distributed within Zones A, B, C and D.
Preference will be given to low-income employees and those already on the
waiting list for the City-owned garages and lots as of January 23, 2017.
f. Daily Employee Parking Permits. Daily Employee Parking Permits will be available
to employees only, and will not be available for sale to employers. Employees
will be limited to purchase up to four (4) daily parking permits per month, or
roughly one per week. The permit will state the date through which it is valid.
1. Distribution of daily employee permits. Daily employee permits will be
valid only in the zone specified on the permit. Employees will not select
a specific zone when purchasing a daily permit, and will receive a zone
3
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4BE27EFA-3DFB-46B9-BODD-CA26436951E6
specific daily employee permit selected by the City at random at the
time of mailing.
B. Resident Parking Permits. The City may issue Resident Parking Permits to residents of
dwelling units within the District. Resident Parking Permits shall be subject to the
following regulations:
a. Duration. Resident Parking Permits shall be available in the form of annual
permits and one-day permits.
b. Form of Permit. The City may issue Resident Parking Permits in any form it
deems practicable, including stickers or hangtags.
c. Zones. Resident Parking Permits shall not be restricted to a specific Parking
Zone. Resident Parking Permits shall be valid only in the areas listed in Table 1.
d. Maximum Number of Permits per Dwelling Unit. Each dwelling unit within the
District shall be limited to five Annual Resident Parking Permits at any given
time. These permits may be used by residents or guests within the District.
e. Daily Resident Parking Permits. Each dwelling unit shall be limited to 50 Daily
Resident Parking Permits annually. These permits may be in the form of
scratcher hangtags, an online issuance system, or such other form as the City
determines. The permit will state the date through which it is valid.
SECTION 5. Fees.
A. Fee for Parking Permits Until March 31, 2018. Until the end of March 31, 2018, the
fee for Parking Permits in the District shall be the following:
a. Annual Resident Permit: First Annual Resident Permit sticker is free; second
and third Annual Permit Resident Permit stickers are $50 per permit per
year; transferable Annual Resident Permit hangtags (up to two) are $50 per
permit per year.
b. One-Day Resident Permit: $5 per permit.
c. Employee Parking Permits
1. Annual Employee Permit: $149 (or $50 if employee qualifies for low-
income status in accordance with Residential Preferential Parking
Regulations) per permit.
2. One-Day Employee Permit: $5 per permit.
B. Fee for Parking Permits Beginning April 1, 2018. Starting April 1, 2018, the fee for
Parking Permits in the District shall be set by the City's Municipal Fee Schedule
Resolution.
SECTION 6. Existing Parking Restrictions.
A. Section 2 of Resolution 4051 is repealed and replaced with the restrictions in this
Resolution.
B. 2 Hour Parking. The 2 Hour Commercial Area parking restrictions as identified in Exhibit
A shall remain in effect.
C. Conflicting Restrictions. In the event City staff should, at a later time, discover
conflicting parking restrictions within the District that conflict with the restrictions of
4