HomeMy WebLinkAboutRESO 6094, . ' • ORIGINAL
RESOLUTION NO. ij094
RESOLUTION OF TBE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALO ALTO
AFFIRMING THE CITY'S CONTINUED PARTICIPATION IN THE
SANTA CLA..'U COUNT"! HOME MORTGAGE FINANCE PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the City of Palo Alto ("City") has heretofore approved
and executed a cooperative agteement c•cooperative Agreement") with the
County of Santa Clara (•county•) pursuant to which the City and the
County have agreed to coopet"ate in the implementation of the Santa
Clara County Home Mortgage Finance Program ("Program•)1 and
WBEREM, it is presently expected that the County will authorize,
sel 1, and issue a second issue of mortgage revenue bonds to provide
additional financing for the Program; and
WHEREAS, the City and County wish to continue to cooperate in the
implementation of the Pro9ram1
NOW, TBER.EPORB, the Councjl of the City of Palo Alto dues RESOLVE
as follows:
SECTION 1. That the Cooperative Agreement shall~ remain in full
force and effect with respect to mortgage revenue bonds which may be
issued by the County during cal~ndar year 1983.
INTRODUCED AND PASSED: February 7, 1983
AYES:
NOES:
Bechtel, Cobb, Fazzino, Fletcher, Klein, Levy, Renzel, Witherspoon
None
ABSTENTIONS: None,
ABSENT: Eyerly
APPROVED:
,. .
' I . . . e· •
·.
COOP!.RATlVE.! AG:U:SMSHT B.b"l'W£EN THE COl.lNTY 01" S.\NTA CLARA
MID THE CITY Of' PALO M.'1'0 FOR PARTICll'ATHlN IN
MORTGAGE REVENUE SOHO PROGRAM
THlS CC(.)PERA~IVE AGkEEM£NT (the •cooperative Agreement•) i& hereby
111adt! hind entered into as of r.&B o 2 ~ , 1981, by and·~tw~en the C'OllNTY Of' SANTA C' ~ ~ a :tlf .~i.;&rrrrswn and bocty corporate
and pulitic of the State of California (the •county•), and the ClT!C OF
p,u.o AI.TO, a 11UnicJ.pal corporation of the State of Coalifon\id lthe
• 1ty•j.
! ! ! !:!. ! ! .2 ! ! !!:
WHEREAS, the County naa detet::mined to en9a9e in a ho11e 111ort9.'iqe
finance pr09ram (the •pr09r .. •) pursuant to Part S of Division 31 of
th~ Health and Safety Code of the State of C~lifo~nia (the ~Act•} to
Make or acquire, directly or indirectly, lonq-term loans to finance th~
constr•Jction and acquisition of homes in the County, all aa provided
for in the Actr and
WHEREAS, the County has determined to borrow •oney to fin~nce the
Pr09raa by th• issuance of revenue bonds Cth• •aonda•) as authorized by
the Act and by the provisions ~t the Costa-Marks Housing Bond All~ca
tion Act of 14)8\ (Cha.pt.er 3.5 _,f Pa'tt. \ of Di.viaicn 3\ of the Health
and Safety Code of the State of California, the •eosta-Marks Act•) 1 and
WHEREAS, the City •·•• ado;ited tM Progra• and deter11Lned to co•
operate with the County pucaua."l.t to the Act in the exerciae of thei'r:
powers unde~ the Act fo~ the purpo .. • of the Frogr&DJ
NOlili, '.l'li£ReFORE, in consideration of the mutual covienants herein-
after provided, the parties heteto agree aa follow•:
SEC'l'IOM 1. 'the 'llfOtds and pllrasea of this Cooperative Aqre~iaent
shall;= for all purp)sea hereof unles6 otherwise defined herein, have
the iaean~ngs assigned to such words and phrases in th• Act or in the
Costa-1'arks Act.
!!£!!!!!-!· The Cour.ty agrees to ~se its beat efforts to ul'ldertake
tile Pr091:JA1 and to isoue the b.: • ..da. therefor at> soon es tbe County de-
tt. u11nes ::.h~ sam~ to be necea:a~ry an<J advi1>dtrl~.
SECTION J. The City represents and warr~~ta to the County that:
(i) the citi'ha• heretofore adopted & general plan for the City in con-
for•ance with the provision• of the Planning and zoning Law of th~
Ste.te of CallfOi"nia (Governaent Code Section 1i5000 et seq.), (ii) said
general plan include9 a land use ele~ent and a housing eleaent as re-
quired by GovecnM1ent Code Section 65302, and (iii) the Program c>niplies
with said land use ele .. nt and housing eleacnt.
SEC'rION 4. The City agrees that the Coursty 1aay-aake or acquir ...
ho111e mortgages under the Progr.,.; all as aore specifically set forth in
the Act, with reapect to resid~nces ~hich are located within the 9ea-
91·aptiic boundaries of tnc City and which at't' identified in a Oe'lel-
opec• • AqreeaP.nt exc..:ut.ed by lti.t cour.ty, the Cl ty and • ac.-cHop..•' 1 ti1!!<
•ae~idenc~s•; and tbat ~ny and all of t~e City~• PQiH.tr• for the EN~pose
uf f ina11cin9 holllk' ilG~l·Jl'<Je• pursuant t.:o the Act "'ith r:espect to the k4' a idences shall be jtae.:c ised t.iy the county.
•• J '" .
..
S!CTION 5. 1'1• City aqrees to tefr•in fro• particip•ting in $ny hoM aort9a9e finance prograa fro• whic:b bond proceeda would be ••de
av•.i.lable to provide fin~ncing tac t.be a.•idencea. How11tver. the City
apecifically renrve• the rigbt to •D9A9• in other ha.e aort1Ja9e fi-nance proqr4.ea includin9 t>ut ~t lt.ited to p~oqram& authorized by the
Act, by the provhion11 of He•ltb end Safftt.y Cude Sections 131750 '1t ~· 1•s.B. 99•), or th• Marks-Foran Re•idential Rehabilitation Act Ol
T'73; and, io connect.ion therewith, it ls understood and a9reed th~t
the City is not by thi• Cooperative Agre!Hlent ossigning to the County
it& Allocatio~ of q~alified 110ctga9e bonds P\lrsuant to tb• Costa-Marks
Act.
SECTION 6. The ~ity a9ree8 ~o undertoke such further proce~dings
or actions as •ay be neee•aary in or..S.r to carry out the ter1m and the
intent of this Cooper•tive Aqrfftaent1 •nd the City furtl\er a9cees to
refr11in fro• taking 11ny action vbicb would to its knowledr:Je tend to
adver:;cly Jiffect the ratin9 on U'ut Bonds to be is11ued by the County
pursuant hereto.
SECTION 7. Not.bing in this Cooperative Agreeaent shall prevent
the County frOll enterin9 into one or .ore aqree9eftts vith othec polit-
ical subdivisions within the county, if d...-ed necessary and advisable
to do so by the County.
SECTION 8. Thi• Cooperative '"9ree11ent ••Y be .-ended by one or
..ara supplemental agreements ea•cuted by the County 41nd tbe City •t an~
time, except that no such AHnd!Mnt or aupple11ent ah.al!. be ••de vhich
shall adveraely affect the right• of th• bolder• of any bonds issued by
the county in eonnection with it• ba.e 110rt9ag« finance pr09rAJ1.
SECTIOH 9. It i~ understood and agr~d thot th4: Cou~ty will in~u(
cerufn coat: and e~n .. 1 in atte91Pti1MJ to iaau• tbtl Dond•. includinq
a fee for the pr•paratlon of a de1Ynd/fe~sibility study, rating aqency
fee& •nd espenHs, and the c-oat cf printing a preli•inary official
state.ent. In order to provide a aource of revenue with vhich to pay
auch coat• and •zpenaes, the County require• that developer& vho wish
to participate l.n the Proqrua pay an application fews .and the County
estisatee that •~cb feea will be aufficient to pay &aid coats end e•-
penaea. Bow•ver, in the event that tbe Progr .. ia abandoned and auch
coats and eicpqnses eaceed tbe •CJ'Jrecjate ..ount of develofW!r&• applica-
tion feea, the City agree• to reiat.urse tbe County for a reai>onaole
share of tbe eacesa .aount of said coat• al\d e:spenae•. '?he a.ount of the City•s •h•r• thereof &hall be deten1ined by ttt. mutual a9reeaent ot
the parties and •Mll b4t baaed upon the ratio of tbe principal u.ount
of aort9o19e loan• which were ant:ici~ted to be ucle iA tbe City to the
total pcincipal aaount of mort949e loan• which were anticipated to t>9
•Ad• h'om Bond proctMds.
JN Wl'l"lll~S WH&iUtOF, th~ parties hereto have cauaed this Coopera-
tive Agreeaent to be executed c11ncl attested ~Y their proper off ice cs
thereto duly •~thoriaed, and ~heir offi~i•l .. &la to be he~•to afriasd, all •a of tbe d&y fic•t &bove written.
-2-
,.. . ··e· ·· . • ' . : . \\
'
CITY OF PALO ALTO
ltk, --;r,Gkc
Vice Aiyor
· . ..
~ . . . • . . • P"/o .Alto .JJof!..iUt., Lorparrdion
February 2, 1983
Honorable City Council
Palo Alto, r..alifornie
Members of t.he Council:
. ..i7 ffANll-T()N .\\'t!'Nl't~-.. 1-ITli ~ t
l","H.O Al.TU. 1 .. U.lt'OllC)l:I.'\ l)l;llnt
St.:bject: l>ewloper Agreement, Santa 1'.:lara County
Single Fa.111.ly Mortgage Revenue Bonds
Ac its meeting of January 26, 1983. the Palo Alto Housiog Corporation voted
unanimously to urge the Council to apptow the ate.ff reco-nd&tions to
amend the Developer Agreement betvee::i us. We believe die fle:ld.bili ty pro-
\."i.ded by these change.a will aid our •rketiug efforts at Birch Court.
We plan to utilize our regular BKl waiting liat to find purdlaaera of both
the five very low priced am unit& in the development: and the thirty-five
units which we will aell at our coeu. Accorcling1y, we su.~yed the wait-
ing list lut June t.o dEt.enli.M ._.the-r tbel:e wn people on the list who
were not firat-tilDe ho9ebuyen and who were able to afford the higher p:cices
of the Birch Court coiuiomoiuma.
We discovered that there were indeed a fw pe:ople wbo were not fira t-tiae
hoaebuyera. One, fot' eu.aple, had beea thTovah a divorce, and although not
U•;i.ng in the home, had shared title to it up to about on.is and a half yegra
ago. Another is living in a relatively low-priced cortdoa:iniua in Fremont.
and wanu to aoft cloeer to her job iu the lndwltrial. Park. Permitting 10%
of the proceeds of the bonds to be used by other than fire t ti• bo.ebuyera
will enable us to sene auch f 11111.Uea •
'l"be~ :rare. alao a ftnr p&opl.e on the waiting Uat with in~ which thf:y e.o-
t.iaat11d will be between the cun-ent •ri•• inco.e of $43.800 and •ilout
$46 .ooo by next year. We t'bink it would be a disaeni.ca to exclude •ucb
fud.llea fra11 the QPportmdty to purcha.e Mrch t'.our~ C'onckl-1.niusa.
Baaed upcm. ou~ pn11'd.nat'1 calculati-ou • famllea vi t.h income• below $40. 000
would need very aia&:>le dowpa.ymnta to be qualified by the lendi.ng institu-
tion to purchue tm..e Wlita. Fa.Uiu Vitb 1llf;htly higher inCOMa c:ould
qualify vi.th suller doftp&r-au. Therefore, we think the trade-off betvftea
inco•• and useta cut the -ndmaAt before you would pel"llit ia in k.eepina
with the goala of the mGrtaaae r•w.uue Nmd progrn.
It ie clear that the aoal of the llouaiDg ~rporatiou 1a to ••tw the lowest
income groups th.at we i>ouibl1 can.. 1'be Council can be aa•ured that we
would a.ot &bua• the t..Mfiu t.be staff reco•andat1ou provide.
Sincerely yours,
PALO ALTO Jl)l'JSDIC COIPOIA.TICIJ
~.~~nt