Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2024-04-18 Architectural Review Board Agenda PacketARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD Regular Meeting Thursday, April 18, 2024 Council Chambers & Hybrid 8:30 AM Architectural Review Board meetings will be held as “hybrid” meetings with the option to attend by teleconference/video conference or in person. To maximize public safety while still maintaining transparency and public access, members of the public can choose to participate from home or attend in person. Information on how the public may observe and participate in the meeting is located at the end of the agenda. Masks are strongly encouraged if attending in person. T h e   m e e t i n g   w i l l   b e   b r o a d c a s t   o n   C a b l e   T V   C h a n n e l   2 6 ,   l i v e   o n YouTube https://www.youtube.com/c/cityofpaloalto, and streamed to Midpen Media Center https://midpenmedia.org. Visit https://bit.ly/PApendingprojects to view project plans and details. Commissioner names, biographies, and archived agendas and reports are available at https://bit.ly/paloaltoARB.  VIRTUAL PARTICIPATION CLICK HERE TO JOIN (https://cityofpaloalto.zoom.us/j/96561891491) Meeting ID: 965 6189 1491    Phone: 1(669)900‐6833 PUBLIC COMMENTS Public comments will be accepted both in person and via Zoom for up to three minutes or an amount of time determined by the Chair. All requests to speak will be taken until 5 minutes after the staff’s presentation. Written public comments can be submitted in advance to arb@CityofPaloAlto.org and will be provided to the Board and available for inspection on the City’s website. Please clearly indicate which agenda item you are referencing in your subject line. Spokespersons that are representing a group of five or more people who are identified as present at the meeting at the time of the spokesperson's presentation will be allowed up to fifteen (15) minutes at the discretion of the Chair, provided that the non‐speaking members agree not to speak individually. The Chair may limit Public Comments to thirty (30) minutes for all combined speakers. The Chair may reduce the allowed time to speak for Study Sessions and Action Items to two (2) minutes or less to accommodate a larger number of speakers. PowerPoints, videos, or other media to be presented during public comment are accepted only by email to arb@CityofPaloAlto.org at least 24 hours prior to the meeting. Once received, the Clerk will have them shared at public comment for the specified item. To uphold strong cybersecurity management practices, USB’s or other physical electronic storage devices are not accepted. Signs and symbolic materials less than 2 feet by 3 feet are permitted provided that: (1) sticks, posts, poles or similar/other type of handle objects are strictly prohibited; (2) the items do not create a facility, fire, or safety hazard; and (3) persons with such items remain seated when displaying them and must not raise the items above shoulder level, obstruct the view or passage of other attendees, or otherwise disturb the business of the meeting. CALL TO ORDER/ ROLL CALL PUBLIC COMMENT  Members of the public may speak to any item NOT on the agenda. Three (3) minutes per speaker. AGENDA CHANGES, ADDITIONS AND DELETIONS The Chair or Board majority may modify the agenda order to improve meeting management. CITY OFFICIAL REPORTS 1.Transmittal of 1) the ARB Meeting Schedule and Attendance Record, 2) Tentative Future Agenda Items and 3) Recently Submitted Projects ACTION ITEMS Public Comment is Permitted. Applicants/Appellant Teams: Ten (10) minutes, plus ten (10) minutes rebuttal. All others: Three (3) minutes per speaker. 2.PUBLIC HEARING / QUASI‐JUDICIAL. 660 University Ave. [21PLN‐00341]: Recommendation on Applicant’s Request for Approval of a Planned Community/Planned Home Zoning (PC/PHZ) on Three Parcels (511 Byron St, 660 University Ave, 680 University Ave/500 Middlefield Rd), Deconstruction of Existing Buildings (9,216 SF Office) and Construction of a New Four Story Mixed‐Use Building with Ground Floor Office (9,115 SF) and 63 Residential Rental Units (48 Studios, 12 1‐Bedroom, 3 2‐ Bedroom), Including a Two Level Below‐Grade Parking Garage. The Applicant Anticipates a Parcel Map to Subdivide the Office Component from the Residential Component. Environmental Assessment: Environmental Impact Report Circulated for Public Review Beginning on April 2, 2024, and Ending on May 17, 2024. Zoning District: RM‐20 (Multi‐ Family Residential). For More Information Contact the Project Planner, Emily Kallas, at Emily.Kallas@CityofPaloAlto.org. 3.PUBLIC HEARING / QUASI‐JUDICIAL. 3265 El Camino Real [24PLN‐00012]: Consideration of Applicant's Request to Rezone the Subject Parcel from Commercial Services (CS) to Planned Community/Planned Home Zoning Application (PC/PHZ) and to Construct a 100% affordable, Five‐story, 44 Dwelling Unit Residential Rental Project. Environmental Assessment: Initial Study/15183 Exemption. For more information contact the project planner at Garrett.Sauls@Cityofpaloalto.org. STUDY SESSION Public Comment is Permitted. Three (3) minutes per speaker. 4.Study Session to Review the Proposed Ordinance Implementing the Draft North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan (NVCAP) and to Receive Stakeholder Comments on the​ Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for the Proposed Project.  BOARD MEMBER QUESTIONS, COMMENTS, ANNOUNCEMENTS OR FUTURE MEETINGS AND AGENDAS Members of the public may not speak to the item(s). ADJOURNMENT PUBLIC COMMENT INSTRUCTIONS Members of the Public may provide public comments to teleconference meetings via email, teleconference, or by phone. 1. Written public comments may be submitted by email to arb@cityofpaloalto.org. 2. Spoken public comments using a computer will be accepted through the teleconference meeting. To address the Board, click on the link below to access a Zoom‐ based meeting. Please read the following instructions carefully. You may download the Zoom client or connect to the meeting in‐ browser. If using your browser, make sure you are using a current, up‐to‐date browser: Chrome 30, Firefox 27, Microsoft Edge 12, Safari 7. Certain functionality may be disabled in older browsers including Internet Explorer. You may be asked to enter an email address and name. We request that you identify yourself by name as this will be visible online and will be used to notify you that it is your turn to speak. When you wish to speak on an Agenda Item, click on “raise hand.” The Clerk will activate and unmute speakers in turn. Speakers will be notified shortly before they are called to speak. When called, please limit your remarks to the time limit allotted. A timer will be shown on the computer to help keep track of your comments. 3. Spoken public comments using a smart phone will be accepted  through the teleconference meeting. To address the Board, download the Zoom application onto your phone from the Apple App Store or Google Play Store and enter the Meeting ID below. Please follow the instructions above. 4. Spoken public comments using a phone use the telephone number listed below. When you wish to speak on an agenda item hit *9 on your phone so we know that you wish to speak. You will be asked to provide your first and last name before addressing the Board. You will be advised how long you have to speak. When called please limit your remarks to the agenda item and time limit allotted. CLICK HERE TO JOIN    Meeting ID: 965 6189 1491   Phone: 1‐669‐900‐6833  Americans with Disability Act (ADA) It is the policy of the City of Palo Alto to offer its public programs, services and meetings in a manner that is readily accessible to all. Persons with disabilities who require materials in an appropriate alternative format or who require auxiliary aids to access City meetings, programs, or services may contact the City’s ADA Coordinator at (650) 329‐2550 (voice) or by emailing ada@cityofpaloalto.org. Requests for assistance or accommodations must be submitted at least 24 hours in advance of the meeting, program, or service. ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARDRegular MeetingThursday, April 18, 2024Council Chambers & Hybrid8:30 AMArchitectural Review Board meetings will be held as “hybrid” meetings with the option to attendby teleconference/video conference or in person. To maximize public safety while stillmaintaining transparency and public access, members of the public can choose to participatefrom home or attend in person. Information on how the public may observe and participate in themeeting is located at the end of the agenda. Masks are strongly encouraged if attending inperson. T h e   m e e t i n g   w i l l   b e   b r o a d c a s t   o n   C a b l e   T V   C h a n n e l   2 6 ,   l i v e   o nYouTube https://www.youtube.com/c/cityofpaloalto, and streamed to Midpen MediaCenter https://midpenmedia.org. Visit https://bit.ly/PApendingprojects to view project plansand details. Commissioner names, biographies, and archived agendas and reports are availableat https://bit.ly/paloaltoARB. VIRTUAL PARTICIPATION CLICK HERE TO JOIN (https://cityofpaloalto.zoom.us/j/96561891491)Meeting ID: 965 6189 1491    Phone: 1(669)900‐6833PUBLIC COMMENTSPublic comments will be accepted both in person and via Zoom for up to three minutes or anamount of time determined by the Chair. All requests to speak will be taken until 5 minutesafter the staff’s presentation. Written public comments can be submitted in advance toarb@CityofPaloAlto.org and will be provided to the Board and available for inspection on theCity’s website. Please clearly indicate which agenda item you are referencing in your subjectline.Spokespersons that are representing a group of five or more people who are identified aspresent at the meeting at the time of the spokesperson's presentation will be allowed up tofifteen (15) minutes at the discretion of the Chair, provided that the non‐speaking membersagree not to speak individually. The Chair may limit Public Comments to thirty (30) minutes forall combined speakers. The Chair may reduce the allowed time to speak for Study Sessions andAction Items to two (2) minutes or less to accommodate a larger number of speakers.PowerPoints, videos, or other media to be presented during public comment are accepted onlyby email to arb@CityofPaloAlto.org at least 24 hours prior to the meeting. Once received,the Clerk will have them shared at public comment for the specified item. To uphold strongcybersecurity management practices, USB’s or other physical electronic storage devices are notaccepted. Signs and symbolic materials less than 2 feet by 3 feet are permitted provided that: (1) sticks, posts, poles or similar/other type of handle objects are strictly prohibited; (2) the items do not create a facility, fire, or safety hazard; and (3) persons with such items remain seated when displaying them and must not raise the items above shoulder level, obstruct the view or passage of other attendees, or otherwise disturb the business of the meeting. CALL TO ORDER/ ROLL CALL PUBLIC COMMENT  Members of the public may speak to any item NOT on the agenda. Three (3) minutes per speaker. AGENDA CHANGES, ADDITIONS AND DELETIONS The Chair or Board majority may modify the agenda order to improve meeting management. CITY OFFICIAL REPORTS 1.Transmittal of 1) the ARB Meeting Schedule and Attendance Record, 2) Tentative Future Agenda Items and 3) Recently Submitted Projects ACTION ITEMS Public Comment is Permitted. Applicants/Appellant Teams: Ten (10) minutes, plus ten (10) minutes rebuttal. All others: Three (3) minutes per speaker. 2.PUBLIC HEARING / QUASI‐JUDICIAL. 660 University Ave. [21PLN‐00341]: Recommendation on Applicant’s Request for Approval of a Planned Community/Planned Home Zoning (PC/PHZ) on Three Parcels (511 Byron St, 660 University Ave, 680 University Ave/500 Middlefield Rd), Deconstruction of Existing Buildings (9,216 SF Office) and Construction of a New Four Story Mixed‐Use Building with Ground Floor Office (9,115 SF) and 63 Residential Rental Units (48 Studios, 12 1‐Bedroom, 3 2‐ Bedroom), Including a Two Level Below‐Grade Parking Garage. The Applicant Anticipates a Parcel Map to Subdivide the Office Component from the Residential Component. Environmental Assessment: Environmental Impact Report Circulated for Public Review Beginning on April 2, 2024, and Ending on May 17, 2024. Zoning District: RM‐20 (Multi‐ Family Residential). For More Information Contact the Project Planner, Emily Kallas, at Emily.Kallas@CityofPaloAlto.org. 3.PUBLIC HEARING / QUASI‐JUDICIAL. 3265 El Camino Real [24PLN‐00012]: Consideration of Applicant's Request to Rezone the Subject Parcel from Commercial Services (CS) to Planned Community/Planned Home Zoning Application (PC/PHZ) and to Construct a 100% affordable, Five‐story, 44 Dwelling Unit Residential Rental Project. Environmental Assessment: Initial Study/15183 Exemption. For more information contact the project planner at Garrett.Sauls@Cityofpaloalto.org. STUDY SESSION Public Comment is Permitted. Three (3) minutes per speaker. 4.Study Session to Review the Proposed Ordinance Implementing the Draft North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan (NVCAP) and to Receive Stakeholder Comments on the​ Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for the Proposed Project.  BOARD MEMBER QUESTIONS, COMMENTS, ANNOUNCEMENTS OR FUTURE MEETINGS AND AGENDAS Members of the public may not speak to the item(s). ADJOURNMENT PUBLIC COMMENT INSTRUCTIONS Members of the Public may provide public comments to teleconference meetings via email, teleconference, or by phone. 1. Written public comments may be submitted by email to arb@cityofpaloalto.org. 2. Spoken public comments using a computer will be accepted through the teleconference meeting. To address the Board, click on the link below to access a Zoom‐ based meeting. Please read the following instructions carefully. You may download the Zoom client or connect to the meeting in‐ browser. If using your browser, make sure you are using a current, up‐to‐date browser: Chrome 30, Firefox 27, Microsoft Edge 12, Safari 7. Certain functionality may be disabled in older browsers including Internet Explorer. You may be asked to enter an email address and name. We request that you identify yourself by name as this will be visible online and will be used to notify you that it is your turn to speak. When you wish to speak on an Agenda Item, click on “raise hand.” The Clerk will activate and unmute speakers in turn. Speakers will be notified shortly before they are called to speak. When called, please limit your remarks to the time limit allotted. A timer will be shown on the computer to help keep track of your comments. 3. Spoken public comments using a smart phone will be accepted  through the teleconference meeting. To address the Board, download the Zoom application onto your phone from the Apple App Store or Google Play Store and enter the Meeting ID below. Please follow the instructions above. 4. Spoken public comments using a phone use the telephone number listed below. When you wish to speak on an agenda item hit *9 on your phone so we know that you wish to speak. You will be asked to provide your first and last name before addressing the Board. You will be advised how long you have to speak. When called please limit your remarks to the agenda item and time limit allotted. CLICK HERE TO JOIN    Meeting ID: 965 6189 1491   Phone: 1‐669‐900‐6833  Americans with Disability Act (ADA) It is the policy of the City of Palo Alto to offer its public programs, services and meetings in a manner that is readily accessible to all. Persons with disabilities who require materials in an appropriate alternative format or who require auxiliary aids to access City meetings, programs, or services may contact the City’s ADA Coordinator at (650) 329‐2550 (voice) or by emailing ada@cityofpaloalto.org. Requests for assistance or accommodations must be submitted at least 24 hours in advance of the meeting, program, or service. ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARDRegular MeetingThursday, April 18, 2024Council Chambers & Hybrid8:30 AMArchitectural Review Board meetings will be held as “hybrid” meetings with the option to attendby teleconference/video conference or in person. To maximize public safety while stillmaintaining transparency and public access, members of the public can choose to participatefrom home or attend in person. Information on how the public may observe and participate in themeeting is located at the end of the agenda. Masks are strongly encouraged if attending inperson. T h e   m e e t i n g   w i l l   b e   b r o a d c a s t   o n   C a b l e   T V   C h a n n e l   2 6 ,   l i v e   o nYouTube https://www.youtube.com/c/cityofpaloalto, and streamed to Midpen MediaCenter https://midpenmedia.org. Visit https://bit.ly/PApendingprojects to view project plansand details. Commissioner names, biographies, and archived agendas and reports are availableat https://bit.ly/paloaltoARB. VIRTUAL PARTICIPATION CLICK HERE TO JOIN (https://cityofpaloalto.zoom.us/j/96561891491)Meeting ID: 965 6189 1491    Phone: 1(669)900‐6833PUBLIC COMMENTSPublic comments will be accepted both in person and via Zoom for up to three minutes or anamount of time determined by the Chair. All requests to speak will be taken until 5 minutesafter the staff’s presentation. Written public comments can be submitted in advance toarb@CityofPaloAlto.org and will be provided to the Board and available for inspection on theCity’s website. Please clearly indicate which agenda item you are referencing in your subjectline.Spokespersons that are representing a group of five or more people who are identified aspresent at the meeting at the time of the spokesperson's presentation will be allowed up tofifteen (15) minutes at the discretion of the Chair, provided that the non‐speaking membersagree not to speak individually. The Chair may limit Public Comments to thirty (30) minutes forall combined speakers. The Chair may reduce the allowed time to speak for Study Sessions andAction Items to two (2) minutes or less to accommodate a larger number of speakers.PowerPoints, videos, or other media to be presented during public comment are accepted onlyby email to arb@CityofPaloAlto.org at least 24 hours prior to the meeting. Once received,the Clerk will have them shared at public comment for the specified item. To uphold strongcybersecurity management practices, USB’s or other physical electronic storage devices are notaccepted.Signs and symbolic materials less than 2 feet by 3 feet are permitted provided that: (1) sticks,posts, poles or similar/other type of handle objects are strictly prohibited; (2) the items do notcreate a facility, fire, or safety hazard; and (3) persons with such items remain seated whendisplaying them and must not raise the items above shoulder level, obstruct the view orpassage of other attendees, or otherwise disturb the business of the meeting.CALL TO ORDER/ ROLL CALLPUBLIC COMMENT Members of the public may speak to any item NOT on the agenda. Three (3) minutes per speaker.AGENDA CHANGES, ADDITIONS AND DELETIONSThe Chair or Board majority may modify the agenda order to improve meeting management.CITY OFFICIAL REPORTS1.Transmittal of 1) the ARB Meeting Schedule and Attendance Record, 2) Tentative FutureAgenda Items and 3) Recently Submitted ProjectsACTION ITEMSPublic Comment is Permitted. Applicants/Appellant Teams: Ten (10) minutes, plus ten (10) minutes rebuttal. All others: Three(3) minutes per speaker.2.PUBLIC HEARING / QUASI‐JUDICIAL. 660 University Ave. [21PLN‐00341]:Recommendation on Applicant’s Request for Approval of a Planned Community/PlannedHome Zoning (PC/PHZ) on Three Parcels (511 Byron St, 660 University Ave, 680University Ave/500 Middlefield Rd), Deconstruction of Existing Buildings (9,216 SFOffice) and Construction of a New Four Story Mixed‐Use Building with Ground FloorOffice (9,115 SF) and 63 Residential Rental Units (48 Studios, 12 1‐Bedroom, 3 2‐Bedroom), Including a Two Level Below‐Grade Parking Garage. The Applicant Anticipatesa Parcel Map to Subdivide the Office Component from the Residential Component.Environmental Assessment: Environmental Impact Report Circulated for Public ReviewBeginning on April 2, 2024, and Ending on May 17, 2024. Zoning District: RM‐20 (Multi‐Family Residential). For More Information Contact the Project Planner, Emily Kallas, atEmily.Kallas@CityofPaloAlto.org.3.PUBLIC HEARING / QUASI‐JUDICIAL. 3265 El Camino Real [24PLN‐00012]: Considerationof Applicant's Request to Rezone the Subject Parcel from Commercial Services (CS) toPlanned Community/Planned Home Zoning Application (PC/PHZ) and to Construct a 100%affordable, Five‐story, 44 Dwelling Unit Residential Rental Project. EnvironmentalAssessment: Initial Study/15183 Exemption. For more information contact the projectplanner at Garrett.Sauls@Cityofpaloalto.org.STUDY SESSION Public Comment is Permitted. Three (3) minutes per speaker. 4.Study Session to Review the Proposed Ordinance Implementing the Draft North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan (NVCAP) and to Receive Stakeholder Comments on the​ Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for the Proposed Project.  BOARD MEMBER QUESTIONS, COMMENTS, ANNOUNCEMENTS OR FUTURE MEETINGS AND AGENDAS Members of the public may not speak to the item(s). ADJOURNMENT PUBLIC COMMENT INSTRUCTIONS Members of the Public may provide public comments to teleconference meetings via email, teleconference, or by phone. 1. Written public comments may be submitted by email to arb@cityofpaloalto.org. 2. Spoken public comments using a computer will be accepted through the teleconference meeting. To address the Board, click on the link below to access a Zoom‐ based meeting. Please read the following instructions carefully. You may download the Zoom client or connect to the meeting in‐ browser. If using your browser, make sure you are using a current, up‐to‐date browser: Chrome 30, Firefox 27, Microsoft Edge 12, Safari 7. Certain functionality may be disabled in older browsers including Internet Explorer. You may be asked to enter an email address and name. We request that you identify yourself by name as this will be visible online and will be used to notify you that it is your turn to speak. When you wish to speak on an Agenda Item, click on “raise hand.” The Clerk will activate and unmute speakers in turn. Speakers will be notified shortly before they are called to speak. When called, please limit your remarks to the time limit allotted. A timer will be shown on the computer to help keep track of your comments. 3. Spoken public comments using a smart phone will be accepted  through the teleconference meeting. To address the Board, download the Zoom application onto your phone from the Apple App Store or Google Play Store and enter the Meeting ID below. Please follow the instructions above. 4. Spoken public comments using a phone use the telephone number listed below. When you wish to speak on an agenda item hit *9 on your phone so we know that you wish to speak. You will be asked to provide your first and last name before addressing the Board. You will be advised how long you have to speak. When called please limit your remarks to the agenda item and time limit allotted. CLICK HERE TO JOIN    Meeting ID: 965 6189 1491   Phone: 1‐669‐900‐6833  Americans with Disability Act (ADA) It is the policy of the City of Palo Alto to offer its public programs, services and meetings in a manner that is readily accessible to all. Persons with disabilities who require materials in an appropriate alternative format or who require auxiliary aids to access City meetings, programs, or services may contact the City’s ADA Coordinator at (650) 329‐2550 (voice) or by emailing ada@cityofpaloalto.org. Requests for assistance or accommodations must be submitted at least 24 hours in advance of the meeting, program, or service. ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARDRegular MeetingThursday, April 18, 2024Council Chambers & Hybrid8:30 AMArchitectural Review Board meetings will be held as “hybrid” meetings with the option to attendby teleconference/video conference or in person. To maximize public safety while stillmaintaining transparency and public access, members of the public can choose to participatefrom home or attend in person. Information on how the public may observe and participate in themeeting is located at the end of the agenda. Masks are strongly encouraged if attending inperson. T h e   m e e t i n g   w i l l   b e   b r o a d c a s t   o n   C a b l e   T V   C h a n n e l   2 6 ,   l i v e   o nYouTube https://www.youtube.com/c/cityofpaloalto, and streamed to Midpen MediaCenter https://midpenmedia.org. Visit https://bit.ly/PApendingprojects to view project plansand details. Commissioner names, biographies, and archived agendas and reports are availableat https://bit.ly/paloaltoARB. VIRTUAL PARTICIPATION CLICK HERE TO JOIN (https://cityofpaloalto.zoom.us/j/96561891491)Meeting ID: 965 6189 1491    Phone: 1(669)900‐6833PUBLIC COMMENTSPublic comments will be accepted both in person and via Zoom for up to three minutes or anamount of time determined by the Chair. All requests to speak will be taken until 5 minutesafter the staff’s presentation. Written public comments can be submitted in advance toarb@CityofPaloAlto.org and will be provided to the Board and available for inspection on theCity’s website. Please clearly indicate which agenda item you are referencing in your subjectline.Spokespersons that are representing a group of five or more people who are identified aspresent at the meeting at the time of the spokesperson's presentation will be allowed up tofifteen (15) minutes at the discretion of the Chair, provided that the non‐speaking membersagree not to speak individually. The Chair may limit Public Comments to thirty (30) minutes forall combined speakers. The Chair may reduce the allowed time to speak for Study Sessions andAction Items to two (2) minutes or less to accommodate a larger number of speakers.PowerPoints, videos, or other media to be presented during public comment are accepted onlyby email to arb@CityofPaloAlto.org at least 24 hours prior to the meeting. Once received,the Clerk will have them shared at public comment for the specified item. To uphold strongcybersecurity management practices, USB’s or other physical electronic storage devices are notaccepted.Signs and symbolic materials less than 2 feet by 3 feet are permitted provided that: (1) sticks,posts, poles or similar/other type of handle objects are strictly prohibited; (2) the items do notcreate a facility, fire, or safety hazard; and (3) persons with such items remain seated whendisplaying them and must not raise the items above shoulder level, obstruct the view orpassage of other attendees, or otherwise disturb the business of the meeting.CALL TO ORDER/ ROLL CALLPUBLIC COMMENT Members of the public may speak to any item NOT on the agenda. Three (3) minutes per speaker.AGENDA CHANGES, ADDITIONS AND DELETIONSThe Chair or Board majority may modify the agenda order to improve meeting management.CITY OFFICIAL REPORTS1.Transmittal of 1) the ARB Meeting Schedule and Attendance Record, 2) Tentative FutureAgenda Items and 3) Recently Submitted ProjectsACTION ITEMSPublic Comment is Permitted. Applicants/Appellant Teams: Ten (10) minutes, plus ten (10) minutes rebuttal. All others: Three(3) minutes per speaker.2.PUBLIC HEARING / QUASI‐JUDICIAL. 660 University Ave. [21PLN‐00341]:Recommendation on Applicant’s Request for Approval of a Planned Community/PlannedHome Zoning (PC/PHZ) on Three Parcels (511 Byron St, 660 University Ave, 680University Ave/500 Middlefield Rd), Deconstruction of Existing Buildings (9,216 SFOffice) and Construction of a New Four Story Mixed‐Use Building with Ground FloorOffice (9,115 SF) and 63 Residential Rental Units (48 Studios, 12 1‐Bedroom, 3 2‐Bedroom), Including a Two Level Below‐Grade Parking Garage. The Applicant Anticipatesa Parcel Map to Subdivide the Office Component from the Residential Component.Environmental Assessment: Environmental Impact Report Circulated for Public ReviewBeginning on April 2, 2024, and Ending on May 17, 2024. Zoning District: RM‐20 (Multi‐Family Residential). For More Information Contact the Project Planner, Emily Kallas, atEmily.Kallas@CityofPaloAlto.org.3.PUBLIC HEARING / QUASI‐JUDICIAL. 3265 El Camino Real [24PLN‐00012]: Considerationof Applicant's Request to Rezone the Subject Parcel from Commercial Services (CS) toPlanned Community/Planned Home Zoning Application (PC/PHZ) and to Construct a 100%affordable, Five‐story, 44 Dwelling Unit Residential Rental Project. EnvironmentalAssessment: Initial Study/15183 Exemption. For more information contact the projectplanner at Garrett.Sauls@Cityofpaloalto.org.STUDY SESSIONPublic Comment is Permitted. Three (3) minutes per speaker.4.Study Session to Review the Proposed Ordinance Implementing the Draft North VenturaCoordinated Area Plan (NVCAP) and to Receive Stakeholder Comments on the​ DraftSupplemental Environmental Impact Report for the Proposed Project. BOARD MEMBER QUESTIONS, COMMENTS, ANNOUNCEMENTS OR FUTURE MEETINGS ANDAGENDASMembers of the public may not speak to the item(s). ADJOURNMENT PUBLIC COMMENT INSTRUCTIONS Members of the Public may provide public comments to teleconference meetings via email, teleconference, or by phone. 1. Written public comments may be submitted by email to arb@cityofpaloalto.org. 2. Spoken public comments using a computer will be accepted through the teleconference meeting. To address the Board, click on the link below to access a Zoom‐ based meeting. Please read the following instructions carefully. You may download the Zoom client or connect to the meeting in‐ browser. If using your browser, make sure you are using a current, up‐to‐date browser: Chrome 30, Firefox 27, Microsoft Edge 12, Safari 7. Certain functionality may be disabled in older browsers including Internet Explorer. You may be asked to enter an email address and name. We request that you identify yourself by name as this will be visible online and will be used to notify you that it is your turn to speak. When you wish to speak on an Agenda Item, click on “raise hand.” The Clerk will activate and unmute speakers in turn. Speakers will be notified shortly before they are called to speak. When called, please limit your remarks to the time limit allotted. A timer will be shown on the computer to help keep track of your comments. 3. Spoken public comments using a smart phone will be accepted  through the teleconference meeting. To address the Board, download the Zoom application onto your phone from the Apple App Store or Google Play Store and enter the Meeting ID below. Please follow the instructions above. 4. Spoken public comments using a phone use the telephone number listed below. When you wish to speak on an agenda item hit *9 on your phone so we know that you wish to speak. You will be asked to provide your first and last name before addressing the Board. You will be advised how long you have to speak. When called please limit your remarks to the agenda item and time limit allotted. CLICK HERE TO JOIN    Meeting ID: 965 6189 1491   Phone: 1‐669‐900‐6833  Americans with Disability Act (ADA) It is the policy of the City of Palo Alto to offer its public programs, services and meetings in a manner that is readily accessible to all. Persons with disabilities who require materials in an appropriate alternative format or who require auxiliary aids to access City meetings, programs, or services may contact the City’s ADA Coordinator at (650) 329‐2550 (voice) or by emailing ada@cityofpaloalto.org. Requests for assistance or accommodations must be submitted at least 24 hours in advance of the meeting, program, or service. Item No. 1. Page 1 of 2 Architectural Review Board Staff Report From: Planning and Development Services Director Lead Department: Planning and Development Services Meeting Date: April 18, 2024 Report #: 2404-2889 TITLE Transmittal of 1) the ARB Meeting Schedule and Attendance Record, 2) Tentative Future Agenda Items and 3) Recently Submitted Projects RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Architectural Review Board (ARB) review and comment as appropriate. BACKGROUND The attached documents are provided for informational purposes. The Board may review and comment as it deems appropriate. If individual Board members anticipate being absent from a future meeting, it is requested that this be brought to staff’s attention when considering this item. The first attachment provides a meeting and attendance schedule for the current calendar year. Also included are subcommittee assignments, which are assigned by the ARB Chair as needed. The second attachment is a Tentative Future Agenda that provides a summary of upcoming projects or discussion items. The hearing dates for these items are subject to change. The attachment also has a list of pending ARB projects and potential projects. Approved projects can be found on the City’s Building Eye webpage at https://paloalto.buildingeye.com/planning. Any party, including the applicant, may request a hearing by the ARB on the proposed director’s decision(s) within the 10-day or 14-day appeal period by filing a written request with the planning division. There shall be no fee required for requesting such a hearing. However, there is a fee for appeals. Pursuant to 18.77.070(b)(5) any project relating to the installation of cabinets containing communications service equipment or facilities, pursuant to any service subject to Palo Alto Municipal Code Chapter 2.11, Chapter 12.04, Chapter 12.08, Chapter 12.09, Chapter 12.10, or Chapter 12.13 is not eligible for a request for hearing by any party, including the applicant. No action is required by the ARB for this item. Item 1 Staff Report     Packet Pg. 5     Item No. 1. Page 2 of 2 ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: 2024 Meeting Schedule & Assignments Attachment B: Tentative Future Agenda and New Projects List AUTHOR/TITLE: ARB Liaison1 & Contact Information Claire Raybould, AICP, Principal Planner (650) 329-2116 Claire.Raybould@CityofPaloAlto.org 1 Emails may be sent directly to the ARB using the following address: arb@CityofPaloAlto.org. Item 1 Staff Report     Packet Pg. 6     Architectural Review Board 2024 Meeting Schedule & Assignments 2024 Meeting Schedule Meeting Dates Time Location Status Planned Absences 1/4/2024 8:30 AM Hybrid Cancelled 1/18/2024 8:30 AM Hybrid Regular 2/1/2024 8:30 AM Hybrid Cancelled 2/15/2024 8:30 AM Hybrid Regular 2/29/2024 9:00 AM Hybrid Retreat 3/7/2024 8:30 AM Hybrid Regular 3/21/2024 8:30 AM Hybrid Canceled 4/4/2024 8:30 AM Hybrid Regular 4/18/2024 8:30 AM Hybrid Regular 5/2/2024 8:30 AM Hybrid Regular 5/16/2024 8:30 AM Hybrid Regular 6/6/2024 8:30 AM Hybrid Regular Chen 6/20/2024 8:30 AM Hybrid Regular 7/4/2024 8:30 AM Hybrid Cancelled 7/18/2024 8:30 AM Hybrid Regular 8/1/2024 8:30 AM Hybrid Regular 8/15/2024 8:30 AM Hybrid Regular 9/5/2024 8:30 AM Hybrid Regular 9/19/2024 8:30 AM Hybrid Regular 10/3/2024 8:30 AM Hybrid Regular 10/17/2024 8:30 AM Hybrid Regular 11/7/2024 8:30 AM Hybrid Regular 11/21/2024 8:30 AM Hybrid Regular 12/5/2024 8:30 AM Hybrid Regular 12/19/2024 8:30 AM Hybrid Regular 2024 Ad Hoc Committee Assignments Assignments will be made by the ARB Chair January February March April May June Hirsch, Adcock 4/4 July August September October November December Item 1 Attachment A: 2024 Meeting Schedule & Assignments     Packet Pg. 7     Palo Alto Architectural Review Board Tentative Future Agenda The following items are tentative and subject to change: Meeting Dates Topics May 2, 2024 •Buena Vista Mobile Home Park Streamlined Housing Development Review Study Session •Pre-Approved Parklets Design •Bird Safe Glazing and Dark Sky Ordinance May 16, 2024 •Work Plan •800 San Antonio Ad Hoc Pending ARB Projects The following items are pending projects and will be heard by the ARB in the near future. The projects can be viewed via their project webpage at bit.ly/PApendingprojects or via Building Eye at bit.ly/PABuildingEye. Permit Type Submitted Permit # Project Mgr.Address Type Work Description Assigned Ad Hoc AR Major - Board 9/16/20 20PLN- 00202 CRAYBOU 250 Hamilton Ave. Bridge On-hold for redesign - Allow the removal and replacement of the Pope-Chaucer Bridge over San Francisquito Creek with a new structure that does not obstruct creek flow to reduce flood risk. The project will also include channel modifications. Environmental Assessment: The SFCJPA, acting as the lead agency, adopted a Final EIR on 9/26/19. Zoning District: PF. __ AR Major - Board 12/21/21 21PLN- 00341 EKALLAS 660 University Mixed use ARB 1st formal 12/1/22, ARB 2nd formal tentative for April - Planned Community (PC), to Combine 3 Parcels __ Item 1 Attachment B: 2024 Agenda and New Projects List 0418     Packet Pg. 8     Zone Change (511 Byron St, 660 University Ave, 680 University Ave/500 Middlefield Rd), Demolish Existing Buildings (9,216 SF Office) and Provide a New Four Story Mixed-Use Building with Ground Floor Office (9,115 SF) and Multi-Family Residential (all floors) Including a Two Level Below-Grade Parking Garage. Proposed Residential Proposed Residential (42,189 SF) Will Include 65 Units (47 Studios, 12 1-Bedroom, 6 2-Bedroom). AR Major - Board 06/16/2022 22PLN- 00201 CRAYBOU 739 SUTTER AV Housing Prelim 11/18/21, Formal Resubmitted 7/21, 11/2 ARB hearing, Resubmitted February 8, 2024. Tentatively Approved March 19, 2024- Major Architectural Review to Allow the Demolition of an Existing 8-unit apartment building, and Construction of 12 new townhome units on the project site Using the State Density Bonus Allowances. The proposed units are 3-stories in height, and 25,522 sf of floor area. Rooftop Open Space is proposed for the units adjacent to Sutter Avenue. A Compliant SB 330 Pre-Application was submitted on 5/5/2022; however, the applicant did not resubmit plans within 90 days; therefore, the project is subject to the current regulations in effect. Zoning District: RM-20 (Low Density Multi-Family Residential). Environmental Assessment: Pending Chen,Adcock Site and Design 10/27/2022 22PLN- 00367 CRAYBOU 2501 EMBARCA DERO WY Public Utility – Water Filtration Application Resubmitted 8/8/23; 11/2 ARB Hearing, Resubmitted 2/5; PTC recommended approval 2/28 ARB recommended approval 4/4; Council tentative May 2024.- Request for Site and Design Review to allow construction of a Local Advanced Water Purification System at the Regional Water Quality Control Plant (RWQCP). The proposed project will include the construction and operation of a membrane filtration recycled water facility and a permeate storage tank at the City’s RWQCP to improve recycled water quality and increase its use. Environmental Assessment: Pending. Zoning District: Public Facilities with Site and Design combining district (PF)(D). __ Zone Change 1/19/2023 23PLN- 00010 EKALLAS 800-808 San Antonio Road Housing 8/17 ARB; Resubmitted 1/29/24; 3/7/24 hearing, 4/4/24 AdHoc, 4/10 PTC, Tentative 5/6 Council; Pending resubmittal - Request for a zone change from CS to Planned Community (PHZ) for a 76-unit, 5-story residential building. 16 of the units would be provided at below market rate, 4 of which would be to low income and 7 of which would be to very low income. The building is designed as a 5-story building with four levels of wood framing over a concrete podium superstructure, with two levels of subterranean parking. Project went to a Council Rosenberg, Hirsch Reported out 5/4 Item 1 Attachment B: 2024 Agenda and New Projects List 0418     Packet Pg. 9     prescreening on 8/15. Major Architectural Review 3/22/23 23PLN- 00061 EKALLAS 702 Clara Street Housing – 3 units No activity from applicant since November 2023. Request for Major Architectural Review and Individual Review to Allow the Construction of Three new two-Story homes approximately 1700sf Square Foot each, to be located on the same Lot, Subdivision Major Architectural Review 5/5/2023 23PLN- 00110 CRAYBOU 3000 El Camino Office NOI Sent 6/6/23; Resubmitted 9/25; NOI Sent 10/25; Resubmitted 1/24/24, NOI Sent 2/23/24. Request for a Major Architectural Review to convert an existing 10,000 square foot movie theater into new office space. Zoning District: Planned Community (PC-4637 and 2533). Baltay, Rosenberg Major Architectural Review 6/8/2023 23PLN- 00136 23PLN- 00277 (Map) 23PLN- 00003 and - 00195 – SB 330 GSAULS 3150 El Camino Real Housing - 380 units NOI sent 11/3/23. Pending Resubmittal. Request for Major Architectural Review for construction of a 380-unit Multi-family Residential Rental Development with 10% Below Market Rate. The project includes a 456,347 square foot apartment building with a 171,433 square foot garage that extends to 84 feet in height. Staff is reviewing the project to ensure the requested concessions and waivers are in accordance with the State Density Bonus laws. Rosenberg, Hirsch Reported out 5/4 on SB 330 Rosenberg, Hirsch Reported out on 8/17 Major Architectural Review 7/19/2023 23PLN- 00181 EKALLAS 824 San Antonio Road Housing – 16 senior units, 12 convalescen t units 12/21/23 ARB hearing; pending resubmittal. Request for Major Architectural Review to allow the Demolition of an existing 2-Story office building and the new construction of a 4-Story private residential senior living facility, including 15 independent dwelling units, 12 assisted living dwelling units and 1 owner occupied unit. Common space amenities on all floors, underground parking, and ground floor commercial space. Zoning District: CS (Commercial Services). ___ PC Amendment 8/9/2023 23PLN- 00202 EKALLAS 4075 El Camino Way Commercial — 14 additional assisted living units Community Meeting in October. 2/28/24 PTC hearing, second PTC April/May 2024;. Request for a Planned Community Zone Amendment to Allow New Additions to an existing Assisted Living and Memory Care Facility consisting of 121 Units. The New additions include 14 Additional Assisted Living Dwelling Units; 5 Studios and 9 One Bedrooms. The total Proposed 135 Units are for Assisted Living and for the elderly in need of day-to-day care for Memory Issues. Zoning District: PC-5116 (Planned Community). Baltay, Chen reported out 6/1 Master Sign Program 11/14/23 23PLN- 00308 EKALLAS 525 University Signs NOI Sent 12/15/2023, staff reviewing revised plans. Master Sign Program to allow for the installation of one illuminated monument, one illuminated canopy address, one illuminated wall property ID, one parking ID w/ uplight, one illuminated parking monument, one non-illuminated _____ Item 1 Attachment B: 2024 Agenda and New Projects List 0418     Packet Pg. 10     parking entry ID. Zoning District: CD-C (P) (Downtown Commercial). Master Sign Program 11/15/23 23PLN- 00311 EKALLAS 530 Lytton Signs NOI Sent 12/15/23, staff reviewing revised plans. Master Sign Program for the installation of 1 illuminated monument, 1 illuminated address, 1 illuminated wall property ID, 1 parking ID w/ uplight, 1 illuminated parking blade and 1 non-illuminated parking entry ID. This application is being reviewed along with 435 Tasso and 525 University. Environmental Assessment: Pending. Zoning District: CD-C (P) Downtown Commercial District (Pedestrian Shopping). ___ Major Architectural Review 1/10/2024 24PLN- 00012 GSAULS 3265 El Camino Real Housing NOI Sent 1/10/24. PTC 4/10/24. Request for rezoning to Planned Community (PC)/Planned Home Zoning (PHZ). New construction of a 5-story 100% affordable multifamily housing development with 44 dwelling units and ground level lobby and parking. Zoning District: CS. Rosenberg, Thompson reported out 8/17 on prescreening plans Rosenberg/ Hirsch Streamlined Housing Development Review 2/15/2024 24PLN- 00041 CHODGKI 3980 El Camino Real Affordable Housing NOI Sent 3/15/24. Tentatively Scheduled for Study Session May 204. Request for a Major Architectural Review Board application to allow the redevelopment of the Buena Vista Village mobile home park into two parcels, featuring a new affordable housing development with a 61-unit multi-family apartment building on one parcel and a 44-unit, occupant owned mobile home park on the second parcel. Zoning District: RM-20 Baltay, Chen Major Architectural Review 3/6/2024 24PLN- 00064 CHODGKI 640 Waverley Mixed-Use Request for a Major Architectural Review Board application to allow the construction of a new four-story, mixed use commercial and residential building with below grade parking. Environmental Assessment: Pending. Zoning District: CD-C(P). Rosenberg, Hirsch Major Architectural Review 4/02/2024 24PLN- 00100 CHODGKI 156 California Mixed-Use Request for Major Architectural Review in accordance with California Government Code 65589.5(D)(5) “Builders Remedy" which proposes to redevelop two lots located at 156 California Avenue and Park Blvd. Lot A, 156 California Ave ( 1.14 ACRE) is situated at the corner of Park and California, Lot B, Park Blvd. (0.29 ACRE) is at the corner of Park and Cambridge Avenue; the reinvention of both sites will include the conversion of an existing parking lot and Mollie Stone's Grocery Store into a Mixed Use Multi Family Development. This project consists of three integrated structures; (1) 7 Story Podium Building Baltay, Adcock Item 1 Attachment B: 2024 Agenda and New Projects List 0418     Packet Pg. 11     with 5 levels of TYPE IIIB Construction over 2 levels of TYPE I Construction, 15,000 square feet will be dedicated to the Mollie Stone Grocery Store, (1) 17 Story Tower, (1) 11 Story Tower, both Towers will be proposed and conceptualized as TYPE IV Mass Timber Construction. Environmental Assessment: Pending Zoning District: CC(2)(R)(P) and CC(2)(R) (Community Commercial) Zone Change 03/28/2024 24PLN- 00095 EKALLAS 70 Encina Housing- 10 Units Request for Planned Community Zone Change (PHZ) to allow construction of a new 3-story, 22,552 sf building (1.86 FAR); to include ten (10) residential condominium units organized around a common access court that provides both vehicular and pedestrian access and full site improvements to replace the existing surface parking area. Environmental Assessment: Pending. Zoning District: CC, (Community Commercial) Hirsch, Adcock Potential Projects This list of items are pending or recently reviewed projects that have 1) gone to Council prescreening and would be reviewed by the ARB once a formal application is submitted and/or 2) have been reviewed by the ARB as a preliminary review and the City is waiting for a formal application. Permit Type Submitted Permit # Project Mgr.Address Type Work Description Assigned Ad- Hoc Prescreening Council SB 330 Pre- Application 07/07/2022 22PLN- 00227 23PLN- 00149 GSAULS 3400 El Camino Real Housing – 382 units Heard by Council on 9/19/22, SB 330/Builder’s Remedy application submitted 6/14/23, waiting for formal application - Prescreening for a Planned Housing Zone (PHZ) to build 382 residential rental units comprised of 44 studios, 243 one-bedroom, 86 two-bedroom and 9 three- bedroom units in two buildings. Zoning: CS, CS(H), RM-20. __ Council Pre- Screening 2/8/2023 23PLN- 00036 THARRIS ON 1237 San Antonio Public Utility Heard by Council on 6/5/23 - Council Pre- Screening request by Valley Water to allow a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to update the land use of a portion of Area B of parcel #116-01- 013 from Public Conservation Land to Major Institution/Special Facilities. The other portion of Area B is currently designated as a Major institution/Special Facilities and the proposed project also calls for the subdivision of Area B. Zoning District: PF(D). __ Item 1 Attachment B: 2024 Agenda and New Projects List 0418     Packet Pg. 12     Preliminary Architectural Review 4/11/2023 23PLN- 00058 CHODGKI 640 Waverley Mixed-use ARB prelim hearing 6/15/23; waiting on formal application. Request for Preliminary Architectural Review to Allow the Demolition of an Existing Residential Home and Construction of a four-story, approximately 10,392 Square Foot mixed-use commercial/residential building with basement and a below-grade Residential parking. Environmental Assessment: Not a Project. The Formal Application Will be Subject to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Review. Zoning District: CD-C(P) (Downtown Commercial). __ Preliminary Architectural Review 7/6/2023 23PLN- 00171 CHODGKI 425 High Street Commercial Preliminary Hearing Held 9/7; waiting on formal application submittal. Request for Preliminary Architectural Review to provide feedback on a proposal to add a new 4th floor (2,632 square feet) for either a new office use (existing hotel to remain) or to provide eight new guest rooms to the existing three-story Hotel Keen structure. Environmental Assessment: Not a Project. Zoning District: CD-C (P) (Downtown Commercial-Community with Pedestrian Combining District). Preliminary Architectural Review 8/29/2023 23PLN- 00231 CHODGKI 616 Ramona Commercial Preliminary ARB hearing held 11/2; waiting on formal application submittal. Request for Preliminary Architectural Review to Allow the Partial Demolition and remodel of an Existing 8,357 square foot, Commercial Building with the addition using TDR and exempt floor area earned from ADA Upgrades. SB 330 Pre- Application 11/01/2023 23PLN- 00296; 23PLN- 00297 GSAULS 3997 Fabian Housing – up to 350 units SB 330 Pre-Application - Request for a 292 or 350-unit apartment development in an 8-story structure. Environmental Assessment: Pending. Zoning District: GM (General Manufacturing). Note: project has not changed but previous SB 330 pre-apps expired. Chen, Hirsch reported out 8/17 SB 330 Pre- Application 11/21/2023 23PLN- 00316 CHODGKI 156 California Avenue Mixed-Use SB 330 Pre-Application for construction of three mixed use buildings on two lots: (Tower A) 17 story tower with 2,100 sf of commercial and 194 residential units, (Podium) 7-story podium/tower with 14,168 sf of commercial and 110 residential units, (Tower B) 11 story tower with 2,131 sf of commercial and 78 residential units for a total of 18,399 sf of commercial space and 382 units. Parking will be provided in a podium and two levels of below grade parking. 20% of these units will be classified as affordable to qualify for Govt. Code Baltay, Adcock Item 1 Attachment B: 2024 Agenda and New Projects List 0418     Packet Pg. 13     Section 65589.5(d)(5) known as the "Builder's Remedy". Zoning District: CC(2)(R)(P) and CC(2)(R) (Community Commercial). Preliminary Architectural Review 10/30/2023 23PLN- 00291 EKALLAS 70 Encina Housing Submitted 10/30; ARB prelim held 12/7, waiting on formal application submittal. Request for Preliminary Architectural Review to Allow a New 3- story, approximately 22,000 sf building (1.84 FAR) and full site improvements to replace an existing surface parking lot. The project includes 10 new 3- story townhouse residential units around a common central courtyard. SB 330 Pre- Application 1/9/2024 24PLN- 00011 EKALLAS 762 San Antonio Housing SB 330 Pre-Application for construction of 198 multifamily residentials rental units in a single structure consisting of 256,392 square feet of floor area. Zoning District: (CS) AD. Baltay, Chen Preliminary Architectural Review 12/19/2023 23PLN- 00339 EKALLAS 1066 E Meadow Private School ARB Hearing 1/18/24; pending formal application. Request for Preliminary Architectural Review to Consider the Deconstruction of an Existing 35,000 Square Foot Commercial Building, and Construction of a new 2-Story, 46,000 sf School Building. It Will Contain Classrooms, Administrative Offices, and a Multi-Purpose Room. Site Improvements Include Parking, a Play Area, and a Rooftop Garden. Zoning District: ROLM Rosenberg, Adcock Preliminary Architectural Review 1/25/2024 24PLN- 00023 CHODGKI 4335/4345 El Camino Real Housing Preliminary Review Application Withdrawn. Request for Preliminary Architectural Review to allow demolition of an existing commercial building (4335 El Camino Real) and an existing motel building (4345 El Camino Real) and to redevelop the two parcels with a 28-unit multi-family townhome style development project with associated utilities, private streets, landscaping, and amenities. Hirsch, Baltay SB 330 Pre- Application 2/15/2024 24PLN- 00047 CHODGKI 3606 El Camino Real Housing SB 330 Pre-Application. Request for review of an SB330 Pre-Application for a Builder's Remedy project consisting of construction of a 315-unit multifamily residential rental and condo map, to include five levels of Type IIIA construction over 2 levels of Type IA residential parking (with 388 spaces) and residential support spaces. The project comprises the following parcels: 137-08-016, 137- 08-070, 137-08-077, 137-08-079, 137-08-080, 137- 08-081, & 137-08-088. Street addresses include: 3508-3628 El Camino Real and 528-530 Kendall Ave. Environmental Assessment: Pending. Zoning Item 1 Attachment B: 2024 Agenda and New Projects List 0418     Packet Pg. 14     District: (CN, CS,RM-30, RM-40) Neighborhood Commercial, Commercial Service, High Density Multiple-Family Residential, Multiply Family Residential, and Commercial Service. SB 330 Pre- Application 2/15/2024 24PLN- 00048 CHODGKI 3781 El Camino Real Housing SB 330 Pre-Application. Request for review of an SB330 Pre-Application for a Builder's Remedy project to construct a 169-unit multifamily residential rental and condo map project comprising 5-levels of Type IIIA construction over 2 levels of Type IA residential parking with 215 parking spaces and residential support spaces. The project includes the following parcels: 132-41-019, 132-41-020, 132-41- 083, & 132-41-084; and the following street addresses: 3727-3781 El Camino Real, 388-400 Curtner Street. Zoning District: (CN, RM-30,) Neighborhood Commercial, Multiply Family Residential. SB 330 Pre- Application 4/10/2024 24PLN- 00107 GSAULS 531 Stanford Housing SB 330 Pre-Application for a housing development project that proposes 30 new detached single-family homes and six new below- market-rate units in a standalone multi-family building on the approx. 1.18-acre project site at the intersection of Stanford Avenue and El Camino Real. 20% of the units would be deed restricted for lower-income households. Zoning: RM-30. Environmental Assessment: Pending. Item 1 Attachment B: 2024 Agenda and New Projects List 0418     Packet Pg. 15     Item No. 2. Page 1 of 10 Architectural Review Board Staff Report From: Jonathan Lait, Planning and Development Services Director Lead Department: Planning and Development Services Meeting Date: April 18, 2024 Report #: 2311-2195 TITLE PUBLIC HEARING / QUASI-JUDICIAL. 660 University Ave. [21PLN-00341]: Recommendation on Applicant’s Request for Approval of a Planned Community/Planned Home Zoning (PC/PHZ) on Three Parcels (511 Byron St, 660 University Ave, 680 University Ave/500 Middlefield Rd), Deconstruction of Existing Buildings (9,216 SF Office) and Construction of a New Four Story Mixed-Use Building with Ground Floor Office (9,115 SF) and 63 Residential Rental Units (48 Studios, 12 1-Bedroom, 3 2-Bedroom), Including a Two Level Below-Grade Parking Garage. The Applicant Anticipates a Parcel Map to Subdivide the Office Component from the Residential Component. Environmental Assessment: Environmental Impact Report Circulated for Public Review Beginning on April 2, 2024, and Ending on May 17, 2024. Zoning District: RM-20 (Multi- Family Residential). For More Information Contact the Project Planner, Emily Kallas, at Emily.Kallas@CityofPaloAlto.org. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Architectural Review Board (ARB) take the following action(s): 1. Consider the Draft Environmental Impact Report; and 2. Recommend that Council approve the proposed project based on findings and subject to conditions of approval EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The applicant requests approval to develop three parcels (511 Byron St, 660 University Ave, and 680 University Ave/500 Middlefield Rd), deconstruct the existing buildings (9,216 sf of medical office use), and rezone to “Planned Home Zone” (PHZ) in accordance with Palo Alto Municipal Code (PAMC) Chapter 18.38 (Planned Community Zoning). The parcels would be merged under a separate subdivision map application, and the resulting parcel would be redeveloped, providing a new four-story mixed-use building with 9,115 sf of ground floor office and 63 multiple-family residential units. The residential component will include 48 studios, 12 1- bedroom, and three 2-bedroom units. The applicant anticipates a Parcel Map to create a separate condominium for the office component and a separate condominium for the Item 2 Staff Report     Packet Pg. 16     Item No. 2. Page 2 of 10 residential component. Parking spaces would be provided in a two-story below-grade parking garage. Thirteen of the units would be provided as below-market rate units (20%). This is comprised of four Very-Low Income, four Low Income, and five Moderate Income units. The ARB previously reviewed the project on December 1, 2022. This December staff report included extensive background information, project analysis and evaluation to city codes and policies1 The purpose of this report is to restate the comments made by the Board and detail the applicant’s response to those comments. The analysis section below builds upon the information contained in the earlier report and has been modified to reflect recent project changes. Following the ARB’s recommendation, the project will return to the Planning and Transportation Commission (PTC) for a formal recommendation of a Planned Community Ordinance. Both of these recommendations will be forwarded to Council for a final decision. BACKGROUND Council held a Prescreening to review a conceptual plan for the proposed project on October 25, 2021. The formal PHZ application was submitted on December 21, 2021. Following staff’s initial review and subsequent resubmittal, the PTC reviewed the project on November 16, 2022 and recommended that the project be forward to the ARB for review in accordance with the PC rezoning process. The ARB reviewed the same plan set on December 1, 2022. Since this time, the applicant made significant modifications to the project, including changing the parking garage driveway entry from Middlefield Road to Byron Street, as well as removing residential uses from the ground floor to meet FEMA flood zone requirements and address ARB comments related to privacy for ground floor units. This submittal was received on September 1, 2023, ten months after the last public hearing. The plans have been further refined over three rounds of staff review in the last seven months to address various staff comments. The Developer’s Program Statement (project description) is included in Attachment F and the project plans are included in Attachment H. Links to the staff reports and minutes for the prior meetings are provided below. Prior City Reviews & Action City Council:Council held a prescreening for the proposed project on October 25, 2021.2,3 1 A link to the staff report for the December 1, 2022 Architectural Review Board hearing is available online at: https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/v/1/agendas-minutes-reports/agendas-minutes/architectural- review-board/2022/arb-12.01.2022-660-university.pdf 2 A link to the staff report for the October 25, 2021 Council hearing is available online at: bit.ly/3NTpv3J 3 A link to the minutes for the October 25, 2021 Council hearing is available online at: bit.ly/3WTxbH0 Item 2 Staff Report     Packet Pg. 17     Item No. 2. Page 3 of 10 PTC:PTC held an initial hearing on November 16, 2022 to review the initial plans and recommended that the plans be forwarded to the ARB for review in accordance with the PTC process.4,5 HRB:None ARB:The ARB held a hearing on December 1, 2022 to review the plans and continued the project to a date uncertain.1 Key comments from Board members and the applicant’s response to those comments are summarized in the following table: ARB Comments/Direction Applicant Response Board members encouraged relocating the vehicular entry from Middlefield Road to Byron Street to minimize potential circulation issues. The vehicular ramp to the underground garage has been relocated to Byron Street. This resulted in a slight parking loss, however the total parking reduction amount remains 20%. The tree protection was maintained. Improve bike and pedestrian circulation by including a bike room at the ground floor and consider future bike improvements that may occur along Middlefield Road. The bike rooms have not been moved and remain in the below ground garage. The ground floor lobby space is minimal, so the bike parking would reduce the amount of office space able to be provided. Provide cover from weather over the pedestrian entries to the below grade garage The stair areas remain open. The vertical and horizonal forms of the building do not easily lend themselves to adding an extended overhang in these locations, as the overhang would be within required setbacks. Reconsider proposed encroachment into the Middlefield Road special setback The proposed Middlefield Road setback of 10 ft is unchanged. Please see contextual analysis in Attachment G. The PTC also 4 A link to the staff report for the November 16, 2022 PTC hearing is available online at: bit.ly/3Oeu8Wb 5 A link to the minutes for the November 16, 2022 PTC hearing is available online at: https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/v/1/agendas-minutes-reports/agendas-minutes/planning-and- transportation-commission/2022/ptc-11.16-draft-verbatim-minutes.pdf Item 2 Staff Report     Packet Pg. 18     Item No. 2. Page 4 of 10 expressed concern regarding this encroachment. Consider improving proposed materials through adding warmth, and richness, such as adding wood elements. More clearly define the architectural style and consider adding a key visual element to the design. The previous materials included only two colors of plaster, and the majority of the building was bright white. Now, the materials include mid-tone wood texture panels, horizontal painted siding, and grey cast concrete and metal elements. All street facing facades have identifiable vertical and horizontal forms. The proposed public art location on the elevator tower provides a key visual element. Improve the design to better fit the “base, middle, top” typology. The University Avenue façade has a textured concrete base, and a wood siding and wood texture panel middle. The wood siding wraps around the tops of some of the balconies to create a “top”. Previously, the entire building was stucco and did not have these texture elements. Provide additional detail demonstrating how the tree will be protected. Protecting the existing 50-inch Coast Live Oak tree is a priority for this project and it has been reviewed extensively by staff and consultants. Three arborist reports have been prepared for this project, including a LIDAR root scan. The plans maintain a minimum distance of 30 ft from the tree, though the TPZ for this tree is 41 ft. Additionally, Urban Forestry has included a Condition of Approval for a security bond for the tree, to further hold the applicant accountable for protecting the tree. Add a loading space to the building design. No loading space was added on site, however a curb space along Byron is proposed to be designated both for loading purposes and for refuse pick up. The ramp height and garage height cannot accommodate a truck-height loading space. Item 2 Staff Report     Packet Pg. 19     Item No. 2. Page 5 of 10 Consider placement of balconies and decks with regards to privacy The balconies locations have not been revised, however there is a 20 ft setback between the interior facing balconies and the property line. While the balconies are not especially private, they provide useable open space, and contribute to “activating” the downtown streetscape. The rooftop garden deck is situated to the University Avenue side of the building. The four trellis structures help divide the space into more useable semi-private areas. Relocate the ground floor manager’s unit away from the street, or provide privacy between University Avenue and this unit. There are now no residential uses on the ground floor, as required by flood zone regulations. The plans no longer designate a unit as a manager’s unit, however, it is still the applicant’s expectation that there will be an on-site manager. ANALYSIS Although not all of the ARB’s comments were addressed, major modifications were made to address key concerns related to site circulation, unit privacy, and the façade design. Overall staff finds that the project is consistent with the ARB findings and, with Council approval of the PC Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan Land Use Text Amendment, the project would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Code. Design Changes The project has been redesigned to reconfigure the driveway and underground garage from Middlefield Road to the Byron Street side and has removed residential uses from the ground floor. The driveway was moved to address PTC and ARB prior comments, Office of Transportation standards, and concerns raised by adjacent neighbors. The single residential unit was removed from the ground floor in response to ARB comments related to privacy, as well as to address flood zone regulations. The modifications slightly reduce the lot coverage by approximately 300 sf, but it still exceeds what would typically be allowed on this property. The floor area was also reduced by approximately 4,000 sf compared to the prior submittal. There are now two fewer units, and a greater number of units are now studio apartments. The modifications to the materials have improved the project, adding texture, warmth, and human scale to the project consistent with the ARB comments. These materials help define vertical and horizonal massing. The proposed public art locations on University Avenue will also provide visual interest and establish this building as a “gateway” to the Downtown area. Item 2 Staff Report     Packet Pg. 20     Item No. 2. Page 6 of 10 The ARB may want to consider minor modifications that could be applied as conditions of the project to improve privacy from balconies. For example, making the glass opaque or another solid material for the railings and/or balcony dividers, particularly overlooking the single-family residence. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan and Guidelines This project is within the boundaries of the Downtown Urban Design Guidelines, as a part of the “Residential Edge” and the Middlefield Road entrance to Downtown. The Guidelines for this area focus on sidewalk and landscaping design. The project includes retention, or replacement where needed, of existing street trees and includes landscape planters along the building within the street side setback. The Guidelines set forth a preference for a double row of street trees in this location. However, the landscape planters will be elevated compared to groundcover landscaping and would not provide sufficient room for tree plantings. The project’s sidewalk paving will be consistent with the Guidelines. The project site is designated Multi-family. The Multi-family land use designation states: “The permitted number of housing units will vary by area, depending on existing land use, proximity to major streets and public transit, distance to shopping and environmental problems. Net densities will range from 8 to 40 units and 8 to 90 persons per acre. Density should be on the lower end of the scale next to single-family residential areas. Densities higher than what is permitted may be allowed where measurable community benefits will be derived, services and facilities are available, and the net effect will be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Population densities will range up to 2.25 persons per unit by 2030.” The project is requesting a Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment to modify the allowable uses in the Multiple Family Land Use Designation. The project proposes ground floor office use, to retain the existing office square footage. The current use is medical office, and staff recommends limiting the office use to medical office, as it provides a necessary service to downtown residents, particularly the seniors at The Hamilton and Lytton Gardens. Zoning Compliance As a PHZ project, the project proposes to deviate from the RM-20 Zoning Development Standards and Parking Standards in the following ways: Proposed land use (allowing non-conforming medical office to remain) Encroachment into the setbacks, including a Special Setback along Middlefield Rd Height – 62’8” where 30 feet is allowed Lot Coverage Floor Area Reduced Useable Open Space Increased parking reduction No residential loading space Item 2 Staff Report     Packet Pg. 21     Item No. 2. Page 7 of 10 In the RM-20 zoning district, Office is a grandfathered use but would not normally be allowed to be redeveloped in a manner that changes the building footprint. As a part of the rezoning process, they are asking for office to be a permitted use. It is staff’s recommendation to limit the office use to medical office. The RM-20 setbacks would typically be a 24 ft special setback along Middlefield Road, 16 ft along the other two street frontages, and 10 ft along the interior property line. This project proposes setbacks of 10 ft along Byron St. and Middlefield Rd. and 6 ft along University Ave. While these setbacks are less than standard, they are acceptable for this urban Downtown neighborhood and ground floor office use. The applicant has prepared a contextual analysis of setbacks on Middlefield Rd. and University Ave. Although the Special Setback along Middlefield Rd. is 24 ft, most buildings are setback 15-22 ft, and some have a setback of as little as 7-12 ft. The proposed 10 ft setback is the same as the existing building at the corner, though it is on the low side of the surrounding context. On University Avenue, the proposed setback of 6 ft is less than the existing 12 ft setback. However, one block away beginning at Webster Street and heading southwest, the Downtown properties do not require a front setback. Additionally, the stair access to the garage, as well as portions of the underground garage are within the setback area. Along the interior, the setback is 19’6”. The increased interior setback is beneficial to protect the neighboring Oak tree, and to provide privacy separation to the adjacent single- family home. A majority of the building would have a height of 50’5”, with rooftop elevators extending the height to 62’8”, where the typical maximum building height is 30 ft. This property is in a flood zone, with the base flood elevation 1’6” above existing grade. The proposed height accommodates a commercial plate height of 13’6”, and residential plate heights varying from 9’9” to 11’3”. Above, rooftop deck amenities extend 10 ft above the majority of the roof, making the total maximum height of the building 57’ plus elevator overrun/rooftop equipment to a height of height to 62’8”. While this is significantly taller than what is allowed in the RM-20 zone, it is more comparable within the surrounding context of PC properties. Lytton Gardens is four stories, with a maximum height of 40 ft, plus rooftop equipment. The Hamilton is four stories, with a maximum height of 44 ft, plus rooftop equipment. The project meets the daylight plane requirements for the interior lot line where it abuts a single-family house. The project exceeds the allowable lot coverage and floor area. However, these increases are necessary to facilitate the high-density housing project. In the prior ARB and PTC meetings, the project received positive feedback for its overall size. Overall, the project proposes a sufficient amount of usable open space, but it is not allocated equitably for all units. The rooftop garden proposes 4,642 sf, or 73.7 sf per unit where normally 75 sf is required. For private open space, most units have balconies, which meet the minimum size requirement of 50 ft or greater, however 3 of the studio units do not have balconies. The applicant has currently identified these three units as BMR units, but the City’s BMR guidelines Item 2 Staff Report     Packet Pg. 22     Item No. 2. Page 8 of 10 require that BMR units be evenly distributed through the project and be similar in size and amenities to market rate units. The City is working with the applicant to refine the selection of units or to otherwise address this in the Conditions of Approval. Unit Affordability The applicant proposes to provide four Very-Low Income, four Low Income, and five Moderate Income units; 20.6% of the total 63 units. The PHZ process offers developers the option to provide affordable units as the “public benefit” of a PC project, as described in the September 21, 2020 Council Staff Report6. In this report, Option #2 is a weighted calculation to incentivize developers to provide very low- and low- income units, rather than the minimum moderate units required. Table 1 below calculates weighted values for the BMR units provided, equivalent to 24.4%. This is in excess of the minimum 20% required for a PHZ project. 660 University Below Market Rate Unit Calculation Income Level Area Median Income Weighted Value Number of Units % of Actual Units Weighted % Very-low Income 31-50%1.9 4 6.3%12% Low Income 51-80%1.2 4 6.3%8%Below Market Rate Units Moderate Income 81-120%0.6 5 7.9%5% Market Rate Units Above Moderate & Market Rate 121% +0 50 Total 63 20.6%24.4% Overall, this project will provide necessary rental housing units. It will help the City work towards our housing goals and contribute as a gateway to the Downtown area. Tree Protection Both the City and the Applicant consider protecting the existing 50-inch Coast Live Oak tree a key part of this project. Three arborist reports have been prepared for this project, including a LIDAR root scan. The plans maintain a minimum distance of 30 ft from the tree, though the TPZ for this tree is 41 ft. Per Urban Forestry review, the expected impacts are within acceptable parameters of industry standards, provided that all mitigation measures in the EIR’s Arborist Report are followed. 6 A link to the September 21, 2020 Council Staff Report is available online at: https://bit.ly/PHZ-CouncilReport Item 2 Staff Report     Packet Pg. 23     Item No. 2. Page 9 of 10 Additionally, Urban Forestry has included a Condition of Approval for a security bond for the tree, to further hold the applicant accountable for protecting the tree. This security bond, put in place at the time of building permits, will be placed on the tree for 100% of the appraised replacement value of the tree as specified in the Palo Alto Tree Technical Manual. This is also subject to a three-year monitoring period after construction is completed. See the Draft RLUA Conditions #37-38 for full text of these conditions. PUBLIC NOTIFCIATION, OUTREACH & COMMENTS The Palo Alto Municipal Code requires notice of this public hearing be published in a local paper and mailed to owners and occupants of property within 600 feet of the subject property at least ten days in advance. Notice of a public hearing for this project was published in the Daily Post on April 5, 2024, which is 12 days in advance of the meeting. Postcard mailing occurred on April 3, which is 14 in advance of the meeting. Public Comments Neighbors at The Hamilton have been involved in this process, primarily through emails from attorneys Leigh Prince and Christopher Ream. Concerns are primarily regarding noise, traffic, disruption to existing neighbors, and protection of the neighboring Oak tree. Attachment E contains only project-relevant comment emails received since the previous ARB hearing. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The subject project has been assessed in accordance with the authority and criteria contained in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State CEQA Guidelines, and the environmental regulations of the City. Specifically, a Draft Environmental Impact Report is in circulation for a 45-day review period beginning on April 2, 2024 and ending on May 17, 2024. The EIR found there are no significant and unavoidable environmental impacts. An alternative to the proposed project was determined to be the environmentally superior alternative. However, this alternative does not substantially lessen or avoid significant environmental impacts compared to the proposed project. In addition, it is less desirable than the proposed project because it would require an additional story of height and return the circulation back to Middlefield Road. Accordingly, staff does not recommend proceeding with the environmentally superior alternative. It is not necessary under CEQA to choose the environmentally superior alternative when doing so would not substantially lessen or avoid significant environmental impacts. Any potentially significant impacts associated with the proposed project can be mitigated as further discussed in the document, see Attachment H. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS In addition to the recommended action, the Architectural Review Board may: 1. Continue the project to a date (un)certain; or 2. Recommend project denial based on revised findings. Item 2 Staff Report     Packet Pg. 24     Item No. 2. Page 10 of 10 ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: Location Map Attachment B: Draft Record of Land Use Action ARB Findings Attachment C: Zoning Comparison Table Attachment D: Applicant’s Letter on the Special Setback Attachment E: Public Comments Attachment F: Project Description Letter and Responses to ARB Comments Attachment G: Project Plans and Environmental Review AUTHOR/TITLE: Report Author & Contact Information ARB7 Liaison & Contact Information Emily Kallas, AICP, Planner Claire Raybould, AICP, Principal Planner (650) 617-3125 (650) 329-2575 emily.kallas@cityofpaloalto.org jodie.gerhardt@cityofpaloalto.org 7 Emails may be sent directly to the ARB using the following address: arb@cityofpaloalto.org Item 2 Staff Report     Packet Pg. 25     30 24 24 24 24 30 24 24 First United_Methodist Church Alain Pinel Realtor Lytton Gardens 50.0'200.0' 50.0'200.0' 200.0' 50.0' 200.0' 200.0' 100.0' 100.0' 250.0' 225.0' 112.5' 50.0' 112.5' 50.0' 112.5' 50.0' 112.5' 200.0' 152.5' 19.3'3.0' 47.7' 25.2' 67.0' 22.2' 100.0' 125.0' 140.0' 112.5'140.0' 112.5' 160.0' 112.5' 160.0' 112.5' 50.0' 112.5' 50.0' 112.5' 50.0' 112.5' 50.0' 112.5' 50.0' 112.5' 50.0' 112.5' 50.0' 112.5' 50.0' 112.5' 50.0' 112.5' 100.0' 100.0'100.0' 100.0' 100.0' 25.0' 100.0' 25.0' 100.0' 50.0' 100.0' 50.0' 100.0' 50.0' 100.0' 50.0' 200.0' 225.0' 250.0' 130.0' 50.0' 95.0'100.0' 59.0' 100.0' 59.0' 100.0' 66.0'100.0' 66.0' 50.0' 125.0' 50.0' 125.0' 50.0' 95.0' 50.0' 95.0' 50.0' 100.0' 50.0' 100.0' 100.0' 100.0' 100.0' 100.0' 147.5' 400.0' 174.7' 47.8' 3.0'19.3'22.2' 133.0' 150.0' 112.5'150.0' 112.5' 75.0' 125.0' 50.0' 150.0' 75.0' 150.0' 75.0' 151.5' 75.0' 151.5' 75.0' 48.5' 7.0'1.5' 150.0' 50.0' 143.0' 75.0' 125.0' 75.0' 125.0' 48.5' 82.0' 48.5' 82.0' 35.0' 100.0' 35.0' 100.0' 40.0' 100.0' 40.0' 100.0'100.0' 35.0' 100.0' 57.5' 125.0' 57.5' 125.0' 67.5' 125.0' 67.5' 125.0'50.0' 90.0' 75.0' 150.0' 75.0' 150.0' 151.5' 75.0' 151.5' 75.0' 151.5' 75.0' 151.5' 75.0' 151.5' 75.0' 151.5' 75.0' 151.5' 75.0' 151.5' 75.0' 151.5' 75.0' 151.5' 75.0' 200.0' 200.0' 200.0' 200.0' 200.0' 200.0' 200.0' 200.0' 200.0' 200.0' 200.0' 200.0' 200.0' 200.0' 200.0' 200.0' 200.0' 200.0' 200.0' 200.0' 200.0' 200.0' 200.0' 200.0' 200.0' 225.0' 250.0' 130.0' 50.0' 95.0' 200.0' 225.0' 250.0' 130.0' 50.0' 95.0' 200.0' 225.0' 250.0' 130.0' 50.0' 95.0' 200.0' 225.0' 250.0' 130.0' 50.0' 95.0' 200.0' 225.0' 250.0' 130.0' 50.0' 95.0' 200.0' 225.0' 250.0' 130.0' 50.0' 95.0' 200.0' 225.0' 250.0' 130.0' 50.0' 95.0' 200.0' 225.0' 250.0' 130.0' 50.0' 95.0' 200.0' 225.0' 250.0' 130.0' 50.0' 95.0' 200.0' 225.0' 250.0' 130.0' 50.0' 95.0' 200.0' 225.0' 250.0' 130.0' 50.0' 95.0' 200.0' 225.0' 250.0' 130.0' 50.0' 95.0' 200.0' 225.0' 250.0' 130.0' 50.0' 95.0' 200.0' 225.0' 250.0' 130.0' 50.0' 95.0' 200.0' 225.0' 250.0' 130.0' 50.0' 95.0' 200.0' 225.0' 250.0' 130.0' 50.0' 95.0' 200.0' 225.0' 250.0' 130.0' 50.0' 95.0' 200.0' 225.0' 250.0' 130.0' 50.0' 95.0' 200.0' 225.0' 250.0' 130.0' 50.0' 95.0' 200.0' 225.0' 250.0' 130.0' 50.0' 95.0' 200.0' 225.0' 250.0' 130.0' 50.0' 95.0' 200.0' 225.0' 250.0' 130.0' 50.0' 95.0' 200.0' 225.0' 250.0' 130.0' 50.0' 95.0' 200.0' 225.0' 250.0' 130.0' 50.0' 95.0' 200.0' 225.0' 250.0' 130.0' 50.0' 95.0' 200.0' 225.0' 250.0' 130.0' 50.0' 95.0' 200.0' 225.0' 250.0' 130.0' 50.0' 95.0' 200.0' 225.0' 250.0' 130.0' 50.0' 95.0' 200.0' 225.0' 250.0' 130.0' 50.0' 95.0' 200.0' 225.0' 250.0' 130.0' 50.0' 95.0' 200.0' 225.0' 250.0' 130.0' 50.0' 95.0' 200.0' 225.0' 250.0' 130.0' 50.0' 95.0' 200.0' 225.0' 250.0' 130.0' 50.0' 95.0' 200.0' 225.0' 250.0' 130.0' 50.0' 95.0' 200.0' 225.0' 250.0' 130.0' 50.0' 95.0' 200.0' 225.0' 250.0' 130.0' 50.0' 95.0' 150.0' 112.5'150.0' 112.5'150.0' 112.5'150.0' 112.5'150.0' 112.5'150.0' 112.5'150.0' 112.5'150.0' 112.5'150.0' 112.5'150.0' 112.5'150.0' 112.5'150.0' 112.5'150.0' 112.5'150.0' 112.5'150.0' 112.5'150.0' 112.5'150.0' 112.5'150.0' 112.5'150.0' 112.5'150.0' 112.5' 250.0' 225.0' 250.0' 225.0' 250.0' 225.0' 250.0' 225.0' 250.0' 225.0' 250.0' 225.0' 250.0' 225.0' 250.0' 225.0' 250.0' 225.0' 250.0' 225.0' 250.0' 225.0' 250.0' 225.0' 250.0' 225.0' 250.0' 225.0' 250.0' 225.0' 250.0' 225.0' 250.0' 225.0' 250.0' 225.0' 250.0' 225.0' 250.0' 225.0' 250.0' 225.0' 250.0' 225.0' 250.0' 225.0' 250.0' 225.0' 250.0' 225.0' 250.0' 225.0' 250.0' 225.0' 250.0' 225.0' 250.0' 225.0' 25.0' 50.0' 100.0' 100.0'75.0' 75.0' 578 642-652630-640 600-610 415 405 434 765 750-798 482 486 490 483 547 526 649 625523 518 610 600 616 624 630 511 517 524 500 680 725 478 499 489 435 428 422 416 724 425 555 530 575 555 536 518 720 500 498 755 515 537 543539 720 519 UNIVERSITY AVENUE UNI V E R S I T Y A V E N U E BYR O N S T R E E T MIDDLEFIELD ROAD FULTON STREET MIDDLEFIELD ROAD WEBSTER STREET FULTON STREET HAMILTON AVENUE RM-20 PC-4173 This map is a product of the City of Palo Alto GIS This document is a graphic representation only of best available sources. Legend Project Site Current Features Search Polygon 0' 68' Attachment ALocation Map 660 University CITY OF PALO ALTOINCORPORATED CALIFORNIA P a l o A l t oT h e C i t y o f APRIL 16 1894 The City of Palo Alto assumes no responsibility for any errors. ©1989 to 2016 City of Palo Altoekallas, 2024-03-21 09:04:52Attachment A. Location Map (\\cc-maps\Encompass\Admin\Personal\Planning.mdb) Item 2 Attachment A: Location Map     Packet Pg. 26     Page 1 of 17 3 9 8 3 APPROVAL NO. 2024-____ RECORD OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALO ALTO LAND USE ACTION FOR 511 BYRON STREET, 660 UNIVERSITY AVENUE, 680 UNIVERSITY AVENUE/500 MIDDLEFIELD ROAD: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT AND PLANNED COMMUNITY REZONING [FILE NO 21PLN-00341] On ____________, the City Council of the City of Palo Alto (“City Council”) approved a Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment and Planned Community Rezoning, making the following findings, determinations, and declarations: SECTION 1. Background. A. On December 21, 2021 Smith Development applied for a Planned Community Rezoning and Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment to construct a four Story Mixed-Use building with Ground Floor Office (9,115 SF) and 63 multi-family residential rental units with 48 studios, 12 1-bedroom units and 3 two-bedroom units (42,189 sf) and a two level below-grade parking garage. This project also includes a Request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to allow Medical Office in to replace existing Medical Office abutting Middlefield Road in the Multiple Family Residential Land Use Designation. B. The project site consists of three existing parcels located at 511 Byron Street, 660 University Avenue, and 680 University-500 Middlefield (APNs 120-03-042, 120-03-043, 120-03-044) totaling 0.52 acres. Existing improvements include two existing medical office buildings totaling 9,216 sf, and associated parking. C. On October 25, 2021 Council conducted a prescreening review of the proposed legislative actions in accordance with PAMC 18.79 D. On November 16, 2022 the Planning and Transportation Commission held a duly noticed public hearing and recommended that the applicant submit the proposed plans to the Architectural Review Board based on the conceptual design and proposed project in accordance with the Planned Community Rezoning process. After responding the ARB and PTC comments, the plans were resubmitted in October and December 2023, and February 2024. E. Following the Planning and Transportation Commission’s initial review, the Architectural Review Board held a duly noticed public hearing on December 1, 2022 to provide feedback and allow for public comment on the proposed project. On _____________, the ARB held a duly noticed public hearing and recommended approval of the proposed project. F. On _____________, the PTC reviewed the project design and the EIR, and recommended approval. G. On _____________, the City Council reviewed the request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Planned Community rezoning. After hearing public testimony, the Council voted to approve/adopt: •Resolution _______adopting the EIR and making findings of overriding consideration; •Resolution _______amending the Comprehensive Plan Text; and •Ordinance________ amending the zoning of the proposed resulting parcel to Planned Item 2 Attachment B: Draft RLUA     Packet Pg. 27     Page 2 of 17 3 9 8 3 Community •This Record of Land Use Action H. This application is subject to the conditions set forth in Section 6 of this Record of Land Use Action. SECTION 2. Environmental Review. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) the City prepared an Environmental Impact Report (“EIR”) for the 660 University Avenue Mixed-Use Project to provide an assessment of the potential environmental consequences of approving and constructing the Project. A Draft EIR was circulated for public review for a 45-day period from April 2, 2024, through May 17, 2024. A Final EIR was prepared to respond to comments and published on _______. The City Council certified and made related findings by Resolution No ________on ________, prior to approval of the decision that is the subject of this RLUA. All mitigation measures as stated in the approved Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) have been incorporated into the conditions of approval. The MMRP is included in Exhibit A of this Record of Land Use Action. SECTION 3. PLANNED COMMUNITY FINDINGS Finding #1: The site is so situated, and the use or uses proposed for the site are of such characteristics that the application of general districts or combining districts will not provide sufficient flexibility to allow the proposed development. The project is consistent with Finding #1 because: The proposed project includes a density of units for the site that exceed what is allowed by the RM-20 zoning. It has street frontage on three sides, and a protected Oak tree overhanging the fourth side, which results in larger setbacks and a smaller buildable area than other lots of a similar size. Finding #2: Development of the site under the provisions of the PC planned community district will result in public benefits not otherwise attainable by application of the regulations of general districts or combining districts. In making the findings required by this section, the planning commission and city council, as appropriate, shall specifically cite the public benefits expected to result from use of the planned community district. The project is consistent with Finding #2 because: The primary public benefit for this project is additional housing units to assist the City in reaching their Regional Housing Needs Assessment goals. Under the RM-20 zoning, the maximum development potential of this property would be 10 units, but through this PC application, the project proposes 63 units. The project proposes 20% of the units to be designated as Below Market Rate, about half of which are allocated to Low Income and Very Low Income households. A secondary public benefit is maintaining the existing medical office, to provide services to the adjacent neighborhood. Finding #3: The use or uses permitted, and the site development regulations applicable within the district shall be consistent with the Palo Alto Comprehensive Plan, and shall be compatible with existing and potential uses on adjoining sites or within the general vicinity. The project is consistent with Finding #3 because: Item 2 Attachment B: Draft RLUA     Packet Pg. 28     Page 3 of 17 3 9 8 3 This project requires approval of the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment to maintain the proposed to remain medical office use. The project is otherwise compatible with the Comprehensive Plan as detailed further in Section 4 Finding #1 below. The proposed uses are compatible with the surrounding neighborhood, as it is primarily multiple-family housing and small offices. Additional care has been taken to ensure viability of the neighboring Oak tree. SECTION 4. ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW FINDINGS The design and architecture of the proposed improvements, as conditioned, complies with the Findings for Architectural Review as required in Chapter 18.76 of the PAMC. Finding #1: The design is consistent with applicable provisions of the Palo Alto Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Code, coordinated area plans (including compatibility requirements), and any relevant design guides. The project is consistent with Finding #1 because: With approval of the requested Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Planned Community Rezoning in accordance with Ordinance _______ and Resolution _______, the proposed project complies with the zoning code and Comprehensive Plan. The project is not located within a coordinated area plan area. The proposed project is consistent with relevant goals and policies set forth in the Comprehensive Plan. Below is an analysis of the applicable goals and policies: Comp Plan Goals and Policies How project adheres or does not adhere to Comp Plan The Comprehensive Plan land use designation for the site is Multiple Family Residential. The project proposes high-density housing in an area designated for high-density housing. The project includes a Comprehensive Plan text amendment to allow for existing non- conforming office uses to be redeveloped when part of a new mixed-use development. This would align the proposed project with the underlying comprehensive plan land use designation. Land Use Element Policy L-1.3 Infill development in the urban service area should be compatible with its surroundings and the overall scale and character of the city to ensure a compact, efficient development pattern. This project proposes to redevelop two existing medical office buildings into a mixed-use, office and multiple-family residential rental building within the Downtown neighborhood. Policy L-2.5 Support the creation of affordable housing units for middle to lower income level earners, such as City and school district employees, as feasible. This project includes 13 BMR units, which is 20% of the 63 provided housing units. Policy L-2.11 Encourage new development and redevelopment to incorporate greenery and The proposed building includes a deck area for the office and rooftop garden for the residents, in Item 2 Attachment B: Draft RLUA     Packet Pg. 29     Page 4 of 17 3 9 8 3 natural features such as green rooftops, pocket parks, plazas and rain gardens. keeping with the urban character of the project and neighborhood. Policy L-6.1 Promote high-quality design and site planning that is compatible with surrounding development and public spaces. The proposed residential building will act as a gateway to the Downtown area and meets the Architectural Review Board findings for approval. Policy L-6.7 Where possible, avoid abrupt changes in scale and density between residential and non-residential areas and between residential areas of different densities. To promote compatibility and gradual transitions between land uses, place zoning district boundaries at mid-block locations rather than along streets wherever possible. The proposed project is four stories, same as the nearby Lytton Gardens and The Hamilton residences. While it will be the tallest building in the immediate area, overall it is compatible with the Downtown neighborhood. Policy T-1.19 Provide facilities that encourage and support bicycling and walking. The project includes sufficient short and long term bicycle parking in compliance with the code requirements. Finding #2: The project has a unified and coherent design, that: a. creates an internal sense of order and desirable environment for occupants, visitors, and the general community, b. preserves, respects and integrates existing natural features that contribute positively to the site and the historic character including historic resources of the area when relevant, c. is consistent with the context-based design criteria of the applicable zone district, d. provides harmonious transitions in scale, mass and character to adjacent land uses and land use designations, e. enhances living conditions on the site (if it includes residential uses) and in adjacent residential areas. The project is consistent with Finding #2 because: There is internal order between the ground floor offices and upper floor residences. There are separate, defined entrances for the residents and office tenant. There are no historic resources on this property. The context-based design criteria do not apply. However, the project incorporates many of the design intents and is consistent with the Architectural Review findings for approval. The four-story building is taller than nearby four-story buildings. However, this is to accommodate the mixed use ground floor, flood zone, and rooftop amenity space. It will enhance the residential options Downtown by providing additional units at various sizes. Finding #3: The design is of high aesthetic quality, using high quality, integrated materials and appropriate construction techniques, and incorporating textures, colors, and other details that are compatible with and enhance the surrounding area. The project is consistent with Finding #3 because: The project incorporates a variety of materials, including gray cast concrete, wood tone panels, painted siding, glass, and landscape elements that are of high quality and that integrate well to create a cohesive design. The project proposes on site Public Art, which will also enhance the design. The project will stand out from other Item 2 Attachment B: Draft RLUA     Packet Pg. 30     Page 5 of 17 3 9 8 3 nearby buildings, because it uses a variety of materials to break up the massing and add visual interest. Most other buildings in the area use a more limited palette. Finding #4: The design is functional, allowing for ease and safety of pedestrian and bicycle traffic and providing for elements that support the building’s necessary operations (e.g. convenient vehicle access to property and utilities, appropriate arrangement and amount of open space and integrated signage, if applicable, etc.). The project is consistent with Finding #4 because: The driveway to the below grade garage is located on Byron St. due to traffic limitations on University Avenue and Middlefield Road. The bike rooms are located below grade and are accessible by stair or by elevator. Building operations such as refuse collection and utilities have been designed to be oriented towards the side streets to create a cohesive façade along University Ave. Pedestrian access is clear and a separate entrance is provided for the residents and office users. Finding #5: The landscape design complements and enhances the building design and its surroundings, is appropriate to the site’s functions, and utilizes to the extent practical, regional indigenous drought resistant plant material capable of providing desirable habitat that can be appropriately maintained. The project is consistent with Finding #5 because: The project is consistent with the finding in that the project provides landscaped area around the perimeter wherever possible, including 9 new trees, and 4 new street trees (13 trees total), as well as in planter boxes on the rooftop garden. The project will protect the Coast Live Oak and provides measures to ensure the tree’s protection through construction. All plants proposed are very low to moderate water use, as well as native or regionally adapted. Many are also edible for small animals, birds, butterflies or insects. Finding #6: The project incorporates design principles that achieve sustainability in areas related to energy efficiency, water conservation, building materials, landscaping, and site planning. The project is consistent with Finding #6 because: In accordance with the City’s Green Building Regulations, the building will satisfy the requirements for CALGreen Mandatory + Tier 2. The project proposed an all electric design and will be consistent with Model Water Efficiency Landscape Ordinance (MWELO) requirements. SECTION 5. Conditions of Approval. PLANNING DIVISION 1.CONFORMANCE WITH PLANS: Construction and development shall conform to the approved plans entitled, "660 University Ave., Palo Alto, CA,” uploaded to the Palo Alto Online Permitting Services Citizen Portal on February 7, 2024, as modified by these conditions of approval. 2.BUILDING PERMIT: Apply for a building permit and meet any and all conditions as contained in this document. Item 2 Attachment B: Draft RLUA     Packet Pg. 31     Page 6 of 17 3 9 8 3 3.BUILDING PERMIT PLAN SET: A copy of this cover letter and conditions of approval shall be printed on the second page of the plans submitted for building permit. 4.PROJECT MODIFICATIONS: All modifications to the approved project shall be submitted for review and approval prior to construction. If during the Building Permit review and construction phase, the project is modified by the applicant, it is the responsibility of the applicant to contact the Planning Division/project planner directly to obtain approval of the project modification. It is the applicant’s responsibility to highlight any proposed changes to the project and to bring it to the project planner’s attention. 5.ENTITLEMENT EXPIRATION. The project approval shall be valid for a period of two years from the date of issuance of the entitlement. If within such one/two years period, the proposed use of the site or the construction of buildings has not commenced, the Planning entitlement shall expire. Application for a one year extension of this entitlement may be made prior to expiration. 6.MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM. The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) associated with the project and attached here as Exhibit A is incorporated by reference and all mitigation measures shall be implemented as described in said document. Prior to requesting issuance of any related demolition and/or construction permits, the applicant shall meet with the Project Planner to review and ensure compliance with the MMRP, subject to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning of Planning and Development Services. 7.LANDSCAPE PLAN. Plantings shall be installed in accordance with the approved plan set and shall be permanently maintained and replaced as necessary. 8.BASEMENT EXCAVATION: Any retaining wall required for basement excavation shall not prevent the planting and future growth of required landscaping. This shall be review by the Project Planner prior to issuance of a Building permit. 9.NOISE THRESHOLDS ON RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY. In accordance with PAMC Section 9.10.030, No person shall produce, suffer or allow to be produced by any machine, animal or device, or any combination of same, on residential property, a noise level more than six dB above the local ambient at any point outside of the property plane. All noise producing equipment shall be located outside of required setbacks. 10.OPEN AIR LOUDSPEAKERS (AMPLIFIED MUSIC). In accordance with PAMC Section 9.12, no amplified music shall be used for producing sound in or upon any open area, to which the public has access, between the hours of 11:00pm and one hour after sunrise. 11.NOISE REPORT AT BUILDING STAGE. An analysis of the proposed project’s compliance with the City’s noise requirements for the proposed HVAC was prepared as part of the documentation to Item 2 Attachment B: Draft RLUA     Packet Pg. 32     Page 7 of 17 3 9 8 3 support a Class 32 categorical exemption. At the time of building permit issuance for new construction or for installation of any such mechanical equipment, if the proposed equipment exceeds the anticipated noise level that was analyzed or is proposed in a location that is closer to the property line, the applicant shall submit an acoustical analysis by an acoustical engineer demonstrating projected compliance with the Noise Ordinance. The analysis shall be based on acoustical readings, equipment specifications and any proposed sound reduction measures, such as equipment enclosures or insulation, which demonstrate a sufficient degree of sound attenuation to assure that the prescribed noise levels will not be exceeded. 12.SIGN APPROVAL NEEDED. No signs are approved at this time. All signs shall conform to the requirements of Title 16.20 of the Palo Alto Municipal Code (Sign Code) and shall be subject to approval by the Director of Planning. 13. AFFORDABLE HOUSING REQUIREMENT (RENTAL PROJECT). This project is subject to the affordable housing requirements set forth in Section 16.65.040 of the Palo Alto Municipal Code. As such, unless the mixed use, nonresidential or residential rental project is exempt under Section 16.65.025 or an alternative is approved as described in Section 16.65.080, all mixed use, nonresidential and residential rental projects shall pay housing impact fees as specified in Section 16.65.060 to mitigate the projects' impacts on the need for affordable housing. This fee will be collected along with other required development impacts fees. 14.AFFORDABLE HOUSING PLAN AND AGREEMENT. The applicant shall prepare an affordable housing plan. An affordable housing agreement, reviewed and approved by the City of Palo Alto, shall be recorded prior to the approval of any final or parcel map or building permit for the development project (PAMC 16.65.090). 15.BELOW MARKET RATE (BMR) HOUSING. A Regulatory Agreement in a form acceptable to the City Attorney for the thirteen (13) BMR units shall be executed and recorded prior to final map approval or building permit issuance, whichever occurs first. All BMR units constructed under this condition shall be in conformance with the City’s BMR Program rules and regulations. Failure to comply with the timing of this condition and any adopted BMR Program rules and regulations shall not waive its later enforcement. Failure to comply with the timing of this condition and any adopted BMR Program rules and regulations shall not waive its later enforcement. 16.TRASH ROOM. The trash room shall be used solely for the temporary storage of refuse and recycling that is disposed on a regular basis and shall be closed and locked during non-business hours. 17.REFUSE. All trash areas shall be effectively screened from view and covered and maintained in an orderly state to prevent water from entering into the garbage container. No outdoor storage is allowed/permitted Item 2 Attachment B: Draft RLUA     Packet Pg. 33     Page 8 of 17 3 9 8 3 unless designated on the approved plan set. Trash areas shall be maintained in a manner to discourage illegal dumping. 18.TDM PROGRAM AND ANNUAL REPORTING REQUIREMENT. The applicant shall abide by the Final Transportation Demand Management (TDM) plan, entitled “660 University Avenue, Transportation Demand Management Prepared for Smith Development”, dated December 20, 2023 to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning and Development Services. The TDM plan includes measures and programs to achieve a reduction in single-occupancy vehicle trips to the site by a minimum of 45%, in conformance with the City’s Comprehensive Plan. The TDM plan includes an annual monitoring plan to document mode split and trips to the project site. The TDM annual report shall be submitted to the Chief Transportation Official. Monitoring and reporting requirements may be revised in the future if the minimum reduction is not achieved through the measures and programs initially implemented. Projects that do not achieve the required reduction may be subject to daily penalties as set forth in the City’s fee schedule. 19.MECHANICAL LIFT PARKING. Up to 52 required parking spaces may be provided in a puzzle parking system, which allows independent access to each vehicle. The property owner shall have a maintenance agreement with the lift system manufacturer and the system shall be operational at all times. All new renters/employees shall be given instructions on how to operate the lift system. If the lift system is out of operation for any reason, anyone who is not able to retrieve their vehicle within a 10-minute period shall be reimbursed by the property owner or their designee for travel expenses up to $50 per occurrence. 20.UTILITY LOCATIONS: In no case shall utilities be placed in a location that requires equipment and/or bollards to encroach into a required parking space. In no case shall a pipeline be placed within 10 feet of a proposed tree and/or tree designated to remain. 21.SUBDIVISION MAP. The Lot Merger and Final Map for Condominium Purposes shall be recorded prior to building permit issuance. 22.ESTIMATED IMPACT FEE: Development Impact Fees, currently estimated in the amount of $3,918,017.24 plus the applicable public art fee, per PAMC 16.61.040, shall be paid prior to the issuance of the related building permit. 23.REQUIRED PUBLIC ART. In conformance with PAMC 16.61, and to the satisfaction of the Public Art Commission, the property owner and/or applicant shall select an artist and received final approval of the art plan, or pay the in-lieu fee equivalent to 1% of the estimated construction valuation, prior to obtaining a Building permit. All required artwork shall be installed as approved by the Public Art Commission and verified by Public Art staff prior to release of the final Use and Occupancy permit. 24.IMPACT FEE 90-DAY PROTEST PERIOD. California Government Code Section 66020 provides that a project applicant who desires to protest the fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions imposed on a development project must initiate the protest at the time the development project is approved or conditionally approved or within ninety (90) days after the date that fees, dedications, reservations or Item 2 Attachment B: Draft RLUA     Packet Pg. 34     Page 9 of 17 3 9 8 3 exactions are imposed on the Project. Additionally, procedural requirements for protesting these development fees, dedications, reservations and exactions are set forth in Government Code Section 66020. IF YOU FAIL TO INITIATE A PROTEST WITHIN THE 90-DAY PERIOD OR FOLLOW THE PROTEST PROCEDURES DESCRIBED IN GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 66020, YOU WILL BE BARRED FROM CHALLENGING THE VALIDITY OR REASONABLENESS OF THE FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS, AND EXACTIONS. If these requirements constitute fees, taxes, assessments, dedications, reservations, or other exactions as specified in Government Code Sections 66020(a) or 66021, this is to provide notification that, as of the date of this notice, the 90-day period has begun in which you may protest these requirements. This matter is subject to the California Code of Civil Procedures (CCP) Section 1094.5; the time by which judicial review must be sought is governed by CCP Section 1094.6. 25.INDEMNITY. To the extent permitted by law, the Applicant shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its City Council, its officers, employees and agents (the “indemnified parties”) from and against any claim, action, or proceeding brought by a third party against the indemnified parties and the applicant to attack, set aside or void, any permit or approval authorized hereby for the Project, including (without limitation) reimbursing the City for its actual attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in defense of the litigation. The City may, in its sole discretion, elect to defend any such action with attorneys of its own choice. 26.FINAL INSPECTION: A Planning Division Final inspection will be required to determine substantial compliance with the approved plans prior to the scheduling of a Building Division final. Any revisions during the building process must be approved by Planning, including but not limited to; materials, landscaping and hard surface locations. Contact your Project Planner, Emily Kallas at emily.kallas@cityofpaloalto.org to schedule this inspection. BUILDING 27. A building permit is required for the scope of work shown. 28. At time of building permit, the following items shall be reviewed in detail. a. Building and site accessibility per CBC 11A, 11B b. Regular and van accessible spaces including EV per CBC and PAMC c. Occupied roof per 503.1.4, CBC d. Building Code analysis e. Fire-rating and protection of opening at roof, floors, and walls f. Green building compliance. g. Structural design calculations, plans, and details. PUBLIC WORKS ZERO WASTE 29. Project will be required to submit a salvage survey prior to receiving the building permit. Please anticipate meeting PAMC 5.24 Deconstruction and Construction Materials Management requirements. 30. Carts must bear appropriate signage. Recycling carts need to be blue lid and blue body. Compost carts need to be green lid and green body. Item 2 Attachment B: Draft RLUA     Packet Pg. 35     Page 10 of 17 3 9 8 3 31. The following comments below are part of the Palo Alto Municipality Code. If your scope of work includes internal and external bins then cut-sheets for the color-coded internal and external containers, related color-coded millwork, and it’s colored signage must be included in the building plans prior to receiving approval from Zero Waste. Please see below for more details. As per Palo Alto Municipal Code 5.20.108 the site is required to have color-coded refuse containers, related color-coded millwork, and colored signage. The three refuse containers shall include recycle (blue container), compost (green container), and garbage (black container). Applicant shall present on the plan the locations and quantity of both (any) internal and external refuse containers, it’s millwork, along with the signage. This requirement applies to any external or internal refuse containers located in common areas such as entrances, conference rooms, open space, lobby, garage, mail room, gym, and etc. except for restrooms, copy area, and mother’s room. Millwork to store the color-coded refuse containers must have a minimum of four inches in height worth of color-coding, wrapping around the full width of the millwork. Signage must be color coded with photos or illustrations of commonly discarded items. Restrooms must have a green compost container for paper towels and an optional black landfill container if applicable. Copy area must have either a recycle bin only or all three refuse receptacles (green compost, blue recycle, and black landfill container). Mother’s room must minimally have a green compost container and black landfill container. Please refer to PAMC 5.20.108 and the Internal Container Guide. Examples of appropriate signage can be found in the Managing Zero Waste at Your Business Guide. Electronic copies of these signage can be found on the Zero Waste Palo Alto’s website, https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/Departments/Public-Works/Zero-Waste/What-Goes- Where/Toolkit#section-2 and hard copies can be requested from the waste hauler, Greenwaste of Palo Alto, (650) 493-4894. TRANSPORTATION 32. Future tenants/owners shall be required to provide free transit passes for office employees to use transit, as part of the TDM plan. The requirement for free transit passes must be included as part of the lease agreement. 33. Ensure landscape area(s) do not encroach on the bike parking space(s). URBAN FORESTRY 34. PROJECT ARBORIST. The property owner shall hire a certified arborist to ensure the project conforms to all Planning and Urban Forestry conditions related to landscaping/trees, as well as relevant CEQA Mitigation Measures. 35.TREE PROTECTION FENCING. Tree protection fencing shall be required for the street trees to remain, the neighboring Coast Live Oak, and for all tree/shrubs proposed to be maintained. 36. Expected impacts to neighboring protected coast live oak tree #10 as described in the C8 updated consulting arborist report from David Babby and from the ground penetrating radar study provided by consulting arborist Robert Booty, are within acceptable parameters of industry standards, provided that all mitigation methods outlined in the consulting arborist report are followed during construction. In addition, prior to the applicant receiving building permit approval, a security bond will be placed on the neighboring coast live oak tree (Quercus agrifolia) 50" DBH tree #10 for 100% of the appraised Item 2 Attachment B: Draft RLUA     Packet Pg. 36     Page 11 of 17 3 9 8 3 replacement value of the tree. See language below pertaining to the tree bond as specified in the Palo Alto Tree Technical Manual: 37. TREE APPRAISAL & SECURITY DEPOSIT AGREEMENT. (Reference: CPA Tree Technical Manual, Section 6.25). Prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit, the applicant shall work with the Urban Forestry Section to prepare and secure a tree appraisal and security deposit agreement stipulating its duration and a monitoring program. For the purposes of a security deposit agreement, the monetary market or replacement value shall be determined using the most recent version of the “Guide for Plant Appraisal”. The appraisal shall be performed at the applicant’s expense, and the appraiser shall be subject to the approval of the Urban Forester. a. SECURITY DEPOSIT AGREEMENT. Prior to grading or building permit issuance, as a condition of development approval, the applicant shall post a security deposit for 100% of the appraised replacement value of the following protected status tree: Tree #10, 50" DBH Quercus agrifolia on the neighboring property. The security may be a cash deposit, letter of credit, or surety bond and shall be filed with the Revenue Collections/Finance Department or in a form satisfactory to the City Attorney. b. SECURITY DEPOSIT & MONITORING PROGRAM. The applicant (or new property owner should the property change hands) shall provide to the City of Palo Alto an annual tree evaluation report prepared by the project arborist or other qualified certified arborist, assessing the condition and providing recommendations to correct potential tree decline. The monitoring program shall end three years from date of final occupancy. c. SECURITY DEPOSIT DURATION. The security deposit duration period shall be three years from the date of final occupancy. Return of the security guarantee shall be subject to City approval of the final monitoring report. A tree shall be considered dead when the main leader has died back, 25% of the crown is dead or if major trunk or root damage is evident. Should the tree die, a new tree of equal or greater appraised value shall be planted in the same area by the applicant (or new property owner should the property change hands) with permission of the tree owner at 517 Byron Street. Landscape area and irrigation shall be adapted to provide optimum growing conditions for the replacement tree at applicants expense. The replacement tree that is planted shall be subject to a new three-year establishment and monitoring program. The applicant shall provide an annual tree evaluation report as originally required. d. FORFEIT OF DEPOSIT. The City may determine that if the tree should die (as defined above) and an agreement on a replacement tree cannot be reached with the tree owner at 517 Byron Street, it will constitute a forfeit of the deposit equal to the appraised value. Any forfeit will be deposited into the Forestry Fund to plant new trees elsewhere. Issues causing forfeit of any portion of the deposit may also be subject to remedies described in Palo Alto Municipal Code. PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING 38. PUBLIC WORKS APPLICATIONS, FORMS, AND DOCUMENTS: Applicant shall be advised that most forms, applications, and informational documents related to Public Works Engineering conditions can be found at the following link: Item 2 Attachment B: Draft RLUA     Packet Pg. 37     Page 12 of 17 3 9 8 3 https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/Departments/Public-Works/Engineering-Services/Forms-and-Permits 39. PARCEL MAP: This project is subject to, and contingent upon the approval of and recordation of a parcel map. The submittal, approval and recordation of the Map shall be in accordance with the provisions of the California Subdivision Map Act and Palo Alto Municipal Code Title 21 Subdivision requirements. All existing and proposed property lines, easements, dedications shown on the parcel map are subject to City’s technical review and staff approval during the map process prior to issuance of any construction permits. 40. MAP THIRD-PARTY REVIEW: The City contracts with a third-party surveyor that will review and provide approval of the map’s technical correctness as the City Surveyor, as permitted by the Subdivision Map Act. The Public Works Department will forward a Scope & Fee Letter from the third-party surveyor and the applicant will be responsible for payment of the fee’s indicated therein, which is based on the complexity of the map. 41. STREETWORK PERMIT: The applicant shall obtain a Streetwork Permit from the Department of Public Works for all public improvements. 42. GRADING AND EXCAVATION PERMIT: A Grading Permit is required per PAMC Chapter 16.28. The permit application and all applicable documents (see Section H of application) shall be submitted to Public Works Engineering. Add the following note: “THIS GRADING PERMIT WILL ONLY AUTHORIZE GENERAL GRADING AND INSTALLATION OF THE STORM DRAIN SYSTEM. OTHER BUILDING AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS ARE SHOWN FOR REFERENCE INFORMATION ONLY AND ARE SUBJECT TO SEPARATE BUILDING PERMIT APPROVAL.” 43. ROUGH GRADING: provide a Rough Grading Plan for the work proposed as part of the Grading and Excavation Permit application. The Rough Grading Plans shall including the following: pad elevation, elevator pit elevation, ground monitoring wells, limits of over excavation, stockpile area of material, overall earthwork volumes (cut and fill), temporary shoring for any existing facilities, ramps for access, crane locations (if any), tree protection measures, etc. 44. CIVIL ENGINEER CERTIFICATION: Upon completion of the rough grading work and at the final completion of the work, applicant shall provide an as-graded grading plan prepared by the civil engineer that includes original ground surface elevations, as-graded ground surface elevations, lot drainage patterns and locations and elevations of all surface and subsurface drainage facilities. The civil engineer shall certify that the work was done in accordance with the final approved grading plan. 45. SOILS ENGINEER CERTIFICATION: Upon completion of the rough grading work and at the final completion of the work, applicant shall provide a soil grading report prepared by the soils engineer, including locations and elevation of field density tests, summaries of field and laboratory tests and other substantiating data, and comments on any changes made during grading and their effect on the recommendations made in the soils engineering investigation report. The soils engineer shall certify as to the adequacy of the site for the intended use. Item 2 Attachment B: Draft RLUA     Packet Pg. 38     Page 13 of 17 3 9 8 3 46. SHORING & TIEBACKS: Provide a shoring plan showing the existing utilities (if needed), to clearly indicate how the new structures will be constructed while protecting the existing utilities (if any). If tiebacks are proposed they shall not extend onto adjacent private property, existing easements or into the City’s right- of-way without having first obtained written permission from the private property owners and/or an encroachment permit from Public Works. 47. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER STATEMENT: The grading plans shall include the following statement signed and sealed by the Geotechnical Engineer of Record: “THIS PLAN HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND FOUND TO BE IN GENERAL CONFORMANCE WITH THE INTENT AND PURPOSE OF THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT”. 48. CONSTRUCTION DEWATERING: At the time of building permit submittal, the applicant shall submit a recent groundwater level reading. This project may be subjected to a dewatering permit during construction due to the groundwater level relative to the depth of excavation. 49. FLOOD ZONE: This project is in a FEMA Special Flood Hazard Area and shall comply with the requirements in Palo Alto Municipal Code Chapter 16.52. 50. DRY-FLOODPROOFING PLAN INSERT: Insert the “Plan Insert for Dry Floodproofed Non-Residential and Mixed-Use Buildings” sheet into the plan set. 51. FLOODPROOFING CERTIFICATE: A Floodproofing Certificate (FEMA Form FF-206-FY-22-153, also formerly known as 086-0-34) shall be completed by a licensed professional engineer prior to building permit approval. 52. FLOODPROOFING PLANS REQUIRED: Prior to building permit final, a licensed professional engineer shall submit a (1) Flood Emergency Operations Plan and (2) Inspection and Maintenance Plan. Additional information may be obtained from Section 5.5 of FEMA Technical Bulletin 3, dated January 2021. 53. OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT: Prior to Public Works final inspection, the owner shall enter into an Operations and Maintenance Agreement to ensure that the Flood Emergency Operations Plan, and the Inspection and Maintenance Plan are followed for the life of the structure and that the agreement will be transferred to future owners and/or leaseholders. This agreement shall be notarized and recorded with the County of Santa Clara and passed on to all subsequent owners. 54. ENCROACHMENT PERMIT: Prior to any work in the public right-of-way, the applicant shall obtain an encroachment permit from the Public Works Department for any work that encroaches onto the City right-of-way. 55. LOGISTICS PLAN: A construction logistics plan shall be provided addressing all impacts to the public including, at a minimum: work hours, noticing of affected businesses, bus stop relocations, construction signage, dust control, noise control, storm water pollution prevention, job trailer, contractors’ parking, truck routes, staging, concrete pours, crane lifts, scaffolding, materials storage, pedestrian safety, and traffic control. All truck routes shall conform to the City of Palo Alto’s Trucks and Truck Route Ordinance, Item 2 Attachment B: Draft RLUA     Packet Pg. 39     Page 14 of 17 3 9 8 3 Chapter 10.48, and the route map. NOTE: Some items/tasks on the logistics plan may require an encroachment permit. 56. STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION: All improvement plan sets shall include the “Pollution Prevention – It’s Part of the Plan” sheet. 57. C.3 THIRD-PARTY CERTIFICATION: Applicant shall provide certification from a qualified third-party reviewer that the proposed permanent storm water pollution prevention measures comply with the requirements of Provision C.3 and Palo Alto Municipal Code Chapter 16.11. 58. Submit the following: a. Stamped and signed C.3 data form (April 2023 version) from SCVURPPP. https://scvurppp.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/SCVURPPP-C.3-Data-Form-_-updated__4- 12-2023_clean_fillable.pdf b. Final stamped and signed letter confirming which documents were reviewed and that the project complies with Provision C.3 and PAMC 16.11. 59. C.3 STORMWATER AGREEMENT: The applicant shall enter into a Stormwater Maintenance Agreement with the City to guarantee the ongoing maintenance of the permanent storm water pollution prevention measures. The City will inspect the treatment measures yearly and charge an inspection fee. The agreement shall be executed by the applicant team prior to building permit final. 60. C.3 FINAL THIRD PARTY CERTIFICATION PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY: Within 45 days of the installation of the required storm water treatment measures and prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit for the building, the third-party reviewer shall submit to the City a certification verifying that all the permanent storm water pollution prevention measures were installed in accordance with the approved plans. 61. PAVEMENT RESTORATION: The applicant shall restore the pavement along the entire project frontage, curb-to-curb, by performing a 3.5” grind and overlay. The exact restoration limits will be determined once the resulting road condition is known following completion of heavy construction activities and utility lateral installations, at minimum the extent will be the project frontage. 62. IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA: The project will be creating or replacing 500 square feet or more of impervious surface. Accordingly, the applicant shall provide calculations of the existing and proposed impervious surface areas with the building permit application. The Impervious Area Worksheet for Land Developments form and instructions are available at the Development Center or on our website. To determine the impervious surface area that is being disturbed, provide the quantity on the site plan. 63. PRIOR TO PUBLIC WORKS FINAL/ACCEPTANCE (STORM DRAIN LOGO): The applicant is required to paint “No Dumping/Flows to Matadero Creek” in blue on a white background adjacent to all onsite storm drain inlets. The name of the creek to which the proposed development drains can be obtained from Public Works Engineering. Stencils of the logo are available from the Public Works Environmental Compliance Division, which may be contacted at (650) 329-2598. Include the instruction to paint the logos on the construction grading and drainage plan. Item 2 Attachment B: Draft RLUA     Packet Pg. 40     Page 15 of 17 3 9 8 3 64. PRIOR TO PUBLIC WORKS FINAL/ACCEPTANCE (ELEVATION CERTIFICATE): The "as-built" elevation of the lowest floor not used solely for parking or storage must be certified on the FEMA Elevation Certificate and accepted by Public Works inspector as meeting the Special Flood Hazard Area requirements prior to final City approval of the structure. WATERSHED PROTECTION 65. Stormwater treatment measures a. All Bay Area Municipal Regional Stormwater Permit requirements shall be followed. b. Refer to the Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program C.3 Handbook (download here: http://scvurppp-w2k.com/c3_handbook.shtml) for details. c. For all C.3 features, vendor specifications regarding installation and maintenance should be followed and provided to city staff. Copies must be submitted to Pam Boyle Rodriguez at pamela.boylerodriguez@cityofpaloalto.org. Add this bullet as a note to the building plans. d. Staff from Stormwater Program (Watershed Protection Division) may be present during installation of stormwater treatment measures. Contact Pam Boyle Rodriguez, Stormwater Program Manager, at (650) 329-2421 before installation. Add this bullet as a note to building plans on Stormwater Treatment (C.3) Plan. 66. Bay-friendly Guidelines (rescapeca.org) - Add these bullets as a note to the building plans. e. Do not use chemicals fertilizers, pesticides, herbicides or commercial soil amendment. Use Organic Materials Review Institute (OMRI) materials and compost. Refer to the Bay-Friendly Landscape Guidelines: http://www.stopwaste.org/resource/brochures/bay-friendly-landscape- guidelines-sustainable-practices-landscape-professional for guidance. f. Avoid compacting soil in areas that will be unpaved. 67. Stormwater quality protection g. Temporary and permanent waste, compost and recycling containers shall be covered to prohibit fly-away trash and having rainwater enter the containers. h. Drain downspouts to landscaping (outward from building as needed). i. Drain HVAC fluids from roofs and other areas to landscaping. j. Offsite downgrade storm drain inlets shall also be identified on this plan set and protected. If City staff removes protection from an inlet in the ROW during a rain event, the contractor shall replace the inlet protection by the end of the following business day. 68. All proposed Stormwater treatment measures should have a detail on this detail sheet. Provide a standard detail for the pervious pavers Item 2 Attachment B: Draft RLUA     Packet Pg. 41     Page 16 of 17 3 9 8 3 69. Alternative Compliance for Stormwater Treatment: The applicant and the City shall enter into an agreement acceptable to the Public Works Director or designated representative to provide alternative compliance as either approved equivalent treatment area or with payment of in-lieu fees to comply with the regulated projects stormwater treatment obligations FIRE 70. Include the following notes in the Building Permit plan set: a. Install a NFPA 13 fire sprinkler, NFPA 14 standpipe, NFPA 20 fire pump and NFPA 72 fire alarm system. b. This building shall be evaluated for an Emergency Responder Radio System. WATER-GAS-WASTEWATER UTILITIES PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF DEMOLITION PERMIT 71. The applicant shall submit a request to disconnect utility services and remove meters. The utility demo is to be processed within 10 working days after receipt of the request. The demolition permit will be issued by the building inspection division after all utility services and/or meters have been disconnected and removed. FOR BUILDING PERMIT (WGW Utility Engineering) 72. The applicant shall submit a completed water-gas-wastewater service connection application - load sheet for the City of Palo Alto Utilities. The applicant must provide all the information requested for utility service demands (water in fixture units/g.p.m. and sewer in fixture units/g.p.d.). The applicant shall provide the existing (prior) loads, the new loads, and the combined/total loads (the new loads plus any existing loads to remain). 73. The applicant shall submit improvement plans for utility construction. The plans must show the size and location of all underground utilities within the development and the public right of way including meters, backflow preventers, fire service requirements, sewer mains, sewer cleanouts, sewer lift stations and any other required utilities. Plans for new wastewater laterals and mains need to include new wastewater pipe profiles showing existing potentially conflicting utilities especially storm drain pipes, electric and communication duct banks. Existing duct banks need to be daylighted by potholing to the bottom of the ductbank to verify cross section prior to plan approval and starting lateral installation. Plans for new storm drain mains and laterals need to include profiles showing existing potential conflicts with sewer, water and gas. 74. The applicant must show on the site plan the existence of any auxiliary water supply, (i.e. water well, gray water, recycled water, rain catchment, water storage tank, etc). 75. The applicant shall be responsible for installing and upgrading the existing utility mains and/or services, and laterals as necessary to handle anticipated peak loads. This responsibility includes all costs associated with the design and construction for the installation/upgrade of the utility mains and/or services/laterals. Item 2 Attachment B: Draft RLUA     Packet Pg. 42     Page 17 of 17 3 9 8 3 76. An approved reduced pressure principle assembly (RPPA backflow preventer device) is required for all existing and new water connections from Palo Alto Utilities to comply with requirements of California administrative code, title 17, sections 7583 through 7605 inclusive. The RPPA shall be installed on the owner's property and directly behind the water meter within 5 feet of the property line. RPPA’s for domestic service shall be lead-free. Show the location of the RPPA on the plans. An approved reduced pressure detector assembly (RPDA backflow preventer device, STD. WD-12A or STD. WD-12B) is required for all existing and new fire water connections from Palo Alto Utilities to comply with requirements of California administrative code, title 17, sections 7583 through 7605 inclusive. The RPDA shall be installed on the owner's property and directly behind the City owned meter, within 5’ (feet) of the property line or City Right of Way. 77. All backflow preventer devices shall be approved by the WGW engineering division. Inspection by the city inspector is required for the supply pipe between the meter and the assembly. 78. The applicant shall pay the capacity fees and connection fees associated with new utility service/s or added demand on existing services. The approved relocation of services, meters, hydrants, or other facilities will be performed at the cost of the person/entity requesting the relocation. 79. If a new water service line installation for fire system usage is required. Show the location of the new water service on the plans. The applicant shall provide to the engineering department a copy of the plans for fire system including all fire department's requirements. If the existing fire service to remain. Applicant to sign an application for CPAU connection for & agree to operate the fire service in accordance with these rules & regulations. Applicant needs to verify whether the existing water supply can meet the current & anticipated fire flows at the site & all equipment for the sprinkler system is in accordance with the fire department requirements. 80. Each unit or building shall have its own water meter shown on the plans. Each parcel shall have its own water service and sewer lateral connection shown on the plans. 81. A sewer lateral per lot is required. Show the location of the sewer lateral on the plans. Existing sewer laterals (city's co to sewer main) if determined to be in poor condition shall be replaced at the owner's expense. A video inspection and full evaluation of the lateral will be performed by WGW utilities operations. The applicant will be informed of the sewer lateral assessment and need to install a new lateral. If a new sewer lateral is required, a profile of the sewer lateral is required showing any possible conflicts with storm, electric/communications ductbanks or other utilities. 82. All existing water and wastewater services/laterals that will not be reused shall be abandoned at the main per the latest WGW utilities standards. 83. Utility vaults, transformers, utility cabinets, concrete bases, or other structures cannot be placed over existing water, gas, or wastewater mains/services. Maintain 1’ horizontal clear separation from the vault/cabinet/concrete base to existing utilities as found in the field. If there is a conflict with existing utilities, Cabinets/vaults/bases shall be relocated from the plan location as needed to meet field conditions. Trees may not be planted within 10 feet of existing water, gas, and wastewater mains/laterals/water services/or meters. New water or wastewater services/laterals/meters may not be installed within 10’ of existing trees. Maintain 10’ between new trees and new water and wastewater services/laterals/meters. Item 2 Attachment B: Draft RLUA     Packet Pg. 43     Page 18 of 17 3 9 8 3 84. The applicant shall provide to the WGW Utility Engineering department a copy of the plans for the fire system including all fire department's requirements prior to the actual service installation. 85. All utility installations shall be in accordance with the City of Palo Alto utility standards for water, gas, & wastewater. 86. The contractor is to temporary plug the sewer lateral during construction. (by using t cone plug: expandable pipe plug with no metal parts) SECTION 7. Term of Approval. This approval shall be valid for a term consistent with the development schedule provided in PC-______. Sixty days prior to the expiration of the development schedule, the director shall notify the property owner in writing of the date of expiration and advise the property owner of Section 18.38.130. Failure to meet the approved development schedule, including an extension, if granted, shall result in: (a) The expiration of the property owner's right to develop under the PC district. The director shall notify the property owner, the city council, the planning commission and the building official of such expiration; and (b) The director's initiating a zone change for the property subject to the PC district in accordance with Chapter 18.80. The property owner may submit a new application for a PC district concurrently with the director's recommendation for a zone change. PASSED: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTENTIONS: ATTEST: APPROVED: _________________________ ____________________________ City Clerk Mayor APPROVED: APPROVED AS TO FORM: ___________________________ ___________________________ Director of Planning and Deputy City Attorney Development Services PLANS AND DRAWINGS REFERENCED: 1. Those plans prepared by _____ titled “______”, consisting of ___ pages, dated _____, (revised ______), and received ______. Item 2 Attachment B: Draft RLUA     Packet Pg. 44     3 9 8 5 ATTACHMENT C ZONING COMPARISON TABLE 660 University Avenue, 21PLN-00341 Table 1: COMPARISON WITH CHAPTER 18.13 (RM-20 DISTRICT) AND PROPOSED Regulation Required RM-20 Proposed Minimum/Maximum Site Area, Width and Depth 8,500 sf area, 70 foot width, 100 foot depth 103 feet by 225 feet; 22,562 sf (0.52 acre) Minimum Front Yard (Middlefield) 24 foot Special Setback along Middlefield Road 10 feet minimum Street Rear Yard (Byron)16 feet 10 feet Street Side Yard (University)16 feet 6 feet Interior Side Yard (for lots greater than 70 feet in width) 10 feet 19 feet 6 inches Max. Building Height 30 feet 50’8” at four story parapet 57’2” at roof deck 62’8” at elevator overrun Interior Side Yard Daylight Plane 10 feet at interior side lot line then 45 degree angle Compliant, see sheet A3.3 Max. Site Coverage 35% (plus an additional 5% for covered patios or overhangs) (7,884 + 1,126 = 9,010 sf) 58% (13,071 sf) Max. Total Floor Area Ratio 0.5:1 2.18:1 (48,991 sf) Mixed-Use; Replacement Office: 9,115 sf (net loss of 100sf), Residential: 39,806 sf Other: 1,091 sf Residential Density 11 to 20 units per acre (5 to 10 units)63 DU on 0.52 acre = 123.5 units per acre Minimum Site Open Space 35% 7,884 sf 42% Ground level open space: 9,455 sf Minimum Usable Open Space 150 sf per unit 9,450 sf Roof terrace: 4,642 sf Balconies: ~60 sf per unit (typical), 5,230 sf total Total ~156 per unit The office deck area: ~1,120 sf does not count towards the residential open space requirement Item 2 Attachment C: Zoning Comparison Table     Packet Pg. 45     3 9 8 5 Minimum Common Open Space 75 sf per unit Roof terrace: 4,642 sf 73.7 sf per unit Minimum Private Open Space 50 sf per unit 3 units do not have private open space All other units have balconies ranging from 60 sf to >400 sf *Bold indicates modification in comparison to base zoning Table 2: CONFORMANCE WITH CHAPTER 18.52 (Off-Street Parking) for Multiple-Family Residential Type Required Proposed Office 1 space/250 sf (General Business Office) 37 parking spaces required, 22 existing 14 regular/carpool 4 ADA = 8 spaces 22 provided, 40% reduction Housing 1 per studio unit – 48 spaces 1 per 1-bedroom unit – 12 spaces 2 per 2-bedroom or larger unit – 6 spaces Tandem parking is permitted for multiple-family and two-family uses. 66 required 48 – Studio; 36 spaces 12 - 1-bedroom; 8 spaces 6 - 2-bedroom; 6 spaces Plus 5 unassigned ADA spaces that count as 10 towards the minimum parking requirement 60 provided, 10% reduction Vehicle Parking Total 37 Commercial 66 Residential 103 total 22 Commercial 60 Residential 82 total, 20% reduction Loading Space for Office None required for office less than 10,000 sf None Proposed Loading Space for Residential 1 required for more than 50 units None Proposed Bicycle Parking Short Term One (1) Long-term bicycle parking space per unit – 63 spaces One (1) bicycle parking space per 2,500 sf of office (80% long term 20% short term) – 4 spaces, 3 long term 1 short term 5 short term rack spaces 100 space long-term enclosure spaces, 80 residential, 20 office Item 2 Attachment C: Zoning Comparison Table     Packet Pg. 46     1 Date: April 4, 2024 From: Boyd Smith, Smith Development Lund Smith, Smith Development To: Emily Kallas, Project Planner, City of Palo Alto Subject: Proposed Project at 660 University Avenue, Palo Alto, CA Emily, We hope this letter finds you well. We’re writing today regarding our proposed project at 660 University Avenue. This project proposes to replace three existing buildings (660 University, 680 University, and 511 Byron) with one mixed-use residential/office building with two levels of underground parking. The total size of the combined lot is 22,526 square feet. The proposed mixed-use project includes 63 housing units, 9,115 square feet of office or medical office space, and 79 covered parking spaces in a two-level underground garage. This project went before the Architectural Review Board (ARB) on December 1, 2022. During that meeting, we received feedback on the project including: 1. A request to consider moving the underground parking garage entrance/exit from Middlefield Road to Byron Street. 2. A request to consider an increased set-back on Middlefield Road to allow for the future installation of a dedicated bicycle lane. 3. A question about whether or not we would trade increased setbacks for increased height. 1. Alternative Location for Garage Entrance/Exit At the request of the Architectural Review Board, we asked our transportation consultant (Fehr & Peers) and our architect to analyze the impact of moving the underground parking garage entrance/exit from Middlefield Road to Byron Street. The most significant impact of moving the parking garage entrance/exit location from Middlefield Road to Byron Street is that it reduces the number of parking stalls that can fit in the garage from 88 to 79, a loss of 9 spaces. Fehr & Peers’ analysis shows there is little difference between the two locations, including the impact to nearby intersection operations. Additionally, both of the street blocks being considered for an entrance/exit location (500 block of Byron and 500 block of Middlefield) already have Item 2 Attachment D: Applicants Letter on Special Setback     Packet Pg. 47     2 existing parking lot or parking garage entrance/exit locations. There is a higher level of existing pedestrian traffic on Byron compared to Middlefield but a higher level of existing vehicular traffic on Middlefield compared to Byron. For bicyclists, there are no bicycle facilities on either Middlefield or Byron near the project site. Due to the similarities between the two entrance/exit locations under consideration, Smith Development is open to both the Middlefield and Byron entrance/exit locations. 2. Increased Set-Back for Future Bicycle Path At the request of the Architectural Review Board, we also considered increasing the proposed setback on Middlefield Road from 10 to 24 feet to allow for the construction of a future dedicated bicycle path along Middlefield Road. From a project perspective, moving the setback from 10 to 24 feet results in a net loss of 3,747 square feet (or approximately 6 units and 1,290 square feet of office space). Losing 7.59% of our buildable square footage is very problematic from a project financing perspective and, in our opinion, would render this project infeasible. History Until we started work on this project, we were not even aware that the City of Palo Alto was considering a dedicated bicycle corridor along Middlefield in the existing set-back, near where the sidewalks are currently located. After being alerted of this possibility, we undertook some research as a team to better understand the history and feasibility of this proposal. Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Plan From what we can tell, the aforementioned future, dedicated bicycle path along Middlefield Road, in the area between Palo Alto Avenue and Channing Avenue, was not explicitly mentioned in the most recent City of Palo Alto Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Plan (July 2012). In that plan, bicycle improvements along Middlefield Road are mentioned, but there was no mention of a plan to study or pursue a dedicated bicycle path in the setback area that runs parallel to Middlefield Road near the project site. In Table 6-5: Proposed Bicycle Boulevards of the above referenced Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Plan, street segments are listed that are proposed to become bicycle boulevards, but Middlefield Road is not included on that list (PDF page 132). Item 2 Attachment D: Applicants Letter on Special Setback     Packet Pg. 48     3 Further, in Table 6-4: Proposed Shared Roadways of the 2012 Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Plan, there is mention of shared roadway improvements for Middlefield between Palo Alto Avenue and Embarcadero Road, but no mention of a dedicated bicycle path that runs parallel to Middlefield between Palo Alto Avenue and Embarcadero Road in the area of the existing sidewalk and tree line (PDF page 131). Item 2 Attachment D: Applicants Letter on Special Setback     Packet Pg. 49     4 The most direct reference to a dedicated bicycle corridor along Middlefield that we were able to identify is Figure 6-5: City Quadrants for Sub-Area Analysis. As shown below, the Proposed Bikeway Map for quadrant 6.4.1 Northeast Palo Alto identifies Middlefield Road between Palo Alto Avenue and Embarcadero Road as either a proposed Class III arterial or a location where further study is needed (PDF page 152). The map didn’t distinguish beyond that. For context, a Class III bike route is normally shared with motor vehicles such as the painting of shared lane markings. A Class I bike route is normally a dedicated bike bath that minimizes conflicts with motor vehicles. If a dedicated bicycle path was intended for the area that runs parallel to Middlefield Road between Palo Alto Avenue and Embarcadero Road, that would have been listed as a Class I or Class II opportunity, rather than a Class III arterial. The closest thing to an explicit endorsement of a dedicated bike path on Middlefield Road in the area between Palo Alto Avenue and Embarcadero Road is in Figure D-6: Cycletrack Preference (PDF page 253-254). As one might expect, this shows that a majority of Palo Alto residents feel safer on a cycletrack (i.e. dedicated bike path) than a traditional bike lane in the roadway. As a follow-up, 26% respondents cited El Camino Real as a good candidate for a cycletrack and 24% cited Middlefield as a good candidate for a cyletrack, but the responses were conceptual and included no analysis of impacts or feasibility. Yet, a later study would evaluate that. In November 2020, the Peninsula Bikeway Alignment Alternatives Study was released. This study was undertaken as a joint venture including the City of Menlo Park, City of Mountain View, City of Palo Alto, and Redwood City. The study evaluated the viability and feasibility of three potential Item 2 Attachment D: Applicants Letter on Special Setback     Packet Pg. 50     5 Peninsula Bikeway corridors: 1) Middlefield Road, 2) Alma Street/Central Expressway/Caltrain Right-of-Way/Evelyn Avenue, and 3) El Camino Real. The conclusion of the Peninsula Bikeway Study is clear, “El Camino Real represents the most cohesive, connected, and appropriate opportunity for implementing this vision” (PDF page 17). As many people are aware, Caltrans is actively working on a proposal that would bring a new bike lane to El Camino Real, running the entire length of the city. The study would later say the following regarding the Middlefield Road alternative, “While a future Peninsula Bikeway along the [Middlefield Road] corridor may improve safety and connectivity for all types of users, existing ROW would not allow for the implementation of a continuous and seamless separated bicycle facility (PDF page 54).” Ultimately, this study makes it clear that the ROW constraints along Middlefield Road do not make it a suitable candidate for a new dedicated bike path in the existing set-back. For example, the Peninsula Bikeway Study notes the constrained ROW along Middlefield Road. If a dedicated cycletrack is built in the existing set-back along Middlefield Road, in the area of our proposed project, it appears, based on our analysis, that this would significantly impact the existing tree line. As displayed in the images below, the treeline in the area of our project site, near the intersection of Middlefield Road and Hamilton Avenue, has multiple mature trees and other vegetation in the existing set-back. 500 Block of Middlefield 600 Block of Middlefield 600 Block of Middlefield Looking South Looking North Looking South Were this set-back to be used for a dedicated bike path, it would require the removal of several mature trees, and other vegetation. Such tree removals seem unlikely to receive community support based on past feedback. For a better sense of the impacts and challenges associated with constructing a dedicated bike path in the existing set-back, please consider walking the 500 and 600 blocks of Middlefield. Item 2 Attachment D: Applicants Letter on Special Setback     Packet Pg. 51     6 Palo Alto Bicycle Map Below is an image of a portion of the Palo Alto Bicycle Map (2021) that is published on the City of Palo Alto website. This map provides an overview of the local bicycle network. This map does not identify Middlefield Road as a primary bicycle corridor. 3. Increased Setbacks for Increased Height At the December 1, 2022 Architectural Review Board meeting, we were asked if we’d be willing to trade an increase in project height for increased setbacks along Middlefield Road. Our strong preference is to keep the project in its current form. Conclusion Our analysis indicates there would be significant feasibility and financial challenges to constructing a new dedicated bike path in the existing set-back along Middlefield Road in the area of our project. Therefore, we respectfully ask the City of Palo Alto allows us to keep our existing, proposed set-back. Thank you in advance for your time and consideration of this letter. Please let us know if you have any questions. Respectfully, Boyd Smith Item 2 Attachment D: Applicants Letter on Special Setback     Packet Pg. 52     7 CC Jonathan Lait, Director of Planning and Development Services Attachments A. Fehr & Peers Driveway Analysis (March 9, 2023) References 1. City of Palo Alto Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Plan (July 2012) 2. Peninsula Bikeway Wayfinding, Safety and Feasibility Study (November 2020) 3. Palo Alto Bicycle Map (2021) Item 2 Attachment D: Applicants Letter on Special Setback     Packet Pg. 53     From:Christopher Ream To:Kallas, Emily Subject:660 University Project, Coast Live Oak Tree Date:Thursday, January 4, 2024 6:10:37 PM Attachments:Walter Levison Consulting Arborist-660 University PA project Final 12-18-2024.pdf Importance:High CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. Emily, Now that we are past the holidays, I would like to move forward with you on your offer to schedule a meeting for me with Urban Forestry. Also, last month I emailed you a PDF of the 14-page impact analysis prepared by the arborist Walter Levison in which he determines that construction of the 660 University Project as proposed in the current plans would be much too close to the magnificent Coastal Live Oak tree such that the tree’s vigor would be negatively impacted to a severe degree resulting in the tree falling into a spiral of condition decline from which it could not recover. I would like to get a copy (PDF or hard copy) of that analysis to the appropriate personnel in Urban Forestry, whomever is drafting the EIR, and anyone else you think would be appropriate. Thank you, Chris _________________________ Christopher Ream 555 Byron Street, #409 Palo Alto, CA 94301 1-650-424-0821 ream@reamlaw.com From: Christopher Ream <ream@reamlaw.com> Date: Tuesday, December 19, 2023 at 4:01 PM To: "Kallas, Emily" <Emily.Kallas@cityofpaloalto.org> Subject: 660 University Project, Coast Live Oak Tree Emily, Item 2 Attachment E Neighbor Comments     Packet Pg. 54     I succeeded in retaining Walter Levison, an arborist highly recommended by Canopy. He has reviewed the most current set of plans filed by Smith Development on October 31, walked the property and examined the magnificent, exceptionally large, protected Coast Live Oak (Tree #10 in the plans), and written a 14-page impact analysis. The bottom line of his impact analysis is that construction of the 660 University Project as proposed in the current plans would be much too close to the tree and the tree’s vigor would be negatively impacted to a severe degree resulting in the tree falling into a spiral of condition decline from which it cannot recover. I have attached a PDF of his impact analysis. I would appreciate it if you would share this with Urban Forestry, whomever is drafting the EIR, and anyone else you think would be appropriate. I have some printed-out hard copies which I could hand to you if they would help; let me know. Last month you had offered to schedule a meeting for me to discuss my concerns about the tree directly with Urban Forestry. I would like to do that. I have family coming into town and will be tied-up through New Years, but I would like to meet as soon as possible in early January. Thank you for your help on this. Chris _________________________ Christopher Ream 555 Byron Street, #409 Palo Alto, CA 94301 1-650-424-0821 ream@reamlaw.com Item 2 Attachment E Neighbor Comments     Packet Pg. 55     From:Christopher Ream To:Gollinger, Peter; Mondkar, Catherine Cc:Kallas, Emily; Leigh Prince Subject:660 University Avenue Project – Timing for Arborist Opinion Date:Wednesday, November 22, 2023 11:42:44 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. Peter and Catherine, I am Christopher Ream, the President of the Hamilton Homeowners Association. The Hamilton is a senior living (55+) development which shares the block with the proposed development at 660 University Avenue. We have a number of objections to that project, but I will limit myself in this email to protection of the magnificent Coastal Live Oak tree that dominates the center of the block. We have a timing issue. Emily Kallas, the Project Planner for the City, is going to be on vacation for two weeks, so she suggested I contact you. I have reached out to an arborist recommended by Canopy to consult with us and, if appropriate, prepare a formal opinion we can submit to the City on the damage the construction of the proposed development will inflict on the tree. Unfortunately, this arborist has a full schedule and will not be able to get on this until the second half of January. If we were to submit the arborist’s opinion at the end of January, would that be in sufficient time for it to be considered? And if not, could you tell me what a sufficient filing date deadline would be so that I could reach out to another arborist. The Tree Protection Report the developers have filed has labeled this tree “#10” and admits that the tree has a 50-inch diameter trunk and 90-foot diameter foliage. The City of Palo Alto Tree Technical Manual specifies that there shall be a Tree Protection Zone (TPZ) with a radius of 42 feet (10x the diameter of the trunk, 50” x 10 / 12 = 42’). The developers have submitted plans with a TPZ of only 30 feet. Not only is the proposed TPZ only 30 feet, it contacts the proposed building so that the tree’s roots will be sheared off by the 2-story underground garage to be built. Item 2 Attachment E Neighbor Comments     Packet Pg. 56     Construction work will undoubtedly intrude even further into the already small TPZ. The 90-foot diameter foliage means that it has a radius of 45 feet, so they will cut back 15 feet of foliage just to have it touch the walls of the building; but there are 6-foot balconies on the second, third and fourth floors that will require more cut- backs. Add at least another four feet so that the new residents are not immediately fighting the tree limbs on their balconies. Now we have a total foliage cut-back of 25 feet (15+6+4) and only 20 feet left. We are very concerned that the construction of this building will kill the Coastal Live Oak tree. Thank you for your help. Chris _________________________ Christopher Ream 555 Byron Street, #409 Palo Alto, CA 94301 1-650-424-0821 ream@reamlaw.com Item 2 Attachment E Neighbor Comments     Packet Pg. 57     349 Sutter Street San Francisco California 94108 KSH Architects | 349 Sutter Street San Francisco California 94108 | 415.954.1960 PROJECT DESCRIPTION – 660 UNIVERSITY AVE, PALO ALTO Located on a prominent site in Palo Alto, the 660 University project is situated on University Avenue between Middlefield Road and Byron Street. The project proposes a mixed-use 4-story building with two (2) levels of below-grade parking and includes the following: 9,115 square feet of office space on the ground floor; 63 residential units with an entry lobby; and parking to service both uses. The residential and office entrances are located on University Avenue with recessed alcoves designed to welcome tenants, connected to the sidewalk grade via ramps and stairs. Separate elevators are also provided for each use and are accessible from the below grade parking levels. Natural finishes have been selected for the exterior of the building, including clear glass, board- formed concrete, simulated wood panels and horizontal siding. The residential elevator tower on University Avenue and the stair towers on Middlefield Road and Byron Street are expressed as sculptural forms, further highlighted by extensive landscaping at the edges of the site. Changes in plane, setbacks, projecting balconies, a roof garden with landscaping and trellises contribute to the character and texture of the proposed building. Three parcels will be combined and two existing office buildings on the site will be demolished in order for this project to proceed. We are estimating that the approximate start date for construction will be 10/01/2024, and the approximate end date for construction will be 09/01/2025. Context The project is designed to be a high-quality addition to Palo Alto. Features include changes in plane, the expression of varied heights in the building volumes, material and color variation, recessed windows and projecting balconies with glass railings. In addition to the private balconies, a terrace for residents is proposed at the roof, to provide common open space. The project has taken steps to respond to the surrounding context of the site. The form of the building steps down toward the adjacent residence located at 524 Middlefield Road and responds to the context of the neighboring single-family use lot through setbacks along the common property line. The shared fence between the neighboring property and the site will be updated based on multiple discussions with the resident of 542 Middlefield Road, and the proposal has been received positively by the neighbor. Trash staging and the vehicular entry to the parking garage are located on Byron Street to avoid further congestion along Middlefield Road. The preservation of a large oak tree, located on an adjacent parcel, is incorporated into the design, and conforms to all recommendations and setbacks prescribed by a city approved arborist. An outdoor deck will also be constructed beneath the existing oak tree without disturbing the existing conditions of the root system. The team for this project successfully designed & constructed a similar project at 250 Bryant in Mountain View (3 stories with two levels of below grade parking) around an existing oak tree and has experience with this type of installation. The project front yard (Middlefield Rd) has a special 24 ft. setback that is required per the current zoning map. In order to deliver the needed housing to Palo Alto as proposed in this project, the Item 2 Attachment F: Applicants Project Description Response Letter     Packet Pg. 58     349 Sutter Street San Francisco California 94108 KSH Architects | 349 Sutter Street San Francisco California 94108 | 415.954.1960 design seeks to propose a 10 ft. setback. This setback is similar to that provided by the existing office building onsite that is scheduled for removal as a part of this scope -- combined with the 14 ft. sidewalk width, both the existing and proposed buildings are located 24 ft. from the face of the curb on Middlefield Road. For added context, Sheet A1.1-B shows the typical setbacks measured on an aerial overlay of the neighborhood – currently, no other buildings in the vicinity appear to comply with the 24 ft. setback proposed. The street side yard setback (University Ave.) requires a 16 ft. setback per zoning, or a 0-20’ setback on arterial roadways. The project proposes 6 ft setback is currently proposed, and combined with a 12 ft wide sidewalk, places the building 18 ft. from the face of curb on University Ave. Similarly, the street rear yard (Byron St) proposes a 10 ft setback where 16 ft is required. With the 10ft sidewalk width, the face of the proposed building is 20 ft. from the face of the curb on Byron Street. The interior side yard requires a 10 ft setback. In order to accommodate the existing oak tree canopy, as well as comply with the required daylight plane adjacent to the single family residence at 534 Middlefield Rd., our building proposes a 19.5 ft. minimum setback, and a 26.5 ft. maximum setback with additional insets. The daylight plane condition is shown in 3/A3.3 in the drawing set. Open Space – 35% min. required The proposed design exceeds open space requirements providing 9,406 SF (42%) ground level open space as well as the following: 3,288 SF of private (residential) balcony area; 644 SF of private (residential) terrace area on the second floor (subdivided for the 5 units adjacent); 1,298 SF of private (residential) terrace area on the fourth floor (subdivided for the 3 units adjacent); and 4,672 SF of common use (residential) terrace area on the roof. In total, ~9,902 SF of private balcony & private/common terrace area is provided where only 9,450 SF is required. While the provided open space total exceeds the minimum requirement, the project proposes 8 units without private balconies. However, the other 55 units are provided with private balconies of a minimum of 60 square feet each. The rooftop terrace will provide a variety of different ‘neighborhoods’ to allow for diverse gathering spaces from smaller quiet pockets to larger group areas including lounge, dining & BBQ uses. The layout allows the roof terrace to be separated from the interior lot line by the penthouse & HVAC enclosures so that the primary views & sight lines from the terrace are out toward the streets (University primarily and also Byron / Middlefield) and not towards the single-family residence. Seating areas are set away from the perimeter guardrail, allowing the primary circulation to be on the outside of the flexible terrace space, connecting between both egress stairs & the elevator. Item 2 Attachment F: Applicants Project Description Response Letter     Packet Pg. 59     349 Sutter Street San Francisco California 94108 KSH Architects | 349 Sutter Street San Francisco California 94108 | 415.954.1960 FAR – 0.5:1 max, min. 11 units – max 20 units / acre The proposed office FAR is .4 & the proposed residential FAR is 1.77 (63 units for ~ 0.5 acres where 10 are allowed) for a combined proposed FAR of 2.175. This residential FAR calculation includes the proposed units, stairs, elevators, MEP rooms, & residential lounge to support the residential units, as well as roof top penthouse space to access the residential rooftop terrace. The project seeks to exceed the allowable FAR in order to provide much needed housing within the downtown community. Jobs/Housing Ratio The existing combined office area (to be removed) on the subject parcels is 9,216 SF, of which 9,115 SF (~100 SF decrease) is proposed to be replaced within the current project. In addition, the project seeks to provide 63 new housing units (combination of studios, 1-BRs & 2-BRs) to the community. Parking With the proposed project being less than a mile from the University Ave. Caltrain station, the project has proposed a robust TDM plan to allow for a parking reduction of 25% overall. In addition, the residential parking is proposed primarily of independent mechanical stackers with pits (2 vehicles per stall) in order to limit the below grade scope to two levels and minimize the amount of below grade excavation and potential dewatering that may be required. Affordability The project sponsor is also including the housing affordability component for this project and proposes to distribute the 20% inclusionary requirement across three income levels. Here would be the breakdown of the 13 affordable units (20% of total unit count): Income Level Unit A1 Unit A3 Unit B1 Unit B2 Unit C Unit E2 Total Below Market Rate Units (20%, 13 total) Very – low income 2 1 1 4 Low Income 1 2 1 4 Moderate Income 1 3 1 5 Total 13 Unit Typology Studio: Unit Type A1-3, B1-4, C, F1 (400 - 500 SF) 1 Bedroom: Unit Type D, E2, F2, G (567 – 655 SF) 2 Bedroom: Unit Type E1 (836 SF) Item 2 Attachment F: Applicants Project Description Response Letter     Packet Pg. 60     349 Sutter Street San Francisco California 94108 KSH Architects | 349 Sutter Street San Francisco California 94108 | 415.954.1960 Unit Design A large variety of different unit plans will be provided, ranging from 400 SF to 836 SF. All but eight units will be provided with at least one private balcony of minimum 60 SF. Five units at the second floor (5 studios) will be provided with larger private terraces of at least ~120 SF each. Three units at the fourth floor (2 studios + 1 1BR) provided with larger private terraces of at least ~375 SF each. Each unit will include a full-size ADA compliant bathroom & kitchen with a full-size stacking or side- by-side washer/dryer. Approximately 24% of the units will be 1BR & 2BR, with the remainder provided as studios. Floor Unit A1 Unit A2 Unit A3 Unit B1 Unit B2 Unit B3 Unit B4 Unit C Unit D Unit E1 Unit E2 Unit F1 Unit F2 Unit G Total per Floor Second 3 2 1 2 2 4 2 1 2 1 1 0 0 1 22 Third 1 4 1 2 2 4 2 1 2 1 1 0 0 1 22 Fourth 2 0 1 4 1 2 2 0 1 1 1 2 1 1 19 Total per Unit 6 6 3 8 5 10 6 2 5 3 3 2 1 3 63 RM-20 Zoning compliance The proposed project requests City Council consideration of the following adjustments under a PC application, to approve 65 new units to the RM-20 district: 1. Increased height: The max building height allowed for RM-20 is 30’. The proposed project seeks to provide a 4-story building with max. 45.5’ height to top of roof (terrace), similar in scale to The Hamilton within the same block (between on Hamilton between Byron & Middlefield) as well as Lytton Gardens (opposite block across University). 2. Increased FAR: 0.5 to 2.175 as noted above, including increased density of 65 units from 10/0.5 acre allowed. 3. Reduced parking: 105 stalls are required (37 office + 68 residential including assigned + 2 unassigned ADA). The proposed project seeks to provide a minimum of 79 stalls utilizing a 25% TDM reduction. 4. Open Space: Allowance for a rooftop terrace as common open space for the residential tenants, including the supporting elevator overrun & code required exit stairs for access. Item 2 Attachment F: Applicants Project Description Response Letter     Packet Pg. 61     349 Sutter Street San Francisco California 94108 KSH Architects | 349 Sutter Street San Francisco California 94108 | 415.954.1960 ARB Feedback & Responses At the previous ARB hearing, the board expressed their interest in seeing a higher level of detail and refinement in the components of the presented design. The feedback has been incorporated into the revised proposal in the following ways: · Provide details to show that the lift parking will have an independent stacking system. o A stacker lift system will be implemented on the P2 level. The lifts utilize pits to allow the lifts to be operated independently so cars can be accessed without assistance. o A puzzle lift system will be implemented on the P1 level. The lift configuration allows the lifts to be operated independently so cars can be accessed without assistance. · Provide high-level site planning options for driveways on both Middlefield and Byron. o Upon further feedback and discussion with Planning, the project team has relocated the below-grade garage entry from Middlefield Road to Byron Street. This will prevent further traffic impacts to the University Ave / Middlefield Road intersection. · Provide flood gate details for below-grade parking. o The relocated driveway incorporates a designated area for a flood gate to be manually installed in the event of a flood. At the bottom of the entry ramp, there will be an additional trench drain to catch any rainwater runoff. · Provide info for how mechanical equipment is allowed below base flood height. o Per correspondence with Ludwig Simpao from CPAU, the transformer pad does not need to be elevated above the base flood elevation. It can remain at the same elevation as the sidewalk so long as the required working space is kept level. o The CPAU Electric Service Requirements manual does not specify any requirements regarding the installation of pad-mounted equipment in flood hazard areas. o CPAU requires that the transformer pad be in a location that allows trucks to back up to within 5’ of the pad on a surface that can withstand the truck weight of 24 tons, has an access path that is at lest 12’ wide, and has a minimum vertical clearance of 14’. Each transformer pad requires 3’ of clear and level working space on the non-operable sides, and 8’ of clear and level working space on the door sides in front. These requirements are shown in the CPAU Pad Mount Clearance Requirements document. · Provide cover from weather over the pedestrian entries to the below grade garage. o The proposed stairs from the below grade garage to the sidewalk grade are used for fire exit access only. o Weather protection is not provided to minimize the visual impact of the exit stairs on the pedestrian experience, and to prevent further encroachment into the setbacks along Byron St. and Middlefield Road. o Trench drains will be located at the bottom of each exit stair for rainwater runoff. Item 2 Attachment F: Applicants Project Description Response Letter     Packet Pg. 62     349 Sutter Street San Francisco California 94108 KSH Architects | 349 Sutter Street San Francisco California 94108 | 415.954.1960 · The special setback on Middlefield should be maintained. There is interest in allowing additional height to accommodate this. o Upon further study, it was determined that maintaining the 24’ Middlefield Road setback would result in the following:  The building façade would be reduced along Middlefield Road to maintain the 24’ special setback requirement above grade. · The raised planters would shift back to match the new building façade, and would encroach into the 24’ setback by 10’. · The two below-grade parking levels would still extend to the property line. · The ground level and below-grade parking levels would reconfigure to accommodate the new garage stair location.  A loss of 6 units (2,457 SF) on residential levels 2-4.  A loss of 1,290 SF of office space on the ground level. o A net loss 3,747 SF, or 7.59% of buildable SF would render the project infeasible from a financing perspective. · Façade lacks articulation – consider adding vertical hierarchy (base, middle, top), deeper eave elements, recessed windows. o The building façade has been refined to include the definition of base, middle, and top, as well as changes in plane, expressed through volumes of varying heights, materials, and color variation. The inclusion of recessed windows of varying depths and projecting balconies with glass railings help to further emphasize these design changes. · Consider the pedestrian experience. o The frontages along Byron Street, University Ave, and Middlefield Road will be replaced with new sidewalks, planter strips, and tree wells. o Raised planters with a variety of native plants and trees are located along the edges of the site at ground level, creating a rich landscaped backdrop for pedestrians. o Two public art installations, located and expressed at the building exterior at different heights and scales, further enrich the pedestrian experience. o The residential and office entries along University Avenue are recessed alcoves designed to welcome tenants and visitors with rich, warm materials. · Consider user experience in provided open spaces (balconies, deck) and privacy between them. o Private balconies are separated by translucent glass partitions. These partitions will be double-layered with a privacy film for additional visual obstruction. o The layout of the roof deck was revised to create privacy between the project and the Hamilton, located two lots away on the same block. The occupiable area has been shifted away from the interior lot line via a mechanical enclosure. Penthouses for exit stairs and elevators create secondary visual obstructions, helping to ensure that views and sightlines are directed primarily towards University Avenue. Item 2 Attachment F: Applicants Project Description Response Letter     Packet Pg. 63     349 Sutter Street San Francisco California 94108 KSH Architects | 349 Sutter Street San Francisco California 94108 | 415.954.1960 · Consider overall design parti, and role of the building in the neighborhood – the “downtown gateway” experience and relationship with “Senior Corners.” o To emphasize the site’s location, the public art program was expanded to include a second art piece at the elevator tower. This piece is 5’ wide by 30’ tall and adds a visual marker to the site and the University / Middlefield intersection as a gateway into Downtown Palo Alto. o The updated exterior materials utilize natural finishes that visually recall those of neighboring high-density projects such as Lytton Gardens. o Wood-clad building volumes with trellises at the roof level are located at the corners of University Ave / Middlefield Road and University Ave / Byron Street to celebrate these key intersections. · Refine the materials – the current proposed materials are not high quality, color scheme is not high enough contrast, materials are “cold”, needs “richness and depth”. Consider incorporating wood and human-scale elements. o Updated finishes have been selected for the exterior of the building, which consist of the following:  Clear vision glass  Board-formed natural concrete  Simulated wood façade panels  Painted horizontal siding  Natural wood slat panels  Warm grey painted metal accent panels  Warm light grey painted mullions  Warm grey painted metal trellis structure with wood slats o The finishes provide heightened contrasts in color, texture, richness, and scale. · Provide a texture sample for all materials, not just colors. o Physical sample materials have been provided. · Confirm unit layouts, considering how window placement affects both the interior and the exterior. Avoid locating major windows with easy viewing from the streets – particularly applies to manager’s unit. o Unit layouts have been revised to accommodate the updated façade articulation. o Window placement guarantees natural light in all kitchen / bedroom spaces within units, and access to balconies where applicable. o The manager’s unit has been removed from the ground level. It will be located on one of the upper residential levels for additional privacy. · Consider adding interior common spaces. o A lounge space is included at the ground level, next to the elevators. o On each residential floor, there is a common area with windows located next to the elevators. · Tree protection is a major priority. Confirm that building the raised deck above existing pavement is the best treatment, and consider clean-up and maintenance related to locating open space below the canopy of the tree. Provide additional detail demonstrating how the tree will be protected. Item 2 Attachment F: Applicants Project Description Response Letter     Packet Pg. 64     349 Sutter Street San Francisco California 94108 KSH Architects | 349 Sutter Street San Francisco California 94108 | 415.954.1960 o The design/construction team has consulted closely with a project arborist to ensure the health and viability of the tree, prioritizing its preservation. o Based on arborist feedback, the proposed raised deck design would provide the least amount of impact on the oak tree’s existing root system. o The office tenants would be responsible for the clean-up and maintenance of the open space below the tree canopy. o As of February 2024, an updated arborist report has been issued and the drawing set has been revised to provide information on protection measures in further detail to mitigate tree impacts. · Add an on-site delivery/drop-off/loading space. o A street stall on Byron Street would be used as a loading space for building use, designated via signage. o This would service car share drop offs / pickups, on-site delivery, loading, and trash staging / pickup. · Add street-level bike parking – minimum 50%, though 100% is preferable and more equitable for residents. Consider including space for larger/alternative types of bikes. Provide a bike/ped circulation diagram. o The proposed street-level bicycle parking is designed for short-term storage; six (6) stalls have been provided along University Ave. o Long-term bicycle parking is located across three separate locations in the below- grade parking garage. The bicycle racks would be accessible through the elevators at ground level and are provided in a secured storage area. o The proposed bicycle racks can be customized with standardized accessories to accommodate larger / alternative bicycle types. o A bike / pedestrian circulation diagram has been provided in the drawing set on sheets A1.1, A2.P2, and A2.P1. · Consider adding more shade, trees/landscaping to the roof deck. Consider moving it slightly back from the edge of the building. The mechanical should be placed around the roof deck, not the other way around. o The mechanical screen has been centered on the roof to allow maximum efficiency. The roof deck is oriented along University Avenue to provide separation from the interior lot line, as well as the neighboring single-family resident and the Hamilton. o Permanent wood slat trellises have been added to the roof deck. Temporary umbrella structures (complying with CBC 3103) will also be available at the roof deck level to provide shade. The temporary structures will stored away in the event of extreme weather or when not in use. o The roof deck has been designed with raised planters of drought-tolerant and native planting, meant to also accommodate stormwater treatment. o 14% of the proposed planting at the roof deck grows up to considerable heights. At full maturity, Cephalanthus occidentalis reaches ~10 feet in height, and Ribes sanguineum reaches ~9 feet in height. These plants are located between the different ‘rooms’ along University Ave, separating programs to provide privacy as well as shade. Item 2 Attachment F: Applicants Project Description Response Letter     Packet Pg. 65     If you need assistance reviewing the above documents, please contact the Project Planner or call the Planner-on- Duty at 650-617-3117 or email planner@cityofpaloalto.org 3 9 8 7 Attachment G Project Plans In order to reduce paper consumption, a limited number of hard copy project plans are provided to Board members for their review. The same plans are available to the public, at all hours of the day, via the following online resources. Environmental Document The City, acting as a lead agency, has prepared an environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the proposed 660 University Avenue Mixed-Use Project. In accordance with CEQA Guideline Section 15073, this document will be available online for review during a minimum 30-day circulation period beginning April 2, 2024 and ending on May 17, 2024. The environmental document is available at https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/Events-Directory/Planning-and- Development-Services/660-University-Avenue Directions to review Project plans and environmental documents online: 1. Go to: bit.ly/PApendingprojects 2. Scroll down to find “660 University” and click the address link 3. On this project-specific webpage you will find a link to the project plans and other important information Direct Link to Project Webpage: https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/News-Articles/Planning-and-Development-Services/660- University-Avenue Material Boards: Samples of the proposed Materials will be provided at the public hearing Item 2 Attachment G: Project Plans and Environmental Review     Packet Pg. 66     Item No. 3. Page 1 of 10 Architectural Review Board Staff Report From: Planning and Development Services Director Lead Department: Planning and Development Services Meeting Date: April 18, 2024 Report #: 2402-2690 TITLE PUBLIC HEARING / QUASI-JUDICIAL. 3265 El Camino Real [24PLN-00012]: Consideration of Applicant's Request to Rezone the Subject Parcel from Commercial Services (CS) to Planned Community/Planned Home Zoning Application (PC/PHZ) and to Construct a 100% affordable, Five-story, 44 Dwelling Unit Residential Rental Project. Environmental Assessment: Initial Study/15183 Exemption. For more information contact the project planner at Garrett.Sauls@Cityofpaloalto.org. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Architectural Review Board (ARB) take the following action(s): 1. Provide initial comments/feedback and recommend the project return to the ARB at a date uncertain REPORT SUMMARY The applicant proposes to rezone the vacant parcel located at 3265 El Camino Real from Commercial Services (CS) to Planned Home Zoning1 in accordance with Palo Alto Municipal Code (PAMC) Chapter 18.38 (Planned Community Zoning). The parcel would be redeveloped with a 100% affordable, 44-unit residential rental project. In accordance with the PC rezoning process set forth in PAMC Chapter 18.38, the ARB reviews the Development Plan following a prescreening with Council and initial review by the Planning and Transportation Commission (PTC), both of which have occurred, as discussed further in this report. Following the ARB’s recommendation, the Development Plan and the Planned Community Ordinance would be reviewed by the PTC and Council for a formal recommendation and decision, respectively. 1 Referred to in this report as "Planned Home Zoning" to emphasize the focus on housing as the benefit to the community. PAMC Section 18.38, which outlines the requirement and process for Planned Community (PC) Zoning, remains the underlying code supporting application of this policy Item 3 Staff Report     Packet Pg. 67     Item No. 3. Page 2 of 10 The application is subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The City is currently preparing an Initial Study(IS)/15183 Exemption to evaluate the project in accordance with CEQA. A location map is included in Attachment A. The applicant’s project description is included in Attachment D. Staff requests initial feedback from the ARB on the project as it relates to the ARB findings for approval. No formal recommendation is requested at this time. The project will return to the ARB for a formal recommendation following completion of the IS/15183 Exemption and staff review of the plans by all departments. BACKGROUND Project Information Owner:Half Dome Capital Architect:Trachtenberg Architects Representative:Jason Matlof Legal Counsel:N/A Property Information Address:3265 El Camino Real Neighborhood:North Ventura Lot Dimensions & Area:50 feet wide x 150 feet long Housing Inventory Site:N/A Located w/in a Plume:California-Olive-Emerson (COE) Plume Protected/Heritage Trees:Yes (One protected Valley Oak tree to be removed; One Designated Black Acacia tree to be removed; see further discussion below) Historic Resource(s):Not Applicable Existing Improvement(s):Vacant Existing Land Use(s):Vacant Adjacent Land Uses & Zoning: North: CS (Hotel) West: RP; RP(L) (R&D/Office) East: CS (Parking Lot for Eating and Drinking Use to the South) South: CS (Eating and Drinking) Aerial View of Property: Item 3 Staff Report     Packet Pg. 68     Item No. 3. Page 3 of 10 Source: Google Maps Land Use Designation & Applicable Plans Zoning Designation:Commercial Service (CS) Comp. Plan Designation:Service Commercial Context-Based Design Criteria:Applicable (see further discussion below) Downtown Urban Design Guide:Not Applicable South of Forest Avenue Coordinated Area Plan:Not Applicable Baylands Master Plan:Not Applicable El Camino Real Design Guidelines (1976 / 2002):Applicable (See further discussion below) Proximity to Residential Uses or Districts (150'):Yes; 460 Lambert Street (Single Family Home) Located w/in the Airport Influence Area:N/A Prior City Reviews & Action City Council:Council held a Prescreening (study session) to review a conceptual plan for this legislative action on 23PLN-00105 Item 3 Staff Report     Packet Pg. 69     Item No. 3. Page 4 of 10 PTC:The PTC held a hearing on April 10, 2024. HRB:None ARB:None Council prescreening City Council held a prescreening (study session) to review a conceptual plan for this project on September 11, 2023. The video2 and minutes3 of that hearing are available online. The project is substantially similar to what was presented at prescreening, including but not limited to, the same height, floor area, and lot coverage. Key comments from Council included: •Questions about how the parking stackers function and whether they could create a circulation issue •Questions about how parking would be allocated and whether spaces would be bundled or unbundled from the units •Questions about the anticipated rent and whether the affordability levels would actually be affordable to teachers •Comments about the functionality of the proposed driveway width Planning and Transportation Commission Review In accordance with the PC rezoning process, the PTC held an initial hearing on April 10, 2024 and recommended that the application be forwarded to the ARB for review. A video of the hearing is available online.4 At the time of this report, minutes were not yet available. Comments from commissioners encouraged the following: •Study ways to expand the size of the common open space at the rooftop terrace •Continue to study circulation and trash collection solutions •Study ways to ensure the enforcement measures for the TDM plan are robust •Provide additional data on how this project will, or will not, be affordable to teachers •Consider providing transit pass subsidies to all tenants and contributing to Palo Alto LINK PROJECT DESCRIPTION On January 10, 2024 Trachtenberg Architects filed an application on behalf of Half Dome Capital to rezone the subject parcel from CS to Planned Community and to redevelop the site with 44 below-market rate residential rental units. Twenty percent (20%) of the units would be restricted at a rate affordable to low income (51%-80% Area Median Income (AMI)) and 80% of the units would be restricted at a rate affordable to moderate income (81%-120% AMI). The applicant has also established a private agreement with the Palo Alto Educator Association (PAEA) to prioritize housing Palo Alto teachers when seeking tenants (Attachment F); however, there is no guarantee that teachers will be the only occupants of the building. 2 A video of the September 11, 2023 Council hearing is available online at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s6b62NDkAyo 3 Minutes of the September 11, 2023 Council hearing are available online at: https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/City- Hall/City-Council/Council-Agendas-Minutes 4 A video of the April 10, 2024 Planning and Transportation Commission hearing is available online at: at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9VDdVRjXEjs. Item 3 Staff Report     Packet Pg. 70     Item No. 3. Page 5 of 10 The building would be five-stories, 55 feet tall to the top of the roof deck line. The elevator overrun would be up to 69 feet as allowed in accordance with PAMC Section 18.40.090. The project includes 25,912 square feet (sf) of gross floor area on a 7,493-sf lot (Floor area ratio of 3.5: 1.0). The project also includes a 1,155 sf roof top deck and 25 total parking spaces provided in an at-grade parking garage and utilizing a parking lift system that will convey vehicles above and below grade (see section drawings on sheet A3.0 of the plan set). The building will be primarily constructed of stucco siding, metal infill panels to frame the windows, and painted Hardie paneling at the elevator overrun on the side of the building which faces the Kasa Hotel. The applicant’s project description is included in Attachment D. The project plans are included in Attachment G. Requested Entitlements, Findings and Purview: The following discretionary applications are being requested: •Planned Community (PC/PHZ) Rezoning: The process for evaluating this type of application is set forth in PAMC 18.38.065. Planned Community rezoning applications require review by the PTC and the Architectural Review Board, a final review of a development plan and ordinance for review and recommendation by the PTC, and a decision by the Council. The findings under 18.38.060 must be made in the affirmative for project approval. The Architectural Review Board makes a recommendation on the development plan in accordance with the findings for architectural review in Section 18.76.020 pursuant to 18.38.065(b). These findings are included in Attachment B. For housing projects rezoning to PC (labeled “Planned Home Zoning”) Council expressed an expectation that projects provide at least 20% of the units at below market rate. ANALYSIS Staff has analyzed the project in accordance with applicable plans, goals, policies, regulations and adopted guidelines, as discussed further below. The project is still being evaluated in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and is still being reviewed by various City departments for consistency with the Municipal Code and other relevant standards and regulations. Therefore, this is an initial analysis and may be modified as the plans are revised through the public process. Neighborhood Setting and Character This site is located along El Camino Real between a contemporary two-story motel on the north side and a one-story restaurant with minor Art-Deco motifs to the south. At the rear of the site the property abuts a parking lot which serves the restaurant, a one-story ranch-style single-family house, and a two-story industrial office building. The site is located within the boundaries of the Draft North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan. The proposed placement and massing of the building is indicative of the El Camino/South El Camino Design Guidelines’ intention for El Camino Real to be framed by multi-story buildings. The building is rectangular, with the second through fifth floor massing built up to the build-to line on El Camino Real. The use of stucco as the primary exterior material is representative of Item 3 Staff Report     Packet Pg. 71     Item No. 3. Page 6 of 10 buildings along El Camino Real nearby the site and is consistent with the ARB’s approved materials List for housing projects reviewed under the Objective Design Standards. Zoning Compliance Attachment C identifies how the project compares with the existing CS zone district development standards. In addition, it provides a comparison to the Affordable Housing Incentive Program (AHIP) for informational purposes, though the applicant is proposing to rezone instead of utilizing the AHIP, which is now by-right for this site. The project deviates from the allowable floor area ratio (FAR) and height. The proposed FAR is 3.58:1.0 where the CS zone allows 0.6:1.0 FAR; the proposed height is 65 feet measured to the roof of the staircase where 50 feet is permitted. PAMC 18.40.090 allows for elevator overruns and similar architectural/utility features like staircases to exceed the height limit by 15 feet; the height measured to the elevator overrun and staircase are 69 feet and 64 feet, respectively. Draft NVCAP Compliance The Draft NVCAP designates this area for high-density residential use but would require ground- floor retail. This project does not propose ground floor retail and no existing retail use is present on the site today. The Draft NVCAP would require a five-foot front setback, and this project proposes a four-foot minimum setback, that is at least five-feet at some points along the façade. The overall sidewalk width would be 12-feet which meets the municipal code’s requirement for an effective 12-foot sidewalk on El Camino Real. The Draft NVCAP would allow a height of 55 feet for this site; the proposed concept plan anticipates a height of approximately 59 feet. Unit Affordability/Public Benefit On February 3, 2020, Council unanimously endorsed using the Planned Community rezoning process for housing and mixed-use housing projects to help spur housing production. In exchange for deviation from certain standards in accordance with the rezoning process, the project must include at least 20% of the housing units as deed restricted for lower-income households. Moreover, the number of housing units must offset the number of net new commercial jobs that are generated by the project. This was coined Planned Home Zoning to emphasize the focus on housing, particularly the affordable housing, as the public benefit of the proposed project. Council endorsed four options to meet the 20% affordability requirements in order to provide flexibility to developers in meeting the requirements. The applicant is proposing to provide 100% of the units as affordable, 20% of which would be provided to low income and 80% of which would be provided at a rate affordable to moderate income, exceeding the 20% requirement under Option 2 that Council endorsed. Using this weighted system, as shown below, the applicant is proposing an equivalency of 72% affordable units, exceeding the 20% minimum requirement as shown in Table 1 below. In addition, the developer will provide affordability via a discount to the Affordable Rent for all the Moderate-Income units, whereby they have agreed that the deed restriction will be set the rent at 110% of AMI instead of the conventional City requirement of 120% of AMI. Since no retail is proposed, this project would inherently create more housing than jobs. Item 3 Staff Report     Packet Pg. 72     Item No. 3. Page 7 of 10 Parking and Circulation The applicant proposes 25 parking spaces, or 0.59 spaces per residential unit, in vehicle stackers. This is an increase from the prescreening application, which had 20 parking spaces in vehicle stackers. Typically one parking space per unit is required for studio and one-bedroom units, and a Transportation Demand Management (TDM) plan can be used for an up to 100% reduction in required spaces for a 100% affordable housing project where units are available to households with income levels at or below 120% of AMI Attachment E. Attachment E includes a draft TDM plan for the proposed project which identifies the trip reduction measures the owner intends to implement (e.g. transit passes, unbundled parking, electric bikes, etc.). The project is located along a high-quality transit corridor along El Camino Real; however, the project is not located within 0.5 miles of a major transit stop (California Avenue Caltrain Station). For comparison, a project using the Affordable Housing Incentive Program (PAMC 18.32) requires 0.75 parking spaces In the previous submittal, the proposed entry into the garage was 14 feet wide. In response to feedback from staff and the City Council, the applicant has increased the driveway to meet the required 20-foot-wide driveway for two-way traffic. Access to and from the site is right-in, right- out only from the driveway. The City’s environmental consultant will evaluate the circulation, Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT), and traffic impact created by the project. The project is located on El Camino Real, a high-quality bus corridor. California State Law AB 2097 prevents cities from requiring parking for projects within a half-mile of a high-quality transit corridor (defined as an area with intersecting cross-street bus routes with a 15-minute headway for both routes) or a Caltrain station. However, the City does not have intersecting bus routes with 15-minute headways on El Camino Real and the site is located further than a half-mile from the California Avenue Caltrain station so this project cannot utilize this provision of state law. The project includes 44 long-term bike parking spaces on the ground floor in a shared storage room and four short-term bike parking spaces in front of the property; five on-site shared electric bikes will also be provided to residents. Roof Deck The proposed project includes a rooftop garden that accommodates most of the required open space. The proposed roof deck is 1,750 sf which provides approximately 40 sf of open space per Item 3 Staff Report     Packet Pg. 73     Item No. 3. Page 8 of 10 unit. Typically, 150 sf of open space per unit is required in the CS zone district regulations, and 50 sf of open space per unit is required for projects using the Affordable Housing Incentive Program. Rooftop gardens are generally not allowed above the standard height limit but are allowed on properties on El Camino Real provided they do not abut a residentially zoned property or a property with a residential use. There is one single-family home on Lambert Street, but it is buffered between another parcel which serves as the parking lot for INDO Restaurant & Lounge. Since the adjacent parcel is not residentially zoned, nor has a residential use located on it, this restriction does not apply. Regardless, the applicant has pushed the deck area to the El Camino Real side of the building to maintain a 150 ft separation from this residence in accordance with other similar provisions of the municipal code. Landscaping and Trees The site contains a large Valley Oak and a Black Acacia tree. The Valley Oak is a Protected tree while the Black Acacia is considered a Designated tree. The tree protection zone for the Valley Oak comprises more than 25% of the developable area for the site and can be removed per ordinance. The Black Acacia tree is considered an invasive species. The ARB may consider the net benefit of 44 housing units compared to maintaining the protected Valley Oak. If removed, this tree will be subject to on-site replacement and/or in lieu fees per Urban Forestry requirements. The property frontage is only 50 feet wide. Therefore, multi-modal access to the site is generally prioritized over landscaping along the facade. However, the existing mature London Plane street tree at the center of the lot on El Camino Real will be preserved. Waste Pick-Up The proposed plans show the waste bins on the ground floor in the garage. Caltrans is proposing bike lanes throughout the City along El Camino Real which will eliminate the opportunity to provide a trash staging area on El Camino Real in front of the property. In addition to that, when staff studied where trash bins could be stored in front of the site, the narrow frontage did not provide any opportunity to place waste bins on El Camino Real that would allow safe bicycle and vehicle traffic to and from the site during collection. Generally, Green Waste collects trash in commercial areas between 4:00am and 6:30am, but three separate collection vehicles will need to service this site and it is likely that collection will occur at a later point in this time range to limit how much residents are disturbed by the sound of the collection vehicles. In order to address the safety and noise issues, staff has recommended that the applicant stage their bins on Lambert Street. On-site staff would move the bins onto Lambert Street the night before collection. The following morning, after Green Waste has serviced the bins from Lambert Street, the on-site staff would promptly move the bins from Lambert Street back into the garage so that the bins will not be left out for a prolonged period. Special Requirements of a Planned Community Application (PAMC 18.38.150) PAMC Section 18.38.150 includes additional restrictions that apply to all PHZ/PC projects when they abut or have any portion of their property within 150 feet of an RE, R-1, R-2, RMD, RM, or Item 3 Staff Report     Packet Pg. 74     Item No. 3. Page 9 of 10 any PC district permitting single-family development or multiple-family development. These restrictions include height limits for parking structures, height and daylight plane transitions from lower density sites, and additional setbacks. While there is a single-family home within 150 feet of the subject parcel located at 460 Lambert Avenue, it is located on a Service Commercial (CS) zoned parcel. As a result, these additional restrictions do not apply. Comprehensive Plan Compliance The Comprehensive Plan includes Goals, Policies, and Programs that guide the physical form of the City. The Comprehensive Plan provides the basis for the City’s development regulations and is used by City staff to regulate building and development and make recommendations on projects. Further, ARB Finding #1 requires that the design be consistent and compatible with applicable elements of the Palo Alto Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan land use designation for the project site is Service Commercial, which allows for higher density multi-family along El Camino Real. This address is not currently listed as a Housing Inventory Site in the Housing Element. Based on an initial analysis, the project appears to be consistent with the policies in the Comprehensive Plan and therefore fulfills the goals of the Plan as well. A detailed review of the project’s consistency with the Comprehensive Plan will be provided at the next hearing. El Camino/South El Camino Real Design Guidelines (5)(6) Given the project site’s location, it must conform to the El Camino/South El Camino Real Design Guidelines. Based on an initial analysis, the project appears to be consistent with these policies. A detailed review of the project’s consistency with these Guidelines will be provided at the next hearing. The building provides a pedestrian oriented facade directly along El Camino Real as is encouraged by the El Camino/South El Camino Design Guidelines. The building’s orientation is directed towards El Camino Real and the facade seeks to break up the building massing along the El Camino frontage with a recessed entry at the ground floor and a system of two metal paneled windows at each unit. Consistency with Application Findings The ARB findings of approval for a Planned Community rezoning are the same as those required for an Architectural Review application. These findings are provided in Attachment B. A detailed review of the project’s consistency with the Findings for approval will be provided once staff’s review is complete and the applicant is seeking a formal recommendation. STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT The Palo Alto Municipal Code requires notice of this public hearing be published in a local paper and mailed to owners and occupants of property within 600 feet of the subject property at least 5 El Camino Real Design Guidelines: https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/v/1/planning-amp- development-services/file-migration/current-planning/forms-and-guidelines/el-camino-real-design-guidelines.pdf 6 South El Camino Real Design Guidelines: https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/v/1/planning-amp- development-services/file-migration/current-planning/forms-and-guidelines/south-el-camino-real-design- guidelines.pdf Item 3 Staff Report     Packet Pg. 75     Item No. 3. Page 10 of 10 ten days in advance. Notice of a public hearing for this project was published in the Daily Post on April 5, 2024. Postcard mailing occurred on April 3, 2024. Public Comments As of the writing of this report, no new project-related, public comments were received. Public comments associated with the September 11, 2023 Council Prescreening are available here: https://cityofpaloalto.primegov.com/Portal/Meeting?meetingTemplateId=13020. The public comments provided during that hearing generally centered around support for a 100% housing project with some members of the public sharing concerns around the affordability of the units and the number of parking spaces provided for the number of units proposed. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The subject project is being assessed in accordance with the authority and criteria contained in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State CEQA Guidelines, and the environmental regulations of the City. Staff has hired Rincon Consultants, Inc. to prepare a 15183 Exemption for this project. Upon completion of the environmental documentation, staff will post the document on the project webpage: https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/Departments/Planning- Development-Services/Current-Planning/Projects/3265-El-Camino. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS In addition to the recommended action, the Architectural Review Board may: 1. Recommend the project return to the ARB at a date certain. ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: Location Map Attachment B: ARB Findings Attachment C: Zoning Comparison Table Attachment D: Applicant’s Project Description Attachment E - TDM Plan Attachment F - Agreement with Teacher’s Association Attachment G - Project Plans AUTHOR/TITLE: Garrett Sauls, Senior Planner Item 3 Staff Report     Packet Pg. 76     Item 3 Attachment A: Location Map     Packet Pg. 77     3 8 3 1 ATTACHMENT B ARB FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL In order for the ARB to make a future recommendation of approval, the project must comply with the following Findings for Architectural Review as required in Chapter 18.76.020 of the PAMC. Finding #1: The design is consistent with applicable provisions of the Palo Alto Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Code, coordinated area plans (including compatibility requirements), and any relevant design guides. Finding #2: The project has a unified and coherent design, that: a. creates an internal sense of order and desirable environment for occupants, visitors, and the general community, b. preserves, respects and integrates existing natural features that contribute positively to the site and the historic character including historic resources of the area when relevant, c. is consistent with the context-based design criteria of the applicable zone district, d. provides harmonious transitions in scale, mass and character to adjacent land uses and land use designations, e. enhances living conditions on the site (if it includes residential uses) and in adjacent residential areas. Finding #3: The design is of high aesthetic quality, using high quality, integrated materials and appropriate construction techniques, and incorporating textures, colors, and other details that are compatible with and enhance the surrounding area. Finding #4: The design is functional, allowing for ease and safety of pedestrian and bicycle traffic and providing for elements that support the building’s necessary operations (e.g. convenient vehicle access to property and utilities, appropriate arrangement and amount of open space and integrated signage, if applicable, etc.). Finding #5: The landscape design complements and enhances the building design and its surroundings, is appropriate to the site’s functions, and utilizes to the extent practical, regional indigenous drought resistant plant material capable of providing desirable habitat that can be appropriately maintained. Finding #6: The project incorporates design principles that achieve sustainability in areas related to energy efficiency, water conservation, building materials, landscaping, and site planning. Item 3 Attachment B: ARB Findings     Packet Pg. 78     ATTACHMENT C ZONING COMPARISON TABLE 3265 El Camino Real, 24PLN-00012 The PHZ/PC Special Requirements (18.38.150) do not apply because the site is not within 150 ft of residential zoning district Regulation Required CS Development Standard AH Development Standard Proposed Minimum Site Area, width and depth No minimum size or dimensions No minimum size or dimensions 7,492 sf Minimum Front Yard 0-10 ft to create an 8-12 ft effective sidewalk width (8) 0-10 ft to create an 8-12 ft effective sidewalk width (8) 4 ft, 12 ft effective sidewalk Rear Yard 10 ft 10 ft 0 @ ground floor; 5 ft at parts of upper floors Interior Side Yard None None 0-6 ft @ ground floor; 0-8 ft at upper floor Build-to-Lines 50% of frontage built to setback (1) 50% of frontage built to setback (1) 100%; Complies Max. Site Coverage 50% (3,746 sf)None 87% (6,525 sf) Max. Building Height 50 feet Add’l 15 ft for equipment 50 feet Add’l 15 ft for equipment 55 ft. to roof deck line 69 ft to elevator overrun Max. Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 0.6:1 (4,495 sf) for 100% residential sites on El Camino Real 2.0 for 100% affordable housing 3.58:1 (26,804 sf) Residential Density (4)No max on El Camino Real No max 44 Min. Ground Floor Commercial FAR (10) None exists on site; therefore, no Retail Preservation None required None proposed Daylight Plane for lot lines abutting one or more residential zone districts other than an RM-40 or PC Zone None, does not abut residential None, does not abut residential None, does not abut residential Minimum Landscape/Open Space Coverage 30% (2,247.6 sf) (2) Max 1,348.6 sf rooftop garden (60% of 2,247.6 sf) 20% (1498.4 sf), may include rooftop garden 28% (2,105 sf) 1,155 sf rooftop garden (51% of req. 2,247.6 sf) Minimum Useable Open Space (Private and/or Common) 150 sf per unit (2)50 sf per unit 26 sf per unit (1) Twenty-five-foot driveway access permitted regardless of frontage. (2) Required usable open space: (1) may be any combination of private and common open spaces; (2) does not need to be located on the ground (but rooftop gardens are not included as open space except as provided below); (3) minimum private open space dimension six feet; and (4) minimum common open space dimension twelve feet. For CN and CS sites on El Camino Real and CC(2) sites that do not abut a single- or two-family residential use or zoning district, rooftop gardens may qualify as usable open space and may count as up to 60% of the required usable open space for the residential component of a project. In order to qualify as usable open space, the rooftop garden shall meet the requirements set forth in Section 18.40.230. (4) For CN sites on El Camino Real, height may increase to a maximum of 40 feet and the FAR may increase to a maximum of 1.0:1 (0.5:1 for nonresidential, 0.5:1 for residential). Item 3 Attachment C: Zoning Comparison Table     Packet Pg. 79     (8) A 12-foot sidewalk width is required along El Camino Real frontage. (10) In the CC(2) zone and on CN and CS zoned sites on El Camino Real, there shall be no minimum mixed use ground floor commercial FAR for a residential project, except to the extent that the retail preservation requirements of Section 18.40.180 or the retail shopping (R) combining district (Chapter 18.30(A)) applies. Table 2: CONFORMANCE WITH CHAPTER 18.52 (Off-Street Parking and Loading) for Multiple Family Use Type Required Standard Required AH Proposed Vehicle Parking 1 per studio or 1- bedroom unit (44 spaces) .75 per unit of any size (33 spaces) 2 ADA spaces1 24 stacker spaces 25 spaces total Bicycle Parking 1 per unit (44 spaces), 100% - LT 1 per unit (44 spaces), 100% - LT 44 LT Loading Space None for less than 50 units None for less than 50 units None provided 1 PAMC 18.52.040(b)(6-8) allows accessible loading zones to count as parking spaces. If those loading zones are shared between two stalls, they are double counted. Item 3 Attachment C: Zoning Comparison Table     Packet Pg. 80     TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS 2 4 2 1 F o u r t h S t r e e t B e r k e l e y , C A 9 4 7 1 0 p h o n e : 5 1 0 . 6 4 9 . 1 4 1 4 w w w . T r a c h t e n b e r g A r c h . c o m March 25, 2024 Planning Division City of Palo Alto 250 Hamilton Ave, 5th Floor Palo Alto, CA 94301 Project Description for 3265 El Camino Real This 100% affordable new multi-family housing project consists of a 5-story development with 44 dwelling units and ground level lobby and parking. First priority for all vacancies will be given to the teacher members of the Palo Alto Educator Association (PAEA) through an existing partnership and agreement. This project would provide a quality infill development on an empty and underutilized site, which is located on a major arterial street, El Camino Real, with close proximity to restaurants, shops, and transit located along both California Avenue and El Camino Real. It would also contribute much needed new housing to the city’s stock. The site is in a transitional zone between residential neighborhoods and commercial development - importantly, more than 500' distance to the nearest residentially zoned parcel. The project scale and housing use are appropriate for the site in this transitional zone, and the design of the project establishes an urban infill development appropriate for El Camino Real frontage. The design intent for the building is to have a contemporary appearance that exemplifies the current time and relates to the surrounding context along El Camino Real. Being an urban infill project with higher density will ensure the project is relevant with the future projects developing along this corridor. The scale and pattern of the window openings, the pop-out bay windows at the front facade, and Juliet balconies reinforce the residential design of the project. The material palette consists of traditional materials, like stucco and metal panels, in a warm neutral color scheme to compliment the surrounding context. This application is submitted under the City's Planned Home Zoning (PHZ) process that motivates developers to offer community benefits in the form of minimum 20% affordable housing in exchange for exceptional entitlements granted by the City that would otherwise make the project economically nonviable. The project proposes to maximize community benefit at 100% affordability targeted for our critically important teacher community. The project is providing a PHZ weighted affordability rating of 72.3% according to Option #2 of the PHZ guidelines. Seventy-two percent is substantially higher than the City's minimum threshold of 20% weighted affordability, and results from 80% of units at Moderate Income (weighted at 0.6) plus 20% of units at Low Income (weighted at 1.2). Further, the principal/owner, Half Dome Capital LLC, has agreed to limit affordable rents for the Moderate Income units at 110% of SCC AMI, instead of the traditional City standard of 120% of SCC AMI. Item 3 Attachment D: Applicant's Project Description     Packet Pg. 81     First priority for all units will be provided via advanced notification to our partners at the PAUSD educator and classified employee unions, who will have 7 calendar days to provide a prioritized list of prospective applicants that will be screened and income-qualified by management (first priority will be given to PAEA members and then to CSEA members). If there are no prospective tenants on the wait list for housing at either of these organizations, then management will conduct public marketing to identify income-qualified applicants. If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to contact me at (510) 649-1414 x124. Sincerely, Isaiah Stackhouse, Principal TRACHTENBERG ARCHITECTS Item 3 Attachment D: Applicant's Project Description     Packet Pg. 82     3265 El Camino Real Residential Development Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Plan Prepared for: The City of Palo Alto on Behalf of Half Dome Capital LLC March 29, 2024 Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. Hexagon Office: 100 Century Center Court, Suite 501, San Jose, CA 95112 Phone: 408.971.6100 Hexagon Job Number: 23JL15 Client Name: Half Dome Capital LLC Item 3 Attachment E: TDM Plan     Packet Pg. 83     3265 El Camino Real Residential Development TDM Plan March 29, 2024 Table of Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................... 1 2. Existing Transportation Facilities .................................................................................... 4 3. Proposed TDM Measures ............................................................................................... 9 4. TDM Implementation, Monitoring, and Reporting ......................................................... 16 Appendices Appendix A 3265 El Camino Real Commuter Flier Example Appendix B Residential Survey Example List of Tables Table 1 Existing Transit Service .................................................................................................. 6 Table 2 TDM Measures and Implementation Responsibilities ................................................... 10 List of Figures Figure 1 Project Site Location ...................................................................................................... 2 Figure 2 Site Plan ......................................................................................................................... 3 Figure 3 Existing Transit Services ................................................................................................ 5 Figure 4 Existing Bicycle Facilities ................................................................................................ 8 Figure 5 Palo Alto Unified School District Sites .......................................................................... 12 Item 3 Attachment E: TDM Plan     Packet Pg. 84     3265 El Camino Real Residential Development TDM Plan March 29, 2024 Page | 1 1. Introduction This Transportation Demand Management (TDM) plan has been prepared for the proposed residential development at 3265 El Camino Real in Palo Alto, California. The development will provide less parking than required, so a TDM plan is required per the City of Palo Alto Municipal Code. TDM is a combination of services, incentives, facilities, and actions that reduce single-occupant vehicle (SOV) trips to help relieve traffic congestion, parking demand, greenhouse gas emissions, and air pollution problems. The purpose of a TDM plan is to promote more efficient utilization of existing transportation facilities, and to ensure that new developments are designed to maximize the potential for sustainable transportation usage. Project Description The project site is located along the El Camino Real corridor at 3265 El Camino Real in Palo Alto, California (see Figure 1). The project will demolish the vacant building and construct 44 affordable housing units in a 5-story building. There would be 24 studio units and 20 one-bedroom units. In comparison to the Affordable Housing Incentive Program (AHIP) in Section 18.32 of the Zoning Code, the project would be required to provide 0.75 space per unit, or 33 parking spaces. The project will provide 24 stacker parking spaces in a ground level parking structure, which is 9 parking spaces (27 percent) fewer than would be required in comparison to the AHIP. In addition, the City’s zoning code, Section 18.52.040 states that multifamily housing developments require one space per studio and one-bedroom units and two spaces per two- or more bedroom units, which would require a total of 44 parking spaces. Per the Zoning Code Section 18.52.030(i), a TDM plan is required for all projects that request a parking reduction. In addition, 100% affordable housing developments may request up to a 100% reduction in parking based on the anticipated demand. Item 3 Attachment E: TDM Plan     Packet Pg. 85     El Ca m i n o R e a l Park B l v d Ash S t Eme r s o n S t Brya n t S t Ram o n a S t Han sen Wa y Birch S t Gra n t A v e Oliv e A v e Sou t h C t el D o r a d o A v e Aca c i a A v e She r m a n A v e Lam b e r t A v e S C a l i f o r n i a A v e Ma t a d ero A v e She r i d a n A v e Fer n a n d o A v e Ma r g a r i t a A v e Wil t o n A v e Chi m a l u s D r Orind a S t Bar r o n A v e Ken d a l l A v e Cam b r i d g e A v e la Se l v a D r Hano v e r S t Ram o s W a y Che s t n u t A v e New M a y f i e l d L n el C a r m e l o A v e Wav e r l e y S t Pep p e r A v e High S t Cypr e s s L n Por t a g e A v e Jac a r a n d a L n Jos i n a A v e Colo r a d o A v e Ma t a d e ro A v e Alma S t Birch S t Pag e M i l l R d Park B l v d Sh e r i d a n A v e Ash S t Or e g o n E x p y = Site Location LEGEND 3265 El Camino Real Residential Development TDM Plan Figure 1 Project Site Location Item 3 Attachment E: TDM Plan     Packet Pg. 86     3265 El Camino Real Residential Development TDM Plan Figure 2 Site Plan 2 A3. 1 TRANSFORMER VAULT, IN SIDEWALK OR STREET 1.5 CU YD32.5" X 81" 1.5 C U Y D 32.5" X 8 1 " 1.5 C U Y D 32.5 " X 8 1 " 1.5 C U Y D 32.5 " X 8 1 " 1.5 C U Y D 32.5 " X 8 1 " 1.5 C U Y D 32.5 " X 8 1 " EXTERIOR SIDE YARD EGRESS COURT (PERMEABLE PAVING) 50' - 0 " 45 ' - 0 " 20' - 0 " 24' - 3 " 5'-4 " 5'-1 0 " 50' - 0 " 5'-0 " 45 ' - 0 " LOBBY MAIL PACKAGES 12'-0" 4'-0" 12'-0" 8'-0 " BACKFLOW 12'-6" EL C A M I N O R E A L 6'-0" CLEAR 2 A3 . 1 1 A3.1 3 A3 . 1 150'-0" 4'-0"137'-8"8'-4" ELEC. ROOM METAL AWNING ABOVE ENTRY DOOR 4'-0" 1-HOUR RATED TUNNEL 2 BIKE RACKS, 4 SPACES TOTAL COMBILIFT543-230-550COMBILIFT543-230-550COMBILIFT543-230-550COMBILIFT543-230-550COMBILIFT543-230-550COMBILIFT543-230-550 EV CHARGING ACCESSIBLE SPACE COMBILIFT543-230-550 2 C U Y D 41.5 " X 8 1 " CO M P O S T RE C Y C L I N G LA N D F I L L 2 C U Y D 41.5 " X 8 1 " 2 C U Y D 41. 5 " X 8 1 " BIKES 44 TOTALGARAGE W/ 24 EV CHARGING SPACES, ASSIGNED PARKING TRIPLE STACK TRIPLE STACK TRIPLE STACK TRIPLE STACK TRIPLE STACK TRIPLE STACK TRIPLE STACK 23 EV CHARGING SPACES COMBILIFT543-230-550 TRIPLE STACK WC MAINT.5 SHARED ELECTRIC BIKES 9'-0"8'-0" 24' - 3 " EQ U I P . T B D 1'-0" UNIT METERS PULL SECTION, MAINSWITCHBOARD, MAIN SERVICEBREAKER, HOUSE METER HOUSE PANEL, FIRE ALARM,TELEPHONE, DATA, SECURITY, CABLE,BEHIND RATED ROLL UP DOOR BACKFLOW EQ U I P . T B D 3'-0" 3' T Y P . H A M M E R H E A D FO R B A C K U P S P A C E STACKER MACHINE KIOSK Item 3 Attachment E: TDM Plan     Packet Pg. 87     3265 El Camino Real Residential Development TDM Plan March 29, 2024 Page | 4 2. Existing Transportation Facilities This chapter describes the existing transportation facilities and services near the project site that can be utilized to reduce parking demand. Transit Services The project site is well-served by transit within a quarter mile. Existing transit services in the study area are provided by the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA), the Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District (AC Transit), and Stanford University. VTA operates bus and light-rail transit (LRT) services in Santa Clara County, AC Transit operates Dumbarton Express bus routes, and Stanford University provides free Stanford Marguerite shuttles between the campus and various points of interests that serve the project area. The VTA, Dumbarton Express, and Stanford Marguerite bus and shuttle routes in the project vicinity and the bus/shuttle stops near the project site are summarized in Table 2 and shown on Figure 3. VTA Local Route 22 and Stanford Shuttle Route Shopping Express (SE) serves the project vicinity with the closest bus stops (310 feet from the project site) located on El Camino Real and Hansen Way. Caltrain The California Avenue station is approximately 0.9 mile from the project site. Although it is not within comfortable walking distance, it can be accessed via bike lanes on Park Boulevard. From the site, bicyclists could use Portage Avenue, Ash Street, and Lambert Avenue to connect to bike lanes on Park Boulevard. Although there are no bicycle facilities on these streets, these streets are low-volume streets with slow travel speeds. More advanced bicyclists may use El Camino Real and Olive Avenue. Caltrain provides frequent commuter train service between San Jose and San Francisco seven days a week, with stops at most cities in between. During the AM peak period between 7:00 and 10:00, there are five northbound trains (two limited-stop trains and three local trains) and six southbound trains (three limited-stop trains and three local trains) serving the California Avenue station. During the PM peak period between 4:00 and 7:00, there are six northbound trains (three limited-stop trains and three local trains) and six southbound trains (three limited-stop trains and three local trains) serving the California Avenue station. Bicycles are permitted on Caltrain, and there are bicycle racks and bicycle lockers available at the California Avenue station. Item 3 Attachment E: TDM Plan     Packet Pg. 88     El Ca m i n o R e a l Park B l v d Ash S t Eme r s o n S t Brya n t S t Ram o n a S t Ha n sen Wa y Birch S t Gra n t A v e Oliv e A v e Sou t h C t el D o r a d o A v e Aca c i a A v e Lam b e r t A v e S C a l i f o r n i a A v e Ma t a d ero A v e She r i d a n A v e Fer n a n d o A v e Ma r g a r i t a A v e Wil t o n A v e Chi m a l u s D r Orind a S t Bar r o n A v e Ken d a l l A v e Cam b r i d g e A v e la Se l v a D r Hano v e r S t Ram o s W a y Che s t n u t A v e New M a y f i e l d L n el C a r m e l o A v e Wav e r l e y S t Pep p e r A v e High S t Cypr e s s L n Por t a g e A v e Jos i n a A v e Colo r a d o A v e Ma t a d e ro A v e Alma S t Birch S t Pag e M i l l R d Park B l v d Sh e r i d a n A v e Ash S t Or e g o n E x p y CaliforniaAvenueCaltrainStation 22 22 522 522 89 89 101 102 103101 102 103 104 104 104 22, SE 22, SE 22, 89, RP PM, SE DB1, 101, 102, 103, 104, RP AM 89, DB1, 104 22, 101, 102, 103 101, 102, 103 101, 102, 103 = Site Location LEGEND XXX 522 522 XXX XXX XXX = Express Bus Route = Frequent Bus Route = Rapid Bus Route = Stanford Marguerite Research Park Route = Stanford Marguerite Shopping Express Route = Dumbarton 1 Express Route = Nearby Bus Stop = Local Bus RouteXX XX 3265 El Camino Real Residential Development TDM Plan Figure 3 Existing Transit Services Item 3 Attachment E: TDM Plan     Packet Pg. 89     3265 El Camino Real Residential Development TDM Plan March 29, 2024 Page | 6 Table 1 Existing Transit Service Bicycle Facilities The bicycle facilities that exist within one-half mile of the project site (see Figure 4) include striped bike lanes (Class II bikeway) and shared bike routes/boulevards (Class III bikeway). Bike lanes are lanes on roadways designated for use by bicycles with special lane markings, pavement legends, and signage. Bike routes are signed bike routes where bicyclists share a travel lane with motorists. Striped bike lanes are present along the following street segments: • Park Boulevard, north of Lambert Avenue • Hansen Way, for the entire street • Page Mill Road, east of Miranda Ave • California Avenue, between Hanover Street and El Camino Real Bike routes are typically designated with signs and/or sharrows (shared-lane markings). Bike routes are appropriate for low-volume streets with slow travel speeds, especially those on which motorist volumes are low enough that passing maneuvers can use the full street width, on roadways with bicycle demand but without adequate space for bike lanes, and as “gap fillers” where there are short breaks in bike lanes due to right-of-way constraints. Bike routes are present along the following street segments, according to the City’s Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Plan (July 2012), the Mid-Peninsula Bicycle Map, and Google Earth: Headways1 Route Route Description (minutes) VTA Bus Route Frequent Route 22 Palo Alto Transit Center - Eastridge 4:15 AM - 3:00 AM (next day)15-17 El Camino Real and Hansen Way 310 Local Route 89 California Avenue Caltrain - Palo Alto VA Hospital 6:30 AM - 6:15 PM 18-23 El Camino Real and Oregon Expy/Page Mill Rd 1,790 Express Route 101 Camden and Hwy 85 - Stanford Research Park 6:15 AM - 8:18 AM 55-60 Hansen Way south of El Camino Real 785 Express Route 102 South San Jose - Stanford Research Park 5:47 AM - 6:47 PM 35 Hansen Way south of El Camino Real 785 Express Route 103 Eastridge - Stanford Research Park 4:55 AM - 6:19 PM 60 Hansen Way south of El Camino Real 785 Express Route 104 Milpitas BART - Stanford Research Park 6:07 AM - 5:39 PM 30-55 El Camino Real and Oregon Expy/Page Mill Rd 1,790 Dumbarton Express Bus Route DB1 Union City BART Station - Stanford University 5:10 AM - 8:30 PM 30 El Camino Real and Oregon Expy/Page Mill Rd 1,790 Stanford Marguerite Shuttle2 Research Park Palo Alto Transit Center - Stanford Research Park 6:53 AM - 10:12 AM 3:17 PM - 7:02 PM 17-18 El Camino Real and Oregon Expy/Page Mill Rd 1,790 Shopping Express Palo Alto Transit Center - San Antonio Shopping Center 3:00 PM - 10:50 PM 60 El Camino Real and Hansen Way 310 Notes: 1. Headways during weekday peak periods as of November 2023. 2. Operated by Stanford University. It provides free transportation connections between the Palo Alto Transit Center and the Stanford Research Park in the project vicinity. Weekday Hours of Operation Nearby Bus Stops/Stations Walking Distance from Nearest Stop to Project Site (feet) Item 3 Attachment E: TDM Plan     Packet Pg. 90     3265 El Camino Real Residential Development TDM Plan March 29, 2024 Page | 7 • California Avenue, east of El Camino Real • Margarita Avenue, for the entire street, and • Park Boulevard, between Lambert Avenue and Margarita Avenue. Pedestrian Facilities A complete network of sidewalks is present along the streets in the vicinity of the project site, including El Camino Real, Portage Avenue, Hansen Way, and Lambert Avenue. Crosswalks with pedestrian signal heads are located at the signalized intersections in the project area, except on the south leg of the El Camino Real/Portage Avenue intersection. Overall, the existing network of sidewalks and crosswalks provides pedestrians with safe routes to transit services and other points of interest in the project vicinity. Item 3 Attachment E: TDM Plan     Packet Pg. 91     El Ca m i n o R e a l Park B l v d Ash S t Eme r s o n S t Brya n t S t Ram o n a S t Han sen Wa y Birch S t Gra n t A v e Oliv e A v e Sou t h C t el D o r a d o A v e Aca c i a A v e She r m a n A v e Lam b e r t A v e S C a l i f o r n i a A v e Ma t a d ero A v e She r i d a n A v e Fer n a n d o A v e Ma r g a r i t a A v e Wil t o n A v e Chi m a l u s D r Orind a S t Bar r o n A v e Ken d a l l A v e Cam b r i d g e A v e la Se l v a D r Ram o s W a y Che s t n u t A v e New M a y f i e l d L n el C a r m e l o A v e Wav e r l e y S t Pep p e r A v e High S t Cypr e s s L n Por t a g e A v e Jac a r a n d a L n Jos i n a A v e Colo r a d o A v e Ma t a d e ro A v e Alma S t Birch S t Pag e M i l l R d Park B l v d Sh e r i d a n A v e Ash S t Or e g o n E x p y = Site Location LEGEND = Existing Bike Lanes (Class II Bikeway) = Existing Bike Routes (Class III Bikeway) 3265 El Camino Real Residential Development TDM Plan Figure 4 Existing Bicycle Facilities Item 3 Attachment E: TDM Plan     Packet Pg. 92     3265 El Camino Real Residential Development TDM Plan March 29, 2024 Page | 9 3. Proposed TDM Measures This chapter describes TDM measures that are proposed for the residential project. These TDM measures include planning and design measures related to the attributes of the site location, site design, on-site amenities, and TDM programs. The TDM programs, including services, incentives, and actions, will encourage residents to forego a personal vehicle, lessening the parking demand on site. Table 2 presents a summary of the TDM measures in this plan. An indication of who will have primary responsibility for implementing each measure is also shown on the table. TDM Administration and Promotion Transportation Coordinator The applicant will appoint a Transportation Coordinator who will be the primary contact with the City and will be responsible for implementing and managing the TDM plan. The Transportation Coordinator will be a point of contact for residents/tenants when TDM-related questions arise and will be responsible for ensuring that residents are aware of all transportation options and how to fully utilize the TDM plan. The Transportation Coordinator will provide the following services and functions to ensure the TDM plan runs smoothly: • Provide transportation information brochures to new residents (see Appendix A for example). • Provide trip planning assistance and/or ride-matching assistance to residents who are considering an alternative mode. • Manage resident travel surveys. The results will be used to determine whether the implemented TDM measures are effective and whether new TDM measures should be implemented. Online Transportation Kiosk This TDM plan includes establishing an “online kiosk” with transportation information that residents could access from their smart phones, their homes, or anywhere else. This online kiosk will be available on the project website. By allowing someone to have all the information about transportation alternatives and TDM programs available to them in a single online location, people will be more likely to refer to this information from home. The project developer or property manager will have responsibility for setting up and maintaining this online information center. This website will include the site-specific information about all the measures, services, and facilities discussed in this plan. In addition, this online information center will include: Item 3 Attachment E: TDM Plan     Packet Pg. 93     3265 El Camino Real Residential Development TDM Plan March 29, 2024 Page | 10 • A summary of VTA, Caltrain, and nearby shuttle services and links to further information about their routes and schedules. • Information about ride matching services (511.org and on-site ride matching) and the incentive programs available to carpools and vanpools. • Information about services such as Uber, Lyft, and other on-demand transportation services. • A local bikeways map and bicycling resources on 511.org. • A link to the many other resources available in the Bay Area, such as Dadnab, the 511 Carpool Calculator, the 511 Transit Trip Planner, real-time traffic conditions, etc. • Carshare services, such as Zipcar. The online transportation kiosk will be developed after construction and before occupancy by the property manager. Table 2 TDM Measures and Implementation Responsibilities Transportation Information Brochure The Transportation Coordinator will provide transportation information brochures to all new residents when they first occupy the building and ensure that residents are aware of the programs available to them. This brochure will include information about transit maps/schedules (VTA, Dumbarton Express, Stanford Marguerite Shuttle, and Caltrain), locations of bus stops and Caltrain station, ride matching TDM Measure Implementation Responsibility Program Administration Designating a Transportation Coordinator Property Manager Online Kiosk/TDM Information Board 1 Transportation Coordinator Transportation Information Brochures Transportation Coordinator Participation in Transportation Management Association Building developer Trip Planning Assistance Transportation Coordinator Transit Elements Proximity to Transit Site Location Transit Subsidy Property Manager Resources (schedules, route maps & other info)Transportation Coordinator Ride Matching Programs Ridematching Assistance Transportation Coordinator 511 Ridematching Service Available to public Bicycle Facilities Bicycle Parking Building Developer Shared Electric Cargo Bikes Property Manager Resources (bikeway maps & other info)Transportation Coordinator Other On-Site Amenities Package Room Building developer High-Bandwidth Internet Connection Building developer Unbundled Parking Building developer Notes: 1.The building developer will have initial responsibility for creating an online kiosk and appointing the Transportation Coordinator. After the building is occupied, the Transportation Coordinator will have ongoing responsibility for the online kiosk and various program elements. Item 3 Attachment E: TDM Plan     Packet Pg. 94     3265 El Camino Real Residential Development TDM Plan March 29, 2024 Page | 11 programs (511.org’s RideMatching service, peer-to-peer matching apps, such as Scoop and Waze), 511.org’s carpool/vanpool subsidy program, bike maps, and bicycle parking on-site. Also included in the brochure will be information regarding how to contact the Transportation Coordinator. Trip Planning Resources There are several free trip planning resources that residents may not be aware of. Information on these services will be included in the online kiosk for new residents. These include: • 511 Transit Trip Planner. Online transit trip planning services are available to the greater San Francisco Bay Area through 511.org. Users enter their starting and ending points, and either the desired starting or ending trip time. The service can build an itinerary that best suits the user’s preferences for the fastest trip, fewest transfers, or least walking. • Moovit. A public transit app within the greater San Francisco Bay Area. Users enter their starting and ending points, and the service can build an itinerary that best suits the user’s preferences for the fastest trip, fewest transfers, or least walking. Palo Alto Transportation Management Association (PATMA) The applicant can join the privately funded and administered Palo Alto Transportation Management Association (PATMA). TMAs are associations of businesses, property owners, tenants, and cities that offer programs and services to give commuters alternatives to driving alone. The PATMA reduces traffic and parking demand by improving commuting through free Caltrain and bus passes for workers making less than $70,000 annually, $5 per day Bike Love rewards for biking to work, and subsidized after-work Lyft ride for those commuting less than 5 miles. These programs are offered to all employees within Palo Alto. Transit Elements Proximity to Transit Services The project is located within an easy walking distance (310 feet or 1-minute walk) from the nearby bus stops serving Route 22 and Stanford Shuttle Route SE and within 0.3 mile (about a 7-minute walk) from the remaining bus stops. The hope is that the tenants of the development will mostly be Palo Alto Unified School District (PAUSD) employees. With that in mind, Route 22 serves the PAUSD office and Palo Alto High School on El Camino Real, approximately 1.3 miles northwest of the development (8-12 minutes bus ride from the project site). In addition, there are 3 other district schools and/or district offices that are within 0.5 miles of the bus corridor along El Camino Real and 3 additional district schools and/or district offices that are within 2/3 mile of the bus corridor (see Figure 5).If a majority of tenants are PUSD employees, it is more likely that they would utilize the transit system and forego a personal vehicle. Express Routes 101, 102, 103, 104, and Stanford Shuttle Route RP provide access to the Stanford Research Park and Stanford University. These routes would be convenient for both people who work in the nearby area and for those who want to access the convenient commercial uses. Item 3 Attachment E: TDM Plan     Packet Pg. 95     Palo Alto Stanford Mountain View 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22, 522 22, 522 22, 522 22, 522 22, 522 22, 522 22, 522 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22, 522 101 82 3265 El Camino Real Residential Development TDM Plan Figure 5 Palo Alto Unified School District Sites Alma S t Brya n t S t Cow p e r S t Wav e r l e y S t Loui s R d Pag e M i l l R d Web s t e r S t Oreg o n E x p y Ross R d Midd l e f i e l d R d Sta n f o r d A v e Embarca d e r o R d Footh i l l E x p y E B a y s h o r e R d Ram o n a S t Loma V e r d e A v e Col l e g e A v e Linc o l n A v e Hano v e r S t Miranda Ave E Me a d o w D r Hom e r A v e Color a d o A v e Ara s t r a d e r o R d New e l l R d Low e l l A v e E Char l e s t o n R d Me l v i l l e A v e Serr a S t Barr o n A v e Tenn y s o n A v e Sho w e r s D r High S t N C a l i f o r n i a A v e May b e l l A v e Coyote Hill R d S C a l i f o r n i a A v e Ama r i l l o A v e Fern e A v e Hill v i e w A v e Ham i l t o n A v e Los R o b l e s A v e Wilk i e W a y Mat a d e r o A v e San A n t o n i o R d Porte r D r Mor e n o A v e Han s e n W a y Del M e d i o A v e Los A l t o s A v e Birch S t Harker Ave Bowd o i n S t Gra n t A v e Fulto n S t Madd u x D r Edle e A v e Ken n e t h D r May v i e w A v e Mad r o n o A v e Ilim a W a y Park B l v d Kipli n g S t Pag e M i l l R d Alma S t Channing Ave Eme r s o n S t El Ca m i n o R e a l Palo AltoHigh School/PAUSD Office Escondido Elementary School GunnHigh School FletcherMiddle School BrionesElementarySchool Barron ParkElementarySchool NixonElementarySchool = School Location = Site Location = 1/2 Mile Zone: Bus to School LEGEND = Bus Stop Palo AltoHigh School/PAUSD Office Escondido Elementary School GunnHigh School FletcherMiddle School BrionesElementarySchool Barron ParkElementarySchool NixonElementarySchool = Frequent Bus Route 22 = Rapid Bus Route 522 Lam b e r t A v e Por t a g e A v e Item 3 Attachment E: TDM Plan     Packet Pg. 96     3265 El Camino Real Residential Development TDM Plan March 29, 2024 Page | 13 Subsidized Transit Passes Subsidized transit passes are an effective means of encouraging residents and employees to use transit rather than drive to work. Transit passes allow residents and employees to save money and avoid the stress of driving during commute periods. One element of this TDM plan is to provide residents with free or discounted transit passes to utilize public transit when commuting to and from the project site. The property manager will reimburse up to a combination of 9 monthly transit passes or credits for 9 tenants for the Palo Alto Link described below, based on the 9 fewer parking spaces provided than would be required. These passes typically provide unlimited transit rides on local or regional transit providers for a low monthly fee; a fee that is lower than the individual cost to purchase a pass, since a bulk discount is given. Ride Matching Programs The 511 Merge service provides an interactive, on-demand system that helps commuters find carpools, vanpools, or bicycle partners. This free car and vanpool ride-matching service helps commuters find others with similar routes and travel patterns with whom they may share a ride. Registered users are provided with a list of other commuters near their employment or residential ZIP code, along with the closest cross street, email, phone number, and hours they are available to commute to and from work. Participants are then able to select and contact others with whom they wish to commute. The service also provides a list of existing carpools and vanpools in their residential area that may have vacancies. Ride-matching assistance is also available through a number of peer-to-peer matching programs, such as Scoop and Waze Carpool, which utilize mobile apps to match commuters. These publicly available ride matching services benefit from a large database of commuters and may enable residents to locate people who may not live nearby or work on site but nevertheless share similar commute patterns. Palo Alto Link Palo Alto Link is the City’s rideshare service option. Through an app, users can request a ride through most of the City for a standard fare of $3.50 per trip, with an additional $1.75 per each additional passenger. Youths, seniors, low-income users, and disabled users are able to use the service for a discounted rate of $1.00 per ride. The service provides 10 vehicles to serve the City except for Stanford, areas north of Bayshore, and south of I-280. There is also a Link Pass option of $20 for up to 4 rides per day for 7 days or $65 for up to 4 rides daily for 30 days. The project will provide credit for up to 9 tenants to use the service or transit passes, as described above. Bicycle Facilities Bicycle Parking Providing secure bicycle parking encourages bicycle commuting and reduces the need for a vehicle. The project will provide 44 long-term bike parking spaces to be covered and lockable. The long-term bicycle parking spaces will be located in the eastern section of the site, accessible from El Camino Real and along the southern border of the site. Item 3 Attachment E: TDM Plan     Packet Pg. 97     3265 El Camino Real Residential Development TDM Plan March 29, 2024 Page | 14 Shared Electric Bicycles The project will include at least 2 shared electric bicycles for residents to use to shop at the nearby grocery stores along El Camino Real and California Avenue. The shared bicycles will be located next to the long-term bicycle parking spaces. The shared bicycles will be adequately maintained by the property. The bicycles will be replaced if they are no longer viable. The shared bikes will use a commercial bike sharing system (e.g., On Bike Share or similar) that allows for tenants to sign up using a mobile app, check out a bike, pay-as-you-go, and then return and lock. These systems track usage, location, and return. These systems have racks, locks, and GPS tracking to ensure that tenants avoid misuse via pay-per-use, lock the bikes while in use, and return the bikes when done using. The system will use electronic smart locks mounted to the front of the bike. The smart locks are used to dock the bike to the rack. The smart locks use rechargeable batteries monitored by the software. The bike racks do not require any power or internet. Bicycle Resources As part of the information available in the online kiosk and bike cafe discussed above, resources useful to cyclists will be included. For example, the local bikeways map will be posted for easy reference. The following resources are available to bicycle commuters through 511.org. These resources will be noted on the project’s online information center, in order to make residents aware of them. • Bicycle maps • Bicycle safety tips • Information about taking bikes on public transit • Location and use of bike parking at transit stations • Information on Bike to Work Day • Links to bicycle organizations On-Site Amenities Package Room The project will provide a package area to store residents’ package deliveries. The storage will be located next to the mailbox for easy access by the carriers and the residents. Sufficient package storage space enables residents to make on-line purchases conveniently, which could reduce vehicle ownership. Having goods delivered to residents reduces trips and the need for a vehicle as residents would not have to go off-site to obtain items. Item 3 Attachment E: TDM Plan     Packet Pg. 98     3265 El Camino Real Residential Development TDM Plan March 29, 2024 Page | 15 High-Bandwidth Internet Connection The project will provide high-bandwidth internet capability for residents. Wireless connectivity supports teleworking, which reduces off-site trips to work and the need for a vehicle. Unbundling of On-Site Residential Parking To encourage non-auto transportation methods and to reduce costs for residents, on-site residential parking will be unbundled from each living unit. Unbundled parking means separating the cost of parking from residential leases and allowing residents to choose whether to lease a parking space. This will allow residents without cars to rent a unit without having to pay for a parking spot. Parking spaces will be added to the leases only for tenants who desire parking. Unbundling of parking encourages residents to forego a second car or to have no car at all. Item 3 Attachment E: TDM Plan     Packet Pg. 99     3265 El Camino Real Residential Development TDM Plan March 29, 2024 Page | 16 4. TDM Monitoring and Reporting The purpose of this TDM plan is to reduce the overall parking demand generated by the proposed residential building. The property manager/Transportation Coordinator will be required to submit to the City an annual TDM monitoring report that identifies the TDM plan’s effectiveness at achieving the parking demand reduction. The initial TDM monitoring report for the project will be submitted two years after final occupancy. Subsequent reports will be prepared annually for five years and will be submitted to the City upon request after 5 years. Annual TDM monitoring reports will be prepared by a qualified third-party consultant. At a minimum, the first TDM monitoring report will be prepared by a professional transportation consultant. The property manager/Transportation Coordinator will coordinate with City staff for any additional reporting requirements. Annual resident surveys and parking counts will be conducted to determine the mode split and parking demand among residents and whether the existing TDM measures are effective. The survey will include questions to the residents around their vehicle parking locations and frequency of driving to work in order to determine the parking demand (see Appendix B). There is no required percentage of participation for the survey; however, monitoring reports typically strive for 30% participation. The parking counts will occur at midnight on a typical weekday (Tuesday to Thursday), as most residents would be parked at home during that time. If 100% of the parking spaces are occupied during annual vehicle parking counts, the annual resident survey must include a question to the residents about their vehicle parking locations in order to determine whether spillover parking is occurring. This will be assessed by comparing the parking count/parking demand and parking provided at the site. The goal is to ensure that the parking demand is less than or equal to the parking supply. Additional TDM measures will be necessary if spillover parking occurs. If the report indicates the project is not effective in reducing parking demand, the report will outline additional measures that must be adopted in the coming year to achieve the goal, along with an implementation schedule. The annual report to the City will also include a brief summary of the TDM measures that were in place during the preceding year, with an explanation of any changes or new programs. Item 3 Attachment E: TDM Plan     Packet Pg. 100     Appendix A 3265 El Camino Real Commuter Flier Example Item 3 Attachment E: TDM Plan     Packet Pg. 101     3265 El Camino Real Commuter Resources BICYCLE Secure bicycle storage in the garage Bicycle Resources Bike Love Program - $5 per day Bike to Work Bikes on Transit Palo Alto Bike Map Santa Clara County Bikeways Map San Mateo County Bike Map San Francisco Bay Trail Silicon Valley Bicycle Coalition SERVICES & INCENTIVES Free Guaranteed Ride Home program Free Lyft for Late-Night trips Commute Planning Bay Area Spare the Air Alert Notices CARPOOL & VANPOOL Palo Alto Link – rideshare Carpool Savings Calculator 511 Merge – online carpool matching $500 monthly 511 Vanpool Group Subsidy $400 monthly VTA Vanpool Group Subsidy (combine 511 and VTA vanpool subsidies and receive a $900 monthly group benefit.) TRANSIT & SHUTTLES VTA Caltrain SamTrans Transit Planner Tool Free Transit Passes (income eligible) VTA Bus Routes Route 22 Express Route 101 Express Route 102 Express Route 103 Rapid Route 522 Additional Service Routes Stanford Marguerite SE Dumbarton Express DB Item 3 Attachment E: TDM Plan     Packet Pg. 102     Appendix B Residential Survey Example Item 3 Attachment E: TDM Plan     Packet Pg. 103     1. Do you own/lease a car that is parked at the property? o Yes o No 2. Are you able to always find parking on site? o Yes o No 3. What method of transportation do you typically use to go to work/school? o Car o Bike/Walk o Public Transportation (Bus, Train, Light Rail, etc.) o Carpool/Vanpool o Ride-Share Services (Uber, Lyft, etc.) o I typically work from home or don’t work/go to school o Other (Please Specify) 4. Do you use the free transit pass provided by the property? o Yes o No o Unaware of the transit pass • If No, why not? 5. Do you use the Palo Alto Link and request for credits from the property? o Yes o No o Unaware of the Palo Alto Link • If No, why not? 6. Is there anything preventing you from taking public transportation/Palo Alto Link to work/school? o I already take public transportation o I bike/walk to work/school o There are no public transportation options to/from my work/school o Public transportation takes too long o Other (Please Specify) Item 3 Attachment E: TDM Plan     Packet Pg. 104     Item 3 Attachment F: Agreement with Teacher's Associations     Packet Pg. 105     Item 3 Attachment F: Agreement with Teacher's Associations     Packet Pg. 106     4 0 8 2 Attachment G Project Plans Project plans are available to the public online. Hardcopies of the plans have been provided to Board members. Directions to review Project plans online: 1. Go to: bit.ly/PApendingprojects 2. Scroll down to find “3265 El Camino Real” and click the address link 3. On this project specific webpage you will find a link to the project plans and other important information Direct Link to Project Webpage: https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Current- Planning/Projects/3265-El-Camino Item 3 Attachment G: Project Plans and Environmental Review     Packet Pg. 107     Item No. 4. Page 1 of 8 Architectural Review Board Staff Report From: Planning and Development Services Director Lead Department: Planning and Development Services Meeting Date: April 18, 2024 Report #: 2402-2607 TITLE Study Session to Review the Proposed Ordinance Implementing the Draft North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan (NVCAP) and to Receive Stakeholder Comments on the Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for the Proposed Project. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Architectural Review Board (ARB) conduct a study session to: 1. Review the proposed ordinance, which includes the draft development standards that would apply to projects in the North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan (NVCAP) Area; and 2. Allow for stakeholder comments on the project’s Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (Draft SEIR). EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The focus of this meeting is to discuss and provide informal feedback on the proposed ordinance implementing the NVCAP, which includes development standards that would apply to future projects within the NVCAP area. This meeting also provides an opportunity for the City to receive public comments on the Draft SEIR for the overall project during the public comment period. Following the ARB Study Session, the draft plan and zoning ordinance will be reviewed by the Planning and Transportation Commission (PTC) for recommendation to Council. Following the PTC’s recommendation and publication of a Final SEIR, the project will be reviewed by Council for a final decision. The current draft of the NVCAP is available here for review: www.paloalto.org/nvcap. Attachment A includes the proposed ordinance and Attachment C includes a link to the Draft SEIR. BACKGROUND Item 4 Staff Report     Packet Pg. 108     Item No. 4. Page 2 of 8 On June 1, 20231, the ARB conducted a Study Session review of the May 2023 draft NVCAP. The ARB provided feedback regarding the Draft NVCAP on the aesthetic and design principles that substantially support the Council’s endorsed plan; Council goals and objectives for the plan; and urban design principles. In addition, the ARB formed an Ad Hoc Committee to consider recommendations on bird-safe glass design, daylighting and natural ventilation, and roof design. Comments from the ARB and Ad Hoc have been considered and edits were made to the Draft NVCAP where appropriate. The Draft NVCAP has been revised since the ARB Study Session to streamline and strengthen the content. The March 2024 Draft NVCAP is available here for review: www.paloalto.org/nvcap. A summary of the ARB’s comments and how those were incorporated into the Revised Draft NVCAP is included in Attachment B. The NVCAP, in accordance with PAMC Chapter 19.10, and Comprehensive Plan Policy L-1.7 and Program L-4.10, provides the framework to create a walkable neighborhood with multi-family housing, ground-floor retail, a public park, creek improvements, and an interconnected street grid. The NVCAP is anticipated to be built out over an approximate 20-year period. The NVCAP includes land use policies and programs that would allow up to an additional 530 residential units and approximately two acres of new public open space within the plan area. To accommodate the new residential units and NVCAP programs, the NVCAP anticipates a net decrease of up to 278,000 square feet (sf) of office and up to 7,500 sf of retail through implementation of the plan. Residential densities would range from low to high, allowing for a wide range of multi-family housing typologies and mixed-use typologies. New buildings in the plan area would be, at a maximum, 55 feet in height. The NVCAP would create and enhance well-defined connections to transit, pedestrian, and bicycle facilities, including improved connections to the Caltrain Station, Park Boulevard, and El Camino Real. The NVCAP would maintain the existing vehicular flow on Park Boulevard, Olive Avenue, Acacia Avenue, Pepper Avenue, and Portage Avenue. On Ash Street, implementation of the plan would change this two-way street to a one-way street from Oregon Expressway to Olive Avenue. On Lambert Avenue, the plan proposes to downsize the vehicle travel lane on the north side to create a wider pedestrian thoroughfare. The NVCAP would eliminate portions of on-street parking to create opportunities for new bike lanes on Park Boulevard, Ash Street, Acacia Avenue, Pepper Avenue, and Portage Avenue. Implementation of the NVCAP could create an opportunity for a new bridge spanning approximately 100 feet across Matadero Creek and connecting Portage Avenue to Lambert Avenue. In addition, implementation of the NVCAP could create a fully naturalized Matadero Creek through the establishment of a 100-foot riparian corridor buffer, at maximum, as measured from the centerline of the creek. The plan also includes approximately two acres of public open space within the plan area. Planning Area 1 Link to June 1, 2023 ARB meeting minutes: https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/v/1/agendas- minutes-reports/agendas-minutes/architectural-review-board/2023/arb-approved-minutes-6-1-23.pdf Item 4 Staff Report     Packet Pg. 109     Item No. 4. Page 3 of 8 The NVCAP project area lies within the Ventura neighborhood of Palo Alto. It is comprised of approximately 60 acres, roughly bounded by Page Mill Road, El Camino Real, Lambert Avenue, and the Caltrain tracks. The plan area is near key community destinations such as the California Avenue Caltrain Station, California Avenue Business District, and Stanford Research Park. The plan area represents a rare opportunity within the City to plan proactively for a transit-oriented, mixed-use neighborhood. ANALYSIS The following discussion includes the methodology for the proposed zoning, summary of proposed development standards, and consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. Methodology for Zoning Staff reviewed the endorsed plan and draft NVCAP document to prepare an ordinance to rezone the parcels within the NVCAP and set forth the development standards to guide development within the plan area. Each zoning district within the plan area is identified with the prefix, North Ventura (NV), to clearly identify the NVCAP zoning designations. The new zoning districts acknowledge the unique aspects of the area and reflect the varying residential and mixed-use densities anticipated within the plan area. Table 1 below summarizes the relationship between the NVCAP land use designations and the PAMC zoning district designations. Figure 1 depicts the location and relationship between the proposed zoning districts. Table 1: NVCAP Land Use Designation & PAMC Zoning Designation Crosswalk NVCAP Land Use Classification Anticipated Density (DU/AC) Maximum Height (FT) Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) Allowed Zoning Districts High-Density Mixed-Use 61-100 55 3.0:1 NV-MXH Medium-Density Mixed-Use 31-70 45 2.0:1 NV-MXM Low-Density Mixed-Use 3-17 35 0.5:1 NV-MXL High Density Residential 61-100 61-100 55 55 3.0:1 3.0:1 NV-R4 NV-PF Medium Density Residential 16-30 35 1.5:1 NV-R3 Low Density Residential 1 or 2 units/lot 30 0.45:1 NV-R2 NV-R1 Item 4 Staff Report     Packet Pg. 110     Item No. 4. Page 4 of 8 NVCAP Land Use Classification Anticipated Density (DU/AC) Maximum Height (FT) Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) Allowed Zoning Districts Parks NV-PF Figure 1: NVCAP Proposed PAMC Zoning Designation Map Staff notes that the figures above reflect the future vision for the entire NVCAP area. However, in accordance with the Development Agreement, areas that were rezoned to Planned Community in accordance with the Sobrato Development Agreement will not be rezoned as part of the adoption of this ordinance. Council may consider rezoning and redesignating these parcels once the Development Agreement has expired. Zoning Districts and Development Standards To create the development standards for each of the new zoning districts, staff reviewed comparable existing zoning districts. Development standards and permitted uses within each of the zone districts were adjusted to align with NVCAP's goals, including the addition of 530 net new dwelling units. These adjustments primarily focused on density, FAR, height limits, and Item 4 Staff Report     Packet Pg. 111     Item No. 4. Page 5 of 8 setback requirements. To eliminate duplicate information, staff incorporated existing regulations by reference for any development standards identical to other Code sections. Only unique standards specific to the new NV zoning districts are included. Table 2 compares NV zoning districts with existing comparable zoning districts. Table 2: Comparable Zoning Districts Proposed NVCAP Zoning District Existing Comparable Zoning District NV-R1 NV-R2 R-1, R-2 NV-R3 RM-30 NV-R4 RM-40 NV-MXL NV-MXM NV-MXH RM-30, RM-40 for residential; Primarily CS and CN for non-residential Density To establish appropriate density for the NVCAP plan, staff used a one-acre lot as the base to calculate density for each land use designation. Several factors were considered in the density calculation, including building height directed by City Council, NVCAP land use designations, and an average unit size of 1,250 square feet to promote diversity in unit sizes within the plan area. Staff employed different FAR levels to determine the maximum building size on a one-acre site. Staff then used the average unit size to arrive at a density appropriate for each zoning district. The goal was to utilize typical building typologies to achieve the designated densities within each land use. For the NV-MXL zone, which applies only to three properties in the plan area, the focus was on maintaining existing building sizes and ensuring smooth transitions to neighboring properties. Summary of Proposed NVCAP Zoning Chapter Staff proposes creating a new chapter in PAMC to house NVCAP-specific development standards and requirements. The chapter mirrors other zoning designation chapters, with dedicated sections for applicability, zoning districts, definitions, permitted uses, development standards, parking and loading, and special requirements. In addition to typical development standards, the NVCAP ordinance includes special requirements specific to the plan area, including office use restrictions, storefront guidelines, ground floor commercial use, and the NV district's housing incentive program. The NVCAP housing incentive program applies to housing projects where all units are affordable. These projects are defined as “a multiple-family housing or mixed-use project in which all residential units are affordable, as defined in Section 16.65.020. The units must be available only to households with income levels at or below 120% of the area median income (as defined in Section 16.65.020), and the average household income cannot exceed 60% of the area median income level, except for a building manager's unit.” Height increases greater than the maximum Item 4 Staff Report     Packet Pg. 112     Item No. 4. Page 6 of 8 allowed per zoning district would be permitted for housing incentive program projects within the plan area. The draft ordinance also references the NVCAP document for several items, including the designated location of required and encouraged ground floor uses, requirements for active ground floor uses, specific site and building design requirements in Chapter 6, and public realm improvements. Both the NVCAP and the NVCAP zoning ordinance are intended to be used together when designing or reviewing development proposals in the plan area. Relationship to the Housing Element The Housing Element is one of seven mandatory elements within the Palo Alto Comprehensive Plan, which assesses the condition of the City's current housing and future needs of its residents through citywide housing goals, objectives, and policies. The City is required to update the Housing Element every eight years. The City adopted the 2023-2031 Housing Element in May 2023. A revised Housing Element was considered by Planning and Transportation Commission and City Council at a joint meeting on April 15, 2024. The Housing Element includes the housing needs assessment, resources and inventory of potential housing sites, housing constraints, and housing element programs or implementation actions. The Housing Element identifies a total of 300 potential housing opportunity sites. Of the total, 17 housing opportunity sites are located within the NVCAP. The Housing Element estimated that the development capacity for these 17 sites would yield over 300 dwelling units. In January 2024, an ordinance implementing Housing Element Program 1.1A and 1.1B became effective, rezoning housing opportunity sites for consistency with the Housing Element. The zoning changes apply to multi-family, commercial, and industrial zoning to accommodate greater housing production, including within the NVCAP. This includes modification of development standards to increase density and height. For housing opportunity sites, the proposed NVCAP development standards generally have more permissive standards compared to development standards from the January 2024 rezoning. Therefore, applying NVCAP development standards to housing opportunity sites within the plan area would not hinder achieving the densities projected in the Housing Element. In addition, the proposed ordinance updates Chapter 18.14 (Housing Incentives) to include the new NV districts and incorporate the few areas where the January 2024 rezoning was more permissive. Compliance with Comprehensive Plan, Area Plans and Guidelines The draft plan implements Comprehensive Plan Program L.4.10.1, which directs staff to prepare a coordinated area plan for the North Ventura area and surrounding California Avenue area. Program L.4.10.1 outlines that the plan should describe a vision for the future of the North Ventura area as a walkable neighborhood with multi-family housing, ground floor retail, a public park, creek improvements and an interconnected street grid. Pipeline Projects Item 4 Staff Report     Packet Pg. 113     Item No. 4. Page 7 of 8 Since the onset of the NVCAP project, property owners have been allowed to submit development applications consistent with the existing zoning code. Notable projects submitted and entitled since the NVCAP initiation include 3001 El Camino Real2, 3200 Park Boulevard3, and 3241 Park Blvd4. These projects are considered “pipeline projects” or projects that do not have to be consistent with the NVCAP due to the submittal of a complete planning entitlement application prior to the adoption of the NVCAP and its associated implementing zoning code amendments. Next Steps Staff will consider and include ARB comments on the draft NVCAP zoning ordinance and on the draft NVCAP, where feasible. The draft NVCAP and associated zoning ordinance will be forwarded to the PTC for consideration in May. The City Council hearing to take action on the plan and the SEIR is tentatively scheduled for June 2024. STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT Consistent with PAMC Chapter 19.10, the City Council appointed a 14-member working group. The working group met 17 times over the course of two years and concluded their effort once alternatives were forwarded to the PTC and City Council for consideration. Notifications throughout the process have been sent to the working group, stakeholders and property owners. The City maintains a project website with archives of working group, workshops and public hearing materials related to the NVCAP. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the City of Palo Alto, acting as the lead agency, released a Notice of Availability (NOA) of a Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (Draft SEIR) for the proposed project on March 8, 2024 for a 45-day public comment period that ends on Monday April 22, 2024. This hearing provides an opportunity for public comment during the Draft SEIR comment period. However, comments may also be provided in writing at any point during the comment period. Responses to comments on the Draft SEIR will be integrated into the Final Supplemental EIR (Final SEIR) for Council’s consideration prior to taking action on the environmental analysis and the proposed project. The Draft SEIR found that the impacts related to biological resources, archaeological resources, noise, and tribal cultural resources could be significant but mitigatable to less than significant. Impacts to historical resources would be significant and unavoidable because the project would involve modifications to an historic resource eligible for the California Register of Historic 2 3001 El Camino Real: a 100% affordable housing project with 129 units. https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/News- Articles/Planning-and-Development-Services/30013017-El-Camino-Real 3 200 Portage: a project including partial demolition of cannery, construction of 74 dwelling units and renovation of cannery into research & development space with associated Development Agreement. https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/News-Articles/Planning-and-Development-Services/200-Portage-Avenue 4 3241 Park Blvd: a new 7,861 square foot office building. https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/Departments/Planning- Development-Services/Current-Planning/Projects/3241-Park-Boulevard Item 4 Staff Report     Packet Pg. 114     Item No. 4. Page 8 of 8 Resources in a manner that would not be consistent with the Secretary of the Interiors Standards. Buildout of the NVCAP, on a plan level, would have a significant and unavoidable criteria air pollutant emissions impact because the increase in population would be exceeded by the increase in VMT and daily trips. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS No action is required. ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: Draft NV Zoning District Regulations Attachment B: NVCAP Comments from ARB and Staff Response Attachment C: link to the Draft SEIR AUTHOR/TITLE: Kelly Cha, Senior Planner Item 4 Staff Report     Packet Pg. 115     ATTACHMENT F SECTION 1. Chapter 18.29 (North Ventura (NV) District Regulations) of Title 18 (Zoning) of the Palo Alto Municipal Code is added to read as follows: CHAPTER 18.29 NORTH VENTURA (NV) DISTRICT REGULATIONS 18.29.010 Purpose 18.29.020 Applicability of Regulations 18.29.030 Zoning Districts 18.29.040 Definitions 18.29.050 Permitted Uses 18.29.060 Development Standards 18.29.070 Parking and Loading 18.29.080 Context-Based Design Criteria and Objective Design Standards 18.29.090 Housing Incentive Programs for NV District 18.29.010 Purpose The purpose of the North Ventura district is to implement the vision and framework of the North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan (NVCAP) through use regulations and development standards. 18.29.020 Applicability of Regulations (a) The North Ventura districts shall apply to properties within the NVCAP and designated as North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan within the Palo Alto Comprehensive Plan. Where designated, the regulations set forth in this chapter shall apply in lieu of the comparable provisions established by the underlying zoning district regulations. (b) Refer to the NVCAP for design guidelines related to streets and buildings in conjunction with the regulations contained within this chapter. 18.29.030 Zoning Districts The North Ventura districts shall apply to properties designated on the zoning map by the symbol “NV” in front of the zoning district designation. The following zoning districts are intended to create and maintain sites for residential, commercial and mixed-use sites: (a) Single Family Residential District (NV-R1) The NV-R1 single family residential district is intended to create, preserve, and enhance areas suitable for detached dwellings with a strong presence of nature and with open area affording maximum privacy and opportunities for outdoor living and children’s play. Minimum site area requirements are established to create and preserve variety among neighborhoods, to provide adequate open area, and to encourage quality design. Accessory dwelling units, junior accessory dwelling units and accessory structures or Item 4 Attachment A: DRAFT NV Zoning District Regulations     Packet Pg. 116     buildings are appropriate. Community uses and facilities are allowed to the extent no net loss of housing would result. (b) Two Family Residential District (NV-R2) The NV-R2 two-family residential district is intended to allow a second dwelling unit, under the same ownership as the initial dwelling unit, in areas designated for single-family use or NVCAP by the Palo Alto Comprehensive Plan, under regulations that preserve the essential character of single-family use. Community uses and facilities are allowed to the extent no net loss of housing would result. (c) Medium Density Multiple-Family Residential District (NV-R3) The NV-R3 medium density multiple-family residential district is intended to create, preserve and enhance neighborhoods for multiple-family housing with better transition to lower density residential districts. Projects at this density are intended for larger parcels that will enable developments to provide their own parking spaces and to meet their open space needs in the form of garden apartments or cluster developments. While there is no maximum density in the NV-R3 residential district, the NVCAP anticipates realistic development yields ranging from 16 to 30 dwelling units per acre based on the applicable development standards. (d) High Density Multiple-Family Residential District (NV-R4) The NV-R4 high density multiple-family residential district is intended to create, preserve and enhance locations for apartment living at the highest density deemed appropriate for Palo Alto. The most suitable locations for this district are along major transportation corridors which are close to mass transportation facilities and major employment and service centers. While there is no maximum density in the NV-R4 residential district, the NVCAP anticipates realistic development yields ranging from 61 to 100 dwelling units per acre based on the applicable development standards. (e) Low Density Mixed-Use District (NV-MXL) The purpose of the NV-MXL district is to allow for small-scale commercial and services with limited amount of residential that is compatible with the surrounding development. While there is no maximum density in the NV-MXL district, the NVCAP anticipates realistic development yields ranging from three to 17 dwelling units per acre. (f) Medium Density Mixed-Use District (NV-MXM) The purpose of the NV-MXM district is to allow for a compatible mix of residential and limited commercial. While there is no maximum density in the NV-MXM district, the NVCAP anticipates realistic development yields ranging from 31 to 70 dwelling units per acre (g) High Density Mixed-Use District (NV-MXH) The purpose of the NV-MXH district is to allow for a mix of retail, restaurant, entertainment and commercial uses on the ground floor with residential on the upper floors, while maintaining a pedestrian- oriented streetscape. It is intended that the active ground floor retail space required will ensure neighborhood-oriented retail and services are provided within walking distance of high density residential. Ground floor active uses are required along El Camino Real. While no maximum density in the Item 4 Attachment A: DRAFT NV Zoning District Regulations     Packet Pg. 117     NV-MXH district, the NVCAP anticipates realistic development yields ranging from 61 to 100 dwelling units per acre. (h) Public Facilities District (NV-PF) The NV-PF public facilities district is designed to accommodate governmental, public utility, educational, and community service or recreational facilities. Within the North Ventura area, an approximate one-acre portion of the NV-PF district may permit a 100% affordable housing project. 18.29.040 Definitions For the purposes of this chapter, the following definitions shall apply: (a) "100% affordable housing project" means a multiple-family housing or mixed-use project in which the residential component consists entirely of affordable units offered at affordable rents or affordable sales prices, as defined in Section 16.65.020, and, for rental projects, where the average household income does not exceed 60% of the area median income level, except for a building manager's unit. (b) “Street yard” means a yard adjoining a street lot line and may also be a front lot line. 18.29.050 Permitted Uses (a) The uses of land allowed by this chapter in each zoning district are identified in the following tables. Land uses that are not listed in the tables are not allowed, except where otherwise noted. Where the last column on the following tables ("Subject to Regulations in") includes a section number, specific regulations in the referenced section also apply to the use; however, provisions in other sections not specifically referenced may apply as well. TABLE 1: PERMITTED AND CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USES P = Permitted Use CUP = Conditional Use Permit Required TUP = Temporary Use Permit Required — = Not Permitted Item 4 Attachment A: DRAFT NV Zoning District Regulations     Packet Pg. 118     ATTACHMENT F LAND USE NV- R1 NV- R2 NV- R3 NV- R4 NV- MXL (1)(5) NV- MXM (5) NV- MXH NV- PF Subject to Regulations In: ACCESSORY AND SUPPORT USES Accessory facilities and activities customarily associated with or essential to permitted uses, and operated incidental to the principal use. P P P P P P P —18.40 Accessory facilities and uses customarily incidental to permitted uses with more than two plumbing fixtures (but with no kitchen), and more than 200 square feet in size, but excluding second dwelling units CUP ———————18.12.080 Accessory facilities and uses customarily incidental to permitted uses (no limit on number of plumbing fixtures) —P ——————18.10.080 Accessory Dwelling Unit & Junior Accessory Dwelling Unit when accessory to primary and permitted residential use P P P P P P P —18.09 Home Occupations, when accessory to permitted residential use P P P P P P P P 18.42 Horticulture, Gardening, and P P P P P P P — Item 4 Attachment A: DRAFT NV Zoning District Regulations     Packet Pg. 119     LAND USE NV- R1 NV- R2 NV- R3 NV- R4 NV- MXL (1)(5) NV- MXM (5) NV- MXH NV- PF Subject to Regulations In: Growing of food products for consumption by occupants of a site EDUCATIONAL, RELIGIOUS, AND ASSEMBLY USES Private Clubs, Lodges, or Fraternal Organizations, excluding any such facility operated as a business for profit ———CUP CUP ——— Private Educational Facilities CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP P P — Religious Institutions CUP CUP CUP CUP P P P — OFFICE USES(2) Administrative Office Services ————P P P —18.29.050(a) Medical Offices ————P P P —18.29.050(a) Professional and General Business Offices ————P P P —18.29.050(a) PUBLIC/QUASI- PUBLIC USES Community Centers CUP CUP CUP CUP ———— Utility Facilities essential to provision of utility services but excluding construction or storage yards, maintenance facilities, or corporation yards. CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP — RECREATION USES Neighborhood Recreational Centers ——CUP CUP ———CUP (3) Commercial Recreation ————CUP CUP CUP CUP (3) Item 4 Attachment A: DRAFT NV Zoning District Regulations     Packet Pg. 120     LAND USE NV- R1 NV- R2 NV- R3 NV- R4 NV- MXL (1)(5) NV- MXM (5) NV- MXH NV- PF Subject to Regulations In: Outdoor Recreation Services CUP CUP CUP CUP —CUP CUP CUP (3) Youth Clubs ———————CUP (3) RESIDENTIAL USES Single-Family P P —————— Two-Family P P ——————18.42.180 Multiple-Family ——P P P P P P(4) Residential Care Homes P P P P P P P — RETAIL USES Eating and Drinking Services, except drive-in and take- out services ——P P P P P CUP (3) 18.40.160, 18.29.050(c) Personal Services and Retail Services of a neighborhood- serving nature ——P P P P P CUP (3) 18.40.160, 18.29. 050(c) Liquor stores —————P P —18.40.160, 18.29. 050(c) SERVICE USES Animal Care, excluding boarding and kennels ————P P P —18.29. 050(c) Convalescent Facilities ———CUP P P P — Day Care Centers CUP CUP CUP P P P P —18.40.160 Large Family Day Care Homes P P P P P P P P(3) Small Family Day Care Homes P P P P P P P P(3) Large Adult Day Care Homes CUP CUP P P P P P P(3) Small Adult Day Care Homes P P P P P P P P(3) Financial Services ————P P P —18.29.050(a) 18.29.060(b) General Business Services ————P P P —18.29. 050(a) 18.29.060(b) Hotels —————P P —18.40.160, 18.16.060(d) Personal Services ————P P P —18.40.160, 18.29. 050(c) Item 4 Attachment A: DRAFT NV Zoning District Regulations     Packet Pg. 121     LAND USE NV- R1 NV- R2 NV- R3 NV- R4 NV- MXL (1)(5) NV- MXM (5) NV- MXH NV- PF Subject to Regulations In: 18.29.060(b) AGRICULTURAL AND OPEN SPACE USES Park uses and uses incidental to park operation ———————P All facilities owned or leased, and operated or used, by the City of Palo Alto, the County of Santa Clara, the State of California, the government of the United States, the Palo Alto Unified School District, or any other governmental agency, or leased by any such agency to another party ———————P Community Centers ———————CUP (3) Utility Facilities ———————CUP TEMPORARY USES Temporary Uses ——TUP TUP —18.42.050 Farmer’s Markets —————CUP CUP — Temporary Parking Facilities, provided that such facilities shall remain no more than five years —————CUP CUP CUP (3) Notes: (1) For NV-MXL zoning district, the total floor area of non-residential uses permitted and conditionally permitted on a lot shall not exceed 5,000 square feet. (2) For office uses, total floor area of permitted office uses on a lot shall not exceed 5,000 square feet. (3) Provided such use is conducted on property owned by the City of Palo Alto, the County of Santa Clara, the State of California, the government of the United States, the Palo Alto Unified School District, or any other governmental agency, and leased for said uses. (4) Only a 100% Affordable Housing Project is permitted. Development shall follow NV-R4 standards. Item 4 Attachment A: DRAFT NV Zoning District Regulations     Packet Pg. 122     LAND USE NV- R1 NV- R2 NV- R3 NV- R4 NV- MXL (1)(5) NV- MXM (5) NV- MXH NV- PF Subject to Regulations In: (5) Ground floor uses shall comply with the ground floor edge framework set forth in NVCAP section 2.3. (a) Office Use Restrictions (1) Conversion of Ground Floor Housing and Non-Office Commercial to Office Medical, Professional, and Business offices shall not be located on the ground floor, unless any of the following apply to such offices: (A) Have been continuously in existence in that space since DATE OF ADOPTION OF NVCAP, and as of such date, were neither non-conforming nor in the process of being amortized pursuant to Chapter 18.30(I); (B) Occupy a space that was not occupied by housing, neighborhood business service, retail services, personal services, eating and drinking services, or automotive service on DATE OF ADOPTION OF NVCAP or thereafter; (C) Occupy a space that was vacant on DATE OF ADOPTION OF NVCAP; or (D) Are located in new or remodeled ground floor area built on or after DATE OF ADOPTION OF NVCAP if the ground floor area devoted to housing, retail services, eating and drinking services, and personal services does not decrease. (E) Along El Camino Real, the office use has a consistent flow of in-person customers visiting the business, such as a dentist or medical office. (2) Size Restrictions on Office Uses in the NV District (A) Total floor area of permitted office uses on a lot shall not exceed 5,000 square feet. (b) Late Night Use and Activities (1) Retail (including restaurants) or service commercial businesses abutting or within 50 feet of residentially zoned properties or properties with existing residential uses located within nonresidential zones, that are open or with operations or activities between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. shall be operated in a manner to protect residential properties from excessive noise, odors, lighting or other nuisances from any sources during those hours. (2) Where planning or building permits are required or for a change in use that results in any such commercial business in the NV-MXM and NV-MXH zoning districts, operating or with activities between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m., a conditional use permit shall be obtained and conditions of approval shall be applied as deemed necessary to ensure the operation is compatible with the abutting (or within 50 feet of) residential property. Said use permit shall be limited to operations or activities occurring between 10:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. (3) Truck deliveries shall not occur before 6:00 a.m. or after 10:00 p.m., except pursuant to the provisions of a conditional use permit. Item 4 Attachment A: DRAFT NV Zoning District Regulations     Packet Pg. 123     (c) Active Ground Floor Commercial Uses The NVCAP requires active ground floor uses along the El Camino Real corridor and encourages active ground floor uses on other designated streets. Active uses are activities and functions that promote social engagement, vitality, and interaction within a community. Refer to NVCAP, Section 2.3 for detailed requirements. (1) Active ground floor commercial uses generally include retail, personal services, neighborhood business service, and eating and drinking establishments. These may also include other active uses such as daycare, building lobbies, spaces accessory to residential uses such as fitness rooms, workspaces, leasing offices, bicycle facilities (Class I) with direct access to the sidewalk. Office uses may be included only to the extent they are permitted in ground floor regulations, are consistent with 18.29.080(a) and have a regular flow of in-person customers. (2) Ground floor commercial uses are required for properties with frontage along El Camino Real, as shown in the NVCAP Section 2.3 (Ground Floor Edges) (3) Ground floor commercial uses shall have a minimum floor to ceiling height of 14 feet. (4) Retail or retail-like at the ground floor is required at the intersections of El Camino Real and Olive Avenue, and El Camino Real and Portage Avenue. (5) 100% affordable housing projects are exempt from providing ground floor commercial uses. 18.29.060 Development Standards (a) The following tables specify the development standards that shall apply to NV district properties. Where the last column on the following tables ("Subject to Regulations in") includes a section number, specific regulations in the referenced section also apply to the development standard; however, provisions in other sections may apply as well. TABLE 1: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT STANDARD NV-R1 NV-R2 Subject to Regulations In: Minimum Setbacks Setback lines imposed by a special setback map pursuant to Chapter 20.08 of this code may also apply 18.10.050 Street yard (ft)Pepper Ave: 12.5’ to create a 12’ effective sidewalk width (1) Olive Ave: 12.5’ 18.29.020(b) Parking None None 18.29.070 Other development standards See regulations in Chapter 18.12 See regulations in Chapter 18.10 Notes: Item 4 Attachment A: DRAFT NV Zoning District Regulations     Packet Pg. 124     DEVELOPMENT STANDARD NV-R1 NV-R2 Subject to Regulations In: (1) The effective sidewalk width includes the pedestrian clear zone and landscape/furniture zone as described in PAMC 18.24.020. TABLE 2: MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL & MUTLI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT STANDARD NV-R3 NV-R4 Subject to Regulations In: Minimum Site Specifications Site Area (ft2) Site Width (ft) Site Depth (ft) 8,500 70 100 Minimum Setbacks Street Yard (ft)Park Blvd.: 20’ Ash St: 5’ Acacia Ave: 5’ Portage Ave: 5’ Park Blvd.: 20’ Olive Ave.: 20’ Ash St.: 5’ Page Mill Rd: sufficient to create a 12’ effective sidewalk width(2)(3) 18.29.020(b) Interior Side Yards (ft)5’5’ Interior Rear Yards (ft)10’10’ Build-to-Lines 50% of frontage built to setback(1) 33% of side street built to setback(1) Maximum Height (ft) Standard 35’55’18.29.100 Portions of a site within 50 feet of a more restrictive residential district or a site containing a residential use in a nonresidential district (measured from property lines) 35’ Daylight Plane For lot lines abutting one or more residential zoning districts or lots bigger than 10,000 ft2 18.24.050(b) For lots smaller than 10,000 ft2 None None Maximum Lot Coverage (%) Base 40 45 Additional area permitted to be covered by covered patios or overhangs otherwise in compliance with all applicable laws 5 5 Item 4 Attachment A: DRAFT NV Zoning District Regulations     Packet Pg. 125     DEVELOPMENT STANDARD NV-R3 NV-R4 Subject to Regulations In: Floor Area Ratio (FAR) Maximum Residential FAR 1.5:1 3.0:1 Maximum Non-residential FAR 0.15:1 0.15:1 18.29.050(c) Total Mixed-Use FAR 1.5:1 3.0:1 Residential Density (net units per acre) Maximum units per acre None None Minimum units per acre 16 61 Minimum Landscape/Open Space Coverage (%) 30(4)None Minimum Usable Open Space (ft2 per unit) 150 150 Minimum Common Open Space (ft2 per unit) 75 75 Minimum Private Open Space (ft2 per unit) 50 50 Landscape Requirements 18.40.130 Parking None None 18.29.070 Notes: (1) 25-foot driveway access permitted regardless of frontage. (2) No parking or loading space, whether required or optional, shall be located in the first 10 feet adjoining the street property line of any required yard. (3) Any minimum front, street side, or interior yard shall be planted and maintained as a landscaped screen excluding areas required for access to the site. A solid wall or fence between 5 and 8 feet in height shall be constructed along any common interior lot line. (4) Landscape coverage may be provided above the ground-floor. TABLE 3: MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT STANDARD NV-MXL NV-MXM NV-MXH Subject to Regulations In: Minimum Site Specifications Site Area (ft2) Site Width (ft) Site Depth (ft) None Required Not required Minimum Setbacks Street Yard (ft)Ash St.: 5’ Olive Ave.: 12.5’ Portage Ave: 0’ Pepper Ave: 12.5’ El Camino Real: 5’ Oregon/Page Mill Rd: 5‘ Pepper: 12.5’ Park Blvd: 5’ El Camino Real: sufficient to create a 12’ effective sidewalk width(1)(2) 18.29.020(b) Item 4 Attachment A: DRAFT NV Zoning District Regulations     Packet Pg. 126     DEVELOPMENT STANDARD NV-MXL NV-MXM NV-MXH Subject to Regulations In: Olive Ave (North side): 12.5’ Olive Ave (South side): 10’ Ash St: 5’ Park Blvd: 20’ Lambert Ave: 5’ Portage Ave: 5’ Acacia Ave: 5’ Oregon Expy/Page Mill Rd: sufficient to create a 12’ effective sidewalk(1)(2) Lambert Ave: 5’ Acacia Ave: 5’ Portage Ave: 5’ Build-to-Lines None For properties abutting El Camino Real: 50% of frontage built to setback(1) 33% of side street built to setback(1) Rear Yard (ft)10’10’ for residential portion/ none for commercial portion 10’ for residential portion/ none for commercial portion Rear Yard abutting residential zone district (ft) 10’10’10’ Interior Side Yard (ft)10’5’5’ Build-to-lines None Required Permitted Setback Encroachments Balconies, awnings, porches, stairways, and similar elements may extend up to 6 ft into the setback. Cornices, eaves, fireplaces, and similar architectural features (excluding flat or continuous walls or enclosures of interior space) may extend up to four (4) ft into the front and rear setbacks and up to three (3) ft into interior side setbacks Maximum Setback (ft)Not applicable El Camino Real: 10’ El Camino Real: 10’ Maximum Lot Coverage (%) 50 100 100 Minimum Landscape/Open Space Coverage (%) 20 5 None Usable Open Space (Private and/or Common) (ft2) 150 per unit 18.16.090 Item 4 Attachment A: DRAFT NV Zoning District Regulations     Packet Pg. 127     DEVELOPMENT STANDARD NV-MXL NV-MXM NV-MXH Subject to Regulations In: Maximum Height (ft)18.29.100 Standard 35’45’55’ Ground Floor Height 14’18.29.050(c) Portions of a site within 150 ft of an abutting residential zoning district (measured from property line)(3) Not applicable 45’Not Applicable Daylight Plane for lot lines abutting one or more residential zoning districts 18.24.050(b) Residential Density (net units per acre) Maximum units per acre None Minimum units per acre 3 31 61 Floor Area Ratio (FAR) Maximum Residential FAR 0.5:1 2.0:1 3.0:1 Maximum Non- residential FAR(4) 0.25:1 0.25:1 0.25:1 18.29.050(c) 18.29.060(c) Minimum Mixed-Use Ground Floor Commercial FAR 0.15:1 0.15:1 0.15:1 18.29.050(c) Total Mixed-Use FAR 0.5:1(4)2.0:1 3.0:1 Parking 18.29.070 Notes: (1) No parking or loading space, whether required or optional, shall be located in the first 10 feet adjoining the street property line of any required yard. (2) Any minimum front, street side, or interior yard shall be planted and maintained as a landscaped screen excluding areas required for access to the site. A solid wall or fence between 5 and 8 feet in height shall be constructed along any common interior lot line. (3) The 150-foot measurement may be reduced to 50 feet at minimum, subject to approval by the Planning Director, upon recommendation by the Architectural Review Board pursuant to criteria set forth in Chapter 18.76. (4) As provided in 18.29.060(c), maximum FAR for hotels shall be 2.0:1. Hotel projects in the NV-MXL zone may reach a Total Mixed-Use FAR of 2.0:1. TABLE 4: PUBLIC FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS(1) Item 4 Attachment A: DRAFT NV Zoning District Regulations     Packet Pg. 128     DEVELOPMENT STANDARD NV-PF Subject to Regulations In: Minimum Setbacks Street Yard (ft)Portage Ave: 0’ Park Blvd: 20’ Lambert Ave: 5’ 18.29.020(b) Rear Yard (ft)10’18.40.140 Side Yard (ft)5’ Maximum Site Coverage (%) Multiple-Family Residential Use Other Uses 100 20 Minimum Landscape/Open Space Coverage (%) Multiple-Family Residential Use Other Uses 0 Not applicable Usable Open Space (Private and/or Common) (ft2) Multiple-Family Residential Use 150 per unit Maximum Height (ft) Multiple-Family Residential Use Other Uses 55’ 18.29.100 Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) Multiple-Family Residential Use Other Uses 3.0:1 1.0:1 Parking 18.29.070 Notes: (1) Residential standards in this table shall only be applicable to 100% Affordable Housing Projects. For standards not listed in Table 4 for 100% Affordable Housing Projects in NV-PF, refer to applicable NV- R4 development standards in PAMC 18.29.060, Table 2. (b) Storefront Guidelines Where active use and retail frontages are required or located within the NV district on the ground floor, the following design standards shall apply: (1) Exterior windows on the ground floor shall use transparent glazing to the extent feasible. Low-e glass or minimal tinting to achieve sun control is permitted, so long as the glazing appears transparent when viewed from the ground level. (2) Window coverings are not permitted on the ground floor during typical business hours. Where operations preclude transparency (e.g., theaters) or where privacy requires window coverings, sidewalk- facing frontage shall include items of visual interest including displays of merchandise or artwork; visual access shall be provided to a minimum depth of three (3) feet. (3) The building facade shall not dedicate more than 10% of its frontage, and no more than 25 feet in width, to mechanical equipment rooms, parking garage entrances, exit stairs, and other facilities necessary for building operation. (c) Hotel Regulations Item 4 Attachment A: DRAFT NV Zoning District Regulations     Packet Pg. 129     (1) The purpose of these regulations is to allow floor area for development of hotels more than floor area limitations for other commercial uses, to provide a visitor-serving use that results in an enhanced business climate, increased transient occupancy tax and sales tax revenue, and other community and economic benefits to the city. (2) Hotels, where they are a permitted use, may develop to a maximum FAR of 2.0:1, subject to the following limitations: (A) The hotel use must generate transient occupancy tax (TOT) as provided in Chapter 2.33 of the Palo Alto Municipal Code; and (B) No room stays more than thirty days are permitted, except where the city council approves longer stays through an enforceable agreement with the applicant to provide for compensating revenues. (3) Hotels may include residential condominium use, subject to: (A) No more than twenty-five percent (25%) of the floor area shall be devoted to condominium use; and (B) No more than twenty-five percent (25%) of the total number of lodging units shall be devoted to condominium use; and (C) A minimum FAR of 1.0 shall be provided for the hotel/condominium building(s); and (D) Where residential condominium use is proposed, room stays for other hotel rooms shall not exceed thirty (30) days. (4) Violation of this chapter is subject to enforcement action for stays more than thirty days not permitted under the provisions of this chapter, in which case each day of room stay more than thirty days shall constitute a separate violation and administrative penalties shall be assessed pursuant to Chapters 1.12 and 1.16. 18.29.070 Parking and Loading In accordance with Assembly Bill 2097 (2022), no minimum automobile parking is required for properties within the NV Districts except for projects including transient lodging. There are no maximum parking standards. Standards for transient lodging and other parking standards, such as bicycle parking, and parking design standards are contained within PAMC Chapters 18.52 and 18.54. 18.29.080 Context-Based Design Criteria and Objective Design Standards In addition to the development standards prescribed in 18.29.050, all Housing Development Projects shall comply with the objective standards outlined in Chapter 18.24, as defined herein. All other developments, and Housing Development Projects that elect to deviate from one or more objective design standards in Chapter 18.24, shall meet the Context Based Design Criteria, as determined by the Director pursuant to the Architectural Review process. (a) Multiple Family Context-Based Design Criteria Refer to Section 18.13.060 for the Context Based Design Criteria. Item 4 Attachment A: DRAFT NV Zoning District Regulations     Packet Pg. 130     (b) Mixed-Use and Commercial Context-Based Design Criteria Refer to Section 18.16.090 for the Context Based Design Criteria. 18.29.090 Housing Incentive Programs for NV District (a) Housing development projects in the NV Districts may utilize any Housing Incentive Program or Affordable Housing Incentive Program set forth in Sections 18.14.030 and 18.14.040, subject to the following restrictions: (1) Maximum Height. The maximum height for a 100% affordable housing project shall not exceed 68 feet in the NV-MXL and NV-R3 districts, 78 feet in the NV-MXM district, and 88 feet in the NV- R4 and NV-MXH districts. SECTION 2. Table 1 of Section 18.14.020 (Housing Element Opportunity Sites) of Chapter 18.14 (Housing Incentives) of Title 18 (Zoning) of the Palo Alto Municipal Code is amended to read as follows (additions underlined): Table 1 Housing Element Opportunity Site Development Standards (Residential and Commercial Mixed Use Districts) Maximum Far(1)Minimum Landscape Coverage Residential Density (du/ac)(4) Other Development Standards Base Zoning District Residential Total Minimum Maximum CC(2)1.5 2.0 (3)20 CC 1.25 1.25 (3)20 CS (El Camino Real) 1.25 1.25 (3)20 See base district regulation s: 18.16.0 60 CS (Other)1.25 1.25 (3)20 See HE Appendix D CN (El Camino Real) 1.25 1.25 30%(3)20 See base district regulation s: 18.16.0 60 See base district regulations: 18.16.060 Item 4 Attachment A: DRAFT NV Zoning District Regulations     Packet Pg. 131     CN (Other)1.25 1.25 30%(3)20 See HE Appendix D CD-C 2.0 2.0 (2)(3)20 See base district regulation s: 18.18.0 60 CD-N 1.5 1.5 (3)20 See HE Appendix D See base district regulations: 18.18.060 RP 1.25 1.25 (3)25 None; 40 du/ac anticipate d See base district regulations: 18.20.040 RM-40 1.5 1.5 (3)31 RM-30 1.25 1.25 (3)20 RM-20 1.25 1.25 See 18.13.0 40 20 See HE Appendix D See base district regulations: 18.13.040 NV-MXM See base district regulations: 18.29.060, except that maximum height shall be 50’ NV-R3 See base district regulations: 18.29.060, except that maximum height shall be 50’, maximum lot coverage shall be 70%, and minimum density shall be 25 du/ac. Notes: (1) Nothing in this table increases the non-residential floor area permitted in any district. (2) FAR may be increased with transfer of development rights; see Chapter 18.18 for details. (3) Landscape coverage may be provided above the ground-floor. If standard is not specified, refer to base district regulations. (4) Where no maximum density is provided in terms of du/ac, maximum density shall be determined by estimating the realistic development capacity of the site based on the objective development standards applicable to the project. Where noted, refer to Housing Element Appendix D: Sites Inventory for specified densities. SECTION 3. Section 18.24.010 (Purpose and Applicability) of Chapter 18.24 (Contextual Design Criteria and Objective Design Standards) of Title 18 (Zoning) of the Palo Alto Municipal Code is amended to read as follows (additions underlined, and unchanged text omitted by bracketed ellipses): 18.24.010 Purpose and Applicability Item 4 Attachment A: DRAFT NV Zoning District Regulations     Packet Pg. 132     (a) Purpose [. . .] (b) Applicability of Regulations These regulations apply to Housing Development Projects (as defined in Gov. Code 65589.5), both new construction and renovations, within the following zones and combining districts: (1) Chapter 18.12: R-1, for multiple-family use projects only (2) Chapter 18.13: RM-20, RM-30, RM-40 (23) Chapter 18.16: CN, CC, CC(2), CS (34) Chapter 18.18: CD-C, CD-S, CD-N (45) Chapter 18.20: MOR, ROLM, ROLM(E), RP, RP(5), GM (56) Chapter 18.28: PF (7) Chapter 18.29: NVCAP (68) Chapter 18.34: PTOD combining district Housing Development Projects include multifamily housing with three or more units ("multiple-family use" as defined in Section 18.04.030), supportive and transitional housing, and residential mixed-use projects with at least two-thirds residential square footage shall meet the objective design standards. (c) Process and Alternative Compliance [. . .] SECTION 4. Section 16.65.030 (Basic affordable housing requirement - residential ownership projects) of Chapter 16.65 (Citywide Affordable Housing Requirements) of Title 16 (Building Regulations) is amended to read as follows ((additions underlined, and unchanged text omitted by bracketed ellipses): 16.65.030 Basic affordable housing requirement - residential ownership projects. The provisions of this section shall apply to all residential ownership projects, including the residential ownership portion of any mixed use project containing three or more units, except for any residential ownership project exempt under Section 16.65.025. (a) Unless an alternative is approved as described in Section 16.65.080, residential ownership projects shall provide the following: Item 4 Attachment A: DRAFT NV Zoning District Regulations     Packet Pg. 133     (1) For projects on sites of less than five acres, fifteen percent of the dwelling units in the project shall be made available at affordable sales price to very low, low, and moderate income households; (2) For projects on sites of five acres or more and all townhome projects in the NV districts, twenty percent of the dwelling units in the project shall be made available at affordable sales price to very low, low, and moderate income households; and (3) For projects that convert existing rental housing to condominiums, other residential ownership or nonresidential space or that remove existing rental housing, twenty-five percent of the dwelling units in the project shall be made available at affordable sales price to very low, low, and moderate income households. (4) Calculations of the number of affordable units required by this section shall be based on the number of dwelling units in the residential project, excluding any density bonus units. Projects shall not receive a credit for any existing dwelling units demolished as part of the project. (b) The affordable units shall be made available at the following affordable sales prices: [. . .] SECTION 5. Section 16.65.040 (Basic requirement - mixed use, nonresidential and residential rental projects) of Chapter 16.65 (Citywide Affordable Housing Requirements) of Title 16 (Building Regulations) is amended to read as follows (additions underlined; deletions struck- through): 16.65.040 Basic requirement - mixed use, nonresidential and residential rental projects. (a) Unless the mixed use, nonresidential or residential rental project is exempt under Section 16.65.025 or an alternative is approved as described in Section 16.65.080, all mixed use, nonresidential and residential rental projects shall pay housing impact fees as specified in Section 16.65.060 to mitigate the projects' impacts on the need for affordable housing; except: (1) that theThe residential ownership portion of a mixed use project containing three or more units shall comply with Section 16.65.030. (2) In the NV districts, residential rental projects, including mixed use projects containing residential rental units, shall provide fifteen percent of the dwelling units in the project at rates affordable to lower income households. SECTION 6. Pipeline Projects. This Ordinance and the NVCAP shall not apply to any project application deemed complete prior to the effective date of this Ordinance. Any project completed pursuant to such application shall be deemed a legal non-conforming structure and/or use, subject to the provisions of Palo Alto Municipal Code Chapter 18.70. Item 4 Attachment A: DRAFT NV Zoning District Regulations     Packet Pg. 134     Staff Response to ARB Comments on Draft NVCAP ID Comment Response ARB 1 Place table captions above the table Table captions were moved above the table throughout the document. ARB 2 Encourage or require more green roofs (maybe incentivize with additional FAR) No incentive programs were considered but green roofs are encouraged in the plan area per Section 6.6.5. ARB 3 Only include essential information in the plan and refer to other documents when necessary. Example: trees. After reorganization of the document, appropriate references were added. ARB 4 2.1: Make exhibit more realistic Language added that no new or recent development constructed during preparation of NVCAP reflected in any exhibits. ARB 5 Ground floor height is 15’ too tall? Ground floor height changed to 14’ to be consistent with Contextual Design Criteria and Objective Design Standards ARB 6 Sustainable design (subcommittee of the ARB): 6.5.4 through 6.5.7. No substantial recommendations were provided to be implemented; new ordinance is underway for bird safe design. ARB 7 4.6.2 :Provide examples of permeable pavement. Updated the Figure 69 in Chapter 4. ARB 8 2.5: Show more green roofs, solar panels. Tell more of a story that includes green roof and solar panels, connection with the open spaces and creek. Vertical green spaces Conceptual figures for the plan added more green roofs and solar panels but no additional changes were made to the draft zoning ordinance as the NVCAP ordinance follows existing Title 18 requirements on green roofs and open space requirements. ARB 9 Figure 42: Provide more setback from building near creek (see document for where). Noted but no changes were made to graphics. ARB 10 Figure 46 & 78: This seems inconsistent with the preferred plan and other illustrative exhibits because the creek improvement would occupy portions of these building envelopes. Shrink the building envelops to be consistent with the diagram for the creek. Figure 82 adjusted ARB 11 3.3: Consider separating out topics The comment addressed by reorganization of the document. ARB 12 3.3: These are already in the code, should refer to the code or master plan The comment addressed by reorganization of the document. Item 4 Attachment B: NVCAP Comments from ARB and Staff response     Packet Pg. 135     ID Comment Response ARB 13 Figure 77: Replace this exhibit with one from the Municipal Code 18.24. Replaced. ARB 14 2.4, figure 36: The legend mentions priority, secondary and tertiary streets. Is this supposed to be “primary,” etc.? Describe more what these mean. Removed legend items for priority secondary and tertiary and replaced with bike facility information. ARB 15 6.4.1: Entries must be raised above sidewalk grade. Is there any consideration for ADA compliance when we require this? Is this already in the zoning code. No changes made; ADA compliance required per building code. ARB 16 Can we encourage exploration and reuse of existing structures? For example for the audi building and ash office? Noted. No changes made. ARB 17 consider adding a FAR bonus as well to make projects more viable No incentive program added; the draft NVCAP ordinance has its own housing incentive program but only for affordable housing with extra height allowed. The NVCAP already increased density and height for the plan area. ARB 18 ground floor uses packet page 85, office edges are going to want to go near retail so having office edge near residential edge may not make so much sense. No changes are needed. Limited office allowed. Office edge removed (See the updated Figure 32 in Chapter 2) ARB 19 consider having a focused retail corridor. The retail seems broken up and unconcentrated now making it less likely to be viable. Figure 32 on Ground Floor Edges in Chapter is updated to show required retail edges along El Camino Real and encouraged active edge along Park Boulevard ARB 20 bird safe building design—UV coated glass is not a preferred option No changes made. The Citywide dark sky and bird safe ordinance will supersede once adopted. ARB 21 Better way to refer to “egg-crate” design on page 159 No changes made. ARB 22 need clarifications on ground floor entries (page 110), 4 active doorways every 200 linear feet The requirement is specific to woonerf. Revised the language to specify the requirement is applicable “between park and ash” on Portage Avenue. ARB 23 Paseo between buildings—possibility to connect greenbelt to the rest of the neighborhood through paseos—would like to see birdseye view of that Figure was updated to remove paseos. Item 4 Attachment B: NVCAP Comments from ARB and Staff response     Packet Pg. 136     Attachment D: Link to the Draft SEIR for North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/v/1/planning-amp-development- services/north-ventura-cap/draft-seir-nvcap-march-2024.pdf Item 4 Attachment C: Link to Draft SEIR     Packet Pg. 137