Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2018-12-03 City Council Action MinutesCITY OF PALO ALTO CITY COUNCIL ACTION MINUTES Page 1 of 16 Special Meeting December 3, 2018 The City Council of the City of Palo Alto met on this date in the Council Chambers at 5:03 P.M. Present: DuBois, Filseth, Fine; Holman arrived at 5:06 P.M., Kniss, Kou, Scharff, Tanaka, Wolbach Council Member Tanaka participating from The Prince Park Tower Tokyo, Main Lobby 4-8-1 Shibakoen Minato,Tokyo 105-8563 Japan Absent: Closed Session 1. CONFERENCE WITH CITY ATTORNEY Subject: Written Liability Claim Against the City of Palo Alto By Keith Bunnell (Claim No. C18-0049) Authority: Government Code Section 54956.9 (e)(3). MOTION: Council Member Scharff moved, seconded by Council Member Fine to go into Closed Session. MOTION PASSED: 7-0 Holman, Tanaka absent Council went into Closed Session at 5:03 P.M. Council returned from Closed Session at 5:46 P.M. Special Orders of the Day 2. Appointment of Three Candidates to the Architectural Review Board and Three Candidates to the Parks and Recreation Commission for Three-year Terms Ending December 15, 2021; and two Candidates to the Planning and Transportation Commission for Four-year Terms Ending December 15, 2022. MOTION: Council Member Holman moved, seconded by Council Member Kou to move the appointments for the Architectural Review Board, Parks and ACTION MINUTES Page 2 of 16 City Council Meeting Action Minutes: 12/03/18 Recreation Commission, and the Planning and Transportation Commission to next year. MOTION FAILED: 3-6 DuBois, Holman, Kou yes First Round of voting for three positions on the Architectural Review Board with terms ending December 15, 2021. Voting For: Peter Baltay: DuBois, Filseth, Fine, Holman, Kniss, Kou, Scharff, Tanaka, Wolbach Voting For: Amparo Del Rio: Voting For: Robert Gooyer: DuBois, Filseth, Holman, Kou Voting For: David Hirsch: Fine, Kniss, Scharff, Tanaka, Wolbach Voting For: Alexander Lew: DuBois, Filseth, Fine, Holman, Kniss, Kou, Scharff, Tanaka, Wolbach Voting For: Curtis Smolder: Beth Minor, City Clerk announced that Peter Baltay with 9 votes, Alexander Lew with 9 votes and David Hirsch with 5 votes were appointed to the Architectural Review Board. First Round of voting for three positions on the Parks and Recreation Commission with terms ending December 15, 2021. Voting For: Anne Cribbs: DuBois, Filseth, Fine, Holman, Kniss, Kou, Scharff, Tanaka, Wolbach Voting For: Jeff Greenfield: DuBois, Filseth, Fine, Holman, Kniss, Kou, Scharff, Tanaka, Wolbach Voting For: David Moss: DuBois, Filseth, Fine, Holman, Kniss, Kou, Scharff, Tanaka, Wolbach Voting For: Calen Weinstein: Beth Minor, City Clerk announced that Anne Cribbs with 9 votes, Jeff Greenfield with 9 votes, and David Moss with 9 votes were appointed to the Parks and Recreation Commission. First Round of voting for two positions on the Planning and Transportation Commission with terms ending December 15, 2022. ACTION MINUTES Page 3 of 16 City Council Meeting Action Minutes: 12/03/18 Voting For: Kelsey Banes: Voting For: L. David Baron: Voting For: Bern Beecham: Scharff, Tanaka Voting For: Rebecca Eisenberg: Voting For: Claude Ezran: Voting For: Brian Hamacheck: Voting For: Michelle Kraus: Voting For: Dena Mossar: Tanaka Voting For: Giselle Roohparvar: DuBois, Filseth, Fine, Holman, Kniss, Kou, Scharff, Wolbach Voting For: Thomas Siegel: DuBois, Filseth, Holman, Kou Voting For: Carolyn “Cari” Templeton: Fine, Kniss, Wolbach Voting For: Craig Yanagisawa: Beth Minor, City Clerk announced that Giselle Roohparvar with 8 votes was appointed to the Planning and Transportation Commission. Second Round of voting for one position on the Planning and Transportation Commission with a term ending December 15, 2022. Voting For: Bern Beecham: Scharff Voting For: Thomas Siegel: DuBois, Filseth, Holman, Kou Voting For: Carolyn “Cari” Templeton: Fine, Kniss, Tanaka, Wolbach Third Round of voting for one position on the Planning and Transportation Commission with a term ending December 15, 2022. Voting For: Thomas Siegel: DuBois, Filseth, Holman, Kou Voting For: Carolyn “Cari” Templeton: Fine, Kniss, Scharff, Tanaka, Wolbach Beth Minor, City Clerk announced that Carolyn “Cari” Templeton with 5 votes was appointed to the Planning and Transportation Commission. ACTION MINUTES Page 4 of 16 City Council Meeting Action Minutes: 12/03/18 Agenda Changes, Additions and Deletions MOTION: Council Member Fine moved, seconded by Council Member Wolbach to continue Agenda Item 9- “PUBLIC HEARING: Adoption of an Ordinance Amending Chapter 18.18 (Downtown Commercial District) of Title 18 (Zoning) of the Palo Alto Municipal Code (PAMC) to Repeal Section 18.18.040 Regarding a Nonresidential Square Footage Cap,” to a date uncertain and Agenda Item 10 “PUBLIC HEARING: Adoption of an Ordinance Amending Section 18.18.120 (Grandfathered Uses and Facilities)…” to December 10, 2018. MOTION PASSED: 9-0 Consent Calendar MOTION: Council Member Fine moved, seconded by Mayor Kniss, third by Vice Mayor Filseth to pull Agenda Item Number 11 “PUBLIC HEARING / QUASI-JUDICIAL: 429 University Avenue [18PLN-00240]: Appeal of the Planning and Community Environment Director's Denial of a Minor Architectural Review..” to be heard on December 17, 2018. Council Members Holman, Kou and Tanaka registered a no vote on Agenda Item Number 6- “Adoption of an Ordinance Amending Palo Alto Municipal Code (PAMC) Title 16, Chapters 16.58 (Development Impact Fees)…” MOTION: Council Member Scharff moved, seconded by Mayor Kniss to approve Agenda Item Numbers 3-8, 11. 3. Approval of an Agreement With the Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board in the Amount of $97,755 for the 2019 Caltrain Go Pass Program. 4. Finance Committee Recommendation That the City Council: 1) Adopt Resolution 9802 Entitled “Resolution of the Council of the City of Palo Alto Approving the 2018 Electric Integrated Resource Plan (EIRP), Updated Renewable Portfolio Standard Procurement Plan and Enforcement Program;” and 2) Approve two EIRP Planning Documents. 5. Approval and Authorization for the City Manager to Execute a Construction Contract With MP Nexlevel of California, Inc. in the Amount of $6,145,494 for Trenching and Substructure Installation and Materials, and a 10 Percent Contingency of $614,549 for Related but Unforeseen Work, for a Total Authorized Amount of $6,760,043 Over Three Years. ACTION MINUTES Page 5 of 16 City Council Meeting Action Minutes: 12/03/18 6. Adoption of an Ordinance Amending Palo Alto Municipal Code (PAMC) Title 16, Chapters 16.58 (Development Impact Fees); 16.59 (Citywide Transportation Impact Fees); and 16.60 (Charleston Arastradero Corridor Pedestrian and Bicyclist Safety Impact Fee) to add Development Impact Fee Exemptions for Junior Accessory Dwelling Units and Certain Accessory Dwelling Units Established by Garage Conversion. 7. Resolution 9803 Entitled “Resolution of the Council of the City of Palo Alto of Support for Formation of a Regional Housing Needs Allocation Subregion for Santa Clara County.” 8. Approval of Amendment Number 1 to Contract Number C18168129 With Kennedy / Jenks Consultants for Professional Design Services for the Primary Sedimentation Tanks Rehabilitation and Equipment Room Electrical Upgrade Project at the Regional Water Quality Control Plant to add Services, Increase Compensation by $249,631 for a new Maximum Compensation Not-to-Exceed $965,000, and to Extend the Contract Term Through March 31, 2022 - Capital Improvement Program Project WQ-14003. 11. PUBLIC HEARING / QUASI-JUDICIAL: 429 University Avenue [18PLN-00240]: Appeal of the Planning and Community Environment Director's Denial of a Minor Architectural Review Consistent With Condition of Approval Number 3 From Record of Land Use Action Number 2017-02, for a Previously Approved Mixed-use Building (14PLN-00222), for the Proposed Exterior Building Materials, Colors, and Craftsmanship. Environmental Assessment: Use of Mitigated Negative Declaration Prepared for 14PLN-00222. Zoning District: CD-C(G)(P) (Downtown Commercial With Ground Floor and Pedestrian Shopping Overlay). MOTION FOR AGENDA ITEM NUMBERS 3-5, 7-8 and 10 PASSED: 9-0 MOTION FOR AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 6 PASSED: 6-3 Holman, Kou Tanaka no Action Items 9. PUBLIC HEARING. Adoption of an Ordinance Amending Chapter 18.18 (Downtown Commercial District) of Title 18 (Zoning) of the Palo Alto Municipal Code (PAMC) to Repeal Section 18.18.040 Regarding a Nonresidential Square Footage Cap in the CD Downtown Commercial Zoning District to Implement and Conform to the Updated Comprehensive Plan; Section 18.18.040 Implemented Policy L-8 of ACTION MINUTES Page 6 of 16 City Council Meeting Action Minutes: 12/03/18 the Prior 1998 Comprehensive Plan, Which was Removed as Part of the Adoption of the Comprehensive Plan Update. California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), This Ordinance is Within the Scope of the Comprehensive Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Certified and Adopted on November 13, 2017 by Council Resolution No. 9720 (Staff Requests This Item be Continued to a Date Uncertain In 2019). 10. PUBLIC HEARING: Adoption of an Ordinance Amending Section 18.18.120 (Grandfathered Uses and Facilities) of Chapter 18.18 (Downtown Commercial District) of Title 18 (Zoning) of the Palo Alto Municipal Code (PAMC) to Adjust Regulations Relating to Noncomplying Facilities. California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); This Ordinance is Within the Scope of the Comprehensive Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Certified and Adopted on November 13, 2017 by Council Resolution No. 9720; Alternatively, the Ordinance is Exempt From Environmental Review Under CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) (Staff Requests This Item be Continued to December 10, 2018). 12. PUBLIC HEARING: Adoption of an Ordinance Amending Various Sections of Title 18 of the Palo Alto Municipal Code Related to Residential and Mixed-use Development Standards Including, but not Limited to, Minimum and Maximum Unit Density, Unit Size, Floor Area Ratio, Height, and Open Space Including Rooftop Gardens; Parking Requirements Including, but not Limited to, Regulations Related to In- lieu Parking for Downtown Commercial Uses and Retail Parking for Mixed Use Projects; Exclusively Residential Projects in Certain Commercial Zoning Districts; Ground-floor Retail and Retail Preservation Provisions; the Entitlement Approval Process; and Other Regulations Governing Residential, Multi-family Residential and Commercial Zoning Districts, all to Promote Housing Development Opportunities in These Zoning Districts in Furtherance of Implementation of the Comprehensive Plan. CEQA: Determination of Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Certified and Adopted on November 13, 2017 by Council Resolution No. 9720. The Planning and Transportation Commission Recommended Approval of the Proposed Ordinance on October 10, 2018 (Continued From November 26, 2018). Vice Mayor Filseth advised that he will not be participating in this part of the Agenda Item due to owning property in an RM-15 zone. Council Member Holman advised that he will not be participating in this part of the Agenda Item due to being within 500 feet of an RM-2 zone. ACTION MINUTES Page 7 of 16 City Council Meeting Action Minutes: 12/03/18 MOTION: Council Member Fine moved, seconded by Council Member Wolbach to accept the following changes related to Multi-Family Zones: A. Unit Density. Replace RM-15 zoning designation, which allows 15 units per acre with a RM-20 designation that allows 20 units per acre, to align with Housing Element density allowance; B. Minimum Density. Establish a minimum unit density as provided below. Allow fewer units when determined by the Planning Director, after review by the Architectural Review Board (ARB), that existing site improvements or parcel constraints preclude meeting this minimum standard: i. RM-20: 11 units/acre ii. RM-30: 16 units/acre iii. RM-40: 21 units/acre; C. Non-complying Unit Density. Allow redevelopment and replacement of legally established residential housing units that exceed the maximum unit density allowed for the parcel, subject to the following criteria: i. Other than unit density, the project complies with all applicable development standards. ii. The project is a residential rental project. iii. The development shall not be eligible for a density bonus pursuant to Palo Alto Municipal Code (PAMC) Chapter 18.15. The applicant must elect whether to utilize state density bonus law or the exception described herein as an alternative to state density bonus law; and D. Administrative Code Clean Up. Modify PAMC Section 18.13.040(g) regarding below market rate (BMR) housing units to reflect regulatory requirements of Chapter 16.65 of Title 16. INCORPORATED INTO THE MOTION WITH THE CONSENT OF THE MAKER AND SECONDER to direct Staff to review the concept of when a project is over the number of units, it will not make the project non- compliant, and return to Council in 2019 for review. Council Member Tanaka left the meeting at 7:58 P.M. ACTION MINUTES Page 8 of 16 City Council Meeting Action Minutes: 12/03/18 INCORPORATED INTO THE MOTION WITH THE CONSENT OF THE MAKER AND SECONDER to add to the Motion to allow a single-family home to be rebuilt as a single-family home and a duplex to be rebuilt as a duplex without meeting the minimum density requirements. MOTION AS AMENDED RESTATED: Council Member Fine moved, seconded by Council Member Wolbach to accept the following changes related to Multi-Family Zones: A. Unit Density. Replace RM-15 zoning designation, which allows 15 units per acre with a RM-20 designation that allows 20 units per acre, to align with Housing Element density allowance; B. Minimum Density. Establish a minimum unit density as provided below. Allow fewer units when determined by the Planning Director, after review by the ARB, that existing site improvements or parcel constraints preclude meeting this minimum standard: iv. RM-20: 11 units/acre v. RM-30: 16 units/acre vi. RM-40: 21 units/acre; C. Non-complying Unit Density. Allow redevelopment and replacement of legally established residential housing units that exceed the maximum unit density allowed for the parcel, subject to the following criteria: i. Other than unit density, the project complies with all applicable development standards. ii. The project is a residential rental project. iii. The development shall not be eligible for a density bonus pursuant to PAMC Chapter 18.15. The applicant must elect whether to utilize state density bonus law or the exception described herein as an alternative to state density bonus law; D. Administrative Code Clean Up. Modify PAMC Section 18.13.040(g) regarding below market rate (BMR) housing units to reflect regulatory requirements of Chapter 16.65 of Title 16; E. Direct Staff to review the concept of when a project is over the number of units, it will not make the project non-compliant and return to Council in 2019 for review; and ACTION MINUTES Page 9 of 16 City Council Meeting Action Minutes: 12/03/18 F. Allow a single-family home to be rebuilt as a single-family home and a duplex to be rebuilt as a duplex without meeting the minimum density requirements. MOTION AS AMENDED PASSED: 6-0 Filseth, Holman recused, Tanaka absent Council took a break at 8:20 P.M. and returned at 8:29 PM Council Member Scharff advised he would not be participating in this part of the Agenda Item due to owning property within the Downtown CD-C Zoning District. MOTION: Council Member Fine moved, seconded by Council Member Wolbach to accept the following changes related to Downtown CD-C Zoning District: A. Unit Density. Eliminate the unit density requirement restricting the maximum density to 40 units per acre. With the proposed amendment, unit density would be controlled by other existing development standards, such as height, floor area, parking requirements, etc.; B. Unit Size. Establish a maximum average housing unit size of 1,500 square feet, (weighted average by the number of bedrooms); C. Retail Parking. Exempt the first 1,500 square feet of ground-floor retail from parking requirements within residential mixed-use buildings; D. Driveway Approach. Reinforce existing city policy and guidelines to preclude curb cuts on University Avenue, except for City-owned parcels or City-sponsored projects; E. Residential Only Development. Allow housing-only projects to be constructed downtown, except in the ground floor (GF) combining district. Retail preservation ordinance standards apply for market rate housing projects. Note, current zoning standards permit housing only when part of a commercial, mixed use development or on housing opportunity sites (i.e., in the Housing Element); F. Open Space. Allow rooftops to qualify for up to 75 percent of the usable open space requirement for the multi-family residential portion of a project, subject to objective performance standards; G. Housing Incentive Program (HIP). Establish a process that would allow property owners to apply to receive greater floor area than otherwise allowed under the zoning code and under State Density Bonus Law ACTION MINUTES Page 10 of 16 City Council Meeting Action Minutes: 12/03/18 through waivers granted by the Director of Planning after review by the ARB. This program would be an alternative to the State Density Bonus Law and SB 35 streamlining, since it allows for more density. Components of the HIP include the following: i. Floor Area Ratio (FAR) waiver to increase residential FAR from 1.0 up to 3.0, except for portion of FAR required to remain commercial by the requirements of the retail preservation ordinance or GF combining district. ii. No TDRs may be used in conjunction with a qualifying HIP project iii. Require discretionary architectural review consistent with PAMC 18.76.020 (Architectural Review); and H. Strike Section 8 of the Ordinance and direct the Planning and Transportation Commission to review it further. INCORPORATED INTO THE MOTION WITH CONSENT OF THE MAKER AND SECONDER to direct Staff and the Planning and Transportation Commission to further study decoupled parking, in lieu parking, and off-site parking for residential developments and return to Council in 2019. INCORPORATED INTO THE MOTION WITH CONSENT OF THE MAKER AND SECONDER to add to the Ordinance a requirement that for rooftop gardens, no up lighting is allowed and light sources should be shielded. AMENDMENT: Council Member Holman moved, seconded by Council Member XX to add to the enforcement officers’ tool kit to conduct code enforcement activities if disruptive noise is perceived offsite from the subject property. AMENDMENT WITHDRAWN BY THE MAKER INCORPORATED INTO THE MOTION WITH CONSENT OF THE MAKER AND SECONDER to direct Staff and the Planning and Transportation Commission to analyze interaction of housing production by: A. Changing the hotel Floor Area Ratio (FAR); B. Elimination of ability of commercial uses above ground to participate in the in-lieu parking program; and C. Methods to match increases in residential FAR with a decrease in commercial FAR for mixed use projects. ACTION MINUTES Page 11 of 16 City Council Meeting Action Minutes: 12/03/18 Council Member Tanaka returned to the meeting at 9:37 P.M. AMENDMENT: Council Member Kou moved, seconded by Council Member XX to require that rooftop gardens should be 100 feet away from any low- density residential zones. AMENDMENT WITHDRAWN BY THE MAKER INCORPORATED INTO THE MOTION WITH CONSENT OF THE MAKER AND SECONDER to modify the Motion Part H. to state “add language to Section 8 of the Ordinance indicating office uses above the ground floor shall not be eligible to participate in the in-lieu parking program for the period of one year or until the Planning and Transportation Commission returns to the City Council with a detailed study and recommendation.” MOTION AS AMENDED RESTATED: Council Member Fine moved, seconded by Council Member Wolbach to accept the following changes related to Downtown CD-C Zoning District: A. Unit Density. Eliminate the unit density requirement restricting the maximum density to 40 units per acre. With the proposed amendment, unit density would be controlled by other existing development standards, such as height, floor area, parking requirements, etc.; B. Unit Size. Establish a maximum average housing unit size of 1,500 square feet, (weighted average by the number of bedrooms); C. Retail Parking. Exempt the first 1,500 square feet of ground-floor retail from parking requirements within residential mixed-use buildings; D. Driveway Approach. Reinforce existing city policy and guidelines to preclude curb cuts on University Avenue, except for City-owned parcels or City-sponsored projects; E. Residential Only Development. Allow housing-only projects to be constructed downtown, except in the ground floor (GF) combining district. Retail preservation ordinance standards apply for market rate housing projects. Note, current zoning standards permit housing only when part of a commercial, mixed use development or on housing opportunity sites (i.e., in the Housing Element); F. Open Space. Allow rooftops to qualify for up to 75 percent of the usable open space requirement for the multi-family residential portion of a project, subject to objective performance standards; ACTION MINUTES Page 12 of 16 City Council Meeting Action Minutes: 12/03/18 G. Housing Incentive Program (HIP). Establish a process that would allow property owners to apply to receive greater floor area than otherwise allowed under the zoning code and under State Density Bonus Law through waivers granted by the Director of Planning after review by the ARB. This program would be an alternative to the State Density Bonus Law and SB 35 streamlining, since it allows for more density. Components of the HIP include the following: i. FAR waiver to increase residential FAR from 1.0 up to 3.0, except for portion of FAR required to remain commercial by the requirements of the retail preservation ordinance or GF combining district. ii. No TDRs may be used in conjunction with a qualifying HIP project iii. Require discretionary architectural review consistent with PAMC 18.76.020 (Architectural Review); H. Add language to Section 8 of the Ordinance indicating office uses above the ground floor shall not be eligible to participate in the in-lieu parking program for the period of one year or until the Planning and Transportation Commission returns to the City Council with a detailed study and recommendation; I. Direct Staff and the Planning and Transportation Commission to further study decoupled parking, in lieu parking, and off-site parking for residential developments and return to Council in 2019; J. Add to the Ordinance a requirement that for rooftop gardens, no up lighting is allowed and light sources should be shielded; and K. Direct Staff and the Planning and Transportation Commission to analyze interaction of housing production by: i. Changing the hotel FAR; ii. Elimination of ability of commercial uses above ground to participate in the in-lieu parking program; and iii. Methods to match increases in residential FAR with a decrease in commercial FAR for mixed use projects. MOTION AS AMENDED PASSED: 6-1 Kou no, Scharff recused, Tanaka absent ACTION MINUTES Page 13 of 16 City Council Meeting Action Minutes: 12/03/18 Mayor Kniss, Vice Mayor Filseth and Council Member Scharff advised they would not be participating in this part of the Agenda Item due to owning property near a Fixed Rail Station. MOTION: Council Member Wolbach moved, seconded by Council Member Fine to approve the Staff recommendation regarding parking standards for properties within ½-mile of a Fixed Rail Station: A. Micro Unit (<450 square feet)- 0.5; B. Studio- 0.8; C. 1 Bedroom- 0.8; and D. 2+ Bedroom- 1.6 AMENDMENT: Council Member DuBois moved, seconded by Council Member Holman to amend the Motion Part C. to 1.0 and Part D. to 2.0. SECOND TO THE AMENDMENT WITHDRAWN BY THE SECONDER AMENDMENT FAILED DUE TO LACK OF A SECOND SUBSTITUTE MOTION: Council Member DuBois moved, seconded by Council Member Wolbach to continue the discussion of the proposed parking standards within ½-mile of a fixed rail station to a date uncertain. SUBSTITUTE MOTION PASSED: 3-2 Holman, Kou no, Filseth, Kniss, Scharff recused, Tanaka absent Council took a break at 11:07 P.M. and returned at 11:09 P.M. Council Member DuBois left the meeting at 11:10 P.M. MOTION: Council Member Wolbach moved, seconded by Council Member Scharff to approve the following changes related to Citywide Revisions: A. Open Space. Establish a consistent open space requirement for multi- family housing units in multi-family residential and commercial districts of 150 square feet (current code ranges from 100 to 200 square feet depending on the number of units provided). Micro units, defined herein as units with less than 450 square feet, are proposed to have a commensurate requirement of 40 square feet/unit; B. Review Process. Eliminate Site & Design Review, which currently applies to residential and residential mixed-use projects with 10 more ACTION MINUTES Page 14 of 16 City Council Meeting Action Minutes: 12/03/18 units in commercial zones. Site & Design applications are reviewed by the Planning and Transportation Commission (PTC), Architectural Review Board (ARB) and City Council. By contrast, commercial-only development projects and housing projects in multi-family zones are reviewed only by the ARB. The amendment makes the review of housing projects (including mixed-use development) no more burdensome than the review process for commercial projects and retains options for appeals to Council; C. Retail Preservation. Exempt 100 percent affordable housing projects (120 percent Area Median Income [AMI] and below) from the retail preservation requirement except in the Ground Floor (GF) and Retail (R) combining districts; and D. Parking. Adjust multifamily parking requirements based on maximum anticipated demand. Coincidentally, the changes generally reflect the standards permitted by State Density Bonus Law. Other changes are proposed to incentivize affordable housing and reflect lower parking demand near transit. AMENDMENT: Council Member Scharff moved, seconded by Vice Mayor Filseth to add a new Part E. to strike the proposed affordable housing standards related to parking for multi-family residential uses; and that an affordable multi-family development may ask for a reduction in parking requirements based on maximum demand. INCORPORATED INTO THE AMENDMENT WITH CONSENT OF THE MAKER AND SECONDER to add to the amendment “up to 50 percent based on maximum…” INCORPORATED INTO THE AMENDMENT WITH CONSENT OF THE MAKER AND SECONDER to add the word “add” to the Amendment so it reads “…and add that an affordable multi-family…” INCORPORATED INTO THE AMENDMENT WITH CONSENT OF THE MAKER AND SECONDER to change the percentage from 50 to 100. INCORPORATED INTO THE AMENDMENT WITH CONSENT OF THE MAKER AND SECONDER to add the word “demonstrated” to the Amendment so it reads “…based on maximum demonstrated demand.” INCORPORATED INTO THE AMENDMENT WITH CONSENT OF THE MAKER AND SECONDER to remove the word “demonstrated” from the amendment and replace it with the word “anticipated.” ACTION MINUTES Page 15 of 16 City Council Meeting Action Minutes: 12/03/18 AMENDMENT AS AMENDED RESTATED: Council Member Scharff moved, seconded by Vice Mayor Filseth to amend the Motion to add a new Part E. to strike the proposed affordable housing standards related to parking for multi-family residential uses; and add that an affordable multi-family development may ask for a reduction in parking requirements up to 100 percent based on maximum anticipated demand. AMENDMENT PASSED: 5-2 Fine, Kniss no, DuBois, Tanaka absent INCORPORATED INTO THE MOTION WITH CONSENT OF THE MAKER AND SECONDER to exempt the first 1,500 square feet of ground-floor retail from parking requirements within residential mixed-use buildings. MOTION AS AMENDED: Council Member Wolbach moved, seconded by Council Member Scharff to approve the following changes related to Citywide Revisions: A. Open Space. Establish a consistent open space requirement for multi- family housing units in multi-family residential and commercial districts of 150 square feet (current code ranges from 100 to 200 square feet depending on the number of units provided). Micro units, defined herein as units with less than 450 square feet, are proposed to have a commensurate requirement of 40 square feet/unit; B. Review Process. Eliminate Site & Design Review, which currently applies to residential and residential mixed-use projects with 10 more units in commercial zones. Site & Design applications are reviewed by the PTC, ARB and City Council. By contrast, commercial-only development projects and housing projects in multi-family zones are reviewed only by the ARB. The amendment makes the review of housing projects (including mixed-use development) no more burdensome than the review process for commercial projects and retains options for appeals to Council; C. Retail Preservation. Exempt 100 percent affordable housing projects (120 percent AMI and below) from the retail preservation requirement except in the Ground Floor (GF) and Retail (R) combining districts; D. Parking. Adjust multifamily parking requirements based on maximum anticipated demand. Coincidentally, the changes generally reflect the standards permitted by State Density Bonus Law. Other changes are proposed to incentivize affordable housing and reflect lower parking demand near transit; ACTION MINUTES Page 16 of 16 City Council Meeting Action Minutes: 12/03/18 E. Strike the proposed affordable housing standards related to parking for multi-family residential uses; and add that an affordable multi-family development may ask for a reduction in parking requirements up to 100 percent based on maximum anticipated demand; and F. Exempt the first 1,500 square feet of ground-floor retail from parking requirements within residential mixed-use buildings. MOTION AS AMENDED PASSED: 5-2 Holman, Kou no, DuBois, Tanaka absent Adjournment: The meeting was adjourned at 12:21 A.M.