HomeMy WebLinkAbout2021-01-11 City Council Summary MinutesCITY COUNCIL
SUMMARY MINUTES
Page 1 of 20
Special Meeting
January 11, 2021
The City Council of the City of Palo Alto met on this date in virtual
teleconference at 5:04 P.M.
Participating Remotely: Burt, Cormack, DuBois, Filseth, Kou, Stone, Tanaka
Absent:
Agenda Changes, Additions and Deletions
Mayor DuBois announced updates from community nonprofits were going to
be included in future Council Agendas. Palo Alto Community Child Care was
scheduled for January 25, 2021.
Oral Communications
Cari Templeton, speaking as an individual, advocated for safety
improvements to the crosswalk at Walgreens in Midtown because a vehicle
struck a child in the crosswalk recently.
Terry Holzemer hoped the Council adopted a Resolution opposing Senate Bill
(SB) 9 and SB 10.
Peter Drekmeier, Tuolumne River Trust, indicated the Council supported the
Bay-Delta Plan in 2020, but its representative to the Bay Area Water Supply
and Conservation Agency (BAWSCA) testified before the San Francisco Public
Utilities Commission (SFPUC) in support of the alternative voluntary
agreement. The representative needed to support Palo Alto's interests.
Stephen Rosenblum shared a portion of his written comments to Council
Member Cormack regarding her testimony before the SFPUC and her
response. He believed these actions and statements disqualified Council
Member Cormack from representing the City at BAWSCA.
Dave Warner noted Council Member Cormack subsequently stated she sent a
letter indicating she was not representing Palo Alto when making those
statements. However, it was unknown whether the letter was publicly
available or whether the letter noted Palo Alto's support for the Bay-Delta
Plan. Council Member Cormack needed to retract her statements before the
SFPUC or resign from BAWSCA. If she chose not to do so, he asked the
Council to limit her role on the Council.
SUMMARY MINUTES
Page 2 of 20
Sp. City Council Meeting
Summary Minutes: 01/11/2021
Shannon McEntee shared the benefits of an unimpaired water flow in the
Tuolumne River and urged the Council to advocate for the Bay-Delta Plan.
Rachel Hamburg proposed the City install a temporary bathroom and offer
trash service to recreational vehicle (RV) dwellers parked along El Camino
Real.
Rebecca Eisenberg questioned whether the City investigated its Police
Officers to determine if any participated in the riot in Washington, D.C. She suggested the Council increase the number of Council seats to nine and
require the seats be filled by African-Americans, especially women.
Elaine Wood, Downtown Streets Team Board of Directors, read a letter from
the Board correcting Mr. Byrd's statements to the Council on December 7,
2020. An Administrative Law Judge and a two-person panel entered findings
in an unemployment insurance compensation matter. The Palo Alto Weekly
reported accurately regarding a former employee's claims of sexual
harassment against the Downtown Streets Team.
Julianne Frizzell requested the Council replace Council Member Cormack as
Palo Alto's representative to BAWSCA.
Aram James appreciated local newspapers' reporting on encryption of the
Police Department's radio transmissions without due process and Mayor
DuBois and Vice Mayor Burt's quick response.
Minutes Approval
1. Approval of Action Minutes for the November 30, December 14, and
December 23, 2020 City Council Meetings.
MOTION: Council Member Cormack moved, seconded by Council Member
Kou to approve the Action Minutes for the November 30, December 14, and
December 23, 2020 City Council Meetings.
MOTION PASSED: 7-0
Consent Calendar
Mayor DuBois inquired regarding Council Members receiving responses to
their questions about Agenda Items. The Council packet was released late.
Council Member Stone advised that he did not receive responses.
Mayor DuBois asked if the City Manager wanted to respond to Council
Members' questions.
SUMMARY MINUTES
Page 3 of 20
Sp. City Council Meeting
Summary Minutes: 01/11/2021
Molly Stump, City Attorney, advised that discussion of Consent Calendar
Items was not consistent with Council procedures. Council Members needed
to remove an item from the Consent Calendar if they wished to discuss it.
Council Member Filseth inquired whether continuing Agenda Item Number 5
for one week was possible under Council procedures.
Ms. Stump recommended Council Members remove the item from the
Consent Calendar. The Council was allowed to refrain from discussion and entertain a Motion. Removing Agenda Item Number 5 from the Consent
Calendar required the support of a majority of Council Members because it
was the second reading of an Ordinance.
MOTION: Council Member Stone moved, seconded by Council Member Kou,
third by Vice Mayor Burt, fourth by Mayor DuBois to pull Agenda Item
Number 5 to be heard on a date uncertain.
Council Member Tanaka registered no votes on Agenda Item Numbers 2 and
4.
MOTION: Mayor DuBois moved, seconded by Vice Mayor Burt to approve
Agenda Item Numbers 2-4.
2. Approval of a Purchase Order With Altec Industries in an Amount Not-
to-Exceed $633,866 for the Purchase of two 2022 DH50 Hydraulic
Digger Derrick Rear Mount Crane Trucks, Utilizing a Cooperative
Purchasing Agreement and Funded Under Capital Improvement Project
VR-20000.
3. Resolution 9937 Entitled, “Resolution of the Council of the City of Palo
Alto Amending the Conflict of Interest Code for Designated City
Officers and Employees as Required by the Political Reform Act and
Regulations of the Fair Political Practices Commission, and Repealing
Resolution Number 9800”.
4. Ordinance 5513 Entitled, “Ordinance of the Council of the City of Palo
Alto Amending Section 18.52.070 (Parking Regulations for CD
Assessment District) to Temporarily Extend Ineligibility of Certain Uses
to Participate in the University Avenue In-lieu Parking Program for 18
Months”. (FIRST READING: December 7, 2020 PASSED: 4-2 Fine,
Tanaka no, Cormack absent)
5. SECOND READING: Adoption of a Temporary Ordinance Amending
Title 18 (Zoning) of the Palo Alto Municipal Code to Broaden
Permissible Uses and Raise Thresholds for Conditional Use Permits for
SUMMARY MINUTES
Page 4 of 20
Sp. City Council Meeting
Summary Minutes: 01/11/2021
Some Land Uses Throughout the City. Environmental Review:
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Exemption 15061(b)(3)
(FIRST READING: December 14, 2020 PASSED: 7-0).
MOTION PASSED FOR AGENDA ITEM NUMBERS 2 AND 4: 6-1 Tanaka
no
MOTION PASSED FOR AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 3: 7-0
Council Member Tanaka preferred the City pay maintenance costs or rent trucks rather than purchase trucks and noted the Staff Report was lacking
information.
City Manager Comments
Ed Shikada, City Manager, advised that the trucks in Agenda Item Number 2
were vital to the Utilities Department, and the current trucks were
approaching obsolescence. The trucks were special funded and not fungible
with General Fund resources. The Regional Stay at Home Order was
extended indefinitely. The State announced economic stimulus package
programs for businesses and low-income residents and a proposal to extend
the eviction moratorium. A State order allowed medical facilities to request
mutual aid for staffing, and four Palo Alto Fire Paramedics were deployed to
Kern County. The deadline to apply for the COVID-19 Relief Grant program
was January 13, 2021. Information regarding COVID-19 vaccinations was
available at sccfreevax.org. Phase 1A of the vaccination plan was underway,
and Plans for Phase 1B were being developed. Free COVID-19 testing was
scheduled for January 22 and February 5 and 26, 2021. Curative was
providing free testing, but the Federal Drug Administration (FDA) issued a
notice of a higher risk for false negative results from Curative tests.
Foothills Park was open to everyone. Because of increased visitation, Staff was exploring access options and providing vehicle counts on the website.
The Police Department encrypted radio transmissions in compliance with a
Department of Justice requirement to protect personally identifiable
information. Virtual Martin Luther King Jr. Day celebrations were planned
for January 18, 2021.
Action Items
6. PUBLIC HEARING: Objections to Weed Abatement and Adoption of
Resolution 9938 Entitled, “Resolution of the Council of the City of Palo
Alto Ordering Weed Nuisance Abated”.
Public Hearing opened at 6:15 P.M.
SUMMARY MINUTES
Page 5 of 20
Sp. City Council Meeting
Summary Minutes: 01/11/2021
Dancia Bostrom, 419 Wilton, explained that weeds occurred when her
professional lawn service was not allowed to work under the shelter in place order. The service resumed as allowed, and the property was well
maintained.
Rebecca Eisenberg, addressing the Consent Calendar, remarked regarding
Vice Mayor Burt's conflict of interest in the CPI matter. Council Members
needed to disclose actual and potential conflicts of interest whether or not
they recused themselves.
Sherry Wei, 2660 Bryant Street, advised that her gardener complied with
the shelter in place order and did not work on her property for a few weeks.
Consequently, she received a notice of being placed in the weed abatement
program. The gardener returned to work when allowed to do so, and the
property was well maintained.
Litai Weng and David Liu, 2349 Greer Road, advised that the inspector
visited his property when his gardener was not allowed to work under the
shelter in place order. The grass was well maintained.
Public Hearing closed at 6:27 P.M.
Moe Kumre, Santa Clara County Fire Marshall, reported properties were
inspected on May 1, 2020. The Shelter in Place Order did not prohibit
property owners and tenants from cutting their lawns.
Geo Blackshire, Fire Chief, recalled residents' confusion regarding activities
allowed under the Shelter in Place Order.
Council Member Cormack inquired whether the number of properties needing
weed abatement was higher than usual.
Mr. Kumre did not believe there was an extraordinary increase in the
number of properties located within the city limits of Palo Alto.
Council Member Cormack noted some residents did not own equipment or
were not physically capable of landscape work. She asked if there was
evidence that the property owners rectified the problems.
Mr. Kumre advised that additional information was not available because the
inspectors had no authority for additional actions until the current process
was complete.
Council Member Cormack indicated her willingness to remove the three
properties from the program because gardeners were asked to shelter in
place at the time of inspections.
SUMMARY MINUTES
Page 6 of 20
Sp. City Council Meeting
Summary Minutes: 01/11/2021
Vice Mayor Burt concurred with Council Member Cormack's comments.
MOTION: Vice Mayor Burt moved, seconded by Council Member Cormack to adopt the Resolution ordering the abatement of weed nuisances in the
City of Palo Alto, with the exclusion of the properties owned by Dancia
Bostrom (419 Wilton), Sherry Wei (2660 Bryant), and Litai Weng and David
Liu (2349 Greer).
Vice Mayor Burt stated he had no business interest in his previous company at the time the Council reviewed the CPI matter. The environmental
achievements of his previous company were renowned throughout the
region.
Council Member Tanaka requested the number of properties that were
placed in the program previously.
Mr. Kumre agreed to provide that information at a later time.
Council Member Tanaka suggested Council Members consider not taking
action against the properties given the COVID-19 situation. Residents may
not know how to contact the Council to explain their circumstances.
Mr. Kumre related that notices of the meeting and the opportunity to
address the Council were sent to residents.
Council Member Tanaka did not support the Motion.
Council Member Kou indicated the program was important for identifying fire
hazards. The Shelter in Place Order was not clear.
Council Member Stone noted the objectors' statements that they remedied
the situation. Therefore, removing them from the program was reasonable.
It was not appropriate to remove all property owners without testimony from
them.
MOTION PASSED: 6-1 Tanaka no
7. Approval of the Macias Gini & O’Connell’s Audit of the City of Palo
Alto’s Financial Statements as of June 30, 2020 and the Management
Letter; Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report
(CAFR); and FY 2020 Budget Amendments in Various Funds.
Kiely Nose, Administrative Services Director/Chief Financial Officer, reported
the Finance Committee reviewed the reports in December 2020. The City
ended fiscal year (FY) 2020 in a positive position, which resulted from
Budget reductions and a surplus in Enterprise Funds. The Budget
SUMMARY MINUTES
Page 7 of 20
Sp. City Council Meeting
Summary Minutes: 01/11/2021
Stabilization Reserve (BSR) balance was slightly below the target of 18.5
percent of expenses but within the target range of 15 percent to 20 percent. Overall, budgeted expenses remained within approved funding levels, but
Staff recommended realignments among departments and the timing of
capital projects.
Kyle O’Rourke, City Auditor, advised that audits of basic financial
statements, the cable TV franchise, the Public Improvement Corporation, and the Regional Water Quality Control Plant as well as agreed-upon
procedures for appropriations were presented for Council review. The
auditors provided an unmodified opinion with no material weaknesses, no
errors, and no reportable findings and concluded that the City complied with
accounting standards. The final audit was to be completed by March 2021.
Ms. Nose defined government-wide financial statements and fund financial
statements. Overall, the City ended the fiscal year with a net position of
$1.2 billion, which included net investment in capital assets, restricted
funds, and unrestricted funds. Across all funds, the net position increased
by approximately $34 million over FY 2019. Governmental fund balances
totaled approximately $266 million, a $38 million decrease from FY 2019.
The BSR balance was $35.9 million, a decrease of $18.9 million from FY
2019. With the exception of the Refuse Fund, Enterprise Funds ended the
year with a positive change in net position. The Capital Projects Fund ended
the year with a balance of $84 million. Proposed Budget adjustments were
realignments in the General Fund among departments and adjustments to
revenue and expenditures in the Capital Projects Fund.
Council took a break at 6:58 P.M. and returned at 7:10 P.M.
Council Member Tanaka related that he did not support the proposed increase in funding for the Public Safety Building (PSB) during the Finance
Committee's discussion. He preferred to postpone the PSB project due to
constraints on the budget.
Council Member Cormack complimented Staff on the use of savings to
ensure the BSR balance was within the target range. She requested the
status of the two new Marriott hotels located on San Antonio.
Ms. Nose believed they were open, but official openings were anticipated in
the first quarter of 2021.
Council Member Cormack asked if any of the workers' compensation claims
were related to COVID-19.
Ms. Nose replied no.
SUMMARY MINUTES
Page 8 of 20
Sp. City Council Meeting
Summary Minutes: 01/11/2021
Vice Mayor Burt noted the importance of the unmodified opinion. With
respect to Council Member Tanaka's comments, the audit pertained to FY 2020. The Council was going to discuss the Capital Budget for the
remainder of FY 2021 in the next few weeks.
Council Member Kou indicated she seemed to be missing Attachment A,
Exhibit 2. She inquired whether electric customer connections were cost
recovery.
Ms. Nose answered yes.
Council Member Kou asked if the decrease in Documentary Transfer Tax was
based on number of units sold or prices.
Ms. Nose explained that Property Tax revenue was based on a combination
of prices, turnover, development, and adjustments. The Documentary
Transfer Tax was based on transactions. The assessed value used to
calculate Property Tax lagged by a year. Staff projected FY 2022 revenue
was going to be flat because it was based on the assessed value during
COVID-19. With respect to the attachment, the Staff Report incorrectly
referred to Attachment A and should be Attachment B.
Mayor DuBois requested the reason for the dramatic decrease in unrestricted
funds.
Ms. Nose reported the decrease occurred because of changes in accounting
principles related to pension and Other Post-Employment Benefits (OPEB)
liabilities.
Mayor DuBois noted that unrestricted funds did not mean the Council had
not allocated them. He requested the contribution plan for the Section 115
Trust.
Ms. Nose advised that Council policy was to budget normal costs for pension obligations annually using a lower discount rate, which was currently 6.2
percent. The difference between the City's discount rate and the California
Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS) discount rate was deposited
to the Section 115 Trust. If the BSR contained excess funds, the City
Manager was authorized to transfer 50 percent of the excess to capital
investment and 50 percent to the Section 115 Trust. Normal costs were
approximately $2 million for the General Fund and $3-$5 million for all
funds.
Mayor DuBois felt $300,000 for COVID-19 office improvement was not going
to be sufficient.
SUMMARY MINUTES
Page 9 of 20
Sp. City Council Meeting
Summary Minutes: 01/11/2021
MOTION: Council Member Cormack moved, seconded by Council Member
Filseth to approve:
A. The City of Palo Alto’s audited financial statements for the fiscal year
ended June 30, 2020, and the accompanying reports provided by
Macias Gini & O’Connell (“MGO”) LLP (Office of the City Auditor Report)
Reports include:
i. Report to the City Council (the “Management Letter”);
ii. Cable TV Franchise, Independent Auditor’s Report and
Statements of Franchise Revenues and Expenses for the years
ended December 31, 2019 and 2018;
iii. Palo Alto Public Improvement Corporation (a component unit of
the City of Palo Alto) Annual Financial Report for the year ended
June 30, 2020;
iv. Regional Water Quality Control Plant, Independent Auditor’s
Report and Financial Statements for the year ended June 30,
2020;
v. Independent Accountant’s Report on Applying Agreed-Upon
Procedures related to the Article XIII-B Appropriations (GANN)
Limit for the year ended June 30, 2020;
B. The Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report
(CAFR), included in CMR #11741 with corrected section Attachment II
and III respectively; and
C. Amendments to the Fiscal Year 2020 Budget Appropriation Ordinance
for various funds as identified in CMR #11741.
Council Member Cormack appreciated the level of detail in the reports and
believed the community was proud of the City's management of its finances.
Vice Mayor Burt concurred with Council Member Cormack's comments and
commended Staff for thorough and transparent reporting.
Ms. Nose indicated the FY 2021 Budget assumed a $5 million contribution to
the Section 115 Trust. Of that amount, $3 million was going to be taken
from the General Fund.
MOTION SPLIT FOR THE PURPOSE OF VOTING
MOTION PASSED FOR PARTS A AND B: 7-0
SUMMARY MINUTES
Page 10 of 20
Sp. City Council Meeting
Summary Minutes: 01/11/2021
MOTION PASSED FOR PART C: 6-1 Tanaka no
8. Update and Discussion on the Plan Bay Area 2050 Final Blueprint and the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) Processes; and
Direction to Staff Regarding the City’s Response, Including Preparation
of Formal Comment Letters.
Jonathan Lait, Director of Planning and Development Service, reported public
hearings before the Association of Bay Area Governments' (ABAG) Executive Board and Regional Planning Commission and the Metropolitan
Transportation Commission (MTC) were scheduled in January. Staff
prepared draft comment letters regarding Plan Bay Area and the Regional
Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) for the Council's consideration. ABAG/MTC
was poised to support a Final Blueprint for the region. Notable changes
between the Draft Blueprint and the Final Blueprint included household and
job growth patterns. The RHNA methodology for distributing housing units
was updated based on the Final Blueprint. The projected increase in Palo
Alto's RHNA was reduced from 36 percent to 22 percent or 10,058 units to
6,086 units.
Gab Layton, speaking for Joe Hirsch, Winter Dellenbach, Chris Robell, Asher
Waldfogel, and Nielson Buchanan, discussed five methodologies for the
distribution of housing units to regions and perceived flaws.
Rebecca Eisenberg believed the high cost of housing in Palo Alto was caused
by high demand and low supply.
Joe Spaulding felt the decision to build housing was based on the acceptance
or rejection of existing segregation. He encouraged the Council to comply
with the 10,000-unit allocation.
Aram James advocated for a safe parking program, very-low-income housing, a local reparations committee, and setting aside housing for
African-Americans.
Greg Schmid stated the source of new jobs and housing projections for the
Bay Area was based on a wild assumption. Public analysis of the numbers
was essential. ABAG's methodology was not acceptable.
Mark Mollineaux commented that land use in Palo Alto upheld racial and
class segregation. The State granted jurisdictions the authority to determine
land use.
SUMMARY MINUTES
Page 11 of 20
Sp. City Council Meeting
Summary Minutes: 01/11/2021
Rohin Ghosh remarked that the lack of home construction for people of
different backgrounds and attempting to reduce the housing allocation
continued segregation.
Terry Holzemer indicated that ABAG's methodology violated several State
Codes, focused only on job-rich areas, and did not consider COVID-19. He
suggested the comment letters explain that the methodology was flawed and
that the City's allocation needed to be reduced.
Kevin Ma felt sending a comment letter was gutsy when the City's allocation
was reduced the most of all cities in the region. Families with children were
needed in the City to provide revenue for Palo Alto Unified School District
(PAUSD). More housing was wanted and needed.
Kelsey Banes expressed disappointment with the reduction in the City's
allocation. Fulfilling the allocation was not going to fulfill the actual need for
housing.
Council Member Kou noted ABAG's reducing the allocations for Palo Alto and
Cupertino only was divisive. The number of housing units allocated to the
region was flawed. The Final Blueprint was not going to achieve ABAG's
guiding principles. Jobs needed to be distributed more diversely. RHNA was
punitive and eliminated local control.
Council Member Stone disclosed his seat on the Embarcadero Institute Board
of Directors, but he received no compensation and did not participate in
drafting Ms. Layton's report. The flawed methodology and the streamlining
process of Senate Bill (SB) 35 was going to make affordable housing
development more difficult. He requested the City's progress in achieving
current allocations, particularly the allocation for market-rate housing.
Mr. Lait indicated the total current allocation was 1,988 units. The City issued permits for 734 units and achieved 10-15 percent of the allocation for
lower-income levels and 92 percent of the allocation for the above-
moderate-income level.
Council Member Stone inquired whether the SB 35 streamlining process
circumvented the City's affordable housing incentives such that a project
with less than the required inclusionary housing was subject to streamlined
approval.
Mr. Lait reported projects were subject to the City's affordable housing
requirement of 15 percent even if the City was subject to the streamlining
process. That was subject to change in the future.
SUMMARY MINUTES
Page 12 of 20
Sp. City Council Meeting
Summary Minutes: 01/11/2021
Council Member Cormack asked if Staff had any additional information
regarding the change in allocations between the Draft and Final Blueprint.
Mr. Lait answered no. Staff requested but did not receive any specific
jurisdictional data.
Council Member Cormack requested the meaning of recession impacts to the
construction industry.
Mr. Lait did not know. Locally, applications for smaller projects were being submitted. Because of the recession, financing for larger projects was more
difficult to obtain. One of the questions was the distribution of the 2050
housing goal in eight-year housing cycles.
Council Member Cormack appreciated the letters providing specific
comments and taking a more modulated tone than prior letters. The
scenario for telecommuting was not the most realistic one.
Council Member Filseth preferred the letters not suggest reassigning a
portion of Palo Alto's allocation to other cities, but pushing back on the
overall process and number was reasonable. The State was attempting to
eliminate local planning through legislation proposing zoning templates for
failure to achieve allocations and large and aggressive allocations. He
suggested expanding the discussion of Palo Alto's office development caps
and including numbers.
Vice Mayor Burt related that over the past 30 years, Palo Alto failed to meet
its allocations for middle-income or workforce housing more so than other
categories because there were no subsidies for workforce housing. The City
was attempting to address workforce housing by funding a project with the
County of Santa Clara (County) and implementing the Housing Incentive
Program and the Housing Planned Community (HPC). SB 35 was going to exacerbate the jobs/housing imbalance because it required projects to have
equal square footage for office and housing.
Mayor DuBois requested the rationale for two letters rather than one.
Mr. Lait clarified that one letter addressed RHNA, and the other addressed
Plan Bay Area. Combining the letters into one was possible.
Mayor DuBois wanted Staff to return to the Council more frequently than
outlined in the Staff Report. With an allocation of 6,000 units, the City was
likely to miss both the affordable and market-rate allocations. The letters
needed to start with the accuracy of the forecasts for overall need in the
state and Bay Area. Comments appeared to focus on a desire for a workable
SUMMARY MINUTES
Page 13 of 20
Sp. City Council Meeting
Summary Minutes: 01/11/2021
solution and concerns about State laws. The number of cities objecting to
the process appeared to be accelerating. The letters needed to refer to an unfunded mandate that was going to have real repercussions and a concern
that numbers needed to be based in reality. The COVID-19 discussion
needed to include long-term and short-term impacts. More attention needed
to be paid to an overall allocation cap based on development feasibility.
Council Member Stone inquired whether the Council needed to amend its inclusionary requirement to 80 percent of Area Median Income (AMI) to
prevent SB 35 from superseding the inclusionary rate.
Mr. Lait indicated the City was likely not to be subject to SB 35 in the
current housing cycle. Staff needed to research the best position for the
City to achieve the type of affordability stated in policies.
Molly Stump, City Attorney, reported the Council needed to act in the next
four years to prepare for SB 35.
Council Member Stone expressed concern about the State not providing
cities with funding to meet housing goals but imposing penalties that
resulted in cities falling further behind in creating affordable housing.
Council Member Kou proposed including in the letter the jobs/housing fit.
The use of a flawed methodology was going to recur until someone
determined what was feasible.
MOTION: Council Member Filseth moved, seconded by Council Member Kou
to:
A. Direct Staff to submit a comment letter to the Association of Bay Area
Governments (ABAG) and Metropolitan Transportation Commission
(MTC) on the Plan Bay Area 2050 Final Blueprint;
B. Direct Staff to submit a comment letter to the ABAG Regional Planning Committee and ABAG Executive Board on the proposed 6th Cycle Draft
RHNA Methodology, along with the following:
I. Ask ABAG and MTC to press HCD to resolve the challenges to
their projections and revise targets as appropriate;
II. Expand discussion of Palo Alto’s Office Development Caps with
actual numbers, if appropriate; and
III. Include consideration of long-term remote work impacts.
SUMMARY MINUTES
Page 14 of 20
Sp. City Council Meeting
Summary Minutes: 01/11/2021
Council Member Filseth remarked that the Vallco SB 35 project was a
disaster because the amount of office space created demand for thousands
more housing units than it supplied.
INCORPORATED INTO THE MOTION WITH THE CONSENT OF THE MAKER AND SECONDER to direct the City Attorney to reach out to William
Curley with Harper and Burns, LLP to discuss their appeals and preparations
with other cities for potential litigation. (New Part E)
Council Member Kou wished to understand the issues and actions other cities
were contemplating.
Ms. Stump agreed to seek information in which the Council was interested.
The Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) provided its
cities with final RHNA numbers and, thus, the numbers were ripe for appeal.
ABAG's final RHNA numbers were not available yet.
Council Member Cormack recalled the Council referring funding for
affordable housing to the Finance Committee in 2020, but it was not on the
Finance Committee's status report at the end of the year. She requested
clarification of the allocation cap and how it related to the development cap.
Mr. Lait advised that it was the number of units that a jurisdiction could
reasonably accommodate. Staff was concerned regarding the City's ability
to achieve 6,000 units.
Council Member Cormack requested clarification of the renter protection
measure under housing strategy.
Mr. Lait explained that the renter protection measure aligned with the
Council's policies.
Council Member Cormack inquired regarding official challenges to the
California Department of Housing and Community Development's (HCD)
projections.
Mr. Lait noted there was a limited time period for ABAG to challenge the
Regional Housing Needs Determination (RHND) issued in July 2020. The
ability to appeal the RHND expired with the challenge period.
Council Member Filseth related that the intent of Part B.i was to push HCD to
revisit the RHND or at least to respond to any challenges.
Council Member Cormack did not believe the language of Part B.i reflected
that.
SUMMARY MINUTES
Page 15 of 20
Sp. City Council Meeting
Summary Minutes: 01/11/2021
Mr. Lait indicated that Staff discussed it with ABAG/MTC, and ABAG/MTC
referred Staff to HCD. Staff communicated with HCD, and HCD responded that it was not going to address it. Procedurally, the issue had run its
course, and he was not aware of any further actions for Staff to take.
INCORPORATED INTO THE MOTION WITH THE CONSENT OF THE
MAKER AND SECONDER to direct Staff to also include in the letters an
introductory paragraph which covers the City’s policies to improve our social and economic balance, as well as emphasizing what we have done on
restraining office growth, and our focus on low to moderate income housing.
(New Part C)
Vice Mayor Burt proposed Mayor DuBois and Council Member Filseth review
and approve the final draft of the letters. The Council needed to engage
local legislators in meaningful discussions of these issues.
Mayor DuBois preferred to retain the language for ABAG/MTC to address the
issue with HCD, but Council Members needed to pursue political alignment
as well. With respect to Part B.iii, the letter addressed remote work.
Council Member Filseth questioned whether the letter needed to request
ABAG/MTC make an assumption regarding remote work.
Mayor DuBois proposed an amendment for Staff to evaluate a bottom-up
model of housing construction feasibility during the sixth housing cycle.
Some jurisdiction-level analysis may be useful.
Mr. Lait did not believe there was time to conduct analyses prior to ABAG
making its recommendations to HCD. A feasibility analysis was based on
existing zoning, but zoning was going to have to change to accommodate
the RHNA numbers. The Housing Element Update included vetting of other
parameters for analyses.
Mayor DuBois did not understand how a feasibility cap or range was
determined.
Mr. Lait explained that distributing the RHNA number equally across
jurisdictions resulted in 16 percent. The City was now at 22 percent. A
feasibility cap between 16 percent and 22 percent was likely a reasonable
number.
Council Member Filseth requested the number contained in the
Comprehensive Plan.
Mr. Lait responded 35 to 43.
SUMMARY MINUTES
Page 16 of 20
Sp. City Council Meeting
Summary Minutes: 01/11/2021
Council Member Filseth wanted to explore a feasibility cap, but it was
probably going to be a difficult analysis.
Mr. Lait clarified that the City needed to retain a consultant for an analysis.
Mayor DuBois clarified that his proposal was for Staff to evaluate developing
a model, not to develop a model.
Mr. Lait remarked that many factors determined whether a property owner
chose to develop or redevelop his property, and the factors were different
for each property owner.
Mayor DuBois suggested Staff return to the Council with RHNA updates as
needed but at least every other month.
Mr. Lait agreed to return as often as the Council wished, but particularly
prior to decision points.
INCORPORATED INTO THE MOTION WITH THE CONSENT OF THE
MAKER AND SECONDER to add to the Motion Part B. i. “… such as, but not
only included in, the Embarcadero Institute and Freddie Mac reports ... .”
INCORPORATED INTO THE MOTION WITH THE CONSENT OF THE MAKER AND SECONDER to direct Staff to provide final drafts of the letters
to Mayor DuBois and Council Member Filseth for review prior to submittal.
(New Part D)
Council Member Filseth proposed the Council agendize a Resolution opposing
State abrogation of local zoning.
Mayor DuBois indicated that topic was not part of the Agenda Item.
Council Member Tanaka asked whether the City had any direct authority
over ABAG.
Mr. Lait reported the City had no direct role in RHNA or its distribution. The
City was allowed to attempt to influence the decision-makers.
Council Member Tanaka remarked that economic recovery and COVID-19
vaccinations were larger concerns than overdevelopment. Perhaps Council
time was better spent on those topics than crafting these letters.
MOTION AS AMENDED: Council Member Filseth moved, seconded by
Council Member Kou to:
SUMMARY MINUTES
Page 17 of 20
Sp. City Council Meeting
Summary Minutes: 01/11/2021
A. Direct Staff to submit a comment letter to the Association of Bay Area
Governments (ABAG) and Metropolitan Transportation Commission
(MTC) on the Plan Bay Area 2050 Final Blueprint;
B. Direct Staff to submit a comment letter to the ABAG Regional Planning
Committee and ABAG Executive Board on the proposed 6th Cycle Draft
RHNA Methodology, along with the following:
i. Ask ABAG and MTC to press HCD to resolve the challenges to their projections such as, but not only included in, the
Embarcadero Institute and Freddie Mac reports, and revise their
targets as appropriate;
ii. Expand the discussion of Palo Alto’s office development caps
with actual numbers, if appropriate;
iii. Include consideration of long-term remote work impacts;
C. Direct Staff to also include in the letters an introductory paragraph
which covers the city’s policies to improve our social and economic
balance, as well as emphasizing what we have done on restraining
office growth, and our focus on low to moderate income housing;
D. Direct Staff to provide final drafts of the letters to Mayor DuBois and
Council Member Filseth for review prior to submittal; and
E. Direct the City Attorney to reach out to William Curley with Harper and
Burns, LLP to discuss their appeals and preparations with other cities
for potential litigations.
MOTION PASSED: 6-1 Tanaka no
Council took a break at 9:50 P.M. and returned at 9:56 P.M.
9. Approval of the Nomination of Vice Mayor Pat Burt and Council
Member Alison Cormack to be Considered for the Santa Clara Valley
Transportation Authority (VTA) Board.
Mayor DuBois noted the Agenda Item was presented in a Colleagues' Memo.
Council Member Kou reported that the previous Bylaws did not allow the
nomination of newly elected Council Members to the Santa Clara Valley
Transportation Authority (VTA) Board. Because of his prior terms on the
Council and negotiations with VTA, Vice Mayor Burt was an appropriate
nominee. Placing appointments to regional bodies on the Consent Calendar
SUMMARY MINUTES
Page 18 of 20
Sp. City Council Meeting
Summary Minutes: 01/11/2021
was not transparent and did not obtain community input. The City needed
regular representation at the VTA Board.
Gail Price supported the nomination of Council Member Cormack, who led
significant campaigns and applied strategy, insight and a measured
approach to complex topics. The effort to change the nomination was
launched by the Mayor and Vice Mayor who intended to assume more
leadership roles.
Mark Weiss expressed concern regarding the nomination of Vice Mayor Burt
and supported the nomination of Council Member Cormack for the VTA
Board only.
Rebecca Eisenberg urged the Council to further a culture of equality and
inclusion. Council Member Cormack was more qualified for the appointment
than other Council Members.
Winter Dellenbach expressed concern regarding the Council having outdated
Bylaws. There were significant differences between the 2015 and current
versions of Bylaws.
Joe Spaulding commented that nominating Vice Mayor Burt for regional
bodies was going to embarrass the City.
Council Member Cormack advised that the Council unanimously approved
her nomination to the VTA Board in October 2020. The Mayor's email to the
working group two months later was unprofessional. The procedures for the
working group did not contemplate this dilemma. The Mayor's action may
result in Los Altos Hills filling the seat. She did not understand the purpose
of sending two nominees to the working group.
Council Member Stone noted that representation on the VTA Board was
critical to most Palo Alto residents. Both Vice Mayor Burt and Council Member Cormack were qualified to advocate for Palo Alto. The Bylaws
allowed the City to nominate two Council Members.
Council Member Filseth inquired as to the body deciding which of the two
nominees served on the Board.
Mayor DuBois answered the four cities that formed the PAC.
Council Member Filseth questioned the desire for the PAC rather than the
Council to select the representative.
SUMMARY MINUTES
Page 19 of 20
Sp. City Council Meeting
Summary Minutes: 01/11/2021
Council Member Tanaka commented that two nominees may dilute the City's
chances. Council Member Cormack was always prepared, and her style was
not abrasive.
Mayor DuBois indicated that the VTA Board position was important for
funding grade separations, bike paths, and bus service. The four cities
comprising Group 2 were transitioning people. Mountain View nominated
two representatives in the previous cycle. Nominees were required to meet two of four qualifications. The Council needed to make a decision during the
meeting.
MOTION: Council Member Tanaka moved, seconded by Council Member
Cormack to nominate Council Member Alison Cormack to be considered for
the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) Board.
Council Member Cormack reviewed her qualifications that fulfilled Criteria 3
and 4.
SUBSTITUTE MOTION: Council Member Kou moved, seconded by Mayor
DuBois to nominate Vice Mayor Burt to be considered for the Santa Clara
Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) Board.
Council Member Kou agreed that Council Member Cormack was qualified;
however, Vice Mayor Burt had many years of experience in the
transportation field. She expected Vice Mayor Burt to advocate for the
agreed-upon allocation of Measure B funding.
Mayor DuBois noted Vice Mayor Burt had extensive experience with rail. As
a newly elected Council Member, it was possible for him to serve on the
Board for four years.
Vice Mayor Burt reviewed his qualifications and experience. Collaboration
was going to be needed to address VTA funding deficits.
Council Member Stone supported Vice Mayor Burt because of his experience
with VTA.
SUBSTITUTE MOTION PASSED: 5-2 Cormack, Tanaka no
Council Member Questions, Comments and Announcements
Mayor DuBois reported that he released assignments earlier in the day. The
accident that Ms. Templeton mentioned was concerning, and Staff was
assessing the matter.
SUMMARY MINUTES
Page 20 of 20
Sp. City Council Meeting
Summary Minutes: 01/11/2021
Council Member Cormack proposed the Council consider reopening and
rebuilding Cubberley Community Center with Palo Alto Unified School District
(PAUSD), perhaps during the discussion of Council Priorities.
Vice Mayor Burt indicated Mayor DuBois and he attended the Citizen Corps
Council meeting regarding the COVID-19 vaccine and resources.
Mayor DuBois advised that he participated in a County of Santa Clara
(County) meeting regarding the vaccine. He urged residents to remain
vigilant in following protocols.
Adjournment: The meeting was adjourned in memory of Lenore Cymes at
10:41 P.M.