HomeMy WebLinkAbout2013-01-22 City Council Action MinutesCITY OF PALO ALTO CITY COUNCIL
DRAFT ACTION MINUTES
Page 1 of 6
Special Meeting
January 22, 2013
The City Council of the City of Palo Alto met on this date in the Council
Chambers at 6:00 P.M.
Present: Berman, Burt, Holman, Klein, Kniss, Price, Scharff, Schmid,
Shepherd
Absent:
CONSENT CALENDAR
6. Colleague’s Memo From Mayor Scharff and Council Member Klein
Regarding Council’s Ad hoc Committee on Infrastructure.
MOTION: Mayor Scharff moved, seconded by Vice Mayor Shepherd to
postpone Agenda Item Number 6 to the January 28, 2013 City Council
Meeting Consent Agenda.
MOTION PASSED: 9-0
MOTION: Council Member Kniss moved, seconded by Vice Mayor Shepherd
to approve Agenda Item Numbers 1-5.
1. Finance Committee Recommendation to Accept the Utilities Reserves
Audit.
2. Policy and Services Committee Recommendation to Accept the Audit of
Employee Health Benefits Administration.
3. Policy and Services Committee Recommendation to Accept the
Contract Oversight Audit.
3. Policy and Services Committee Recommendation to Accept the
Auditor's Office Quarterly Report as of September 30, 2012.
5. Appointment of 2013 Emergency Standby Council.
DRAFT ACTION MINUTES
Page 2 of 6
City Council Meeting
Draft Action Minutes:
MOTION PASSED: 8-0 Holman absent
ACTION ITEMS
7. Public Hearing: Adoption of a Resolution 9316 Amending the
Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan to Incorporate the
Palo Alto Rail Corridor Study and Approval of a Negative Declaration.
MOTION: Council Member Klein moved, seconded by Council Member Price
to adopt a Resolution approving the Rail Corridor Study Report, amending
the Transportation Element of the Palo Alto Comprehensive Plan to
incorporate the Vision Statement of the Study and to approve the Negative
Declaration for the project.
INCORPORATED INTO THE MOTION WITH THE CONSENT OF THE
MAKER AND SECONDER that the words “mixed use” which were included
in the Executive Summary of the Staff Report will be added to the language
of the Resolution and to the Vision Statement.
AMENDMENT: Council Member Schmid moved to change Goal 1.3, “When
examining the potential impacts of vertical rail alignments equal attention
shall be given to all Palo Alto neighborhoods. Adopted mitigation measures
should be proportionate to the impacts identified in studies.” to add that “all
neighborhoods shall be treated equally.”
AMENDMENT FAILED DUE TO THE LACK OF A SECOND
MOTION PASSED: 9-0
8. Review and Approval of the Palo Alto City Council Rail Committee
Guiding Principles.
MOTION: Council Member Klein moved, seconded by Council Member Burt
to approve the revisions to the Rail Committee Guiding Principles, as follows:
Guiding Principle No. 3 was updated to clarify that during the
environmental review stage, equal attention shall be given to all Palo Alto
neighborhoods. Adopted mitigation measures should be proportionate to
the impacts identified in the studies.
Guiding Principle No. 12 now states that while the City supports Caltrain
Modernization, the City’s position of electrification cannot be determined
until the environmental impacts are studied, identified and suitable
mitigation measures are implemented.
DRAFT ACTION MINUTES
Page 3 of 6
City Council Meeting
Draft Action Minutes:
Guiding Principle No. 16 language was strengthened, stating that the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) shall not be modified in any way that
affects the HSR or Caltrain Corridor environmental review process as
currently required by law.
Guiding Principle No. 17 was added, stating that the overall
environmental review process should be comprised of two separate
Environmental Impact Reports. The first EIR should be for the Caltrain
Modernization Project. The second EIR should address any subsequent
improvements proposed or necessary for HSR operation in the corridor.
Minor language changes and clarifications were made throughout the
document, all of which are shown in the attached redlined document.
MOTION WITHDRAWN
MOTION: Council Member Klein moved, seconded by Council Member Price
to return Agenda Item Number 8, “Review and Approval of the Palo Alto City
Council Rail Committee Guiding Principles”, to the Rail Committee.
MOTION PASSED: 9-0
9. Response to Colleague’s Memo on Employee Benefits: Pension.
MOTION: Vice Mayor Shepherd moved, seconded by Council Member Klein
to; 1) direct Staff to explore additional pension legislation with our
Legislators and other parties (such as the League of California Cities) to
close remaining loopholes and to give cities broader decision making power
in regards to their pension plans, and 2) to continue to work with City
employees and the public to fully understand the facts about pensions and
the status of the City’s efforts to manage costs and provision of benefits
while maintaining a talented work force.
INCORPORATED INTO THE MOTION WITH THE CONSENT OF THE
MAKER AND SECONDER to add: 3) to direct Staff to write CalPERS to
confirm our understanding of how regulations will apply to Palo Alto
regarding the definition of income and advise CalPERS of our opposition to
their present interpretation as we understand it, and to send copies of our
correspondence to Legislators.
AMENDMENT: Council Member Schmid moved, seconded by Council
Member Burt to specifically work with employees and the League of
California Cities to get Legislators to open participation into the Social
Security System.
DRAFT ACTION MINUTES
Page 4 of 6
City Council Meeting
Draft Action Minutes:
AMENDMENT MODIFIED BY THE MAKER AND SECONDER to request
Staff to return to Council on this subject prepared to have a discussion on
the potential to open participation in the Social Security System for our
employees as part of a hybrid pension system.
AMENDMENT PASSED: 6-3 Shepherd, Kniss, Price no
MOTION RECAPPED: Vice Mayor Shepherd moved, seconded by Council
Member Klein to; 1) direct Staff to explore additional pension legislation with
our Legislators and other parties (such as the League of California Cities) to
close remaining loopholes and to give cities broader decision making power
in regards to their pension plans, and 2) to continue to work with City
employees and the public to fully understand the facts about pensions and
the status of the City’s efforts to manage costs and provision of benefits
while maintaining a talented work force, and 3) to direct Staff to write
CalPERS to confirm our understanding of how regulations will apply to Palo
Alto regarding the definition of income and advise CalPERS of our opposition
to their present interpretation as we understand it, and to send copies of our
correspondence to Legislators. Staff is directed to return to Council on this
subject prepared to have a discussion on the potential to open participation
in the Social Security System for our employees as part of a hybrid pension
system.
MOTION AS AMENDED PASSED: 9-0
10. 2013 State Legislative Priorities.
MOTION: Council Member Burt moved, seconded by Vice Mayor Shepherd
to direct Staff to explore potential legislation including: 1) require CalPERS
to offer a wider range of health care options and flexibility to local
governments, 2) extend the three year highest average for calculation of
pension, 3) more flexibility for new hires to save money over the long term
and tailor recruiting to a new generation who may prefer higher pay over
benefits, 4) eliminate costly and punitive CalPERS rules that restrict cities
from hiring some job candidates, 5) PEPRA clean-up and clarification, and 6)
landfill capping requirements. Additionally the following: 7) CEQA reform
(particularly as it relates to High Speed Rail), 8) State’s Housing Element
Process and Allocation, 9) some form of dedicated funding for Caltrain and
10) High Speed Rail clean up.
MOTION PASSED: 9-0
DRAFT ACTION MINUTES
Page 5 of 6
City Council Meeting
Draft Action Minutes:
11. Library Advisory Commission Viability Report.
MOTION: Vice Mayor Shepherd moved, seconded by Council Member Kniss
to direct Staff to return with an Ordinance to reduce Commissioners to five
members, extend current terms three months to provide for the recruitment
process and to incorporate a requirement that one or more seats are
designated for individuals with certain qualifications such as membership on
Friends of the Palo Alto Library and Palo Alto Library Foundation.
MOTION SEPARATED FOR THE PURPOSE OF VOTING: Mayor Scharff
requested the Motion be bifurcated to allow separate votes.
MOTION: Vice Mayor Shepherd moved, seconded by Council Member Kniss
to direct Staff to return with an Ordinance to reduce Commissioners to five
members and to extend current terms three months to provide for
recruitment process.
INCORPORATED INTO THE MOTION WITH THE CONSENT OF THE
MAKER AND SECONDER to change the Municipal Code to reflect bi-
monthly meetings instead of quarterly.
MOTION AS AMENDED PASSED: 9-0
MOTION: Vice Mayor Shepherd moved, seconded by Council Member Kniss
to incorporate a requirement that one or more seats are designated for
individuals with certain qualifications such as membership on Friends of the
Palo Alto Library and Palo Alto Library Foundation.
SUBSTITUTE MOTION TO SECOND PART OF MOTION: Council Member
Burt, seconded by Council Member XX moved instead of the “Incorporate a
requirement that one or more seats are designated for individuals with
certain qualifications such as membership on Friends of the Palo Alto Library
and Palo Alto Library Foundation.” “Invite the Friends of the Palo Alto
Library and Palo Alto Library Foundation.to designate liaisons to Library
Advisory Commission.”
SUBSTITUTE MOTION FAILED DUE TO LACK OF A SECOND
MOTION WITHDRAWN BY MAKER AND SECONDER
DRAFT ACTION MINUTES
Page 6 of 6
City Council Meeting
Draft Action Minutes:
12. Colleague’s Memo from Mayor Scharff, and Council Members Klein and
Price Regarding the Length of City Council.
MOTION: Council Member Klein moved, seconded by Council Member Price
to agendize a discussion for up to one hour regarding the length of City
Council meetings at the City Council Retreat on February 2, 2013.
MOTION PASSED: 9-0
COUNCIL MEMBER QUESTIONS, COMMENTS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS
Council Member Klein reported from Bay Area Water Supply and
Conservation Agency (BAWSCA) regarding the City of San Francisco election
regarding the draining of the Hetch Hetchy Reservoir which was defeated.
BAWSCA agencies were concerned that San Francisco was able to vote solely
on the issue when the other agencies represented 2/3 of the system.
Conversations were taking place to alter the law to allow all the agencies to
have a vote.
Council Member Kniss reported she was selected to return to The Bay Area
Air Quality Management Board.
ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 10:40 P.M.