Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2025-03-31 City Council Emails
DOCUMENTS IN THIS PACKET INCLUDE: LETTERS FROM CITIZENS TO THE MAYOR OR CITY COUNCIL RESPONSES FROM STAFF TO LETTERS FROM CITIZENS ITEMS FROM MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS ITEMS FROM OTHER COMMITTEES AND AGENCIES ITEMS FROM CITY, COUNTY, STATE, AND REGIONAL AGENCIES Prepared for: 3/31/2025 Document dates: 3/24/2025 - 3/31/2025 Note: Documents for every category may not have been received for packet reproduction in a given week. 701-32 From:Rebecca Sanders To:Nose, Kiely; Council, City Cc:Furman, Sheri Subject:Finance Committee -Agenda Item #3, April 1, 2025 Date:Monday, March 31, 2025 11:22:13 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. Dear Councilmembers Burt, Lythcott-Haims, and Reckdahl: Palo Alto Neighborhoods strongly supports full staffing of the Mitchell Park Fire Station for both the ambulance and a fire engine concurrently. We understand that full functionality requires 5 personnel in toto, staffed 24x7. As concerned residents, we believe ensuring optimal emergency response capabilities is not just a matter of public service but one of public safety, well-being and equity across neighborhoods. We understand this is a budgetary matter and that there are many competing demands forlimited funds. We ask you to urge Council to direct the City Manager’s office to allocate the funding to fully staff and equip the fire station as soon as possible: South Palo Alto and Midtown deserve parity with other sections of the city. Does it make sense for an entire quadrant of the city to be put at risk? Why are other stations fully equipped and staffed while South Palo Alto’s is hamstrung. Fully staffed stations alleviate the burden on neighboring stations, promoting a more balanced and efficient distribution of emergency services throughout the city. Firefighters deserve a crew complement, not a skeleton crew. We worry that current emergency crews will get burned out due to understaffing by not fully staffingan ambulance and the proposed fire truck. Doesn’t excessive overtime put the health and safety of our first responders at risk? South Palo Alto will see significant expansion as the San Antonio Corridor and adjacent streets are poised to add high-density housing and more businesses. Anincreased demand for emergency services must be planned for. It's a matter of trust. We seek budgetary transparency. When a representativefrom the City points out that additional emergency responders are being added, shouldn’t it also be pointed out that these new recruits are backfill for open positionsor positions let go for budgetary reasons in the past? Even with the addition of new staff, Fire Station #2 will still be understaffed. Please level with us. Investing in the full staffing of the Mitchell Park Fire Station is an investment in the safety, resilience, and security of our community. It demonstrates a commitment to protecting thelives and property of Palo Alto residents and reflects the values we hold as a city that prioritizes public health and safety. We urge you to support the allocation of necessary resources to ensure that the Mitchell Park Fire Station is fully staffed and equipped to meet the growing needs of our community.After all, Measure K provided increased funding for public safety. Put it to good use. Thank you for your attention to this critical matter and for your continued dedication to the safety and well-being of Palo Alto residents. Sincerely, Becky SandersSheri Furman PAN Co-Chairs From:Jo Vitanye To:Council, City Subject:fire station 4 Date:Monday, March 31, 2025 11:09:53 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. Council members, Please consider restoring Fire Station 4 to full function with the return of a fire truck and a full staff. Having a functional fire station is like having homeowner's insurance. Most of the timeyou don't need it but when you do, you really need it. This is more important than some of the projects I see in Palo Alto such as redoing the children's play area in Ramos Park. Jo From:John Melnychuk To:Burt, Patrick; Lythcott-Haims Julie; Council, City Cc:QuietZones PaloAlto Subject:Railway: Quiet Zone, Grade Separation discussion. Date:Monday, March 31, 2025 9:17:17 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. ! Hello Mr. Burt, Thank you for your long, effective service to Palo Alto. We were pleased to hear that you are searching for a way to speed up implementation of Quiet Zones but concerned that you are still considering wayside horns as the technology. Please, could we have an in-person meeting to discuss the City’s timetable for implementation of Quiet Zones, and also, our concerns about Grade Separation Projects? We look forward to the public meeting scheduled for April 16th and would like to meet with you ahead of that meeting. We offer to host you for a short meeting at our home; you could experience conditions at our location, and get the best sense of what Quiet Zones and Grade Separation options would mean to us and our neighbors. If not at our home, please where could we meet? We could not find an up-to-date listing of office hours, and sadly, Zombie Cafe is no more. Quiet Zones 1) We’ve undertaken research ourselves; Wayside Horns are a less desirable option because they are noisier than other possible arrangements, and because the companies that install them are quite steadily going out of business as they offer obsolete technology; it’s hardto get technicians and sometimes impossible to get parts to repair broken wayside horns. (So says the Railway Engineer who helped us, the same person who helped Atherton’s then Mayor to establish its Quiet Zone of 2016). 2) More effort and expense is involved in re-engineering level crossings with Quad Gate upgrades, installation of raised curbs, bollards, new lighting and paint striping, but they are actually easier to maintain these and we won’t risk losing Quiet Zone status because one wayside horn failed. 3) Last week I spoke with Eric Walker, FRA safety inspector. If I understood him correctly, he explained that the average time to implement Quiet Zones was 1 to 3 years, some as quickly as 1 year! Is there a way to expedite ours along with Palo Alto Ave project? This message could be suspicious The sender's email address couldn't be verified. This is a personal email address. Mark Safe Report Powered by Mimecast What constructive action could we take to expedite the Quiet Zone Project in our City? We respect that City Staff has many projects to manage, and fewer personnel are available to manage them. Grade Separation 4) As part of the meeting we would like to analyze the overall merits and demerits of Grade Separation for our City, dollar costs, disruption to already long-suffering neighbors of Caltrain, public sentiment about strategy for suicide prevention, and for moving traffic of all types ever more safely and efficiently. 5) Public sentiment about suicides in our city, teens especially, may influence our decision making in not the most practical way. We would like to hear your thoughts, and we’d like to share ours in a bit more depth than is possible in 2-minute public commentary at Rail Committee or City Council meetings. We note that, since 2010, our schools, our City, our County and our State have invested and innovated in Suicide Prevention strategies with a very substantial and beneficial effect. 6) Your comments at the recent City Council meeting about implementation of Mega Projects was resonant. "Take the time to thoughtfully and creatively evaluate all options, then plan extensively and in great detail, then rapidly execute.” Two questions for me are: is this the best Mega Project Palo Alto could undertake - perhaps a $1 billion with great compromises and huge negative impacts to neighborhoods? 1. 6 to 8 years of construction disruption, some neighbors will lose their homes entirely and others will be faced with permanent blight which will reduce their ability to enjoy their homes, quality of life, and property values. Frankly our needs should be considered and, so far, we cannot see that they have been. 2. The compromise to consider hybrid or viaduct approaches is considerable, and questionable because Palo Alto would engage on this project not-in-coordination with other Cities in the corridor. The impetus to make changes came as a reaction to a tragic cluster of teen suicides, collisions with cars at level crossings, and in preparation for High Speed Rail which has proven to be a masterclass in immature planning and bungled, wasteful execution. Truly, spending $20M to plan for the removal of level crossings, changes that will never be built due to the rising costs is a waste of time and money. Let’s cut the cord now! For example: The Guardian (UK) has published this: https://www.theguardian.com/us- news/2025/feb/27/trump-california-high-speed-rail?utm_source=chatgpt.com My opinion is that Caltrain has historically been ambitious to build its infrastructure and to leave engineering safety improvements unfunded - leaving individual cities to engineer and fund many safety improvements - fencing, level crossing improvements, grade separations. We think that there must be a better way to spend $1 billion in our City. We hope for something that would not cause further harm to already long-suffering neighbors of Caltrain while striking a balance that would bring best value for dollars for the greatest number in our City. With respect, John Melnychuk and Melinda McGee3707 Lindero DrivePalo Alto, CA 94306650-906-5656 The Vast Gaza Death Undercount– Undermines Civic, Diplomatic and Political Pressures By Ralph Nader March 28, 2025 The vast undercount of Israeli-caused deaths in Gaza is regularly reported as 50,000. The actual toll from violent military action and the indirect deaths (stemming from infectious disease, epidemics, untreated chronic illness, untreated serious wounds, and starvation) is well over 400,000 and growing by the day. No crowded enclave like Gaza – the geographical size of Philadelphia – with 2.3 million people under a long-term siege blocking essentials can withstand over 115 thousand tons of bombs, plus artillery, grenades, and snipers targeting civilians, with uncontrollable fires everywhere. How could 97.5% of its inhabitants survive? Tens of thousands of Palestinian children, women, and men lie under the rubble. Tens of thousands of diabetics and cancer victims have no medicine. Five thousand babies a month are born into the rubble. As declared by the Israeli war ministries, “no food, water, medicine, electricity and fuel,” the words of genocide or mass murder of utterly defenseless civilians who had nothing to do with October 7, 2023 — hikes the ratio of “indirect deaths” to the higher range of three to fifteen-fold by the Geneva Declaration Secretariat’s review of prior conflicts. From:Aram James To:Vicki Veenker; Veenker, Vicki; Friends of Cubberley; Palo Alto Free Press; WILPF Peninsula Palo Alto; dennisburns; Dave Price Cc:Supervisor Susan Ellenberg; Josh Becker; Jessica Speiser, Educational Leader for California Democratic Delegate, Assembly District 23; assemblymember.berman@assembly.ca.gov; Zelkha, Mila; Lori Meyers; Sheree Roth; h.etzko@gmail.com; josh@joshsalcman.com; John Burt; Burt, Patrick; cromero@cityofepa.org; Binder, Andrew; Reifschneider, James; Wagner, April; Perron, Zachary; Barberini, Christopher; Enberg, Nicholas; Bill Newell; Baker, Rob; Roberta Roth; Robert.Jonson@shf.sccgov.org; Sean Allen; Lewis James; Cait James; Tim James; Paul Bains; DuJuan Green; Afanasiev, Alex; Ed Lauing; editor@almanacnews.com; Shikada, Ed; jgreen@dailynewsgroup.com; Diana Diamond; MGR-Melissa Stevenson Diaz; Council, City; GRP-City Council; city.council@menlopark.gov; citycouncil@mountainview.gov; Gerry Gras; Dana St. George; Dennis Upton; Gardener, Liz; Vara Ramakrishnan; Jeff Hayden; Human Relations Commission; Holman, Karen (external); kamhialison@gmail.com; Kaloma Smith; Doug Minkler; Jeff Conrad; <michael.gennaco@oirgroup.com>; Rodriguez, Miguel; Damon Silver; Yolanda Conaway; Donna Wallach; Don Austin; Liz Kniss; Daniel Kottke; Angel, David; Robert. Jonsen; Templeton, Cari; EPA Today Subject:The Vast Gaza Death Undercount– Undermines Civic, Diplomatic and Political Pressures By Ralph Nader March28, 2025 Date:Monday, March 31, 2025 12:11:39 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. In my lengthy article, published in the Capitol Hill Citizen, (August/September 2024 issue) I noted that the total ban by Netanyahu of foreign and Israeli reporters from entering the killing fields of Gaza allows the undercount by Hamas to be the anchor on the lethal truth. Hamas counts only names of the deceased given by hospitals and mortuaries, which were largely destroyed many months ago. Hamas, like Netanyahu, favors an undercount for obviously different reasons – the former to lessen the ire of its people for not protecting them and the latter to diminish international sanctions and condemnation. It is not as if there are no higher estimates by credible groups. UN agencies, international aid groups, and specialists in disaster casualties at places like Brown University and the University of Edinburgh, and reports in the prestigious medical journal LANCETall point to a major undercount. They cite minimum reasonable estimates. But the mass media just keeps citing the Hamas undercount, awaiting some magical number that meets an impossible level of precision. Interestingly, the mass media has no problem reporting estimates of deaths under the Syrian Assad dictatorship, during the Sudanese conflict, or the Russian war on Ukraine. It seems only the Palestinians are not allowed to live by the Israeli/U.S. terrorist regimes and are not told how many of them are being annihilated. Imagine, whole extended families in apartment buildings and tents. More curious is why the so-called Left, in their denunciations, are still clinging to the Hamas figure. A famous commentator from Haaretz and a civic leader in the U.S. gave me the same answer. The Hamas figures are horrific enough! Can you imagine Israeli governments undercounting their fatalities by nearly 90%? More curious is what is keeping the few strong defenders of Palestinian survival in Congress from asking the Congressional Research Service of the Library of Congress to come up with a minimum accurate figure from the available empirical and clinical evidence? What kept the majority of Democrats in the Senate under Biden from subpoenaing the evidence accumulated by the State Department on the death/injury count? The State Department has been resisting our Freedom of Information request since May 23, 2024. What about tapping into the work of sixteen Israeli human rights groups, including the military reservist groups like “Breaking the Silence”? Numbers matter in wars and natural disasters. They matter in the intensity behind the civic, political, and diplomatic efforts worldwide to stop the killing, secure a permanent ceasefire, let in the thousands of trucks bearing humanitarian aid (food, water, medicine, fuel, and other essentials), and enter into serious peace negotiations. Instead, Trump is backing the expulsion of the Palestinian survivors, supporting the annexation of the West Bank, and leaving devastated Gaza as a real estate opportunity for Israeli and American developers. This attitude is what Jim Zogby (founder of the Arab-American Institute) exposed when years ago he delivered a lecture on “The Other Anti-Semitism” before an Israeli University audience. The other antisemitism, exhibited by Biden and Trump, is backed by F-16s and other weapons of mass destruction that have killed over 100,000 children along with their mothers, fathers, grandmothers, and grandfathers. A deep racism backed by a genocidal delivery system day after day is funded by American tax dollars delivered by a homicidal Congress. A Congress that has refused, since 1948, testimony by leading Israeli and Palestinian peace advocates before House and Senate Committees to provide justice for the Palestinian people. Copyright © 2025 Nader.Org, All rights reserved.You are receiving this email because you opted in at our website. Our mailing address is:Nader.OrgP.O. Box 19367Washington, DC 20036 From:Dorothy Bender <dbender@gmail.com> To:Council, City Subject:Re: Your e-mail to City Council was received Date:Sunday, March 30, 2025 4:33:55 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. On Sun, Mar 30, 2025 at 15:44 Council, City <city.council@cityofpaloalto.org> wrote: Thank you for your comments to the City Council. Your e‐mail will be forwarded to all seven Council Members and a printout of your correspondence will also be included in thenext available Council packet. If your comments are about an item that is already scheduled for a City Council agenda, you can call (650) 329‐2571 to confirm that the item is still on the agenda for the next meeting. If your letter mentions a specific complaint or a request for service, we'll either reply with anexplanation or else send it on to the appropriate department for clarification. We appreciate hearing from you. ------------------Cybersecurity safety note: Official emails from the City of Palo Alto typically end with @cityofpaloalto.organd there are limited exceptions such as surveys or polls that may come from City consultants acting on theCity’s behalf. Though the City doesn’t often solicit donations, City partners, including local foundations suchas the Palo Alto Art Center Foundation, Friends of the Palo Alto Library, and Friends of the Palo Alto JuniorMuseum & Zoo do send out fundraising communications. Please contact the appropriate City department orCity Council Member to double check its legitimacy and never share personal information or other securedetails via email. Contact City Departments: https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/City-Hall/Phone-Directory Contact City Council: https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/City-Hall/City-Council From:Dorothy Bender <dbender@gmail.com> To:gabrielle johnck; steve schmidt; Patti Fry; Paul Collacchi; Peter Drekmeier; pat@patburt.org; Summa, Doria;Council, City; dcombs@menlopark.gov; info@menloforward.org Subject:Re: Josh Becker Bill re builder"s remedy applications Date:Sunday, March 30, 2025 3:44:37 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. Senate Bill 457 (SB 457), introduced by California State Senator Josh Becker in 2025, aims to prevent the misuse of the Builder’s Remedy by closing loopholes that allow developers tobypass local zoning laws. The bill proposes that a city’s Housing Element be considered compliant from the date of its adoption, rather than waiting for state approval. However, the bill’s text does not specify whether these provisions would apply retroactively toprojects initiated before its enactment. Determining the retroactive applicability of SB 457 would require further clarification from legislative analyses or legal counsel. On Sun, Mar 30, 2025 at 12:51 gabrielle johnck <gabriellejohnck@gmail.com> wrote:so ... you do not know if it is retroactive and will have any impact on the Sunset magazine project. OK, thanks On Sun, Mar 30, 2025 at 12:10 PM Dorothy Bender <dbender@gmail.com><dbender@gmail.com> wrote: Senator Josh Becker issued a press release on March 24, 2025, announcing theintroduction of Senate Bill 457 (SB 457). The legislation aims to prevent the misuse of the Builder’s Remedy and ensure equitable treatment of cities in San Mateo and Santa Claracounties as they strive to meet California’s housing objectives. The bill seeks to close loopholes that allow speculative developers to bypass zoning laws while still providingstrong incentives for cities to adopt compliant Housing Elements on time. On Sat, Mar 29, 2025 at 17:11 gabrielle johnck <gabriellejohnck@gmail.com> wrote: Hi Dorothy,Can you tell me where I can find a definite answer regarding the Bill's impact on the Sunset Magazine campus project. There are conflicting articles, some saying it isretroactive and others not addressing the issue. I did a word search on the bill and Becker's summary of the Bill on his web site and the word "retroactive" does notappear. The legislative language in the Bill says it goes into effect on January 1, 2026. I hope you can direct me in the right direction. I filled out a question to Becker's office on his web site but that approach may be pointless. Thanks, Brielle From:Aram James To:Vicki Veenker; Veenker, Vicki Cc:Josh Becker; Jessica Speiser, Educational Leader for California Democratic Delegate, Assembly District 23; assemblymember.berman@assembly.ca.gov; Zelkha, Mila; board@pausd.org; board@valleywater.org; bos@smcgov.org; Jay Boyarsky; Jeff Rosen; Rosen, Jeff; Gardener, Liz; Gerry Gras; Dana St. George; Dave Price; Emily Mibach; Braden Cartwright; Council, City; Perron, Zachary; Binder, Andrew; Reifschneider, James; Wagner, April; <michael.gennaco@oirgroup.com>; Enberg, Nicholas; Foley, Michael; h.etzko@gmail.com; Lotus Fong; Lori Meyers; Gennady Sheyner; Sheree Roth; dennis burns; Doug Minkler; Yolanda Conaway; Don Austin; Donna Wallach; Sean Allen; Pat M; Burt, Patrick; Bains, Paul; Lu, George; Greg Tanaka; Cecilia Taylor; Nash, Betsy; Friends of Cubberley; GRP-City Council; city.council@menlopark.gov; citycouncil@mountainview.gov Subject:President Donald Trump"s efforts to deport foreign students who participated in pro-Palestinian demonstrationsare getting help from private groups that use fac… Date:Sunday, March 30, 2025 1:56:37 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links. Private groups work to identify and report student protesters for possible deportation President Donald Trump's efforts to deport foreign students who participated inpro-Palestinian demonstrations are getting help from private groups that usefacial-recognition technology to identify masked protesters President Donald Trump's efforts to deport foreign students who participated in pro- Palestinian demonstrations are getting help from private groups that use fac… Source: ABC Newshttps://search.app/EExwnEA6uceChGSr6 Shared via the Google app From:Aram James To:Vicki Veenker; Veenker, Vicki; Supervisor Susan Ellenberg Cc:Josh Becker; assemblymember.berman@assembly.ca.gov; Jessica Speiser, Educational Leader for California Democratic Delegate, Assembly District 23; Gennady Sheyner; Patricia.Guerrero@jud.ca.gov; Gardener, Liz; Liz Kniss; Kaloma Smith; Emily Mibach; Mickie Winkler; <michael.gennaco@oirgroup.com>; Zelkha, Mila; Lori Meyers; Sheree Roth; Lotus Fong; Anna Griffin; Cribbs, Anne; Dave Price; Gennady Sheyner; Sarah Wright; Dennis Upton; Daniel Kottke; Lydia Kou; jgreen@dailynewsgroup.com; Greg Tanaka; Council, City; Rowena Chiu; board@pausd.org; board@valleywater.org; BoardOperations; Binder, Andrew; Reifschneider, James; Wagner, April; Perron, Zachary; editor@almanacnews.com; Ed Lauing; Shikada, Ed; Stump, Molly Subject:PRESSLEY, WARREN, MARKEY, LAWMAKERS DEMAND EXPLANATION FOR “DISTURBING ARREST ANDDETENTION” OF TUFTS STUDENT RUMEYSA OZTURK Student seemingly arrested for her political views,lawmakers demand due process and Date:Saturday, March 29, 2025 11:52:45 PM CAUTION: THIS EMAIL ORIGINATED FROM OUTSIDE OF THE ORGANIZATION. BE CAUTIOUSOF OPENING ATTACHMENTS AND CLICKING ON LINKS. PRESSLEY, WARREN, MARKEY, LAWMAKERS DEMAND EXPLANATION FOR “DISTURBING ARREST AND DETENTION” OF TUFTS STUDENT RUMEYSA OZTURK Student seemingly arrested for her political views, lawmakers demand due process and https://admin-pressley.house.gov/2025/03/28/pressley-warren-markey-lawmakers-demand-explanation-for-disturbing-arrest-and-detention-of-tufts-student-rumeysa-ozturk/ From:Aram James To:Binder, Andrew Cc:Reifschneider, James; Barberini, Christopher; Enberg, Nicholas; <michael.gennaco@oirgroup.com>; Foley, Michael; Figueroa, Eric; Perron, Zachary; Wagner, April; Jensen, Eric; Afanasiev, Alex; Lee, Craig; Jay Boyarsky; Jeff Rosen; Jeff Hayden; Jeff Conrad; Jessica Speiser, Educational Leader for California Democratic Delegate, Assembly District 23; Josh Becker; assemblymember.berman@assembly.ca.gov; Cribbs, Anne; Anna Griffin; Council, City; city.council@menlopark.gov; jgreen@dailynewsgroup.com; Gardener, Liz; Gerry Gras; h.etzko@gmail.com; Dave Price; Emily Mibach; Braden Cartwright; Gennady Sheyner; Sean Allen; Pat M; Bains, Paul; Freddie.Quintana@sen.ca.gov; Patricia.Guerrero@jud.ca.gov; Sheree Roth; Lori Meyers; Nash, Betsy; GRP- City Council; citycouncil@mountainview.gov Subject:Protest over Hwy 101 swastika flag ends in unexpected understanding Date:Saturday, March 29, 2025 5:27:27 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. Protest over Hwy 101 swastika flag ends in unexpected understanding Source: KTVU FOX 2 https://share.newsbreak.com/ccfpvvur?s=i0 From:Henry Etzkowitz To:Office of the Provost; Council, City; Roberta Ahlquist; Mark Granovetter; Aram James; Terry Beaubois; RebeccaEisenberg; Ellen Bob; Josh Schneider; Sue Rosser; Human Relations Commission Date:Saturday, March 29, 2025 1:30:15 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. FYI implications for repairing Palo Alto-Stanford strained relationship? Proposed incandidates statement in 2024 City Council election, drawing upon the Yale-New Haven agreement. It may appear to be untimely for the university to take on a new financialobligation, especially one with long term potential, yet it may also be a propitious moment to reset town-gown relations on a renewed basis of solidarity among relative equals rather thanthe previous regime that induced the contemporary disjuncture. The novel funds could at least partially be earmarked for inter-generational sociability efforts, for , extending the Avenidassenior programs like community meet-up’s, bird watching and walking groups that on their face are age-appropriate to all. For further ideas see the “Amsterdam model” Etzkowitz andde Tombe, 2024) in follow-up. Best, Henry Neighbors for Environmental and social Justice (NESJ) Www.HenryEtzkowitz.org Harvard University has agreed to voluntarily pay the City of Cambridge $6 million without committing to a long-term amount for the Payment in Lieu of Taxes prog… https://search.app/jFKdmAU3NQwcvnCJ7 Shared via the Google app Sent from my iPhone From:Carol To:Council, City Subject:Fire Station at Mitchell Park Date:Saturday, March 29, 2025 10:24:08 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. ! Dear Council. I live in the south of Palo Alto and have been very disappointed to learn that there is no fire engine at Mitchell Park fire station. It is over 2 years since the corner shops on Loma Verde and Middlefield were gutted by fire and are still not able to be used. I have no idea how damaged they are, but I feel sure that if there had been a fire engine on the scene that had come from Mitchell Park, then there would have been a lot less damage and those shops would be back open again. If instead of 4 unoccupied shops late at night, this had been a home or homes with people fast asleep inside, this would have been seen very differently by the Council. Next time instead of 4 shops, it might be an apartment building or a single home with many occupants, some elderly, who may not have been able to get outside easily. These factors alone should urge the Council to insist on full operations at a fire station, with a fire engine and adequate staffing to ensure that anywhere in south Palo Alto gets the help it needs in the case of fire. Thank you Carol Rogers, Stockton Place. This message could be suspicious Similar name as someone you've contacted. This is a personal email address. Mark Safe Report Powered by Mimecast From:Joe Penko To:Council, City Subject:Staffing Fire Station 4 Date:Friday, March 28, 2025 1:42:55 PM Attachments:image002.png Single role E64 staff report 4.1.25 finance committee meeting.pdf CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. Dear Members of the Finance Committee and City Council at Large, If you have not had a chance to read the opinion piece that came out today I wouldrecommend reading it first prior to my message. It does a great job capturing the significance of the issue that is being weighed. https://www.paloaltoonline.com/guest-opinion/2025/03/28/opinion-bolstering-fire-service-resources-will-save-more-lives/ On behalf of the Palo Alto Firefighters, Local 1319, I urge you to carefully consider the lastingimpacts your decisions will have on the health of our organization, the retention of our workforce, and—most importantly—the safety of the Palo Alto community. This Tuesday, you will be reviewing the staff report prepared for the April 1, Finance Committee meeting. It is critical that you understand the options proposing cross-staffing ofEngine 64 and Medic 64, or the use of contract single-role paramedics, will have significant and lasting negative consequences. These approaches compromise emergency responsecapabilities, strain an already overextended workforce, and threaten to degrade both service reliability and morale within the department. We were clear during February’s Council meeting: the Palo Alto Firefighters do notsupport cross-staffing as an ongoing solution, and we will continue to fight against any planthat seeks to make a cross-staffed Engine 64 a permanent reality. Our position is not ours alone—the community has spoken loudly and clearly in favor ofrestoring Engine 64 as a fully staffed unit. Time and again, residents have voiced their opposition to cross-staffing and their unwillingness to accept it as a compromise. They deserveand expect a fully operational engine company at Station 4, staffed with dedicated personnel ready to respond at a moment’s notice. Anything less diminishes their safety and erodes theirtrust in the services they rely on. We believe there are better paths forward—ones that support public safety while also valuingthe dedicated professionals who protect it. Of the options presented, our membership generally supports: Option B (All firefighters): This provides a full-time, in-house solution that invests in our workforce and ensures system stability. We do have concerns about adding a peakhour overtime ambulance to our staff.Option C (Single Role), provided it is implemented in a healthy, sustainable manner.Our primary concern with this option is the length of time required to make it a reality.Option F: This is the most realistic and implementable plan in the short term whilemaintaining service quality and reliability—with one critical exception. The current plan proposes replacing two fire ambulances with single-role paramedics and adding a peak- hour unit staffed by firefighters on overtime. As we have repeatedly stated, we do notsupport permanently staffing firefighter positions with overtime. o This proposal is especially problematic because it relies on partial shifts. Manyof our members live hours away, and we have had significant challenges staffing 12-hour shifts with overtime. We currently staff three 12-hour shiftsduring the summer for Station 8, which is far from ideal. This type of 12-hourovertime staffing was one of the primary factors cited in the mass exodusof employees in recent years. Instead, we urge the Finance Committee to counter-propose converting one fire ambulance to single-role staffing and use single-role personnel for the additional peak- hour ambulance. This approach would allow personnel to transition to Engine 64immediately and offer a more practical path to launching the single-role division. We understand the financial constraints the City faces, but we ask that you prioritize long-termpublic safety and employee well-being over short-term budget fixes. Decisions made now will echo for years to come—impacting not only the fire department but the safety and confidenceof our community. We remain committed to working collaboratively with the City to find meaningful andsustainable solutions. Thank you for your time and thoughtful consideration. Respectfully, Joseph Penko Palo Alto Fire Department Local 1319 President C: 650.392.5589 | E: josephpenko@gmail.com 6 6 3 0 Finance Committee Staff Report From: City Manager Report Type: ACTION ITEMS Lead Department: Fire Meeting Date: April 1, 2025 Report #:2502-4221 TITLE Evaluation of Fire and Ambulance Service Expansion Options (Follow-up from 11/19/24 Meeting) RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Finance Committee evaluate Fire Department fire and ambulance service expansion options and provide feedback for further consideration. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY During the Fiscal Year 2025 Budget Hearings, the Finance Committee requested the Palo Alto Fire Department (PAFD) to return with options to increase fire and emergency medical service (EMS) resources to meet service needs. The Fire Department presented data on three staffing options to Finance Committee on November 19, 2024. During that meeting, the Finance Committee reviewed the options and requested additional data and additional staffing options to achieve the staffing of Engine 64 and a peak hour ambulance. As part of the Mid-Year budget actions this month, Council approved staffing of Engine 64 and Medic 64 in a cross-staffed model with the addition of 3 positions to be filled on overtime. This report includes specific follow-up data requested, including additional options for staffing Fire Station 4 and a peak hour ambulance for 12-Hour daily, and details on the creation of a new classification of single-role civilian EMS staff and establishing a single-role division (modified from the original proposal made in the November meeting). It also includes a proposed implementation timeline to illustrate the steps necessary to create the new division. BACKGROUND The November 19, 2024 Staff Report, (Attachment A) included information on existing City- wide Fire Department service demands and system performance, as well as options to increase resources by adding a fire engine at Station 4 and a peak call time 12-Hour ambulance (peak ambulance) to the current Palo Alto Fire Department deployment model. Three staffing options Item 3 Staff Report Item 3: Staff Report Pg. 1 Packet Pg. 91 of 113 6 6 3 0 considered in November included: A. Contract with a private ambulance company B. Current model staffing with additional firefighters, or C. Creation of a new classification of single-role civilian EMS staff and establishing a single- role division. At the November 19, 2024 Finance Committee meeting, the following specific data was requested: 1. Details of “Other Calls” in Table 1 "Calls for Service” of the November report 2. Stanford Call for Service details 3. Mountain View Volume Comparison 4. Chart that shows history of deployment and cross staffing 5. Potential Revenue increases 6. Alternative options for staffing Fire Station 4 and the 12-Hour Peak Ambulance that were not presented in the November report 7. Details on the timeline for adding Single-Role Civilian staffing Responses to each of these requests are provided below in the Analysis section. ANALYSIS Below are the responses to the Committee’s questions, updated based on the FY 2025 Mid- Year Budget Review actions that approved resources to cross staff an engine with the ambulance at Station 4. 1. Details of “Other Calls” in Table 1 "Calls for Service” of the November report Table 1. Calls for Services shows a total of 9,416 calls for service in FY 2024, a 2% increase from the prior year. Of these calls, 5,884 (62%) were for EMS responses, 136 (1.4%) were for fires, and 3,396 (36%) were “All Others”. All Other calls include service calls, false alarm calls and good intent calls: •Good Intent Calls: Good Intent calls capture incidents where there may have been an emergency, but it turned out to be non-emergent or nothing at all. For example, someone could smell smoke and call 9-1-1, but after firefighters arrive and investigate, they may find that the odor was from burnt popcorn down the hall. •False Alarms and False Calls: These are primarily alarms that are automatically triggered during construction or other non-emergency causes such as steam from a shower, dust, insects, or smoke from cooking. This category also covers situations where someone negligently triggered a fire alarm or made an intentionally false report. •Service Calls: These calls are for situations where the department is providing a service, but it’s not an emergency. This can include clean up calls for smoke removal, water evacuations or other hazards; assisting with non-emergency falls in the home; people trapped in an elevator or elevator overrides. •Hazardous Materials and Others: Most of these are utilities-related, such as a natural Item 3 Staff Report Item 3: Staff Report Pg. 2 Packet Pg. 92 of 113 6 6 3 0 gas leak, wiring problem, powerlines down, but it also includes gasoline, diesel, or oil spills, chemical releases or other biological hazards. Table 1. Detail of "All Other" Calls for Service in FY 2024 Count Proportion of “All Other” Proportion of Total Calls for Service Good intent call 1,379 41%15% False alarm or false call 1,246 37%13% Service Call 655 19%7% Hazardous condition and Others 116 3%1% Subtotal “All Other “ 3,396 100%36% EMS 5,884 N/A 62% Fires 136 N/A 1% FY 2024 Total Calls for Services 9,416 N/A 100% 2. Stanford Call for Service Details The City of Palo Alto provides fire service protection under contract to Stanford University. The current contract began in July 2018, after being renegotiated with the closure of station 7 at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (SLAC). This contract was renewed to be effective through June 30, 2028, with re-negotiations for services beyond that date due to commence on or before July 1, 2026. The contract covers Fire Services only and explicitly excludes any costs associated with ambulance transport services. The cost model developed to calculate the charge to Stanford is complex and ensures that only the services covered by the contract, specifically resources staged at Station 6 and corresponding pro rata share of shared resources, are charged. The calculation equates to approximately 19% of the Fire Department budget. Table 2. Fiscal Year 2024 Stanford and Palo Alto Calls for Service Palo Alto Stanford Total EMS 5,154 730 5,884 Good intent call 1,234 145 1,379 False alarm or false call 851 395 1,246 Service Call 583 72 655 Fire 110 26 136 Hazardous condition and Others 100 16 116 TOTAL 8,032 1,384 9,416 Ambulance Transports 3,595 395 3,990 Stanford University accounts for fifteen percent (15%) of all calls for service. The call volume trends are similar to that of the rest of the city, with the majority of calls for emergency medical Item 3 Staff Report Item 3: Staff Report Pg. 3 Packet Pg. 93 of 113 6 6 3 0 services (53%). However, false alarms make up a greater proportion of Stanford call volume (29%) in comparison to Palo Alto (11%). Stanford University makes up ten percent (10%) of transports. 3.Mountain View Call Volume Comparison The City of Mountain View Fire Department’s most recent annual report that is available to the public is from Fiscal Year 20231. In that report the following calls for service data is provided: Table 4. City of Mountain View Fire Department Calls for Service Comparison Mountain View (FY23)Palo Alto (FY24) Count Percentage Count Percentage EMS*5,747 72%5,884 62% Good intent call 546 7%1,379 15% False alarm or false call 718 9%1,246 13% Service Call 539 7%655 7% Fire 196 2%136 1% Hazardous condition and Others 231 3%116 1% TOTAL 7,977 100%9,416 100% *Mountain View does not provide medical transport services, during this period they are serviced by County of Santa Clara EMS 4. Chart that shows history of deployment and cross-staffing Attachment B provides a deployment and cross-staffing timeline for the Fire Department since Fiscal Year 2011. 5.Potential Revenue increases As part of the municipal fee study being conducted in fiscal year 2025, the Fire Department has included work exploring the addition of a first responder fee and an increase to the base fee for ambulance transports. Neither of these fees are dependent on any of the options discussed for additional resources or alternative service models. Work is underway and analysis are too preliminary as of the date of this report to publish with confidence of reliability. Adding a 12-Hour peak ambulance will generate additional revenue by capturing transports that Santa Clara County is picking up when City resources are fully deployed and unable to respond. This is estimated to generate $70,000-$100,000 in revenue that could offset the significant on-going and one-time investment costs of enhanced services. 1 https://www.mountainview.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/8329/638423818087870000 Item 3 Staff Report Item 3: Staff Report Pg. 4 Packet Pg. 94 of 113 6 6 3 0 6. Alternative Options for staffing Fire Station 4 and the 12-Hour Peak Ambulance that were not presented in the November report The November 19, 2024 Staff Report presented the following options for adding a dedicated fire engine to station 64 and a new 12-Hour ambulance: •Option A: Contract with a private ambulance company •Option B: Current model staffing with additional firefighters, or •Option C: Creation of a new classification of single-role civilian EMS staff and establishing a single-role division Additional options are limited that will increase resources and provide the same service level enhancements as Options A through C. Two Alternatives have been identified that are steps towards a Long-Term implementation of Option C. Fire Engine Staffing Permanent alternatives to bring Engine 64 to full-time staffing are limited. To provide some clarity on staffing needs for an engine, below outlines operational and budgetary staffing details. “Daily positions” represents the number of employees on each unit at any given time providing services to the community. This is how many people must be assigned to the unit for it to be in service. A fire engine requires 3 daily positions to operate. In total, the current staffing model operates with 3 daily staff. All engines operate 24 hours a day, seven days a week, 365 days per year which requires three shifts (i.e. “battalions”); therefore, each daily position must be multiplied by three battalions: 3.0 daily positions on an engine x 3 battalions = 9 total employees to staff one dedicated engine + Backfill staffing Additional firefighters are authorized in the service delivery model to provide leave coverage and are called “backfill.” The Department has 0.5 FTE backfill positions for every daily position. When adding 3 daily positions, at least 1.0 FTE firefighter would be necessary as a backfill position. Therefore, a total of 10 FTE would need to be added to fully staff a dedicated engine. Table 5: Fire Engine Staffing Position Classification Daily Staffing Budgeted Staffing (FTE) Fire Captain 1 3.0 Apparatus Operator 1 3.0 Fire Fighter 1 4.0 Total Staffing 3.0 daily staffing 10.0 budgeted staffing (FTE) Alternative Options Options A through C presented in the November report are long-term options to fully staff Engine 64 and a 12 HR Peak Ambulance. The Finance Committee asked the Department to explore alternative options for Fire Station 4 and a 12-Hour Peak Ambulance. Item 3 Staff Report Item 3: Staff Report Pg. 5 Packet Pg. 95 of 113 6 6 3 0 Since the November meeting, City Council approved Engine 64 to be placed into service by cross-staffing the unit with Medic 64 on overtime in the FY 2025 Mid-Year Budget Review. This is a swift and initial action to place a fire engine in service allowing the City time to explore additional resource options to invest in the system. The alternative options presented below offer different levels of resources added to the current system. Both include the Single-Role model of staffing for ambulance services, moving towards the Long-Term Option C presented in the November report. Option D: Cross Staff Engine 64 and Medic 64 (as approved at FY 2025 Mid-year) •Adds 3.0 FTE Fire Captain positions to Cross-Staff Engine 64 and Medic 64 Fire Station 4 This option adds Firefighter positions in the budget that are currently filled with Overtime. This will maintain the cross-staffed Engine 64 and Medic 64 while reducing reliance on overtime. It continues firefighting capacity at Fire Station 4, however, it does not add resources to the emergency response system. This is meant as a very limited-term option as it will not address the performance issues covered in the November memo. Cross-staffing Engine 64 and Medic 64 will not positively impact Unit Hour Utilization or Response Times. It will increase the workload of the crew at Fire Station 4, and Medic 64 will be less available to respond. As the City works through additional options to fully staff Fire Engine 64 these positions could be used as a stepping stone towards full staffing with firefighters or be removed through attrition if the single-role model is fully implemented (Option C). Option E: Establish Single-Role Division with 12 Hour Peak Ambulance •Adds 7.0 FTE to launch Single-Role Division with 12 HR Peak Ambulance Single-Role This moves towards the single-role model with the addition of a 12-hour peak ambulance staffed with single-role positions. This option includes management and administrative staff to build the single-role division and set the City up for further expansion into the single-role model, moving towards the long-term Option C. The 12-hour peak ambulance will assist with improving response times, as it is adding a resource to the overall system, and it will help reduce reliance on Santa Clara County ambulance service. Item 3 Staff Report Item 3: Staff Report Pg. 6 Packet Pg. 96 of 113 6 6 3 0 Option F: Establish Single-Role Division with 2 Full-Time Ambulances, Add Engine 64 and 12 HR Peak Ambulance on Overtime •Add 12-hour peak ambulance on firefighter overtime •Adds 16.0 FTE to launch single-role division with 2 24-hour ambulances •Adds Engine 64 full-time by reassigning current firefighters from ambulances Single-Role This creates the single-role division that allows for the full-time staffing of Fire Engine 64, the transition of 2 full-time ambulance staffed with single-role positions, instead of firefighters. This option includes management and administrative staff to help build the single-role division and set the City up for further expansion into the single-role model. By adding enough single-role positions for 2 full-time ambulances, the firefighters on the ambulances will be reassigned to staff up Engine 64. The chart below shows how this results in a reduction of 3.0 FTE firefighters. Table 6. Firefighter Position Changes with Option F 2 Ambulances Engine 64 Difference Daily Staffing 4.0 3.0 (1.0) Budgeted Staffing (x3 Battalions) 12.0 FTE 9.0 FTE (3.0) FTE Fire Station 4 This option brings firefighting capacity to Fire Station 4 and Fire Engine 64 into full-time staffing, adding it as a resource to the system. Option F will improve key areas of performance by reducing response times and improving Unit Hour Utilization for all units in the system. Peak Ambulance The 12 -hour peak ambulance is still an important resource add to improving response times, and reducing reliance on Santa Clara County‘s ambulance. In this option, it will be staffed on firefighter overtime. This allows for that resource to be easily deployed in a cost-effective manner while the Department works toward the long-term Option C. Attachment C, Staffing Options Summary, compares Options A through C presented in the November report, and the alternatives presented above. All cost are shown in Fiscal Year 2025 figures. Item 3 Staff Report Item 3: Staff Report Pg. 7 Packet Pg. 97 of 113 6 6 3 0 7. Details on the timeline for adding Single-Role Civilian staffing Single-role refers to an organizational model that will be new to Palo Alto, and has been adopted by other fire departments in California that provide an ambulance service. Currently all PAFD ambulances are staffed with firefighter Emergency Medical Technicians (EMT) and paramedics, working as an EMS provider and firefighter. The single-role organizational model establishes a new type of ambulance employee that does not have firefighting duties. The “single-role” will have the singular role as an ambulance employee and not a firefighter. This new position requires engagement with labor related to salaries and benefits. Staff have engaged labor in discussions on adding classifications for the positions of EMT and Paramedic, so the City will have the administrative ability to proceed with a new single-role staffing approach if approved. Single-role EMTs and paramedics market salary is typically 30% lower than those of firefighters, and there is potential for additional savings with pension benefits. CalPERS does not have uniformity on whether these job classifications would have safety or non-safety (miscellaneous) pensions. Across jurisdictions in the state, there are examples of different CalPERS classifications for these roles; for example, the City of Berkeley provides a safety pension for their single-role civilian staff, and the City of Chula Vista provides a non-safety pension. Palo Alto’s Human Resources staff has already communicated with CalPERS about the City’s intent to create the new job classifications, but has been informed that a determination cannot be made until final job descriptions are submitted to CalPERS. Hiring costs and timeframes are expected to be reduced with the single-role staff. Hiring timelines may be shortened, as the selection and training process for single-role staff is significantly shorter than it is for firefighters. Single-role staff will be required to complete approximately three weeks of training as compared to the 20-week academy for firefighters. This will allow the Department to fill vacancies for ambulance staff more rapidly. The associated expenses related to the hiring and training of new single-role staff is lower compared to the costs of firefighters. The single-role model is expected to create a more flexible staffing structure that will allow for faster and more cost-efficient expansion of EMS services in the future. This staff model could increase the resources provided to the community with a lower financial impact in both the short and long term. There is a possibility of a higher turnover rate with single-role personnel, however, that is something we would have to monitor to quantify. This model will create a hiring pipeline and assist with recruitment and diversity in hiring. The Department can tap into the more diverse candidate pool of civilian EMTs and paramedics, many of whom would be attracted to joining PAFD in the pursuit of a career in the fire service. It would create a hiring pipeline for civilian EMS workers to gain exposure and experience in the fire service. Item 3 Staff Report Item 3: Staff Report Pg. 8 Packet Pg. 98 of 113 6 6 3 0 Single-role has a number of anticipated operational benefits for the Department, and will create more availability for response units during firefighter training exercises. Single-role ambulance staff will provide medical response coverage for the City as firefighters complete mandatory training. All firefighters must complete 200+ hours of training each year, including emergency medical training. This is currently accomplished while they are on-duty. Often, firefighters in training are called away due to the heavy workload from increasing calls for service. With this option, single-role civilian staffing would not be required to complete the firefighter portion of the training and would be able to provide full coverage for firefighters during training drills significantly reducing interruption and improving training continuity. Timeline The transition to an alternative service delivery and/or implementation of new resources takes time, and that time depends on the options outlined. Further details on the timing of each option is outlined in their descriptions. In addition to labor discussions discussed previously, both funding to support investments and internal administrative updates such as policies, procedures, specialized training and change management all factor into the implementation timeline, especially if this includes establishing a new division and operational model. FISCAL/RESOURCE IMPACT FY25 • IAFF Negotiations • E64 Cross-Staffed on Overtime FY26 (Jul-Dec) • 12 HR Ambulance on Overtime • E64 Cross-Staffed on Overtime • Preparation for Single-Role Division (if approved) FY26 (Jan-Jun) • Hire Single-Role Admin Staff • Hire Single-Role EMTs & Paramedics • Conduct training & transition Item 3 Staff Report Item 3: Staff Report Pg. 9 Packet Pg. 99 of 113 6 6 3 0 This report presents information for consideration and potential fiscal impacts. Direction and feedback from the Committee will guide the Department in preparing the Fiscal Year 2026 budget to be presented and approved by the City Council. STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT The Department conducted a neighborhood briefing on February 13, 2025 and maintains a dedicated webpage to the staffing of Fire Station 4 to provide up to date information to the public. All proposals will have an impact on the Stanford Fire Services Contract cost model and will require discussion and potential renegotiation with the university. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Finance Committee’s review and discussion of potential staffing models to expand fire and ambulance services is not a project under CEQA. ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: November 19, 2024 Staff Report Attachment B: Deployment and Cross-Staffing Timeline (2011 – present) Attachment C: Staffing Options Summary APPROVED BY: Geoffrey Blackshire, Fire Chief Item 3 Staff Report Item 3: Staff Report Pg. 10 Packet Pg. 100 of 113 Palo Alto Fire Department Deployment History FY2011 to Present Day The chart below shows resource staffing at each Fire Station from Fiscal Year 2011 through Fiscal Year 2025. Only years where changes were made are shown. Glossary BC = Battalion Chief E = Engine M = Medic/Ambulance R = Rescue T = Truck XS = Cross Staffing Fire Station FY2011 FY2012 FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 FY2018 FY2021 FY2022 FY2025 (Current) Station 1 E61 (3) M61 (2) E61 (3) M61 (2) E61 (3) M61 (2) E61 (3) M6 (2) E61 (3) M61 (2) E61 (3) M61 (Peak, XS in PM) BC (1) E61 (3) M61 (Peak, XS in PM by E63) BC (1) E61 (3) M61 (2) BC (1) E61 (3) M61 (2) BC (1) Station 2 E62 (3) R62 (3) M62 (Peak, XS in PM) E62 (3) R62 (3) M62 (Peak, XS in PM) E62 (3) M62 (2) E62 (3) M62 (2) E62 (3) M62 (2) E62 (3) M62 (XS) E62 (3) Brown Out M62 (XS) S62 (2) M62 (2) E62 (3) M62 (2) Station 3 E63 (3) E63 (3) E63 (3) M63 (XS in PM) E63 (3) M63 (XS in PM) E63 (3) M63 (XS in PM) E63 (3) M63 (XS in PM) E63 (3) M63 (XS in PM) E63 (3) E63 (3) Station 4 E64 (3)E64 (3)E64 (3)E64 (3)E64 (3) M64 (XS) E64 (3) M64 (XS) E64 (3) M64 (XS) M64 (2)M64 (2) Station 5 E65 (3) E65 (3) E65 (3) E65 (3) M65 (XS) E65 (3)E65 (3) E65 (3) E65 (3) E65 (3) Station 6 E66 (3) T66 (3) BC (1) E66 (3) T66 (3) BC (1) E66 (3) T66 (4) BC (1) E66 (3) T66 (3) M66 (2) E66 (3) T66 (3) M66 (2) E66 (3) T66 (3) M66 (2) E66 (3) T66 (3) M66 (2) E66 (3) T66 (3) E66 (3) T66 (3) Station 7 (SLAC)E67 (3) Closed Closed Closed Closed Closed Closed Closed Closed Fire Units 9 8 7 7 7 7 7 6 6 Ambulance Units 1.5 1.5 2 2 2 1.5 1.5 3 3 Total Daily Staffing Day: 32 Night: 30 Day: 29 Night: 27 Day: 27 Night: 27 Day: 27 Night: 27 Day: 27 Night: 27 Day: 26 Night: 24 Day: 26-23 Night: 24-21 Day: 24 Night: 24 Day: 25 Night: 25 Changes SLAC Closed Removed Rescue 4th person to Truck M62 24hours M63 XS in PM Cross-Staffed E65 with M65 Moved Cross- Staffed M65 To station for as M64 New Stanford Contract Cross-Staffing Model 3 person Truck Moved M62 to M66 M61 reduced to Peak COVID Fiscal Crisis Brown out of E62/M62 (86% of time) Ended Cross-Staffing Removed M61 Peak E62 changed to Squad S62 changed to Engine 62 Item 3 Attachment B_Deployment History Item 3: Staff Report Pg. 22 Packet Pg. 112 of 113 7 3 8 6 Palo Alto Fire Department Staffing Options Summary The table below compares Options A through C from the November report, and Options D through E as the alternatives. All costs are shown in Fiscal Year 2025 figures. Table 7. Staffing Options Summary Metric A. Contract B. IAFF C. Single-Role Civilian D. Cross-Staff E64 E. Single-Role Peak Hour Ambulance F. Single-Role & Fully Staff E64 1 Fire Units 7 7 7 7 6 7 2 Ambulance Units 3.5 3.5 3.5 2.0* 3.5 3.5 3 Annual Operating Cost $3.4-3.6M $3.2M $3.1-3.3M $0.9M $1.2M $2.5-2.7M 4 Headcount 10 FTE Firefighters 10 FTE Firefighters 25 FTE Single-Role -3 FTE Firefighters 3 FTE Firefighters 7 FTE Single-Role 16 FTE Single-Role -3 FTE Firefighters 5 Labor Negotiations required N/A Negotiations required Meet/Confer Negotiations required Negotiations required 6 12HR Ambulance Timeframe 18+ Months 3 Months 12-18 Months No 12 HR Am2bulance added 12-18 Months 3 Months 7 Implementation Elements RFP Process IAFF Staff Assignment Bidding Process Establish new division N/A Establish new division Establish new division 8 Hiring Costs $1.2M $1.2M $0.6M $0.4M $0.1M $0.4M 9 Fleet Fire Engine 64 ($1.2-$1.9M) Fire Engine 64 ($1.2- $1.9M) Reserve Ambulance ($0.5M) Fire Engine 64 ($1.2-$1.9M) Reserve Ambulance ($0.5M) Fire Engine 64 ($1.2-$1.9M) Reserve Ambulance ($0.5M) Fire Engine 64 ($1.2 - $1.9M) Reserve Ambulance ($0.5M) 10 One Time Total (Hiring + Fleet) $2.4-3.1M $2.9-3.6M $2.3-3.0M $1.6M-2.3M $0.6M $2.1-2.8M 11 Other Considerations •Bundled Rate •201 Rights •Quality Control •Staff Supervision •Easy to Implement •Higher Long Term Liability Costs •Long Term Savings •Easy Upstaff for Higher Demand •Hiring Pipeline •Training Coverage •Adds firefighting capacity to FS4 •Increases workload on FS4 Crew •Reduces availability of Medic 64 •Move towards Single-Role •Improves ambulance availability •Reduces reliance on SCC Ambulance •Fully staffs E64 & Peak Ambulance •Improves ambulance availability •Reduces reliance on SCC Ambulance •Long Term Savings •Hiring Pipeline •Training Coverage *Engine 64 and Medic 64 are Cross-Staffed Item 3 Attachment C_Staffing Options Summary Item 3: Staff Report Pg. 23 Packet Pg. 113 of 113 From:CeCi Kettendorf To:Council, City; Reckdahl, Keith; Lythcott-Haims, Julie; Burt, Patrick Subject:Excellent article per funding and structure of PAFD Date:Friday, March 28, 2025 1:09:34 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Becautious of opening attachments and clicking on links. https://www.paloaltoonline.com/guest-opinion/2025/03/28/opinion-bolstering-fire-service-resources- will-save-more-lives/ From:Deborah Goldeen To:Council, City Subject:Hate Speech Over Zoom Date:Friday, March 28, 2025 1:06:24 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links. MidPen doesn’t let people speak for themselves over Zoom. They are given the option of giving their comment is wiriting to the clerk who then reads them aloud to the board. Seems to me you all a repsonsibility to not provide a platform that enables the amplification of hate speech. Also, there is no reason anyone should be subjected to that kind of psychic assault while serving on the council or attending meetings for civic purposes. Deb G., Birch St., 94306 From:Jennifer Landesmann To:Council, City Subject:MUST SEE Excellent Opinion piece - Bolstering fire service resources will save more lives Date:Friday, March 28, 2025 11:32:55 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. Dear City Council, Please see Opinion: Bolstering fire service resources will save more lives. It states the following recommendations: 1. Decouple the Fire Department from the City Manager. This restructuring would allow the Fire Chief to operate independently, perhaps reporting to a City Council subcommittee or a citizens’ advisory board. 2. Create a Dedicated Fire Services Budget. This budget should be prioritized and insulated from reallocations to other city departments. Funding recommendations should reflect input from seasoned fire professionals and community members. (Based on previous statements from fire professionals,this would include fully staffing E64.) 3. Enhance Performance Metrics. We need to track relevant operational statistics that will better inform decision-making, not just average response times. Some might be simultaneous call patterns, calls served outside normaldistricts, patient survival rates correlated with response times, and frequency of imposed overtime shifts This is one of the best inputs I would say confronting how the City Council oversees issuesthat regard safety and health. Unlike other priorities where the City is engaging with largelyprofessional organizations, be it Stanford, Chamber of Commerce, Retail, and Developmentwhich have their professionals tracking projects or initiatives that can take 5,10,15, 20 years,the issues that directly affect people's safety and health demand enhanced oversight with broadcitizen involvement. Not decisions made at midnight that nobody may ever watch; worse if thetopic does not make your agenda in years or the public is not informed about how you aremaking decisions. As I've previously suggested, it is also impossible to measure relativeprogress on the City's priorities or how strategic allocations can be tracked over time. The suggestions presented by Mr. Milne. are so important. I hope you will take them to thinkabout how to accomplish what are actually best practices to handle these issues. Thank you, Jennifer From:City Mgr To:Council, City; Shikada, Ed Cc:Executive Leadership Team; City Mgr; Clerk, City Subject:City Council Bundle - March 28 Date:Friday, March 28, 2025 11:04:37 AM Attachments:RE IndustrialTransportCommercial Safety.msgFW Methane gas equipment removal AND service charge refund - 3115 Avalon Court.msgRE Street musician issue.msgRe Rational decision.msgRE Byron Ave - Car Overnighting on Street.msgFW Re Home Water Report Mailing.msgimage001.pngimage002.png Dear Mayor and Council Members, On behalf of City Manager Ed Shikada, please see the attached staff responses to emails received in the City.Council inbox through March 28, 2025. Respectfully, Danille Danille RiceAdministrative AssistantCity Manager’s Office|Human Resources|Transportation(650) 329-2229 | danille.rice@cityofpaloalto.orgwww.cityofpaloalto.org From:Abello, Emmanuel Subject:LAFCO Agenda Packet Now Available - 4/2/25 Meeting Date:Friday, March 28, 2025 10:49:54 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. The agenda packet for the April 2, 2025 LAFCO Meeting is now available on the LAFCO website at: https://santaclaralafco.org/meetings/commission-meeting-2025-04-02-201500 Regards, Emmanuel Abello LAFCO Analyst, LAFCO of Santa Clara County 777 North First Street, Suite 410, San Jose, CA 95112 (408) 993-4705 | Mobile: (669) 321-9704 | www.SantaClaraLAFCO.org From:Aram James To:Keith Reckdahl Cc:Lu, George; h.etzko@gmail.com; Council, City; Stump, Molly; Doug Minkler Subject:From the archives of Aram James Date:Friday, March 28, 2025 8:58:40 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. **11/9/24** Hi Henry, I'm reaching out regarding a case I tried before a jury in 1979 and handled appeals for until about 1985. The case, *In re Weller*, was significant - a case of first impression- as itinvolved applying the Defense of Necessity to a nuclear weapons trespass case at Lockheed Martin, where Keith is currently employed, in Sunnyvale, CA. Additionally, the defenseraised the Nuremberg principles in this case. I plan to investigate whether Keith currently works, or has previously worked, on weapons systems at Lockheed Martin that are sold to Israel and utilized by the Israeli military in theongoing genocide in Gaza, the West Bank, Lebanon, and other areas. In other words, I want to find out if he is complicit in these actions. According to public records, Keith isemployed by Lockheed Martin as an aerospace engineer. I am copying Keith Reckdahl on this email. As you know, he may be on the city council starting in January 2025. The public has the right to know if Keith has been involved indeveloping fighter planes or other weapon systems that are being used by the Israeli military in the U.S.-supported genocide in Palestine. Best regards, Avram Finkelstein aka Aram James In re Weller (1985), California Court of Appeals Source: Justia LawIn re Weller (1985):::: California Court of Appeal Decisions:: California Case Law:: California Law:: US Law :: Justia https://search.app/XV8ZeAPw9yxia1mi From:Aram James To:Jeff Rosen; Jay Boyarsky; Josh Becker; josh@joshsalcman.com; Jessica Speiser, Educational Leader for CaliforniaDemocratic Delegate, Assembly District 23; assemblymember.berman@assembly.ca.gov; Lori Meyers; ShereeRoth; Dave Price; Figueroa, Eric; Binder, Andrew; Reifschneider, James; Tim James; Cait James; Marina Lopez;Templeton, Cari; planning.commission@cityofpaloalto.0rg; ParkRec Commission; Bains, Paul; Reckdahl, Keith;Reckdahl, Keith; Vicki Veenker; Veenker, Vicki; Patricia.Guerrero@jud.ca.gov; Pat M; Sean Allen;board@pausd.org; board@valleywater.org; BoardOperations; boardfeedback@smcgov.org; Bill Newell;Robert.Jonson@shf.sccgov.org; Roberta Roth; Jensen, Eric; Barberini, Christopher; Nicole Chiu-Wang; SarahWright; Braden Cartwright; Emily Mibach; Diana Diamond; Jeff Conrad; Jeff Hayden; Rosen, Jeff;frances.Rothschild@jud.ca.gov; Freddie.Quintana@sen.ca.gov; EPA Today; cromero@cityofepa.org;rabrica@cityofepa.org; Josie James-Le; Lotus Fong; Linda Jolley; John Burt; Mickie Winkler;<michael.gennaco@oirgroup.com>; Foley, Michael; h.etzko@gmail.com; Rodriguez, Miguel; Dana St. George;Gerry Gras; Gennady Sheyner; gstone22@gmail.com; Lu, George; Jasso, Tamara; MGR-Melissa Stevenson Diaz;Anna Griffin; Cribbs, Anne; Palo Alto Free Press; Zelkha, Mila; Arthur Millman; Gardener, Liz; Human RelationsCommission; Karen Holman; Drekmeier, Peter; WILPF Peninsula Palo Alto; Don Austin; Yolanda Conaway; SalemAjluni; sharon jackson; The Office of Mayor Matt Mahan; city.council@menlopark.gov; Perron, Zachary; Council,City; citycouncil@mountainview.gov; Cecilia Taylor; Nash, Betsy; Burt, Patrick; Rose Lynn; Lydia Kou; DuJuanGreen; dennis burns; jgreen@dailynewsgroup.com; Greg Tanaka Subject:The judge who blocked Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil’s deportation is an observant Jew Date:Thursday, March 27, 2025 4:03:19 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. The judge who blocked Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil’s deportation is an observant Jew The judge who blocked Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil’s deportation is an observant JewSource: The Forward https://share.newsbreak.com/cb249ytt?s=i0 From:Alberto Poggesi To:Lauing, Ed; Julie@cityofpaloalto.org; Stone, Greer; Lu, George; Burt, Patrick; Vicki.Venkeer@cityofpaloalto.org;Keith@cityofpaloalto.org; Council, City Cc:Alberto Poggesi Subject:Fire Safety Petition Date:Thursday, March 27, 2025 1:42:40 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. i Dear Palo Alto City Council Member (individually as well as collectively): I am a resident, homeowner taxpayer and elector of Palo Alto, living at 3809 MiddlefieldRoad since 1990. I walk in the neighborhood almost daily and I extremely often pass in frontof Fire Station 4, noticing or at least trying to notice how attended or otherwise it is by fireassets (equipment and personnel). Since about 2020, I noticed the absence of the customary fire engine that had been there, tomy personal knowledge, for decades. I hoped that the absence could be a temporary situation,but it has now become obvious, and explained in town-hall meetings, that it is a deliberatechoice. I find that to be an outrageous and completely unacceptable disregard for the firesafety of the people who live in the neighborhood, including the hundreds of children thatattend its schools. I realize that I have no title to issue demands of the City Government, but I think I am entitledto submit a petition to: Hire the number of firefighters necessary and sufficient to fully man around the clock afire engine, to be stationed permanently in Fire Station 4, and retain them indefinitely. Ibelieve that number to be at least 10 by general consensus. Restore a permanently assigned fire engine to Fire Station 4, without subtracting it fromthe allocation of other fire stations (no shell games, please), and without removing thepermanently assigned ambulance truck or its assigned personnel (here too, no “sharedduties”, please). Never again in the future enact any staffing and resource assignment decision involvingFire Station 4 without complete disclosure and ample notification and discussion by thepublic. I heard claims like: “the City already spends hugely on the Fire Department” (where “hugely”is obviously a personal characterization of the speaker that I do not share). Be that as it may, Ifeel that the residents are financing the City just as “hugely”, actually more, and that therecord of how the budget is allocated indicates the City Council priorities, favoring manyother projects above residents fire safety. Lack of budget capacity should never be used as an This message needs your attention This is a personal email address. This is their first email to your company. Mark Safe Report Powered by Mimecast excuse to defund safety, as it happened in this case, when the budget is set by the Council, andnot externally imposed. On my part, I can officially promise that no member of my family nor I will vote in favor ofany Council Member candidate who does not publicly pledge to support the above petition. Sincerely,Alberto Poggesi3809 Middlefield From:Justine Burt To:Council, City Cc:Star-Lack, Sylvia Subject:Combined 2024 Palo Alto TMA reports Date:Thursday, March 27, 2025 1:22:52 PM Attachments:PATMA combined 2024 reports.pdf CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. ! Dear Palo Alto City Councilmembers, For your consideration, please find three Palo Alto Transportation Management Association(PATMA) reports attached: 2024 Annual Report, Three-Year Strategic Plan, and 2024 Commute Survey Report. All three were written for skimmability with many subheaders,figures, and photos. These combined reports detail what PATMA accomplished in 2024, where opportunities exist for further mode shift, and our plans for the next three years given current conditions andexpected developments. PATMA staff and our board of directors look forward to continuing to deliver cost-effective results for the City of Palo Alto regarding reductions in traffic, demand for parking andgreenhouse gas emissions while supporting local small businesses and addressing equity issues. I am happy to answer any questions you have. Kind regards,Justine Burt -- Justine Burt Executive Director, Palo Alto Transportation Management Associationjustine@paloaltotma.org 510.709.6266 This message could be suspicious The sender's email address couldn't be verified. Mark Safe Report Powered by Mimecast March 4, 2024 Palo Alto City Councilmembers Subject: PATMA’s 20024 Annual Report, Three-Year Strategic Plan, and 2024 Commute Survey Dear Councilmembers, The non-profit Palo Alto Transportation Management Association (PATMA) is pleased to present three reports for your consideration. Written in an easy to skim style, you will see attached PATMA’s 2024 Annual Report, Three-Year Strategic Plan (FY 2026 – FY 2028), and 2024 Commute Survey. In FY 2025, PATMA’s budget was restored to $400,000/year, closer to pre-pandemic levels. With the same budget level in FY 2026, we will be able to grow our impact by further reducing traffic, demand for parking, and greenhouse gas emissions while supporting local businesses. We also understand the City’s budget situation and offer three budget scenarios. Three budget scenarios for FY 2026 Expenses Expenses $400,000 budget Expenses $350,000 budget Expenses $300,000 budget ALTRANS management $105,000 $95,000 $85,000 Business (office supplies, insurance, software) $8,000 $8,000 $8,000 Lyft $3,000 $3,000 $0 ALTRANS operations & admin $105,000 $84,000 $75,000 Transit passes - Clipper card expenses $115,000 $100,000 $100,000 Commute survey $28,000 $28,000 $28,000 E-bike e-scooter pilot $4,000 $0 $0 Refurbished bikes $4,000 $4,000 $4,000 Bike Love $28,000 $28,000 $0 Total $400,000 $350,000 $300,000 The $400,000 scenario represents a continuation of the restored budget PATMA realized in FY 2025, which would allow PATMA to grow the program’s impact to 500 parking spaces freed up. The $350,000 budget (cutting staff hours and transit pass expenditures) would allow us to grow the program to 400 parking spaces freed up. A smaller $300,000 budget (cutting staff hours further, cutting the Lyft afterhours program and cutting the BikeLove $5/day rewards program) would maintain our impact at 312 parking spaces freed up. PATMA is pleased to support the City Council’s goals on climate change, community wellness, and economic development. Let me know if you have any questions. Kind regards, Justine Burt Executive Director, Palo Alto Transportation Management Association 2024 Annual Report Three-Year Strategic Plan (FY 2026 - FY 2028) 2024 Commute Survey Submitted to the Palo Alto City Council and Finance Committee March 4, 2025 Prepared by: Palo Alto Transportation Management Association 855 El Camino Real #13A-200, Palo Alto, CA 94301 www.paloaltotma.org 2024 Annual Report January 1, 2024 – December 31, 2024 Submitted to the Palo Alto City Council Prepared by: Palo Alto Transportation Management Association 855 El Camino Real #13A-200, Palo Alto, CA 94301 www.paloaltotma.org March 2025 Table of Contents Executive Summary .....................................................................................................................1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................2 About PATMA .............................................................................................................................2 PATMA’s Top Five Accomplishments in 2024 ..............................................................................3 PATMA Programs ........................................................................................................................4 Benefits of PATMA Programs ....................................................................................................10 Program Results ........................................................................................................................11 Testimonials ..............................................................................................................................14 Budget ......................................................................................................................................15 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................18 Palo Alto Transportation Management Association 2024 Annual Report Executive Summary With leadership and financial support from the City of Palo Alto, as well as collaborative partnerships with regional transit agencies, local community-based organizations, and grantmaking organizations, in 2024, the Palo Alto Transportation Management Association (PATMA) delivered mode shift results efficiently and cost-effectively. PATMA’s sustainable transportation programs for workers – free train and bus passes, $5/day Bike Love bicycle commute incentive rewards, free refurbished bicycles, after-hour Lyft rides, and a new e-bike e-scooter pilot – in 2024, resulted in a reduction in demand for 312 parking spaces around town, 1,542,441 fewer vehicle miles traveled, and 603 fewer tons of greenhouse gas emissions. With these accomplishments, PATMA supported three of the 2024 Palo Alto City Council’s four priorities: economic development, climate change, and community health. Highlights of PATMA’s work in 2024 included: • Increased funding o Stability - City of Palo Alto restored PATMA’s budget which allowed expansion beyond University Ave Downtown and California Ave o Grant awards – PATMA won funding from VTA’s Transit Oriented Communities program, City of Palo Alto Utilities, Palo Alto Community Foundation, and the Starbucks Neighborhood Grant program o Fair market value of transit passes – Securing free Caltrain GoPasses (worth $4,200/year each) and reduced cost $169/year VTA passes (worth $1,080/year each) allowed PATMA to help more workers at a lower cost/user • Expanded geographic reach o Performed outreach at the Stanford Mall, along El Camino Real, at Midtown, and in South Palo Alto o In these areas, PATMA offered sustainable transportation programs, conducted the annual commute survey, and presented an e-bike and e-scooter pilot program • Small business support o Ahead of Caltrans’ El Camino Real repaving project where bike lanes will be replacing 220 on-street parking spaces, PATMA offered train and bus passes and refurbished bikes to workers who park on El Camino • Leveraged partnerships • A dramatic reduction in cost/user/month from $77 in Dec 2023 to $51 in Dec 2024 These developments lay a strong foundation for PATMA’s future mode shift work. 2 | P a g e Introduction The Palo Alto TMA is a non-profit working to reduce single-occupancy vehicle (SOV) trips, traffic congestion, demand for parking and greenhouse gas emissions by delivering targeted transportation solutions that serve Palo Alto’s diverse range of employers, employees, visitors, and residents. Financial support for this work comes primarily from the City of Palo Alto’s University Avenue and California Avenue parking fund, and, starting in 2024, from the City’s General Fund. This funding allows PATMA to provide free transit passes, $5/day Bike Love rewards, refurbished bicycles, and late-night Lyft rides chiefly to low wage service sector workers in the commercial districts of Palo Alto. About PATMA Staff PATMA is a non-profit, staffed by ALTRANS TMA Inc., a firm specializing in transportation demand management (TDM). Staff providing on-going support for PATMA include: ● Justine Burt, Executive Director ● Sana Ahmed, Program Coordinator ● Stephen Blaylock, President, ALTRANS TMA Inc. ● Andrew Ridley, Chief Operating Officer, ALTRANS TMA Inc. Board of Directors In 2024, two long-serving board members (Philip Kamhi and Brad Ehikian) stepped down and one new member (Steven Lee) joined. A representative from the tech sector helped diversify our board whose members at the end of the year included: ● Cedric de la Beaujardiere, resident (Board Chair) ● Rob George, Philz Coffee (Treasurer and a founding board member) ● Shannon Rose McEntee, resident (Secretary) ● Sebastian Mafla, Sheraton ● Nathaniel Duncan, Patagonia ● Alejandra Mier, Coupa Café ● Steven Lee, Meta The PATMA board meets monthly on the third Thursday at 9:00am and efficiently works through one hour of agenda items. Nearly all board members regularly attend. The public is encouraged to join these virtual meetings. Meeting details and zoom links can be found on our Meetings page at https://www.paloaltotma.org/meetings-reports. New Mission and Core Values In 2024, PATMA staff and Board members updated PATMA’s mission and core values to be more aspirational and memorable. The new mission statement reads “Better commutes for everyone.” PATMA’s core values describe how our non-profit improves life for the workers and residents of Palo Alto: 3 | P a g e • Traffic and parking – reduce traffic congestion and demand for parking • Climate change – transition to a zero-emission transportation system • Equity – fair outcomes, treatment and opportunities for all • Local businesses – help local businesses attract and retain employees • Health – encourage community health Incorporating City of Palo Alto Priorities While the original motivation for the Palo Alto City Council to create PATMA was to alleviate traffic congestion and reduce demand for parking downtown, each year, PATMA overlays the City Council’s stated priorities to guide its work. In January 2024, the City Council announced its priorities for the year: 1. Climate Change & Natural Environment - Protection & Adaptation 2. Community Health, Safety, Wellness & Belonging 3. Economic Development & Transition 4. Housing for Social & Economic Balance PATMA’s work supports three of these priorities: climate change, community health, and economic development. Regarding City Council’s priority of addressing climate change, PATMA helps reduce greenhouse gases from on-road transportation sources which are 51.7% of Palo Alto’s emissions, according to the City’s 2022 Greenhouse Gas Emissions inventory. Supporting City of Palo Alto’s Sustainability/Climate Action Plan (S/CAP) The City of Palo Alto set a goal to reduce greenhouse gas emissions 80% below 1990 levels by 2030 and to become carbon neutral by 2030. One S/CAP mobility goal relevant to PATMA regarding reducing greenhouse gas emissions is “increasing the mode share for active transportation (walking, biking) and transit from 19% to 40% of local work trips by 2030.” The S/CAP focuses on launching effective programs for emissions reductions with the highest impact and lowest cost. PATMA’s programs help accomplish this goal as noted in the following section. PATMA’s Top Five Accomplishments The following were highlights of PATMA’s work in 2024. 1. Rebuilt the transit pass program from a Covid-induced low of 28 people served in May 2020 to a high of 300 in December 2024, exceeding pre-pandemic numbers. Figure 1 shows the number of PATMA-granted transit passes in circulation among Palo Alto workers over the past six years. 4 | P a g e Figure 1: Transit passes activated 2019 – 20241 2. Activated and distributed 197 Caltrain GoPasses from the Caltrain GoPass Donation Program. Likewise, 67 VTA Smartpasses were distributed to low wage service sector workers in 2024. 3. Received approval from transit agencies to continue distributing Caltrain GoPasses and VTA Smartpasses in 2025 to low wage service sector workers to help grow transit ridership. 4. Reduced 605 tons of greenhouse gas emissions 5. Started an e-bike and e-scooter pilot program with City of Palo Alto Utilities funding to develop case studies that will inspire other low wage service sector workers to consider active commutes. These activities demonstrate the power of partnerships with local and regional organizations as well as the trust PATMA has established with local business managers. Programs With funding from the City’s University Avenue Parking Fund, California Avenue Parking Fund, and General Fund, PATMA provides free Clipper Cards loaded with monthly or annual passes for Caltrain, VTA buses, SamTrans buses, and Dumbarton Transbay buses. PATMA also offers $10 1 Note the drop of transit passes between Dec 2023 and Jan 2024. This is due to the fact that in 2023, PATMA started distribuing free annual Caltrain GoPasses instead of renewing and paying for Caltrain passes each month. In December 2023, about 100 workers had moved to different jobs outside of Palo Alto and did not renew their GoPasses for January 2024. 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 Jan ' 1 9 Mar ' 1 9 May ' 1 9 Jul ' 1 9 Sep ' 1 9 Nov ' 1 9 Jan ' 2 0 Mar ' 2 0 May ' 2 0 Jul ' 2 0 Sep ' 2 0 Nov ' 2 0 Jan ' 2 1 Mar ' 2 1 May ' 2 1 Jul ' 2 1 Sep ' 2 1 Nov ' 2 1 Jan ' 2 2 Mar ' 2 2 May ' 2 2 Jul ' 2 2 Sep ' 2 2 Nov ' 2 2 Jan ' 2 3 Mar ' 2 3 May ' 2 3 Jul ' 2 3 Sep t ' 2 3 Nov ' 2 3 Jan ' 2 4 Mar ' 2 4 May ' 2 4 Jul ' 2 4 Sep ' 2 4 Nov ' 2 4 5 | P a g e credits for after-hours Lyft rides of less than five miles, refurbished bicycles at no cost to the recipient, and $5/day Bike Love rewards. During 2024, PATMA expanded outreach efforts to the Stanford Mall, throughout the length of El Camino Real, at Midtown, and in South Palo Alto. Service sector workers who receive transit passes work primarily in food service establishments, retail, and accommodation. Light office workers who receive transit passes or accrue Bike Love rewards include staff at Palo Alto’s banks, dental and medical offices, and professional firms such as accounting and law offices. Programs with income thresholds Train and bus passes Transit pass benefits are provided to employees earning less than $70,000 per year who work in the commercial areas of Palo Alto and who do not already receive employer-supported TDM benefits. Workers at the Stanford Research Park and Stanford University are ineligible for PATMA’s programs as these organizations have their own TDM programs. Pilot: E-bicycles and e-scooters With funding from the City of Palo Alto Utilities Department, in 2024 PATMA ran a pilot program to study e-bikes and e-scooters for active mobility commutes. Four pilot participants making less than $70,000/year received either an e-bike and safety equipment, or a 12-month e-scooter lease. The intent was to study how many times a week they used the e-bike or e- scooter, how many device miles they traveled, and understand supports and barriers to device use. The four participants in the 12-month pilot have realized the following benefits. Figure 2: E-scooter and e-bike pilot case studies Katrina uses an Unagi e-scooter to travel the first mile to the Santa Clara Caltrain station, folds it up and brings it onboard, then rides it the last mile to work. During the week she often scooters to restaurants Downtown to grab lunch. But the big time savings comes when she leaves work. The e-scooter allows her to catch the train and get home in time to pick up her kids from school. 6 | P a g e Rickaya’s kids have scooters. Now that she also has an e-scooter she can keep up with them. After she dropping them off at school, she rides off to meet either the Caltrain or a VTA bus. She folds up the Unagi e-scooter and brings it on then scooters the last half-mile to work. Rickaya finds this a faster way to commute from Santa Clara given rush hour traffic or accidents on Highway 101 or 280. Antonio works at Patagonia and lives in Mountain View. Each morning, once he’s ready to leave for work, he looks at the time of the next Caltrain and the weather to figure out if he wants to bike to Caltrain or bike five miles to work. One handy feature of his Lectric folding e-bike is that it does not take up much space when folded, which makes it easier to store safely inside at home and at work. The benefits of the e- bike to Antonio are getting exercise and fresh air, relaxing on Caltrain, saving money on gas, and helping the environment. 7 | P a g e Dorothee teaches cooking classes at Taste Buds Kitchen in Midtown. She loves commuting to work from Menlo Park on her Lectric e-bike among the beautiful, tree-lined streets of Palo Alto. The fresh air and exercise energize her on the way to work. Refurbished bicycles In 2024, PATMA continued working with local non-profit Bike Exchange for a pilot program to provide seven refurbished bicycles and safety gear to essential workers. This pilot is open to workers making less than $70,000/year. Figure 3 shows several Palo Alto-based essential workers receiving their refurbished bicycles. Figure 3: Essential workers taking delivery of their “new” refurbished bikes 8 | P a g e Lyft after-hours rides The Lyft after-hours program provides rides home to workers commuting less than five miles after transit stops running. 9 | P a g e PATMA programs without an income threshold Bike Love rewards The Bike Love smartphone app provides daily incentives for active mode first-mile commute trips to transit and active mode commutes between home and work, of $5/day up to $599 per year per commuter. Automated travel mode detection identifies eligible bike, e-bike, e-scooter, and e-skateboard trips. Eligibility is determined by trips that stop or start within geofences around 30 Caltrain stations and five commercial areas (Downtown, California Ave., Stanford Mall, El Camino Real, and Midtown). Incentive dollars are instantly redeemable at local merchants via reloadable Apple/Google Wallet Virtual Visa cards. Figure 4 shows the current geofences that mark commute destinations that earn workers rewards. This map includes all Caltrain stations, for workers who use a bike or e-scooter for first/last mile, as well as expanded commercial areas. Figure 4: Bike Love Geofence Boundaries In 2024, 35% of the transaction values of redeemed rewards happened in Palo Alto, in support of the City Council’s 2024 priority for economic development. The ability of Bike Love users to 10 | P a g e redeem incentives at Palo Alto businesses helps keep dollars in the local economy. Figure 5 provides detail about where Bike Love users spend their reward funds. Figure 5: Where Bike Love Rewards Were Spent in 2024 All Palo Alto Mountain View Redwood City San Francisco San Carlos Sunny- vale Menlo Park Amazon or online Other cities Transactions value ($) 17,503 4,944 596 195 1344 110 231 2,570 3,586 3,927 Number of transactions 877 308 20 12 55 22 8 114 172 166 Source: Motion This information is gathered from merchant identification numbers where rewards are redeemed. For a quick overview video explaining the app, please visit Bike Love in 80 seconds (video). Benefits of PATMA Programs While PATMA programs save service workers money on their commutes, many other benefits of these programs accrue to local businesses, workers, City government, and Palo Alto residents. Businesses For business owners and managers, PATMA participation gives them a competitive advantage over similar businesses in nearby cities. Being able to provide transit passes to their employees helps shops, restaurants, and hotels attract and retain workers in competitive industries with high rates of staff turnover. Workers Workers who stop driving not only save money on variable vehicle costs such as gasoline, maintenance, and repairs, they also escape the stress of having to drive in traffic congestion. The workers who commute by active modes enjoy the benefits of exercise that allow them to arrive at work energized and refreshed. City of Palo Alto Municipal governments impact the wellbeing of residents and workers within the city’s boundaries, and PATMA’s programs on the City’s behalf reduce traffic congestion, free up parking spaces in commercial areas, and enhance the quality of life for residents by reducing the number of cars parked in neighborhoods. 11 | P a g e Program Results Results of the TMA’s program management, outreach, and program operation labor in Figures 6 – 12 depict the number of transit passes distributed, the cost per freed up parking space (cost/user), vehicle miles traveled avoided, and greenhouse gases reduced. Among all businesses served, Figure 6 gives a breakdown by business with the number of their employees in descending order who had an active train or bus pass from PATMA in December 2024. Figure 6: Number of Transit Passes Distributed by Employer in December 2024 Employer Transit Pass Count Sheraton/Westin 33 Nobu Hotel 16 Ettan 12 Whole Foods 10 Patagonia 9 Neiman Marcus 8 Walgreens 7 Coupa Cafe 7 Apple 7 Watercourse Way 6 Rangoon Ruby 6 Philz Coffee 6 Macy's 6 Crepevine 6 West Elm 5 The Palo Alto Inn 5 SkinSpirit 5 The Melt 4 Sephora 4 Peloton 4 Lytton Gardens (Front Porch) 4 Christine Hansen DDS 4 VIP Vein Treatment Clinic 3 True Foods Kitchen 3 Employer Transit Pass Count San Agus 3 Oren's Hummus 3 Lima Ruby Peruvian Restaurant 3 Hobee's 3 Glass Slipper Inn 3 Buca di Beppo 3 Avenidas 3 Yayoi 2 Wells Fargo 2 Webster House 2 Vizavoo Salon 2 Starbucks 2 Spring Spa 2 School of Rock 2 Restoration Hardware (RH) 2 Palo Alto Orthodontics 2 Palo Alto Oral and Maxillofacial surgery 2 Palo Alto Bicycles 2 Mollie Stone’s Market 2 McDonald’s 2 L&P Aesthetics 2 Kowa Ramen 2 Kindercare Day Care Center 2 Equinox 2 Curry Up Now 2 Employer Transit Pass Count Creamery 2 Coach 2 City of Palo Alto (interns) 2 Cardinal Hotel 2 Bright Horizons 2 Blue Bottle 2 Bloomingdales 2 Arya Steakhouse 2 Zola + Zola Bar 1 Zareen's 1 Xfinity 1 Wu Orthodontics 1 Williams Sonoma 1 Wetzel Pretzel 1 Victra 1 Trader Joes 1 The Real Real 1 TAVERNA 1 Tamarine 1 Tacolicious 1 Summit Bicycles 1 Sprinkles 1 Somi Somi 1 Smiles By Pai 1 Security Industry Specialists 1 Rooh 1 PIP Printing 1 12 | P a g e Employer Transit Pass Count Palo Alto Bilingual Montessori Academy 1 Pacific catch 1 Nola Restaurant & Bar 1 Matroid 1 Lush Cosmetics 1 La Bodeguita del Medio 1 Kris Hamamoto DDS, Inc. 1 Khazana Palo Alto 1 Keen Garage 1 K. Minamoto 1 Employer Transit Pass Count Immersion Spa 1 Imaginemos Oruguitas 1 Guckenheimer: Palo Alto Club 1 Gott's Roadside 1 Gong Cha 1 Gardening 1 Fast Repair 1 Everything but Water 1 Everlane 1 Embarcadero Media Foundation 1 Dr. William Tseng 1 Employer Transit Pass Count Downtown Streets Team 1 Da Sichuan 1 Comfort Inn 1 Clement Hotel 1 City National Bank 1 Channing House 1 Caretaker (home in Palo Alto) 1 Cafe 220 1 Block Advisors 1 Bike Connection 1 Beyond Explorations 1 Grand Total 304 Figure 7 provides the number of transit passes PATMA distributed to businesses along El Camino Real (between Park Blvd and San Antonio Rd) by month. PATMA’s proactive transit pass outreach efforts were conducted along with Silicon Valley Bicycle Coalition volunteers to help reduce demand for parking ahead of the Caltrans repaving and bike lane project in fall 2024. Figure 7: Transit Passes Distributed Along El Camino Real by Month in 2024 Month Caltrain VTA SamTrans Dumbarton Express Jan Feb Mar 12 Apr 1 1 May 1 Jun Jul Aug 2 Sep 3 1 1 1 Oct 3 10 1 Nov 6 2 1 Dec Total 14 26 4 2 PATMA’s marketing and outreach efforts throughout Palo Alto in 2024 resulted in the following impacts. 13 | P a g e Figure 8: Number of Commuters Diverted from Single-Occupancy Vehicles (average of three months) Program Q1 2024 Q2 2024 Q3 2024 Q4 2024 Transit passes 153 182 216.67 286.67 Bike Love (>12 rides/month) 13.33 15.33 14.67 10 Lyft 3.33 2.67 3.33 4 Total 169.67 200.0 234.67 300.67 Figures 9 and 10 show the average cost per month that PATMA paid to mode shift workers out of single-occupancy vehicles and into a sustainable transportation commute. The drop in monthly cost between December 2023 and December 2024 is partially attributable to the increased number of GoPasses Caltrain donated to PATMA and the highly discounted Smartpasses VTA sold to PATMA. Figure 9: Cost per User in 2023 Cost per user Jan '23 Feb '23 Mar '23 Q1 '23 Apr '23 May '23 Jun '23 Q2 '23 Jul '23 Aug '23 Sep '23 Q3 '23 Oct '23 Nov '23 Dec '23 Q4 '23 ANNUAL TOTALS Transit Pass Program $39.45 $50.29 $44.49 $44.74 $45.98 $39.87 $38.30 $41.38 $36.29 $39.10 $36.97 $37.45 $45.54 $49.40 $31.92 $42.29 $493.97 Bike Love $54.93 $69.97 $46.02 $56.98 $49.15 $53.16 $61.95 $54.75 $49.78 $72.12 $62.43 $61.44 $65.90 $74.84 $85.02 $75.25 $741.64 Lyft Program $106.99 $63.31 $86.42 $85.57 $86.89 $100.09 $116.25 $101.08 $107.95 $93.98 $79.12 $93.68 $63.62 $78.78 $112.74 $85.05 $1,099.67 Average cost/user $67.12 $61.19 $58.98 $62.43 $60.67 $64.37 $72.17 $65.74 $64.67 $68.40 $59.51 $64.19 $58.35 $67.67 $76.56 $67.53 $778.43 Figure 10: Cost per User in 2024 Cost per user Jan '24 Feb '24 Mar '24 Q1 '24 Apr '24 May '24 June '24 Q2 '24 July '24 Aug '24 Sept '24 Q3 '24 Oct '24 Nov '24 Dec '24 Q4 '24 ANNUAL TOTALS Transit pass subsidy $58.63 $56.07 $56.76 $57.15 $46.33 $50.77 $46.79 $47.97 $40.75 $38.86 $40.27 $39.96 $49.54 $19.69 $15.47 $28.23 $486.55 Bike Love $52.47 $0.00 $99.46 $50.64 $47.49 $0.00 $69.60 $39.03 $80.36 $65.73 $54.30 $66.80 $54.20 $67.84 $83.84 $68.63 $659.46 Lyft Program $86.54 $86.65 $69.47 $80.89 $85.35 $124.37 $78.04 $95.92 $94.98 $70.91 $70.00 $78.63 $42.17 $49.94 $54.67 $48.93 $870.62 Average cost/user $65.88 $47.57 $75.23 $62.89 $59.72 $58.38 $64.81 $60.97 $72.03 $58.50 $54.86 $61.80 $48.63 $45.82 $51.33 $48.60 $672.21 Figure 11 shows the number of avoided vehicle miles traveled as a result of PATMA’s programs. 14 | P a g e Figure 11: Avoided Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Program Q1 2024 Q2 2024 Q3 2024 Q4 2024 Transit pass subsidy 247,473.7 320,103.0 403,728.4 561,593.4 Lyft 250.4 211.9 239.1 195.8 Bike Love 2,179.4 2,408.2 2,205.9 1,852.1 Total 249,903.5 322,723.1 406,173.4 563,641.3 Adding up the four quarters, PATMA programs reduced vehicle miles traveled by 1,542,441. And finally, Figure 12 shows greenhouse gas emissions reduced as a result of programs. Figure 12: Greenhouse Gases Reduced (tons) Program Q1 2024 Q2 2024 Q3 2024 Q4 2024 Transit passes, Lyft and Bike Love 98.5 126.0 158.7 220.2 In 2024, PATMA’s work resulted in a reduction of greenhouse gas emissions of 603.4 tons. Testimonials Beyond the quantitative effect, PATMA also has a qualitative impact on workers in Palo Alto. The following feedback from employees of local businesses shows how much PATMA’s programs mean to the community. Here are some testimonials we received from retail, accommodations, and personal services establishments. • “I was able to ride the bus to work this morning and it was a lot of fun! Very efficient and saving me lots of gas money! I appreciate your efforts and this awesome program!” - DéBorah S. • “I love the ability to combine bicycling and Caltrain and not rely at all on an automobile. And I am impressed by how the City of Palo Alto encourages and supports that.” - Dennis W. • “Estoy muy contenta con el servicio de PATMA. Gracias .” (I am very happy with PATMA’s service.) - Yuliana A. • “Being a part of the program really reduces my stress of commuting to work. I don’t drive because it will cost me too much money to drive back and forth versus taking the train. It really saves me stress and money.” – Ernestine T. 15 | P a g e • “Me gusta viajar en el Caltrain porque es comodo, llego a tiempo a mi trabajo, etc.” (I like to travel on Caltrain because it’s comfortable, I arrive to work on time, etc.) – Juana A. • “Es seguro y siempre llego temprano a mi trabajo.” (It’s safe and I always arrive on time for work.) - Nancy R. • “No issues! Happy with Caltrain.” – Spencer S. Budget The non-profit demonstrated program results which helped to grow its City funding allocation until 2020 when the pandemic altered commuting habits and parking fund revenues fell dramatically. Figure 13 shows the history of PATMA’s funding allotments since FY 2016. Figure 13: PATMA Funding Since Inception Since 2020, PATMA has worked hard to do more with less and build back the number of workers it supports with mode shift. Grant funding In 2024, PATMA applied for and received grants from four organizations to use for various purposes. • VTA Transit Oriented Communities - $24,550 for outreach and marketing along El Camino Real to encourage mode shift to VTA buses 16 | P a g e • City of Palo Alto Utilities - $10,000 grant for e-bike and e-scooter pilot • Palo Alto Community Foundation - $5,000 unrestricted grant • Starbucks Neighborhood Grant - $1,000 used to purchase Starbucks gift cards to incentivize filling out PATMA’s commute survey These grants complemented City of Palo Alto funding. Figure 14 provides specific information about income sources and expenses by month. Figure 14: PATMA Income and Expenses in 2024 In Figure 14, the Executive Director’s tasks include program oversight, communications with stakeholders, finance and accounting activities, managing board meetings, maintaining 501c3 non-profit status, tax filing, and pursuing grant opportunities to diversify funding sources. The Program Coordinator’s labor involves updating the website, processing new transit pass requests, communicating about pass renewals, purchasing new passes, replacing lost passes, troubleshooting, and monitoring accounts. 17 | P a g e Figures 15 and 16 show relative income sources and expenditures. Note that the fair market value of Caltrain GoPasses ($827,400) and VTA Smartpasses ($50,105) in 2024 that PATMA received for free or at a fully discounted price respectively are not included in the income chart. Figure 15: Overview of 2024 Income Figure 16: Overview of 2024 Expenses 18 | P a g e Conclusion In 2024, PATMA made great strides in mode shift and program cost effectiveness by working in close collaboration with a number of partners. Thanks to our colleagues at Caltrain and VTA, additional free Caltrain GoPasses and highly discounted VTA Smartpasses helped bring down PATMA’s cost/user. Grant providers supported PATMA with specific aspects of our mode shift work along El Camino Real and during the annual commute survey. Local and regional non-profits such as Bike Exchange, Silicon Valley Bicycle Coalition, Seamless Bay Area, and Palo Alto Forward either provided services, volunteers, or introduced PATMA to potential funders to grow our work. In addition, PATMA’s Board members provided valuable advice and conducted advocacy on PATMA’s behalf. All together, these collaborations have helped position PATMA to have an even larger impact reducing traffic, demand for parking, and greenhouse gas emissions in 2025. Three-Year Strategic Plan July 1, 2025 – June 30, 2028 Submitted to the Palo Alto City Council Prepared by: Palo Alto Transportation Management Association 855 El Camino Real #13A-200, Palo Alto, CA 94301 www.paloaltotma.org March 2025 Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 1 Context ................................................................................................................................................... 2 PATMA Programs .................................................................................................................................... 5 Accomplishments .................................................................................................................................... 6 Three-Year Strategic Planning .................................................................................................................. 7 Workplan .............................................................................................................................................. 10 Budget .................................................................................................................................................. 10 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................................. 12 1 PATMA’s Three Year Strategic Plan July 1, 2025 – June 30, 2028 Executive Summary Each year, the Palo Alto Transportation Management Association (PATMA) conducts a Three-Year Strategic Plan with input from its Board of Directors. This plan provides a roadmap of goals, strategies, tactics, and objectives that ensure the non-profit will be able to help an increasing number of workers shift from driving single-occupancy vehicles to sustainable transportation modes. PATMA’s work supports local businesses with transportation demand management programs that help companies attract and retain workers: free transit passes, refurbished bicycles, rewards for active mobility commutes, and after-hours Lyft rides less than five miles. For the past five years, PATMA has been rebuilding from a pandemic-induced 90% drop in transit pass requests in early 2020 and in 2024 exceeded pre-pandemic numbers. In December 2024, PATMA’s programs resulted in a reduction of demand for 312 parking spaces which yields benefits every day, all year. Building on this success, this Strategic Plan details the following goals for the next three years. • Year 1: Scale up the number of transit passes; scale up the number of active mobility commuters traveling <3 miles • Year 2: Make it easier for commuters to access multiple sustainable commute modes; support active commutes <5 miles • Year 3: Leverage new technologies and programs to enable workers to commute without a personal vehicle In the next year, PATMA expects dramatic growth in the number of workers served by our mode shift work for several reasons. Contractually, PATMA is now able to offer programs beyond just Downtown and California Ave to most businesses throughout the commercial areas of Palo Alto. New findings from the 2024 Commute Survey provide insights about which sectors offer mode shift opportunities. PATMA has the ability to provide programs to workers at a higher income threshold. Caltrain and VTA have made a large number of free or highly discounted transit passes available. Starting in FY2025, the City restored PATMA’s baseline $400,000 budget which provided more resources to accomplish mode shift. These conditions enable growth in the number of workers served in the next year. Introduction The Palo Alto Transportation Management Association (PATMA) is a non-profit leading efforts to reshape commute behaviors around town. Abundant mass transit, active mobility (bicycle, electric scooter, walking), on-demand ride hailing options, as well as trip planning and real time arrival apps are available to enable workers who live and work near major transit pipelines (Caltrain, VTA 22/522, SamTrans ECR, and the Dumbarton Express) to commute quickly and efficiently without 2 needing to own a personal vehicle. In this spirit, PATMA provides information and incentives that encourage workers to shift out of their single-occupancy vehicles (SOVs) and into low-carbon transportation options. For the 12-month period ending December 31, 2024, PATMA programs resulted in a reduction in demand for 312 parking spaces around town, 1,542,441 fewer vehicle miles traveled, and 603 fewer tons of greenhouse gas emissions by providing free transit passes, $5/day Bike Love rewards, refurbished bicycles, and after-hour Lyft rides. There is potential for PATMA to free up more parking spaces and reduce more greenhouse gas emissions. The following Three-Year Strategic Plan, which is compiled each year for the next three years, lays out goals, strategies, tactics, and objectives for PATMA’s work supporting Palo Alto businesses and workers over the next three years. Context Several contextual elements inform this strategic plan, including the City of Palo Alto’s ambitious greenhouse gas emission reduction goals, the fact that on-road transportation contributes more than half of Palo Alto’s greenhouse gases emissions, the priorities the Palo Alto City Council sets each January, PATMA’s contract with the City of Palo Alto, and PATMA’s bylaws, among other considerations. Sustainability Climate Action Plan (S/CAP) The City of Palo Alto set a goal to reduce greenhouse gas emissions 80% below 1990 levels by 2030 and to become carbon neutral by 2030. One S/CAP mobility goal relevant to PATMA regarding reducing greenhouse gas emissions is “increasing the mode share for active transportation (walking, biking) and transit from 19% to 40% of local work trips by 2030.” Two sectors in Palo Alto already exceed the 40% metric. Data from PATMA’s 2024 commute survey found the following percentages of workers in four different work sectors in Palo Alto who were commuting by a mode other than driving a single- occupancy vehicle: • Service – 45% • Light office – 23% • Tech – 45% • Government – 28% To help realize the City’s S/CAP goal that 40% of work trips by 2030 be by transit or active mobility, PATMA plans to support each sector in different ways. The service sector - in retail, food service, and accommodation - has a high sustainable commute rate already but also high turnover. This is a sector whose employees served as frontline workers during the pandemic, that are price sensitive and have elastic demand for driving to work, and as a result is most open to PATMA’s sustainable commute mode shift programs. PATMA will continue offering programs to new service sector employees. 3 With PATMA’s new higher income threshold, PATMA will be able to serve more members of front office staff in the light office sector who have been just above PATMA’s old income threshold of $70,000/year. Finally, PATMA will support mode shift efforts at large tech companies and the City of Palo Alto by sharing annual commute survey findings, and in the case of tech companies, table at commuter fairs when requested. All of these efforts will help realize the City’s S/CAP goals. City Council Priorities Each year, the Palo Alto City Council sets their strategic priorities for the year. In January 2025, the new set of goals included: 1. Climate Change & Natural Environment – Protection & Adaptation 2. Community Health, Safety, Wellness & Belonging 3. Economic Development & Transition 4. Housing for Social & Economic Balance PATMA’s programs help address three of these four priorities: economic recovery, climate change, and community health by providing low wage workers with commute counseling, access to free transit passes, rewards for bicycling to work, and late night ride hailing services. PATMA’s Contract with the City of Palo Alto The contract between the City of Palo Alto and PATMA provides guidance about how public funds should be used to ensure the public good as well as planning, reporting, and surveying requirements. • Use of City funds – “PATMA shall use the City Funds for “pilot projects” intended to reduce single occupancy vehicle trips by Downtown and California Avenue Business District workers, as mutually agreed upon by the City Manager and PATMA. For FY24 and FY25, $200,000 of City Funds may be used to reduce single occupancy vehicle trips anywhere in Palo Alto. Pilot projects may include purchase and distribution of transit passes, active commute rewards, support for carpooling, and other measures to address first mile and last mile connections. If PATMA uses City Funds to purchase transit passes to give away free-of-charge, the free transit passes shall be provided solely to low income workers.” • Planning – “PATMA shall: (a) conduct an annual strategic planning session producing 3-year goals and objectives and funding requirements, and prepare an annual budget with projected metrics (cost per mode shift, ROI, etc.), and (b) annually provide to the City a detailed, updated strategic plan and budget. The strategic plan may utilize scenarios to illustrate the return on investment associated with different funding levels. The strategic plan shall identify the projects proposed to be funded with the City Funds for the City Manager’s review and approval.” • Reporting – “PATMA shall provide the City with quarterly written reports on the implementation and effectiveness of pilot programs funded by the City, including quantitative measures of SOV trip reduction and mode shift achieved, metrics used, cost 4 per employee mode shift, and how the City Funds were expended. PATMA shall submit the reports at the same time that PATMA submits the quarterly invoice to the City.” • Surveying – “PATMA shall conduct a robust survey of Downtown and California Avenue Business District employee commute patterns on an annual basis. Additional areas of Palo Alto where the TMA has been active may be included in the survey.” PATMA’s Bylaws PATMA’s bylaws provide operating instructions for the non-profit. One way it does this is by ensuring PATMA’s board members represent a range of interests among the Palo Alto community as well as the number of board members PATMA should have. • Qualifications of Directors. “The Board shall in good faith strive to include as Directors, representatives from major stakeholder groups serving PATMA’s current or planned/proposed service areas, including representatives of the following industries: technology, real estate development, retail and/or hospitality, philanthropy, and traditional office (e.g., finance, accounting, legal) and including representatives representing residential interests.” • Number of Directors. “The authorized number of Directors shall consist of at least five but no more than thirteen Directors.” New Mission and Core Values In 2024, PATMA staff and their board rewrote PATMA’s mission statement to make it more memorable and rewrote its core values to provide clarity on what the non-profit seeks to accomplish. Mission Better commutes for everyone Core values • Traffic – lighten traffic congestion • Parking – reduce demand for parking in commercial areas • Climate change – transition to a zero-emission transportation system • Equity – fair outcomes, treatment and opportunities for all • Local businesses – help local businesses attract and retain employees • Health – encourage community health Higher Income Threshold In 2018, PATMA raised its income threshold for program participation from $50,000 to $70,000/year. Since then, the cost of living in the Bay Area has increased substantially. In January 2025, PATMA’s board decided to raise the threshold to 80% of Area Median Income in Santa Clara County which in 2024 was $103,200/year for a household of one. All together, this context provides guidance to PATMA about how to structure our programs to best serve the public’s interest. 5 PATMA Programs Programs with a $100,000/year income threshold Transit Passes Currently, PATMA focuses on supporting essential workers in the commercial districts of Downtown and California Ave, at the Stanford Mall, along El Camino Real, at Midtown, and along San Antonio Rd. If these workers are driving to work and make less than $100,000/year1, they can receive free Caltrain, SamTrans, or Dumbarton Transbay bus passes.2 Refurbished Bicycles In 2022, PATMA piloted a refurbished bicycle program with the local non-profit Bike Exchange. This refurbished bicycle program is for essential workers in Palo Alto making less than PATMA’s income threshold who would like to bike to work but do not own a bicycle. If they also need any safety equipment – helmet, lock, lights – Bike Exchange provides these to each essential worker receiving a refurbished bike. E-bike e-scooter pilot This pilot studied two mode shift scenarios: active commutes via e-bike and first/last mile solutions via e-scooter. Four pilot participants making less than $70,000/year received either an e- bike and safety equipment, or a 12-month e-scooter lease. The intent was to study how many times a week they used the e-bike or e-scooter, how many device miles they traveled, and understand supports and barriers to device use. In addition, based on what is learned in the pilot, PATMA will create case studies with photos to inspire other workers in similar situations who drive alone to work. After hours Lyft rides Workers who live less than five miles from work and who need to travel home from work late at night when mass transit is not running can receive a $10 Lyft credit per ride. Program without an income threshold Bike Love PATMA’s Bike Love app provides $5/day up to $599/year to workers in Palo Alto’s commercial districts to encourage commuters to leave their cars at home and bike or e-scooter to work. Unlike the transit pass program, there are no income restrictions for the Bike Love program. The app was designed to provide attractive financial rewards to build active mobility habits. See Figure 1 for a map of Bike Love program boundaries within which workers earn rewards. The Bike Love app also 1 PATMA’s new income threshold is currently 80% of Santa Clara County’s Area Median Income, which in 2024 was $103,200 for a household of one person. For the sake of memorability to PATMA’s target audience, marketing materials will say $100,000/year. 2 VTA is currently working on a contract amendment to allow PATMA to raise the income limit for access to Smartpasses to workers making less than 80% of Area Median Income. 6 rewards travel to all 30 Caltrain stations for commuters who would be incentivized to bike or scooter to Caltrain and take the train to work. In 2024, 35% of Bike Love reward transactions were redeemed at Palo Alto-based businesses which is another way that PATMA supports local businesses and multiplies program impact to benefit the local economy. Accomplishments PATMA’s sustainable transportation programs in 2024, resulted in a reduction in demand for 312 parking spaces around town, 1,542,441 fewer vehicle miles traveled, and 603 fewer tons of greenhouse gas emissions. The majority of these results were due to the transit pass program. See Figure 2 for the number of transit passes activated over the past five years. Figure 2: Transit passes activated 2019-20243 3 Note the drop in the number of transit passes activated in January 2024. This was due to a switch from monthly pass purchases to annual free passes. High turnover in the service sector means about 100 workers no longer needed transit passes for 2025 which PATMA found out about after asking if they wanted to re-register in December 2024 for 2025. 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 Figure 1: Geofenced areas for Bike Love rewards 7 Three-Year Strategic Planning With this context in mind, PATMA staff and board members met in person in December 2024 to discuss strategic planning for the next three years. Input gathered informs PATMA’s path forward with goals (targets to achieve), strategies (plan of action), tactics (specific actions), and objectives (measurable outcomes) for FY2026-FY2028. Year 1 (Jul 2025-Jun 2026) Assumptions: Free Caltrain GoPasses and highly discounted VTA Smartpasses will continue to be available for PATMA to distribute to low wage workers Goals • Scale up number of transit passes activated • Scale up number of workers commuting <3 miles by active mobility • Support S/CAP goals to reduce greenhouse gas emissions • Support local businesses to attract and retain workers Strategies • Develop or deepen relationships with managers at light office and service sector businesses • Develop or deepen relationships with community-based organizations that work on transportation, housing and/or climate issues • Raise awareness about PATMA’s programs • Develop new pilot programs Tactics • Update and expand marketing collateral for transit passes and active mobility o Update one page flyer with $100,000 income threshold for English, Spanish, and Mandarin. Translate into Vietnamese. o Develop window clings (non-adhesive decal) for windows of businesses that receive PATMA incentives • Deploy 8 minute 1:1 manager training on mode shift programs and tools beneficial to workers (transit passes, refurbished bikes, $5/day Bike Love, after-hours Lyft, Transit app) o 40% transit or active mobility commutes by 2030 S/CAP goal o One page flyer o Real time arrival information: Transit app and Caltrain live system map o Window clings – membership and ask them to post • Refer a co-worker outreach wherein workers receive a free coffeehouse gift card if the coworker they refer receives a transit pass • Refine application process for refurbished bicycle program (apply, download Bike Love app, and pass bike safety quiz) before workers can receive a refurbished bicycle • Conduct annual commute survey 8 • Develop pilot programs that encourage active mobility – e-bike financing, bike safety quiz and classes • Hold a promotional event around active mobility • Organize interactive information sharing event with other Bay Area TMA and TDM professionals • Deepen relationships with non-profit organizations that have similar missions and goals (Friends of Caltrain, Seamless Bay Area, Silicon Valley Bicycle Coalition, Bike Exchange, Alta Housing) • Develop and share short, relevant content regularly with local CBOs and the Chamber of Commerce to distribute to their membership • Develop and offer short content regularly to local online news outlets Objectives • # freed up parking spaces • # workers using transit passes • # workers commuting by active mobility • # vehicle miles traveled reduced • # tons greenhouse gas emissions reduced • # survey respondents Year 2 (Jul 2026-Jun 2027) Assumptions: Availability of Tap to Pay, expanded Bay Pass program, and/or Mobility Wallet pilot Goals • Scale up number of transit passes • Enable workers who live outside Santa Clara County to access multiple sustainable commute modes and make transit connections seamlessly • Scale up number of active mobility commutes <5 miles • Find creative solutions to challenges of workers interested in active mobility commutes <5 miles Strategies • Raise awareness about PATMA’s programs by strengthening relationships with local business managers and community-based organizations • Update printed and digital promotional materials • Leverage new technologies for trip planning and payment • Develop new pilot programs Tactics • Develop e-bike financing pilot program 9 • Update printed and digital materials to address gaps in knowledge and mode shift friction points • Train managers on new apps that help workers plan and pay for sustainable commute modes • Update branding materials – PATMA as a fun, trusted, and valued brand • Further streamline application process • Conduct commute survey • Hold a promotional event • Develop and share content with inspiring new case studies about local workers commuting by transit or active mobility Objectives • # freed up parking spaces • # workers using transit passes • # workers commuting by active mobility • # vehicle miles traveled reduced • # tons greenhouse gas emissions reduced • # survey respondents Year 3 (Jul 2027-Jun 2028) Assumptions: 2026 Bay Area ballot initiative passed providing more funding for transit agencies which allows them to increase service frequency, Mobility Hubs are available around town Goals • Workers can easily commute without a personal vehicle • Study and leverage new technologies (ex., Mobility as a Service to plan and pay for commute trips, commute management platform) • Support the evolution of our region’s commuting systems • Determine what is missing to help workers get where they need to go without owning a personal vehicle Strategies • Expand PATMA’s toolkit of information and incentives to encourage mode shift • Help expand clean transportation options available to workers in Palo Alto Tactics • Develop new case studies of workers who commute by transit or active mobility • Test new technology Mobility-as-a-Service planning and payment options as they become available • Promote Mobility Hubs that are available 10 Objectives • # parking spaces freed up • # vehicle miles traveled reduced • # tons greenhouse gas emissions reduced • # survey respondents Workplan Year 1 The flow of work over the course of FY2026 is shown in Figure 3. Figure 3: Year 1 workplan Jul ‘25 Aug ‘25 Sep ‘25 Oct ‘25 Nov ‘25 Dec ‘25 Jan ‘26 Feb ‘26 Mar ‘26 Apr ‘26 May ‘26 Jun ‘26 Events X X X Market transit passes X X X X Develop pilot X X Translate materials into additional language X Commute survey X X X Apply for grant funding X X Deliver Commute Survey, Annual Report, and Strategic Plan reports X Market active mobility X X X Budget Looking back at funding levels since PATMA’s inception in 2016, PATMA grew over several years and demonstrated cost-effective successes freeing up parking spaces, reducing greenhouse gas emissions, and reducing vehicle miles traveled until the pandemic. Figure 4 shows historic budget trends. 11 Figure 4: PATMA funding since inception The PATMA baseline budget is $400,000. This level allows PATMA to continue with 2 part-time staff and pull in additional contractors on an ad hoc basis to support seasonal activities such as active mobility marketing in the spring and Commute Survey distribution in the fall. A status quo budget for FY2026 will allow PATMA to: • Perform marketing and outreach to target sectors • Develop or deepen relationships with business managers who are the gatekeepers to workers who could use PATMA’s programs and services • Conduct the annual commute survey • Free up additional parking spaces, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and ease traffic congestion In 2024, the cost/user/year or cost to free up a parking space was $672 while in 2023 the cost/user/year was $780. This includes the cost to purchase transit passes, Lyft rides, refurbished bicycles, and $5/day Bike Love rewards. Figure 5 provides three budget scenarios for PATMA’s projected expenses in FY2026. The $400,000 scenario represents a continuation of the restored budget PATMA realized in FY2025, closer to a pre-pandemic level which would allow PATMA to grow the program’s impact to 500 parking spaces freed up. The $350,000 budget would allow us to grow the program to 400 parking spaces freed up. A smaller $300,000 budget would maintain our impact at 312 parking spaces freed up. 12 Figure 5: Three budget scenarios for FY2026 Expenses Expenses $400,000 budget Expenses $350,000 budget Expenses $300,000 budget ALTRANS management $105,000 $95,000 $85,000 Business (office supplies, insurance, software) $8,000 $8,000 $8,000 Lyft $3,000 $3,000 $0 ALTRANS operations & admin $105,000 $84,000 $75,000 Transit passes - Clipper card expenses $115,000 $100,000 $100,000 Commute survey $28,000 $28,000 $28,000 E-bike e-scooter pilot $4,000 $0 $0 Refurbished bikes $4,000 $4,000 $4,000 Bike Love $28,000 $28,000 $0 Total $400,000 $350,000 $300,000 In the $350,000 budget scenario, PATMA would cut staff hours and expenditures on transit passes. In the $300,000 budget scenario, PATMA would cut back further on staff hours, cut the Lyft afterhours program, and cut the BikeLove $5/day rewards program. As circumstances change, PATMA has the ability to adjust income and expenses through various financial levers. • Reducing labor costs • Reducing program expenses • Requesting additional GoPasses from Caltrain and large employers in the area • Increasing grant writing and philanthropic fundraising PATMA will continue to operate leanly and use our budget effectively to maximize impact. Conclusion Many public and private organizations in the Bay Area are working hard to facilitate a future seamless, integrated low-carbon transportation system that will lower personal transportation costs and reduce GHG emissions. PATMA will continue to monitor developments in these areas and adjust our programs accordingly to best serve Palo Alto businesses. In support of the local economy, over the next three years PATMA will look for opportunities to help more workers shift to a sustainable commute as we raise awareness about the benefits of transit and active mobility commutes, offer information about sustainable transportation options, and provide programs and incentives for mode shift. 2024 COMMUTE SURVEY REPORT for and PATMA Board Members Cedric de la Beaujardiere, resident (Chair) Rob George, Philz Coffee (Treasurer) Shannon McEntee, resident (Secretary) Philip Kamhi, City of Palo Alto Sebastian Mafla, Sheraton Alejandra Mier, Coupa Cafe Nathan Duncan, Patagonia Steven Lee, Meta December 2024 Prepared by: Justine Burt Sana Ahmed ALTRANS TMA Inc 302 Toyon Ave, F, 410 San Jose, CA 95127 www.altrans.net Table of Contents Executive Summary .............................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 3 Survey Population ................................................................................................................................ 3 Survey Methodology ............................................................................................................................ 6 Results ................................................................................................................................................. 6 Key Insights ........................................................................................................................................ 17 Conclusions ........................................................................................................................................ 18 1 Executive Summary In August and September 2024, the Palo Alto Transportation Management Association (PATMA) team surveyed workers in commercial areas of Palo Alto to learn about their commute habits and preferences. The team conducted online and in-person surveys in English, Spanish, and Mandarin beginning with emailing and texting then following up with door-to-door canvassing. This document provides highlights from the survey findings. The two main objectives of the commute survey were to 1) determine which workers were open to shifting their commute from single-occupancy vehicles to mass transit or active mobility options and 2) raise awareness of PATMA’s programs. Based on the 885 completed surveys, Figure 1 shows the percentage of respondents from the four main sectors into which PATMA classifies workers: service, government, technology, and light office. Figure 1: Survey Respondents by Sector Figure 2 below provides the primary mode workers use to commute each week. The survey found that overall 62% of workers surveyed used a single-occupancy vehicle (SOV) as their primary commute mode in 2024. 2 Figure 2: Primary Commute Mode of Survey Respondents By separating out commute mode by work sector, Figure 3 illustrates the sectors with the highest drive alone rates: light office and government. Figure 3: Commute Mode by Work Sector With respect to PATMA’s mission, data collected in the 2024 commute survey provides opportunities to reach more workers and expand PATMA’s program offerings that will help realize PATMA’s goals to reduce traffic congestion, reduce demand for parking, support small businesses, lower greenhouse gas emissions, and address social equity issues. 3 Introduction In 2024, the Palo Alto Transportation Management Association (PATMA) conducted its ninth annual employee commute survey as required by the funding agreement between PATMA and the City of Palo Alto (COPA). PATMA contracted with ALTRANS TMA Inc. to conduct the survey and performed outreach in August and September 2024. The survey was designed to identify how Palo Alto employees working in the commercial areas of Palo Alto - University Avenue (Downtown), California Avenue (Cal Ave), El Camino Real, the Stanford Mall, the Charleston Middlefield shopping center, and along San Antonio Rd - commute to work, identify individuals currently driving alone who are open to shifting to a sustainable commute mode, and raise awareness of PATMA’s program offerings. Survey Population According to U.S. Census data, the total worker population in Palo Alto was 109,011 in 2022. The darker shaded areas of Figure 4 show where work centers are clustered Downtown, along El Camino Real, and along San Antonio close to Highway 101. Figure 4: Density of Workers in Palo Alto Source: U.S. Census OnTheMap, 2022 4 The U.S. Census organizes sectors using the North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) categories. Figure 5 shows the number of workers by NAICS codes. Figure 5: Palo Alto Workers by Sector NAICS Sector Number of Employees Percentage Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing, and Hunting 5 0.0% Mining, Quarrying, Oil and Gas Extraction 1 0.0% Utilities 282 0.3% Construction 881 0.8% Manufacturing 5,152 4.7% Wholesale Trade 971 0.9% Retail Trade 3,991 3.7% Transportation and Warehousing 2,217 2.0% Information 18,860 17.3% Finance and Insurance 4,283 3.9% Real Estate and Rental and Leasing 1,389 1.3% Professional, Scientific, and Information 23,575 21.6% Management of Companies and Enterprises 3,049 2.8% Administration & Support, Waste Management and Remediation 1,915 1.8% Educational Services 3,420 3.1% Healthcare and Social Assistance 30,187 27.7% Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation 831 0.8% Accommodation and Food Services 4,931 4.5% Other Services (excluding Public Administration) 2,315 2.1% Public Administration 756 0.7% PATMA organizes NAICS sectors into four employer categories – service, light office, technology, and government – and offers programs to workers in the first two categories. Figure 6 shows which NAICS code sectors PATMA includes in service, light office, technology, and government categories. Figure 6: NAICS Codes and PATMA Classification NAICS Code NAICS Sector Name PATMA Classification 11 21 22 23 31-33 42 44-45 48-49 51 Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting Mining, Quarrying, and Oil and Gas Extraction Utilities Construction Manufacturing Wholesale Trade Retail Trade Transportation and Warehousing Information Service Service Government Service Service Service Service Service Technology 5 NAICS Code NAICS Sector Name PATMA Classification 52 53 54 55 56 61 62 71 72 81 92 Finance and Insurance Real Estate and Rental and Leasing Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services Management of Companies and Enterprises Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services Educational Services Health Care and Social Assistance Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation Accommodation and Food Services Other Services (except Public Administration) Public Administration Light Office Light Office Technology Light Office Light Office Light Office Service Light Office Service Service Government Source: NAICS Association After sorting Census data for the number of workers in the four categories for statistical purposes, Figure 7 shows the number of workers in each category and the total worker population in Palo Alto. Figure 7: Number of Workers in Four Sectors PATMA Organization Category Number of Employees % Share Service 50,651 46% Light Office 14,887 14% Technology 42,435 39% Government 1,038 1% Total 109,011 Subtracting the 29,000 worker population at the Stanford Research Park, which has its own Transportation Management Association, leaves us with a worker population of 80,011. After cleaning the survey data of duplicate responses and incomplete surveys, there were a total of 885 complete surveys of which: • 399 respondents were service sector workers • 280 were government staff • 47 were light office workers • 142 were tech workers • 17 chose not to share their employer’s name This year’s response rate was higher than the three previous years the survey was conducted. The response rate for each of the nine survey years is shown in Figure 8. 6 Figure 8: Number of PATMA Commute Survey Responses by Year Year Number of Respondents 2024 885 2023 738 2022 511 2021 551 2019 1,471 2018 496 2017 892 2016 829 2015 1,173 Compared to 2023, stronger working relationships with managers in the technology and government sectors in 2024 helped boost response numbers. Survey Methodology In August and September 2024, the PATMA team reached out to businesses and organizations to administer the survey. The survey asked questions about the primary travel mode workers used to commute, their home city, employer, income level, and openness to sustainable commute options. The survey was administered through the SurveyMonkey platform which respondents accessed via personal smartphones through a QR code or PATMA’s electronic tablets. The electronic survey tool offers skip logic and survey branching to optimize question relevance to different respondents. Paper copies of the surveys in English and Spanish were distributed to managers at downtown hotels who collected responses from their staff. Electronic surveys in Mandarin were administered at restaurants and spas. Block-by-block, door-to-door canvassing resulted in a dataset representing businesses and organizations in commercial areas. Door-to-door outreach was bolstered by mass texting and email follow-up to business contacts. As noted above, the PATMA team secured 885 responses from a citywide worker population of 80,011. With a 95% confidence level and a sample size representing 1.1% of the population, the margin of error for this data is ±3%. Results Data collected in this survey shed light on several topics: • how people commute to work • where they are coming from • which workers could commute using one main transit or active mobility option 7 • which workers are open to a different commute mode, and • what information, equipment, or incentives could encourage them to make the shift from driving alone. The following figures show results for each question. Q1. In which city and zip code do you live? Among survey respondents this year, the top 10 home cities are shown in Figure 9. Figure 9: Top 10 Cities of Survey Respondents Home City Number Survey Respondents 1 San Jose 152 2 Redwood City 83 3 Palo Alto 80 4 Mountain View 74 5 Sunnyvale 57 6 East Palo Alto 56 7 Santa Clara 36 8 Fremont 33 9 San Francisco 32 10 San Mateo 23 Note that 70% of respondents live in cities served by a train or bus that runs to Palo Alto. Figure 10 maps the home zip codes of survey respondents in San Francisco Bay Area1 counties. 1 The Bay Area refers to the nine counties that touch the San Francisco Bay plus Santa Cruz County. 8 Figure 10: Number of Respondents by Zip Code Some survey respondents live beyond the nine county Bay Area near Sacramento, in the Central Valley, and even one in Southern California. Q2. What is the name of your employer? (This information will help us analyze commuting patterns for the four main types of employers [service, technology, light office, and government] in Palo Alto.) Employer names were organized into four main sectors of employers in Palo Alto, as seen in Figure 11. 9 Figure 11: Survey Respondents by Sector Note that the number of survey respondents from technology companies located in Downtown, Amazon and Salesforce, is higher this year than last. With Return to Office encouragement from management and corporate concern about greenhouse gas emission reductions, employees at both companies were encouraged to fill out PATMA’s commute survey. Q3. How do you usually travel to work? If you use more than one type of transportation, choose the one used for the longest distance of your trip. Many commuters use more than one type of transportation for commuting. To be able to compare this year’s data with previous years’, we asked people about the main commute mode they used for the longest segment of their trip. Figure 12 provides information about the primary commute mode. 10 Figure 12: Primary Commute Mode Figure 13 divides this data by sector for 2024 to allow comparisons between government, light office, service, and tech sectors. Figure 13: Commute Mode by Sector, 2024 A comparison of commute modes over the past several years is shown in Figure 14. 11 Figure 14: Changes in Commute Mode, 2015-2024 Q4 If you drive alone to work, which of the following sustainable commute modes are you open to taking? Note that respondents could choose more than one option, and only respondents who said their main commute mode was by single-occupancy vehicle were given this question. Figure 15: Sustainable Commute Options Drivers Considering 12 Many respondents were open to transit (46%), carpooling (22%), bicycling (17%), vanpooling (9%), and walking (4%). Q5. If you drive alone to work, is your home located less than one mile from a Caltrain station, VTA 22/522 bus stop, SamTrans ECR bus stop, or Dumbarton Express bus stop? Figure 16: Live <1 Mile from Sustainable Transit Option This question was included to determine the proximity of a transit option that runs directly to Palo Alto. Q6. If you live less than 5 miles from work, are you open to switching to an active mobility mode (bicycle, electric bicycle, scooter, electric scooter, or other personal mobility device) for commuting? Figure 17: Live <5 Miles from Work and Open to Active Commute 13 Thirty percent of respondents are open to an active commute. Q7. What is most important to you when choosing how to commute to work? (select up to 3) Figure 18: Most Important Considerations When Choosing How to Commute Travel time and schedule predominates the list of factors workers consider when deciding how to commute. Q8. Does your workplace need additional bike racks outside? Figure 19: Need Additional Bike Racks 14 This information provides an opportunity for follow-up with organizations surveyed. Q9. What is your annual salary? Figure 20: Is Your Annual Salary Less Than $70,000 or More? Figure 20 shows the percentage of respondents making less than $70,000/year who are eligible for PATMA’s free transit passes, refurbished bicycles, and after hour Lyft credits. Q10. Are there any issues or concerns you would like to share about your commute? The answers to this open-ended question provide PATMA with insights to improve our programs, accomplish more mode shift, or share questions and concerns with our contacts at tech companies and City government. Compliments and positive statements included: • I am excited about new Caltrain trains. • Very hard to get my bike on old trains. Like the new schedule too!! • I love the ability to combine bicycling and Caltrain and not rely at all on an automobile. And I am impressed by how the City of Palo Alto encourages and supports that. • Being a part of the program really reduces my stress of commuting to work. I don’t drive because it will cost me too much money to drive back and forth versus taking the train. • This has saved me money and time in traffic. • It has saved my job and life. I’m so thankful for this service. I would love more stops at my Caltrain station. 15 • No issues! Happy with Caltrain. • Estoy muy contenta con el servicio de PATMA. Gracias. (I’m very happy with PATMA’s service. Thank you.) • Es seguro y siempre llego temprano a mi trabajo. (It’s safe and I always arrive early to work.) • Me gusta viajar en el Caltrain porque es comodo, llego a tiempo a mi trabajo, etc. (I like to travel on Caltrain because it’s comfortable, I arrive on time to work, etc.) • I like the VTA and Caltrain options. • Bike lanes have improved throughout the Peninsula. Thank you!!! • Biking to Downtown is the best! • I love the train and really appreciate the Caltrain GoPass. Concerns raised multiple times by respondents were grouped by topic in Figure 21. Figure 21: Respondent Concerns About Their Commute Topic # of Workers Mentioning Topic Example Comment Difficulties while driving: traffic, parking, cost of gas and tolls, road surface quality 73 “The afternoon commute has doubled in time in the last 1-2 years from 1 hour 10 min to 2 hours 15-20 mins.” Timeliness of trains and buses: late, infrequent service, not reliable 31 “Just buses being on time, especially in the morning hours.” Limited or no transit options near home (East Bay, Tri-Valley, Los Gatos, Gilroy) or work 20 “I wish there were a reliable, quick public transit option from the East Bay” and “Caltrain stops infrequently in South Counties.” Caltrain passes for City workers who don’t work Downtown 12 “I would take the train if it was offered since I can bike easily to and from the train.” Connectivity too difficult: to and from transit, making connections between transit options 11 “The first 5 miles and the last 5 miles are the biggest barrier for public transportation.” Safety and cleanliness of transit and stations 9 “The station needs to be only for people that use it to commute to take the bus or train.” Want more transit service: earlier, later, weekends 8 “Wish Caltrain stopped at the Blossom Hill station in San Jose more frequently in general, but on weekends specifically.” 16 Topic # of Workers Mentioning Topic Example Comment Feel can do their job from home most of the time 7 “I can do my job well from home and would use the extra 2 hours a day to do more work if could work from home every day.” Would like electric vehicle charging for City workers - MSC and Elwell 6 “There are no charging stations at our yard (MSC) and I believe I have the only all electric vanpool running for the City.” Wish could afford a home closer to work 4 “My commute is very long but my husband is a disabled veteran. The city we live in is the only place we can live for accessibility reasons and afford.” Would like showers to wash up after biking 3 “There are no showers for staff at my workplace so biking isn't an option.” Other concerns mentioned: • I can’t be late for work: “I work as a dental hygienist and have patients” or “my manager expects a timely arrival for my shift.” • Public transit is difficult to navigate, so I drive. Nobody is at the train stations to help when you are new to it. I worry about problems at the last minute. Like funds not applied to Clipper card etc. • Clipper cards should cover Caltrain and buses in case one is running late I can take the other. • As a single parent working an hour away from home, I have to be able to get to my kiddo fast in case of an emergency. • Better lights for nighttime commuters. • Neighborhoods should be zoned for multi-use so there would be less sprawl and more housing. Comments about bicycling: • Would like more visible and separated bike lanes. (3) • Unsafe drivers o Palo Alto really needs to ban Right Turn on Red in Downtown Palo Alto. Drivers accelerate to red lights - it's terrible for pedestrians. At least do this for a 2 block radius around the Caltrain Station. o Cars that run the red lights at the intersection of Lytton and High Street in Palo Alto in particular but all along University and Lytton is an issue. o Cars run red lights which is dangerous for cyclists and pedestrians. o I almost get right hooked every day I ride my bike in to work. It’s terrifying sometimes. 17 • The nearest train station is very far away and there is no secondary transit to close the gap. No buses, no bike or scooter rental etc. (Midtown) • There is one bike rack, but it is blocking a convenient access point for handicapped people getting out of their cars. • Bike theft (4) o There are people who will steal bikes in downtown Palo Alto. o Lots of bike theft in Palo Alto, so outdoor bike rack not optimal. (Downtown) o Need bike boxes. We have racks but I won't use. Had locked bike stolen from racks. I bring my bike inside. (retail on University Ave) o Bikes are still getting stolen and I would like greater protection for bike racks. Key Insights The following insights gleaned from data and comments lead PATMA to believe that additional mode shift opportunities exist among workers in Palo Alto. • PATMA conducted the 2024 commute survey in an expanded geographic area this year with a larger worker population compared to previous years. • The survey had more participation from workers in the government and technology sectors this year than last. • This year, the average drive alone commute rate is higher (62%) than last year (56%). • Light office (77%) and government sector (72%) sectors have higher drive alone rates than service (55%) and tech (55%) sectors. • Gathering responses from service sector workers in restaurants, retail and accommodations was more time-consuming than government and tech sectors where managers took a more active role encouraging staff to participate. Service sector businesses required multiple visits to realize results. • Seventy percent (70%) of survey respondents live in a city served by Caltrain or a bus that runs directly to Palo Alto. • Two percent (2%) of respondents are super commuters coming from outside of the Bay Area (17 out of 885 responses). • Among people who drive alone to work: o 46% are open to taking transit o 22% are open to carpool o 17% are open to active mobility (bicycle or e-scooter) o 9% are open to vanpool o 4% are open to walking • Sixteen percent (16%) live less than 5 miles from work and are open to an active commute (bike or e-scooter). • When deciding how to travel to work, 72% of respondents cite travel time or schedule as the most important consideration. These insights point to potential for workers to switch from driving alone to transit, carpooling, active mobility, vanpool, or walking, particularly among light office and government workers. 18 Conclusions Given the openness of respondents to sustainable commute modes and the proximity of their home or workplace to transit options, survey results point to opportunities to mode shift more workers who commute to Palo Alto by providing information, equipment, and rewards. Some people would benefit from more availability of refurbished bikes, electric bikes, and electric scooters to connect to transit or for commutes of less than five miles. Others just need information about real time train and bus arrivals, Guaranteed Ride Home availability, rapid bus schedules and routes, and safer bicycle routes between home and work. And finally, any incentives, such as Bike Love rewards, would provide an additional nudge toward a more sustainable commute. Tax-Aid new logo From:Jill Sturm To:Jill Sturm Subject:Fwd: Fw: Final weeks before tax filing deadline! Please spread the word Date:Thursday, March 27, 2025 11:50:50 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of openingattachments and clicking on links. The tax filing deadline is almost here! Please help let your community know about Tax-Aid's free tax sites open thisSaturday March 29. Best, Jill SturmExecutive Director, Tax-Aid Pronouns: she/her/hers 235 Montgomery Street, Suite 1155, San Francisco, CA 94104Phone and Fax: 415-229-9239jill@tax-aid.org www.tax-aid.org/ Want to stay up to date with Tax-Aid? Subscribe to our newsletter here: https://tax-aid.org/newsletter-subscription/ Visit us on Facebook! Instagram taxaid_ Click to view this email in a browser March 2025 About Us Through skilled volunteers, Tax-Aid provides year- round free tax services to strengthen our San Francisco Bay Area community. btn_donateCC_LG Dear friend, There's only a couple more weeks before the tax filing deadline. Please let your friends and networks know about Tax-Aid's locations open this Saturday: Lick-Wilmerding High School 755 Ocean Avenue, San Francisco 10 am - 2 pm Ortega Branch Library (the only library in San Francisco with an ocean view!) 3223 Ortega Street, San Francisco 10 am - 2 pm Mitchell Park Library 3700 Middlefield Road, Palo Alto 10 am - 2 pm Fair Oaks Community Center 2600 Middlefield Road, Redwood City 10 am - 2 pm Our Second Home 725 Price Street, Daly City 10 am - 2 pm Let’s stay social Check our website for updates, and follow us on Facebook and Instagram! Have a question or suggestion? Drop us a line via email. Best,Jill Sturm Executive Director, Tax-Aid Pronouns: she/her/hers 235 Montgomery Street, Suite 1155, San Francisco, CA 94104 Phone and Fax: 415-229-9239 jill@tax-aid.org www.tax-aid.org/ Want to stay up to date with Tax-Aid? Subscribe to our newsletter here: https://tax-aid.org/newsletter-subscription/ Visit us on Facebook! Instagram taxaid_ Home | About Tax-Aid | Need Tax Help? | Volunteers | News Media | Donate Now Email: admin@tax-aid.org If you no longer wish to receive these emails, please reply to this message with "Unsubscribe" in the subject line or simply click onthe following link: Unsubscribe Tax-Aid235 Montgomery Street, suite 1155San Francisco, California 94104US Read the VerticalResponse marketingpolicy. From:Liz Gardner To:Aram James Cc:Supervisor Susan Ellenberg; Vicki Veenker; Veenker, Vicki; Jessica Speiser, Educational Leader for California Democratic Delegate, Assembly District 23; Ed Lauing; Sheree Roth; Lori Meyers; Josh Becker; assemblymember.berman@assembly.ca.gov; Zelkha, Mila; Reckdahl, Keith; Jeff Rosen; Jay Boyarsky; Baker, Rob; dennis burns; DuJuan Green; Liz Kniss; Lotus Fong; Marina Lopez; Tim James; Cait James; Josie James-Le; Jose Valle; board@pausd.org; bos@smcgov.org; Bill Newell; Roberta Ahlquist; Reifschneider, James; Binder, Andrew; Doug Minkler; Barberini, Christopher; Enberg, Nicholas; h.etzko@gmail.com; Lythcott-Haims, Julie; Pat M; Kaloma Smith; Sean Allen; Dave Price; EPA Today; jgreen@dailynewsgroup.com; Gennady Sheyner; Braden Cartwright; Emily Mibach; Sarah Wright; Gerry Gras; Dana St. George; Yolanda Conaway; Don Austin; Donna Wallach; WILPF Peninsula Palo Alto; Bains, Paul; planning.commission@cityofpaloalto.0rg; ParkRec Commission; Perron, Zachary; Figueroa, Eric; <michael.gennaco@oirgroup.com>; Damon Silver; Rodriguez, Miguel; rabrica@cityofepa.org; Raj Jayadev; cromero@cityofepa.org; Templeton, Cari; Anna Griffin; Angel, David; Patricia.Guerrero@jud.ca.gov; frances.Rothschild@jud.ca.gov; Afanasiev, Alex; Jeff Conrad; Council, City; city.council@menlopark.gov; GRP-City Council; citycouncil@mountainview.gov; GRP-City Clerk; Palo Alto Free Press; Rose Lynn; Wagner, April; Nicole Chiu-Wang; sharon jackson; Friends of Cubberley; Freddie.Quintana@sen.ca.gov Subject:Re: Kids Under Fire: An investigation into Israeli soldiers shooting children | Fault Lines Documentary Date:Thursday, March 27, 2025 10:15:44 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=qKAdujuHvuQ EXCLUSIVE: “How Fascism Works” Author Jason Stanley Plans to Leave the U.S. | Amanpour and Company On Thursday, March 27, 2025, Aram James <abjpd1@gmail.com> wrote:Kids Under Fire: An investigation into Israeli soldiers shooting children | Fault Lines Documentary https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-0zrQZWwDE -- Liz Gardner From:Margot Lockwood-Stein To:Council, City Subject:Willow Park Development Date:Thursday, March 27, 2025 9:51:52 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. I'm a resident of Palo Alto and have concerns about the scale of the development proposed for the Sunset Magazine site. I'm very supportive of new housing but feel the scale of this development is just too large for the neighborhood given the impacts to traffic and parking. The tallest buildings in the area are roughly 5-10 stories high and I think this development should align to that max height. If these buildings were easy walking distance to the train station then it might be a different story but it is critical that the environmental impacts be looked at - especially traffic and parking. Thank you for your attention to this. Margot Lockwood-Stein Margot Lockwood-Steinmlockwood_stein@yahoo.com From:Marguerite Poyatos To:Dave Stellman Cc:Cathi Lerch; news@padailypost.com; Bill McLane; Lester Wong; Maor Greenberg; Patrick Kelly; Gaines, Chantal; osbaldo@or-builders.com; Manu Kumar; Becchetti, Benjamin;Dave Stellman; City Mgr; Moffatt, Pete; Jacob@onemovemovers.com; david@paloaltoconcrete.com; Steve Wong; RamonMorenoSchool@gmail.com; nancy@drewmaran.com; DanMcKinley; McDonough, Melissa; Reifschneider, James; Transportation; John Lerch; Binder, Andrew; Jade Jin; Xenia Czisch; City Attorney; Lauing, Ed; Veenker, Vicki; Council, City;Burt, Patrick; Stone, Greer; Lythcott-Haims, JulieSubject:Re: Industrial/Transport/Commercial Safety Date:Thursday, March 27, 2025 8:45:42 AM Attachments:20250327_070237.png CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clickingon links. Attached are new pictures of the vehicles that I failed to attach in my previous email. Please have vehicles numbered 1-5 towed as soon aspossible. On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 8:41 AM Dave Stellman <davestellman@gmail.com> wrote:You’re right Marguerite, there has never been anyone living in these vehicles. This person is using our street as his private storage for hiscollection of junk cars and the infamous “Raider” motor home. This parking is desperately needed by local businesses for our customersand employees. These and the other vehicles that are being tagged and ignoring it need to be towed NOW. On Mar 27, 2025, at 8:26 AM, Marguerite Poyatos <MARGUERITE@paloaltoglass.com> wrote: Thank you for sending by officers to put notices on the numerous vehicles that have not moved in a month. Please note, thegentleman I initially emailed about ripped the notices off of his 6 vehicles (including his RV) and has not moved them. Atthis point, can you tow them? Officers have explained to us in the past that the RV's cannot be towed since they aresomeone's dwelling. However, this gentleman's 5 additional vehicles he has parked on this street are not lived in. Rather,they are filled with trash. Attached is a picture numbering all of his vehicles in addition to his RV. None of these vehiclesmove and they really have no business on this street. Please also note, it may look as if I used the exact same pictures thatwere sent yesterday, but in fact I took new pictures this morning which show that he has seen the notices (as hes removedthem from his windshield) and has made no attempt to move a single car. Also attached are pictures of the RV belonging to the same gentleman which is leaking sewage. Again, parking is exasperated here. Employees of businesses have to park in other businesses' parking lots because there isno room on the street. This is creating tensions between businesses who want their parking open for their own employees andcustomers. Why is this ok for a random person to decide that they are going to monopolize public parking and defy any sortof rules that are in place?? On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 11:06 AM Marguerite Poyatos <marguerite@paloaltoglass.com> wrote:Can you please send community officers to put notices on vehicles that have not moved? Please see the attached images. All vehicles with a red X are associated with the RV with the damaged Raiders wrapping.These vehicles have all been parked in the same spots for at least a month. Thank you. On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 2:19 PM Cathi Lerch <cathi@lerchconstruction.com> wrote:I wanted to let you know that the new resident has been seen wandering around the neighborhood. Iinitially encountered her on Saturday at 998 San Antonio, where she was asking for money. Then, onTuesday, she was going through our dumpster at 923 Industrial. She just walked by our front, ranting. Cathi On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 12:44 PM Bill McLane <bill@paloaltoglass.com> wrote: Is the plan for Palo Alto to follow in San Francisco's footsteps? What's next, open-air drug markets for Palo Alto. This person moved to our street just a few days ago, and we have had to call the police every day due to her behavior and out of concern for her well-being. Bill McLane ---------------------------------Palo Alto Glass, Inc. 4085 Transport StreetPalo Alto, CA 94303 650-494-7000 Office www.paloaltoglass.com On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 12:43 PM Lester Wong <LWong@wongelectric.com> wrote:Commercial St. was cleared last night. Thank you for your efforts! Lester Wong | Vice President O: 650.813.9999 ext. 22 | C: 650.720.8455 4067 Transport Street | Palo Alto | CA 94303 Celebrating Our 46th Anniversary 1978 – 2024 A Proud Member of the U.S. Green Building Council <Image.jpeg> From: Marguerite Poyatos <marguerite@paloaltoglass.com> Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2025 12:37:47 PM To: Maor Greenberg <maor@greenberg.construction> Cc: Dave Stellman <davestellman@gmail.com>; Patrick Kelly <Patrick.Kelly@dmdsystems.com>; Bill McLane <bill@paloaltoglass.com>; chantal.gaines@cityofpaloalto.org <chantal.gaines@cityofpaloalto.org>; osbaldo@or- builders.com <osbaldo@or-builders.com>; Manu Kumar <manu@k9ventures.com>; Benjamin Becchetti <Benjamin.Becchetti@cityofpaloalto.org>; Lester Wong <LWong@wongelectric.com>; Cathi Lerch <cathi@lerchconstruction.com>; Dave Stellman <dave@paloaltoglass.com>; City Mgr <CityMgr@cityofpaloalto.org>; Pete Moffatt <pete@petemoffat.com>; Jacob@onemovemovers.com <Jacob@onemovemovers.com>; david@paloaltoconcrete.com <david@paloaltoconcrete.com>; Steve Wong <SWong@wongelectric.com>; RamonMorenoSchool@gmail.com <RamonMorenoSchool@gmail.com>; nancy@drewmaran.com <nancy@drewmaran.com>; Dan McKinley <danmck@scientific-equipment.com>; Melissa McDonough <Melissa.McDonough@cityofpaloalto.org>; James Reifschneider <james.reifschneider@cityofpaloalto.org>; Transportation <transportation@cityofpaloalto.org>; John Lerch <john@lerchconstruction.com>; Andrew Binder <Andrew.Binder@cityofpaloalto.org>; Jade Jin <JJin@wongelectric.com>; Xenia Czisch <Xenia@qmsshields.com>; City Attorney <city.attorney@cityofpaloalto.org>; Ed Lauing <Ed.Lauing@cityofpaloalto.org>; Lydia Kou <Lydia.Kou@cityofpaloalto.org>; Vicki Veenker <vicki.veenker@cityofpaloalto.org>; City Council <city.council@cityofpaloalto.org>; Patrick Burt <pat.burt@cityofpaloalto.org>; Greer Stone <Greer.Stone@cityofpaloalto.org>; Julie Lythcott-Haims <Julie.LythcottHaims@cityofpaloalto.org> Subject: Re: Industrial/Transport/Commercial Safety The wooden RV seems to be a severe safety issue. A former coworker spoke to the man living in it a couple yearsago and was told there is a wood burning oven/stove inside the RV, which he uses. Seems like that could be a severesafety hazard not only for the man residing in it, as well as for the surrounding RV's/vehicles & businesses if it wereever to catch fire. We have had to face a number of safety hazards on this street. It is unsafe for pedestrians. We have had attemptedbreak ins at night. We have been harassed by people associated with these RV's, as well as loose dogs, just to name acouple issues. Luckily, police officers do respond and try to help but there will be a time when they will be too lateto prevent injury. The community officers coming through and putting notices on vehicles is nowhere near the solution needed for thisarea. The notices are thrown away and the vehicles rarely move. I believe this email string started in 2023 and wehave had minimal progress with the actual issues at hand. On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 12:19 PM Maor Greenberg <maor@greenberg.construction> wrote:City of palo alto!! please let me know how this is Legal for driving also come and clean the street as it’s not safesee attached <email-signture_87b8d7a2-c4f4-4cbf-b474-af2f32118dd2.png> Maor GreenbergCEO maor@greenberg.construction | 650-610-7711 Greenberg.Construction | 650-600-9536 x101 | Fax 925-269-2325908 Industrial Ave, Palo Alto 94303 <F_1bc77f31-68bf-4143-80ea-3f34f539ea07.png> <insta_26696304-1b39-4259-9776-9f137454bed9.png> <yelp_e821c57e-caea-4e87-a5dd-5905e7ca4fb1.png> <Houzz_7abe75ad-d6ee-48ac-943b-592713e31957.png> <P_aece63f3-754b-4dca-a0a9-e93b94de4930.png> <google_04352117-2fb4-4963-bb3e- cc5317269360.png> From: Dave Stellman <davestellman@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2025 10:56:09 AM To: Patrick Kelly <Patrick.Kelly@dmdsystems.com> Cc: Bill McLane <bill@paloaltoglass.com>; Marguerite Poyatos <MARGUERITE@paloaltoglass.com>; chantal.gaines@cityofpaloalto.org <chantal.gaines@cityofpaloalto.org>; osbaldo@or-builders.com <osbaldo@or- builders.com>; Manu Kumar <manu@k9ventures.com>; Benjamin Becchetti <Benjamin.Becchetti@cityofpaloalto.org>; Lester Wong <lwong@wongelectric.com>; Cathi Lerch <cathi@lerchconstruction.com>; Dave Stellman <dave@paloaltoglass.com>; City Mgr <CityMgr@cityofpaloalto.org>; Pete Moffatt <pete@petemoffat.com>; Jacob@onemovemovers.com <Jacob@onemovemovers.com>; david@paloaltoconcrete.com <david@paloaltoconcrete.com>; Steve Wong <swong@wongelectric.com>; RamonMorenoSchool@gmail.com <RamonMorenoSchool@gmail.com>; nancy@drewmaran.com <nancy@drewmaran.com>; Dan McKinley <danmck@scientific-equipment.com>; Melissa McDonough <Melissa.McDonough@cityofpaloalto.org>; James Reifschneider <james.reifschneider@cityofpaloalto.org>; Transportation <transportation@cityofpaloalto.org>; John Lerch <john@lerchconstruction.com>; Andrew Binder <Andrew.Binder@cityofpaloalto.org>; Jade Jin <JJin@wongelectric.com>; Xenia Czisch <Xenia@qmsshields.com>; City Attorney <city.attorney@cityofpaloalto.org>; Ed Lauing <Ed.Lauing@cityofpaloalto.org>; Lydia Kou <Lydia.Kou@cityofpaloalto.org>; Vicki Veenker <vicki.veenker@cityofpaloalto.org>; City Council <city.council@cityofpaloalto.org>; Patrick Burt <pat.burt@cityofpaloalto.org>; Greer Stone <Greer.Stone@cityofpaloalto.org>; Julie Lythcott-Haims <Julie.LythcottHaims@cityofpaloalto.org>; Maor Greenberg <maor@greenberg.construction> Subject: Re: Industrial/Transport/Commercial Safety What is it going to take for the city of Palo Alto to catch up to the rest of the country? A lawsuit when someone inour neighborhood is injured because of the unsafe conditions that exist here? This email chain alone would beenough evidence to show the city’s knowledge of the problem and inaction. With newly enacted laws giving cities the legal right to clean up our public spaces, local cities like MountainView, Santa Clara and San Jose have already begun the process of relocating and housing these people that need it.Why not Palo Alto? Its not a money issue here, and even if it was, wouldn’t it be less costly to tow some vehiclesand help relocate them to a safer area than to pay the cost of litigation? We are asking the city to stop ignoring this issue before it becomes an even bigger problem. On Mar 12, 2025, at 9:17 AM, Patrick Kelly <Patrick.Kelly@dmdsystems.com> wrote: Hi Ben, Please take action. The safety of our employees and locals is critical. Anyone walking or driving on Industrial/Transport/Commercial is constantly at risk. Every crosswalk and entry is a major risk for anyone walking the sidewalks or pulling into any of these facilities where illegally parked abandoned vehicles are encamped. The visibility is very poor and the reason there are height and length restrictions for these types of streets; There are There are illegally running generators with unsafe live electrical lines oftentimes in the sidewalk or even running across entryways There are collections of volatile liquids like gasoline and oil (environmental issues aside) that pose additional hazards to anyone in the vicinity Please let us know what you need from us to support your team in enforcing our city regulations in order to make our workplaces safer for our employees. Respectfully, Patrick Kelly | CIODMD Systems Recovery, LLC.C: 650.492.9003patrick.kelly@dmdsystems.com | www.dmdsystems.com<Outlook-DMD Logo.png> <Outlook-larpkod1.png>Book time to meet with me From: Bill McLane <bill@paloaltoglass.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 5, 2025 12:39 PM To: Marguerite Poyatos <marguerite@paloaltoglass.com> Cc: Dave Stellman <davestellman@gmail.com>; chantal.gaines@cityofpaloalto.org <chantal.gaines@cityofpaloalto.org>; osbaldo@or-builders.com <osbaldo@or-builders.com>; Manu Kumar <manu@k9ventures.com>; Benjamin Becchetti <Benjamin.Becchetti@cityofpaloalto.org>; Lester Wong <lwong@wongelectric.com>; Cathi Lerch <cathi@lerchconstruction.com>; Dave Stellman <dave@paloaltoglass.com>; City Mgr <CityMgr@cityofpaloalto.org>; Pete Moffatt <pete@petemoffat.com>; Jacob@onemovemovers.com <Jacob@onemovemovers.com>; david@paloaltoconcrete.com <david@paloaltoconcrete.com>; Steve Wong <swong@wongelectric.com>; RamonMorenoSchool@gmail.com <RamonMorenoSchool@gmail.com>; nancy@drewmaran.com <nancy@drewmaran.com>; Patrick Kelly <Patrick.Kelly@dmdsystems.com>; Dan McKinley <danmck@scientific-equipment.com>; Melissa McDonough <Melissa.McDonough@cityofpaloalto.org>; James Reifschneider <James.Reifschneider@cityofpaloalto.org>; Transportation <Transportation@cityofpaloalto.org>; Patrick Kelly <Patrick.Kelly@dmdsystems.com>; John Lerch <john@lerchconstruction.com>; Andrew Binder <Andrew.Binder@cityofpaloalto.org>; Jade Jin <JJin@wongelectric.com>; Xenia Czisch <Xenia@qmsshields.com>; City Attorney <city.attorney@cityofpaloalto.org>; Ed Lauing <Ed.Lauing@cityofpaloalto.org>; Lydia Kou <Lydia.Kou@cityofpaloalto.org>; Vicki Veenker <Vicki.Veenker@cityofpaloalto.org>; City Council <city.council@cityofpaloalto.org>; Patrick Burt <Pat.Burt@cityofpaloalto.org>; Greer Stone <Greer.Stone@cityofpaloalto.org>; Julie Lythcott-Haims <Julie.LythcottHaims@cityofpaloalto.org>; Maor <maor@greenberg.construction> Subject: Re: Industrial/Transport/Commercial concerns A citation for double parking and expired tags is what is needed here. I’m positive that’s what thepolice would do to me if I did the same. That is unless there are two separate sets of laws that governthe city of Palo Alto and the state of California. Bill McLane ---------------------------------Palo Alto Glass, Inc. 4085 Transport StreetPalo Alto, CA 94303 650-494-7000 Office www.paloaltoglass.com On Wed, Feb 5, 2025 at 10:13 AM Marguerite Poyatos <marguerite@paloaltoglass.com> wrote:Please see the attached image. The pictured RV & associated white truck pulled up over night. As pictured, they disregardedmarked parking spots, which is one of the things that exacerbates our parking issue. A small car or motorcycle may fit there but in a commercial area where most vehicles are trucks,this does not help. Can you please send a community officer to leave notices on the RVs? I hope this doesn't comeacross as petty, but every spot really does matter on this block. Employees of some businesses haveto park in lots that belong to other businesses, which can create tension amongst neighbors. Thank you. On Sat, Dec 21, 2024 at 9:19 PM Dave Stellman <davestellman@gmail.com> wrote:The police also responded and were very helpful. Initially the people involved denied everything,but when I sent the videos to the officer and he showed it to them they admitted to dumping theirRV waste. They were cited for misdemeanor illegal waste dumping and will be going to court.They were then told to leave the area - and freed up two parking spaces. Thank you Palo AltoPolice and Fire. Apparently reporting violations of every kind is what is going to have to be doneon a regular basis if we want our streets cleaned up. On Dec 21, 2024, at 3:39 PM, Bill McLane <bill@paloaltoglass.com> wrote: Thank you, Dave! Bill McLane ---------------------------------Palo Alto Glass, Inc. 4085 Transport StreetPalo Alto, CA 94303 650-494-7000 Office www.paloaltoglass.com On Sat, Dec 21, 2024 at 8:22 AM Dave Stellman <davestellman@gmail.com> wrote:I just called the hotline for Palo Alto for hazardous waste dumping and gave themall of this information including license numbers. These vehicles are still parkedthere.They are sending the fire department out to flush the street and these peoplebetter be held accountable. On Dec 21, 2024, at 7:56 AM, Bill McLane <bill@paloaltoglass.com>wrote: License plate of the accomplice<IMG_0142.jpeg> Bill McLane ---------------------------------Palo Alto Glass, Inc. 4085 Transport Street Palo Alto, CA 94303 650-494-7000 Office www.paloaltoglass.com On Sat, Dec 21, 2024 at 5:13 AM Bill McLane<bill@paloaltoglass.com> wrote: Still parked right across from my building. Note, NO rear license plate. I do think that is against the law. I do also have video of them driving up, proof of the vehicle operating on city streets. Do you think they have insurance? <image.png> Bill McLane ---------------------------------Palo Alto Glass, Inc. 4085 Transport Street Palo Alto, CA 94303650-494-7000 Office www.paloaltoglass.com On Sat, Dec 21, 2024 at 4:54 AM Bill McLane<bill@paloaltoglass.com> wrote: Here, they are emptying their waste in front of my building. Bill McLane ---------------------------------Palo Alto Glass, Inc.4085 Transport Street Palo Alto, CA 94303 650-494-7000 Office www.paloaltoglass.com On Fri, Dec 20, 2024 at 9:18 PM Dave Stellman<davestellman@gmail.com> wrote:Chantal, It looks like somehow most of the city council members, ViceMayor and Mayor must have inadvertently been deleted fromyour last email response. I have added them back in to make sure they stay apprised of thesituation. I hope it doesn't take the legal channels mentioned tostart cleaning up our neighborhood immediately; this has gottenout of control and kicking the problem back and forth to differentmembers of your city staff is not going to make it go away. Dave StellmanTransport St. On Fri, Dec 20, 2024 at 8:16 AM Maor Greenberg<maor@greenberg.construction> wrote:Dear Chantal, Your response, while detailed, fails to address the critical and ongoingviolations of law, public safety, and business rights in the area. The City of Palo Alto has both the authority and obligation to take immediate anddecisive action to protect its residents, businesses, and public spaces.Allowing illegally parked, unsafe, and hazardous RVs to persist isunacceptable and directly violates state and local regulations. Below arespecific legal and factual challenges to the City’s approach, along withdemands for corrective action: 1. Illegally Parked and Unsafe RVs California Vehicle Code § 4000(a)(1) and Palo Alto Municipal Code§ 10.48.010 clearly require all vehicles parked on public streets todisplay valid registration. Many of the RVs in question lack valid registration, making their presence illegal. Further, under CaliforniaVehicle Code § 22651(o) and PAMC § 10.48.120, any vehicleunregistered for six months or more may be towed immediately. Additionally, vehicles with exposed sewage tanks, missing wheels, orother structural hazards are in direct violation of California VehicleCode § 24002, which prohibits parking or operating vehicles in unsafe conditions. These RVs also create a public health hazardunder California Health and Safety Code § 117490, which prohibitsimproper disposal of waste and sewage. **2. Clarification Requested Regarding Unregistered Vehicles In light of your response, please confirm whether the City of PaloAlto allows unregistered vehicles to be driven on its streets. - I havesome fun vehicles I would love to order from Alibaba and drivethem around Palo Alto... • California Vehicle Code § 4000(a)(1) expressly prohibits the operation of unregistered vehicles. If these RVs are being movedevery 72 hours as claimed, and they lack proper registration, theiroperation is illegal under state law. • Allowing unregistered vehicles to remain or operate within city limits undermines traffic safety and compliance standards. This point must be clarified explicitly: Does the City of Palo Altocondone the operation of unregistered vehicles? 3. Abuse of the 72-Hour Rule The City’s reliance on PAMC § 10.36.060 to justify the continuedpresence of these RVs is flawed. Surveillance footage and eyewitness accounts confirm that many RVs are circumventing the 72-hour rule bywiping off chalk markings rather than physically moving. This is blatantnon-compliance and undermines the intent of the ordinance. Furthermore, California Vehicle Code § 22669 explicitly allows for theremoval of vehicles that are “wrecked, dismantled, or inoperative,” evenif they are moved every 72 hours. The City has the authority to act, and failing to do so jeopardizes public safety and traffic flow. 4. Public Safety and Sanitation Violations The exposed sewage tanks, illegal dumping, and general neglect by these RV occupants pose significant health and environmental risks. TheCity’s failure to enforce sanitation laws, such as California Health and Safety Code § 117490 and PAMC § 16.09.100, endangers residents, workers, and the environment. Additionally, blocking roadways anddriveways is a clear violation of California Vehicle Code § 22500,which prohibits parking that obstructs traffic flow or access. 5. Impact on Businesses and Traffic Flow Businesses in the area are suffering due to blocked roadways, limitedparking for customers, and safety concerns. Under California VehicleCode § 21101(c) and PAMC § 10.48.120, the City has the authority to regulate parking to ensure the safety of businesses and residents. The City’s failure to allocate parking for business deliveries, customers, or even emergency services is a gross dereliction of duty. Blockingroadways for long periods creates safety hazards, violates municipalcode, and disrupts commerce. Conclusion and Final Demands The City of Palo Alto has the legal authority and responsibility to actunder the following regulations: • PAMC § 10.48.120: Authorizes the removal of unregisteredvehicles. • California Vehicle Code § 22651(o): Allows towing ofunregistered vehicles. • California Vehicle Code § 22669: Mandates removal of inoperativevehicles. • California Health and Safety Code § 117490: Prohibits illegalwaste disposal. • California Vehicle Code § 21101(c): Permits parking restrictions toensure safety. We demand the immediate implementation of the following measures: 1. Impound all unregistered, unsafe, or inoperative RVs within twoweeks. 2. Establish designated loading zones and 2-hour parking areas near businesses. 3. Conduct regular sanitation inspections and impose penalties forviolations. 4. Provide a clear timeline for resolution and enforcement updates. The continued failure to act exposes the City to liability for neglectingpublic health and safety under California Government Code § 815.6,which requires municipalities to perform mandatory duties. We expect a formal response with a clear action plan within 14 days. If nosatisfactory action is taken, we reserve the right to escalate this matterthrough legal channels to protect our businesses, employees, and thecommunity. <email-signture_87b8d7a2-c4f4-4cbf-b474-af2f32118dd2.png> Maor GreenbergCEO maor@greenberg.construction |650-610-7711 Greenberg.Construction | 650-600-9536 x101 | Fax 925-269-2325908 Industrial Ave, Palo Alto94303 <F_1bc77f31-68bf-4143-80ea-3f34f539ea07.png> <insta_26696304-1b39-4259-9776-9f137454bed9.png> <yelp_e821c57e-caea- 4e87-a5dd-5905e7ca4fb1.png> <Houzz_7abe75ad-d6ee-48ac-943b-592713e31957.png> <P_aece63f3-754b-4dca-a0a9-e93b94de4930.png> <google_04352117-2fb4-4963-bb3e-cc5317269360.png> From: Gaines, Chantal <Chantal.Gaines@CityofPaloAlto.org> Date: Friday, December 20, 2024 at 7:12 AM To: Maor Greenberg <maor@greenberg.construction>, Marguerite Poyatos <marguerite@paloaltoglass.com>, osbaldo@or-builders.com <osbaldo@or-builders.com> Cc: Bill McLane <bill@paloaltoglass.com>, Dave Stellman <davestellman@gmail.com>, Manu Kumar <manu@k9ventures.com>, Becchetti, Benjamin <Benjamin.Becchetti@CityofPaloAlto.org>, Lester Wong <lwong@wongelectric.com>, Cathi Lerch <cathi@lerchconstruction.com>, Dave Stellman <dave@paloaltoglass.com>, City Mgr <CityMgr@cityofpaloalto.org>, Moffatt, Pete <pete@petemoffat.com>, Jacob@onemovemovers.com <Jacob@onemovemovers.com>, david@paloaltoconcrete.com <david@paloaltoconcrete.com>, Steve Wong <swong@wongelectric.com>, RamonMorenoSchool@gmail.com <RamonMorenoSchool@gmail.com>, nancy@drewmaran.com <nancy@drewmaran.com>, Patrick Kelly <patrick.kelly@basketmaterials.com>, Dan McKinley <danmck@scientific-equipment.com>, McDonough, Melissa <Melissa.McDonough@CityofPaloAlto.org>, Reifschneider, James <James.Reifschneider@CityofPaloAlto.org>, Transportation <Transportation@CityofPaloAlto.org>, Patrick Kelly <info@basketmaterials.com>, John Lerch <john@lerchconstruction.com>, Binder, Andrew <Andrew.Binder@CityofPaloAlto.org>, Jade Jin <JJin@wongelectric.com>, Xenia Czisch <Xenia@qmsshields.com>, City Attorney <city.attorney@CityofPaloAlto.org> Subject: RE: Industrial/Transport/Commercial concerns You don't often get email from chantal.gaines@cityofpaloalto.org. Learnwhy this is important Hello everyone, Thank you for the emails and the time you all have spent to relay your concerns about the area surrounding your businesses. My name is Chantal and I’m the Deputy City Manager responding on behalf of the City Manager. I understand that you feel a lack of progress on the concerns you’ve identified. Through multiple City departments we are continuing to explore avenues to help mitigate those concerns being mindful of compliance with the federal Constitution and state laws, City resources, as well as providing respect to the humanity of the individuals experiencing homelessness. As our Police Lieutenant mentioned, our enforcement largely consists of the efforts described below involving multiple City departments, including: Weekly markings for 72-hour violations from our Community Service Officers. These are required by law prior to issuing citations for the 72-hour violations. Weekly re-checks of those markings, followed by citations if vehicles are not moved. Checks of the area by traffic officers as well as patrol officers on a routine basis, consistently several times per week. Officers make personal contact with RV occupants to speak with them regarding complaints and concerns, offer services or seek alternative solutions (i.e., a small repair to fix a vehicle). Through our Community Services Department, had our Homeless Outreach Team attempt to speak with RV occupants to connect them to available resources. Of note, there are limited safe parking resources available countywide. Consulted with our Code Enforcement team to address any activity that falls under municipal code violations. We hear you that there are perhaps more RVs in the neighborhood than have been in the past. Some previous concerns, relayed through the Police Department, have been for dumping, visibility/safety issues, or other nuisance-type complaints. Officers have responded to investigate and determine if a violation has in fact occurred in response to those complaints. As the officer who issues the citation must attest to its legality, we trust their judgement to use their discretion when deciding to cite or not. It should be noted that the overwhelming majority of the RV’s are compliant with the 72-hour rule on a weekly basis according to our Police Department and their regular checks. RVs (and any other vehicle) are allowed to move and return to the exact same location under PAMC section 10.36.060. I asked the Police Department to examine the calls for service in your area since November 1st to look for additional complaints the Police Department might be able to address and to get an understanding of what they have responded to in your area. Officers responded to 29 calls for service between the 900 block of San Antonio, Commercial, Transport and Industrial Ave. Only 2 were reported complaints from a business about the RV’s. None of those 29 calls for service reported potential illegal behavior, such as illegal dumping, threatening or harassing behavior, or other criminal actions, on behalf of those working in the area. Most of those calls were self-initiated by the officers or calls from the RV occupants themselves. One of the calls, initiated by an RV occupant, reported suspicious persons that helped prevent a burglary to one of the businesses. Since early November, there have been several citations issued and one vehicle tow. I would encourage your employees to report, either online, through our non-emergency line (650-329-2413) or via 911, any behavior they feel is harassment, or potentially illegal or unsafe. The Police Department will continue to explore ideas such as additional collaboration with City departments, outside organizations and service providers, as well as nearby police departments whose actions can influence the issues felt in Palo Alto. We will also investigate the ability to perform street sweeping efforts and consult with our wastewater officials to address any cleanliness, illegal dumping and sanitation issues. The Police Department will be further assessing the vehicle code violations in the coming weeks to determine the necessity of removing some offending vehicles. Best, Chantal <image001.png>Chantal Cotton Gaines Deputy City Manager (650) 329-2572 | chantal.gaines@cityofpaloalto.org www.cityofpaloalto.org <image002.png> From: Maor Greenberg <maor@greenberg.construction> Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2024 11:35 PM To: Marguerite Poyatos <marguerite@paloaltoglass.com>; osbaldo@or-builders.com Cc: Bill McLane <bill@paloaltoglass.com>; Dave Stellman <davestellman@gmail.com>; Manu Kumar <manu@k9ventures.com>; Becchetti, Benjamin <Benjamin.Becchetti@CityofPaloAlto.org>; Lester Wong <lwong@wongelectric.com>; Cathi Lerch <cathi@lerchconstruction.com>; Dave Stellman <dave@paloaltoglass.com>; City Mgr <CityMgr@cityofpaloalto.org>; Moffatt, Pete <pete@petemoffat.com>; Jacob@onemovemovers.com; david@paloaltoconcrete.com; Steve Wong <swong@wongelectric.com>; RamonMorenoSchool@gmail.com; nancy@drewmaran.com; Patrick Kelly <patrick.kelly@basketmaterials.com>; Dan McKinley <danmck@scientific-equipment.com>; McDonough, Melissa <Melissa.McDonough@CityofPaloAlto.org>; Reifschneider, James <James.Reifschneider@CityofPaloAlto.org>; Transportation <Transportation@CityofPaloAlto.org>; Patrick Kelly <info@basketmaterials.com>; John Lerch <john@lerchconstruction.com>; Tanaka, Greg <Greg.Tanaka@CityofPaloAlto.org>; Lauing, Ed <Ed.Lauing@CityofPaloAlto.org>; Kou, Lydia <Lydia.Kou@CityofPaloAlto.org>; Veenker, Vicki <Vicki.Veenker@CityofPaloAlto.org>; Binder, Andrew <Andrew.Binder@CityofPaloAlto.org>; Council, City <city.council@cityofpaloalto.org>; Burt, Patrick <Pat.Burt@CityofPaloAlto.org>; Stone, Greer <Greer.Stone@CityofPaloAlto.org>; Lythcott-Haims, Julie <Julie.LythcottHaims@CityofPaloAlto.org>; Jade Jin <JJin@wongelectric.com>; Xenia Czisch <Xenia@qmsshields.com>; City Attorney <city.attorney@CityofPaloAlto.org> Subject: Re: Industrial/Transport/Commercial concerns CAUTION: This email originated from outside of theorganization. Be cautious of opening attachments andclicking on links. Dear Molly (City Attorney) and All Copied City Officials, On behalf of the many businesses in the Commercial-Industrial- Transport Street area who are deeply frustrated with the persistent and escalating issues caused by illegally parked RVs, unregistered vehicles, and boats. This situation has reached a critical point, impacting not only our daily operations but also the safety, reputation, and economic health of our businesses. Impact on Businesses and Community 1. Safety and Sanitation Hazards: • Dumped bodily waste, debris, and hazardous conditions are becoming commonplace, creating significant health risks. • Aggressive behavior and intimidation from some vehicle occupants have been reported, making the area unsafe for employees and customers. 2. Operational Challenges: • Parking for employees, customers, and service vehicles is nearly nonexistent due to the occupation of public spaces by illegally parked vehicles. • Businesses are suffering tangible financial losses as customers avoid the area due to these conditions. 3. Lack of Enforcement: • Despite repeated citations and notices issued by Community Service and Special Problems Officers, there has been no meaningful resolution. • Violations of California Vehicle Code 4000(a)(1) VC (unregistered vehicles) and Vehicle Code 22651(o)(1) VC (impound authority for registration violations) are being ignored. Call for Immediate Action This is a collective appeal to the city and its representatives to act decisively to restore order in our community. We urge the city to prioritize: 1. Enforcement: Immediate towing and penalties for unregistered and illegally parked vehicles in alignment with state and local laws. 2. Comprehensive Solutions: A transparent and actionable plan to address these issues, including increased patrols, collaboration with businesses, and enforcement timelines. 3. Engagement: A commitment to working with affected businesses to ensure our concerns are heard and addressed effectively. Potential Legal Action The city’s ongoing inaction not only jeopardizes public safety and operational viability but also exposes it to potential legal consequences. Many businesses on this email chain are experiencing severe financial and reputational damages due to these unresolved issues. We cannot afford further delays. Thank you for your attention. <image003.png> Maor Greenberg CEO maor@greenberg.construction | 650-610-7711 Greenberg.Construction | 650-600-9536 x101 |Fax 925-269-2325 908 Industrial Ave, Palo Alto 94303 <image004.png> <image005.png> <image006.png> <image007.png> <image008.png> <image009.png> From: Marguerite Poyatos <marguerite@paloaltoglass.com> Date: Tuesday, December 17, 2024 at 10:29 AM To: osbaldo@or-builders.com <osbaldo@or- builders.com> Cc: Bill McLane <bill@paloaltoglass.com>, Dave Stellman <davestellman@gmail.com>, Manu Kumar <manu@k9ventures.com>, Benjamin Becchetti <Benjamin.Becchetti@cityofpaloalto.org>, Lester Wong <lwong@wongelectric.com>, Cathi Lerch <cathi@lerchconstruction.com>, Maor Greenberg <maor@greenberg.construction>, Dave Stellman <dave@paloaltoglass.com>, City Mgr <CityMgr@cityofpaloalto.org>, Pete Moffatt <pete@petemoffat.com>, Jacob@onemovemovers.com <Jacob@onemovemovers.com>, david@paloaltoconcrete.com <david@paloaltoconcrete.com>, Steve Wong <swong@wongelectric.com>, RamonMorenoSchool@gmail.com <RamonMorenoSchool@gmail.com>, nancy@drewmaran.com <nancy@drewmaran.com>, Patrick Kelly <patrick.kelly@basketmaterials.com>, Dan McKinley <danmck@scientific-equipment.com>, Melissa McDonough <Melissa.McDonough@cityofpaloalto.org>, James Reifschneider <James.Reifschneider@cityofpaloalto.org>, Transportation <transportation@cityofpaloalto.org>, Patrick Kelly <info@basketmaterials.com>, John Lerch <john@lerchconstruction.com>, Greg Tanaka <Greg.Tanaka@cityofpaloalto.org>, Ed Lauing <Ed.Lauing@cityofpaloalto.org>, Lydia Kou <Lydia.Kou@cityofpaloalto.org>, Vicki Veenker <Vicki.Veenker@cityofpaloalto.org>, Andrew Binder <andrew.binder@cityofpaloalto.org>, City Council <city.council@cityofpaloalto.org>, Patrick Burt <pat.burt@cityofpaloalto.org>, Greer Stone <Greer.Stone@cityofpaloalto.org>, Julie Lythcott-Haims <Julie.LythcottHaims@cityofpaloalto.org>, Jade Jin <JJin@wongelectric.com>, Xenia Czisch <Xenia@qmsshields.com> Subject: Re: Industrial/Transport/Commercial concerns You don't often get email from marguerite@paloaltoglass.com. Learn whythis is important A community officer came by today. Not sure what was done other than inspecting the volume of vehicles on the street. It is pretty disheartening that there are 14 city employees/email addresses included in this email and we are getting no responses or acknowledgements from any of them. This seems to be just a community forum for us to air our grievances regarding the area we all work in rather than getting any sort of resolutions. For years now, the businesses in this area have dealt with a number of issues that are a direct result of the RVs residing on this street - dumped bodily waste, aggressive dogs, aggression/intimidation, amongst many others. We try to vigilant and call the non- emergency police line to confront situations. Officers will come out and at the very most, they will go and have a conversation with whoever it is that's causing issues. Then, nothing happens. We have had customers complain that they do not feel safe coming into this corner of Palo Alto. This is directly affecting Palo Alto businesses - many of which on this street provide important/critical types of service to residents, businesses, local government and schools in Palo Alto. Can we please get some help other than weekly notices stuck on windshields? On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 8:36 AM <osbaldo@or-builders.com> wrote: I agree 100 % The city of Palo A lot needs to have a solution for this please O.R. Builders Inc. Osbaldo RomeroPresident 939 Industrial Ave Palo Alto, Ca. 94303 Phone: 650.938.2222 Fax: 650.938.2224Cell: 415.215.6788 From: Bill McLane <bill@paloaltoglass.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2024 5:34 AM To: Dave Stellman <davestellman@gmail.com> Cc: Manu Kumar <manu@k9ventures.com>; Marguerite Poyatos <MARGUERITE@paloaltoglass.com>; Benjamin Becchetti <Benjamin.Becchetti@cityofpaloalto.org>; Lester Wong <lwong@wongelectric.com>; Cathi Lerch <cathi@lerchconstruction.com>; Maor Greenberg <maor@greenberg.construction>; Dave Stellman <dave@paloaltoglass.com>; City Mgr <CityMgr@cityofpaloalto.org>; osbaldo@or-builders.com; Pete Moffatt <pete@petemoffat.com>; Jacob@onemovemovers.com; david@paloaltoconcrete.com; Steve Wong <swong@wongelectric.com>; RamonMorenoSchool@gmail.com; nancy@drewmaran.com; Patrick Kelly <patrick.kelly@basketmaterials.com>; Dan McKinley <danmck@scientific-equipment.com>; Melissa McDonough <Melissa.McDonough@cityofpaloalto.org>; James Reifschneider <James.Reifschneider@cityofpaloalto.org>; Transportation <transportation@cityofpaloalto.org>; Patrick Kelly <info@basketmaterials.com>; John Lerch <john@lerchconstruction.com>; Greg Tanaka <Greg.Tanaka@cityofpaloalto.org>; Ed Lauing <Ed.Lauing@cityofpaloalto.org>; Lydia Kou <Lydia.Kou@cityofpaloalto.org>; Vicki Veenker <Vicki.Veenker@cityofpaloalto.org>; Andrew Binder <andrew.binder@cityofpaloalto.org>; City Council <city.council@cityofpaloalto.org>; Patrick Burt <pat.burt@cityofpaloalto.org>; Greer Stone <Greer.Stone@cityofpaloalto.org>; Julie Lythcott-Haims <Julie.LythcottHaims@cityofpaloalto.org>; Jade Jin <JJin@wongelectric.com>; Xenia Czisch <Xenia@qmsshields.com> Subject: Re: Industrial/Transport/Commercial concerns Out of curiosity, were this my personal vehicle or one of mycompany vehicles, how long would it take for the City of Palo Alto to either site me or tow me? This is ridiculous; our streets have now become storage forpeople's crap; sorry, no better way to state that. This boat isnot someone's dwelling; neither are all the additional cars associated with each camper out here. If you can't do anything about the campers, do something about theadditional crap. Again, how quickly would the city respond if it were my carthat was illegally parked out here? I implore everyone on this thread to continue this daily until something is done. Do better, City of Palo Alto. Bill McLane ---------------------------------Palo Alto Glass, Inc. 4085 Transport Street Palo Alto, CA 94303 650-494-7000 Officewww.paloaltoglass.com On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 3:08 PM Dave Stellman <davestellman@gmail.com> wrote: This is ridiculous. The Supreme Court has given cities in the state of California more tools to crack down on homeless camps and illegally parked and stored vehicles. It’s time to clean up this mess in the Commercial - Industrial - Transport street area before it becomes even more of an eyesore than it is now. This is just not fair to owners and customers trying hard to do business here with NO AVAILABLE PARKING. Dave Stellman 4083 / 4085 Transport St. On Dec 16, 2024, at 1:42 PM, Manu Kumar <manu@k9ventures.com> wrote: Here are some pictures from my walkaround the block a week ago.. <IMG_1556.jpeg> <IMG_1557.jpeg> I counted at least 10 RVs just onCommercial St.... too many to even fit onone camera frame. And that's not evencounting the ones all over Transport andIndustrial. Some of the RVs also have othersupporting vehicles as noted in prior email. The City of Palo Alto clearly doesn't careabout businesses and would rather have thestreets be an eyesore, sidewalks beunusable to walk on, and parking spots notbe available to customers/clients oremployees. Warm regards, -- Marguerite PoyatosPalo Alto Glass, Inc.4085 Transport Street Palo Alto CA 94303(650) 494-7000(650) 494-7087 (FAX)<Safety on Industrial avenue.pdf> -- Marguerite Poyatos Palo Alto Glass, Inc. 4085 Transport StreetPalo Alto CA 94303(650) 494-7000(650) 494-7087 (FAX) -- Marguerite PoyatosPalo Alto Glass, Inc. 4085 Transport StreetPalo Alto CA 94303(650) 494-7000(650) 494-7087 (FAX) -- Marguerite PoyatosPalo Alto Glass, Inc. 4085 Transport Street Palo Alto CA 94303(650) 494-7000(650) 494-7087 (FAX)<IMG_0946.jpg><IMG_0947.jpg> -- Marguerite PoyatosPalo Alto Glass, Inc.4085 Transport Street Palo Alto CA 94303 (650) 494-7000(650) 494-7087 (FAX) From:Karen Chakmakian To:Lauing, Ed; Veenker, Vicki; Stone, Greer; Reckdahl, Keith; Lu, George; Burt, Patrick; Council, City Cc:Shikada, Ed Subject:Eleanor Pardee Park Concerns Date:Thursday, March 27, 2025 8:43:29 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. ! Dear Members of the Palo Alto City Council, It seems that we are joining a conversation that we were unaware of until now. We respectfully ask that you add our names to the list of neighbors opposed to the installation of restrooms at Eleanor Pardee Park. We would be more open to supporting this project if our concerns are addressed as part of a comprehensive implementation plan. Our nearly 30 years of experience living across from the park gives us unique insight into how changes might impact our local community, and park users. We understand that adding restrooms will increase convenience for some. However, please understand that this is a change that could negatively affect our quality of daily home life, the value of our homes, and will increase the demand for other city resources to keep the park and neighborhood safe and free of disturbances. If the installation of restrooms is prioritized (or even if it is not), we urge you to consider the following ongoing and growing issues at and around Eleanor Pardee Park and to plan for the resources necessary to address them. These include: · Increased daily and nightly patrols by Palo Alto PD, along with enforcement of fines and arrests for illegal activities and neighborhood disturbances. · Clear restrictions on the number of hours vehicles can park during the day and a ban on overnight parking along the streets bordering the park. We have seen the park’s usage change significantly over the past decade. It has become a much busier location, with traffic and activity that can overwhelm the surrounding streets. While it’s heartening to see the park enjoyed by many, the following issues have become increasingly concerning: 1. The Growing Number of Vehicle Dwellers – Mobile homes, vans, and cars parking along Center Drive, often close enough to look directly into our home or shine blinding headlights through our windows at night. Even if restrooms are locked at night, their installation will likely encourage more of this behavior, possibly leading to park dwelling as well. 2. Disruptive Evening Activity – We frequently experience disturbances, such as drug use, drug sales, loud music, screaming, violence, and fireworks throughout the night. These activities often spill over from the park to the surrounding streets. 3. Increased Trash – With more people coming to the park for events, the amount of trash has grown, much of which ends up blowing onto our property. We pick up trash in our landscaping daily. 4. Limited Street Parking – On many occasions, there is no available parking on our street due to the high level of park activity, which affects our ability to host friends and family. This message could be suspicious The sender's email address couldn't be verified. This is their first mail to some recipients. Mark Safe Report Powered by Mimecast We are also concerned about the apparent reduction in city services, including Palo Alto PD patrols, park maintenance, and street cleaning. Who will be responsible for maintaining the restrooms and ensuring their cleanliness? What are the associated costs, and shouldn’t all these other issues be addressed before new facilities are added? If public restrooms are installed, we hope they will be discreetly located within the park, near the children’s play structures, and automatically locked between 6pm and 8am. Without careful placement, children will likely continue using the bushes, despite the addition of facilities. If this project moves forward, we request that those of us living closest to the park are included in ongoing discussions and communications (ideally by email). Thank you for your time and consideration, and thank you for your service. Sincerely, Karen Chakmakian and Ron Celaya 850 Center Drive From:Dave Stellman To:Marguerite Poyatos Cc:Cathi Lerch; news@padailypost.com; Bill McLane; Lester Wong; Maor Greenberg; Patrick Kelly; Gaines, Chantal; osbaldo@or-builders.com; Manu Kumar; Becchetti, Benjamin;Dave Stellman; City Mgr; Moffatt, Pete; Jacob@onemovemovers.com; david@paloaltoconcrete.com; Steve Wong; RamonMorenoSchool@gmail.com; nancy@drewmaran.com;Dan McKinley; McDonough, Melissa; Reifschneider, James; Transportation; John Lerch; Binder, Andrew; Jade Jin; Xenia Czisch; City Attorney; Lauing, Ed; Veenker, Vicki;Council, City; Burt, Patrick; Stone, Greer; Lythcott-Haims, Julie Subject:Re: Industrial/Transport/Commercial SafetyDate:Thursday, March 27, 2025 8:41:35 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clickingon links. You’re right Marguerite, there has never been anyone living in these vehicles. This person is using our street as his private storage for hiscollection of junk cars and the infamous “Raider” motor home. This parking is desperately needed by local businesses for our customersand employees. These and the other vehicles that are being tagged and ignoring it need to be towed NOW. On Mar 27, 2025, at 8:26 AM, Marguerite Poyatos <MARGUERITE@paloaltoglass.com> wrote: Thank you for sending by officers to put notices on the numerous vehicles that have not moved in a month. Please note, thegentleman I initially emailed about ripped the notices off of his 6 vehicles (including his RV) and has not moved them. Atthis point, can you tow them? Officers have explained to us in the past that the RV's cannot be towed since they aresomeone's dwelling. However, this gentleman's 5 additional vehicles he has parked on this street are not lived in. Rather,they are filled with trash. Attached is a picture numbering all of his vehicles in addition to his RV. None of these vehiclesmove and they really have no business on this street. Please also note, it may look as if I used the exact same pictures thatwere sent yesterday, but in fact I took new pictures this morning which show that he has seen the notices (as hes removedthem from his windshield) and has made no attempt to move a single car. Also attached are pictures of the RV belonging to the same gentleman which is leaking sewage. Again, parking is exasperated here. Employees of businesses have to park in other businesses' parking lots because there isno room on the street. This is creating tensions between businesses who want their parking open for their own employees andcustomers. Why is this ok for a random person to decide that they are going to monopolize public parking and defy any sortof rules that are in place?? On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 11:06 AM Marguerite Poyatos <marguerite@paloaltoglass.com> wrote:Can you please send community officers to put notices on vehicles that have not moved? Please see the attached images. All vehicles with a red X are associated with the RV with the damaged Raiders wrapping.These vehicles have all been parked in the same spots for at least a month. Thank you. On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 2:19 PM Cathi Lerch <cathi@lerchconstruction.com> wrote:I wanted to let you know that the new resident has been seen wandering around the neighborhood. Iinitially encountered her on Saturday at 998 San Antonio, where she was asking for money. Then, onTuesday, she was going through our dumpster at 923 Industrial. She just walked by our front, ranting. Cathi On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 12:44 PM Bill McLane <bill@paloaltoglass.com> wrote: Is the plan for Palo Alto to follow in San Francisco's footsteps? What's next, open-air drug markets for Palo Alto. This person moved to our street just a few days ago, and we have had to call the police every day due to her behavior and out of concern for her well-being. Bill McLane --------------------------------- Palo Alto Glass, Inc. 4085 Transport Street Palo Alto, CA 94303 650-494-7000 Office www.paloaltoglass.com On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 12:43 PM Lester Wong <LWong@wongelectric.com> wrote:Commercial St. was cleared last night. Thank you for your efforts! Lester Wong | Vice President O: 650.813.9999 ext. 22 | C: 650.720.8455 4067 Transport Street | Palo Alto | CA 94303 Celebrating Our 46th Anniversary 1978 – 2024 A Proud Member of the U.S. Green Building Council <Image.jpeg> From: Marguerite Poyatos <marguerite@paloaltoglass.com> Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2025 12:37:47 PM To: Maor Greenberg <maor@greenberg.construction> Cc: Dave Stellman <davestellman@gmail.com>; Patrick Kelly <Patrick.Kelly@dmdsystems.com>; Bill McLane <bill@paloaltoglass.com>; chantal.gaines@cityofpaloalto.org <chantal.gaines@cityofpaloalto.org>; osbaldo@or- builders.com <osbaldo@or-builders.com>; Manu Kumar <manu@k9ventures.com>; Benjamin Becchetti <Benjamin.Becchetti@cityofpaloalto.org>; Lester Wong <LWong@wongelectric.com>; Cathi Lerch <cathi@lerchconstruction.com>; Dave Stellman <dave@paloaltoglass.com>; City Mgr <CityMgr@cityofpaloalto.org>; Pete Moffatt <pete@petemoffat.com>; Jacob@onemovemovers.com <Jacob@onemovemovers.com>; david@paloaltoconcrete.com <david@paloaltoconcrete.com>; Steve Wong <SWong@wongelectric.com>; RamonMorenoSchool@gmail.com <RamonMorenoSchool@gmail.com>; nancy@drewmaran.com <nancy@drewmaran.com>; Dan McKinley <danmck@scientific-equipment.com>; Melissa McDonough <Melissa.McDonough@cityofpaloalto.org>; James Reifschneider <james.reifschneider@cityofpaloalto.org>; Transportation <transportation@cityofpaloalto.org>; John Lerch <john@lerchconstruction.com>; Andrew Binder <Andrew.Binder@cityofpaloalto.org>; Jade Jin <JJin@wongelectric.com>; Xenia Czisch <Xenia@qmsshields.com>; City Attorney <city.attorney@cityofpaloalto.org>; Ed Lauing <Ed.Lauing@cityofpaloalto.org>; Lydia Kou <Lydia.Kou@cityofpaloalto.org>; Vicki Veenker <vicki.veenker@cityofpaloalto.org>; City Council <city.council@cityofpaloalto.org>; Patrick Burt <pat.burt@cityofpaloalto.org>; Greer Stone <Greer.Stone@cityofpaloalto.org>; Julie Lythcott-Haims <Julie.LythcottHaims@cityofpaloalto.org> Subject: Re: Industrial/Transport/Commercial Safety The wooden RV seems to be a severe safety issue. A former coworker spoke to the man living in it a couple yearsago and was told there is a wood burning oven/stove inside the RV, which he uses. Seems like that could be a severesafety hazard not only for the man residing in it, as well as for the surrounding RV's/vehicles & businesses if it wereever to catch fire. We have had to face a number of safety hazards on this street. It is unsafe for pedestrians. We have had attemptedbreak ins at night. We have been harassed by people associated with these RV's, as well as loose dogs, just to name acouple issues. Luckily, police officers do respond and try to help but there will be a time when they will be too lateto prevent injury. The community officers coming through and putting notices on vehicles is nowhere near the solution needed for thisarea. The notices are thrown away and the vehicles rarely move. I believe this email string started in 2023 and wehave had minimal progress with the actual issues at hand. On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 12:19 PM Maor Greenberg <maor@greenberg.construction> wrote:City of palo alto!! please let me know how this is Legal for driving also come and clean the street as it’s not safesee attached <email-signture_87b8d7a2-c4f4-4cbf-b474-af2f32118dd2.png> Maor Greenberg CEO maor@greenberg.construction | 650-610-7711 Greenberg.Construction | 650-600-9536 x101 | Fax 925-269-2325908 Industrial Ave, Palo Alto 94303 <F_1bc77f31-68bf-4143-80ea-3f34f539ea07.png> <insta_26696304-1b39-4259-9776-9f137454bed9.png> <yelp_e821c57e-caea-4e87-a5dd-5905e7ca4fb1.png> <Houzz_7abe75ad-d6ee-48ac-943b-592713e31957.png> <P_aece63f3-754b-4dca-a0a9-e93b94de4930.png> <google_04352117-2fb4-4963-bb3e-cc5317269360.png> From: Dave Stellman <davestellman@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2025 10:56:09 AM To: Patrick Kelly <Patrick.Kelly@dmdsystems.com> Cc: Bill McLane <bill@paloaltoglass.com>; Marguerite Poyatos <MARGUERITE@paloaltoglass.com>; chantal.gaines@cityofpaloalto.org <chantal.gaines@cityofpaloalto.org>; osbaldo@or-builders.com <osbaldo@or- builders.com>; Manu Kumar <manu@k9ventures.com>; Benjamin Becchetti <Benjamin.Becchetti@cityofpaloalto.org>; Lester Wong <lwong@wongelectric.com>; Cathi Lerch <cathi@lerchconstruction.com>; Dave Stellman <dave@paloaltoglass.com>; City Mgr <CityMgr@cityofpaloalto.org>; Pete Moffatt <pete@petemoffat.com>; Jacob@onemovemovers.com <Jacob@onemovemovers.com>; david@paloaltoconcrete.com <david@paloaltoconcrete.com>; Steve Wong <swong@wongelectric.com>; RamonMorenoSchool@gmail.com <RamonMorenoSchool@gmail.com>; nancy@drewmaran.com <nancy@drewmaran.com>; Dan McKinley <danmck@scientific-equipment.com>; Melissa McDonough <Melissa.McDonough@cityofpaloalto.org>; James Reifschneider <james.reifschneider@cityofpaloalto.org>; Transportation <transportation@cityofpaloalto.org>; John Lerch <john@lerchconstruction.com>; Andrew Binder <Andrew.Binder@cityofpaloalto.org>; Jade Jin <JJin@wongelectric.com>; Xenia Czisch <Xenia@qmsshields.com>; City Attorney <city.attorney@cityofpaloalto.org>; Ed Lauing <Ed.Lauing@cityofpaloalto.org>; Lydia Kou <Lydia.Kou@cityofpaloalto.org>; Vicki Veenker <vicki.veenker@cityofpaloalto.org>; City Council <city.council@cityofpaloalto.org>; Patrick Burt <pat.burt@cityofpaloalto.org>; Greer Stone <Greer.Stone@cityofpaloalto.org>; Julie Lythcott-Haims <Julie.LythcottHaims@cityofpaloalto.org>; Maor Greenberg <maor@greenberg.construction> Subject: Re: Industrial/Transport/Commercial Safety What is it going to take for the city of Palo Alto to catch up to the rest of the country? A lawsuit when someone inour neighborhood is injured because of the unsafe conditions that exist here? This email chain alone would beenough evidence to show the city’s knowledge of the problem and inaction. With newly enacted laws giving cities the legal right to clean up our public spaces, local cities like MountainView, Santa Clara and San Jose have already begun the process of relocating and housing these people that need it.Why not Palo Alto? Its not a money issue here, and even if it was, wouldn’t it be less costly to tow some vehiclesand help relocate them to a safer area than to pay the cost of litigation? We are asking the city to stop ignoring this issue before it becomes an even bigger problem. On Mar 12, 2025, at 9:17 AM, Patrick Kelly <Patrick.Kelly@dmdsystems.com> wrote: Hi Ben, Please take action. The safety of our employees and locals is critical. Anyone walking or driving on Industrial/Transport/Commercial is constantly at risk. Every crosswalk and entry is a major risk for anyone walking the sidewalks or pulling into any of these facilities where illegally parked abandoned vehicles are encamped. The visibility is very poor and the reason there are height and length restrictions for these types of streets; There are There are illegally running generators with unsafe live electrical lines oftentimes in the sidewalk or even running across entryways There are collections of volatile liquids like gasoline and oil (environmental issues aside) that pose additional hazards to anyone in the vicinity Please let us know what you need from us to support your team in enforcing our city regulations in order to make our workplaces safer for our employees. Respectfully, Patrick Kelly | CIODMD Systems Recovery, LLC.C: 650.492.9003patrick.kelly@dmdsystems.com | www.dmdsystems.com<Outlook-DMD Logo.png> <Outlook-larpkod1.png>Book time to meet with me From: Bill McLane <bill@paloaltoglass.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 5, 2025 12:39 PM To: Marguerite Poyatos <marguerite@paloaltoglass.com> Cc: Dave Stellman <davestellman@gmail.com>; chantal.gaines@cityofpaloalto.org <chantal.gaines@cityofpaloalto.org>; osbaldo@or-builders.com <osbaldo@or-builders.com>; Manu Kumar <manu@k9ventures.com>; Benjamin Becchetti <Benjamin.Becchetti@cityofpaloalto.org>; Lester Wong <lwong@wongelectric.com>; Cathi Lerch <cathi@lerchconstruction.com>; Dave Stellman <dave@paloaltoglass.com>; City Mgr <CityMgr@cityofpaloalto.org>; Pete Moffatt <pete@petemoffat.com>; Jacob@onemovemovers.com <Jacob@onemovemovers.com>; david@paloaltoconcrete.com <david@paloaltoconcrete.com>; Steve Wong <swong@wongelectric.com>; RamonMorenoSchool@gmail.com <RamonMorenoSchool@gmail.com>; nancy@drewmaran.com <nancy@drewmaran.com>; Patrick Kelly <Patrick.Kelly@dmdsystems.com>; Dan McKinley <danmck@scientific-equipment.com>; Melissa McDonough <Melissa.McDonough@cityofpaloalto.org>; James Reifschneider <James.Reifschneider@cityofpaloalto.org>; Transportation <Transportation@cityofpaloalto.org>; Patrick Kelly <Patrick.Kelly@dmdsystems.com>; John Lerch <john@lerchconstruction.com>; Andrew Binder <Andrew.Binder@cityofpaloalto.org>; Jade Jin <JJin@wongelectric.com>; Xenia Czisch <Xenia@qmsshields.com>; City Attorney <city.attorney@cityofpaloalto.org>; Ed Lauing <Ed.Lauing@cityofpaloalto.org>; Lydia Kou <Lydia.Kou@cityofpaloalto.org>; Vicki Veenker <Vicki.Veenker@cityofpaloalto.org>; City Council <city.council@cityofpaloalto.org>; Patrick Burt <Pat.Burt@cityofpaloalto.org>; Greer Stone <Greer.Stone@cityofpaloalto.org>; Julie Lythcott-Haims <Julie.LythcottHaims@cityofpaloalto.org>; Maor <maor@greenberg.construction> Subject: Re: Industrial/Transport/Commercial concerns A citation for double parking and expired tags is what is needed here. I’m positive that’s what thepolice would do to me if I did the same. That is unless there are two separate sets of laws that governthe city of Palo Alto and the state of California. Bill McLane ---------------------------------Palo Alto Glass, Inc. 4085 Transport Street Palo Alto, CA 94303 650-494-7000 Officewww.paloaltoglass.com On Wed, Feb 5, 2025 at 10:13 AM Marguerite Poyatos <marguerite@paloaltoglass.com> wrote:Please see the attached image. The pictured RV & associated white truck pulled up over night. As pictured, they disregardedmarked parking spots, which is one of the things that exacerbates our parking issue. A small car or motorcycle may fit there but in a commercial area where most vehicles are trucks,this does not help. Can you please send a community officer to leave notices on the RVs? I hope this doesn't comeacross as petty, but every spot really does matter on this block. Employees of some businesses haveto park in lots that belong to other businesses, which can create tension amongst neighbors. Thank you. On Sat, Dec 21, 2024 at 9:19 PM Dave Stellman <davestellman@gmail.com> wrote:The police also responded and were very helpful. Initially the people involved denied everything,but when I sent the videos to the officer and he showed it to them they admitted to dumping theirRV waste. They were cited for misdemeanor illegal waste dumping and will be going to court.They were then told to leave the area - and freed up two parking spaces. Thank you Palo AltoPolice and Fire. Apparently reporting violations of every kind is what is going to have to be doneon a regular basis if we want our streets cleaned up. On Dec 21, 2024, at 3:39 PM, Bill McLane <bill@paloaltoglass.com> wrote: Thank you, Dave! Bill McLane --------------------------------- Palo Alto Glass, Inc. 4085 Transport Street Palo Alto, CA 94303 650-494-7000 Office www.paloaltoglass.com On Sat, Dec 21, 2024 at 8:22 AM Dave Stellman <davestellman@gmail.com> wrote:I just called the hotline for Palo Alto for hazardous waste dumping and gave themall of this information including license numbers. These vehicles are still parkedthere.They are sending the fire department out to flush the street and these peoplebetter be held accountable. On Dec 21, 2024, at 7:56 AM, Bill McLane <bill@paloaltoglass.com>wrote: License plate of the accomplice<IMG_0142.jpeg> Bill McLane ---------------------------------Palo Alto Glass, Inc. 4085 Transport Street Palo Alto, CA 94303 650-494-7000 Office www.paloaltoglass.com On Sat, Dec 21, 2024 at 5:13 AM Bill McLane<bill@paloaltoglass.com> wrote: Still parked right across from my building. Note, NO rear license plate. I do think that is against the law. I do also have video of them driving up, proof of the vehicle operating on city streets. Do you think they have insurance? <image.png> Bill McLane ---------------------------------Palo Alto Glass, Inc. 4085 Transport Street Palo Alto, CA 94303 650-494-7000 Office www.paloaltoglass.com On Sat, Dec 21, 2024 at 4:54 AM Bill McLane<bill@paloaltoglass.com> wrote: Here, they are emptying their waste in front of my building. Bill McLane ---------------------------------Palo Alto Glass, Inc. 4085 Transport Street Palo Alto, CA 94303 650-494-7000 Office www.paloaltoglass.com On Fri, Dec 20, 2024 at 9:18 PM Dave Stellman<davestellman@gmail.com> wrote:Chantal, It looks like somehow most of the city council members, ViceMayor and Mayor must have inadvertently been deleted fromyour last email response. I have added them back in to make sure they stay apprised of thesituation. I hope it doesn't take the legal channels mentioned tostart cleaning up our neighborhood immediately; this has gottenout of control and kicking the problem back and forth to differentmembers of your city staff is not going to make it go away. Dave StellmanTransport St. On Fri, Dec 20, 2024 at 8:16 AM Maor Greenberg<maor@greenberg.construction> wrote:Dear Chantal, Your response, while detailed, fails to address the critical and ongoingviolations of law, public safety, and business rights in the area. The Cityof Palo Alto has both the authority and obligation to take immediate anddecisive action to protect its residents, businesses, and public spaces.Allowing illegally parked, unsafe, and hazardous RVs to persist is unacceptable and directly violates state and local regulations. Below are specific legal and factual challenges to the City’s approach, along withdemands for corrective action: 1. Illegally Parked and Unsafe RVs California Vehicle Code § 4000(a)(1) and Palo Alto Municipal Code§ 10.48.010 clearly require all vehicles parked on public streets todisplay valid registration. Many of the RVs in question lack validregistration, making their presence illegal. Further, under California Vehicle Code § 22651(o) and PAMC § 10.48.120, any vehicle unregistered for six months or more may be towed immediately. Additionally, vehicles with exposed sewage tanks, missing wheels, orother structural hazards are in direct violation of California VehicleCode § 24002, which prohibits parking or operating vehicles in unsafe conditions. These RVs also create a public health hazard under California Health and Safety Code § 117490, which prohibitsimproper disposal of waste and sewage. **2. Clarification Requested Regarding Unregistered Vehicles In light of your response, please confirm whether the City of PaloAlto allows unregistered vehicles to be driven on its streets. - I havesome fun vehicles I would love to order from Alibaba and drivethem around Palo Alto... • California Vehicle Code § 4000(a)(1) expressly prohibits theoperation of unregistered vehicles. If these RVs are being movedevery 72 hours as claimed, and they lack proper registration, theiroperation is illegal under state law. • Allowing unregistered vehicles to remain or operate within city limits undermines traffic safety and compliance standards. This point must be clarified explicitly: Does the City of Palo Altocondone the operation of unregistered vehicles? 3. Abuse of the 72-Hour Rule The City’s reliance on PAMC § 10.36.060 to justify the continuedpresence of these RVs is flawed. Surveillance footage and eyewitnessaccounts confirm that many RVs are circumventing the 72-hour rule by wiping off chalk markings rather than physically moving. This is blatantnon-compliance and undermines the intent of the ordinance. Furthermore, California Vehicle Code § 22669 explicitly allows for theremoval of vehicles that are “wrecked, dismantled, or inoperative,” evenif they are moved every 72 hours. The City has the authority to act, and failing to do so jeopardizes public safety and traffic flow. 4. Public Safety and Sanitation Violations The exposed sewage tanks, illegal dumping, and general neglect by these RV occupants pose significant health and environmental risks. The City’s failure to enforce sanitation laws, such as California Health andSafety Code § 117490 and PAMC § 16.09.100, endangers residents,workers, and the environment. Additionally, blocking roadways anddriveways is a clear violation of California Vehicle Code § 22500,which prohibits parking that obstructs traffic flow or access. 5. Impact on Businesses and Traffic Flow Businesses in the area are suffering due to blocked roadways, limitedparking for customers, and safety concerns. Under California Vehicle Code § 21101(c) and PAMC § 10.48.120, the City has the authority toregulate parking to ensure the safety of businesses and residents. The City’s failure to allocate parking for business deliveries, customers,or even emergency services is a gross dereliction of duty. Blockingroadways for long periods creates safety hazards, violates municipal code, and disrupts commerce. Conclusion and Final Demands The City of Palo Alto has the legal authority and responsibility to actunder the following regulations: • PAMC § 10.48.120: Authorizes the removal of unregisteredvehicles. • California Vehicle Code § 22651(o): Allows towing ofunregistered vehicles. • California Vehicle Code § 22669: Mandates removal of inoperativevehicles. • California Health and Safety Code § 117490: Prohibits illegalwaste disposal. • California Vehicle Code § 21101(c): Permits parking restrictions toensure safety. We demand the immediate implementation of the following measures: 1. Impound all unregistered, unsafe, or inoperative RVs within two weeks. 2. Establish designated loading zones and 2-hour parking areas nearbusinesses. 3. Conduct regular sanitation inspections and impose penalties forviolations. 4. Provide a clear timeline for resolution and enforcement updates. The continued failure to act exposes the City to liability for neglectingpublic health and safety under California Government Code § 815.6,which requires municipalities to perform mandatory duties. We expect a formal response with a clear action plan within 14 days. If no satisfactory action is taken, we reserve the right to escalate this matterthrough legal channels to protect our businesses, employees, and thecommunity. <email-signture_87b8d7a2- Maor GreenbergCEO maor@greenberg.construction |650-610-7711 Greenberg.Construction | 650-600-9536 x101 | Fax 925-269-2325908 Industrial Ave, Palo Alto94303 <F_1bc77f31-68bf-4143-80ea-3f34f539ea07.png> <insta_26696304-1b39-4259-9776-9f137454bed9.png> c4f4-4cbf-b474-af2f32118dd2.png> <yelp_e821c57e-caea-4e87-a5dd-5905e7ca4fb1.png> <Houzz_7abe75ad-d6ee-48ac-943b-592713e31957.png> <P_aece63f3-754b-4dca-a0a9-e93b94de4930.png> <google_04352117-2fb4-4963-bb3e-cc5317269360.png> From: Gaines, Chantal <Chantal.Gaines@CityofPaloAlto.org> Date: Friday, December 20, 2024 at 7:12 AM To: Maor Greenberg <maor@greenberg.construction>, Marguerite Poyatos <marguerite@paloaltoglass.com>, osbaldo@or-builders.com <osbaldo@or-builders.com> Cc: Bill McLane <bill@paloaltoglass.com>, Dave Stellman <davestellman@gmail.com>, Manu Kumar <manu@k9ventures.com>, Becchetti, Benjamin <Benjamin.Becchetti@CityofPaloAlto.org>, Lester Wong <lwong@wongelectric.com>, Cathi Lerch <cathi@lerchconstruction.com>, Dave Stellman <dave@paloaltoglass.com>, City Mgr <CityMgr@cityofpaloalto.org>, Moffatt, Pete <pete@petemoffat.com>, Jacob@onemovemovers.com <Jacob@onemovemovers.com>, david@paloaltoconcrete.com <david@paloaltoconcrete.com>, Steve Wong <swong@wongelectric.com>, RamonMorenoSchool@gmail.com <RamonMorenoSchool@gmail.com>, nancy@drewmaran.com <nancy@drewmaran.com>, Patrick Kelly <patrick.kelly@basketmaterials.com>, Dan McKinley <danmck@scientific-equipment.com>, McDonough, Melissa <Melissa.McDonough@CityofPaloAlto.org>, Reifschneider, James <James.Reifschneider@CityofPaloAlto.org>, Transportation <Transportation@CityofPaloAlto.org>, Patrick Kelly <info@basketmaterials.com>, John Lerch <john@lerchconstruction.com>, Binder, Andrew <Andrew.Binder@CityofPaloAlto.org>, Jade Jin <JJin@wongelectric.com>, Xenia Czisch <Xenia@qmsshields.com>, City Attorney <city.attorney@CityofPaloAlto.org> Subject: RE: Industrial/Transport/Commercial concerns You don't often get email from chantal.gaines@cityofpaloalto.org. Learnwhy this is important Hello everyone, Thank you for the emails and the time you all have spent to relay your concerns about the area surrounding your businesses. My name is Chantal and I’m the Deputy City Manager responding on behalf of the City Manager. I understand that you feel a lack of progress on the concerns you’ve identified. Through multiple City departments we are continuing to explore avenues to help mitigate those concerns being mindful of compliance with the federal Constitution and state laws, City resources, as well as providing respect to the humanity of the individuals experiencing homelessness. As our Police Lieutenant mentioned, our enforcement largely consists of the efforts described below involving multiple City departments, including: Weekly markings for 72-hour violations from our Community Service Officers. These are required by law prior to issuing citations for the 72-hour violations. Weekly re-checks of those markings, followed by citations if vehicles are not moved. Checks of the area by traffic officers as well as patrol officers on a routine basis, consistently several times per week. Officers make personal contact with RV occupants to speak with them regarding complaints and concerns, offer services or seek alternative solutions (i.e., a small repair to fix a vehicle). Through our Community Services Department, had our Homeless Outreach Team attempt to speak with RV occupants to connect them to available resources. Of note, there are limited safe parking resources available countywide. Consulted with our Code Enforcement team to address any activity that falls under municipal code violations. We hear you that there are perhaps more RVs in the neighborhood than have been in the past. Some previous concerns, relayed through the Police Department, have been for dumping, visibility/safety issues, or other nuisance-type complaints. Officers have responded to investigate and determine if a violation has in fact occurred in response to those complaints. As the officer who issues the citation must attest to its legality, we trust their judgement to use their discretion when deciding to cite or not. It should be noted that the overwhelming majority of the RV’s are compliant with the 72-hour rule on a weekly basis according to our Police Department and their regular checks. RVs (and any other vehicle) are allowed to move and return to the exact same location under PAMC section 10.36.060. I asked the Police Department to examine the calls for service in your area since November 1st to look for additional complaints the Police Department might be able to address and to get an understanding of what they have responded to in your area. Officers responded to 29 calls for service between the 900 block of San Antonio, Commercial, Transport and Industrial Ave. Only 2 were reported complaints from a business about the RV’s. None of those 29 calls for service reported potential illegal behavior, such as illegal dumping, threatening or harassing behavior, or other criminal actions, on behalf of those working in the area. Most of those calls were self-initiated by the officers or calls from the RV occupants themselves. One of the calls, initiated by an RV occupant, reported suspicious persons that helped prevent a burglary to one of the businesses. Since early November, there have been several citations issued and one vehicle tow. I would encourage your employees to report, either online, through our non-emergency line (650-329-2413) or via 911, any behavior they feel is harassment, or potentially illegal or unsafe. The Police Department will continue to explore ideas such as additional collaboration with City departments, outside organizations and service providers, as well as nearby police departments whose actions can influence the issues felt in Palo Alto. We will also investigate the ability to perform street sweeping efforts and consult with our wastewater officials to address any cleanliness, illegal dumping and sanitation issues. The Police Department will be further assessing the vehicle code violations in the coming weeks to determine the necessity of removing some offending vehicles. Best, Chantal <image001.png>Chantal Cotton Gaines Deputy City Manager (650) 329-2572 | chantal.gaines@cityofpaloalto.org www.cityofpaloalto.org <image002.png> From: Maor Greenberg <maor@greenberg.construction> Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2024 11:35 PM To: Marguerite Poyatos <marguerite@paloaltoglass.com>; osbaldo@or-builders.com Cc: Bill McLane <bill@paloaltoglass.com>; Dave Stellman <davestellman@gmail.com>; Manu Kumar <manu@k9ventures.com>; Becchetti, Benjamin <Benjamin.Becchetti@CityofPaloAlto.org>; Lester Wong <lwong@wongelectric.com>; Cathi Lerch <cathi@lerchconstruction.com>; Dave Stellman <dave@paloaltoglass.com>; City Mgr <CityMgr@cityofpaloalto.org>; Moffatt, Pete <pete@petemoffat.com>; Jacob@onemovemovers.com; david@paloaltoconcrete.com; Steve Wong <swong@wongelectric.com>; RamonMorenoSchool@gmail.com; nancy@drewmaran.com; Patrick Kelly <patrick.kelly@basketmaterials.com>; Dan McKinley <danmck@scientific-equipment.com>; McDonough, Melissa <Melissa.McDonough@CityofPaloAlto.org>; Reifschneider, James <James.Reifschneider@CityofPaloAlto.org>; Transportation <Transportation@CityofPaloAlto.org>; Patrick Kelly <info@basketmaterials.com>; John Lerch <john@lerchconstruction.com>; Tanaka, Greg <Greg.Tanaka@CityofPaloAlto.org>; Lauing, Ed <Ed.Lauing@CityofPaloAlto.org>; Kou, Lydia <Lydia.Kou@CityofPaloAlto.org>; Veenker, Vicki <Vicki.Veenker@CityofPaloAlto.org>; Binder, Andrew <Andrew.Binder@CityofPaloAlto.org>; Council, City <city.council@cityofpaloalto.org>; Burt, Patrick <Pat.Burt@CityofPaloAlto.org>; Stone, Greer <Greer.Stone@CityofPaloAlto.org>; Lythcott-Haims, Julie <Julie.LythcottHaims@CityofPaloAlto.org>; Jade Jin <JJin@wongelectric.com>; Xenia Czisch <Xenia@qmsshields.com>; City Attorney <city.attorney@CityofPaloAlto.org> Subject: Re: Industrial/Transport/Commercial concerns CAUTION: This email originated from outside of theorganization. Be cautious of opening attachments andclicking on links. Dear Molly (City Attorney) and All Copied City Officials, On behalf of the many businesses in the Commercial-Industrial- Transport Street area who are deeply frustrated with the persistent and escalating issues caused by illegally parked RVs, unregistered vehicles, and boats. This situation has reached a critical point, impacting not only our daily operations but also the safety, reputation, and economic health of our businesses. Impact on Businesses and Community 1. Safety and Sanitation Hazards: • Dumped bodily waste, debris, and hazardous conditions are becoming commonplace, creating significant health risks. • Aggressive behavior and intimidation from some vehicle occupants have been reported, making the area unsafe for employees and customers. 2. Operational Challenges: • Parking for employees, customers, and service vehicles is nearly nonexistent due to the occupation of public spaces by illegally parked vehicles. • Businesses are suffering tangible financial losses as customers avoid the area due to these conditions. 3. Lack of Enforcement: • Despite repeated citations and notices issued by Community Service and Special Problems Officers, there has been no meaningful resolution. • Violations of California Vehicle Code 4000(a)(1) VC (unregistered vehicles) and Vehicle Code 22651(o)(1) VC (impound authority for registration violations) are being ignored. Call for Immediate Action This is a collective appeal to the city and its representatives to act decisively to restore order in our community. We urge the city to prioritize: 1. Enforcement: Immediate towing and penalties for unregistered and illegally parked vehicles in alignment with state and local laws. 2. Comprehensive Solutions: A transparent and actionable plan to address these issues, including increased patrols, collaboration with businesses, and enforcement timelines. 3. Engagement: A commitment to working with affected businesses to ensure our concerns are heard and addressed effectively. Potential Legal Action The city’s ongoing inaction not only jeopardizes public safety and operational viability but also exposes it to potential legal consequences. Many businesses on this email chain are experiencing severe financial and reputational damages due to these unresolved issues. We cannot afford further delays. Thank you for your attention. Maor Greenberg CEO maor@greenberg.construction | 650-610-7711 Greenberg.Construction | 650-600-9536 x101 | <image003.png> Fax 925-269-2325 908 Industrial Ave, Palo Alto 94303 <image004.png> <image005.png> <image006.png> <image007.png> <image008.png> <image009.png> From: Marguerite Poyatos <marguerite@paloaltoglass.com> Date: Tuesday, December 17, 2024 at 10:29 AM To: osbaldo@or-builders.com <osbaldo@or- builders.com> Cc: Bill McLane <bill@paloaltoglass.com>, Dave Stellman <davestellman@gmail.com>, Manu Kumar <manu@k9ventures.com>, Benjamin Becchetti <Benjamin.Becchetti@cityofpaloalto.org>, Lester Wong <lwong@wongelectric.com>, Cathi Lerch <cathi@lerchconstruction.com>, Maor Greenberg <maor@greenberg.construction>, Dave Stellman <dave@paloaltoglass.com>, City Mgr <CityMgr@cityofpaloalto.org>, Pete Moffatt <pete@petemoffat.com>, Jacob@onemovemovers.com <Jacob@onemovemovers.com>, david@paloaltoconcrete.com <david@paloaltoconcrete.com>, Steve Wong <swong@wongelectric.com>, RamonMorenoSchool@gmail.com <RamonMorenoSchool@gmail.com>, nancy@drewmaran.com <nancy@drewmaran.com>, Patrick Kelly <patrick.kelly@basketmaterials.com>, Dan McKinley <danmck@scientific-equipment.com>, Melissa McDonough <Melissa.McDonough@cityofpaloalto.org>, James Reifschneider <James.Reifschneider@cityofpaloalto.org>, Transportation <transportation@cityofpaloalto.org>, Patrick Kelly <info@basketmaterials.com>, John Lerch <john@lerchconstruction.com>, Greg Tanaka <Greg.Tanaka@cityofpaloalto.org>, Ed Lauing <Ed.Lauing@cityofpaloalto.org>, Lydia Kou <Lydia.Kou@cityofpaloalto.org>, Vicki Veenker <Vicki.Veenker@cityofpaloalto.org>, Andrew Binder <andrew.binder@cityofpaloalto.org>, City Council <city.council@cityofpaloalto.org>, Patrick Burt <pat.burt@cityofpaloalto.org>, Greer Stone <Greer.Stone@cityofpaloalto.org>, Julie Lythcott-Haims <Julie.LythcottHaims@cityofpaloalto.org>, Jade Jin <JJin@wongelectric.com>, Xenia Czisch <Xenia@qmsshields.com> Subject: Re: Industrial/Transport/Commercial concerns You don't often get email from marguerite@paloaltoglass.com. Learn whythis is important A community officer came by today. Not sure what was done other than inspecting the volume of vehicles on the street. It is pretty disheartening that there are 14 city employees/email addresses included in this email and we are getting no responses or acknowledgements from any of them. This seems to be just a community forum for us to air our grievances regarding the area we all work in rather than getting any sort of resolutions. For years now, the businesses in this area have dealt with a number of issues that are a direct result of the RVs residing on this street - dumped bodily waste, aggressive dogs, aggression/intimidation, amongst many others. We try to vigilant and call the non- emergency police line to confront situations. Officers will come out and at the very most, they will go and have a conversation with whoever it is that's causing issues. Then, nothing happens. We have had customers complain that they do not feel safe coming into this corner of Palo Alto. This is directly affecting Palo Alto businesses - many of which on this street provide important/critical types of service to residents, businesses, local government and schools in Palo Alto. Can we please get some help other than weekly notices stuck on windshields? On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 8:36 AM <osbaldo@or-builders.com> wrote: I agree 100 % The city of Palo A lot needs to have a solution for this please O.R. Builders Inc. Osbaldo Romero President 939 Industrial Ave Palo Alto, Ca. 94303 Phone: 650.938.2222Fax: 650.938.2224 Cell: 415.215.6788 From: Bill McLane <bill@paloaltoglass.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2024 5:34 AM To: Dave Stellman <davestellman@gmail.com> Cc: Manu Kumar <manu@k9ventures.com>; Marguerite Poyatos <MARGUERITE@paloaltoglass.com>; Benjamin Becchetti <Benjamin.Becchetti@cityofpaloalto.org>; Lester Wong <lwong@wongelectric.com>; Cathi Lerch <cathi@lerchconstruction.com>; Maor Greenberg <maor@greenberg.construction>; Dave Stellman <dave@paloaltoglass.com>; City Mgr <CityMgr@cityofpaloalto.org>; osbaldo@or-builders.com; Pete Moffatt <pete@petemoffat.com>; Jacob@onemovemovers.com; david@paloaltoconcrete.com; Steve Wong <swong@wongelectric.com>; RamonMorenoSchool@gmail.com; nancy@drewmaran.com; Patrick Kelly <patrick.kelly@basketmaterials.com>; Dan McKinley <danmck@scientific-equipment.com>; Melissa McDonough <Melissa.McDonough@cityofpaloalto.org>; James Reifschneider <James.Reifschneider@cityofpaloalto.org>; Transportation <transportation@cityofpaloalto.org>; Patrick Kelly <info@basketmaterials.com>; John Lerch <john@lerchconstruction.com>; Greg Tanaka <Greg.Tanaka@cityofpaloalto.org>; Ed Lauing <Ed.Lauing@cityofpaloalto.org>; Lydia Kou <Lydia.Kou@cityofpaloalto.org>; Vicki Veenker <Vicki.Veenker@cityofpaloalto.org>; Andrew Binder <andrew.binder@cityofpaloalto.org>; City Council <city.council@cityofpaloalto.org>; Patrick Burt <pat.burt@cityofpaloalto.org>; Greer Stone <Greer.Stone@cityofpaloalto.org>; Julie Lythcott-Haims <Julie.LythcottHaims@cityofpaloalto.org>; Jade Jin <JJin@wongelectric.com>; Xenia Czisch <Xenia@qmsshields.com> Subject: Re: Industrial/Transport/Commercial concerns Out of curiosity, were this my personal vehicle or one of mycompany vehicles, how long would it take for the City of Palo Alto to either site me or tow me? This is ridiculous; our streets have now become storage forpeople's crap; sorry, no better way to state that. This boat is not someone's dwelling; neither are all the additional cars associated with each camper out here. If you can't do anything about the campers, do something about theadditional crap. Again, how quickly would the city respond if it were my carthat was illegally parked out here? I implore everyone on this thread to continue this daily until something is done. Do better, City of Palo Alto. Bill McLane ---------------------------------Palo Alto Glass, Inc. 4085 Transport Street Palo Alto, CA 94303 650-494-7000 Office www.paloaltoglass.com On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 3:08 PM Dave Stellman <davestellman@gmail.com> wrote: This is ridiculous. The Supreme Court has given cities in the state of California more tools to crack down on homeless camps and illegally parked and stored vehicles. It’s time to clean up this mess in the Commercial - Industrial - Transport street area before it becomes even more of an eyesore than it is now. This is just not fair to owners and customers trying hard to do business here with NO AVAILABLE PARKING. Dave Stellman 4083 / 4085 Transport St. On Dec 16, 2024, at 1:42 PM, Manu Kumar <manu@k9ventures.com> wrote: Here are some pictures from my walkaround the block a week ago.. <IMG_1556.jpeg> <IMG_1557.jpeg> I counted at least 10 RVs just onCommercial St.... too many to even fit onone camera frame. And that's not evencounting the ones all over Transport andIndustrial. Some of the RVs also have othersupporting vehicles as noted in prior email. The City of Palo Alto clearly doesn't careabout businesses and would rather have thestreets be an eyesore, sidewalks beunusable to walk on, and parking spots notbe available to customers/clients oremployees. Warm regards, -- Marguerite Poyatos Palo Alto Glass, Inc.4085 Transport StreetPalo Alto CA 94303 (650) 494-7000(650) 494-7087 (FAX)<Safety on Industrial avenue.pdf> -- Marguerite PoyatosPalo Alto Glass, Inc. 4085 Transport StreetPalo Alto CA 94303(650) 494-7000 (650) 494-7087 (FAX) -- Marguerite PoyatosPalo Alto Glass, Inc. 4085 Transport StreetPalo Alto CA 94303(650) 494-7000 (650) 494-7087 (FAX) -- Marguerite PoyatosPalo Alto Glass, Inc. 4085 Transport StreetPalo Alto CA 94303(650) 494-7000 (650) 494-7087 (FAX)<IMG_0946.jpg><IMG_0947.jpg> From:Aram James To:Supervisor Susan Ellenberg; Vicki Veenker; Veenker, Vicki; Jessica Speiser, Educational Leader for CaliforniaDemocratic Delegate, Assembly District 23; Ed Lauing; Sheree Roth; Lori Meyers; Josh Becker;assemblymember.berman@assembly.ca.gov; Zelkha, Mila; Reckdahl, Keith; Jeff Rosen; Jay Boyarsky; Baker,Rob; dennis burns; DuJuan Green; Gardener, Liz; Liz Kniss; Lotus Fong; Marina Lopez; Tim James; Cait James;Josie James-Le; Jose Valle; board@pausd.org; bos@smcgov.org; Bill Newell; Roberta Ahlquist; Reifschneider,James; Binder, Andrew; Doug Minkler; Barberini, Christopher; Enberg, Nicholas Cc:h.etzko@gmail.com; Lythcott-Haims, Julie; Pat M; Kaloma Smith; Sean Allen; Dave Price; EPA Today; jgreen@dailynewsgroup.com; Gennady Sheyner; Braden Cartwright; Emily Mibach; Sarah Wright; Gerry Gras; Dana St. George; Yolanda Conaway; Don Austin; Donna Wallach; WILPF Peninsula Palo Alto; Bains, Paul; planning.commission@cityofpaloalto.0rg; ParkRec Commission; Perron, Zachary; Figueroa, Eric; <michael.gennaco@oirgroup.com>; Damon Silver; Rodriguez, Miguel; rabrica@cityofepa.org; Raj Jayadev; cromero@cityofepa.org; Templeton, Cari; Anna Griffin; Angel, David; Patricia.Guerrero@jud.ca.gov; frances.Rothschild@jud.ca.gov; Afanasiev, Alex; Jeff Conrad; Council, City; city.council@menlopark.gov; GRP-City Council; citycouncil@mountainview.gov; GRP-City Clerk; Palo Alto Free Press; Rose Lynn; Wagner, April; Nicole Chiu-Wang; sharon jackson; Friends of Cubberley; Freddie.Quintana@sen.ca.gov Subject:Kids Under Fire: An investigation into Israeli soldiers shooting children | Fault Lines Documentary Date:Thursday, March 27, 2025 8:27:31 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. Kids Under Fire: An investigation into Israeli soldiers shooting children | Fault Lines Documentary https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-0zrQZWwDE From:Marguerite Poyatos To:Cathi Lerch; news@padailypost.comCc:Bill McLane; Lester Wong; Maor Greenberg; Dave Stellman; Patrick Kelly; Gaines, Chantal; osbaldo@or-builders.com; Manu Kumar; Becchetti, Benjamin; DaveStellman; City Mgr; Moffatt, Pete; Jacob@onemovemovers.com; david@paloaltoconcrete.com; Steve Wong; RamonMorenoSchool@gmail.com;nancy@drewmaran.com; Dan McKinley; McDonough, Melissa; Reifschneider, James; Transportation; John Lerch; Binder, Andrew; Jade Jin; Xenia Czisch; CityAttorney; Lauing, Ed; Veenker, Vicki; Council, City; Burt, Patrick; Stone, Greer; Lythcott-Haims, Julie Subject:Re: Industrial/Transport/Commercial Safety Date:Thursday, March 27, 2025 8:26:55 AM Attachments:email-signture_87b8d7a2-c4f4-4cbf-b474-af2f32118dd2.pngF_1bc77f31-68bf-4143-80ea-3f34f539ea07.pnginsta_26696304-1b39-4259-9776-9f137454bed9.pngyelp_e821c57e-caea-4e87-a5dd-5905e7ca4fb1.pngHouzz_7abe75ad-d6ee-48ac-943b-592713e31957.pngP_aece63f3-754b-4dca-a0a9-e93b94de4930.pnggoogle_04352117-2fb4-4963-bb3e-cc5317269360.png CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments andclicking on links. Thank you for sending by officers to put notices on the numerous vehicles that have not moved in a month. Please note, thegentleman I initially emailed about ripped the notices off of his 6 vehicles (including his RV) and has not moved them. At thispoint, can you tow them? Officers have explained to us in the past that the RV's cannot be towed since they are someone'sdwelling. However, this gentleman's 5 additional vehicles he has parked on this street are not lived in. Rather, they are filled withtrash. Attached is a picture numbering all of his vehicles in addition to his RV. None of these vehicles move and they really haveno business on this street. Please also note, it may look as if I used the exact same pictures that were sent yesterday, but in fact Itook new pictures this morning which show that he has seen the notices (as hes removed them from his windshield) and has madeno attempt to move a single car. Also attached are pictures of the RV belonging to the same gentleman which is leaking sewage. Again, parking is exasperated here. Employees of businesses have to park in other businesses' parking lots because there is no roomon the street. This is creating tensions between businesses who want their parking open for their own employees and customers.Why is this ok for a random person to decide that they are going to monopolize public parking and defy any sort of rules that are inplace?? On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 11:06 AM Marguerite Poyatos <marguerite@paloaltoglass.com> wrote:Can you please send community officers to put notices on vehicles that have not moved? Please see the attached images. All vehicles with a red X are associated with the RV with the damaged Raiders wrapping. Thesevehicles have all been parked in the same spots for at least a month. Thank you. On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 2:19 PM Cathi Lerch <cathi@lerchconstruction.com> wrote:I wanted to let you know that the new resident has been seen wandering around the neighborhood. I initiallyencountered her on Saturday at 998 San Antonio, where she was asking for money. Then, on Tuesday, she wasgoing through our dumpster at 923 Industrial. She just walked by our front, ranting. Cathi On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 12:44 PM Bill McLane <bill@paloaltoglass.com> wrote: Is the plan for Palo Alto to follow in San Francisco's footsteps? What's next, open-air drug markets for Palo Alto. This person moved to our street just a few days ago, and we have had to call the police every day due to her behavior and out of concern for her well-being. Bill McLane --------------------------------- Palo Alto Glass, Inc. 4085 Transport Street Palo Alto, CA 94303 650-494-7000 Office www.paloaltoglass.com On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 12:43 PM Lester Wong <LWong@wongelectric.com> wrote:Commercial St. was cleared last night. Thank you for your efforts! Lester Wong | Vice President O: 650.813.9999 ext. 22 | C: 650.720.8455 4067 Transport Street | Palo Alto | CA 94303 Celebrating Our 46th Anniversary 1978 – 2024 A Proud Member of the U.S. Green Building Council From: Marguerite Poyatos <marguerite@paloaltoglass.com> Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2025 12:37:47 PM To: Maor Greenberg <maor@greenberg.construction> Cc: Dave Stellman <davestellman@gmail.com>; Patrick Kelly <Patrick.Kelly@dmdsystems.com>; Bill McLane <bill@paloaltoglass.com>; chantal.gaines@cityofpaloalto.org <chantal.gaines@cityofpaloalto.org>; osbaldo@or-builders.com <osbaldo@or-builders.com>; Manu Kumar <manu@k9ventures.com>; Benjamin Becchetti <Benjamin.Becchetti@cityofpaloalto.org>; Lester Wong <LWong@wongelectric.com>; Cathi Lerch <cathi@lerchconstruction.com>; Dave Stellman <dave@paloaltoglass.com>; City Mgr <CityMgr@cityofpaloalto.org>; Pete Moffatt <pete@petemoffat.com>; Jacob@onemovemovers.com <Jacob@onemovemovers.com>; david@paloaltoconcrete.com <david@paloaltoconcrete.com>; Steve Wong <SWong@wongelectric.com>; RamonMorenoSchool@gmail.com <RamonMorenoSchool@gmail.com>; nancy@drewmaran.com <nancy@drewmaran.com>; Dan McKinley <danmck@scientific-equipment.com>; Melissa McDonough <Melissa.McDonough@cityofpaloalto.org>; James Reifschneider <james.reifschneider@cityofpaloalto.org>; Transportation <transportation@cityofpaloalto.org>; John Lerch <john@lerchconstruction.com>; Andrew Binder <Andrew.Binder@cityofpaloalto.org>; Jade Jin <JJin@wongelectric.com>; Xenia Czisch <Xenia@qmsshields.com>; City Attorney <city.attorney@cityofpaloalto.org>; Ed Lauing <Ed.Lauing@cityofpaloalto.org>; Lydia Kou <Lydia.Kou@cityofpaloalto.org>; Vicki Veenker <vicki.veenker@cityofpaloalto.org>; City Council <city.council@cityofpaloalto.org>; Patrick Burt <pat.burt@cityofpaloalto.org>; Greer Stone <Greer.Stone@cityofpaloalto.org>; Julie Lythcott-Haims <Julie.LythcottHaims@cityofpaloalto.org> Subject: Re: Industrial/Transport/Commercial Safety The wooden RV seems to be a severe safety issue. A former coworker spoke to the man living in it a couple years ago andwas told there is a wood burning oven/stove inside the RV, which he uses. Seems like that could be a severe safety hazardnot only for the man residing in it, as well as for the surrounding RV's/vehicles & businesses if it were ever to catch fire. We have had to face a number of safety hazards on this street. It is unsafe for pedestrians. We have had attempted break insat night. We have been harassed by people associated with these RV's, as well as loose dogs, just to name a couple issues.Luckily, police officers do respond and try to help but there will be a time when they will be too late to prevent injury. The community officers coming through and putting notices on vehicles is nowhere near the solution needed for this area.The notices are thrown away and the vehicles rarely move. I believe this email string started in 2023 and we have hadminimal progress with the actual issues at hand. On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 12:19 PM Maor Greenberg <maor@greenberg.construction> wrote:City of palo alto!! please let me know how this is Legal for driving also come and clean the street as it’s not safe seeattached Maor GreenbergCEO maor@greenberg.construction | 650-610-7711 Greenberg.Construction | 650-600-9536 x101 | Fax 925-269-2325908 Industrial Ave, Palo Alto 94303 From: Dave Stellman <davestellman@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2025 10:56:09 AM To: Patrick Kelly <Patrick.Kelly@dmdsystems.com> Cc: Bill McLane <bill@paloaltoglass.com>; Marguerite Poyatos <MARGUERITE@paloaltoglass.com>; chantal.gaines@cityofpaloalto.org <chantal.gaines@cityofpaloalto.org>; osbaldo@or-builders.com <osbaldo@or-builders.com>; Manu Kumar <manu@k9ventures.com>; Benjamin Becchetti <Benjamin.Becchetti@cityofpaloalto.org>; Lester Wong <lwong@wongelectric.com>; Cathi Lerch <cathi@lerchconstruction.com>; Dave Stellman <dave@paloaltoglass.com>; City Mgr <CityMgr@cityofpaloalto.org>; Pete Moffatt <pete@petemoffat.com>; Jacob@onemovemovers.com <Jacob@onemovemovers.com>; david@paloaltoconcrete.com <david@paloaltoconcrete.com>; Steve Wong <swong@wongelectric.com>; RamonMorenoSchool@gmail.com <RamonMorenoSchool@gmail.com>; nancy@drewmaran.com <nancy@drewmaran.com>; Dan McKinley <danmck@scientific-equipment.com>; Melissa McDonough <Melissa.McDonough@cityofpaloalto.org>; James Reifschneider <james.reifschneider@cityofpaloalto.org>; Transportation <transportation@cityofpaloalto.org>; John Lerch <john@lerchconstruction.com>; Andrew Binder <Andrew.Binder@cityofpaloalto.org>; Jade Jin <JJin@wongelectric.com>; Xenia Czisch <Xenia@qmsshields.com>; City Attorney <city.attorney@cityofpaloalto.org>; Ed Lauing <Ed.Lauing@cityofpaloalto.org>; Lydia Kou <Lydia.Kou@cityofpaloalto.org>; Vicki Veenker <vicki.veenker@cityofpaloalto.org>; City Council <city.council@cityofpaloalto.org>; Patrick Burt <pat.burt@cityofpaloalto.org>; Greer Stone <Greer.Stone@cityofpaloalto.org>; Julie Lythcott-Haims <Julie.LythcottHaims@cityofpaloalto.org>; Maor Greenberg <maor@greenberg.construction> Subject: Re: Industrial/Transport/Commercial Safety What is it going to take for the city of Palo Alto to catch up to the rest of the country? A lawsuit when someone in ourneighborhood is injured because of the unsafe conditions that exist here? This email chain alone would be enoughevidence to show the city’s knowledge of the problem and inaction. With newly enacted laws giving cities the legal right to clean up our public spaces, local cities like Mountain View,Santa Clara and San Jose have already begun the process of relocating and housing these people that need it. Why notPalo Alto? Its not a money issue here, and even if it was, wouldn’t it be less costly to tow some vehicles and helprelocate them to a safer area than to pay the cost of litigation? We are asking the city to stop ignoring this issue before it becomes an even bigger problem. On Mar 12, 2025, at 9:17 AM, Patrick Kelly <Patrick.Kelly@dmdsystems.com> wrote: Hi Ben, Please take action. The safety of our employees and locals is critical. Anyone walking or driving on Industrial/Transport/Commercial is constantly at risk. Every crosswalk and entry is a major risk for anyone walking the sidewalks or pulling into any of these facilities where illegally parked abandoned vehicles are encamped. The visibility is very poor and the reason there are height and length restrictions for these types of streets; There are There are illegally running generators with unsafe live electrical lines oftentimes in the sidewalk or even running across entryways There are collections of volatile liquids like gasoline and oil (environmental issues aside) that pose additional hazards to anyone in the vicinity Please let us know what you need from us to support your team in enforcing our city regulations in order to make our workplaces safer for our employees. Respectfully, Patrick Kelly | CIODMD Systems Recovery, LLC.C: 650.492.9003patrick.kelly@dmdsystems.com | www.dmdsystems.com<Outlook-DMD Logo.png> <Outlook-larpkod1.png>Book time to meet with me From: Bill McLane <bill@paloaltoglass.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 5, 2025 12:39 PM To: Marguerite Poyatos <marguerite@paloaltoglass.com> Cc: Dave Stellman <davestellman@gmail.com>; chantal.gaines@cityofpaloalto.org <chantal.gaines@cityofpaloalto.org>; osbaldo@or-builders.com <osbaldo@or-builders.com>; Manu Kumar <manu@k9ventures.com>; Benjamin Becchetti <Benjamin.Becchetti@cityofpaloalto.org>; Lester Wong <lwong@wongelectric.com>; Cathi Lerch <cathi@lerchconstruction.com>; Dave Stellman <dave@paloaltoglass.com>; City Mgr <CityMgr@cityofpaloalto.org>; Pete Moffatt <pete@petemoffat.com>; Jacob@onemovemovers.com <Jacob@onemovemovers.com>; david@paloaltoconcrete.com <david@paloaltoconcrete.com>; Steve Wong <swong@wongelectric.com>; RamonMorenoSchool@gmail.com <RamonMorenoSchool@gmail.com>; nancy@drewmaran.com <nancy@drewmaran.com>; Patrick Kelly <Patrick.Kelly@dmdsystems.com>; Dan McKinley <danmck@scientific-equipment.com>; Melissa McDonough <Melissa.McDonough@cityofpaloalto.org>; James Reifschneider <James.Reifschneider@cityofpaloalto.org>; Transportation <Transportation@cityofpaloalto.org>; Patrick Kelly <Patrick.Kelly@dmdsystems.com>; John Lerch <john@lerchconstruction.com>; Andrew Binder <Andrew.Binder@cityofpaloalto.org>; Jade Jin <JJin@wongelectric.com>; Xenia Czisch <Xenia@qmsshields.com>; City Attorney <city.attorney@cityofpaloalto.org>; Ed Lauing <Ed.Lauing@cityofpaloalto.org>; Lydia Kou <Lydia.Kou@cityofpaloalto.org>; Vicki Veenker <Vicki.Veenker@cityofpaloalto.org>; City Council <city.council@cityofpaloalto.org>; Patrick Burt <Pat.Burt@cityofpaloalto.org>; Greer Stone <Greer.Stone@cityofpaloalto.org>; Julie Lythcott-Haims <Julie.LythcottHaims@cityofpaloalto.org>; Maor <maor@greenberg.construction> Subject: Re: Industrial/Transport/Commercial concerns A citation for double parking and expired tags is what is needed here. I’m positive that’s what the policewould do to me if I did the same. That is unless there are two separate sets of laws that govern the city ofPalo Alto and the state of California. Bill McLane ---------------------------------Palo Alto Glass, Inc. 4085 Transport Street Palo Alto, CA 94303 650-494-7000 Office www.paloaltoglass.com On Wed, Feb 5, 2025 at 10:13 AM Marguerite Poyatos <marguerite@paloaltoglass.com> wrote:Please see the attached image. The pictured RV & associated white truck pulled up over night. As pictured, they disregarded markedparking spots, which is one of the things that exacerbates our parking issue. A small car or motorcycle may fit there but in a commercial area where most vehicles are trucks, this doesnot help. Can you please send a community officer to leave notices on the RVs? I hope this doesn't come across aspetty, but every spot really does matter on this block. Employees of some businesses have to park in lotsthat belong to other businesses, which can create tension amongst neighbors. Thank you. On Sat, Dec 21, 2024 at 9:19 PM Dave Stellman <davestellman@gmail.com> wrote:The police also responded and were very helpful. Initially the people involved denied everything, butwhen I sent the videos to the officer and he showed it to them they admitted to dumping their RV waste. They were cited for misdemeanor illegal waste dumping and will be going to court. They were then toldto leave the area - and freed up two parking spaces. Thank you Palo Alto Police and Fire. Apparentlyreporting violations of every kind is what is going to have to be done on a regular basis if we want ourstreets cleaned up. On Dec 21, 2024, at 3:39 PM, Bill McLane <bill@paloaltoglass.com> wrote: Thank you, Dave! Bill McLane ---------------------------------Palo Alto Glass, Inc. 4085 Transport Street Palo Alto, CA 94303 650-494-7000 Office www.paloaltoglass.com On Sat, Dec 21, 2024 at 8:22 AM Dave Stellman <davestellman@gmail.com> wrote:I just called the hotline for Palo Alto for hazardous waste dumping and gave them all ofthis information including license numbers. These vehicles are still parked there.They aresending the fire department out to flush the street and these people better be heldaccountable. On Dec 21, 2024, at 7:56 AM, Bill McLane <bill@paloaltoglass.com> wrote: License plate of the accomplice<IMG_0142.jpeg> Bill McLane ---------------------------------Palo Alto Glass, Inc. 4085 Transport Street Palo Alto, CA 94303 650-494-7000 Office www.paloaltoglass.com On Sat, Dec 21, 2024 at 5:13 AM Bill McLane <bill@paloaltoglass.com>wrote: Still parked right across from my building. Note, NO rear license plate. I do think that is against the law. I do also have video of them driving up, proof of the vehicle operating on city streets. Do you think they have insurance? <image.png> Bill McLane ---------------------------------Palo Alto Glass, Inc. 4085 Transport StreetPalo Alto, CA 94303 650-494-7000 Office www.paloaltoglass.com On Sat, Dec 21, 2024 at 4:54 AM Bill McLane <bill@paloaltoglass.com>wrote: Here, they are emptying their waste in front of my building. Bill McLane --------------------------------- Palo Alto Glass, Inc. 4085 Transport Street Palo Alto, CA 94303 650-494-7000 Office www.paloaltoglass.com On Fri, Dec 20, 2024 at 9:18 PM Dave Stellman<davestellman@gmail.com> wrote:Chantal, It looks like somehow most of the city council members, Vice Mayorand Mayor must have inadvertently been deleted from your last emailresponse. I have added them back in to make sure they stay apprised of thesituation. I hope it doesn't take the legal channels mentioned to start cleaning up our neighborhood immediately; this has gotten out ofcontrol and kicking the problem back and forth to different members ofyour city staff is not going to make it go away. Dave StellmanTransport St. On Fri, Dec 20, 2024 at 8:16 AM Maor Greenberg<maor@greenberg.construction> wrote:Dear Chantal, Your response, while detailed, fails to address the critical and ongoingviolations of law, public safety, and business rights in the area. The City ofPalo Alto has both the authority and obligation to take immediate and decisive action to protect its residents, businesses, and public spaces. Allowing illegally parked, unsafe, and hazardous RVs to persist is unacceptable and directlyviolates state and local regulations. Below are specific legal and factualchallenges to the City’s approach, along with demands for corrective action: 1. Illegally Parked and Unsafe RVs California Vehicle Code § 4000(a)(1) and Palo Alto Municipal Code §10.48.010 clearly require all vehicles parked on public streets to display validregistration. Many of the RVs in question lack valid registration, making their presence illegal. Further, under California Vehicle Code §22651(o) and PAMC § 10.48.120, any vehicle unregistered for six months ormore may be towed immediately. Additionally, vehicles with exposed sewage tanks, missing wheels, or otherstructural hazards are in direct violation of California Vehicle Code § 24002,which prohibits parking or operating vehicles in unsafe conditions. These RVsalso create a public health hazard under California Health and Safety Code §117490, which prohibits improper disposal of waste and sewage. **2. Clarification Requested Regarding Unregistered Vehicles In light of your response, please confirm whether the City of Palo Altoallows unregistered vehicles to be driven on its streets. - I have some funvehicles I would love to order from Alibaba and drive them around PaloAlto... • California Vehicle Code § 4000(a)(1) expressly prohibits the operation ofunregistered vehicles. If these RVs are being moved every 72 hours as claimed, and they lack proper registration, their operation is illegal understate law. • Allowing unregistered vehicles to remain or operate within city limitsundermines traffic safety and compliance standards. This point must be clarified explicitly: Does the City of Palo Alto condonethe operation of unregistered vehicles? 3. Abuse of the 72-Hour Rule The City’s reliance on PAMC § 10.36.060 to justify the continued presence ofthese RVs is flawed. Surveillance footage and eyewitness accounts confirm that many RVs are circumventing the 72-hour rule by wiping off chalk markingsrather than physically moving. This is blatant non-compliance and underminesthe intent of the ordinance. Furthermore, California Vehicle Code § 22669 explicitly allows for theremoval of vehicles that are “wrecked, dismantled, or inoperative,” even if theyare moved every 72 hours. The City has the authority to act, and failing to do sojeopardizes public safety and traffic flow. 4. Public Safety and Sanitation Violations The exposed sewage tanks, illegal dumping, and general neglect by these RVoccupants pose significant health and environmental risks. The City’s failure toenforce sanitation laws, such as California Health and Safety Code § 117490 and PAMC § 16.09.100, endangers residents, workers, and theenvironment. Additionally, blocking roadways and driveways is a clearviolation of California Vehicle Code § 22500, which prohibits parking thatobstructs traffic flow or access. 5. Impact on Businesses and Traffic Flow Businesses in the area are suffering due to blocked roadways, limited parking for customers, and safety concerns. Under California Vehicle Code §21101(c) and PAMC § 10.48.120, the City has the authority to regulate parkingto ensure the safety of businesses and residents. The City’s failure to allocate parking for business deliveries, customers, oreven emergency services is a gross dereliction of duty. Blocking roadways forlong periods creates safety hazards, violates municipal code, and disruptscommerce. Conclusion and Final Demands The City of Palo Alto has the legal authority and responsibility to act under thefollowing regulations: • PAMC § 10.48.120: Authorizes the removal of unregistered vehicles. • California Vehicle Code § 22651(o): Allows towing of unregisteredvehicles. • California Vehicle Code § 22669: Mandates removal of inoperativevehicles. • California Health and Safety Code § 117490: Prohibits illegal wastedisposal. • California Vehicle Code § 21101(c): Permits parking restrictions to ensuresafety. We demand the immediate implementation of the following measures: 1. Impound all unregistered, unsafe, or inoperative RVs within two weeks. 2. Establish designated loading zones and 2-hour parking areas nearbusinesses. 3. Conduct regular sanitation inspections and impose penalties forviolations. 4. Provide a clear timeline for resolution and enforcement updates. The continued failure to act exposes the City to liability for neglecting publichealth and safety under California Government Code § 815.6, which requiresmunicipalities to perform mandatory duties. We expect a formal response with a clear action plan within 14 days. If no satisfactory action is taken, we reserve the right to escalate this matter through legal channels to protect our businesses,employees, and the community. <email-signture_87b8d7a2-c4f4-4cbf-b474-af2f32118dd2.png> Maor GreenbergCEO maor@greenberg.construction | 650-610-7711 Greenberg.Construction | 650-600-9536 x101 | Fax 925-269-2325908 Industrial Ave, Palo Alto 94303 <F_1bc77f31-68bf-4143-80ea-3f34f539ea07.png> <insta_26696304-1b39-4259-9776-9f137454bed9.png> <yelp_e821c57e-caea-4e87-a5dd-5905e7ca4fb1.png> <Houzz_7abe75ad-d6ee-48ac-943b-592713e31957.png> <P_aece63f3-754b-4dca-a0a9-e93b94de4930.png> <google_04352117-2fb4-4963-bb3e-cc5317269360.png> From: Gaines, Chantal <Chantal.Gaines@CityofPaloAlto.org> Date: Friday, December 20, 2024 at 7:12 AM To: Maor Greenberg <maor@greenberg.construction>, Marguerite Poyatos <marguerite@paloaltoglass.com>, osbaldo@or-builders.com <osbaldo@or-builders.com> Cc: Bill McLane <bill@paloaltoglass.com>, Dave Stellman <davestellman@gmail.com>, Manu Kumar <manu@k9ventures.com>, Becchetti, Benjamin <Benjamin.Becchetti@CityofPaloAlto.org>, Lester Wong <lwong@wongelectric.com>, Cathi Lerch <cathi@lerchconstruction.com>, Dave Stellman <dave@paloaltoglass.com>, City Mgr <CityMgr@cityofpaloalto.org>, Moffatt, Pete <pete@petemoffat.com>, Jacob@onemovemovers.com <Jacob@onemovemovers.com>, david@paloaltoconcrete.com <david@paloaltoconcrete.com>, Steve Wong <swong@wongelectric.com>, RamonMorenoSchool@gmail.com <RamonMorenoSchool@gmail.com>, nancy@drewmaran.com <nancy@drewmaran.com>, Patrick Kelly <patrick.kelly@basketmaterials.com>, Dan McKinley <danmck@scientific-equipment.com>, McDonough, Melissa <Melissa.McDonough@CityofPaloAlto.org>, Reifschneider, James <James.Reifschneider@CityofPaloAlto.org>, Transportation <Transportation@CityofPaloAlto.org>, Patrick Kelly <info@basketmaterials.com>, John Lerch <john@lerchconstruction.com>, Binder, Andrew <Andrew.Binder@CityofPaloAlto.org>, Jade Jin <JJin@wongelectric.com>, Xenia Czisch <Xenia@qmsshields.com>, City Attorney <city.attorney@CityofPaloAlto.org> Subject: RE: Industrial/Transport/Commercial concerns You don't often get email from chantal.gaines@cityofpaloalto.org. Learn why thisis important Hello everyone, Thank you for the emails and the time you all have spent to relay your concerns about the area surrounding your businesses. My name is Chantal and I’m the Deputy City Manager responding on behalf of the City Manager. I understand that you feel a lack of progress on the concerns you’ve identified. Through multiple City departments we are continuing to explore avenues to help mitigate those concerns being mindful of compliance with the federal Constitution and state laws, City resources, as well as providing respect to the humanity of the individuals experiencing homelessness. As our Police Lieutenant mentioned, our enforcement largely consists of the efforts described below involving multiple City departments, including: Weekly markings for 72-hour violations from our Community Service Officers. These are required by law prior to issuing citations for the 72-hour violations. Weekly re-checks of those markings, followed by citations if vehicles are not moved. Checks of the area by traffic officers as well as patrol officers on a routine basis, consistently several times per week. Officers make personal contact with RV occupants to speak with them regarding complaints and concerns, offer services or seek alternative solutions (i.e., a small repair to fix a vehicle). Through our Community Services Department, had our Homeless Outreach Team attempt to speak with RV occupants to connect them to available resources. Of note, there are limited safe parking resources available countywide. Consulted with our Code Enforcement team to address any activity that falls under municipal code violations. We hear you that there are perhaps more RVs in the neighborhood than have been in the past. Some previous concerns, relayed through the Police Department, have been for dumping, visibility/safety issues, or other nuisance-type complaints. Officers have responded to investigate and determine if a violation has in fact occurred in response to those complaints. As the officer who issues the citation must attest to its legality, we trust their judgement to use their discretion when deciding to cite or not. It should be noted that the overwhelming majority of the RV’s are compliant with the 72-hour rule on a weekly basis according to our Police Department and their regular checks. RVs (and any other vehicle) are allowed to move and return to the exact same location under PAMC section 10.36.060. I asked the Police Department to examine the calls for service in your area since November 1st to look for additional complaints the Police Department might be able to address and to get an understanding of what they have responded to in your area. Officers responded to 29 calls for service between the 900 block of San Antonio, Commercial, Transport and Industrial Ave. Only 2 were reported complaints from a business about the RV’s. None of those 29 calls for service reported potential illegal behavior, such as illegal dumping, threatening or harassing behavior, or other criminal actions, on behalf of those working in the area. Most of those calls were self-initiated by the officers or calls from the RV occupants themselves. One of the calls, initiated by an RV occupant, reported suspicious persons that helped prevent a burglary to one of the businesses. Since early November, there have been several citations issued and one vehicle tow. I would encourage your employees to report, either online, through our non-emergency line (650-329-2413) or via 911, any behavior they feel is harassment, or potentially illegal or unsafe. The Police Department will continue to explore ideas such as additional collaboration with City departments, outside organizations and service providers, as well as nearby police departments whose actions can influence the issues felt in Palo Alto. We will also investigate the ability to perform street sweeping efforts and consult with our wastewater officials to address any cleanliness, illegal dumping and sanitation issues. The Police Department will be further assessing the vehicle code violations in the coming weeks to determine the necessity of removing some offending vehicles. Best, Chantal <image001.png>Chantal Cotton Gaines Deputy City Manager (650) 329-2572 | chantal.gaines@cityofpaloalto.org www.cityofpaloalto.org <image002.png> From: Maor Greenberg <maor@greenberg.construction> Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2024 11:35 PM To: Marguerite Poyatos <marguerite@paloaltoglass.com>; osbaldo@or- builders.com Cc: Bill McLane <bill@paloaltoglass.com>; Dave Stellman <davestellman@gmail.com>; Manu Kumar <manu@k9ventures.com>; Becchetti, Benjamin <Benjamin.Becchetti@CityofPaloAlto.org>; Lester Wong <lwong@wongelectric.com>; Cathi Lerch <cathi@lerchconstruction.com>; Dave Stellman <dave@paloaltoglass.com>; City Mgr <CityMgr@cityofpaloalto.org>; Moffatt, Pete <pete@petemoffat.com>; Jacob@onemovemovers.com; david@paloaltoconcrete.com; Steve Wong <swong@wongelectric.com>; RamonMorenoSchool@gmail.com; nancy@drewmaran.com; Patrick Kelly <patrick.kelly@basketmaterials.com>; Dan McKinley <danmck@scientific- equipment.com>; McDonough, Melissa <Melissa.McDonough@CityofPaloAlto.org>; Reifschneider, James <James.Reifschneider@CityofPaloAlto.org>; Transportation <Transportation@CityofPaloAlto.org>; Patrick Kelly <info@basketmaterials.com>; John Lerch <john@lerchconstruction.com>; Tanaka, Greg <Greg.Tanaka@CityofPaloAlto.org>; Lauing, Ed <Ed.Lauing@CityofPaloAlto.org>; Kou, Lydia <Lydia.Kou@CityofPaloAlto.org>; Veenker, Vicki <Vicki.Veenker@CityofPaloAlto.org>; Binder, Andrew <Andrew.Binder@CityofPaloAlto.org>; Council, City <city.council@cityofpaloalto.org>; Burt, Patrick <Pat.Burt@CityofPaloAlto.org>; Stone, Greer <Greer.Stone@CityofPaloAlto.org>; Lythcott-Haims, Julie <Julie.LythcottHaims@CityofPaloAlto.org>; Jade Jin <JJin@wongelectric.com>; Xenia Czisch <Xenia@qmsshields.com>; City Attorney <city.attorney@CityofPaloAlto.org> Subject: Re: Industrial/Transport/Commercial concerns CAUTION: This email originated from outside of theorganization. Be cautious of opening attachments andclicking on links. Dear Molly (City Attorney) and All Copied City Officials, On behalf of the many businesses in the Commercial-Industrial-Transport Street area who are deeply frustrated with the persistent and escalating issues caused by illegally parked RVs, unregistered vehicles, and boats. This situation has reached a critical point, impacting not only our daily operations but also the safety, reputation, and economic health of our businesses. Impact on Businesses and Community 1. Safety and Sanitation Hazards: • Dumped bodily waste, debris, and hazardous conditions are becoming commonplace, creating significant health risks. • Aggressive behavior and intimidation from some vehicle occupants have been reported, making the area unsafe for employees and customers. 2. Operational Challenges: • Parking for employees, customers, and service vehicles is nearly nonexistent due to the occupation of public spaces by illegally parked vehicles. • Businesses are suffering tangible financial losses as customers avoid the area due to these conditions. 3. Lack of Enforcement: • Despite repeated citations and notices issued by Community Service and Special Problems Officers, there has been no meaningful resolution. • Violations of California Vehicle Code 4000(a)(1) VC (unregistered vehicles) and Vehicle Code 22651(o)(1) VC (impound authority for registration violations) are being ignored. Call for Immediate Action This is a collective appeal to the city and its representatives to act decisively to restore order in our community. We urge the city to prioritize: 1. Enforcement: Immediate towing and penalties for unregistered and illegally parked vehicles in alignment with state and local laws. 2. Comprehensive Solutions: A transparent and actionable plan to address these issues, including increased patrols, collaboration with businesses, and enforcement timelines. 3. Engagement: A commitment to working with affected businesses to ensure our concerns are heard and addressed effectively. Potential Legal Action The city’s ongoing inaction not only jeopardizes public safety and operational viability but also exposes it to potential legal consequences. Many businesses on this email chain are experiencing severe financial and reputational damages due to these unresolved issues. We cannot afford further delays. Thank you for your attention. <image003.png> Maor Greenberg CEO maor@greenberg.construction | 650-610-7711 Greenberg.Construction | 650-600-9536 x101 | Fax 925-269-2325 908 Industrial Ave, Palo Alto 94303 <image004.png> <image005.png> <image006.png> <image007.png> <image008.png> <image009.png> From: Marguerite Poyatos <marguerite@paloaltoglass.com> Date: Tuesday, December 17, 2024 at 10:29 AM To: osbaldo@or-builders.com <osbaldo@or-builders.com> Cc: Bill McLane <bill@paloaltoglass.com>, Dave Stellman <davestellman@gmail.com>, Manu Kumar <manu@k9ventures.com>, Benjamin Becchetti <Benjamin.Becchetti@cityofpaloalto.org>, Lester Wong <lwong@wongelectric.com>, Cathi Lerch <cathi@lerchconstruction.com>, Maor Greenberg <maor@greenberg.construction>, Dave Stellman <dave@paloaltoglass.com>, City Mgr <CityMgr@cityofpaloalto.org>, Pete Moffatt <pete@petemoffat.com>, Jacob@onemovemovers.com <Jacob@onemovemovers.com>, david@paloaltoconcrete.com <david@paloaltoconcrete.com>, Steve Wong <swong@wongelectric.com>, RamonMorenoSchool@gmail.com <RamonMorenoSchool@gmail.com>, nancy@drewmaran.com <nancy@drewmaran.com>, Patrick Kelly <patrick.kelly@basketmaterials.com>, Dan McKinley <danmck@scientific-equipment.com>, Melissa McDonough <Melissa.McDonough@cityofpaloalto.org>, James Reifschneider <James.Reifschneider@cityofpaloalto.org>, Transportation <transportation@cityofpaloalto.org>, Patrick Kelly <info@basketmaterials.com>, John Lerch <john@lerchconstruction.com>, Greg Tanaka <Greg.Tanaka@cityofpaloalto.org>, Ed Lauing <Ed.Lauing@cityofpaloalto.org>, Lydia Kou <Lydia.Kou@cityofpaloalto.org>, Vicki Veenker <Vicki.Veenker@cityofpaloalto.org>, Andrew Binder <andrew.binder@cityofpaloalto.org>, City Council <city.council@cityofpaloalto.org>, Patrick Burt <pat.burt@cityofpaloalto.org>, Greer Stone <Greer.Stone@cityofpaloalto.org>, Julie Lythcott-Haims <Julie.LythcottHaims@cityofpaloalto.org>, Jade Jin <JJin@wongelectric.com>, Xenia Czisch <Xenia@qmsshields.com> Subject: Re: Industrial/Transport/Commercial concerns You don't often get email from marguerite@paloaltoglass.com. Learn why this isimportant A community officer came by today. Not sure what was done other than inspecting the volume of vehicles on the street. It is pretty disheartening that there are 14 city employees/email addresses included in this email and we are getting no responses or acknowledgements from any of them. This seems to be just a community forum for us to air our grievances regarding the area we all work in rather than getting any sort of resolutions. For years now, the businesses in this area have dealt with a number of issues that are a direct result of the RVs residing on this street - dumped bodily waste, aggressive dogs, aggression/intimidation, amongst many others. We try to vigilant and call the non-emergency police line to confront situations. Officers will come out and at the very most, they will go and have a conversation with whoever it is that's causing issues. Then, nothing happens. We have had customers complain that they do not feel safe coming into this corner of Palo Alto. This is directly affecting Palo Alto businesses - many of which on this street provide important/critical types of service to residents, businesses, local government and schools in Palo Alto. Can we please get some help other than weekly notices stuck on windshields? On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 8:36 AM <osbaldo@or-builders.com> wrote: I agree 100 % The city of Palo A lot needs to have a solution for this please O.R. Builders Inc. Osbaldo Romero President 939 Industrial Ave Palo Alto, Ca. 94303 Phone: 650.938.2222 Fax: 650.938.2224 Cell: 415.215.6788 From: Bill McLane <bill@paloaltoglass.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2024 5:34 AM To: Dave Stellman <davestellman@gmail.com> Cc: Manu Kumar <manu@k9ventures.com>; Marguerite Poyatos <MARGUERITE@paloaltoglass.com>; Benjamin Becchetti <Benjamin.Becchetti@cityofpaloalto.org>; Lester Wong <lwong@wongelectric.com>; Cathi Lerch <cathi@lerchconstruction.com>; Maor Greenberg <maor@greenberg.construction>; Dave Stellman <dave@paloaltoglass.com>; City Mgr <CityMgr@cityofpaloalto.org>; osbaldo@or-builders.com; Pete Moffatt <pete@petemoffat.com>; Jacob@onemovemovers.com; david@paloaltoconcrete.com; Steve Wong <swong@wongelectric.com>; RamonMorenoSchool@gmail.com; nancy@drewmaran.com; Patrick Kelly <patrick.kelly@basketmaterials.com>; Dan McKinley <danmck@scientific-equipment.com>; Melissa McDonough <Melissa.McDonough@cityofpaloalto.org>; James Reifschneider <James.Reifschneider@cityofpaloalto.org>; Transportation <transportation@cityofpaloalto.org>; Patrick Kelly <info@basketmaterials.com>; John Lerch <john@lerchconstruction.com>; Greg Tanaka <Greg.Tanaka@cityofpaloalto.org>; Ed Lauing <Ed.Lauing@cityofpaloalto.org>; Lydia Kou <Lydia.Kou@cityofpaloalto.org>; Vicki Veenker <Vicki.Veenker@cityofpaloalto.org>; Andrew Binder <andrew.binder@cityofpaloalto.org>; City Council <city.council@cityofpaloalto.org>; Patrick Burt <pat.burt@cityofpaloalto.org>; Greer Stone <Greer.Stone@cityofpaloalto.org>; Julie Lythcott-Haims <Julie.LythcottHaims@cityofpaloalto.org>; Jade Jin <JJin@wongelectric.com>; Xenia Czisch <Xenia@qmsshields.com> Subject: Re: Industrial/Transport/Commercial concerns Out of curiosity, were this my personal vehicle or one of mycompany vehicles, how long would it take for the City of Palo Altoto either site me or tow me? This is ridiculous; our streets have now become storage for people's crap; sorry, no better way to state that. This boat is not someone's dwelling; neither are all the additional cars associatedwith each camper out here. If you can't do anything about the campers, do something about the additional crap. Again, how quickly would the city respond if it were my car thatwas illegally parked out here? I implore everyone on this thread to continue this daily until something is done. Do better, City of Palo Alto. Bill McLane ---------------------------------Palo Alto Glass, Inc. 4085 Transport Street Palo Alto, CA 94303 650-494-7000 Office www.paloaltoglass.com On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 3:08 PM Dave Stellman <davestellman@gmail.com> wrote: This is ridiculous. The Supreme Court has given cities in the state of California more tools to crack down on homeless camps and illegally parked and stored vehicles. It’s time to clean up this mess in the Commercial - Industrial - Transport street area before it becomes even more of an eyesore than it is now. This is just not fair to owners and customers trying hard to do business here with NO AVAILABLE PARKING. Dave Stellman 4083 / 4085 Transport St. On Dec 16, 2024, at 1:42 PM, Manu Kumar <manu@k9ventures.com> wrote: Here are some pictures from my walk around theblock a week ago.. <IMG_1556.jpeg> <IMG_1557.jpeg> I counted at least 10 RVs just on Commercial St....too many to even fit on one camera frame. Andthat's not even counting the ones all overTransport and Industrial. Some of the RVs alsohave other supporting vehicles as noted in prioremail. The City of Palo Alto clearly doesn't care aboutbusinesses and would rather have the streets bean eyesore, sidewalks be unusable to walk on, andparking spots not be available to customers/clientsor employees. Warm regards, -- Marguerite Poyatos Palo Alto Glass, Inc.4085 Transport StreetPalo Alto CA 94303 (650) 494-7000 (650) 494-7087 (FAX)<Safety on Industrial avenue.pdf> -- Marguerite Poyatos Palo Alto Glass, Inc. 4085 Transport StreetPalo Alto CA 94303(650) 494-7000 (650) 494-7087 (FAX) -- Marguerite PoyatosPalo Alto Glass, Inc.4085 Transport Street Palo Alto CA 94303 (650) 494-7000(650) 494-7087 (FAX) -- Marguerite PoyatosPalo Alto Glass, Inc. 4085 Transport Street Palo Alto CA 94303(650) 494-7000 (650) 494-7087 (FAX) From:Sue To:Magdalena Cabrera Cc:Council, City; Angela Dellaporta; Claire Elliott; Andrea Wald; Rebecca Sanders; Brown Jonathan; Horrigan-Taylor, Meghan Subject:Re: ARtificial Turf Date:Thursday, March 27, 2025 7:35:22 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. Hi Magdalena: Good job! It covers a lot of important points. Let's see if he responds. Sue On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 3:37 PM Magdalena Cabrera <magdalenac@gmail.com> wrote: Esteemed City Council Members and Mayor Lauing, I am writing formally to implore you to re-think the use of artificial turf in our city parks, playgrounds and playing fields. I have spoken at the open mike twice now on the same topic. I will also take this moment to urge you to VOTE NO oncontracting with Lloyd Consulting on yet another study. There is more thanenough evidence to guide our thinking on the relative merits or demerits ( in this case) of artificial turf. As my friends and neighbors have stated, there is already much science to informus that micro and nano plastics are bad for humans, flora, fauna and our riparian habitats and all who live there. Here is a link to an article about the uncovering of plastics in fish and birds: Source: The Cool Down https://search.app/5GywR7XtNNvdjbf38 I am including this next an aritcle on the finding of microplastics in humanbrains and other organs in living individuals including in placental tissue ( babiesin utero are absorbing plastics from their mothers and being born withnanoplastics in their bodies!!!): https://search.app/iebEVebDmTbwgCHp9 You are all of an age to remember the issues of acid rain. NOW we have plasticrain. Please read the link I am including here:https://search.app/2v8bCUkcVJctPGHV7 This next hotlink is taken from Stanford Medicine's publication The Scope and itis entitled "What's the Deal with Microplastics?" This article should terrify us all. All of these articles should terrify us honestly. https://search.app/tRhuiKjBNiEH5NuE8 I thank you for your time and for your good efforts on behalf of the citizens of Palo Alto. I will trust that you will consider very carefully what I and others have presented to you and then do the RIGHT thing for our children, for theenvironment and the world at large. Say NO to artificial turf. Respectfully, Magdalena Cabrera397 Fernando Ave.Palo Alto, CA 94306 From:Aram James To:Vicki Veenker; Veenker, Vicki; Supervisor Susan Ellenberg; BoardOperations; board@pausd.org; Ed Lauing; JoshBecker; Jessica Speiser, Educational Leader for California Democratic Delegate, Assembly District 23;assemblymember.berman@assembly.ca.gov; Zelkha, Mila; Reckdahl, Keith; Reckdahl, Keith; Rowena Chiu; LoriMeyers; Sheree Roth Cc:Lythcott-Haims, Julie; Bains, Paul; Lotus Fong; WILPF Peninsula Palo Alto; h.etzko@gmail.com; Nicole Chiu- Wang; Sean Allen; sharon jackson; Sameena@Secure-Justice.org; Vara Ramakrishnan; yolanda; Yolanda Conaway; Don Austin; Doug Minkler; Dave Price; Gennady Sheyner; Sarah Wright; EPA Today; jgreen@dailynewsgroup.com; Dana St. George; Gerry Gras; rabrica@cityofepa.org; Raj Jayadev; Jose Valle Subject:WATCH: The Moment Masked ICE Agents Arrested Tufts Graduate Student Who Spoke Out in Support ofPalestine Date:Wednesday, March 26, 2025 4:28:26 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links. WATCH: The Moment Masked ICEAgents Arrested Tufts GraduateStudent Who Spoke Out in Support ofPalestine “I can buy that badge from a fucking costume store,” says a witness to the“kidnapping” of Rumeysa Ozturk as she was on her way to break her Ramadanfast. Checkout fascist ICE/COPS/IDF/ Death Squads/???? Do THEIR Nazi Thing!!!! SEE VIDEO BELOW!!!! Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more WATCH: The Moment Masked ICEAgents Arrested Tufts GraduateStudent Who Spoke Out in Support of Palestine “I can buy that badge from a fucking costume store,” says a witness tothe “kidnapping” of Rumeysa Ozturk as she was on her way to break herRamadan fast. PREM THAKKER MAR 26 READ IN APP On Tuesday evening, plainclothes-masked Department of Homeland Security agents arrested Tufts University graduate student Rumeysa Ozturk, a Turkish national with a valid student visa, as she was on her way to break her Ramadan fast, according to her attorney and video footage of the arrest. Video credit: Daniel Boguslaw Ozturk’s attorney, Mahsa Khanbabai, says her team is unaware of her whereabouts, has been unable to contact her, and that no charges have been filed against Ozturk that they are aware of. The ICE locator database on Wednesday afternoon listed Ozturk as being held in the “South Louisiana Processing Center” in Basile, Louisiana – more than 1,400 miles away from Somerville, Massachusetts, where Ozturk was detained. ICE and the White House did not respond to requests for comment. A DHS spokesperson claimed without evidence that “DHS and ICE investigations found Ozturk engaged in activities in support of Hamas.” The spokesperson added, “A visa is a privilege not a right…This is commonsense security.” Ozturk, a doctoral student at Tufts University, was targeted after the McCarthyite organization Canary Mission accused her on its website of “anti-Israel activism.” The proof was scant, involving an op-ed she co-wrote calling on Tufts to follow democratic outcomes. Upgrade to paid Exactly one year ago, on March 26, 2024, Ozturk co-authored an op-ed in the student newspaper, in which she and three other students urged Tufts to heed resolutions that were overwhelmingly passed by the student senate, including one resolution that called on university leadership to acknowledge the Palestinian genocide and divest from companies with ties to Israel. “This arrest is the latest in an alarming pattern to stifle civil liberties,” Massachusetts Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren said in an emailed statement. “The Trump administration is targeting students with legal status and ripping people out of their communities without due process. This is an attack on our Constitution and basic freedoms — and we will push back." Democratic Rep. Ayanna Pressley, who represents the district where Ozturk was detained, echoed Warren, saying: "This is a horrifying violation of Rumeysa's constitutional rights to due process and free speech. She must be immediately released. And we won't stand by while the Trump Administration continues to abduct students with legal status and attack our fundamental freedoms." On Tuesday night, Tufts president Sunil Kumar wrote in an email to university affiliates that the school had no prior knowledge of the arrest, nor did they share information with federal authorities. Kumar said university officials were told that Ozturk’s visa had been terminated. He added that they were seeking to confirm whether that was true, and would assist in connecting Ozturk to external legal resources if they requested it. Late Tuesday, a federal judge granted her lawyer’s request that Ozturk not be moved out of the state without advanced notice to the court from the government. It's unclear whether Ozturk was taken to Louisiana after the judge's order. State-Sanctioned ‘Kidnapping’ A source who witnessed the arrest said that what stuck with them was that the incident was “clearly premeditated” with “overwhelming force.” They told Zeteo that at least one officer was carrying a firearm, and that one of the agents’ vehicles had been parked on the street since 4:00 AM, according to a neighbor’s camera. They saw the vehicle when they left for the morning and returned in the evening. Upgrade to paid As Ozturk walked down the sidewalk, three people got out of the vehicle and began crossing the street, one pulling up his hood, according to the video of her arrest. They confronted Ozturk, who appeared confused. They then grabbed her and pulled her phone out of her hand, as the other officers began pulling up ski masks to cover their faces. Amid the confusion, several other people emerged, pulling masks over their faces. According to the witness, the masked individuals insisted they were either police or with the police. The witness never heard them identify the agency they were from. The masked individuals continued to tug at her backpack, eventually taking it from her. The detainment – with no apparent charges or clear grounds – appeared less like a legal arrest and more like a “kidnapping,” said the source. "They did not start very well by identifying themselves or anything like that. And then when, like, questioned, they said either we are the police, or we're with the police, I think they say both. And it's all sort of like, yeah, fucking right man, you're with the police. Like, I can say that, and I can buy that badge from a fucking costume store." A String of Arrests Ozturk’s arrest is the latest in a growing list of the Trump administration’s crackdown on students who have spoken out against Israel’s genocide in Gaza. Legal experts question the constitutionality of the crackdown, given its complete dismissal of First Amendment rights, as well as its attempts to retrofit and weaponize law to target individuals without any solid legal basis. The case of Columbia student protest leader Mahmoud Khalil, a green card holder, remains ongoing. Khalil was detained under an obscure provision that allows the secretary of state to deem noncitizens as a foreign policy risk and have them deported – a law that experts told Zeteo likely is unconstitutional. Mahmoud Khalil speaks to members of the media about the Revolt for Rafah encampment at Columbia University on June 1, 2024. Photo by Jeenah Moon/Reuters The Justice Department has subsequently tried to justify his arrest, claiming he did not state on his green card application that he previously worked for the Syria office of the British Embassy and was a member of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA). One of Khalil’s attorneys, Marc Van Der Hout, called the allegations "completely meritless” and said they show “that the government has no case whatsoever on this bogus charge that his presence in the U.S. would have adverse foreign policy consequences." Van Der Hout says Khalil was not a “member” of UNRWA; he simply did one of his three Columbia-approved internships there. On Khalil’s embassy work, Van Der Hout says Khalil’s work there “ended in December 2022, as he stated in his residency application.” Khalil was similarly sent over a thousand miles away from his home to Louisiana. Just months ago, rights groups published a report on facilities in Louisiana titled "Inside the Black Hole: Systemic Human Rights Abuses Against Immigrants Detained & Disappeared in Louisiana." Another Columbia student, 21-year-old Yunseo Chung, a South Korean national who has lived in the US since she was 8 – had her green card revoked by the Trump administration. Chung is suing the Trump administration to stop their targeting of her and other students. On Tuesday, a judge issued a temporary restraining order stopping the Trump administration from detaining her. Badar Khan Suri, an Indian scholar at Georgetown University, was arrested by masked agents last week. Suri has been taken through several detention centers and has now been placed a thousand miles away from his family, in a detention center in Texas. Share The Trump administration has justified the arrest on the grounds that Suri apparently has "close connections to a known or suspected terrorist, a senior adviser to Hamas.” The charge is in reference to his father-in-law, who was a former Hamas government adviser, who left his position more than a decade ago and has since become a writer and commentator, who has been quoted in the New York Times. Suri’s attorney, Hassan Ahmad, told Mehdi Hasan that his client’s father-in-law is “a person that, according to the information that we have, he [Suri] has met twice in his entire life, doesn't really know, and has not had any sort of meaningful relationship with.” A judge has blocked Suri’s deportation for now. Prem Thakker is Zeteo’s political reporter. Send tips via email or Signal (premthakker.35). If you are already a paid subscriber to Zeteo but would like to increase your support for our accountability journalism, please do consider a donation, too. You’re currently a free subscriber to Zeteo. If you believe our work is important, please consider supporting Zeteo by upgrading your subscription. If you have any issues with your subscription, please email us at info@zeteonews.com. Upgrade to paid LIKE COMMENT RESTACK © 2025 Zeteo1640 Boro Place 4th floor, McLean, VA 22102 Unsubscribe From:Virginia Smedberg To:Council, City Subject:proposed development at former Sunset Mag property Date:Wednesday, March 26, 2025 4:01:12 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. i Dear City Council Members: I'm writing to ask you to make sure that the Menlo Park City Council insists on an Environmental Impact Report to make sure that this proposal complies with CEQA, California Environmental Quality Act. In my view there are several very negative factors involved, so the EIR needs to be done thoroughly. cheers - virginia smedberg 441 Washington Ave, Palo Alto EARTH without ART is just EH This message needs your attention This is a personal email address. Mark Safe Report Powered by Mimecast From:Aram James To:Gennady Sheyner; Dave Price; ladoris cordell; Sean Allen; Binder, Andrew; Pat M; Jeff Rosen; Bill Newell; EmilyMibach; Sarah Wright; Lythcott-Haims, Julie; Bains, Paul; Kaloma Smith; Paul George @ PPJC;h.etzko@gmail.com; Jay Boyarsky; board@pausd.org; board@valleywater.org; Braden Cartwright; Jeff Hayden;Council, City; Reifschneider, James; sharon jackson; Nicole Chiu-Wang; Enberg, Nicholas; dennis burns; DianaDiamond; EPA Today; jgreen@dailynewsgroup.com; Baker, Rob; Jeff Conrad Subject:San Francisco DA Brooke Jenkins Escalates Attack after Judge Cordell’s Resignation, Ignoring Calls for Judicial Independence Date:Wednesday, March 26, 2025 2:12:26 PM CAUTION: THIS EMAIL ORIGINATED FROM OUTSIDE OF THE ORGANIZATION. BE CAUTIOUSOF OPENING ATTACHMENTS AND CLICKING ON LINKS. SAN FRANCISCO DA BROOKE JENKINS ESCALATES ATTACK AFTER JUDGE CORDELL’S RESIGNATION, IGNORING CALLS FOR JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE San Francisco DA Brooke Jenkins Escalates Attack after Judge Cordell’s Resignation,Ignoring Calls for Judicial Independence Source: davisvanguard.org https://share.newsbreak.com/cabixfk5?s=i0 From:Christine Walravens To:Council, City Subject:development in Menlo Park at old Sunset Date:Wednesday, March 26, 2025 1:49:41 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. Hello, I am writing to request that you work with the Menlo Park City Council to insist on an Environmental Impact Report to make sure that this proposal complies with CEQA, California Environmental Quality Act for the development at the old Sunset Magazine location. Thanks, Christine Walravens 145 Heather Lane From:Aram James To:Veenker, Vicki; Supervisor Susan Ellenberg Cc:Josh Becker; Jessica Speiser, Educational Leader for California Democratic Delegate, Assembly District 23; assemblymember.berman@assembly.ca.gov; Lythcott-Haims, Julie; ladoris cordell; Jeff Rosen; jay.boyarsky@da.sccgov.org; Emily Mibach; Zelkha, Mila; Dave Price; dennis burns; DuJuan Green; Council, City; Binder, Andrew; Reifschneider, James; Wagner, April; Diana Diamond; EPA Today; board@pausd.org; board@valleywater.org; BoardOperations; Pat M; Nicole Chiu-Wang; Sean Allen; Bill Newell; Dana St. George; h.etzko@gmail.com; Lori Meyers; Sheree Roth; Gennady Sheyner; city.council@menlopark.gov; Lotus Fong; Gardener, Liz; Liz Kniss; Rodriguez, Miguel; Foley, Michael; <michael.gennaco@oirgroup.com>; Figueroa, Eric; Barberini, Christopher; Josie James-Le; Perron, Zachary; planning.commission@cityofpaloalto.0rg; ParkRec Commission Subject:White House blocked from deporting Yunseo Chung, green card holder and student who sued Trumpadministration Date:Wednesday, March 26, 2025 1:34:02 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. White House blocked from deporting Yunseo Chung, green card holder and student who suedTrump administration Source: the Guardian https://search.app/n4FCDgGbXeGtk9BK9 Shared via the Google app From:debbie ballon To:Council, City Subject:Middlefield and Loma Verde Shopping Center Date:Wednesday, March 26, 2025 11:00:36 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links. Can you please provide an update on the rebuilding of this area. Neighbors are wondering what’s happening. We really miss it and need clarification on the future of this community resource. Thank you, Debbie Ballon 3366 Ross Rd Sent from my iPhone From:Maithreyan Srinivasan To:Council, City; Lauing, Ed; Stone, Greer; Veenker, Vicki; Burt, Patrick; Reckdahl, Keith; Lu, George Cc:Kshama Jirage Subject:Fire station 4 Date:Wednesday, March 26, 2025 9:13:48 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. Dear City council members, leaders, Thank you for rebuilding fire station 4. We were made aware of the staffing situation at the fire stationand how the city is considering having the required staff recommended by the fire station staff. As ataxpayer of Palo Alto and a resident in Adobe Meadow Neighborhood for the last 15 years, I suggest welisten to the firefighter's recommendations and hire10 firefighters for fire station 4 with 3 firefighters on call24/7 to manning our fire engine. The current proposal is to cross staff fire station 4 with personnel fromthe Barron Park or Embarcadero fire station. This would be inadequate in the case of a fire especiallywhen the response time to up to 8 mins with further increases to the response time depending on delaysto the engine waiting for a train to cross the tracks. A delay of such magnitude risks losing many homes inthe neighborhood in the event of a fire. Much appreciate our tax dollars put to protecting the community effectively. Maithreyan Srinivasan (Srini) From:Bob Moss To:Council, City Subject:Proposed Development in Menlo Park at Sunset Magazine Site Date:Tuesday, March 25, 2025 9:56:58 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. ! This massive, proposed development will have major negative environmental impacts. The developer must submit an Environmental Impact Report from a non- biased organization and agree to adopt any required mitigations to reduce such impacts. It is located close to the Palo Alto border and San Francisquito Creek so Palo Alto also must be involved in approving any required mitigations. Robert Moss Virus-free.www.avast.com This message could be suspicious The sender's email address couldn't be verified. This is a personal email address. Mark Safe Report Powered by Mimecast From:amy kacher To:Council, City Subject:Bathrooms at Pardee Date:Tuesday, March 25, 2025 8:12:07 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. I question the human excrement that people are describing present in the garden. If this is accurate I wonder what type of person is doing that and feel concern for their mental health. Ifsomeone were to have an emergency of that nature, my belief is that a clear minded well meaning community member would clean up after themselves. I am thinking that what hasbeen found is more likely animal feces. hey, we are all just people From:amy kacher To:Council, City Subject:Rinconada bathrooms Date:Tuesday, March 25, 2025 8:07:15 PM Attachments:IMG_8287.png IMG_8286.png CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. City Council Members, Attached please see the Rinconada bathrooms. I am questioning the ability of our city to keepup with maintenance. These have been like this way for about 3 months as far as I know. Thanks hey, we are all just people From:Maura Carta To:Council, City Subject:Sunset Magazine site Date:Tuesday, March 25, 2025 6:59:16 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links. Hello City of Palo Alto, I am aware of the new building proposal on the site of the former Sunset Magazine company. I am writing to ask you to make sure that the Menlo Park City council insists on an Environmental Impact Report to ensure that this proposal complies with CEQA, California Environmental Quality Act. Thanks so much, Maura Greenlaw From:Friends of the Palo Alto Junior Museum & Zoo To:Council, City Subject:Meet the JMZ"s Zoo Director: Sean Ramsdell Date:Tuesday, March 25, 2025 5:18:16 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious ofopening attachments and clicking on links. Meet the JMZ's Zoo Director: Sean Ramsdell March 25, 2025 Hello Friends, It’s spring at the Palo Alto Junior Museum & Zoo, and the plants in the California Dinosaur Garden are entering full bloom. I hope you’ll come and visit the JMZ and see what’s new soon. Our second annual Spring Breakfast will be Friday, May 9 from 9 a.m. to 11 a.m. Funds raised at this event will directly support programs that expand access to science education throughout our community. If you are interested in attending thisevent, please reach out to Stephanie Kerry, Advancement and Operations Manager at stephanie@friendsjmz.org. If you would like to become an early supporter, please consider making a donation online. In this newsletter, we’re excited to spotlight the JMZ’s Zoo Director, Sean Ramsdell. Sean combines his passion for wildlife and strong organizational skills to provide thebest care for the JMZ’s critters and fun experiences for guests. Read on to learn more about what he enjoys most about the JMZ, and how his team works to enhance programming both at the JMZ and local schools served by JMZ Educators. Warmly, Lauren Angelo President, Friends of the Palo Alto Junior Museum & Zoo Spotlight on Sean Ramsdell, JMZ Zoo Director: Exploring a Lifetime of Curiosity How did your early experiences shape your desire to pursue a career with animals? Although I don’t have many clear childhood memories, I always remember loving animals. Growing up on the edge of a state forest, I was lucky to have nature right in my own backyard. I would spend hours outdoors, often looking for small critters like frogs and salamanders. One of my favorite toys was my Fisher Price zoo set with little monkeys and an elephant, which further piqued my curiosity about animals allover the world. Having early exposure to science and nature shaped my desire to pursue a career that involved working with animals. I love that I have the opportunity to introduce animals to young learners, which can then inspire them to become more curious about nature. I studied biology in college, but I wasn’t quite sure what my path should be. I latersecured an internship at the Fossil Rim Wildlife Center in Glen Rose, Texas, where I had the opportunity to work with rhinos. Soon after, I started working at the Houston Zoo before relocating to Busch Gardens in Tampa. When I first visited the JMZ, I knew this place had something special. I was really drawn to the warm, collaborative environment of the museum and zoo. I knew that the JMZ would give me theopportunity to both work with animals and engage with guests. Sean poses with a reindeer. What do you enjoy most about working at the JMZ? One of the things I love most about working here is the relationships I get to build with the animals. Some of them are elusive, but have their own unique personalities—like Bruce, the Bruce’s green pigeon, who can be a bit challenging to find when it’s time for bed. I made a shirt that says, “Ask me about Bruce” to prompt conversations with guests about her. Beyond that, I’m passionate about creating a positive environment for my team. I want them to feel supported and valued in their work. Working with such a dedicated group of people, and knowing we’re all here for the same purpose—providing the best care for the animals and creating meaningful experiences for our guests—is incredibly rewarding. Sean's favorite work shirt features a photo of a Bruce's green pigeon. How do the education and zoo teams collaborate to improve programs? The high-quality lessons that JMZ Educators deliver at local schools are a huge part of what makes the JMZ so unique. We’re lucky to have a team of passionate educators who want to share the wonder of nature with students across our community. Collaboration between our zoo staff and the education team is key to our success: educators share knowledge with the zoo team on how to best stimulatelearning, and we work with the educators on animal handling and behaviors. Both educators and zoo team members actively incorporate a Socratic teaching style,which encourages collaborative learning with guests. Instead of simply telling guests about an animal, we encourage them to think critically about why an animal might behave a certain way or how it adapts to its environment. I’m proud to be part of a team that’s dedicated to making our programs educational for everyone involved. We’re always looking for ways to expand and improve our programming, both atschools and at the JMZ. One area we’re really focused on right now is animal training, which will benefit both JMZ Science Outreach lessons and the Friends’ Animal Encounters Program. Creating quality experiences with science and nature lays a foundation for success in the lives of many young children. Expanding access to our programs is important to the Friends and the JMZ. I’m excited to continue toreach more young learners and their families through working with our educators and introducing guests to our animals. Sean and Zookeeper and Friends Ambassador Lee Harper pose with the JMZ'swhistling ducks. DONATE NOW Friends of the Palo Alto Junior Museum & Zoo1451 Middlefield Road, Palo Alto, CA 94301 Friends of the Palo Alto Junior Museum & Zoo | 1451 Middlefield Road | Palo Alto, CA 94301US Unsubscribe | Update Profile | Constant Contact Data Notice Constant Contact From:Tavera, Samuel To:Council, City Subject:Photos Referenced by Marcie Rodrigues During Public Comment Date:Tuesday, March 25, 2025 2:27:01 PM Attachments:Marcie Rodrigues Public Comment.pdf image001.png image002.png image003.png image006.png image007.png Greetings Councilmembers, Please find attached the photos that Marcie Rodrigues referenced during her public comment last night. Thank you Samuel Tavera Administrative Associate III Office of the City Clerk P: 650.838.2898 E: Samuel.Tavera@cityofpaloalto.org www.cityofpaloalto.org From:David PageTo:Council, City Subject:Fwd: Methane gas equipment removal AND service charge refund - 3115 Avalon Court Date:Tuesday, March 25, 2025 1:50:58 PMAttachments:image014.pngimage015.pngimage016.pngimage017.pngimage020.pngimage021.pngimage022.pngimage023.pngimage025.pngimage026.pngimage027.pngimage002.png CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links. Dear City Council Members, I apologize for bothering you, but my wife and I are still being billed for methane gas, which we don't use. I've sent a dozen emails to various players in the City, asking to have the billingdiscontinued (see photo of latest utility bill below). We stopped using methane a couple of years ago. Perhaps you won't be able to help my wife and I any more than the utility commission or the City manager, but one never knows. I assume City employees are busy, and taking care of a $17per month problem is not their highest priority. However, we shouldn't have to hound so many bureaucrats to stop the billing. It should be easily handled. The most recent emails we received were a couple of weeks ago from Jodie Gerhardt, and Crystal Jensen. We've heard nothing from anyone since then. Some of the email thread is enclosed further below. 20250325_123620 (1).jpg David PageStephanie Troyan3115 Avalon Ct, Palo Alto, CA 94306 =================================================================================== ---------- Forwarded message ---------From: David Page <dalpage5@gmail.com>Date: Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 11:06 AMSubject: Re: Methane gas equipment removal AND service charge refund - 3115 Avalon CourtTo: Gerhardt, Jodie <Jodie.Gerhardt@cityofpaloalto.org> Thanks for looking into this Ms. Gerhardt. The furnace was replaced with an electric heat pump in 2018 by Alternative HVAC Solutions (not in 2024). I assumed they took care of all appropriate papers and permits. Am I wrong? I admit I don't know much about permits. The methane-burning water heater was replaced with an electric tankless model, also in 2018, by Kevin Bennett Plumbing. His company did the panel upgrade that you see on your list (7/18). Again, did the contractor not acquire the appropriate permits? I didn't realize we were being charged a monthly Methane Fee by the utility until last year, when I wrote to stop paying this. If the removal of the meter and (above-ground) pipes is too much to ask for, I can do it myself - I have a monkey wrench. Would the pipes go in the blue bin or the black one? Thank you for helping us get to the bottom of this morass. David Page Stephanie Troyan650-269-1126 On Fri, Mar 7, 2025 at 6:09 PM Gerhardt, Jodie <Jodie.Gerhardt@cityofpaloalto.org> wrote: David Page, If I understand correctly, your gas water heater and furnace were replaced with electric equipment a year ago and you would now like your gas meter removed. Correct? Below are all of the permits I see for your property (2000 to present). It shows the furnace was relocated in 2002 and the water heater was replaced in 2005. Have these been replaced again? Please let me know if I am on the right track, and we can discuss further on Monday. Sincerely, Jodie Gerhardt (she/her), AICP Development Center Manager –- Please note my new role -- Planning and Development Services Department (650) 329-2575 | jodie.gerhardt@cityofpaloalto.org www.cityofpaloalto.org From: Jensen, Crystal <crystal.jensen@cityofpaloalto.org> Sent: Friday, March 7, 2025 3:23 PMTo: David Page <dalpage5@gmail.com>Cc: Borjon, David <David.Borjon@CityofPaloAlto.org>; Gerhardt, Jodie <Jodie.Gerhardt@CityofPaloAlto.org>Subject: RE: Methane gas equipment removal AND service charge refundImportance: High Hi David, I have cc’d David Borjon in this email and marked it as high-priority. Our Building Department will be the division in the City most appropriate to answer your questions about permit costs and what is needed to electrify your home. I will follow up with them ifwe still don’t hear anything by midweek next week. Thank you, Crystal Jensen Manager, Utilities Customer Service City of Palo Alto Utilities Department 250 Hamilton Ave | Palo Alto, CA 94301 O: 650.329.2547 M: 650.885.8350 E-mail: Crystal.Jensen@cityofpaloalto.org www.cityofpaloalto.org From: David Page <dalpage5@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, March 6, 2025 5:10 PMTo: Jensen, Crystal <crystal.jensen@cityofpaloalto.org>Subject: Re: Methane gas equipment removal AND service charge refund CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links. Yes Ms. Jenson, I did follow up with the Building dept. (see email back and forth - below). What building permit/s are you talking about EXACTLY? After the last email I sent to David Borjon (2/12), I haven't gotten a reply from anyone (until yours today). Please read what I've already written: "She [Kelly Harata] did say that the replacement of the (methane-burning) hot water tank and furnace (years ago) required retroactive permits - which Imust get before the monthly fee will be cancelled. I believe our [City of Palo Alto-approved] contractor at the time took care of the appropriate permits! " So how much do I have to pay (permit fees?) in order for you to stop charging me for gas we do not use? If the cost of these permit fees are considerably more than the monthly methane fee, I'll continue to pay the monthly fee you charge. If the permit fees are minimal, I'll pay them rather thanyour monthly fee. Did the contractor take money from us to pay "permit fees", and then not pay the City? Should I take him to small claims court? If you are not in a position of authority to clear up this inanity, could you please forward my request to someone who can? Thank you for sending a reply, David Page ====================================================== 2/12/25 Dear Permits Staff, I'm writing to find out if I need a permit (or two) for work done a few years ago. We replaced a (methane-burning) hot water tank with an electrical tankless system. Separately, we replaced our methane-burning furnace with an electric heat-pump system - at a different time with a different contractor. Our understanding was that both contractors took care of the appropriate permits. Is that correct? The contact information for both contractors was obtained via a list of City approved contractors. If permits are required, how much do they cost? Thank you,David Page ====================================================== 2/12/25 David B,Can you answer this question from this resident please? Thank you,Dorothy Dale ====================================== 2/12/25 Hi David, Please provide me with an address. David Borjon ========================================= [to david b. From dorothy d.] 2/12/25 “David Page 3115 Avalon Ct.650-269-1126” It was at the bottom. {of the email sent by mr. Page}Dorothy =============================================== 2/12/25 Dear David P., For 3115 Avalon Ct there are no permits for the scope you are describing below. The cost for a tankless water heater is roughly $500-$800 dollars. David Borjon ========================================================= 2/12/25 Hello David B., Thanks for getting back to me. Re: "For 3115 Avalon Ct there are no permits for the scope you are describing." Do you mean no permits are now needed? Or there are no permits on file, and therefore we must obtain such permits? Thank you, David P.(3115 Avalon Ct.) On Thu, Mar 6, 2025 at 3:11 PM Jensen, Crystal <crystal.jensen@cityofpaloalto.org> wrote: Hello Mr. Page, If I may, I would like to refer you to the email thread with you and our Lead Customer Service Representative dated February 12th. As mentioned, you will need to visit the BuildingDepartment to obtain a building permit for the electrification of your home. They may be contacted at 650 329-2496, press #1 at recording, or email them at buildingpermits@cityofpaloalto.org Additionally, please refer to the link provided in that email for more information on the electrification process: Residential Electrification – City of Palo Alto, CA If you have any questions or need further assistance, please feel free to reach out. Best regards, Crystal Jensen Manager, Utilities Customer Service City of Palo Alto Utilities Department 250 Hamilton Ave | Palo Alto, CA 94301 O: 650.329.2547 M: 650.885.8350 E-mail: Crystal.Jensen@cityofpaloalto.org www.cityofpaloalto.org From: UTL-Customer Service <UtilitiesCustomerService@CityofPaloAlto.org> Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2025 8:38 AMTo: David Page <dalpage5@gmail.com>Cc: Haruta, Kelly <Kelly.Haruta@CityofPaloAlto.org>; Building <Building@CityofPaloAlto.org>Subject: RE: Methane gas equipment removal AND service charge refund Hello David, Permits are handled by the Building Department, on the permit site there is information on how to apply for a permit and check status. The Building Department can assist with permitsneeded. They may be contacted at 650 329-2496, press #1 at recording or email them at buildingpermits@cityofpaloalto.org Apply for a Building Permit – City of Palo Alto, CA Here are the permits that I was able to see on the Palo Alto Online Permitting Service portal. Sincerely, Lorraina Alvarez Customer Service Specialist City of Palo Alto Utilities Department 250 Hamilton Ave | Palo Alto, CA 94301 O: 650.329.2161 E-mail: Lorraina.Alvarez@CityofPaloAlto.org www.cityofpaloalto.org From: David Page <dalpage5@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2025 6:39 PMTo: UTL-Customer Service <UtilitiesCustomerService@CityofPaloAlto.org>Subject: Fwd: Methane gas equipment removal AND service charge refund CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links. ---------- Forwarded message ---------From: David Page <dalpage5@gmail.com> Date: Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 4:39 PMSubject: Re: Methane gas equipment removal AND service charge refundTo:UTL-Customer Service <UtilitiesCustomerService@cityofpaloalto.org> Hello Lorraina, Kelly Haruta called and claimed not to know much about our request for removal of the meter, nor the refund for the monthly "gas" fee. She did say that the replacement of the (methane-burning) hot water tank and furnace (20 years ago?) required retroactive permits - which I must get before the monthly fee will be cancelled. I believe our contractor at the time took care ofthe appropriate permits. Kelly recommended I call the Building Department to find out. I can email them at buildingpermits@cityofpaloalto.org. I believe I'm asking them for some kind of permit/s, so that we can have our above-ground meter-equipment removed, and toget a refund for the monthly fee. Is that correct? I'm not sure why this is so much more complicated than advertised: · "After submission, Customer Service will acknowledge application completion within 2-3 business days by email. · After acknowledging completion, Customer Service will create a work order and send it to the Gas Meter Technician(s). · The Gas Meter Technician(s) will be on site to turn off and remove the gas meter and or service line within 3-5 working days. · Overall, completion time will be anywhere between 2-10 business days. · It may take 1-2 billing cycles to see that gas services has been removed from your statements." David Page650-269-1126 On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 3:00 PM David Page <dalpage5@gmail.com> wrote: Sorry, but I don't see anything about permits here: · "After submission, Customer Service will acknowledge application completion within 2-3 business days by email. · After acknowledging completion, Customer Service will create a work order and send it to the Gas Meter Technician(s). · The Gas Meter Technician(s) will be on site to turn off and remove the gas meter and or service line within 3-5 working days. · Overall, completion time will be anywhere between 2-10 business days. · It may take 1-2 billing cycles to see that gas services has been removed from your statements." What permits are you referring to? "changing gas to electric appliances" Are you saying I need to pay money to stop using gas? We stopped using gas many months ago (look at yourbilling for us). Are you saying we broke the law?!? I have no reason to contact the Building Department. Is this some kind of shakedown? "cost of restoration"? I don't want a restoration of anything; we already get electricity. Should I fill out another online demolition form? "Utilities will be disconnected and/or removed within 1 and 10 working days after receipt of a completed application. Exact times and/or dates cannot be scheduled." David Page650-269-1126 On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 9:33 AM Haruta, Kelly <Kelly.Haruta@cityofpaloalto.org> wrote: The Building Department can assist with permits needed. They may be contacted at 650 329-2496, press #1 at recording or email them at buildingpermits@cityofpaloalto.org Kelly Haruta Utilities Project Coordinator/Water-Gas-Wastewater Engineering City of Palo Alto Utilities Office Hours M-F 7: 30 AM to 4: 30 PM www.cityofpaloalto.org Link to WGW and Electric Engineering Standards/Requirements in CPAU Website: https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/Departments/Utilities/Utilities-Services-Safety/New-Connection-or-Upgrades-to-Utilities/Application-Forms-Guidelines Link to Utility Disconnection for Deconstruction/Demolition Forms: https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/Departments/Utilities/Utilities-Services-Safety/New-Connection-or-Upgrades-to-Utilities/Application-Forms-Guidelines Link to Utility Connection Fees and New/Upgraded Connections/Meter Forms: https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/Departments/Utilities/Utilities-Services-Safety/New-Connection-or-Upgrades-to-Utilities Link to Building Permit Status Tutorial: how-to-check-record-status-of-a-record-online.pdf (cityofpaloalto.org) Link to on line Building Permit Submittal: https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Development-Services/Online-Permit-Services-OPS From: UTL-Customer Service <UtilitiesCustomerService@CityofPaloAlto.org>Sent: Thursday, February 6, 2025 7:35 AMTo: David Page <dalpage5@gmail.com>; Haruta, Kelly <Kelly.Haruta@CityofPaloAlto.org>Subject: RE: Methane gas equipment removal AND service charge refund Hello David, @Haruta, Kelly can assist with the permits needed. Here is a link to the residential electrification with resources. Residential Electrification – City of Palo Alto, CA Sincerely, Lorraina Alvarez Customer Service Specialist City of Palo Alto Utilities Department 250 Hamilton Ave | Palo Alto, CA 94301 O: 650.329.2161 E-mail: Lorraina.Alvarez@CityofPaloAlto.org www.cityofpaloalto.org From: David Page <dalpage5@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 5, 2025 9:34 PMTo: UTL-Customer Service <UtilitiesCustomerService@CityofPaloAlto.org>Subject: Re: Methane gas equipment removal AND service charge refund CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links. What permits? David Page650-269-1126 On Mon, Feb 3, 2025 at 2:57 PM UTL-Customer Service <UtilitiesCustomerService@cityofpaloalto.org> wrote: Hello David, Your request to DEMO the Gas meter was processed for electrification. Notes on the service notification indicate that an email from @Haruta, Kelly was sent out on 10/31/24regarding the cost of restoration due to no permits filed with the building Dept for changing gas to electric appliances. As of 12/27/24 no response was received, therefore yourrequest was closed out. If you would like to proceed with the DEMO of the gas meter, please respond to the email. Sincerely, Lorraina Alvarez Customer Service Specialist City of Palo Alto Utilities Department 250 Hamilton Ave | Palo Alto, CA 94301 O: 650.329.2161 E-mail: Lorraina.Alvarez@CityofPaloAlto.org www.cityofpaloalto.org From: David Page <dalpage5@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, February 3, 2025 2:18 PMTo: UTL-Customer Service <UtilitiesCustomerService@CityofPaloAlto.org>Subject: Methane gas equipment removal AND service charge refund CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links. Dear Utility Staff, I called your office a few months ago and asked that you stop charging us a monthly service fee for methane gas delivery. I also asked that you please remove the gas meter and related fixtures from next to our house. You said you would do both, but it might take weeks as you’re busy with other business. So now I’m putting this in writing. Do as you agreed, please. We’d also like a refund for the service charges we should not have paid. We stopped buying methane gas from you maybe a year ago (check your records). Please reply with a date when we can expect the equipment to be removed from above ground - and when the gas will be shut off from the street. Thank you, David Page 3115 Avalon Ct, Palo Alto, CA 94306 650-269-1126 From:Marguerite Poyatos To:Cathi Lerch Cc:Bill McLane; Lester Wong; Maor Greenberg; Dave Stellman; Patrick Kelly; Gaines, Chantal; osbaldo@or-builders.com; Manu Kumar; Becchetti, Benjamin; DaveStellman; City Mgr; Moffatt, Pete; Jacob@onemovemovers.com; david@paloaltoconcrete.com; Steve Wong; RamonMorenoSchool@gmail.com;nancy@drewmaran.com; Dan McKinley; McDonough, Melissa; Reifschneider, James; Transportation; John Lerch; Binder, Andrew; Jade Jin; Xenia Czisch; CityAttorney; Lauing, Ed; Lydia Kou; Veenker, Vicki; Council, City; Burt, Patrick; Stone, Greer; Lythcott-Haims, Julie Subject:Re: Industrial/Transport/Commercial Safety Date:Tuesday, March 25, 2025 11:07:26 AM Attachments:email-signture_87b8d7a2-c4f4-4cbf-b474-af2f32118dd2.pngF_1bc77f31-68bf-4143-80ea-3f34f539ea07.pnginsta_26696304-1b39-4259-9776-9f137454bed9.pngyelp_e821c57e-caea-4e87-a5dd-5905e7ca4fb1.pngHouzz_7abe75ad-d6ee-48ac-943b-592713e31957.pngP_aece63f3-754b-4dca-a0a9-e93b94de4930.pnggoogle_04352117-2fb4-4963-bb3e-cc5317269360.png CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments andclicking on links. Can you please send community officers to put notices on vehicles that have not moved? Please see the attached images. All vehicles with a red X are associated with the RV with the damaged Raiders wrapping. Thesevehicles have all been parked in the same spots for at least a month. Thank you. On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 2:19 PM Cathi Lerch <cathi@lerchconstruction.com> wrote:I wanted to let you know that the new resident has been seen wandering around the neighborhood. I initiallyencountered her on Saturday at 998 San Antonio, where she was asking for money. Then, on Tuesday, she wasgoing through our dumpster at 923 Industrial. She just walked by our front, ranting. Cathi On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 12:44 PM Bill McLane <bill@paloaltoglass.com> wrote: Is the plan for Palo Alto to follow in San Francisco's footsteps? What's next, open-air drug markets for Palo Alto. This person moved to our street just a few days ago, and we have had to call the police every day due to her behavior and out of concern for her well-being. Bill McLane ---------------------------------Palo Alto Glass, Inc. 4085 Transport Street Palo Alto, CA 94303 650-494-7000 Office www.paloaltoglass.com On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 12:43 PM Lester Wong <LWong@wongelectric.com> wrote:Commercial St. was cleared last night. Thank you for your efforts! Lester Wong | Vice President O: 650.813.9999 ext. 22 | C: 650.720.8455 4067 Transport Street | Palo Alto | CA 94303 Celebrating Our 46th Anniversary 1978 – 2024 A Proud Member of the U.S. Green Building Council From: Marguerite Poyatos <marguerite@paloaltoglass.com> Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2025 12:37:47 PM To: Maor Greenberg <maor@greenberg.construction> Cc: Dave Stellman <davestellman@gmail.com>; Patrick Kelly <Patrick.Kelly@dmdsystems.com>; Bill McLane <bill@paloaltoglass.com>; chantal.gaines@cityofpaloalto.org <chantal.gaines@cityofpaloalto.org>; osbaldo@or-builders.com <osbaldo@or-builders.com>; Manu Kumar <manu@k9ventures.com>; Benjamin Becchetti <Benjamin.Becchetti@cityofpaloalto.org>; Lester Wong <LWong@wongelectric.com>; Cathi Lerch <cathi@lerchconstruction.com>; Dave Stellman <dave@paloaltoglass.com>; City Mgr <CityMgr@cityofpaloalto.org>; Pete Moffatt <pete@petemoffat.com>; Jacob@onemovemovers.com <Jacob@onemovemovers.com>; david@paloaltoconcrete.com <david@paloaltoconcrete.com>; Steve Wong <SWong@wongelectric.com>; RamonMorenoSchool@gmail.com <RamonMorenoSchool@gmail.com>; nancy@drewmaran.com <nancy@drewmaran.com>; Dan McKinley <danmck@scientific-equipment.com>; Melissa McDonough <Melissa.McDonough@cityofpaloalto.org>; James Reifschneider <james.reifschneider@cityofpaloalto.org>; Transportation <transportation@cityofpaloalto.org>; John Lerch <john@lerchconstruction.com>; Andrew Binder <Andrew.Binder@cityofpaloalto.org>; Jade Jin <JJin@wongelectric.com>; Xenia Czisch <Xenia@qmsshields.com>; City Attorney <city.attorney@cityofpaloalto.org>; Ed Lauing <Ed.Lauing@cityofpaloalto.org>; Lydia Kou <Lydia.Kou@cityofpaloalto.org>; Vicki Veenker <vicki.veenker@cityofpaloalto.org>; City Council <city.council@cityofpaloalto.org>; Patrick Burt <pat.burt@cityofpaloalto.org>; Greer Stone <Greer.Stone@cityofpaloalto.org>; Julie Lythcott-Haims <Julie.LythcottHaims@cityofpaloalto.org> Subject: Re: Industrial/Transport/Commercial Safety The wooden RV seems to be a severe safety issue. A former coworker spoke to the man living in it a couple years ago andwas told there is a wood burning oven/stove inside the RV, which he uses. Seems like that could be a severe safety hazardnot only for the man residing in it, as well as for the surrounding RV's/vehicles & businesses if it were ever to catch fire. We have had to face a number of safety hazards on this street. It is unsafe for pedestrians. We have had attempted break insat night. We have been harassed by people associated with these RV's, as well as loose dogs, just to name a couple issues.Luckily, police officers do respond and try to help but there will be a time when they will be too late to prevent injury. The community officers coming through and putting notices on vehicles is nowhere near the solution needed for this area.The notices are thrown away and the vehicles rarely move. I believe this email string started in 2023 and we have hadminimal progress with the actual issues at hand. On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 12:19 PM Maor Greenberg <maor@greenberg.construction> wrote:City of palo alto!! please let me know how this is Legal for driving also come and clean the street as it’s not safe seeattached Maor Greenberg CEO maor@greenberg.construction | 650-610-7711 Greenberg.Construction | 650-600-9536 x101 | Fax 925-269-2325908 Industrial Ave, Palo Alto 94303 From: Dave Stellman <davestellman@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2025 10:56:09 AM To: Patrick Kelly <Patrick.Kelly@dmdsystems.com> Cc: Bill McLane <bill@paloaltoglass.com>; Marguerite Poyatos <MARGUERITE@paloaltoglass.com>; chantal.gaines@cityofpaloalto.org <chantal.gaines@cityofpaloalto.org>; osbaldo@or-builders.com <osbaldo@or-builders.com>; Manu Kumar <manu@k9ventures.com>; Benjamin Becchetti <Benjamin.Becchetti@cityofpaloalto.org>; Lester Wong <lwong@wongelectric.com>; Cathi Lerch <cathi@lerchconstruction.com>; Dave Stellman <dave@paloaltoglass.com>; City Mgr <CityMgr@cityofpaloalto.org>; Pete Moffatt <pete@petemoffat.com>; Jacob@onemovemovers.com <Jacob@onemovemovers.com>; david@paloaltoconcrete.com <david@paloaltoconcrete.com>; Steve Wong <swong@wongelectric.com>; RamonMorenoSchool@gmail.com <RamonMorenoSchool@gmail.com>; nancy@drewmaran.com <nancy@drewmaran.com>; Dan McKinley <danmck@scientific-equipment.com>; Melissa McDonough <Melissa.McDonough@cityofpaloalto.org>; James Reifschneider <james.reifschneider@cityofpaloalto.org>; Transportation <transportation@cityofpaloalto.org>; John Lerch <john@lerchconstruction.com>; Andrew Binder <Andrew.Binder@cityofpaloalto.org>; Jade Jin <JJin@wongelectric.com>; Xenia Czisch <Xenia@qmsshields.com>; City Attorney <city.attorney@cityofpaloalto.org>; Ed Lauing <Ed.Lauing@cityofpaloalto.org>; Lydia Kou <Lydia.Kou@cityofpaloalto.org>; Vicki Veenker <vicki.veenker@cityofpaloalto.org>; City Council <city.council@cityofpaloalto.org>; Patrick Burt <pat.burt@cityofpaloalto.org>; Greer Stone <Greer.Stone@cityofpaloalto.org>; Julie Lythcott-Haims <Julie.LythcottHaims@cityofpaloalto.org>; Maor Greenberg <maor@greenberg.construction> Subject: Re: Industrial/Transport/Commercial Safety What is it going to take for the city of Palo Alto to catch up to the rest of the country? A lawsuit when someone in ourneighborhood is injured because of the unsafe conditions that exist here? This email chain alone would be enoughevidence to show the city’s knowledge of the problem and inaction. With newly enacted laws giving cities the legal right to clean up our public spaces, local cities like Mountain View,Santa Clara and San Jose have already begun the process of relocating and housing these people that need it. Why not Palo Alto? Its not a money issue here, and even if it was, wouldn’t it be less costly to tow some vehicles and helprelocate them to a safer area than to pay the cost of litigation? We are asking the city to stop ignoring this issue before it becomes an even bigger problem. On Mar 12, 2025, at 9:17 AM, Patrick Kelly <Patrick.Kelly@dmdsystems.com> wrote: Hi Ben, Please take action. The safety of our employees and locals is critical. Anyone walking or driving on Industrial/Transport/Commercial is constantly at risk. Every crosswalk and entry is a major risk for anyone walking the sidewalks or pulling into any of these facilities where illegally parked abandoned vehicles are encamped. The visibility is very poor and the reason there are height and length restrictions for these types of streets; There are There are illegally running generators with unsafe live electrical lines oftentimes in the sidewalk or even running across entryways There are collections of volatile liquids like gasoline and oil (environmental issues aside) that pose additional hazards to anyone in the vicinity Please let us know what you need from us to support your team in enforcing our city regulations in order to make our workplaces safer for our employees. Respectfully, Patrick Kelly | CIO DMD Systems Recovery, LLC. C: 650.492.9003 patrick.kelly@dmdsystems.com | www.dmdsystems.com<Outlook-DMD Logo.png> <Outlook-larpkod1.png>Book time to meet with me From: Bill McLane <bill@paloaltoglass.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 5, 2025 12:39 PM To: Marguerite Poyatos <marguerite@paloaltoglass.com> Cc: Dave Stellman <davestellman@gmail.com>; chantal.gaines@cityofpaloalto.org <chantal.gaines@cityofpaloalto.org>; osbaldo@or-builders.com <osbaldo@or-builders.com>; Manu Kumar <manu@k9ventures.com>; Benjamin Becchetti <Benjamin.Becchetti@cityofpaloalto.org>; Lester Wong <lwong@wongelectric.com>; Cathi Lerch <cathi@lerchconstruction.com>; Dave Stellman <dave@paloaltoglass.com>; City Mgr <CityMgr@cityofpaloalto.org>; Pete Moffatt <pete@petemoffat.com>; Jacob@onemovemovers.com <Jacob@onemovemovers.com>; david@paloaltoconcrete.com <david@paloaltoconcrete.com>; Steve Wong <swong@wongelectric.com>; RamonMorenoSchool@gmail.com <RamonMorenoSchool@gmail.com>; nancy@drewmaran.com <nancy@drewmaran.com>; Patrick Kelly <Patrick.Kelly@dmdsystems.com>; Dan McKinley <danmck@scientific-equipment.com>; Melissa McDonough <Melissa.McDonough@cityofpaloalto.org>; James Reifschneider <James.Reifschneider@cityofpaloalto.org>; Transportation <Transportation@cityofpaloalto.org>; Patrick Kelly <Patrick.Kelly@dmdsystems.com>; John Lerch <john@lerchconstruction.com>; Andrew Binder <Andrew.Binder@cityofpaloalto.org>; Jade Jin <JJin@wongelectric.com>; Xenia Czisch <Xenia@qmsshields.com>; City Attorney <city.attorney@cityofpaloalto.org>; Ed Lauing <Ed.Lauing@cityofpaloalto.org>; Lydia Kou <Lydia.Kou@cityofpaloalto.org>; Vicki Veenker <Vicki.Veenker@cityofpaloalto.org>; City Council <city.council@cityofpaloalto.org>; Patrick Burt <Pat.Burt@cityofpaloalto.org>; Greer Stone <Greer.Stone@cityofpaloalto.org>; Julie Lythcott-Haims <Julie.LythcottHaims@cityofpaloalto.org>; Maor <maor@greenberg.construction> Subject: Re: Industrial/Transport/Commercial concerns A citation for double parking and expired tags is what is needed here. I’m positive that’s what the policewould do to me if I did the same. That is unless there are two separate sets of laws that govern the city ofPalo Alto and the state of California. Bill McLane ---------------------------------Palo Alto Glass, Inc. 4085 Transport Street Palo Alto, CA 94303 650-494-7000 Office www.paloaltoglass.com On Wed, Feb 5, 2025 at 10:13 AM Marguerite Poyatos <marguerite@paloaltoglass.com> wrote:Please see the attached image. The pictured RV & associated white truck pulled up over night. As pictured, they disregarded markedparking spots, which is one of the things that exacerbates our parking issue. A small car or motorcycle may fit there but in a commercial area where most vehicles are trucks, this doesnot help. Can you please send a community officer to leave notices on the RVs? I hope this doesn't come across aspetty, but every spot really does matter on this block. Employees of some businesses have to park in lotsthat belong to other businesses, which can create tension amongst neighbors. Thank you. On Sat, Dec 21, 2024 at 9:19 PM Dave Stellman <davestellman@gmail.com> wrote:The police also responded and were very helpful. Initially the people involved denied everything, butwhen I sent the videos to the officer and he showed it to them they admitted to dumping their RV waste. They were cited for misdemeanor illegal waste dumping and will be going to court. They were then toldto leave the area - and freed up two parking spaces. Thank you Palo Alto Police and Fire. Apparentlyreporting violations of every kind is what is going to have to be done on a regular basis if we want ourstreets cleaned up. On Dec 21, 2024, at 3:39 PM, Bill McLane <bill@paloaltoglass.com> wrote: Thank you, Dave! Bill McLane ---------------------------------Palo Alto Glass, Inc. 4085 Transport Street Palo Alto, CA 94303 650-494-7000 Office www.paloaltoglass.com On Sat, Dec 21, 2024 at 8:22 AM Dave Stellman <davestellman@gmail.com> wrote:I just called the hotline for Palo Alto for hazardous waste dumping and gave them all ofthis information including license numbers. These vehicles are still parked there.They aresending the fire department out to flush the street and these people better be heldaccountable. On Dec 21, 2024, at 7:56 AM, Bill McLane <bill@paloaltoglass.com> wrote: License plate of the accomplice<IMG_0142.jpeg> Bill McLane ---------------------------------Palo Alto Glass, Inc. 4085 Transport Street Palo Alto, CA 94303 650-494-7000 Office www.paloaltoglass.com On Sat, Dec 21, 2024 at 5:13 AM Bill McLane <bill@paloaltoglass.com>wrote: Still parked right across from my building. Note, NO rear license plate. I do think that is against the law. I do also have video of them driving up, proof of the vehicle operating on city streets. Do you think they have insurance? <image.png> Bill McLane ---------------------------------Palo Alto Glass, Inc. 4085 Transport Street Palo Alto, CA 94303 650-494-7000 Office www.paloaltoglass.com On Sat, Dec 21, 2024 at 4:54 AM Bill McLane <bill@paloaltoglass.com>wrote: Here, they are emptying their waste in front of my building. Bill McLane ---------------------------------Palo Alto Glass, Inc. 4085 Transport Street Palo Alto, CA 94303 650-494-7000 Office www.paloaltoglass.com On Fri, Dec 20, 2024 at 9:18 PM Dave Stellman<davestellman@gmail.com> wrote:Chantal, It looks like somehow most of the city council members, Vice Mayorand Mayor must have inadvertently been deleted from your last emailresponse. I have added them back in to make sure they stay apprised of thesituation. I hope it doesn't take the legal channels mentioned to startcleaning up our neighborhood immediately; this has gotten out ofcontrol and kicking the problem back and forth to different members ofyour city staff is not going to make it go away. Dave StellmanTransport St. On Fri, Dec 20, 2024 at 8:16 AM Maor Greenberg<maor@greenberg.construction> wrote:Dear Chantal, Your response, while detailed, fails to address the critical and ongoing violations of law, public safety, and business rights in the area. The City of Palo Alto has both the authority and obligation to take immediate and decisiveaction to protect its residents, businesses, and public spaces. Allowing illegallyparked, unsafe, and hazardous RVs to persist is unacceptable and directly violates state and local regulations. Below are specific legal and factualchallenges to the City’s approach, along with demands for corrective action: 1. Illegally Parked and Unsafe RVs California Vehicle Code § 4000(a)(1) and Palo Alto Municipal Code § 10.48.010 clearly require all vehicles parked on public streets to display validregistration. Many of the RVs in question lack valid registration, making theirpresence illegal. Further, under California Vehicle Code § 22651(o) and PAMC § 10.48.120, any vehicle unregistered for six months ormore may be towed immediately. Additionally, vehicles with exposed sewage tanks, missing wheels, or otherstructural hazards are in direct violation of California Vehicle Code § 24002, which prohibits parking or operating vehicles in unsafe conditions. These RVsalso create a public health hazard under California Health and Safety Code §117490, which prohibits improper disposal of waste and sewage. **2. Clarification Requested Regarding Unregistered Vehicles In light of your response, please confirm whether the City of Palo Altoallows unregistered vehicles to be driven on its streets. - I have some funvehicles I would love to order from Alibaba and drive them around PaloAlto... • California Vehicle Code § 4000(a)(1) expressly prohibits the operation of unregistered vehicles. If these RVs are being moved every 72 hours asclaimed, and they lack proper registration, their operation is illegal understate law. • Allowing unregistered vehicles to remain or operate within city limits undermines traffic safety and compliance standards. This point must be clarified explicitly: Does the City of Palo Alto condonethe operation of unregistered vehicles? 3. Abuse of the 72-Hour Rule The City’s reliance on PAMC § 10.36.060 to justify the continued presence ofthese RVs is flawed. Surveillance footage and eyewitness accounts confirm that many RVs are circumventing the 72-hour rule by wiping off chalk markingsrather than physically moving. This is blatant non-compliance and undermines the intent of the ordinance. Furthermore, California Vehicle Code § 22669 explicitly allows for the removal of vehicles that are “wrecked, dismantled, or inoperative,” even if theyare moved every 72 hours. The City has the authority to act, and failing to do so jeopardizes public safety and traffic flow. 4. Public Safety and Sanitation Violations The exposed sewage tanks, illegal dumping, and general neglect by these RVoccupants pose significant health and environmental risks. The City’s failure toenforce sanitation laws, such as California Health and Safety Code §117490 and PAMC § 16.09.100, endangers residents, workers, and theenvironment. Additionally, blocking roadways and driveways is a clear violation of California Vehicle Code § 22500, which prohibits parking thatobstructs traffic flow or access. 5. Impact on Businesses and Traffic Flow Businesses in the area are suffering due to blocked roadways, limited parking for customers, and safety concerns. Under California Vehicle Code §21101(c) and PAMC § 10.48.120, the City has the authority to regulate parkingto ensure the safety of businesses and residents. The City’s failure to allocate parking for business deliveries, customers, or even emergency services is a gross dereliction of duty. Blocking roadways forlong periods creates safety hazards, violates municipal code, and disrupts commerce. Conclusion and Final Demands The City of Palo Alto has the legal authority and responsibility to act under the following regulations: • PAMC § 10.48.120: Authorizes the removal of unregistered vehicles. • California Vehicle Code § 22651(o): Allows towing of unregisteredvehicles. • California Vehicle Code § 22669: Mandates removal of inoperative vehicles. • California Health and Safety Code § 117490: Prohibits illegal wastedisposal. • California Vehicle Code § 21101(c): Permits parking restrictions to ensuresafety. We demand the immediate implementation of the following measures: 1. Impound all unregistered, unsafe, or inoperative RVs within two weeks. 2. Establish designated loading zones and 2-hour parking areas near businesses. 3. Conduct regular sanitation inspections and impose penalties forviolations. 4. Provide a clear timeline for resolution and enforcement updates. The continued failure to act exposes the City to liability for neglecting publichealth and safety under California Government Code § 815.6, which requires municipalities to perform mandatory duties. We expect a formal response witha clear action plan within 14 days. If no satisfactory action is taken, we reservethe right to escalate this matter through legal channels to protect our businesses, employees, and the community. <email-signture_87b8d7a2-c4f4-4cbf-b474-af2f32118dd2.png> Maor Greenberg CEO maor@greenberg.construction | 650-610-7711 Greenberg.Construction | 650-600-9536 x101 | Fax 925-269-2325908 Industrial Ave, Palo Alto 94303 <F_1bc77f31-68bf-4143-80ea-3f34f539ea07.png> <insta_26696304-1b39-4259-9776-9f137454bed9.png> <yelp_e821c57e-caea-4e87-a5dd-5905e7ca4fb1.png> <Houzz_7abe75ad-d6ee-48ac-943b-592713e31957.png> <P_aece63f3-754b-4dca-a0a9-e93b94de4930.png> <google_04352117-2fb4-4963-bb3e-cc5317269360.png> From: Gaines, Chantal <Chantal.Gaines@CityofPaloAlto.org> Date: Friday, December 20, 2024 at 7:12 AM To: Maor Greenberg <maor@greenberg.construction>, Marguerite Poyatos <marguerite@paloaltoglass.com>, osbaldo@or-builders.com <osbaldo@or-builders.com> Cc: Bill McLane <bill@paloaltoglass.com>, Dave Stellman <davestellman@gmail.com>, Manu Kumar <manu@k9ventures.com>, Becchetti, Benjamin <Benjamin.Becchetti@CityofPaloAlto.org>, Lester Wong <lwong@wongelectric.com>, Cathi Lerch <cathi@lerchconstruction.com>, Dave Stellman <dave@paloaltoglass.com>, City Mgr <CityMgr@cityofpaloalto.org>, Moffatt, Pete <pete@petemoffat.com>, Jacob@onemovemovers.com <Jacob@onemovemovers.com>, david@paloaltoconcrete.com <david@paloaltoconcrete.com>, Steve Wong <swong@wongelectric.com>, RamonMorenoSchool@gmail.com <RamonMorenoSchool@gmail.com>, nancy@drewmaran.com <nancy@drewmaran.com>, Patrick Kelly <patrick.kelly@basketmaterials.com>, Dan McKinley <danmck@scientific-equipment.com>, McDonough, Melissa <Melissa.McDonough@CityofPaloAlto.org>, Reifschneider, James <James.Reifschneider@CityofPaloAlto.org>, Transportation <Transportation@CityofPaloAlto.org>, Patrick Kelly <info@basketmaterials.com>, John Lerch <john@lerchconstruction.com>, Binder, Andrew <Andrew.Binder@CityofPaloAlto.org>, Jade Jin <JJin@wongelectric.com>, Xenia Czisch <Xenia@qmsshields.com>, City Attorney <city.attorney@CityofPaloAlto.org> Subject: RE: Industrial/Transport/Commercial concerns You don't often get email from chantal.gaines@cityofpaloalto.org. Learn why thisis important Hello everyone, Thank you for the emails and the time you all have spent to relay your concerns about the area surrounding your businesses. My name is Chantal and I’m the Deputy City Manager responding on behalf of the City Manager. I understand that you feel a lack of progress on the concerns you’ve identified. Through multiple City departments we are continuing to explore avenues to help mitigate those concerns being mindful of compliance with the federal Constitution and state laws, City resources, as well as providing respect to the humanity of the individuals experiencing homelessness. As our Police Lieutenant mentioned, our enforcement largely consists of the efforts described below involving multiple City departments, including: Weekly markings for 72-hour violations from our Community Service Officers. These are required by law prior to issuing citations for the 72-hour violations. Weekly re-checks of those markings, followed by citations if vehicles are not moved. Checks of the area by traffic officers as well as patrol officers on a routine basis, consistently several times per week. Officers make personal contact with RV occupants to speak with them regarding complaints and concerns, offer services or seek alternative solutions (i.e., a small repair to fix a vehicle). Through our Community Services Department, had our Homeless Outreach Team attempt to speak with RV occupants to connect them to available resources. Of note, there are limited safe parking resources available countywide. Consulted with our Code Enforcement team to address any activity that falls under municipal code violations. We hear you that there are perhaps more RVs in the neighborhood than have been in the past. Some previous concerns, relayed through the Police Department, have been for dumping, visibility/safety issues, or other nuisance-type complaints. Officers have responded to investigate and determine if a violation has in fact occurred in response to those complaints. As the officer who issues the citation must attest to its legality, we trust their judgement to use their discretion when deciding to cite or not. It should be noted that the overwhelming majority of the RV’s are compliant with the 72-hour rule on a weekly basis according to our Police Department and their regular checks. RVs (and any other vehicle) are allowed to move and return to the exact same location under PAMC section 10.36.060. I asked the Police Department to examine the calls for service in your area since November 1st to look for additional complaints the Police Department might be able to address and to get an understanding of what they have responded to in your area. Officers responded to 29 calls for service between the 900 block of San Antonio, Commercial, Transport and Industrial Ave. Only 2 were reported complaints from a business about the RV’s. None of those 29 calls for service reported potential illegal behavior, such as illegal dumping, threatening or harassing behavior, or other criminal actions, on behalf of those working in the area. Most of those calls were self-initiated by the officers or calls from the RV occupants themselves. One of the calls, initiated by an RV occupant, reported suspicious persons that helped prevent a burglary to one of the businesses. Since early November, there have been several citations issued and one vehicle tow. I would encourage your employees to report, either online, through our non-emergency line (650-329-2413) or via 911, any behavior they feel is harassment, or potentially illegal or unsafe. The Police Department will continue to explore ideas such as additional collaboration with City departments, outside organizations and service providers, as well as nearby police departments whose actions can influence the issues felt in Palo Alto. We will also investigate the ability to perform street sweeping efforts and consult with our wastewater officials to address any cleanliness, illegal dumping and sanitation issues. The Police Department will be further assessing the vehicle code violations in the coming weeks to determine the necessity of removing some offending vehicles. Best, Chantal <image001.png>Chantal Cotton Gaines Deputy City Manager (650) 329-2572 | chantal.gaines@cityofpaloalto.org www.cityofpaloalto.org <image002.png> From: Maor Greenberg <maor@greenberg.construction> Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2024 11:35 PM To: Marguerite Poyatos <marguerite@paloaltoglass.com>; osbaldo@or- builders.com Cc: Bill McLane <bill@paloaltoglass.com>; Dave Stellman <davestellman@gmail.com>; Manu Kumar <manu@k9ventures.com>; Becchetti, Benjamin <Benjamin.Becchetti@CityofPaloAlto.org>; Lester Wong <lwong@wongelectric.com>; Cathi Lerch <cathi@lerchconstruction.com>; Dave Stellman <dave@paloaltoglass.com>; City Mgr <CityMgr@cityofpaloalto.org>; Moffatt, Pete <pete@petemoffat.com>; Jacob@onemovemovers.com; david@paloaltoconcrete.com; Steve Wong <swong@wongelectric.com>; RamonMorenoSchool@gmail.com; nancy@drewmaran.com; Patrick Kelly <patrick.kelly@basketmaterials.com>; Dan McKinley <danmck@scientific- equipment.com>; McDonough, Melissa <Melissa.McDonough@CityofPaloAlto.org>; Reifschneider, James <James.Reifschneider@CityofPaloAlto.org>; Transportation <Transportation@CityofPaloAlto.org>; Patrick Kelly <info@basketmaterials.com>; John Lerch <john@lerchconstruction.com>; Tanaka, Greg <Greg.Tanaka@CityofPaloAlto.org>; Lauing, Ed <Ed.Lauing@CityofPaloAlto.org>; Kou, Lydia <Lydia.Kou@CityofPaloAlto.org>; Veenker, Vicki <Vicki.Veenker@CityofPaloAlto.org>; Binder, Andrew <Andrew.Binder@CityofPaloAlto.org>; Council, City <city.council@cityofpaloalto.org>; Burt, Patrick <Pat.Burt@CityofPaloAlto.org>; Stone, Greer <Greer.Stone@CityofPaloAlto.org>; Lythcott-Haims, Julie <Julie.LythcottHaims@CityofPaloAlto.org>; Jade Jin <JJin@wongelectric.com>; Xenia Czisch <Xenia@qmsshields.com>; City Attorney <city.attorney@CityofPaloAlto.org> Subject: Re: Industrial/Transport/Commercial concerns CAUTION: This email originated from outside of theorganization. Be cautious of opening attachments andclicking on links. Dear Molly (City Attorney) and All Copied City Officials, On behalf of the many businesses in the Commercial-Industrial-Transport Street area who are deeply frustrated with the persistent and escalating issues caused by illegally parked RVs, unregistered vehicles, and boats. This situation has reached a critical point, impacting not only our daily operations but also the safety, reputation, and economic health of our businesses. Impact on Businesses and Community 1. Safety and Sanitation Hazards: • Dumped bodily waste, debris, and hazardous conditions are becoming commonplace, creating significant health risks. • Aggressive behavior and intimidation from some vehicle occupants have been reported, making the area unsafe for employees and customers. 2. Operational Challenges: • Parking for employees, customers, and service vehicles is nearly nonexistent due to the occupation of public spaces by illegally parked vehicles. • Businesses are suffering tangible financial losses as customers avoid the area due to these conditions. 3. Lack of Enforcement: • Despite repeated citations and notices issued by Community Service and Special Problems Officers, there has been no meaningful resolution. • Violations of California Vehicle Code 4000(a)(1) VC (unregistered vehicles) and Vehicle Code 22651(o)(1) VC (impound authority for registration violations) are being ignored. Call for Immediate Action This is a collective appeal to the city and its representatives to act decisively to restore order in our community. We urge the city to prioritize: 1. Enforcement: Immediate towing and penalties for unregistered and illegally parked vehicles in alignment with state and local laws. 2. Comprehensive Solutions: A transparent and actionable plan to address these issues, including increased patrols, collaboration with businesses, and enforcement timelines. 3. Engagement: A commitment to working with affected businesses to ensure our concerns are heard and addressed effectively. Potential Legal Action The city’s ongoing inaction not only jeopardizes public safety and operational viability but also exposes it to potential legal consequences. Many businesses on this email chain are experiencing severe financial and reputational damages due to these unresolved issues. We cannot afford further delays. Thank you for your attention. <image003.png> Maor Greenberg CEO maor@greenberg.construction | 650-610-7711 Greenberg.Construction | 650-600-9536 x101 | Fax 925-269-2325 908 Industrial Ave, Palo Alto 94303 <image004.png> <image005.png> <image006.png> <image007.png> <image008.png> <image009.png> From: Marguerite Poyatos <marguerite@paloaltoglass.com> Date: Tuesday, December 17, 2024 at 10:29 AM To: osbaldo@or-builders.com <osbaldo@or-builders.com> Cc: Bill McLane <bill@paloaltoglass.com>, Dave Stellman <davestellman@gmail.com>, Manu Kumar <manu@k9ventures.com>, Benjamin Becchetti <Benjamin.Becchetti@cityofpaloalto.org>, Lester Wong <lwong@wongelectric.com>, Cathi Lerch <cathi@lerchconstruction.com>, Maor Greenberg <maor@greenberg.construction>, Dave Stellman <dave@paloaltoglass.com>, City Mgr <CityMgr@cityofpaloalto.org>, Pete Moffatt <pete@petemoffat.com>, Jacob@onemovemovers.com <Jacob@onemovemovers.com>, david@paloaltoconcrete.com <david@paloaltoconcrete.com>, Steve Wong <swong@wongelectric.com>, RamonMorenoSchool@gmail.com <RamonMorenoSchool@gmail.com>, nancy@drewmaran.com <nancy@drewmaran.com>, Patrick Kelly <patrick.kelly@basketmaterials.com>, Dan McKinley <danmck@scientific-equipment.com>, Melissa McDonough <Melissa.McDonough@cityofpaloalto.org>, James Reifschneider <James.Reifschneider@cityofpaloalto.org>, Transportation <transportation@cityofpaloalto.org>, Patrick Kelly <info@basketmaterials.com>, John Lerch <john@lerchconstruction.com>, Greg Tanaka <Greg.Tanaka@cityofpaloalto.org>, Ed Lauing <Ed.Lauing@cityofpaloalto.org>, Lydia Kou <Lydia.Kou@cityofpaloalto.org>, Vicki Veenker <Vicki.Veenker@cityofpaloalto.org>, Andrew Binder <andrew.binder@cityofpaloalto.org>, City Council <city.council@cityofpaloalto.org>, Patrick Burt <pat.burt@cityofpaloalto.org>, Greer Stone <Greer.Stone@cityofpaloalto.org>, Julie Lythcott-Haims <Julie.LythcottHaims@cityofpaloalto.org>, Jade Jin <JJin@wongelectric.com>, Xenia Czisch <Xenia@qmsshields.com> Subject: Re: Industrial/Transport/Commercial concerns You don't often get email from marguerite@paloaltoglass.com. Learn why this isimportant A community officer came by today. Not sure what was done other than inspecting the volume of vehicles on the street. It is pretty disheartening that there are 14 city employees/email addresses included in this email and we are getting no responses or acknowledgements from any of them. This seems to be just a community forum for us to air our grievances regarding the area we all work in rather than getting any sort of resolutions. For years now, the businesses in this area have dealt with a number of issues that are a direct result of the RVs residing on this street - dumped bodily waste, aggressive dogs, aggression/intimidation, amongst many others. We try to vigilant and call the non-emergency police line to confront situations. Officers will come out and at the very most, they will go and have a conversation with whoever it is that's causing issues. Then, nothing happens. We have had customers complain that they do not feel safe coming into this corner of Palo Alto. This is directly affecting Palo Alto businesses - many of which on this street provide important/critical types of service to residents, businesses, local government and schools in Palo Alto. Can we please get some help other than weekly notices stuck on windshields? On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 8:36 AM <osbaldo@or-builders.com> wrote: I agree 100 % The city of Palo A lot needs to have a solution for this please O.R. Builders Inc. Osbaldo Romero President 939 Industrial Ave Palo Alto, Ca. 94303 Phone: 650.938.2222 Fax: 650.938.2224 Cell: 415.215.6788 From: Bill McLane <bill@paloaltoglass.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2024 5:34 AM To: Dave Stellman <davestellman@gmail.com> Cc: Manu Kumar <manu@k9ventures.com>; Marguerite Poyatos <MARGUERITE@paloaltoglass.com>; Benjamin Becchetti <Benjamin.Becchetti@cityofpaloalto.org>; Lester Wong <lwong@wongelectric.com>; Cathi Lerch <cathi@lerchconstruction.com>; Maor Greenberg <maor@greenberg.construction>; Dave Stellman <dave@paloaltoglass.com>; City Mgr <CityMgr@cityofpaloalto.org>; osbaldo@or-builders.com; Pete Moffatt <pete@petemoffat.com>; Jacob@onemovemovers.com; david@paloaltoconcrete.com; Steve Wong <swong@wongelectric.com>; RamonMorenoSchool@gmail.com; nancy@drewmaran.com; Patrick Kelly <patrick.kelly@basketmaterials.com>; Dan McKinley <danmck@scientific-equipment.com>; Melissa McDonough <Melissa.McDonough@cityofpaloalto.org>; James Reifschneider <James.Reifschneider@cityofpaloalto.org>; Transportation <transportation@cityofpaloalto.org>; Patrick Kelly <info@basketmaterials.com>; John Lerch <john@lerchconstruction.com>; Greg Tanaka <Greg.Tanaka@cityofpaloalto.org>; Ed Lauing <Ed.Lauing@cityofpaloalto.org>; Lydia Kou <Lydia.Kou@cityofpaloalto.org>; Vicki Veenker <Vicki.Veenker@cityofpaloalto.org>; Andrew Binder <andrew.binder@cityofpaloalto.org>; City Council <city.council@cityofpaloalto.org>; Patrick Burt <pat.burt@cityofpaloalto.org>; Greer Stone <Greer.Stone@cityofpaloalto.org>; Julie Lythcott-Haims <Julie.LythcottHaims@cityofpaloalto.org>; Jade Jin <JJin@wongelectric.com>; Xenia Czisch <Xenia@qmsshields.com> Subject: Re: Industrial/Transport/Commercial concerns Out of curiosity, were this my personal vehicle or one of my company vehicles, how long would it take for the City of Palo Altoto either site me or tow me? This is ridiculous; our streets have now become storage for people's crap; sorry, no better way to state that. This boat is notsomeone's dwelling; neither are all the additional cars associated with each camper out here. If you can't do anything about thecampers, do something about the additional crap. Again, how quickly would the city respond if it were my car that was illegally parked out here? I implore everyone on this thread to continue this daily untilsomething is done. Do better, City of Palo Alto. Bill McLane ---------------------------------Palo Alto Glass, Inc.4085 Transport Street Palo Alto, CA 94303 650-494-7000 Office www.paloaltoglass.com On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 3:08 PM Dave Stellman <davestellman@gmail.com> wrote: This is ridiculous. The Supreme Court has given cities in the state of California more tools to crack down on homeless camps and illegally parked and stored vehicles. It’s time to clean up this mess in the Commercial - Industrial - Transport street area before it becomes even more of an eyesore than it is now. This is just not fair to owners and customers trying hard to do business here with NO AVAILABLE PARKING. Dave Stellman 4083 / 4085 Transport St. On Dec 16, 2024, at 1:42 PM, Manu Kumar <manu@k9ventures.com> wrote: Here are some pictures from my walk around theblock a week ago.. <IMG_1556.jpeg> <IMG_1557.jpeg> I counted at least 10 RVs just on Commercial St....too many to even fit on one camera frame. Andthat's not even counting the ones all overTransport and Industrial. Some of the RVs alsohave other supporting vehicles as noted in prioremail. The City of Palo Alto clearly doesn't care aboutbusinesses and would rather have the streets bean eyesore, sidewalks be unusable to walk on, andparking spots not be available to customers/clientsor employees. Warm regards, -- Marguerite Poyatos Palo Alto Glass, Inc. 4085 Transport Street Palo Alto CA 94303(650) 494-7000(650) 494-7087 (FAX)<Safety on Industrial avenue.pdf> -- Marguerite Poyatos Palo Alto Glass, Inc.4085 Transport StreetPalo Alto CA 94303(650) 494-7000 (650) 494-7087 (FAX) -- Marguerite PoyatosPalo Alto Glass, Inc.4085 Transport StreetPalo Alto CA 94303 (650) 494-7000 (650) 494-7087 (FAX) From:Aram James To:Supervisor Susan Ellenberg Cc:Council, City; Veenker, Vicki; Julie Lythcott-Haims; Jessica Speiser, Educational Leader for California Democratic Delegate, Assembly District 23; Josh Becker; assemblymember.berman@assembly.ca.gov; Emily Mibach; Bains, Paul; Reifschneider, James; Kaloma Smith Subject:Columbia University professors, activists hold "emergency vigil" | Fox News Date:Monday, March 24, 2025 9:42:34 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links. Columbia faculty hold 'emergency vigil,' urge students to wear mask, skip class to protest Trump Columbia University professors, activists hold "emergency vigil" | Fox News https://search.app/LMrBEuNTX8aeEepL7 Shared via the Google app From:Aram James To:Supervisor Susan Ellenberg; Veenker, Vicki Cc:Jeff Rosen; Jessica Speiser, Educational Leader for California Democratic Delegate, Assembly District 23; Josh Becker; assemblymember.berman@assembly.ca.gov; Jay Boyarsky; h.etzko@gmail.com; Lori Meyers; Sheree Roth; board@pausd.org; board@valleywater.org; BoardOperations; Council, City; Bains, Paul; Kaloma Smith; DuJuan Green; dennis burns; Dennis Upton; Human Relations Commission; Sean Allen; Nicole Chiu-Wang; Pat M; Patricia.Guerrero@jud.ca.gov; frances.Rothschild@jud.ca.gov; Bill Newell; Zelkha, Mila; Zelkha, Mila; Binder, Andrew; Reifschneider, James; Wagner, April; Zahra Billoo; Perron, Zachary; Baker, Rob; Rodriguez, Miguel; Damon Silver; Dave Price; Braden Cartwright; Emily Mibach; Sarah Wright; Gennady Sheyner; sharon jackson; Sheriff Transparency; editor@paweekly.com; editor@almanacnews.com; Shikada, Ed; Ruth Silver Taube; Donna Wallach; Yolanda Conaway; Don Austin; Doug Minkler Subject:As universities become targets for investigation and arrest, even the annual custom of Spring Break has becomecause for concern Date:Monday, March 24, 2025 9:37:59 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. UC Berkeley tells foreign students leaving forspring break they may not be able to return A time-honored college tradition has become a source of anxiety for international students who might consider traveling abroad. MAs universities become targets for investigation and arrest, even the annual custom of Spring Break has become cause for concern Source: The San Francisco Standardhttps://search.app/qd2Q1mj5rU1UxmAn8 Shared via the Google app From:Aram James To:Veenker, Vicki; Supervisor Susan Ellenberg Cc:board@pausd.org; BoardOperations; board@valleywater.org; Council, City; Josh Becker; Jessica Speiser, Educational Leader for California Democratic Delegate, Assembly District 23; assemblymember.berman@assembly.ca.gov; Lotus Fong; h.etzko@gmail.com; Roberta Ahlquist; Binder, Andrew; Reifschneider, James; Cait James; Tim James; Marina Lopez; Josie James-Le; Nicole Chiu-Wang; Pat M; Lori Meyers; Sheree Roth; Figueroa, Eric; Friends of Cubberley; dennis burns; DuJuan Green; Dave Price; Emily Mibach; Braden Cartwright; Bill Newell; Gennady Sheyner; Salem Ajluni; Sarah Wright; EPA Today; Diana Diamond; Rodriguez, Miguel; Damon Silver; Yolanda Conaway; Don Austin; Doug Minkler Subject:A Palestinian American medical student objected to working alongside IDF soldiers. The university suspended her Date:Monday, March 24, 2025 8:43:02 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. A Palestinian American medical student objected to working alongside IDF soldiers. The university suspended her A Palestinian American medical student objected to working alongside IDF soldiers. The university suspended her Source: The Guardian https://share.newsbreak.com/c98m86wq?s=i0 From:John Guislin To:Shikada, Ed; Council, City; Binder, Andrew Subject:This is an example of what Palo Alto should be doing to have a real and immediate impact on road safety Date:Monday, March 24, 2025 7:23:42 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments andclicking on links. Atherton police enforce pedestrian right-of-way in El Camino safety operation During the two-and-a-half-hour operation, 72 motorists were issued citations forcrosswalk violations. We have many crosswalks where pedestrians are routinely in danger because drivers to not yield right of way. I live by two of them, the intersections of Middlefield-Everett and Middlefield-Hawthorne. At minimum, let's do a case study to see how many citations we need to issue in 2.5 hours test period. Urgently,John Guislin Full article: https://www.almanacnews.com/police/2025/03/21/atherton-police-enforce-pedestrian-right-of-way-in-el-camino-safety-operation/?utm_medium=email&utm_source=Embarcadero+Mailing+List+%28including+SLJ+Members%29&utm_campaign=a3e1a7b015-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2025_03_20_08_25&utm_term=0_-a3e1a7b015-112032675 From:Magdalena Cabrera To:Council, City Cc:Angela Dellaporta; Claire Elliott; Andrea Wald; Sue; Rebecca Sanders; Brown Jonathan; Magdalena Cabrera; Horrigan-Taylor, Meghan Subject:Re: ARtificial Turf Date:Monday, March 24, 2025 3:37:19 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. Esteemed City Council Members and Mayor Lauing, I am writing formally to implore you to re-think the use of artificial turf in our city parks, playgrounds and playing fields. I have spoken at the open mike twice now on the same topic. I will also take this moment to urge you to VOTE NO oncontracting with Lloyd Consulting on yet another study. There is more than enoughevidence to guide our thinking on the relative merits or demerits ( in this case) of artificial turf. As my friends and neighbors have stated, there is already much science to informus that micro and nano plastics are bad for humans, flora, fauna and our riparian habitats and all who live there. Here is a link to an article about the uncovering of plastics in fish and birds: Source: The Cool Down https://search.app/5GywR7XtNNvdjbf38 I am including this next an aritcle on the finding of microplastics in humanbrains and other organs in living individuals including in placental tissue ( babiesin utero are absorbing plastics from their mothers and being born with nanoplasticsin their bodies!!!): https://search.app/iebEVebDmTbwgCHp9 You are all of an age to remember the issues of acid rain. NOW we have plasticrain. Please read the link I am including here:https://search.app/2v8bCUkcVJctPGHV7 This next hotlink is taken from Stanford Medicine's publication The Scope and it is entitled "What's the Deal with Microplastics?" This article should terrify us all. All of these articles should terrify us honestly. https://search.app/tRhuiKjBNiEH5NuE8 I thank you for your time and for your good efforts on behalf of the citizens of Palo Alto. I will trust that you will consider very carefully what I and others havepresented to you and then do the RIGHT thing for our children, for the environment and the world at large. Say NO to artificial turf. Respectfully,Magdalena Cabrera397 Fernando Ave. Palo Alto, CA 94306 From:Aram James To:Supervisor Susan Ellenberg; Veenker, Vicki Cc:Sean Allen; Pat M; Jessica Speiser, Educational Leader for California Democratic Delegate, Assembly District 23; Jeff Rosen; board@pausd.org; ladoris cordell; Jay Boyarsky; Kaloma Smith; Rose Lynn; Tim James; Lewis James; Julie Lythcott-Haims; Jeff Conrad; sharon jackson; Jeff Hayden; Ed Lauing; Council, City; Binder, Andrew; Reifschneider, James; Cait James; WILPF Peninsula Palo Alto; Sarah Wright; Salem Ajluni; Yolanda Conaway; Doug Minkler; Don Austin; Dave Price; board@valleywater.org; BoardOperations; Gennady Sheyner; Bill Newell; Enberg, Nicholas; Nicole Chiu-Wang; Rodriguez, Miguel; Damon Silver; DuJuan Green; jgreen@dailynewsgroup.com; dennis burns; Dana St. George; <michael.gennaco@oirgroup.com>; cromero@cityofepa.org; rabrica@cityofepa.org; Dennis Upton; Human Relations Commission; GRP-City Council; city.council@menlopark.gov; Nash, Betsy; Cecilia Taylor; Gardener, Liz; Lotus Fong Subject:N Last Article Filed hours before his killing in an Israeli airstrike, journalist Hossam Shabat describes theresumption of Israel"s scorched earth campaign in his hometown of Beit Hanoun. Date:Monday, March 24, 2025 1:56:53 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. Hossam Shabat’s Last Article Filed hours before his killing in an Israeli airstrike, journalist Hossam Shabat describes the resumption of Israel's scorched earth campaign in his hometown of Beit Hanoun. https://www.dropsitenews.com/p/hossam-shabat-journalist-killed-gaza-last-article?publication_id=2510348&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=email-share&triggerShare=true&r=fjmzt