HomeMy WebLinkAbout2024-04-03 Utilities Advisory Commission Summary MinutesUtilities Advisory Commission Minutes Approved on: May 1, 2024 Page 1 of 8
UTILITIES ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING
MINUTES OF APRIL 3, 2024 REGULAR MEETING
CALL TO ORDER
Chair Segal called the meeting of the Utilities Advisory Commission (UAC) to order at 6:03 p.m.
Present: Chair Segal, Vice Chair Scharff, Commissioners Forssell, Mauter and Phillips
Absent: Commissioners Croft and Metz
AGENDA CHANGES, ADDITIONS AND DELETIONS
None
PUBLIC COMMENT
John Kelley encouraged the UAC to consider at a future meeting the topic of allowing ADUs to have
separate electrical and water service.
Lisa Madden thought AB 1944 was great and could be a good example for other items in Section
54954.3.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
ITEM 1: ACTION: Approval of the Minutes of the Utilities Advisory Commission Meeting Held on March
6, 2024
Chair Segal invited comments on the March 6, 2024 UAC draft meeting minutes.
ACTION: Commissioner Phillips moved to approve the draft minutes of the March 6, 2024 meeting as
submitted.
Vice Chair Scharff seconded the motion.
The motion carried 5-0 with Chair Segal, Vice Chair Scharff, Commissioners Forssell, Mauter and Phillips
voting yes.
Commissioners Croft and Metz absent.
ITEM 2: ACTION: Approval of the Minutes of the Special Utilities Advisory Commission Meeting Held on
March 14, 2024
Chair Segal invited comments on the March 14, 2024 UAC draft meeting minutes.
0
Utilities Advisory Commission Minutes Approved on: May 1, 2024 Page 2 of 8
ACTION: Chair Segal moved to approve the draft minutes of the March 14, 2024 meeting as submitted.
Commissioner Phillips seconded the motion.
The motion carried 4-0 with Chair Segal, Vice Chair Scharff, Commissioners Mauter and Phillips voting
yes.
Commissioner Forssell abstained.
Commissioners Croft and Metz absent.
UTILITIES DIRECTOR REPORT
Utilities Director Dean Batchelor delivered the Director's Report.
April 1 through April 8, San Francisco Public Utilities will perform an inspection project of one of the
drinking water transmission pipelines along El Camino at California Avenue. This work will result in
closure of two lanes of traffic on El Camino from Cambridge Avenue to California Avenue. Vehicle and
pedestrian crossings at the intersection of California Avenue and El Camino may be restricted.
On March 12, the City began posting refunds to utility customers who were members of the Green case.
The City will disburse funds in three payments of approximately $156. Active gas utility customers who
had service between September 23, 2015 and June 30, 2022 will receive credits on their next utility bill,
in March 2025 and in March 2026. The City will reach out to non-active customers.
Hydro update: As of March 28, levels in Northern and Central California are above average. Snowpack
levels are slightly above average. The City’s hydro resources were projected to produce about 108% of
the long-term average output for this fiscal year and 109% of the long-term average for 2025.
On February 26, 2024, Council suspended enforcement of the all-electric requirement for new buildings
and substantial remodels. Staff was working on a new set of local energy Reach Codes to present to
Council for consideration before their break.
As of the end of March, 29 sites have received rebates for EV chargers. Recent participants in the
program include Stanford Healthcare, Children’s Hospital, a school and three condominiums. The City in
partnership with nonprofit Cool the Earth Ride and Drive extended the EV discount campaign through
March to provide residents with savings up to $11,500 on EVs from Audi, Ford, Hyundai and Kia. In April
or May, there will be a limited-time rebate campaign.
Upcoming events:
• April 4 WaterConservationShowcase.com
• April 13 Tips and Tricks for Successful Turf Conversions
• April 21 Earth Day Festival
• May 4 The UAC will have a couple tables at the May Fete parade. Commissioners were invited to
host with staff and talk to community members who stop at the table.
Utilities Advisory Commission Minutes Approved on: May 1, 2024 Page 3 of 8
In response to Chair Segal’s request for further explanation, Mr. Batchelor stated the City suspended the
Reach Code. Utilities, Public Works and the Development Center were working together on new
standards for staff to present to Council before they go on break. Staff’s report to Council will include
models of higher efficiency standards in San Jose, San Luis Obispo and a couple other cities. Staff will
provide more information by June 2024.
In reply to Commissioner Phillips’s queries about the Green case refund, Mr. Batchelor responded it was
coming out of the General Fund. Utilities Strategic Business Manager Dave Yuan replied the total was
about $17M.
NEW BUSINESS
ITEM 3: ACTION: Approval of Chair and Vice Chair to Serve a Short Term of April 3, 2024 through April 2,
2025
ACTION: Commissioner Mauter moved to approve Vice Chair Scharff as Chair.
Commissioner Phillips seconded the motion.
The motion carried 5-0 with Chair Segal, Vice Chair Scharff, Commissioners Forssell, Mauter and Phillips
voting yes.
Commissioners Croft and Metz absent.
Chair Scharff accepted the role of Chair.
ACTION: Commissioner Segal moved to approve Commissioner Mauter as Vice Chair.
Chair Scharff seconded the motion.
The motion carried 5-0 with Chair Scharff and Commissioners Forssell, Mauter, Phillips and Segal voting
yes.
Commissioners Croft and Metz absent.
Vice Chair Mauter accepted the role of Vice Chair.
ITEM 4: ACTION: Continuation of Staff’s Request for Utilities Advisory Commission’s Recommendation
for City Council to Approve the Phase IV Cross-Bore Verification Program
Principal Engineer Aaron Perkins delivered a slide presentation. A search on the federal government’s
website demonstrated seven reportable incidents of a natural gas cross-bore occurred in the past 20
years across the nation. Palo Alto’s cross-bore inspection program discovered 23 gas cross-bores in
sewer laterals, 0 reportable incidents.
Of the 966 laterals proposed for Phase IV cross-bore inspection, 670 have emergency excess flow valves
(EFVs) on gas services, 296 do not. The cost estimate is $8950 to install an EFV for gas service including a
four-person crew, materials, excavation and restoration of the street. The total to install 296 EFVs is
$2.6M. EFV installation cost is about 190% more than the cost to perform Phase IV cross-bore
Utilities Advisory Commission Minutes Approved on: May 1, 2024 Page 4 of 8
inspection. An EFV failed to prevent an incident in Chicago because EFVs require a certain amount of
flow to trigger.
Mr. Perkins displayed a table. The criteria for priority factored the volumes of people impacted and the
likelihood of finding cross-bores. Groups 1, 2 and 3 include schools, hospitals, churches and business
districts. Group 1 does not have EFVs, Group 2 has manual valves and Group 3 has EFVs. The majority of
cross-bores found during this project were within 15 feet to the sewer lateral. Staff will provide an
update to the UAC after the first year of Phase IV. The estimated Cross-Bore Phase IV Project two-year
budget was $1,352,400 ($676,200 for FY25 and $676,200 for FY26). Assistant Director WGW Engineering
and Operations Matt Zucca stated there was a 1% or $0.70 impact on an average customer’s gas utility
bill for every $550,000 but this was not a recurring cost.
Mr. Perkins and Mr. Zucca addressed the Commission’s questions. Phase IV is the final phase to inspect
historic laterals. Staff reviewed the table of remaining laterals and all groups had a risk, so staff’s
proposal for next year is to prioritize inspections of laterals with higher risk (15 feet or less and Group 1).
Utilities Director Dean Batchelor remarked that staff’s proposal was to do the first half of Phase IV in this
budget period. Staff will review the results and return to the UAC next year for approval to continue
Phase IV. The Water, Gas, Wastewater (WGW) group does not have the resources to perform 966
inspections internally. Staff believed inspections were important. If the UAC did not approve the
proposal, staff would complete the project internally, which may take 8 or 10 years although staff had
not calculated the actual timeline. Discussion ensued.
Mr. Perkins and Mr. Zucca explained PG&E’s process. PG&E has a historic cross-bore program. PG&E
changed the method for installing services. PG&E digs opens a path from the curb to the house and
drops it in as opposed to running the risk of a cross-bore and the errors introduced with video.
Since approximately 2011, the City of Palo Alto uses in-house staff to video inspect the sewer when
installing a gas line and previously used contractors since 2001. If Council did not approve spending
additional money for Phase IV cross-bore inspections, Mr. Zucca guessed it would take 5 or 10 years to
complete the project in-house. Mr. Perkins did not expect to complete the project in less than 10 years
when taking into consideration approximately 100 inspections per year and some may include
excavations and additional work.
Mr. Perkins addressed Vice Chair Mauter’s questions. Potholing, cleanout installation and section
replacement would have bid item pricing fixed for that year. Funds expended on private property
benefit the homeowner to clear the cross-bore. If a failed private sewer line is found, it will be replaced
to complete the inspection, resulting in a benefit to the homeowner.
The Commission reached a consensus to include Group 1 in its entirety and sewer laterals within 15-feet
proximity to the gas service in Groups 2 through 6.
Mr. Perkins remarked that staff would return to the UAC in the fall or before the next round of work for
approval. Chair Scharff encouraged staff to complete the remainder of the inspections using staff’s
resources instead of returning to the UAC to seek further approval.
ACTION: Chair Scharff moved the Utilities Advisory Commission recommend the City Council approve
FY25 funding in the amount of $676,200 to complete the Cross Bore Phase IV inspections of Group 1 and
Utilities Advisory Commission Minutes Approved on: May 1, 2024 Page 5 of 8
inspections of the sewer laterals within proximity of 15ft or less to the gas service in Groups 2 through 6,
for a total of 495 inspections.
Commissioner Segal seconded the motion.
The motion carried 5-0 with Chair Scharff, Vice Chair Mauter, Commissioners Forssell, Phillips and Segal
voting yes.
Commissioners Croft and Metz absent.
ITEM 5: ACTION: Recommendation to Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager or Their
Designee to Execute an Amendment to the Power Purchase Agreement with Ameresco Half Moon Bay
LLC for the Purchase of up to 60,000 Megawatt-Hours per Year of Biogas Energy over a Term of up to 20
Years for a Total Not to Exceed Amount of $147.2 Million; CEQA Status: Not a Project under CEQA
Guidelines Section 15378
Sr. Resource Planner Jim Stack, PhD, delivered a slide presentation. Palo Alto and Alameda Municipal
Power each receive 50% of the Ox Mountain Landfill-Gas-to-Energy (LFGTE) Plant’s output. The plant
delivers about 44,000 MWh/year to Palo Alto, which is approximately 5.5% of the City’s overall
electricity consumption. It has been a very reliable, valuable plant. In addition to electricity, the plant
provides Local Resource Adequacy (RA) capacity and Bucket 1 Renewable Energy Credits (RECs). Palo
Alto has a requirement to purchase RA capacity every year and there is a shortage of local RA in our
portfolio.
The current contract price escalates at 1.5%/year. In 2026, the contract price will be $67/MWh, which is
a very competitive price in the current market. The contract ends in 2029. Proposed Amendment No. 1
increases the plant’s capacity, extends the contract 20 years from the expansion capacity online date,
increases the price to $74/MWh when the expansion capacity comes online and the annual escalation
factor drops to 1% except in years with high inflation when it will be 2%. The contract price will be
$0.93/MWh lower if the expansion capacity does not qualify as RA. Ameresco will have the right to
terminate the amendment if it cannot obtain the CEQA permit and/or air permit needed for expansion
capacity or if the required permitting improvements result in the project becoming uneconomic for
them.
Amendment No. 1 would result in an annual cost to Palo Alto between $4.4M to $5.8M. Including the
benefits of Bucket 1 REC prices and Local RA value, the net value is between -$4 to $21/MWh (expected
value $11/MWh). The total cost of the original 20-year contract is $61.8M. With Amendment No. 1, the
total cost of the approximately 37-year contract will be $147.2M. For the 20-year extension term, the
maximum spending authority is $101M (approximately $5M/year).
Dr. Stack addressed the Commission’s questions. The triggering of the termination rights clause does not
have specific objective criteria, as there is no objective and non-proprietary information available to
make this determination. Ameresco did not want to have discussions to pre-negotiate a pure contract
extension in the event that this amendment termination provision is exercised, due to their focus being
on the capacity expansion at this time.
The City of Palo Alto negotiated as a team with the City of Alameda and were offered the same terms.
Utilities Advisory Commission Minutes Approved on: May 1, 2024 Page 6 of 8
Commissioner Phillips commented he was very strongly in support. Landfills were not going away
anytime soon. It was great economically and for the environment.
Commissioner Forssell loves landfill gas as a resource. Dr. Stack addressed Commissioner Forssell’s
questions. In comparison to some of our other contracts, $74/MWh is an attractive price. The City
executed this agreement in 2005. Today, a baseload contract for a new resource is probably $95-
$100/MWh. In the current market, the price of RECs is over $70/MWh although it is expected to come
down in a few years. Most of our solar projects are priced in the $70 range but the most recent was in
the mid-$30s. Dr. Stack believed the newest geothermal contract, executed last year, was priced at
$79/MWh.
Dr. Stack explained the proposal to waive the anti-speculation requirement of Section D.1 of the City’s
Energy Risk Management Policy. The anti-speculation requirement prevents the City from purchasing
things we will not need in the future in order to sell them and make a profit. Given the huge amount of
variation in our supply portfolio due to hydroelectric variability and climate change impacts, staff
recommended waiving the requirement because it does not expect to have consistent surpluses in the
future. This will be a core part of meeting our needs as well as helping meet our Renewable Portfolio
Standard (RPS) requirements. Any resource we contract for now would probably require a waiver unless
it was a contract only delivering in the winter months when the City has energy deficits.
Chair Scharff remarked he was very strongly in support and it seemed like a good deal for the Utility.
ACTION: Commissioner Phillips moved Staff recommendation that the Utilities Advisory Commission
(UAC) recommend that the City Council adopt a Resolution (Attachment A) to:
1. Authorize the City Manager, or their designee, to execute Amendment No. 1 (Exhibit A to
Attachment A) to the Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) with Ameresco Half Moon Bay LLC
(Ameresco) to increase the generating capacity of the Ox Mountain landfill-gas-to-energy
(LFGTE) project, increase the contract price, and extend the contract term by approximately
17 years;
2. Increase the maximum spending authority under the PPA from $61,800,000 to
$147,200,000; and
3. Waive the application of the anti-speculation requirement of Section D.1 of the City’s
Energy Risk Management Policy as it may apply to surplus electricity purchases resulting from
the City’s execution of this amendment, due to the small increase in the facility’s generating
capacity and the City’s need for the output to continue complying with its Renewable
Portfolio Standard (RPS) procurement requirements.
Commissioner Forssell seconded the motion.
The motion carried 5-0 with Chair Scharff, Vice Chair Mauter, Commissioners Forssell, Phillips and Segal
voting yes.
Commissioners Croft and Metz absent.
ITEM 6: ACTION: Utilities Advisory Commission FY 2024 - 2025 Work Plan
Utilities Director Dean Batchelor invited commissioners to have a conversation on this item and move
the work plan forward.
Utilities Advisory Commission Minutes Approved on: May 1, 2024 Page 7 of 8
Chair Scharff believed the scope of work plans should be as broad and flexible as possible so the UAC
could take up any matter they choose.
Vice Chair Mauter wanted to define the relationship between the UAC and S/CAP. A RACI table to clarify
who is responsible, who has decision-making authority, who to consult and who to inform as these
efforts get underway would be very conducive to helping S/CAP and the UAC collaborate more
effectively and more effectively work with Council to move some of these actions forward.
The Commission discussed changes to Standing Topics.
ACTION: Commissioner Forssell moved to approve Staff recommendation the Utilities Advisory
Commission Review and Approve the Amended Utilities Advisory Commission's 2024-2025 Annual Work
Plan, and Recommend the City Council Review the Work Plan and Provide Feedback
Commissioner Segal seconded the motion.
The motion carried 5-0 with Chair Scharff, Vice Chair Mauter, Commissioners Forssell, Phillips and Segal
voting yes.
Commissioners Croft and Metz absent.
COMMISSIONER COMMENTS and REPORTS from MEETINGS/EVENTS
Commissioner Phillips attended a power conference at Berkeley. He learned it takes 8000 hours of
training to become an authorized electrician but authorized electricians can only have one trainee
working for them at a time according to California State Law. In Alberta, Canada, 210 people who had
EVs were assigned into three groups. One group monitored their behavior on charging, the second
group received gave a $0.035/kWh reward for off-peak charging at home, and an optimization program
managed when the third group could charge. The time-of-use group changed their behavior so much,
the spike moved to later in the evening. Commissioner Phillips asked staff to send slides to the
commissioners.
Commissioner Segal stated this is likely her last meeting. She expressed her gratitude for having been a
part of the UAC and the pleasure of working with her fellow commissioners. The quality of staff
impressed her. She believed Palo Alto residents were in good hands.
Commissioner Forssell expressed gratitude to staff, commissioners and the public who comment at UAC
meetings. She felt it was an honor and a pleasure to serve as commissioner. Going forward, she will
watch the UAC meetings on video.
If new commissioners were not appointed within the next month, Commissioner Segal and
Commissioner Forssell would be back for the next UAC meeting.
FUTURE TOPICS FOR UPCOMING MEETINGS
Commissioner Segal suggested a topic on ADUs having their own meter as the public commenter
requested. Chair Scharff agreed. Utilities Director Dean Batchelor pointed out that Utilities Rules and
Regulations only allow one set of services to any parcel. Utilities staff needed to have more
conversations and talk to Jonathan Lait’s group about permitting. Chair Scharff asked staff to put it on
Utilities Advisory Commission Minutes Approved on: May 1, 2024 Page 8 of 8
the topic list and staff can address the UAC to say if rules and regulations will or will not change.
Commissioner Forssell thought it was a compelling topic and remarked that ADUs need separate meters
to allow for EV chargers and electrification.
NEXT SCHEDULED MEETING: May 1, 2024
ADJOURNMENT
Chair Scharff moved to adjourn.
Commissioner Phillips seconded the motion.
The motion carried 5-0 with Chair Scharff, Vice Chair Mauter, Commissioners Forssell, Phillips and Segal
voting yes.
Commissioners Croft and Metz absent.
Meeting adjourned at 8:08 p.m.