HomeMy WebLinkAbout2007-05-02 Utilities Advisory Commission Summary Minutes
Utilities Advisory Commission Minutes from: May 2, 2007 Approved on: June 6, 2007 Page 1 of 7
UTILITIES ADVISORY COMMISSION
MINUTES OF MAY 2, 2007
CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Melton called to order at 12:00 noon the regular scheduled meeting of the Utilities
Advisory Commission.
Present: Melton, Rosenbaum, Bechtel, Dawes, Keller and Council Liaison, Beecham
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
NONE
APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES
Minutes of the April 4, 2007 meeting were unanimously approved.
AGENDA REVIEW
NONE
REPORT FROM COMMISSION MEETINGS/EVENTS
NONE
UTILITIES DIRECTOR REPORT
Fong presented the following report:
1) Pamphlets about the Utilities are ready for distribution. They will be made available for
customers and posted on our website. The pamphlets give the history of the Utilities and show
where we are today with respect to costs and revenues. Thanks was given to Utilities staff,
Utilities Advisory Commission Minutes from: May 2, 2007 Approved on: June 6, 2007 Page 2 of 7
ASD and Public Work’s teams and Linda Clerkson for their significant contribution to this
project. More pamphlets can be made available to UAC members if needed.
2) Fong, Beecham and Debra Lloyd, Resource Planner, attended the NCPA Washington D.C.
Federal Policy Conference last week. There were a number of speakers who provided updates
on the federal legislative front. The key message was that Congress is engaging in the debate
on climate change. The vehicle to implement these policies is at the forefront of this debate.
The two main alternatives are a carbon tax or a cap and trade emissions market. The carbon
tax is probably not likely. There will be activities to create a federal renewable portfolio
standard. Congress is likely to go after fuel efficiency incentives. One of the major challenges
is the “pay as you go” policy which requires that any new spending not add to the federal
deficit. There were a number of meetings and we were able to meet with Representatives
Eshoo and Honda, FERC Commissioners Kelly and Spitzer and Minority Staff Director Weaver.
3) SFPUC has indicated that this is not a good hydro year. Discussions between SFPUC and
BAWSCA will begin in terms of how the SFPUC will manage its water during this forecasted
shortage period. The first meeting will be held tomorrow and this will be an ongoing process as
we move into the summer and next year.
4) There has been significant State legislative activity around climate protection, water
conservation and electric system reliability. Bills are being presented at the State Legislature
with quick turn around times on comments or concerns regarding proposed language in the
bills.
5) The readings for the Emergency Water Supply Project had their first reading at Council.
6) The second reading for the Park Improvement Ordinances will be May 21st.
7) The CEQA process for the EIR is complete. There were no protests filed with any State
agencies.
8) Seven electric master agreements will be presented to Council for approval on Monday
night.
9) Council approved the Recycled Water Project for Palo Alto. We are beginning work with a
contractor to assess financial feasibility and stakeholder support.
10) The Utilities budget is on the May 8 Finance Committee meeting agenda. Chair Melton will
be there to represent the UAC.
There were a few questions on the Recycled Water Project. Fong said the State grant had
been granted for $75k. We have contracted with a vendor to help look at the financial feasibility
of the project, to see who funding partners might be and to establish stakeholder support,
stakeholders being the public, water users, customers. This project is just for Palo Alto and
Utilities Advisory Commission Minutes from: May 2, 2007 Approved on: June 6, 2007 Page 3 of 7
does not include the million dollar pipeline expansion project with Mtn. View. Fong understands
the bids received for the Mtn. View project were favorable. This will be managed out of the
Public Works Department.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
NONE
NEW BUSINESS
ITEM 1: ACTION ITEM:
Approval of Congestion Revenue Rights (CRR) product to manage electric transmission
congestion cost exposure
Debra Lloyd and Shiva Swaminathan, Senior Resource Planner, went through the highlights of the
slides provided to the Commissioners as part of the UAC report. They explained the need for the
CRR product within the larger context of the new transmission market design. Commissioner
Dexter inquired about the mechanics of how the product would work and observed that the
example provided in the report was helpful; he also requested that staff report back on the
performance of these products upon implementation next year. Staff agreed. Commissioner
Rosenbaum observed that the cost/value associated with the CRR product at hundreds of
thousands of dollars was small compared to the $100 million electric budget. He also requested
that it will be helpful for him to see a more comprehensive description of the CRR product. Valerie
Fong agreed to share the Council report with Commissioner Rosenbaum. Commissioner Bechtel
inquired about information that needs to be provided to the CAISO and regarding electrical losses
associated with transmission.
Council Member Beecham provided his perspective as the NCPA Commissioner. He outlined the
various interventions and filings made by NCPA and City staff on various aspects of this market
design at the FERC and US Congress. The final market design, now contemplated for
implementation in January 2008, was a product of a highly involved process.
Staff recommendation was approved unanimously by a 5-0 vote by the Commissioners.
Utilities Advisory Commission Minutes from: May 2, 2007 Approved on: June 6, 2007 Page 4 of 7
ITEM 2: ACTION ITEM:
Review of Proposed CIP for 2008-2012 and Proposed Operating Budget for 2007-08 and 2008-09
Fong gave an overview of each utility fund starting with the Electric Fund, followed by the Gas,
Wastewater Collection, and closing with the Water Fund. Commissioners and Councilmember
Beecham asked questions as the presentation moved from Fund to Fund.
Electric:
Chair Melton asked about the impact of low hydro conditions and the status of the Supply Rate
Stabilization Reserve resulting in an $11 million drawdown for commodity expenditures.
Swaminathan explained that costs for 07-08 have gone up $5 million since the earlier budget
projection, and that staff would constantly assess the situation and return with a mid-year rate
increase request if necessary. Fong also noted that the low hydro reports are not as impactful for
the NCPA/Western hydro power resources as they do not draw water from the SFPUC’s Hetch
Hetchy system which is facing more severe shortfalls.
Beecham asked if there other City departments use the Utility’s Fiber Optics system. Rosemary
Ralston, Senior Management Analyst noted the increase of close to $160K in new projects. Fong
added examples of new projects (Foothills Interpretive Center, Police, and Fire) which explain
some of the additional Fiber income.
In response to questions from Bechtel, Fong explained the retirement plan, “2.7 @ 55” which was
noted as one of the reasons for the increase in salaries and benefits.
Dawes asked whether Futures would be purchased as the hydro supply declines, or whether the
shortfall would be purchased on the open market. Fong noted that the commodity portfolio and
commodity purchases are reviewed and modified in accordance with updated information on
Utilities Advisory Commission Minutes from: May 2, 2007 Approved on: June 6, 2007 Page 5 of 7
resources. Dawes asked whether prices for power have increased as a result of reduced hydro
availability outlook. Swaminathan replied that prices are still under $100 on- peak.
With regard to electric undergrounding projects, Dawes inquired into cost-sharing agreements with
the Phone Company. Tomm Marshall, Assistant Director, informed him that we do have an
agreement on the next underground district but additional districts are still up for discussion. Fong
noted the California Public Utilities Commission has regulatory oversight and that there are very
explicit cost-recovery guidelines under which it permits cost recovery. Dawes requested an update
on the undergrounding effort at a future meeting.
Regarding funds for the SAP upgrade, Dawes asked if the costs are fair and appropriate. Fong
explained that the current Customer Information System (CIS) is no longer being supported by the
vendor. Beecham assured the commissioners that from his talks with the City Auditor the SAP
costs are fair and appropriate.
Regarding Contract Services and General Expenses in Resource Management, Bechtel asked why
the budget jumped up. Ralston explained the creation of the two new cost centers under
Alternative Resources, for the purpose of handling incentives and consulting fees to cover
investments in supply-funded energy efficiency, solar, and distributed generation incentives to
comply with the City’s Ten Year Energy Efficiency Plan.
Regarding employee count, Rosenbaum asked if the total Full Time Employees (FTE) count is
going down by two. Ralston explained that the level of staff is the same as last year, but that two
Utilities members were moved from Utilities to the City Manager’s Office, and that some
reclassifications from one work group to another, to reflect workloads, occurred. Ralston also
noted that a few staff are in other departments but paid for by Utilities. Ralston also confirmed that
the FTE count did not increase.
Utilities Advisory Commission Minutes from: May 2, 2007 Approved on: June 6, 2007 Page 6 of 7
In a discussion on Reserves levels, Beecham asked whether the minimum guidelines are
appropriately set. Fong noted that staff revisits the reserve guidelines annually and that some cost
drivers, specifically the Retiree Medical, are of a one-time nature as a catch-up.
Gas:
Bechtel asked for an update on the Gas Main Replacement Capital Improvement Projects. Roger
Cwiak, Acting Assistant Director in Engineering, gave an overview of the Gas Main Replacement
Project, and explained that the ABS mains project will be complete in 2010-2011, following which,
smaller pipeline installation projects will be budgeted. So that by the 2011/2012 time period, costs
will go down significantly. Cwiak pointed out that polyethylene pipe has a service life of 100 years,
and that the pipe has a higher chance of damage by third-party dig-ins than by failure prior to end
of design life.
Wastewater:
Cwiak provided some information regarding the cost reductions for the Wastewater Projects that
will occur over the next ten years.
Water:
During a discussion on the Emergency Water Supply Melton acknowledged that the CEQA process
was completed, and Fong informed the commissioners that the Council will be asked to approve
the second readings of the Park Improvement Ordinances on May 21. Fong also noted that in
November, at the request of Council, there will be an Advisory Vote. Fong noted that a negative
vote will not preclude the project from moving forward but that the purpose is to get an indication
of voters’ support for the project. Bechtel referenced the $40 million cost for the entire project, and
suggested a review of all project alternatives as the alternatives may be cheaper than the project
given the significant costs associated with the project. Cwiak clarified that the advisory vote is on
the use of El Camino Park, and further clarified that the cost for construction and materials for the
underground reservoir have doubled since first talks in 2000 and 2001 and that a similar cost
increase would likely apply to any project alternatives. Melton remarked on Stanford’s apparent
preference for the El Camino Park site over the other sites being considered and Cwiak confirmed
Utilities Advisory Commission Minutes from: May 2, 2007 Approved on: June 6, 2007 Page 7 of 7
this information, noting that the project did look at a number of alternatives for the emergency water
supplies. Cwiak also noted that the budget reflects the estimated costs associated with the project.
Dawes suggested the Commission examine the cost breakdown of the $40 million project and
asked whether Council and UAC will get to look at the in its entirety at some point soon. Cwiak
noted that the project budget for each year will be reviewed by the UAC and Council at budget
time. Bechtel stated that Cwiak had adequately put forth the necessary information needed by the
Commissioner at this point, and that the Finance Committee is the appropriate place to start a
discussion.
Melton addressed his colleagues and reviewed the information needed for the Finance Committee
which he will attend as the UAC Chair. To obtain the necessary cost information on the
Emergency Water Supply Project, Melton requested a meeting with staff prior to the Finance
Committee.
Action:
Bechtel moved staff’s recommendation and Rosenbaum seconded. Motion approved 4-0 with
Commissioner Keller absent.
Meeting adjourned at 2:22 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Melody Vega
City of Palo Alto Utilities