HomeMy WebLinkAbout2024-05-14 Policy & Services Committee Summary MinutesPOLICY AND SERVICES COMMITTEE
SUMMARY MINUTES
Page 1 of 4
Regular Meeting
May 14, 2024
The Policy and Services Committee of the City of Palo Alto met on this date in the Council
Chambers and by virtual teleconference at 7:01 P.M.
Present: Kou (Chair), Lythcott-Haims, Tanaka
Absent:
Call to Order
Chair Kou called the meeting to order. The clerk called roll with all present.
Oral Communications
1. Ken H. was disturbed about how much meeting time has been taken up with Hamas and
Israel. He suggested moving public comments to the end of the meeting, agendizing it at
the end of the meeting or doing research on how other City Councils are handling this
issue.
Action Items
1. City Council Referral to Review the respective role of the Public Art Commission, staff,
stakeholders, and the Council in public art decisions in relation to placement and
themes of art. (CEQA Status – Not a Project.)
Elise DeMarzo, Public Art Program Director, discussed slides covering staff recommendations
for the Public Art Program, the public art commissioning process, conceptual design
development and detailed design and implementation.
Hsinya Shen, Public Art Commission Vice Chair, provided details about the project initiation and
artist selection process slides.
SUMMARY MINUTES
Page 2 of 4
Policy & Services Meeting
Summary Minutes: 05/14/2024
Council Member Lythcott-Haims was curious as to what prompted the referral from Council.
She wanted instruction on the importance of history versus the present in terms of what they
are trying to reflect in the City’s public art and/or the City’s values and identity. She was
interested in how to balance the importance of honoring and respecting the past with their
interest in understanding who they are now through art. She encouraged them to engage youth
as often as they engage leaders in the selection of public art. She questioned what they would
do if they could affirmatively decide to place art around the City.
Chantal Cotton Gaines, Deputy City Manager, commented there were questions about the
process as well as the City Council’s role in the process related to public art. It was just to have
a dialog to further understand the work that the Staff and the Public Arts Commission do and to
better understand if there are things Council wanted to ask further questions about.
Chair Kou wanted to come back and review the Midtown Poetry Wall and the artwork for 345
Portage (the Cannery). She wanted to know if the Council liaison has been able to get a glimpse
of the rendering. She queried how many staff members the Public Art Commission has. She
suggested reaching out to the neighborhood association about the Midtown Poetry Wall. She
wondered if there were boundaries that needed to be set as a public entity. She discussed using
public artwork to draw people into the City.
Ms. Shen remarked that the goal was to engage with the local community in Midtown to make
sure they understand what the timeline and options may be. She opined that the Cannery was a
treasured opportunity to highlight the history of Asian-American involvement in the history of
Palo Alto. She explained a publicly available master plan and mission statement the artists that
gives an anchoring point for the type of public art they are trying to promote. She stated when
they do art projects that are $85,000 and above, they come to the City Council for review and
approval. She spoke about selected artists engaging with local community members to
understand the site specific history. She also explained that once an artist is selected for a
private mural opportunity, they may have in idea for that wall but the owner can reject if they
do not believe that is the right artwork for their wall. She described art projects being done all
around Palo Alto and projects that were interrelated.
Ms. DeMarzo recalled the public art for that project came to the Public Art Commission after
the project went to Council. There is a design update coming to the Commission in the packet.
She described what they look for when issuing an RFQ for artists. She talked about Greg
Brown’s art in Palo Alto, the first artist in residence in Palo Alto. She stated she has one full-
time staff member, a part-time staff member to project manage CIP projects and an hourly
employee. She shared that their policies, procedures and selection processes are very much
within the bounds of best practices. She thought putting boundaries on what art is and is not
acceptable is a legally slippery slope.
Deputy City Manager Cotton Gaines emphasized that with a variety of people on the panel, the
more likely it will be to catch different viewpoints. She advised that they could do an
informational report back to the Council with some version of the materials that was brought to
the meeting or they could also provide the full City Council an update during the council
SUMMARY MINUTES
Page 3 of 4
Policy & Services Meeting
Summary Minutes: 05/14/2024
member update section of a standard City Council meeting. She agreed to work on an
informational report to go in the Council packet.
NO ACTION TAKEN
2. Approval of the Office of the City Auditor Task Order Time Extension for the ADA
Compliance and Purchasing Card Audits
Kate Murdock, City Auditor, explained that the Auditor’s Office is requesting to extend the task
orders for the ADA compliance and purchasing card audits to December 31, 2024. Work has not
begun on these audits yet because of the City Auditor vacancy.
Council Member Lythcott-Haims indicated this is an obvious push in the deadline necessary
because of the vacancy in the City Auditor position.
MOTION: Council Member Lythcott-Haims moved, seconded by Council Member Tanaka to
recommend the City Council approve the task order time extensions the ADA Compliance and
Purchasing Card Audits.
MOTION PASSED: 3-0
Future Meetings and Agendas
Deputy City Manager Cotton Gaines advised that for the month of June the expected items
were the audits related to the Public Safety building construction and the automated license
plate readers, a presentation from the Downtown Streets Team and a follow-up on the last
Council referral related to the procedures and protocols related to Council discretionary
spending.
Council Member Lythcott-Haims remarked on the stacked agenda. It was her preference to
address what had to be addressed in June and kick anything to August that they could.
Deputy City Manager Cotton Gaines explained the thought was that they could make it through
that amount of items based on the time estimates they were receiving from Staff. As they see
the reports shape up will be a better determinant of how much time it could possibly take. It
SUMMARY MINUTES
Page 4 of 4
Policy & Services Meeting
Summary Minutes: 05/14/2024
would be possible to send the Council referral on discretionary spending to the following
meeting if it is too many items.
Chair Kou agreed to take Council Member Lythcott-Haims preferences into consideration as
they discuss the agenda.
Adjournment: The meeting was adjourned at 8:03 P.M.