Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2023-11-06 City Council Agenda Packet
CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting Monday, November 06, 2023 CITY O F Council Chambers & Hybrid PALO 5:30 PM ALTO Palo Alto City Council meetings will be held as "hybrid" meetings with the option to attend by teleconference or in person. To maximize public safety while still maintaining transparency and public access, members of the public can choose to participate from home or attend in person. Information on how the public may observe and participate in the meeting is located at the end of the agenda. Masks are strongly encouraged if attending in person. The meeting will be broadcast on Cable TV Channel 26, live on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/c/cityofpaloalto, and streamed to Midpen Media Center https://midpenmedia.org. VIRTUAL PARTICIPATION CLICK HERE TO JOIN (https://cityofpaloalto.zoom.us/j/362027238) Meeting ID: 362 027 238 Phone: 1(669)900-6833 PUBLIC COMMENTS Public comments will be accepted both in person and via Zoom for up to three minutes or an amount of time determined by the Chair. All requests to speak will be taken until 5 minutes after the staff's presentation. Written public comments can be submitted in advance to city.council@CityofPaloAlto.org and will be provided to the Council and available for inspection on the City's website. Please clearly indicate which agenda item you are referencing in your subject line. PowerPoints, videos, or other media to be presented during public comment are accepted only by email to city.clerk@CityofPaloAlto.org at least 24 hours prior to the meeting. Once received, the Clerk will have them shared at public comment for the specified item. To uphold strong cybersecurity management practices, USB's or other physical electronic storage devices are not accepted. TIME ESTIMATES Listed times are estimates only and are subject to change at any time, including while the meeting is in progress. The Council reserves the right to use more or less time on any item, to change the order of items and/or to continue items to another meeting. Particular items may be heard before or after the time estimated on the agenda. This may occur in order to best manage the time at a meeting or to adapt to the participation of the public. Regular Meeting November 06, 2023 Materials submitted after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection at www.CityofPaloAlto.org/agendas. CALL TO ORDER SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY (5:30 - 5:35 PM) Proclamation Honoring Olenka Villarreal CLOSED SESSION (5:35 - 6:35 PM) 2. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS Authority: Government Code Section 54956.8 Property: 1175 North San Antonio Road, Palo Alto (Informally known as the former Los Altos Treatment Plant site) Negotiating Party: Santa Clara Valley Water District City Negotiators: (Ed Shikada, Brad Eggleston, Karin North, Sunny Tong) Subject of Negotiations: Lease Price and Terms of Payment AGENDA CHANGES, ADDITIONS AND DELETIONS PUBLIC COMMENT (6:35 - 6:50 PM) Members of the public may speak to any item NOT on the agenda. Council reserves the right to limit the duration of Oral Communications period to 30 minutes. COUNCIL MEMBER QUESTIONS. COMMENTS. ANNOUNCEMENTS (6:50 - 6:55 PM) Members of the public may not speak to the item(s). CONSENT CALENDAR (6:55 - 7:00 PM) Items will be voted in one motion unless removed from the calendar by three Council Members. 3. Approval of Minutes from October 16, 2023 Meeting 4. Approval to Proceed with Design of Improvements for Permanent Installation of the Traffic Calming Pilot Project in the Crescent Park Neighborhood 5. Approval of the Acceptance of State of California Citizens Options for Public Safety (COPS) Funds of $194,400 and a Budget Amendment in the Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Fund (2/3 vote required) for front-line law enforcement expenses 6. Approval of First Amendment to the Santa Clara County Recycling and Waste Reduction Commission Technical Advisory Committee Memorandum of Agreement. CEQA Status - Not a project. 7. Approval of General Services Agreement Contract C24185703A with SWA Services Group, Inc. for a five-year term in an Amount Not -to -Exceed $19,327,547 for Janitorial Cleaning Regular Meeting November 06, 2023 Materials submitted after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection at www.CityofPaloAlto.org/agendas. and Maintenance Services, and Approval of a Fiscal Year 2024 Budget Amendment in the General Fund; CEQA status — Not a Project. 8. CONSENT: Second Reading of Electrification Equipment Ordinance adopted October 2, 2023 amending the Palo Alto Municipal Code Title 18 (Zoning) Chapters 18.04 (Definitions), 18.10 (Low -Density Residential), 18.12 (R-1 Zones), 18.13 (Multiple Family Residential Zones),18.40 (General Standards and Exceptions), and 18.54 (Parking Facilities Design Standards) and Title 9, Chapter 9.10 (Noise) to Further Facilitate the Installation of Electrification Equipment in Residential Neighborhoods. CEQA Status — Exempt under CEQA Guidelines sections 15061(b)(3) and 15301. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS (7:00 - 7:15 PM) BREAK (5-10 MINUTES) ACTION ITEMS (Item 9: 7:25 - 9:25 PM, Item 10: 9:25 - 10:25 PM) Include: Report of Committees/Commissions, Ordinances and Resolutions, Public Hearings, Report of Officials, Unfinished Business and Council Matters. 9. Approval of a Contract with Urban Field Studio (C24188179) for a Not -to -Exceed Amount of $384,990 for the Car -free Streets Alternatives Study; Adopt an Interim Ordinance Continuing Parking Lot and Sidewalk Dining through March 2024 and On -Street Dining through December 2024; Adopt Resolutions Extending the City Manager's Authority to Temporarily Close Portions of California Avenue and Ramona Street through December 2024; Provide Direction on the Street Configuration of California Ave. and Ramona St. during the Study Period; and Approval of a FY 2024 Budget Amendment in the General Fund. CEQA Status - Categorically exempt under CEQA Guidelines Sections 15301 (existing facilities) and 15304(e) (minor temporary use). 10. LEGISLATIVE: Adopt Ordinances Amending Planned Community Ordinance 2343 for 2901-2905 Middlefield Road and Establishing a Separate Planned Community Zoning Designation for 702 Ellsworth Place to Enable the Development of a new Single -Story, Single -Family Residence. CEQA Status -- Categorically Exempt Under CEQA Guidelines Sections 15061(b)(3), 15301, and 15303 (Continued from September 18, 2023) ADJOURNMENT INFORMATION REPORTS Information reports are provided for informational purposes only to the Council and the public but are not listed for action during this meeting's agenda. 11. Information Item: Summary of Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Community Development Block Regular Meeting November 06, 2023 Materials submitted after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection at www.CityofPaloAlto.org/agendas. Grant (CDBG) Program Accomplishments - Review of the Draft Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER). CEQA Status — Not a Project OTHER INFORMATION OTHER INFORMATION Standing Committee Meetings this week Finance Committee November 7, 2023 Public Comment Letters Schedule of Meetings Regular Meeting November 06, 2023 Materials submitted after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection at www.CityofPaloAlto.org/agendas. PUBLIC COMMENT INSTRUCTIONS Members of the Public may provide public comments to teleconference meetings via email, teleconference, or by phone. 1. Written public comments may be submitted by email to city.council@cityofpaloalto.org. 2. For in person public comments please complete a speaker request card located on the table at the entrance to the Council Chambers and deliver it to the Clerk prior to discussion of the item. 3. Spoken public comments using a computer or smart phone will be accepted through the teleconference meeting. To address the Council, click on the link below to access a Zoom -based meeting. Please read the following instructions carefully. o You may download the Zoom client or connect to the meeting in- browser. If using your browser, make sure you are using a current, up-to-date browser: Chrome 30 , Firefox 27 , Microsoft Edge 12 , Safari 7 . Certain functionality may be disabled in older browsers including Internet Explorer. Or download the Zoom application onto your smart phone from the Apple App Store or Google Play Store and enter in the Meeting ID below. o You may be asked to enter an email address and name. We request that you identify yourself by name as this will be visible online and will be used to notify you that it is your turn to speak. o When you wish to speak on an Agenda Item, click on "raise hand." The Clerk will activate and unmute speakers in turn. Speakers will be notified shortly before they are called to speak. o When called, please limit your remarks to the time limit allotted. A timer will be shown on the computer to help keep track of your comments. 4. Spoken public comments using a phone use the telephone number listed below. When you wish to speak on an agenda item hit *9 on your phone so we know that you wish to speak. You will be asked to provide your first and last name before addressing the Council. You will be advised how long you have to speak. When called please limit your remarks to the agenda item and time limit allotted. CLICK HERE TO JOIN Meeting ID: 362-027-238 Phone: 1-669-900-6833 Americans with Disability Act (ADA) It is the policy of the City of Palo Alto to offer its public programs, services and meetings in a manner that is readily accessible to all. Persons with disabilities who require materials in an appropriate alternative format or who require auxiliary aids to access City meetings, programs, or services may contact the City's ADA Coordinator at (650) 329-2550 (voice) or by emailing ada@cityofpaloalto.org. Requests for assistance or accommodations must be submitted at least 24 hours in advance of the meeting, program, or service. Regular Meeting November 06, 2023 Materials submitted after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection at www.CityofPaloAlto.org/agendas. Item 1 Item 1 Staff Report CITY OF PALO ALTO TITLE Proclamation Honoring Olenka Villarreal ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: Olenka Villarreal Proclamation APPROVED BY: Mahealani Ah Yun City Council Staff Report Report Type: SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY Lead Department: City Clerk Meeting Date: November 6, 2023 Report #:2310-2178 Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 1 Packet Pg. 6 of 374 Item 1 Attachment A - Olenka Villarreal Proclamation Honoring Olenka Villarreal WHEREAS, Olenka Marta Steciw was born on November 6, 1963 and grew up in Palo Alto, California and Vienna, Austria before graduating from Ponoma College and Golden Gate University and embarking on a 17 -year career in marketing and sales in Silicon Valley; and WHEREAS, Olenka married Robert Villarreal in 1998, and they have raised their two spirited daughters Emma and Ava in Palo Alto; and WHEREAS, after recognizing a great need, Olenka dedicated herself to creating an inclusive recreation space where all community members, no matter their size, age, or ability could benefit from the power of play; and WHEREAS, after many years of resolute fundraising and research with a team of experts, city officials and volunteers, Olenka designed and developed the first Magical Bridge Playground in Mitchell Park, Palo Alto; and WHEREAS, the Mitchell Park Magical Bridge Playground opened in 2015 and is now a beloved destination whose socially inclusive and physically accessible design enables children and adults of all abilities come together to laugh and play; and WHEREAS, Olenka has worked tirelessly to expand Magical Bridge's vision of inclusivity and accessibility to communities far and wide, opening seven custom Magical Bridge playgrounds with many more on the way; and WHEREAS, Olenka makes this world a little more magical every single day, doggedly and successfully advocating for a culture of inclusion, belonging, and empathy for all. NOW, THEREFORE I, Lydia Kou, Mayor of the City of Palo Alto, on behalf of the entire City Council, do hereby honor and congratulate Olenka Villarreal on her 60th birthday and commend her for her magical contributions to Palo Alto and the world. Presented: November 6, 2023 Lydia Kou Mayor O Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 2 I Packet Pg. 7 of 374 O Item 3 Item 3 Staff Report CITY OF PALO ALTO TITLE Approval of Minutes from October 16, 2023 Meeting RECOMMENDATION That the minutes be reviewed and approved. ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: October 16, 2023 Draft Action Minutes APPROVED BY: Mahealani Ah Yun City Council Staff Report Report Type: CONSENT CALENDAR Lead Department: City Clerk Meeting Date: November 6, 2023 Report #:2310-2168 Item 3: Staff Report Pg. 1 Packet Pg. 8 of 374 Item 3 Attachment A - October L16, 2023 Draft Action CITY COUNCIL Minutes CITY Or PALO DRAFT ACTION MINUTES ALTO Regular Meeting October 16, 2023 The City Council of the City of Palo Alto met on this date in the Council Chambers and by virtual teleconference at 5:30 P.M. Present In Person: Burt, Kou, Lauing, Lythcott-Haims, Stone, Tanaka, Veenker Present Remotely: Absent: ecial Orders of the Da 1. The Great California Shakeout 2. 26th Annual United Nations Association Film Festival (UNAFF) Proclamation Study Session 3. Bi-Annual Discussion with the Independent Police Auditor NO ACTION Consent Calendar Council Member Tanaka registered a no vote on Agenda Item Number 5. MOTION: Vice Mayor Stone moved, seconded by Council Member Burt to approve Agenda Item Numbers 4-12. MOTION SPLIT FOR THE PURPOSE OF VOTING MOTION PASSED ITEMS 4, 6-12: 7-0 MOTION PASSED ITEM 5: 6-1, Tanaka no 4. Approval of Minutes from September 18, 2023 and October 2, 2023 Meetings Page 1 of 4 Item 3: Staff Report Pg. 2 Packet Pg. 9 of 374 Item 3 Attachment A - October DRAFT ACTION MINUT N U T 16, 2023 Draft Action Minutes 5. Approve Additional Funding for the Human Services Resource Allocation Process for Ada's Cafe and Approve a Budget Amendment in the General Fund. CEQA Status— Not A Project. 6. Approval of Contract Number C24187903 Contract C24187903 With Daleo, Inc. in the Amount of $7,826,860 for the Gas Main Replacement Project 24B (GS -14003) on University Avenue and surrounding streets in the University Park and Crescent Park neighborhoods, at a business district complex adjacent to Geng Road, and at Town & Country Village Plaza at Embarcadero Road and El Camino Real including water main and service replacements at this location; Authorization for the City Manager to Negotiate and Execute Related Change Orders Not -to -Exceed of $782,686, for a Total Not -to -Exceed Amount of $8,609,546; and Approval of Budget Amendments in the Gas and Water Funds. CEQA status — Exempt per CEQA Guidelines 15302(c) (Replacement or Reconstruction of Existing Facilities). 7. Adoption of a Resolution to Vacate a Public Utility Easement at 160, 162, and 164 Waverley Street. CEQA Status — Exempt under CEQA Guidelines Section 15305. 8. Update on the Memorandum of Understanding and Funding Agreement with Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (JPB/Caltrain) and the City of Menlo Park Regarding Emergency Repairs to the North Bank of San Francisquito Creek and Approval of a Fiscal Year 2024 Budget Amendment in the Capital Improvement Fund; CEQA exempt per Reg. 15269. 9. Approval of Construction Contract with Golden Bay Construction, Inc. in the Amount of $1,247,069 and Authorization for the City Manager to Negotiate and Execute Change Orders up to a Not -to -Exceed Amount of $311,767 for the Capacity Upgrades along East Meadow Drive (SD -22000) and Connection to Adobe Creek Pump Station from East Meadow Circle (SD -26000), Storm Drainage System Replacement and Rehabilitation (SD - 06101), and Sidewalk Repairs (PO -89003); CEQA status — exempt under CEQA Guidelines Section 15301(c). 10. Approval of Financing Plan for a Local Salt Removal Facility at the Regional Water Quality Control Plant and Direct Staff to Secure Financing and Solicit Bids for a Construction Contract and Construction Management Services Contract as Recommended by Finance Committee. CEQA status - Project analyzed in 2019 Addendum to the 2015 Environmental Impact Report for the Palo Alto Recycled Water Project (SCH 2011062037), approved November 18, 2019. 11. Authorization of the City Manager or their designee to execute a change order to Contract C20177344 with Bear Electrical Services for On -Call Traffic Signal and Electrical Services to Extend the Term through March 1, 2024 with No Change to the Not To Exceed Amount of $375,000; CEQA status — categorically exempt. 12. 340 Portage Avenue and 3201-3225 Ash Street [23PLN-00226]: Denial of Resident's Request for Historic Designation of the Cannery Building located at 200-404 Portage Page 2 of 4 City Council Meeting Draft Action Minutes: 10/16/2023 Item 3: Staff Report Pg. 3 Packet Pg. 10 of 374 Item 3 Attachment A - October DRAFT ACTION MINUT N U T 16, 2023 Draft Action Minutes Avenue as well as the Office Building at 3201-3225 Ash Street as Category I or II Resources on the City's Local Historic Inventory. Environmental Assessment: Exempt from the Provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) In Accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3). City Manager Comments Ed Shikada, City Manager Artinn Itamc 13. Direction to Staff to Develop a Proposal to Lease the Cubberley site from the Palo Alto Unified School District for 55 years or Provide Alternative Direction to Transfer Ownership or Control to the City; CEQA status — not a project. MOTION: Mayor Kou moved, seconded by Council Member Burt to direct staff to work with the Cubberley Ad Hoc to: a. Develop a proposal for a 55 -year or more ground lease with the School District for the portion of Cubberley site owned by the Palo Alto Unified School District, with an option of a lease back to the district of a subset of acreage; and, b. Explore a lease for the entire site and finance options to include a purchase of 7 -acres or more, as well as exploring a note to purchase through the School District; and, c. Remove Terman Park land swap from consideration. MOTION PASSED: 7-0 14. City Council Discussion and Potential Direction on Feedback Regarding the Proposed Joint Powers Agency (JPA) Agreement for Cities Association of Santa Clara County; CEQA: Not a Project MOTION: Mayor Kou moved, seconded by Council Member Veenker to defer item number 14 to the October 23, 2023 City Council Meeting. MOTION PASSED: 7-0 Adjournment: The meeting was adjourned at 9:57 P.M. Page 3 of 4 City Council Meeting Draft Action Minutes: 10/16/2023 Item 3: Staff Report Pg. 4 Packet Pg. 11 of 374 Item 3 Attachment A - October DRAFT ACTION MINUT N U T 16, 2023 Draft Action Minutes ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor NOTE: Action minutes are prepared in accordance with Palo Alto Municipal Code (PAMC) 2.04.160(a) and (b). Summary minutes (sense) are prepared in accordance with PAMC Section 2.04.160(c). Beginning in January 2018, in accordance with Ordinance No. 5423, the City Council found action minutes and the video/audio recordings of Council proceedings to be the official records of both Council and committee proceedings. These recordings are available on the City's website. Item 3: Staff Report Pg. 5 Page 4 of 4 City Council Meeting Draft Action Minutes: 10/16/2023 Packet Pg. 12 of 374 Item 4 Item 4 Staff Report City Council Staff Report From: City Manager CITY O F Report Type: CONSENT CALENDAR PALO Lead Department: Transportation ALTO Meeting Date: November 6, 2023 Report #:2307-1777 TITLE Approval to Proceed with Design of Improvements for Permanent Installation of the Traffic Calming Pilot Project in the Crescent Park Neighborhood RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Transportation Commission and Staff recommend that the City Council approves staff to proceed with the design of traffic calming improvements with landscaping, and direct staff to seek input from the community and adjacent property owners during the design phase for the permanent installation of the traffic calming project piloted in the Crescent Park Neighborhood. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In 2018 residents of the Crescent Park area neighborhood raised traffic concerns regarding cut -through traffic, congestion, and speeding in their neighborhood. In response to these community concerns, the Office of Transportation staff initiated the Crescent Park Traffic Calming Project study to evaluate the project area. A pilot project with temporary improvements was developed by consultants, Fehr and Peers, and City staff. With the approval of the Planning and Transportation Commission (PTC) and City Council in 2020, temporary improvements were installed in the summer of 2021. The temporary installation as a pilot program allowed staff to observe the traffic pattern and the potential changes. In 2022, an analysis was conducted on both the pre -pilot and post -pilot data to evaluate the effectiveness of the traffic calming measures. The City's consultant performed the analysis, which revealed a decrease in speed and cut -through traffic in the majority of segments. Additionally, the staff conducted a neighborhood survey to gather feedback from residents, and while not unanimous a supermajority of residents voted in favor of making the treatments permanent. The post -pilot study was reviewed by the Planning and Transportation Commission (PTC) which recommended moving forward with the design of permanent improvements while seeking input from adjacent property owners. The PTC also suggested incorporating landscaping elements into the design of these traffic calming measures. Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 1 Packet Pg. 13 of 374 Item 4 Item 4 Staff Report Therefore, the staff is now seeking approval from the Council before proceeding with the design of these improvements. BACKGROUND In January 2018, residents of the Crescent Park area neighborhood raised traffic concerns to the Office of Transportation staff. The residents cited ongoing cut -through traffic, congestion during the peak hours and speeding in the off-peak hours as recurring issues in this neighborhood. In response to these community concerns, Office of Transportation staff initiated the Crescent Park Traffic Calming Project to study the project area and evaluated the neighborhood for potential traffic calming elements to be placed. Staff retained the services of Fehr & Peers Engineers (Consultant) to assist with the project study and traffic calming evaluation for the neighborhood. Following the request, comprehensive traffic speed and volume data were collected in the neighborhood. Staff in coordination with the City's consultant developed initial concepts to implement traffic calming measures. Based on the comments received from the residents through neighborhood outreach and community meetings, the concepts were further refined. The final improvements included in the pilot project were: 1) curb extension improvements with three-way stop signs at Southwood Avenue & East Crescent Drive and 2) an oval -shaped traffic circle at the intersection of Hamilton Avenue, Center Drive & Southwood Drive, and 3) a 50 foot of protected bikeway on University Avenue eastbound direction at West Crescent Avenue. The PTC conducted a hearing on the project on September 9, 2020 (Staff Report ID 115171). At this meeting, PTC recommended the approval and implementation of a pilot traffic calming project trial in Crescent Park Neighborhood, to the City Council. The project was then approved by the City Council to proceed with the design and installation of temporary improvements on November 9, 2020 (Staff Report 116032). The recommendation also included that staff would return to the City Council one year after the implementation of the pilot program for direction on whether to make the improvements permanent or modify the alternatives. The project elements were implemented in the summer of 2021. A year after the installation, traffic data was collected to review the effectiveness of the temporary traffic calming measures at these locations. The protected bikeway improvements on University Avenue are consistent with standard installation at other locations in the City and provide bicycle markings in accordance with the California Manual of Traffic Control Devices. Therefore, staff believes that such bike lane improvements should be continued as a permanent installation irrespective of the traffic calming project. 1 https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/agendas-minutes-reports/agendas-minutes/planning-and- transportation-commission/2020-agendas-minutes-and-staff-reports/ptc-9.9-transportation.pdf 2 https://www.cityofpaIoaIto.org/files/assets/public/agendas-minutes-reports/reports/city-manager-reports- c m rs/year-archive/2020-2/i d-11603. pd f?t=49846.12 Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 2 Packet Pg. 14 of 374 Item 4 Item 4 Staff Report ANALYSIS The comparison of the pre -pilot and post -pilot data was analyzed with a focus on travel speeds and traffic volume at key locations. The post -pilot analysis showed the volume on all street segments was reduced and the speeds also reduced on most street segments. The detailed data showing changes to the volumes and speeds of various street segments are depicted in Figures 2 and 3 of Attachment A. The data indicates that the temporary traffic calming measures have been effective in addressing the volume of cut-thru traffic as well as the speeding concerns in the neighborhood. Staff, however, also believes that some of the traffic volume reduction is likely attributed due to the impact of the COVID pandemic and remote work on traffic circulation. Attachment A to this report provides the Crescent Park Neighborhood Traffic Calming Post Pilot Memorandum compiling study analysis and results. Following the review of field conditions, staff conducted a neighborhood survey in early 2023 to seek feedback and gain community input before proceeding with permanent improvements. The survey requested feedback from the neighborhood on the specific improvements at the two locations. The majority were in favor of converting the temporary improvements to permanent improvements at these locations. The results from the survey are as follows: Project Location 1: Southwood Drive & East Crescent Drive: Curb Extensions and Stop Signs • 74% of the neighborhood household voted YES to permanently install these calming measures • 26% of the neighborhood household voted NO to permanently install these calming measures Some residents in the immediate vicinity of this intersection raised concerns about the temporary improvements. Therefore, staff conducted an additional review of the survey results in the immediate geographic vicinity of Project Location 1 to determine the neighborhood response. This focused review also yielded 75% favor to continue with permanent improvements results at this location. Project Location 2: Hamilton Avenue, Southwood Drive, and Center Drive: Oval -Shaped Traffic Circle • 78% of the neighborhood households voted YES to a permanent installation of the oval - shaped traffic circle • 22% of the neighborhood households voted NO to a permanent installation of the oval - shaped traffic circle Based on the post -pilot study and feedback from the neighborhood, staff supports the implementation of these improvements on a permanent basis. This matter was discussed by Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 3 Packet Pg. 15 of 374 Item 4 Item 4 Staff Report the Planning and Transportation Commission (PTC) on June 14, 2023 (Staff Report 2304-13813). The PTC members unanimously endorsed the project and recommended to the City Council that the staff be authorized to proceed with the design of permanent improvements. However, in response to concerns raised by the fronting property owners, the PTC further recommended that the staff work with the adjacent property owners to gather their input for the concerns of those directly affected in designing the permanent improvements. In addition, the PTC suggested that the design of traffic calming features such as traffic circles and curb ramp extensions should incorporate landscaping that blends well with the neighborhood's aesthetics. The staff is recommending the City Council's approval to move forward with designing the improvements for the permanent installation of the traffic calming project that was piloted in the Crescent Park Neighborhood. The neighborhood residents are notified of the staff recommendation to the Council at this meeting. Next Steps: Once the City Council approves, the staff will begin the design process for the permanent improvements which is expected to be completed in 16-18 months. During this phase, the staff will engage with the community and fronting property owners to seek feedback and ensure that the permanent improvements align with planning and engineering standards. The construction of improvements will follow which is expected to take about a year to complete after bidding, following completion of design. In the meantime, the temporary improvements for the pilot traffic calming will remain in place. FISCAL/RESOURCE IMPACT The cost estimate for the design and construction of the project could range from minimum of $600,000 with minimum landscaping and can exceed $1.0 Million depending upon the final improvements. The design of project will be funded by the existing Transportation and Parking Improvement Capital Project (PL -12000) that supports neighborhood traffic calming projects. As appropriated in the FY 2024 Adopted Capital Budget, there is sufficient funding available in PL - 12000 to fund the design of these improvements. After City Council approval, Staff will work with City's on -call Consultant to initiate the design of the permanent improvements and return to Council to award the construction contract as necessary. Depending upon the final cost estimates of the project after the completion of design and other priorities in the CIP; staff will evaluate budget and appropriate funding for construction of the project estimated to occur in FY 26 Budget STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT During the pilot project phase, there were several opportunities for the community to share their opinions with the City. Residents had the opportunity to provide feedback through a voting card that was sent to every household. Additionally, a dedicated website was established 3 https://cityofpaloaIto.primegov.com/meeting/document/2109.pdf?name=Staff%20Report Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 4 Packet Pg. 16 of 374 Item 4 Item 4 Staff Report for the project, aiming to provide information and seek feedback from residents. Furthermore, all households in the neighborhood were notified by mail about the June 14, 2023 PTC meeting for the availability of the staff report and the opportunity to provide comments. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The proposed modifications are minor upgrades to an existing residential street right-of-way and would not result in any new impacts on the existing environment. This project is considered as a minor alteration to the existing street system, and therefore categorically exempt (Class 1 Exemption, Section 15301) from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: Crescent Park Neighborhood Traffic Calming Post -Pilot Memorandum APPROVED BY: Philip Kamhi, Chief Transportation Official Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 5 Packet Pg. 17 of 374 Item 4 F E H R Attachment A - Crescent Park Neighborhood Post Pilot Memo Memorandum Date: November 21, 2022 To: Chirag Panchal, Shahla Yazdy, and Ripon Bhatia — City of Palo Alto From: Susie Hufstader and Steve Davis — Fehr & Peers Subject: Crescent Park Neighborhood Traffic Calming Post- ot Memorandum SJ21-2081.07 The Crescent Park Traffic Calming Pilot Study is an effort I by the City of Palo Alto to investigate the implementation of traffic calming mea s to reduce cu hrough traffic and vehicular speeding in the Crescent Park neighborhoo t Park is a residential neighborhood adjacent to Palo Alto's northern boundary. A pre -Pilot memorandum sum the pre- ot traffic conditions, goals of the Pilot, development of traffic calm nts, and p posed implementation and monitoring measures to evaluate effective the p sed treatments considering Pilot goals. This post - Pilot memorandum d ibes the ffic calming treatments implemented in August 2021, evaluates the of ed on ffic data collected in 2022 and a discussion of Covid-19 trends, and p ext steps for traffic calming in Crescent Park. Study Area The Crescent Park neighborhood is generally bound by San Francisquito Creek to the north, Newell Road the east, Channing Avenue to the south, and Middlefield Road to the west. Crescent Park is a residential neighborhood that spans the area between the City's commercial core, Downtown Palo Alto, to the west, and the US 101 corridor, providing vehicular access to much of the Bay Area, to the east. University Avenue, which serves as an arterial connection between Downtown Palo Alto and US 101, passes through the neighborhood. After the initial analysis and community outreach in 2019 and 2020, City Council selected the following intersections to implement traffic calming pilot implementation as shown in Figure 1: 1. University/West Crescent Drive 2. East Crescent Drive/Southwood Drive 3. Center Drive/Southwood Drive/Hamilton Avenue 60 South Market Street I Suite 700 1 San Jose, CA 951131(408)278-17001 Fax (408) 278-1717 www.fehrandpeers.com Packet Pg. 18 of 374 Salo Alto Avenue 0) m C) 3 � o Cs Cs 00 N C Or Co m U yO/e of N r SIC) 0 0 LLU Pilot Intersections 0 CITY OF PALO ALTO Item 4 a Attachment A - Crescent Park Q > r z 0cc aP1\ Neighborhood Post -Pilot Memo Oak Coin r w C CC y � O Jc 101 e m ay h° ,e s 0 m °aa a) 3 C Scofield Avenue m Woodland dland G�esoentgrNe 2 Avenue 00 s y2 v • ,L P P�e�Je w 0��F n o �rO 0 F O L s 3 N z 0 O -Se c oaO� G 0 CD a9 Hamilton Avenue 0°o e a ma Lincoln Avenue Q° Dana Avenue 2 Forest Avenue N Q O Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 7 Figure 1 Crescent Park Traffic Calming - Pilot Intersections Packet Pg. 19 of 374 Item 4 Chirag Panchal, Shahla Yazdy, and Ripon Bhatia AttachmentA-Crescent November 21, 2022 Park Neighborhood Post - Page 3 of 15 Pilot Memo Intersection Pilot Elements In August 2021, the City implemented Pilot intersection traffic calming treatments in the three study locations listed above. Pilot intersection treatment design elements are described and shown below. Full design drawings are provided in Appendix A. 1. University Avenue/West Crescent Drive: The Pilot installed flexible bollards and striping along eastbound bicycle lane to provide bicycle lane protection and discourage right - turning drivers from using the bicycle lane as a vehicular travel lane from which to merge into eastbound University Avenue traffic. 2. East Crescent Drive/Southwood Drive: The Pilot re gne ast Crescent Drive into a 90 -degree T -intersection using rubber curb. This i cluded imp menting all -way stop control to better manage movements through he intersection. 3. Center od Drive/Hamilton Avenue: The Pilot maintained existing roadway ali roviding an oval -shaped traffic circle in the center of the Hamilton Avenue / Cente ve intersection. The treatment also added a double -yellow centerline to separate traffic approaching the intersection on all roadways. The five -way stop control approaching the intersection was maintained per the existing configuration. Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 8 Packet Pg. 20 of 374 Item 4 Chirag Panchal, Shahla Yazdy, and Ripon Bhatia AttachmentA-Crescent November 21, 2022 Park Neighborhood Post - Page 4 of 15 Pilot Memo Data Collection To better understand pre- and post -Pilot traffic and circulation patterns, three types of traffic counts were collected throughout the study area before and after the Pilot in May 2019 and October 2022: • 24 -hour average and 85th- percentile speed counts, shown in Table 1 • Peak hour vehicle volume counts, shown in Table 2 • 24 -hour vehicular volume counts, shown in Table 3. Community engagement and pre -pilot observations indicated th cut -through traffic was most noticeable during weekday afternoons when higher eastboun vol es and longer queues on University Avenue made Hamilton Avenue an attractive alternate rout s such, an evaluation of eastbound PM peak traffic was also conducted shown Table 4. Percentage changes in vehicle speeds are presented in gur 2: Percent Change in Vehicle Speeds, 2019-2022 and percentage changes in vehicle vol es are shown in Figure 3. Raw data collection sheets are included in Appendi Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 9 Packet Pg. 21 of 374 Chirag Panchal, Shahla Yazdy, and Ripon Bhatia November 21, 2022 Page 5 of 15 Table 1: Study Area 24 -Hour Vehicle Speeds Item 4 Attachment A - Crescent Park Neighborhood Post -Pilot Memo ,1 1 University Avenue between Guinda Street EB 28.3 29.4 4% 32.7 35 7% and Seneca Street WB 26.2 28.7 10% 31.5 36.7 17% Hamilton Avenue between Guinda Street EB 24 23.8 -1% 27.7 27.8 0% 2 and Seneca Street WB 22.4 22.4 0% 26.6 26.8 1% Hamilton Avenue between Lincoln EB 26.6 25.4 -5% 31.2 30.5 -2% 3 Avenue and Chaucer Street WB 25.8 24 -7% 30.9 30.8 0% University Avenue between Lincoln EB 28.3 29.5 4% 35.2 35.1 0% 4 Avenue and Palm Street WB 31. 30.8 -2% 35.7 35.2 -1% Lincoln Avenue between University NB 21.1 .7 -7% 24.9 23.8 -4% 5 Avenue and Hamilton Avenue SB 22.6 20. -9% 26.6 24.4 -8% W. Crescent Drive between University NB 17.5 18.5 6% 23.9 23.4 -2% 6 Avenue and Hamilton Avenue S B 18.1 ° 15 /0 21.5 24.1 ° 12 /o Hamilton Avenue between W. Crescent 25. 23.5 -6% 29.6 28.3 -4% 7 Drive and Center Drive 23.9 21.2 -11% 29.2 26.7 -9% University Avenue between W. Crescent 2 28.5 1% 35.2 34.9 -1% 8 Drive and Center Drive W 28.2 29.4 ° 4% 33.1 34.8 ° 5 /o Center Drive between Universit NB 23.8 21.1 -11% 28.6 26.6 -7% 9 and Southwood Drive SB 23.7 20.9 -12% 28.2 26.1 -7% E. Crescent Drive between Univers 20.3 22.3 10% 26.3 27.3 4% 10 Avenue and Southwoo ve SB 20.4 20.4 0% 25.9 25.5 -2% UniversityAven scent EB 22.7 21.6 -5% 29.6 29.8 1% 11 Drive and W WB 20.4 24 18% 27.7 30.3 o 9/0 Source: Fehr & Peers, 2022 Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 10 Packet Pg. 22 of 374 Chirag Panchal, Shahla Yazdy, and Ripon Bhatia November 21, 2022 Page 6 of 15 Table 2: Study Area Peak Hour Vehicle Item 4 Attachment A - Crescent Park Neighborhood Post -Pilot Memo 11:00- EB 489 11:00-12:00 506 9:00-10:00 699 2:00-3:00 677 University Avenue between Guinda 12:00 1 Street and Seneca Street 10:00- 12:00- WB 781 9:00-10:00 718 12:00-1:00 627 621 11:00 1:00 10:00- Hamilton Avenue between Guinda EB 94 11:00-12:00 71 4:00-5:00 339 5:00-6:00 186 2 11:00 Street and Seneca Street WB 8:00-9:00 178 8:00-9:00 150 4:00-5:00 116 1:00-2:00 81 10:00 - Hamilton Avenue between Lincoln EB 73 9:00-10:00 52 4:00-5:00 312 5:00-6:00 161 3 11:00 Avenue and Chaucer Street WB 8:00-9:00 9 8:00-9:00 95 5:00-6:00 119 1:00-2:00 70 11:00- EB 540 :00-12:00 523 1:00-2:00 710 1:00-2:00 727 University Avenue between Lincoln 12:00 4 Avenue and Palm Street 10:00 12:00- WB 856 7:00 :00 725 12:00-1:00 665 638 11:0 1:00 Lincoln Avenue between University NB 8:00-9:00 169 8:00-9:00 120 7:00-8:00 113 4:00-5:00 127 5 Avenue and Hamilton Avenue SB 7:00-8:00 144 8:00-9:00 147 7:00-8:00 122 4:00-5:00 138 W. Crescent Drive between NB 0:00- 1 9:00-10:00 17 4:00-5:00 17 3:00-4:00 16 6 University Avenue and Hamilton Avenue SB 25 8:00-9:00 21 4:00-5:00 19 4:00-5:00 12 0- Hamilton Avenue between W. EB 67 9:00-10:00 40 4:00-5:00 344 5:00-6:00 131 7 1:00 Crescent Drive and Center Drive B 8: 9:01 101 8:00-9:00 70 5:00-6:00 96 1:00-2:00 54 11:00- EB 595 11:00-12:00 586 1:00-2:00 777 2:00-3:00 808 University Avenue between W. 12:00 8 Crescent Drive and Ce ive 10:00- 12:00- WB 947 8:00-9:00 862 12:00-1:00 761 662 11:00 1:00 NB 8:00-9:00 74 7:00-8:00 21 4:00-5:00 93 4:00-5:00 79 Center Drive b 9 Avenue and Sout SB 7:00-9:00 120 7:00-8:00 80 4:00-5:00 68 4:00-5:00 73 Source: Fehr & Peers, 2022 Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 11 Packet Pg. 23 of 374 Chirag Panchal, Shahla Yazdy, and Ripon Bhatia November 21, 2022 Page 7 of 15 Item 4 Attachment A - Crescent Park Neighborhood Post -Pilot Memo E. Crescent Drive between NB 8:00-9:00 52 8:00-9:00 69 3:00-4:00 157 4:00-5:00 91 10 University Avenue and Southwood Drive SB 7:00-8:00 37 7:00-8:00 34 1:00-2:00 21 4:00-5:00 27 11:00- 12:00- University Avenue between E. EB 637 8:00-9:00 913 1:00-2:00 851 674 12:00 1:00 11 Crescent Drive and Woodland 10:00- Avenue WB 1,017 11:00-12:00 639 12:00-1:00 814 2:00-3:00 848 11:00 Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 12 1 Packet Pg. 24 of 374 Chirag Panchal, Shahla Yazdy, and Ripon Bhatia November 21, 2022 Page 8 of 15 Table 3: Study Area 24 -Hour Vehicle Volumes Item 4 Attachment A - Crescent Park Neighborhood Post -Pilot Memo University Avenue between Guinda Street and EB 8,422 8,335 -87 -1% 1 Seneca Street WB 9,401 8,839 -562 o -6% Hamilton Avenue between Guinda Street and EB 1,955 1,403 -552 -28% 2 Seneca Street WB 1,475 1,033 -442 o -30% Hamilton Avenue between Lincoln Avenue and EB 1,630 1,103 -527 -32% 3 Chaucer Street WB 171 785 -386 -33% University Avenue between Lincoln Avenue and EB 8,540 8,773 233 3% 4 Palm Street WB 529 8,845 -684 o -7% Lincoln Avenue between University Avenue and NB 1, 1,503 23 2% 5 Hamilton Avenue 1,676 1,281 -395 -24% W. Crescent Drive between University Avenue and B 108 119 11 10% 6 Hamilton Avenue S 210 127 -83 -40% Hamilton Avenue between W. Crescent Drive and EB 1,881 897 -984 -52% 7 Center Drive WB 903 675 -228 -25% University Avenue between W. Crescent Drive and 9,566 10,019 453 5% 8 Center Drive WB 10,927 9,689 -1,238 -11% Center Drive between University A d NB 816 517 -299 -37% 9 Southwood Drive SB 796 714 -82 -10% E. Crescent Drive between Unive NB 921 651 -270 -29% 10 Southwood Drive SB 321 265 -56 ° -17% 11 University Avenue escent D e and EB 10,926 10,248 -678 -6% Woodland Ave WB 11,758 10,502 -1,256 -11% Source: Fehr & Peers, 2022 Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 13 1 Packet Pg. 25 of 374 Chirag Panchal, Shahla Yazdy, and Ripon Bhatia November 21, 2022 Page 9 of 15 Table 4: Study Area Eastbound PM Peak Hour Volumes' 1 University Avenue between Guinda Street and Seneca Street 2 Hamilton Avenue between Guinda Street and Seneca Street 3 Hamilton Avenue between Lincoln Avenue and Chaucer Street 4 University Avenue between Lincoln Avenue and Palm Street 5 Lincoln Avenue between University Avenue and Hamilton Avenu 6 W. Crescent Drive between University Avenue and Hamilton enue 7 Hamilton Avenue between W. Crescent Drive and Center Drive 8 University Avenue between W. Crescent Drive an 9 Center Drive between University A nd Southw Drive 10 E. Crescent Drive between Univ e and South ood Drive 11 University Avenue b Notes: 1. Eastbound P Source: Fehr & Peers, 2022 Crescen ive and Woodland Avenue Item 4 Attachment A - Crescent Park Neighborhood Post -Pilot Memo EB 1:00-2:00 661 2:00-3:00 677 16 WB 1:00-2:00 569 2:00-3:00 442 -127 EB 1:00-2:00 125 2:00-3:00 116 -9 WB 1:00-2:00 87 2:00-3:00 60 -27 EB 1:00-2:00 89 2:00-3:00 82 -7 WB 1:00-2:00 47 2:00-3:00 41 -6 EB 1:00-2:00 710 2:00-3:00 727 17 WB 1:00-2:00 607 2:00-3:00 452 -155 NB 1:00-2:00 92 2:00-3:00 106 14 1:00-2:00 76 2:00-3:00 89 13 NB 1:00-2:00 6 2:00-3:00 2 -4 SB 1:00-2:00 14 2:00-3:00 7 -7 EB 1:00-2:00 75 2:00-3:00 67 -8 WB 1:00-2:00 38 2:00-3:00 34 -4 EB 1:00-2:00 777 2:00-3:00 808 31 WB 1:00-2:00 669 2:00-3:00 492 -177 NB 1:00-2:00 56 2:00-3:00 44 -12 SB 1:00-2:00 32 2:00-3:00 63 31 NB 1:00-2:00 49 2:00-3:00 37 -12 SB 1:00-2:00 21 2:00-3:00 15 -6 EB 1:00-2:00 851 2:00-3:00 576 -275 WB 1:00-2:00 711 2:00-3:00 848 137 number of vehicles traveling eastbound on University Avenue in the pre -pilot and post -pilot scenarios. Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 14 1 Packet Pg. 26 of 374 <-Change in Average (85%) Speed � i Cities Change in Average (85%) Speed 4 CRESCENT PARK TRAFFIC CALMING 0 CITY 0= PALO ALTO PILOT IMPROVEMENT CONCEPT Figure 2: Study Area Change in Vehicle 2019 to 2022 Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 15 1 Packet Pg. 27 of 374 Item 4 oa -°,a 1I Attachment A - Crescent Park Neighborhood Post -Pilot Memo ' Palo /` 1AM Peak Volume: 1017. �Q9 Alto `' PM Peak Volume: 814 pos \ 24 -hr Volume: 11,758 ``/sy��(o�• / 1\\ v°naa aA e 1 -1� ' ° �� Menlo Park onm AM Peak Volume: 637 1'�� / ` — — 1 PM Peak Volume: 851,���o '� 1 24 -hr Volume: 10, 1 'k spy, ` 6' AM Peak Volume: 37 / ` �� cd'l PM Peak Volume: 21 // ' ire'. q ° 07 �� 24 -hr Volume: 321 / 3o e- � rUYY// PaloAlto Q eu µ>o\2d - W AM Peak Volume: 52 / P ea.��`1" PM Peak Volume: 157 aye p e' 24 -hr Volume: 921 AM Peak v eaHoe. u 1°o fA / 1 aa 0lpme: 856 c1 Univer; F $�ed�o° Ume. P� sYv4ve ``��TT r- AM Peak Volr�e: �a0 + �dp'ho\o.P k o PM Peak Volume: `; 0 5i� 24 -hr Volume: 796 I 24 hrak V em e, 71 j 2 -AM Peak Volume: 74 V01u 8,540 , ° uAM Peak Volume: 93 ° -p4-hr Volume: 816 AM Peak Volume: 119 - ro y o°a w Peak Volume: 101 _ r PM Peak Volume: 119 .° .__. _. __. b1B Wr44° TIP33%> e{� d) Hamilton Ave / Pi ro -294^^°Ar AW"W6:3073> h y 0 1 aiEr PM Peak Volume: 312 - 24 -hr Volume: 1,630 AM Peak Volume: 25 PM Peak Volume: 19 F Change in AM Peak (PM Peak) <24 -hr Total> Volume —' Change in AM Peak (PM Peak) <24 -hr Total> Volume _ _ _ Cities Note: Due to Covid-19 travel patterns, peak hours differed between 2019 and 2022. CITY OF PALO ALTO 24 -hr Volume: 210 AM Peak Volume: 144 AM Peak Volume: 12 PM Peak Volume: 122 PM Peak Volume: 17 24 -hr Volume: 1,676 24 -hr Volume: 108 AM Peak Volume: 169 PM Peak Volume: 113 rore,t Ave 24 -hr Volume: 1,480 Scoreldso> 0 4r i 4°x Pitmdn Ave Fi'eAve Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 16 Martn Ave 0 0.1 ,...\ 0.2 Miles CRESCENT PARK TRAFFIC CALMING PILOT IMPROVEMENT CONCEPT Figure 3: Study Area Change in Vehicle r 2019 to 2022 Packet Pg. 28 of 374 Item 4 Chirag Panchal, Shahla Yazdy, and Ripon Bhatia AttachmentA-Crescent November 21, 2022 Park Neighborhood Post November 12 of 15 Pilot Memo Discussion Traffic Volume While vehicle volumes have returned to some degree since the beginning of the Covid-1 9 pandemic, traffic patterns are still substantially altered since 2019. In particular, peak hour commute traffic has not returned to pre -pandemic volumes. In the study area, this is evident in the difference between pre- and post -Pilot counts for the neighborhood streets and on University Avenue. To address the ongoing altered travel patterns, the comparison b ween pre- and post- pilot volumes are based on the hour with the highest volumes tray ng stbound on University Avenue, which would be the time period in which cut -through traffic i most likely to occur. As presented in Table 4, this peak hour in the pre -pilot sc ario is 1:00-2:00 M and in the post -pilot scenario is 2:00-3:00 PM. Table 2 presents the worst se scenario for each segment in the pre - and post -pilot scenarios, on a segment -by -segment ba During this eastbound early afternoon pea higher (2-4%) in the post -pilot scenario, an streets are lower. In total, the volumes show t r, volumes on niversity Avenue are slightly n most of the studied neighborhood overal demand in the area has decreased, allowing slightly higher through n Univers Avenue with less congestion. University Avenue is generally accommodating and, alle ting the demand for drivers to seek alternate routes such as Hamilton Ave the Pilot project installations may cause some deterrent for the use of Hamilton Avenue East Crescent Drive, in particular reducing cut -through traffic and encouraging on of tr is on University Avenue, it cannot be concluded definitively that the Pilot i ecisions more than the overall reduction in traffic demand. With the reduced rough traffic potentially combined with the positive effects of the traffic calming pilot, n neighborhood streets are now very low, with bi-directional daily volumes generally less t 3,000 vehicles per day on Hamilton and Lincoln Avenues and even lower volumes on Center and Crescent Streets. Traffic Speed Despite these low volumes, 85th percentile speeds on neighborhood streets are still consistently near or above 25 mph, with some fluctuations but overall little change from pre -Pilot speeds. Speeds are highest on Hamilton Avenue where 85th percentile speeds are above 30mph between Lincoln Avenue and Chaucer Court. Locations with higher speeds are further from the project locations and are generally along longer blocks. Speed reductions in the vicinity of the Pilots are likely affected by the Pilot installations themselves. Some reductions in average speed were observed in other segments, but were likely unrelated to the specific Pilot implementations. In some cases, a reduction in cut -through traffic Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 17 Packet Pg. 29 of 374 Chirag Panchal, Shahla Yazdy, and Ripon Bhatia November 21, 2022 Page 13 of 15 Item 4 Attachment A - Crescent Park Neighborhood Post - Pilot Memo may correlate with a reduction in travel speeds regardless of cause as cut -through traffic is sometimes associated with more aggressive driver behavior. Conclusion While the traffic data is generally inconclusive on the effect of the Pilot because of the changes in traffic demand due to Covid-19, the traffic calming installations are still valuable in slowing turning speeds, organizing vehicle movements at complex intersections, and improving overall intersection safety. While sufficient safety data is not available to assess the effects of the project quantitatively, future community outreach should seek to determine hether neighbors are observing the desired effects and experiencing improved driver b avior at the study intersections. The Pilot included modifications at three intersections, th some of tho modifications specifically focused on drivers making certain move nts (i.e., the separate bikeway at University Avenue/W. Crescent Drive deterring undesir e b havior by drivers making northbound right -turn movements). Because of this focus, more widespread effect on travel speeds and traffic calming throughout the borhood was t expected to be observed as part of the Pilot. In general, no negative outcomes m the Pilo tallations were identified, and incorporation of permanent intersection impr hat redu intersection size, reduce turning speeds, and clarify right-of-way between kely to be beneficial. Additional mid -block and/or intersection traffic calming shou e considered to further reduce speeding, even when traffic volumes are low. Tr ing tre ments are most effective when they are implemented with enough freque hborho d to influence drivers more broadly, including providing greater deterr traffic on local streets. Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 18 Packet Pg. 30 of 374 Item 4 Chirag Panchal, Shahla Yazdy, and Ripon Bhatia AttachmentA-Crescent November 21, 2022 Park Neighborhood Post November 14 of 15 Pilot Memo Appendix A Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 19 Packet Pg. 31 of 374 WORK ORDER (SHEET 1 OF 3) West Crescent Drive and University Avenue 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE EXISTING BIKE LANE SYMBOL WITH PERSON PAVEMENT MARKING AND ARROW. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ONE (1) NEW BIKE LANE SYMBOL WITH PERSON PER CALTRANS A24C AND ONE (1) NEW BIKE LANE ARROW PER CALTRANS A24A 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL DETAIL 39 BIKE LANE WHITE STRIPING (100 LF TOTAL) AS INDICATED. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL FOUR (4) K-71 DELINEATORS POSTS, FLEXIBLE DELINEATOR POSTS, OR APPROVED EQUAL AS INDICATED. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH CITY ENGINEER OR THEIR DESIGNEE TO CONSTRUCT IDENTIFIED MODIFICATIONS TO BUS STOP. K-71 DELINEATOR DETAIL 01 IIIJS�MLAIcW1� fNLi�3,1JKclA�IE LU ik WERIFJI�GjT00�L�r�1JTA�) W �� llIS�AI�AIcW ° Whll?EL31AG NAI RPJ GAYA.JC<rA S.°ACJNG12i1 4)TAt) EXI�NGJ3�S�'OPT�J R • , �� I � RfILCAD, CU'WiIL CIDO,RU>yA�f WI?1d��A��aPERA`9J Iu3ECaI��V�V' N1fOCIHCA1 NS PR F \IVA RK 6 10' 2'4bJ .J UNIVERSITY AVENU W— ; INSTALL FOUR (4) K-71 DELINEATOR POSTS, FLEXIBLE DELINEATORS, OR N (n > ��OU i APPROVED EQUAL W j V Q REMOVE EXISTING BIKE LANE SYMBOL AND ARROW, INSTALL NEW BIKE LANE SYMBOL WITH PERSON PER CALTRANS A24C AND BIKE LANE ARROW PER CALTRANS A24A cahwam e• � _El flth GENERAL NOTES: Item 4 Attachment A - Crescent Park Neighborhood Post -Pilot Memo BOL WITH PERSON OW • K-71 DELINEATOR POST, FLEXIBLE DELINEATOR POST, OR APPROVED EQUAL EXISTING STOP LEGEND TO V�OBE PROTECTED IN PLACE 1. THIS PLAN PROVIDES RECOMMENDATIONS FOR LAYOUT OF STRIPING AND SIGNING ONLY. FIELD CONDITIONS ARE TO BE VERIFIED BY THE CITY ENGINEER OR THEIR DESIGNEE AND ADJUSTMENTS MAY BE NEEDED. FINAL STRIPING AND SIGNING PLACEMENT SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER OR THEIR DESIGNEE. 2. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE 2018 STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (CALTRANS) STANDARD PLANS, 2014 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (CA MUTCD), AND STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND APPLICABLE CITY OF PALO ALTO STANDARDS UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED. 3. CITY OF PALO ALTO SPECIFICATIONS SHALL SUPERSEDE THOSE OF THE CALTRANS STANDARD PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS WHERE DISCREPANCIES EXIST. 4. A LIST OF MATERIALS PROPOSED BY THE CONTRACTOR TO BE USED ON THE PROJECT SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY ENGINEER OR THEIR DESIGNEE FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO ORDERING ANY EQUIPMENT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SIGN PROOFS FOR ALL PROPOSED SIGNS AND OBTAIN CITY APPROVAL PRIOR TO ORDERING. 5. ALL SIGN CODES REFER TO THE 2014 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (CA MUTCD) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 6. SIGNS SHALL BE PLACED SUCH THAT THEY ARE NOT BLOCKED BY OTHER ROADWAY FEATURES AND ARE NOT IN A LOCATION THAT IMPEDES DRIVER SIGHT LINES. 7. ALL EXISTING SIGNING AND STRIPING SHALL REMAIN UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 8. CONTRACTOR MUST ENSURE THAT ROADWAYS AND BIKEWAYS ARE CLEAR OF OBSTRUCTIONS THAT COULD IMPEDE THE SAFE TRAVEL OF VEHICLES AND BICYCLES. 9. CURB RAMPS AND OTHER ACCESSIBLE ROUTES MUST BE VERIFIED IN THE FIELD FOR COMPLIANCE WITH ACCESSIBILITY GUIDELINES. 10. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING THAT THE MINIMUM SIGHT DISTANCE IS MET PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHOWN ON PLANS. IF THE SIGHT DISTANCE CANNOT BE MET, CONTRACTOR WILL NOTIFY ENGINEER PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES. 11. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO OBTAIN PERMIT NECESSARY TO PERFORM THE IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN IN THESE PLANS FROM THE APPROPRIATE AGENCIES AND TO COMPLY WITH THE AGENCIESREQUIREMENTS. THE CONTRACT MUST COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE NATIONAL, STATE, AND LOCAL LAWS. 12. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFICATION OF ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WHETHER OR NOT THEY ARE SHOWN ON THESE PLANS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT USA (800-642-2444) AT LEAST 48 HOURS BEFORE BEGINNING WORK. University Avenue / West Crescent Drive Bicycle Lane Protection Packet Pg. 32 of 374 WORK ORDER (SHEET 2 OF 3) ZIPPER DETAIL* RUBBER CURB NEW SIGNS Item4 1 DETAIL* Southwood Drive and East Crescent Drive - - NAttachmentA- crescent Park BE Neighborhood Post -Pilot Memo JACE 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL NEW 12 -INCH WHITE LIMIT LINE (29 LF TOTAL) AS INDICATED. PROPOSED NEW SIGN AND POST 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL TWO (2) NEW 'STOP" PAVEMENT LEGENDS AS INDICATED. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ONE (1) NEW R1-1 AND R1 -3P ON NEW TUBULAR STEEL POST. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ONE (1) NEW R1-1 AND R1 -3P ON NEW PAVEMENT -MOUNTED POST AS • ■ PROPOSED BLACK MODULAR ZIPPER INDICATED. Wl-8(L) RI -1 & RI -3P WITH WHITE RETROREFLECTIVE TOP 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ONE (1) NEW R1 -3P SIGN BELOW EXISTING R1-1. J (J (1) 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ONE (1) NEW W1 -8(L) SIGN ON NEW PAVEMENT -MOUNTED POST AS INDICATED. EXISTING STOP LEGEND TO 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL NEW DETAIL 27B EDGE STRIPE (98 LF) AS INDICATED. �<®���^ NEW BE PROTECTED IN PLACE 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ZICLA ZIPPER, RUBBERFORM ENGINEERED RUBBER CURB, OR APPROVED EQUAL. „ TRAFFIC \ USE BLACK WITH WHITE RETRO-REFLECTIVE ELEMENTS. IF ZIPPER IS USED, INSTALL WITH 11" GAP UNLESS A *� PROPOSED STOP PAVEMENT LEGEND *COLOR OF RETRO PATTERN OTHERWISE SHOWN (SEE ZIPPER DETAIL THIS SHEET AND ZICLA.COM/EN/ZIPPER-SYSTEMII. IF RUBBER CURB IS ELEMENT e AHEAD PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A24D USED, FIELD FORM TO RADII AS INDICATED ON PLANS (SEE RUBBER CURB DETAIL THIS SHEET AND TO REFLECTIVE BE AS INDICATED ELEMENT RUBBERFORM.COM/PRODUCT/ENGINEERED-RUBBER-CURB). IN PLANS AND NOTES. INDICATED. 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL THREE (3) A -FRAME BARRIERS WITH W23-2 SIGNS AND ORANGE FLAGS AS INDICATED. SIGNS SHALL REMAIN IN POSITION FOR 30 DAYS AFTER CONSTRUCTION. GENERAL NOTES: W23-2 ISSAl1 FRAN LI3,9RRR WWid W23-2 SC 17)RANGL'FtAGS "i)RAE6 ED 4)F 3tti DAYS Ills+ AILAIFW WALI KGWAN AIZW *y:*. PAUrEtl�r� A�.QUNrEI 't) N S AILAIE W �" A -10 -3.P yS GNS ON S/.2AVEUA�f IhISAILA `rRAc�3ARILR WP F W23-2SME. AN0%RA'NC -,- GS F'CR�E.RIA)DFv3tC DkYS TI ce ,. - (i rh• ^•�4�''1 >� II�S�AILAlEW�2iWCH \ bi fE H X44' / ' lIILNcJ12rSCR PAVLkT,(i ��� �! 'S UTkILY10 O RW' "I ------ yyy�, S IS AL. AIL 27 3 iLiC i RIP J ) WW'HH 7JCLAZ71 °ER,88E8 CNRB,.AER r cam. JEW IN9 AIL !LWA�-3P'IGNS 4 — . Oil _kcWA >489"R��ErL TQS� j --. — EIS11A G 5' _ 1 IflIS� AlkMRAE F NEW R1 -3P SIGN BARRIER WITH W232GAI.A IS�� AIL WA2- C ORANGAGS'tER W611e11R�hlJ_Nc17 PfhJ.©aOF.) DAYS LIF) S4XP' PAVkS L IT LGL iD li N Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 21 1. THIS PLAN PROVIDES RECOMMENDATIONS FOR LAYOUT OF STRIPING AND SIGNING ONLY. FIELD CONDITIONS ARE TO BE VERIFIED BY THE CITY ENGINEER OR THEIR DESIGNEE AND ADJUSTMENTS MAY BE NEEDED. FINAL STRIPING AND SIGNING PLACEMENT SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER OR THEIR DESIGNEE. 2. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE 2018 STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (CALTRANS) STANDARD PLANS, 2014 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (CA MUTCD), AND STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND APPLICABLE CITY OF PALO ALTO STANDARDS UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED. 3. CITY OF PALO ALTO SPECIFICATIONS SHALL SUPERSEDE THOSE OF THE CALTRANS STANDARD PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS WHERE DISCREPANCIES EXIST. 4. A LIST OF MATERIALS PROPOSED BY THE CONTRACTOR TO BE USED ON THE PROJECT SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY ENGINEER OR THEIR DESIGNEE FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO ORDERING ANY EQUIPMENT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SIGN PROOFS FOR ALL PROPOSED SIGNS AND OBTAIN CITY APPROVAL PRIOR TO ORDERING. 5. ALL SIGN CODES REFER TO THE 2014 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (CA MUTCD) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 6. SIGNS SHALL BE PLACED SUCH THAT THEY ARE NOT BLOCKED BY OTHER ROADWAY FEATURES AND ARE NOT IN A LOCATION THAT IMPEDES DRIVER SIGHT LINES. 7. ALL EXISTING SIGNING AND STRIPING SHALL REMAIN UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 8. CONTRACTOR MUST ENSURE THAT ROADWAYS AND BIKEWAYS ARE CLEAR OF OBSTRUCTIONS THAT COULD IMPEDE THE SAFE TRAVEL OF VEHICLES AND BICYCLES. 9. CURB RAMPS AND OTHER ACCESSIBLE ROUTES MUST BE VERIFIED IN THE FIELD FOR COMPLIANCE WITH ACCESSIBILITY GUIDELINES. 10. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING THAT THE MINIMUM SIGHT DISTANCE IS MET PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHOWN ON PLANS. IF THE SIGHT DISTANCE CANNOT BE MET, CONTRACTOR WILL NOTIFY ENGINEER PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES. 11. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO OBTAIN PERMIT NECESSARY TO PERFORM THE IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN IN THESE PLANS FROM THE APPROPRIATE AGENCIES AND TO COMPLY WITH THE AGENCIESREQUIREMENTS. THE CONTRACT MUST COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE NATIONAL, STATE, AND LOCAL LAWS. 12. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFICATION OF ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WHETHER OR NOT THEY ARE SHOWN ON THESE PLANS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT USA (800-642-2444) AT LEAST 48 HOURS BEFORE BEGINNING WORK. Southwood Drive / East Crescent Drive Curb Extension for Intersection Realignment Packet Pg. 33 of 374 WORK ORDER (SHEET 3 OF 3) SIGNS Hamilton Avenue / Center Drive / Southwood Drive CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL NEW 6" DOUBLE YELLOW LINE (174 LF) AS INDICATED. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL NEW 6" SINGLE YELLOW LINE (220 LF) AS INDICATED. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL FOUR (4) NEW R6 -5P AND OM2-1H ON NEW PAVEMENT MOUNTED POST AS INDICATED. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ZICLA ZIPPER, RUBBERFORM ENGINEERED RUBBER CURB, OR APPROVED EQUAL. USE BLACK WITH YELLOW RETRO-REFLECTIVE ELEMENTS. IF ZIPPER IS USED, INSTALL WITH 11" GAP UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN (SEE ZIPPER DETAIL ON SHEET 2 AND ZICLA.COM/EN/ZIPPER-SYSTEM. IF RUBBER CURB IS USED, FIELD FORM TO RADII AS INDICATED ON PLANS (SEE RUBBER CURB DETAIL ON SHEET 2 AND RUBBERFORM.COM/PRODUCT/ENGINEERED-RUBBER-CURB). CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL FIVE (5) A -FRAME BARRIERS WITH W23-2 SIGNS AND ORANGE FLAGS AS INDICATED. SIGNS SHALL REMAIN IN POSITION FOR 30 DAYS AFTER CONSTRUCTION. INSTALL A -FRAME BARRIER - WITH W23-2 SIGN AND ORANGE FLAGS FOR • PERIOD OF 30 DAYS INSTALL NEW 6" DOUBLE r YELLOW LINE (50 LF) EXISTING R1-1 AND R1 -3P SIGN TO REMAIN NST AtL QCK 36WL)RAFE C CLEClL StC-J'QTt4. WV HAMI! AWN A'o IiNL E NS AILCLW 6 tiU&l E YFLl�W11Nc1)2kf AimAI�k) LS llIG U&lc Y81sQWllhlc EXISTING R1-1 AND Jj R1 -3P TO REMAIN INSTALL NEW 6" SINGLE YELLOW LINE (255 LF TOTAL) LNSAILI L1N 6iU&lL Yr7JAD1N11Nc1i0 L+r) Item 4 Attachment A - Crescent Park Neighborhood Post -Pilot Memo TR � PROPOSED SIGN [o 0 0]■ PATTERN AHEAD / ■ PROPOSED BLACK MODULAR ZIPPER WITH YELLOW RETROREFLECTIVE TOP 0M2 -1H R'-1 & Ri-3P 3o -HP W23-2 EXISTING STOP LEGEND GENERAL NOTES: I r > OOO INSTALL A -FRAME BARRIER WITH W23-2 SIGN AND ORANGE FLAGS FOR PERIOD OF 30 DAYS INSTALL NEW 6" DOUBLE YELLOW LINE (50 LF) EXISTING R1-1 AND R1 3P' SIGN TO REMAIN INSTALL NEW R6 -5P i AND OM2-1H EXI�STINGR1-1 AND R1 -3P SIGN TO REMAIN fj INSTALL A -FRAME HqM� BARRIER WITH W23-2 1 'ON SIGN AND ORANGE FLAGS FOR PERIOD OF 30 DAYS 11115TALEW 6 U&lrcLlL)W LIhIc1i2k-)� GRII� fNl� EXI��NG�U&lc�'tLJ�WJJNc W H > =G-1 Z U INSTALL A -FRAME BARRIER WITH W23-2 SIGN AND ORANGE FLAGS FOR PERIOD OF 30 DAYS 1. THIS PLAN PROVIDES RECOMMENDATIONS FOR LAYOUT OF STRIPING AND SIGNING ONLY. FIELD CONDITIONS ARE TO BE VERIFIED BY THE CITY ENGINEER OR THEIR DESIGNEE AND ADJUSTMENTS MAY BE NEEDED. FINAL STRIPING AND SIGNING PLACEMENT SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER OR THEIR DESIGNEE. 2. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE 2018 STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (CALTRANS) STANDARD PLANS, 2014 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (CA MUTCD), AND STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND APPLICABLE CITY OF PALO ALTO STANDARDS UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED. 3. CITY OF PALO ALTO SPECIFICATIONS SHALL SUPERSEDE THOSE OF THE CALTRANS STANDARD PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS WHERE DISCREPANCIES EXIST. 4. A LIST OF MATERIALS PROPOSED BY THE CONTRACTOR TO BE USED ON THE PROJECT SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY ENGINEER OR THEIR DESIGNEE FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO ORDERING ANY EQUIPMENT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SIGN PROOFS FOR ALL PROPOSED SIGNS AND OBTAIN CITY APPROVAL PRIOR TO ORDERING. 5. ALL SIGN CODES REFER TO THE 2014 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (CA MUTCD) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 6. SIGNS SHALL BE PLACED SUCH THAT THEY ARE NOT BLOCKED BY OTHER ROADWAY FEATURES AND ARE NOT IN A LOCATION THAT IMPEDES DRIVER SIGHT LINES. 7. ALL EXISTING SIGNING AND STRIPING SHALL REMAIN UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 8. CONTRACTOR MUST ENSURE THAT ROADWAYS AND BIKEWAYS ARE CLEAR OF OBSTRUCTIONS THAT COULD IMPEDE THE SAFE TRAVEL OF VEHICLES AND BICYCLES. 9. CURB RAMPS AND OTHER ACCESSIBLE ROUTES MUST BE VERIFIED IN THE FIELD FOR COMPLIANCE WITH ACCESSIBILITY GUIDELINES. 10. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING THAT THE MINIMUM SIGHT DISTANCE IS MET PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHOWN ON PLANS. IF THE SIGHT DISTANCE CANNOT BE MET, CONTRACTOR WILL NOTIFY ENGINEER PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES. 11. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO OBTAIN PERMIT NECESSARY TO PERFORM THE IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN IN THESE PLANS FROM THE APPROPRIATE AGENCIES AND TO COMPLY WITH THE AGENCIES' REQUIREMENTS. THE CONTRACT MUST COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE NATIONAL, STATE, AND LOCAL LAWS. 12. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFICATION OF ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WHETHER OR NOT THEY ARE SHOWN ON THESE PLANS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT USA (800-642-2444) AT LEAST 48 HOURS BEFORE BEGINNING WORK. Hamilton Avenue / Center Drive / Southwood Drive Traffic Circle Pilot [ • Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 22 11 Packet Pg. 34 of 374 Item 4 Chirag Panchal, Shahla Yazdy, and Ripon Bhatia Attachm Crescent November 21, 2022 Park Neighborhood Post November 15 of 15 Pilot Memo Appendix B Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 23 Packet Pg. 35 of 374 Item 4 st-8959 Page 1 A Attachment A - Crescent Traffic Data Service -- San Jose, CA Park Neighborhood Post - Speed Report Pilot Memo CustomList-8959 -- English (ENU) Datasets: Site: [9] CENTER DR BT UNIVERSITY AVE AND HAMILTON AVE Data type: Axle sensors - Paired (Class/Speed/Count) Profile: Included classes: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 Speed range: 0 - 100 mph. Direction: North (bound), P = North, Lane = 0-16 Name: TDS Scheme: Vehicle classification (Scheme F) Units: Non metric (ft, mi, ft/s, mph, Ib, ton) Column Leaend: 0 [Time] 1 [Total] 2 [Vbin] 3 [vPace] 4 [Pace%] 5 [Mean] 6 [Vpp] 24 -hour time (0000 - 2359) Number in time step Speed bin totals Speed at start of pace Percent in pace Average speed Percentile speed * Tuesday, October 4, 2022 Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin vPace Pace% Mean Vpp <-- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 10 10 85 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 100 0000 3 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.3 66.67 23.3 - 0100 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.0 100.0 23.3 - 0200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0300 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 100.0 8.0 - 0400 5 0 0 0 1 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.5 80.00 23.1 - 0500 3 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.4 100.0 24.8 - 0600 14 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.4 92.86 27.7 31.2 0700 21 0 1 6 4 7 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.3 57.14 19.0 26.7 0800 10 0 0 4 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.3 100.0 17.0 - 0900 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.7 100.0 12.8 - 1000 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 100.0 6.3 - 1100 17 0 0 0 10 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.5 94.12 19.7 24.1 1200 31 0 0 1 12 12 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.0 77.42 20.9 26.2 1300 36 0 2 5 9 15 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.9 69.44 19.7 24.9 1400 44 0 2 9 8 18 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.5 59.09 19.5 25.3 1500 74 0 1 11 11 35 13 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.0 68.92 21.4 25.7 1600 79 0 2 11 23 24 14 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.6 68.35 20.8 26.4 1700 60 0 0 10 16 19 11 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.1 63.33 21.1 27.1 1800 36 0 0 4 9 12 6 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.8 63.89 22.7 30.1 1900 31 0 0 3 10 10 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.5 67.74 21.3 27.9 2000 19 0 0 2 0 13 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.3 89.47 22.9 26.1 2100 14 0 0 0 3 5 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.2 85.71 23.9 28.8 2200 9 0 0 1 1 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.7 77.78 23.0 - 2300 5 0 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.2 100.0 21.7 - 07-19 411 0 9 63 106 149 64 16 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.8 64.23 20.6 26.2 06-22 489 0 9 68 119 180 86 23 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.7 64.21 21.0 26.5 06-00 503 0 9 69 120 188 90 23 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.7 64.61 21.1 26.5 00-00 517 0 10 69 122 194 94 24 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.7 64.60 21.1 26.6 Peak step 16:00 (79) AM Peak step 7:00 (21) PM Peak step 16:00 (79) Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 24 Packet Pg. 36 of 374 * Wednesday, October 5, 2022 Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin <-- 0 5 10 5 10 15 Vbin 15 20 Vbin 20 25 Vbin 25 30 Vbin 30 35 Vbin 35 40 Vbin 40 45 Vbin 45 50 Vbin 50 55 Vbin 55 60 Vbin 60 65 Vbin 65 70 Item 4 Attachment A - Crescent Park Neighborhood Post- Pilot Memo st-8959 Page 2 e% Mean Vpp 10 85 0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0100 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6.6 100.0 16.5 - 0200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0300 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 50.00 18.6 - 0400 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5.0 50.00 20.2 - 0500 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.0 100.0 27.0 - 0600 19 0 0 0 0 7 10 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.1 89.47 26.1 30.0 0700 41 0 1 0 5 18 12 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.9 78.05 24.3 29.3 0800 53 0 0 7 12 23 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.4 67.92 21.4 26.3 0900 37 0 3 6 8 12 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.0 62.16 19.5 27.0 1000 35 0 1 2 7 17 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.6 80.00 22.0 26.8 1100 39 1 0 3 17 11 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.6 76.92 20.7 25.2 1200 52 0 1 9 19 13 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.3 67.31 19.8 27.1 1300 48 0 2 4 11 24 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.3 75.00 20.7 25.5 1400 34 0 1 3 7 15 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.3 79.41 20.9 25.8 1500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 1600 3 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.9 66.67 21.2 - 1700 65 0 0 7 16 28 13 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.9 84.62 21.5 26.0 1800 47 0 1 5 13 15 11 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.1 63.83 21.4 27.6 1900 36 0 0 1 7 20 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.1 77.78 22.5 27.4 2000 25 0 0 1 4 13 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.3 84.00 22.8 27.8 2100 16 0 0 0 2 8 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.3 87.50 23.3 26.7 2200 14 0 0 2 3 6 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.5 71.43 22.3 30.4 2300 5 0 0 1 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.2 80.00 24.1 - 07-19 454 1 10 47 115 178 90 12 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.6 70.26 21.2 26.3 06-22 550 1 10 49 128 226 118 15 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.4 71.27 21.6 26.6 06-00 569 1 10 52 131 233 122 16 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.4 70.47 21.6 26.7 00-00 576 1 11 53 132 233 125 17 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.4 69.97 21.6 26.7 Peak step 17:00 (65) AM Peak step 8:00 (53) PM Peak step 17:00 (65) * Thursday, October 6, 2022 Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin vPace Pace% Mean Vpp <-- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 10 10 85 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 100 0000 3 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 17.0 100.0 24.8 - 0100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0300 4 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.9 75.00 19.7 - 0400 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.9 100.0 23.2 - 0500 5 0 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.7 100.0 24.9 - 0600 14 0 0 0 1 5 6 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.5 85.71 25.8 31.0 0700 54 0 0 2 17 17 13 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.1 68.52 22.5 28.8 0800 61 0 1 6 17 28 8 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.4 73.77 20.8 25.2 0900 47 1 1 4 13 21 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.4 80.85 20.5 25.3 1000 34 0 0 2 11 13 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.1 76.47 21.3 26.6 1100 40 0 0 2 14 15 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.5 72.50 21.4 26.9 1200 39 0 0 3 10 18 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.7 74.36 21.8 26.8 1300 47 0 2 2 18 14 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.8 74.47 20.8 25.8 1400 48 0 0 3 13 18 12 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.5 77.08 22.4 27.8 1500 79 0 2 5 23 34 14 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.6 75.95 21.0 26.3 1600 72 0 0 2 14 31 21 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.5 80.56 23.2 27.4 1700 57 0 2 8 17 16 10 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.9 63.16 20.8 27.7 1800 47 0 1 6 12 20 7 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.9 72.34 20.7 25.2 1900 34 0 0 1 10 14 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.0 73.53 22.1 27.7 2000 32 0 0 2 4 13 9 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.7 75.00 24.0 28.8 2100 19 1 0 0 7 4 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.6 78.95 21.6 26.4 2200 10 0 1 0 2 4 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.5 70.00 22.4 - 2300 7 0 0 0 0 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.9 100.0 25.2 - 07-19 625 1 9 45 179 245 128 13 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.6 69.44 21.5 26.6 06-22 724 2 9 48 201 281 154 22 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.6 69.89 21.7 26.7 06-00 741 2 10 48 203 288 160 23 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.6 69.77 21.7 26.8 00-00 755 2 11 48 204 294 166 23 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.2 69.80 21.8 26.8 Peak step 15:00 (79) AM Peak step 8:00 (61) PM Peak step 15:00 (79) * Grand Total Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin vPace Pace% Mean Vpp <-- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 10 10 85 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 100 -- 1848 3 32 170 458 721 385 64 13 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.6 68.07 21.5 26.7 Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 25 Packet Pg. 37 of 374 Item 4 st-8960 Page 1 A Attachment A - Crescent Traffic Data Service -- San Jose, CA Park Neighborhood Post - Speed Report Pilot Memo CustomList-8960 -- English (ENU) Datasets: Site: [9] CENTER DR BT UNIVERSITY AVE AND HAMILTON AVE Data type: Axle sensors - Paired (Class/Speed/Count) Profile: Included classes: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 Speed range: 0 - 100 mph. Direction: South (bound), P = North, Lane = 0-16 Name: TDS Scheme: Vehicle classification (Scheme F) Units: Non metric (ft, mi, ft/s, mph, Ib, ton) Column Leaend: 0 [Time] 1 [Total] 2 [Vbin] 3 [vPace] 4 [Pace%] 5 [Mean] 6 [Vpp] 24 -hour time (0000 - 2359) Number in time step Speed bin totals Speed at start of pace Percent in pace Average speed Percentile speed * Tuesday, October 4, 2022 Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin vPace Pace% Mean Vpp <-- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 10 10 85 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 100 0000 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.8 100.0 27.7 - 0100 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.5 100.0 23.3 - 0200 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.7 100.0 20.5 - 0300 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.8 100.0 18.2 - 0400 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.2 100.0 23.1 - 0500 6 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.5 83.33 28.3 - 0600 13 0 0 0 2 1 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.8 76.92 25.9 32.3 0700 80 0 1 9 16 43 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.4 78.75 21.0 24.9 0800 66 0 6 19 25 14 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.0 69.70 16.5 22.6 0900 41 1 6 14 17 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.4 80.49 14.4 19.2 1000 30 0 4 8 7 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.5 66.67 16.7 22.7 1100 35 0 0 9 8 14 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.2 65.71 19.7 24.8 1200 37 0 1 7 10 12 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.3 64.86 19.9 26.1 1300 38 0 0 1 15 20 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.5 92.11 20.7 24.0 1400 63 0 0 1 8 37 15 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.6 87.30 23.1 26.4 1500 48 0 0 5 14 18 9 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.1 75.00 21.5 26.5 1600 73 0 1 3 14 28 21 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.2 72.60 23.1 28.1 1700 50 0 1 1 10 18 17 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.9 78.00 23.2 27.6 1800 51 0 1 4 10 25 8 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.4 74.51 22.1 27.6 1900 32 0 0 2 8 12 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.3 81.25 22.1 26.1 2000 18 0 0 1 5 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.7 88.89 22.6 27.4 2100 16 0 0 2 3 6 3 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 15.3 68.75 23.1 28.9 2200 7 0 0 0 2 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.1 85.71 23.9 - 2300 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.1 100.0 25.4 - 07-19 612 1 21 81 154 242 95 16 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.2 66.01 20.5 25.8 06-22 691 1 21 86 172 267 120 21 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 16.2 66.57 20.8 26.0 06-00 700 1 21 86 174 269 125 21 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 16.2 66.57 20.8 26.1 00-00 714 1 21 86 176 277 127 22 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 16.2 66.81 20.9 26.1 Peak step 7:00 (80) AM Peak step 7:00 (80) PM Peak step 16:00 (73) Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 26 Packet Pg. 38 of 374 * Wednesday, October 5, 2022 Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin <-- 0 5 10 5 10 15 Vbin 15 20 Vbin 20 25 Vbin 25 30 Vbin 30 35 Vbin 35 40 Vbin 40 45 Vbin 45 50 Vbin 50 55 Vbin 55 60 Vbin 60 65 Vbin 65 70 Item 4 Attachment A - Crescent Park Neighborhood Post- Pilot Memo st-8960 Page 2 e% Mean Vpp 10 85 0000 3 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.8 100.0 21.5 - 0100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0200 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.9 100.0 25.7 - 0300 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.4 100.0 22.8 - 0400 3 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.3 100.0 23.7 - 0500 5 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.6 100.0 26.1 - 0600 11 0 0 0 1 1 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.0 90.91 26.7 31.2 0700 92 0 0 1 8 36 30 12 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.7 77.17 25.6 30.4 0800 48 0 0 3 7 25 11 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.2 79.17 22.8 25.9 0900 53 0 2 7 22 13 7 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.1 75.47 20.1 26.7 1000 37 0 1 5 12 13 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.0 72.97 19.7 25.2 1100 46 0 1 8 14 14 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.1 71.74 19.6 25.8 1200 63 0 1 4 23 23 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.3 76.19 20.9 26.0 1300 44 0 0 4 16 14 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.0 72.73 21.0 26.1 1400 25 0 1 4 5 6 8 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.6 68.00 21.2 27.3 1500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 1600 6 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.2 83.33 17.2 - 1700 57 0 0 6 15 22 13 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.3 78.95 21.3 25.6 1800 44 0 0 4 11 15 13 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.0 77.27 22.2 26.6 1900 25 0 1 4 7 10 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.4 72.00 20.3 25.3 2000 18 0 1 0 4 8 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.8 83.33 21.4 26.1 2100 12 0 0 0 4 6 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.7 83.33 22.3 27.9 2200 7 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.5 100.0 22.1 - 2300 5 0 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.5 100.0 23.0 - 07-19 515 0 6 48 135 183 115 19 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.6 67.77 21.8 26.7 06-22 581 0 8 52 151 208 129 24 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.9 67.64 21.8 26.7 06-00 593 0 8 52 153 217 130 24 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.9 67.96 21.8 26.7 00-00 607 0 8 52 156 220 138 24 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.0 68.37 21.9 26.7 Peak step 7:00 (92) AM Peak step 7:00 (92) PM Peak step 12:00 (63) * Thursday, October 6, 2022 Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin vPace Pace% Mean Vpp <-- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 10 10 85 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 100 0000 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.6 100.0 25.8 - 0100 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.8 100.0 24.2 - 0200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0300 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.3 100.0 19.1 - 0400 4 0 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7.9 75.00 18.5 - 0500 5 0 0 0 1 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.8 80.00 26.3 - 0600 14 0 0 0 2 3 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.0 85.71 24.8 28.9 0700 97 0 0 4 20 38 26 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.9 73.20 23.1 28.1 0800 79 0 1 6 32 24 14 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.1 70.89 20.6 26.5 0900 49 2 2 8 19 13 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.2 69.39 17.9 24.0 1000 29 0 1 3 8 8 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.9 62.07 21.1 29.0 1100 35 0 0 3 14 8 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.7 68.57 21.0 26.6 1200 49 0 0 1 13 21 12 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.9 77.55 22.3 26.7 1300 51 0 1 9 10 13 13 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.5 58.82 21.7 27.8 1400 44 0 0 3 10 16 13 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.0 70.45 22.8 28.5 1500 47 1 2 4 20 14 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.8 72.34 19.1 24.4 1600 53 0 1 3 14 20 14 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.4 79.25 21.9 26.3 1700 54 0 0 1 12 20 17 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.6 75.93 23.3 28.3 1800 32 0 0 1 4 20 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.8 87.50 22.3 25.6 1900 35 0 0 1 3 15 12 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.7 82.86 24.3 28.9 2000 23 0 0 3 3 9 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.7 69.57 22.5 28.1 2100 17 0 0 0 5 6 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.4 70.59 22.8 28.3 2200 19 0 0 0 4 13 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.9 89.47 22.0 24.7 2300 7 0 0 0 2 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.7 85.71 22.8 - 07-19 619 3 8 46 176 215 140 30 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.2 67.37 21.5 27.1 06-22 708 3 8 50 189 248 170 39 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.2 67.66 21.8 27.3 06-00 734 3 8 50 195 264 173 40 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.4 68.39 21.8 27.2 00-00 748 3 8 51 199 266 178 42 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.4 68.32 21.8 27.3 Peak step 7:00 (97) AM Peak step 7:00 (97) PM Peak step 17:00 (54) * Grand Total Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin vPace Pace% Mean Vpp <-- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 10 10 85 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 100 -- 2069 4 37 189 531 763 443 88 13 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 17.0 67.47 21.5 26.6 Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 27 Packet Pg. 39 of 374 Item 4 st-8955 Page 1 A Attachment A - Crescent Traffic Data Service -- San Jose, CA Park Neighborhood Post- ___________________ Speed Report Pilot Memo CustomList-8955 -- English (ENU) Datasets: Site: [7] CRESCENT DR BT HAMILTON AVE AND UNIVERSITY AVE Data type: Axle sensors - Paired (Class/Speed/Count) Profile: Included classes: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 Speed range: 0 - 100 mph. Direction: North (bound), P = North, Lane = 0-16 Name: TDS Scheme: Vehicle classification (Scheme F) Units: Non metric (ft, mi, ft/s, mph, Ib, ton) Column Leaend: 0 [Time] 1 [Total] 2 [Vbin] 3 [vPace] 4 [Pace%] 5 [Mean] 6 [Vpp] 24 -hour time (0000 - 2359) Number in time step Speed bin totals Speed at start of pace Percent in pace Average speed Percentile speed * Tuesday, October 4, 2022 Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin vPace Pace% Mean Vpp <-- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 10 10 85 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 100 0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0200 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 100.0 10.0 - 0300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0400 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0500 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.1 100.0 24.8 - 0600 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.8 100.0 12.6 - 0700 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.4 100.0 22.3 - 0800 7 0 0 1 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.5 85.71 19.4 - 0900 17 0 1 6 5 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.4 76.47 17.4 22.2 1000 9 0 0 0 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.0 100.0 18.4 - 1100 11 0 0 1 4 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.4 90.91 19.8 23.2 1200 11 0 2 3 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.3 81.82 14.8 19.7 1300 7 0 0 1 3 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.1 71.43 20.5 - 1400 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.5 100.0 20.7 - 1500 7 0 1 2 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.6 57.14 19.2 - 1600 9 0 0 0 2 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.0 88.89 21.2 - 1700 16 0 1 2 2 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.7 81.25 19.4 23.8 1800 4 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.4 75.00 13.3 - 1900 5 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.4 100.0 20.0 - 2000 4 0 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.7 75.00 17.3 - 2100 3 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.6 100.0 19.7 - 2200 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.2 100.0 23.0 - 2300 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 100.0 8.2 - 07-19 101 1 5 17 36 35 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.5 71.29 18.6 23.3 06-22 114 1 6 18 43 39 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.5 72.81 18.6 23.3 06-00 116 1 7 18 43 40 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.5 72.41 18.5 23.3 00-00 119 1 7 19 43 41 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.5 71.43 18.5 23.4 Peak step 9:00 (17) AM Peak step 9:00 (17) PM Peak step 17:00 (16) Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 28 Packet Pg. 40 of 374 Item 4 st-8955 Page 2 * Wednesday, October 5, 2022 Attachment A - Crescent Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Park Neighborhood Post- e% Mean Vpp <-- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 I 110 85 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 Pilot Memo 0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0400 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0500 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.2 100.0 25.1 - 0600 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0700 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.4 100.0 18.3 - 0800 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.4 100.0 21.4 - 0900 4 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.2 100.0 14.5 - 1000 5 0 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6.7 100.0 13.7 - 1100 5 0 0 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.5 80.00 19.1 - 1200 11 0 1 1 5 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.8 72.73 18.9 25.3 1300 4 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.1 75.00 19.6 - 1400 10 0 1 2 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.4 90.00 17.7 - 1500 10 0 0 3 1 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.5 70.00 20.2 - 1600 12 0 0 3 2 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.5 75.00 20.0 25.0 1700 5 0 0 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.0 80.00 18.8 - 1800 5 0 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.0 80.00 16.9 - 1900 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 2000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 2100 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.9 100.0 22.7 - 2200 3 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5.6 66.67 16.8 - 2300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 07-19 74 0 5 16 22 26 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.5 67.57 18.5 24.6 06-22 75 0 5 16 22 27 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.5 68.00 18.5 24.6 06-00 78 0 5 17 23 28 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.5 66.67 18.5 24.5 00-00 79 0 5 17 23 28 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.5 67.09 18.5 24.6 Peak step 16:00 (12) AM Peak step 10:00 (5) PM Peak step 16:00 (12) * Thursday, October 6, 2022 Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin vPace Pace% Mean Vpp <-- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 10 10 85 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 100 0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0400 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0500 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5.9 100.0 15.8 - 0600 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.3 100.0 25.2 - 0700 4 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 50.00 14.4 - 0800 4 0 0 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.1 75.00 19.9 - 0900 9 0 0 2 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.2 77.78 19.1 - 1000 4 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.7 100.0 17.5 - 1100 6 0 1 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.7 83.33 15.0 - 1200 4 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.5 100.0 18.6 - 1300 6 0 0 2 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.6 83.33 17.5 - 1400 13 0 1 8 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7.8 76.92 14.9 24.8 1500 10 0 0 1 1 5 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.3 80.00 22.1 - 1600 11 0 0 2 2 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.5 81.82 20.9 25.3 1700 10 0 5 0 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6.0 60.00 15.8 - 1800 8 0 1 1 2 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.3 75.00 18.3 - 1900 4 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.0 100.0 19.9 - 2000 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 100.0 9.1 - 2100 3 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.8 100.0 21.2 - 2200 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.2 100.0 23.2 - 2300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 07-19 89 0 10 21 18 29 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.3 59.55 18.0 24.6 06-22 98 0 11 21 22 31 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.7 60.20 18.1 24.8 06-00 100 0 11 21 22 32 13 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.7 61.00 18.2 24.8 00-00 101 0 11 21 23 32 13 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.7 60.40 18.2 24.8 Peak step 14:00 (13) AM Peak step 9:00 (9) PM Peak step 14:00 (13) * Grand Total Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin vPace Pace% Mean Vpp <-- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 10 10 85 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 100 -- 299 1 23 57 89 101 26 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.5 65.22 18.4 24.4 Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 29 Packet Pg. 41 of 374 Item 4 st-8956 Page 1 A Attachment A - Crescent Traffic Data Service -- San Jose, CA Park Neighborhood Post - Speed Report Pilot Memo CustomList-8956 -- English (ENU) Datasets: Site: [7] CRESCENT DR BT HAMILTON AVE AND UNIVERSITY AVE Data type: Axle sensors - Paired (Class/Speed/Count) Profile: Included classes: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 Speed range: 0 - 100 mph. Direction: South (bound), P = North, Lane = 0-16 Name: TDS Scheme: Vehicle classification (Scheme F) Units: Non metric (ft, mi, ft/s, mph, Ib, ton) Column Leaend: 0 [Time] 1 [Total] 2 [Vbin] 3 [vPace] 4 [Pace%] 5 [Mean] 6 [Vpp] 24 -hour time (0000 - 2359) Number in time step Speed bin totals Speed at start of pace Percent in pace Average speed Percentile speed * Tuesday, October 4, 2022 Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin vPace Pace% Mean Vpp <-- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 10 10 85 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 100 0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0300 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.9 100.0 22.7 - 0400 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0600 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.5 50.00 21.5 - 0700 9 0 0 1 2 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.0 88.89 20.4 - 0800 21 0 0 1 6 10 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.2 80.95 21.9 26.8 0900 8 0 0 2 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.8 87.50 17.2 - 1000 8 0 0 5 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.1 87.50 15.0 - 1100 6 0 0 2 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.4 100.0 17.8 - 1200 9 0 0 3 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.4 100.0 16.4 - 1300 10 0 0 2 4 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.6 70.00 18.7 - 1400 7 0 0 2 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.4 85.71 16.3 - 1500 10 0 2 5 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.4 70.00 14.7 - 1600 12 0 0 1 5 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.6 91.67 20.4 26.2 1700 8 0 1 2 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.1 75.00 17.1 - 1800 7 0 1 0 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.2 85.71 17.9 - 1900 3 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.1 100.0 15.3 - 2000 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 100.0 4.4 - 2100 4 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.2 100.0 16.6 - 2200 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.6 100.0 11.4 - 2300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 07-19 115 0 4 26 38 37 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.2 66.09 18.3 24.2 06-22 125 1 4 30 41 38 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.3 65.60 18.1 24.2 06-00 126 1 4 31 41 38 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.3 65.08 18.1 24.1 00-00 127 1 4 31 41 39 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.3 64.57 18.1 24.1 Peak step 8:00 (21) AM Peak step 8:00 (21) PM Peak step 16:00 (12) Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 30 Packet Pg. 42 of 374 * Wednesday, October 5, 2022 Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin <-- 0 5 10 5 10 15 Vbin 15 20 Vbin 20 25 Vbin 25 30 Vbin 30 35 Vbin 35 40 Vbin 40 45 Vbin 45 50 Vbin 50 55 Vbin 55 60 Vbin 60 65 Vbin 65 70 Item 4 Attachment A - Crescent Park Neighborhood Post- Pilot Memo st-8956 Page 2 e% Mean Vpp 10 85 0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0200 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.4 100.0 20.2 - 0300 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 100.0 5.4 - 0400 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0600 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.5 100.0 22.3 - 0700 5 0 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.2 100.0 23.3 - 0800 12 0 0 1 5 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.2 83.33 19.7 25.1 0900 6 0 1 2 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5.8 66.67 18.1 - 1000 5 0 1 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.2 80.00 17.2 - 1100 10 0 1 2 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.7 80.00 16.2 - 1200 13 0 1 4 2 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.1 92.31 17.5 21.7 1300 11 0 1 1 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.8 81.82 16.5 20.5 1400 9 0 0 0 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.6 100.0 18.2 - 1500 8 0 0 2 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.3 87.50 17.9 - 1600 9 0 1 1 1 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.9 66.67 20.2 - 1700 5 0 2 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7.5 60.00 15.4 - 1800 8 0 0 0 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.8 100.0 18.0 - 1900 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 2000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 2100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 2200 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.0 100.0 20.8 - 2300 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 100.0 9.5 - 07-19 101 0 8 13 43 27 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.3 72.28 18.1 22.9 06-22 102 0 8 13 43 28 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.3 72.55 18.1 22.8 06-00 104 0 9 13 43 29 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.3 72.12 18.1 22.8 00-00 106 0 10 13 43 30 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.3 71.70 18.0 22.7 Peak step 12:00 (13) AM Peak step 8:00 (12) PM Peak step 12:00 (13) * Thursday, October 6, 2022 Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin vPace Pace% Mean Vpp <-- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 10 10 85 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 100 0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0100 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6.4 100.0 16.3 - 0200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0300 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 100.0 5.7 - 0400 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0600 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.2 100.0 23.9 - 0700 9 0 1 3 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.2 66.67 16.4 - 0800 10 0 0 2 2 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.3 70.00 20.0 - 0900 7 0 1 1 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.5 71.43 18.0 - 1000 9 0 1 1 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.0 77.78 17.8 - 1100 6 1 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6.2 83.33 10.9 - 1200 13 0 0 3 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.0 84.62 18.1 21.8 1300 10 0 0 3 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7.8 80.00 16.6 - 1400 6 0 0 2 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5.1 50.00 18.1 - 1500 10 0 1 1 7 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.9 80.00 17.3 - 1600 10 0 1 2 3 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.4 60.00 19.2 - 1700 8 0 0 4 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.0 100.0 15.8 - 1800 11 0 1 3 3 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7.4 63.64 17.1 24.1 1900 5 0 0 1 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.4 80.00 20.8 - 2000 6 0 0 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.5 100.0 18.6 - 2100 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.0 100.0 18.4 - 2200 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.3 50.00 24.7 - 2300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 07-19 109 1 7 28 41 24 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.0 66.97 17.3 23.3 06-22 124 1 7 29 48 29 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.0 67.74 17.6 23.5 06-00 126 1 7 29 49 29 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.0 67.46 17.7 23.6 00-00 128 1 8 29 50 29 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.0 67.19 17.6 23.6 Peak step 12:00 (13) AM Peak step 8:00 (10) PM Peak step 12:00 (13) * Grand Total Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin vPace Pace% Mean Vpp <-- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 10 10 85 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 100 -- 361 2 22 73 134 98 28 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.3 66.48 17.9 23.5 Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 31 Packet Pg. 43 of 374 Item 4 st-8961 Page 1 A Attachment A - Crescent Traffic Data Service -- San Jose, CA Park Neighborhood Post - Speed Report Pilot Memo CustomList-8961 -- English (ENU) Datasets: Site: [10] CRESCENT DR BT UNIVERSITY AVE AND SOUTHWOOD DR Data type: Axle sensors - Paired (Class/Speed/Count) Profile: Included classes: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 Speed range: 0 - 100 mph. Direction: North (bound), P = North, Lane = 0-16 Name: TDS Scheme: Vehicle classification (Scheme F) Units: Non metric (ft, mi, ft/s, mph, Ib, ton) Column Leaend: 0 [Time] 1 [Total] 2 [Vbin] 3 [vPace] 4 [Pace%] 5 [Mean] 6 [Vpp] 24 -hour time (0000 - 2359) Number in time step Speed bin totals Speed at start of pace Percent in pace Average speed Percentile speed * Tuesday, October 4, 2022 Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin vPace Pace% Mean Vpp <-- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 10 10 85 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 100 0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0400 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0500 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.4 100.0 27.8 - 0600 3 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 33.33 24.6 - 0700 24 0 0 0 6 13 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.8 87.50 22.2 25.8 0800 69 0 0 1 13 43 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.2 92.75 22.4 25.1 0900 43 0 3 4 12 18 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.1 72.09 19.8 24.4 1000 41 0 0 3 23 10 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.9 80.49 20.2 24.8 1100 46 0 1 6 11 16 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.2 67.39 20.8 26.8 1200 40 0 0 2 5 21 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.7 85.00 22.9 26.4 1300 32 0 1 0 8 14 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.2 75.00 22.5 28.0 1400 37 0 0 1 5 20 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.6 83.78 23.1 28.6 1500 82 0 0 7 9 30 31 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.8 74.39 23.8 28.4 1600 91 0 0 4 17 44 20 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.3 79.12 22.9 27.5 1700 65 0 0 4 14 27 15 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.7 67.69 22.4 28.1 1800 33 0 0 0 5 16 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.1 81.82 23.9 28.8 1900 19 0 0 2 1 11 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.7 84.21 23.0 27.3 2000 11 0 1 0 3 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.5 72.73 21.7 27.8 2100 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.3 100.0 18.0 - 2200 5 0 0 0 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.7 100.0 21.4 - 2300 4 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.3 100.0 20.2 - 07-19 603 0 5 32 128 272 141 24 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.2 73.47 22.4 27.3 06-22 640 0 7 34 136 286 150 25 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.2 73.13 22.3 27.3 06-00 649 0 7 34 140 289 152 25 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.2 73.04 22.3 27.3 00-00 651 0 7 34 140 290 152 26 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.2 72.96 22.3 27.3 Peak step 16:00 (91) AM Peak step 8:00 (69) PM Peak step 16:00 (91) * Grand Total Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin vPace Pace% Mean Vpp <-- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 10 10 85 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 100 -- 651 0 7 34 140 290 152 26 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.2 72.96 22.3 27.3 Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 32 Packet Pg. 44 of 374 Item 4 st-8962 Page 1 A Attachment A - Crescent Traffic Data Service -- San Jose, CA Park Neighborhood Post- ___________________ Speed Report Pilot Memo CustomList-8962 -- English (ENU) Datasets: Site: [10] CRESCENT DR BT UNIVERSITY AVE AND SOUTHWOOD DR Data type: Axle sensors - Paired (Class/Speed/Count) Profile: Included classes: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 Speed range: 0 - 100 mph. Direction: South (bound), P = North, Lane = 0-16 Name: TDS Scheme: Vehicle classification (Scheme F) Units: Non metric (ft, mi, ft/s, mph, Ib, ton) Column Leaend: 0 [Time] 1 [Total] 2 [Vbin] 3 [vPace] 4 [Pace%] 5 [Mean] 6 [Vpp] 24 -hour time (0000 - 2359) Number in time step Speed bin totals Speed at start of pace Percent in pace Average speed Percentile speed * Tuesday, October 4, 2022 Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin vPace Pace% Mean Vpp <-- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 10 10 85 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 100 0000 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.1 100.0 18.9 - 0100 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.3 100.0 26.2 - 0200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0300 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7.4 100.0 13.4 - 0400 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0500 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6.2 100.0 16.0 - 0600 5 0 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.0 100.0 21.0 - 0700 34 0 1 1 8 13 8 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.6 73.53 22.4 28.3 0800 25 0 0 2 12 6 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.7 76.00 20.6 25.5 0900 15 0 1 1 5 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.1 80.00 19.1 23.7 1000 9 0 0 1 1 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.9 88.89 21.4 - 1100 12 0 1 1 5 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.2 66.67 19.4 27.5 1200 20 0 0 1 8 7 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.1 85.00 21.1 25.9 1300 18 0 1 2 9 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.9 83.33 18.2 23.4 1400 15 0 1 2 1 7 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.1 73.33 21.6 28.2 1500 16 0 0 3 6 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.3 75.00 19.2 25.8 1600 27 0 0 3 11 11 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.9 85.19 19.4 23.8 1700 24 0 0 1 8 9 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.3 79.17 21.3 26.8 1800 12 0 0 2 4 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.3 83.33 19.9 24.8 1900 10 0 1 0 3 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.9 90.00 20.2 - 2000 7 0 0 0 3 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.9 100.0 20.6 - 2100 4 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.7 75.00 20.2 - 2200 6 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.5 100.0 20.3 - 2300 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7.7 100.0 17.5 - 07-19 227 0 5 20 78 82 36 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.3 70.93 20.5 25.9 06-22 253 0 6 21 86 96 38 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.3 72.33 20.5 25.7 06-00 260 0 6 21 90 99 38 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.3 73.08 20.4 25.5 00-00 265 0 7 21 93 99 39 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.3 72.83 20.4 25.5 Peak step 7:00 (34) AM Peak step 7:00 (34) PM Peak step 16:00 (27) * Grand Total Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin vPace Pace% Mean Vpp <-- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 10 10 85 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 100 -- 265 0 7 21 93 99 39 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.3 72.83 20.4 25.5 Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 33 Packet Pg. 45 of 374 Item 4 st-8958 Page 1 A Attachment A - Crescent Traffic Data Service -- San Jose, CA Park Neighborhood Post - Speed Report Pilot Memo CustomList-8958 -- English (ENU) Datasets: Site: [8] HAMILTON AVE BT CRESCENT DR AND CENTER DR Data type: Axle sensors - Paired (Class/Speed/Count) Profile: Included classes: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 Speed range: 0 - 100 mph. Direction: East (bound), P = East, Lane = 0-16 Name: TDS Scheme: Vehicle classification (Scheme F) Units: Non metric (ft, mi, ft/s, mph, Ib, ton) Column Leaend: 0 [Time] 1 [Total] 2 [Vbin] 3 [vPace] 4 [Pace%] 5 [Mean] 6 [Vpp] 24 -hour time (0000 - 2359) Number in time step Speed bin totals Speed at start of pace Percent in pace Average speed Percentile speed * Tuesday, October 4, 2022 Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin vPace Pace% Mean Vpp <-- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 10 10 85 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 100 0000 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.8 100.0 33.6 - 0100 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.9 100.0 21.7 - 0200 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.4 100.0 18.2 - 0300 3 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.1 100.0 23.9 - 0400 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 100.0 8.5 - 0500 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.2 100.0 25.1 - 0600 3 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.8 66.67 21.6 - 0700 29 0 0 4 5 13 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.2 79.31 21.4 26.5 0800 37 0 3 2 4 16 9 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.6 72.97 22.7 29.2 0900 40 0 0 0 7 19 13 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.8 92.50 23.4 26.4 1000 31 0 1 5 6 9 7 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.8 58.06 21.9 28.7 1100 38 0 0 2 8 15 11 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.6 81.58 22.5 26.4 1200 46 0 2 3 7 16 15 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.8 71.74 22.9 27.6 1300 58 0 2 4 5 19 24 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.3 74.14 23.8 29.1 1400 67 0 1 4 4 21 27 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.0 80.60 25.0 29.9 1500 114 0 2 5 4 33 60 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.2 82.46 25.1 29.2 1600 124 0 0 6 8 51 56 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.5 87.90 24.3 27.4 1700 131 0 0 17 13 44 43 12 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.8 68.70 23.3 29.0 1800 72 0 2 8 5 28 20 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.5 72.22 23.3 29.1 1900 35 0 2 4 4 13 10 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.3 68.57 22.1 28.1 2000 21 0 1 2 3 10 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.8 71.43 21.5 27.3 2100 21 1 1 2 3 7 4 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.9 57.14 21.5 29.8 2200 15 0 0 2 4 5 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.6 66.67 23.0 34.9 2300 7 0 1 1 0 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.8 57.14 23.5 - 07-19 787 0 13 60 76 284 291 55 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.5 74.08 23.7 28.3 06-22 867 1 17 69 86 315 310 59 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.5 72.43 23.5 28.3 06-00 889 1 18 72 90 321 313 61 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.5 71.65 23.5 28.3 00-00 897 1 19 72 91 324 315 62 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.5 71.57 23.5 28.3 Peak step 17:00 (131) AM Peak step 9:00 (40) PM Peak step 17:00 (131) Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 34 Packet Pg. 46 of 374 Item 4 st-8958 Page 2 Attachment A - Crescent * Wednesday, October 5, 2022 Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Park Neighborhood Post- e% Mean Vpp <-- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 I 110 85 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 Pilot Memo 0000 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.3 100.0 16.8 - 0100 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.3 100.0 11.2 - 0200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0300 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5.1 100.0 11.7 - 0400 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.8 100.0 23.5 - 0500 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24.7 100.0 34.6 - 0600 11 0 1 1 2 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.2 72.73 21.5 28.4 0700 25 0 0 5 4 7 5 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.0 56.00 22.2 30.5 0800 37 0 0 6 6 14 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.2 67.57 22.3 28.1 0900 32 0 0 2 6 9 13 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.5 71.88 23.6 28.3 1000 31 0 0 2 9 13 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.0 70.97 22.0 28.0 1100 34 0 0 0 11 13 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.6 79.41 22.8 27.4 1200 40 1 0 2 6 17 12 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.0 75.00 22.8 28.1 1300 58 0 2 3 6 25 17 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.7 79.31 23.3 28.4 1400 52 0 2 6 10 15 15 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.3 59.62 22.3 29.0 1500 116 0 2 8 16 46 37 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.6 75.86 22.9 28.0 1600 132 0 1 10 10 57 43 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.0 75.76 23.8 28.3 1700 99 0 1 13 9 39 30 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.2 70.71 22.9 28.0 1800 78 0 1 9 6 22 36 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.8 74.36 23.5 28.6 1900 45 0 2 8 4 14 14 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.3 64.44 21.9 28.8 2000 22 0 0 1 1 11 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.0 90.91 23.5 27.7 2100 27 0 1 4 3 6 10 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.6 66.67 22.8 29.7 2200 21 0 1 2 2 6 7 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.8 61.90 23.9 31.3 2300 8 0 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.6 50.00 22.6 - 07-19 734 1 9 66 99 277 233 47 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.9 69.62 23.1 28.2 06-22 839 1 13 80 109 311 270 53 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.9 69.49 23.0 28.3 06-00 868 1 15 83 112 318 279 56 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.9 69.01 23.0 28.3 00-00 875 1 16 86 113 319 279 57 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.9 68.57 23.0 28.3 Peak step 16:00 (132) AM Peak step 8:00 (37) PM Peak step 16:00 (132) * Thursday, October 6, 2022 Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin vPace Pace% Mean Vpp <-- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 10 10 85 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 100 0000 4 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.5 75.00 15.1 - 0100 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.9 100.0 21.7 - 0200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0300 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.3 100.0 23.2 - 0400 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 100.0 7.9 - 0500 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.4 100.0 31.2 - 0600 10 0 0 1 2 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.6 70.00 23.1 - 0700 32 0 0 4 9 10 6 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.0 59.38 21.7 27.6 0800 35 0 3 5 3 15 6 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.2 62.86 21.4 27.7 0900 13 0 0 2 3 4 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.8 61.54 21.8 27.1 1000 27 0 0 0 5 7 12 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.6 74.07 25.3 29.8 1100 39 1 0 2 7 11 13 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.8 66.67 23.5 29.9 1200 57 0 0 2 4 29 16 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.7 78.95 24.4 28.9 1300 49 0 0 5 7 21 11 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.2 67.35 23.1 29.0 1400 71 0 0 1 8 31 24 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.5 80.28 24.4 27.8 1500 139 0 0 6 22 56 47 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.6 78.42 23.6 28.2 1600 123 0 0 3 11 49 53 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.4 83.74 24.6 27.9 1700 89 0 2 9 13 28 30 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.1 67.42 23.0 27.9 1800 65 0 1 9 11 25 12 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.8 63.08 22.1 28.9 1900 42 0 0 6 4 17 10 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.6 71.43 22.8 28.0 2000 19 0 0 0 2 8 8 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.8 84.21 25.2 28.5 2100 34 0 0 6 3 6 13 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.6 64.71 23.7 30.7 2200 19 0 1 2 2 5 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.0 73.68 22.1 26.7 2300 9 0 1 1 0 4 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.5 66.67 23.2 - 07-19 739 1 6 48 103 286 233 53 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.0 72.12 23.5 28.1 06-22 844 1 6 61 114 320 268 63 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.0 71.33 23.5 28.2 06-00 872 1 8 64 116 329 278 65 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.0 70.99 23.5 28.2 00-00 881 1 10 66 116 331 280 66 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.0 70.72 23.4 28.2 Peak step 15:00 (139) AM Peak step 11:00 (39) PM Peak step 15:00 (139) * Grand Total Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin vPace Pace% Mean Vpp <-- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 10 10 85 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 100 -- 2653 3 45 224 320 974 874 185 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.3 70.00 23.3 28.3 Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 35 Packet Pg. 47 of 374 Item 4 st-8957 Page 1 A Attachment A - Crescent Traffic Data Service -- San Jose, CA Park Neighborhood Post- ___________________ Speed Report Pilot Memo CustomList-8957 -- English (ENU) Datasets: Site: [8] HAMILTON AVE BT CRESCENT DR AND CENTER DR Data type: Axle sensors - Paired (Class/Speed/Count) Profile: Included classes: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 Speed range: 0 - 100 mph. Direction: West (bound), P = East, Lane = 0-16 Name: TDS Scheme: Vehicle classification (Scheme F) Units: Non metric (ft, mi, ft/s, mph, Ib, ton) Column Leaend: 0 [Time] 1 [Total] 2 [Vbin] 3 [vPace] 4 [Pace%] 5 [Mean] 6 [Vpp] 24 -hour time (0000 - 2359) Number in time step Speed bin totals Speed at start of pace Percent in pace Average speed Percentile speed * Tuesday, October 4, 2022 Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin vPace Pace% Mean Vpp <-- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 10 10 85 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 100 0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0300 3 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6.5 66.67 18.1 - 0400 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0500 5 0 0 0 0 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.4 60.00 27.6 - 0600 14 0 1 2 1 6 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.5 78.57 20.8 26.5 0700 54 0 1 11 2 17 17 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.5 64.81 22.6 28.7 0800 70 0 1 11 8 29 17 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.5 71.43 22.0 27.3 0900 50 0 3 2 7 26 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.3 84.00 21.3 25.9 1000 57 0 1 8 12 27 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.6 77.19 20.7 25.2 1100 60 0 4 7 17 21 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.8 65.00 20.1 26.2 1200 36 0 0 6 7 15 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.8 72.22 21.0 27.0 1300 54 0 2 4 8 21 18 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.8 70.37 22.2 27.9 1400 34 0 2 1 6 16 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.2 76.47 21.9 26.0 1500 44 0 3 9 7 17 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.2 59.09 19.9 27.0 1600 48 0 2 7 8 18 10 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.9 66.67 21.1 26.5 1700 45 0 3 4 7 19 9 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.2 66.67 21.7 27.2 1800 45 0 0 10 8 16 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.0 71.11 20.7 26.2 1900 25 0 3 3 4 7 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.1 68.00 20.5 26.9 2000 12 1 1 5 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5.4 58.33 15.0 24.3 2100 13 0 1 2 0 6 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.7 76.92 20.9 27.2 2200 4 0 0 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.9 75.00 22.4 - 2300 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 50.00 13.8 - 07-19 597 0 22 80 97 242 131 23 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.9 66.16 21.3 26.7 06-22 661 1 28 92 104 263 148 23 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.9 65.81 21.1 26.6 06-00 667 1 29 92 107 264 148 24 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.9 65.67 21.1 26.6 00-00 675 1 29 93 108 266 150 26 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.9 65.48 21.2 26.7 Peak step 8:00 (70) AM Peak step 8:00 (70) PM Peak step 13:00 (54) Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 36 Packet Pg. 48 of 374 Item 4 st-8957 Page 2 Attachment A - Crescent * Wednesday, October 5, 2022 Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Park Neighborhood Post- e% Mean Vpp <-- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 I 110 85 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 Pilot Memo 0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0100 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.1 100.0 22.9 - 0200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0300 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5.3 100.0 12.1 - 0400 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0600 11 0 1 0 1 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.2 90.91 21.3 26.4 0700 48 0 1 4 4 19 19 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.1 79.17 23.0 28.2 0800 80 0 5 10 7 32 22 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.2 68.75 21.7 28.1 0900 51 0 2 4 8 20 13 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.0 68.63 22.4 28.9 1000 44 0 2 4 11 18 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.6 72.73 20.6 26.3 1100 53 0 4 5 6 20 16 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.1 71.70 21.4 26.8 1200 48 0 0 5 12 20 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.3 75.00 21.4 26.2 1300 37 0 0 3 10 15 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.2 86.49 21.5 25.4 1400 48 0 6 2 9 15 15 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.9 75.00 21.0 27.0 1500 38 0 1 10 7 11 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.6 55.26 20.2 27.6 1600 47 0 0 8 13 18 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.5 70.21 20.1 25.7 1700 60 0 3 8 13 22 12 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.3 66.67 20.7 26.7 1800 31 0 2 5 3 8 11 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.7 64.52 21.4 27.5 1900 29 0 1 7 6 8 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.5 55.17 19.6 28.0 2000 13 0 1 2 1 3 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.2 61.54 21.7 27.6 2100 13 0 0 2 4 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.6 69.23 21.0 28.1 2200 9 0 0 1 3 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.4 66.67 21.5 - 2300 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.7 100.0 20.2 - 07-19 585 0 26 68 103 218 149 18 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.1 65.98 21.3 27.0 06-22 651 0 29 79 115 240 166 19 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.6 65.28 21.2 27.0 06-00 662 0 29 80 119 243 168 20 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.6 65.41 21.2 27.0 00-00 666 0 30 80 120 245 168 20 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.6 65.32 21.2 27.0 Peak step 8:00 (80) AM Peak step 8:00 (80) PM Peak step 17:00 (60) * Thursday, October 6, 2022 Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin vPace Pace% Mean Vpp <-- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 10 10 85 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 100 0000 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.9 100.0 22.8 - 0100 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.1 100.0 10.0 - 0200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0300 3 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6.0 66.67 17.6 - 0400 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.7 100.0 14.5 - 0500 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.4 100.0 17.1 - 0600 13 0 0 1 2 4 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.9 76.92 22.7 26.7 0700 56 0 0 8 3 26 14 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.5 71.43 22.7 27.8 0800 74 0 4 7 4 29 21 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.8 67.57 23.1 29.6 0900 18 0 1 1 7 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.1 83.33 20.1 25.5 1000 46 0 4 5 10 15 9 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.8 63.04 20.8 27.2 1100 45 0 1 7 4 15 15 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.1 73.33 22.6 28.2 1200 47 0 0 7 9 17 10 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.0 68.09 21.9 26.6 1300 53 0 1 4 11 21 12 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.7 73.58 22.5 27.2 1400 54 0 2 6 11 19 13 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.7 70.37 21.5 26.4 1500 50 0 1 6 8 19 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.5 72.00 21.6 26.4 1600 49 0 2 8 13 14 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.0 59.18 20.7 27.2 1700 69 0 4 9 15 26 13 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.7 71.01 20.4 26.4 1800 55 0 0 8 8 24 14 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.4 74.55 21.5 25.5 1900 11 0 1 3 2 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.1 72.73 18.1 24.2 2000 12 0 0 3 3 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.4 66.67 20.1 25.4 2100 13 0 1 1 2 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.0 76.92 20.5 25.7 2200 9 0 2 1 1 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.0 66.67 18.7 - 2300 3 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.4 66.67 24.5 - 07-19 616 0 20 76 103 231 150 33 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.2 67.05 21.7 27.1 06-22 665 0 22 84 112 250 161 33 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.2 67.07 21.6 26.9 06-00 677 0 24 85 114 252 166 33 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.2 66.91 21.6 27.0 00-00 686 0 25 88 116 253 168 33 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.2 66.62 21.6 26.8 Peak step 8:00 (74) AM Peak step 8:00 (74) PM Peak step 17:00 (69) * Grand Total Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin vPace Pace% Mean Vpp <-- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 10 10 85 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 100 -- 2027 1 84 261 344 764 486 79 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.2 65.56 21.3 26.8 Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 37 Packet Pg. 49 of 374 Item 4 st-8946 Page 1 A Attachment A- Crescent Traffic Data Service -- San Jose, CA Park Neighborhood Post - Speed Report Pilot Memo CustomList-8946 -- English (ENU) Datasets: Site: [2] HAMILTON AVE BT GUINDA ST AND SENECA ST Data type: Axle sensors - Paired (Class/Speed/Count) Profile: Included classes: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 Speed range: 0 - 100 mph. Direction: East (bound), P = East, Lane = 0-16 Name: TDS Scheme: Vehicle classification (Scheme F) Units: Non metric (ft, mi, ft/s, mph, Ib, ton) Column Leaend: 0 [Time] 1 [Total] 2 [Vbin] 3 [vPace] 4 [Pace%] 5 [Mean] 6 [Vpp] 24 -hour time (0000 - 2359) Number in time step Speed bin totals Speed at start of pace Percent in pace Average speed Percentile speed * Tuesday, October 4, 2022 Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin vPace Pace% Mean Vpp <-- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 10 10 85 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 100 0000 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.6 50.00 28.2 - 0100 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.8 100.0 18.4 - 0200 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.6 100.0 11.4 - 0300 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.9 100.0 25.7 - 0400 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 100.0 6.9 - 0500 4 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.3 100.0 25.4 - 0600 4 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.1 75.00 23.9 - 0700 42 0 2 4 3 19 11 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.6 73.81 22.6 27.9 0800 53 0 0 1 6 32 12 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.9 86.79 23.0 26.6 0900 54 0 1 3 13 26 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.1 83.33 21.6 25.4 1000 49 0 2 2 11 25 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.9 83.67 21.5 25.8 1100 71 0 2 3 7 38 19 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.9 81.69 22.8 26.9 1200 73 0 1 3 5 34 27 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.2 86.30 23.9 28.1 1300 93 0 0 5 3 41 37 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.6 86.02 24.7 28.3 1400 116 0 3 2 3 44 46 17 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.7 81.90 25.5 30.1 1500 177 0 0 3 7 75 78 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.0 90.40 25.3 28.6 1600 171 0 1 7 13 79 61 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.2 83.63 24.1 27.9 1700 186 0 1 9 16 98 53 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.7 81.72 23.5 27.4 1800 115 0 0 11 7 46 43 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.8 78.26 23.7 28.0 1900 87 0 0 4 19 41 22 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.0 80.46 22.5 26.6 2000 38 0 1 2 2 20 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.7 84.21 23.3 27.7 2100 32 0 1 1 4 19 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.1 81.25 22.4 26.3 2200 21 0 0 1 5 4 7 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.3 57.14 24.3 33.0 2300 10 0 0 1 1 2 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.8 80.00 24.8 - 07-19 1200 0 13 53 94 557 405 76 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.8 80.42 23.9 28.0 06-22 1361 0 15 60 120 639 446 78 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.8 80.09 23.8 27.8 06-00 1392 0 15 62 126 645 458 81 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.8 79.60 23.8 27.8 00-00 1403 0 16 63 128 648 461 82 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.7 79.40 23.8 27.8 Peak step 17:00 (186) AM Peak step 11:00 (71) PM Peak step 17:00 (186) Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 38 Packet Pg. 50 of 374 Item 4 st-8946 Page 2 * Wednesday, October 5, 2022 Attachment A - Crescent Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Park Neighborhood Post- e% Mean Vpp <-- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 10 85 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 Pilot Memo 0000 3 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.7 66.67 20.5 - 0100 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.8 50.00 26.6 - 0200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0300 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.5 100.0 23.4 - 0400 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 50.00 13.4 - 0500 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.7 100.0 27.0 - 0600 10 0 0 1 0 5 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.1 80.00 23.8 - 0700 36 0 0 2 6 17 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.2 83.33 23.4 27.7 0800 66 1 1 2 11 29 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.2 80.30 22.5 26.9 0900 47 0 1 5 3 17 20 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.9 80.85 23.0 27.4 1000 56 0 3 2 9 18 23 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.9 73.21 22.4 27.4 1100 58 0 1 3 5 23 25 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.6 82.76 23.4 27.3 1200 81 0 1 1 11 38 24 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.1 80.25 24.0 27.9 1300 96 0 0 4 5 40 38 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.5 82.29 24.6 27.9 1400 121 0 3 3 8 59 42 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.2 85.12 23.7 27.7 1500 160 0 0 4 11 78 61 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.1 90.00 24.2 27.3 1600 192 0 1 8 16 86 74 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.8 84.38 23.8 27.3 1700 169 0 1 11 21 80 54 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.8 79.88 23.0 27.8 1800 127 0 3 10 20 57 35 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.2 79.53 22.0 26.5 1900 84 0 1 10 9 34 28 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.7 75.00 22.4 27.2 2000 52 0 1 2 5 24 18 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.2 84.62 23.0 27.5 2100 38 0 1 4 6 15 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.1 78.95 21.5 27.2 2200 36 0 2 2 4 14 9 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.0 66.67 23.9 29.5 2300 14 0 0 2 0 3 8 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.7 78.57 24.6 28.5 07-19 1209 1 15 55 126 542 427 40 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.1 80.56 23.4 27.4 06-22 1393 1 18 72 146 620 488 44 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.1 80.11 23.3 27.3 06-00 1443 1 20 76 150 637 505 47 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.1 79.76 23.3 27.4 00-00 1453 1 21 77 152 639 508 48 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.1 79.63 23.3 27.4 Peak step 16:00 (192) AM Peak step 8:00 (66) PM Peak step 16:00 (192) * Thursday, October 6, 2022 Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin vPace Pace% Mean Vpp <-- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 10 10 85 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 100 0000 4 0 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.1 50.00 17.7 - 0100 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.1 100.0 26.0 - 0200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0300 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.5 100.0 28.3 - 0400 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.6 50.00 15.9 - 0500 4 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.9 75.00 27.1 - 0600 9 0 0 0 1 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.2 88.89 24.6 - 0700 34 0 0 1 8 14 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.9 79.41 23.1 26.8 0800 58 0 1 3 6 29 17 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.1 81.03 23.1 27.6 0900 44 0 0 1 4 27 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.1 86.36 23.2 27.1 1000 52 0 1 3 8 23 14 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.0 80.77 23.1 27.9 1100 76 0 0 1 8 39 26 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.8 93.42 23.9 26.9 1200 90 0 2 4 10 29 38 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.0 78.89 24.1 28.1 1300 96 0 0 4 9 42 37 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.2 82.29 23.9 27.9 1400 105 0 1 1 5 32 54 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.4 85.71 25.8 29.4 1500 176 0 0 5 13 65 83 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.1 84.66 25.0 28.5 1600 173 0 0 5 11 78 63 15 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.5 83.24 24.8 28.4 1700 169 0 1 10 19 79 50 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.8 76.92 23.5 27.9 1800 110 0 1 7 6 55 34 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.5 81.82 23.6 28.0 1900 80 0 1 5 12 30 28 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.2 81.25 23.4 28.4 2000 55 0 1 3 5 27 16 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.9 81.82 23.2 27.0 2100 59 0 1 6 7 26 15 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.0 72.88 22.8 27.2 2200 30 0 2 3 2 12 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.5 76.67 22.4 28.0 2300 14 0 0 2 1 2 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.4 78.57 24.1 28.2 07-19 1183 0 7 45 107 512 436 73 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.3 80.14 24.2 28.1 06-22 1386 0 10 59 132 599 499 82 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.3 79.65 24.0 28.1 06-00 1430 0 12 64 135 613 517 84 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.3 79.44 24.0 28.1 00-00 1442 0 12 67 135 616 522 85 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.3 79.33 24.0 28.1 Peak step 15:00 (176) AM Peak step 11:00 (76) PM Peak step 15:00 (176) * Grand Total Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin vPace Pace% Mean Vpp <-- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 10 10 85 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 100 -- 4298 1 49 207 415 1903 1491 215 14 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.5 79.39 23.7 27.7 Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 39 Packet Pg. 51 of 374 Item 4 st-8945 Page 1 A Attachment A - Crescent Traffic Data Service -- San Jose, CA Park Neighborhood Post- ___________________ Speed Report Pilot Memo CustomList-8945 -- English (ENU) Datasets: Site: [2] HAMILTON AVE BT GUINDA ST AND SENECA ST Data type: Axle sensors - Paired (Class/Speed/Count) Profile: Included classes: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 Speed range: 0 - 100 mph. Direction: West (bound), P = East, Lane = 0-16 Name: TDS Scheme: Vehicle classification (Scheme F) Units: Non metric (ft, mi, ft/s, mph, Ib, ton) Column Leaend: 0 [Time] 1 [Total] 2 [Vbin] 3 [vPace] 4 [Pace%] 5 [Mean] 6 [Vpp] 24 -hour time (0000 - 2359) Number in time step Speed bin totals Speed at start of pace Percent in pace Average speed Percentile speed * Tuesday, October 4, 2022 Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin vPace Pace% Mean Vpp <-- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 10 10 85 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 100 0000 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.6 100.0 22.5 - 0100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0300 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.1 100.0 24.9 - 0400 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 50.00 17.3 - 0500 8 0 0 0 1 2 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.2 87.50 26.4 - 0600 21 0 1 2 1 12 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.2 71.43 23.0 29.5 0700 65 0 2 11 13 22 16 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.5 61.54 20.5 26.5 0800 150 0 3 15 29 66 31 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.9 70.00 21.7 26.7 0900 90 0 1 5 16 40 24 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.9 75.56 22.5 26.8 1000 79 0 3 12 15 35 13 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.1 69.62 20.5 25.3 1100 76 0 1 8 17 34 15 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.7 76.32 21.3 26.2 1200 67 0 1 6 8 26 21 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.7 74.63 23.1 27.8 1300 81 0 4 5 5 42 24 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.3 82.72 22.5 26.4 1400 60 0 1 3 8 27 18 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.9 80.00 23.4 28.0 1500 67 0 0 3 9 33 16 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.1 74.63 23.8 28.4 1600 73 0 0 6 9 32 21 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.6 78.08 23.5 27.3 1700 74 0 1 4 7 27 31 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.3 81.08 24.1 28.2 1800 64 0 2 7 5 36 13 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.9 79.69 21.8 26.4 1900 22 0 0 1 3 14 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.9 90.91 22.7 25.4 2000 13 0 0 3 2 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.0 76.92 20.8 26.7 2100 14 0 0 0 1 6 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.7 92.86 25.5 28.4 2200 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.4 100.0 22.0 - 2300 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.7 100.0 19.5 - 07-19 946 0 19 85 141 420 243 32 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.5 72.41 22.3 26.8 06-22 1016 0 20 91 148 456 259 36 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.9 72.74 22.4 26.8 06-00 1021 0 20 91 150 459 259 36 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.9 72.87 22.4 26.8 00-00 1033 0 21 91 151 463 264 36 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.9 72.89 22.4 26.8 Peak step 8:00 (150) AM Peak step 8:00 (150) PM Peak step 13:00 (81) Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 40 Packet Pg. 52 of 374 Item 4 st-8945 Page 2 * Wednesday, October 5, 2022 Attachment A - Crescent Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Park Neighborhood Post- e% Mean Vpp <-- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 10 85 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 Pilot Memo 0000 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.2 100.0 22.5 - 0100 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.5 100.0 23.3 - 0200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0400 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 100.0 9.8 - 0500 5 0 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.8 100.0 23.0 - 0600 15 0 0 0 0 10 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.3 100.0 23.9 27.0 0700 65 0 1 1 7 19 34 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.4 83.08 24.5 28.4 0800 143 1 5 14 23 63 29 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.9 68.53 21.6 27.0 0900 90 0 1 11 15 31 29 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.0 72.22 22.2 27.4 1000 83 0 3 7 10 42 16 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.8 74.70 22.1 26.7 1100 87 0 0 5 15 38 26 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.9 80.46 23.2 27.4 1200 63 0 0 9 11 23 18 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.2 74.60 21.9 26.7 1300 69 0 0 4 8 29 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.6 85.51 23.3 27.5 1400 81 0 2 2 12 36 25 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.9 80.25 23.2 27.4 1500 63 0 3 8 6 20 21 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.7 68.25 22.7 28.1 1600 83 0 0 2 12 48 19 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.2 86.75 22.7 26.4 1700 66 0 0 4 15 32 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.1 86.36 21.9 25.6 1800 50 0 1 1 7 26 13 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.2 80.00 23.1 27.3 1900 36 0 2 3 9 11 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.7 69.44 20.7 26.8 2000 14 0 1 0 0 10 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.8 92.86 22.1 26.3 2100 10 0 0 0 1 5 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.6 90.00 23.6 - 2200 6 0 0 0 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.0 100.0 23.8 - 2300 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.6 100.0 30.4 - 07-19 943 1 16 68 141 407 273 36 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.0 74.87 22.6 27.2 06-22 1018 1 19 71 151 443 296 36 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.9 75.05 22.5 27.1 06-00 1025 1 19 71 152 446 298 37 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.9 75.12 22.6 27.1 00-00 1034 1 20 71 153 451 300 37 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.9 75.24 22.5 27.1 Peak step 8:00 (143) AM Peak step 8:00 (143) PM Peak step 16:00 (83) * Thursday, October 6, 2022 Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin vPace Pace% Mean Vpp <-- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 10 10 85 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 100 0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0300 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.8 100.0 27.6 - 0400 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 100.0 10.3 - 0500 8 0 0 0 1 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.2 100.0 22.7 - 0600 18 0 0 0 4 5 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.6 77.78 24.0 29.2 0700 65 0 0 4 14 27 17 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.2 72.31 22.6 27.1 0800 118 0 3 11 13 43 44 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.1 77.12 22.7 27.2 0900 88 0 3 7 15 38 24 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.8 78.41 21.9 26.8 1000 85 0 3 10 11 34 23 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.3 70.59 21.8 26.7 1100 83 0 2 7 13 33 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.6 79.52 22.3 27.3 1200 87 0 0 9 13 30 31 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.1 78.16 23.0 27.1 1300 83 0 0 3 11 35 27 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.7 78.31 24.1 28.4 1400 74 0 1 5 6 33 27 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.2 86.49 23.4 27.0 1500 73 0 0 2 4 39 25 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.8 87.67 24.0 28.0 1600 84 0 2 7 16 31 25 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.3 67.86 22.2 27.8 1700 78 0 1 6 9 44 16 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.1 83.33 22.1 26.0 1800 60 0 0 1 7 33 17 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.3 85.00 23.3 26.6 1900 29 0 1 4 7 13 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.8 72.41 20.4 25.6 2000 19 0 2 2 1 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.7 73.68 21.5 28.3 2100 13 0 0 1 3 5 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.4 84.62 21.7 26.2 2200 7 0 1 1 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.2 71.43 18.9 - 2300 3 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.0 100.0 26.5 - 07-19 978 0 15 72 132 420 304 33 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.7 76.69 22.7 27.1 06-22 1057 0 18 79 147 450 327 34 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.7 76.25 22.7 27.1 06-00 1067 0 19 80 147 455 330 34 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.7 76.19 22.6 27.1 00-00 1077 0 19 81 148 461 332 34 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.7 76.23 22.6 27.1 Peak step 8:00 (118) AM Peak step 8:00 (118) PM Peak step 12:00 (87) * Grand Total Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin vPace Pace% Mean Vpp <-- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 10 10 85 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 100 -- 3144 1 60 243 452 1375 896 107 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.9 74.75 22.5 27.0 Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 41 Packet Pg. 53 of 374 Item 4 st-8948 Page 1 A Attachment A - Crescent Traffic Data Service -- San Jose, CA Park Neighborhood Post - Speed Report Pilot Memo CustomList-8948 -- English (ENU) Datasets: Site: [3] HAMILTON AVE BT HAMILTON CT AND LINCOLN AVE Data type: Axle sensors - Paired (Class/Speed/Count) Profile: Included classes: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 Speed range: 0 - 100 mph. Direction: East (bound), P = East, Lane = 0-16 Name: TDS Scheme: Vehicle classification (Scheme F) Units: Non metric (ft, mi, ft/s, mph, Ib, ton) Column Leaend: 0 [Time] 1 [Total] 2 [Vbin] 3 [vPace] 4 [Pace%] 5 [Mean] 6 [Vpp] 24 -hour time (0000 - 2359) Number in time step Speed bin totals Speed at start of pace Percent in pace Average speed Percentile speed * Tuesday, October 4, 2022 Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin vPace Pace% Mean Vpp <-- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 10 10 85 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 100 0000 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26.2 100.0 36.0 - 0100 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.3 100.0 24.1 - 0200 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.7 100.0 27.6 - 0300 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.0 100.0 25.8 - 0400 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0500 4 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.8 50.00 17.4 - 0600 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.1 100.0 27.3 - 0700 33 0 0 6 6 7 10 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 18.5 54.55 23.1 29.0 0800 48 0 0 4 4 17 21 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.8 83.33 23.7 27.7 0900 52 1 0 2 8 12 19 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.2 67.31 24.8 30.7 1000 34 0 2 4 5 8 11 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.8 61.76 23.0 29.4 1100 51 0 0 1 4 14 21 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.8 72.55 26.2 31.5 1200 59 0 1 3 5 22 22 3 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.9 76.27 24.7 29.3 1300 65 0 2 4 4 14 26 12 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.8 73.85 25.9 31.7 1400 82 0 0 6 4 16 40 14 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.4 75.61 26.1 31.3 1500 153 0 0 5 4 29 83 28 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.7 82.35 27.0 31.1 1600 139 0 2 3 9 29 72 22 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.9 79.86 26.1 30.3 1700 161 0 1 10 10 41 78 20 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.5 74.53 25.2 29.3 1800 87 0 1 10 4 22 31 15 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.5 70.11 24.9 30.7 1900 50 0 0 5 4 16 19 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.7 70.00 24.2 29.1 2000 26 0 0 1 4 8 11 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.8 73.08 24.3 28.6 2100 24 0 0 1 4 8 7 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.2 70.83 24.7 31.0 2200 19 0 1 2 3 4 3 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.2 42.11 24.8 34.2 2300 7 0 0 0 1 0 3 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24.4 71.43 29.6 - 07-19 964 1 9 58 67 231 434 139 18 5 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 21.9 72.30 25.5 30.5 06-22 1068 1 9 65 79 263 475 149 20 5 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 21.9 71.91 25.4 30.3 06-00 1094 1 10 67 83 267 481 155 21 7 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 21.9 71.12 25.4 30.5 00-00 1103 1 11 68 83 270 484 155 22 7 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 21.9 71.08 25.4 30.5 Peak step 17:00 (161) AM Peak step 9:00 (52) PM Peak step 17:00 (161) Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 42 Packet Pg. 54 of 374 Item 4 st-8948 Page 2 * Wednesday, October 5, 2022 Attachment A - Crescent Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Park Neighborhood Post- e% Mean Vpp <-- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 10 85 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 Pilot Memo 0000 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.1 100.0 17.6 - 0100 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.4 100.0 23.3 - 0200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0300 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.2 100.0 23.0 - 0400 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 100.0 9.0 - 0500 5 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.5 60.00 24.8 - 0600 12 0 1 1 0 4 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.7 75.00 23.9 29.6 0700 23 0 0 2 5 3 6 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.9 60.87 24.4 30.6 0800 51 0 0 6 4 14 18 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.6 66.67 24.9 30.6 0900 32 0 0 2 2 10 15 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.7 78.13 24.9 29.5 1000 46 0 0 1 5 13 18 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.0 67.39 25.8 32.2 1100 44 0 0 0 5 19 13 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.9 72.73 24.9 31.2 1200 51 0 0 2 3 24 16 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.6 82.35 24.9 29.6 1300 62 0 0 3 1 15 25 16 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.3 75.81 27.0 32.8 1400 81 0 0 4 10 24 23 19 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.6 67.90 25.2 31.6 1500 142 0 4 8 5 25 68 29 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.8 73.24 26.3 31.9 1600 152 0 1 12 10 19 79 27 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.9 75.66 26.1 30.9 1700 131 0 2 12 6 46 42 21 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.8 67.94 24.4 30.4 1800 88 0 2 10 7 19 26 23 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.4 59.09 24.9 31.6 1900 58 0 1 9 6 18 14 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.8 56.90 23.4 31.0 2000 29 0 0 2 3 8 15 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.2 82.76 23.8 27.3 2100 33 0 1 4 5 7 10 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.1 54.55 23.6 31.8 2200 26 0 1 4 1 7 8 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.4 61.54 24.2 30.8 2300 10 0 0 2 0 2 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.9 60.00 25.1 - 07-19 903 0 9 62 63 231 349 169 17 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.6 67.88 25.5 31.0 06-22 1035 0 12 78 77 268 393 182 22 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.6 66.76 25.2 30.9 06-00 1071 0 13 84 78 277 404 187 24 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.6 66.39 25.2 30.9 00-00 1081 0 15 85 79 280 406 187 25 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.6 66.14 25.2 30.9 Peak step 16:00 (152) AM Peak step 8:00 (51) PM Peak step 16:00 (152) * Thursday, October 6, 2022 Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin vPace Pace% Mean Vpp <-- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 10 10 85 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 100 0000 5 0 0 3 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.2 60.00 18.1 - 0100 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.0 100.0 31.8 - 0200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0300 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.1 100.0 25.9 - 0400 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 100.0 9.2 - 0500 4 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.8 50.00 23.0 - 0600 11 0 0 2 1 4 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.5 63.64 22.9 31.2 0700 33 0 0 2 5 4 16 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.4 63.64 26.2 33.4 0800 44 0 0 8 5 13 16 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.0 65.91 22.6 28.0 0900 45 0 1 3 7 13 16 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.5 68.89 23.9 29.3 1000 36 0 0 2 4 14 11 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.9 75.00 24.1 29.4 1100 50 0 2 0 5 8 23 9 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.0 76.00 26.1 31.7 1200 69 0 1 5 3 18 27 10 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.5 72.46 26.1 31.3 1300 65 0 2 1 5 20 27 7 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.8 75.38 25.3 30.5 1400 88 0 1 2 4 7 52 18 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24.9 79.55 27.6 32.7 1500 150 0 1 7 11 34 68 26 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.7 68.67 26.1 31.3 1600 166 1 1 6 6 36 79 32 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.3 76.51 26.5 31.3 1700 127 0 0 12 12 29 50 22 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.9 70.87 25.3 30.9 1800 87 0 1 6 8 26 32 11 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.8 70.11 24.8 30.2 1900 55 0 0 5 4 19 19 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.6 74.55 24.7 30.0 2000 26 0 0 1 3 8 9 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.9 80.77 25.5 30.6 2100 43 0 2 6 5 9 13 6 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.3 58.14 23.6 31.0 2200 21 0 3 2 3 5 5 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.8 52.38 21.8 30.4 2300 13 0 0 1 0 4 5 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.5 84.62 26.4 31.2 07-19 960 1 10 54 75 222 417 148 29 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.6 68.75 25.7 30.8 06-22 1095 1 12 68 88 262 460 168 31 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.1 68.04 25.5 30.6 06-00 1129 1 15 71 91 271 470 172 33 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.6 67.94 25.5 30.6 00-00 1141 1 16 75 92 272 473 174 33 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.6 67.57 25.4 30.6 Peak step 16:00 (166) AM Peak step 11:00 (50) PM Peak step 16:00 (166) * Grand Total Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin vPace Pace% Mean Vpp <-- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 10 10 85 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 100 -- 3325 2 42 228 254 822 1363 516 80 14 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 21.6 68.15 25.3 30.6 Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 43 Packet Pg. 55 of 374 Item 4 st-8947 Page 1 A Attachment A - Crescent Traffic Data Service -- San Jose, CA Park Neighborhood Post- ___________________ Speed Report Pilot Memo CustomList-8947 -- English (ENU) Datasets: Site: [3] HAMILTON AVE BT HAMILTON CT AND LINCOLN AVE Data type: Axle sensors - Paired (Class/Speed/Count) Profile: Included classes: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 Speed range: 0 - 100 mph. Direction: West (bound), P = East, Lane = 0-16 Name: TDS Scheme: Vehicle classification (Scheme F) Units: Non metric (ft, mi, ft/s, mph, Ib, ton) Column Leaend: 0 [Time] 1 [Total] 2 [Vbin] 3 [vPace] 4 [Pace%] 5 [Mean] 6 [Vpp] 24 -hour time (0000 - 2359) Number in time step Speed bin totals Speed at start of pace Percent in pace Average speed Percentile speed * Tuesday, October 4, 2022 Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin vPace Pace% Mean Vpp <-- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 10 10 85 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 100 0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0200 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.5 100.0 23.4 - 0300 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.0 100.0 25.7 - 0400 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0500 7 0 1 0 0 1 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.1 71.43 26.7 - 0600 15 0 0 1 0 3 5 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.7 73.33 28.4 37.6 0700 64 0 0 12 2 12 18 15 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.5 57.81 25.3 33.1 0800 95 0 2 13 8 29 28 14 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.6 61.05 23.7 30.4 0900 66 0 4 4 3 16 28 9 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.7 71.21 24.6 30.4 1000 48 0 1 4 5 20 14 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.2 77.08 23.2 28.6 1100 56 0 1 6 10 15 16 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.9 58.93 22.8 29.3 1200 44 0 0 5 5 16 15 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.9 75.00 23.0 29.0 1300 70 0 4 6 7 21 21 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.5 62.86 23.6 30.3 1400 41 0 1 4 1 11 14 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.6 75.61 25.2 31.1 1500 54 0 1 4 7 11 15 15 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.2 61.11 25.2 32.7 1600 62 0 1 7 6 15 16 12 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.0 58.06 25.0 31.6 1700 55 0 2 8 5 15 17 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.2 60.00 23.2 30.5 1800 52 0 0 9 10 11 16 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.1 55.77 22.8 29.2 1900 22 0 1 3 4 4 7 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.4 54.55 22.6 30.4 2000 17 0 1 5 2 5 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.8 58.82 20.3 27.4 2100 9 0 0 0 0 3 2 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.8 77.78 29.2 - 2200 3 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.3 100.0 20.2 - 2300 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.9 100.0 21.9 - 07-19 707 0 17 82 69 192 218 109 18 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.3 59.55 24.0 30.7 06-22 770 0 19 91 75 207 235 118 22 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.3 59.22 24.0 30.8 06-00 775 0 19 91 77 210 235 118 22 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.3 59.10 24.0 30.7 00-00 785 0 20 91 77 213 237 121 23 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.3 59.11 24.0 30.8 Peak step 8:00 (95) AM Peak step 8:00 (95) PM Peak step 13:00 (70) Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 44 Packet Pg. 56 of 374 * Wednesday, October 5, 2022 Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin <-- 0 5 10 5 10 15 Vbin 15 20 Vbin 20 25 Vbin 25 30 Vbin 30 35 Vbin 35 40 Vbin 40 45 Vbin 45 50 Vbin 50 55 Vbin 55 60 Vbin 60 65 Vbin 65 70 Item 4 Attachment A - Crescent Park Neighborhood Post- Pilot Memo st-8947 Page 2 e% Mean Vpp 10 85 0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0100 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.8 100.0 26.4 - 0200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0300 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.1 100.0 26.9 - 0400 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 100.0 4.4 - 0500 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.8 100.0 26.6 - 0600 13 0 0 0 0 3 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.9 92.31 27.3 30.6 0700 57 0 0 7 2 9 19 17 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.9 68.42 26.4 31.8 0800 100 0 3 14 6 16 39 15 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.0 63.00 25.0 31.3 0900 72 0 1 9 5 18 26 10 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.9 62.50 24.2 31.2 1000 59 0 2 5 4 18 24 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.0 72.88 23.9 28.7 1100 60 0 0 3 5 23 18 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.8 71.67 24.7 30.4 1200 53 0 0 5 6 16 18 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.0 66.04 24.3 30.1 1300 43 0 0 3 0 12 19 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.9 81.40 26.4 31.2 1400 58 0 6 5 7 13 21 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.3 65.52 22.8 29.3 1500 44 0 1 9 3 7 15 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.8 61.36 23.6 31.3 1600 51 0 0 8 11 8 18 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.8 52.94 22.8 29.6 1700 67 0 5 5 8 20 22 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.3 65.67 23.1 29.2 1800 46 0 2 6 6 9 17 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.0 65.22 23.2 29.1 1900 23 0 0 4 7 7 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.5 60.87 20.4 29.7 2000 12 0 0 1 2 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.5 66.67 23.7 30.4 2100 17 0 0 2 1 7 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.7 76.47 23.6 28.5 2200 7 0 0 1 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.1 85.71 21.4 - 2300 3 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.1 66.67 25.3 - 07-19 710 0 20 79 63 169 256 96 25 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.7 62.11 24.2 30.5 06-22 775 0 20 86 73 189 274 106 25 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.8 61.68 24.1 30.4 06-00 785 0 20 87 74 195 275 107 25 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.8 61.66 24.1 30.4 00-00 790 1 20 87 74 195 279 107 25 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.8 61.77 24.1 30.4 Peak step 8:00 (100) AM Peak step 8:00 (100) PM Peak step 17:00 (67) * Thursday, October 6, 2022 Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin vPace Pace% Mean Vpp <-- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 10 10 85 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 100 0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0100 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5.9 100.0 15.8 - 0200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0300 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.0 100.0 30.9 - 0400 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0500 3 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.1 100.0 25.7 - 0600 14 0 0 0 2 5 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24.2 71.43 25.4 31.9 0700 59 0 0 9 3 17 13 12 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.5 55.93 25.2 32.4 0800 98 0 3 11 6 24 32 17 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.8 60.20 24.9 31.7 0900 66 0 1 10 12 18 15 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.3 54.55 22.7 30.0 1000 60 0 2 6 6 18 17 7 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.7 60.00 24.2 31.0 1100 56 0 3 4 10 13 15 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.7 57.14 23.7 31.3 1200 62 0 1 5 4 19 24 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.1 75.81 24.8 29.9 1300 58 0 2 1 3 14 24 9 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.1 75.86 26.2 30.8 1400 57 0 3 6 2 13 23 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.7 68.42 24.3 30.8 1500 61 0 3 5 5 9 29 5 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 19.2 63.93 25.0 31.5 1600 77 0 1 8 9 20 27 9 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.7 61.04 24.1 30.5 1700 79 0 6 10 9 22 24 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.5 59.49 22.2 28.4 1800 61 0 1 5 11 19 21 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.6 65.57 23.2 29.3 1900 26 0 2 4 5 9 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.6 57.69 20.7 25.9 2000 16 0 0 3 4 2 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.4 50.00 23.2 32.3 2100 15 0 1 1 2 7 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.5 80.00 21.9 28.0 2200 13 0 1 1 0 8 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.0 84.62 21.3 25.1 2300 3 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.0 66.67 24.0 - 07-19 794 0 26 80 80 206 264 103 30 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 20.8 60.45 24.2 30.6 06-22 865 0 29 88 93 229 279 111 31 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 20.8 59.77 24.0 30.5 06-00 881 0 30 89 93 239 282 112 31 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 20.8 59.82 24.0 30.5 00-00 886 0 30 89 94 240 284 113 31 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 20.8 59.82 24.0 30.5 Peak step 8:00 (98) AM Peak step 8:00 (98) PM Peak step 17:00 (79) * Grand Total Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin vPace Pace% Mean Vpp <-- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 10 10 85 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 100 -- 2461 1 70 267 245 648 800 341 79 9 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 21.0 59.93 24.0 30.5 Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 45 Packet Pg. 57 of 374 Item 4 st-8951 Page 1 A Attachment A - Crescent Traffic Data Service -- San Jose, CA Park Neighborhood Post - Speed Report Pilot Memo CustomList-8951 -- English (ENU) Datasets: Site: [5] LINCOLN AVE BT HAMILTON AVE AND UNIVERSITY AVE Data type: Axle sensors - Paired (Class/Speed/Count) Profile: Included classes: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 Speed range: 0 - 100 mph. Direction: North (bound), P = North, Lane = 0-16 Name: TDS Scheme: Vehicle classification (Scheme F) Units: Non metric (ft, mi, ft/s, mph, Ib, ton) Column Leaend: 0 [Time] 1 [Total] 2 [Vbin] 3 [vPace] 4 [Pace%] 5 [Mean] 6 [Vpp] 24 -hour time (0000 - 2359) Number in time step Speed bin totals Speed at start of pace Percent in pace Average speed Percentile speed * Tuesday, October 4, 2022 Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin vPace Pace% Mean Vpp <-- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 10 10 85 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 100 0000 4 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.2 100.0 18.8 - 0100 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.6 100.0 19.9 - 0200 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.0 100.0 21.8 - 0300 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 100.0 6.3 - 0400 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.4 100.0 22.4 - 0500 13 0 0 0 2 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.9 100.0 22.4 24.5 0600 20 0 0 1 6 10 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.2 85.00 20.9 25.0 0700 73 0 0 1 25 35 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.1 82.19 21.4 25.6 0800 120 0 4 17 40 49 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.1 75.00 19.4 23.7 0900 91 0 3 3 35 44 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.4 90.11 20.0 23.5 1000 100 0 4 8 44 39 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.1 83.00 19.1 23.1 1100 90 0 2 6 33 39 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.1 80.00 20.5 24.6 1200 120 0 1 9 47 57 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.8 86.67 19.8 23.0 1300 95 0 1 1 44 43 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.2 91.58 20.1 23.3 1400 106 0 2 22 37 35 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.6 69.81 19.0 24.0 1500 122 0 4 21 48 40 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.6 76.23 19.2 24.2 1600 127 1 4 18 43 51 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.4 76.38 19.3 23.6 1700 125 1 4 17 52 39 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.0 72.80 19.0 24.3 1800 99 0 2 18 38 33 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.4 77.78 19.0 23.6 1900 70 0 0 4 26 34 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.7 87.14 20.3 23.3 2000 46 0 0 4 24 16 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.9 86.96 19.4 23.5 2100 30 0 0 2 8 14 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.6 86.67 21.1 25.7 2200 26 0 0 1 8 13 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.9 84.62 21.6 25.6 2300 19 0 1 1 5 9 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.3 78.95 20.9 25.2 07-19 1268 2 31 141 486 504 95 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.1 77.76 19.6 23.8 06-22 1434 2 31 152 550 578 111 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.1 78.38 19.6 23.8 06-00 1479 2 32 154 563 600 117 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.1 78.36 19.7 23.8 00-00 1503 2 33 154 569 617 117 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.1 78.64 19.7 23.8 Peak step 16:00 (127) AM Peak step 8:00 (120) PM Peak step 16:00 (127) Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 46 Packet Pg. 58 of 374 Item 4 st-8951 Page 2 * Wednesday, October 5, 2022 Attachment A - Crescent Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Park Neighborhood Post- e% Mean Vpp <-- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 10 85 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 Pilot Memo 0000 4 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.2 100.0 22.7 - 0100 5 0 0 0 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.1 100.0 22.3 - 0200 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.3 100.0 22.1 - 0300 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 100.0 4.7 - 0400 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0500 9 0 0 1 0 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.1 88.89 23.4 - 0600 23 0 1 1 8 10 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.9 86.96 20.4 25.1 0700 68 0 1 6 21 34 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.7 82.35 20.3 23.9 0800 102 0 1 11 38 41 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.5 80.39 19.8 24.2 0900 110 0 1 10 40 45 13 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.8 78.18 20.1 24.7 1000 117 0 0 6 41 58 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.3 85.47 20.8 24.4 1100 105 0 8 9 24 51 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.9 73.33 19.9 24.6 1200 116 0 2 10 48 46 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.4 82.76 19.7 23.2 1300 112 0 1 8 49 45 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.8 87.50 19.9 23.8 1400 124 0 9 7 51 42 13 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.4 76.61 19.6 24.5 1500 122 0 2 13 39 59 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.8 81.97 20.1 23.9 1600 141 0 6 24 46 55 7 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.4 71.63 19.0 23.5 1700 134 0 3 21 62 38 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.5 83.58 18.9 22.8 1800 95 0 0 12 35 36 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.0 75.79 20.1 24.6 1900 65 0 4 5 31 21 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.9 80.00 18.9 23.5 2000 64 0 1 6 22 31 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.1 82.81 19.9 24.3 2100 37 1 0 3 16 15 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.4 86.49 19.4 23.0 2200 24 0 1 2 9 9 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.4 79.17 19.5 24.6 2300 13 0 1 0 6 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.4 84.62 20.3 26.3 07-19 1346 0 34 137 494 550 121 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.4 77.86 19.8 24.0 06-22 1535 1 40 152 571 627 133 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.4 78.18 19.8 23.9 06-00 1572 1 42 154 586 638 140 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.4 78.05 19.8 24.0 00-00 1592 2 42 155 588 649 145 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.4 78.02 19.8 24.0 Peak step 16:00 (141) AM Peak step 10:00 (117) PM Peak step 16:00 (141) * Thursday, October 6, 2022 Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin vPace Pace% Mean Vpp <-- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 10 10 85 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 100 0000 7 0 0 1 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.1 85.71 19.6 - 0100 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.1 100.0 20.6 - 0200 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.5 100.0 22.4 - 0300 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.1 100.0 22.7 - 0400 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0500 18 0 0 0 7 6 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.2 83.33 21.8 28.1 0600 25 1 1 2 9 8 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.2 72.00 19.3 25.6 0700 76 0 0 6 16 44 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.6 84.21 21.4 24.8 0800 101 0 0 13 38 47 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.1 84.16 19.5 23.2 0900 92 0 1 5 42 33 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.1 88.04 19.9 24.5 1000 106 0 0 7 43 48 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.0 86.79 20.0 23.1 1100 99 0 1 8 33 39 17 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.4 79.80 21.0 25.3 1200 136 0 3 22 55 48 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.0 76.47 18.9 23.2 1300 112 0 2 6 41 48 14 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.5 83.04 20.6 24.7 1400 115 0 5 12 45 43 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.4 76.52 19.3 23.8 1500 136 0 3 20 64 44 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.0 81.62 18.5 22.6 1600 138 0 4 13 63 48 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.0 80.43 19.3 22.9 1700 124 0 2 19 43 42 16 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.2 72.58 19.6 24.9 1800 139 0 4 20 58 51 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.6 82.01 18.6 22.7 1900 67 1 0 7 25 31 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.7 83.58 19.6 23.7 2000 47 1 0 5 14 19 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.3 72.34 20.3 25.9 2100 50 0 0 5 19 16 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.3 74.00 20.8 26.5 2200 24 0 1 3 9 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.3 79.17 19.9 24.3 2300 22 0 0 0 5 14 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.2 95.45 21.9 25.0 07-19 1374 0 25 151 541 535 115 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.3 78.17 19.6 23.7 06-22 1563 3 26 170 608 609 138 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.9 77.80 19.7 23.7 06-00 1609 3 27 173 622 632 143 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.9 77.87 19.7 23.7 00-00 1639 3 27 174 632 646 148 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.9 77.91 19.7 23.8 Peak step 18:00 (139) AM Peak step 10:00 (106) PM Peak step 18:00 (139) * Grand Total Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin vPace Pace% Mean Vpp <-- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 10 10 85 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 100 -- 4734 7 102 483 1789 1912 410 29 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.2 77.97 19.7 23.8 Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 47 Packet Pg. 59 of 374 Item 4 st-8952 Page 1 A Attachment A - Crescent Traffic Data Service -- San Jose, CA Park Neighborhood Post- ___________________ Speed Report Pilot Memo CustomList-8952 -- English (ENU) Datasets: Site: [5] LINCOLN AVE BT HAMILTON AVE AND UNIVERSITY AVE Data type: Axle sensors - Paired (Class/Speed/Count) Profile: Included classes: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 Speed range: 0 - 100 mph. Direction: South (bound), P = North, Lane = 0-16 Name: TDS Scheme: Vehicle classification (Scheme F) Units: Non metric (ft, mi, ft/s, mph, Ib, ton) Column Leaend: 0 [Time] 1 [Total] 2 [Vbin] 3 [vPace] 4 [Pace%] 5 [Mean] 6 [Vpp] 24 -hour time (0000 - 2359) Number in time step Speed bin totals Speed at start of pace Percent in pace Average speed Percentile speed * Tuesday, October 4, 2022 Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin vPace Pace% Mean Vpp <-- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 10 10 85 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 100 0000 4 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.2 75.00 23.4 0100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - 0200 3 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.6 100.0 24.1 0300 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 100.0 9.6 0400 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.5 100.0 22.4 0500 6 0 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.8 100.0 22.0 0600 35 0 1 3 7 18 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.3 80.00 21.1 26 0700 85 0 0 5 23 46 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.0 83.53 21.5 24 0800 147 0 2 10 51 65 18 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.7 79.59 20.5 24 0900 112 0 1 6 39 56 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.1 84.82 20.4 24 1000 89 0 2 8 41 29 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.3 80.90 19.5 23 1100 63 0 2 4 16 32 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.0 79.37 20.7 24 1200 56 1 1 6 23 22 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.2 83.93 19.6 23 1300 64 0 1 7 17 35 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.0 85.94 20.2 24 1400 89 0 1 8 28 42 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.8 82.02 20.2 24 1500 68 0 0 7 21 33 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.5 83.82 20.4 24 1600 138 2 0 7 37 67 24 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.0 79.71 21.1 25 1700 97 0 0 7 31 49 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.6 84.54 20.6 24 1800 89 0 1 8 32 40 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.1 80.90 19.9 23 1900 44 0 1 2 14 22 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.9 86.36 20.6 24 2000 33 0 0 1 10 21 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.2 96.97 21.0 24 2100 26 0 0 1 9 12 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.4 88.46 21.5 25 2200 19 0 0 0 5 11 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.3 89.47 22.4 27 2300 10 0 0 0 3 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.4 100.0 22.2 07-19 1097 3 11 83 359 516 119 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.5 80.22 20.4 24 06-22 1235 3 13 90 399 589 134 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.0 80.65 20.5 24 06-00 1264 3 13 90 407 606 137 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.0 80.85 20.5 24 00-00 1281 3 14 90 410 617 138 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.0 80.87 20.6 24 Peak step 8:00 (147) AM Peak step 8:00 (147) PM Peak step 16:00 (138) 0 6 5 6 6 8 2 3 3 5 8 6 4 5 2 4 2 3 4 4 4 Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 48 Packet Pg. 60 of 374 Item 4 st-8952 Page 2 * Wednesday, October 5, 2022 Attachment A - Crescent Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Park Neighborhood Post- e% Mean Vpp <-- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 10 85 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 Pilot Memo 0000 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.7 50.00 19.9 - 0100 3 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.4 100.0 25.3 - 0200 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.4 100.0 23.3 - 0300 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 100.0 9.4 - 0400 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.7 100.0 20.0 - 0500 5 0 0 0 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.1 100.0 22.7 - 0600 38 0 0 2 3 26 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.7 84.21 22.2 25.8 0700 115 0 0 10 27 50 27 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.2 80.00 21.7 26.1 0800 147 0 0 12 57 65 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.5 84.35 20.2 23.7 0900 109 0 0 6 35 51 16 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.8 83.49 21.4 25.3 1000 90 0 0 4 31 44 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.8 90.00 21.4 24.9 1100 81 0 0 11 25 28 15 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.6 70.37 20.6 25.8 1200 72 0 0 8 22 36 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.4 81.94 20.2 23.9 1300 69 0 0 1 17 39 11 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.8 84.06 21.9 25.8 1400 70 0 3 8 27 24 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.1 75.71 19.8 24.6 1500 84 0 0 7 24 39 13 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.7 77.38 21.3 25.5 1600 66 0 2 6 32 19 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.0 78.79 19.5 24.7 1700 84 0 1 11 26 40 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.3 83.33 19.6 23.4 1800 75 0 1 7 22 40 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.4 85.33 20.0 23.6 1900 63 0 1 3 15 33 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.9 80.95 21.2 25.6 2000 39 0 1 2 10 17 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.1 79.49 21.6 26.1 2100 27 1 0 0 10 10 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.1 92.59 21.1 25.3 2200 26 0 0 2 6 14 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.4 84.62 21.5 26.1 2300 14 0 0 0 1 11 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.3 92.86 22.7 25.5 07-19 1062 0 7 91 345 475 133 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.2 78.63 20.7 24.8 06-22 1229 1 9 98 383 561 164 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.8 78.68 20.8 24.9 06-00 1269 1 9 100 390 586 168 14 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.8 78.72 20.8 24.9 00-00 1283 1 10 101 392 591 173 14 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.8 78.72 20.8 24.9 Peak step 8:00 (147) AM Peak step 8:00 (147) PM Peak step 15:00 (84) * Thursday, October 6, 2022 Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin vPace Pace% Mean Vpp <-- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 10 10 85 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 100 0000 4 0 0 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.0 75.00 20.7 - 0100 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.4 100.0 19.2 - 0200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0300 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.3 100.0 10.2 - 0400 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.6 100.0 21.5 - 0500 8 0 0 0 1 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.6 87.50 23.9 - 0600 28 0 0 1 5 13 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.4 85.71 22.5 26.0 0700 112 0 1 10 29 54 16 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.6 78.57 21.1 25.7 0800 134 0 0 7 52 64 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.2 87.31 20.6 24.0 0900 97 0 5 6 27 42 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.3 78.35 20.7 25.4 1000 72 0 0 6 22 33 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.2 80.56 20.8 25.1 1100 71 0 1 2 28 30 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.4 85.92 20.6 25.0 1200 91 0 2 8 38 33 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.9 81.32 19.7 23.7 1300 64 0 0 5 17 30 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.4 75.00 21.5 26.1 1400 88 0 0 8 28 42 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.8 82.95 20.7 24.4 1500 103 0 1 17 35 40 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.2 75.73 19.3 23.4 1600 72 0 3 4 22 37 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.0 81.94 19.9 23.7 1700 96 0 3 10 39 39 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.3 82.29 19.2 22.9 1800 90 0 1 14 42 22 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.2 74.44 18.8 24.0 1900 41 1 0 5 14 18 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.5 82.93 19.7 24.2 2000 40 0 1 0 17 21 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.1 95.00 20.4 23.9 2100 36 0 0 2 10 17 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.7 80.56 21.1 25.7 2200 25 0 0 0 5 14 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.7 84.00 23.1 27.6 2300 14 0 0 0 6 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.5 100.0 21.1 24.2 07-19 1090 0 17 97 379 466 126 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.4 77.80 20.2 24.4 06-22 1235 1 18 105 425 535 145 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.7 78.30 20.3 24.4 06-00 1274 1 18 105 436 557 149 6 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.7 78.57 20.3 24.5 00-00 1289 1 18 107 438 563 154 6 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.7 78.20 20.4 24.5 Peak step 8:00 (134) AM Peak step 8:00 (134) PM Peak step 15:00 (103) * Grand Total Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin vPace Pace% Mean Vpp <-- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 10 10 85 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 100 -- 3853 5 42 298 1240 1771 465 29 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.7 79.08 20.6 24.6 Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 49 Packet Pg. 61 of 374 Item 4 st-8954 Page 1 A Attachment A - Crescent Traffic Data Service -- San Jose, CA Park Neighborhood Post- ___________________ Speed Report Pilot Memo CustomList-8954 -- English (ENU) Datasets: Site: [6] UNIVERSITY AVE BT CRESCENT DR AND CENTER DR Data type: Axle sensors - Paired (Class/Speed/Count) Profile: Included classes: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 Speed range: 0 - 100 mph. Direction: East (bound), P = East, Lane = 0-16 Name: TDS Scheme: Vehicle classification (Scheme F) Units: Non metric (ft, mi, ft/s, mph, Ib, ton) Column Leaend: 0 [Time] 1 [Total] 2 [Vbin] 3 [vPace] 4 [Pace%] 5 [Mean] 6 [Vpp] 24 -hour time (0000 - 2359) Number in time step Speed bin totals Speed at start of pace Percent in pace Average speed Percentile speed * Tuesday, October 4, 2022 Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin vPace Pace% Mean Vpp <-- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 10 10 85 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 100 0000 75 0 0 1 0 0 13 29 24 6 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 30.2 72.00 34.3 39.7 0100 45 0 0 1 0 2 2 17 16 4 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 29.9 73.33 34.7 40.6 0200 40 0 0 1 0 1 7 9 18 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 29.5 67.50 34.4 39.2 0300 26 0 0 0 0 1 3 7 8 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 27.6 69.23 36.0 44.1 0400 23 0 0 0 0 0 3 11 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29.2 82.61 33.7 38.8 0500 66 0 0 0 0 2 5 12 24 18 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 33.1 68.18 37.6 43.5 0600 126 0 0 0 0 2 10 42 39 26 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 28.7 63.49 36.3 43.0 0700 336 0 0 0 1 18 75 131 81 20 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 27.2 70.83 33.2 38.0 0800 508 0 0 2 4 24 188 212 62 13 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.1 78.74 30.9 35.1 0900 452 0 1 0 0 42 127 199 66 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26.4 75.44 31.3 35.7 1000 488 0 0 1 2 25 141 237 66 14 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 26.2 80.94 31.5 35.2 1100 586 0 2 0 2 34 198 266 77 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26.7 81.57 30.7 34.9 1200 663 0 0 0 4 44 250 290 61 12 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.6 81.75 30.6 34.3 1300 674 0 4 14 11 61 245 238 96 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26.1 73.29 29.7 35.1 1400 808 1 31 26 83 136 274 204 46 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 22.9 61.14 26.4 32.8 1500 734 6 69 172 135 122 118 91 19 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.3 41.96 20.3 30.1 1600 768 5 38 170 184 168 120 71 9 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.1 50.65 20.2 28.5 1700 655 5 67 141 130 64 100 110 27 9 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 9.3 43.82 21.2 31.9 1800 685 0 0 7 22 76 285 209 77 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24.8 72.55 29.3 34.3 1900 614 0 0 1 4 31 246 247 64 19 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 24.9 80.46 30.7 34.8 2000 553 0 1 3 2 23 211 249 59 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.1 83.00 30.6 34.7 2100 502 0 0 5 2 22 174 244 44 9 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 26.5 84.26 30.9 34.3 2200 348 0 0 5 0 9 59 141 115 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28.7 77.59 33.3 37.9 2300 244 0 0 2 2 4 47 94 65 21 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 28.0 72.13 33.9 39.2 07-19 7357 17 212 533 578 814 2121 2258 687 117 16 4 0 0 0 0 0 25.1 59.40 27.2 34.1 06-22 9152 17 213 542 586 892 2762 3040 893 175 26 6 0 0 0 0 0 25.1 63.23 28.0 34.3 06-00 9744 17 213 549 588 905 2868 3275 1073 215 33 8 0 0 0 0 0 25.9 63.17 28.3 34.7 00-00 10019 17 213 552 588 911 2901 3360 1171 251 45 10 0 0 0 0 0 26.1 62.78 28.5 34.9 Peak step 14:00 (808) AM Peak step 11:00 (586) PM Peak step 14:00 (808) Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 50 Packet Pg. 62 of 374 * Wednesday, October 5, 2022 Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin <-- 0 5 10 5 10 15 Vbin 15 20 Vbin 20 25 Vbin 25 30 Vbin 30 35 Vbin 35 40 Vbin 40 45 Vbin 45 50 Vbin 50 55 Vbin 55 60 Vbin 60 65 Vbin 65 70 Item 4 Attachment A - Crescent Park Neighborhood Post- Pilot Memo st-8954 Page 2 e% Mean Vpp 10 85 0000 87 0 0 1 0 0 23 26 22 12 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 26.8 65.52 34.5 40.3 0100 43 0 0 0 1 0 5 16 10 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 29.0 65.12 35.7 43.3 0200 40 0 0 0 0 2 7 20 7 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 29.1 80.00 33.3 38.7 0300 26 0 0 0 2 0 1 8 9 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 30.3 69.23 35.5 41.9 0400 29 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 16 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32.9 86.21 36.8 41.7 0500 62 0 0 0 0 1 3 18 20 13 5 1 1 0 0 0 0 31.9 74.19 37.7 42.3 0600 133 0 0 2 0 1 17 45 41 17 8 1 1 0 0 0 0 30.8 65.41 35.5 41.2 0700 317 0 0 0 0 8 75 134 65 30 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 27.3 74.45 33.3 38.4 0800 431 1 0 2 4 22 164 185 48 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.6 81.44 30.6 34.4 0900 463 0 0 0 4 32 150 200 60 15 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 26.3 77.97 31.1 35.3 1000 497 0 0 0 3 25 154 208 89 16 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 26.4 75.45 31.6 36.0 1100 554 0 1 2 10 45 193 219 73 9 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 24.8 74.37 30.4 35.1 1200 665 1 0 9 26 67 234 256 66 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24.9 73.68 29.3 34.0 1300 721 0 0 0 12 49 286 296 70 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.1 80.58 30.2 34.2 1400 805 2 10 47 81 127 266 218 46 5 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 23.8 60.75 26.7 33.2 1500 775 2 18 66 101 143 228 155 50 7 2 2 0 0 0 0 1 22.6 52.52 25.5 32.9 1600 759 2 33 112 148 174 144 113 29 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.2 45.19 22.5 31.3 1700 737 3 56 112 109 134 136 128 48 9 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 19.6 37.31 22.9 32.9 1800 619 0 1 3 3 63 245 219 78 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 24.4 74.80 30.0 34.8 1900 646 0 0 2 2 53 302 252 32 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24.9 86.07 29.5 32.9 2000 633 0 0 5 14 58 232 234 82 6 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 25.6 75.20 30.1 34.8 2100 539 0 1 4 6 25 200 234 62 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.8 83.12 30.4 34.6 2200 389 0 0 3 3 14 108 178 68 14 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 27.5 77.89 31.7 36.0 2300 242 0 0 2 0 0 35 118 70 15 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 29.2 80.99 33.8 38.3 07-19 7343 11 119 353 501 889 2275 2331 722 117 17 5 2 0 0 0 1 25.1 62.55 28.0 34.3 06-22 9294 11 120 366 523 1026 3026 3096 939 150 26 7 3 0 0 0 1 25.1 65.69 28.5 34.3 06-00 9925 11 120 371 526 1040 3169 3392 1077 179 29 7 3 0 0 0 1 25.7 66.08 28.8 34.6 00-00 10212 11 120 372 529 1043 3208 3488 1161 227 36 11 5 0 0 0 1 25.7 65.66 29.0 34.8 Peak step 14:00 (805) AM Peak step 11:00 (554) PM Peak step 14:00 (805) * Thursday, October 6, 2022 Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin vPace Pace% Mean Vpp <-- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 10 10 85 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 100 0000 102 0 0 1 2 3 13 40 24 15 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 30.4 67.65 34.4 40.2 0100 66 0 0 1 0 1 2 18 25 12 1 3 1 1 1 0 0 30.2 66.67 38.1 43.3 0200 44 0 0 1 0 0 1 11 11 6 7 2 3 1 1 0 0 30.4 54.55 40.9 51.9 0300 25 0 0 0 0 3 1 8 3 7 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 33.6 52.00 37.2 44.2 0400 29 0 0 0 0 1 3 8 11 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 30.6 75.86 35.8 40.4 0500 77 0 0 0 0 0 12 24 31 7 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 30.4 72.73 35.7 39.6 0600 125 0 0 0 0 2 18 33 39 22 8 3 0 0 0 0 0 29.9 59.20 36.6 43.2 0700 361 0 0 2 3 9 93 158 77 14 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 26.3 73.13 32.6 37.7 0800 495 1 1 3 7 43 186 178 65 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.1 73.54 30.1 35.3 0900 443 0 0 2 0 13 113 192 106 15 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 26.6 76.98 32.4 36.7 1000 533 0 0 1 4 52 195 205 67 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.1 74.86 30.3 34.9 1100 568 0 0 0 5 50 197 218 80 16 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.3 73.77 30.7 35.3 1200 700 1 2 8 12 54 286 245 83 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.3 76.29 29.9 34.5 1300 725 0 1 10 42 123 208 233 87 16 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 24.9 60.97 29.1 35.0 1400 762 0 5 19 52 113 278 214 68 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.9 65.22 28.0 33.6 1500 736 14 112 214 149 76 87 60 22 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.4 51.49 17.9 28.7 1600 800 11 37 98 160 188 167 107 28 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.0 44.88 22.3 30.5 1700 710 3 37 111 122 87 153 119 63 13 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.3 38.59 23.6 33.8 1800 674 0 0 1 20 90 236 259 62 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 24.5 74.18 29.5 33.9 1900 668 1 1 14 34 103 225 233 49 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.2 68.56 28.5 33.6 2000 531 1 0 1 14 21 189 245 52 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.3 81.73 30.6 34.4 2100 626 0 0 8 6 74 273 211 47 5 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 24.5 78.12 29.2 33.8 2200 378 0 1 5 1 20 96 173 69 11 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 26.4 74.34 31.6 36.1 2300 270 0 0 2 2 18 67 103 64 13 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 28.0 71.48 32.2 36.8 07-19 7507 30 195 469 576 898 2199 2188 808 120 23 1 0 0 0 0 0 25.1 58.31 27.4 34.4 06-22 9457 32 196 492 630 1098 2904 2910 995 159 36 5 0 0 0 0 0 25.1 61.33 27.9 34.4 06-00 10105 32 197 499 633 1136 3067 3186 1128 183 38 6 0 0 0 0 0 25.1 61.74 28.1 34.7 00-00 10448 32 197 502 635 1144 3099 3295 1233 235 53 14 5 2 2 0 0 25.7 61.08 28.4 34.9 Peak step 16:00 (800) AM Peak step 11:00 (568) PM Peak step 16:00 (800) * Grand Total Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin vPace Pace% Mean Vpp <-- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 10 10 85 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 100 -- 30679 60 530 1426 1752 3098 9208 10143 3565 713 134 35 10 2 2 0 1 25.7 63.11 28.6 34.9 Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 51 Packet Pg. 63 of 374 Item 4 st-8953 Page 1 A Attachment A - Crescent Traffic Data Service -- San Jose, CA Park Neighborhood Post- ___________________ Speed Report Pilot Memo CustomList-8953 -- English (ENU) Datasets: Site: [6] UNIVERSITY AVE BT CRESCENT DR AND CENTER DR Data type: Axle sensors - Paired (Class/Speed/Count) Profile: Included classes: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 Speed range: 0 - 100 mph. Direction: West (bound), P = East, Lane = 0-16 Name: TDS Scheme: Vehicle classification (Scheme F) Units: Non metric (ft, mi, ft/s, mph, Ib, ton) Column Leaend: 0 [Time] 1 [Total] 2 [Vbin] 3 [vPace] 4 [Pace%] 5 [Mean] 6 [Vpp] 24 -hour time (0000 - 2359) Number in time step Speed bin totals Speed at start of pace Percent in pace Average speed Percentile speed * Tuesday, October 4, 2022 Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin vPace Pace% Mean Vpp <-- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 10 10 85 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 100 0000 33 0 0 0 1 1 5 13 7 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 26.8 72.73 34.6 40.3 0100 18 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 7 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 28.4 77.78 36.7 43.2 0200 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 9 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 33.2 77.27 37.2 41.9 0300 34 0 0 0 0 0 5 6 14 3 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 31.2 67.65 37.2 45.4 0400 98 0 0 0 0 2 8 39 37 8 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 30.0 77.55 35.3 39.7 0500 269 0 0 0 0 1 24 107 73 49 7 5 0 2 0 0 1 29.6 67.29 36.4 41.6 0600 536 0 0 1 6 65 160 154 101 37 9 3 0 0 0 0 0 24.2 59.70 31.6 38.3 0700 797 0 0 1 10 147 347 219 58 8 4 0 1 2 0 0 0 23.6 76.54 29.0 33.3 0800 862 0 12 50 75 260 271 142 40 8 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 20.6 62.99 25.5 31.9 0900 787 0 3 8 25 176 367 163 37 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.6 75.86 27.6 32.2 1000 712 0 1 4 34 110 312 199 37 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.7 73.74 28.3 33.0 1100 699 0 1 0 19 193 239 195 42 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.6 69.24 28.0 33.1 1200 662 0 0 2 27 115 264 174 56 21 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.7 69.34 28.9 34.3 1300 570 0 1 0 6 95 225 155 66 15 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 23.4 70.00 29.6 35.1 1400 492 0 0 2 4 53 173 180 52 24 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 24.9 71.54 30.5 35.2 1500 448 0 7 8 13 76 169 133 35 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 24.0 69.20 28.4 33.6 1600 517 0 2 6 15 103 219 138 30 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 23.5 74.27 28.0 32.8 1700 467 0 3 1 1 37 179 178 52 13 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.7 76.87 30.4 34.9 1800 596 0 0 2 11 106 264 156 49 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.5 74.16 28.8 33.8 1900 392 0 0 0 1 33 169 125 54 9 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 24.2 76.02 30.4 35.2 2000 251 0 0 2 0 6 65 114 44 19 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 26.6 76.49 32.6 37.1 2100 202 0 0 0 1 6 56 92 28 15 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.9 75.25 32.5 37.2 2200 147 0 0 0 0 5 42 52 35 11 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 27.6 71.43 33.2 39.0 2300 78 0 0 0 0 3 8 29 29 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 29.8 74.36 34.7 39.6 07-19 7609 0 30 84 240 1471 3029 2032 554 132 28 6 1 2 0 0 0 23.3 70.05 28.4 33.4 06-22 8990 0 30 87 248 1581 3479 2517 781 212 41 11 1 2 0 0 0 23.9 69.00 28.9 34.1 06-00 9215 0 30 87 248 1589 3529 2598 845 230 44 12 1 2 0 0 0 23.9 68.65 29.0 34.3 00-00 9689 0 30 87 249 1593 3572 2777 992 301 62 19 2 4 0 0 1 24.2 67.12 29.4 34.8 Peak step 8:00 (862) AM Peak step 8:00 (862) PM Peak step 12:00 (662) Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 52 Packet Pg. 64 of 374 * Wednesday, October 5, 2022 Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin <-- 0 5 10 5 10 15 Vbin 15 20 Vbin 20 25 Vbin 25 30 Vbin 30 35 Vbin 35 40 Vbin 40 45 Vbin 45 50 Vbin 50 55 Vbin 55 60 Vbin 60 65 Vbin 65 70 Item 4 Attachment A - Crescent Park Neighborhood Post- Pilot Memo st-8953 Page 2 e% Mean Vpp 10 85 0000 36 0 0 0 0 2 4 16 8 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 29.0 72.22 34.4 41.6 0100 28 0 0 0 0 0 5 10 10 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 28.5 75.00 34.5 38.4 0200 14 0 0 0 1 0 2 8 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.6 78.57 31.8 38.5 0300 34 0 0 0 1 0 2 14 12 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 29.4 79.41 35.2 40.1 0400 89 0 0 0 0 0 7 31 31 16 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 29.4 69.66 36.1 41.2 0500 235 0 0 0 0 2 19 81 89 31 8 4 1 0 0 0 0 30.4 73.19 36.0 40.8 0600 561 0 0 0 3 39 170 184 119 32 9 2 3 0 0 0 0 26.3 64.17 32.3 38.1 0700 825 0 1 2 19 141 368 203 63 26 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 22.8 75.15 28.7 33.6 0800 938 0 14 89 167 229 306 100 27 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.0 56.93 23.6 29.8 0900 789 0 1 9 46 169 332 171 48 9 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.8 68.69 27.6 32.5 1000 678 0 0 7 21 169 249 151 55 23 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 22.0 67.40 28.4 34.3 1100 656 0 0 9 30 105 284 169 52 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.6 71.34 28.3 33.1 1200 613 0 0 15 29 106 227 175 48 6 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 24.8 66.23 28.3 33.8 1300 577 0 1 1 11 76 220 161 78 22 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.6 69.67 30.2 36.2 1400 486 0 0 6 9 67 184 158 46 13 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 24.5 70.37 29.5 34.4 1500 477 0 1 0 11 74 182 140 58 10 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 24.5 68.34 29.5 34.8 1600 509 0 5 1 15 66 242 138 33 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.7 78.00 28.7 33.1 1700 532 0 3 13 29 93 199 144 42 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.6 68.61 28.1 33.4 1800 567 0 3 7 33 113 215 153 34 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.0 68.61 27.9 33.3 1900 437 0 0 3 3 71 197 113 41 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.8 73.23 29.0 34.3 2000 253 0 0 0 0 9 65 114 49 12 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 26.6 79.84 32.7 36.5 2100 217 0 0 0 1 2 43 97 54 19 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 27.7 76.04 33.4 38.4 2200 174 0 0 0 0 2 31 75 51 11 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 28.3 77.59 33.9 38.1 2300 82 0 0 0 0 0 14 27 30 6 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 27.1 70.73 35.0 39.9 07-19 7647 0 29 159 420 1408 3008 1863 584 145 27 3 0 1 0 0 0 23.2 66.98 28.0 33.4 06-22 9115 0 29 162 427 1529 3483 2371 847 215 43 5 3 1 0 0 0 23.3 65.90 28.6 34.2 06-00 9371 0 29 162 427 1531 3528 2473 928 232 49 8 3 1 0 0 0 23.8 65.38 28.7 34.4 00-00 9807 0 29 162 429 1535 3567 2633 1080 291 62 14 4 1 0 0 0 24.3 64.30 29.0 35.0 Peak step 8:00 (938) AM Peak step 8:00 (938) PM Peak step 12:00 (613) * Thursday, October 6, 2022 Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin vPace Pace% Mean Vpp <-- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 10 10 85 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 100 0000 38 0 0 0 0 0 5 14 11 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 30.5 71.05 35.6 42.4 0100 23 0 0 0 0 0 1 8 4 5 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 30.4 56.52 38.4 45.5 0200 23 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 10 4 4 2 1 0 0 0 0 35.1 60.87 41.8 50.7 0300 37 0 0 0 1 0 5 6 14 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.0 70.27 36.2 42.4 0400 96 0 0 0 0 0 8 24 33 23 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 33.0 69.79 37.6 42.9 0500 274 0 0 1 0 0 32 122 80 32 4 2 1 0 0 0 0 29.1 76.28 35.0 39.8 0600 515 0 0 0 4 56 157 147 89 48 11 2 1 0 0 0 0 25.7 60.19 32.0 38.2 0700 823 0 0 0 10 163 371 201 60 14 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 23.0 73.63 28.6 33.2 0800 928 0 10 55 108 218 325 168 38 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.3 61.96 25.6 31.7 0900 802 0 1 7 40 193 326 181 37 14 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.3 72.32 27.5 32.1 1000 682 1 1 7 34 174 270 157 30 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.7 69.50 27.3 32.7 1100 582 1 0 2 3 108 239 168 45 11 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 22.7 73.20 29.2 34.0 1200 637 0 5 18 24 146 219 169 48 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.2 67.19 27.6 32.9 1300 546 0 3 9 4 62 222 172 53 16 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 24.3 73.99 29.7 34.7 1400 536 0 0 4 9 46 214 175 76 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.6 73.88 30.2 35.2 1500 489 1 3 1 16 112 211 103 27 13 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.1 74.23 27.9 33.0 1600 510 3 1 5 11 78 225 134 41 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.9 72.35 28.6 33.6 1700 564 0 3 3 5 101 276 131 35 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.6 78.01 28.4 32.4 1800 638 0 0 0 8 105 277 186 49 11 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.6 74.61 29.1 33.7 1900 437 0 0 0 1 43 187 156 40 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 24.3 79.41 30.1 34.0 2000 282 0 1 1 3 6 64 123 64 17 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 25.9 73.40 32.5 37.6 2100 240 0 0 0 1 17 85 84 38 12 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.6 72.08 31.3 36.3 2200 184 0 0 0 0 3 47 77 42 9 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 26.6 72.83 33.2 37.7 2300 91 0 0 0 0 1 17 40 23 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 27.3 78.02 33.9 38.4 07-19 7737 6 27 111 272 1506 3175 1945 539 128 26 1 1 0 0 0 0 22.7 69.99 28.1 33.3 06-22 9211 6 28 112 281 1628 3668 2455 770 214 43 4 2 0 0 0 0 23.4 68.81 28.7 34.0 06-00 9486 6 28 112 281 1632 3732 2572 835 231 49 5 3 0 0 0 0 23.4 68.32 28.8 34.1 00-00 9977 6 28 113 282 1632 3785 2746 987 313 67 13 5 0 0 0 0 23.6 66.56 29.2 34.7 Peak step 8:00 (928) AM Peak step 8:00 (928) PM Peak step 18:00 (638) * Grand Total Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin vPace Pace% Mean Vpp <-- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 10 10 85 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 100 -- 29473 6 87 362 960 4760 10924 8156 3059 905 191 46 11 5 0 0 1 24.2 65.91 29.2 34.8 Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 53 Packet Pg. 65 of 374 Item 4 st-8964 Page 1 A Attachment A - Crescent Traffic Data Service -- San Jose, CA Park Neighborhood Post- ___________________ Speed Report Pilot Memo CustomList-8964 -- English (ENU) Datasets: Site: [11] UNIVERSITY AVE BT E CRESCENT DR AND WOODLAND AVE Data type: Axle sensors - Paired (Class/Speed/Count) Profile: Included classes: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 Speed range: 0 - 100 mph. Direction: East (bound), P = East, Lane = 0-16 Name: TDS Scheme: Vehicle classification (Scheme F) Units: Non metric (ft, mi, ft/s, mph, Ib, ton) Column Leaend: 0 [Time] 1 [Total] 2 [Vbin] 3 [vPace] 4 [Pace%] 5 [Mean] 6 [Vpp] 24 -hour time (0000 - 2359) Number in time step Speed bin totals Speed at start of pace Percent in pace Average speed Percentile speed * Tuesday, October 4, 2022 Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin vPace Pace% Mean Vpp <-- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 10 10 85 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 100 0000 37 0 0 0 0 3 15 14 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24.4 78.38 30.1 34.5 0100 20 0 0 0 0 3 6 8 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.7 80.00 30.3 35.9 0200 22 0 0 0 0 1 9 7 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26.1 77.27 31.3 36.9 0300 37 0 0 0 1 4 11 16 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.4 75.68 30.2 35.1 0400 97 0 0 0 0 5 35 39 16 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 26.6 78.35 31.2 36.3 0500 275 0 0 0 2 39 102 90 31 9 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 24.4 70.91 30.1 35.4 0600 560 0 4 45 74 152 173 93 16 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.8 60.54 24.8 31.0 0700 898 1 70 343 148 146 122 47 18 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 8.7 56.24 18.3 27.0 0800 913 3 103 355 166 107 119 53 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.6 60.90 17.3 26.5 0900 825 0 32 195 195 174 157 57 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.4 49.94 20.3 28.2 1000 738 1 15 135 177 210 145 48 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 17.2 54.88 21.1 27.4 1100 719 0 29 134 112 180 178 75 8 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.6 50.76 21.8 29.2 1200 674 6 33 163 153 104 109 80 21 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.7 49.26 20.7 30.3 1300 530 4 22 63 106 114 132 70 17 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.7 47.55 22.7 30.7 1400 576 0 16 124 128 95 129 66 17 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.3 44.27 21.6 30.0 1500 449 3 27 117 92 109 77 22 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.3 47.22 19.3 26.7 1600 593 3 38 182 92 126 111 35 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.8 46.71 19.3 27.4 1700 527 1 34 98 99 108 129 50 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.2 45.35 21.1 29.1 1800 643 1 37 156 146 134 118 47 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.4 47.43 19.9 28.1 1900 387 0 12 17 36 109 162 42 6 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 20.6 70.80 24.6 29.5 2000 266 0 0 1 1 61 135 53 14 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.6 77.44 27.9 32.5 2100 217 0 0 0 4 48 98 58 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.2 82.49 28.0 31.9 2200 163 0 0 0 1 33 75 43 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.5 80.37 28.6 33.1 2300 82 0 0 0 0 10 30 34 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.5 79.27 29.9 33.9 07-19 8085 23 456 2065 1614 1607 1526 650 125 13 3 1 0 0 0 1 1 10.4 45.70 20.1 28.5 06-22 9515 23 472 2128 1729 1977 2094 896 169 20 3 1 0 0 1 1 1 19.6 42.74 21.0 29.1 06-00 9760 23 472 2128 1730 2020 2199 973 187 21 3 1 0 0 1 1 1 19.9 43.14 21.2 29.2 00-00 10248 23 472 2128 1733 2075 2377 1147 250 33 5 1 0 1 1 1 1 19.9 43.32 21.6 29.8 Peak step 8:00 (913) AM Peak step 8:00 (913) PM Peak step 12:00 (674) Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 54 Packet Pg. 66 of 374 Item 4 st-8964 Page 2 * Wednesday, October 5, 2022 Attachment A - Crescent Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Park Neighborhood Post- e% Mean Vpp <-- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 10 85 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 Pilot Memo 0000 39 0 0 0 1 3 19 11 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.3 79.49 29.7 34.4 0100 28 0 0 0 0 2 11 13 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24.7 89.29 30.7 34.1 0200 16 0 0 0 1 3 7 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.8 87.50 28.3 32.6 0300 39 0 0 0 0 4 12 15 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26.3 76.92 31.3 36.1 0400 94 0 0 0 0 6 35 35 14 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.9 76.60 31.2 35.9 0500 240 0 0 0 1 25 99 90 19 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.1 78.75 30.0 34.4 0600 577 0 3 26 55 125 225 117 23 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.8 66.72 26.2 31.8 0700 935 3 70 349 189 132 106 71 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.3 58.93 18.1 27.1 0800 981 2 123 401 194 137 88 33 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7.8 63.81 16.4 24.3 0900 824 2 50 227 195 166 129 46 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.4 51.58 19.2 27.2 1000 710 0 23 113 143 195 163 66 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.3 54.08 21.6 28.3 1100 689 0 14 101 137 176 167 81 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.6 50.94 22.3 29.7 1200 644 3 15 131 110 139 145 79 18 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.2 45.03 22.0 30.1 1300 554 0 17 93 75 119 135 88 26 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.9 47.11 23.3 31.3 1400 514 3 24 97 93 125 97 61 11 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.1 45.14 21.4 29.8 1500 469 4 16 120 105 72 92 43 11 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.1 50.11 20.6 29.2 1600 540 5 26 83 116 141 109 49 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.9 49.07 21.2 28.9 1700 617 1 41 182 118 132 96 38 8 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.8 48.95 19.3 27.7 1800 562 3 22 122 96 131 135 46 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.0 47.51 21.0 28.5 1900 419 1 4 37 70 133 129 44 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.9 64.44 23.3 28.7 2000 281 0 1 0 2 51 151 66 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.0 83.27 28.0 31.7 2100 232 0 0 1 5 37 122 53 12 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.9 81.03 28.2 32.1 2200 187 0 0 0 2 33 86 56 8 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 22.9 81.28 28.8 32.5 2300 90 0 0 0 0 13 39 29 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24.6 75.56 29.3 34.2 07-19 8039 26 441 2019 1571 1665 1462 701 131 19 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.7 44.86 20.2 28.5 06-22 9548 27 449 2083 1703 2011 2089 981 177 22 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.0 42.85 21.1 29.3 06-00 9825 27 449 2083 1705 2057 2214 1066 194 22 7 0 0 1 0 0 0 20.2 43.39 21.4 29.4 00-00 10281 27 449 2083 1708 2100 2397 1234 239 35 8 0 0 1 0 0 0 21.0 43.95 21.8 30.0 Peak step 8:00 (981) AM Peak step 8:00 (981) PM Peak step 12:00 (644) * Thursday, October 6, 2022 Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin vPace Pace% Mean Vpp <-- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 10 10 85 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 100 0000 41 0 0 0 0 2 17 20 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24.9 92.68 30.3 34.3 0100 26 0 0 0 0 2 12 8 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.8 76.92 29.9 36.1 0200 23 0 0 0 1 0 4 8 6 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 26.6 69.57 34.0 41.2 0300 37 0 0 0 0 3 10 15 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26.6 75.68 32.0 36.7 0400 103 0 0 0 0 5 36 38 17 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.5 76.70 31.7 36.1 0500 285 0 0 0 7 37 113 92 29 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 24.6 72.63 29.6 34.2 0600 538 0 3 26 76 145 158 101 23 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.5 58.36 25.4 31.4 0700 931 2 102 339 178 131 121 51 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.4 57.14 17.5 26.5 0800 1010 6 152 423 168 119 92 42 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6.9 63.07 16.0 24.6 0900 836 2 48 261 182 174 101 55 11 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.4 53.95 18.8 27.0 1000 697 2 16 151 162 185 139 38 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.2 51.36 20.4 27.2 1100 593 2 5 52 103 158 169 87 15 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.3 56.49 23.8 30.4 1200 649 4 21 149 137 109 148 69 11 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 9.8 44.68 21.1 29.2 1300 578 3 12 125 106 126 115 71 17 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.5 43.60 21.8 30.1 1400 519 3 19 100 92 114 111 68 9 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.4 45.09 21.8 30.0 1500 560 5 37 188 121 87 77 40 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.1 55.71 18.5 27.5 1600 533 4 22 128 116 104 106 44 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.2 45.97 20.3 28.6 1700 614 3 71 207 92 108 91 32 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.6 51.95 18.2 26.7 1800 629 3 38 168 103 125 140 46 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.4 44.04 20.1 28.3 1900 441 1 4 19 53 146 149 59 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.4 67.57 24.7 30.2 2000 304 0 0 1 21 58 142 64 15 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.0 75.00 27.4 31.7 2100 244 0 2 3 11 63 97 58 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.4 74.18 27.2 32.1 2200 204 0 0 1 0 28 112 49 11 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.2 83.33 28.7 32.9 2300 100 0 0 0 1 17 41 38 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.5 84.00 28.7 32.8 07-19 8149 39 543 2291 1560 1540 1410 643 109 12 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 9.4 47.26 19.5 28.2 06-22 9676 40 552 2340 1721 1952 1956 925 164 23 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 10.0 41.90 20.5 29.0 06-00 9980 40 552 2341 1722 1997 2109 1012 178 26 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 20.1 41.07 20.8 29.3 00-00 10495 40 552 2341 1730 2046 2301 1193 242 43 6 0 0 1 0 0 0 21.1 41.65 21.3 29.8 Peak step 8:00 (1010) AM Peak step 8:00 (1010) PM Peak step 12:00 (649) * Grand Total Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin vPace Pace% Mean Vpp <-- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 10 10 85 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 100 -- 31024 90 1473 6552 5171 6221 7075 3574 731 111 19 1 0 3 1 1 1 21.1 42.87 21.5 29.8 Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 55 Packet Pg. 67 of 374 Item 4 st-8963 Page 1 A Attachment A - Crescent Traffic Data Service -- San Jose, CA Park Neighborhood Post- ___________________ Speed Report Pilot Memo CustomList-8963 -- English (ENU) Datasets: Site: [11] UNIVERSITY AVE BT E CRESCENT DR AND WOODLAND AVE Data type: Axle sensors - Paired (Class/Speed/Count) Profile: Included classes: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 Speed range: 0 - 100 mph. Direction: West (bound), P = East, Lane = 0-16 Name: TDS Scheme: Vehicle classification (Scheme F) Units: Non metric (ft, mi, ft/s, mph, Ib, ton) Column Leaend: 0 [Time] 1 [Total] 2 [Vbin] 3 [vPace] 4 [Pace%] 5 [Mean] 6 [Vpp] 24 -hour time (0000 - 2359) Number in time step Speed bin totals Speed at start of pace Percent in pace Average speed Percentile speed * Tuesday, October 4, 2022 Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin vPace <-- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 10 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 100 0000 80 0 0 1 0 5 24 35 14 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 26.6 0100 48 0 0 1 1 3 14 18 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26.5 0200 38 0 0 0 0 2 10 14 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27.8 0300 24 0 0 0 0 0 7 7 6 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.3 0400 27 0 0 0 0 1 10 11 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26.2 0500 69 0 0 0 0 1 18 31 15 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27.1 0600 146 0 0 0 2 20 63 44 15 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24.0 0700 360 1 4 18 13 93 136 79 12 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 21.9 0800 571 0 6 28 105 176 181 69 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.7 0900 480 0 5 26 62 117 159 96 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.1 1000 488 0 2 10 47 168 204 52 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 20.2 1100 639 0 6 12 57 140 258 150 14 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.5 1200 691 1 8 40 122 165 248 94 10 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.0 1300 701 1 10 60 129 183 190 113 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.1 1400 848 0 9 101 187 219 243 82 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.0 1500 758 2 11 122 177 233 163 47 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.1 1600 821 1 10 145 215 258 160 30 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.2 1700 677 2 21 129 176 184 133 24 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.7 1800 698 0 7 54 148 253 164 59 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.7 1900 648 1 10 45 153 202 169 65 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 19.1 2000 571 0 2 14 89 192 208 62 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.1 2100 508 0 3 20 56 128 224 64 10 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.3 2200 359 0 1 9 11 60 155 100 22 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.2 2300 252 0 0 3 2 25 93 85 37 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24.3 07-19 7732 8 99 745 1438 2189 2239 895 105 10 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 19.7 06-22 9605 9 114 824 1738 2731 2903 1130 136 15 2 1 0 0 1 0 1 20.2 06-00 10216 9 115 836 1751 2816 3151 1315 195 23 2 1 0 0 1 0 1 20.7 00-00 10502 9 115 838 1752 2828 3234 1431 254 35 3 1 0 0 1 0 1 20.7 Peak step 14:00 (848) AM Peak step 11:00 (639) PM Peak step 14:00 (848) Pace% Mean Vpp 10 85 77.50 30.9 35.6 72.92 31.2 36.4 81.58 32.6 37.4 62.50 33.7 40.5 81.48 30.8 35.9 84.06 32.6 36.2 75.34 29.5 33.9 68.61 26.4 31.8 64.62 23.9 29.8 62.71 25.2 31.2 76.84 25.1 29.5 68.08 26.4 31.3 62.23 24.3 30.1 55.92 23.8 30.4 55.90 22.5 28.7 55.41 21.3 27.7 57.98 20.6 26.8 53.47 20.4 27.0 62.32 22.8 28.6 58.64 22.7 28.7 71.98 24.4 29.4 69.29 25.3 30.0 75.77 27.9 32.4 71.83 30.3 35.7 57.37 23.2 29.5 58.60 23.5 29.6 58.53 23.8 30.0 57.96 24.0 30.3 Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 56 Packet Pg. 68 of 374 Item 4 st-8963 Page 2 * Wednesday, October 5, 2022 Attachment A - Crescent Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Park Neighborhood Post- e% Mean Vpp <-- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 10 85 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 Pilot Memo 0000 89 0 0 1 0 3 28 43 9 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.5 82.02 31.1 35.2 0100 45 0 0 0 1 5 10 16 8 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27.6 71.11 31.8 37.2 0200 41 0 0 1 0 3 12 17 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.9 75.61 31.2 35.8 0300 25 0 0 0 1 0 11 4 5 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 26.3 68.00 32.7 40.1 0400 32 0 0 0 0 1 9 13 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27.0 87.50 32.3 36.3 0500 66 0 0 0 0 1 12 31 17 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 27.1 75.76 33.8 38.2 0600 150 0 1 2 0 13 48 60 23 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26.8 74.67 30.5 35.9 0700 356 1 6 15 35 69 129 74 25 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.9 63.20 26.3 32.5 0800 493 0 6 18 46 163 175 76 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.0 69.98 25.1 30.5 0900 484 0 4 17 65 101 201 81 11 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.4 66.94 25.6 30.8 1000 537 1 3 11 54 142 222 93 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.6 72.25 25.9 30.8 1100 591 1 2 24 82 143 228 93 16 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.4 65.99 25.2 30.5 1200 705 2 16 72 91 168 242 103 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.4 59.86 23.9 30.3 1300 767 0 13 48 139 238 236 89 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.6 62.19 23.5 29.5 1400 829 0 5 62 199 219 246 91 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.2 57.06 23.1 29.1 1500 809 3 10 87 193 231 207 62 13 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.2 58.34 22.4 28.5 1600 834 2 24 127 181 229 205 63 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.0 54.92 21.5 27.9 1700 779 1 15 95 151 227 198 77 14 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.2 55.71 22.5 28.9 1800 664 2 5 86 150 179 161 72 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.2 53.31 22.5 29.2 1900 670 0 15 85 138 235 158 37 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.1 62.99 21.7 27.4 2000 659 0 5 16 117 204 239 68 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.5 67.98 24.4 29.3 2100 543 0 1 12 55 184 215 68 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.6 75.14 25.2 29.9 2200 403 0 2 4 16 101 194 73 10 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 21.5 76.18 26.9 31.2 2300 252 0 0 2 2 13 108 97 26 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.4 82.14 30.2 34.0 07-19 7848 13 109 662 1386 2109 2450 974 128 16 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.8 58.22 23.6 29.9 06-22 9870 13 131 777 1696 2745 3110 1207 171 19 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.8 59.37 23.7 29.9 06-00 10525 13 133 783 1714 2859 3412 1377 207 24 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 20.8 59.93 24.0 30.1 00-00 10823 13 133 785 1716 2872 3494 1501 260 43 3 2 0 1 0 0 0 20.8 59.30 24.2 30.3 Peak step 16:00 (834) AM Peak step 11:00 (591) PM Peak step 16:00 (834) * Thursday, October 6, 2022 Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin vPace Pace% Mean Vpp <-- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 10 10 85 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 100 0000 102 0 0 0 0 7 37 37 19 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26.6 75.49 31.3 36.4 0100 68 0 0 1 0 1 15 35 14 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 28.3 79.41 32.5 36.4 0200 43 0 0 0 0 0 5 13 13 6 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 29.5 60.47 37.4 44.6 0300 27 0 0 0 0 2 3 7 9 4 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 29.4 59.26 36.0 42.7 0400 30 0 0 0 0 4 4 13 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28.0 73.33 32.2 37.7 0500 81 0 0 0 0 0 30 33 12 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 26.4 79.01 32.6 37.1 0600 139 0 0 0 1 24 45 45 21 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.2 65.47 30.0 35.7 0700 408 0 6 23 46 109 134 75 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.4 65.20 25.3 31.2 0800 546 0 9 43 111 145 167 58 9 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.7 58.97 23.4 29.3 0900 463 0 3 15 48 134 157 96 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.4 64.79 25.7 31.2 1000 543 0 2 27 70 183 200 55 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.6 71.64 24.2 29.1 1100 614 0 3 17 71 161 240 107 12 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 21.6 68.40 25.6 30.8 1200 751 2 16 56 88 195 299 84 6 1 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 20.7 67.78 24.3 29.8 1300 762 1 7 87 122 225 229 84 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.7 59.32 23.1 29.3 1400 809 4 18 75 161 229 228 85 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.6 57.23 22.8 29.2 1500 789 3 6 139 200 220 180 37 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.8 55.39 20.9 27.4 1600 860 1 20 121 205 235 217 57 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.4 55.23 21.5 27.8 1700 734 1 11 108 148 185 201 70 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.2 53.13 22.2 28.7 1800 687 2 6 56 133 213 224 48 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.9 63.76 23.0 28.6 1900 674 1 13 88 184 202 157 28 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.7 60.53 21.1 27.2 2000 557 0 0 13 61 186 217 72 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.7 73.43 25.3 30.0 2100 637 0 5 31 112 190 239 51 8 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.1 67.35 23.9 29.0 2200 378 0 2 2 18 83 169 93 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.0 78.31 27.2 31.7 2300 278 0 1 2 1 51 123 80 18 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.3 75.90 28.5 33.1 07-19 7966 14 107 767 1403 2234 2476 856 95 9 1 0 1 3 0 0 0 20.0 58.90 23.3 29.3 06-22 9973 15 125 899 1761 2836 3134 1052 133 12 2 0 1 3 0 0 0 20.1 59.66 23.4 29.3 06-00 10629 15 128 903 1780 2970 3426 1225 162 13 3 0 1 3 0 0 0 20.6 60.06 23.6 29.6 00-00 10980 15 128 904 1780 2984 3520 1363 237 30 10 4 2 3 0 0 0 20.6 59.26 23.9 30.0 Peak step 16:00 (860) AM Peak step 11:00 (614) PM Peak step 16:00 (860) * Grand Total Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin vPace Pace% Mean Vpp <-- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 10 10 85 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 100 -- 32305 37 376 2527 5248 8684 10248 4295 751 108 16 7 2 4 1 0 1 20.7 58.82 24.1 30.2 Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 57 Packet Pg. 69 of 374 Item 4 st-8944 Page 1 A Attachment A - Crescent Traffic Data Service -- San Jose, CA Park Neighborhood Post- ___________________ Speed Report Pilot Memo CustomList-8944 -- English (ENU) Datasets: Site: [1] UNIVERSITY AVE BT GUINDA ST AND SENECA ST Data type: Axle sensors - Paired (Class/Speed/Count) Profile: Included classes: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 Speed range: 0 - 100 mph. Direction: East (bound), P = East, Lane = 0-16 Name: TDS Scheme: Vehicle classification (Scheme F) Units: Non metric (ft, mi, ft/s, mph, Ib, ton) Column Leaend: 0 [Time] 1 [Total] 2 [Vbin] 3 [vPace] 4 [Pace%] 5 [Mean] 6 [Vpp] 24 -hour time (0000 - 2359) Number in time step Speed bin totals Speed at start of pace Percent in pace Average speed Percentile speed * Tuesday, October 4, 2022 Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin vPace <-- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 10 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 100 0000 66 0 0 0 0 2 15 21 21 4 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 27.7 0100 40 0 0 0 1 1 5 15 11 3 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 29.4 0200 42 0 0 0 1 1 4 14 14 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 29.1 0300 23 0 0 0 0 1 5 8 5 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 29.3 0400 21 0 0 0 0 1 5 8 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29.2 0500 42 0 0 0 0 3 1 18 12 6 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 29.8 0600 103 1 0 1 2 4 4 28 35 17 6 5 0 0 0 0 0 30.4 0700 252 1 0 0 2 11 57 89 68 19 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 27.6 0800 365 3 1 4 15 30 147 104 43 15 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.2 0900 330 0 0 0 5 29 117 94 61 18 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 25.9 1000 372 0 1 3 6 55 128 110 55 13 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 24.0 1100 506 0 2 6 22 96 190 126 50 13 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.2 1200 542 0 1 6 18 92 225 135 56 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.7 1300 555 1 2 8 13 108 223 148 46 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.9 1400 677 0 0 3 40 105 274 197 48 8 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 23.2 1500 601 0 1 2 13 109 291 126 53 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.5 1600 616 1 1 1 26 113 256 173 37 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.2 1700 535 1 0 5 23 113 196 134 51 11 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 23.5 1800 575 0 2 11 9 102 232 158 49 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.8 1900 546 0 0 0 10 94 232 156 51 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24.2 2000 507 0 2 6 12 58 217 164 42 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 24.5 2100 471 0 0 1 4 88 213 130 33 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.2 2200 321 0 0 2 2 21 78 133 75 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 27.6 2300 227 0 0 1 1 9 44 78 66 22 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 28.4 07-19 5926 7 11 49 192 963 2336 1594 617 135 18 2 1 0 1 0 0 23.7 06-22 7553 8 13 57 220 1207 3002 2072 778 162 25 7 1 0 1 0 0 23.3 06-00 8101 8 13 60 223 1237 3124 2283 919 193 32 7 1 0 1 0 0 24.2 00-00 8335 8 13 60 225 1246 3159 2367 989 216 39 10 2 0 1 0 0 24.2 Peak step 14:00 (677) AM Peak step 11:00 (506) PM Peak step 14:00 (677) Pace% Mean Vpp 10 85 69.70 34.1 39.0 67.50 34.9 40.9 73.81 35.2 40.8 65.22 34.0 42.2 71.43 33.0 38.6 71.43 35.5 42.1 62.14 36.4 43.9 64.68 33.1 39.2 69.04 29.8 35.5 65.45 31.4 37.2 64.52 29.9 35.8 67.00 28.6 34.3 71.40 28.6 34.1 71.53 28.2 33.6 73.41 28.5 33.2 75.54 28.3 33.2 71.59 28.2 32.9 66.92 28.4 33.9 73.39 28.6 33.6 75.27 28.9 33.6 75.94 29.0 33.6 76.43 28.7 33.7 75.08 31.9 36.7 66.08 33.9 39.6 68.31 29.0 34.4 69.01 29.0 34.3 68.08 29.3 34.8 67.29 29.4 35.0 Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 58 Packet Pg. 70 of 374 * Wednesday, October 5, 2022 Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin <-- 0 5 10 5 10 15 Vbin 15 20 Vbin 20 25 Vbin 25 30 Vbin 30 35 Vbin 35 40 Vbin 40 45 Vbin 45 50 Vbin 50 55 Vbin 55 60 Vbin 60 65 Vbin 65 70 Item 4 Attachment A - Crescent Park Neighborhood Post- Pilot Memo st-8944 Page 2 e% Mean Vpp 10 85 0000 80 0 0 2 0 3 14 26 24 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 28.2 67.50 33.9 39.7 0100 36 0 0 0 1 1 6 9 11 7 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 28.2 61.11 35.0 42.6 0200 40 0 0 0 0 0 10 16 8 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.5 72.50 33.9 40.9 0300 23 0 0 0 0 1 1 8 9 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 31.1 78.26 36.0 40.6 0400 29 0 0 0 1 0 5 7 11 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 27.3 65.52 35.1 40.7 0500 49 0 0 0 1 5 8 16 7 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 26.6 51.02 33.4 41.7 0600 105 0 0 1 1 4 15 32 28 15 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 31.8 60.95 35.2 41.6 0700 256 0 0 0 1 6 65 95 60 20 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 27.4 68.75 33.3 38.7 0800 357 0 1 3 12 73 148 93 24 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.4 70.87 28.0 33.1 0900 339 0 0 2 4 29 90 115 74 21 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 26.1 64.31 32.0 37.7 1000 410 1 3 2 19 47 141 134 54 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.8 67.80 29.6 35.2 1100 442 3 2 6 12 84 132 124 61 16 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.8 61.09 29.3 35.5 1200 558 0 0 3 32 128 215 132 39 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.2 69.18 27.9 33.1 1300 612 1 0 7 31 132 218 169 42 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.4 67.48 28.1 33.3 1400 677 1 0 1 16 176 261 157 54 7 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 21.8 70.61 28.1 33.3 1500 650 0 1 1 6 79 275 223 56 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 24.8 77.23 29.6 34.0 1600 607 0 1 6 23 131 231 163 42 7 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 23.4 68.04 28.1 33.2 1700 612 0 1 2 28 116 256 163 34 10 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 23.3 70.75 28.2 33.3 1800 534 0 3 2 21 127 218 115 44 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.8 67.60 27.8 33.7 1900 600 0 0 2 14 102 269 168 37 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.0 75.00 28.4 32.8 2000 579 0 1 3 3 117 262 144 42 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.0 76.86 28.6 33.3 2100 508 0 1 1 8 84 177 165 59 8 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 23.7 69.09 29.6 34.9 2200 356 0 1 0 3 31 75 149 78 16 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 26.2 68.26 32.0 37.5 2300 226 0 0 0 0 10 38 91 58 23 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 30.2 66.37 33.8 39.5 07-19 6054 6 12 35 205 1128 2250 1683 584 121 21 6 2 1 0 0 0 23.6 66.55 28.9 34.3 06-22 7846 6 14 42 231 1435 2973 2192 750 159 32 9 2 1 0 0 0 23.8 67.64 28.9 34.3 06-00 8428 6 15 42 234 1476 3086 2432 886 198 40 10 2 1 0 0 0 23.8 66.56 29.2 34.7 00-00 8685 6 15 44 237 1486 3130 2514 956 237 46 11 2 1 0 0 0 23.8 65.73 29.3 34.9 Peak step 14:00 (677) AM Peak step 11:00 (442) PM Peak step 14:00 (677) * Thursday, October 6, 2022 Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin vPace Pace% Mean Vpp <-- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 10 10 85 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 100 0000 93 0 0 1 0 8 20 27 19 14 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 26.8 56.99 33.6 41.2 0100 64 0 0 1 0 0 8 23 16 12 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 28.9 67.19 35.9 42.6 0200 44 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 11 13 9 2 3 1 0 0 0 37.8 59.09 42.9 50.1 0300 24 0 0 0 0 1 3 2 2 9 3 2 1 0 0 1 0 39.1 50.00 41.9 51.1 0400 26 0 0 0 2 0 3 1 7 11 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.7 69.23 37.9 44.3 0500 46 0 0 0 1 2 5 19 16 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 28.6 82.61 33.6 37.6 0600 106 0 0 0 0 3 28 26 35 10 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 26.3 58.49 34.2 39.7 0700 269 0 0 0 5 13 74 122 48 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27.3 75.46 31.5 35.8 0800 376 1 0 2 11 41 136 104 56 23 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 24.0 65.16 30.4 37.2 0900 324 3 0 5 5 39 89 96 71 12 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 25.9 58.64 30.9 37.2 1000 410 1 1 2 10 51 158 121 52 9 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.9 69.51 29.8 35.5 1100 451 0 1 3 5 76 180 126 41 17 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 23.9 72.28 29.3 34.6 1200 560 0 0 7 22 108 229 152 34 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.9 70.89 28.1 33.3 1300 595 1 3 3 29 128 226 148 52 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.2 68.91 27.9 33.6 1400 630 0 1 4 31 142 241 165 39 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.7 70.95 27.9 33.1 1500 633 0 0 3 13 93 297 169 46 9 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 23.9 74.72 28.8 33.6 1600 603 0 0 2 26 152 278 107 30 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.4 74.96 27.5 31.9 1700 578 2 3 2 14 129 208 161 57 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.2 71.11 28.3 33.7 1800 543 0 1 5 8 110 227 147 38 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.5 76.61 28.3 33.0 1900 593 0 1 6 14 130 226 169 43 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.7 70.15 28.3 33.6 2000 506 0 0 6 8 99 207 119 49 15 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.0 71.54 28.8 34.4 2100 572 0 0 1 12 103 226 178 37 12 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.8 74.30 28.8 33.4 2200 365 0 0 0 6 32 105 144 67 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 26.1 71.51 31.2 35.9 2300 249 0 0 2 3 11 79 89 52 10 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 27.0 76.31 31.7 36.4 07-19 5972 8 10 38 179 1082 2343 1618 564 111 15 3 1 0 0 0 0 23.3 69.21 28.8 34.1 06-22 7749 8 11 51 213 1417 3030 2110 728 152 24 3 2 0 0 0 0 23.3 69.13 28.8 34.1 06-00 8363 8 11 53 222 1460 3214 2343 847 172 28 3 2 0 0 0 0 23.8 68.50 29.0 34.3 00-00 8660 8 11 55 225 1471 3253 2420 918 233 50 8 6 1 0 1 0 23.8 67.24 29.3 34.8 Peak step 15:00 (633) AM Peak step 11:00 (451) PM Peak step 15:00 (633) Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 59 Packet Pg. 71 of 374 * Friday, October 7, 2022 Time Total Vbin Vbin <-- 0 5 5 10 Vbin 10 15 Vbin 15 20 Vbin 20 25 Vbin 25 30 Vbin 30 35 Vbin 35 40 Vbin 40 45 Vbin 45 50 Vbin 50 55 Vbin 55 60 Vbin 60 65 Vbin 65 70 Item 4 Attachment A - Crescent Park Neighborhood Post- Pilot Memo st-8944 Page 3 e% Mean Vpp 10 85 0000 106 0 0 1 0 7 16 38 35 5 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 29.4 70.75 33.7 39.0 0100 66 0 0 0 0 4 7 18 23 10 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 30.5 63.64 35.8 41.8 0200 60 0 0 0 0 2 5 12 17 16 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 32.2 60.00 38.3 44.6 0300 27 0 0 0 0 2 0 4 9 5 1 5 1 0 0 0 0 33.2 55.56 40.7 53.3 0400 33 0 0 0 0 2 2 5 15 6 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 33.6 69.70 37.1 42.8 0500 45 0 0 0 0 3 3 15 12 8 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 30.5 66.67 35.8 43.2 0600 112 0 1 0 0 8 17 38 28 19 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 29.5 61.61 33.9 40.3 0700 243 1 0 1 4 10 57 98 52 16 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 26.7 71.60 32.5 37.7 0800 333 2 0 8 12 50 115 87 49 6 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 24.2 63.36 29.2 36.3 0900 369 0 0 2 9 31 97 135 70 21 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 27.8 69.11 31.6 37.0 1000 309 0 0 0 5 64 116 71 45 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.7 62.78 29.5 35.6 1100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 1200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 1300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 1400 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 1500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 1600 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 1700 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 1800 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 1900 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 2000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 2100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 2200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 2300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 07-19 1254 3 0 11 30 155 385 391 216 51 9 3 0 0 0 0 0 26.7 62.76 30.6 36.6 06-22 1366 3 1 11 30 163 402 429 244 70 10 3 0 0 0 0 0 26.7 62.08 30.9 37.0 06-00 1366 3 1 11 30 163 402 429 244 70 10 3 0 0 0 0 0 26.7 62.08 30.9 37.0 00-00 1703 3 1 12 30 183 435 521 355 120 28 11 2 0 1 1 0 27.4 59.25 31.9 38.4 Peak step 9:00 (369) AM Peak step 9:00 (369) * Saturday, October 8, 2022 Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin vPace Pace% Mean Vpp <-- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 10 10 85 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 100 0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0400 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0600 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0700 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0800 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0900 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 1000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 1100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 1200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 1300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 1400 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 1500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 1600 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 1700 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 1800 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 1900 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 2000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 2100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 2200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 2300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 07-19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 06-22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 06-00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 00-00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 60 Packet Pg. 72 of 374 * Sunday, October 9, 2022 Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin <-- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0400 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0600 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0700 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0800 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0900 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1400 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1600 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1700 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1800 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1900 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07-19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06-22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06-00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00-00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * Grand Total Time Total Vbin Vbin <-- 0 5 5 10 27383 25 40 Item 4 st-8944 Page 4 Attachment A - Crescent Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Park Neighborhood Post- e% Mean Vpp 50 55 60 651 110 85 55 60 65 70 Pilot Memo 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin vPace Pace% Mean Vpp 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 10 10 85 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 100 171 717 4386 9977 7822 3218 806 163 40 12 2 2 2 0 24.0 65.80 29.5 35.1 Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 61 Packet Pg. 73 of 374 Item 4 st-8943 Page 1 A Attachment A - Crescent Traffic Data Service -- San Jose, CA Park Neighborhood Post- ___________________ Speed Report Pilot Memo CustomList-8943 -- English (ENU) Datasets: Site: [1] UNIVERSITY AVE BT GUINDA ST AND SENECA ST Data type: Axle sensors - Paired (Class/Speed/Count) Profile: Included classes: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 Speed range: 0 - 100 mph. Direction: West (bound), P = East, Lane = 0-16 Name: TDS Scheme: Vehicle classification (Scheme F) Units: Non metric (ft, mi, ft/s, mph, Ib, ton) Column Leaend: 0 [Time] 1 [Total] 2 [Vbin] 3 [vPace] 4 [Pace%] 5 [Mean] 6 [Vpp] 24 -hour time (0000 - 2359) Number in time step Speed bin totals Speed at start of pace Percent in pace Average speed Percentile speed * Tuesday, October 4, 2022 Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin vPace Pace% Mean Vpp <-- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 10 10 85 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 100 0000 26 0 0 0 1 1 4 10 6 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27.8 69.23 33.8 40.8 0100 19 0 0 0 1 0 2 4 8 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 30.1 63.16 36.1 45.2 0200 20 0 0 1 0 2 0 6 2 4 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 30.6 50.00 37.2 48.6 0300 36 0 0 0 2 2 2 9 11 7 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 30.9 63.89 35.7 44.1 0400 96 0 1 0 3 1 6 21 39 16 8 0 1 0 0 0 0 32.1 69.79 36.7 41.9 0500 265 0 1 2 6 4 29 89 64 27 24 12 4 1 0 2 0 29.6 59.62 36.6 45.4 0600 496 0 4 6 16 34 65 129 106 83 43 8 1 1 0 0 0 28.6 48.79 34.9 43.9 0700 684 1 2 12 39 74 135 205 149 55 7 2 2 1 0 0 0 27.5 53.36 31.3 38.7 0800 716 1 10 65 140 188 142 94 60 14 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.3 49.58 24.4 33.3 0900 718 0 6 28 99 142 168 159 87 27 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.7 45.82 27.3 35.2 1000 622 0 7 25 127 127 144 118 57 14 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.0 45.66 26.0 34.3 1100 636 1 7 23 105 155 155 127 57 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.5 49.21 25.8 33.2 1200 621 1 9 37 77 124 161 129 64 14 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 24.3 47.99 26.7 34.4 1300 521 1 3 20 41 99 153 145 49 7 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.0 60.46 27.9 33.9 1400 442 0 2 13 28 63 119 120 71 21 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.7 56.33 29.4 36.6 1500 459 0 7 19 41 73 94 144 67 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 26.6 55.77 28.4 35.5 1600 488 0 1 25 53 79 118 142 53 16 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 25.8 54.51 27.9 34.9 1700 472 1 0 10 19 80 116 139 86 19 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.7 54.87 29.8 36.9 1800 542 2 6 31 46 95 131 159 55 14 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 24.8 54.24 27.6 34.7 1900 360 0 1 10 28 59 92 109 45 12 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 26.5 57.78 28.9 35.6 2000 231 2 4 18 27 26 32 60 47 13 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 29.3 46.75 28.4 37.3 2100 177 0 0 5 20 24 35 51 30 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.4 50.28 29.6 38.1 2200 120 0 0 1 1 13 30 29 23 18 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 25.2 49.17 33.2 40.9 2300 72 0 0 0 0 8 9 14 22 12 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 30.2 50.00 35.7 43.0 07-19 6921 8 60 308 815 1299 1636 1681 855 218 31 6 2 1 0 0 1 25.5 48.04 27.6 35.2 06-22 8185 10 69 347 906 1442 1860 2030 1083 336 82 14 3 2 0 0 1 25.5 47.66 28.2 36.0 06-00 8377 10 69 348 907 1463 1899 2073 1128 366 92 16 3 2 0 0 1 25.5 47.55 28.3 36.2 00-00 8839 10 71 351 920 1473 1942 2212 1258 425 132 31 8 3 0 2 1 25.5 47.20 28.7 36.7 Peak step 9:00 (718) AM Peak step 9:00 (718) PM Peak step 12:00 (621) Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 62 Packet Pg. 74 of 374 * Wednesday, October 5, 2022 Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin <-- 0 5 10 5 10 15 0000 30 0 0 0 0100 22 0 0 0 0200 15 0 0 0 0300 35 0 0 1 0400 90 0 0 1 0500 219 0 0 5 0600 530 0 0 4 0700 715 0 0 18 0800 775 3 11 109 0900 748 2 8 23 1000 610 0 9 42 1100 595 2 10 37 1200 590 0 4 22 1300 523 0 2 17 1400 482 1 3 34 1500 426 0 2 7 1600 503 0 2 11 1700 551 0 4 13 1800 528 0 2 9 1900 396 0 3 13 2000 229 0 2 13 2100 190 0 0 5 2200 134 0 0 2 2300 67 0 0 0 07-19 7046 8 57 342 06-22 8391 8 62 377 06-00 8592 8 62 379 00-00 9003 8 62 386 Peak step 8:00 (775) AM Peak St * Thursday, October 6, 2022 Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin <-- 0 5 10 5 10 15 0000 32 0 0 0 0100 18 0 0 0 0200 27 0 0 0 0300 36 0 0 0 0400 92 0 0 0 0500 258 0 0 3 0600 501 0 2 15 0700 679 0 1 15 0800 825 1 7 49 0900 735 0 6 36 1000 613 1 7 45 1100 557 1 3 32 1200 585 1 4 30 1300 516 2 14 23 1400 501 0 3 27 1500 495 0 5 15 1600 497 2 11 33 1700 530 1 10 31 1800 579 0 2 16 1900 399 1 2 18 2000 249 0 2 10 2100 213 1 2 2 2200 156 0 1 1 2300 81 0 0 0 07-19 7112 9 73 352 06-22 8474 11 81 397 06-00 8711 11 82 398 00-00 9174 11 82 401 Vbin Vbin Vbin 15 20 25 20 25 30 0 1 8 0 1 2 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 4 11 8 12 11 11 29 104 32 49 176 178 171 127 88 154 164 79 144 146 114 131 158 80 103 158 51 88 137 68 84 111 23 66 106 58 72 115 57 111 179 35 123 158 38 65 130 28 35 40 9 23 34 8 18 18 0 3 8 863 1296 1735 949 1448 2043 957 1469 2069 966 1487 2104 ep 8:00 (775) PM Vbin Vbin Vbin 15 20 25 20 25 30 0 0 7 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 1 4 9 13 26 42 62 76 36 76 179 108 207 252 87 169 207 85 91 185 77 131 136 92 126 120 70 118 139 66 71 128 40 63 135 82 98 111 65 97 156 65 104 167 55 91 95 28 52 45 20 24 52 4 13 21 3 4 11 873 1351 1915 1018 1580 2183 1025 1597 2215 1035 1612 2255 Vbin 30 35 6 5 7 11 16 43 127 209 147 171 122 102 147 138 107 144 155 136 137 98 62 62 31 19 1715 2064 2114 2202 ?eak s Vbin 30 35 6 5 0 2 19 69 118 248 132 165 142 100 138 109 145 162 111 127 164 88 52 58 62 29 1743 2059 2150 2251 Item 4 st-8943 Page 2 Attachment A - Crescent Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Park Neighborhood Post- e% Mean Vpp 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 10 85 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 Pilot Memo 10 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33.2 60.00 34.0 41.0 10 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 29.0 68.18 36.1 41.5 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24.9 66.67 32.4 40.0 11 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 32.0 71.43 37.3 42.4 29 24 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 34.6 61.11 36.2 43.3 73 43 15 3 5 0 0 0 1 31.7 60.73 36.2 42.8 136 81 24 12 2 0 0 0 0 28.9 51.51 34.5 41.9 163 50 16 1 1 0 0 0 0 27.2 59.58 31.6 38.0 28 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.6 47.35 22.9 31.9 85 44 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 25.4 45.99 28.0 36.4 56 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.8 48.52 25.9 33.9 36 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.8 50.08 24.8 32.7 61 14 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 24.0 53.39 27.3 34.2 75 14 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 24.0 55.45 28.3 35.6 61 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 24.4 45.23 26.9 35.2 58 15 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 26.6 59.62 29.7 36.0 75 14 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.7 55.07 28.7 35.6 43 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.2 59.35 27.3 33.7 51 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.4 60.23 28.0 34.1 37 10 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 24.5 59.60 27.8 34.4 36 10 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 27.0 47.16 28.4 36.9 28 27 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 27.6 55.26 31.5 40.2 29 18 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 30.3 45.52 32.8 42.0 25 9 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 31.2 70.15 35.4 40.9 792 201 33 3 1 0 0 0 0 24.3 49.11 27.3 34.9 1029 329 63 16 3 0 0 0 0 24.9 48.83 27.9 35.7 1083 356 74 18 3 0 0 0 0 24.9 48.58 28.1 35.8 1218 443 96 22 8 0 0 0 1 25.5 47.73 28.4 36.4 :ep 12:00 (590) Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin vPace Pace% Mean Vpp 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 10 10 85 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 100 10 5 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 32.2 59.38 36.7 43.3 3 5 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 33.7 61.11 40.3 51.8 0 2 8 7 3 1 2 0 1 44.9 55.56 50.3 63.2 8 13 7 4 1 1 0 0 0 39.3 63.89 43.8 50.7 22 21 17 5 1 1 0 0 0 33.2 51.09 40.1 47.4 84 46 5 1 1 1 0 0 0 32.2 64.73 34.7 40.7 128 44 11 1 2 0 0 0 0 28.7 50.10 31.1 38.8 98 22 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.8 64.95 30.0 35.7 54 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.2 56.36 25.6 32.3 50 14 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 22.6 54.69 26.3 33.1 47 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 24.5 54.65 26.2 33.4 60 16 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.8 49.01 26.4 34.7 59 12 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.0 46.84 26.5 34.6 33 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.0 52.91 25.7 32.8 52 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 24.8 55.29 27.4 34.3 56 15 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.1 60.00 28.7 35.1 42 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.7 44.67 25.6 34.0 29 13 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.0 54.72 26.2 33.1 51 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.7 58.72 27.5 33.4 40 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.1 49.62 26.7 34.4 38 16 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 21.0 40.16 28.6 37.1 37 11 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 25.5 53.52 30.0 38.2 35 12 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 28.5 62.18 33.0 39.5 21 9 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 28.1 64.20 33.7 40.7 631 144 20 1 0 0 0 0 0 24.3 51.83 26.8 34.0 874 221 43 5 2 0 0 0 0 24.8 50.17 27.2 34.6 930 242 54 5 2 0 0 0 0 24.8 50.17 27.4 34.8 1057 334 94 26 8 5 2 0 1 24.8 49.12 27.9 35.5 Peak step 8:00 (825) AM Peak step 8:00 (825) PM Peak step 12:00 (585) Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 63 Packet Pg. 75 of 374 Item 4 st-8943 Page 3 * Friday, October 7, 2022 Attachment A - Crescent Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Park Neighborhood Post- e% Mean Vpp <-- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 10 85 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 Pilot Memo 0000 32 0 0 0 1 0 7 10 10 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27.8 71.88 33.4 39.8 0100 26 0 0 0 1 1 5 5 9 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 29.8 57.69 35.2 43.5 0200 19 0 0 0 0 1 1 4 4 4 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 32.7 63.16 40.0 51.4 0300 43 0 0 1 0 2 1 4 4 11 11 5 3 0 0 1 0 40.3 53.49 43.2 51.8 0400 108 0 0 1 3 4 2 12 33 33 8 6 2 2 1 1 0 34.7 61.11 40.0 47.1 0500 208 0 0 3 4 4 18 53 68 46 7 3 1 1 0 0 0 32.7 59.62 36.2 42.7 0600 457 1 1 8 9 23 46 143 122 70 28 5 1 0 0 0 0 30.3 58.42 34.8 41.6 0700 670 0 2 20 53 84 139 212 121 34 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 27.4 55.97 29.9 37.1 0800 786 3 8 70 185 230 172 88 23 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.7 54.71 23.0 30.0 0900 695 1 1 41 66 134 172 179 81 18 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 24.8 50.36 27.5 34.9 1000 447 0 1 18 60 109 120 97 34 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.1 56.15 26.4 33.3 1100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 1200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 1300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 1400 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 1500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 1600 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 1700 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 1800 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 1900 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 2000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 2100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 2200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 2300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 07-19 2598 4 12 149 364 557 603 576 259 67 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 22.5 47.73 26.6 34.3 06-22 3055 5 13 157 373 580 649 719 381 137 33 7 1 0 0 0 0 23.5 44.91 27.8 35.9 06-00 3055 5 13 157 373 580 649 719 381 137 33 7 1 0 0 0 0 23.5 44.91 27.8 35.9 00-00 3491 5 13 162 382 592 683 807 509 237 63 23 9 3 1 2 0 26.3 42.77 29.0 37.8 Peak step 8:00 (786) AM Peak step 8:00 (786) * Saturday, October 8, 2022 Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin vPace Pace% Mean Vpp <-- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 10 10 85 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 100 0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0400 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0600 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0700 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0800 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0900 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 1000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 1100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 1200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 1300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 1400 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 1500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 1600 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 1700 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 1800 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 1900 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 2000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 2100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 2200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 2300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 07-19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 06-22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 06-00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 00-00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 64 Packet Pg. 76 of 374 Item 4 st-8943 Page 4 * Sunday, October 9, 2022 Attachment A - Crescent Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Park Neighborhood Post- e% Mean Vpp <-- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 10 85 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 Pilot Memo 0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0400 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0600 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0700 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0800 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0900 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 1000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 1100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 1200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 1300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 1400 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 1500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 1600 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 1700 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 1800 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 1900 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 2000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 2100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 2200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 2300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 07-19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 06-22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 06-00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 00-00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - * Grand Total Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin vPace Pace% Mean Vpp <-- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 10 10 85 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 100 -- 30507 34 228 1300 3303 5164 6984 7472 4042 1439 385 102 33 11 3 4 3 25.4 47.18 28.4 36.4 Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 65 Packet Pg. 77 of 374 Item 4 st-8950 Page 1 A Attachment A - Crescent Traffic Data Service -- San Jose, CA Park Neighborhood Post - Speed Report Pilot Memo CustomList-8950 -- English (ENU) Datasets: Site: [4] UNIVERSITY AVE BT PALM ST AND LINCOLN AVE Data type: Axle sensors - Paired (Class/Speed/Count) Profile: Included classes: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 Speed range: 0 - 100 mph. Direction: East (bound), P = East, Lane = 0-16 Name: TDS Scheme: Vehicle classification (Scheme F) Units: Non metric (ft, mi, ft/s, mph, Ib, ton) Column Leaend: 0 [Time] 1 [Total] 2 [Vbin] 3 [vPace] 4 [Pace%] 5 [Mean] 6 [Vpp] 24 -hour time (0000 - 2359) Number in time step Speed bin totals Speed at start of pace Percent in pace Average speed Percentile speed * Tuesday, October 4, 2022 Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin vPace Pace% Mean Vpp <-- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 10 10 85 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 100 0000 70 0 0 1 0 0 12 25 25 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 30.2 74.29 34.1 38.7 0100 43 0 0 0 1 2 4 17 12 5 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 30.3 72.09 34.5 40.1 0200 39 0 0 0 1 1 3 14 13 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31.8 71.79 35.2 41.2 0300 26 0 1 0 1 0 6 5 7 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 27.8 61.54 34.4 45.8 0400 20 0 0 0 0 2 1 7 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28.5 75.00 34.0 38.3 0500 51 0 0 0 0 1 3 12 15 19 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 33.2 72.55 37.6 42.5 0600 112 0 0 0 1 2 19 43 28 13 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 30.0 64.29 34.4 40.6 0700 280 0 0 3 0 16 66 105 63 24 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 27.6 67.86 32.7 38.7 0800 429 0 0 2 10 29 147 169 60 8 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 26.1 76.22 30.7 35.2 0900 373 0 1 4 14 38 87 163 58 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.5 68.36 30.5 35.3 1000 397 0 0 5 7 32 119 167 55 9 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 26.6 73.30 30.7 35.3 1100 523 0 0 3 8 39 149 256 64 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 26.8 78.01 30.8 34.8 1200 568 0 1 6 34 60 187 225 50 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.2 72.54 29.1 33.9 1300 589 0 0 2 15 36 166 292 76 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26.4 83.02 30.8 34.7 1400 727 1 4 22 45 67 267 262 49 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.6 73.18 28.5 33.4 1500 621 10 77 52 50 56 118 190 55 12 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 25.5 50.08 25.0 34.0 1600 660 0 1 9 24 77 230 247 65 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.2 72.12 29.4 34.3 1700 547 25 94 64 50 47 71 147 42 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26.2 42.23 22.1 34.0 1800 604 1 0 8 16 33 230 232 72 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 26.2 77.15 30.2 34.8 1900 552 1 2 14 13 48 189 211 63 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 24.9 73.01 29.7 34.6 2000 516 1 4 15 34 52 189 177 40 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 24.6 71.32 28.3 33.5 2100 478 0 2 11 14 37 157 206 43 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.2 76.36 29.7 34.1 2200 324 0 0 3 4 14 63 123 107 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28.1 76.23 32.6 37.2 2300 224 0 0 3 3 11 39 68 70 25 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 28.5 65.18 33.7 39.5 07-19 6318 37 178 180 273 530 1837 2455 709 104 11 4 0 0 0 0 0 25.6 68.47 28.9 34.7 06-22 7976 39 186 220 335 669 2391 3092 883 138 19 4 0 0 0 0 0 25.9 69.26 29.0 34.7 06-00 8524 39 186 226 342 694 2493 3283 1060 173 24 4 0 0 0 0 0 26.2 68.76 29.3 35.0 00-00 8773 39 187 227 345 700 2522 3363 1140 214 29 7 0 0 0 0 0 26.2 68.22 29.5 35.1 Peak step 14:00 (727) AM Peak step 11:00 (523) PM Peak step 14:00 (727) Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 66 Packet Pg. 78 of 374 * Wednesday, October 5, 2022 Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin <-- 0 5 10 5 10 15 Vbin 15 20 Vbin 20 25 Vbin 25 30 Vbin 30 35 Vbin 35 40 Vbin 40 45 Vbin 45 50 Vbin 50 55 Vbin 55 60 Vbin 60 65 Vbin 65 70 Item 4 Attachment A - Crescent Park Neighborhood Post- Pilot Memo st-8950 Page 2 e% Mean Vpp 10 85 0000 85 0 0 1 0 0 17 30 26 9 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 28.2 72.94 34.2 39.6 0100 37 0 0 0 0 0 6 12 11 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 26.8 67.57 35.2 41.9 0200 39 0 0 0 0 0 5 21 8 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28.0 79.49 34.1 39.5 0300 26 0 1 0 1 0 1 8 10 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 30.0 69.23 35.5 43.0 0400 29 0 0 0 0 0 1 14 9 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 30.6 89.66 36.0 40.3 0500 53 0 0 0 0 0 2 16 16 15 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 33.2 73.58 37.8 43.0 0600 113 0 0 1 1 1 12 31 40 23 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 29.3 65.49 36.0 41.5 0700 278 0 0 1 2 19 74 106 65 8 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 27.2 70.14 31.9 37.2 0800 401 0 0 2 10 58 122 140 58 7 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 26.1 67.83 30.2 35.4 0900 393 0 1 7 19 30 107 150 68 9 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 26.8 70.48 30.4 35.7 1000 411 0 1 6 24 38 119 169 47 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.8 71.05 29.7 34.7 1100 477 0 3 23 47 52 118 161 65 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 26.2 61.84 28.3 35.1 1200 566 0 3 17 36 53 175 235 39 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.3 72.44 28.9 33.9 1300 625 0 2 4 23 47 221 261 60 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.6 78.24 29.8 34.0 1400 703 0 7 26 63 76 248 215 62 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24.5 66.00 27.9 33.9 1500 678 0 10 31 64 69 197 255 49 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 25.3 67.26 27.7 33.3 1600 639 7 32 74 107 96 123 144 52 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.9 42.57 24.0 33.1 1700 627 11 53 65 56 47 116 193 71 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26.2 51.04 25.6 34.7 1800 542 0 1 9 14 51 189 203 60 13 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 25.4 73.06 29.9 34.9 1900 597 1 3 21 20 47 212 231 51 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24.8 74.20 29.1 34.0 2000 579 0 0 5 28 50 157 259 74 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.7 72.54 30.1 34.8 2100 505 1 4 9 22 34 189 188 47 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.9 75.45 29.4 34.2 2200 368 0 1 7 11 23 99 160 58 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26.6 74.46 30.6 35.3 2300 231 0 0 3 0 2 30 109 67 18 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 28.7 80.95 33.9 38.4 07-19 6340 18 113 265 465 636 1809 2232 696 91 11 4 0 0 0 0 0 25.8 64.34 28.3 34.4 06-22 8134 20 120 301 536 768 2379 2941 908 142 13 6 0 0 0 0 0 25.8 65.87 28.7 34.6 06-00 8733 20 121 311 547 793 2508 3210 1033 169 15 6 0 0 0 0 0 25.8 66.24 28.9 34.8 00-00 9002 20 122 312 548 793 2540 3311 1113 212 23 7 1 0 0 0 0 25.8 65.92 29.1 35.0 Peak step 14:00 (703) AM Peak step 11:00 (477) PM Peak step 14:00 (703) * Thursday, October 6, 2022 Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin vPace Pace% Mean Vpp <-- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 10 10 85 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 100 0000 95 0 0 1 1 3 10 42 25 12 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 29.9 71.58 34.2 39.7 0100 65 0 1 0 0 2 5 21 23 10 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 31.7 73.85 35.7 40.9 0200 44 0 0 0 1 0 1 15 12 7 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 30.2 63.64 37.9 46.0 0300 24 0 0 0 0 1 1 6 9 2 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 31.2 66.67 38.2 46.1 0400 28 0 0 1 0 0 8 5 8 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 31.9 57.14 34.3 40.8 0500 58 0 0 0 0 0 6 18 22 9 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 30.5 72.41 36.2 41.4 0600 104 0 0 0 0 3 11 35 29 17 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 30.9 61.54 35.7 41.5 0700 303 0 0 2 9 11 73 123 59 24 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 26.7 69.31 32.1 37.8 0800 441 0 0 2 10 35 130 175 78 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 26.3 71.43 30.9 35.8 0900 379 0 3 7 13 25 75 140 98 17 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 28.6 68.60 31.5 37.1 1000 441 0 3 13 18 49 129 176 46 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.4 69.16 29.3 34.6 1100 494 0 1 1 14 43 174 207 44 7 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 24.7 77.33 30.0 34.1 1200 593 0 2 14 24 47 218 228 53 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24.8 75.21 29.2 34.0 1300 633 1 1 8 29 51 194 272 70 5 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 25.4 73.93 29.8 34.3 1400 664 0 5 9 29 81 175 287 75 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.7 70.93 29.4 34.5 1500 655 5 64 96 84 84 156 144 19 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 23.6 47.48 22.9 31.9 1600 654 3 23 38 46 66 188 218 65 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.8 64.37 27.5 34.2 1700 587 0 19 61 55 76 140 164 56 14 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.4 52.30 26.6 34.3 1800 556 0 1 6 15 43 154 262 70 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26.1 78.06 30.3 34.7 1900 600 0 1 17 34 41 159 252 83 11 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 25.7 70.33 29.8 35.1 2000 499 2 5 17 22 58 143 198 44 7 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 26.1 68.94 28.9 34.1 2100 583 0 7 16 19 72 214 201 49 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 25.4 71.70 28.7 34.0 2200 355 0 2 5 5 32 85 150 64 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 26.4 69.86 31.0 36.2 2300 254 0 0 3 8 21 62 95 48 15 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 28.1 64.57 31.5 37.6 07-19 6400 9 122 257 346 611 1806 2396 733 105 12 1 2 0 0 0 0 25.8 66.44 28.8 34.6 06-22 8186 11 135 307 421 785 2333 3082 938 143 24 5 2 0 0 0 0 25.8 66.97 28.9 34.7 06-00 8795 11 137 315 434 838 2480 3327 1050 169 26 6 2 0 0 0 0 26.1 66.94 29.1 34.9 00-00 9109 11 138 317 436 844 2511 3434 1149 214 40 11 4 0 0 0 0 26.1 66.32 29.3 35.1 Peak step 14:00 (664) AM Peak step 11:00 (494) PM Peak step 14:00 (664) * Grand Total Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin vPace Pace% Mean Vpp <-- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 10 10 85 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 100 -- 26884 70 447 856 1329 2337 7573 10108 3402 640 92 25 5 0 0 0 0 26.1 66.75 29.3 35.1 Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 67 Packet Pg. 79 of 374 Item 4 st-8949 Page 1 A Attachment A- Crescent Traffic Data Service -- San Jose, CA Park Neighborhood Post - Speed Report Pilot Memo CustomList-8949 -- English (ENU) Datasets: Site: [4] UNIVERSITY AVE BT PALM ST AND LINCOLN AVE Data type: Axle sensors - Paired (Class/Speed/Count) Profile: Included classes: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 Speed range: 0 - 100 mph. Direction: West (bound), P = East, Lane = 0-16 Name: TDS Scheme: Vehicle classification (Scheme F) Units: Non metric (ft, mi, ft/s, mph, Ib, ton) Column Leaend: 0 [Time] 1 [Total] 2 [Vbin] 3 [vPace] 4 [Pace%] 5 [Mean] 6 [Vpp] 24 -hour time (0000 - 2359) Number in time step Speed bin totals Speed at start of pace Percent in pace Average speed Percentile speed * Tuesday, October 4, 2022 Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin vPace Pace% Mean Vpp <-- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 10 10 85 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 100 0000 28 0 0 0 0 1 7 9 6 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26.6 71.43 33.9 40.2 0100 18 0 0 0 0 0 2 8 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32.7 77.78 35.5 41.1 0200 21 0 0 1 0 0 2 5 6 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.9 61.90 36.0 43.3 0300 32 0 0 0 0 0 6 7 10 7 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 30.6 65.63 36.2 40.5 0400 96 0 0 0 1 0 14 30 38 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 29.2 73.96 35.0 39.6 0500 266 0 0 2 0 1 14 119 78 40 7 3 1 0 0 0 1 29.5 74.81 35.7 40.8 0600 497 0 0 3 0 8 117 218 114 29 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 27.5 76.86 33.0 37.9 0700 725 0 1 1 0 64 244 286 107 15 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 26.6 74.48 31.0 35.4 0800 716 0 0 4 11 83 334 218 55 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.8 80.03 29.2 33.4 0900 707 0 0 6 4 66 307 267 48 7 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 24.5 81.75 29.6 33.6 1000 644 0 1 3 5 59 286 245 37 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.1 82.45 29.5 33.2 1100 642 0 0 1 6 54 253 276 48 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24.8 81.93 30.0 33.9 1200 638 0 0 1 9 56 237 268 56 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.4 80.41 30.2 34.2 1300 518 0 0 0 0 23 163 254 64 12 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.6 81.47 31.2 35.0 1400 452 0 2 3 2 33 143 186 62 20 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 26.5 74.12 31.0 35.6 1500 436 2 3 3 8 31 151 174 53 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.7 75.00 30.1 34.9 1600 481 0 1 1 1 43 177 190 59 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 26.3 77.75 30.5 34.7 1700 409 0 2 4 2 11 167 165 52 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.7 82.89 30.7 34.9 1800 555 0 1 0 1 73 230 184 60 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24.4 77.12 29.7 34.1 1900 360 0 0 0 2 17 139 156 40 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 26.5 83.89 30.8 34.7 2000 221 0 0 1 0 5 49 108 47 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 28.5 77.83 32.7 37.5 2100 182 0 0 0 1 4 40 87 42 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 27.4 81.32 32.7 36.5 2200 128 0 0 0 0 4 18 58 34 9 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 29.8 73.44 34.2 39.0 2300 73 0 0 1 0 1 12 27 25 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 29.2 76.71 34.2 39.0 07-19 6923 2 11 27 49 596 2692 2713 701 115 13 4 0 0 0 0 0 25.1 77.90 30.2 34.3 06-22 8183 2 11 31 52 630 3037 3282 944 165 25 4 0 0 0 0 0 25.5 77.22 30.5 34.8 06-00 8384 2 11 32 52 635 3067 3367 1003 180 29 6 0 0 0 0 0 25.5 76.80 30.6 34.9 00-00 8845 2 11 35 53 637 3112 3545 1145 255 38 10 1 0 0 0 1 25.7 75.60 30.8 35.2 Peak step 7:00 (725) AM Peak step 7:00 (725) PM Peak step 12:00 (638) Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 68 Packet Pg. 80 of 374 * Wednesday, October 5, 2022 Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin <-- 0 5 10 5 10 15 Vbin 15 20 Vbin 20 25 Vbin 25 30 Vbin 30 35 Vbin 35 40 Vbin 40 45 Vbin 45 50 Vbin 50 55 Vbin 55 60 Vbin 60 65 Vbin 65 70 Item 4 Attachment A - Crescent Park Neighborhood Post- Pilot Memo st-8949 Page 2 e% Mean Vpp 10 85 0000 32 0 0 0 0 0 7 14 6 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26.7 71.88 33.9 40.2 0100 23 0 0 0 0 0 4 5 12 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 27.8 73.91 35.6 39.1 0200 14 0 0 1 0 2 1 6 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28.7 71.43 31.8 38.2 0300 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 13 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 31.3 94.12 36.0 40.0 0400 88 0 0 0 0 0 11 29 33 12 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 30.3 72.73 36.0 40.3 0500 232 0 0 0 0 1 13 86 95 30 4 1 2 0 0 0 0 30.9 79.74 36.0 40.3 0600 518 0 0 0 1 0 85 221 153 45 8 4 0 1 0 0 0 28.6 75.29 34.4 39.0 0700 739 0 0 2 1 29 273 316 100 15 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 25.4 79.97 31.0 35.2 0800 831 0 4 20 29 104 349 269 44 8 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 24.8 75.09 28.5 33.0 0900 700 0 0 1 1 60 235 308 83 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.4 78.00 30.7 34.8 1000 612 0 0 2 1 58 269 220 55 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24.9 80.23 29.8 33.9 1100 589 0 1 2 4 64 254 211 45 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.5 79.12 29.5 33.3 1200 547 0 0 0 4 27 220 215 70 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.4 80.62 30.8 35.0 1300 524 0 2 0 1 27 144 241 94 13 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 25.9 76.53 31.7 36.1 1400 464 0 2 1 2 28 141 203 77 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27.0 78.23 31.4 35.8 1500 444 0 0 3 0 12 161 206 53 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 26.4 84.91 31.1 34.9 1600 480 2 2 2 5 25 174 204 59 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.9 79.79 30.4 34.4 1700 511 0 1 4 0 19 195 217 59 10 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 25.1 80.43 31.0 34.9 1800 505 0 1 1 1 30 203 189 69 8 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.2 77.43 30.7 35.1 1900 393 0 0 0 1 22 143 169 46 9 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.3 80.41 31.0 34.9 2000 232 0 0 0 0 5 49 120 47 8 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 27.1 83.62 32.9 36.4 2100 194 0 1 0 1 10 28 91 50 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29.1 78.87 32.8 37.7 2200 149 0 0 0 0 6 32 55 39 16 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 28.5 68.46 33.5 38.8 2300 69 0 0 0 0 1 9 28 23 4 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 28.0 79.71 34.6 38.9 07-19 6946 2 13 38 49 483 2618 2799 808 113 18 4 1 0 0 0 0 25.4 78.06 30.4 34.7 06-22 8283 2 14 38 52 520 2923 3400 1104 188 31 9 1 1 0 0 0 25.5 76.68 30.8 35.2 06-00 8501 2 14 38 52 527 2964 3483 1166 208 35 10 1 1 0 0 0 25.5 76.25 30.9 35.3 00-00 8924 2 14 39 52 530 3000 3639 1328 261 43 12 3 1 0 0 0 25.6 74.98 31.1 35.8 Peak step 8:00 (831) AM Peak step 8:00 (831) PM Peak step 12:00 (547) * Thursday, October 6, 2022 Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin vPace Pace% Mean Vpp <-- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 10 10 85 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 100 0000 36 0 0 1 0 2 5 11 13 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29.8 69.44 33.8 39.6 0100 23 0 0 0 0 0 1 8 5 5 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 30.4 65.22 37.9 45.0 0200 24 0 0 1 0 0 3 2 10 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 33.8 66.67 37.3 43.9 0300 37 0 0 0 0 0 1 12 13 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 32.4 75.68 37.1 41.8 0400 96 0 0 0 1 0 8 19 49 14 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 31.1 73.96 36.6 40.9 0500 263 0 0 1 0 0 29 110 86 31 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 31.1 76.43 35.1 39.7 0600 494 0 0 2 0 16 84 227 114 41 7 2 1 0 0 0 0 28.0 75.10 33.5 38.4 0700 719 0 0 3 3 24 241 318 101 23 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 26.7 79.97 31.6 35.7 0800 847 0 0 2 21 89 314 324 88 6 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 25.1 75.21 29.8 34.3 0900 712 0 0 3 17 63 266 267 81 14 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 24.7 75.28 30.0 34.6 1000 635 0 0 14 6 80 260 214 56 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.2 74.80 29.2 33.9 1100 538 0 1 0 3 26 229 201 63 14 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.5 81.23 30.8 34.9 1200 564 0 0 0 4 38 224 225 65 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.2 80.14 30.4 34.7 1300 505 0 1 1 4 23 145 255 65 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.6 81.78 31.2 35.0 1400 487 0 1 2 0 18 164 211 78 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 26.3 81.11 31.4 35.5 1500 470 0 2 6 0 36 182 181 52 9 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 25.6 77.66 30.2 34.6 1600 494 1 1 1 3 36 203 189 54 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 24.9 79.55 30.2 34.5 1700 513 0 0 1 3 32 207 223 36 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.1 83.82 30.2 34.1 1800 558 0 0 0 1 47 200 217 73 15 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.5 74.73 30.9 35.5 1900 407 0 0 1 5 23 126 179 60 9 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 26.8 78.62 31.3 35.5 2000 247 0 0 0 1 3 46 115 66 14 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 29.0 80.97 33.4 38.0 2100 212 0 0 0 0 13 59 88 42 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.4 70.75 32.0 36.8 2200 158 0 0 0 0 4 29 83 32 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 27.4 82.28 33.0 36.6 2300 88 0 0 0 1 2 16 40 21 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29.2 73.86 33.4 38.9 07-19 7042 1 6 33 65 512 2635 2825 812 129 19 4 0 1 0 0 0 25.7 77.63 30.5 34.8 06-22 8402 1 6 36 71 567 2950 3434 1094 203 31 7 1 1 0 0 0 25.8 76.62 30.8 35.1 06-00 8648 1 6 36 72 573 2995 3557 1147 220 32 7 1 1 0 0 0 25.8 76.48 30.9 35.2 00-00 9127 1 6 39 73 575 3042 3719 1323 290 47 10 1 1 0 0 0 25.8 75.19 31.1 35.6 Peak step 8:00 (847) AM Peak step 8:00 (847) PM Peak step 12:00 (564) * Grand Total Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin vPace Pace% Mean Vpp <-- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 10 10 85 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 100 -- 26896 5 31 113 178 1742 9154 10903 3796 806 128 32 5 2 0 0 1 25.8 75.19 31.0 35.6 Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 69 Packet Pg. 81 of 374 Item 5 Item 5 Staff Report City Council Staff Report From: City Manager CITY O F Report Type: CONSENT CALENDAR PALO Lead Department: Police ALTO Meeting Date: November 6, 2023 Report #:2308-1926 TITLE Approval of the Acceptance of State of California Citizens Options for Public Safety (COPS) Funds of $194,400 and a Budget Amendment in the Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Fund (2/3 vote required) for front-line law enforcement expenses RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council: 1. Approve the acceptance of annual Citizens Options for Public Safety (COPS) funds from State of California, totaling $194,400; and 2. Amend the Fiscal Year 2024 Budget Appropriation (requires 2/3 approval) for the Supplemental Law Enforcement Services (SLES) Fund by: a. Increasing the estimate for revenue from the State of California by $194,400; b. Increasing expense appropriation for Facilities and Equipment by $205,000; c. Increasing expense appropriation for General Expenses by $20,700; d. Increasing expense appropriation for Salary & Benefits by $206,000; e. Increasing expense appropriation for Supplies & Materials by $12,500; and f. Decreasing the ending fund balance by $249,800. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Staff recommends that the City Council approve the acceptance of the annual State of California COPS FY 2024 funds, totaling $194,400 and amend the budget appropriation in the SLES Fund to spend the revenues. Staff also recommends appropriating unspent funding from previous years of $249,800. This funding went into the fund balance at the close of the previous fiscal years to be used for other eligible expenses. In total, $444,200 is recommended for non - capitalized tools, general expenses, supplies and materials, and overtime related to front-line law enforcement. Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 1 Packet Pg. 82 of 374 Item 5 Item 5 Staff Report BACKGROUND Every year since 1997, the State of California, by statute, allocates designated funds to counties, which pass funding through to cities, through a Citizens Options for Public Safety (COPS) program. This ongoing program is apportioned by a State statute and the level of funding is relative to the population as determined by the California Department of Finance. This funding is not related to the Federal Government Department of Justice "COPS" program with the same acronym. State law provides for four main requirements as written in Government Code sections 30025- 30029.12 and 30051-30063: 1) Each recipient (County and a City) is required to deposit the revenue into a separate fund so the funds are not co -mingled with the General Fund (Sec. 30063); and 2) the money shall be used for front line law enforcement services or municipal police services (Sec. 30061(c)(2)); and transfer to other funds is allowed provided it is to facilitate the use according to the code (Sec. 30063); and 4) the funds shall not supplant the city budget (Sec. 30062(a)). Previous uses of COPS funds have included restarting the Community Service Officer (CSO) program, electronic traffic citation system, equipment upgrades, safety equipment, police training, staff wellness testing, police recruiting, upgrades to patrol vehicles, and upgraded tools and technology, all benefiting front line law enforcement services or municipal police services for the City of Palo Alto. According to State staff, the source of funding is vehicle license fees. Specific allocations are directed by the Department of Finance, in accordance with the Government Code, while the distributions are made by the State Controller's Office. There are two parts to the distribution: A. a semi -permanent component based on a minimum funding level for the program, paid monthly and B. a growth component for funds (referred to as Growth Fund) in excess of the minimum base, paid one-time the following year after reconciliation. Staff identified excess fund balance in this SLES fund in FY 2022 and working to determine appropriate needs and uses for public safety services. Fund balance has accumulated due to higher than estimated revenues from a change in State law that increased funding and because of projects or programs previously identified did not require the funding set -aside or did not materialize. Most of those previously planned expenses were for non -mandatory training and recruiting which did not occur due to insufficient backfill staffing to support these while maintaining necessary minimum staffing levels for daily service delivery. The most recent fund balance, $848,000, can be found in the FY 2022 Annual Comprehensive Financial Report1 and an electronic copy of the report is available on the City's websitez. 1 City Council, January 23, 2023; Agenda Item #8, pg 266 https://recordsportal.paloalto.gov/Weblink/DocView.aspx?id=2296 2 City of Palo Alto FY 2022 Annual Comprehensive Financial Report beginning on pg 125 Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 2 Packet Pg. 83 of 374 Item 5 Item 5 Staff Report ANALYSIS The City recently received the annual notice of COPS funding for the distribution in Fiscal Year 2023-2024 of $104,6193 in alignment with the minimum distribution (distribution A above). Further, the Growth Fund portion (distribution B above) was funded and reported $89,787 in funding allocated for Palo Alto4.The total expected revenue to the SLES Fund for Fiscal Year 2024 is $194,400. Staff recommends use of this year's expected COPS funds, along with a portion of the existing fund balance, for a total amount of $444,200 ($194,400 in revenue and $249,800 in existing fund balance), in the following manner(s) which are compliant with the law. All expenses below are estimated. Respirators: The Department supplies front-line law enforcement staff with safety equipment including respirators, commonly referred to as "gas masks." The air -purifying respirator is a device that is worn over the face to protect :f.lIJt Revenue $ 194,400 From Fund Balance $ 249,800 Total Source $ 444,200 Respirators $ 36,000 SWAT tools $ 18,000 Firearms with Optical Sights $ 259,700 Key Management System $ 26,000 Road Safety Equipment $ 8,000 Honor Guard Uniforms $ 4,500 Recruiting $ 92,000 Total Expenditures $ 444,200 the user from inhaling hazardous atmospheres including fumes, vapors, gases, and particulate matter such as dusts and airborne pathogens. The current inventory of respirators is aged and beginning to fail. This purchase will update the existing stock with improved technology. Tactical tools This will purchase four ballistic vests for new Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT) operators and additional breaching tools (hand -carried tools used to open doors and windows that operate similar to a crowbar). Replacement Handguns with optical sights: This will update the on -duty handgun carried by all 89 police officers (regular and reserve). This update of standard issued handguns to a newer model handgun that can be equipped with optical sights. Optical sights on handguns improves accuracy but more importantly, opens the field of vison for officers so they can see more as both eyes are open and the officer is focusing https://www.citvofoaIoaIto.ore/files/assets/oubIic/administrative-services/financial-reporting/comprehensive annual-financial-reports-cafr/cu rrent-2011-cafrs/2022-acfr-final/city-of-paIo-alto-acfr-fy2022-final-secured-2.pdf 3 State of California Department of Finance September 13, 2023 pg. 12 https://www.sco.ca.gov/Files-ARD-Payments/copsdofletter 2324.pdf 4 State of California Citizens Option for Public Safety Growth Allocation Report For COPS and Juvenile Justice (FY 2022-2023) Spreadsheet, sheet "Front Line City Breakdown", row 499, column F https://www.sco.ca.gov/Files-ARD-Payments/copsandii al locationreport.xlsx Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 3 Packet Pg. 84 of 374 Item 5 Item 5 Staff Report more on the threat landscape as opposed to the fixed front sight (which is how targeting is done on fixed sights). Although the Police Department seeks to address all emergencies with measured use of force, when required, this type of tool allows officers greater capacity to focus on the situation through a broader line of sight. Of note, officers are accustomed to the newer optical sighting technology as it exists on the issued Department rifle inventory. The average age of the current handgun is 10 years, which is still within the serviceable life of the weapon and will be sold back to the distributor for surplus. The current handguns are equipped with fixed sights. "Sights" are the weapon component that allows the user to acquire a target in the event the handgun will be fired. The current inventory of handguns in the Department, fixed sights are "built-in" to the weapon and cannot be modified. Training on the new technology will be required for each officer to become accustomed to the draw from the updated holster and activation of the technology under stressful conditions. Transition training for the updated handgun is also included in the total estimated cost. The training costs will be an instructor's course, overtime for officers training, and range rental fees. Key management system: This will provide an unmonitored key cabinet system with an electronic key system for patrol vehicles and equipment. The update will secure keys and allow for improved accounting of use. Road Safety: The purchase of Electric Roadside Flares will update to the current chemical flare used in the field. The improved technology will decrease the hazards associated with the gaseous emissions and the environmental impact of leftover spent road flares. Honor Guard Uniforms: The Honor Guard is a ceremonial unit comprised of sworn members of the police department who maintain exceptionally high standards of appearance and conduct and provide a presence at ceremonial events. While duty uniforms are already budgeted in the general fund, this allocation will update the uniforms of newer Honor Guard personnel. The primary role of the Honor Guard officer is to provide funeral honors for fallen staff. The honor guard also serves as the "guardians of the colors" by displaying and escorting the national flag on ceremonial occasions at official city functions. Recruiting Police Officers: Last fiscal year Council approved the use of COPS funds to resource police officer recruiting5; this action will effectively reinstate the budget appropriation to the 5 City Council, October 5, 2022; Agenda Item #5, SR # 14943 https://recordsportal.paloalto.gov/Weblink/DocView.aspx?id=82126 Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 4 Packet Pg. 85 of 374 Item 5 Item 5 Staff Report current fiscal year based on unspent funds. The FY 2023 expenses for activities related to recruiting police officers. The Department budgeted $90,000 for overtime and $20,000 for general expenses (mostly travel) Only $10,000 was used on overtime and $8,000 on general expenses. The unused funds appropriated last fiscal year fell to the fund balance at year end, as is common practice for special revenue funds. POLICY IMPLICATIONS Palo Alto Municipal Code 2.28.080 requires a two-thirds vote by Council to accept the funds and amend the budget and a majority vote for the transfer between funds. Further, by written authorization, the City Manager may direct the redistribution of unencumbered balance within any department or office or fund. The California Government Code would limit how SLES funds are redistributed. As with the acquisition of any goods or services by the City, the purchasing process will be subject to City purchasing policy manual as established in the municipal code under the direction of the Chief Procurement Officer. Any purchase that is surveillance technology is subject to provisions of the Municipal Code during the purchase process. None of the proposed uses here are considered surveillance technology nor are considered military equipment and subject to reporting according to AB 481. FISCAL/RESOURCE IMPACT This activity directly impacts only the Supplemental Law Enforcement Services (SLES) Fund. The City has received revenue each year under this program since its inception. To receive the revenue into the SLES Fund, Council's approval is required according to the Municipal Code (PAMC 2.30.360) and the State Government code referenced above. Revenues of $194,400 are recommended to be recognized in the SLES Fund. A total of $444,200 of expenditures are anticipated as described previously in the memorandum, including the use of $249,800 the existing fund balance. There will be no impact to the General Fund as ongoing maintenance costs, if any, for the items purchased by the SLES Fund will be absorbed in the Department's existing budget, otherwise, the activities will stop when the SLES funds are spent in full. STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT None ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Acceptance of COPS funding and the proposed expenditures for public safety equipment are not projects subject to CEQA review. ATTACHMENTS None APPROVED BY: Andrew Binder, Police Chief Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 5 Packet Pg. 86 of 374 Item 6 Item 6 Staff Report City Council Staff Report From: City Manager CITY O F Report Type: CONSENT CALENDAR PALO Lead Department: Public Works ALTO Meeting Date: November 6, 2023 Report #:2309-2077 TITLE Approval of First Amendment to the Santa Clara County Recycling and Waste Reduction Commission Technical Advisory Committee Memorandum of Agreement. CEQA Status - Not a project. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that Council approve and authorize the City Manager or their designee to execute the first amendment to the Recycling and Waste Reduction Commission Technical Advisory Committee Memorandum of Agreement permitting access to teleconference options as specified in Section 54953(b) of the Ralph M. Brown Act. BACKGROUND The Recycling and Waste Reduction Commission Technical Advisory Committee (RWRC TAC) of Santa Clara County provides leadership for countywide solid waste planning and works to assure the success of countywide cooperative programs to reduce, reuse, and recycle materials that otherwise would be disposed of in landfills. Members of the RWRC TAC are representatives from local agencies and/or municipalities operating under the jurisdiction of Santa Clara County, including Palo Alto. In 2013, City Council authorized the City Manager to execute the Santa Clara County Recycling and Waste Reduction Technical Advisory Committee Memorandum of Agreement (Attachment A), to implement the City's participation in the RWRC TAC. Staff actively participates and collaborates in the RWRC's Technical Advisory Committee and multiple subcommittee meetings including the following: Implementation Committee, Outreach, Operations, Household Hazardous Waste, SB 1383, and Zero Waste committees. ANALYSIS In December 2020, the Santa Clara County Health Officer ordered local businesses and agencies to begin implementing workplace changes in accordance with the rules and regulations of Assembly Bill 361, Amendment to Ralph M. Brown Act (AB 361), in response to the state of emergency caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. The RWRC TAC was instructed to conduct all Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 1 Packet Pg. 87 of 374 Item 6 Item 6 Staff Report meetings virtually and began using the online platform Zoom. In January 2023, the expiration of AB 361 prompted the Santa Clara County Health Officer to lift its previous order and the restrictions placed on local entities during the height of the pandemic. Subsequently, RWRC TAC was instructed to align their meeting procedures with Section 54953(b) from the Ralph M. Brown Act, which permits the inclusion of teleconference participation (including both audio and camera) based on specific predefined conditions. However, an amendment is needed since the current Memorandum of Agreement contains stringent language prohibiting the use of alternative teleconference methods. The proposed first amendment (Attachment B) incorporates language in the Memorandum of Agreement permitting teleconference access to members of the RWRC TAC committees, and subcommittees. FISCAL/RESOURCE IMPACT There is no fiscal impact associated with the approval of the first amendment to the RWRC TAC MOA. All costs associated with staff's participation in committee meetings and activities are included in the existing Refuse Fund operating budget. STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT Stakeholder engagement included notifying the public at the monthly RWRC meetings, the TAC meetings, the Implementation Committee meetings as well as the various TAC subcommittee meetings. All meeting minutes are posted on the County of Santa Clara Board of Supervisors and Boards and Commission webpage (http://sccgov.iqm2.com/citizens/default.aspx). ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW This action is not a project defined under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: Recycling and Waste Reduction Commission Technical Advisory Committee Memorandum of Agreement Attachment B: Recycling and Waste Reduction Commission First Amendment to MOA APPROVED BY: Brad Eggleston, Director Public Works/City Engineer Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 2 Packet Pg. 88 of 374 Item 6 Attachment A - Recycling and Waste Reduction Commission Technical AGREEMENT Advisory Committee CREATING THE SANTA CLARA COUNT Memorandum of RECYCLING AND WASTE REDUCTION Agreement TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE THIS AGREEMENT, is made and entered into this t day of �LtOe- 2013 by and between the COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, a political subdivision of the State of California; CITY OF CAMPBELL, a municipal corporation of the State of California; CITY OF CUPERTINO, a municipal corporation of the State of California; CITY OF GILROY, a municipal corporation of the State of California, CITY OF LOS ALTOS, a municipal corporation of the State of California; TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS, a municipal corporation of the State of California; TOWN OF LOS GATOS, a municipal corporation of the State of California; CITY OF MILPITAS, a municipal corporation of the State of California; CITY OF MONTE SERENO, a municipal corporation of the State of California; CITY OF MORGAN HILL, a municipal corporation of the State of California, CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW, a municipal corporation of the State of California; CITY OF PALO ALTO, a municipal corporation of the State of California; CITY OF SAN JOSE, a municipal corporation of the State of California; CITY OF SANTA CLARA, a chartered municipal corporation of the State of California; CITY OF SARATOGA, a municipal corporation of the State of California; and CITY OF SUNNYVALE, a municipal corporation of the State of California. All of the above -mentioned entities are hereinafter collectively referred to as "PARTIES" or individually as "PARTY." RECITALS: A. In 1989, the California Legislature passed and enacted the California Integrated Waste Management Act, known as "AB 939", (Public Resources Code Section 40000 et. seq) requiring jurisdictions' to divert 25% of waste from disposal by 1995 and 50% of waste from disposal by 2000. AB 939 required each County to develop and periodically update . a County Integrated Waste Management Plan and to appoint an AB 939 Local Task Force. B. Prior to 1992, the Solid Waste Committee of the Santa Clara County Intergovernmental Council advised the cities and the County on solid waste and recycling issues. The Technical Advisory Committee, also originally convened by the Intergovernmental Council, provided technical advice to the Solid Waste Committee on solid waste and recycling issues. C. On or about February 1992, the Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors and the cities in Santa Clara County designated the Solid Waste Committee of the Intergovernmental Council as the AB 939 Task Force for Santa Clara County. D. On February 4, 1992, the Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors replaced the Solid Waste Committee of the Intergovernmental Council with the Solid Waste Commission of Santa Clara County ("Commission") in order to streamline the 5/6/13 N 0 4 2013 Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 3 Packet Pg. 89 of 374 Item 6 TAC MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT Attachment A - Recycling and Waste Reduction Commission Technical decision -making process on solid waste and recycling issues. Advisory Committee S_ 300.495) The powers and duties of the Commission are defin Memorandum of II, Division A6 of the County of Santa Clara Ordinance Code. Agreement E. On December 4, 2001, the Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors approved Ordinance No. NS -300.658 changing the name of the Commission to the Recycling and Waste Reduction Commission of Santa Clara County. F. The Commission advises city councils and the Board of Supervisors in Santa Clara County on countywide solid waste and recycling planning issues and on the County Solid Waste Management Plan/County Integrated Waste Management Plan. G. The By -Laws of the Commission (also approved by the County Board of Supervisors on February 4, 1992) continued the existence of the Recycling and Waste Reduction Technical Advisory Committee (the "TAC"). The purpose of the TAC was to provide technical advice to the Commission on solid waste management and policy; to bring together a wide spectrum of viewpoints and expertise on countywide solid waste and recycling issues affecting individual jurisdictions; and to assist in development of policies, programs and revisions and amendments to countywide plans. H. On an annual basis, the TAC prepares and submits an Annual Workplan and Budget for review and approval by the Commission. The Commission -approved Annual Workplan is then implemented by the TAC using funds in the Commission -approved Annual Budget. I. In accordance with the AB 939 provisions for financing solid waste diversion and planning activities, the County of Santa Clara levies and collects the Countywide Solid Waste Planning Fee ("SWPF") on each ton of solid waste disposed at landfills located within the County, on tons taken to non -disposal facilities located within the county and subsequently transported for disposal to landfills outside Santa Clara County, and on tons transported directly to disposal facilities located outside Santa Clara County. The current SWPF of $0.78 per ton was established by the County Board of Supervisors on May 19, 2009. Funds from the SWPF are used to fund the activities and programs of the Commission and the TAC. In addition, funds from grants, voluntary contributions from other agencies and other revenue sources are used to fund these activities and programs. Such funds, including monies from the SWPF, are referred to herein as "Countywide Funds". J. In 2011, Assembly Bill 341 ("AB 341") was signed into law establishing a statewide goal of diverting 75% of solid waste from disposal by 2020 and requiring The California Department of Resources, Recycling and Recovery to prepare and submit a plan to the Legislature on or before January 1, 2014 on how to achieve this goal. K. Since the TAC was originally established, the field of solid waste management and recycling has become much more complex and the PARTIES must comply with an increasing number of laws and regulations. In order to achieve the statewide goal of 75% diversion, many materials currently disposed in landfills must be segregated and 5/6/13; Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 4 Packet Pg. 90 of 374 Item 6 TAC MEMORANDUM OFAGREEMENT Attachment A - Recycling and Waste Reduction Commission Technical processed at new facilities, and channeled into useful purpose Advisory Committee ture, diversion systems and enhanced producer responsibility meas Memorandum of lemented in order to accomplish this goal. Agreement L. Commensurate with changes in the breadth and complexity of the solid waste and recycling field, the work and functions of the TAG have evolved over time to encompass not only providing advice to the Commission, but also recommending, implementing and monitoring countywide public education and diversion programs included in the Commission -approved Annual Workplan and Budget where it is cost effective for the PARTIES to jointly provide such programs. M. The. TAG requires expanded powers and authority to monitor ongoing staffing support for programs in the Commission -approved Annual Workplan as well as the power and authority to recommend, monitor and audit the funding for these programs, at the levels contained in the Commission -approved Annual Budget. N. In order to address these issues, the Commission appointed the Ad Hoc Committee for TAG Organizational Study, and the TAG appointed the TAG Ad Hoc Organizational Study Subcommittee. Pursuant to recommendations from these Committees, the County retained Arroyo Associates in 2010 to conduct an independent Organizational Study. The study evaluated the countywide integrated waste management programs and services and provided operational and organizational recommendations to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of the countywide solid waste management system. The Commission's Ad Hoc Committee held a meeting on May 29, 2012 with representatives of the TAG and the public to discuss the recommendations of the Organizational Study and options for restructuring the operating parameters of the TAG. O. The purpose of this Agreement is to implement the recommendations of the Commission's Ad Hoc Committee and the TAC Ad Hoc Subcommittee to revise the functions, powers, membership, structure and duties of the TAC to make these consistent with the manner in which the TAC currently functions; and to simplify the reporting relationship between the Commission and the TAG. Such changes are desired by the PARTIES in order to facilitate countywide and regional approaches for meeting the statewide goal of 75% diversion articulated in AB 341; remaining in compliance with the existing requirements of AB 939, SB 1016 and all other state and federal laws and regulations, and planning for the goal of zero waste in the future. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HERETO AGREE AS FOLLOWS: PURPOSES AND FUNDING The Santa Clara County Recycling and Waste Reduction Technical Advisory Committee ("TAC") is hereby established to replace the Recycling and Waste Reduction Technical Advisory Committee referred to in Article V of the Commission Bylaws dated October 2001. A. Purposes. The purposes of the TAC are: 516113 Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 5 Packet Pg. 91 of 374 TAC MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT Item 6 Attachment A - Recycling and Waste Reduction Commission Technical 1. To implement the Commission -approved Annual W Advisory Committee et; 2. To advise the Commission and the decision -making Memorandum of RTIES on technical and policy issues related to solid waste managemer including plans to achieve the statewide AB 341 goal of 75% diversion by 2020 and plans for working toward the goal of zero waste; 3. To bring together a wide spectrum of viewpoints and expertise to focus on countywide solid waste management, issues affecting individual communities, and solid waste and recycling issues affecting public environmental health; 4. To assist in development of policies, programs and revisions and amendments to countywide plans that can meet countywide needs and, thus, receive countywide approval; 5. To provide a forum for exchange of solid waste, recycling, composting and other diversion information; 6. To inform the PARTIES' respective agencies and jurisdictions about issues and recommendations of the Commission, and perform follow-up actions, as necessary; 7. To recommend Commission approval of countywide programs to maximize the effectiveness of local funds spent for public education and recycling programs, and to implement and monitor such programs. 8. To assist with future master planning for facilities and infrastructure, as requested by the Commission. 9. To perform technical and policy review and make technical and policy recommendations to the Commission and technical recommendations to the PARTIES concerning best practices in solid and hazardous waste management; recycling, composting, diversion programs, source reduction; litter reduction on land; reduction of litter that originates from the storage, collection, transportation, and processing of solid waste, recyclable materials and organic materials that affects water quality in local creeks, San Francisco Bay, and oceans; and 'cradle -to -cradle' extended producer responsibility for products and packaging from creation through use and ultimate recycling or other disposition, with regard to: a. The feasibility of technical proposals; b. Analysis of issues and problems in solid waste management; c. Proposed and/or needed national and state legislation and policies; d. New infrastructure required to achieve countywide goals, and; e. Financing and management options for creation of such infrastructure. 10. To perform other duties as directed by the Commission. B. Funding. The TAC is funded by the Solid Waste Planning Fee ("SWPF") that is charged to customers by the operators of all disposal and non -disposal facilities located within the County of Santa Clara, and remitted, by those facility operators, to the County of Santa Clara. The SWPF is also charged on tons of solid waste that are hauled directly to out -of -county disposal facilities. The amount of the SWPF is established by the Board of Supervisors based upon input and recommendations from the Commission and the TAC Implementation Committee. Additional revenues come from grants, voluntary contributions of other agencies and other sources. These, together with the SWPF funds constitute the Countywide Funds used to fund the Commission -approved. Annual Workplan and Budget. 5/6/13 Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 6 Packet Pg. 92 of 374 TAC MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT COMPOSITION A Item 6 Attachment A - Recycling and Waste Reduction Commission Technical Advisory Committee Memorandum of Voting members, not to exceed 27 in number, shall inch, Agreement J 1. One (1) staff person from each City or Town that is a PARTY 2. Three (3) staff persons from the County as follows: a. One (1) to represent the Unincorporated Area b. One (1) to represent County interests related to environmental health c. One (1) to represent County interests related to integrated waste management 3. One (1) staff person from the Santa Clara Valley Water District 4. Up to eight (8) persons from non -governmental organizations appointed Commission as follows: by the a. No more than three (3) representing for-profit industry groups and/or business organizations (however, no member shall represent a single for-profit company) b. No more than four (4) representatives of non-profit groups that advocate for source reduction, recycling programs, sustainability, and/or producer responsibility c. No more than two (2) representatives of institutions of higher learning located within Santa Clara County B. Appointment of Members. All members representing a public agency shall be re- designated annually via a letter on agency letterhead addressed to the TAC Administrator ("Administrator"). The Commission will accept requests and nominations for non- governmental organizations to serve on the TAC. The Administrator will publish a notice in a daily local newspaper of general circulation to a minimum of two -hundred fifty thousand (250,000) people in September of every other year announcing that nominations and requests to serve are being accepted. The Administrator will take other reasonable and cost-effective measures to distribute the announcement via other media, including, but not limited to, websites, local publications and social media, to reach persons who might not see the notice in a daily newspaper. The Commission will select the non -governmental organizations to be represented on the TAC. Those organizations will, in turn, submit a letter to the Administrator designating a member and an alternate. Members representing non -governmental organizations shall serve for a period of two (2) years beginning in January. At the end of that time, the Commission shall select the non- governmental organizations to be represented on the TAC for the new two (2) year term. The initial group of non -governmental organization representatives will be selected by the Commission on or before December 31, 2013 and will begin serving their terms on January 1, 2014. The Administrator will publish a notice in the newspaper, and distribute the notice via other suitable media, in September 2013 announcing that the Commission will consider nominations and applications for non -governmental organizations to be represented on the TAC. C. Alternates. Each PARTY may designate one or more alternate representative(s) to serve in the absence of the regular member. The alternate(s) will be designated in writing as described in Section II B. Alternates may serve on TAC committees, 5/6/13 Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 7 Packet Pg. 93 of 374 TAC MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT Item 6 Attachment A - Recycling and Waste Reduction Commission Technical subcommittees, and ad hoc subcommittees. Advisory Committee Memorandum of D. Vacancies. Each PARTY is responsible for designating-..GG.,TGnI for its member if the member can no longer serve. In the event of a vacancy, the Chair shall, by letter, request that the PARTY designate a new member. If a vacancy occurs with regard to a representative of a non -governmental organization, the Administrator shall notify the non -governmental organization to designate a. new member. In the event the non -governmental organization declines, the TAC shall notify the Commission and request that a new non -governmental organization be selected to fill the remainder of the term created by the vacancy. E. Attendance. Attendance at meetings is vital to the proper and effective functioning of the TAC. Three (3) consecutive absences or a member missing over fifty percent (50%) of the TAC meetings in a calendar year are sufficient grounds for the Administrator to notify the member and request their attendance. Should a PARTY be unable to send its representative to meetings for an extended period of time, the PARTY shall notify the Chair in writing on letterhead and a replacement representative will not be requested from that PARTY. III. QUORUM AND VOTING A. Quorum. A quorum consists of thirteen (13) voting members physically present at a meeting. B. Voting. Actions of the TAC shall be taken by a majority vote of the members present at the meeting. Each member has one vote. (See Section VI B for voting and quorum requirements for the Implementation Committee that differ from those for the full TAC.) C. Attendance From A Remote Location. In the event of an unavoidable schedule conflict, a member may participate in a meeting from a remote location via telephone or video -conference provided that all requirements of the Brown Act (Government Code Section 54950, et seq.) are met and further provided that the scheduled meeting room has the technical capabilityto accommodate the request. In such event, the member will notify the Administrator at least ten (10) days in advance of the meeting and ask to attend from a remote location. The Administrator will advise the member if this is possible. If so, the Administrator will comply with all Brown Act requirements including stating the alternate location in the meeting notice. The member shall also comply with all Brown Act requirements in Government Code Section 54953 (b), including, but not limited to, posting a meeting notice and agenda on the door of the remote location for the duration of the meeting, and allowing members of the public to participate in the meeting from the remote location along with the member. The member's vote will be counted; however, the member will not be included in the count to determine a quorum. Attendance from a remote location is to be used only in rare cases of unavoidable schedule conflicts. In - person attendance and participation at meetings is strongly preferred and encouraged. D. Bylaws. The TAC may, as necessary, recommend adoption of Bylaws for its 5/6/13 6 Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 8 Packet Pg. 94 of 374 Item 6 TAC MEMORANDUM OFAGREEMENT GREEMENT Attachment A - Recycling and Waste Reduction Commission Technical governance to the Commission for approval, and operate accc Advisory Committee approved by the Commission. In the event revisions to Commission -app Memorandum of desired, the TAC may recommend such revisions to the Commission. Agreement IV. OFFICERS AND THEIR RESPONSIBILITIES A. Officer Positions The officers of the TAC shall be the Chair, Vice Chair, and the Subcommittee Chairs. The Chair and Vice Chair of the TAC must be voting members or .alternates representing a PARTY. B. Election and Term. Each officer shall be elected by majority vote of a quorum of the voting membership at the last meeting of each calendar year or as soon thereafter as possible. All officers' terms begin with the first meeting of each calendar year. C. Duties. The Chair of the TAG shall be responsible for chairing all meetings of the TAG and the Implementation Committee (IC), and representing the TAG and the IC at Commission meetings. The Chair shall approve the draft agendas for TAC and IC meetings, except that any agenda item proposed by two (2) or more voting members must be placed on the next available agenda. The Vice Chair shall serve as the Chair in the Chair's absence. The Chairs of the Subcommittees shall be responsible for calling meetings of their respective Subcommittees and chairing those meetings. The Subcommittee Chairs shall approve the draft agendas for their respective Subcommittees except that any items proposed by two (2) or more voting members of a Subcommittee shall be placed on the next available Subcommittee agenda. V. MEETINGS A. Meetings. The TAC shall meet monthly at the time and place published on the agendas. Additional meetings may be called as needed. The Chair shall provide every member of the TAG with seventy-two (72) hours written notice of regular and additional TAC meetings. The agenda for each meeting shall be developed by the Administrator in consultation with the TAG Chair, and shall be approved by the Chair. B. Conduct of Meetings. All meetings of the TAC, including all Committees, Subcommittees, Ad Hoc Committees and Subcommittees and any closed sessions with legal counsel, shall be properly noticed and conducted in accordance with the "Brown Act" (Government Code Section 54950 et seq.) Except for official meetings of the TAC and its Committees, Subcommittees and Ad Hoc Committees and Subcommittees, nothing herein shall be interpreted to require meetings between staff members of the individual PARTIES (including designated representatives of the PARTIES) to be subject to the Brown Act, where the Brown Act would not otherwise apply. Each PARTY is individually responsible for ensuring it complies with the Brown Act. Wherever this Agreement is silent with regard to procedure, Robert's Rules of Order shall apply. VI. IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE A. Composition and Duties. The TAG Implementation Committee (IC) is comprised of one voting member from each PARTY to this Agreement plus one voting member from the Santa Clara Valley Water District (SCVWD). The PARTY'S 5/6/13 7 Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 9 Packet Pg. 95 of 374 TAG MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT Item 6 Attachment A - Recycling and Waste Reduction Commission Technical IC representative is usually also the PARTY'S TAC repr Advisory Committee PARTY and the SCVWD may also designate an alternate. The P11 Memorandum of is to make decisions and recommendations on all fiscal, manageme Agreement ative issues of the TAC. The IC selects, monitors and provides oversight of the Administrator, the Fiscal Agent, the Contracting Agent, and legal counsel to the TAC. The IC recommends the level and setting of the SWPF to the Commission. B. Quorum, Voting and Meetings. A quorum of the IC is nine (9) voting members. (Note: the City of San Jose representative counts as two (2) voting members toward the IC quorum.) The affirmative vote of at least eight (8) voting members of the IC, including PARTIES collectively representing at least forty percent (40%) of the population of the incorporated and unincorporated areas of the County of Santa Clara, is necessary to approve any measure brought before the IC. (For purposes of calculating whether or not the forty percent (40%) figure has been reached, the population of each PARTY shall be counted; however, no population shall be attributed to the SCVWD due to the fact that it encompasses such a large percentage of the population of the entire incorporated and unincorporated County.) Each member of the IC shall have one vote, with the exception of the City of San Jose which shall have two (2) votes. The IC shall meet at least annually to consider and recommend approval of the Annual Workplan and Budget to the Commission for the upcoming fiscal year. The Chair may call other meetings of the IC as needed. All IC meetings are open to the public and to all TAC members. Participation and _discussion by all TAC members and by members of the public is encouraged. The Chair of the IC forwards all recommendations made by the IC directly to the Commission, and also makes an informational report to the TAC on the recommendations forwarded to the Commission. The Chair shall strive to achieve consensus among IC members. Consensus is defined as general agreement in sentiment or belief. If clear consensus cannot be reached, the Chair will call for a vote of the voting members present. In such event, the Chair will report the recommendation of the IC along with the dissenting opinion(s) and viewpoints, to the Commission and to the TAC. In the event of a tie, the Chair will report that outcome and the viewpoint(s) expressed that led to that outcome. In the alternative, the Chair may, in the Chair's sole discretion, re-agendize the item for another IC meeting. C. Use of Outside Contractors. The IC is responsible for selecting any consultant(s) or contractor(s) ("Outside Contractors") to perform tasks included in the Commission - approved Annual Workplan and Budget and who are to be paid from Countywide Funds, using a process created in consultation with the Contracting Agent. The IC is responsible for reviewing and approving the parameters of any contracts with Outside Contractors, including the scope(s) of work, schedules of performance, use of subcontractors, and compensation for such Outside Contractors. The IC then directs the Contracting Agent to conduct the procurement process for Outside Contractors and to execute contracts with the selected Outside Contractor(s). 5/6/13 8 Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 10 Packet Pg. 96 of 374 TAC MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT VII. TAC SUBCOMMITTEES A. Issue and Policy Subcommittees. Issue and policy su established as needed by the TAC. The TAC will evaluate an Item 6 Attachment A - Recycling and Waste Reduction Commission Technical Advisory Committee Subcommittees in December of each year. Additional Subcommittees may be established at other times throughout the year as needed. II be ng B. Membership and Meetings. Membership on all issue and policy Subcommittees is open to all TAC voting members and designated alternates. There is no maximum size for each Subcommittee. The TAC shall appoint a Chair for each Subcommittee. A quorum is two (2) or more Subcommittee members. Subcommittees may elect a Vice - Chair to serve in the Chair's absence. Subcommittee chairs shall be responsible for calling and chairing meetings. The Subcommittee chairs shall approve the draft agenda and report the activities and recommendations of the Subcommittee to the TAC. Subcommittee chairs shall strive to achieve consensus among members. Consensus is defined as general agreement in sentiment or belief. If clear consensus cannot be reached, the Chair will call for a vote of the voting members present. In such event, the Chair will report the recommendation of the Subcommittee along with the dissenting opinion(s) and viewpoints, to the TAC. In the event of a tie, the Subcommittee Chair will report that outcome and the viewpoint(s) expressed that led to that outcome. In the alternative, the Subcommittee Chair, in consultation with the TAC Chair, may decide to re-agendize the item for discussion at another meeting. C. Ad Hoc Subcommittees. The TAC may establish Ad Hoc Subcommittees as needed to address specific issues or problems. The TAC shall appoint a Chair for each Ad Hoc Subcommittee. All Ad Hoc Subcommittees shall follow the same operating procedures as the standing issue and policy subcommittees. The TAC Chair shall monitor the work of all Ad Hoc Subcommittees, and all such Subcommittees shall be prorriptly disbanded by the TAC once their tasks have been accomplished. VIII. TAC ADMINISTRATOR A. Duties. The TAC Administrator provides administration and management services to the TAC and carries out the Annual Workplan. Duties of the Administrator include, but are not limited to: scheduling meetings of the TAC and all committees, subcommittees, and ad hoc subcommittees; preparing agendas and meeting minutes; maintaining all TAC records and files; notifying the TAC of correspondence received and preparing outgoing correspondence; completing all tasks in the Annual Workplan; providing monthly reports at TAC meetings on the status of the Workplan; and other duties as directed by the IC. The Administrator reports to the Chair of the TAC. The Administrator shall work cooperatively and collaboratively with the IC, the Fiscal Agent and the Contracting Agent. The Administrator is paid from funds in the adopted TAC budget. B. Selection. The IC shall select a PARTY or an Outside Contractor to serve as the Administrator for the TAC. The IC will receive and evaluate proposal(s) and make a recommendation to the Commission on selection of an Administrator, as further described in Attachment 2. 5/6/13 Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 11 Packet Pg. 97 of 374 Item 6 Attachment A - Recycling TAC MEMORANDUM QF AGREEMENT and Waste Reduction Commission Technical Advisory Committee C. Initial Administrator. The initial Administrator for the T Memorandum of ounty of Santa Clara, Integrated Waste Management Division ("County Agreement itial staff provided is described on Attachment 1. In the event of a change in the initial staff, the procedures described in Attachment 2 shall be followed. In the event the IC determines there is a need for a change in the Administrator in the future (due to costs, availability of designated employees or for other reasons), or in the event the County IWMD is unable or unwilling to serve, the procedures for selection of a new Administrator in Attachment 2 shall be followed. D. If Administrator Is Also A PARTY. In the event the Administrator is a PARTY, that PARTY shall appoint a TAC/IC representative whose function is to represent the PARTY's point of view on issues, policy and fiscal matters. The PARTY'S TAC/IC representative shall be a person who is not be involved in the work of the Administrator. This designation shall be made in writing on the PARTY'S letterhead to the Chair of the TAC. The person(s) fulfilling the duties of the Administrator shall act as staff to the TAC, TAC committees and subcommittees, and to the IC. E. Contract With Administrator. All duties and responsibilities of the Administrator, and a list and description of all staff assigned to provide Administrator services, shall be included in a contract between the Contracting Agent and the Administrator. The contract term may be for a single year or for multiple years, at the discretion of the IC. In the event that the Administrator is a PARTY, a letter agreement will be prepared between the Contracting Agent and the. Administrator, containing all of the duties, responsibilities, staffing commitments and costs for the Administrator to serve for the upcoming fiscal year. The letter agreement will include the Annual Workplan and costs for the Administrator's services. The letter agreement shall state that the Administrator agrees to provide the described services at the approved costs for the upcoming fiscal year and that all employee and overhead costs will be maintained at the levels specified in the agreement for that fiscal year. With regard to the initial Administrator, the first letter agreement shall be prepared and executed prior to July 1, 2014 to reflect the costs and the scope of work to be performed for FY 2014/15. If the Administrator and the Contracting Agent are the same PARTY, the letter agreement will be prepared and signed by a staff person designated to represent the Administrator and also signed by a separate staff person designated to represent the Contracting Agent. F. Annual Workplan and Budget. As the work of the TAC progresses each year, the Administrator will maintain a list of potential work items to be placed in the Annual Workplan for the upcoming fiscal year. Beginning with preparation of the Annual Workplan and Budget for fiscal year 2014/15, the following schedule will apply. In November of each year, the IC will review the list of potential work items compiled by the Administrator, add additional items as needed, and direct the Administrator to prepare a proposed Workplan and Budget for the upcoming fiscal year. The proposed Annual Workplan will contain the elements described in Attachment 3. The Administrator shall submit the final draft of the proposed Annual Workplan and 5/6/13 10 Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 12 Packet Pg. 98 of 374 TAC MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT Item 6 Attachment A - Recycling and Waste Reduction Commission Technical Budget to the IC no later than December 15 of each year. If r Advisory Committee ill provide revisions and comments to the Administrator, who will then re Memorandum of he Annual Workplan and Budget. The IC will approve the Annual Workpl Agreement or before January 31 of each year and forward it to the Commission for approval. Commission approval is anticipated to be during the month of February. Upon approval by the Commission, the Contracting Agent will prepare agreements with the Administrator, the Fiscal Agent and the Contracting Agent that include the approved Annual Workplan and Budget (for the Administrator) and the approved costs and duties (for the Fiscal Agent and the Contracting Agent) as described in Sections VIII E, IX D and X C. The agreements will be signed by designated representatives of the Administrator, the Fiscal Agent and the Contracting Agent. In the event the Administrator, the Fiscal Agent and/or the Contracting Agent are the same PARTY, that PARTY shall designate separate representatives to execute the agreements on behalf of the Administrator, the Fiscal Agent and the Contracting Agent. Said agreements shall be fully executed and in place prior to July 1 of each year. G. Annual Reporting and Evaluation. The Administrator shall prepare a self- evaluation/audit report to the IC including significant accomplishments, work items planned but not accomplished, work items not planned but completed, and the status of all work items in the Annual Workplan. The report will include recommendations and suggestions for improving the work of the Administrator and will be submitted on or before September 15 each year. The IC will consider the report at a regular meeting and discuss and provide recommendations and feedback to the Administrator. The IC will rate the overall implementation and effectiveness of the Workplan and, in turn, rate the performance of the Administrator based upon the ability of the Administrator to meet the timelines and budget in the Workplan and to effectively support the Commission and the TAC. The final recommendations and feedback of the IC will be recorded in the minutes and also in a letter from the IC Chair to the Administrator. This feedback will be used by the Administrator to make any required changes in operations, procedures and/or work tasks for the next fiscal year. In addition to the annual review of the Administrator, the IC may, at any time, discuss questions, concerns or issues of performance with the Administrator. IX. FISCAL AGENT A. Duties. The Fiscal Agent serves as the treasurer of the Countywide Funds and is responsible for collecting the SWPF from all solid waste disposal facilities and non - disposal facilities located within Santa Clara County. The Fiscal Agent also collects and receives grant funds and revenues from other sources. The Fiscal Agent shall diligently pursue collection of all SWPF funds and shall keep the IC apprised of the amount and entity owing delinquent payments, as well as of the status of collection activity initiated by the Fiscal Agent regarding the delinquent payments. The Fiscal Agent shall manage all funds in accordance with generally accepted government accounting procedures. The Fiscal Agent shall keep Countywide Funds segregated from all other funds administered by the Fiscal Agent in separately numbered and coded accounts that are readily identifiable as those containing Countywide Funds; shall credit appropriate interest income earned on such funds in each fiscal year; and shall not expend, use or transfer 5/6/13 11 Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 13 Packet Pg. 99 of 374 TAC MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT Item 6 Attachment A - Recycling and Waste Reduction Commission Technical any funds except in accordance with the Annual Workplan an Advisory Committee d by the IC and the Commission, or as otherwise directed by the IC. In Memorandum of cal Agent is not also the Contracting Agent, the Fiscal Agent shall transf Agreement unds to the Contracting Agent as directed by the IC, in accordance with the procedures in Attachment 5. The Fiscal Agent shall work cooperatively and collaboratively with the IC, the Administrator, and the Contracting Agent. B. Initial Fiscal Agent. The initial Fiscal Agent shall be the County of Santa Clara. The specific contact person shall be designated in writing to the Administrator and to the TAC Chair. In the event the IC determines there is a need for a change in the Fiscal Agent in the future (due to costs, lack of availability of designated employees or for other reasons), or in the event the County is unable or unwilling to serve, the following procedures for selection of a new Fiscal Agent shall be followed. C. Selection. Any PARTY willing to serve as the Fiscal Agent may be nominated by another PARTY. The nominated PARTY(IES) will submit a letter proposal to the IC containing the costs for performing the services of the Fiscal Agent, including all employee and overhead costs and all proposed expenses. If the same PARTY is also already serving, or is proposing to serve, as the Administrator, the Contracting Agent, or both, the proposed costs to perform each function shall be separately specified. The IC will hold discussions with representatives of the nominated PARTY(IES) as needed. The recommendation of the IC will be forwarded to the Commission for approval. Upon receipt of Commission approval, the Contracting Agent will execute an agreement with the new Fiscal Agent that includes the approved costs for the PARTY to provide Fiscal Agent services for the upcoming fiscal year. D. Payment For Services. The Fiscal Agent shall provide the Administrator with proposed costs to perform the duties of TAC Fiscal Agent for the upcoming fiscal year upon request. The proposed costs shall be at the level of detail described in Attachment 2. If the Fiscal Agent is also serving as the Administrator, the Contracting Agent, or both, the proposed costs to perform each function shall be separately specified. The proposed costs will be reviewed by the IC as part of review of the Annual Workplan and Budget. If there is a question or concern about the proposed costs, the Chair of the IC and the Administrator will meet with the Fiscal Agent concerning the issues. Upon approval of the Annual Workplan and Budget by the IC and the Commission, the Contracting Agent will prepare an agreement to be signed by the Fiscal Agent and the Contracting Agent to perform services for the new fiscal year. In the event that the Contracting Agent and the Fiscal Agent are the same PARTY, the agreement shall be signed by the designated employee of the PARTY serving as the Fiscal Agent and the (separate) designated employee of the PARTY serving as the Contracting Agent. E. Quarterly and Annual Budget Status. The Fiscal Agent shall prepare and submit quarterly budget updates to the IC every three (3) months, and shall provide a Year -End Budget Report. These reports shall be formatted in a clear and concise manner such that all expenditures, revenues, movement of monies, reallocation of funds and adjustments to the budget are detailed by project and line item (i.e. numerical reference and narrative 5/6/13 12 Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 14 Packet Pg. 100 of 374 Item 6 Attachment A - Recycling TAC MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT and Waste Reduction Commission Technical description). The Year -End Budget Report shall be submitted Advisory Committee efore October 31 each year. The IC may, at any time, request addit Memorandum of rmation, detail, documentation and updates. The Fiscal Agent shall res Agreement all such requests. F. Biennial Audit. The Fiscal Agent shall arrange for an audit by an independent third party Certified Public Accounting Firm (CPA) to be conducted every other year beginning with an audit of the 2013/14 fiscal year. The Fiscal Agent may utilize the CPA firm retained by the jurisdiction of which the Fiscal Agent is a part, to perform that PARTY's annual audit. In such event, the results of the audit of the Countywide Funds and accounts shall be clearly and separately called out in the CPA's audit report. The results of the audit shall be reported to the IC on or before January 15 every other year. G. Evaluation of the Fiscal Agent. Each year, the Fiscal Agent shall prepare a self - evaluation, along with the Year -End Budget Report, for submittal to the IC. The self - evaluation will include a description of key work tasks performed, any duties or tasks not completed, and any non -planned work tasks completed. The report will include recommendations and suggestions for improving the services of the Fiscal Agent. The self -evaluation shall be submitted at the same time as the Year -End Budget Report. The IC will review the report at a regular meeting and discuss any suggested or needed changes or improvements. The IC will rate the overall performance of the Fiscal Agent based upon the ability of the Fiscal Agent to perform its duties in a timely manner and in accordance with all requirements of this Agreement. The final recommendations and feedback of the IC will be recorded in the minutes and also in a letter from the IC Chair to the Fiscal Agent. This feedback will be used by the Fiscal Agent to make any required changes in operations and procedures and/or work tasks for the next fiscal year. In addition to the annual review of the Fiscal Agent, the IC may, at any time, discuss questions, concerns or issues of performance with the designated representative of the Fiscal Agent. X. CONTRACTING AGENT A. Duties. The Contracting Agent executes contracts with Outside Contractors, including the Administrator and the Fiscal Agent (where applicable) that have been requested and approved by the IC. The Contracting Agent consults with the IC to establish a procurement process for Outside Contractors, and then conducts that process once the IC has approved a scope of work, schedule, budget and other parameters of the contract that will be awarded by the Contracting Agent. The Contracting Agent shall conduct the procurement process and execute all contracts within a reasonable period of time after being directed to do so by the IC. The Contracting Agent shall provide a copy of any contract executed on behalf of the TAC to any PARTY, any TAC member, and to any PARTY or person designated by any PARTY or the IC upon request. The governing body of the Contracting Agent, at its discretion, may delegate authority to execute agreements and contracts approved by the IC to a designated employee. Notice of any such delegation of authority shall be provided in writing to the Chair of the IC and to the Administrator. 5/6/13 13 Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 15 Packet Pg. 101 of 374 TAC MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT Item 6 Attachment A - Recycling and Waste Reduction Commission Technical In the event the Contracting Agent is not also the Fiscal Agent Advisory Committee Agent shall receive Countywide Funds transferred to the Contracting Memorandum of cal Agent on a periodic basis as described in Attachment 5. The Contracb Agreement manage all Countywide Funds in accordance with generally accepted government accounting procedures. The Contracting Agent shall keep Countywide Funds segregated from all other funds administered by the Contracting Agent in separately numbered and coded accounts that are readily identifiable as Countywide Funds, and shall not expend, use or transfer any funds except as specifically directed by the IC. At the close of the fiscal year, the Contracting Agent shall, pursuant to the procedures in Attachment 5, comply with all directions from the IC with regard to retention of funds for contracts with Outside Contractors that are still in effect, and with regard to return of unexpended or unencumbered funds to the Fiscal Agent. The Fiscal Agent shall work cooperatively and collaboratively with the IC, the Administrator, and the ContractingAgent. B. Initial Contracting Agent. The initial Contracting Agent shall be the County of Santa Clara. The specific contact person shall be designated in writing to the Administrator and to the TAC Chair. In the event the IC determines there is a need for a change in the Contracting Agent in the future (due to costs, lack of availability of designated employees or for other reasons), or in the event the County is unable or unwilling to serve, the procedures for selection of a new Contracting Agent shall be the same as those for selection of a Fiscal Agent as described in Section IX C. C. Payment For Services. The Contracting Agent shall provide the Administrator with proposed. costs to perform the duties of TAC Contracting Agent for the upcoming fiscal year upon request. The proposed costs shall be at the level of detail described in Attachment 2. If the Contracting Agent is also serving as the Administrator, the Fiscal Agent, or both, the proposed costs to perform each function shall be separately specified. The proposed costs will be reviewed by the IC as part of review of the Annual Workplan and Budget. If there is a question or concern about the proposed costs, the Chair of the IC and the Administrator will meet with the Contracting Agent concerning the issues. Upon approval of the Annual Workplan and Budget by the IC and the Commission, the Administrator will prepare an agreement to be signed by the Contracting Agent and the Administrator to perform services for the new fiscal year. In the event that the Administrator and the Contracting Agent are the same PARTY, the agreement shall be signed by the designated employee of the PARTY serving as the Contracting Agent and the (separate) designated employee of the PARTY serving as the Administrator. D. Annual Contract Status Report. The Contracting Agent shall prepare and submit an annual report to the IC on the status of all contracts (listing all contracts in progress, expired, terminated, and the amount of work and budget remaining in each) on or before October 31 each year. The report shall also note the amount of Countywide Funds held by the Contracting Agent, and specify the amount(s) of funds encumbered for contracts, and the amount(s) of funds that are unspent and unencumbered. The IC may, at any time, request additional information, detail, documentation and updates on any or all contracts. The Contracting Agent shall respond promptly to all such requests. 5/6/13 14 Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 16 Packet Pg. 102 of 374 TAC MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT Item 6 Attachment A - Recycling and Waste Reduction Commission Technical E. Audits. The Contracting Agent shall cooperate with an Advisory Committee mation and documentation required in order to complete the bi-annual Memorandum of in Section IX F. In the event the IC decides that any actions or activities o Agreement Agent are not in compliance with this Agreement, or if the IC determines there are other reasons for an audit to be performed, the IC may perform an audit of the Countywide Funds received and expended by the Contracting Agent. In such event, the Contracting Agent shall cooperate fully, and in a timely manner, with persons performing the audit. F. Evaluation of the Contracting Agent. Each year, the Contracting Agent shall prepare a self -evaluation, along with the Annual Contract Status Report, for submittal to the IC. The self -evaluation will include a description of key work tasks performed, any duties or tasks not completed, and any non -planned work tasks completed. The report will include recommendations and suggestions for improving the services of the Contracting Agent. The self -evaluation shall be submitted at the same time as the Annual Contract Status Report. The IC will review the report at a regular meeting and discuss any suggested or needed changes or improvements. The IC will rate the overall performance of the Contracting Agent based upon the ability of the Contracting Agent to perform its duties in a timely manner and in accordance with all requirements of this Agreement. The final recommendations and feedback of the IC will be recorded in the minutes and also in a letter from the IC Chair to the Contracting Agent. This feedback will be used by the Contracting Agent to make any required changes in operations and procedures for the next fiscal year. In addition to the annual review of the Contracting Agent, the IC may, at any time, discuss questions, concerns or issues of performance with the designated representative of the Contracting Agent. XI. LEGAL COUNSEL A. Selection. The IC may select an attorney or firm that is experienced in solid waste, recycling and municipal law to research legal issues, proposed legislation, and to provide legal advice to the TAC ("Legal Counsel") as provided for in the Commission - approved Annual Workplan and Budget. Legal Counsel may be a City Attorney or County Counsel (i.e. an employee of one of the PARTIES) or may be an outside attorney or law firm. The IC will interview and select Legal Counsel as needed, and direct the Contracting Agent to prepare a contract with Legal Counsel for the provision of legal services. The IC shall direct the work of Legal Counsel. The Administrator may assist in coordination of activities with Legal Counsel, but shall not give direction without prior authorization from the IC. Legal Counsel shall not be responsible for providing legal advice to individual PARTIES related to their individual compliance with Public Resources Code Section 40000 et. seq., but may provide such services under separate contract with any PARTY or PARTIES. XII. OTHER AGREEMENTS OF THE PARTIES A. Term of Agreement. The term of this Agreement shall commence on the date the last duly authorized representative of the PARTIES executes it. This Agreement shall remain in effect until terminated by the PARTIES or until eight (8) or more PARTIES containing more than fifty percent (50%) of the population of the incorporated and unincorporated areas of County of Santa Clara withdraw from the Agreement, whichever 5/6/13 15 Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 17 Packet Pg. 103 of 374 Item 6 Attachment A - Recycling TAC MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT and Waste Reduction Commission Technical occurs first. A PARTY may withdraw from the Agreement by p Advisory Committee otice to the Administrator, stating the effective date of the PARTY'S wi Memorandum of thdrawal of a PARTY shall not entitle that PARTY to receive or retain an Agreement SWPF. B. Ethical Code of Conduct. All TAC members and Alternates shall adhere to the Ethical Code of Conduct in Attachment 4. All TAC members and Alternates shall attend a TAC-sponsored ethics training every other year beginning in FY 2013/14. The Administrator shall arrange for this training and include the cost in the Annual Workplan and Budget for each year the training is required to be conducted. C. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed and delivered in any number of copies ("counterparts") by the PARTIES, including by means of facsimile and e-mail of PDF copies. When each PARTY has signed and delivered at least one counterpart to the Administrator, each counterpart shall be deemed an original, and taken together, shall constitute one and the same Agreement, which shall be binding and effective as to the PARTIES hereto. D. Non -Compliance With State and Federal Laws. No PARTY shall, by entering into this Agreement, participating in the TAC or the IC, or agreeing to serve as Administrator, Fiscal Agent, Contracting Agent, and/or Legal Counsel, assume or be deemed to assume responsibility for any other PARTY in complying with the requirements of state and federal solid waste and recycling laws, including but not limited to, the California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 as amended (Public Resources Code Section 400000 et seq). This Agreement is intended solely for the convenience and benefit of the PARTIES hereto and shall not be deemed for the benefit of any third party and may not be enforced by any third party, including, but not limited to, the United States Environmental Protection Agency and the California Department of Resources, Recycling and Recovery, or any person acting on their behalf or in their stead. E. Indemnification. In lieu of and notwithstanding the pro rata risk allocation which might otherwise be imposed between the PARTIES pursuant to Government Code Section 895.6, the PARTIES agree that all losses or liabilities incurred by a PARTY, or by the Santa Clara Valley Water District in carrying out its duties under Section VI. Implementation Committee shall not be shared pro rata, but instead the PARTIES agree that pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, each of the PARTIES hereto shall fully defend, indemnify and hold harmless each of the other PARTIES, and the Santa Clara Valley Water District in the carrying out of its duties under Section VI. Implementation Committee, from any claim, expense or cost, damage or liability imposed for injury (as defined by Government Code Section 810.8) occurring by reason of the negligent acts or omissions or willful misconduct of the indemnifying PARTY, its officers agents or employees, or in connection with or arising from any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to such PARTY under this Agreement. No PARTY, nor any officer, board member, employee or agent thereof, shall be responsible for any damage or liability incurred by reason of the negligent acts or omissions or willful misconduct of the other PARTIES hereto, their officers, board members, employees or agents under or in connection with or arising from any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to such 5/6/13 16 Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 18 Packet Pg. 104 of 374 TAG MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT PARTY under this Agreement. Item 6 Attachment A - Recycling and Waste Reduction Commission Technical Advisory Committee Memorandum of F. Entire Agreement. This Agreement supersedes any prix Agreement for agreement among the PARTIES regarding the composition, structure, duties and powers of the TAC including, but not limited to, the TAC Rules of Procedure dated May 22, 2006, but does not supersede any other agreements between any of the PARTIES. G. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended by unanimous written agreement of the PARTIES. All PARTIES agree to bringanyproposed amendments to this Agreement to their Council or Board, as applicable' within three (3) months following acceptance by the IC. The IC shall, on a biennial basis, evaluate this Agreement and determine if any amendments are needed. The first biennial evaluation shall be in 2015. The IC may recommend amendments on a more frequent basis if desired. H. Venue. In the event that suit shall be brought by any PARTY to this Agreement, the PARTIES agree that venue shall be exclusively vested in the state courts of the County of Santa Clara, or where otherwise a p'ii iate;'e3 6161-01 "S' rffi'0 nited States District Court, Northern District of California, irfara'�a.:,r cafr-Iqu I. Attachments. Attachments 1 through 5 are attached hereto and 'inrporated herein -by this reference. 5/6/13 17 Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 19 Packet Pg. 105 of 374 TAC MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the PARTIES hereto have executed this dates shown below. Item 6 Attachment A - Recycling and Waste Reduction Commission Technical Advisory Committee Memorandum of Agreement COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, a public entity of the State of California JUN 0 4 2013 Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM: By:__________By: LI' -- � PRESthEN Board of S ervisors Deputy County Counsel KEN YEAGER S"Wed and certified that a copy of this document has been delivered by eledronlc" or other means to the Pres1dent8oard0t Supervisofis. Anp - gadanz, CI Board of Supervise the 5/6/13 18 Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 20 Packet Pg. 106 of 374 TAG MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the PARTIES hereto have executed th dates shown below. Item 6 Attachment A - Recycling and Waste Reduction Commission Technical Advisory Committee Memorandum of COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, a public entity of the State of California Date: By: Chair, Board of Supervisors CITY OF CAMPBELL Date: July 17, 2013 By. N e Mark Linder- Title: City Manager CITY OF Date: Name: Title: APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Deputy County Counsel ATTEST: Date: By: Agreement pf the APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Name : rA,; I l i am R Cox I rnnann Title: Citttcy APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Name: Title: 5/6/13 19 Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 21 Packet Pg. 107 of 374 TA C MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT CITY OF CAMPBELL Date: By: Name: Mark Linder Title: City Manager CITY OF CUPERTINO Date: By: Name: David Brandt Title: City Manager CITY OF GILROY Date: By: Name: Thomas Haglund Title: City Administrator CITY OF LOS ALTOS Date: By: Name: Marcia Somers Title: City Manager TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS Date: By: Name: Carl Cahill Title: City Manager 5/6113 Item 6 Attachment A - Recycling and Waste Reduction Commission Technical Advisory Committee Memorandum of APPROVED AS TO FORD Agreement By: Name: Title: City Attorney APPROVED AS TO FORM: Name: t4e1ia totle: City Attorney APPROVED AS TO FORM: By.: Name Title: City Attorney APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Name: Title: APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Name: Title: Town Attorney 19 Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 22 Packet Pg. 108 of 374 . 9 TAC MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT CITY OF CAMPBELL Date: By: Name: Mark _Linder Title: City _li tanager CITY OF CUPERTINO Date: By: Name: David Brandt Title:. City Manager CITY OF GILROY Lol 4 Name: Thomas Haglund Title: City Administrator CITY OF LOS ALTOS Date: By: Name: Marcia Somers Title: City Manager TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS. Date: Item 6 Attachment A - Recycling and Waste Reduction Commission Technical Advisory Committee Memorandum of Agreement APPROVED AS TO By: Name: Title: City Attorney APPROVED AS TO FORM: lay Name: Title: -City Attorney APPROVED. AS TO FORM: By✓`-� Name: G AtA CAu©rV Title: City Attorney ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Name: Title: APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: By: Name: Carl Cahill Name: Title: City Manager Title: Town Attorney 5/6/13 19 Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 23 Packet Pg. 109 of 374 TAC MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the PARTIES hereto have executed t dates shown below. Item 6 Attachment A - Recycling and Waste Reduction Commission Technical Advisory Committee Memorandum of Agreement J COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, a public entity of the State of California Date: Bv: Chair, Board of Supervisors APPROVED AS TO FORM: Bv: Deputy County Counsel ATTEST: Date: CITY OF Date: t APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Name: SO E42S Title: CITY OF Date: By: Name: Title: - ®r�I _ fm "iiL i i APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Name: Title: of the 5/6/13 19 Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 24 Packet Pg. 110 of 374 Item 6 Attachment A - Recycling TAC MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT and Waste Reduction Commission Technical Advisory Committee IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the PARTIES hereto have executed Memorandum of dates shown below. Agreement COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, a public entity of the State of California Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Chair, Board of Supervisors CITY OF LOS ALTOS HILLS Date: 1O 14. 2PI3 .By: ('2rj2 Name Carl. Ca x.1.1 Title:_ city Manager CITY OF Date: By: Name:___________________ Title: By: Deputy County Counsel ATTEST: Date: By: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Name: -Steve Mattas Title: C; y Attorney APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Name: Title: of the 5/6/13 Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 25 Packet Pg. 111 of 374 TAC MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the PARTIES hereto have executed th dates shown below. Item 6 Attachment A - Recycling and Waste Reduction Commission Technical Advisory Committee Memorandum of Agreement COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, a public entity of the State of California Date: By: Chair, Board of Supervisors GG OF LOS (P® Date:/ ") By: Name: ____ Title: CITY OF Date: By: Name: Title: APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Deputy County Counsel ATTEST: Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM: I � V APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Name:, Title: of the 5/6/13 19 Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 26 Packet Pg. 112 of 374 TAC MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT Title: City Manager TOWN OF LOS GATOS Date: By: Name: Greg Larson Title: Town Manager CITY OF MILPITAS Date: By: _ Nam m Ham Title:'City Manager CITY OF MONTE SERENO Date: By: Name: Brian Loventhal Title: City Manager CITY OF MORGAN HILL Date: By: Name: Steve Rymer Title: City Manager Title: Town Attorney r � Item 6 Attachment A - Recycling and Waste Reduction Commission Technical Advisory Committee Memorandum of Agreement J APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Name: Title: Town Attorney APPROVED AS TO FORM: By:.'-- Narr� : M' e . Ogaz Title: City Attorney APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Name: Title: APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Name: Title: City Attorney 5/6/13 20 Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 27 Packet Pg. 113 of 374 TA C MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT TOWN: OF- LOS GATOS Date: By: Name: Greg Larson Title: Town Manager CITY OF MILPITAS Date: By: Name Tom Williams Title: City Manager CITY OF MONTE SERENO Date: ?/i // 3 By Na Loventhal Title: City Manager CITY OF MORGAN HILL Dater By: Name "Steve Rymer Title:. City Manager 516/13. Item 6 Attachment A - Recycling and Waste Reduction Commission Technical Advisory Committee Memorandum of Agreement APPROVEDAS TO FORM: By: Name: Title: Town Attorney APPROVED AS TO .FORM:: By: Name : Michael J. Ogaz Title: City Attorney. APPROVEDAS TO FORM: Name:Kirsten Powell Title: City At rney APPROVED:. AS: TO FORM: By. Name: Title: City Attorney 20 Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 28 Packet Pg. 114 of 374 TAC: MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT TOWNOF LOS-'GATOS Date: By: Name..Greg Larson Title: Town Manager CITY OF MILPITAS Date: By: Name Tom Williams; Title; City Manager CITY OF, MONTE °SERENO Date Bye `Name: Brian, Leventhal Title: City Manager" CITY OF MORGAN HILL Date: .By: T2J Names teve Rymer Title: City Manager 5/6/13 Item 6 Attachment A - Recycling and Waste Reduction Commission Technical Advisory Committee Memorandum of Agreement APPROVED:AS TO FORM: 'N'ame: Titles Town°Attorney APPROVED. AS TO !FORM: By: 'Name~:: Michael a.J:Ogaz Title: pity Attorney APPROVED. AS TO..F:ORM: By: )Blame Title:. APPROVED TO FORM: By:. .V ,Name 12t NA `Title: City Attorney 20 Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 29 Packet Pg. 115 of 374 TAC MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT CITY OF- MOUNTAIN VIEW Date: 1-v'-• By (amme DanieL H. ich Title: City Manager CITY OF PALO ALTO Date: By: . I Name: James Keene Title: City Manager CITY OF SAN JOSE Date: By: Name: Norberto Duenas Title: Deputy City Manager CITY OF SANTA CLARA Date: By: Name: Julio J. Fuentes Title: City Managel' CITY OF SARATOGA Date: By: Name: Dave Anderson Title:. City Manager Item 6 Attachment A - Recycling and Waste Reduction Commission Technical Advisory Committee Memorandum of Agreement APPROVED AS TO FORt By: Uw& Na*: annie L. Quinn Title: ity Attorney APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Name: Title: City Attorney APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Name: Rosa Tsongtaatarii Title: Senior Deputy City Attorney APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Name: Richard E. Nosky, Jr. Title: City Attorney APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Name: Richard Taylor Title: City Attorney 5/6/I3. - 21 Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 30 Packet Pg. 116 of 374 Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM: • By: By: Name: Daniel-H..Rich Name : Jannie L. Quinn . Title: City Manager: TitleCity Attorney CITY OF =PALO' ALTO Date: 2 APP VEDAST T OR By: : By: Name:. J mes Keen . me: \ . Title 9tSr Manager'Title : City Attorney CITY OF SAN JOSE Date: • APPROVED AS:TO FORM: By:. By: Name: Norberto Du enas Name .: Rosa Tsongtaatarii Title: Deputy. City Manager . Title: Senior Deputy City Attorney CITY OF SANTA CLARA Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: By: Name: Julio J. Fuentes Name: Richard E. Nosky, Jr. Title: City Manager. Title: City. Attorney CITY .OF SARATOGA Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: By: Name: Dave Anderson. Name: Richard Taylor Title: City Manager Title: City Attorney 5/6/13 •21 • Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 31 Packet Pg. 117 of 374 TAG MEMORANDUM OF -AGREEMENT CITY:OF--MOUNTAIN VIEW Date: By: .Name: Daniel H. Rich .Title: City Manager .CITY OF PALO ALTO Date: By: Name James Keene Title: it Manager.. :CITY -OF SAN JOSE Date:_________ By' �► NarrreNorberto Duenas Title: _Deputy City Manager CITY c.F :SANTA C:LARA Date:. . , .. By:,,, Name: -Julio .J, :Fuentes Title Cray:Manager CITY .F :SARAT0QA Pate:.. By Name; Dave Anderson Title, City. Manager 516113. Item 6 Attachment A - Recycling and Waste Reduction Commission Technical Advisory Committee Memorandum of Agreement APPROVED.AS--O FORM. ,By; Name : Jannie L Quinn Title: City Attorney APPROVED.AS._TO'=F,OFM • By Name: Title: OTh)' Attorney APPRO _ A TC0 F ilk: By: Na sa Tyhgtaatarii Titl-_... Senior Deputy. City Attorney APPROVED AA TQ FORM - By: Name; Richard E..Nosky, Jr Title City Attorney APPROVED AS TO FORM: By. Name; Richard Taylor Title City Attorney 21 Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 32 Packet Pg. 118 of 374 Date:::.: .. APPROVED AS TO- FORM: By: _ By: . Name::: Daniel H. Rich ::: Name : Jannie L. Quinn Title: City Manager Title: City Attorney CITY OF PALO ALTO Date APPROVED AS TO FORM By By: Name: James Keene Name: Title: City Manager Title: City Attorney CITY OF SAN JOSE Date:.. APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: : - - By: Name: Norberto Duenas Name : Rosa Tsongtaatarii Title: Deputy City Manager g... Title: Senior Deputy City Attorney Y Y CITY OF SANTA. CLARA i� Date: " l l - l 3 APPROVED AS. TO FORM: By. By: olio J. ientes NameAlty Na : Ric rd E. Nosy, Jr, Manager Title: Mana er Y:. Y Titl . Cit Attorne CITY OF SARATOGA Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM. By: Sy; Name: Dave Anderson Name: Richard Taylor Title: City Manager Title: -City Attorney 516/13 21 Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 33 Packet Pg. 119 of 374 TAC MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT CITY OF MOUNTAIN''VIEW Date: By , Name: Daniel H. Rich_ Title: City Manager CITY OF 'PALO:ALT0} Date.. By: Name: .James- Keene Title:. City :Manager CITY OF SAN .JOE. Date: r By. Name: Norberto O'uehas Title: Deputy city Manager CITY OF SANTA'•CLARA Date: By: :Name .J:ulio: J. -Fuentes Title City Manager CITY OF SARATOGA bate;. -"2 e /3 By: Dave -Anderson Title: City Manager' Item 6 Attachment A - Recycling and Waste Reduction Commission Technical Advisory Committee i� Memorandum of APPROVED AS TO FOI Agreement By Name Jann(e:L Quinn' Title:. City Attorney Ai4D, PS TO FORM By: Name: Title:. City Attorney iP`PRG)VED' A:TO FQ,R)V# 1'• . Name ';:Rosa .:Tsot g aatarn Titles S'eni:or...DepuyCity•Atk®me APPROVED AS. TO FORM: By. Name: `Richard E• Nosky,. Jr Title 'city Attorney APPROVED AS TO FORM: By _--, Name: Richard Taylor Title: .City -Attorney 516713:1. Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 34 Packet Pg. 120 of 374 TAG MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT CITY OF SUNNYVALE Date: '7/22.. j By:_ Nam Title: 5/6/13 Manager r � Item 6 Attachment A - Recycling and Waste Reduction Commission Technical Advisory Committee Memorandum of Agreement J APPROVED AS TO FORM: By; d72 Name: Joan A. Borger Title: 22 Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 35 Packet Pg. 121 of 374 TAC MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT Item 6 Attachment A - Recycling and Waste Reduction Commission Technical Advisory Committee Memorandum of Agreement ATTACHMENT 1 INITIAL STAFFING OF ADMINISTRATOR The following is the initial staff complement for the Administrator: Staff Person % FTE Committed % FTE Committed To Administrator To County Duties Unincorporated Duties Elizabeth Constantino, Program Manager II 0.82 FTE 0.18 FTE Provides oversight of all Annual Workplan tasks and all functions of the Administrator. Lisa Rose, Senior Management Analyst 0.87 FTE 0.13 FTE Coordinates the Green Business Program, serves as staff to the Commission, and performs various other duties. Clifton Chew, Management Analyst 0.80 FTE 0.20 FTE Serves as staff to the TAC, prepares state reporting and DRS, and performs various other duties. Zachary DeVine, Management Analyst 0.67 FTE 0.33 FTE Contracts monitoring, budget tracking, Outreach Specialist, and various other duties. Sue Sherrin, Associate Management 0.98 FTE 0.02 FTE Analyst B, Green Business Specialist Sarah Smith, Management Analyst 1.0 FTE 0.00 FTE Home Composting Education Program Coordinator Joanne Chapa, Office Specialist III 0.94 FTE 0.06 FTE 5/6/13 23 Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 36 Packet Pg. 122 of 374 Item 6 Attachment A - Recycling TAC MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT and Waste Reduction Commission Technical ATTACHMENT 2 Advisory Committee Memorandum of SELECTION PROCESS FOR THE ADMINISTRA1' .. Age 1.Selection. The IC shall select a PARTY or an Outside Contractor to serve as the Administrator for the TAC. As part of the selection process, the potential candidate(s) shall submit a proposal to the IC for providing Administrator services. The proposal shall include: a detailed scope of work for the upcoming fiscal year, detailed costs and work hours for the completion of each task, and a list of the employees proposed to perform .each part of the Annual Workplan, as well as the administrative and management duties of the Administrator. The proposal shall also include a resume and description of the education, experience and expertise of each proposed staff member highlighting experience in solid waste management, recycling, diversion programs, producer responsibility, public education and outreach, legislative analysis, budgeting, public sector management, administration and policy development. It is of great importance that each member of the Administrator staff possess a high level of experience and expertise in the listed areas. The proposal shall designate the duties and activities to be carried out by each employee. The IC will review the proposal(s) and conduct interview(s) with the potential Administrator(s). The IC will select an Administrator and recommend approval to the Commission. 2.Change in Administrator Staff. In the event any member of the Administrator's staff is unable or unavailable to serve in the capacity indicated in the original proposal, the IC shall work with the Administrator to determine if an acceptable alternate staff member is available. This shall include, if desired by the IC, having representatives from the IC participate in the selection process for the alternate staff person; review the resumes, references and writing samples of proposed candidates; attend and participate in interviews; and provide input to the decision -making process for selection of the proposed alternate staff member. If the proposed alternate staff person is not acceptable to the IC, and the IC determines that the employee who is unavailable is a key employee, the IC may give written notice to the Administrator that the TAC will seek another Administrator, and the IC may recommend to the Commission that the selection process for a new Administrator be commenced. Upon receipt of Commission approval, the IC will begin that process. The Administrator shall serve until such time as either a replacement Administrator is selected and approved by the Commission, or (if the Administrator is not a PARTY) until the current contract for the services of the Administrator expires, whichever occurs first. In the IC's sole discretion, the services of the Administrator may be terminated prior to the selection of a new Administrator. In the event the Administrator is not a PARTY, an early termination clause shall be placed in the contract with the Administrator for use by the IC in the event a key staff person becomes unavailable. 3. Key Employee. A "key employee" includes, but is not limited to, any one of the following: a. An employee who is performing twenty percent (20%) or more of the work hours in the Annual Workplan. 5/6/13 24 Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 37 Packet Pg. 123 of 374 TAG MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT Item 6 Attachment A - Recycling and Waste Reduction Commission Technical b. An employee whose work tasks require a high level Advisory Committee ertise and experience in recycling, solid and/or hazardous wa Memorandum of t programs and practices. Agreement c. An employee whose work tasks require a high level of professional judgment that is the product of numerous years of experience in recycling, solid and hazardous waste management, and/or in work for public agencies. d. An employee whose work tasks involve a high level of interaction with the public (e.g. in trainings, liaison with businesses or non-profit organizations, etc.). e. An employee whose work tasks involve presentations or testimony to public agencies (e.g. City Councils, the Board of Supervisors) and/or community organizations (e.g. service organizations, community groups, homeowner's` associations, etc.). 5/6/13 25 Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 38 Packet Pg. 124 of 374 TAC MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT ATTACHMENT 3 Item 6 Attachment A - Recycling and Waste Reduction Commission Technical Advisory Committee Memorandum of Agreement ELEMENTS TO BE CONTAINED IN THE ANNUAL WORKPLAN AND BUDGET 1.Scope of Work. The proposed Annual Workplan and Budget will contain a detailed scope of work for each proposed task, the employee work hours estimated to complete each task, the name(s) of the specific employees that will perform the work for each task, the cost of the work hours for each task, all proposed overhead costs for the Administrator and all other projected costs. If the Administrator is a public agency, the costs may be shown as a percentage of each Full Time Equivalent (FTE) and the cost therefore, as long as the position (such as 'Analyst I') and the name of the employee filling that position are indicated, along with the fully burdened cost of the specified percentage of each FTE. The proposed Annual Workplan shall contain a list of key milestones for each task. 2.Administrative Tasks. The Workplan shall include a task for providing administrative support for the TAC including work hours to prepare meeting agendas, to schedule meetings, attend meetings, prepare minutes and correspondence, and carry out the direction of the TAC and all Committees and Subcommittees. The Workplan shall also include a separate task for providing administrative support to the Commission including work hours to prepare agendas, attend Commission meetings, prepare minutes, and carry out the direction of the Commission, its Committees and Subcommittees. 3.Other Staff Commitments. The proposed Workplan will contain a listing of the other duties and responsibilities of each assigned employee (other than the work to be performed as Administrator for the TAC and the Commission) including the work hours and a general description of the key tasks and projects to be performed. This will serve as a cross-check (regardless of whether the Administrator is a public agency or a private firm) to ensure that the time of each employee is not overcommitted, and that sufficient time exists for each employee to complete all their assigned tasks. 4. Fiscal Agent and Contracting Agent Costs. The Administrator shall consult with the Fiscal Agent and with the Contracting Agent (in the event they are separate PARTIES) and shall incorporate the proposed costs for the services of each into the proposed Workplan and Budget. Such costs shall be clearly and separately identified for each function (and identified separately from those of the Administrator) and shall include the costs for employee time, expenses (such as bank fees), overhead charges and all other proposed costs. 5.Cost Detail For Comparison. The budget shall be formatted in a clear and concise manner such that all projected expenditures and revenues are detailed by project and line item. The proposed Workplan and Budget shall contain sufficient detail about proposed work hours and costs such that a comparison can be made between the proposed costs for the current Administrator, the current Fiscal Agent and the current 5/6/13 26 Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 39 Packet Pg. 125 of 374 TAC MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT Item 6 Attachment A - Recycling and Waste Reduction Commission Technical Contracting Agent, and other potential providers of these ser Advisory Committee Memorandum of 6.Projected Amount of Fund Transfer From Fiscal Agent to Agreement ent. In the event the Fiscal Agent and the Contracting Agent are different PARTIES, the budget shall include the projected amount of funds to be transferred from the Fiscal Agent to the Contracting Agent in order to pay for contracts with Outside Contractors that will be awarded by the Contracting Agent in the upcoming year. Such projections shall take into account all funds currently held by the Contracting Agent (if any) and the amount of such funds already, encumbered for contracts in progress. The projection shall be accompanied by a recommendation as to the frequency of fund transfers from the Fiscal Agent to the Contracting Agent that will be required to fund contracts awarded by the Contracting Agent for the upcoming year (e.g. annual one-time transfer of funds, quarterly transfer of funds, or other recommended timing.) 7. Discussion Concerning Potential Conflicts. Once the initial draft of the proposed Annual Workplan is prepared, the IC Chair, the Administrator, the Fiscal Agent and the Contracting Agent shall meet to review and discuss the Workplan and shall work cooperatively to identify and address any potential conflicts that could arise with regard to policies of the Administrator, the Fiscal Agent or the Contracting Agent. Examples include proposed sale of recycling containers or other goods at less than thepurchase price (i.e. subsidized cost of compost bins for the home composting program); provision of recycling grants, prizes, incentives; and other such items. At the direction of the IC Chair, the Administrator shall further investigate any potential conflicts that have been identified, and shall, in consultation with the Fiscal Agent and the Contracting Agent, research and propose solutions for each. If solutions cannot be found, the issue may be presented to the IC for further consideration and/or the IC Chair may direct the Administrator to revise the Workplan and Budget to remove the items creating the potential conflict. In this event the IC Chair will inform the IC of such action when the Annual Workplan and Budget are considered for approval. 5/6/13 27 Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 40 Packet Pg. 126 of 374 TAC MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT ATTACHMENT 4 CODE OF ETHICAL CONDUCT Item 6 Attachment A - Recycling and Waste Reduction Commission Technical Advisory Committee Memorandum of Agreement 1. Members shall strive to conduct all meetings, discussions and deliberations in a spirit of collaboration and partnership. Members shall treat all persons with respect and courtesy. In the course of discussions, members shall make their arguments on the merits of the issue rather than engaging in personal remarks or attacks on persons holding positions other than their own. 2. All members shall remain aware that the activities of the TAC are funded by fees, raised from the public; and that the TAC is recommending expenditures of public funds. Members shall act prudently and in the best interest of the public when making fiscal and policy decisions. 3. Members shall voluntarily recuse themselves from all discussions and votes, and shall refrain from expressing any opinion to other members on issues where any one of the following apply: a. The member holds a financial interest such that the member could financially benefit from the action or issue being considered. b. The member is an owner or investor of a business the TAC is considering doing business with. c. The member owns land that is being considered for purchase or lease by the TAC or by any program funded by the TAC. d. A charity, community group or non -governmental organization to which the member belongs or contributes funds would receive funds from the TAC for projects or services. e. A person in the member's family could benefit financially from the action or issue being considered. Family includes the members' spouse, children, step -children, grandchildren and step -grandchildren, as well as siblings and parents of the member and the member's spouse. 4. A member recusing themselves shall mean (a) announcing the member has a conflict of interest when the item is opened for discussion, (b) leaving the meeting room before discussion on the matter commences, and (c) not returning to the room until after discussion and any vote on the matter is concluded. 5. Members shall periodically conduct a. self -assessment and inventory of any potential conflicts of interest they may have and, if the member is unsure whether or not a conflict exists, the member shall discuss the issue with the TAC Chair, the Administrator, TAC Legal Counsel or legal counsel for the member's own agency. 6: In the event a member fails to recuse him or her self during discussion of an issue where the member appears to have a conflict of interest, the Chair of the meeting shall ask the member to recuse him or her self and shall halt discussion about the issue until the member has left the room. 7. Members shall not engage in financial transactions using non-public information nor allow the improper use of such information to further any personal or private interest. 5/6/13 28 Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 41 Packet Pg. 127 of 374 TAC MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT Item 6 Attachment A - Recycling and Waste Reduction Commission Technical 8. Members shall not solicit or accept any gift or other item of Advisory Committee rom any person or entity seeking official action from, doing Memorandum of , or conducting activities regulated by the TAC, or whose Agreement be substantially affected by actions of the TAC. Gifts do not include coffee, tea, donuts, discounts available to the general public, greeting cards or plaques of minor intrinsic value. It is appropriate and prudent for members to decline even items of minor intrinsic value from sources described in this section. 9. Members shall not knowingly make unauthorized commitments or promises of any kind purporting to bind the TAC to take any type of action or to approve any contract, program or other commitment. 10. Members shall not use their membership on the TAC for private gain. 11. Members shall always act impartially and objectively and not give preferential treatment to any organization or individual. 12. Members shall not seek or accept any contract to provide services to the TAC for a period of at least six (6) months after termination of their membership on the TAC. 13. Members shall adhere to, and be vigilant that the TAC adheres to, all applicable state, federal and local laws and regulations. 14.All members shall participate in a TAC-sponsored Ethics Training biennially. 15. Members shall endeavor to avoid any actions or statements that violate, or that create the appearance that they are violating, the law or any ethical standards set forth in this Attachment. - 5/6/13 29 Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 42 Packet Pg. 128 of 374 Item 6 Attachment A - Recycling TAC MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT and meWaste Reduction Commission Technical ATTACHMENT 5 Advisory Committee PROCEDURES FOR TRANSFER OF COUNTYWIDE FUNDS FRd Memorandum of NT TO CONTRACTING AGENT Agreement The following procedures shall be used in the event the Fiscal Agent and the Contracting Agent are different PARTIES.., 1. As part of its review and approval of the Annual Workplan and Budget, the IC shall establish the amount of funds and the schedule for transfer of funds from the Fiscal Agent to the Contracting Agent for the upcoming fiscal year. 2. Upon approval of the Annual Workplan and Budget by the Commission, the IC may take appropriate actions consistent with the Annual Workplan and Budget, including but not limited to, the following: A. Direct the Fiscal Agent to transfer specific amount(s) of Countywide Funds to the Contracting Agent on a specified schedule. The schedule may call for annual, quarterly, or more frequent transfers, as needed for the fiscal year. B. Adjust the timing and/or the amount(s) of funds to be transferred by the Fiscal Agent to the Contracting agent if circumstances change during the year, or if there are other reasons to do so. C. In the event the IC directs a change in the scope of work for an existing Outside Contractor that will increase the cost of the work, the IC may direct the Fiscal Agent to transfer additional funds to the Contracting Agent to pay for the amended scope of work. 3. In the event the Fiscal Agent is also serving as the Administrator, the IC shall direct the Fiscal Agent to transfer funds to the Contracting Agent for payment of the Administrator. The Contracting Agent shall pay the Administrator pursuant to the contract executed between the Contracting Agent and the Administrator. 4. If a single PARTY is serving as the Fiscal Agent and the Contracting Agent, the IC may direct that PARTY to retain a specified amount of Countywide Funds to pay the PARTY for performing the services of Fiscal Agent and Contracting Agent. 5. In the event a single PARTY is serving as the Fiscal Agent, the Administrator and the Contracting Agent, the IC will direct the PARTY to implement the Annual Workplan and Budget as approved by the IC and the Commission. This includes paying the costs specified in the approved Budget for the PARTY performing the duties of the Administrator, the Fiscal Agent and the Contracting Agent, as well as carrying out the duties of each. 6. If the Contracting Agent is, at any time, running out of funds or projects a shortfall in funds due to changed conditions or circumstances, the Contracting Agent shall immediately inform the IC and the Fiscal Agent and proceed according to the directions of the IC. 7. When making transfers of funds to the Contracting Agent, the Fiscal Agent shall make the required arrangements for an electronic transfer of funds or for preparation of a check made payable to the Contracting Agent. 8. If the Contracting Agent does not receive funds from the Fiscal Agent pursuant to the schedule directed by the IC, the Contracting Agent shall promptly inform the Fiscal Agent and the Fiscal Agent shall promptly arrange for the funds to be transferred. 5/6/13 30 Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 43 Packet Pg. 129 of 374 TAC MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT Item 6 Attachment A - Recycling and Waste Reduction Commission Technical 9. At the end of the fiscal year, the IC will review the Year End Cont Advisory Committee rt from the Contracting Agent, the Year -End Budget Report from the F Memorandum of the Year -End Report from the Administrator. The IC may direct the Con Agreement transfer unspent, unencumbered funds to the Fiscal Agent or to retain such funds for use in the following fiscal year. The Contracting Agent will promptly comply with the directions of the IC. 10. If the IC directs the Contracting Agent to transfer unspent funds to the Fiscal Agent, the Fiscal Agent shall acknowledge receipt of such funds to the Contracting Agent and shall note the transfer in the accounting records of the Fiscal Agent pursuant to generally accepted government accounting procedures. 5/6/13 31 Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 44 Packet Pg. 130 of 374 County of Santa Clara Department of Agriculture and Environmental Management Recycling and Waste Reduction Division 1555 Berger Drive Suite 300 San Jose, CA 95112 (408) 282-3180 Fax (408) 282-3188 DATE: September 2, 2014 TO: Clerk of the Board FROM: Lisa Rose RE: Memorandum of Agreement Item 6 Attachment A - Recycling and Waste Reduction Commission Technical Advisory Committee Memorandum of Agreement http://www.ReduceWaste.org Attached are the original, signed copies of the Agreement Creating the Santa Clara County Recycling and Waste Reduction Technical Advisory Committee, signed by each Party to the Agreement. Please forward an executed copy to me (electronically) and I will distribute to each of the cities. Please contact me at 408-282-3166 or lisa.roseaem.sccgov.org if you have any questions. Board of Supervisors: Mike Wasserman, Cindy Chavez, Dave Cortese, Ken Yeager, S. Joseph Simitian County Executive: Jeffrey V. Smith Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 45 Packet Pg. 131 of 374 Item 6 Attachment B - Recycling and Waste Reduction FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT CREATING THE SANTA CLARA COUNTY Commission First RECYCLING AND WASTE REDUCTION Amendment toMOA TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE This FIRST AMENDMENT ("FIRST AMENDMENT") TO AGREEMENT CREATING THE SANTA CLARA COUNTY RECYCLING AND WASTE REDUCTION TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE ("AGREEMENT") is entered into and becomes effective on ("Effective Date"), by and between the COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, a political subdivision of the State of California; CITY OF CAMPBELL, a municipal corporation of the State of California; CITY OF CUPERTINO, a municipal corporation of the State of California; CITY OF GILROY, a municipal corporation of the State of California; CITY OF LOS ALTOS, a municipal corporation of the State of California; TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS, a municipal corporation of the State of California; TOWN OF LOS GATOS, a municipal corporation of the State of California; CITY OF MILPITAS, a municipal corporation of the State of California; CITY OF MONTE SERENO, a municipal corporation of the State of California; CITY OF MORGAN HILL, a municipal corporation of the State of California; CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW, a municipal corporation of the State of California; CITY OF PALO ALTO, a municipal corporation of the State of California; CITY OF SAN JOSE, a municipal corporation of the State of California; CITY OF SANTA CLARA, a chartered municipal corporation of the State of California; CITY OF SARATOGA, a municipal corporation of the State of California; and CITY OF SUNNYVALE, a municipal corporation of the State of California. All the above -mentioned entities are hereinafter collectively referred to as "PARTIES" or individually as "PARTY." RECITALS WHEREAS, PARTIES entered into the AGREEMENT creating the Santa Clara County Recycling and Waste Reduction Technical Advisory Committee ("TAC"); WHEREAS, pursuant to "Section Ill, Paragraph C. Attendance From A Remote Location" of the AGREEMENT, member participation in TAC's meetings virtually through teleconference technology was strongly discouraged; WHEREAS, starting in December 2020, pursuant to the first state of emergency teleconferencing procedures and subsequently AB 361, PARTIES were routinely meeting virtually through teleconference technology, which continues to support robust participation and communication; and WHEREAS, PARTIES wish to enter into this FIRST AMENDMENT to revise the language in "Section 111, Paragraph C. Attendance From A Remote Location" of the AGREEMENT to remove any indication that participation in TAC meetings virtually through teleconference technology is prohibited or strongly discouraged and allow members to participate in TAC meetings by utilizing teleconference technology, pursuant to the teleconferencing provisions in the Ralph M. Brown Act (Government Code Section 54953(b)) ("Brown Act"). FIRST AMENDMENT NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed among the PARTIES to incorporate the above Recitals hereto, and that the AGREEMENT is hereby amended as follows: Amendment. All terms and conditions of the AGREEMENT, as attached hereto and incorporated First Amendment to MOA revised 7-18-23 Creating the Santa Clara County Recycling and Waste Reduction Technical Advisory Committee Page 1 of 6 Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 46 Packet Pg. 132 of 374 Item 6 Attachment B - Recycling and Waste Reduction herein as Exhibit "1" shall remain in full force and effect except that the following Commission First a made as set forth below. "Section Ill, Paragraph C. Attendance From A Remote L mended and replaced in its entirety by the following: Amendment to MOA "C. Satellite and Auxiliary Teleconferencing Attendance in Meetings. 1. Definitions: Satellite Locations: Satellite Locations are defined in paragraph 2 below and include designated locations that will be determined in advance by the TAC in consultation with the Administrator. Auxiliary Locations: Auxiliary Locations are defined in paragraph 3 below and do not include previously designated Satellite Locations and must be approved in advance by the Administrator. 2. Satellite Locations. Meetings of the TAC may be held via video teleconference from multiple Satellite Locations located within Santa Clara County. Each designated Satellite Location will be open to the public, and public comment may be made from all Satellite Locations. The TAC shall comply with all Brown Act teleconferencing requirements, including but not limited to, requiring a quorum of the TAC to participate from Satellite Locations within the TAC's jurisdiction, posting the agendas at all Satellite Locations, and posting the members' Satellite Location on the notice and agenda. Satellite Locations, including number and location, shall be determined by the TAC in consultation with the Administrator. 3 Auxiliary Teleconference Location. In the event of an unavoidable schedule conflict, a member may participate in a meeting from an Auxiliary Teleconference Location not previously designated as a Satellite Location via teleconferencing technology, provided that an Auxiliary Teleconference Location meeting room or rooms comply with all Brown Act teleconferencing requirements, including, but not limited to, the ability to connect the Auxiliary Teleconference Location to the other locations where TAC members are meeting and the ability for the public to address the TAC directly. The Auxiliary Teleconference Location will be open to the public, and public comment may be made from the separate Auxiliary Teleconference Locations. The agenda shall be posted at each Auxiliary Teleconference Location, and the agenda will include the member's separate Auxiliary Teleconference Location on the notice and agenda. The member shall comply with all Brown Act teleconferencing requirements. In such event, the member will notify the Administrator at least seven (7) days in advance of the meeting and request to attend from an Auxiliary Teleconference Location. The Administrator will advise the member if attendance from the Auxiliary Teleconference Location is permissible. If attendance from the Auxiliary Teleconference Location is permissible, the Administrator will comply with all Brown Act teleconferencing requirements, including but not limited to, requiring a quorum of the TAC to participate from teleconferencing locations within the TAC's jurisdiction. The member shall be responsible for posting of the agenda and public access at the Auxiliary Teleconference Location. First Amendment to MOA revised 7-18-23 Page 2 of 6 Creating the Santa Clara County Recycling and Waste Reduction Technical Advisory Committee Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 47 Packet Pg. 133 of 374 Item 6 Attachment B - Recycling I and Waste Reduction A member who attends a meeting from a separate Auxiliar Commission First Location outside the jurisdiction of Santa Clara County will I the Amendment to MCA count to determine a quorum; however, the member's vote VIII u eouriiu. A member who attends a meeting from a separate Auxiliary Teleconference Location within the jurisdiction of Santa Clara County shall be included in the count to determine the quorum. Attendance from an Auxiliary Teleconference Location is to be used only in rare cases of unavoidable schedule conflicts. In person and Satellite Location attendance at meetings is strongly preferred and encouraged. 2. Except as amended by this FIRST AMENDMENT, all other applicable terms and conditions of the original Agreement and attachments shall remain in full force and effect. The terms of this First Amendment shall control if any conflict exists. 3. The unenforceability, invalidity or illegality of any provision(s) of this FIRST AMENDMENT shall not render the other provisions unenforceable, invalid or illegal. 4. The PARTIES may execute this FIRST AMENDMENT in two or more counterparts, which shall, in the aggregate, be deemed an original but all of which, together, shall constitute one and the same instrument. The parties agree that an electronic copy of a signed agreement, or an electronically signed agreement, has the same force and legal effect as an agreement executed with an original ink signature. The term "electronic copy of a signed agreement" refers to a transmission by facsimile, electronic mail, or other electronic means of a copy of an original signed agreement in a portable document format. The term "electronically signed agreement" means an agreement that is executed by applying a verified electronic signature using technology approved by the County. 5. The signatories to this FIRST AMENDMENT warrant and represent that each is authorized to execute this FIRST AMENDMENT and that their respective signatures serve to legally obligate their respective representatives, agents, successors and assigns to comply with the provisions of this FIRST AMENDMENT. 6. This FIRST AMENDMENT is authorized by Article XII, Section G, of the AGREEMENT, which provides that the AGREEMENT may be amended by unanimous written agreement of the PARTIES. [SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE] First Amendment to MOA revised 7-18-23 Page 3 of 6 Creating the Santa Clara County Recycling and Waste Reduction Technical Advisory Committee Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 48 Packet Pg. 134 of 374 Item 6 Attachment B - Recycling and Waste Reduction IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the PARTIES have executed this FIRST AMEND of the Commission First date first written above. Amendment to MOA J COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, a political subdivision of the State of California Date: _ By: Name: Approved as to Form: Date: By: Name: President, Board of Supervisors Deputy County Counsel CITY OF CAMPBELL, a municipal corporation of the State of California Approved as to Form: Date: Date: By: By: Name: Name: City Administrator/Manager City Attorney CITY OF CUPERTINO, a municipal corporation of the State of California Date: _ By: Name: City Administrator/Manager Approved as to Form: Date: By: Name: City Attorney CITY OF GILROY, a municipal corporation of the State of California Date: _ By: Name: City Administrator/Manager Approved as to Form: Date: By: Name: City Attorney CITY OF LOS ALTOS, a municipal corporation of the State of California Date: _ By: Name: City Administrator/Manager Approved as to Form: Date: By: Name: City Attorney TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS, a municipal corporation of the State of California Date: _ By: Name: Approved as to Form: Date: By: Name: City Administrator/Manager Town Attorney First Amendment to MOA revised 7-18-23 Page 4 of 6 Creating the Santa Clara County Recycling and Waste Reduction Technical Advisory Committee I Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 49 Packet Pg. 135 of 374 J Item 6 Attachment B - Recycling and Waste Reduction Commission First Amendment to MOA TOWN OF LOS GATOS, a municipal corporation of the State of California Date: _ By: Name: City Administrator/Manager Approved as to Form: Date: By: Name: Town Attorney CITY OF MILPITAS, a municipal corporation of the State of California Approved as to Form: Date: Date: By: By: Name: Name: City Administrator/Manager City Attorney CITY OF MONTE SERENO, a municipal corporation of the State of California Date: _ By: Name: City Administrator/Manager Approved as to Form: Date: By: Name: City Attorney CITY OF MORGAN HILL, a municipal corporation of the State of California Date: _ By: Name: City Administrator/Manager Approved as to Form: Date: By: Name: City Attorney CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW, a municipal corporation of the State of California Approved as to Form: Date: Date: By: By: Name: Name: City Administrator/Manager City Attorney CITY OF PALO ALTO, a municipal corporation of the State of California Date: _ By: Name: Approved as to Form: Date: By: Name: City Administrator/Manager City Attorney First Amendment to MOA revised 7-18-23 Page 5 of 6 Creating the Santa Clara County Recycling and Waste Reduction Technical Advisory Committee Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 50 Packet Pg. 136 of 374 Item 6 Attachment B - Recycling and Waste Reduction Commission First Amendment to MOA CITY OF SAN JOSE, a municipal corporation of the State of California Approved as to Form: Date: Date: By: By: Name: Name: City Administrator/Manager City Attorney CITY OF SANTA CLARA, a chartered municipal corporation of the State of California Date: _ By: Name: City Administrator/Manager Approved as to Form: Date: By: Name: City Attorney CITY OF SARATOGA, a municipal corporation of the State of California Date: _ By: Name: City Administrator/Manager Approved as to Form: Date: By: Name: City Attorney CITY OF SUNNYVALE, a municipal corporation of the State of California Date: _ By: Name: Approved as to Form: Date: By: Name: City Administrator/Manager City Attorney First Amendment to MOA revised 7-18-23 Page 6 of 6 Creating the Santa Clara County Recycling and Waste Reduction Technical Advisory Committee Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 51 Packet Pg. 137 of 374 Item 7 Item 7 Staff Report City Council Staff Report From: City Manager CITY O F Report Type: CONSENT CALENDAR PALO Lead Department: Public Works ALTO Meeting Date: November 6, 2023 Report #:2309-2053 TITLE Approval of General Services Agreement Contract C24185703A with SWA Services Group, Inc. for a five-year term in an Amount Not -to -Exceed $19,327,547 for Janitorial Cleaning and Maintenance Services, and Approval of a Fiscal Year 2024 Budget Amendment in the General Fund; CEQA status — Not a Project. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that Council: 1. Approve and authorize the City Manager or their designee to execute Services Agreement C24185703A with SWA Services Group, Inc. for a five-year term in an amount not -to -exceed $19,327,547 (including $18,407,188 for Basic Services and $920,359 for Additional Services); and 2. Amend the Fiscal Year 2024 Budget Appropriation for the General Fund (requires a 2/3 vote) by: a. Increasing the Public Works Department Public Services Division ongoing contract expense appropriation by $200,000; and b. Decreasing the Budget Stabilization Reserve by $200,000. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The recommended Janitorial Services contract' marks the first time a collective bargaining agreement with a union representing custodians has been required for the City's janitorial services, in accordance with Council's January 30, 2023 direction. This requirement, coupled with new wage and benefits standards, new scope of work for several new and existing City facilities, and increased service frequency at some City facilities, increased the cost of janitorial services by 39 percent from costs in the current janitorial services contract. In the January 30, 1 C24185703A SWA Services Contract; https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/v/1/public-works/public- services/contracts/c24185703a swa gsa 10.25.2023 partially-executed.pdf Item 7: Staff Report Pg. 1 Packet Pg. 138 of 374 Item 7 Item 7 Staff Report 2023 staff report, staff had estimated the increased cost of the contract with the new requirements to be 44 percent. BACKGROUND The City's current janitorial services contract with SWA expires on November 15, 2023. This contract was initially for a five-year term beginning in 20172 and has been amended four times. The first amendment added contractor services for the Police Department in December 2018.3 The second and third amendments were six-month extensions approved by Council in June 2022 and December 2022,5 respectively. And the fourth amendment was a two and one -half - month extension approved by the City Manager in August 2023.6 As part of the 2023 procurement for a janitorial services contractor, staff included the collective bargaining agreement requirement and wage and benefits requirement that evolved from the Responsible Contracting Standards Colleague's Memo (Vice Mayor Stone and Councilmember Burt) in January 2023.7 On January 30, 2023, City Council directed Staff to include in the next Janitorial Services bid solicitation a requirement that the contractor's employees be covered under a Collective Bargaining Agreement and be paid per the job classification and hourly wage rate table, below, and no less than the prevailing wage and benefits established for janitorial services pursuant to the California Public Utilities Code Section 465 and as set forth by the Department of Industrial Relations. Should the wage rates described in the wage table below and the collective bargaining agreement's wages and benefits and the prevailing wage and benefits differ, the higher wage rates and/or benefits will be paid. Job Classification Employee Pay Rate ($/hour) 2 City of Palo Alto. City Council Staff Report ID#8323, August 14, 2017; https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/v/1/agendas-minutes-reports/reports/city-manager-reports- cmrs/year-archive/2017/id-8323.pdf 3 City of Palo Alto. City Council Staff Report ID#9514, December 17, 2018 https://www.citvofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/v/1/agendas-minutes-reports/reports/city-manager-reports- cmrs/year-archive/2018/janitorial-amendment-staff-report-sr-9514.pdf 4 City of Palo Alto. City Council Staff Report ID#14161; June 20, 2022, https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/v/1/agendas-minutes-reports/reports/city-manager-reports- cmrs/2022/staff-report-14161-amendment-2-first-6-month-extension.pdf 5 City of Palo Alto. City Council Staff Report ID#14820, December 19, 2022; https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/v/1/agendas-minutes-reports/reports/city-manager-reports- cmrs/2022/id.-14820-approva I-of-amendment-no.-3-with-swa-services-group-inc.-swa.pdf 6 City of Palo Alto. City Council Staff Report ID#14932, November 14, 2022; https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/v/1/agendas-minutes-reports/reports/city-manager-reports- cmrs/2022/id.-14932-janitorial-services-rfp-discussion-and-direction.pdf C18168154 SWA Services Contract; https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/v/1/public-works/public- services/c18168154-swa-services-amend-4-fu l ly-executed-003. pdf Item 7: Staff Report Pg. 2 Packet Pg. 139 of 374 Item 7 Item 7 Staff Report Custodian Hourly wage rate for Custodian job classification of PUC Prevailing Wage or Collective Bargaining Agreement Wage rate (whichever is higher). Parking Garage Custodian 11.4% more than the Custodian hourly rate. Parks Custodian 11.4% more than the Custodian hourly rate. Utility Custodian 22.9% more than the Custodian hourly rate. Lead Custodian 28.6% more than the Custodian hourly rate. Police Department Custodian 45.7% more than the Custodian hourly rate. Supervisor 74.3% more than the Custodian hourly rate. ANALYSIS The Request for Proposals (RFP) included the Council -directed new requirements for a Collective Bargaining Agreement and wages and benefits. Additionally, the RFP included the following added scope of work and increased cleaning frequencies compared to the previous contract: New cleaning locations or services were added at the • Airport: add 3 modular office trailers • New Public Safety Building: add new building and increase cleaning from 5 to 7 days per week • Community Services Department: add five new park restroom buildings • Libraries: add new services at various locations • Water Quality Control Plant: add 3 modular office trailers • Foothills Park: increase cleaning from 3 to 5 days per week • Arastradero Preserve: increase cleaning from 3 to 5 days per week Procurement Process An RFP for Janitorial Services was posted on the City's eProcurement system on April 3, 2023, however, through the procurement process only 2 proposals were deemed responsive, therefore the RFP was reissued on June 23, 2023 to ensure competitive pricing, resulting in 4 responsive proposals. Proposals were evaluated by a four -person evaluation team of staff from the Public Works and Community Services departments. Proposers were evaluated on 1) Quality of Proposal, 2) Proposed Solution, 3) Experience, 4) Cost, 5) Financial Condition and Stability, 6) Timely Performance, 7) Prior Record of Performance, 8) Ability to Provide Ongoing Services, and 9) Item 7: Staff Report Pg. 3 Packet Pg. 140 of 374 Item 7 Item 7 Staff Report Compliance SWA had the highest aggregate score of all four evaluators. SWA's cost proposal was the second lowest. Their total aggregate score was also notably higher than the other proposers. SWA's proposal was clearly superior for quality, performance, effectiveness of the solution, and goods and services. Cost proposals for Basic Services ranged from a low of $17,606,690 to a high of $20,826,504 for the five-year term of the contract. SWA's cost proposal was $18,407,188. The cost increase of requiring a collective bargaining agreement and following the wage table, above, is approximately 39%. The increase was calculated by comparing the cost of janitorial services that the City currently pays to the first -year cost of the new contract. However, the 39% increase is not all due to the new wage/benefit requirements because some new scope of work and frequency of work was added to the new contract. Staff had projected a 44% cost increase, which was presented at the January 30, 2023 City Council Meeting in Table 2 of the City Council discussion and direction regarding wage requirements (collective bargaining agreement) for the contract for next janitorial services.There were no formal bid protests submitted by any of the four responsive proposers. Bid Summary for RFP 185703A Proposed Length of Contract 5 years Total Days to Respond to Bid 24 Pre -Bid Meeting Yes Number of Responsive Bids Received 4 Bid Price Range $17,606,690 to $20,826,504 eProcurement Link https://procurement.opengov.com/portal/palo- a lto-ca/projects/49913/document The current janitorial services contract expires November 15, 2023. Pending Council approval of the recommended contract with SWA Services Group, Inc., the contractor can begin services under the new contract on November 16, 2023. SWA is the current provider and will not require a transition period that would be needed by a new contractor. Basic Services include routine/regular janitorial services included in the scope of work of the original contract. The contract includes five percent of the Basic Services amount for Additonal Services, matching the approach taken in the previous contract. Additional Services covers work not specified in the original scope of Basic Services and may include but is not limited to emergency services, new service requests (for existing buildings or for new buildings coming online), and special event services that may be required during the course of the five-year term. Without Additional Services, each request for other janitorial servcies outside the contract basic scope would require Council approval and additional funding. Item 7: Staff Report Pg. 4 Packet Pg. 141 of 374 Item 7 Item 7 Staff Report FISCAL/RESOURCE IMPACT Funding for a portion of the first year of the five-year contract term is available in the Fiscal Year 2024 Public Works Department operating budget. For the remaining portion, Staff recommends increasing the Fiscal Year 2024 budget by $200,000 in the Public Works operating budget and decreasing the Budget Stabilization Reserve (BSR) by the same amount. Together with other recommended budget amendments in the current year, this action would bring the FY 2024 Adopted BSR estimate of $54.3 million down to $53.4 million. Subsequent years of the contract are subject to appropriation of funds through the annual budget process. Janitorial Services Funding Breakdown Year Dates Basic Service Cost Additional Service Cost Total Cost 1 11/16/23-11/15/24 $3,290,026.92 $164,501.35 $3,454,528.27 2 11/16/24-11/15/25 $3,495,995.16 $174,799.76 $3,670,794.92 3 11/16/25-11/15/26 $3,689,514.72 $184,475.74 $3,873,990.46 4 11/16/26-11/15/27 $3,875,058.84 $193,752.94 $4,068,811.78 5 11/16/27-11/15/28 $4,056,591.96 $202,829.60 $4,259,421.56 Grand Total $18,407,187.60 $920,359.38 $19,327,546.98 STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT Feedback was solicited from City Department stakeholders for new or additional and applicable cleaning requirements for their facilities. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW This project is not a project for the purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). APPROVED BY: Brad Eggleston, Director Public Works/City Engineer Item 7: Staff Report Pg. 5 Packet Pg. 142 of 374 Item 8 Item 8 Staff Report City Council Staff Report From: City Manager CITY O F Report Type: CONSENT CALENDAR PALO Lead Department: Planning and Development Services ALTO Meeting Date: November 6, 2023 Report #:2310-2104 TITLE CONSENT: Second Reading of Electrification Equipment Ordinance adopted October 2, 2023 amending the Palo Alto Municipal Code Title 18 (Zoning) Chapters 18.04 (Definitions), 18.10 (Low -Density Residential), 18.12 (R-1 Zones), 18.13 (Multiple Family Residential Zones),18.40 (General Standards and Exceptions), and 18.54 (Parking Facilities Design Standards) and Title 9, Chapter 9.10 (Noise) to Further Facilitate the Installation of Electrification Equipment in Residential Neighborhoods. CEQA Status — Exempt under CEQA Guidelines sections 15061(b)(3) and 15301. RECOMMENDATION This is the second reading of the Electrification Equipment Ordinance for Council approval on consent. The ordinance has been modified to include the City Council -directed revisions of October 2, 2023. BACKGROUND On October 2, 2023, City Council adopted the Electrification Ordinance on first reading. The motion, made by Council Member Burt, seconded by Council Member Veenker, and passed on a 6-1 vote (Lythcott-Haims recused) to adopt the ordinance recommended by staff and the Planning and Transportation Commission (PTC), with the following modifications and direction: 1. Increase the base noise standards by 3 decibels for all heat pumps, and by 5 decibels for heat pumps with inverters, and to create a comprehensive list of heat pump equipment. 2. Direct staff to evaluate the following for future refinements to the ordinance: a. Evaluate allowing units with higher manufactured dB ratings provided that the sound is attenuated, b. Explore the streamline testing protocol for nonstandard equipment, and c. The Development Center receives this information as soon as possible to disseminate for anyone looking at heat pumps or other HVAC equipment. The attached ordinance (Attachment A) has been updated to reflect the Council's direction, with the addition of two columns to Table 1 for inverter pumps and increased decibels in all Item 8: Staff Report Pg. 1 Packet Pg. 143 of 374 Item 8 Item 8 Staff Report four columns (3 dBA for non -inverter equipment, and 5 dBA for inverter equipment) and other non -substantive clarifications. FISCAL/RESOURCE IMPACT This action to approve the Electrification Equipment Ordinance has no fiscal impact. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW CEQA Status — Exempt under CEQA Guidelines sections 15061(b)(3) and 15301. ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: Ordinance for Second Reading Incorporating City Council's Revisions APPROVED BY: Jonathan Lait, Planning and Development Services Director Item 8: Staff Report Pg. 2 Packet Pg. 144 of 374 Not Yet Approved Ordinance No. Item 8 Attachment A - Ordinance for Second Reading Incorporating City Council's Revisions Ordinance of the Council of the City of Palo Alto Amending Palo Alto Municipal Code (PAMC) Title 18 (Zoning), Chapters 18.04 (Definitions), 18.10 (Low -Density Residential), 18.12 (R-1, Single Family Residence District), 18.13 (Multifamily Residential Zones), 18.40 (General Standards and Exceptions), and 18.54 (Parking Facilities Design Standards) and Title 9 (Public Peace, Morals, and Safety), Chapter 9.10 (Noise) to Facilitate Adoption of Electrification Equipment Required bythe 2022 Green Building Code and Local Amendments The Council of the City of Palo Alto does ORDAIN as follows: SECTION 1. Section 18.04.030 (Definitions) of Chapter 18.04 (Definitions) of Title 18 (Zoning) is amended to read as follows (additions underlined, deletions struck through, and omissions noted with bracketed ellipses): 18.04.030 Definitions (a) Throughout this title the following words and phrases shall have the meanings ascribed in this section. (49) ) "Electrification Equipment" means one or more devices that use electric energy to serve a dwelling unit's needs for heating and cooling, water heating, cooking, and electric vehicle charging. In addition, ancillary equipment such as an electric panel, photovoltaic equipment, and energy storage systems that are deployed to support such devices shall be considered Electrification Equipment. SECTION 2. Section 18.10.040 (Site Development Standards) of Chapter 18.10 (RE, R2, RMD Low -Density Residential District) of Title 18 (Zoning) of the PAMC is amended to read as follows (additions underlined, deletions struck through, and omissions noted with bracketed ellipses): 18.10.040 Development Standards (h) Location of Noise -Producing Equipment and Electrification Equipment 0160125_20231016_ay16 Item 8: Staff Report Pg. 3 Packet Pg. 145 of 374 Electrification Ec Not Yet Approved uipment and any associated housin Item 8 achment A - Ordina for Second Reading Incorporating City Council's Revisions or bollards necessary to enable compliance with the applicable regulations, including Chapter 9.10 of this Code, shall provide a minimum three foot interior side and rear yard setback and a minimum ten foot street sideyard setback. Except as otherwise provided in this Title EVSE and energy storage systems, Electrification Equipment shall not be located in the required front yard setback and shall at all times provide sufficient clearance for fire safety purposes. All other noise -producing equipment, such as air conditioner ^l equipment, gas powered generators, commercial kitchen fans, and similar service equipment shall be located outside of the front, rear and side yard setbacks. Such equipment may, however, be located up to 6 feet into the street sideyard setback. All such noise -producing equipment, including Electrification Equipment, shall be insulated and housed, except where doing so would interfere with the operation of the equipment. that tlhe Planning Director may also permit installation without housing and insulation, provided the equipment is located within the building envelope and ,hero that a combination of technical noise specifications, location of equipment, and/or other screening or buffering will assure compliance with the City's Noise Ordinance at the nearest property line. Any replacement of such shall h feasible; replacement f equipment shall r�9 �section rw=rr2F 2a �rs��cpcccriTcn c -v -r equipment for which permits were obtained prior to those restrictions is allowable in the samc location provided the r placcmcnt c nt complies with the City's noisc ^rdinanc^. All service equipment must meet the City Noise Ordinance in Chapter 9.10 of this code. Where existine improvements comely with front setback requirements. EVSE may encroach up to four feet into the required front setback. Where existing improvements do not comply with front setback requirements, EVSE may encroach into the otherwise required front setback by two feet beyond the existing improvement. EVSE and energy storage systems and associated eauipment and safety bollards may be located within required on -site parking spaces, as further described in PAMC Chapter 18.54 Section 18.54.020. The Planning Director may publish administrative regulations to further implement this subsection (h), including a list of equipment or technologies that may presumptively be installed without housing and insulation due to noise generation below applicable maximums. 0160125_20231016_ay16 Item 8: Staff Report Pg. 4 Packet Pg. 146 of 374 Item 8 Attachment A - Ordinance Not Yet Approved for Second Reading Incorporating City SECTION 3. Sections 18.12.040 (Site Development Standards), 1 Council's Revisions d Encroachments, Projections, and Exceptions), and Section 18.12.120 (Home Improvement Exception) of Chapter 18.12 (R-1 Single- Family Residential District) of Title 18 (Zoning) of the PAMC are amended to read as follows (additions underlined, deletions struck through, and omissions noted with bracketed ellipses): 18.12.040 Site Development Standards (I) Location of Noise -Producing Equipment and Electrification Equipment fj Electrification Equipment and any associated housing, screening, insulation, or bollards necessary to enable compliance with the applicable regulations, including Chapter 9.10 of this Code, shall provide a minimum three foot interior side and rear yard setback and a minimum ten foot street sideyard setback. Except as otherwise provided in this Title for EVSE and energy storage systems, Electrification Equipment shall not be located in the required front yard setback and shall at all times provide sufficient clearance for fire safety purposes. All other noise -producing equipment, such as a+r conditioners, peel equipment, gas powered generators, commercial kitchen fans, and similar service equipment shall be located outside of the front, rear and side yard setbacks. Such equipment may, however, be located up to 6 feet into the street sideyard setback. All such noise producing equipment, including Electrification Equipment, shall be insulated and housed, except where doing so would interfere with the recommended operation of the equipment. that tihe Planning Director may also permit installation without housing and insulation, provided the equipment is located within the building envelope and where that a combination of technical noise specifications, location of equipment, and/or other screening or buffering will assure compliance with the City's Noise Ordinance at the nearest property line. An rcplaccmcnt of such cquipmcnt shall conform to this scction whcrc fcasiblc, except the Director may allow r placcm nt of cxisting cquipmcnt in a non complying location, prior building r mit(s) with � g . .pm nt that m ets the City's Noise Ordinanc^. All service equipment must meet the City Noise Ordinance in Chapter 9.10 of this code. Where existing improvements comply with front setback requirements, EVSE may encroach up to four feet into the required front setback. Where existing improvements do not comply with front setback requirements, EVSE may encroach into the otherwise required front setback by two feet beyond the existing improvement. EVSE and energy storage systems and associated eauipment and safety bollards may be located within reauired on -site 0160125_20231016_ayl6 Item 8: Staff Report Pg. 5 Packet Pg. 147 of 374 Item 8 Attachment A - Ordinance Not Yet Approved for Second Reading Incorporating City oarkinL- spaces. as further described in PAMC Chanter 1 council's Revisions 18.54.020. The Planning Director may publish administrative regulations to further implement this subsection (I), including a list of equipment or technologies that may presumptively be installed without housing and insulation due to noise generation below applicable maximums. 18.12.050 Permitted Encroachments, Projections and Exceptions (a) Setback/Yard Encroachments and Projections (3) Allowed Projections (F) Pools, Spas, and Hot Tubs and Associated Electrification Equipment (i) Pools, spas, and hot tubs may extend into a required rear yard a distance not to exceed fourteen feet, provided that a minimum setback of six feet from the property line shall be maintained. (ii) No swimming pool, hot tub, spa, or similar accessory facility shall be located in any portion of a required front or street side yard. (iii) Electrification Equipment for pools, spas, hot tubs, and swimming pools subject to meeting the standards set forth in Table 1 of Section 9.10.030. 18.12.120 Home Improvement Exceptions (b) Applicability A home improvement exception may be granted as part of a proposed improvement or addition to an existing single-family or two-family structure, or accessory structure, or both, in the RE, R-1, RMD, or R-2 district, as limited in subsection (c). A home improvement exception 4 0160125_20231016_ay16 Item 8: Staff Report Pg. 6 Packet Pg. 148 of 374 Item 8 Attachment A - Ordinance Not Yet Approved I for Second Reading Incorporating City may be granted as described in subsections (1) through 16 kof subseciL Council's Revisions of exceed the limits set forth in those subsections. In order to qualify for a home improvement exception, the project must retain at least 75% of the existing exterior walls, including exterior finishes such as siding or cladding. (c) Limits of Home Improvement Exception A home improvement exception may be granted only for one or more of the following, not to exceed the specified limits: 16) To allow Electrification Eauipment to -exceed the noise ordinance standards set forth in Section 9.10.030(c). SECTION 4. Section 18.13.040 (Development Standards) of Chapter 18.13 (Multiple Family Residential Zones— RM20, RM30, RM40) of Title 18 (Zoning) of the PAMC is amended to read as follows (additions underlined, deletions struck through, and omissions noted with bracketed ellipses): 18.13.040 Development Standards (b) Setbacks, Daylight Planes and Height - Additional Requirements and Exceptions (1)Setbacks (A) Required parking spaces shall not be located in a required front yard, nor in the first ten feet (10') adjoining the street property line of a required street side yard. (B) Projections into yards are permitted only to the extent allowed by Section 18.40.070 of this code. (C) Electrification Equipment and any associated housing, screening, insulation, or bollards necessary to enable compliance with the applicable regulations, including Chapter 9.10 of this Code, shall provide a minimum three foot interior side and rear yard setback and a minimum ten foot street sideyard setback. Except as otherwise provided in this Title for EVSE and energy storage systems, Electrification Equipment shall not be located in the required front yard setback and shall at all times provide sufficient clearance for fire safety purposes. All Electrification Equipment must meet the City Noise Ordinance in Chapter 9.10 of this code. 0160125_20231016_ay16 Item 8: Staff Report Pg. 7 Packet Pg. 149 of 374 Not Yet Approved (D) Where existing improvements comply with front set Item 8 schment A - Ordina for Second Reading Incorporating City Council's Revisions EVSE may encroach up to four feet into the required front setback. Where existing improvements do not comply with front setback requirements, EVSE may encroach into the otherwise required front setback by two feet beyond the existing improvement. (E) The Planning Director may publish administrative regulations to further implement subsection (b)(1)(C), including a list of equipment or technologies that may presumptively be installed within setbacks without housing and insulation due to noise generation below applicable maximums. SECTION 5. Sections 18.40.060 (Permitted Uses and Facilities in Required Yards) of Chapter 18.40 (General Standards and Exceptions) of Title 18 (Zoning) of PAMC is amended to read as follows (additions underlined, deletions struck through, and omissions noted with bracketed ellipses): 18.40.060 Permitted Uses and Facilities in Required Yards Except as otherwise prescribed by district regulations or other provisions of this title, use and development of required yards shall be limited to the following: (f) Electrification Equipment for residential uses only: When installed in a required yard, Electrification Equipment and any associated housing, screening, insulation, or bollards necessary to enable compliance with the applicable regulations, including Chapter 9.10 of this Code, shall provide a minimum three foot interior side and rear yard setback and a minimum ten foot street sideyard setback. Except as otherwise provided in this Title for EVSE and energy storage systems, Electrification Equipment shall not be located in the required front yard setback and shall at all times provide sufficient clearance for fire safety purposes. EVSE, energy storage systems, and safety bollards may encroach two feet into a 20 -foot standard front setback. SECTION 6. Section 18.40.260 (Visual Screening and Landscaping) of Chapter 18.40 (General Standards and Exceptions) of Title 18 (Zoning) of PAMC is amended to read as follows (additions underlined, deletions struck through, and omissions noted with bracketed ellipses): 18.40.260 Visual Screening and Landscaping (b) Requirements 6 0160125_20231016_ay16 Item 8: Staff Report Pg. 8 Packet Pg. 150 of 374 Not Yet Approved Item 8 Attachment A - Ordinance for Second Reading Incorporating City Council's Revisions (2) For all project types: (A) All areas not covered by structures, service yards, walkways, driveways, and parking spaces shall be landscaped with ground cover, shrubs, and/or trees. (B) Rooftop equipment shall be screened by a parapet or enclosure. Rooftop equipment or rooftop equipment enclosures shall be set back at least 20 feet from the building edge or a minimum of 100 feet from the property line, whichever is closer. Roof vents, flues and other protrusions through the roof of any building or structure shall be obscured from ground -level public view (when viewed from the sidewalk on the opposite side of a street), by a roof screen or proper placement. See Section 18.40.090 (height limit exceptions) for further restrictions. (C) A minimum ten -foot planting and screening strip shall be provided adjacent to any facade abutting a low density residential district (R-1, R-2, or RMD) or abutting railroad tracks. (D) All exterior mechanical and other types of equipment, whether installed on the ground or attached to a building roof or walls, shall be obscured from public view when viewed from the abutting opposite sidewalk, except for residentially used EVSE and energy storage systems and associated bollards. SECTION 7. Section 18.54.020 (Vehicle Parking Facilities) of Chapter 18.54 (Parking) of Title 18 (Zoning) of PAMC is amended to read as follows (additions underlined, deletions struck through, and omissions noted with bracketed ellipses): 18.54.020 Vehicle Parking Facilities (a) Parking Facility Design Parking facilities shall be designed in accordance with the following regulations: (1) Requirements for dimensions of parking facilities at, above, and below grade are contained in this section and in Figures 1-6 and Tables 3-6 of Section 18.54.070. (2) Stalls and aisles shall be designed such that columns, walls, or other obstructions do not interfere with normal vehicle parking maneuvers. All required stall and aisle widths shall be designed to be clear of such obstructions except as otherwise provided in subsection (a)(4) below. (3) The required stall widths shown in Table 3 of Section 18.54.070 shall be increased by 0.5 foot for any stall located immediately adjacent to a wall, whether on 7 0160125_ 20231016_ay16 Item 8: Staff Report Pg. 9 Packet Pg. 151 of 374 Item 8 Attachment A - Ordinance Not Yet Approved for Second Reading Incorporating City one or both sides. The director may require that the required stal council's Revisions sed by 0.5 foot for any stall located immediately adjacent to a post, where such post limits turning movements into or out of the stall. (4) For property owners or tenants seeking to install EVSE, the required stall widths shown in Table 3 of Section 18.54.070 may be reduced by no more than eighteen inches below the code -required minimum dimensions in order to accommodate EVSE or associated electrical utility equipment. For parking lots and garages other than for one- and two-family use, tThis reduction may be applied to 10% of the total required parking stalls, or two stalls, whichever is greater. The director may approve a reduction in width for a greater number of stalls through a director's adjustment pursuant to Section 18.52.050. For one- and two-family residential garages and carports, 18 -inch reductions are allowed for both stall width and depth to enable Electrification Equipment and protective bollards, as long as (i) the reduced width is not continuous along the side of the stall, to provide a six-foot length near the middle of the stall for opening two vehicular side doors, and (ii) the proposed garage has an interior clearance depth of 20 feet in compliance with 18.54.020 (b)(2) or an existing substandard garage has a depth of at least 19 feet -six inches. For a garage depth less than 19 feet -six inches but greater than 18 feet, such equipment may be installed on the back wall of the garage at a location at least four feet above the finished floor. (b) Off -Street Parking Stalls (1) Each off-street parking stall shall consist of a rectangular area not less than eight and one-half (8.5) feet wide by seventeen and one-half (17.5) feet long (uni-class stall), or as otherwise prescribed for angled parking by Table 3 in Section 18.54.070. (2) Garages and carports for single-family and two-family development shall provide a minimum interior clearance of ten (10) feet wide by twenty (20) feet long for a single car and a minimum of twenty (20) feet wide by twenty (20) feet long for two cars to allow sufficient clearance, except as otherwise provided in subsection (a)(4) above. SECTION 8. Section 9.10.030 (Residential Property Noise Limits) of Chapter 9.10 (Noise) of Title 9 (Public Peace, Morals, and Safety) of the Palo Alto Municipal Code is amended to read as follows (additions underlined, deletions struck through, and omissions noted with bracketed ellipses): 9.10.030 Residential property noise limits. (a) No person shall produce, suffer or allow to be produced by any machine, animal or device, or any combination of same, on residential property, a noise level more than six dB above the local ambient at any point outside of the property plane, except as modified in (c below. 8 0160125_20231016_ay16 Item 8: Staff Report Pg. 10 Packet Pg. 152 of 374 Not Yet Approved Item 8 Attachment A - Ordinance for Second Reading Incorporating City Council's Revisions (b) No person shall produce, suffer or allow to be produced by any machine, animal, or device, or any combination of same, on multi -family residential property, a noise level more than six dB above the local ambient three feet from any wall, floor, or ceiling inside any dwelling unit on the same property, when the windows and doors of the dwelling unit are closed, except within the dwelling unit in which the noise source or sources may be located. c) Electrification Eauioment shall be deemed to comply with this Section 9.10.030 if the equipment complies with the maximum equipment sound levels and is placed at the setbacks established in Table 1- Setback Requirements. As an alternative to compliance with Table 1, a property owner may utilize the limits set forth in subsections (a) and (b) of this Section 9.10.030 if those arovisions would be more permissive. Table 1— Setback Requirements Equipment Sound Level (≤dBA) West of Foothill Blvd. Equipment Sound Level (≤dBA) East of Foothill Blvd. Equipment Sound Level (≤dBA) West of Equipment Sound Level (≤dBA) East of Minimum Setback from Receiving Property Line (≥ft.) Foothill Blvd. for Foothill Blvd. for Inverter Pumps Inverter Pumps 42 §2 44 -54 3 43 53 45 55 3 44 54 46 56 4 45 55 47 57 4 46 56 48 58 5 47 57 49 59 5 48 58 50 60 6 49 59 51 61 7 50 60 52 62 7 51 61 53 63 8 52 62 54 64 9 53 63 55 65 10 54 64 56 66 12 55 65 57 67 13 56 66 58 68 15 57 67 59 69 17 58 68 60 70 19 59 69 61 71 21 60 70 62 72 24 61 71 63 73 27 62 72 64 74 30 63 73 65 75 34 0160125_20231016_ay16 Item 8: Staff Report Pg. 11 Packet Pg. 153 of 374 Item 8 Attachment A - Ordinance Not Yet Approved for Second Reading Incorporating City SECTION 9. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phras council's Revisions is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this Ordinance and each and every section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase not declared invalid or unconstitutional without regard to whether any portion of the ordinance would be subsequently declared invalid or unconstitutional. SECTION 10. The Council finds that the adoption of this ordinance is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to CEQA Guideline sections 15061(b)(3) because it can be seen with certainty that the proposed modifications, which retain existing noise standards in Chapter 9.10, will not result in a significant impact on the physical environment. Additionally, the activity regulated by the ordinance is exempt under CEQA Guideline 15301 because it involves the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, and mechanical equipment, involving negligible or no expansion of existing or former uses. SECTION 11. This ordinance shall be effective on the thirty-first date after the date of its adoption. INTRODUCED: October 2, 2023 PASSED: November 6, 2023 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTENTIONS: ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED: Assistant City Attorney City Manager Director of Planning and Development Services 10 0160125 20231016ay16 Item 8: Staff Report Pg. 12 Packet Pg. 154 of 374 Item 9 Item 9 Staff Report City Council Staff Report From: City Manager CITY O F Report Type: ACTION ITEMS PALO Lead Department: Transportation ALTO Meeting Date: November 6, 2023 Report #:2309-2011 TITLE Approval of a Contract with Urban Field Studio (C24188179) for a Not -to -Exceed Amount of $384,990 for the Car -free Streets Alternatives Study; Adopt an Interim Ordinance Continuing Parking Lot and Sidewalk Dining through March 2024 and On -Street Dining through December 2024; Adopt Resolutions Extending the City Manager's Authority to Temporarily Close Portions of California Avenue and Ramona Street through December 2024; Provide Direction on the Street Configuration of California Ave. and Ramona St. during the Study Period; and Approval of a FY 2024 Budget Amendment in the General Fund. CEQA Status - Categorically exempt under CEQA Guidelines Sections 15301 (existing facilities) and 15304(e) (minor temporary use). RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Palo Alto City Council (Council): 1. Approve and authorize the City Manager to execute contract C24188179 with Urban Field for a Not -to -Exceed Amount of $384,990 for the 12 -month Car -free Streets Alternatives Study (Attachment A); 2. Amend the Fiscal Year 2024 Budget Appropriation in the General Fund (requires 2/3 vote) by: a. Increasing the contract expense appropriation in the Office of Transportation by $134,990; and b. Decreasing the Budget Stabilization Reserve by $134,990; 3. Adopt the attached Interim Ordinance Continuing On -Street Outdoor Dining until December 31, 2024 and Some Parking Lot and Sidewalk Uses through March 2024 (Attachment B); 4. Adopt the attached Resolutions extending the City Manager's authority to temporarily close portions of California Avenue and Ramona Street through December 31, 2024 while the Alternatives Study is conducted (Attachments C and D); and 5. Provide direction to staff on the closed street configuration of California Ave. and/or Ramona St. during the study period. Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 1 Packet Pg. 155 of 374 Item 9 Item 9 Staff Report Staff's recommendation is to continue the existing street configurations for the 12 -month Alternative Study period. Alternatively, Council may direct staff to implement alternative street configurations during the 12 -month interim period while the study is conducted: A. Reversion Option: Revert California Avenue and/or Ramona Street to pre -pandemic traffic patterns starting on a date set by Council, which would open the street fully (two-way) to vehicular traffic, on an ongoing basis. B. Seasonal/Hybrid Option: Open the street to two-way vehicular traffic, but implement a seasonal/hybrid option where it would become a car -free street seasonally, on weekends, or for special events. C. One-way Option: Implement a one-way street for vehicles to use, in either direction. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This staff report first seeks approval of a contract with Urban Partners to conduct a 12 -month Alternatives Study to inform decisions on the future of California Avenue and Ramona Street, including spaces for outdoor dining, community programming, activations for the street, entertainment spaces, appropriate wayfinding and signage, development of parking strategies, and a discussion on the long-term street configurations and circulation for vehicles, pedestrians, and bicycles, plus stewardship of the streets. During the 12 -month study period, staff will continue to advance demonstration projects to enhance the experience on the streets and further encourage people to visit the area. This could include an extension of the mini golf activation, additional game play areas and community spaces to gather, continuation of partnerships like Third Thursday Music, and implementing new barriers to rid of the orange plastic barriers, and other aesthetic enhancements, such as more public art and wayfinding signage opportunities. The remainder of this report seeks Council's approval and/or alternative direction on whether the existing closures of California Avenue and Ramona Street should remain during the 12 -month study period. The current car -free streets are at California Avenue between El Camino Real and Birch Street; and Ramona Street half -block between Hamilton Avenue and University Avenue. Staff recommend keeping the existing closures through December 2024 to coincide with the end of the Alternative Study and continue to allow on -street dining. BACKGROUND The Car -free Streets: Cal Ave. and Ramona St. project is a Council -supported effort enabling outdoor dining, retail, and personal services in business districts such as California Avenue and the downtown core. Currently, California Avenue is open to pedestrians and closed to through vehicle traffic from El Camino Real to Birch Street, and Ramona Street is open to pedestrians and closed to vehicle traffic for a half block between Hamilton Avenue and University Avenue. Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 2 Packet Pg. 156 of 374 Item 9 Item 9 Staff Report The City Council originally authorized Car -free Streets in 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic through a program called Summer Streets then incorporated the project into the City's Uplift Local initiative, as an economic recovery effort and to provide community members with outdoor spaces to gather. At their February 28, 2022 meeting, the City Council directed staff to issue a Request for Proposals (RFP) to obtain a consultant to conduct a study ("Alternatives Study") to understand the impact of the proposed permanent closure(s) on portions of California Avenue and the section of Ramona Street'. In the City Manager Report (CMR 14066), staff noted that the study would include developing conceptual plans with possible alternatives, review existing conditions, traffic circulation, impacts to access for properties in the proposed segments, a traffic analysis to look at traffic circulation, access to properties, emergency access, parking impacts, loading -unloading, delivery, access for maintenance of utilities, impacts to signal operations, and environmental documentation review & preparation2. The Report also noted how the study would include outreach to stakeholders and the public and would review the impacts of long-term temporary closures such as seasonal closures or regular weekend closures3. At the February 28, 2022 meeting, the City Council voted to include into the RFP the items mentioned in the Report and also to include the following: • consideration of methods to value rents for use of public spaces and evaluate if revenues could be used as partial funding of the process; • suggest an approach to improve aesthetics and maintain open sidewalks so that pedestrian traffic is near the windows; • include proposed guidelines on hours of use of public spaces and noise control; • evaluate displaced traffic impacts particularly on residential streets; • bring the budget request as part of the 2023 Budget process; and, • to return for approval of the contract; • to provide the schedule; and, • to return with an item to extend the street closure through December 31, 20234. On May 16, 2022, the City Council authorized staff to extend the street closure through December 31, 2023 as well as approve the implementation of several interim improvements, 1 See Page 5, Item 13, Action Minutes for February 28, 2022 City Council Meeting: https://cityofpaloaIto.primegov.com/Public/CompiledDocument?meetingTem plate ld=3708&com pile0utputType= 1 2 Ibid. 3 See Page 5, Item 13, Agenda Packet for February 28, 2022 City Council Meeting: https://cityofpaloaIto.primegov.com/Public/CompiledDocument?meetingTemplateld=3709&compileoutputType= 1 4 See Page 5, Item 13, Action Minutes for February 28, 2022 City Council Meeting: https://cityofpaloaIto.primegov.com/Public/CompiledDocument?meetingTem plate ld=3708&com pile0utputType= 1 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 3 Packet Pg. 157 of 374 Item 9 Item 9 Staff Report most notably, a dedicated emergency access lane, the requirement for edge treatments around outdoor dining and retail spaces, and direction to staff to install appropriate enhancements or aesthetic elements that will also provide a visible distinction from the emergency access lane and dining areas5. After the May 2022 meeting, staff engaged the services of Bay Area consultant, Bruce Fukuji from Fukuji Architecture & Planning, to assist the City with engaging the broader community and businesses along California Avenue and Ramona Street on the future of the street closures. This pre-RFP outreach informed both additional interim changes and the RFP scope of work for the Alternatives Study. Mr. Fukuji is an architect and urban designer with experience working in Palo Alto, most notably eight years on the Palo Alto Urban Design Committee that prepared the Downtown Urban Design Plan, and representing the City in negotiations with Stanford University during their Health Center expansion. From October 2022 to April 2023, City staff, Bruce Fukuji, with support from Fehr & Peers, engaged key stakeholders and the community through meetings, interviews, focus groups, a community workshop, and an online survey to better understand priorities for California Avenue and Ramona Street, and to determine the topics and themes to study and include as part of the RFP. A high-level overview of the pre-RFP engagement efforts can be found in the Stakeholder Engagement section of this report. For more details, see Bruce Fukuji's published summary of the engagement effort, titled Community & Stakeholder Engagement Report, and is Attachment E. A Summary of the Online Community Survey Results is also included as Attachment F of this report. Demonstration Projects & Temporary Activations In addition to informing the scope of work, the pre-RFP engagement also informed additional near -term interim changes and improvements. Starting in mid -2023, City staff focused on implementing four demonstration projects as a response to feedback received from the public and stakeholders. The four demonstration projects are: • Flexible Community Spaces: free public gathering places with public seating (tables and chairs) and game play areas (giant chess, giant Jenga, corn hole) • New barriers: looking at options for replacing the orange water -filled barriers • Public art: ground plane and building murals • Pedestrian and vehicular signage: directing people to nearby destinations and parking areas 5 See Page 4, Item 14, Action Minutes for May 16, 2022 City Council Meeting: https://cityofpaloaIto.primegov.com/Public/CompiledDocument?meetingTemplateld=12251&compileOutputType =1 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 4 Packet Pg. 158 of 374 Item 9 Item 9 Staff Report More recently, the City partnered with local groups to bring music and mini -golf to Cal Ave., all in an effort to further activate the street and invite people to the area, and to respond to feedback received to provide spaces for people to gather, particularly in underutilized areas of the street: • 3rd Thursday Music on Cal Ave. • Putter's Mini Rolf course -Palo Alto In early summer 2023, City staff prepared the RFP, and on July 3, 2023, staff formally published the RFP for the Alternatives Study on the City's eProcurement platform with proposals due in early August 2023. The City received one responsive bid from Urban Field Studio, an urban design firm based out of San Francisco. ANALYSIS The Alternatives Study is an effort to pursue consensus on the future of California Avenue and Ramona Street. The City published the RFP for the Alternatives Study on the City's Procurement Platform on July 3, 2023 with proposals due on August 1, 2023. The City received one responsive proposal from Urban Field, an urban design firm and studio, partnering with Kimley-Horn, a transportation consulting firm. Table 1 summarizes the RFP process. Table 1. Summary of RFP Process RFP Name RFP Number RFP Issued Proposals Due # of Firms Notified through OpenGov Number of Firms Notified via email Project View Count Downloaders of RFP document Total Days to Respond to RFP Number of Proposals Received Public Link to Solicitation Proposals Price Range Car -free Streets Alternatives Study & Implementation Plan RFP No. 188179 July 3, 2023 August 1, 2023 2,740 46 318 41 30 1 https://procurement.opengov.com/portal/palo- a lto-ca/projects/52330?section=441151 $297,898 Staff reached out to potential responsive bidders to understand why they did not submit a proposal. The potential bidders noted that they believed they did not have the expertise required of the scope of work; they had limited staff capacity; and one noted their email server sent the eProcurement email alerting of the RFP to their junk folder and did not see the RFP in time to submit a proposal. Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 5 Packet Pg. 159 of 374 Item 9 Item 9 Staff Report Since the City received a single responsive bid, it moved forward with issuing a Letter of Intent to Award to Urban Field on August 16, 2023. Staff and Urban Field negotiated the scope and contract starting in late August. Staff recommends contracting with Urban Field because of their comprehensive approach to the scope of work, clear understanding of Palo Alto and its needs, and has an innovative approach to engage the community. Urban Field also has extensive experience working with Bay Area communities on developing plans for alternative traffic configurations, active spaces, and healthy commercial and community spaces, including Mountain View, Burlingame, Fremont, and Oakland, plus originally proposed a scope under budget, and is to provide exceptional project management experience. The updated scope of work the consultant proposes includes the following tasks, to be completed in a 12 -month (one-year) process, beginning once the contract is executed, anticipated for January 2024: 1. Public Outreach and Engagement Strategy 2. Research & Analysis of Existing Conditions and Technical Studies 3. Urban Design Framework (described in greater detail below) 4. Implementation Plan 5. Environmental Clearance Review and Recommendations 6. Project Management and Oversight More specifically, the Urban Design Framework task above (task #3) is a key task that will include researching and developing the following topics: • Streetscape Design and Amenities • Access, Circulation, Traffic, Parking, and Curb Impacts and Strategies • Commercial Outdoor Dining Guidelines • Historic Resources • Signage • Legislative Options • Equity and Accessibility • Equitable Economic Development and Partnership Building Council Priorities & Basis for Staff Recommendation In January 2023, the City Council established two 2023 priorities related to Car -free Streets, both Economic Recovery and Business Transition objectives: • Select consultant to conduct a study that informs the development of a permanent car - free streets ordinance (ERBT h) —Q3 2023; and, • Extend temporary closure for car -free streets (ERBTj)—Q4-2023. In alignment with Council's 2023 priorities, the first recommended action in this report approves of the contract with the consultant, Urban Field, for the 12 -month Alternatives Study. The second Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 6 Packet Pg. 160 of 374 Item 9 Item 9 Staff Report recommended action approves of a budget amendment to cover anticipated project costs. The additional recommended actions extend existing conditions and the current street configurations until December 31, 2024 while the study is conducted through the adoption of an ordinance and resolutions. If Council approves the contract with Urban Field, Council will need to provide staff with direction on what to do with the street configurations during the 12 -month study period. Staff evaluated the different street configuration options on several factors to develop the recommended action for this report, outlined below under the following categories: 1) Timeline/Schedule; 2) Resource Needs; and, 3) Potential Business Impacts. The options below have varying levels of complexity and implementation timelines that should be taken into consideration. The study will evaluate all available options. The recommended action is to extend the current street configurations until December 31, 2024 while the study is happening: • Timeline/Schedules o Provides continuity and avoids repeated changes to the street configurations in a short timeframe. o Allows for the Alternatives Study to identify and determine the next significant change to the existing street configurations. • Resource Needs o Continues utilizing existing staff resources with no changes required. o Staff would continue enhancing the area with additional activations and improvements through 2024. o No additional environmental review or traffic study required to continue the current street configurations. o Only administrative work to review and approve of permit renewal applications. • Potential Business Impacts o Businesses would need to renew their existing permits for outdoor dining for 2024. Mostly administrative work for the business owner. Alternative Street Configurations During the Study Period The City Council may direct staff to implement other street configurations during the 12 -month study period. These were also evaluated using the same categories as the recommended action: A. Reversion Option: Revert car -free California Avenue and/or Ramona Street to pre - pandemic traffic patterns by a date set by Council, which would open the street fully (two- way) to vehicular traffic on an ongoing basis. • Timeline/Schedules This would return street configurations to pre -pandemic conditions, pre - March 2020, provided businesses receive advanced notice and time to break down outdoor areas. Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 7 Packet Pg. 161 of 374 Item 9 Item 9 Staff Report • The street configurations may change again once Council identifies preferred street configurations as part of the Alternatives Study, and the businesses and community have already expressed they want stability. • Resources Needs • Street reversion can be implemented quickly. The existing Car -free Streets program sunsets on December 31, 2023, and staff can notice the businesses to remove their outdoor dining areas by a date in early 2024. • Council could direct staff to implement parklets on Cal Ave. However, additional work would be needed to implement parklets on Cal Ave. considering outdoor dining exists in areas beyond just parking stalls, such as former bus stops, vehicle turn and travel lanes, and driveways. The City cannot just simply apply the recently adopted Permanent Parklet regulations to Cal Ave. without additional work required to make it context specific. • Potential Business Impacts • This option would eliminate all existing outdoor dining areas on Cal Ave. and Ramona St. that are part of the Car -free Streets effort. • Businesses would need time to remove their existing outdoor dining areas and return the street Right -of -Way to the City. • Businesses would no longer have their outdoor dining areas as they exist now. • The community would lose the gathering spaces available now and may be discouraged to visit altogether. B. Seasonal/Hybrid Option: Open the street to two-way vehicular traffic by a certain date set by Council but implement a seasonal/hybrid option where it would become a car -free street seasonally, on weekends, or for special events. • Timeline/Schedule • The street configurations would change now and could change again soon once Council identifies a preferred long-term alternative. • Could turn away the community and confuse would be visitors who are unsure of the street conditions and environment. • Council would need to provide direction on the time of year to implement a seasonal/hybrid option. • Resource Needs • Staff needs a reasonable timeframe to implement this option. Currently there are no resources dedicated to implementing this option. Resources would be necessary to modify the streets to allow for closure and re- opening, including placing/removing barriers and signage. Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 8 Packet Pg. 162 of 374 Item 9 Item 9 Staff Report • Council will need to adopt the attached Resolutions and Ordinance to extend the existing program into 2024 while City staff works to implement this option. • Potential Business Impacts • Businesses need time to make any required changes or upgrades to their existing outdoor dining footprint or design. • Businesses would need time to update permits to reflect new layouts. C. One-way Option: Implement a one-way vehicle traffic lane on the current car -free portions of the street, in either direction (east -bound or west -bound). • Timeline/Schedule • Requires both time and a high-level of evaluation and consultation that has more complexities. Evaluation includes an Environmental Assessment and a Traffic Study on the one-way street configuration, which also extends the timeline to implement. • The most involved option that will require the most resources to implement. • Resource Needs • No existing staff resources identified to implement this option. • Limited staff capacity. Implementing this option would take staff resources away from projects in the pipeline or extend the timeline of existing projects. • Staff would need a reasonable timeframe to implement this option. • Council needs to adopt the attached Resolutions and Ordinance to extend the existing program into 2024 while City staff work to implement this option. • Potential Business Impacts • Street configurations may change again after Council identifies a preferred alternative, and the businesses and community may get confused and discouraged with continuous and frequent changes. • Businesses need time to make any required changes or upgrades to their existing outdoor dining footprint or design. • Businesses would need time to update permits to reflect new layouts. Other Factors/Factors that Apply to All Street Configuration Options • Council would need to provide direction on whether the option selected applies to California Avenue and/or Ramona Street. • The weekly California Avenue Sunday Farmers Market would be exempt since they have an existing permit to close portions of California Avenue to vehicles and operate the market on the street. Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 9 Packet Pg. 163 of 374 Item 9 Item 9 Staff Report Extension of the Interim Ordinance Allowing Outdoor Dining Separately, staff is also recommending that the interim ordinance allowing various types of outdoor dining be extended. The existing interim ordinance was originally adopted in 2020 and last extended by Council on May 8, 2023. The interim ordinance currently allows outdoor dining on closed streets, in parklets in on -street parking spaces, public and private parking lots, sidewalks, and other outdoor areas on the premises of a restaurant (e.g. a lawn). The existing ordinance allows on -street, parking lot and sidewalk uses through December 2023. Interim parklets are authorized through March 2024, at which point the newly adopted parklet ordinance and standards will begin. The proposed ordinance will extend on -street, non-parklet dining and retail through December 2024 to match the proposed street closures. The proposed ordinance will also extend parking lot and sidewalk uses through March 2024 to allow time for staff to gauge how these uses may continue or be phased out in lieu of other uses, such as parklets. The existing sunset date of March 31, 2024 for interim parklets will remain the same. FISCAL/RESOURCE IMPACT The Office of Transportation FY 2024 Adopted Operating Budget had $250,000 appropriated for this initiative, as a place -holder value, and Urban Field's responsive bid proposed a $297,898 project. During scope and contract negotiations, staff noted deficiencies in the number of public meetings originally planned and saw an opportunity to analyze more recent available parking data. Staff requested additional items under the public outreach & community engagement task and parking assessment task to ensure a robust engagement approach and a more comprehensive parking analysis. This expanded the number of visits to City Commissions, Board & Committees, and the City Council. Additionally, the City asked for several additional separate in -person and remote meetings with both California Avenue and Ramona Street business owners, the community at -large, and ensured online engagement tools, such as a public survey and street -level tabling were included in the scope as well. And because of the City's more recent efforts around parking data -collection, the scope expanded to include a more involved parking data analysis than originally prescribed in the RFP, and the consultant project management fee increased since the overall scope expansion lengthened the project timeline from nine months as originally proposed, to 12 months: January 2024 through December 2024. The updated cost proposal for the updated scope of work is: $384,990 ($349,991 base, with a $34,999 contingency of 10 percent). The requested Budget Amendment of $134,990 reflects the additional funding required to complete the project with the additional scope and outreach, and would be supported by the Budget Stabilization Reserve (BSR). Together with other recommended budget amendments in the current year, this action would bring the FY 2024 Adopted BSR estimate of $54.3 million down to $53.3 million. In addition, Office of Transportation, City Manager's Office, City Attorney's Office, Planning, and Public Works staff, plus Planning Code Enforcement Officers, Fire Department Inspectors, and Building Inspection staff, all have both ongoing and additional work supporting and related to the Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 10 Packet Pg. 164 of 374 Item 9 Item 9 Staff Report Car -free Streets project. Current and anticipated resources can support the workload for the recommended action. If Council directs staff to implement new or different interim street configurations, additional resources may be needed and staff would need to bring forward proposals for Council's consideration as part of the annual budget process to recommend aligning resources and workload. STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT Pre-RFP engagement: From Fall 2022 to Spring 2023, City staff and consultants, Bruce Fukuji and Fehr & Peers undertook a pre-RFP engagement effort to solicit local stakeholder and community perspectives regarding current issues, opportunities for change, and potential near -term projects to advance the Car -free Street initiative. The project team also solicited feedback on a potential scope of work for an RFP to study different potential activations and street configurations. The project team undertook the following outreach elements: • Nearly a dozen structured interviews with business and property owners, non-profit and for-profit developers, Chamber of Commerce leadership, local architects, property managers, the Palo Alto Art Center Director, and Councilmember Pat Burt. • Two rounds of focus group meetings with: o Local business owners on California Avenue o Local business owners on Ramona Street o City Commission Chairpersons • Two community meetings: o An in -person Community Workshop on California Avenue, attended by over 60 people, with facilitated small group engagement followed by informal discussion with elected officials, local business owners, and community members. o A subsequent online community meeting, attended by 30 people with facilitated individual feedback. • Online survey on the City's website, viewed by 617 people with 356 responses, predominantly Palo Alto residents, with only 1 percent Palo Alto business owners, and 15 percent of respondents living outside of Palo Alto. The outreach process was organized into two phases: 1) Assessment and 2) Validation. Assessment comprised of background research, context mapping, framing key questions for stakeholders and community members; conducting initial outreach; collecting data and conducting analysis; and formulating preliminary findings (Fall 2022 through Winter 2023). Validation comprised of conducting a second round of outreach for stakeholders and community members to validate what was learned by City staff and consultants from the initial outreach, and solicit feedback on near -term demonstration projects and the Alternatives Study (Winter 2023 through Spring 2023). Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 11 Packet Pg. 165 of 374 Item 9 Item 9 Staff Report The Community & Stakeholder Engagement Report (Attachment E) highlights how stakeholders have different perspectives on how to shape the future physical environment of California Avenue, as shown in Figure 1: Stakeholder Perspectives. On one hand, the discussion is divided between local retail business owners and residents on the allocation of street space for vehicle access. Some local businesses have a strong preference for an alternative that is not car -free, while many residents favor the closure of the street for safety, outdoor dining, and public spaces without vehicles. However, some residents feel that public gathering spaces and outdoor dining do not need use of all the street space to the complete exclusion of cars. RESTAU RANTEU RS "Outdoor dining saved our business" RETAILERS "We're at high risk to further impacts with permanent closure" Build outdoor dining to destination Can't attract Heaters Need shops tenants, erodes essential open before & shopper base Want at least Customers enjoy after dinner one vehicle outdoor dining Need daytime lane open __ vitality Need community Need signage Zoningtoo gathering places from parking to restrictive to Ped/bike shops attract tenants Doesn't feel like safety uity of private community space Retail use of public �iversity space Desire events � RESIDENTS Support small "close street permanently" business retention Figure 1: Stakeholder Perspectives There was agreement between local retail business owners, restauranteurs, and residents in that California Avenue is a highly valued, frequently visited environment integral to community and the economic vitality of the Palo Alto, and that the Cal Ave. District needs to be revived as a destination with a new identity, and that economic development, urban design, and community partnerships need to work together to realize the potential of California Avenue. Specific to Ramona Street, stakeholders all agree that Ramona Street, as a historic district, is an ideal setting downtown to shape a vibrant public space as an outdoor dining destination, and expressed great interest in maintaining the street permanently closed to vehicle traffic. A summary of the engagement effort, titled Community & Stakeholder Community & Stakeholder Engagement Report, is Attachment E of this report. Alternatives Study engagement: Urban Field's updated scope of work includes a structured and robust community engagement plan for the Alternatives Study, dividing the community engagement approach into four phases: 1) Initial Outreach; 2) Socialize Preliminary Concepts; 3) Socialize Preferred Concepts; 4) Present Final Plan. The engagement activities are tailored toward the unique character of the community, and these phases will help effectively and meaningfully engage the residents, business owners, and members of City Commissions, Boards & Committees, and the City Council. At the onset of Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 12 Packet Pg. 166 of 374 Item 9 Item 9 Staff Report the Alternatives Study, the consultant will develop a formal Community Engagement Strategy Memo that will explain how the project team will share information and gather input regarding the needs and issues of the public, stakeholders, and interested parties. More specifically, the Alternatives Study includes events and meetings with members of the following: • Pedestrian and Bicycle Advisory Committee (PABAC) • Architectural Review Board (ARB) • Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) • Planning and Transportation Commission (PTC) • City Council meetings • Focus Group Meetings, including separate meetings with both Cal Ave. and Ramona St. business owners • Street -level engagement • In -person and online community engagement Demonstration Projects QR-code Survey Soon after implementing the Demonstration Project: Flexible Community Spaces, staff created a OR -code survey and sticker and installed the QR-codes throughout the tables, chairs, and game play areas to receive immediate feedback on the installations. The survey asked people what they like about the Flexible Community Spaces and what else they would like to see. Some responses are below: • "It's amazing! Brings so much joy to our family. Great spot for building community and hanging out." • "Fun place for families to hang out together" • "The street games! It's so safe and fun." • "Love the chairs and that it's pedestrian only" • "Keep doing more of these" • "Corn hole" [many times] • "Less paving and more parklike" • "Yasssssssssssss #love" • "I like that they give me a place to sit and enjoy the day outside of my apartment and being able to walk around more has helped me discover so many more local food places and shops." • "The games are terrific! But overall it is just so incredible to have a safe space to go to and walk around with the whole family." • "The games are a worse mess than the tables and chairs. They get scattered all over the street and sidewalk." Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 13 Packet Pg. 167 of 374 Item 9 Item 9 Staff Report ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The ordinance and resolutions are categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under CEQA Guidelines Sections 15301 (existing facilities) and 15304(e) (minor temporary use of land having negligible or no permanent effects on the environment). For the Alternatives Study, as part of Task 5: Environmental Clearance Review and Recommendations, the consultant will review the final conceptual alternatives and implementation plan, develop an environmental clearance strategy, and file any required exemption documentation under CEQA on behalf of the City, following direction to do so from the City. ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: Contract C24188179 with Urban Field Studio Attachment B: Interim Ordinance Temporarily Continuing Outdoor Dining, Retail, and Other Uses in Closed Streets until December 31, 2024 and Other Uses until March 31, 2024 Attachment C: Resolution Authorizing City Manager to Temporarily Close a Portion of California Avenue Until December 31, 2024 Attachment D: Resolution Authorizing City Manager to Temporarily Close a Portion of Ramona Street Until December 31, 2024 Attachment E: Community & Stakeholder Engagement Report from Bruce Fukuji Attachment F: Summary of Community Survey Results Attachment G: Presentation from the in -person December 7, 2022 Community Meeting Attachment H: Presentation from the virtual April 27, 2023 Community Meeting Attachment I: California Avenue Exhibit (El Camino Real to Birch Street) Attachment J: Ramona Street Exhibit (half block between Hamilton Avenue and University Avenue) APPROVED BY: Philip Kamhi, Chief Transportation Official Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 14 Packet Pg. 168 of 374 DocuSign Envelope ID: 354AE088-777O-406F-B1 B7-543AF691 11 C5 Item 9 Attachment A - Contract C24188179 with Urban Field Studio CITY OF PALO ALTO CONTRACT NO. C24188179 AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF PALO ALTO AND JOHN BELA URBANISM + DESIGN, LLC dba: URBAN FIELD STUDIO FAIRFAX This Agreement for Professional Services (this "Agreement") is entered into as of the 19th day of October, 2023 (the "Effective Date"), by and between the CITY OF PALO ALTO, a California chartered municipal corporation ("CITY"), and JOHN BELA URBANISM + DESIGN, LLC dba: URBAN FIELD STUDIO FAIRFAX a California Limited Liability Corporation, located at 24 Woodland Road, Fairfax, CA 94903 ("CONSULTANT"). The following recitals are a substantive portion of this Agreement and are fully incorporated herein by this reference: RECITALS A. CITY intends to retain the services of a qualified consulting firm ( (the "Project") and desires to engage a consultant to produce a CAR -FREE STREETS Alternatives Study and Implementation Plan for the City of Palo Alto in connection with the Project (the "Services", as detailed more fully in Exhibit A). B. CONSULTANT represents that it, its employees and subconsultants, if any, possess the necessary professional expertise, qualifications, and capability, and all required licenses and/or certifications to provide the Services. C. CITY, in reliance on these representations, desires to engage CONSULTANT to provide the Services as more fully described in Exhibit A, entitled "SCOPE OF SERVICES". NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the recitals, covenants, terms, and conditions, in this Agreement, the parties agree as follows: SECTION 1. SCOPE OF SERVICES. CONSULTANT shall perform the Services described in Exhibit A in accordance with the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement. The performance of all Services shall be to the reasonable satisfaction of CITY. ❑ Optional On -Call Provision (This provision only applies if checked and only applies to on -call agreements.) CITY may elect to, but is not required to, authorize on -call Services up to the maximum compensation amount set forth in Section 4 (Not to Exceed Compensation). CONSULTANT shall provide on -call Services only by advanced, written authorization Professional Services Rev. Dec.15, 2020 Page 1 of 38 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 15 Packet Pg. 169 of 374 DocuSign Envelope ID: 354AE088-777C-406F-B1 B7-543AF69111 C5 Item 9 Attachment A - Contract C24188179 with Urban CITY, as needed, with a Task Order assigned and approved by CIT1 Field Studio er, as identified in Section 13 (Project Management). Each Task Order shall be in sub s an Tally the same form as Exhibit A -I entitled "PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TASK ORDER". Each Task Order shall contain a specific scope of services, schedule of performance and maximum compensation amount, in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement. Compensation for on -call Services shall be specified by CITY in the Task Order, based on whichever is lowest: the compensation structure set forth in Exhibit C, the hourly rates set forth in Exhibit C-1, or a negotiated lump sum. To accept a Task Order, CONSULTANT shall sign the Task Order and return it to CITY's Project Manager within the time specified by the Project Manager, and upon authorization by CITY (defined as counter -signature by the CITY Project Manager), the fully executed Task Order shall become part of this Agreement. The cumulative total compensation due to CONSULTANT for all Task Orders issued under this Agreement shall not exceed the amount of compensation set forth in Section 4. CONSULTANT shall only be compensated for on -call Services performed under an authorized Task Order and only up to the maximum compensation amount set forth in Section 4. Performance of and payment for any on -call Services are subject to all requirements and restrictions in this Agreement. SECTION 2. TERM. The term of this Agreement shall be from the date of its full execution through December 31, 2024 unless terminated earlier pursuant to Section 19 (Termination) of this Agreement. SECTION 3. SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE. Time is of the essence in the performance of Services under this Agreement. CONSULTANT shall complete the Services within the term of this Agreement and in accordance with the schedule set forth in Exhibit B, entitled "SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE". Any Services for which times for performance are not specified in this Agreement shall be commenced and completed by CONSULTANT in a reasonably prompt and timely manner based upon the circumstances and direction communicated to the CONSULTANT. CITY's agreement to the extent caused by CONSULTANT'S failure to meet its professional standard of care. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, CONSULTANT shall not be deemed in default of this Agreement to the extent that any delay or failure in the performance of its obligations results from any cause beyond its reasonable control and without its negligence. SECTION 4. NOT TO EXCEED COMPENSATION. The compensation to be paid to CONSULTANT for performance of the Services shall be based on the compensation structure detailed in Exhibit C, entitled "COMPENSATION," including any reimbursable expenses specified therein, and the maximum total compensation shall not exceed Three Hundred Forty - Nine Thousand, Nine Hundred Ninety -One Dollars ($349,991.00). The hourly schedule of rates, if applicable, is set out in Exhibit C-1, entitled "SCHEDULE OF RATES." Any work performed or expenses incurred for which payment would result in a total exceeding the maximum compensation set forth in this Section 4 shall be at no cost to the CITY. Professional Services Rev. Dec.15, 2020 Page 2 of 37 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 16 Packet Pg. 170 of 374 DocuSign Envelope ID: 354AE088-777C-406F-B1 B7-543AF69111 C5 Item 9 Attachment A - Contract C24188179 with Urban ® Optional Additional Services Provision (This provision applies L Field Studio d a not -to -exceed compensation amount for Additional Services is allocateallocatei below under this Section 4.) In addition to the not -to -exceed compensation specified above, CITY has set aside the not - to -exceed compensation amount of Thirty -Four Thousand, Nine Hundred Ninety -Nine Dollars ($34,999.00) for the performance of Additional Services (as defined below). The total compensation for performance of the Services, Additional Services and any reimbursable expenses specified in Exhibit C, shall not exceed Three Hundred Eighty - Four Thousand, Nine Hundred Ninety Dollars ($384,990.00), as detailed in Exhibit C. "Additional Services" means any work that is determined by CITY to be necessary for the proper completion of the Project, but which is not included within the Scope of Services described at Exhibit A. CITY may elect to, but is not required to, authorize Additional Services up to the maximum amount of compensation set forth for Additional Services in this Section 4. CONSULTANT shall provide Additional Services only by advanced, written authorization from CITY as detailed in this Section. Additional Services, if any, shall be authorized by CITY with a Task Order assigned and authorized by CITY's Project Manager, as identified in Section 13 (Project Management). Each Task Order shall be in substantially the same form as Exhibit A-1, entitled "PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TASK ORDER". Each Task Order shall contain a specific scope of services, schedule of performance and maximum compensation amount, in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement. Compensation for Additional Services shall be specified by CITY in the Task Order, based on whichever is lowest: the compensation structure set forth in Exhibit C, the hourly rates set forth in Exhibit C-1, or a negotiated lump sum. To accept a Task Order, CONSULTANT shall sign the Task Order and return it to CITY's Project Manager within the time specified by the Project Manager, and upon authorization by CITY (defined as counter -signature by the CITY Project Manager), the fully executed Task Order shall become part of this Agreement. The cumulative total compensation to CONSULTANT for all Task Orders authorized under this Agreement shall not exceed the amount of compensation set forth for Additional Services in this Section 4. CONSULTANT shall only be compensated for Additional Services performed under an authorized Task Order and only up to the maximum amount of compensation set forth for Additional Services in this Section 4. Performance of and payment for any Additional Services are subject to all requirements and restrictions in this Agreement. SECTION 5. INVOICES. In order to request payment, CONSULTANT shall submit monthly invoices to the CITY describing the Services performed and the applicable charges (including, if applicable, an identification of personnel who performed the Services, hours worked, hourly rates, and reimbursable expenses), based upon Exhibit C or, as applicable, CONSULTANT's schedule of rates set forth in Exhibit C-1. If applicable, the invoice shall also describe the percentage of completion of each task. The information in CONSULTANT's invoices shall be subject to verification by CITY. CONSULTANT shall send all invoices to CITY's Project Manager at the address specified in Section 13 (Project Management) below. CITY will generally process and pay invoices within thirty (30) days of receipt of an acceptable invoice. Professional Services Rev. Dec.15, 2020 Page 3 of 37 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 17 Packet Pg. 171 of 374 DocuSign Envelope ID: 354AE088-777C-406F-B1 B7-543AF691 11 C5 Item 9 Attachment A - Contract C24188179 with Urban Field Studio SECTION 6. QUALIFICATIONS/STANDARD OF CARE. All Services snail e per ormed by CONSULTANT or under CONSULTANT's supervision. CONSULTANT represents that it, its employees and subcontractors, if any, possess the professional and technical personnel necessary to perform the Services required by this Agreement and that the personnel have sufficient skill and experience to perform the Services assigned to them. CONSULTANT represents that it, its employees and subcontractors, if any, have and shall maintain during the term of this Agreement all licenses, permits, qualifications, insurance and approvals of whatever nature that are legally required to perform the Services. All Services to be furnished by CONSULTANT under this Agreement shall be performed with the professional standard of care that prevail among professionals in the same discipline and of similar knowledge and skill engaged in related work throughout California under the same or similar circumstances and locality. Such professional standard of care is not a warranty or guarantee and CONSULTANT shall have no such obligation. SECTION 7. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS. CONSULTANT'S shall exercise due and reasonable professional care in observing those non -conflicting keep itself informed of and in compliance with all federal, state and local codes, laws, ordinances, regulations, and orders applicable at the time CONSULTANT renders its Services that prevail among professionals in the same discipline and of similar knowledge and skill engaged in related work throughout California under the same or similar circumstances and locality that may affect in any manner the Project or the performance of the Services or those engaged to perform Services under this Agreement, or CONSULTANT'S Services, as amended from time to time. CONSULTANT shall procure all permits and licenses, pay all charges and fees, and give all notices required by law in the performance of the Services. SECTION 8. ERRORS/OMISSIONS. CONSULTANT is solely responsible for costs, including, but not limited to, increases in the cost of Services, arising from or caused by CONSULTANT's errors and omissions, including, but not limited to, the costs of corrections such errors and omissions, any change order markup costs, or costs arising from delay caused by the errors and omissions or unreasonable delay in correcting the errors and omissions, to the extent caused by CONSULTANT'S failure to meet its professional standard of care. SECTION 9. COST ESTIMATES. If this Agreement pertains to the design of a public works project, CONSULTANT shall submit estimates of probable construction costs at each phase of design submittal, CONSULTANT'S opinions or estimates of probable construction cost are prepared on the basis of CONSULTANT'S experience and qualifications and represent CONSULTANT'S judgment as a professional, generally familiar with the industry. However, since CONSULTANT' has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment or services furnished by others, over contractor's methods of determining prices, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, CONSULTANT cannot and does not guarantee that proposals, bids, or actual construction cost will not vary from CONSULTANT'S opinions or estimates of probable construction cost. If the total estimated construction cost at any submittal exceeds the CITY's stated construction budget by ten percent (10%) or more, CONSULTANT shall make recommendations to CITY for aligning the Project design with the budget, incorporate CITY Professional Services Rev. Dec.15, 2020 Page 4 of 37 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 18 Packet Pg. 172 of 374 DocuSign Envelope ID: 354AE088-777C-406F-B1 B7-543AF69111 C5 Item 9 Attachment A - Contract C24188179 with Urban approved recommendations, and revise the design to meet the Project budgd Field Studio cost to CITY. SECTION 10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. CONSULTANT acknowledges and agrees that CONSULTANT and any agent or employee of CONSULTANT will act as and shall be deemed at all times to be an independent contractor and shall be wholly responsible for the manner in which CONSULTANT performs the Services requested by CITY under this Agreement. CONSULTANT and any agent or employee of CONSULTANT will not have employee status with CITY, nor be entitled to participate in any plans, arrangements, or distributions by CITY pertaining to or in connection with any retirement, health or other benefits that CITY may offer its employees. CONSULTANT will be responsible for all obligations and payments, whether imposed by federal, state or local law, including, but not limited to, FICA, income tax withholdings, workers' compensation, unemployment compensation, insurance, and other similar responsibilities related to CONSULTANT's performance of the Services, or any agent or employee of CONSULTANT providing same. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as creating an employment or agency relationship between CITY and CONSULTANT or any agent or employee of CONSULTANT. Any terms in this Agreement referring to direction from CITY shall be construed as providing for direction as to policy and the result of CONSULTANT's provision of the Services only, and not as to the means by which such a result is obtained. SECTION 11. ASSIGNMENT. The parties agree that the expertise and experience of CONSULTANT are material considerations for this Agreement. CONSULTANT shall not assign or transfer any interest in this Agreement nor the performance of any of CONSULTANT's obligations hereunder without the prior written approval of the City Manager. Any purported assignment made without the prior written approval of the City Manager will be void and without effect. Subject to the foregoing, the covenants, terms, conditions and provisions of this Agreement will apply to, and will bind, the heirs, successors, executors, administrators and assignees of the parties. SECTION 12. SUBCONTRACTING. ❑ Option A: No Subcontractor: CONSULTANT shall not subcontract any portion of the Services to be performed under this Agreement without the prior written authorization of the City Manager or designee. In the event CONSULTANT does subcontract any portion of the work to be performed under this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall be fully responsible for all acts and omissions of subcontractors. ® Option B: Subcontracts Authorized: Notwithstanding Section 11 (Assignment) above, CITY agrees that subcontractors may be used to complete the Services. The subcontractors authorized by CITY to perform work on this Project are: Kimley-Horn CONSULTANT shall be responsible for directing the work of any subcontractors and for any compensation due to subcontractors. CITY assumes no responsibility whatsoever concerning compensation of subcontractors. CONSULTANT shall be fully responsible to CITY for all acts Professional Services Rev. Dec.15, 2020 Page 5 of 37 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 19 Packet Pg. 173 of 374 DocuSign Envelope ID: 354AE088-777C-406F-B1 B7-543AF69111 C5 Item 9 Attachment A - Contract C24188179 with Urban and omissions of subcontractors. CONSULTANT shall change or add su Field Studio ith the prior written approval of the City Manager or designee. SECTION 13. PROJECT MANAGEMENT. CONSULTANT will assign John Bela, john(a�urbanfieldstudio.com, (415) 350-8257 as the CONSULTANT's Project Manager to have supervisory responsibility for the performance, progress, and execution of the Services and represent CONSULTANT during the day-to-day performance of the Services. If circumstances cause the substitution of the CONSULTANT's Project Manager or any other of CONSULTANT's key personnel for any reason, the appointment of a substitute Project Manager and the assignment of any key new or replacement personnel will be subject to the prior written approval of the CITY's Project Manager. CONSULTANT, at CITY's request, shall promptly remove CONSULTANT personnel who CITY finds do not perform the Services in an acceptable manner, are uncooperative, or present a threat to the adequate or timely completion of the Services or a threat to the safety of persons or property. CITY's Project Manager is Ozzy Arce, ozzy.arce(,citfpaloalto.org, Department, Office of Transportation, 250 Hamilton Avenue Alto, CA, 94301, Telephone:(650) 329-2156. CITY's Project Manager will be CONSULTANT's point of contact with respect to performance, progress and execution of the Services. CITY may designate an alternate Project Manager from time to time. SECTION 14. OWNERSHIP OF MATERIALS. All work product, including without limitation, all writings, drawings, studies, sketches, photographs, plans, reports, specifications, computations, models, recordings, data, documents, and other materials and copyright interests developed under this Agreement, in any form or media, shall be and remain the exclusive property of CITY without restriction or limitation upon their use. CONSULTANT agrees that all copyrights which arise from creation of the work product pursuant to this Agreement are vested in CITY, and CONSULTANT hereby waives and relinquishes all claims to copyright or other intellectual property rights in favor of CITY. Neither CONSULTANT nor its subcontractors, if any, shall make any of such work product available to any individual or organization without the prior written approval of the City Manager or designee. CONSULTANT makes no representation of the suitability of the work product for use in or application to circumstances not contemplated by the Scope of Services. CITY acknowledges that CONSULTANT'S work product may be stored and delivered to CITY and others in electronic files ("Data"), and that anomalies and errors can be introduced into the Data when it is transferred or used in conjunction with incompatible computer equipment or software. CONSULTANT'S Data is being furnished "as is" and CONSULTANT shall have no duty to modify or update the Data. CONSULTANT reserves the right to retain an archival paper or electronic copy of the Data delivered to CITY or the general contractor which shall be referred to and shall be conclusive proof and govern in all disputes over the form or content of the Data furnished by CONSULTANT. CITY acknowledges that ownership of, and any copyrights to, CONSULTANT'S and its consultants pre-existing standard details and specifications shall remain with their respective owners and CITY shall not acquire any rights in any such pre-existing standard details. Professional Services Rev. Dec.15, 2020 Page 6 of 37 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 20 Packet Pg. 174 of 374 DocuSign Envelope ID: 354AE088-777C-406F-B1 B7-543AF691 11 C5 Item 9 Attachment A - Contract C24188179 with Urban Field Studio SECTION 15. AUDITS. CONSULTANT agrees to permit CITY and its authorized representatives to audit, at any reasonable time during the term of this Agreement and for four (4) years from the date of final payment, CONSULTANT's records pertaining to matters covered by this Agreement, including without limitation records demonstrating compliance with the requirements of Section 10 (Independent Contractor). CONSULTANT further agrees to maintain and retain accurate books and records in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for at least four (4) years after the expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement or the completion of any audit hereunder, whichever is later. SECTION 16. INDEMNITY. ® Option A applies to the following design professionals pursuant to Civil Code Section 2782.8: architects; landscape architects; registered professional engineers and licensed professional land surveyors.] 16.1. To the extent permitted by law, CONSULTANT shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless CITY, its Council members, officers, employees and any other entity or person for which CONSULTANT is legally liable (each an "Indemnified Party") from and against any damages, losses, liabilities, judgments, settlements, expenses and costs, that Indemnified Party incurs from third party demands, claims, actions suits or matters connected therewith, including reasonable and necessary costs and expenses attorney's fees, costs and expenses recoverable under applicable law ("Claims") to the extent that such Claims arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct, including death or injury to any person, or damage to tangible property of CONSULTANT, its officers, employees, any other entity or person for which CONSULTANT is legally liable under this Agreement, Notwithstanding the foregoing, if CONSULTANT'S obligation to indemnify arises out of CONSULTANT'S performance of services for the Project as a "design professional," as that term is defined in California Civil Code Section 2782.8, CONSULTANT'S indemnity obligation shall be limited in accordance with the provisions of Section 2782.8 as it was in effect as of the date of this Agreement. CONSULTANT agrees to obtain executed indemnity agreements with provisions identical to those set forth in this indemnity provision from each and every subconsultant it retains. In no event shall the indemnification obligation extend beyond the date when the institution of legal or equitable proceedings for professional negligence would be barred by any applicable statute of repose or statute of limitations. CONSULTANT is not obligated to indemnify and hold harmless Indemnified Party for its active or sole negligence, or willful misconduct. ❑ [Option B applies to any consultant who does not qualify as a design professional as defined in Civil Code Section 2782.8.] 16.1. To the fullest extent permitted by law, CONSULTANT shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless CITY, its Council members, officers, employees and agents (each an "Indemnified Party") from and against any and all demands, claims, or liability of any nature, including death or injury to any person, property damage or any other loss, including all costs and expenses of whatever nature including attorney's fees, experts fees, court costs and disbursements ("Claims") resulting from, arising out of or in any manner related to performance or nonperformance by CONSULTANT, its officers, employees, agents or Professional Services Rev. Dec.15, 2020 Page 7 of 37 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 21 Packet Pg. 175 of 374 DocuSign Envelope ID: 354AE088-777O-406F-B1 B7-543AF69111 C5 Item 9 Attachment A - Contract 024188179 with Urban contractors under this Agreement, regardless of whether or not it is Field Studio an Indemnified Party. 16.2. Notwithstanding the above, nothing in this Section 16 shall be construed to require CONSULTANT to indemnify an Indemnified Party from a Claim arising from the active negligence or willful misconduct of an Indemnified Party that is not contributed to by any act of, or by any omission to perform a duty imposed by law or agreement by, CONSULTANT, its officers, employees, agents or contractors under this Agreement. 16.3. The acceptance of CONSULTANT's Services and duties by CITY shall not operate as a waiver of the right of indemnification. The provisions of this Section 16 shall survive the expiration or early termination of this Agreement. SECTION 17. WAIVERS. No waiver of a condition or nonperformance of an obligation under this Agreement is effective unless it is in writing in accordance with Section 29.4 of this Agreement. No delay or failure to require performance of any provision of this Agreement shall constitute a waiver of that provision as to that or any other instance. Any waiver granted shall apply solely to the specific instance expressly stated. No single or partial exercise of any right or remedy will preclude any other or further exercise of any right or remedy. SECTION 18. INSURANCE. 18.1. CONSULTANT, at its sole cost and expense, shall obtain and maintain, in full force and effect during the term of this Agreement, the insurance coverage described in Exhibit D, entitled "INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS". CONSULTANT and its contractors, if any, shall obtain a policy endorsement naming CITY as an additional insured under any general liability or automobile policy or policies. 18.2. All insurance coverage required hereunder shall be provided through carriers with AM Best's Key Rating Guide ratings of A- :VII or higher which are licensed or authorized to transact insurance business in the State of California. Any and all contractors of CONSULTANT retained to perform Services under this Agreement will obtain and maintain, in full force and effect during the term of this Agreement, identical insurance coverage, naming CITY as an additional insured under such policies as required above. 18.3. Certificates evidencing such insurance shall be filed with CITY concurrently with the execution of this Agreement. The certificates will be subject to the approval of CITY's Risk Manager and will contain reference and attach an endorsements stating that the insurance (1) is primary coverage, with the exception of professional liability, workers' compensation and employers' liability insurance policies, and (2) will not be canceled, or materially reduced in coverage or limits, by the insurer except after filing with the Purchasing Manager thirty (30) days' prior written notice of the cancellation or modification. If the insurer cancels or modifies the insurance and provides less than thirty (30) days' notice to CONSULTANT, CONSULTANT shall provide the Purchasing Manager written notice of the cancellation or modification within two (2) business days of the CONSULTANT's receipt of such notice. CONSULTANT shall be responsible for ensuring that current certificates evidencing the insurance are provided to CITY's Chief Procurement Officer during the entire term of this Agreement. Professional Services Rev. Dec.15, 2020 Page 8 of 37 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 22 Packet Pg. 176 of 374 DocuSign Envelope ID: 354AE088-777C-406F-B1 B7-543AF691 11 C5 Item 9 Attachment A - Contract C24188179 with Urban Field Studio 18.4. The procuring of such required policy or policies of insurance will not be construed to limit CONSULTANT's liability hereunder nor to fulfill the indemnification provisions of this Agreement. Notwithstanding the policy or policies of insurance, CONSULTANT will be obligated for the full and total amount of any damage, injury, or loss caused by or directly arising as a result of the Services performed under this Agreement, including such damage, injury, or loss arising after the Agreement is terminated or the term has expired. SECTION 19. TERMINATION OR SUSPENSION OF AGREEMENT OR SERVICES. 19.1. The City Manager may suspend the performance of the Services, in whole or in part, or terminate this Agreement, with or without cause, by giving ten (10) days prior written notice thereof to CONSULTANT. If CONSULTANT fails to perform any of its material obligations under this Agreement, in addition to all other remedies provided under this Agreement or at law, the City Manager may terminate this Agreement sooner upon written notice of termination. Upon receipt of any notice of suspension or termination, CONSULTANT will discontinue its performance of the Services on the effective date in the notice of suspension or termination. 19.2. In event of suspension or termination, CONSULTANT will deliver to the City Manager on or before the effective date in the notice of suspension or termination, any and all work product, as detailed in Section 14 (Ownership of Materials), whether or not completed, prepared by CONSULTANT or its contractors, if any, in the performance of this Agreement. Such work product is the property of CITY, as detailed in Section 14 (Ownership of Materials). 19.3. In event of suspension or termination, CONSULTANT will be paid for the Services rendered and work products delivered to CITY in accordance with the Scope of Services up to the effective date in the notice of suspension or termination; provided, however, if this Agreement is suspended or terminated on account of a default by CONSULTANT, CITY will be obligated to compensate CONSULTANT only for that portion of CONSULTANT's Services provided in material conformity with this Agreement as such determination is made by the City Manager acting in the reasonable exercise of his/her discretion. The following Sections will survive any expiration or termination of this Agreement: 14, 15, 16, 17, 19.2, 19.3, 19.4, 20, 25, 27, 28, 29 and 30. 19.4. No payment, partial payment, acceptance, or partial acceptance by CITY will operate as a waiver on the part of CITY of any of its rights under this Agreement, unless made in accordance with Section 17 (Waivers). Professional Services Rev. Dec.15, 2020 Page 9 of 37 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 23 Packet Pg. 177 of 374 DocuSign Envelope ID: 354AE088-777C-406F-B1 B7-543AF69111 C5 SECTION 20. NOTICES. Item 9 Attachment A - Contract C24188179 with Urban Field Studio All notices hereunder will be given in writing and mailed, postage prepaid, by certified mail, addressed as follows: To CITY: Office of the City Clerk City of Palo Alto Post Office Box 10250 Palo Alto, CA 94303 With a copy to the Purchasing Manager To CONSULTANT: Attention of the Project Manager at the address of CONSULTANT recited on the first page of this Agreement. CONSULTANT shall provide written notice to CITY of any change of address. SECTION 21. CONFLICT OF INTEREST. 21.1. In executing this Agreement, CONSULTANT covenants that it presently has no interest, and will not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, financial or otherwise, which would conflict in any manner or degree with the performance of the Services. 21.2. CONSULTANT further covenants that, in the performance of this Agreement, it will not employ subcontractors or other persons or parties having such an interest. CONSULTANT certifies that no person who has or will have any financial interest under this Agreement is an officer or employee of CITY; this provision will be interpreted in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Palo Alto Municipal Code and the Government Code of the State of California, as amended from time to time. CONSULTANT agrees to notify CITY if any conflict arises. 21.3. If the CONSULTANT meets the definition of a "Consultant" as defined by the Regulations of the Fair Political Practices Commission, CONSULTANT will file the appropriate financial disclosure documents required by the Palo Alto Municipal Code and the Political Reform Act of 1974, as amended from time to time. SECTION 22. NONDISCRIMINATION; COMPLIANCE WITH ADA. 22.1. As set forth in Palo Alto Municipal Code Section 2.30.510, as amended from time to time, CONSULTANT certifies that in the performance of this Agreement, it shall not discriminate in the employment of any person due to that person's race, skin color, gender, gender identity, age, religion, disability, national origin, ancestry, sexual orientation, pregnancy, genetic information or condition, housing status, marital status, familial status, weight or height of such person. CONSULTANT acknowledges that it has read and understands the provisions of Section 2.30.510 of the Palo Alto Municipal Code relating to Nondiscrimination Requirements and the penalties for violation thereof, and agrees to meet all requirements of Section 2.30.510 pertaining to nondiscrimination in employment. Professional Services Rev. Dec.15, 2020 Page 10 of 37 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 24 Packet Pg. 178 of 374 DocuSign Envelope ID: 354AE088-777C-406F-B1 B7-543AF69111 C5 Item 9 Attachment A - Contract C24188179 with Urban 22.2. CONSULTANT understands and agrees that pursue Field Studio ans Disabilities Act ("ADA"), programs, services and other activities provided by a public entity to the public, whether directly or through a contractor or subcontractor, are required to be accessible to the disabled public. CONSULTANT will provide the Services specified in this Agreement in a manner that complies with the ADA and any other applicable federal, state and local disability rights laws and regulations, as amended from time to time. CONSULTANT will not discriminate against persons with disabilities in the provision of services, benefits or activities provided under this Agreement. SECTION 23. ENVIRONMENTALLY PREFERRED PURCHASING AND ZERO WASTE REQUIREMENTS. CONSULTANT shall comply with the CITY's Environmentally Preferred Purchasing policies which are available at CITY'S Purchasing Department, hereby incorporated by reference and as amended from time to time. CONSULTANT shall comply with waste reduction, reuse, recycling and disposal requirements of CITY's Zero Waste Program. Zero Waste best practices include, first, minimizing and reducing waste; second, reusing waste; and, third, recycling or composting waste. In particular, CONSULTANT shall comply with the following Zero Waste requirements: (a) All printed materials provided by CONSULTANT to CITY generated from a personal computer and printer including but not limited to, proposals, quotes, invoices, reports, and public education materials, shall be double -sided and printed on a minimum of 30% or greater post -consumer content paper, unless otherwise approved by CITY's Project Manager. Any submitted materials printed by a professional printing company shall be a minimum of 30% or greater post -consumer material and printed with vegetable -based inks. (b) Goods purchased by CONSULTANT on behalf of CITY shall be purchased in accordance with CITY's Environmental Purchasing Policy including but not limited to Extended Producer Responsibility requirements for products and packaging. A copy of this policy is on file at the Purchasing Department's office. (c) Reusable/returnable pallets shall be taken back by CONSULTANT, at no additional cost to CITY, for reuse or recycling. CONSULTANT shall provide documentation from the facility accepting the pallets to verify that pallets are not being disposed. SECTION 24. COMPLIANCE WITH PALO ALTO MINIMUM WAGE ORDINANCE. CONSULTANT shall comply with all requirements of the Palo Alto Municipal Code Chapter 4.62 (Citywide Minimum Wage), as amended from time to time. In particular, for any employee otherwise entitled to the State minimum wage, who performs at least two (2) hours of work in a calendar week within the geographic boundaries of the City, CONSULTANT shall pay such employees no less than the minimum wage set forth in Palo Alto Municipal Code Section 4.62.030 for each hour worked within the geographic boundaries of the City of Palo Alto. In addition, CONSULTANT shall post notices regarding the Palo Alto Minimum Wage Ordinance in accordance with Palo Alto Municipal Code Section 4.62.060. SECTION 25. NON -APPROPRIATION. This Agreement is subject to the fiscal provisions of the Charter of the City of Palo Alto and the Palo Alto Municipal Code, as amended from time to time. This Agreement will terminate without any penalty (a) at the end of any fiscal year in the event that funds are not appropriated for the following fiscal year, or (b) at any time within a fiscal year in the event that funds are only appropriated for a portion of the fiscal year and funds for this Agreement are no longer available. This Section shall take precedence in the event of a conflict with any other covenant, term, condition, or provision of this Agreement. Professional Services Rev. Dec.15, 2020 Page 11 of 37 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 25 Packet Pg. 179 of 374 DocuSign Envelope ID: 354AE088-777C-406F-B1 B7-543AF691 11 C5 Item 9 Attachment A - Contract C24188179 with Urban Field Studio WORKS CONTRACTS. ® 26.1. This Project is not subject to prevailing wages and related requirements. CONSULTANT is not required to pay prevailing wages and meet related requirements under the California Labor Code and California Code of Regulations in the performance and implementation of the Project if the contract: (1) is not a public works contract; (2) is for a public works construction project of $25,000 or less, per California Labor Code Sections 1782(d)(1), 1725.5(f) and 1773.3(j); or (3) is for a public works alteration, demolition, repair, or maintenance project of $15,000 or less, per California Labor Code Sections 1782(d)(1), 1725.5(f) and 1773.3(j). ❑ 26.1. This Project is subject to prevailing wages and related requirements as a "public works" under California Labor Code Sections 1720 et seq. and related regulations. CONSULTANT is required to pay general prevailing wages as defined in California Labor Code Section 1773.1 and Subchapter 3, Title 8 of the California Code of Regulations Section 16000 et seq., as amended from time to time. Pursuant to Labor Code Section 1773, the CITY has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification, or type of worker needed to execute the contract for this Project from the State of California Department of Industrial Relations ("DIR"). Copies of these rates maybe obtained at the CITY's Purchasing Department office. The general prevailing wage rates are also available at the DIR, Division of Labor Statistics and Research, web site (see e.g. http://www.dir.ca.gov/DLSR/PWD/index.htm) as amended from time to time. CONSULTANT shall post a copy of the general prevailing wage rates at all Project job sites and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. CONSULTANT shall comply with all applicable provisions of Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1 of the California Labor Code (Labor Code Section 1720 et seq.), including but not limited to Sections 1725.5, 1771, 1771.1, 1771.4, 1773.2, 1774, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1782, 1810, 1813 and 1815, and all applicable implementing regulations, including but not limited to Subchapter 3, Title 8 of the California Code of Regulations Section 16000 et seq. (8 CCR Section 16000 et seq.), as amended from time to time. CONSULTANT shall comply with the requirements of Exhibit E, entitled "DIR REGISTRATION FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTS", for any contract for public works construction, alteration, demolition, repair or maintenance, including but not limited to the obligations to register with, and furnish certified payroll records directly to, DIR. SECTION 27. CLAIMS PROCEDURE FOR "9204 PUBLIC WORKS PROJECTS". For purposes of this Section 27, a "9204 Public Works Project" means the erection, construction, alteration, repair, or improvement of any public structure, building, road, or other public improvement of any kind. (Cal. Pub. Cont. Code § 9204.) Per California Public Contract Code Section 9204, for Public Works Projects, certain claims procedures shall apply, as set forth in Exhibit F, entitled "Claims for Public Contract Code Section 9204 Public Works Projects". Professional Services Rev. Dec.15, 2020 Page 12 of 37 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 26 Packet Pg. 180 of 374 DocuSign Envelope ID: 354AE088-777C-406F-B1 B7-543AF69111 C5 Item 9 Attachment A - Contract C24188179 with Urban Field Studio ❑ This Project is a 9204 Public Works Project and is required o comply wit the claim's procedures set forth in Exhibit F, entitled "Claims for Public Contract Code Section 9204 Public Works Projects". 1' ❑ This Project is not a 9204 Public Works Project. SECTION 28. CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION. 28.1. In the performance of this Agreement, CONSULTANT may have access to CITY's Confidential Information (defined below). CONSULTANT will hold Confidential Information in strict confidence, not disclose it to any third party, and will use it only for the performance of its obligations to CITY under this Agreement and for no other purpose. CONSULTANT will maintain reasonable and appropriate administrative, technical and physical safeguards to ensure the security, confidentiality and integrity of the Confidential Information. Notwithstanding the foregoing, CONSULTANT may disclose Confidential Information to its employees, agents and subcontractors, if any, to the extent they have a need to know in order to perform CONSULTANT's obligations to CITY under this Agreement and for no other purpose, provided that the CONSULTANT informs them of, and requires them to follow, the confidentiality and security obligations of this Agreement. 28.2. "Confidential Information" means all data, information (including without limitation "Personal Information" about a California resident as defined in Civil Code Section 1798 et seq., as amended from time to time) and materials, in any form or media, tangible or intangible, provided or otherwise made available to CONSULTANT by CITY, directly or indirectly, pursuant to this Agreement. Confidential Information excludes information that CONSULTANT can show by appropriate documentation: (i) was publicly known at the time it was provided or has subsequently become publicly known other than by a breach of this Agreement; (ii) was rightfully in CONSULTANT's possession free of any obligation of confidence prior to receipt of Confidential Information; (iii) is rightfully obtained by CONSULTANT from a third party without breach of any confidentiality obligation; (iv) is independently developed by employees of CONSULTANT without any use of or access to the Confidential Information; or (v) CONSULTANT has written consent to disclose signed by an authorized representative of CITY. 28.3. Notwithstanding the foregoing, CONSULTANT may disclose Confidential Information to the extent required by order of a court of competent jurisdiction or governmental body, provided that CONSULTANT will notify CITY in writing of such order immediately upon receipt and prior to any such disclosure (unless CONSULTANT is prohibited by law from doing so), to give CITY an opportunity to oppose or otherwise respond to such order. 28.4. CONSULTANT will notify City promptly upon learning of any breach in the security of its systems or unauthorized disclosure of, or access to, Confidential Information in its possession or control, and if such Confidential Information consists of Personal Information, CONSULTANT will provide information to CITY sufficient to meet the notice requirements of Civil Code Section 1798 et seq., as applicable, as amended from time to time. Professional Services Rev. Dec.15, 2020 Page 13 of 37 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 27 Packet Pg. 181 of 374 DocuSign Envelope ID: 354AE088-777C-406F-B1 B7-543AF691 11 C5 Item 9 Attachment A - Contract C24188179 with Urban Field Studio 28.5. Prior to or upon termination or expiration ot mis Agreement, CONSULTANT will honor any request from the CITY to return or securely destroy all copies of Confidential Information. All Confidential Information is and will remain the property of the CITY and nothing contained in this Agreement grants or confers any rights to such Confidential Information on CONSULTANT. 28.6. If selected in Section 30 (Exhibits), this Agreement is also subject to the terms and conditions of the Information Privacy Policy and Cybersecurity Terms and Conditions. SECTION 29. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS. 29.1. This Agreement will be governed by California law, without regard to its conflict of law provisions. 29.2. In the event that an action is brought, the parties agree that trial of such action will be vested exclusively in the state courts of California in the County of Santa Clara, State of California. 29.3. The prevailing party in any action brought to enforce the provisions of this Agreement may recover its reasonable costs and attorneys' fees expended in connection with that action. The prevailing party shall be entitled to recover an amount equal to the fair market value of legal services provided by attorneys employed by it as well as any attorneys' fees paid to third parties. 29.4. This Agreement, including all exhibits, constitutes the entire and integrated agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement, and supersedes all prior agreements, negotiations, representations, statements and undertakings, either oral or written. This Agreement may be amended only by a written instrument, which is signed by the authorized representatives of the parties and approved as required under Palo Alto Municipal Code, as amended from time to time. 29.5. If a court of competent jurisdiction finds or rules that any provision of this Agreement is void or unenforceable, the unaffected provisions of this Agreement will remain in full force and effect. 29.6. In the event of a conflict between the terms of this Agreement and the exhibits hereto (per Section 30) or CONSULTANT's proposal (if any), the Agreement shall control. In the event of a conflict between the exhibits hereto and CONSULTANT's proposal (if any), the exhibits shall control. Professional Services Rev. Dec.15, 2020 Page 14 of 37 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 28 Packet Pg. 182 of 374 DocuSign Envelope ID: 354AE088-777C-406F-B1 B7-543AF69111 C5 Item 9 Attachment A - Contract C24188179 with Urban 29.7. The provisions of all checked boxes in this Agreem Field Studio this Agreement; the provisions of any unchecked boxes shall not apply to this Agreement. 29.8. All section headings contained in this Agreement are for convenience and reference only and are not intended to define or limit the scope of any provision of this Agreement. 29.9. This Agreement may be signed in multiple counterparts, which, when executed by the authorized representatives of the parties, shall together constitute a single binding agreement. SECTION 30. EXHIBITS. Each of the following exhibits, if the check box for such exhibit is selected below, is hereby attached and incorporated into this Agreement by reference as though fully set forth herein: ® EXHIBIT A: SCOPE OF SERVICES ® EXHIBIT B: SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE ® EXHIBIT C: COMPENSATION ® EXHIBIT D: INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS THIS A GREEMENT IS NOT COMPLETE UNLESS ALL SELECTED EXHIBITS ARE ATTACHED. Professional Services Rev. Dec.15, 2020 Page 15 of 37 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 29 Packet Pg. 183 of 374 DocuSign Envelope ID: 354AE088-777C-406F-B1 B7-543AF69111 C5 Item 9 Attachment A - Contract C24188179 with Urban CONTRACT No. C24188179 Field Studio SIGNATURE PAGE IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have by their duly authorized representatives executed this Agreement as of the date first above written. CITY OF PALO ALTO JOHN BELA URBANISM + DESIGN, LLC dba: URBAN FIELD STUDIO FAIRFAX Officer 1 Docu5igned by City Manager By: tL 4ABB85BF 6D04BF. John Bela Name: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Pri nci pal Title: City Attorney or designee Professional Services Rev. Dec.15, 2020 Page 16 of 38 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 30 Packet Pg. 184 of 374 DocuSign Envelope ID: 354AE088-777C-406F-B1 B7-543AF691 11 C5 Item 9 Attachment A - Contract C24188179 with Urban EXHIBIT A Field Studio SCOPE OF SERVICES CONSULTANT will provide the Services detailed in this Exhibit A, entitled "SCOPE OF SERVICES". CONSULTANT will produce an Alternatives Study and Implementation Plan for the City of Palo Alto. Task 1 — Public Outreach and Engagement Strategy • CONSULTANT will customize the engagement approach for each of the target audiences, and return to them to solicit ideas and input into the planning and design process. • CONSULTANT will work closely with City staff for all community engagement activities and will build on previous community feedback from Palo Alto's Uplift Local program and other City -led engagement efforts. Task 1.1— Kick-off Meeting, Community Engagement Strategy Memo • CONSULTANT will meet with City staff to discuss key stakeholder groups and target audiences and how to engage with them. • CONSULTANT will prepare a Community Engagement Strategy Memo that outlines target audiences, engagement approaches, and a schedule for meeting with stakeholder groups. Timing • 1 meeting, 2 -hours, preference for in -person (part of the kick-off meeting). • 1 week to develop Memo. Deliverables • Community Engagement Strategy Memo. Task 1.2 — Phase One Community Engagement: Initial Outreach • CONSULTANT will conduct a preliminary phase of outreach with all stakeholder groups identified in the Engagement mem. These will be small group, informal meetings; meetings that occur during canvassing efforts with local businesses. The purpose of these preliminary meetings is to gather insights and concepts and to identify important considerations in advance of developing preliminary concepts. Audience • Cal Ave. Business Association or Merchants Association, or similar group. • Individual California Avenue Business District business owners. • Ramona Street Business Association or Merchants Association, or similar group. Professional Services Rev. Dec.15, 2020 Page 17 of 37 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 31 Packet Pg. 185 of 374 DocuSign Envelope ID: 354AE088-777C-406F-B1 B7-543AF691 11 C5 Item 9 Attachment A - Contract C24188179 with Urban • Individual Ramona Street business owners. Field Studio Activities • In person or virtual meetings with business association representatives. • Canvassing during business hours - a short survey will be developed to collect opinions door to door on California Avenue and Ramona Street. • Office hours will be held via zoom or other virtual format with the business owners on California Avenue and Ramona Street. Multiple business owners can be interviewed together during office hours. Timing • (2) 1 -hour meetings with business association representatives, 3 office hours, 1 -hour each, 8 hours of canvassing. Deliverables • Fliers; short online survey. Audience: Advisory Groups and Committees • Palo Alto Pedestrian and Bicycle Advisory Committee (PABAC). • Palo Alto Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors, or a similar group. • Historic Resources Board (HRB). • Architecture Review Board (ARB). • Planning and Transportation Commission (PTC). Activities • (5) In person or virtual meetings with selected representatives of each of the Boards, Commissions, and Committees. Timing • 5 meetings, 1 hour each. Deliverables • Slide deck Presentation. Audience; Local Resident and Employees/Workers Activities • Mailers will be sent out (distribution by the City) to residents and nearby offices to share the options for feedback on the project. Mailers will include two ways of getting in touch: by email and through office hours (held online). Additionally, stakeholders will be invited to the project webpage (hosted on the City website) and the Community -at -large Outreach event. Timing • 3 office hours, 1 -hour each. Deliverables • Mailer design only. Task 1.3 — Phase Two Community Engagement: Socialize Preliminary Concepts • CONSULTANT will socialize preliminary concepts and gather feedback from target audiences and stakeholder groups. This phase will include presentations at regularly scheduled commission, committee, board meetings, a City Council Study Session and Community at -large public events. Professional Services Rev. Dec.15, 2020 Page 18 of 37 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 32 Packet Pg. 186 of 374 DocuSign Envelope ID: 354AE088-777C-406F-B1 B7-543AF691 11 C5 Item 9 Attachment A - Contract C24188179 with Urban Audience: Local Businesses Field Studio • Cal Ave Business Association or Merchants Association, or similar group. • Ramona Street Business Association or Merchants Association, or similar group. Activities • Presentation of preliminary concepts at Business / Merchant association meetings. Timing • (2) 1 -hour meetings with biz association representatives. Deliverables • Content for memos or reports, presentation, summary of insights and feedback added to the 'What We Heard' memo. Audience: Advisory Groups and Committees • Palo Alto Pedestrian and Bicycle Advisory Committee (PABAC). • Palo Alto Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors, or a similar group. • Historic Resources Board (HRB). • Architecture Review Board (ARB). • Planning and Transportation Commission (PTC). Activities • (5) In person or virtual presentations at regularly scheduled meetings. Timing • 5 meetings, 1-2 hours each. Deliverables • Content for memos or reports, presentation, summary of insights and feedback added to the 'What We Heard' memo. Audience: Local Residents and Employees / Workers Activities • Community -at -large Outreach Events o Two events will be held, one on Ramona Street and the other on California Avenue to engage the Community -at -large. Ideally timed with recurring weekly events, like farmer's markets, outdoor music, or holiday events, the team can table to garner feedback and extend the invitation to be part of an online survey about the streets. This would capture the opinion of visitors. o The events will include tabling and an interactive diagram of the street to capture ideas. The display will be colorful, and comments will be added to boards. Timing • Two 4 -hour events (one for each street). Deliverables • Boards and Interactive Feature, summary of insights and feedback added to the 'What We Heard' memo. Audience: City Council Activities • Presentation at City Council Study Session. o CONSULTANT will present preliminary concepts and a draft of the What we heard report from previous engagement efforts. Professional Services Rev. Dec.15, 2020 Page 19 of 37 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 33 Packet Pg. 187 of 374 DocuSign Envelope ID: 354AE088-777C-406F-B1 B7-543AF691 11 C5 Timing Item 9 Attachment A - Contract C24188179 with Urban Field Studio • One 1.5 -hour presentation and discussion with City Council. Deliverables • Content for memos or reports, presentation, summary of insights and feedback added to the 'What We Heard' memo. Task 1.4 — Phase Three Community Engagement: Socialize Preferred Concepts • CONSULTANT will socialize preferred concepts to gather feedback from target audiences and stakeholder groups. This phase will include presentations at regularly scheduled commission, committee, board meetings, and a second City Council Study Session. Audience: Local Businesses • Cal Ave Business Association or Merchants Association, or similar group. • Ramona Street Business Association or Merchants Association, or similar group. Activities • Presentation at Business / Merchant association meetings. Timing • (2) 1 -hour meetings. Deliverables • Content for memos or reports, presentation, summary of insights and feedback added to the 'What We Heard' memo. Audience: Advisory Groups and Committees • Palo Alto Pedestrian and Bicycle Advisory Committee (PABAC). • Palo Alto Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors, or a similar group. • Historic Resources Board (HRB). • Architecture Review Board (ARB). • Planning and Transportation Commission (PTC). Activities • In person or virtual presentations at regularly scheduled meetings. Timing • (5) 1-1.5 hour meetings. Deliverables • Content for memos or reports, presentation, summary of insights and feedback added to the 'What We Heard' memo. Audience: Residents and Employees / Workers Activities • Invitation to provide feedback on project webpage. Timing • Open invitation to add comments and feedback on project webpage. Deliverables • Preferred Concept Content on project webpage. Professional Services Rev. Dec.15, 2020 Page 20 of 37 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 34 Packet Pg. 188 of 374 DocuSign Envelope ID: 354AE088-777C-406F-B1 B7-543AF69111 C5 Item 9 Attachment A - Contract C24188179 with Urban Audience: City Council Field Studio Activities • Presentation at second City Council Study Session. Timing • One 1.5 -hour presentation and discussion with City Council. Deliverables • Content for memos or reports, presentation, summary of insights and feedback added to the 'What We Heard' memo. Task 1.5 — Phase Four Community Engagement: Present Final Plan • CONSULTANT will present the final preferred plan and implementation strategy at a City Council hearing. Timing • One 1.5 -hour presentation and discussion with City Council. Deliverables • Content for memos or reports, presentation of final Urban Design Plan and Implementation Plan. Task 1.6 — Community Outreach Summary • CONSULTANT will prepare a 'What We Heard' memo that summarizes the entire engagement process for the project and identifies key insights, concerns, and considerations. This will form the basis of the design brief prior to developing preliminary concepts and guide the process to select preferred alternatives. This document will serve as a record and summary of the project engagement efforts. Timing • Draft in Q 1 2024, Final in Q3 2024. Deliverables • 'What We Heard' memo for public presentation, content for project webpage summarizing the engagement effort, such as a public executive summary of the 'What We Heard' memo. Task 2 — Research & Analysis of Existing Conditions and Technical Studies Task 2.1 — Background Research • CONSULTANT will conduct a review of relevant policy and planning documents, codes, and previous community engagement efforts. o Review existing sources of City provided data, i.e., GIS files, parking and loading data. The Consultant may need to supplement existing City provided data sources, and budget has not yet been allocated to collect and utilize supplemental data. o Review existing economic impact reports from Uplift Local phase, including the Community & Stakeholder Engagement Report and the Street sense Economic report. o Review previous engagement efforts. Timing Professional Services Rev. Dec.15, 2020 Page 21 of 37 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 35 Packet Pg. 189 of 374 DocuSign Envelope ID: 354AE088-777C-406F-B1 B7-543AF69111 C5 Item 9 Attachment A - Contract C24188179 with Urban • Q4 2023, Q 1 2024. Field Studio Deliverables • Key insights integrated into 'What We Heard' memo and Draft Design Brief. Task 2.2 — Parking and Loading Assessment • CONSULTANT will do an evaluation of parking contexts and options within roughly a block of the Project's Area of Interest. Parking data provided by the City includes information about capacity and usage at different times of days for both on- and off- street facilities. • Prior to conducting evaluations, the CONSULTANT will incorporate 2023 parking data provided by the City in an Excel file into GIS files provided by the City that includes parking facility location information. • CONSULTANT will evaluate the updated GIS-based data and work with the City to determine if additional parking data should be collected before commencing further analyses. • CONSULTANT will develop up to 6 maps (2 locations, three different times of day) that include information about on- and off-street parking facilities and their capacities and occupancies. These maps will be color coded to represent percent occupancies at the facility at the time of day represented in the map. Timing • Q4 2023, Q 1 2024. Deliverables • Conduct a parking / loading assessment using existing city parking capacity and utilization data and integrate key insights into 'What We Heard' memo and Design Brief. Task 2.3 — Location Analytics Data Analysis • CONSULTANT will access Replica and Replica data through a City provided access account (through the Consultant Access Program) to obtain relevant data to support the project's transportation and circulation analysis. Timing • Q4 2023, Q 1 2024. Deliverables • Key insights integrated into 'What We Heard' memo and Design Brief. Task 2.4 — Meeting to review existing conditions analysis with City Team • CONSULTANT will review key findings from background research and existing conditions analysis with the City team, and update the design brief based on conversations with City staff. Timing • Q1 -Q2 2024. Deliverables • Summary of site analysis, including parking analysis; Draft What We Heard' memo and Design Brief Professional Services Rev. Dec.15, 2020 Page 22 of 37 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 36 Packet Pg. 190 of 374 DocuSign Envelope ID: 354AE088-777C-406F-B1 B7-543AF691 11 C5 Task 3 — Urban Design Framework Item 9 Attachment A - Contract C24188179 with Urban Field Studio • Building on the site analysis, community engagement, and discussions with City Staff to inform the project Design Brief, the CONSULTANT will craft a comprehensive urban design framework for the project focus areas and areas of interest (see map). • CONSULTANT will establish the conditions for an environment that encourages curiosity and exploration, place -making, and economic vibrancy, while also considering overall project cost and operational capacity. • CONSULTANT will seek to balance the uses and users of the street such as pedestrians and cyclists, retailers and restaurants, parking and emergency vehicle access. • The Urban Design framework will evolve over the course of the project in response to key findings and insights from site analysis and community engagement. • CONSULTANT will work with the City and stakeholders to identify up to two future scenarios for both the California Avenue and Ramona Street areas (four scenarios total) to be advanced into more detailed evaluation. The scenarios will be identified, developed, and selected using high-level screening criteria built from the design brief, including guiding principles for the effort. Map of Project Areas: CALIFORNIA AVENUE _ _; Vroj looms Area.Cal. Are he[ween El CemEno Real and Pim h Sheet P Plajecl Area tf interest Atli 5laelmsM1emian avenue Ne Canrain sraLon er,er,errer,A!daeaeeeae New U.rtAIduneJecerenda Le e,aed&a ,an Avenue RAMONA STREET -------------------, I Rojecl Fows Area', Ramona% 6etvreen Ut'n ly Ave. -d Hamihon Ave. Pealed Area ofinterest Remote St adjacent pe.destden alleyways std drive aisles • For California Avenue, the Project Focus Area is California Avenue between El Camino Real and Birch Street; and the Project Area of Interest is California Avenue from El Camino Real to the Caltrain Station, Ash Street to Sherman Avenue, neighboring alleyways and streets: Cambridge Avenue, New Mayfield Lane, Jacaranda Lane, and Sherman Avenue. • For Ramona Street, the Project Focus Area is Ramona Street between University Avenue and Hamilton Avenue; and the Project Area of Interest is Ramona Street adjacent pedestrian alleyways and drive aisles. Professional Services Rev. Dec.15, 2020 Page 23 of 37 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 37 Packet Pg. 191 of 374 DocuSign Envelope ID: 354AE088-777C-406F-B1 B7-543AF691 11 C5 Item 9 Attachment A - Contract C24188179 with Urban Field Studio The Urban Design framework will incorporate the following elements and considerations: Task 3.1— Streetscape Design and Amenities • CONSULTANT will develop concepts for a public realm and streetscape design that includes, but is not limited to the following: o Delineation of pedestrian, bicycle, and vehicular access zones. o Delineation of public and private commercial use areas. o Pedestrian Priority Street Design including surface treatments, movement and lingering areas, hierarchy and delineation of public and private spaces. o Opportunities for daily, weekly, and seasonal events and gatherings. o Furnishings: paving treatments, planting, lighting, various types and arrangements of seating. o Utilities: power, lighting, heating, water POCs, drainage, street cleaning. o Safety and security, ADA accessibility, vehicle barricades. o Amenities: Restrooms, Bike parking. o Locations and Opportunities for Public art and Street Activation. Timing • Q 1 2024. Deliverables • Preliminary illustrative plans, circulation, and access diagrams for up to four concepts. • Final illustrative plans, circulation and access diagrams, and up to 4 eye -level experience renderings for preferred alternative concepts. Task 3.2 — Access, Circulation, Traffic, Parking, and Curb Impacts and Strategies • As a major component of the Urban Design framework, the CONSULTANT will work with the City and stakeholders to develop strategies and scenarios that strongly contribute to strengthened public life and economic outcomes while also appropriately maintaining or creating access, circulation, off-street parking/loading, and managed curb conditions. • The guiding principles for this task are as follows: o Identify preferred uses for public streets and alleys, with focus on strengthening public life and improving economic, environmental, and quality -of -life outcomes. o Provide appropriate access for service and emergency vehicles — the team will conduct an analysis of what other cities are doing for emergency access of local car -free streets to help inform guiding principles related to this topic. o Make sure there are adequate places to park and plan for proper utilization of other facilities before developing curb usage and management strategies for the California Avenue and Ramona Street scenarios. o Plan for high -quality bicycle and pedestrian networks that are connected, safe, clean, and comfortable. o Integrate transit access particularly to/from VTA bus stops and Caltrain train stations. Professional Services Rev. Dec.15, 2020 Page 24 of 37 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 38 Packet Pg. 192 of 374 DocuSign Envelope ID: 354AE088-777C-406F-B1 B7-543AF69111 C5 Task 3.2.1 — Scenario Evaluation Item 9 Attachment A - Contract C24188179 with Urban Field Studio • CONSULTANT will evaluate traffic and parking impacts for up to two configurations for pedestrianization (vehicular road closure or diet scenarios) in both the California Avenue and Ramona Street areas (four scenarios total). Access to properties and access for pedestrians, bicycles, emergency vehicles, and shuttle and transit riders will be evaluated based on the presence and quality of access routes and locations. Potential vehicular traffic impacts (e.g., traffic expected to be diverted onto residential streets or into congested intersections) will be evaluated using Synchro. Solutions to address potential vehicular traffic impacts (e.g., traffic diversion to contribute to calm residential streets and potentially bike boulevards, improved intersection or corridor design and/or signal coordination/timing, etc...) will also be explored. • This task includes eight study intersections in the California Avenue area, which are: o El Camino Real / College Avenue o El Camino Real / Cambridge Avenue o El Camino Real / California Avenue o El Camino Real / Grant Avenue o Birch Street / Grant Avenue o Birch Street / College Avenue o Park Boulevard / Grant Avenue o Park Boulevard / Oxford Avenue • CONSULTANT will collect Multimodal turning movement count data for each of the intersections listed above, as well as for people riding vs walking their bikes through the California Avenue undercrossing, during weekday AM & PM 2 -hour peak times. • CONSULTANT will focus the traffic analysis related to Ramona Street on evaluating the ability of nearby parallel streets to accommodate traffic volumes without Ramona Street being a part of the vehicular circulation network. • CONSULTANT will obtain pre -pandemic traffic volumes of Ramona Street, as well as pre -pandemic and current traffic volumes for nearby parallel streets from Replica through the consultant access program. Timing • Q2 2024. Deliverables • Summary of Scenario Evaluation: Traffic and Parking Impacts for preferred alternatives (2 alternatives for Cal Ave, 2 alternatives for Ramona Street). Task 3.2.2 — Parking and Curb Management Strategies for Preferred Alternatives • CONSULTANT will work with the City and stakeholders to develop parking and curb management strategies for the preferred scenarios. • CONSULTANT will incorporate potential access impacts (within project boundaries) as well as potential traffic impacts (outside of project boundaries) associated with the preferred scenarios, and strategies to address them, into the updated design brief and final concept alternative presentation. Timing • Q3 2024. Professional Services Rev. Dec.15, 2020 Page 25 of 37 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 39 Packet Pg. 193 of 374 DocuSign Envelope ID: 354AE088-777C-406F-B1 B7-543AF691 11 C5 Item 9 Attachment A - Contract C24188179 with Urban Deliverables Field Studio • Parking and loading strategies for preferred alternatives Integrated into Draft and Final Urban Design Framework. Task 3.3 — Commercial Outdoor Dining Design Standards and Guidelines • CONSULTANT will evaluate existing use of public right-of-way for open streets, parklets, and private outdoor dining on Cal Ave and Ramona Streets, and develop commercial outdoor dining design standards and guidelines that build on the City's recently adopted Permanent Parklet Guidelines and Regulations. • CONSULTANT will highlight relevant findings from best practices research that apply to Palo Alto. • CONSULTANT will develop written and graphic design standards and guidelines for commercial outdoor dining /patios, as informed by the City's recently adopted Permanent Parklet Guidelines and Regulations. • Develop recommendations for a fee/pricing strategy for public and commercial use of the public right-of-way, as informed by the City's recently adopted Permanent Parklet Regulations. • Present draft design standards and guidelines to commission, committee, and boards for recommendation, and the City Council for adoption and incorporation as part of the preferred alternative. Timing • Q2 2024. Deliverables • Design standards and guidelines for commercial outdoor dining on Cal Ave and Ramona Streets; content for presenting draft guidelines to commission, committee, boards, and the City Council. Task 3.4 — Historic Resources • CONSULTANT will review background information on Cal Ave Business District and Ramona Street Historic District and incorporate historic resources design consideration into the Design Brief and Urban Design Framework Plan. Timing • Q3 2024. Deliverables • Incorporate historic resources design considerations into the Design Brief and Urban Design Framework Plan. Task 3.5 — Signage • CONSULTANT will develop a conceptual plan for Pedestrian directional/wayfinding signage and vehicle signage. • CONSULTANT will provide recommendations for wayfinding signage and/or Car -free Streets identification. Timing • Q3 2024. Professional Services Rev. Dec.15, 2020 Page 26 of 37 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 40 Packet Pg. 194 of 374 DocuSign Envelope ID: 354AE088-777C-406F-B1 B7-543AF69111 C5 Item 9 Attachment A - Contract C24188179 with Urban Deliverables Field Studio • Incorporate signage considerations into the Design Brief and Urban Design Framework Plan. Task 3.6 — Legislative Options • CONSULTANT will evaluate and determine the various legislative methods for enacting a permanent street closure, a one-way directional partial street closure, and a seasonal closure, including, but not limited to reviewing and reporting on the Pedestrian Mall Law of 1960. Timing • Q3 2024. Deliverables • Incorporate legislative considerations into the Design Brief and Urban Design Framework Plan. Task 3.7 — Equity and Accessibility • As part of the community engagement process, the CONSULTANT will identify key considerations for universal access, including identifying the potential obstacles or barriers for different communities and user groups to participate in and shape these new public spaces. Equity and Accessibility considerations will be integrated into the project design brief and will be used as fundamental drivers of alternatives evaluation. Timing • Q3 2024. Deliverables • Incorporate equity and accessibility considerations into the Design Brief and Urban Design Framework Plan. Task 3.8 — Equitable Economic Development and Partnership Building • Using best practice research, the CONSULANT will build a case for the project in the design to demonstrate the role that Cal Ave and Ramona Street streets can have on the local economy. • Using case studies from local and national precedents the CONSULTANT team will craft recommendations to establish a strong base of ongoing support and stewardship. Timing • Q3 2024. Deliverables • Incorporate recommendations for equitable economic development and partnership building into the Design Brief and Urban Design Framework Plan. Task 4— Urban Design Framework Task 4.1 — Open Streets Road Map • The Urban Field team will create a roadmap outlining steps to implement the Urban Professional Services Rev. Dec.15, 2020 Page 27 of 37 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 41 Packet Pg. 195 of 374 DocuSign Envelope ID: 354AE088-777C-406F-B1 B7-543AF69111 C5 Item 9 Attachment A - Contract C24188179 with Urban Design Framework including recommendations for strategic investnl Field Studio phasing, organizational structure, and partnerships for maintenance, programming and stewardship. Timing • Q3 2024. Deliverables • Project Implementation Roadmap. Task 4.2 — Funding Strategies and Legislative Approach • CONSULTANT will identify opportunities for public and private funding and recommend a legislative method to implement the preferred option and Plan. Timing • Q3 2024. Deliverables • Funding Strategies and Legislative Approach recommendations integrated into Implementation Plan. Task 4.3 — Ongoing Maintenance and Safety • Based on the site analysis and community engagement, the CONSULTANT will generate recommendations for Cal Ave. and Ramona Street maintenance and public safety, including but not limited to: street cleaning, graffiti abatement, and vehicular and pedestrian lighting recommendations. Timing • Q3 2024. Deliverables • Ongoing Maintenance and Safety recommendations integrated into Implementation Plan. Task 4.4 — Ongoing Operations and Stewardship • CONSULTANT will Identify short and long-term operational needs and management of public realm areas and provide suggestions and recommendations for daily, weekly, and seasonal programming concepts (e.g. parades, festivals, regular -occurring events, permitting events and other opportunities for utilization of the street space). • CONSULTANT will identify potential partner organizations for programming, operations, and stewardship. Timing • Q3 2024. Deliverables • Ongoing Operations & Stewardship recommendations integrated into Implementation Plan. Task 5— Environmental Clearance Review and Recommendations • CONSULTANT will review the final concept alternatives and implementation plan and develop an environmental clearance strategy and roadmap. The environmental clearance Professional Services Rev. Dec.15, 2020 Page 28 of 37 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 42 Packet Pg. 196 of 374 DocuSign Envelope ID: 354AE088-777C-406F-B1 B7-543AF69111 C5 Item 9 Attachment A - Contract C24188179 with Urban strategy may include options to clear exempt portions of the project, Field Studio ual plan at a program -level by tiering -off of existing environmental clearances, ana next steps for project -level clearance. • For project components expected to qualify for exemptions, the CONSULTANT will develop a Notice of Exemption under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and file it on behalf of the City, following direction to do so from City staff. Timing • Q3 2024. Deliverables • Environmental Clearance Strategy document. Task 6 — Project Management and Oversight • At the outset of the project, such as at the kick-off meeting, the CONSULTANT will discuss and establish the final project schedule and rhythm for project updates and check - ins with City Staff. • CONSULTANT will identify the primary point of contact from the consultant and from City Staff. • CONSULTANT may use a variety of tools to track and communicate progress including the Community Engagement memo and a slide deck to share biweekly (every two weeks), project updates, as well as a project budget tracker, to ensure alignment on fee utilization. Task 6.1— Project Kick-off • At project kick-off, City staff and the CONSULTANT will review and agree on the project scope, goals, and objective; the community engagement plan; project timeline, data needs; and team roles and responsibilities. Timing • Q4 2023. Deliverables • Final Scope document and workplan, meeting schedule with target audiences. Task 6.2 — Biweekly Check -ins with City Staff • CONSULTANT will meet with City staff every two weeks, as needed. These meetings may be virtual. Timing • Every two weeks as needed. Deliverables • Meeting agendas, updated project schedule, updated budget spreadsheet, and recorded meeting notes. Professional Services Rev. Dec.15, 2020 Page 29 of 37 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 43 Packet Pg. 197 of 374 DocuSign Envelope ID: 354AE088-777C-406F-B1 B7-543AF69111 C5 Item 9 Attachment A - Contract C24188179 with Urban Field Studio EXHIBIT A-1 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TASK ORDER CONSULTANT shall perform the Services detailed below in accordance with all the terms and conditions of the Agreement referenced in Item 1 below. All exhibits referenced in Item 8 are incorporated into this Task Order by this reference. CONSULTANT shall furnish the necessary facilities, professional, technical and supporting personnel required by this Task Order as described below. CONTRACT NO. OR PURCHASE ORDER REQUISITION NO. (AS APPLICABLE) IA. MASTER AGREEMENT NO. (MAYBE SAME AS CONTRACT /P.O. NO. ABOVE): 1B. TASK ORDER NO.: 2. CONSULTANT NAME: 3. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: START: COMPLETION: 4 TOTAL TASK ORDER PRICE: $ BALANCE REMAINING IN MASTER AGREEMENT/CONTRACT $ 5. BUDGET CODE COST CENTER COST ELEMENT WBS/CIP PHASE 6. CITY PROJECT MANAGER'S NAME & DEPARTMENT: 7. DESCRIPTION OF SCOPE OF SERVICES (Attachment A) MUST INCLUDE: • SERVICES AND DELIVERABLES TO BE PROVIDED • SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE • MAXIMUM COMPENSATION AMOUNT AND RATE SCHEDULE (as applicable) • REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES, if any (with "not to exceed" amount) 8. ATTACHMENTS: A: Task Order Scope of Services B (if any): I hereby authorize the performance of the work described in this Task Order. APPROVED: CITY OF PALO ALTO BY: Name Title Date I hereby acknowledge receipt and acceptance of this Task Order and warrant that I have authority to sign on behalf of Consultant. APPROVED: COMPANY NAME: BY: Name Title Date EXHIBIT B SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE CONSULTANT shall perform the Services so as to complete each milestone within the number of weeks specified below. The time to complete each milestone may be increased or decreased by mutual written agreement of the Project Managers for CONSULTANT and CITY so long as all Professional Services Rev. Dec.15, 2020 Page 30 of 37 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 44 Packet Pg. 198 of 374 DocuSign Envelope ID: 354AE088-777C-406F-B1 B7-543AF69111 C5 Item 9 Attachment A - Contract C24188179 with Urban work is completed within the term of the Agreement. CONSULTANT Sit Field Studio iled schedule of work consistent with the schedule below within 2 weeks of receipt ot the notice to proceed ("NTP") from the CITY. Milestones Completion Number of Weeks (as specified below) from NTP 1. Public Outreach and Engagement 52 weeks 2. Research and Analysis 12 weeks 3. Urban Design Framework 36 weeks 4. Implementation Plan 4 weeks 5. Environmental Clearance 4 weeks 6. Project Management 52 weeks 7. 8. 9. 10. ® Optional Schedule of Performance Provision for On -Call or Additional Services Agreements. (This provision only applies if checked and only applies to on -call agreements per Section 1 or agreements with Additional Services per Section 4.) The schedule of performance shall be as provided in the approved Task Order, as detailed in Section 1 (Scope of Services) in the case of on -call Services, or as detailed in Section 4 in the case of Additional Services, provided in all cases that the schedule of performance shall fall within the term as provided in Section 2 (Term) of this Agreement. Professional Services Rev. Dec.15, 2020 Page 31 of 37 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 45 Packet Pg. 199 of 374 DocuSign Envelope ID: 354AE088-777C-406F-B1 B7-543AF691 11 C5 EXHIBIT C COMPENSATION Item 9 Attachment A - Contract C24188179 with Urban Field Studio CITY agrees to compensate CONSULTANT for Services performed in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement, and as set forth in the budget schedule below. Compensation shall be calculated based on the rate schedule attached as Exhibit C-1 up to the not to exceed budget amount for each task set forth below. CITY's Project Manager may approve in writing the transfer of budget amounts between any of the tasks or categories listed below, provided that the total compensation for the Services, including any specified reimbursable expenses, and the total compensation for Additional Services (if any, per Section 4 of the Agreement) do not exceed the amounts set forth in Section 4 of this Agreement. CONSULTANT agrees to complete all Services, any specified reimbursable expenses, and Additional Services (if any, per Section 4), within this/these amount(s). Any work performed or expenses incurred for which payment would result in a total exceeding the maximum amount of compensation set forth in this Agreement shall be at no cost to the CITY. BUDGET SCHEDULE TASK NOT TO EXCEED AMOUNT Task 1 (Public Outreach and Engagement Strategy) $94,057 Task 2 (Research & Analysis) $38,564 Task 3 Urban Design Framework $128,304 Task 4 Implementation Plan $40,832 Task 5 Environmental Clearance $8,594 Task 6 (Project Management) $39,640 Sub -total for Services $349,991 Reimbursable Expenses (if any) 0 Total for Services and Reimbursable Expenses $34,999 Additional Services (if any, per Section 4) $ 34,999 Maximum Total Compensation $384,990 REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES CONSULTANT'S ordinary business expenses, such as administrative, overhead, administrative support time/overtime, information systems, software and hardware, photocopying, telecommunications (telephone, internet), in-house printing, insurance and other ordinary business expenses, are included within the scope of payment for Services and are not reimbursable expenses hereunder. Professional Services Rev. Dec.15, 2020 Page 32 of 37 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 46 Packet Pg. 200 of 374 DocuSign Envelope ID: 354AE088-777C-406F-B1 B7-543AF69111 C5 Item 9 Attachment A - Contract C24188179 with Urban Field Studio Reimbursable expenses, if any are specified as reimbursable under is section, w11 be reimbursed at actual cost. The expenses (by type, e.g. travel) for which CONSULTANT will be reimbursed are: NONE up to the not -to -exceed amount of: $0.00. A. Travel outside the San Francisco Bay Area, including transportation and meals, if specified as reimbursable, will be reimbursed at actual cost subject to the City of Palo Alto's policy for reimbursement of travel and meal expenses. B. Long distance telephone service charges, cellular phone service charges, facsimile transmission and postage charges, if specified as reimbursable, will be reimbursed at actual cost. All requests for reimbursement of expenses, if any are specified as reimbursable under this section, shall be accompanied by appropriate backup documentation and information. Professional Services Rev. Dec.15, 2020 Page 33 of 37 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 47 Packet Pg. 201 of 374 DocuSign Envelope ID: 354AE088-777C-406F-B1 B7-543AF69111 C5 Item 9 Attachment A - Contract C24188179 with Urban EXHIBIT C-1 Field Studio SCHEDULE OF RATES CONSULTANT'S schedule of rates is as follows: Professional Services Rev. Dec.15, 2020 Page 35 of 37 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 48 Packet Pg. 202 of 374 DocuSign Envelope ID: 354AE088-777C-406F-B1 B7-543AF691 11 C5 Item 9 Attachment A - Contract 024188179 with Urban Field Studio RATE SCHEDULE (Rates effective through 12/31/2024) Charges for Services: Charges for basic and additional services shall be based on the following rates and are subject to revision annually: Principal -In -Charge: $250.00 per hour Consulting Principal: $205.00 per hour Urban Designer: $185.00 per hour Senior Designer: $150.00 per hour Consultant's Time: 1.15 times consultant's charges Automobile Travel: Prevailing IRS allowance Reimbursable Expenses/ Reproduction Costs: 1.15 times charge All other costs: Direct reimbursement Reimbursable Expenses: Reimbursable Expenses are in addition to the compensation for basic and additional services and include actual expenditures made by Urban Field Studio or its professional consultants in the interest of the Project for the expenses listed in the following subparagraphs: 1. Expense of transportation, including rental car insurance (loss damage waiver/ collision damage waiver and liability coverage), and living when traveling in connection with the Project; conference call services, and fees paid for securing approval of authorities having jurisdiction over the project. 2. Expense of reproductions including computer plotting, postage, overnight priority mail and handling of Drawings and Specifications. 3. If authorized in advance by the Owner, expense of overtime work requiring higher than regular rates and expense of renderings or models for the Owner's use. URBAN FIELD STUDIO 415.350.8257 john@urbanfieldstudio.com www.urbanfieldstudio.com Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 49 Packet Pg. 203 of 374 DocuSign Envelope ID: 354AE088-777C-406F-B1 B7-543AF69111 C5 Item 9 Attachment A - Contract C24188179 with Urban EXHIBIT D Field Studio INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS CONSULTANTS TO THE CITY OF PALO ALTO (CITY), AT THEIR SOLE EXPENSE, SHALL FOR THE TERM OF THE CONTRACT OBTAIN AND MAINTAIN INSURANCE IN THE AMOUNTS FOR THE COVERAGE SPECIFIED BELOW, AFFORDED BY COMPANIES WITH AM BEST'S KEY RATING OF A -:VII, OR HIGHER, LICENSED OR AUTHORIZED TO TRANSACT INSURANCE BUSINESS IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. AWARD IS CONTINGENT ON C()MPT.TANCF. WITH CITY'S TNSTTRANCF. RFOTTTRFMFNTS AS SPECIFIED HFRFTN_ MINIMUM LIMITS REQUIRED TYPE OF COVERAGE REQUIREMENT EACH OCCURRENCE AGGREGATE YES WORKER'S COMPENSATION STATUTORY STATUTORY STATUTORY YES EMPLOYER'S LIABILITY STATUTORY YES GENERAL LIABILITY, INCLUDING BODILY INJURY $1,000,000 $1,000,000 PERSONAL INJURY, BROAD FORM PROPERTY DAMAGE $1,000,000 $1,000,000 PROPERTY DAMAGE BLANKET CONTRACTUAL, AND FIRE LEGAL BODILY INJURY & PROPERTY $1,000,000 $1,000,000 LIABILITY DAMAGE COMBINED. BODILY INJURY $1,000,000 $1,000,000 - EACH PERSON $1,000,000 $1,000,000 YES AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY, - EACH OCCURRENCE $1,000,000 $1,000,000 INCLUDING ALL OWNED, HIRED, PROPERTY DAMAGE $1,000,000 $1,000,000 NON -OWNED BODILY INJURY AND PROPERTY $1,000,000 $1,000,000 DAMAGE, COMBINED YES PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY, INCLUDING, ERRORS AND OMISSIONS, MALPRACTICE (WHEN ALL DAMAGES $1,000,000 APPLICABLE), AND NEGLIGENT PERFORMANCE YES THE CITY OF PALO ALTO IS TO BE NAMED AS AN ADDITIONAL INSURED: CONSULTANT, AT ITS SOLE COST AND EXPENSE, SHALL OBTAIN AND MAINTAIN, IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE TERM OF ANY RESULTANT AGREEMENT, THE INSURANCE COVERAGE HEREIN DESCRIBED, INSURING NOT ONLY CONSULTANT AND ITS SUBCONSULTANTS, IF ANY, BUT ALSO, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION, EMPLOYER'S LIABILITY AND PROFESSIONAL INSURANCE, NAMING AS ADDITIONAL INSUREDS CITY, ITS COUNCIL MEMBERS, OFFICERS, AGENTS, AND EMPLOYEES. I. INSURANCE COVERAGE MUST INCLUDE: A. A CONTRACTUAL LIABILITY ENDORSEMENT PROVIDING INSURANCE COVERAGE FOR CONSULTANT'S AGREEMENT TO INDEMNIFY CITY. II. THE CONSULTANT MUST SUBMIT CERTIFICATES(S) OF INSURANCE EVIDENCING REQUIRED COVERAGE AT THE FOLLOWING URL: HTTP://WWW.OPENGOV.COM III. ENDORSEMENT PROVISIONS WITH RESPECT TO THE INSURANCE AFFORDED TO ADDITIONAL INSUREDS: A. PRIMARY COVERAGE WITH RESPECT TO CLAIMS ARISING OUT OF THE OPERATIONS OF THE NAMED INSURED, INSURANCE AS AFFORDED BY THIS POLICY IS PRIMARY AND IS NOT ADDITIONAL TO OR CONTRIBUTING WITH ANY OTHER INSURANCE CARRIED BY OR FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE ADDITIONAL INSUREDS. Professional Services Rev. Dec.15, 2020 Page 36 of 37 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 50 Packet Pg. 204 of 374 DocuSign Envelope ID: 354AE088-777C-406F-B1 B7-543AF691 11 C5 C. CROSS LIABILITY Item 9 Attachment A - Contract C24188179 with Urban Field Studio THE NAMING OF MORE THAN ONE PERSON, FIRM, OR CORPORATION AS INSUREDS UNDER THE POLICY SHALL NOT, FOR THAT REASON ALONE, EXTINGUISH ANY RIGHTS OF THE INSURED AGAINST ANOTHER, BUT THIS ENDORSEMENT, AND THE NAMING OF MULTIPLE INSUREDS, SHALL NOT INCREASE THE TOTAL LIABILITY OF THE COMPANY UNDER THIS POLICY. NOTICE OF CANCELLATION IF THE POLICY IS CANCELED BEFORE ITS EXPIRATION DATE FOR ANY REASON OTHER THAN THE NON-PAYMENT OF PREMIUM, THE CONSULTANT SHALL PROVIDE CITY AT LEAST A THIRTY (30) DAY WRITTEN NOTICE BEFORE THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF CANCELLATION. 2. IF THE POLICY IS CANCELED BEFORE ITS EXPIRATION DATE FOR THE NON-PAYMENT OF PREMIUM, THE CONSULTANT SHALL PROVIDE CITY AT LEAST A TEN (10) DAY WRITTEN NOTICE BEFORE THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF CANCELLATION. IV. EVIDENCE OF INSURANCE AND OTHER RELATED NOTICES ARE REQUIRED TO BE FILED WITH THE CITY OF PALO ALTO AT THE FOLLOWING URL: HTTP://WWW.OPENGOV.COM Professional Services Rev. Dec.15, 2020 Page 37 of 37 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 51 Packet Pg. 205 of 374 *NOT YET APPROVED* Ordinance No. Item 9 Attachment B - Interim Ordinance Temporarily Continuing Expansion of )utdoor Dining Retail and Other Activities until Interim Ordinance of the Council of the City of Palo Alto TemL December312024 Continuing the Expansion of Outdoor Dining, Retail and Other Activities on Public and Private Property and Relaxing Regulations Regarding Onsite Parking, On -Sale of Alcohol, Design/Architectural Review, Permit Fees, and Alcohol Consumption in Public Places, All to Facilitate Such Outdoor Use The Council of the City of Palo Alto ORDAINS as follows: SECTION 1. Findings and Declarations. The City Council finds and declares as follows: A. On June 23, 2020, the City Council adopted Ordinance 5500, an emergency ordinance, in response to COVID-19 and its effects on local businesses. At that time and since then, county and state regulations related to COVID-19 have limited or curtailed many indoor activities, including dining, bars, retail, performances, and other recreational uses. B. In June 2021, the City Council adopted Ordinance 5526, which amended and restated Ordinance 5500 on a non -emergency basis (among other changes). C. On November 8, 2022, the City Council adopted Ordinance 5533, which amended and restated Ordinance 5526 with a sunset date of June 30, 2022. D. In May 2022, the City Council adopted Ordinance 5551, which amended and restated Ordinance 5533 to extend its provisions through December 31, 2022. E. In October and November 2022, the City Council adopted Ordinance 5572, which amended and restated Ordinance 5551 to extend its parklet provisions through June 30, 2023 and the remainder of its provisions through December 31, 2023. F. In May 2023, the City Council adopted Ordinance 5584 to extend the parklet provisions of this ordinance until March 31, 2024. The remainder of the ordinance will sunset on December 31, 2023 as previously adopted. G. The City Council now desires to amend and restate Ordinance 5584 to extend the on - street dining provisions of this ordinance until December 31, 2024. The remainder of the ordinance will sunset on the dates as previously adopted. SECTION 2. City Manager Authorization The City Manager or his or her designee(s) may promulgate guidelines and implementing regulations for the uses and programs described in this Ordinance as long as such regulations do not conflict with this Ordinance. 20231024 ts24 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 52 Packet Pg. 206 of 374 *NOT YET APPROVED* SECTION 3. Fee Waivers for Encroachment Permits and Parking Space U Item 9 Attachment B - Interim Ordinance Temporarily Continuing Expansion of Other Activities until December 312024 The permit fees set forth in the Municipal Fee Schedule are teftiiaiiiy vvaivcd for applications for encroachment permits under Palo Alto Municipal Code Section 12.12.010 and Section 12.12.020, as modified by this Ordinance, to place structures and equipment in the public right-of-way (including closed streets and sidewalks) for purposes of outdoor dining and outdoor retail sales and display of wares. B. The parking space closure fee in the Municipal Fee Schedule collected by the Department of Planning and Development Services is temporarily waived for the use of a parking space(s) on -street or in a parking lot for purposes of outdoor dining and outdoor retail sales and display of wares as authorized through an encroachment permit, license, or agreement with the City. SECTION 4. Modified Review Process for Commercial Sidewalk Encroachment Permits Notwithstanding contrary provisions of PAMC Section 12.12.020, permits may be granted for commercial sidewalk encroachments for outdoor retail sales and display areas and outdoor eating areas. Permits for these purposes shall not be required to undergo and complete design review by the Planning Department described in subsection (d) of Section 12.12.020. Except as expressly modified herein, the provisions of Section 12.12.020 shall apply to commercial sidewalk encroachments. SECTION 5. Eating and Drinking Establishments Eating establishments, and drinking establishments may temporarily relocate some or all of their existing indoor seating capacity to outdoor seating capacity, as follows: A. Location. Outdoor eating areas may be placed in one or more of the following areas: 1. Public streets temporarily closed by the City of Palo Alto, through issuance of an encroachment permit under PAMC Section 12.12.010; 2. Sidewalks through issuance of an encroachment permit under PAMC Section 12.12.020, as modified by Section 4 of this Ordinance; 3. In on -street parking spaces approved for use as temporary parklets, in accordance with the Pilot Parklet Demonstration Project as first approved by Council Resolution No. 9909 and continued by subsequent resolutions; 4. Surface parking lots that currently provide required onsite parking for the eating/drinking establishment, through issuance of an approval by the Director of Planning, or his or her designee, as described in subsections C and D of this Section, below; 20231024 ts24 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 53 Packet Pg. 207 of 374 Item 9 *NOT YET APPROVED* Attachment B - Interim Ordinance Temporarily Continuing Expansion of Outdoor Dining Retail and 5. Other outdoor areas on the eating/drinking establishmen Other Activities until ally permitted for outdoor seating in the establishment'December 312024 s approved ing entitlement (such as landscaped areas), through issuance of an approval by the Director of Planning, or his or her designee, in accordance with subsections C and D of this Section, below; and 6. In other areas that the Council identifies by resolution or ordinance. B. Use of Private Parking Lots —Temporary Reduction of Parking Requirements. 1. Notwithstanding the parking requirements applicable to eating/drinking establishments in Title 18 (Zoning) of the PAMC or in individual planning entitlements or approvals for eating/drinking establishments, an eating/drinking establishment may place outdoor eating areas in its parking lot, so long as at least half of the parking spaces on the subject site remain available for use by vehicles. If the establishment's parking lot has ten or fewer parking spaces, up to 100 percent of the parking lot may be used for outdoor eating, subject to review and approval of the Planning Director or his or her designee. 2. Notwithstanding the parking requirements applicable to shopping centers and their tenant businesses in Title 18 (Zoning) of the PAMC or in individual planning entitlements or approvals for shopping centers or their tenant businesses, a shopping center with an eating/drinking establishment tenant(s) may place outdoor eating areas for such tenant business(es) in the shopping center parking lot, so long as at least half of the parking spaces on the subject site remain available for use by vehicles. C. Application. An application in a form approved by the Director of Planning shall be submitted to the Planning and Development Services Department to relocate some or all of an eating/drinking establishment's permitted indoor restaurant seating to outdoor seating in privately -owned areas on the eating/drinking establishment site not originally permitted for outdoor eating. The Director of Planning is authorized to establish submittal requirements and procedures. Temporary Use Permits (TUP) under PAMC Section 18.42.050 may be utilized for this purpose. A TUP issued for this purpose may be valid for a specified period longer than 45 days, notwithstanding subsection (d) of Section 18.42.050. The Planning Director may extend a TUP issued prior to the effective date of this Ordinance to be valid beyond 45 days. D. Seating Layout Review. A Seating Layout Review is required to relocate some or all of an eating/drinking establishment's permitted indoor seating to outdoor seating in privately - owned areas on the eating/drinking establishment site not originally permitted for outdoor eating. The Seating Layout Review shall be conducted by a transportation planner, planner, and/or fire inspector who will review and either approve or require modifications to the proposed outdoor seating layout based on the following criteria: 20231024 ts24 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 54 Packet Pg. 208 of 374 *NOT YET APPROVED* Item 9 Attachment B - Interim Ordinance Temporarily Continuing Expansion of )utdoor Dining Retail and 1. Seating layout does not create a safety risk and adequate pedi Other Activities until lar Dece separation is maintained, including with movable barriers u ,u u 2024 ere outdoor seating is to be placed in parking lots or on -street parking spaces. 2. Seating layout accommodates appropriate vehicle and pedestrian circulation and maintains adequate paths of travel and complies with accessibility requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. 3. Any tents must comply with fire codes and Palo Alto Fire Department issued standards for tents, and safety standards set forth by the National Fire Protection Association for fire-resistant tents and must include an affixed manufacturer's label stating the tent meets NFPA requirements. A State Fire Marshal seal on the tent or a certificate is needed to prove treatment. 4. Any heaters must comply with fire codes. 5. An adequate and visible barrier is placed that clearly separates the retail area from the parking area and provides sufficient protection for patrons. Adequacy shall be defined in standards and guidelines issued by the Director of Planning. 6. Other requirements established in the standards and guidelines issued by the Director of Planning. E. Fee. No fee will be charged for submittal and review of the Application and for conducting a Seating Layout Review. F. Occupancy. Total seating occupancy (including all indoor and outdoor seating) shall not exceed the overall occupancy for which the restaurant is permitted. G. Alcohol Service. Establishments that are allowed by the City to serve alcohol for onsite consumption by issuance of a conditional use permit ("CUP") as required by PAMC Section 18.42.090 or as a legal nonconforming use, and that both have an on -sale license from the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control ("ABC") and are duly authorized by ABC to serve alcohol in outdoor areas, shall be allowed to serve alcohol for onsite consumption in such outdoor areas, notwithstanding any prohibition on outdoor alcohol service or consumption in the PAMC or planning entitlement issued under Title 18 (Zoning) of the PAMC. During the effective period of this Ordinance, establishments that meet the preceding requirements may expand their footprint to outdoor areas without an amendment of the CUP, notwithstanding PAMC Section 18.42.090(c). Outdoor alcohol service shall be in full compliance with ABC regulations, as amended. 20231024 ts24 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 55 Packet Pg. 209 of 374 Item 9 *NOT YET APPROVED* Attachment B- Interim Ordinance Temporarily Continuing Expansion of H. No Architectural Review. Notwithstanding PAMC Sections 18.7 Outdoor Dining Retail and 20 architectural review shall not be required for proposed outdoor a Other Activities until age related to such areas during the effective period of this Ordinance. December312o24 SECTION 6. Retail Establishments Retail establishments may temporarily relocate some or all of their existing customer -accessible square footage to outdoor spaces as follows: 0 Location. Outdoor retail sales and display areas and outdoor eating areas may be placed in one or more of the following areas: 1. Public streets temporarily closed by the City of Palo Alto, through issuance of an encroachment permit under PAMC Section 12.12.010; 2. Sidewalks through issuance of an encroachment permit under PAMC Section 12.12.020, as modified by Section 4 of this Ordinance; 3. Surface parking lots that currently provide required onsite parking for the retail establishment, through issuance of an approval by the Director of Planning, or his or her designee, as described in subsections C and D of this Section, below; 4. Other outdoor areas on the retail establishment site not originally permitted for retail sales and display or dining in the retail establishment's approved site plan or planning entitlement (such as landscaped areas), through issuance of an approval by the Director of Planning or his or her designee in accordance with subsections C and D of this Section, below; and 5. In other areas that the Council identifies by resolution or ordinance. Use of Private Parking Lots — Temaorary Reduction of Parking Reauirements. 1. Notwithstanding the parking requirements applicable to retail establishments in Title 18 (Zoning) of the PAMC or in individual planning entitlements or approvals for retail establishments, a retail establishment may conduct outdoor retail sales and display and may place outdoor eating areas in its parking lot, so long as at least half of the parking spaces on the subject site remain available for use by vehicles. If the establishment's parking lot has ten or fewer parking spaces, up to 100 percent of the parking lot may be used for outdoor dining/retail, subject to review and approval of the Planning Director or his or her designee. 2. Notwithstanding the parking requirements applicable to shopping centers and their tenant businesses in Title 18 (Zoning) of the PAMC or in individual planning entitlements or approvals for shopping centers or their tenant businesses, a shopping 20231024 ts24 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 56 Packet Pg. 210 of 374 Item 9 *NOT YET APPROVED* Attachment B - Interim Ordinance Temporarily Continuing Expansion of center with a retail establishment tenant(s) may place outdoor Outdoor Dining Retail and lay areas and outdoor eating areas for such tenant business(es) iLDece,mb Other Activities until ter parking lot, so long as at least half of the parking spaces on ter 312024 ain available for use by vehicles. C. Application. An application in a form approved by the Director of Planning shall be submitted to the Planning and Development Services Department to relocate some or all of a retail establishment's customer -accessible square footage to outdoor retail sales and display in privately -owned areas on the retail establishment site not originally permitted for outdoor retail sales and display. The Director of Planning is authorized to establish submittal requirements and procedures. Temporary Use Permits (TUP) under PAMC Section 18.42.050 may be utilized for this purpose. A TUP issued for this purpose may be valid for a specified period longer than 45 days, notwithstanding subsection (d) of Section 18.42.050. The Planning Director may extend a TUP issued prior to the effective date of this Ordinance to be valid beyond 45 days. D. Merchandise or Seating Layout Review. A Layout Review is required to relocate some or all of an retail establishment's permitted indoor customer -accessible square footage to privately -owned areas on the retail establishment site not originally permitted for retail. The Layout Review shall be conducted by a transportation planner, planner, and/or fire inspector who will review and either approve or require modifications to the proposed retail layout based on the following criteria: 1. The placement of the merchandise, displays, or other items does not create a safety risk and adequate pedestrian and vehicular separation is maintained, including with movable barriers as appropriate where outdoor seating is to be placed in parking lots or on -street parking spaces. 2. The layout accommodates appropriate vehicle and pedestrian circulation and maintains adequate paths of travel and complies with accessibility requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. 3. Any tents must comply with fire codes and Palo Alto Fire Department issued standards for tents, and safety standards set forth by the National Fire Protection Association for fire-resistant tents and must include an affixed manufacturer's label stating the tent meets NFPA requirements. A State Fire Marshal seal on the tent or a certificate is needed to prove treatment. 4. Any heaters must comply with fire codes. An adequate and visible barrier is placed that clearly separates the retail area from the parking area and provides sufficient protection for patrons. Adequacy shall be defined in standards and guidelines issued by the Director of Planning. 20231024 ts24 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 57 Packet Pg. 211 of 374 Item 9 *NOT YET APPROVED* Attachment B - Interim Ordinance Temporarily Continuing Expansion of 6. Other requirements established in the standards and guidelines I0utdoor Dining Retail and for of Planning. Other Activities until December 31 2024 E. Fee. No fee will be charged for submittal and review of the Application and for conducting a Layout Review. F. No Architectural Review. Notwithstanding PAMC Sections 18.77.077 and 18.76.020, architectural review shall not be required for proposed outdoor retail areas or signage related to such areas during the effective period of this Ordinance. SECTION 7. Compliance with Other Regulations, Orders and Approvals The uses of public and private property allowed in this Ordinance shall be conducted in compliance with any applicable state or county mandate (including executive orders and health orders), this Ordinance, Resolution No. 9909 and its successors, and all other local and state regulations, orders, and approvals, as applicable (collectively, "Applicable Law"). Any approval, allowance or permit to conduct such temporary outdoor use(s) shall be subject to revocation by the issuing City official if the use is conducted in violation of Applicable Law, or poses a threat to public health, safety or welfare. SECTION 8. No Vested Rights The outdoor uses of public and private property allowed in this Ordinance are temporary and shall be terminated upon the earlier of the date stated in the applicable permit/approval or the expiration of this interim Ordinance, unless earlier revoked by the City Manager or other authorized official (or their designee) or terminated by action of the City Council. The City may discontinue one or more, or all, of the allowed outdoor uses at any time if the City Manager or designee determines that the public health, safety or welfare warrant such action. Nothing in this Ordinance shall establish a vested right. SECTION 9. Suspension of Prohibition on Alcohol Consumption in Lytton Plaza and Cogswell Plaza Notwithstanding PAMC Sections 22.04.330 and 22.04.331, the City Manager is authorized to suspend the prohibition on consumption of alcoholic beverages in the parking lots adjacent to Lytton Plaza and Cogswell Plaza. SECTION 10. Use of City Parking Lots for Reopening Activities A. The City Manager, or his or her designee ("City Manager"), is authorized to permit outdoor dining, retail and other activities necessary to facilitate the reopening of businesses, in public parking lots owned by the City, subject to the City Manager's adoption of rules, regulations, guidelines, and standards for such use ("Regulations"), and publication of such Regulations on the City's website. Use of parking lots, or portions 20231024 ts24 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 58 Packet Pg. 212 of 374 Item 9 *NOT YET APPROVED* Attachment B - Interim Ordinance Temporarily Continuing Expansion of thereof, by a business shall require a license or other agreement, in Outdoor Dining Retail andlent to indemnify and hold harmless the City, and provision of insuranc4 Other Activities until December 312024 B. The City Manager is authorized to waive any fee in the Municipal Fee Schedule associated with the temporary use of parking areas for the purposes identified in Section A above. C. Notwithstanding PAMC Section 9.04.020, the City Manager is authorized to suspend the prohibition on consumption of alcoholic beverages in any City owned parking lot. SECTION 11. Personal Services, Indoor Recreation and Other Uses The authorized outdoor uses of public and private spaces authorized in this Ordinance may be applied to personal services, indoor recreation and other uses. Prior to authorizing these additional activities to occur, the City Manager, or his or her designee ("City Manager"), shall adopt rules, regulations, guidelines, and standards for these uses, and publish them on the City's website. SECTION 12. Severability If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this Ordinance and each and every section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase not declared invalid or unconstitutional without regard to whether any portion of the Ordinance would be subsequently declared invalid or unconstitutional. SECTION 13. Environmental Review The Council finds that the Ordinance is categorically exempt from CEQA under CEQA Guidelines Sections 15301 (existing facilities) and 15304(e) (minor temporary use of land having negligible or no permanent effects on the environment). SECTION 14. Effective Date This Ordinance shall be effective 31 days after adoption. Subject to future Council action, the provisions of this ordinance allowing eating and drinking establishments, retail establishments, and other uses on temporarily closed streets in Sections 5, 6, and 11 of this Ordinance shall remain in effect until December 31, 2024. The remainder of the provisions in sections 5, 6, 10, and 11, including those provisions allowing parklets, shall remain in effect until March 31, 2024. SECTION 15. Uncodified This Ordinance shall not be codified. 20231024 ts24 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 59 Packet Pg. 213 of 374 *NOT YET APPROVED* SECTION 16. Supercedes Ordinance 5584. As of the effective date of this Ordinance, this Ordinance shall supercede any conflict shall be resolved in favor of this Ordinance. INTRODUCED: PASSED: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTENTIONS: NOT PARTICIPATING: ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Assistant City Attorney Mayor APPROVED: City Manager r � Item 9 Attachment B - Interim Ordinance Temporarily Continuing Expansion of Outdoor Dining Retail and Other Activities until December 31 2024 Director of Public Works Director of Planning & Development Services and 20231024 ts24 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 60 Packet Pg. 214 of 374 *NOT YET ADOPTED* Resolution No. Item 9 ,ttachment C - Resolution authorizing City Manager toTemporarily Close a Portion of California Avenue Until December Resolution of the Council of the City of Palo Alto Extending the Cit v 31, 2024 Authority to Temporary Close a Portion of California Avenue Pursuant to California Vehicle Code Section 21101 to Facilitate Outdoor Dining, Retail, and Other Uses A. On June 23, 2020, the Council adopted Resolution No. 9909 approving the temporary closure of portions of California Avenue, University Avenue and certain other Downtown streets through Labor Day 2020 to allow for outdoor dining and retail on those streets, consistent with the Santa Clara County Public Health Order in effect. The street closures were part of a Summer Streets Program initiated by the City to accommodate outdoor uses at a time when indoor dining remained prohibited in the County and the growing scientific evidence showed a lower risk of COVID-19 transmission outdoors compared to indoors. At that time, the City anticipated that indoor dining would be allowed to resume in the County, as had been allowed in neighboring counties, and sought to address the immediate needs of the community including residents, workers and businesses that had been severely impacted by loss of business activity and revenue. B. Through Resolution No. 9909 the Council also approved a temporary pilot parklet program to allow parklets to be installed in on -street parking spaces on an expedited and temporary basis to provide more space for outdoor dining. C. On July 2, 2020, the County Public Health Officer issued a revised Shelter in Place Order, to become effective on July 13, 2020, that allowed certain additional activities to resume if specified strict across-the-board risk reduction measures were followed. The objective was to allow activities that were already allowed in surrounding jurisdictions, which had reopened more quickly than Santa Clara County, so long as the prescribed risk reduction measures were followed. D. On July 7, 2020, the State approved Santa Clara County's requested variance that allowed the revised Shelter in Place Order to go into effect on July 13, 2020. E. However, with the number of COVID-19 cases dramatically increasing again in the State, on July 13, 2020, the Governor announced a sweeping roll back of the reopening that the State had allowed. The State mandated that all counties close certain indoor operations, including in -restaurant dining. For counties on the State's monitoring list for 3 consecutive days (and thus placed on the State "watchlist"), the State required the closure of additional industries or activities unless they could be modified to operate outside or by pick-up; these included gyms and fitness centers, places of worship and cultural ceremonies, personal care services, hair salons and barbershops, and shopping malls. 1 20231024_ts24 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 61 Packet Pg. 215 of 374 Item 9 ttachment C - Resolution *NOT YET ADOPTED* Authorizing City Manager toTemporarily Close a F. Through the summer, the United States including "hot Portion of California nia continued to hit new highs in confirmed cases and deaths, as the looseni Avenue Until December ace restrictions had precipitated a resurgence of the virus in many states, inclu 31, 2024 s of July 27, 2020, the State was averaging nearly 10,000 new COVID-19 cases per day, and hospitals and their intensive care units were filling up. Thirty-seven counties representing 93% of the State's population were on the State's watchlist, and California had 460,550 confirmed cases of COVID-19, resulting in 8,445 deaths. G. On August 10, 2020, the Council adopted Resolution No. 9911, which amended Resolution 9909, to extend until December 31, 2020 the temporary closure of portions of California Avenue and University Avenue and certain intersecting streets to allow for continued use of these areas in the heart of the City's commercial districts to allow for outdoor dining and potentially other activities as may be allowed by State and County Public Health Orders. Resolution No. 9911 also extended the temporary parklet program to September 7, 2021. H. Since August 2020, the County Public Health Officer issued a Risk Reduction Order on October 5, 2020, which coincided with the County moving into the orange tier under the State's "Blueprint for a Safer Economy" tiered restriction system. I. However, on November 16, 2020, the State moved Santa Clara County two steps from the orange/moderate tier to the purple/widespread tier (the highest risk tier) due to a sharp increase in COVID-19 cases statewide. On that date, the County reported 388 new cases of COVID-19, bringing the cumulative total to 28,686. As of November 17, 2020, California reported 1,029,235 confirmed cases of COVID-19, resulting in 18,263 deaths, and 94.1% of the State's population was now in the purple tier (according to the Governor's Office). The State's rules for the purple/widespread tier mandate that restaurants and gyms cannot have indoor service and retail stores may only have 25% capacity indoors. J. On December 14, 2020, the Council adopted Resolution 9933, which amended Resolution 9099, to extend until May 31, 2021 the temporary closure of portions of California Avenue and University Avenue and certain intersecting streets to allow for continued use of these areas in the heart of the City's commercial districts to allow for outdoor dining and potentially other activities as may be allowed by State and County Public Health Orders. K. On March 3, 2021, the State moved Santa Clara County one step down from the purple/widespread tier to the red/substantial tier. As of March 16, 2021, the County reported a cumulative total of 112,909 COVID cases and 1,867 deaths. L. On May 10, 2021, the Council adopted Resolution 9954, which further amended Resolution 9099 to extend until October 31, 2021 the temporary closure of portions of California Avenue and University Avenue and certain intersecting streets to allow for continued use of these areas in the heart of the City's commercial districts to allow for outdoor dining and potentially other activities as may be allowed by State and County Public Health Orders. 2 20231024_ts24 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 62 Packet Pg. 216 of 374 Item 9 *NOT YET ADOPTED* ttachment C - Resolution Authorizing City Manager toTemporarily Close a M. On June 7, 2021, the Council adopted Resolution 9962. Res Portion ofCalifornia ed and restated Section 4 of Resolution 9909 regarding the pilot parklet Avenue Until December on - 31, 2024 emergency basis. N. On June 15, 2021, the State of California eliminated the Blueprint for a Safer Economy system of COVID-related rules and restrictions (also known as the color -tier system) amidst improvements in public health data and increasing availability of the COVID vaccine. The City of Palo Alto rescinded its declaration of local emergency on July 1, 2021. O. On September 13, 2021 the Council voted to extend the street closures of portions of California Avenue and Ramona Street through June 30, 2022 to allow for the continued use of these streets for outdoor dining and other activities as may be allowed. The Council voted on each street separately and Resolution 9987 extended the closure of California Avenue only; a separate resolution (no. 9988) extended the closure of Ramona Street. At the same meeting, the Council directed the City Manager to open the portion of University Avenue which was closed by Resolution 9909 and its successors on October 15, 2021. P. On May 16, 2022, the City Council adopted Resolution 10040, which amended and restated Resolution 9987 to continue its provisions until December 31, 2023. Q. The City Council now desires to continue the provisions of Resolution 10040 until December 31, 2024. NOW THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALO ALTO RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Findings and Declarations. The Council hereby adopts the above Recitals as findings of the Council. SECTION 2. Supersedes Resolution 10040. This Resolution shall supersede Resolution 10040, which is rescinded as of the effective date of this Resolution. SECTION 3. Extension of Temporary Street Closure A. The following street is hereby closed to any and all vehicular traffic through December 31, 2023, in accordance with California Vehicle Code Section 21101(e), to facilitate the temporary uses of outdoor dining, retail, and other permitted uses: 1. California Avenue from Birch Street to El Camino Real. B. The City Manager is authorized to determine the days, hours and duration of the temporary street closure(s) within the period specified in Section A, with reasonable notice provided, and whether exceptions to the closure 3 20231024_ts24 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 63 Packet Pg. 217 of 374 Item 9 ttachment C - Resolution *NOT YET ADOPTED* Authorizing City Manager toTemporarily Close a shall be made for municipal purposes. The City Man Portion ofCalifornia zed to close only part of the street authorized for closur Avenue Until December 31, 2024 SECTION 4. The Council finds that this Resolution is categorically exempt from CEQA under CEQA Guidelines Sections 15301 (existing facilities) and 15304(e) (minor temporary use of land having negligible or no permanent effects on the environment). SECTION 5. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon adoption. INTRODUCED: PASSED: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTENTIONS: ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED: Assistant City Attorney City Manager Director of Public Works Chief Transportation Official Director of Planning and Development Services 4 20231024_ts24 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 64 Packet Pg. 218 of 374 *NOT YET ADOPTED* Resolution No. Item 9 Attachment D - Resolution Authorizing City Manager to Temporarily Close a Portion of Ramona Street Resolution of the Council of the City of Palo Alto Extending the Cit Until December31, -3 Authority to Temporary Close a Portion of Ramona Street Pursuant to California Vehicle Code Section 21101 to Facilitate Outdoor Dining, Retail, and Other Uses RECITALS A. On June 23, 2020, the Council adopted Resolution No. 9909 approving the temporary closure of portions of California Avenue, University Avenue and certain other Downtown streets through Labor Day 2020 to allow for outdoor dining and retail on those streets, consistent with the Santa Clara County Public Health Order in effect. The street closures were part of a Summer Streets Program initiated by the City to accommodate outdoor uses at a time when indoor dining remained prohibited in the County and the growing scientific evidence showed a lower risk of COVID-19 transmission outdoors compared to indoors. At that time, the City anticipated that indoor dining would be allowed to resume in the County, as had been allowed in neighboring counties, and sought to address the immediate needs of the community including residents, workers and businesses that had been severely impacted by loss of business activity and revenue. B. Through Resolution No. 9909 the Council also approved a temporary pilot parklet program to allow parklets to be installed in on -street parking spaces on an expedited and temporary basis to provide more space for outdoor dining. C. On July 2, 2020, the County Public Health Officer issued a revised Shelter in Place Order, to become effective on July 13, 2020, that allowed certain additional activities to resume if specified strict across-the-board risk reduction measures were followed. The objective was to allow activities that were already allowed in surrounding jurisdictions, which had reopened more quickly than Santa Clara County, so long as the prescribed risk reduction measures were followed. D. On July 7, 2020, the State approved Santa Clara County's requested variance that allowed the revised Shelter in Place Order to go into effect on July 13, 2020. E. However, with the number of COVID-19 cases dramatically increasing again in the State, on July 13, 2020, the Governor announced a sweeping roll back of the reopening that the State had allowed. The State mandated that all counties close certain indoor operations, including in -restaurant dining. For counties on the State's monitoring list for 3 consecutive days (and thus placed on the State "watchlist"), the State required the closure of additional industries or activities unless they could be modified to operate outside or by pick-up; these included gyms and fitness centers, places of worship and cultural ceremonies, personal care services, hair salons and barbershops, and shopping malls. 1 20231024_ts24 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 65 Packet Pg. 219 of 374 Item 9 Attachment D - *NOT YET ADOPTED* Resolution Authorizing City Manager to F. Through the summer, the United States including "hot TemporarilyClosea nia continued to hit new highs in confirmed cases and deaths, as the looseni Portion of Ramona street ace Until December 31, 2024 restrictions had precipitated a resurgence of the virus in many states, inclu . s of July 27, 2020, the State was averaging nearly 10,000 new COVID-19 cases per day, and hospitals and their intensive care units were filling up. Thirty-seven counties representing 93% of the State's population were on the State's watchlist, and California had 460,550 confirmed cases of COVID-19, resulting in 8,445 deaths. G. On August 10, 2020, the Council adopted Resolution No. 9911, which amended Resolution 9909, to extend until December 31, 2020 the temporary closure of portions of California Avenue and University Avenue and certain intersecting streets to allow for continued use of these areas in the heart of the City's commercial districts to allow for outdoor dining and potentially other activities as may be allowed by State and County Public Health Orders. Resolution No. 9911 also extended the temporary parklet program to September 7, 2021. H. Since August 2020, the County Public Health Officer issued a Risk Reduction Order on October 5, 2020, which coincided with the County moving into the orange tier under the State's "Blueprint for a Safer Economy" tiered restriction system. I. However, on November 16, 2020, the State moved Santa Clara County two steps from the orange/moderate tier to the purple/widespread tier (the highest risk tier) due to a sharp increase in COVID-19 cases statewide. On that date, the County reported 388 new cases of COVID-19, bringing the cumulative total to 28,686. As of November 17, 2020, California reported 1,029,235 confirmed cases of COVID-19, resulting in 18,263 deaths, and 94.1% of the State's population was now in the purple tier (according to the Governor's Office). The State's rules for the purple/widespread tier mandate that restaurants and gyms cannot have indoor service and retail stores may only have 25% capacity indoors. J. On December 14, 2020, the Council adopted Resolution 9933, which amended Resolution 9099, to extend until May 31, 2021 the temporary closure of portions of California Avenue and University Avenue and certain intersecting streets to allow for continued use of these areas in the heart of the City's commercial districts to allow for outdoor dining and potentially other activities as may be allowed by State and County Public Health Orders. K. On March 3, 2021, the State moved Santa Clara County one step down from the purple/widespread tier to the red/substantial tier. As of March 16, 2021, the County reported a cumulative total of 112,909 COVID cases and 1,867 deaths. L. On May 10, 2021, the Council adopted Resolution 9954, which further amended Resolution 9099 to extend until October 31, 2021 the temporary closure of portions of California Avenue and University Avenue and certain intersecting streets to allow for continued use of these areas in the heart of the City's commercial districts to allow for outdoor dining and potentially other activities as may be allowed by State and County Public Health Orders. 2 20231024t524 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 66 Packet Pg. 220 of 374 Item 9 *NOT YET ADOPTED* Attachment D - Resolution Authorizing City Manager to M. On June 7, 2021, the Council adopted Resolution 9962. Resc TemporarilyClosea ed and restated Section 4 of Resolution 9909 regarding the pilot parklet Portion of Ramona street on - until December 31, 2024 emergency basis. N. On June 15, 2021, the State of California eliminated the Blueprint for a Safer Economy system of COVID-related rules and restrictions (also known as the color -tier system) amidst improvements in public health data and increasing availability of the COVID vaccine. The City of Palo Alto rescinded its declaration of local emergency on July 1, 2021. O. On September 13, 2021 the Council voted to extend the street closures of portions of California Avenue and Ramona Street through June 30, 2022 to allow for the continued use of these streets for outdoor dining and other activities as may be allowed. The Council voted on each street separately and Resolution 9988 extended the closure of Ramona Street only; a separate resolution (no. 9987) extended the closure of California Avenue. At the same meeting, the Council directed the City Manager to open the portion of University Avenue which was closed by Resolution 9909 and its successors on October 15, 2021. P. On May 16, 2022, the City Council adopted Resolution 10039, which amended and restated Resolution 9988 to continue its provisions until December 31, 2023. Q. The City Council now desires to continue the provisions of Resolution 10039 until December 31, 2024. NOW THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALO ALTO RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Findings and Declarations. The Council hereby adopts the above Recitals as findings of the Council. SECTION 2. Supersedes Resolution 10039. This Resolution shall supersede Resolution 10039, which is rescinded as of the effective date of this Resolution. SECTION 3. Extension of Temporary Street Closure A. The following street is hereby closed to any and all vehicular traffic through December 31, 2024, in accordance with California Vehicle Code Section 21101(e), to facilitate the temporary uses of outdoor dining, retail, and other permitted uses: 1. Ramona Street from University Avenue to Hamilton Avenue. B. The City Manager is authorized to determine the days, hours and duration of the temporary street closure(s) within the period specified in Section A, with reasonable notice provided, and whether exceptions to the closure 3 20231024_ts24 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 67 Packet Pg. 221 of 374 Item 9 Attachment D - *NOT YET ADOPTED* Resolution Authorizing City Manager to shall be made for municipal purposes. The City Man Temporarily Close a zed to close only part of the street authorized for closur Portion of Ramona Street Until December 31, 2024 SECTION 4. The Council finds that this Resolution is categorically exempt from CEQA under CEQA Guidelines Sections 15301 (existing facilities) and 15304(e) (minor temporary use of land having negligible or no permanent effects on the environment). SECTION 5 INTRODUCED: PASSED: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTENTIONS: ATTEST: City Clerk This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon adoption. APPROVED AS TO FORM: Assistant City Attorney Mayor APPROVED: City Manager Director of Public Works Chief Transportation Official Director of Planning and Development Services 20231024_ts24 21 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 68 Packet Pg. 222 of 374 CITY OF PALO ALTO Fall 2022 -Spring 2023 Item 9 Attachment E - Community and Stakeholder Engagement Report from Bruce Fukuji Community & Stakeholder Engagement Report Car -free Streets: California Avenue & Ramona Street Fukuji Architecture and Planning Fehr & Peers May 2023 Prepared for: City of Palo Alto, California Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 69 Packet Pg. 223 of 374 Item 9 Attachment E - Community and Stakeholder Engagement TABLE OF CONTENTS Report from Bruce Fukuji ASSIGNMENT................................................................................................................................... 3 UPLIFT LOCAL CAR -FREE STREETS INITIATIVE........................................................................................................................3 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT.......................................................................................................... 4 OBJECTIVES...................................................................................................................................................................4 STAKEHOLDERS AND OUTREACH METHODS..........................................................................................................................4 ENGAGEMENTPROCESS...................................................................................................................................................5 CONTEXTSETTING........................................................................................................................... 6 IMPACT OF THE PANDEMIC ON CITIES.................................................................................................................................6 LESSONS LEARNED FROM PEDESTRIAN MALLS......................................................................................................................8 REVITALIZING MAIN STREET..............................................................................................................................................9 INTERIM STREET TRANSFORMATIONS................................................................................................................................10 STREET CHARACTER & VITALITY.................................................................................................... 11 CALIFORNIAAVENUE.....................................................................................................................................................11 RAMONASTREET..........................................................................................................................................................13 STAKEHOLDER PERSPECTIVES....................................................................................................... 14 LOCAL BUSINESS AND PROPERTY OWNERS.........................................................................................................................14 COMMUNITYMEMBERS.................................................................................................................................................17 CONSENSUSBUILDING.................................................................................................................. 19 CALIFORNIAAVENUE.....................................................................................................................................................19 RAMONASTREET..........................................................................................................................................................20 MOVING FORWARD...................................................................................................................... 21 DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS...........................................................................................................................................21 UPCOMINGSTUDY........................................................................................................................................................21 STRATEGIES FOR SUCCESS...............................................................................................................................................23 Car free Streets — Fall 2022 - Spring 2023 Community & Stakeholder Engagement Report 2 of 24 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 70 Packet Pg. 224 of 374 Item 9 Attachment E - Community and Stakeholder Engagement "Even 10 years ago, reclaiming streets from cars to cre Report from Bruce Fukuji walk and to bike was considered a radical - almost revolutionary - act. Today, people focused streets are a proven global best practice and the first -line response for transportation and transit agencies during COVID-19 crisis, from Berlin to Brussels." Jannette Sadik-Kahn Chair of the National Association of City Transportation Officials ASSIGNMENT UPLIFT LOCAL CAR -FREE STREETS INITIATIVE The City Council authorized Car -free Streets early in the COVID-19 pandemic as an economic recovery effort and to provide community members with outdoor spaces to gather socially distant. The Uplift Local Car free Streets: California Avenue and Ramona Street initiative is a Council -supported effort enabling outdoor dining, retail, and personal services in business districts such as California Avenue and the downtown core. In May 2022, the City Council extended the program through the end of 2023 and directed staff to issue a Request for Proposals (RFP) to study various alternatives and impacts of different street configurations. From October 2022 to April 2023, City staff, Bruce Fukuji, the City's urban design consultant and Fehr & Peers, the City's on -call transportation consultants engaged key stakeholders and the community through meetings, interviews, focus groups, a community workshop and an online survey to better understand priorities for California Avenue and Ramona Street, and to determine the topics and themes to study and include as part of the RFP. This report summarizes the research questions, data collection and analysis, business and community perspectives and demonstration projects to invest in the transformation of California Avenue and Ramona Street to be vibrant, attractive destinations. Car free Streets — Fall 2022 - Spring 2023 Community & Stakeholder Engagement Report 3 of 24 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 71 Packet Pg. 225 of 374 Item 9 Attachment E i- Community and Stakeholder Engagement Report from Bruce Fukuji COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT OBJECTIVES The objectives of the community engagement process are to: • Solicit local stakeholder and community perspectives regarding current issues, opportunities for change and potential near -term projects to advance the Car -free street initiative. • Receive feedback on a potential scope of work for an RFI (Request for Information) or RFP (Request for Proposals) to design and implement priority projects and study different potential street configurations. STAKEHOLDERS AND OUTREACH METHODS To gain an in-depth understanding of key stakeholders' perspectives with long- term interests in the California Avenue and Ramona Street, City staff and consultants undertook the following outreach: • Nearly a dozen structured interviews with business and property owners, non-profit and for-profit developers, Chamber of Commerce leadership, local architects, property managers, the Palo Alto Art Center Director, and Councilmember Pat Burt. • Two rounds of focus group meetings with: o Local business owners on California Avenue, o Local business owners on Ramona Street, and o City Commission Chairpersons • Two community meetings: an in -person Community Workshop on California Avenue, attended by over 60 people, with facilitated small group engagement followed by informal discussion with elected officials, local business owners and community members, and a subsequent online community meeting, attended by 30 people with facilitated individual feedback. • Online survey on the City's website, viewed by 617 people with 356 responses, predominantly Palo Alto residents, with only 1 percent Palo Alto business owners, and 15 percent of respondents living outside of Palo Alto. Car free Streets — Fall 2022 - Spring 2023 Community & Stakeholder Engagement Report 4 of 24 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 72 Packet Pg. 226 of 374 Item 9 Attachment E i- Community and Stakeholder Engagement Report from Bruce Fukuji ENGAGEMENT PROCESS The outreach process was organized into two phases: • Assessment — comprised of background research, context mapping, framing key questions for stakeholders and community members; conducting initial outreach; collecting data and conducting analysis; and formulating preliminary findings (Fall 2022 through Winter 2023). • Validation — comprised of conducting a second round of outreach for stakeholders and community members to validate what was learned by City staff and consultants from initial outreach, and solicit feedback on demonstration projects and upcoming Alternatives study (Winter 2023 through Spring 2023). Car free Streets — Fall 2022 - Spring 2023 Community & Stakeholder Engagement Report 5 of 24 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 73 Packet Pg. 227 of 374 Item 9 Attachment E - Community and Stakeholder Engagement Report from Bruce Fukuji CONTEXT SETTING To frame the community inquiry process for the potential future of California Avenue and Ramona Street as post -pandemic, people -first streets, the following background context was shared with stakeholders as to the potential long-term implications of the COVID-19 pandemic, lessons learned from the U.S. experience of converting main streets to pedestrian malls, and current best practice on the transformation of street travel ways to multi -modal and public use. IMPACT OF THE PANDEMIC ON CITIES UNPRECEDENTED FORCES CHANGING MAIN STREET The COVID-19 pandemic has radically altered how most people go about their daily lives with huge shifts to how we move in the world, how we get groceries and food, whether we go outside, where we go, who we see, and what we do.' 2020 ushered in the trauma of COVID-19, with the world shutting down with shelter -in -place orders resulting in one half of the world's population asked to stay home and avoid public places.z Never had the world seen such striking images of ghostly empty city streets, parks, and cities. Five main forces are leading to long lasting transformations of cities 3 that bear on how to reconfigure California Avenue and Ramona Street: 1. Fear and avoidance of crowded public places 2. Technological transition to remote work, school and online shopping which has drastically reduced office occupancies and commuting, expanded home delivery and integrated digital life deeply into society, including over -exposure of youth to social media 3. Need adequate hygiene standards and rapid adaptability of publicly facing businesses, gathering places and infrastructure to secure the urban environment from future public health crisis's 1 Janette Sadik-Kahn, "Streets for Pandemic Response and Recovery. " National Association of City Transportation Officials, Global Designing Cities Initiative, 6/25/2020. ' Jordi Honey-Rosse, "The Impact of COVID-19 on Public Space: an Early Review of the Emerging Questions — Design, Perceptions and Inequities, " Cities, Health and COVID- 19: Initial Reflections and Future Challenges, 21 April 2021 https: //doi. org/10.1080/23748834.2020.1780074 -3 Richard Florida, "Cities in a Post-COVID World," Urban Studies, June 27, 2021, https: //journals. sagepub. com/doi/full/10.1177/00420980211018072 Car free Streets — Fall 2022 - Spring 2023 Community & Stakeholder Engagement Report 6 of 24 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 74 Packet Pg. 228 of 374 Item 9 Attachment E - Community and Stakeholder Engagement 4. Economic and public health inequities to frontlin Report from Bruce Fukuji 5. Reconfiguring indoor and outdoor spatial use for social distancing NEW PRIORITIES FOR MAIN STREET As the unparalleled disruption of daily life extended for over a year, people struggled with mental health issues with continued unemployment and working from home without childcare or school for children and teens. Public life came to a halt with State and County public health mandates. Streets became a first line of defense: The requirement of "social or physical distancing" —maintaining at least 6' (2 m) distance between people, with significant reductions or bans on group gatherings and crowds —combined with what we know today about the transmission of this coronavirus and its increased communicability in indoor settings, requires that we reallocate our streets and sidewalks for public use during this crisis and for the future.4 With the rollout of vaccines, and a fall is cases and deaths, public health officials progressively reopened public settings for in -person use. As pandemic restrictions were slowly lifted, streets provided room for restaurants, vendors, schools, and daycare to expand outdoors, allowing businesses to re -open and people to return to the office. Public health requirements for social distancing lead to a global epiphany that cities need to completely rethink the allocation of street space for public use and economic recovery: "As we think about ways to reopen during this pandemic, its' staring us in the face: sidewalks and street spaces are right there outside every business, restaurant, hairdresser.... particularly in the developed world, these spaces have long been underutilized, and are for more equitable distributed across cities.., we can create more space for those businesses to start to move outside."" Collectively, we experienced an immense sense of hope and relief with the return of the social life of public places, of reconnecting to friends and loved ones in person, and the affirmation of our common humanity through the daily interactions of urban life. Unfortunately, remote work and online shopping drained the life out of downtowns. The daily concentration of downtown workers evaporated, and online shopping looted the viability of small independent businesses. With communities now coming to terms with the "new normal" of 4 Ibid. 5 Carey L. Biron, `Public Space a Lifeline for Post-Lockdown Cities, " Reuters. June 15, 2020, https://news.trust.org/item/20200615091609-7dluu/ Car free Streets — Fall 2022 - Spring 2023 Community & Stakeholder Engagement Report 7 of 24 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 75 Packet Pg. 229 of 374 Item 9 Attachment E - Community and Stakeholder Engagement post -pandemic economic and social life, the permanent c Reportfrom Bruce Fukuji t to vehicle traffic needs to consider the emerging needs for economic recovery and desires for social life. "The feeling of city life —people were hungry for this... as businesses expanded into the city's closed streets... there was unimaginable enthusiasm on the first day... as competition arose [for outdoor dining space], the City had to come up with metrics for deciding which establishment would have access to which piece of public space, and this became part of a broader strategy aimed to draw in young families and new talent. This is an important factor of economic recovery, but we were thinking even more about the spirit of the City.6" Regmigijus Simasius, Mayor of Vilnius, the capital of Lithuania LESSONS LEARNED FROM PEDESTRIAN MALLS Michael Berne, in American Downtown Revitalization Review, argues that pedestrian malls were a "good concept at the wrong time" and that [pre - pandemic], with the growing appreciation for the benefits and attraction of dense urban living, and the emergence of Business Improvement Districts, the closing a main street to vehicle traffic pedestrian mall maybe less of a "gamble" with the right fundamentals, nuanced attention and a good exit strategy.' Research overwhelmingly indicates that closing Main Street to vehicle traffic has been an economic failure in the United States with 89 percent of "pedestrian malls" re -opening to vehicle access after experiencing increased vacancies, deteriorating retail mix, and changing retail focus from comparison/destination goods/services to convenience stores. In cities where few people lived downtown, pedestrian malls turned lifeless after work, becoming uncomfortable, threatening environments. Only 11 percent continue as pedestrian malls today$ and this is primarily due to community organizing and implementing a successful main street management program. This has resulted in low vacancy rates, higher pedestrian traffic levels and greater mix of businesses and uses for these closed streets. Civic leaders and City Planners believed main street conversions to pedestrian malls were the answer to suburbanization and the decline of downtowns because of post -World War II population investing in the American dream of single-family home ownership and relocating from the urban core to the periphery of regions. 6 Ibid. ' Michael Berne, "Pedestrian Malls: The Newest Fad? " The American Downtown Revitalization Review, Volume 2, 2021. 8 Cole E. Judge, "The Experient of American Pedestrian Malls: Trends Analysis, Necessary Indicators for Success and Recommendations for Fresno 's Fulton Mall" Downtown Fresno Partnership, October 2013. Car free Streets — Fall 2022 - Spring 2023 Community & Stakeholder Engagement Report 8 of 24 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 76 Packet Pg. 230 of 374 Item 9 Attachment E - Community and Stakeholder Engagement The Interstate Highway Act of 1956 exacerbated this tren Report from Bruce Fukuji ent from central business districts to the highways with convenient auto exits to shopping malls with free parking. Planners in the 1960's installed over 200 pedestrian malls as an effort to lure shoppers back to downtown and bring economic development back to the core of cities.' Pedestrian malls failed in part because these downtown locations were not able to compete with destination shopping and large chain stores at newer suburban locations, as they continued to lose tenants and offer comparatively less retail selection. Research from the Downtown Fresno Partnership on trends of American pedestrian malls found the key findings for success: • Need to be near or attached to a major anchor such as a university, or in close proximity to a beach • Designed to be short in length in terms of city blocks • Located in a city with population under 100,000 and/or a city with a major tourist location • Cities that embrace the Main Street model have experienced turnarounds in their downtowns with more investment, higher occupancy rates and more pedestrian traffic REVITALIZING MAIN STREET The Main Street America is a program of the National Main Street Center, established by the National Trust for Historic Preservation. The purpose of the program is to revitalize older and historic commercial districts and build vibrant neighborhoods and thriving economies. 10 The Main Street approach offers community -based retailization strategies to transform a local economy and enhance quality of life. Foundational to this approach is the creation of a local organization to promote and manage the placemaking and economic development of the area. Expanded outdoor dining has the potential to revitalize California Avenue, create an anchor destination to attract people locally and regionally and counter the technological trends of remote life on retail use. Across the United States, communities are finding, in the aftermath of street closures and the lifting of emergency shelter -in -place orders, outdoor dining has not only allowed restaurants, cafes, and bars to stay open and survive the pandemic, it is wildly popular, giving cities a more European street life feel. This approach has 10 https://www.mainstreet.org/aboutus Car free Streets — Fall 2022 - Spring 2023 Community & Stakeholder Engagement Report 9 of 24 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 77 Packet Pg. 231 of 374 Item 9 Attachment E - Community and Stakeholder Engagement statewide political support, as shown by the unanimo Report from Bruce Fukuji rnia State Senate vote to approve on Senate Bill 314 the Bar and Restaurant Recovery Act.11 INTERIM STREET TRANSFORMATIONS In response to citizen frustration with the conventional project development process that takes several years to plan, design, environmentally analyze, bid, award, and finally construct a capital improvement, several cities are implementing short term improvements strategies, such as San Francisco's "Quick-Build"12 projects and NACTO's "Interim Design Strategies."13 These efforts are identifying tools and tactics to enable cities to rapidly deliver low-cost community projects. The informal street environment of California Avenue and Ramona Street, with temporary outdoor dining, and ample travel way space, is an ideal candidate to apply this approach. Key benefits are: • Repurpose existing street infrastructure • Demonstrate new ideas • Engage and empower stakeholders • Implement change quickly • Explore and refine designs • Inspire new policies and practices The interim street transformation process relies on the City capacity to deliver improvements and creative local partnerships to take ownership to activate, program and maintain the space. 11 https://sdll.senate.ca.gov/news/20210602-senator-wiener's-legislation-allowing- outdoor-dining-alcohol post pandemic passes 12 https://www.sfmta.com/vision-zero-quick-buildprojects 13 https://nacto.org/publication/urban-street-design-guide/interim-design-strategies/ Car free Streets — Fall 2022 - Spring 2023 Community & Stakeholder Engagement Report 10 of 24 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 78 Packet Pg. 232 of 374 Item 9 Attachment E - Community and Stakeholder Engagement Report from Bruce Fukuii STREET CHARACTER & VITALI CALIFORNIA AVENUE HISTORY In its heyday, California Avenue was a bustling Main Street with a theater, bookstores, camera shops, magazine shop, pharmacy, clothing, shoes, candy, ice cream, cafes, and restaurants. California Avenue is considered by residents as Palo Alto's second "main street." It is located within the oldest part of the city, with origins dating back to the 1850s when it was the main commercial street for the town of Mayfield, which was incorporated into Palo Alto in 1925. The closure of California Avenue across the Caltrain corridor to Alma Street with the building of the Oregon Expressway in the 1960's reduced the accessibility and vitality of the street. The growth of Stanford Research Park, with more than 150 companies, many industry leaders in technology, brought 23,000 workers near California Avenue, providing a daytime population to support the retail and restaurant uses. ASSETS The California Avenue District has the structure of a sustainable neighborhood per LEED Neighborhood Design criteria, with its walkable street and block pattern, mixed -use, access to regional transit and proximity to a regional employment center, Stanford Research Park. California Avenue is served by a multi -modal, regional rail Caltrain station. It is locally and regionally planned as a transit -oriented neighborhood. With predominantly one and two-story buildings, California Avenue is a lower -density commercial environment with air space for multi -story mixed -use development. The California Avenue right-of-way is 90 feet wide, which is similar width to two successful pedestrian streets, Pearl Street in Boulder, Colorado, and the 3rd Street Promenade in Santa Monica, California. California Avenue has become a lunch and evening destination for outdoor dining offering over 20 restaurants, and the Sunday Farmer's Market is vibrant with pedestrian activity with 70 vendors. The close knit, local business community has a long standing, multi -generational presence on California Avenue. Live music is adding life to the street, with public art recalling the history of the area. Residents find California Avenue more local serving that University Avenue downtown. Car free Streets — Fall 2022 - Spring 2023 Community & Stakeholder Engagement Report 11 of 24 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 79 Packet Pg. 233 of 374 Item 9 Attachment E - Community and Stakeholder Engagement CURRENT ENVIRONMENT Report from Bruce Fukuji Today, California Avenue is open to pedestrians and closed to through vehicle traffic from El Camino Real to Birch Street. California Avenue is more local serving than the University Avenue/Downtown, and it is the closest business district to employees and visitors to Stanford Research Park and portions of Stanford University. Electrification of Caltrain by 2024 can increase service and improve travel times for riders at California Avenue Caltrain Station, further improving regional transportation access. 67 percent of survey respondents visit California Avenue at least once a week, and 1/3 visit several times a week. 90 percent visit for outdoor dining, and 2/3 attend the farmer's market. Half of visitors go to grocery shopping or to a cafe, 40 percent to retail shops, and 25 percent use professional services. Key concerns for California Avenue: • Undifferentiated space with travel way markings • Too many vacancies • Loss retail shops • Does not feel like a care -free community space • Tents ugly, no aesthetic unity • No people gathering places • Underutilized street space • No appealing storefronts or buildings • Landscaping blocks views to storefronts • Conflicts between pedestrians & bicyclists • Barriers are not inviting • Emergency lane divides street, limits creating public space • Pedestrian connections from parking have no signage, just blank walls Car free Streets — Fall 2022 - Spring 2023 Community & Stakeholder Engagement Report 12 of 24 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 80 Packet Pg. 234 of 374 Item 9 Attachment E - Community and Stakeholder Engagement RA M ON A STREET Report from Bruce Fukuji HISTORIC ASSETS Ramona Street is recognized as a Historic District in the National Registered Historic Places. The cohesive character of the architecture is in Monterey and Spanish Colonial styles with archways, balconies, wrought iron work, tile roofs of varying heights, and courtyards. CURRENT ENVIRONMENT Ramona Street is open to pedestrians and closed to vehicle traffic for a half block in between Hamilton Avenue and University Avenue in downtown Palo Alto. This portion of Ramona Street has become an outdoor dining destination downtown. Visitors enjoy the safety and community feeling of the street closure. An emergency access lane divides the street with parklets and outdoor dining lining replacing on -street parking, extending from the sidewalk into the street on both sides. 30 percent of survey respondents visit Ramona Street at least once a month, with 1/4 visiting at least once every six months. 26 percent of respondents are regular visitors at least once a week. The predominant reason to visit Ramona Street is dining for 81 percent of respondents, and over half visit a cafe. 1/3 of respondents visit for retail shopping. Challenges to be addressed to advance City Council objectives to enhance community experience and economic vibrancy of Ramona Street are: • Temporary situation is not visually attractive • Emergency lane divides street, limits creating public space • Need aesthetic standards for improvements • No gathering places • Too many vacancies • Loss of retail shops • Not enough parking • Road closure barriers not welcoming Car free Streets — Fall 2022 - Spring 2023 Community & Stakeholder Engagement Report 13 of 24 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 81 Packet Pg. 235 of 374 Item 9 Attachment E i- Community and Stakeholder Engagement Report from Bruce Fukuji STAKEHOLDER PERSPECTIVES LOCAL BUSINESS AND PROPERTY OWNERS CALIFORNIA AVENUE Initial outreach to local business and property owners confirmed that, in consideration of the continued closure California Avenue to vehicle traffic, these stakeholders have the "most at stake." Some California Avenue retailers feel they are at high risk of further economic impact with the permanent closure of the street. In the absence of compelling data otherwise, these retail business owners want to keep street open to at least a single lane of vehicle movement. Restauranteurs are the economic beneficiaries of the street closures, and want outdoor dining extended indefinitely. Several restauranteurs are appreciative of the closure of the street and the opening of outdoor dining. This has saved their businesses. Nevertheless, if outdoor dining can continue, they are indifferent if the street is re -opened to vehicles. Local business owners have several concerns regarding the future economic health of the California Avenue, citing the loss the daytime population of Stanford Research Park workers to remote work and the evaporation of destination retail due to online shopping. Retail rents are down, and vacancies reported as high as 25 percent including "shadow" vacancies, which are storefronts where lease payments are made but there are no tenants occupying the space. Restaurants are benefiting from the use of the street for outdoor dining; however, they are challenged with finding workers and the increasing costs to stay in business. While sales tax revenues have returned to pre -pandemic levels, with California Avenue contributed approximately 4 percent to the City's sales tax revenues in 2022, small, independently owned retail business are not back to pre -pandemic Car free Streets — Fall 2022 - Spring 2023 Community & Stakeholder Engagement Report 14 of 24 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 82 Packet Pg. 236 of 374 Item 9 Attachment E - Community and Stakeholder Engagement cash flows and required revenue margins.14 Several inter Reportfrom Bruce Fukuji ay's California Avenue: • Has no destination stores, and therefore there is no reason to go there other than for outdoor dining, groceries or to take Caltrain. For example, the now closed Keeble & Shuchat Photography store was a destination store for camera shopping, a regional attraction now lost. • Is at risk of "out —of -sight, out -of -mind," where the closure of the street to vehicle traffic eliminating drive -by awareness of retail shops and creating a circuitous driving route to find a shop from the rear alleys and parking. The belief is that this limits attracting new retail tenants, and overtime erodes the shopper base as people forget what is there and never return. • While people like outdoor dining, there are no free places to sit or work. • Is a dirty, empty space with nothing charming to draw you to it, with no building height, or buildings worth saving. • Doesn't have the density of housing (employment or tourism) of a major metropolitan city; unrealistic to imagine California Avenue becoming State Street in Santa Barbara. At the second California Avenue Business Owners focus group it was clear that, to attain the support of those who provided their input, to achieve the City Council's objectives the following issues would need to be addressed: • Their need to be a high priority voice in decisions on future of street • Their interests are respected and represented, as shown by senior staff and City Council level engagement • There is an alternative that has at least a single vehicle lane that provides customers store front access, which includes exploration of parklets. • There is not a "Car -free" bias in the selection, analysis, and evaluation of alternatives • There needs to be more demonstrated progress since City Council action in February 2021 • Zoning regulations need to eliminate barriers to opening new businesses, including conditional use permits, restrictions to convert ground floor space to non -retail uses, and parking. 14 Streetsense, "Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy Update, " City Council Study Session Item #2 11/7/2022 Car free Streets — Fall 2022 - Spring 2023 Community & Stakeholder Engagement Report 15 of 24 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 83 Packet Pg. 237 of 374 RAMONA STREET Item 9 Attachment E - Community and Stakeholder Engagement Report from Bruce Fukuji Local business owners on Ramona Street want to see it permanently closed to vehicular traffic. Main perspectives are: • The impact the emergency access lane, which divides the street along its length in half and displaces a third of the street, significantly limits creating a destination public space. • The desire for high quality design and uniform standards for parklets, outdoor dining and street improvements that complement the historic character of the street; business and property owner willingness to invest with clear guidance and City commitment to create a high -quality environment. • A need for wayfinding and signage to direct visitors to dining on Ramona Street from University Avenue and Hamilton Avenue. • Reallocating curbside loading space along the west side of Ramona Street between University Avenue and the alley to accommodate door-to-door deliveries, passenger pick-up and drop-off and loading. • High demand for and lack of availability of bike racks. • Cars turning around in front of the Wine Room, creates confusion and vehicle congestion. At the second focus group, local business owners wanted to see Ramona Street space allocated to community use, including how to repave the street to reflect the historic architectural character of the area. They expressed concerns about street drainage, and how to provide alternatives to an emergency access lane extending the entire length of the street. Car free Streets — Fall 2022 - Spring 2023 Community & Stakeholder Engagement Report 16 of 24 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 84 Packet Pg. 238 of 374 Item 9 Attachment E - Community and Stakeholder Engagement Report from Bruce Fukuji COMMUNITY MEMBERS CALIFORNIA AVENUE The December 2022 Community Workshop, plus the online community survey show a predominant preference to continue closure of both California Avenue (79 percent in favor) to car traffic except emergency vehicles. Additional feedback received on California Avenue includes: • Extend street closure permanently, continue outdoor dining • Reduce vacancies and loss of retail, increase diversity of retail shopping • Ensure pedestrian and bike safety, avoid conflicts, consider bike lanes • Design street to attract people to linger and shop at a vibrant pedestrian promenade, add community gathering places with street furniture and lighting and explore introducing nature areas and more trees • Need wayfinding and signage to attract attention and guide visitors to arrive and shop • Expand use of public art • Need variety of events — music, theater, and community services to both attract and serve the residents and regional visitors • Need district economic development, small business support, and anchor destination uses to ensure long-term viability • Need equity with use of public space for private economic benefit • Area underutilized, no appealing storefronts or buildings • Need aesthetic unity, consistency and beauty, street is empty without cars, but it does not feel like a car -free community place Car free Streets — Fall 2022 - Spring 2023 Community & Stakeholder Engagement Report 17 of 24 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 85 Packet Pg. 239 of 374 Item 9 Attachment E - Community and Stakeholder Engagement At the April 2023 Community Meeting, comprised primar Report from Bruce Fukuji residents who frequently visit California Avenue, the main points were: • General support for closure • Enjoyment of outdoor dining • Support for retail businesses, with a recognition of the impact of online shopping and the pandemic, and a need for the City to lift zoning restrictions for retail, and support economic development partnership for retail to be successful • Concerns on pedestrian/bike conflicts recognizing the important role of California Avenue in the city's bicycle network • Want to see a range of alternatives: street closed to vehicles, open to vehicles with at least one -lane, with district wide traffic, and parking analysis • Broad support for demonstration projects and upcoming Alternatives study RAMONA STREET Similarly, at the December 2022 Community Workshop and results from online the community survey show a predominant preference to continue closure of and Ramona Street (70 percent in favor) to car traffic. Additional feedback received on Ramona Street includes: • Create an outdoor dining destination (70 percent survey respondents) • New planting and streets trees that complement the historic buildings (61 percent of survey respondents) • Over half want to maintain the historic character and scale of the street, small-scale public spaces with seating and high -quality design • There is a lack of people gathering places and the loss of retail • Visitors appreciate the safety and feeling of community with the street closure Car free Streets — Fall 2022 - Spring 2023 Community & Stakeholder Engagement Report 18 of 24 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 86 Packet Pg. 240 of 374 Item 9 Attachment E - Community and Stakeholder Engagement Report from Bruce Fukuii RESTAURANTEURS RS "Outdoor dining saved our business" RETAILERS "We're at high risk to further impacts with permanent closure" Build outdoor dining to destination Can't attract Heaters �eecl shops tenants, erodes essential obefore & shopper base Want at leastCustomers enjoy ar dinner one vehicle r dining Need daytime lane open outdoo vitality Need community Need signage Zoning too gathering places from parking to restrictive to Ped/bike shops attract tenants Doesn't feel like safety Equity of private community space Retail use of public Diversity space Desire events RESIDENTS Support small "Close street permanently" business retention Figure 1: Stakeholder Perspectives CONSENSUS BUILDING CALIFORNIA AVENUE The closure of California Avenue to vehicular traffic, in response to the pandemic, has introduced new possibilities to reshape the use of these streets by Palo Altans and visitors to advance the city's economic vitality, community livability, sustainability, and public health. Stakeholders have different perspectives on how to shape the future physical environment of California Avenue, as shown in Figure 1: Stakeholder Perspectives. On one hand, the discussion is divided between local retail business owners and residents on the allocation of street space for vehicle access: • Some local businesses have a strong preference for an alternative that is not car -free (a single travel lane or re -open the street except for the Farmer's Market). • Many residents favor the closure of the street for safety, outdoor dining, and public spaces without vehicles. However, some residents feel that public gathering spaces and outdoor dining do not need use of all the street space to the complete exclusion of cars. On the other hand, local retail business owners, restauranteurs, and residents agree on several points: • California Avenue is a highly valued, frequently visited environment integral to community and economic vitality of the Palo Alto. Car free Streets — Fall 2022 - Spring 2023 Community & Stakeholder Engagement Report 19 of 24 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 87 Packet Pg. 241 of 374 Item 9 Attachment E - Community and Stakeholder Engagement • The District needs to be revived as a destination Report from Bruce Fukuji and that economic development, urban design, and community partnerships need to work together to realize the potential of California Avenue. • California Avenue's wide, 90 -foot right-of-way offers opportunities for restaurant, retail, and community needs to be met and create a more vibrant destination environment, by building on the assets of the area and addressing the barriers to attracting ground floor uses. • The current street environment is temporary, unattractive, and needs to change. • Retail businesses are suffering from the loss of daytime activity from Stanford Research Park employees due to remote work and the loss customers to online shopping. RAMONA STREET Stakeholders all agree that Ramona Street, as a historic district, is an ideal setting downtown to shape a vibrant public space as an outdoor dining destination. Local business owners and community members expressed great interest in maintaining Ramona Street permanently closed to vehicle traffic, however the emergency vehicle lane dividing the street in half presents a barrier to realizing the potential to transform this street into cherished urban place. Stakeholder all agree that Ramona Street is of such importance to the downtown Palo Alto experience that it merits investment in high quality, historically respectful urban and landscape architectural design. Car free Streets — Fall 2022 - Spring 2023 Community & Stakeholder Engagement Report 20 of 24 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 88 Packet Pg. 242 of 374 Item 9 Attachment E - Community and Stakeholder Engagement Report from Bruce Fukuji MOVING FORWARD The Car -free Streets effort proposes two parallel approaches to advancing the City Council's objectives: demonstration projects and an upcoming Alternatives study. DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS Local business owners and residents strongly supported the idea of demonstration projects to initiate immediate change. To improve the current temporary environment, the City is planning to implement the following demonstration projects for both California Avenue and Ramona Street as shown in Figures 2 and 3 California Avenue — Demonstration Projects, and Figure 4 Ramona Street — Demonstration Projects. • Install removable bollards • Flexible community spaces • Wayfinding and signage • Ground plane public art and building murals (California Avenue) UPCOMING STUDY The following topics were presented to stakeholders for the Alternatives study. Overall, people were supportive of this approach for California Avenue and Ramona Street: • Streetscape design & amenities • Circulation • Design guidelines for private outdoor dining and public areas • Fee/pricing for use of Right -of -Way • Parking strategies • Historic resources • Signage • Legislative options • Equity & accessibility • Partnership building Car free Streets — Fall 2022 - Spring 2023 Community & Stakeholder Engagement Report 21 of 24 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 89 Packet Pg. 243 of 374 Item 9 Attachment E - Community and Stakeholder Engagement Report from Bruce Fukuii H•ev, E& Avenue- Optometry .. Oub Benetech k T— E N ` Techcu Dilates ' Lee ry - urvu T Cay Sn asdnB e • Bant uan er inwran1 Bookshare H ce_3iN lin Sho Terun Boom NaMI Foods Q) ••t -- s •f f 11n Sho Tenm - rrrn r s — E S u m •~s Z7D 4Bodep del Moo Kali vam's KowavwW — t°°" la ' • IR - _ — hoheme W _ 'I I. Cm IR✓s La Bodeguda Rio Wont Rime, LR & h ,Vyto j Vacant Lotus Ume rho La Bank BrOONyn del Medw Worts Rme lyfal Wyse t. Thai Tea Avenue Bo^ene •Bagels • 11,,■d V Gmpof Ir OrWWr IBoclrr r IM6lertanean , -M •• r Figure 2: California Avenue Demonstration Projects El Camino Real to Mimosa Lane Figure 3: California Avenue Demonstration Projects Mimosa Lane to Birch Street Car free Streets — Fall 2022 - Spring 2023 Community & Stakeholder Engagement Report 22 of 24 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 90 Packet Pg. 244 of 374 Item 9 Attachment E - Community and Stakeholder Engagement Report from Bruce Fukuji ,l i -- —aae� - V/� ��..� • tY V —t WxM • Vacant ® No4 (Former+ P.W . Sweet Gree' . .. • . Y • '" -:._. Nob Sweet Gn l 70 Ramona Street 00 m. 1," .. Coup. Cale TT Vne 8.WOMWSe often. 0 J I ' vores[Sp. Ba�IpVe toow Ok ma,me o Sen. Baroenno❑ 1 Legend �If Parklet Parkin`ln[ ® 1 meow Vacant Wood Ostr Pura n Good TeaTime — — ) 1 E—Senry Access lane Outdoor Unm! Area Bdlards VTn p �11 ' 111' Yw Bus Stop T• 1 -^ (' . Fleas We Comm—ty Spaces — Me Corral 1 • .T -� - ; r ( Scaie ff Pedestrian AIIev/W.hwry , F•-'. I• Figure 4: Ramona Street Demonstration Projects Lane STRATEGIES FOR SUCCESS Based on what was learned from this stakeholder engagement effort, there are three transformational strategies needed to advance the City Council's goals to enhance community experience and economic vibrancy of California Avenue: economic development, organizational capacity building, and urban design. • Economic development will need resourcefulness and creativity to establish the area's market position and focus investment to enhance the vibrancy of the street, per Streetsense.ls • Organizational capacity building is creating a California Avenue Business Association that can take a leadership role in the revitalization of California Avenue. The leadership role needs to cultivate partnerships, build consensus, recruit staff, secure funding, focus on an economic vitality plan, placemaking and promotion of the area. Based on stakeholder engagement so far, there is no functioning California Avenue Business Association. • Urban design can improve the quality and function of the physical environment, however by itself it is insufficient to advance economic 15 City Council staff report 2/10/23. Car free Streets — Fall 2022 - Spring 2023 Community & Stakeholder Engagement Report 23 of 24 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 91 Packet Pg. 245 of 374 Item 9 Attachment E - Community and Stakeholder Engagement vibrancy of California Avenue without the other Report from Bruce Fukuji ding the way. The three strategies need work together with a consensus building process among local businesses and community stakeholders to shape a vision for California Avenue. Economic development and building organizational capacity need to be prioritized. Local business concerns need to be addressed in the short- term. Demonstration projects can build trust and credibility with local business owners, but ultimately will be insufficient without these two transformational strategies. California Avenue's wide, 90 -foot right-of-way has ample space to balance economic, placemaking, and environmental considerations to create a vibrant main street destination. Stakeholders all agree that California Avenue has tremendous potential. The interviews, focus groups, community meetings, and survey have a wealth of observations and ideas about California Avenue to build upon — what brings people, what is and is not working, and desires for the future. Stakeholder agreement on goals and evaluation criteria will enable alternatives to be designed, tested, and refined. Feedback on potential benefits and impacts of each alternative will enable selection of a feasible, achievable, and optimal solution for City Council action. It will take well -managed, on -going stakeholder engagement to advance the City Council's direction to enhance the community experience and economic vibrancy of California Avenue and Ramona Street. Car free Streets — Fall 2022 - Spring 2023 Community & Stakeholder Engagement Report 24 of 24 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 92 Packet Pg. 246 of 374 Item 9 Attachment F - Summary of Community Survey CITY OF PALO ALTO COMMUNITY SURVEY SUMMARY Car Free Streets: California Avenue & Ramona Street Fukuji Architecture and Planning Fehr & Peers April 2023 Fukuji Architecture & Planning 1 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 93 Packet Pg. 247 of 374 Item 9 Attachment F - Summary of Community Survey The on-line survey was conducted from December 7, 2022, to January 9, 2023. 617 people viewed the survey with 356 responses with approximately 18 hours of public comment. A total of 15 questions covering both California Avenue, Ramona Street and background demographics were asked. The survey question type asked is the select -all -that -apply format.' CALIFORNIA AVENUE 1. How often do you visit California Avenue? 67% of respondents visit California Avenue at least once a week, with 1/3 visiting several times a week, so respondents are predominantly regular visitors. 2. What brings you to California Avenue? The predominant reasons that bring visitors to California Avenue are dining for 90% of respondents and attending the Farmer's Market for 2/3 of respondents. Half of respondents go grocery shopping or to a cafe. Retail shopping is at approximately 40%. Interestingly, % of respondents use Caltrain and 24% use professional services, showing diversification of reasons to be at California Avenue. More respondents visit for the arts/entertainment at 10% than employment, at 5% and even less go for government or non-profit reasons. 3. What Concerns you the most about California Avenue today and in the future? Too many vacancies and loss of retail are primary concerns, at 46% and 39% respectively, with almost a % of respondents feeling the area is underutilized, and 15% feeling there are no appealing storefronts and buildings. 30% of respondents observed there are no people gathering spaces, and over 1/3 felt there were other concerns not listed in the survey. Alternatively, little concern was expressed on the visibility of the store fronts to motorists driving along the street at 8 % or insufficient parking at 6%. 4. If you can have anything on California Avenue, what would you want long-term? The overwhelming response was continuation of outdoor dining at 82%, followed by 2/3 of respondents wanting public places with seating at 62% and music at 62%. Slightly less than half want to see public art (47%), retail vendors and kiosks (44%), and programmed events and activities 42%. Over % of respondents want to see children's play areas (26%), and almost 1/3 would like artisan stalls (29%) and food trucks (32%). Slightly less than 1/5 expressed interest in adult games and sports. ' For ranking of endorsements, select -all -that -apply questions yield similar results from forced -choice questions, so this format was selected. The consultant tested forced -choice questions with the City Commissioners, and Commissioner feedback was to reduce barriers to have the survey be as direct and simple as possible. Fukuji Architecture & Planning — Car Free Streets Community Survey Results 2 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 94 Packet Pg. 248 of 374 Item 9 Attachment F - Summary of Community Survey 5. If you were to test creative, flexible interim street design prior to permanent improvements, which options would you want to explore? The predominant preference is for closure of the street to all car traffic except emergency vehicles at 79%. A pedestrian promenade (71%) and public plazas with street furniture including movable chairs, tables, planters and lighting (69%) are preferred urban design options to explore, followed by identifying locations for future trees and nature areas (53%) and bike lanes (52%). Slow low traffic volume two-way access to local businesses (10%) and partial closure to one lane vehicle access to local business (9%) were the least desired options of respondents. RAMONA STREET 6. How often do you visit Ramona Street? 30% of respondents visit Ramona Street at least once a month, with 1/4 visiting at least once every six months. 26% of respondents are regular visitors at least once a week. 18% visit at least once a year. 7. What brings you to Ramona Street? The predominant reasons that bring visitors to Ramona Street are dining for 81% of respondents and cafes for over %2 of respondents. 1/3 of respondents visit for retail shopping. 8. What concerns you the most about Ramona Street today and in the future? The predominant concern of respondents is a lack of people gathering places (34%). Too many vacancies and loss of retail are concerns are at 26% and 24% respectively, followed by not enough parking at 21%. The road closure barriers are of concern for 16% of respondents. % of respondents felt there were other concerns not listed in the survey. 9. If you were to test creative, flexible interim street design prior to permanent improvements, which options would you want to explore? The predominant preference is for closure of the street to all car traffic except emergency vehicles at 70%. Expanding outdoor dining, (58%) and creating an urban public space (55%) are preferred urban design options to explore, followed by identifying locations for future trees and nature areas (48%) and bike lanes (42%). Slow low traffic volume two-way access to local businesses (10%) and partial closure to one lane vehicle access to local business (12%) were the least desired options of respondents. 10. If you can have anything on Ramona Street, what would you want long-term? The preferred response is creating an outdoor dining destination at 70%, followed by 61% of respondents wanting planting and streets trees that complement the historic buildings. Over half want to maintain the historic character and scale of the street (56%) and small-scale public spaces with seating (56%), followed by 43% wanting to see high quality design. Fukuji Architecture & Planning — Car Free Streets Community Survey Results 3 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 95 Packet Pg. 249 of 374 Item 9 Attachment F - Summary of Community Survey DEMOGRAPHICS 11. How old are you? Just under half of the respondents are over 55 years of age, and the other half of respondents are adults 25- 54. 12. Where do you live? Over half work within a short 5 -10 -minute bike ride of California Avenue (54%). 16% work within a short 5- 10 -minute bike ride of Ramona Street in Downtown Palo Alto. Ten percent of respondents work at Stanford at less than 2%, other areas not within walking of cycling distance of California Avenue at 6%. Surprisingly, 15% of respondents live outside of Palo Alto. 13. Where do work? Approximately 1/3 work within a short 5 -10 -minute bike ride of California Avenue. Slightly over 20% live within a short 5 -10 -minute bike ride of Ramona Street in Downtown Palo Alto. Approximately 25% work at Stanford Research Park (14%) and Stanford University (11%). One quarter of respondents work outside of Palo Alto 26% and % of respondents work in Palo Alto. 14. Do you own a business in Palo Alto? 99% of respondents do not own a business in Palo Alto. Only 5 respondents of 356 respondents own a business on California Avenue or Ramona Street. Fukuji Architecture & Planning — Car Free Streets Community Survey Results 4 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 96 Packet Pg. 250 of 374 CITY OF PALO ALTO Item 9 Attachment F - Summary of Community Survey Car Free Streets: California Avenue & Ramona Street Visioning January 9, 2023, 4:43 PM Contents i. Summary of responses ii. Survey questions iii. Individual responses 2 11 14 1 1 www.opentownhall.com/12434 rre.+e.I . • , 2023, 4:43 PM Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 97 Packet Pg. 251 of 374 Item 9 Attachment F - Summary Car Free Streets: California Avenue & Ramona Street Visioning of Community Survey Share input on the future of car free streets: California Avenue and Ramona Street. Summary Of Responses As of January 9, 2023, 4:43 PM, this forum had: Topic Start Topic End Attendees: 617 December 7, 2022, 2:12 PM January 9, 2023, 12:00 AM Responses: 356 Hours of Public Comment: 17.8 QUESTION 1 How often do you visit California Avenue (pick one)? Count Several times a week 34.5% 122 At least once a week 32.5% 115 At least once a month 26.3% 93 At least once every 6 months 6.2% 22 At least once a year I 0.6% 2 QUESTION 2 What brings you to California Avenue? [select all that apply] % Count Restaurants 89.8% 318 Grocery store 50.6% 179 Farmer's market 63.8% 226 Cafe 51.4% 182 2 l www.opentownhall.com/12434 r- +e.1 I , 2023, 4:43 PM Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 98 Packet Pg. 252 of 374 Car Free Streets: California Avenue & Ramona Street Visioning Share input on the future of car free streets: California Avenue and Ramona Street. Item 9 Attachment F - Summary of Community Survey Count Retail 39.8% 141 Professional services 23.7% 84 Government or non -profits I 3.7% 13 Arts/entertainment 10.5% 37 Caltrain station 24.9% 88 Place of employment 1 5.1% 18 QUESTION 3 What concerns you most about California Avenue today and in the future? [select all that apply] Count Too many vacancies 46.0% 151 Loss of retail shops 39.3% 129 No people gathering places 29.9% 98 No potential customers driving on the street 7.6% 25 Underutilized 24.4% 80 Not enough parking 1 6.1% 20 No appealing storefronts and buildings ■ 15.5% 51 No reason to be there 6.4% 21 Other 35.7% 117 3 1 www.opentownhall.com/12434 r- +e.1' ' , 2023, 4:43 PM Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 99 Packet Pg. 253 of 374 Car Free Streets: California Avenue & Ramona Street Visioning Share input on the future of car free streets: California Avenue and Ramona Street. QUESTION 4 If you can have anything on California Avenue, what would you want long-term? [Select all that apply] Item 9 Attachment F - Summary of Community Survey Count Outdoor dining 81.8% 287 Music 62.1% 218 Food trucks 31.6% 111 Retail vendors and kiosks 44.2% 155 Public art 46.7% 164 Artisan stalls 28.8% 101 Public places with seating 62.4% 219 Children's play areas 25.6% 90 Adult games and sports ■ 18.2% 64 Programmed events and activities 41.6% 146 Other . 22.8% 80 QUESTION 5 If you were to test creative, flexible interim street designs prior to permanent improvements, what options would you want to explore: [Select all that apply] Count Closure to all car traffic except emergency vehicles 79.3% 276 Partial closure to one lane vehicle access to local 8.9% 31 businesses 4 1 www.opentownhall.com/12434 (.'-+,.I I , 2023, 4:43 PM Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 100 Packet Pg. 254 of 374 Car Free Streets: California Avenue & Ramona Street Visioning Share input on the future of car free streets: California Avenue and Ramona Street. Item 9 Attachment F - Summary of Community Survey Count Slow, low volume two-way vehicle access to local , 10.3% 36 businesses Bike lanes Pedestrian promenade Public plazas with street furniture including chairs, tables, movable planters, and lighting Locations for future trees and nature areas Other QUESTION 6 How often do you visit Ramona Street? [Select one] 52.0% 181 71.3% 248 68.7% 239 52.6% 183 12.9% 45 % Count Several times a week 8.8% 28 At least once a week ■ 17.2% 55 At least once a month 30.3% 97 At least once every six months 25.9% 83 At least once a year ■ 17.8% 57 QUESTION 7 What brings you to Ramona Street? [Select all that apply] % Count Restaurants 80.7% 251 5 1 www.opentownhall.com/12434 (.'-+,.I I , 2023, 4:43 PM Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 101 Packet Pg. 255 of 374 Item 9 Attachment F - Summary Car Free Streets: California Avenue & Ramona Street Visioning of Community Survey Share input on the future of car free streets: California Avenue and Ramona Street. Count Cafes 54.7% 170 Retail 31.8% 99 Professional services 6.1% 19 Place of employment I 2.6% 8 Other 10.0% 31 QUESTION 8 What concerns you most about Ramona Street today and in the future? [Select all that apply] Count Too many vacancies 26.4% 61 Loss of retail shopping 23.8% 55 No people gathering places 33.8% 78 Road closure barriers ■ 15.6% 36 No potential customers driving past businesses 6.5% 15 Emergency vehicle access I 2.6% 6 Not enough parking ■ 21.2% 49 Other 25.1% 58 QUESTION 9 If you were to test creative, flexible interim street designs prior to permanent improvements, what options would 6 1 www.opentownhall.com/12434 (.'-+,.I I , 2023, 4:43 PM Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 102 Packet Pg. 256 of 374 Item 9 Attachment F - Summary Car Free Streets: California Avenue & Ramona Street Visioning of Community Survey Share input on the future of car free streets: California Avenue and Ramona Street. you want to explore: [Select all that apply] Count Closure to all car traffic 70.2% 205 Partial closure to one lane vehicle access to local 11.6% 34 businesses Slow, low volume two-way vehicle access to local 10.3% 30 businesses Bike lanes 41.8% 122 Expand outdoor dining 58.2% 170 Create an urban public space 55.5% 162 Locations for future trees and nature areas 47.6% 139 Other 6.5% 19 QUESTION 10 Long-term, what would you like to see on Ramona Street? [Select all that apply] Count Small scale public spaces with seating 56.1% 162 Maintain historic character and scale of street 56.4% 163 High -quality design 42.9% 124 Planting and street trees that complement historic 60.6% 175 buildings An outdoor dining destination 69.9% 202 Other , 11.1% 32 7 1 www.opentownhall.com/12434 (.'-+,.I I , 2023, 4:43 PM Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 103 Packet Pg. 257 of 374 Item 9 Attachment F - Summary Car Free Streets: California Avenue & Ramona Street Visioning of Community Survey Share input on the future of car free streets: California Avenue and Ramona Street. QUESTION 11 How old are you? Count 18-24 I 1.7% 6 25-34 12.8% 44 35-44 12.8% 44 45-54 ■ 20.6% 71 55+ 47.1% 162 Prefer not to answer 4.9% 17 QUESTION 12 Where do you live? Count Downtown Palo Alto 5.2% 18 Adjacent Downtown Palo Alto neighborhood within 8.2% 28 5 -to -10 -minute walk Within 5 -to -10 -minute bicycle trip to Ramona 6.7% 23 Street Within Palo Alto, but not walking or cycling 2.6% 9 distance of Ramona Street Cal Ave District 6.4% 22 Adjacent Cal Ave District neighborhood within 5 -to- ■ 21.6% 74 10 -minute walk Within 5 -to -10 -minute bicycle trip to Cal Ave 26.5% 91 Within Palo Alto, but not walking or cycling 6.4% 22 distance of California Avenue Stanford University I 1.7% 6 8 1 www.opentownhall.com/12434 (.'-+,.I I , 2023, 4:43 PM Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 104 Packet Pg. 258 of 374 Item 9 Attachment F - Summary Car Free Streets: California Avenue & Ramona Street Visioning of Community Survey Share input on the future of car free streets: California Avenue and Ramona Street. Count Outside of Palo Alto 14.6% 50 QUESTION 13 Where do you work? Count Downtown Palo Alto 8.7% 25 Adjacent Downtown Palo Alto neighborhood within 3.5% 10 a 5- to 10 -minute walk Within a 5 -to -10 -minute bicycle trip to Ramona 3.5% 10 Street Within Palo Alto, but not walking or cycling 1.4% 4 distance of Ramona Street Cal Ave District 6.6% 19 Adjacent Cal Ave District neighborhood within 5 -to - 10.5% 30 10 -minute walk Within a 5 -to -10 -minute bicycle trip to Cal Ave 12.5% 36 Within Palo Alto, but not walking or cycling I 3.1% 9 distance of Cal Ave Stanford Research Park 13.9% 40 Stanford University 10.5% 30 Outside of Palo Alto 25.8% 74 QUESTION 14 Do you own a business on Cal Ave or Ramona St? 9 1 www.opentownhall.com/12434 (.'-+,.I I , 2023, 4:43 PM Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 105 Packet Pg. 259 of 374 Car Free Streets: California Avenue & Ramona Street Visioning Share input on the future of car free streets: California Avenue and Ramona Street. Item 9 Attachment F - Summary of Community Survey Count Yes 1.1% 4 No 98.9% 350 QUESTION 15 Which business(es) do you own on Cal Ave. and/or Ramona St.? Answered 5 Skipped 351 italico 10 1 www.opentownhall.com/12434 r. —+o , 2023, 4:43 PM Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 106 Packet Pg. 260 of 374 Car Free Streets: California Avenue & Ramona Street Visioning Share input on the future of car free streets: California Avenue and Ramona Street. Survey Questions QUESTION 1 How often do you visit California Avenue (pick one)? • Several times a week • At least once a week • At least once a month • At least once every 6 months • At least once a year QUESTION 2 What brings you to California Avenue? [select all that apply] • Restaurants • Grocery store • Farmer's market • Cafe • Retail • Professional services • Government or non -profits • Arts/entertainment • Caltrain station • Place of employment QUESTION 3 What concerns you most about California Avenue today and in the future? [select all that apply] • Too many vacancies • Loss of retail shops • No people gathering places • No potential customers driving on the street • Underutilized • Not enough parking • No appealing storefronts and buildings • No reason to be there • Other QUESTION 4 Item 9 Attachment F - Summary of Community Survey • Outdoor dining • Music • Food trucks • Retail vendors and kiosks • Public art • Artisan stalls • Public places with seating • Children's play areas • Adult games and sports • Programmed events and activities • Other QUESTION 5 If you were to test creative, flexible interim street designs prior to permanent improvements, what options would you want to explore: [Select all that apply] • Closure to all car traffic except emergency vehicles • Partial closure to one lane vehicle access to local businesses • Slow, low volume two-way vehicle access to local businesses • Bike lanes • Pedestrian promenade • Public plazas with street furniture including chairs, tables, movable planters, and lighting • Locations for future trees and nature areas • Other QUESTION 6 How often do you visit Ramona Street? [Select one] • Several times a week • At least once a week • At least once a month • At least once every six months • At least once a year QUESTION 7 If you can have anything on California Avenue, what would you want What brings you to Ramona Street? long-term? [Select all that apply] [Select all that apply] • Restaurants 11 1 www.opentownhall.com/12434 (.'-+,-I , 2023, 4:43 PM Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 107 Packet Pg. 261 of 374 Car Free Streets: California Avenue & Ramona Street Visioning Share input on the future of car free streets: California Avenue and Ramona Street. • Cafes • Retail • Professional services • Place of employment • Other QUESTION 8 What concerns you most about Ramona Street today and in the future? [Select all that apply] • Too many vacancies • Loss of retail shopping • No people gathering places • Road closure barriers • No potential customers driving past businesses • Emergency vehicle access • Not enough parking • Other QUESTION 9 If you were to test creative, flexible interim street designs prior to permanent improvements, what options would you want to explore: [Select all that apply] • Closure to all car traffic • Partial closure to one lane vehicle access to local businesses • Slow, low volume two-way vehicle access to local businesses • Bike lanes • Expand outdoor dining • Create an urban public space • Locations for future trees and nature areas • Other QUESTION 10 Long-term, what would you like to see on Ramona Street? [Select all that apply] • Small scale public spaces with seating • Maintain historic character and scale of street • High -quality design • Planting and street trees that complement historic buildings • An outdoor dining destination • Other QUESTION 11 How old are you? • Under 12 • 13-17 • 18-24 • 25-34 • 35-44 • 45-54 • 55+ • Prefer not to answer QUESTION 12 Where do you live? Item 9 Attachment F - Summary of Community Survey • Downtown Palo Alto • Adjacent Downtown Palo Alto neighborhood within 5 -to -10 -minute walk • Within 5 -to -10 -minute bicycle trip to Ramona Street • Within Palo Alto, but not walking or cycling distance of Ramona Street • Cal Ave District • Adjacent Cal Ave District neighborhood within 5 -to -10 -minute walk • Within 5 -to -10 -minute bicycle trip to Cal Ave • Within Palo Alto, but not walking or cycling distance of California Avenue • Stanford University • Outside of Palo Alto QUESTION 13 Where do you work? • Downtown Palo Alto • Adjacent Downtown Palo Alto neighborhood within a 5- to 10 -minute walk • Within a 5 -to -10 -minute bicycle trip to Ramona Street • Within Palo Alto, but not walking or cycling distance of Ramona Street • Cal Ave District • Adjacent Cal Ave District neighborhood within 5 -to -10 -minute walk • Within a 5 -to -10 -minute bicycle trip to Cal Ave • Within Palo Alto, but not walking or cycling distance of Cal Ave • Stanford Research Park • Stanford University • Outside of Palo Alto QUESTION 14 12 1 www.opentownhall.com/12434 (.'-+,-I I , 2023, 4:43 PM Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 108 Packet Pg. 262 of 374 Car Free Streets: California Avenue & Ramona Street Visioning Share input on the future of car free streets: California Avenue and Ramona Street. Do you own a business on Cal Ave or Ramona St? • Yes • No QUESTION 15 Which business(es) do you own on Cal Ave. and/or Ramona St.? Item 9 Attachment F - Summary of Community Survey 13 1 www.opentownhall.com/12434 rre.+e,a I , 2023, 4:43 PM Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 109 Packet Pg. 263 of 374 Car Free Streets, California Avenue Ramona Street City of Palo Alto April 2023 Fukuji Architecture & Planning Fehr and Peers lb ruri jrilllll��r� � Ally California Avenue 11m2r. A Li ll Z ll� _ r I UI . . . I 1{" ily' lr na Street Agenda 1. Welcome & Introductions 2, Outreach Findings • Cal Ave • Ramona Street • Feedback 3. Two Project Approach • Demonstration Projects • Upcoming Study topics • Feedback 4. Next Steps Meeting Objectives • Validate outreach findings • Receive feedback on: • Demonstration projects • Upcoming study topics Car Free Streets. California Avenue & Ramona Street City Council effort to: • Enhance community experience and economic vibrancy of Palo Alto • Engage community, businesses & property owners • Advance interim and permanent street configurations Connecting the community together through expanded dining options, retail, and service options with Covid safety measures in mind. Community & Stakeholder Outreac mom;"""'tY visioning • Project Website • 12 Interviews 1:' • Local businesses, property owners & managers, non-profit leaders, Chamber of Commerce, elected officials, developers • 3 Focus Groups 11/17 —12/1 • Ramona Street Business Owners • California Avenue Business Owners • Chairpersons of City Commissions • 12/7/22 Community Workshop - 60 attendees • Online Community Survey - 356 responses! V V Cal Ave Business Owners r1 IiI A ,' 4 f.f'l\'. ; ' orkshop Item 9 Attachment G - Presentation from the April 2023 Community Meetin: t Ramona Street Priorities California Avenue Existnditions El Camino Real to Mimosa Lane ' 7 ____ J N Scale Shape a vibrant, urban public space Maintain character and scale of historic district • . Foster public life with places to meet, socialize and sit outdoors W Improve visual quality of street improvements ••.•• P RIo0.1�li.E (�Ug1,ll� ttslln sr improvements Introduce planting and street trees that .. complement historic buildings and storefronts Ensure inviting, customer friendly access and visibility to local businesses Create a pedestrian precinct that slows or divert vehicles Improve wayfinding and signage Create an outdoor dining destination • I, • • • Other: — Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 114 1 Packet Pg. 268 of 374 Item 9 Attachment G - Presentation from the April 2023 Community Meetinj leli(dTiiiTh1!WI'illfo Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 115 1 1 Packet Pg. 269 of 374 Restaurants What brings you to C. Online Survey Restaurants ••_•i p •� Farmer's market • ri � •�! .P4 { E. w Grocery Cafe Retail shops Caltrain ��4� 1V �_l1�• 141 Services 0 Farmer's Market 1 1 1 1 ii .1 Li :1 iiis Staff Report Pg. 116 Packet Pg. 270 of 374 Item 9 Attachment G - Presentation from the April 2023 Community Meetinj oncerns you snout cai P �mTF cAj �ktn I. Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 117 1 Packet Pg. 271 of 374 What would you like to see on Cal Ave: Online Survey 0 � } II Outdoor Dining 90 82% 80 70 62 % 62% 60 10 0 42% 32% o 29 % Outdoor Public Music Retail Events Food trucks Artisan stalls dining places with vendors & Public Spaces with Seating & Mus. j Item 9 Attachment G - Presentation from the April 2023 Community Meetinj F/I I RESTAURANTEURS "Outdoor dining saved our business" I Build outdoor (i2ifl;N) es on street uosur� RETAILERS "We're at high risk to further impacts with permanent closure" to destination Can't attract Heaters Need shops tenants, erodes essential open before & shopper base Want at least Customers enjoy after dinner one vehicle outdoor dining Need daytime lane open vitality Need community Need signage gathering places from parking to Ped/bike shops Doesn't feel like safety community space Retail Diversity Desire events RESIDENTS "Close street per, Support small iciness retention Zoning too restrictive to attract tenants Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 119 r 1 Packet Pg. 273 of 374 Cal Ave Assets • Historic Main Street • Walkable • 90 -foot ROW • Recent streetscape improvements & parking structure • Farmer's Market • Higher density & mixed -use • Regional transit • Pedestrian connections from parking • Public art Disorganized Cal Ave Challenges No aesthetics Vacancies pry, a -J } Retail invisibility Not inviting -. Divided Ped/bike conflicts Underutilized Item 9 Attachment G - Presentation from the April 2023 Community Meetinj iiiTi1ThL1 iiT-�c Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 122 1 1 Packet Pg. 276 of 374 What brings you to Ramona Street Online Survey frP .. Restaurants Restaurants Cafes t w Retail shops Services 0 10 32 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 What concerns you about Ramona SI Online Survev Road closure Not enough Loss of retail Too many No gathering barriers parking shops vacancies places What would you like to see on Ramrn Online Survey Outdoor Dining Destination 80% 70% treet: 1)/U Outdoor dining New planting & Maintain the Small-scale High -quality destination street trees historic public spaces design Packet Pg. 279 of 374 Business Owner Perspectives • 11 • Customers love street closure, supports business Temporary situation is not visually attractive Emergency lane divides street, limits creating public space Need aesthetic standards for improvements Willing to invest long-term if City commits to permanent street closure Feedback Ground Rules Give everyone a chance to contribute Share by "raising your virtual hand" When called on unmute yourself If having a technical problem, contact Ozzy Arce at Ozzy.Arce@CityofPaloAlto.org Cal Ave & Ramona Str( Feedback Community Outreach • Did we capture the high -priority opportunities and concerns? • Any gaps? Two Project I Initiating immediate and near -1 Demonstration Projects Demonstration P Install removable bollards Flexible community spaces Ground plane public art Wayfinding and signage ects Item 9 Attachment G - Presentation from l'iemonstration the April 2023 Community Meeting1•1 I 11 f' Replacing barriers to create safe and inviting public spaces on Cal Ave & Ramona Street Contemporary removable bollards for Cal Ave Traditional removable bollards for Ramona Street Demonstration Projects — Flexible Spes Activating public spaces on Cal Ave and Ramona Street • 41 ' i!&I!id d i r { Bmnur ,II A�N •��h., lye Outdoor living rooms Seating for Individuals and small groups Space for events and games Demonstration Projects — Ground PI'ane, Creating public art on Cal Ave iF l }• f_y Wfl5I ___ 1•• ...,. ____ �hl Commissioned Artists, Community Mt... - . . L. + Item 9 Attachment G - Presentation from the April 2023 Community Meeting II1 111.1 iTrt tiltiiii iIJ (I*- -TATMYA liii' kITrVI41TTa IT'S A 16 MINUTE WALK TO SEABOARD STATION IT'S 17 MINUTES' BY FOOT TO OAKWOOD ry,. CEMETERY Mi) rn STRAIGHT AHEAD X-2 SHOPPING, COFFEE, ATM, INUTE RESTAURANTS, MUSEUMS, LIBRARY, METRORAIL STATION TAE LEFT 4111 WINE BAR (30 sec) INUTE MIAMI'S OLDEST BAR (10 min) Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 134 Packet Pg. 288 of 374 Item 9 Attachment G - Presentation from the April 2023 Community Meeting \1 II ►TT ,� i Backyard Brew �, .o. 0 Californina to Avenue • Benetech Optometry Club �y Terun (D t Former VA Pilates Techcu Lee Tasting I CountrySun Bank Bookshare Aldinger Insurance tin Sho Terun Room Natural Foods ' cmu- °O m 4J• Jin Sho Terun 1111W! oC I 4- Izzy's Brooklyn Mediterranean La Bodega del Medio ° Kali Pasti's Kowa Wraps Thai Lotus 14, LaBagels _ _- Bohe e V. It Citi Izzy's La Bodeguita Eye Vacant Ramen Leaf & Vin Vino Vacant Lotus Ume The La Bank Brooklyn del Medio Works •Kowa Petal Wine J Thai Tea Avenue Boheme ' T Bagels • � � ,' v n — -\ Kali Greek JJ Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 135 Packet Pg. 289 of 374 Item 9 Attachment G - Presentation from the April 2023 Community Meeting i II,' j' IA Abb$11ey Neurodynamic t:► __iir: L: _ _ Center t.1 '', � . Palo Alto Massage n 0momi Lash ' Anatolian 1 Sol ; Therapy & Permanent '�� Kitchen 4 I Center The Sun of • Makeup Former Cobblery Wolf Zombie Bank Summit Avalon Art & La Jolie California Spoke & ( Runner Bicycles Yoga Center 1 Nail Spa Paint Co. Coffee Weal The Sun of Wolf Cobblery Palo Alto Sol / Ground -Plane 1 Joanie's Mural La p l Cafe Boheme j 4' s�1 moo �� 4' Vacant The La Joanie's Q1 Avenue Bohe Cafe % a-+ qCasual Chic J Local Kitchens Zareen's/Starbucks Food Hall Vacant Local , �+ Kitchens Food Zareen's Starbucks Hall Pakistani & Indian • Kitchen Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 136 � J sd f1 , Gallery 1 �1 House V1 r rF Printers Moods Performance Cafe Wine Bar Gaines Gym Gamelandia — f • N • I,� off. iTalico ' ` --Li [4/7' 1 Talico Vertex (Future) (Future) • • �...•a, IC Pure Ventures Scuttlebut Outdoor y Sf,; . Barre Restaurant Seating for I y J J � Scuttlebut `f � '1' I r Packet Pg. 290 of 374 Item 9 Attachment G - Presentation from the April 2023 Community Meetinj ITh11i :I. III ••• • ` __. y1 t u iE ._� �•__.j' ,• . �Itl r I {, I �I 4J I} I jl Vacant IWarbyIt •rt,''. • I 1`Vacant s (Formerly Parker.) Sweet Green • Nola - Old Pro) . N t N r' � � � � �' all ��7 I • Nola O Ramona Street m m• L IT Wr Coupa Cafe Bistro Cardinal Osteria Forest Spa Coupa Cafel Maxine Barbershop Legend Iry� ' IH ` ` Pamela Wood Over Walsh Parklet Parking Lot Mansoor n� Vacant r IMA, Pizza Gallery Tea Time I Q (' Emergency Access Lane Vibrations g y • Bollards .'• � I � �,+ t t� f • Outdoor Dining Area �� II i I" VA Bus Stop I 111 Flexible Community Spaces I f Scale Bike Corral • 0 So ft Pedestrian Alley/Walkway I (, .�.` r O . Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 137 Packet Pg. 291 of 374 Item 9 Attachment G - Presentation from the April 2023 Community Meetinj PCOUMIng �tuay 1UP Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 138 1 1 Packet Pg. 292 of 374 Upcoming Study Topics Alternatives Analysis & Implementation Plan • Streetscape design & amenities • Circulation • Design guidelines for private outdoor dining and public areas Fee/pricing for use of Right -of -Way • Parking strategies • Historic resources • Signage • Legislative options • Equity & accessibility • Partnership building Cal Avenue & Ramona Feedback Demonstration Projects • Feedback on the demonstration projects? • Thoughts on the proposed locations? • Feedback on additional locations for demonstration projects? Upcoming Studies • What are the highest priority topics for City Council consideration? Next Steps 1. Implement demonstration projects this summer! 2. Release the Scope of Work/RFP for the Alternatives Analysis study, as directed by Counci 3. Council approval of contract for the Alternatives Analysis study once a preferred consultant is identified For More Informal Project Website: CityofPaloAlto.org/CarFreeStreets Project Contact: Ozzy Arce, Senior Transportation Planner Ozzy.Arce@CityofPaloAlto.org Car Free Streets, California Avenue Ramona Street City of Palo Alto December 7, 2022 Fukuji Architecture & Planning Fehr and Peers i lI Istanbul, Turkey Car Free Streets. California Avenue & Ramona Street City Council effort to: • Enhance community experience and economic vibrancy of Palo Alto • Engage community, businesses & property owners • Advance interim and permanent street configurations Connecting the community together through expanded dining options, retail, and service options with Covid safety measures in mind. Agenda 1. Welcome & Introductions 2. Presentation 3. Small Group Activity 4. Next Steps _ ' fi ,:rya . T J .1 I Ramona Street __ Objectives �, V'e • Listen to community -'~ r z � � perspectives and ideas ' • Present best practices TA m _,,,.,► . Mllii i�RV ir P. Wzool- t I,. • Inpuon draft work plan;: Reshapinga Post Pandemic Main Str Challenges for California Avenue - • ■_,. A #'LTG; K 1, 4 2019 Pre -Pandemic ;•,. IV ` 1 Rs r ��" � • �a� Tom' �� - 2022 Post -Pandemic r• ar y,,H • r'•;_. \ gut r., -�'-.} �� � �► ^,s , M y Cn .f, Santa Monica 3R° Street Promenade - Santa Monica, California r, , k `} •Y � y a`„ •i• i 4. t4____ ___ Pearl Street — Boulder, Colorado ___LLessons Learned: Pedestrian Mall Reintroducing cars - placemaking and walkability with increasing visibility with local vehicle access .., : V4i:it S __________ - ii Fresno, California: 1964 Fulton Street Closed; 2017 Converted to 2 -way Street with 1960's Art r4r i Eiors etmj.I II T J!!IIL L I Kalamazoo, Michigan: 19 ....,,. ' ►'f► •1 I} I iii 1iil 1 1 [a 111 r0 6uiI as cilwme K4r r tic base I Catalyz' smart rxy.r .ILl.LrrIiEuI. I JIUxake a Stl'oi' eritr n jp gMgqm CO I"II4UN ITY IRA N S FORI'tATION Item 9 Attachment H - Presentation from the December 7 2022 Community Meeting mime an irwikjnq, in 'lv ahr art I Cdcbraiz historic .backer I F'ste acee!slUe, � tBrW public sates OR13ANIZAfIOFI PROMQTIDI# &tiIddo Iprii er5I30 5tro organizational'apaoiL I £r&im 'rcd.d COMB unity i` Icger i ht I _ rierJr9�ir5 ' !ofkit ii: ricI' deliniqq ass�- I ComrnurtikMD uniqua Lrd.Ure through &L•t44llin' I SupNq j '-Ioial eoperi Main Street America Resource Guide National Main +„.". "~��� Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 149 Packet Pg. 303 of 374 Post Pandemic Opportunity: Interim Street T Reprioritizing Transportation Infrastructure for Public Use Benefits • Demonstrate new ideas • Engage and empower stakeholders • Implement change quickly • Explore and refine designs • Inspire new policies and practices ions ai Identify Permanent improvements M J Item 9 Attachment H - Presentation from ' • - - the December 7 2022 Community Meeting Identify where Select Assemble Create a Learn from Plan to to start the site the team(s) schedule local context communicate 1. Plan 5. Evaluate a Move toward long-term impact Design the project Select and procure materials 4. Test 3. Implement 0 v Maintain the Share Activate project findings Test system the site Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 151 Coordinate implementation Packet Pg. 305 of 374 esign Guide Street —Existi Pike Street, New York ng Co Fl L 4ti •\;•, -. .. . I ...- . .. . 'h' ti 1 fJ n � .. •11 J • —.-- J Ii id.: I I .,p...- I- I ....... r � � .� 1 ew York City Department of Transpc Street — Interim DKe. Pike Street, New York M ___ 4$) :1;io i ____ - S. -. ___ - I i -, r • I,I - New York City Department of Tr Street — Capital Recu.ij::in Pike Street, New York Y �• 1 ' i1 c'-i' 1 .,' 9 .r i1 41 .m. r • New York City Department A# T State Street — Interim Design Santa Barbara, California . ,' � ,; ' ,! • , � fir► � , F , 1 j- � - mss_ �� �. ■ � State Street — Interim Design Santa Barbara, California I II y.._ti •.d \4 , 7, w +�. I py t t •11 11I IM II 4 i1! . . .' rr v Y State Street — I nt Santa Barbara, California f �I erim Design P'b sl !� yA i •.fir *. + ° !y j�yr l N r �•i; ti a N '. 1!T �/ f� � dy r �dj i� h .r •+ w, 4C� 11 ulr rep AL '••' T': Aft jiP State Street — Interim Design Santa Barbara, California � f 1 III i \j. V I, // `• ' �' I •. � � rY1• 7n � . �j_� f ' - --�... ,�7 �'�: �lr--�%•► '�C' , `fir. � !`. �� r , ,- :,. (p' ! f {JII .`I hi?:' I a k -It;' ;'! '3' .per iI ' I i!3'a � +CJ -L+ •_ '°•l�x�-I I E _ 4 Ih1\[ R. yt• � r�� � k � a , • ___ I � I Sunset Trian le laza — Interim Desi Los Angeles, California di i I, "*! I � � ry r J r k* • � .fl � - I 5 1��1 IIl L: : Public Space Activation NACTO 2021 Grant Program -Streets for Pandemic Response and Recovery 10 City/Community Partnerships Funded • '-II I �hn `il. , II' ra_. r,i VACI4LdII i __ * Bike Repair Station T ___ lii I1 - ijT Pop-up Library Community Artists Indigenous Culture Local Cart Vendors Street Murals Baltimore — Denver — Fort Collins — Los shington DC Item 9 - - Traisforul,;flotis 1 Couiuitaitk Attachment H - Presentation from • the December 7 2022 Community Meeting Y0 CASA DE LA GUERRA GUE PLAZA V l EL PASE MEMORrA.L PA , RK `, , '!!L: ''1 .., ______ MERCHANT KIOSKS , LATISAI CHILDR$NS ALLEE OF FOUNTAIN REMBERANCE I , PASEO NUEVO mill r I, 800 700 DOWNTOWN SANTA BARBARA • /V 1 ,. ,... ,- Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 161 METRO 4 THEATRE ; L4J;H: - r � Packet Pg. 315 of 374 Small Group Activity • Give everyone a chance to contribute • Make notes on maps or post -its to document your thoughts This is a data collection, not decision making or consensus building • All ideas welcome ! Small Group Questions 1. What concerns you most about the closure of California Avenue to vehicle traffic? 2. If you can have anything on California Avenue what would attract the most people to visit and spend time? Next Steps 1. Update City Council 2. Summarize Outreach Results including On-line Survey 3. Develop Scope of Work 4. Focus Group Follow-up 5. Draft RFQ/RFI For More Informatic Project Website: CityofPaloAlto.org/CarFreeStreets Project Contact: Ozzy Arce, Senior Transportation Planner Ozzy.Arce@CityofPaloAlto.org Itern 9 ;1ifornia Avenue • 4!1 I I Condition, Attachment H - Presentation from the December 7 2022 Community Meeting - 'I ': jfJ 1.1 ___ ___ -I•. ,k� r Backyard Rrew 3 ^� d Californina 1 t Avenue ' ` � � Optometry ' r Beretech D tomet a }� • Terun Club Techu Countr Sun t Bookshare Lee g r3t�� Tast ng y 1 Silicon Valley 1- Future Pilates Aldinger Inc Jinsho�1 1Terun Room Natural Foods Bank r � m Q 4C r•" ir Izzy'sBrooklyn .: .. Mcrikrcnaneaa .� La Bodega del Medio Kali Pasti's Kowa wr.,ps Tha'Lotus La Citi IZzy's LaBodeguita Eye 1 Pass Ramen Leaf& Vin Vino Vacant Lotus Urne The La Bank Brooklyn del Medio Works Bistro Kowa Petal Wine I Thal Tea Avenue ,Boheme Kali Greek+ Christian KitchenMediterranean r Science ► I Wrap • ding . t Rea , Hairshaper's Club � 4 actin 1 it gar Legend Pedestrian Alley/Walkway ;* S Outdoor Dining Area "' Parking Lot z J Emergency Access Lane Orange Plastic Barrier Scale Tented Dining Area VA Bus Sto Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 166 Packet Pg. 320 of 374 Item 9 / - - • xviiiiIii 4!1 I I Condition, Attachment H - Presentation from the December 7 2022 Community Meeting Wi ,. r f• R Palo Alto Spl '! Massage 14 Therapy ti + 11 I < . -, ' Sun of Center F (Future) European , . wolf r ~ 5iliconValley • I1 Cobblery I1 . i!JI SummitBank 9icycies Yoga Center Abbey r Neurodynamic Center pmomi lash Port of a Permanent .: Perip r Makeup • , zombie Spoke& s uI Weal Printers Gallery Performance Lalolie California Runner Cafe House Gains Gym Hail Spa PrintCo. Coffee Eu opean — _ Cabblery �� 07Z s to of Wolf HIOdPie5_ -.. zifi aoheme Local E\ Kitchens Lareen'sfStallbueks Food Hall acanl Vacant K ` Local The La loanie's . _ • ral — Hlichens Avenue 6oheme Cafe I ti I Food Zen's 5larbucks t �' I � • eI{ HaN Pak{skani s Casual Chit ' , ' , & Indian Salon jh y t{ Kitchen i1 111 y �• f , � , Legend Pedestrian Alley/Walkway �e Outdoor Dining Area 0 + Parking Lot • Emergency Access Lane ' � Orange Plastic Barrier •*'1 Scale Tented DiningArea iA Bus5to Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 167 (.I] rf lb lb rt r� •`I Gamelandia I__. •4 4r iSaiko ,yl�— f ti iTalicn Future) {Future} Five Sturtlebut Outdoor N Faire „w Restaurant 5eaengfor Scuttlebut �l ti .r {. I it �, 4 F° Packet Pg. 321 of 374 Item 9 . Lt1ii,tFi il *!1 iLI - • Conditions Attachment H - Presentation from the December 7 2022 Community Meeting "•�J={Former�Y Parker 5weetGreens « Nola old Pm} ..r Nola Vacant Sweet Greens r+ } tlr 1 W 2D'? Ramona StreetI �� Caupa Cafe Tea Time BFStm Maxine terla i { Via. L, +1� 'n a '.NXr— � ;.. tU I bistro Cardinal Osteria Forest Spe Coy a Cafe �' f 5outicu^ P Maxine Barbershop VI 1 Pamela I� r ' Wood Over — Vacant Waish Tea Time 1 r} 1 .3. Plaa j I Gallery Legend Orange Plastic Barrier 1 =' ' Good t l u' + Vibrations Parklet PedestrianWaIkway L. i i _ • III 1 lI I } I 1• �I 13 OutdoorDining Emergency Access Lang Scale Bike Corral Parking Garage • Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 168 Packet Pg. 322 of 374 i�: California Avenue Existing Conditions c�FEl Camino Real to Mimosa Lane Californina • -' k _ ' Avenue P.! Benetech �Li Optometry Club Techcu �. Lee C� Pilates ll 1 Bookshare Aldinger Insurance Jin Sho Terun t, r CO c° "'� La Bodega del Medio - Kal V o 8 Izzy's__ - W ... agels I Citi Bank Legend Outdoor Dining Area Emergency Access Lane Tented Dining Area ■ Flexible Community Spaces/ Game Play Areas Brooklyn ti Bag`ls La Bodeguit del Medio t Campus S Barber Shop r 1 1t Pedestrian Alley/Walkway Parking Lot � Orange Plastic Barrier TfA Bus Stop Backyard Brew Terun iTLI!FItem 9 Attachment I -California Avenue Exhibit October 2023 (El Camino Real to Birch Street) CTYOFPALOALTO October 13, 2023 (Vacant) � 1 Country Sun Former Terun Natural Foods Bank Pasti's Kowa : Q diterranean Wrap — - P=hai Lotus La !AZ & ( Ume Sekoya La Tea Lounge Boheme and Kitchen I' Scale 0 50ft d Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 169 1 Packet Pg. 323 of 374 California Avenue Existing Conditions Mimosa Lane to Birch Street Existing Conditions Item 9 Attachment I - California Avenue Exhibit October 2023 (El Camino Real to Birch Street) () CITY OF PALO ALTO October 13, 2023 _1 Abbey ffE Neurodynamic? , i 1" r. I Center 111 f Galler J Massage ��� Omomi Lash i r /� Palo Alto Anatolian House r Sol Therapy s & Permanent. Kitchen ; ~ (Vacant) )' "" Center Makeup `� l The Sun of �� / r 1t� I Former Cobblery Wolf Zombie • Bank Summit Avalon Art & La Jolie California Spoke & Printers Moods Performance Bicycles Yoga Center • Nail Spa Paint Co. •Runner Wine Bar Gaines Weal i Cafe Gym 1' - i 1 Coffee - - The Sun of Wolf Cobblery Palo Alto 5o1 f Ground -Plane Jeanie s La 7 Mural Cafe Boheme :� -\ L alb Sekoya La I Joanie's Lounge Boheme Cafe and Kitchen Casual Chic Salon . �I.r) -, 11 Legend flOutdoor Dining Area Emergency Access Lane Tented Dining Area ■ Flexible Community Spaces/ Game Play Areas Ii ii ir'r i + iTalico Local Zareen's Kitchens .�. Food Hail l �-' Vacant ` Vacant n • Local L Kitchens L1 Food 2-; Hall +�T Pedestrian Alley/Walkway Parking Lot M Orange Plastic Barrier VA Bus Stop Zareen's Pakistani & Indian Kitchen • Scale 0 50ft iTalico Vertex Venture. J -77— (Future) (Future) ' $cuttlebut utdoor k ' �test�alr�nt atingfor r ttlebut TI tir• r ; F Gamelandia xo •- sz 'Cs t Pure Barre r! •�1 Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 170 1 Packet Pg. 324 of 374 Ramona Street Existing Conditions University Avenue to Hamilton Avenue Item 9 Attachment J - Ramona Street Exhibit October 2023 (El Camino Real to Birch Street) CITY ui- • PALO ALTO October 13, 2023 J. tr•�r •r •k Clti Bank i � Vacant Warby - (Formerly-- Sweet Green Vacant �^' ( Y " Parker s..t r: 4 Nola Old Pro) ...r .� �• aw.� •h_ _ - • Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 171 1 Packet Pg. 325 of 374 Item 10 Item 10 Staff Report City Council Staff Report From: City Manager CITY O F Report Type: ACTION ITEMS PALO Lead Department: Planning and Development Services ALTO Meeting Date: November 6, 2023 Report #:2309-2070 TITLE LEGISLATIVE: Adopt Ordinances Amending Planned Community Ordinance 2343 for 2901-2905 Middlefield Road and Establishing a Separate Planned Community Zoning Designation for 702 Ellsworth Place to Enable the Development of a new Single -Story, Single -Family Residence. CEQA Status -- Categorically Exempt Under CEQA Guidelines Sections 15061(b)(3), 15301, and 15303 (Continued from September 18, 2023) RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that City Council adopt two ordinances amending Planned Community Ordinance 2343 for 2901-2905 Middlefield Road to establish separate Planned Community zoning designations for the existing 12 -unit apartment building at 2901-2905 Middlefield Road (Attachment A) and the undeveloped lot at 702 Ellsworth Place to enable the development of a single-family residence (Attachment B). BACKGROUND The City Council held a public hearing on September 18, 2023 to consider the subject request. Project background information is available online in the staff report prepared for that meeting.' The City Council, on a 5-2 vote, continued the hearing with the main motion on the table and with direction to staff to attempt to resolve the issue of package deliveries on Ellsworth Place. Some Councilmembers expressed interest to support the request with the following adjustments: • Extend the access easement to Ellsworth Place from 24 -feet to 26 -feet in width; • Prohibit additional landscaping within the sight triangle at 2901 Middlefield Road; • Delete the word 'perceived' from the ordinance that establishes the easement; • Verify the accuracy of lot sizes identified in the ordinances; 1 September 18, 2023, city Council Staff Report: https://cityofpaloaIto.primegov.com/meeting/document/2722.pdf?name=Item%207%20Staff%20Report Item 10: Staff Report Pg. 1 Packet Pg. 326 of 374 Item 10 Item 10 Staff Report • Provide for package delivery on 2901 Middlefield Road and coordinate with package delivery vendors to provide drop off lockers for residents on Ellsworth Place; and, • Extend the sight triangle at 702 Ellsworth to the southernmost corner of the property. Staff revised the proposed ordinance based on this direction, as discussed in the Analysis section below. Staff additionally asked the applicant to investigate if it would be beneficial to lower a raised portion of the access drive that occurs near the property line boundary adjacent to Middlefield Road. The applicant contacted a grading contractor and the project traffic consultant, and both agree that the existing condition is suitable and appropriate for the site. The raised bump condition near the sidewalk causes motorists to slow down when entering or exiting the property. Slower traffic lessens the chance of collision or injury. Moreover, the raised bump does not impede visual access exiting onto Middlefield Road. The City's Office of Transportation has similarly reviewed the condition and concurs with these findings, conditioned upon the maintenance of vegetation in the planting strips next to the sidewalk to ensure visibility; this requirement has been incorporated into the Site Development Regulations (Section 5(a)) contained in both of the proposed ordinances. Additionally, there may also be drainage -related concerns if the raised portion were lowered but staff did not pursue that further given the safety findings above. ANALYSIS Responses to the City Council's direction are provided below. 26 -Foot -Wide Easement to Provide Access to Ellsworth Place The City Council expressed preference for a 26 -foot -wide easement to provide access from Middlefield Road to Ellsworth Place. Both PC ordinances have been revised to require additional asphalt paved sections along both sides of Ellsworth Place, that, when combined with the existing paved area, would result in a 26 -foot wide easement over the first 37 feet of Ellsworth Place. The ordinances also require the property owners to record easements designating the additional paved sections for ingress and egress to the other properties on Ellsworth Place. At the time this report was prepared, the owner of 2901-2905 Middlefield Road has not indicated agreement or support for the additional easement width request. The owner of 702 Ellsworth Place supports the request in combination with a taller front yard fence within the sight triangle (see heading further below and Attachment C). Landscaping Within Sight Triangles The proposed ordinance for 702 Ellsworth Place PC already limits new impediments to a height of one foot within the sight triangle. The City Council expressed a preference for similar restrictions for the sight triangle on the 2901-2905 Middlefield Road. The proposed ordinance for 2901-2905 Middlefield Road PC has been updated accordingly. Item 10: Staff Report Pg. 2 Packet Pg. 327 of 374 Item 10 Item 10 Staff Report Verify the Accuracy of Lot Sizes Staff reviewed the draft PC ordinances and found no discrepancy in the lot sizes. Staff has made minor, non -substantive changes to the ordinances to clarify requirements regarding dimensions and locations of the additional paved sections along Ellsworth Place, sight triangles, and parking and loading areas. Packaee Delivery & Droo Off Lockers for Ellsworth Place Residents The applicant reports contacting UPS and FedEx and states that residential drop off containers are not available from those companies. Efforts to contact Amazon were not successful. Staff similarly attempted internet-based searches to see if there were coordinated residential drop off arrangements between companies but was unsuccessful finding a solution. The property owner for 2901-2905 Middlefield Road concludes that a community package delivery drop box solution is not feasible and is not an approach the applicant is willing to pursue. The property owner restates a perspective that the proposed temporary loading zone design represents an improvement for the residents at Ellsworth Place and that the current system that Ellsworth Place residents rely upon for their parcel delivery involves trespassing on private property. Staff concurs that a communal parcel drop box supported by many delivery vendors is not practical and that the loading zone space can reasonably accommodate certain -sized delivery trucks. For larger trucks, staff recommends a sign be posted at Middlefield Road before accessing the private easement directing delivery trucks over 24 feet to use a designated loading space on Sutter Avenue. The loading zone space on Sutter Avenue would occupy two parking spaces (approximately 40 feet) and have signs and a white -painted curb restricting non - loading zone parking. The installation of curb paint along the Sutter Avenue frontage of 2901 Middlefield for a loading zone space has been added as a new requirement to SECTION 1 item (d) sub -item (ii) in the PC ordinance for 2901 Middlefield Road, to offset the nominal cost for a loading zone installation. Staff recommends the installation of a sign stating "No Delivery Trucks Over 24' long" below or above the existing 'No Outlet' sign located within the Middlefield right of way between the sidewalk and Handa's property. This has been added to SECTION 5 item (a) sub -item (v) of the PC ordinance for 702 Ellsworth, as an exception to the 'no new impediments over one foot in height' rule. Extend Sieht Trian&le for 702 Ellsworth to Southernmost Property Corner This provision has been incorporated into the PC ordinance for 702 Ellsworth Place. By extending the sight triangle endpoint to the southernmost property corner along Middlefield Road, the ordinance introduces further restrictions on vegetation, fences and other impediments to one foot or less in height within the extended triangle area. This new sight triangle area would affect approximately 14 additional feet of fence length along Middlefield to Item 10: Staff Report Pg. 3 Packet Pg. 328 of 374 Item 10 Item 10 Staff Report reach the southernmost corner of 702 Ellsworth Place. The PC ordinance retains the restriction on new impediments taller than one foot within the sight triangle. As noted above, the owner for this property objects to the 12 -inch fence height restriction citing safety concerns and noting other properties do not have the same requirement. In exchange for the increased easement width for this property, the owner requests approval for a 36 -inch tall wrought iron fence within the sight triangle that is set back four feet from the sidewalk. Two design options are proposed, including one that provides an angled design to eliminate any obstruction within six feet of the intersection of Ellsworth Place and the Middlefield Road sidewalk. More information is available in Attachment C. Staff notes that the municipal code does permit a 36 -inch tall fence within the sight triangle. Moreover, in consultation with the City's Office of Transportation, a 36 -inch tall fence with openings such as wrought iron and located four feet back from the sidewalk, would not obstruct visibility of pedestrians walking on the sidewalk or motorists entering or exiting Ellsworth Place. Staff had supported a similar design concept when the project was reviewed by the PTC who added the one -foot tall fence height restriction; staff carried forward the PTC's recommendation to the City Council when this item was considered in August. Communications Pole Relocation on 2901 Middlefield Road When assessing the implications of a 26 -foot -wide easement on the subject property, staff learned that the proposal to relocate the bracing for the existing AT&T pole requires modification. To improve access to one of the planned parking spaces near the apartment building and address bracing requirements, the existing communications pole will require relocation. The image in Exhibit 2 attached to the 2901 Middlefield ordinance shows the approximate location of the new communications pole and will require coordination with AT&T for communication line trenching, removing the existing pole, and rewiring from the new pole to the existing pole on the property line with 705 Ellsworth Place. The PC ordinance for 2901- 2905 Middlefield has been revised to require the relocation of the communications pole as depicted in Exhibit 2 of the 2901-2905 Middlefield ordinance prior to the issuance of a building permit for the property at 702 Ellsworth Place, at the property owner's expense. Construction Logistics Plan While not typically required for new single-family home construction, given community concerns expressed about site access and visibility, the adjacency to Middlefield Road, and that Ellsworth residents rely on the 702 Ellsworth Place easement for ingress and egress to their properties, staff has added a requirement that the property owner of 702 Ellsworth place prepare a construction logistics plan for approval by the City prior to the issuance of a building permit for the new home. The logistics plan will address construction staging, construction worker parking, and material deliveries during site preparation and construction. It will also include best practices for dust mitigation, stipulate permitted construction activities, hours, and noise requirements, and include contact information for construction -related complaints. Item 10: Staff Report Pg. 4 Packet Pg. 329 of 374 Item 10 Item 10 Staff Report Moreover, to offset city enforcement costs, staff recommends including a $5,000 deposit to respond to construction -related complaints that may arise from this project. The deposit would be replenished after reaching a certain amount specified in the ordinance, and unspent portions refunded upon issuance of the certificate of occupancy. FISCAL/RESOURCE IMPACT The recommendation included with this report does not have any significant fiscal impacts but does include conditions of approval to off -set costs associated with anticipated code enforcement during construction and installation of some signs and street markings. STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT Notice of the subject hearing was mailed to owners and occupants within 600 feet of the properties, posted in the local paper, online and placed at the public information kiosk on Martin Luther King Jr. Plaza at City Hall, in accordance with local requirements and procedures. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Council action on this item is exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under CEQA Guidelines section 15061(b)(3) in that it can be seen with certainty that minor changes to the parking configuration at 2901-2905 Middlefield Road and construction of a single-family home will not result in a significant impact on the environment. Council action on the PC ordinance for 2901-2905 Middlefield Road (Attachment A) is also categorically exempt under CEQA Guidelines section 15301 (minor alterations to existing facilities). Council action on the PC ordinance for 702 Ellsworth Place (Attachment B) is also categorically exempt under CEQA Guidelines section 15303 (construction of a new single family residence). ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: Planned Community 2343 Amendment Ordinance for 2901 Middlefield Attachment B: Planned Community Ordinance for 702 Ellsworth Place Attachment C: Email/Letter from Nitin Handa, owner for 702 Ellsworth Place APPROVED BY: Jonathan Lait, Planning and Development Services Director Item 10: Staff Report Pg. 5 Packet Pg. 330 of 374 Item 10 Attachment A - Planned Not Yet Adopted Community 2343 Amendment Ordinance Ordinance No. for 2901 Middlefield Ordinance of the Council of the City of Palo Alto Amending Section 18.08.040 of the Palo Alto Municipal Code (the Zoning Map) to Rezone the Property at 2901- 2905 Middlefield Road from Planned Community Ordinance 2343 (PC -2343) to Planned Community Ordinance XXXX (PC-XXXX). The Council of the City of Palo Alto does ORDAIN as follows: SECTION 1. Findings and Declarations. (a) On February 2, 2023, Dewey Land Company LLC ("Dewey") and Handa Developer's Group/RRP ("Handa") applied to amend Planned Community Ordinance 2343 ("PC -2343") to apply solely to the property at 2901-2905 Middlefield Road, APN 127-35-194, ("Middlefield Parcel") and rezone the property at 702 Ellsworth Place, APN 127-35-152, ("Ellsworth Parcel") from Planned Community to Single Family Residential (R-1). (b) At a March 13, 2023 study session, the City Council considered the prescreening application and indicated the project applicants should proceed with a formal PC rezoning application to the Planning and Transportation Commission for a recommendation. (c) On June 28, 2023, July 12, 2023, and August 9, 2023 the Palo Alto Planning and Transportation Commission ("PTC") held a series of public hearings to consider the application. The PTC recommended that PC -2343 be amended to remove the Ellsworth Parcel and to adopt two new PC ordinances to govern the Middlefield Parcel and Ellsworth Parcel, respectively, along with a corresponding amendment to Section 18.08.040 of the Palo Alto Municipal Code (Zoning Map). (d) The amendment recommended by the PTC would reduce the area of the Planned Community PC 2343 from approximately 26,386 sf to approximately 19,893 square feet to encompass 2901-2905 Middlefield Road, a 12 -unit apartment building currently owned by Dewey, and amend the development plan for the PC to: (i) restripe the tenant parking facility to assign four uncovered parking spaces to meet current code requirements for tenant parking spaces, (ii) provide a truck delivery space, (iii) maintain trash enclosure and pickup from Sutter Avenue, (iv) the 35 -foot sight triangle at the intersection of Ellsworth Place and Middlefield Road shall not be obstructed by plants, fences, or other objects taller than 1 foot, (v) add a 3'6" -wide swath of paving alongside Ellsworth Place beginning at the Middlefield Road. (e) The PTC recommended concurrent adoption of a companion ordinance (Ordinance No. XXXX) to designate the remaining approximately 6,493 square foot parcel currently owned by 1 0160120_20230906_ayl6 Item 10: Staff Report P . 6 p g Packet Pg. 331 of 374 Item 10 Attachment A - Planned Not Yet Adopted Community 2343 Amendment Ordinance Hands at 702 Ellsworth as PC, for the purpose of constructing a sing) for 2901 Middlefield ily residence. (f) The City Council held public hearings on September 18, 2023 and November 6, 2023 to consider the PTC's recommendation and additional public input, and made further amendments to those recommendations regarding the width of Ellsworth Place, parking and loading requirements, and the sight triangle at the northeast corner of the intersection of Ellsworth Place and Middlefield Road, as set forth below. (g) The Council, after due consideration of the PTC's recommendations, finds: (i) The site is so situated and the uses proposed for the site are of such characteristics that the application of general districts or combining zoning districts will not provide sufficient flexibility to allow the proposed development; the City's conventional zoning district RM20 would not permit the existing 12 unit structure on the proposed 0.46 acre site (ii) Amendment to the existing Planned Community PC -2343 will provide public benefits expected to result from the Project, including expanded ingress and egress for the existing residences on Ellsworth Place through additional easements, that, when combined, would result in a 26 -foot wide easement over the first 37 feet of Ellsworth Place, and the construction of an additional dwelling unit. (iii) The Council further finds that the Project provides public benefits, as described above, that are of sufficient importance to make the Project, as a whole, one with reasonable public benefit. (iv) The existing use and improvements are generally remaining unchanged and are compatible with existing and potential uses on adjoining sites or within the general vicinity. (v) The use permitted and the site development regulations are consistent with the following Palo Alto Comprehensive Plan policies and are, on balance, consistent with the goals and purposes of the Comprehensive Plan: Policy L-1.1 Infill development in the urban service area should be compatible with its surroundings and the overall scale and character of the city to ensure a compact, efficient development pattern. Policy L-1.2 Hold new development to the highest development standards in order to maintain Palo Alto's livability and achieve the highest quality development with the least impacts. Policy L-1.3 Ensure that new or remodeled structures are compatible with the neighborhood and adjacent structures. Policy L-1.4 Avoid negative impacts of basement construction for single-family homes on adjacent properties, public resources, and the natural environment. Policy L-1.5 Design buildings to complement streets and public spaces; to promote personal safety, public health and well-being; and to enhance a sense of community safety. 2 0160120_20230906_ayl6 Item 10: Staff Report P . 7 p g Packet Pg. 332 of 374 Item 10 Attachment A - Planned Not Yet Adopted Community 2343 Amendment Ordinance Policy L-1.6 Discourage the use of fences that obscure the viet for 2901 Middlefield douses from the street. The use and improvements on the site are remaining unchanged from existing conditions, which are compatible with existing and potential uses on adjoining sites. SECTION 2. Amendment of Zoning Map. Section 18.08.040 of the Palo Alto Municipal Code, the "Zoning Map," is hereby amended to rezone the certain property known as 2901-2905 Middlefield Road from PC -2343 to "PC- XXXX." The subject property and revised zoning designation is shown on the map labeled Exhibit "A," attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 3. Development Plan Those certain plans entitled PROPOSED PC AMENDMENT TO PC 2343, DATED 1967, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and incorporated herein, are hereby approved as the Development Plan for the subject property. SECTION 4. Uses. (a) Permitted Uses. The permitted uses within the PC boundary shall be limited to a 12 -unit apartment building: The existing apartment building shall remain on the 2901-2905 Middlefield site within the PC boundary. Covered and uncovered parking for the tenants shall be provided in accordance with Section 5(b) of this ordinance. SECTION 5. Site Development Regulations. (a) Compliance with Development Plan. All improvements and development shall be substantially in accordance with the Development Plan, except as modified herein. (i) A 42 -inch -wide swath of asphalt paving shall be created alongside the northern edge of Ellsworth Place beginning at the Middlefield Road curb line and extending eastward approximately 37 feet to the location of an existing communications utility pole guy -wire, to increase the perceived -width of Ellsworth Place. (ii) This additional paved area shall be maintained remain clear of obstructions. (iii) Prior to final inspection of any improvements on the site, Dcwcy property owner shall offer prepare and record an ingress and egress easement over this additional paved area to the other properties on Ellsworth Place. (iv) Any exterior changes to the apartment building or any new construction not specifically permitted by the Development Plan or by these site development regulations shall require an amendment to this Planned Community Zone or, if eligible, Architectural Review approval under Section 18.76 of the Palo Alto Municipal Code, as it is amended from time to time. 3 0160120_20230906_ayl6 Item 10: Staff Report P . 8 p g Packet Pg. 333 of 374 Item 10 Attachment A - Planned Not Yet Adopted Community 2343 Amendment Ordinance (vi) The 35 -foot sight triangle at the intersection of Ellsworth for 2901 Middlefield Road shall not be obstructed by new plants, fences, or other objects taller than 1 foot. (vii) The property owner shall maintain vegetation at a height of 1 foot or less in the planter strip between the Middlefield Road curb and sidewalk. (b) Parking and Loading Requirements. u One covered parking space shall be provided for each of the 12 residential apartments. In addition, four uncovered spaces and a truck delivery space shall be provided on the 2901-2905 Middlefield property, accessible from Ellsworth Place, as shown on the Development Plan. A curbside loading? zone 40 feet in length shall be designated on Sutter Avenue in front of 2901 Middlefield Road with signage and curb painting. (iii) Property owner shall install a sign restricting the length of delivery vehicles on Ellsworth Place to 24' or shorter. The sign shall be placed above or below the existing "No Outlet" sign installed in the Middlefield Road right of way, between the sidewalk and the Ellsworth Parcel. (iv) Property owner shall restripe the existing parking facility to assign three uncovered parking spaces to meet current code requirements for tenant parking. (v) To facilitate the provision of off-street parking space #16, property owner shall relocate the existing communications utility pole and install any improvements as required by the Director of Utilities and the Director of Planning and Development Services to comply with parking design and safety standards. (vi) Property owner shall be responsible for all costs associated with fulfilling the requirements of this paragraph. (c) Trash Enclosures and Pickup. Trash enclosures and pickup shall be maintained with access from Sutter Avenue, and not from Ellsworth Place. (d) Development Schedule. The parking lot restriping on 2901-2905 Middlefield Road shall be immediately implemented upon the effective date of this ordinance. Off-street parking space #16 shall be provided prior to issuance of building hermits for the construction of the 702 Ellsworth Place residence. Construction of the improvements to Ell worth Dlac^ the Middlefield Parcel shall be completed within twelve (12) months of the effective date of this ordinance. (e) Minor Variations in Project. Minor changes to the Project may be approved by the Director, according to the provisions of Palo Alto Municipal Code Section 18.76.020(b)(3)(D) for architectural review. "Minor" changes do not include changes in land use. SECTION 6. The City Council finds that this ordinance is categorically exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section 15061(b)(3) because it can be seen with certainty that minor changes to the parking configuration at 2901- 2905 Middlefield Road and construction of a single-family home pursuant to Ordinance No. XXXX will not result in a significant impact on the environment. The City Council finds that this 4 0160120_20230906_ayl6 Item 10: Staff Report P . 9 p g Packet Pg. 334 of 374 Item 10 Attachment A - Planned Not Yet Adopted Community 2343 Amendment Ordinance ordinance is additional categorically exempt under Section 15301 of the d for 2901Middlefield sit involves only minor alterations to existing facilities. r I lII1►WA adoption. INTRODUCED: PASSED: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTENTIONS: ATTEST: This ordinance shall be effective on the thirty-first day after the date of its City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Assistant City Attorney Mayor /e1»,091T �i71 City Manager Director of Planning and Development Services 5 0160120_20230906_ayl6 Item 10: Staff Report P . 10 P Pg. Packet Pg. 335 of 374 Item 10 Attachment B - Planned Not Yet Adopted Community Ordinance for 702 Ellsworth Place ORDINANCE NO. Ordinance of the Council of the City of Palo Alto Amending Section 18.08.040 of the Palo Alto Municipal Code (the Zoning Map) to Rezone the Property at 702 Ellsworth Place from Planned Community Ordinance 2343 (PC -2343) to Planned Community Ordinance XXXX (PC-XXXX). The Council of the City of Palo Alto does ORDAIN as follows: SECTION 1. Findings and Declarations. (a) On February 2, 2023, Dewey Land Company LLC ("Dewey") and Handa Developer's Group/RRP ("Handa") applied to amend Planned Community Ordinance 2343 ("PC -2343") to apply solely to the property at 2901-2905 Middlefield Road, APN 127-35-194, ("Middlefield Parcel") and rezone the property at 702 Ellsworth Place, APN 127-35-152, ("Ellsworth Parcel") from Planned Community to Single Family Residential (R-1). (b) At a March 13, 2023 study session, the City Council considered the prescreening application and indicated the project applicants should proceed with a formal PC rezoning application to the Planning and Transportation Commission for a recommendation. (c) On June 28, 2023, July 12, 2023, and August 9, 2023 the Palo Alto Planning and Transportation Commission ("PTC") held a series of public hearings to consider the application. The PTC recommended that PC -2343 be amended to remove the Ellsworth Parcel and to adopt two new PC ordinances to govern the Middlefield Parcel and Ellsworth Parcel, respectively, along with a corresponding amendment to Section 18.08.040 of the Palo Alto Municipal Code (Zoning Map). (d) The amendment recommended by the PTC would remove the approximately 6,493 square foot parcel currently owned by Handa at 702 Ellsworth from PC -2343 and redesignate it as a separate PC, for the purpose of constructing a single -story, single-family residence. The PTC recommended the following conditions: (i) the development plan shall include a 2'6" -wide swath of pavement alongside Ellsworth Place beginning at the Middlefield Road curb line and extending to the proposed walkway to the single-family residence to increase the width of Ellsworth Place, (ii) the 35 -foot sight triangle at the intersection of Ellsworth Place and Middlefield Road shall not be obstructed by new plants, fences, or other objects taller than 1 foot, (iii) the 24 -foot special setback from Middlefield Road shall be observed, (iv) the setback from the creek shall be determined by a slope stability analysis, (v) and a 6 -foot setback shall apply to the rear property line, except with respect to a detached garage. 1 0160121 20230906_ayl6 Item 10: Staff Report Pg. 11 p Packet Pg. 336 of 374 Item 10 Attachment B - Planned Not Yet Adopted ICommunity Ordinance for 702 Ellsworth Place (e) The PTC recommended concurrent adoption of a companion ordinance (Ordinance No. XXXX) to reduce the area of the Planned Community PC -2343 from approximately 26,386 sf to approximately 19,893 square feet to encompass 2901-2905 Middlefield Road, a 12 -unit apartment building currently owned by Dewey. (f) The City Council held public hearings on September 18, 2023 and November 6, 2023 to consider the PTC's recommendation and additional public input, and made further amendments to those recommendations regarding the width of Ellsworth Place and the sight triangle at the southeast corner of the intersection of Ellsworth Place and Middlefield Road, as set forth below. (g) The Council, after due consideration of the PTC's recommendations, finds: (i) The site is so situated and the uses proposed for the site are of such characteristics that the application of general districts or combining zoning districts will not provide sufficient flexibility to allow the proposed development; the City's conventional zoning district RM20 would not permit the existing 12 unit structure on the proposed 0.46 acre site (ii) Amendment to the existing Planned Community PC -2343 will provide public benefits expected to result from the Project, including expanded ingress and egress for the existing residences on Ellsworth Place through additional easements, that, when combined, would result in a 26 -foot wide easement over the first 37 feet of Ellsworth Place, an additional 5 -foot long by 30 -inch wide easement on 702 Ellsworth Place, and the construction of an additional dwelling unit. (iii) The Council further finds that the Project provides public benefits, as described above, that are of sufficient importance to make the Project, as a whole, one with reasonable public benefit. (iv) The proposed single-family residence is compatible with existing and potential uses on adjoining sites or within the general vicinity, which are typically single- family residences and one 12 -unit apartment complex. (v) The use permitted and the site development regulations are consistent with the following Palo Alto Comprehensive Plan policies and are, on balance consistent with the goals and purposes of the Comprehensive Plan: Policy L- 1.1 Infill development in the urban service area should be compatible with its surroundings and the overall scale and character of the city to ensure a compact, efficient development pattern. Policy L-1.2 Hold new development to the highest development standards in order to maintain Palo Alto's livability and achieve the highest quality development with the least impacts. Policy L-1.3 Ensure that new or remodeled structures are compatible with the neighborhood and adjacent structures. Policy L-1.4 Avoid negative impacts of basement construction for single-family homes on adjacent properties, public resources, and the natural environment. 2 0160121_20230906_ayl6 Item 10: Staff Report P . 12 P Pg. Packet Pg. 337 of 374 Item 10 Attachment B - Planned Not Yet Adopted Community Ordinance for 702 Ellsworth Place Policy L-1.5 Design buildings to complement streets and public spaces; to promote personal safety, public health and well-being; and to enhance a sense of community safety. Policy L-1.6 Discourage the use of fences that obscure the view of the front of houses from the street. The use and improvements on the site are remaining unchanged from existing conditions, which are compatible with existing and potential uses on adjoining sites. SECTION 2. Amendment of Zoning Map. Section 18.08.040 of the Palo Alto Municipal Code, the "Zoning Map," is hereby amended to rezone the certain property known as 702 Ellsworth Place from PC -2343 to "PC-XXXX." The subject property and revised zoning designation is shown on the map labeled Exhibit "A," attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 3. Development Plan Those certain plans entitled Proposed Development Plan 702 Ellsworth, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and incorporated herein, are hereby approved as the Development Plan for the subject property. SECTION 4. Uses. (a) Permitted Uses. The permitted uses within the PC boundary shall be limited to a single- family residence. SECTION 5. Site Development Regulations. (a) Compliance with Development Plan. All improvements and development shall be substantially in accordance with the Development Plan, except as modified herein. (i) Any exterior changes to the single-family residence or any new construction not specifically permitted by the Development Plan or by these site development regulations shall require an amendment to this Planned Community Zone or, if eligible, Architectural Review approval under Section 18.76 of the Palo Alto Municipal Code, as it is amended from time to time. (ii) The development plan shall include a 2 -foot, 6 -inch -wide swath of asphalt pavement alongside the southern edge of Ellsworth Place beginning at the Middlefield Road curb line and extending eastward approximately 42 feet to the proposed walkway to the single-family residence, to increase the perceived -width of Ellsworth Place. (iii) This additional paved area shall remain clear of obstructions. (iv) Prior to final inspections for any structure on the site, Handa shall effe prepare and record an ingress and egress easement over this additional paved area to the other properties on Ellsworth Place. 3 0160121_20230906_ayl6 Item 10: Staff Report P . 13 P Pg. Packet Pg. 338 of 374 Item 10 Attachment B - Planned Not Yet Adopted ICommunity Ordinance for 702 Ellsworth Place (v) The sight triangle at the southeast corner of the intersection of Ellsworth Place and Middlefield Road shall extend to the southernmost corner of the property along Middlefield Road and shall not be obstructed by new impediments taller than 1 foot, except for the installation of an additional sign stating "No Delivery Trucks Over 24' long" below or above the existing 'No Outlet' sign located within the Middlefield Road right of way between the sidewalk and Handa's property. (vi) The property owner shall maintain the vegetation in the Middlefield right of way planting strip between the curb and sidewalk at a height no taller than 1 foot. (vii) The 24 -foot special setback from Middlefield Road shall be observed, (viii) The setback from the creek shall be determined by a slope stability analysis, but no less than 6 feet. (ix) A 6 -foot setback shall apply to the rear property line, except with respect to a detached garage (b) Logistics Plan. A logistics plan shall be submitted for City approval prior to the issuance of a building permit for the construction of the new residence at 702 Ellsworth. The logistics plan shall address construction staging, construction worker parking, and material deliveries during site preparation and construction. It shall also include best practices for dust mitigation, stipulate permitted construction activities, hours and noise requirements, and include contact information for construction -related complaints. The property owner shall provide a $5,000 deposit to offset City's enforcement costs reasonably incurred in responding to construction -related complaints that may arise from this project. If the deposit account balance falls to $1,000 or lower, the deposit account balance shall be replenished to $5,000. Any funds remaining in the deposit account shall be refunded to arooerty owner upon issuance of the certificate of occuaancv for the residence. (c) Development Schedule. Construction of the improvements to Ellsworth Place shall be completed within twelve (12) months of the effective date of this ordinance. Construction of other improvements shall be completed within twenty-four (24) months of the effective date of this ordinance. (d) Minor Variations in Project. Minor changes to the Project may be approved by the Director, according to the provisions of Palo Alto Municipal Code Section 18.76.020(b)(3)(D) for architectural review. "Minor" changes do not include changes in land use. SECTION 6. The City Council finds that this ordinance is categorically exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section 15061(b)(3) because it can be seen with certainty that construction of a single-family home pursuant to will not result in a significant impact on the environment. The City Council finds that this ordinance is additionally categorically exempt under Section 15303 of the CEQA Guidelines, as it approves construction of a new single-family residence. SECTION 7 adoption. This ordinance shall be effective on the thirty-first day after the date of its 0160121 20230906_ay16 4 Item 10: Staff Report Pg. 14 Packet Pg. 339 of 374 INTRODUCED: PASSED: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTENTIONS: ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Assistant City Attorney Not Yet Adopted Mayor APPROVED: City Manager Item 10 Attachment B - Planned Community Ordinance for 702 Ellsworth Place Director of Planning and Development Services 5 0160121 20230906_ayl6 Item 10: Staff Report Pg. 15 p Packet Pg. 340 of 374 Item 10 Attachment C - Email/Letter from Nitin French, Amy Handa, owner for 702 Ellsworth Place From: Nitin Handa <nitinhanda2001@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2023 8:35 AM To: Stone, Greer Cc: Lait, Jonathan; Sauls, Garrett; French, Amy; Hayes, Ken Subject: 702 Ellsworth - Alternate Proposal Attachments: Attachment 2.pdf; Attachment 1 [1].pdf; attachment 3.pdf; Letter to Council from Nitin Handa re Fence Proposal.pdf Some people who received this message don't often get email from nitinhanda2001 @gmail.com. Learn why this is important CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links. Hello Honorable Vice Chair Stone, Me and My wife are the owners of property at 702 Ellsworth PI. As you know, the council members were contemplating a few options on how to resolve the issue we all face with this property. We thought about those options and have drafted the attached proposal with 2 options to help things move forward. See attached letter containing these 2 options along with Pictures supporting the same. We are agreeable to either of these 2 options. PS - This letter is being sent to all council members 1 Item 10: Staff Report Pg. 16 Packet Pg. 341 of 374 October 19, 2023 Mayor Kou and Members of the City Council City of Palo Alto city.council@cityofpaloalto.org Via Email Re: 702 Ellsworth Place - November 6, 2023, Council Agenda Dear Mayor Kou and Members of the City Council: Item 10 Attachment C - Email/Letter from Nitin Handa, owner for 702 Ellsworth Place My family and I plan to build our home on 702 Ellsworth Place. After five public hearings over eight months, including a City Council hearing on September 18, 2023, the City Council continued the matter to November 6th with a motion on the table that included reducing my front fence along Middlefield to just twelve inches high. A twelve -inch high front yard fence on Middlefield Road is not really a fence that provides any security or privacy, especially given that the existing sidewalk is 6 inches higher than the proposed top of a 12 inch fence (set four feet back from sidewalk). I have a 4 year old son who can easily step out to Middlefield road from this short fence. Requiring a twelve inch fence also differs from other fences along Middlefield that are 36 inches. The stated purpose of a twelve inch height limit was to avoid obstruction of sight lines exiting Ellsworth Place onto Middlefield. However, as shown in the enclosed photos (Attachment 1), a 36 -inch high fence set four feet back from the edge of the sidewalk does not obstruct line of sight. This is supported by the Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. memos dated April 14, 2023 and July 12, 2023 respectively, and was recommended by City staff, including Transportation Planning Manager Slyvia Star -Lack who elaborated on this recommendation at the July 12, 2023 Planning Commission meeting: 17 Ms. Sylvia Star -Lack, : No, no I think I have it, thank you. Good evening, Commissioners, this is 18 Sylvia Star -Lack, Transportation Planning Manager for the City. Shrupath... my Transportation 19 Planner Shrupath Patel and I visited the site on Monday, July 3rd. We spoke with residents, 20 Shrupath and I did a simulation of car... of his car. He was driving his car out of Ellsworth Place 21 and our recommendation is reflected in what you see on this slide which is to pull back the 22 fence... yeah shorten the fence next to the creek if possible. Yeah, to 3 -feet, pull back the fence 23 to 4 -feet behind the sidewalk, the back of the sidewalk because when cars have to come to a 24 stop before the sidewalk. They need to be able to see people on the sidewalk before they can 25 cross the sidewalk. We've also reached out to Valley Water to eliminate the vegetation that is 26 overgrown at the corner of the... of their site at the creek and I think.., oh and the driveway 27 widening will allow for an easier turn for vehicles when another car is... when is a car is at the 28 exit. Transportation Staff feel that these adjustments will be... will improve visibility and the 29 ability for people to get in and out easier. cn Item 10: Staff Report Pg. 17 Packet Pg. 342 of 374 Item 10 Attachment C - Email/Letter from Nitin Handa, owner for 702 Despite this, there was some discussion about line of sight issues at the Se Ellsworth Place• meeting. In attempt to further address this while preserving some version of a 36 inch high fence, please consider the following two alternate proposals: Alternate Proposal A: Allow for a 36 inch high wrought iron fence with minimum 3 inch gapping (Picture Given Below) within the 35 -foot site triangle along the Middlefield frontage, set back 4 feet from the back of sidewalk, in exchange for increasing the offered swath of pavement and easement offered to the neighbors fronting Ellsworth by one foot (from 18 inches wide to 30 inches wide) alongside Ellsworth Place beginning at the Middlefield Road curb line and extending approximately 42 feet to the proposed walkway to the single- family residence Or Alternate Proposal B: Allow for a 36 -inch high wrought iron fence with minimum 3 inch gapping (Picture Given Below) within the 35 -foot site triangle along the Middlefield frontage, set back 4 feet from the back of sidewalk, with the requirement that this fence be angled as shown in Attachment 2. Photos of this mocked up fence design are included in Attachment 3. Thank you for your consideration. Should you have any questions or wish to discuss I am more than happy to meet with any of you individually either in person at the site, or by zoom. Sincerely, Nitin Handa and Priyanka Handa 2 Item 10: Staff Report Pg. 18 Packet Pg. 343 of 374 Cc Item 10 Attachment C - Email/Letter from Nitin Handa, owner for 702 Jonathan Lait, Planning Director Ellsworth Place Amy French, Chief Planning Official Garret Saul, Project Planner Item 10: Staff Report Pg. 19 Packet Pg. 344 of 374 Views approaching stop sign: Man walking. Views approaching stop sign: Woman on bike. ATTACHMENT 1 Item 10: Staff Report Pg. 20 Packet Pg. 345 of 374 S52°00'00"E 44.50' 117.11'(T) 20'-0" 110-0" .ASEMENT SB 10'X30 SU-30 DELIVERY 4'-0" SPACE PA\/FP ZONE Item 10 Attachment C - Email/Letter from Nitin Handa, owner for 702 Ellsworth Place 12.61' r FUTURE s DETACHED I c GARAGE to ATTACHMENT_3 Item 10: Staff Report Pg. 22 Packet Pg. 347 of 374 Item 11 Item 11 Staff Report City Council Staff Report From: City Manager CITY O F Report Type: INFORMATION REPORTS PALO Lead Department: Planning and Development Services ALTO Meeting Date: November 6, 2023 Report #:2308-1916 TITLE Information Item: Summary of Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program Accomplishments - Review of the Draft Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER). CEQA Status — Not a Project RECOMMENDATION This is an informational report and no action is required. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The City is required to report annually to U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) the accomplishments for its Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program. This report, the Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER), summarizes the City's CDBG accomplishments and expenditures for the Program Year/Fiscal Year 2022-2023 CDBG funding cycle. The City funded a total of seven projects that are summarized below. The City conducted a public hearing with the Human Relations Commission on September 14, 2023 to allow for public review and discussion of the CAPER (Attachment A). The report was submitted to HUD by the September 29, 2023 deadline. BACKGROUND The City of Palo Alto receives funds annually from HUD as an entitlement city under the CDBG program. As a recipient of CDBG funds, the City is required to prepare a CAPER at the end of each fiscal year. The CAPER describes the City's progress implementing the activities identified in the 2022-2023 Annual Action Plan1 and the goals and objectives of the 2020-2025 Consolidated Plan.2 1 Annual Action Plan: An annual report listing the activities the city intends to undertake with CDBG funds to address the needs and implement the strategies identified in the Consolidated Plan. 2 Consolidated Plan (Con Plan): A five-year strategic plan that addresses the housing and non -housing community development needs of lower income persons and establishes annual goals and objectives to meet the identified needs. Item 11: Staff Report Pg. 1 Packet Pg. 348 of 374 Item 11 Item 11 Staff Report The HRC reviewed the CAPER report on September 14, 2023 and briefly discussed the findings and asked a few clarifying questions. The HRC did not provide any substantive comments on the CAPER. Additionally, there were no members of the public that spoke to this item. During FY 2022-2023, the City's CDBG subrecipients continued to provide vital services to extremely low, very low, low, and moderate -income households while addressing the priorities and needs of the community and the City's funding priorities. The City has achieved a number of goals as outlined in the 2022-2023 Annual Action Plan (AAP) through CDBG funding. A total of $620,468 was available for CDBG projects and programs during the 2022-23 program year. The City received $513,168 from the federal CDBG program and approximately $107,300 in program income. Through CDBG funds, 310 persons were assisted in this program year. Of those, 275 were extremely low-income, 23 were low-income and 12 were moderate -income. CDBG CARES -Act (CDBG-CV) funds were available in FY 2022-23 and utilized for planning and administrative services to continue providing assistance to homeless providers in regard to their CV contracts, scope of work and the required substantial amendment processes. The number of persons assisted through CDBG-CV funds will be reported in next year's FY 2023-24 CAPER. The draft 2022-2023 CAPER (Attachment A) provides a detailed description of the programs and project accomplishments. The major accomplishments include the following: 1. Catholic Charities assisted mostly low- and moderate -income (LMI) elderly residents through the Long -Term Care Ombudsman Program at the Palo Alto long-term care facilities that mainly serve low-income residents. Additionally, the Long -Term Care Ombudsman Program resolved complaints made by, or on behalf of, low-income elderly residents of the facilities. [Goal: Assist 50 individuals; Actual: 62 individuals] 2. Alta Housing had on -site counseling services available to the residents of the 131 units of the Single -Room Occupancy (SRO) Resident Support Program at Alma Place (25 units) and Barker Hotel (106 units). [Goal: Assist 50; Actual: 148 individuals] 3. LifeMoves, at the Opportunity Services Center, provided case management services, including assistance with housing and job searches, referrals, and mentoring homeless and/or very low-income Palo Alto residents. [Goal: Assist 30 individuals; Actual: 49 individuals] 4. Project Sentinel assisted LMI individuals in investigating their fair housing complaints, as well as provided individual consultation relating to specific fair housing questions. The outreach goal was 100 individuals, and the case management goal was 15 LMI individuals. Project Sentinel completed outreach to 779 residents who received fair housing mailers, and provided case management to 22 LMI residents. [Goal 1: Outreach 100 individuals; Actual 779 individuals] [Goal 2: Assist 15 LMI individuals; Actual 22 LMI individuals] Item 11: Staff Report Pg. 2 Packet Pg. 349 of 374 Item 11 Item 11 Staff Report 5. Silicon Valley Independent Living Center (SVILC) (Housing and Emergency Services) assisted adults with disabilities in developing an independent living plan for housing that resulted in improved accessibility to decent, affordable housing. [Goal: Assist 24 individuals; Actual: 24 individuals] 6. Rebuilding Together Peninsula (Safe at Home) assisted income -qualified owner -occupied households with home rehabilitation. [Goal: Assist 4 households; Actual: 5 households] 7. 525 E. Charleston Road Eden Housing requested funds for public facilities improvements adjacent to its proposed 50 -unit affordable housing development. Approximately half the units are for persons with disabilities. [Goal: Assist 355 individuals; Actual: 0 individuals] Michell Park Place/525 E. Charleston Road affordable housing project's tax credit application (LIHTC) was recently approved and construction is targeted to commence in early 2024. TIMELINE As required by HUD, the FY 2022-23 CAPER was submitted by the September 28th deadline. FISCAL/RESOURCE IMPACT This informational report has no fiscal impact. STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT An advertisement was published in The Daily Post on August 28, 2023 announcing the availability of the draft CAPER for public review and comment. The draft CAPER was posted on the City's CDBG webpage (https://www.cityofpaloaIto.org/cdbg) from August 30, 2023 through September 13, 2023, meeting the 15 -day public comment period requirement. The Human Relations Commission held a public hearing on September 14, 2023, to discuss the CAPER and provide the public the opportunity to comment; the meeting fulfills the public hearing requirement for the CAPER. There were no public comments made during the hearing and the HRC did not provide comments necessitating changes to the contents and or metrics of the CAPER Report. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Council action on this item is not a considered a project as defined by CEQA because the Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report is for informational purposes only with no action required by the Council. ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: FY 2022-2023 Palo Alto CAPER Report APPROVED BY: Jonathan Lait, Planning and Development Services Director Item 11: Staff Report Pg. 3 Packet Pg. 350 of 374 Item 11 Attachment A - FY 2022- 2023 Palo Alto CAPER Report CITY OF PALO ALTO DRAFT 2022-2023 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER) PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD AUGUST 30, 2023 - SEPTEMBER 13, 2023 SUBMITTED TO HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT (HUD) SEPTEMBER 28, 2023 ADMINISTERED BY: PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Draft September 28, 2023 Item 11: Staff Report Pg. 4 1 Packet Pg. 351 of 374 Item 11 Attachment A - FY 2022- 2023 Palo Alto CAPER Report Draft September 28, 2023 Item 11: Staff Report Pg. 5 1 Packet Pg. 352 of 374 Item 11 Attachment A - FY 2022-2023 Palo Alto CAPER Report CR-05 - Goals and Outcomes Progress the jurisdiction has made in carrying out its strategic plan and its action plan. 91.520(a) This could be an overview that includes major initiatives and highlights that were proposed and executed throughout the program year. Below, as shown in Table 1 - City of Palo Alto's accomplishments for the Program Year & Strategic Plan to date. The description illustrates the strides made toward fulfilling the objectives outlined in the strategic and annual action plans. Throughout the FY2022- 23 Program Year, the City successfully attained a significant portion of its yearly objectives and is progressing well toward accomplishing the overarching five-year goals specified in the Consolidated Plan. This includes the Substantial Amendment to the FY2022-2023 Annual Action Plan. The major accomplishments include the following for FY2022-2023: 1. Catholic Charities assisted mostly low- and moderate -income (LMI) elderly residents through the Long -Term Care Ombudsman Program at the Palo Alto long-term care facilities that mainly serve low-income residents. Additionally, the Long -Term Care Ombudsman Program resolved complaints made by, or on behalf of, low-income elderly residents of the facilities. [Goal: Assist 50 individuals; Actual 62 individuals] 2. Alta Housing had on -site counseling services available to the residents of the 131 units of the Single -Room Occupancy (SRO) Resident Support Program at Alma Place (25 units) and Barker Hotel (106 units). [Goal: Assist 50; Actual 148 individuals] 3. LifeMoves, at the Opportunity Services Center, provided case management services, including assistance with housing and job searches, referrals, and mentoring homeless and/or very low-income Palo Alto residents. [Goal: Assist 30 individuals; Actual 49 individuals] 4. Project Sentinel assisted LMI individuals in investigating their fair housing complaints, as well as received individual consultation relating to specific fair housing questions. The outreach goal was based on 100 individuals and the case management goal was 15 LMI individuals. Actual reports revealed the following: outreach was provided to 779 residents receiving fair housing mailers of which 33 residents received direct outreach, case management assisted 22 LMI residents. It must be noted, all fair housing activities must meet HUD's national objective of assisting LMI residents. Table One of this CAPER PROGRAM YEAR 2022-23 PALO ALTO CAPER- DRAFT 2 Item 11: Staff Report Pg. 6 1 1 Packet Pg. 353 of 374 Item 11 Attachment A - FY 2022-2023 Palo Alto CAPER Report reflects LMI accomplishments of the 22 LMI individuals who received case management and fair housing consolation. [Goal 1: Assist 100 individuals; Actual 779 individuals] [Goal 2: Assist 15 LMI individuals; Actual 22 LMI individuals] 5. Silicon Valley Independent Living Center (SVILC) (Housing and Emergency Services) assisted adults with disabilities in developing an independent living plan for housing that resulted in improved accessibility to decent, affordable housing. [Goal: Assist 24 individuals; Actual 24 individuals] 6. Rebuilding Together Peninsula (Safe at Home) assisted income -qualified owner -occupied households with home rehabilitation. [Goal: Assist 4 households; Actual 5 households] 7. 525 E. Charleston Road Eden Housing requested funds for public facilities improvements adjacent to its proposed 50 -unit affordable housing development. Approximately half the units are for persons with disabilities. [Goal: Assist 355 individuals; Actual 0 individuals] Michell Park Place/525 E. Charleston Road affordable housing project's tax credit application (LIHTC) was recently approved and construction is targeted to commence in early 2024. Other CDBG Program Updates A total of $620,468 was available for CDBG funding projects and programs during the 2022-23 program year. The City received $513,168 from the federal CDBG program and approximately $107,300 in program income. Through CDBG funds 310 persons were assisted in this program year. Of the 310 persons, 275 were extremely low-income, 23 were low-income and 12 were moderate - income of the total. CDBG CARES -Act (CDBG-CV) funds were available in FY 2022-23. CDBG-CV funds were utilized in FY 2022-23 for planning and administrative services in order to continue to provide assistance to homeless providers in regards to their CV contracts, scope of work and the required substantial amendment processes. The number of persons assisted through CDBG-CV funds will be reported in next year's FY 2023-24 CAPER. FY2022 Annual Action Plan Substantial Amendment PROGRAM YEAR 2022-23 PALO ALTO CAPER- DRAFT 3 Item 11: Staff Report Pg. 7 1 1 Packet Pg. 354 of 374 Item 11 Attachment A - FY 2022-2023 Palo Alto CAPER Report The approved FY2022-23 AAP included funding of $356,330 for the Mitchell Park Place/525 E. Charleston Road project. CDBG funding was to be allocated for predevelopment costs associated with an affordable housing development. This activity supports affordable housing development at a Santa Clara County -owned property; Eden Housing will develop 50 affordable housing units, half of which are for people with disabilities. As the property owner, the County plans to execute a long-term lease with the developer, Eden Housing. In late Summer 2022, the City was informed by HUD that the Mitchell Park Place project description was incorrectly represented in the FY2022-23 Annual Action Plan. A substantial amendment is needed to amend section AP -38 Project Summary description of the FY2022-23 Annual Action Plan. Comparison of the proposed versus actual outcomes for each outcome measure submitted with the consolidated plan and explain, if applicable, why progress was not made toward meeting goals and objectives. 91.520(g) Categories, priority levels, funding sources and amounts, outcomes/objectives, goal outcome indicators, units of measure, targets, actual outcomes/outputs, and percentage completed for each of the grantee's program year goals. Goal Category Source / Indicator Unit of Expected Actual — *Percent Expected — Actual — *Percent Amount Measure — Strategic Complete Program Program Complete Strategic Plan Year Year Plan Household Rental units Housing 107 0 0.00% n/a n/a n/a Affordable Affordable CDBG: rehabilitated Housing Housing $900,000 Unit Household Homeowner Housing Housing 40 11 o 27.50% 4 5 0 125% Rehabilitated Unit Public service activities other than Persons 0 0 0.00% n/a n/a n/a Economic Non -Housing Low/Moderate Income Assisted Development Community CDBG: Housing Benefit Development $900,000 Homeless Person Persons 0 0 0.00% n/a n/a n/a Overnight Shelter Assisted Jobs created/retained Jobs 150 28 18.67% n/a n/a n/a PROGRAM YEAR 2022-23 PALO ALTO CAPER- DRAFT 4 Item 11: Staff Report Pg. 8 1 1 Packet Pg. 355 of 374 Item 11 Attachment A - FY 2022-2023 Palo Alto CAPER Report Public service activities Non -Housing CDBG: other than Persons Fair Housing Community $150,000 Low/Moderate Income Assisted 75 63 84% 15 22 146.67% Development Housing Benefit CDBG: Public service activities $240,000 other than Persons / Low/Moderate Income Assisted 850 577 67.90% 161 148 92.00% CDBG-CV: Housing Benefit $294,000 Tenant -based rental Households assistance / Rapid 60 54 90.00% n/a n/a n/a Homelessness (CDBG-CV Rehousing Assisted Homeless funds were not utilized Homeless Person Persons 100 43 43.00% 30 49 163% Overnight Shelter Assisted in FY2022- Overnight/Emergency 2023 in a matter that Shelter/Transitional Beds 0 0 0.00% n/a n/a n/a would Housing Beds added contribute to the Homelessness Persons Actual # of 0 0 0.00% n/a n/a n/a each unit Prevention Assisted measured. Public Facility or Infrastructure Activities Non- other than Persons 1200 0 0.00% n/a n/a n/a Assisted Homeless Low/Moderate Income Strengthen Special Needs CDBG: Housing Benefit Neighborhoods Non -Housing $120,000 Public service activities Community other than Persons Development Low/Moderate Income Assisted 1345 1636 121.6% 77 62 80.50% Housing Benefit Homeless Person Persons 0 0 0.00% n/a n/a n/a Overnight Shelter Assisted Table 1 - Accomplishments — Program Year & Strategic Plan to Date PROGRAM YEAR 2022-23 PALO ALTO CAPER- DRAFT Item 11: Staff Report Pg. 9 1 1 Packet Pg. 356 of 374 Item 11 Attachment A - FY 2022-2023 Palo Alto CAPER Report *IDIS (Integrated Disbursement and Information System) automatically rounds percentages to the nearest whole number: rounding up if the decimal portion is 0.50 or greater and rounds down if it's less than 0.50. Table 1 reports on precise percentages. PROGRAM YEAR 2022-23 PALO ALTO CAPER- DRAFT Item 11: Staff Report Pg. 10 1 1 Packet Pg. 357 of 374 Item 11 Attachment A - FY 2022-2023 Palo Alto CAPER Report Assess how the jurisdiction's use of funds, particularly CDBG, addresses the priorities and specific objectives identified in the plan, giving special attention to the highest priority activities identified. Throughout Program Year 2022-23, the subrecipients of the City's Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) persistently delivered essential services to households belonging to extremely low, very low, low, and moderate income brackets. Simultaneously, they tackled the priorities and needs of the community, as outlined in the City's officially adopted 2020-25 Consolidated Plan. The City has achieved a number of goals as outlined in the 2022-2023 Annual Action Plan (AAP) through CDBG funding. A total of $620,468 is available for funding projects and programs during the 2022-2023 Program Year. The City received $513,168 from the federal CDBG program, approximately $107,300 in program income. At the time of this report, the City has spent approximately $223,052.67. Through CDBG funds, in total, 310 persons were assisted in this program year. Of the 310 persons, 275 were extremely low-income, 23 were low-income and 12 were moderate -income of the total. With the CDBG annual formula grant, Catholic Charities, through the Ombudsman Program, assisted 62 senior residents through visitation, resolved complaints, phone outreach at the local long-term facilities, and LifeMoves, at the Opportunity Services Center, provided case management services, including assistance with housing and job searches to 49 homeless/very low-income community residents. Project Sentinel provided fair housing and tenant/landlord mediation services to 22 local residents. Additionally, through the CDBG funds, Alta Housing was able to offer on -site counseling services to 148 residents of the Single -Room Occupancy (SRO) Resident Support Program. Additionally, Rebuilding Together Peninsula was able to assist 5 households with home rehabilitation to help assist in the City's goal of affordable housing. PROGRAM YEAR 2022-23 PALO ALTO CAPER- DRAFT 7 Item 11: Staff Report Pg. 11 1 1 Packet Pg. 358 of 374 Item 11 Attachment A - FY 2022- 2023 Palo Alto CAPER Report CR-10 — Racial and Ethnic composition of families assisted Describe the families assisted (including the racial and ethnic status of families assisted). 91.520(a) CDBG White: 183 Black/African American: 60 Asian: 31 American Indian/Alaskan Native: 4 Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander: 0 American Indian/Alaskan Native & White: 1 Asian White: 4 Black/African American & White: 0 American Indian/Alaskan Native & Black/African American: 1 Other multi -racial: 24 Asian/Pacific Islander: 0 Total 310 Hispanic 56 Not Hispanic 254 Table 2— Table of assistance to racial and ethnic populations by source of funds Narrative Table 2 shows the racial and ethnic categories of total individuals served in FY2022-23 through CDBG funds. Total number (310) does not include individuals assisted through the CDBG-CV related activities. CDBG-CV related activities requested expansion to their contracts. This will be reported in the following year's CAPER. In total, the City's CDBG program served 310 individuals in FY2022-23. Of those individuals, approximately 59% were White; 19% were African American; 5% were Asian; less than 1% were either American Indian/American Native, American Indian/Alaskan Native and Black, American Indian/Alaskan Native and White, Asian White, American Indian/Alaskan Native & Black/African American. 7% of individuals reported as "Other." PROGRAM YEAR 2022-23 PALO ALTO CAPER- DRAFT 8 Item 11: Staff Report Pg. 12 Packet Pg. 359 of 374 Item 11 Attachment A - FY 2022- 2023 Palo Alto CAPER Report CR-15 — Resources and Investments 91.520(a) Identify the resources made available Source of Funds Source Resources Made Available Amount Expended During Program Year CDBG public — federal 620,468 223,052.67 Other public —federal 0 0 Table 3 — Resources Made Available Narrative Except for one CDBG activity, 525 E. Charleston Road, nearly all of the City's CDBG subrecipients effectively utilized their grant funds during FY2022-23. • 525 E. Charleston Road bidding for the CDBG-funded public facilities improvements section of the project is anticipated in the Fall of 2023, while construction is planned to commence in early 2024. Identify the geographic distribution and location of investments Target Area Planned Percentage of Allocation Actual Percentage of Allocation Narrative Description N/A Table 4 — Identify the geographic distribution and location of investments Narrative The City's approach to housing assistance encompasses all forms of housing support, aligning with the principles outlined in the Comprehensive Plan. In Palo Alto, housing activities are not confined to specific target areas; instead, the city strives to offer affordable housing options to individuals with lower incomes across the entire municipality. Minority concentration pertains to locales within the city where there is a notable concentration of racial and ethnic minority populations, surpassing 10% in comparison to their citywide representation. Only a few areas are considered to have a concentration of minority populations or low-income residents in Palo Alto. The CDBG Program defines low-income concentration as any census block group where 51% or more residents earn 80% of Median Family Income (MFI) or less. An exception exists for a jurisdiction with no areas meeting this definition, such as Palo Alto, which includes the highest quartile of all areas in the City in terms of degree of concentration, is used. Palo Alto currently has 5 census block groups that are designated as upper quartile tracks with and LMI% > 32.26% qualifying activities under the low- and moderate -income (LMI) area benefit category. PROGRAM YEAR 2022-23 PALO ALTO CAPER- DRAFT 9 Item 11: Staff Report Pg. 13 Packet Pg. 360 of 374 Item 11 Attachment A - FY 2022- 2023 Palo Alto CAPER Report Explain how federal funds leveraged additional resources (private, state and local funds), including a description of how matching requirements were satisfied, as well as how any publicly owned land or property located within the jurisdiction that were used to address the needs identified in the plan. Palo Alto (P.A.) leverages Fed., state, & private housing funds in alignment with goals outlined in 2020-2025 Consolidated Plan. The city actively encourages non-profit organizations to pursue various avenues of funding, spanning local, state, & Fed. resources, to support both housing and non -housing community development activities. HUMAN SERVICES RESOURCES ALLOCATION PROCESS (HSRAP):In FY2022-23, the City allocated $622,377 from its General Funds to address primary human service needs in the community. These funds support initiatives, guided by the Human Relations Commission's priority needs & administered by the Office of Human Services and fund: the Commercial Housing Fund & the Residential Housing Fund. LOCAL HOUSING TRUST FUND (LHTF): In FY 2022-23, the Palo Alto received a $3.4 million to use as local matching funds toward the production of rental housing units at affordability levels. 70% of funds target housing units for residents with incomes at or below 60% of AMI and 30% of funds targeting housing units for residents with incomes at or below 30% AMI. PERMANENT LOCAL HOUSING ALLOCATION (PLHA): Palo Alto receives an annual allocation of an estimated $1.3M from the PHLA to assist persons experiencing or at risk of homelessness, including:(a) Outreach & services to those experiencing homelessness, (b)Operating expenses for the forthcoming Homekey shelter, & Affordable housing rental unit preservation, new construction, & operating subsidies. HOMEKEY: Palo Alto and LifeMoves receive Homekey funds supporting homeless individuals. The Homekey program is made up of several funding sources including: local, county and state contributions as well as Sobrato Philanthropies. The project is to build a new modular interim housing shelter near the Palo Alto Baylands, that will house over 200 individuals annually. HOMEKEY funs leverage additional funds to cover expenses beyond what federal funds can cover such as pre -development costs, feasibility studies, site acquisition, and other similar activities. 525 EAST CHARLESTON ROAD (Mitchell Park Place): The County currently owns the property located on 525 E. Charleston Road to be developed by an affordable housing developer. The County will extend a long-term lease with the developer. The City intends to use CDBG funding for public facilities improvements near the proposed Mitchell Park Place affordable housing site. PROGRAM YEAR 2022-23 PALO ALTO CAPER- DRAFT 10 Item 11: Staff Report Pg. 14 Packet Pg. 361 of 374 Item 11 Attachment A - FY 2022- 2023 Palo Alto CAPER Report CR-2O - Affordable Housing 91.520(b) Evaluation of the jurisdiction's progress in providing affordable housing, including the number and types of families served, the number of extremely low-income, low-income, moderate - income, and middle -income persons served. One -Year Goal Actual Number of homeless households to be provided affordable housing units 0 0 Number of non -homeless households to be provided affordable housing units 0 0 Number of special -needs households to be provided affordable housing units 4 5 Total 4 5 Table 5 — Number of Households One -Year Goal Actual Number of households supported 0 0 through rental assistance Number of households supported 0 0 through the production of new units Number of households supported 4 5 through the rehab of existing units Number of households supported 0 0 through the acquisition of existing units Total 4 5 Table 6- Number of Households Supported Discuss the difference between goals and outcomes and problems encountered in meeting these goals. The City continued its partnership with Rebuilding Together Peninsula through its Safe at Home Program. The Program helps preserve affordable housing by transforming homes through critical repairs and accessibility modifications at no cost to the recipient. Those served include [Ml homeowners that are elderly and/or are people with disabilities, who are physically and financially unable to maintain safe living conditions for themselves and their families. The City exceeded its goal of assisting 4 households due to efficient use of its $73,135 in program funds for the year. Discuss how these outcomes will impact future annual action plans. The success of the program has dated back to last year, when it achieved its goal of 6 households supported. The repeat success shows that there is a continued demand for rehabilitation for LMI families, and effective systems in place to implement improvements. Future plans will look to build upon these consecutive successes. The organization has continued to provide essential PROGRAM YEAR 2022-23 PALO ALTO CAPER- DRAFT 11 Item 11: Staff Report Pg. 15 Packet Pg. 362 of 374 Item 11 Attachment A - FY 2022- 2023 Palo Alto CAPER Report services to residents and this partnership will continue to support the affordable housing goals contained in both the Consolidated Plan and Action Plans. Include the number of extremely low-income, low-income, and moderate -income persons served by each activity where information on income by family size is required to determine the eligibility of the activity. Number of Households Served CDBG Actual HOME Actual Extremely Low-income 2 0 Low-income 3 0 Moderate -income 0 0 Total 5 0 Table 7 — Number of Households Served Palo Alto's Subrecipient Rebuilding Together only serves low to moderate households. PROGRAM YEAR 2022-23 PALO ALTO CAPER- DRAFT 12 Item 11: Staff Report Pg. 16 Packet Pg. 363 of 374 Item 11 Attachment A - FY 2022- 2023 Palo Alto CAPER Report CR-25 - Homeless and Other Special Needs 91.220(d, e); 91.320(d, e); 91.520(c) Evaluate the jurisdiction's progress in meeting its specific objectives for reducing and ending homelessness through: Reaching out to homeless persons (especially unsheltered persons) and assessing their individual needs Addressing homelessness and striving to provide services for the unhoused in Palo Alto has been an enduring local commitment. The continuing impact of the COVID-19 pandemic has heightened challenges for individuals and households, leading to an upsurge in homelessness. This, in turn, has prompted service providers to seek innovative ways of delivering assistance, reinforcing the pertinence of this issue. In 2022, The County was unable to complete a count on time in FY 2021-22, due to COVID-19. The Point -in -Time Count was completed in 2022, the County was working to finalize the 2022 numbers at the time of FY2021-22 CAPER reporting. The Point -in -Time Count that was completed in 2022 showed 274 Total Unhoused in Palo Alto (263 unsheltered and 11 sheltered) which is a decrease from 2019, when the count was 313. The 2023 Point -in -Time Count that was completed in 2023 showed 206 Total Unhoused in Palo Alto (187 unsheltered and 19 sheltered) which is a decrease from 2022. While homelessness is still a concern, this data shows that initiatives have been successful in making improvements. During the Point -in -Time count, surveys are administered to gather information and assess needs for the population. The City of Palo Alto provides funding for unhoused services and homelessness prevention via three primary funding channels: HSRAP, CDBG, and the Emerging Needs Fund. Broadly financial support for the homeless and those most at risk of homelessness is directed toward service provision and homeless prevention. Unhoused services include workforce development, basic needs stipends for work experience, food, seasonal homeless shelter, school supplies for homeless children, case management, tele- medicine equipment, and shower/laundry services. Homelessness Prevention support includes provision of emergency rent and utility funding assistance through LifeMoves and Silicon Valley Independent Living Center. LifeMoves — Opportunity Center is designated by the County as the Emergency Assistance Network Agency for financial assistance for Palo Alto. The Opportunity Services Center (OSC) in Palo Alto exclusively serves homeless individuals. LifeMoves at the OSC provides intake services to all the clients they serve to assess their needs and provide the appropriate resources and referrals. They also provide basic need services such as access to restrooms, showers, laundry, used clothing, hygiene supplies, health care, mail/telephone services, food, transportation assistance, information and referral services, counseling, and other critical services. Through support from CDBG and funding from the County's office of supportive housing, in FY2022-23, they have served 49 unduplicated individuals. PROGRAM YEAR 2022-23 PALO ALTO CAPER- DRAFT 13 Item 11: Staff Report Pg. 17 Packet Pg. 364 of 374 Item 11 Attachment A - FY 2022- 2023 Palo Alto CAPER Report Palo Alto will continue to explore its funding strategy and collaborate with other South County cities to ensure that limited federal and local resources are targeted to pressing community needs such as homelessness. Addressing the emergency shelter and transitional housing needs of homeless persons The following activity received funding from the City of Palo Alto to provide emergency shelter and/or transitional housing for homeless persons. LifeMoves — Hotel De Zink, funded by CDBG with an amount of $26,660, has significantly extended its operational hours, thereby providing enhanced support to Palo Alto's homeless community. This extension has granted vulnerable clients more time within a secure and nurturing environment, ensuring they receive the critical assistance they require. The prolonged hours of operation and improved communication facilitated by electronic signage are attributed to the effective prevention of a widespread COVID-19 outbreak within the Opportunity Services Center and Hotel De Zink emergency shelter. Continuation of these extended hours remains a priority for the organization. During this year, the program funds facilitated services to 49 individuals. Helping low-income individuals and families avoid becoming homeless, especially extremely low-income individuals and families and those who are: likely to become homeless after being discharged from publicly funded institutions and systems of care (such as health care facilities, mental health facilities, foster care and other youth facilities, and corrections programs and institutions); and, receiving assistance from public or private agencies that address housing, health, social services, employment, education, or youth needs The following agencies received funding from the City of Palo Alto to help low-income individuals and families avoid becoming homeless. Alta Housing; CDBG $22,413: Alta Housing had on -site counseling services available to residents of the 131 units of the Single -Room Occupancy (SRO) Resident Support Program at Alma Place and Barker Hotel. Majority of the residents are low-income, disabled, elderly, veterans, and formerly homeless adults. Many residents have difficulty managing daily living skills, such as managing finances, maintaining their health (mental and physical) and apartments, and getting along with others. Without onsite support, such issues can become so severe that tenants risk losing their housing. Case management was provided to 148 residents this year using program funds. LifeMoves, Case Management; CDBG $26,660: The organization provided case management service including assistance with housing and job searches, referrals, and mentoring to 49 unduplicated homeless and/or very low-income Palo Alto residents. PROGRAM YEAR 2022-23 PALO ALTO CAPER- DRAFT 14 Item 11: Staff Report Pg. 18 Packet Pg. 365 of 374 Item 11 Attachment A - FY 2022- 2023 Palo Alto CAPER Report Silicon Valley Independent Living Center; Rental Assistance Program; CDBG $14,021: Through this grant, the organization was able to address rent increases, utility payments, emergency situations, and other market forces for 24 residents. The target population of this activity were lower income (80% or less AMI) residents with disabilities, veterans, and older adults, aged 55 and over. The City follows the guidance of Santa Clara County's CoC as it relates to individuals who may be discharged from publicly funded institutions and systems of care. The Santa Clara County's CoC has developed the Santa Clara County Countywide Quality Assurance Standards for Homeless Housing & Service Programs (2021). The document was developed with the expectation of providing quality, standardized services to persons who have become homeless to facilitate their successful re-entry back into their communities. As a member of the CoC, the City of Palo Alto will be following the standards in the documents. Helping homeless persons (especially chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth) make the transition to permanent housing and independent living, including shortening the period of time that individuals and families experience homelessness, facilitating access for homeless individuals and families to affordable housing units, and preventing individuals and families who were recently homeless from becoming homeless again The following agencies received funding from the City of Palo Alto to help homeless persons make the transition to permanent housing and independent living. Silicon Valley Independent Living Center; Case Management; CDBG $14,021: SVILC is highly recognized for its Housing Workshops. The Housing Workshops cover many important topics such as: credit readiness and credit repair; types of low-income housing and eligibility; application and interview preparation; tenant and landlord rights and responsibilities; fair housing and home modifications laws and resources; security deposit and rental assistance programs; long term services and supports. Through the FY2022-23 CDBG funding, 24 unduplicated Palo Alto residents with disabilities received one-on-one assistance and developed an independent living plan for housing which resulted in improved accessibility to decent affordable housing. Project Sentinel; Fair Housing Services; CDBG $19,976 & $13,722 for Administration (Total Funded amount of $33,698). Project Sentinel provided community education and outreach regarding fair housing law and practices, investigation, counseling, and legal referral for victims of housing discrimination. In total, 22 LMI residents were provided individual case management and consultation relating to specific fair housing questions. PROGRAM YEAR 2022-23 PALO ALTO CAPER- DRAFT 15 Item 11: Staff Report Pg. 19 Packet Pg. 366 of 374 Item 11 Attachment A - FY 2022- 2023 Palo Alto CAPER Report CR-30 - Public Housing 91.220(h); 91.320(j) Actions taken to address the needs of public housing Not applicable. The Housing Authority of the County of Santa Clara (HACSC) does not operate in Palo Alto. Actions taken to encourage public housing residents to become more involved in management and participate in homeownership While the majority of their units have been converted to affordable housing stock, HACSC is proactive in incorporating resident input into the agency's policy -making process. An equitable and transparent policy -making process that includes the opinions of residents is achieved through the involvement of two tenant commissioners, one being a senior citizen, on the HACSC board. Actions taken to provide assistance to troubled PHAs Not Applicable. PROGRAM YEAR 2022-23 PALO ALTO CAPER- DRAFT 16 Item 11: Staff Report Pg. 20 Packet Pg. 367 of 374 Item 11 Attachment A - FY 2022- 2023 Palo Alto CAPER Report CR-35 - Other Actions 91.220(j) -(k); 91.320(i) -(j) Actions taken to remove or ameliorate the negative effects of public policies that serve as barriers to affordable housing such as land use controls, tax policies affecting land, zoning ordinances, building codes, fees and charges, growth limitations, and policies affecting the return on residential investment. 91.220 (j); 91.320 (i) The City of Palo Alto recently adopted the 2023-2031 Housing Element in May 2023. The Housing Element includes many programs to tackle impediments to affordable housing development. Programs include modifications to existing zoning to allow for denser development, further streamlining the development review process, provisions of development standards that incentivize housing production, and reevaluation of fees to support development, to name a few. Housing Trust Silicon Valley (Housing Trust): Originally known as the Housing Trust Fund of Santa Clara County (HTSCC), the Housing Trust was established to provide available financial resources targeted at bridging the affordable housing gap within the County. Its overarching mission is to contribute to rendering Silicon Valley a more financially accessible place to reside. The Housing Trust achieves this by disbursing loans and grants to increase the affordable housing supply, supporting first-time homebuyers, forestalling homelessness, and enhancing community stability. Palo Alto was one of the founding contributors to this initiative and has maintained a consistent commitment to fund allocation. Notably, a provision was introduced to ensure that the funds allocated by the City are exclusively channeled towards qualifying affordable housing projects situated within Palo Alto's municipal boundaries. Development Impact Fees for Housing: The City's development impact fees encompass four distinct categories: Housing, Traffic, Community Facilities, and Parkland Dedication. These fees result from comprehensive Nexus Studies undertaken for both Residential and Commercial Development. The outcomes of these studies laid the groundwork for revised fees associated with residential and non-residential housing, which became effective on June 19, 2017. The housing impact fees are subjected to annual updates. As stated above, the current fees being charged will be evaluated and modified to levels that are more appropriate to support rather than prohibit housing development. Actions taken to address obstacles to meeting underserved needs. 91.220(k); 91.320(j) The City's CDBG program demonstrates a committed effort to collaborate with various funding entities, aiming to maximize the impact of each dollar invested. This endeavor is realized through strategic collaborations with other municipal resources, such as HSRAP, enabling the pooling of funds designated for site acquisition in low-income housing alongside diverse funding sources. However, Palo Alto faces challenges in fully addressing barriers that impede the fulfillment of underserved needs, primarily due to the dwindling availability of CDBG funds over the past years. To mitigate this limitation, the City undertakes measures to supplement its CDBG funding with other resources and funds, which include: • During FY2022-23, the City's Human Service Resource Allocation Process (HSRAP) provided approximately $622,377 from the General Fund in support of human services. PROGRAM YEAR 2022-23 PALO ALTO CAPER- DRAFT 17 Item 11: Staff Report Pg. 21 Packet Pg. 368 of 374 Item 11 Attachment A - FY 2022- 2023 Palo Alto CAPER Report The HSRAP funds, when coupled with the CDBG public service funds, are allocated to local non-profit organizations. • The Palo Alto Commercial Housing Fund is used primarily to increase the number of new affordable housing units for Palo Alto's work force. It is funded with mitigation fees required from developers of commercial and industrial projects; • Palo Alto Residential Housing Fund is derived from mitigation fees collected through Palo Alto's BMR housing program from residential developers and various other miscellaneous sources. These diverse sources include proceeds generated from the sale or leasing of City property. • The City established the Below Market Rate Emergency Fund to offer continuous funding for loans to BMR owners, encompassing special assessment loans, as well as supporting the restoration and safeguarding of the City's collection of BMR ownership units. • Annually, the HOME Program funds are made accessible through a competitive selection process administered by the State of California HOME program and the County's HOME Consortium. Actions taken to reduce lead -based paint hazards. 91.220(k); 91.320(j) Lead exposure can inflict enduring damage upon the brain and various organs, ultimately leading to diminished cognitive and behavioral challenges, especially among young children. As of August 2023, an estimated 500,000 children below the age of six in the United States exhibit elevated lead levels in their bloodstream, surpassing the threshold set by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for concern. A significant portion of these children hails from low-income families, residing in aged residences marked by substantial concentrations of lead -based paint and lead -contaminated dust and soil in their surroundings. The housing and CDBG staff of the City is actively engaged in disseminating information and making referrals to property owners, developers, and non-profit organizations engaged in the restoration of older housing, particularly concerning hazards linked to lead -based paint (LBP). In line with this, any dwelling slated for rehabilitation aided by City financial support is subjected to an assessment for the presence of LBP hazards. The City extends financial support for mitigating LBP hazards in rehabilitated units with City funding. Additionally, the City enforces contractor training and certification to mitigate the potential use of LBP in the construction of 40 new units. All development and rehabilitation projects must be evaluated according to HUD's Lead Safe mitigating LBP hazards in rehabilitated units Housing Rule 24 CFR Part 35.[1]. Actions taken to reduce the number of poverty -level families. 91.220(k); 91.320(j) As part of its ongoing commitment to poverty reduction, the City prioritized allocating funds to agencies offering direct support to individuals experiencing homelessness or those at risk of becoming homeless. During the program year FY2022-23, the highlighted programs encompassed the following: PROGRAM YEAR 2022-23 PALO ALTO CAPER- DRAFT 18 Item 11: Staff Report Pg. 22 Packet Pg. 369 of 374 Item 11 Attachment A - FY 2022- 2023 Palo Alto CAPER Report Through the Ombudsman Program, Catholic Charities of Santa Clara County assisted 62 senior residents with resolved complaints made by, or on behalf of, low-income elderly facility residents. LifeMoves, at the Opportunity Services Center, provided case management services, including assistance with housing and job searches to 49 homeless/very low-income community residents LifeMoves provides necessities for persons who are homeless or at risk of becoming homeless. The Opportunity Services Center is a comprehensive, one -stop, multi -service, day drop -in center that provides critical services for homeless Palo Alto residents. Specifically, the facility provides showers, laundry, clothing, snacks, case management, and shelter/housing referral services. As mentioned previously, the City provided LifeMoves with $26,660 in CDBG funds in FY2022-23. During the fiscal year 49 homeless and/or very low-income Palo Alto residents received case management services, including assistance with housing/job search, referral, and mentoring. Alta Housing provided counseling and supportive case management services for low-income residents of single -room occupancy facilities to help them maintain housing stability. Activities included financial counseling, health maintenance, information and referral, problem solving, employment assistance, crisis intervention, and case management. Alta Housing was able to provide services to 148 individuals. Actions taken to develop institutional structure. 91.220(k); 91.320(j) The City is actively working towards enhancing collaboration between governmental bodies and private sector entities to harness collective endeavors, pool resources, and cultivate fresh avenues of revenue to address community service requirements and foster affordable housing creation. This collaborative approach encompasses several key initiatives: • Holding regular meetings among entitlement jurisdictions through the CDBG Coordinators. • Participation in meetings of the Regional Housing Working Group. • Engaging in joint jurisdiction Request for Proposals and project review committees. • Coordinating project management for initiatives funded by multiple jurisdictions. • Participating in HOME Consortium meetings among member jurisdictions to discuss affordable housing projects Actions taken to enhance coordination between public and private housing and social service agencies. 91.220(k); 91.320(j) The City benefits from a strong housing and community development partner network within its jurisdiction and the wider region. Collaborative relationships with organizations such as the County and the Continuum of Care (CoC) further strengthen this network. To foster increased collaboration between public and private sectors, the City actively partners with local jurisdictions and developers, facilitating the exchange of knowledge and resources. In addition to the strategies mentioned above, the City remains dedicated to harmonizing its goals with its HSRAP funding initiatives, ensuring a comprehensive approach to meeting community needs. PROGRAM YEAR 2022-23 PALO ALTO CAPER- DRAFT 19 Item 11: Staff Report Pg. 23 Packet Pg. 370 of 374 Item 11 Attachment A - FY 2022- 2023 Palo Alto CAPER Report Identify actions taken to overcome the effects of any impediments identified in the jurisdictions analysis of impediments to fair housing choice. 91.520(a) The City is committed to actively promoting fair housing in accordance with the adopted Analysis of Impediments. The subsequent enumeration outlines the measures undertaken to advance fair housing: • The City's 2023-2031 Housing Element includes programs to address affirmatively further fair housing (AFFH). These include outreach/education services, continue to enforce the Below Market Rate (BMR) program that provides more affordable units, expands housing services, and implement more renter protections. • A significant portion of the City's local housing funds were allocated towards augmenting and conserving the inventory of affordable housing. • The Office of Human Services held regular meetings with the County of Santa Clara Housing Authority to facilitate the placement of homeless individuals utilizing Section 8 vouchers. • Affordable housing information and referral services were provided by the Office of Human Services; • In a joint effort with the County of Santa Clara and Cities, the City adopted its updated Assessment of Fair Housing (AFH) Plan in May 2023. During FY2022-23, the City continued to support actions to affirmatively further fair housing choice through a subrecipient agreement with Project Sentinel, a non-profit organization dedicated to assisting individuals with housing problems. Project Sentinel exceeded their goal of 15 individuals served through case management. They served 22 LMI individuals via case management. They updated their fair housing manual for housing providers and is readily available on their website. PROGRAM YEAR 2022-23 PALO ALTO CAPER- DRAFT 20 Item 11: Staff Report Pg. 24 Packet Pg. 371 of 374 Item 11 Attachment A - FY 2022- 2023 Palo Alto CAPER Report CR-40 - Monitoring 91.220 and 91.230 Describe the standards and procedures used to monitor activities carried out in furtherance of the plan and used to ensure long-term compliance with requirements of the programs involved, including minority business outreach and the comprehensive planning requirements The City remains actively engaged in overseeing all subrecipients and projects to ensure their adherence to program and comprehensive planning requirements. This monitoring process encompasses the review of quarterly performance reports, reimbursement requests, submitted supporting documentation, and agency audit reports. Biennial desk -site monitoring is conducted for all CDBG subrecipients, involving assessing client files, project objectives, compliance with agreements, administrative and financial management, and internal controls. For the program year 2022-23, the City foresees completing the monitoring process in the spring of 2024. The City also plans to conduct risk assessments for all subgrantees, including those receiving funding. Citizen Participation Plan 91.105(d); 91.115(d) Describe the efforts to provide citizens with reasonable notice and an opportunity to comment on performance reports. The 2022-23 Draft CAPER was made available on the City website (https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/CDBG) for the required 15 -day public comment period from August 30th through September 13, 2023. An advertisement was placed in The Daily Post, a newspaper of general circulation, on August 28, 2022, advertising the availability of the CAPER for public review and comment. The draft CAPER was posted on the City's website on August 30, 2023. Copies of the CAPER were available electronically. The Human Relations Commission held a public hearing on September 14, 2023, to discuss the CAPER and allow the public to comment on the CAPER. There was no public comment made during the hearing, and the HRC members did not provide any significant discussion points that would change the contents and or metrics of the CAPER Report. HRC recommends the CAPER Report be included within the October 23, 2023 City Council Staff Report. Per the City's adopted Citizen Participation Plan, the City offers translation services when a significant number of non-English speaking residents can be reasonably expected to participate or when a reasonable accommodation request is made. Non-English speaking residents requiring translation assistance or any accommodations and or persons with disabilities that require assistance are advised to submit their request as soon as possible but no later than 48 hours before a scheduled meeting, program, or service. For the HRC agenda, meeting link and additional information related to the meeting, please visit: www.cityofpaloalto.org/City-Hall/Boards-Commissions/Human-Relations-Commission. Comments, if any, received during the public meeting are summarized and provided in the attachments. PROGRAM YEAR 2022-23 PALO ALTO CAPER- DRAFT 21 Item 11: Staff Report Pg. 25 Packet Pg. 372 of 374 Item 11 Attachment A - FY 2022- 2023 Palo Alto CAPER Report CR-45 - CDBG 91.520(c) Specify the nature of, and reasons for, any changes in the jurisdiction's program objectives and indications of how the jurisdiction would change its programs as a result of its experiences. Not applicable. The City does not plan to change the CDBG program objectives. Does this Jurisdiction have any open Brownfields Economic Development Initiative (BEDI) grants? No. [BEDI grantees] Describe accomplishments and program outcomes during the last year. Not Applicable. PROGRAM YEAR 2022-23 PALO ALTO CAPER- DRAFT 22 Item 11: Staff Report Pg. 26 Packet Pg. 373 of 374 Item 11 Attachment A - FY 2022- 2023 Palo Alto CAPER Report CR-58 - Section 3 - Identify the number of individuals assisted and the types of assistance provided Total Labor Hours CDBG HOME ESG HOPWA HTF Total Number of Activities 0 0 0 0 0 Total Labor Hours Total Section 3 Worker Hours Total Targeted Section 3 Worker Hours Table 8 — Total Labor Hours Qualitative Efforts - Number of Activities by Program CDBG HOME ESG HOPWA HTF Outreach efforts to generate job applicants who are Public Housing Targeted Workers Outreach efforts to generate job applicants who are Other Funding Targeted Workers. Direct, on -the job training (including apprenticeships). Indirect training such as arranging for, contracting for, or paying tuition for, off -site training. Technical assistance to help Section 3 workers compete for jobs (e.g., resume assistance, coaching). Outreach efforts to identify and secure bids from Section 3 business concerns. Technical assistance to help Section 3 business concerns understand and bid on contracts. Division of contracts into smaller jobs to facilitate participation by Section 3 business concerns. Provided or connected residents with assistance in seeking employment including: drafting resumes, preparing for interviews, finding job opportunities, connecting residents to job placement services. Held one or more job fairs. Provided or connected residents with supportive services that can provide direct services or referrals. Provided or connected residents with supportive services that provide one or more of the following: work readiness health screenings, interview clothin , uniforms, test fees, trans ortation. Assisted residents with finding child care. Assisted residents to apply for, or attend community college or a four year educational institution. Assisted residents to apply for, or attend vocational/technical training. Assisted residents to obtain financial literacy training and/or coaching. Bonding assistance, guaranties, or other efforts to support viable bids from Section 3 business concerns. Provided or connected residents with training on computer use or online technologies. Promoting the use of a business registry designed to create opportunities for disadvantaged and small businesses. Outreach, engagement, or referrals with the state one -stop system, as designed in Section 121(e)(2) of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act. Other Table 9— Qualitative Efforts - Number of Activities by Program Narrative There were no Section 3 project activities in FY 2022-23. PROGRAM YEAR 2022-23 PALO ALTO CAPER- DRAFT 23 Item 11: Staff Report Pg. 27 Packet Pg. 374 of 374