HomeMy WebLinkAbout2016-02-18 City Schools Liaison Committee Summary MinutesMinutes
1 | Page
BIG CREEK ELEMENTARY
Regular Meeting
February 18, 2016
The City School Liaison Committee met in the Council Conference Room at
this date at 8:08 A.M, 250 Hamilton Avenue, Palo Alto, California.
Present: City of Palo Alto
Tom DuBois, Council Member, Committee (Chair)
Cory Wolbach, Council Member
Khashayar “Cash” Alaee, City Manager’s Office
Palo Alto Unified School District
Terry Godfrey, Vice President
Melissa Baten Caswell, Board Member Cathy Mak, District Chief Business Officer
Absent:
1. Welcome and Introductions.
2. Oral Communications.
None
3. Approval of Minutes- November 19, 2015 and December 17, 2015.
MOTION: Chair DuBois moved, seconded by School Board Member Godfrey
to approve the November 19th and December 17th, 2015 minutes.
MOTION PASSED: 4-0
Chair DuBois requested City Staff provide the School Board Members with
meeting information packets in advance via email.
4. Discussion Regarding Purpose of the Committee.
Melissa Baten Caswell, School Board Member, expressed in the past both
parties provided a brief update on the items occurring in their respective
City/School Liaison Committee Minutes
Minutes
2 | Page
arenas that may have an effect on the other parties consideration for
projects.
Chair DuBois agreed that was a positive beginning to the meetings.
Ms. Baten Caswell discussed items that had occurred at the recent School Board Meetings. The first was a new School Board Policy regarding non-
service dogs on campus during school hours. The new policy was easily
distributed to the parents; although, there was difficulty reaching the rest of
the community.
Chair DuBois asked if the policy was a change or recently enforced.
Ms. Baten Caswell stated it was a change; there were different policies in
place for different areas.
Chair DuBois asked if there was an after hour’s policy.
Ms. Baten Caswell noted after school hours the fields were on City Policy
enforcement. On a separate matter there was a lawsuit presented to the
Office of Education that was recently determined. The outcome was that the
Morgan Hill Concerned Parents Association was going to be provided privacy information pertaining to more than ten million students unless their parents
completed an Opt Out form by April 1, 2016. The lawsuit included any
student in a public school from 2008 to present; name, social security
number. Unfortunately, for those students who have left the system the
District has no manner in which to contact them.
Terry Godfrey, School Board Member, stated the notices went out to the
parents of Palo Alto Unified School District (PAUSD) parents Wednesday,
February 17th. She noted the PAUSD was not a party to the lawsuit.
Ms. Baten Caswell reiterated the CDE (The California Department of
Education) has the information so whether or not the PAUSD was or was not
a party in the lawsuit, the CDE will send the information.
Chair DuBois asked what information was requested other than the
aforementioned items.
Ms. Baten Caswell stated student grades, test scores, and if there was an
IEP or a 504 on file all of the details would be released.
Minutes
3 | Page
Chair DuBois asked if there was an injunction in the process.
Ms. Baten Caswell said it was not clear although the PAUSD was encouraging
parents to complete the Opt Out form by April 1st.
Ms. Godfrey mentioned there were a couple of School Board Committees. There was a Stanford/PAUSD meeting on the 17th where the new housing
units were discussed. The result affecting the City was the possibility of
discussions regarding the intersection of Serra Street and El Camino Real.
Ms. Baten Caswell explained the PAUSD had several community committees
being formed. To date the official committees were; Jordon School Renaming
Committee, discussions of a Cubberley Committee are in the works.
Interested parties should apply directly to the Superintendent.
Chair DuBois announced the City was working on a Draft Environmental
Impact Report (EIR) for the Comprehensive Plan Update which was released
on February 5th. There was 90 days for public comment; part of the EIR was
an impact on public schools. There were four scenarios provided and the end
goal was for the City to select elements of each scenario to create the ultimate one. One scenario was on public growth which indicated no impact
in public schools. During the next Agenda Item he wanted to include the
determination of demographics.
Ms. Baten Caswell felt it would be beneficial for the City to review the
County demographic report which reflected growth in Santa Clara and San
Mateo County’s but not growth in school age children.
Council Member Wolbach asked which scenario in the Comprehensive Plan
Update was reflective of the unrestrained group.
Chair DuBois stated the 4th scenario.
Ms. Baten Caswell agreed the Comprehensive Plan Update should be
included as a topic for discussion in the next Agenda Item. She mentioned
the PAUSD was in discussions regarding expanding Addison School.
Chair DuBois said a series of parking permit discussions were occurring and
the outcome may impact schools; including expansion of the Downtown
Parking and possibly South Gate Neighborhoods.
Minutes
4 | Page
Kathy Mak, District Chief Business Officer, asked for clarification on what the
areas would be expanded.
Chair DuBois noted the Downtown South Gate Neighborhood areas were
requesting to be a part of the parking permit program.
Ms. Baten Caswell stated the South Gate neighborhood was close to Palo
Alto High School (PALY) and with the reduction in available parking due to
construction there had been a noted increase in students parking in that
neighborhood.
Chair DuBois affirmed that processing was just beginning and could take up
to a year for completion.
Ms. Baten Caswell declared the construction was anticipated to be completed
within that timeframe.
Chair DuBois mentioned the Evergreen Park neighborhood was being
impacted by the California Avenue and Stanford parking issues. Crescent
Park neighborhood was being impacted by the Downtown parking issues.
Ms. Baten Caswell asked how the permit parking program was going to impact Addison.
Ms. Mak stated the PAUSD purchased approximately 70 permits for staff and
visitors; they were requesting exemption with the next phase.
Chair DuBois clarified exemption from paying.
Ms. Mak replied yes.
Chair DuBois asked which City Staff person the PAUSD was discussing the
matter with.
Ms. Mak said Josh Mello from the Transportation Division of Planning.
Ms. Godfrey mentioned there was no impact around the Escondido School
when the College Terrace neighborhood parking permit program went into
effect.
Minutes
5 | Page
Ms. Baten Caswell noted there was ample parking in that area. She believed
the parking matter was a discussion for the Agenda; if for nothing more than
to maintain an update.
Council Member Wolbach asked for an update on the matter of housing for teachers.
Ms. Baten Caswell noted there were negotiations currently in the works and
that matter could not be discussed at this time.
Council Member Wolbach understood but wanted to mention there were
potential topics of discussion around the City through the Housing Element.
Ms. Baten Caswell asked if the Staff was reviewing surrounding communities
because the School District was finding similar issues with surround cities
school districts.
Council Member Wolbach stated yes, Staff was communicating with other
areas. He mentioned the City was in discussions with the County on a
regional effort for a Ballot Measure to fund transportation.
Ms. Godfrey felt the grade separation issue was not a matter of funding as
much as the people who lived in the affected areas.
Chair DuBois asked if the School Board was aware of the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) / California Energy Commission (CEC) meeting next
week.
Ms. Baten Caswell stated yes and noted there was a meeting later on this
evening and on February 23rd where they will be talking to community
groups.
Ms. Godfrey asked to discuss the time of the meetings; the Agenda reflected 8:00 to 10:00 am. She believed the meetings were 8:00 to 9:30 am.
Chair DuBois agreed there was a general understanding of a 9:30 am end
time but he would have Staff change the Agenda to reflect that.
Chair DuBois believed the Committee began historically when the City and
Schools really needed to work together when the PAUSD was closing school
sites. The Committee seemingly evolved from an active group to information
Minutes
6 | Page
sharing. He was interested in returning the ideals to a more productive
Committee.
Ms. Godfrey asked what productive looked like to the Chair.
Chair DuBois shared there was information in the Comprehensive Plan
Update where it denotes maximizing the use of the Committee and to
promote collaboration between the City and the PAUSD.
Ms. Baten Caswell informed the Committee the other committees she and
Ms. Godfrey sat on did not make decisions; they shared information.
Chair DuBois was hoping the Board Members would return to the School
Board and make recommendations on policy matters pertaining to relations
between the Schools and the City. The City/School Liaison Committee would
be in an advisory capacity.
Ms. Godfrey asked what the Committee looked like when Chair DuBois felt it
played a different role.
Chair DuBois suggested not planning the Agenda for the entire year but
rather having topics for discussion and thus allowing room for change.
Ms. Godfrey asked for specific clarification on what the Committee looked
like before now.
Ms. Baten Caswell reiterated a productive committee was difficult when the
School Board Members were prohibited from making decisions or recommendations. Their role was to gather information and return it to the
rest of the Board.
Chair DuBois wanted this Committee to serve a more in-depth capacity
being able to discuss, for example; traffic issues, come up with a resolution
and bring that back to the Committees respective bodies.
Ms. Godfrey announced the PAUSD did have a Committee where there were
decisions made but that was the only one. Her expectation when she joined
this Committee was to dive into a topic of mutual interest, surface the issues
and request staff to pursue them with the School Board or the City Council.
Ms. Baten Caswell stated the Committee in the past had been constrained by
the fixed subject matter of the Agenda. Not being able to discuss matters
until their time on the Agenda, which was not effective.
Minutes
7 | Page
Council Member Wolbach believed there was a great deal of nexus between
the two entities. In order to direct City Staff to perform work that would take
longer than an hour’s time the direction needed to come directly from the
full Council.
Chair DuBois clarified Staff would be presenting at the Committee level and
therefore, they will be made aware of these issues.
Ms. Baten Caswell explained the proposal was not that the Committee would
have a solution the Staff discusses but rather to declare it was an important
enough issue for both bodies to be aware of the need.
Council Member Wolbach stated that in itself would be a recommendation to
the full Council; having Staff present an issue and the Committee
determining there was a real need. The Chair and I would recommend to the
full Council that Staff be directed to spend more time vetting the issue and adopting a resolution.
Ms. Baten Caswell stated from the PAUSD side Ms. Mak was attending the
Committee meetings as the senior staff member who would bring the
matters she felt were in the best interest of the District to the
Superintendent for further vetting.
Council Member Wolbach felt listening to all of the conversations regarding
the aspiration to have a more useful Committee is that it is desired by both
parties. Even if it was to stay as an information sharing Committee, being
able to share more detailed information would be beneficial.
Ms. Baten Caswell wanted to be certain the Committee was flexible. There
needs to be a process of information sharing for the community. The PAUSD
has access to the school community but not the greater community, while
the City has access to the greater community but not the school community.
Chair DuBois had the thought of rather than Staff on either side presenting a
broad topic; present the specific issue that pertains to both entities; South
Gate Neighborhood crossing. The Committee could have a proactive
discussion on a specific resolution to present to their respective bodies.
Ms. Baten Caswell agreed although reiterated it would not be herself or Ms.
Godfrey with the ability to bring the matter forward but their senior staff
person.
Minutes
8 | Page
Ms. Godfrey agreed staff attended the meetings and were aware of the
issues or needs. The question was having the ability to have a discussion
when needed and the flexibility with the Agenda process.
Ms. Baten Caswell asked how flexible the Agenda could be. Meaning if a
month out from the meeting there was an issue which needed attention
could staff be notified to prepare and bring it forward.
Chair DuBois stated asking was always an option.
Richard Hackmann, Management Analyst, stated from a Staff’s perspective
in the vein of making the Committee a recommendation policy body, there
was an understanding the School Board Members would need to return to
their body before any official action could be taken as would the Council
Members. An example was the school being interested in a waiver from the
parking permit program costs. When Staff presented the matter to the Council they would be asked the reasoning behind why the PAUSD was
requesting a waiver, what the fiscal impact on the PAUSD would be and the
number of spaces being requested to be waived. If a policy discussion had
taken place at the Committee level, Staff would be better able to explain the
request and a policy implementation from the Council.
Ms. Baten Caswell noted that would be a difficult scenario for them as the
City/School Liaison Committee was a liaison role.
Chair DuBois clarified the School Board Members were on several
committees jointly with the City.
Ms. Baten Caswell stated yes; although, as with this Committee they were
not part of making any decisions or policy, they strictly returned information
to the PAUSD.
Ms. Godfrey noted the discussion seemed to be circling. Her expectation in
joining the Committee was having a flexible agenda process and inviting
items to the agenda on an update of issues that had been previously
brought to the respective bodies. If an item arises during the update that
the Committee felt needed further discussion or review that could be
brought to the attention of the parties’ official bodies for further direction of
staff.
Chair DuBois announced the more detailed the information a sub-Committee
provided the smoother the Council Meeting or School Board Meeting could
run.
Minutes
9 | Page
Ms. Baten Caswell recalled in prior years on the Committee they attempted
to create a more dynamic approach and when the senior staff member
brought the subject forward to the Board they were told there were specific
people they would select to be on that type of committee. Therefore, the liaison representatives of the City/School Committee were not seen as more
than information gathering.
Council Member Wolbach wanted to have the authority to make
recommendations to the respective bodies with the understanding the
members of this Committee did not have the authority to make direction.
Ms. Godfrey stated given there was no formal definition of the Committee if
the Committee members agreed amongst themselves to have a more
flexible agenda process, to discuss items more fully and that the process be
vetted after a few months to see if there were changes necessary.
Ms. Baten Caswell wanted to add open communication to the list. If either
party had information they needed to be disseminated through their
respective constituencies that could be done in a timely manner; she was
confirmable bringing that type of issue back to the Board.
Chair DuBois requested any information from the PAUSD be received ahead
of time rather than at the meeting. That would provide more time to review
and be better prepared such as staff presentations or background
information. He asked the Committee Members if they felt a 3-month lead
time was sufficient for items.
Ms. Baten Caswell agreed that would be ample time.
Council Member Wolbach agreed there should be more dialogue and less
time spent on presentations.
5. Discussion of 2016 Committee Meeting Agenda Items.
Chair DuBois provided a potential list of topics for the agenda discussion.
Terry Godfrey, School Board Member, noticed middle school athletics was
listed twice.
Chair DuBois stated yes but for two different schools. He reviewed lists
presented by Staff and found the list of topics for 2013 and 2014 were
similar.
Minutes
10 | Page
Melissa Baten Caswell, School Board Member, expressed concern over the
routine style of the meetings which was where the desire for a more flexible
agenda process arose from.
Chair DuBois suggested each member select their top three priorities.
Ms. Godfrey asked if there was a topic on the agenda that had been
discussed previously but the current Committee was in need of a brief
closure. Staff was not needed for a full disclosure but rather a brief update
on the resolution and the final outcome of the projects from prior years.
Chair DuBois agreed.
Council Member Wolbach said the role of the Committee was not articulated.
If there was a discussion amongst the City Manager and the Superintendent
regarding a subject that involved both entities they could request Staff vet the matter through the City/School Committee and then Staff would present
the recommendation to the full Council or School Board for approval.
Ms. Baten Caswell agreed staff could present the matter and the Committee
could vet it then senior staff could bring the recommendation to the
Superintendent who could present the matter the School Board. She was not
certain how the School Board would react to the two liaisons having that
type of authority.
Council Member Wolbach felt it was simply a different style of how the
bodies preferred to receive information.
Ms. Baten Caswell stated having staff come to the Committee to bounce
information or ideas through them was a good idea, it was simply the next
steps would be different.
Council Member Wolbach expressed the need for a description from the
School Board and the full Council on the expectation of the Committee.
Ms. Baten Caswell stated the ideal goal was a better flow of information from
the Committee.
Ms. Godfrey asked if there was a mechanism that informed the rest of the
Council Members of resolved items such as the Weekly; a weekly paper
produced Superintendent on the complete goings on throughout the District.
Ms. Baten Caswell asked if there was a weekly newsletter that was
produced.
Minutes
11 | Page
Chair DuBois said no, there was a month-in-review by the City Manager.
Different departments provided informational items in the Council packet.
Council Member Wolbach noted at the City Council meetings the City
Manager provided comments on matters throughout the City.
Ms. Baten Caswell selected her priorities for the Committee to discuss as: 1)
middle school athletics, 2) school transportation and traffic around school
sites, 3) construction and boundary planning needed to be a separate items,
4) upcoming ballot initiatives, and 5) regular updates on the Cubberley Plan.
Chair DuBois asked if there were particular initiatives on the ballot this
November that impacted the schools.
Ms. Baten Caswell stated there were state level initiatives around schools but there were not local initiatives.
Council Member Wolbach mentioned the County transportation Sales Tax
could have an impact on schools.
Ms. Baten Caswell felt state and county ballot initiatives should be discussed
since they may impact either the City or schools.
Ms. Godfrey provided her priorities list as; 1) middle school athletics.
Chair DuBois interrupted and asked what the issue was since it was a
priority for both of School Board Members.
Ms. Baten Caswell mentioned there was a lot of community input on there
not being enough bandwidth for all of the student interest and the City
managed that program.
Ms. Godfrey felt the resolution was difficult because the City could not hire
coaching staff.
Chair DuBois agreed middle school athletics was a priority but for different
reasons. He wanted to be sure the City and schools were abiding by the
recent change in the state law of not denying participation based on funding.
Ms. Baten Caswell was aware of that situation and agreed there were
matters that needed to be further discussed for a better understanding.
Minutes
12 | Page
Ms. Godfrey continued with her priority list; 2) the school impacts from the
Comprehensive Plan draft, 3) summer school programs but she requested
more details.
Chair DuBois referred to the cutback in the summer school programs from
four or five years ago. The City summer programs were full and it seemed
like a similar subject matter.
Ms. Godfrey agreed. The Palo Alto Unified School District (PAUSD) was
adding summer school programs back and communication around
coordination was important. She mentioned the possibility of work
experience programs.
Ms. Baten Caswell mentioned the City backfilled programs when the PAUSD
shortened theirs. She neglected to mention communication outreach process
in her list of priorities.
Council Member Wolbach provided his list of priorities as; 1) Comprehensive
Plan and school impacts, 2) communication strategy, 3) middle school
athletic programs, 4) Cubberley updates, 5) transportation, 6) summer
school programs, 7) ballot initiatives, and 8) Project Safety Net. He felt
continued and regular updates on how the Project Safety Net Program was
working would be beneficial to both parties.
Ms. Baten Caswell agreed and said especially since the program had recently
hired a Director.
Chair DuBois clarified his top three priorities would be; 1) Cubberley, 2) Project Safety Net/teen programs, and 3) school transportation/traffic
around school sites. He noted the three lesser priorities would be; 1) middle
school athletics, 2) summer programs, and 3) child care/early child care
services.
Ms. Baten Caswell asked for clarification on the last topic of child care and if
it was in reference to after school care.
Chair DuBois stated child care in general. He noted most of the child care
services were concentrated at Ventura School and there was a great deal of
demand that far exceeded the capacity.
Ms. Baten Caswell did not understand the City’s priority at Cubberley. She
would like to understand how the community services support would be
beneficial to both parties.
Minutes
13 | Page
Chair DuBois was asking if the PAUSD was looking into more child care
services at more locations.
Ms. Baten Caswell noted the discussions had been around kinder and pre-k ages. The PAUSD was under discussions on possibly changing the process of
kindergarten. Currently each site had a different schedule.
Chair DuBois stated in reference to the priority topics there were five or six
subjects that were agreed upon.
Ms. Baten Caswell agreed and clarified the middle school athletics was
mentioned by all parties, summer programs; if there was a possibility of
getting a head start on that topic it needed to be discussed soon.
Ms. Mak noted the discussions could be around the 2017 summer programs.
Ms. Baten Carswell said yes, although there did need to be communications
regarding the 2016 summer; so if there were gaps that needed to be filled in
for 2017, both parties were aware of them now.
Chair DuBois agreed and added that could be part of the communication
strategy discussion. He continued the top priority list where Cubberley was
mentioned by most.
Ms. Godfrey added the Comprehensive Plan was mentioned by three parties.
Ms. Baten Caswell requested the Committee have regular updates as to the
status and changes to Cubberley.
Ms. Godfrey stated providing Staff a several month lead time should be
sufficient.
Chair DuBois mentioned the Draft EIR of the Comprehensive Plan had a
section on school impacts; outside of that section would the PAUSD be
interested in information.
Ms. Baten Caswell declared the impacts on enrollment and transportation
would be of interest to the PAUSD. She felt transportation and impacts
around school sites was a matter she wished to visit early on.
Chair DuBois asked if parking should be added to the transportation
element.
Ms. Baten Caswell stated yes, as well as school construction.
Minutes
14 | Page
Chair DuBois asked the senior staff members if they felt they could return
with a report on middle school athletics in March.
Ms. Baten Caswell asked to add the summer school programs on the March
agenda; knowing the schedule could not be changed but receiving the
information and determining the gaps would be beneficial for the planning of
the 2017 programs.
Ms. Godfrey agreed with the summer school programs and although middle
school athletics was an important, the issues were already known. The more
important goal would be to get behind the summer school program issues
before they become greater.
Council Member Wolbach asked if goal was to change the structure of the
programs.
Ms. Baten Caswell noted that was a more significant discussion which was
why they requested it be on the agenda sooner.
Chair DuBois reviewed the proposed agenda items for the upcoming few
months. Summer Programs and communications for the March agenda,
middle school discussions in April, and Cubberley in May.
Ms. Baten Caswell asked if the idea behind combining summer programs and
communications was if the Committee could achieve a positive outcome with
the summer programs the communications strategy could be worked out
across the board.
Chair DuBois felt the communications strategy would return as a topic.
Because the summer programs schedules were set, adding the
communications element to the agenda item would be more on how to
communicate to the different communities. He continued with the agenda
discussion as May being transportation and parking.
Ms. Baten Caswell stated that would be a good way for the PAUSD to
prepare for the upcoming school year.
Council Member Wolbach asked if the Comprehensive Plan should be on an
earlier agenda. He felt the middle school athletics topic was less time
sensitive than the Comprehensive Plan.
Ms. Baten Caswell asked whether the Comprehensive Plan was time
sensitive to the PAUSD.
Minutes
15 | Page
Chair DuBois noted a number of the elements in the Comprehensive Plan
had not been drafted so in order to add it to an earlier agenda there would
need to be specific subject matters.
Ms. Baten Caswell noted in the past years the Comprehensive Plan did not
have much impact on the PAUSD.
Chair DuBois stated it was more of a review and comment.
Ms. Baten Caswell stated if there was review and comment to be made it
would not be by Ms. Godfrey or herself. She asked who would provide the
document to the PAUSD for review.
Council Member Wolbach stated it was available on the City website.
Ms. Baten Caswell noted that was part of the communication issues needing
to be discussed; the PAUSD staff was not regularly visiting the City website
to see what was updated. She did not believe City Staff was visiting the
PAUSD website.
Council Member Wolbach requested Staff send the Comprehensive Plan URL
to the PAUSD members.
Chair DuBois mentioned talking about teacher housing around the
Comprehensive Plan.
Ms. Baten Caswell reiterated any discussions regarding teacher housing would occur after negations had closed.
Chair DuBois asked when the negotiations were anticipated to be closed.
Ms. Baten Caswell was unaware of a closure time.
Chair DuBois reiterated the upcoming agenda schedule; Summer Programs
in March, Middle School Athletics in April, Cubberley in May, and
Transportation and Parking in June.
Ms. Baten Caswell asked if the Communications item could be added before
June.
Chair DuBois clarified the next four months were agendized so he suggested
making a potential list for the months of five through ten. The Committee
Minutes
16 | Page
could revisit the agenda list items monthly and see if there needed to be a
reprioritizing. Communications could be “on-deck” for July.
Ms. Baten Caswell asked if there was a way to have more than one topic on an agenda. For example the PAUSD had the new dog on campus policy; how
could that be disseminated to the entire community.
Council Member Wolbach asked if there was a way in which Staff could assist
with that matter.
Ms. Baten Caswell mentioned the PAUSD had a new communications position
and possibly they could speak with Claudia Keith, the City’s Communications
Manager.
Chair DuBois asked Staff if the Community Services Division had newsletters
they distributed.
Richard Hackmann, Management Analyst, stated there was a monthly
Mayor’s Letter and Animal Services Division had a newsletter; although, the
scope was limited. He requested the proper person he should contact to
receive a statement that would go into a newsletter.
Ms. Baten Caswell provided the name of the new Communications Manager
for the PAUSD.
Ms. Mak requested the City reiterate the City Ordinance on dogs on school
grounds along with the new PAUSD policy.
Chair DuBois asked for input on the items “on-desk” for the agenda after June.
Ms. Godfrey stated communication strategy, summer teen programs/work
experience programs.
Council Member Wolbach mentioned the Valley Transportation Authority had
a ballot measure coming up in November. Should that be discussed and tied
in to the Transportation/Parking discussion in June.
Ms. Godfrey asked what was meant by “teen programs” on the potential list
of topics.
Chair DuBois clarified the Teen Drop-In at Mitchell Park Community Center.
Minutes
17 | Page
Ms. Baten Caswell asked if the Committee was aware the Art Center had a
Teen Drop-In Center as well. The City had a number of teen programs that
the PAUSD did not see.
Council Member Wolbach noted that was why the need for the discussion.
Chair DuBois asked if there were items the PAUSD had that the City was
unaware of.
Ms. Baten Caswell stated there were individual clubs at the High Schools that
ran camps. Unfortunately those types of events were done organically.
Ms. Godfrey asked when the dates were for the upcoming meetings.
Chair DuBois stated the Committee met the third Thursday of each month
from 8:00 A.M. to 9:30 A.M.
Ms. Baten Caswell suggested hearing Transportation and Parking in May and
Cubberley in June.
Adjournment: This meeting was adjourned at 9:32 A.M.