HomeMy WebLinkAbout2017-02-16 Architectural Review Board Agenda Packet_______________________
1.Spokespersons that are representing a group of five or more people who are identified as present at the meeting at
the time of the spokesperson’s presentation will be allowed up to fifteen (15) minutes at the discretion of the Chair,
provided that the non-speaking members agree not to speak individually.
2.The Chair may limit Oral Communications to 30 minutes for all combined speakers.
3.The Chair may reduce the allowed time to speak to three minutes to accommodate a larger number of speakers.
Architectural Review Board
Regular Meeting Agenda: February 16, 2017
Council Chambers
250 Hamilton Avenue
8:30 AM
Call to Order / Roll Call
Oral Communications
The public may speak to any item not on the agenda. Three (3) minutes per speaker.1,2
Agenda Changes, Additions, and Deletions
The Chair or Board majority may modify the agenda order to improve meeting management.
City Official Reports
1.Transmittal of the ARB Meeting Schedule and Attendance Record, and Administrative
Staff-Level Architectural Review Approvals
Study Session
Public Comment is Permitted. Five (5) minutes per speaker.1,3
2.Receive Presentation and Comment on Neighborhood Traffic Safety and Bicycle
Boulevard Projects along Amarillo Avenue, Bryant Street, Carlson Court, Castilleja
Avenue, Creekside Drive, Duncan Place, East Meadow Drive, Georgia Avenue, Louis
Road, Mackay Drive, Maybell Avenue, McClane Street, Miller Avenue, Montrose
Avenue, Moreno Avenue, Park Boulevard, Redwood Circle, Palo Alto Avenue, Ross
Road, Stanford Avenue and Wilkie Way Environmental Assessment: Not a Project
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. Please contact Christopher
Corrao for Additional Information at christopher.corrao@ciytofpaloalto.org.
Action Items
Public Comment is Permitted. Applicants/Appellant Teams: Ten (10) minutes, plus ten (10) minutes rebuttal. All
others: Five (5) minutes per speaker.1,3
3.QUASI-JUDICIAL / PUBLIC HEARING: 855 El Camino Real [16PLN-00237]: Request for
Architectural Review of an Amendment to an existing Master Sign Program and Sign
Exception for construction of a new externally illuminated post-mounted
freestanding tenant sign for "Gott's Roadside" at Town & Country. Environmental
_______________________
1.Spokespersons that are representing a group of five or more people who are identified as present at the meeting at
the time of the spokesperson’s presentation will be allowed up to fifteen (15) minutes at the discretion of the Chair,
provided that the non-speaking members agree not to speak individually.
2.The Chair may limit Oral Communications to 30 minutes for all combined speakers.
3.The Chair may reduce the allowed time to speak to three minutes to accommodate a larger number of speakers.
Assessment: Categorically Exempt per CEQA Guideline Section 15301.
Zoning District: Community Commercial (CC). For additional information
contact Rebecca Atkinson at rebecca.atkinson@cityofpaloalto.org
4.PUBLIC HEARING / QUASI-JUDICIAL. 2600 El Camino Real [16PLN-00022]:
Consideration of an Architectural Review Application to Allow the Demolition of an
Existing Six-Story Commercial Building and Construction of a New Four-Story, 62,616
Square Foot Commercial Building; no new Floor Area is Being Requested. The Project
Includes Retention of an Existing Subterranean Garage and Proposes a new Parking
Structure at the Rear of the Proposed Building. Environmental Assessment: The
Project is Exempt From CEQA per Guideline Section 15302 (Replacement and
Reconstruction) Zoning District: CS. For addtional information contact Sheldon Ah
Sing at SAhsing@m-group.us
Approval of Minutes Public Comment is Permitted.
Five (5) minutes per speaker.1,3
None
Subcommittee Items
Board Member Questions, Comments or Announcements
Adjournment
_______________________
1.Spokespersons that are representing a group of five or more people who are identified as present at the meeting at
the time of the spokesperson’s presentation will be allowed up to fifteen (15) minutes at the discretion of the Chair,
provided that the non-speaking members agree not to speak individually.
2.The Chair may limit Oral Communications to 30 minutes for all combined speakers.
3.The Chair may reduce the allowed time to speak to three minutes to accommodate a larger number of speakers.
Palo Alto Architectural Review Board
Boardmember Biographies, Present and Archived Agendas and Reports are available online:
http://www.cityofpaloalto.org/gov/boards/architectural/default.asp. The ARB Boardmembers
are:
Chair Alex Lew
Vice Chair Kyu Kim
Boardmember Peter Baltay
Boardmember Wynne Furth
Boardmember Robert Gooyer
Get Informed and Be Engaged!
View online: http://midpenmedia.org/category/government/city-of-palo-alto or on Channel 26.
Show up and speak. Public comment is encouraged. Please complete a speaker request card
located on the table at the entrance to the Council Chambers and deliver it to the Board
Secretary prior to discussion of the item.
Write to us. Email the ARB at: arb@cityofpaloalto.org. Letters can be delivered to the Planning
& Community Environment Department, 5th floor, City Hall, 250 Hamilton Avenue, Palo Alto, CA
94301. Comments received by 2:00 PM the Thursday preceding the meeting date will be
included in the agenda packet. Comments received afterward through 3:00 PM the day before
the meeting will be presented to the Board at the dais.
Material related to an item on this agenda submitted to the ARB after distribution of the
agenda packet is available for public inspection at the address above.
Americans with Disability Act (ADA)
It is the policy of the City of Palo Alto to offer its public programs, services and meetings in a
manner that is readily accessible to all. Persons with disabilities who require materials in an
appropriate alternative format or who require auxiliary aids to access City meetings, programs,
or services may contact the City’s ADA Coordinator at (650) 329-2550 (voice) or by emailing
ada@cityofpaloalto.org. Requests for assistance or accommodations must be submitted at least
24 hours in advance of the meeting, program, or service.
Architectural Review Board
Staff Report (ID # 7740)
Report Type: City Official Reports Meeting Date: 2/16/2017
City of Palo Alto
Planning & Community Environment
250 Hamilton Avenue
Palo Alto, CA 94301
(650) 329-2442
Summary Title: Schedule and Staff Architectural Review Approvals
Title: Transmittal of the ARB Meeting Schedule and Attendance
Record, and Administrative Staff-Level Architectural Review
Approvals
From: Hillary Gitelman
Recommendation
Staff recommends the Architectural Review Board (ARB) review and comment as appropriate.
Background
The attached documents are provided for informational purposes. The Board may review and
comment as it deems appropriate. If individual Boardmembers anticipate being absent from a
future meeting, it is requested that be brought to staff’s attention when considering this item.
The first attachment provides a meeting and attendance schedule for the current calendar year.
Also included are the subcommittee assignments, which rotate throughout the year.
The second attachment transmits administrative staff-level Architectural Review approvals
since the Board’s last meeting. Any party, including the applicant, may request a hearing by the
ARB on the proposed director's decision by filing a written request with the planning division.
There shall be no fee required for requesting such a hearing.
However, pursuant to 18.77.070(b)(5) any project relating to the installation of cabinets
containing communications service equipment or facilities, pursuant to any service subject to
Palo Alto Municipal Code Chapter 2.11, Chapter 12.04, Chapter 12.08, Chapter 12.09, Chapter
12.10, or Chapter 12.13 is not eligible for a request for hearing by any party, including the
applicant.
No action is required by the ARB for this item.
Attachments:
City of Palo Alto
Planning & Community Environment Department Page 2
Attachment A: ARB Meeting Schedule / Assignments (DOCX)
Attachment B: Staff Approvals (DOCX)
2017 Schedule
Architectural Review Board
Meeting Schedule & Assignments
Meeting Dates Time Location Status Planned Absences
1/5/2017 8:30 AM Council Chambers Canceled
1/19/2017 8:30 AM Council Chambers Regular
2/2/2017 8:30 AM Council Chambers Regular
2/16/2017
/17
8:30 AM Council Chambers Regular Peter Baltay
3/10/2017 8:30 AM Council Chambers Regular
3/16/2017 8:30 AM Council Chambers Regular
4/6/2017 8:30 AM Council Chambers Regular
4/20/2017 8:30 AM Council Chambers Regular
5/4/2017 8:30 AM Council Chambers Regular
5/18/2017 8:30 AM Council Chambers Regular
6/2/2017 8:30 AM Council Chambers Regular
6/16/2017 8:30 AM Council Chambers Regular
7/6/2017 8:30 AM Council Chambers Regular
7/20/2017 8:30 AM Council Chambers Regular
8/3/2017 8:30 AM Council Chambers Regular
8/17/2017 8:30 AM Council Chambers Regular
9/8/2017 8:30 AM Council Chambers Regular
9/22/2017 8:30 AM Council Chambers Regular
10/6/2017 8:30 AM Council Chambers Regular
10/20/2017 8:30 AM Council Chambers Regular
11/3/2017 8:30 AM Council Chambers Regular
11/17/2017 8:30 AM Council Chambers Regular
12/15/2017 8:30 AM Council Chambers Regular
12/29/2017 8:30 AM Council Chambers Regular
2017 Subcommittee Assignments
January February March April May June
(Gooyer/
Baltay)
(Gooyer/
Baltay)
(Gooyer/
Baltay)
(Baltay/
Kim)
(Baltay/
Kim)
(Baltay/
Kim)
July August September October November December
(Kim/
Furth)
(Kim/
Furth)
(Kim/
Furth)
(Furth/
Lew)
(Furth/
Lew)
(Furth/
Lew)
Architectural Review Board
Project Description: Steel beam trellis structure over 30,125 sf area to support a solar
development on the top floor of an existing City parking structure, Planned Community
(PC-3995; formerly PC 3499). Trellis will extend 5’6” above the existing parapet (at
51’9”) to a maximum height of 57’3” above grade, allowing 7’6” minimum clearance
from garage top floor to underside of trellis.
Applicant: MBL Energy
Address: 520 Webster Street; File #16PLN-00254
Approval Date: February 2, 2016
Request for hearing deadline: February 17, 2017
Project Description: Steel beam trellis structure over 20,645 sf area to support a solar
development on the top floor of an existing City parking structure, Planned Community
(PC-4127). The trellis will extend to a maximum height of 27.9’ above grade, allowing 8
foot minimum clearance from garage top floor to underside of trellis.
Applicant: MBL Energy
Address: 275 Cambridge Avenue; File #16PLN-00278
Approval Date: February 3, 2016
Request for hearing deadline: February 17, 2017
Project Description: Steel beam trellis structure over 28,051 sf area to support a solar
development on the top floor of an existing City parking structure, zoned Public
Facilities. The trellis will extend one floor above the garage, providing 8 foot minimum
clearance above the roof deck to underside of trellis.
Applicant: MBL Energy
Address: 475 Cambridge Avenue; File#16PLN-00250
Approval Date: February 3, 2016
Request for hearing deadline: February 17, 2017
Project Description: Review to resurface and install a new illuminated freestanding sign.
Applicant: Deleon Realty Inc.
Planning & Transportation Commission
Meeting Schedule & Assignments
Address: 1717 Embarcadero Rd.; File#16PLN-00340
Approval Date: January 30, 2017
Request for hearing deadline: February 20, 2017
Project Description: Review to install one new non-illuminated wall sign
Applicant: Vic Balushian
Address: 2191 E Bayshore Rd.; File#16PLN-00415
Approval Date: January 30, 2017
Request for hearing deadline: February 20, 2017
Architectural Review Board
Staff Report (ID # 7680)
Report Type: Study Session Meeting Date: 2/16/2017
City of Palo Alto
Planning & Community Environment
250 Hamilton Avenue
Palo Alto, CA 94301
(650) 329-2442
Summary Title: Neighborhood Traffic Safety & Bicycle Boulevard Projects
Title: Receive Presentation and Comment on Neighborhood Traffic
Safety and Bicycle Boulevard Projects along Amarillo Avenue,
Bryant Street, Carlson Court, Castilleja Avenue, Creekside
Drive, Duncan Place, East Meadow Drive, Georgia Avenue,
Louis Road, Mackay Drive, Maybell Avenue, McClane Street,
Miller Avenue, Montrose Avenue, Moreno Avenue, Park
Boulevard, Redwood Circle, Palo Alto Avenue, Ross Road,
Stanford Avenue and Wilkie Way Environmental Assessment:
Not a Project Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality
Act. Please contact Christopher Corrao for Additional
Information at christopher.corrao@ciytofpaloalto.org.
From: Hillary Gitelman
Recommendation
It is recommended that the Architectural Review Board (ARB) take the following action(s):
1. Receive presentation and comment as appropriate.
Background
Transportation planning staff will provide an update to the ARB on the Neighborhood Traffic
Safety and Bicycle Boulevard Projects. This is intended to be a study session style format, with a
staff presentation followed by discussion and comments.
Attachments:
Attachment A - Raised Crosswalk (PDF)
Attachment B - Speed Hump (PDF)
Attachment C - Traffic Circle + Raised Intersection + Landscaping (PDF)
Attachment A: Example of Raised Crosswalk with Curb Extensions
Slotted Speed Hump with Planters
1
2
Reduce Speeding
Enhance Landscaping
Before
After
Narrow the street, with planters and reduce speeding with speed
humps. Slots in the speed hump allow emergency vehicles and bicycles
to easily pass through.
Landscaping along this corridor will consist of trees and low-water
plantings and will improve the user experience for people driving, biking,
or walking.
Ross Road Bicycle Boulevard
PLANNING & COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENT - TRANSPORTATION
2016-149
NTS
JP
DE
T
A
I
L
S
20 NTS
SAWCUT AND HMA PLUG
PROJECT NO.
RE
V
I
S
I
O
N
S
NO
.
DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
DA
T
E
DRAWING NUMBER:
SCALE:
SHEET NO.
City of Palo AltoPlanning & Community Development Dept.Transportation Division250 Hamilton AvenuePalo Alto, CA 94301O: (650) 329-2441F: (650) 329-2154
100 Webster Street, Suite 300Oakland, CA 94607P: 510.540.5008
JO
B
N
A
M
E
AM
B
L
U
R
B
I
C
Y
C
L
E
B
O
U
L
E
V
A
R
D
S
LO
C
A
T
I
O
N
PA
L
O
A
L
T
O
,
C
A
L
I
F
O
R
N
I
A
SH
E
E
T
T
I
T
L
E
DRAWN BY:
OF
75%
L
E
V
E
L
P
L
A
N
S
NO
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
1
75
%
S
U
B
M
I
T
T
A
L
9/
3
0
/
2
0
1
6
154
D-3
151
17NTS
DRIVEWAY/SIDEWALK DRAIN
16 NTS
NARROW SLOTTED SPEED HUMP WITH PLANTERS
17NTS
MODIFIED CURB AND GUTTER19 NTS
DRIVEWAY/SIDEWALK DRAIN
14SLOTTED SPEED HUMP15MODIFIED CONCRETE DRIVEWAY
NTSNTS
2016-149
NTS
JP
DE
T
A
I
L
S
8 NTS
MOUNTABLE MEDIAN 9 NTS
MOUNTABLE TRUCK APRON & LANDSCAPED CIRCLE
12 NTS
RAISED CROSSWALK 13 NTS
PLANTING STRIP11NTS
CONCRETE DRIVEWAY, COPA STD. PLAN NO. 122
PROJECT NO.
RE
V
I
S
I
O
N
S
NO
.
DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
DA
T
E
DRAWING NUMBER:
SCALE:
SHEET NO.
City of Palo AltoPlanning & Community Development Dept.Transportation Division250 Hamilton AvenuePalo Alto, CA 94301O: (650) 329-2441F: (650) 329-2154
100 Webster Street, Suite 300
Oakland, CA 94607P: 510.540.5008
JO
B
N
A
M
E
AM
B
L
U
R
B
I
C
Y
C
L
E
B
O
U
L
E
V
A
R
D
S
LO
C
A
T
I
O
N
PA
L
O
A
L
T
O
,
C
A
L
I
F
O
R
N
I
A
SH
E
E
T
T
I
T
L
E
DRAWN BY:
OF
75%
L
E
V
E
L
P
L
A
N
S
NO
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
1
75
%
S
U
B
M
I
T
T
A
L
9/
3
0
/
2
0
1
6
154
D-2
150
10 NTS
LANDSCAPED ISLAND
2016-149
NTS
JP
DE
T
A
I
L
S
8 NTS
MOUNTABLE MEDIAN 9 NTS
MOUNTABLE TRUCK APRON & LANDSCAPED CIRCLE
12 NTS
RAISED CROSSWALK 13 NTS
PLANTING STRIP11NTS
CONCRETE DRIVEWAY, COPA STD. PLAN NO. 122
PROJECT NO.
RE
V
I
S
I
O
N
S
NO
.
DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
DA
T
E
DRAWING NUMBER:
SCALE:
SHEET NO.
City of Palo AltoPlanning & Community Development Dept.Transportation Division250 Hamilton AvenuePalo Alto, CA 94301O: (650) 329-2441F: (650) 329-2154
100 Webster Street, Suite 300
Oakland, CA 94607P: 510.540.5008
JO
B
N
A
M
E
AM
B
L
U
R
B
I
C
Y
C
L
E
B
O
U
L
E
V
A
R
D
S
LO
C
A
T
I
O
N
PA
L
O
A
L
T
O
,
C
A
L
I
F
O
R
N
I
A
SH
E
E
T
T
I
T
L
E
DRAWN BY:
OF
75%
L
E
V
E
L
P
L
A
N
S
NO
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
1
75
%
S
U
B
M
I
T
T
A
L
9/
3
0
/
2
0
1
6
154
D-2
150
10 NTS
LANDSCAPED ISLAND
2016-149
NTS
JP
DE
T
A
I
L
S
8 NTS
MOUNTABLE MEDIAN 9 NTS
MOUNTABLE TRUCK APRON & LANDSCAPED CIRCLE
12 NTS
RAISED CROSSWALK 13 NTS
PLANTING STRIP11NTS
CONCRETE DRIVEWAY, COPA STD. PLAN NO. 122
PROJECT NO.
RE
V
I
S
I
O
N
S
NO
.
DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
DA
T
E
DRAWING NUMBER:
SCALE:
SHEET NO.
City of Palo AltoPlanning & Community Development Dept.Transportation Division250 Hamilton AvenuePalo Alto, CA 94301O: (650) 329-2441F: (650) 329-2154100 Webster Street, Suite 300Oakland, CA 94607P: 510.540.5008
JO
B
N
A
M
E
AM
B
L
U
R
B
I
C
Y
C
L
E
B
O
U
L
E
V
A
R
D
S
LO
C
A
T
I
O
N
PA
L
O
A
L
T
O
,
C
A
L
I
F
O
R
N
I
A
SH
E
E
T
T
I
T
L
E
DRAWN BY:
OF
75%
L
E
V
E
L
P
L
A
N
S
NO
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
1
75
%
S
U
B
M
I
T
T
A
L
9/
3
0
/
2
0
1
6
154
D-2
150
10 NTS
LANDSCAPED ISLAND
Construction Details
Palo Alto Bike Boulevards
PLANNING & COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENT - TRANSPORTATION
Slotted Speed Hump with Planters
Mountable Median
Raised Crosswalk
Mountable Truck Apron and Landcaped Circle
Traffi c Circle
1
2
Reduces Speeding
Enhanced with Landscaping
Before
After
Traffi c circle slows motorists driving through intersection.
Landscaping increases traffi c calming eff ect, and beautifi es the
neighborhood. It will consist of low water use shrub and groundcover
plantings.
Redwood Circle & Carlson Court
PLANNING & COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENT - TRANSPORTATION
Raised Intersection
1
2
Reduces Speeding
Enhances Safety
Before
After
Vertical grade change ensures motorists cross slowly.
Raised intersection encourages motorists to yield to pedestrians.
Bollards protect pedestrians from errant vehicles.
Maybell Avenue & Coulombe Drive
PLANNING & COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENT - TRANSPORTATION
Planting Palette
Palo Alto Bike Boulevards
PLANNING & COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENT - TRANSPORTATION
Western redbud
Rockrose
Manzanita ‘Emerald Carpet’
Red-bronze New Zealand flax Cream-green New Zealand flax Autumn sage Mat rush Point Reyes wild lilac
California meadow sedge Pink yarrow Blue lily-of-the-nile White lily-of-the-nile
Purple sage Cape rush California gray rush Deer grass
Desert willow Honey locust Manzanita Bush anemone
Architectural Review Board
Staff Report (ID # 7342)
Report Type: Action Items Meeting Date: 2/16/2017
City of Palo Alto
Planning & Community Environment
250 Hamilton Avenue
Palo Alto, CA 94301
(650) 329-2442
Summary Title: 855 El Camino Real - Major Architectural Review/Sign
Exceptions
Title: QUASI-JUDICIAL / PUBLIC HEARING: 855 El Camino Real
[16PLN-00237]: Request for Architectural Review of an
Amendment to an existing Master Sign Program and Sign
Exception for construction of a new externally illuminated
post-mounted freestanding tenant sign for "Gott's Roadside"
at Town & Country. Environmental Assessment: Categorically
Exempt per CEQA Guideline Section 15301. Zoning District:
Community Commercial (CC).
From: Hillary Gitelman
Recommendation
Staff recommends that the Architectural Review Board (ARB) take the following action(s):
1.Review the proposed project and provide direction to staff for a recommended action to
the Director of Planning and Community Environment.
Report Summary
A Master Sign Program exists for the subject site. Consistent with that program, any sign that
deviates from the established standard is subject to the provisions of the city’s sign code. The
applicant proposes one new sign for the Gott’s Roadside tenant at the Town and Country
center. This sign deviates from the program and requires a sign exception from the sign code
because it allows an additional sign beyond what is already allowed for a single tenant and
establishes a new free-standing sign on the property. Existing free-standing signs on the
property are designed to support the center generally. The proposed sign would be the first
free-standing sign dedicated to an individual tenant. The proposed sign appears to be
thoughtfully designed and within the character of other signs at the center, however, staff is
concerned about the shift this application makes to authorize individual tenants to establish
free-standing signs. Staff seeks the ARBs direction on the proposed sign.
City of Palo Alto
Planning & Community Environment Department Page 2
Background
Project Information
Owner: Ellis Partners
Architect: Jason Holleb, Hayes Group Architects
Representative: Emily Petrilla, Gott’s Roadside
Legal Counsel: Not applicable
Property Information
Address: 855 El Camino Real
Neighborhood: Town and Country Village
Lot Dimensions & Area: 535.5 feet of frontage on El Camino Real; 1019.5 feet of frontage on
Embarcadero Road
Housing Inventory Site: No
Located w/in a Plume: No
Protected/Heritage Trees: Yes
Historic Resource(s): Not listed on the City’s Historic Property List
Existing Improvement(s): Five existing two story buildings, one existing one-story building,
extensive parking lot, trees and landscaping; Originally constructed in
phases between 1952 and 1958.
Existing Land Use(s): Retail and Office
Adjacent Land Uses &
Zoning:
North: CS zoning
West: PF zoning (Railroad)
East: Santa Clara County (Stanford University)
South: PF zoning (Palo Alto High School)
Aerial View of Property:
City of Palo Alto
Planning & Community Environment Department Page 3
Land Use Designation & Applicable Plans
Zoning Designation: Community Commercial (CC)
Comp. Plan Designation: Regional/Community Commercial (CC)
Context-Based
Design Criteria: Yes
Downtown Urban
Design Guide: Not applicable
South of Forest Avenue
Coordinated Area Plan: Not applicable
Baylands Master Plan: Not applicable
El Camino Real Design
Guidelines (1976 / 2002): Yes
Proximity to Residential
Uses or Districts (150'): No
Located w/in the Airport
Influence Area: No
Prior City Reviews & Action
City Council: Not applicable
PTC: Not applicable
HRB: Not applicable
ARB: 05PLN-00278 – Major Architectural Review (façade, site
improvements, Master Sign Program, and parking space reduction)
07PLN-00216 – Major Architectural Review (Master Façade Program)
City of Palo Alto
Planning & Community Environment Department Page 4
08PLN-00111 – Major Architectural Review (Update to Master Sign
Program/Sign Exception for Sign Area)
13PLN-00029 & 13PLN-00030 – Minor Architectural Review and
Conditional Use Permit (Gott’s Roadside façade changes, two
outdoor dining areas, and alcohol sales)
Other: 16PLN-00444. Director approval of four free-standing directory signs.
Project Description
The proposed project is the installation of a new freestanding tenant sign at Town & Country
Village for Gott’s Roadside restaurant. The freestanding tenant sign employs materials similar
to those utilized elsewhere at the property in building architecture and other site identification
freestanding signs, including resawn redwood timber, aluminum “GOTT’S ROADSIDE” letters, a
stone base, and LED spotlights for nighttime external illumination. The aggregate sign area is
approximately 28 square feet (sf). The sign panel for the proposed freestanding sign generally
matches the design of the existing “GOTT’S ROADSIDE” fascia wall sign, but is somewhat larger.
The applicant’s project description is included as Attachment A.
Requested Entitlements, Findings and Purview:
The following discretionary applications are being requested:
Architectural Review – Major (AR) Sign Exception(s): The process for evaluating this type
of application is set forth in Palo Alto Municipal Code (PAMC) Section 16.20.040 and
PAMC Section 18.77.070. AR applications for a sign exception(s) are reviewed by the
ARB and recommendations are forwarded to the Planning & Community Development
Director for action within five business days of the Board’s recommendation. Action by
the Director is appealable to the City Council if filed within 14 days of the decision. AR
projects are evaluated against specific findings. All architectural review and sign
exception findings must be made in the affirmative to approve the project and are
included for reference in Attachment B. Failure to make any one finding requires project
redesign or denial.
Analysis1
Neighborhood Setting and Character
Town & Country Village was originally built in phases between 1952 and 1958 by Ronald H.
Williams, who also built other Town & Country developments in Sunnyvale, San Jose, and Mill
Valley. The original character utilized exposed timber and wood framing, low slung tile roofing,
and projecting roofs to create arcades. Over time, changes to the original design of the
buildings and property have included opening portions of the large overhanging arcades, add
1 The information provided in this section is based on analysis prepared by the report author prior to the public
hearing. The Architectural Review Board in its review of the administrative record and based on public testimony
may reach a different conclusion from that presented in this report and may choose to make alternative findings. A
change to the findings may result in a final action that is different from the staff recommended action in this
report.
City of Palo Alto
Planning & Community Environment Department Page 5
stone walls, add rough-hewn timber pergolas at dining areas, adjust parking lot configurations,
adjust landscaping, update site identification signage and to construct the new building that
hosts Trader Joe’s. The changes have largely maintained the overarching architectural style of
the property.
The City approved a Master Façade Program in 2007 under application 07PLN-00216 that
outlines three options for tenant facades. As tenants switch at Town & Country, they typically
employ one of these three façade options such that over time the property maintains general
consistency of the retail facades. The City approved a Master Sign Program in 2005 as part of
application 05PLN-00278 that addressed both site identification freestanding signs and tenant
signs. This application did not explicitly include any sign exceptions to the City’s sign ordinance,
although some aspects of the approved Master Sign Program would qualify as sign exceptions
today. As tenants switch at Town & Country, they utilize the requirements in the Master Sign
Program to create their wall signs and blade signs. The City approved an update to the Master
Sign Program in 2008 under application 08PLN-00111 that allowed for the installation of the
current site identification signs, including the two large 17-foot 8-inches high Town & Country
freestanding signs that required approval of a sign exception for overall sign area. These signs
host a subset of tenant names on each side to provide more tenant visibility off of Embarcadero
Road and El Camino Real.
Existing Signs
The site contains a variety property and tenant identification signs. There are three free-
standing signs, not including the car wash sign located at the corner of the property.
These signs are provided below.
Existing Free Standing Signs at the Town and Country Village (over 5 feet in height)
Free Standing Sign on
Embarcadero
Free Standing Sign at the
Corner
Free Standing Sign on El
Camino Real
City of Palo Alto
Planning & Community Environment Department Page 6
Gott’s Roadside has sign space on one of the free standing signs above (not shown) and three
other signs pictured below:
Above: Gott’s Wall Sign
Right: Projecting Wall Sign and Supergraphic
Zoning Compliance2
According to the Master Sign Program, each tenant shall either conform to the provisions in the
Master Sign Program or proposed variations would require approval via the standard
architectural review process. Any new sign location or type would then be added as an
amendment to the existing Master Sign Program.
In this case, the proposed project does not conform to the provisions in the Master Sign
Program regarding the number of individual tenant signs and introduces another free-standing
sign on the property.
Free standing signs are not permitted signs on the subject property. Each of the free standing
signs that were approved required a sign exception. The code also limits the combination of
signs that may be allowed for a tenant. For instance, the code permits wall and projecting signs
as long as there is no free standing sign. The applicant’s request for a free standing sign
requires a sign exception for that sign over five feet in height and for the combination of signs
allowed for the tenant (free standing, wall and projecting).
Table 1: Existing Gott’s Roadside and Town & Country Village Signs
EXISTING SIGN STATUS NOTES
Gott’s Roadside Fascia
Wall Sign
1 sign Meets Master Sign Program requirements – 1
sign per facade
2 The Palo Alto Zoning Code is available online: http://www.amlegal.com/codes/client/palo-alto_ca
City of Palo Alto
Planning & Community Environment Department Page 7
Gott’s Roadside
Blade Signs
2 signs Meets Master Sign Program requirements – 1
sign per entrance door
Gott’s Roadside
Supergraphic Wall
Sign
1 sign Staff has not been able to identify any approval
record for this sign
Existing Free-Standing Signs at Town & Country
EXISTING SIGN STATUS NOTES
Corner Lantern
Freestanding Sign
1 sign, over 5-feet in
height, conforms
Approved per 08PLN-00111
Site Identification
Freestanding Sign with
Tenant Names – El
Camino Real
1 sign, over 5-feet in
height, conforms
Approved per 08PLN-00111 with a sign
exception; two-sided with tenant names on
each side
Site Identification
Freestanding Sign with
Tenant Names –
Embarcadero Road*
1 sign, over 5-feet in
height, conforms
Approved per 08PLN-00111 with a sign
exception; two-sided with tenant names on
each side
Site Identification
Freestanding Sign –
Embarcadero Road
1 sign, under 5-feet
in height, conforms
Approved per 08PLN-00111
*Gott’s Roadside is listed on this sign
Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan, Area Plans and Guidelines3
The project site is subject to the El Camino Real Design Guidelines (1979). These Guidelines
encourage limiting the size of freestanding signs along El Camino Real to between 1/2 to 2/3
the maximum sign area allowed by the sign ordinance, which is between 25 and 33 square feet.
The proposed free standing sign is approximately 28 square feet. The Guidelines encourage
external illumination of signs and the use of timers so that signs are illuminated during business
hours only. The Guidelines encourage limiting the height of freestanding signs to 10 feet at the
property line and slightly higher if set back from the frontage, which the proposed project
complies with.
Environmental Review
3 The Palo Alto Comprehensive Plan is available online:
http://www.cityofpaloalto.org/gov/topics/projects/landuse/compplan.asp
City of Palo Alto
Planning & Community Environment Department Page 8
The subject project has been assessed in accordance with the authority and criteria contained
in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State CEQA Guidelines, and the
environmental regulations of the City. Specifically, the project is Categorically Exempt from the
provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per CEQA Guideline Section
15301.
Public Notification, Outreach & Comments
The Palo Alto Municipal Code requires notice of this public hearing be published in a local paper
and mailed to owners and occupants of property within 600 feet of the subject property at least
ten days in advance. Notice of a public hearing for this project was published in the Palo Alto
Weekly on February 3, 2017, which is 12 days in advance of the meeting. Postcard mailing
occurred on February 2, 2017, which is 13 days in advance of the meeting.
Public Comments
As of the writing of this report, no project-related public comments were received.
Alternative Actions
In addition to the recommended action, the Architectural Review Board may:
1. Recommend approval of the project with findings and/or conditions; or
2. Continue the project to a date (un)certain.
Report Author & Contact Information ARB4 Liaison & Contact Information
Rebecca Atkinson, Planner Jodie Gerhardt, AICP, Planning Manager
(650) 329-2596 (650) 329-2575
Rebecca.Atkinson@cityofpaloalto.org Jodie.Gerhardt@cityofpaloalto.org
Attachments:
Attachment A: Applicant's Project Description (PDF)
Attachment B: Sign Exception and Architectural Review Findings (DOCX)
Attachment C: Project Plans (DOCX)
4 Emails may be sent directly to the ARB using the following address: arb@cityofpaloalto.org
June 30th, 2016
City of Palo Alto
Department of Planning & Community Environment
250 Hamilton Avenue, 5th floor
Palo Alto, CA 94303
Re: 855 El Camino Real, Gott’s Roadside Signage, Project Description
To Planning Staff and ARB Members:
Hayes Group Architects is pleased to submit an ARB submittal package for new signage at Gott’s
Roadside, Town & Country Shopping Center, 855 El Camino Real.
The project applicant is Hayes Group Architects on behalf of our client, Gott’s Roadside. This package
includes twelve sets of half size drawings and two sets of full size drawings.
1. EXISTING CONDITIONS
Gott’s Roadside is an existing restaurant tenant at Town & Country Shopping Center. The restaurant
occupies roughly 3,900 square feet, near the corner of El Camino Real and Embarcadero Road.
Town & Country leases Gott’s Roadside use of a 1,500 square foot open patio for dedicated outdoor
dining. This patio seating contains six rustic picnic tables and four umbrellas, surrounded by a low stone
wall and landscaping.
Gott’s Roadside has one existing facia sign. The size and character and detailing of this sign was
installed as permitted by the Town & Country Shopping centers previously established Master Signage
Program.
2. PROPOSED PROJECT
The tenant is requesting additional signage at their dedicated dining plaza in order to increase the
presence as well as define the edge of seating area. The tenant name ‘Gott’s Roadside’ will be written in
cut aluminum letters on both sides of a painted redwood board. The paint colors and detailing will match
the existing facia sign.
The proposed design for the sign relates to the key architectural vocabulary for the center emphasizing
and expressing a heavy timber post and beam frame. The original entries at the center as well as
monumental signs were derived from California “ranchos”. This sing also continues this them as a
gateway element to the plaza as well as pedestrian path to the buildings.
This sign board spans over a walkway and is supported by two heavy timber ten-inch rough sawn square
redwood posts. These posts shall be mounted onto existing stone landscape walls.
The overall height of the sign is 9’-5” above the walkway with the bottom of the sign intended to relate to
and emphasize the strong horizontal line of the patio umbrellas and arcade beams.
The size and color and detailing of the posts and sign will be similar to the existing monumental
freestanding signs at the center.
Both sides of the sign will be illuminated with four high-efficiency narrow-focus light fixtures that match the
site lighting standard.
The appearance of the fixtures and intensity of the lighting shall be similar to other existing light fixtures at
the shopping center. Power will be routed within the landscaping and through the post with minimal
disturbance to plants and trees. Any ground plants disturbed during construction will be replaced to match
the existing previously approved landscape design.
3. SIGN EXCEPTION FINDINGS
The shopping center has three freestanding signs and a landscape wall sign. These signs were reviewed
by the ARB and approved by the director of planning under application 08PLN-00219 and 08PLN-00111.
A Master Sign Program regulates tenant signage at Town & Country Shopping Center.
Planning staff has indicated that they believe the proposed ‘Gott’s Roadside’ sign design would not be
covered under the master sign program since the sign program did not address “pole mounted” signs.
Staff requested this item be reviewed as a sign exception. As required by PAMC Section 16.20.040,
findings supporting this are below.
1. There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved
that do not apply generally to property in the same district.
Town & Country Shopping Center is a unique facility; distinct from all other uses in this zoning district.
The layout of the retail tenants requires signage different from what is typically permitted in the municipal
sign code. This particular tenant has leasing rights for dedicated dining/ seating space as well as to brand
the space with their identification for patrons.
2. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial
property right of the applicant and to prevent unreasonable property loss or unnecessary hardships.
The outdoor patio, with picnic tables and umbrellas, has been leased to the tenant as an uncovered
dining area. Identification of this dining area dedicated for the tenant’s patrons is key to the continued
success of the restaurant since they rely on these seats for their business use.
3. The granting of the application will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the
vicinity and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare or convenience.
The freestanding sign does not reduce or eliminate any pedestrian walkway, parking space, or
landscaping. The design of the sign is compatible with the post and beam vocabulary of the existing
buildings. The sign will not be detrimental or injurious to the area. The signs architectural vocabulary
compliments the centers defining elements. The sign will not be in conflict or competition with the other
monumental or pole mounted signs at the center given its scale and distance between these elements.
Kindly call us at (650) 365-0600 with any questions or comments.
Sincerely,
Jason Holleb, AIA
Principal
16PLN-00237 City of Palo Alto
Page 1 of 2
ATTACHMENT C
SIGN EXCEPTION FINDINGS & ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW FINDINGS
855 El Camino Real / File No. 16PLN-00237
SIGN EXCEPTION FINDINGS
Finding #1: There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to
the property involved that do not apply generally to property in the same district;
Finding #2: The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right of the applicant and to prevent unreasonable property loss or
unnecessary hardships;
Finding #3: The granting of the application will not be detrimental or injurious to property or
improvements in the vicinity and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general
welfare or convenience.
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW FINDINGS
Finding #1: The design is consistent with applicable provisions of the Palo Alto Comprehensive
Plan, Zoning Code, coordinated area plans (including compatibility requirements), and any
relevant design guides.
Finding #2: The project has a unified and coherent design, that:
a. creates an internal sense of order and desirable environment for occupants, visitors,
and the general community,
b. preserves, respects and integrates existing natural features that contribute positively to
the site and the historic character including historic resources of the area when
relevant,
c. is consistent with the context-based design criteria of the applicable zone district,
d. provides harmonious transitions in scale, mass and character to adjacent land uses and
land use designations,
e. enhances living conditions on the site (if it includes residential uses) and in adjacent
residential areas.
Finding #3: The design is of high aesthetic quality, using high quality, integrated materials and
appropriate construction techniques, and incorporating textures, colors, and other details that
are compatible with and enhance the surrounding area.
16PLN-00237 City of Palo Alto
Page 2 of 2
Finding #4: The design is functional, allowing for ease and safety of pedestrian and bicycle
traffic and providing for elements that support the building’s necessary operations (e.g.
convenient vehicle access to property and utilities, appropriate arrangement and amount of
open space and integrated signage, if applicable, etc.).
Finding #5: The landscape design complements and enhances the building design and its
surroundings, is appropriate to the site’s functions, and utilizes to the extent practical, regional
indigenous drought resistant plant material capable of providing desirable habitat that can be
appropriately maintained.
Finding #6: The project incorporates design principles that achieve sustainability in areas
related to energy efficiency, water conservation, building materials, landscaping, and site
planning.
16PLN-00237 City of Palo Alto
Page 1 of 1
ATTACHMENT D
PROJECT PLANS
855 El Camino Real / File No. 16PLN-00237
Project Plans
Hardcopies of project plans are provided to ARB Members. These plans are available to the
public by visiting the Planning and Community Environmental Department on the 5th floor of
City Hall at 250 Hamilton Avenue.
Directions to review Project plans online:
1. Go to: https://paloalto.buildingeye.com/planning
2. Search for “855 El Camino Real” and open record by clicking on the green dot for
Gott’s Roadside
3. Review the record details and open the “more details” option
4. Use the “Records Info” drop down menu and select “Attachments”
5. Open the attachment named “Project Plans Architectural Review 091916”
Architectural Review Board
Staff Report (ID # 7673)
Report Type: Action Items Meeting Date: 2/16/2017
City of Palo Alto
Planning & Community Environment
250 Hamilton Avenue
Palo Alto, CA 94301
(650) 329-2442
Summary Title: 2600 El Camino Real: New Commercial Building
Title: PUBLIC HEARING / QUASI-JUDICIAL. 2600 El Camino Real
[16PLN-00022]: Consideration of an Architectural Review
Application to Allow the Demolition of an Existing Six-Story
Commercial Building and Construction of a New Four-Story,
62,616 Square Foot Commercial Building; no new Floor Area is
Being Requested. The Project Includes Retention of an Existing
Subterranean Garage and Proposes a new Parking Structure at
the Rear of the Proposed Building. Environmental Assessment:
The Project is Exempt From CEQA per Guideline Section 15302
(Replacement and Reconstruction) Zoning District: CS.
From: Hillary Gitelman
Recommendation
Staff recommends the Architectural Review Board (ARB) take the following action(s):
1. Recommend approval of the proposed project to the Director of Planning and
Community Environment based on findings and subject to conditions of approval.
Report Summary
The subject project was previously reviewed by the ARB. An earlier staff report includes
extensive background information, project analysis and evaluation to city codes and policies;
that report is available online:
http://www.cityofpaloalto.org/civicax/filebank/blobdload.aspx?BlobID=55205. A copy of the
report without prior attachments is available in Attachment H.
The purpose of this report is to restate the comments made by the Board and detail the
applicant’s response to those comments. The analysis section below builds upon the
information contained in the earlier report and modified to reflect recent project changes.
Background
City of Palo Alto
Planning & Community Environment Department Page 2
On December 15, 2016 the ARB reviewed the project. A video recording of the Board’s meeting
is available online: http://midpenmedia.org/architectural-review-board-54/. The Board’s
comments and the applicant’s response are summarized in the following table:
ARB Comments/Direction Applicant Response
Demonstrate that the parking garage works Sheet A1.1a provides the layout of the
parking levels and spaces.
Demonstrate that the garage complements
the building
Sheets 1.1b and A5.3a show elevations of
the buildings.
Demonstrate safe pedestrian connectivity to
the garage
Sheet A1.1a shows delineated pavement
areas from the garage to the building.
Raised concerns regarding the preservation of
the two Chinese Elms along El Camino Real
A revised Sheet A1.1 shows that these trees
have been eliminated and the parking lot
and landscaping is revised.
Analysis1
The Board had interest in the design of the parking garage at the rear of the site and how the
structure would be integrated with the main building. The original design did not include
sufficient detail regarding its design and layout. The Board directed the applicant to come back
with plans that detailed the specific layout of the parking spaces and turning movements. In
addition, the Board wanted to see more specificity on the architectural elements of the garage
and how the structure would relate to the proposed building. Another concern regarding the
garage was the lack of pedestrian connectivity from the garage to the building.
Applicant Responses
The applicant responded with revised plans. These plans address the garage, pedestrian
connection and circulation, hardscape and paving on El Camino Real and the two Chinese Elms
along El Camino Real.
The Garage
The plans also showed a revised garage structure. The plans demonstrate the arrangement of
the drive aisles and parking spaces. The parking decks are designed to meet the code
requirements for minimum distances and turning radii. The structure remains two-levels,
however, there is a one-way drive aisle with single two-way ramps to allow complete clockwise
circulation. The structure includes a single, two-way ramp that continues to the top level.
The proposed garage structure relates to the main building by mirroring some of the similar
architectural materials and themes. This includes the application of white metal panels along
the north side facing the office and enclosing the garden courtyard. The panels provide similar
1 The information provided in this section is based on analysis prepared by the report author prior to the public
hearing. The Architectural Review Board in its review of the administrative record and based on public testimony
may reach a different conclusion from that presented in this report and may choose to take an alternative action
from the recommendation in this report.
City of Palo Alto
Planning & Community Environment Department Page 3
form as the office building’s northwest corner. The elevator of the garage also includes form
and materials similar as the main building including a wood soffit. Attention was also added to
the ground level of the structure. The planter at the base is limestone to reflect the office wall
limestone on the other side. Natural light is maximized for the structure through the use of
metal cable railings. The light standards at the top level are shown directed away from the
adjacent housing project and use cut-offs to eliminate light spillover.
Assessment
The proposed changes provide visual and thematic connectivity between the main building and
the garage. The use of similar materials achieves consistency with Finding 3 of the Architectural
Review. The revised plans also demonstrate that how the placement of the garage is consistent
with Finding 2 of the Architectural Review since there is a transition in scale on the site and in
relation to surrounding properties.
Pedestrian Connection and Circulation
A five-foot tree-lined walkway was added to both sides of the parking deck. Special pavement
treatment will distinguish the walkway from the driveway surface that will also match the
pavers used around the main building. Both stairways provide access to all levels and lead the
pedestrian to the rear courtyard of the main building. From the courtyard, there are
connections to the main lobby of the building.
Assessment
The proposed changes are consistent with Finding 4. The pavers provide an identifiable
pathway for pedestrians and is aesthetically compatible with the landscape of the site. The
stairways provide adequate access to the structure and direct people to the entry of the
building.
Hardscape and Paving on El Camino sidewalk
The plans show the alignment with the adjacent sidewalk in front of the housing project. The
design of the new sidewalk will incorporate the same concrete scoring patterns and accent
stone around the trees.
Assessment
The proposed project demonstrates consistency with Finding 3. The project will provide a
consistent streetscape experience along El Camino Real.
Privacy of the Adjacent Residential Property
There is approximately 77 feet between the proposed building and the residential building. This
distance includes approximately 54 feet between the proposed building and the property
between the two buildings. There is a line of trees on the neighboring property side within the
23-foot distance between the property line and the residential building. Obscured glass panels
at the balconies are proposed for the third floor.
Assessment
City of Palo Alto
Planning & Community Environment Department Page 4
The project demonstrates that there is adequate distance between the office building and the
neighboring building. Obscured glass balcony panels are provided to assist in privacy issues.
Two Chinese Elms along El Camino Real
Two existing mature Chinese Elms in raised planters were being preserved in the previous plan
iteration. Because of the concerns of the Board, these have been removed. These trees are not
heritage trees and their removal would provide for a design that would improve visibility along
the sidewalk without the need to add a stop sign.
Environmental Review
The subject project has been assessed in accordance with the authority and criteria contained
in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State CEQA Guidelines, and the
environmental regulations of the City. Specifically, the project is considered categorically
exempt pursuant to CEQA Section 15302, Replacement or Reconstruction. The Class 2
exemption consists of replacement or reconstruction of existing structures and facilities where
the new structure will be located on the same site as the structure replaced and will have
substantially the same purpose and capacity as the structure replaced.
As detailed in the project description, the project substantially replaces the same amount of
building gross floor area. The project as proposed replaces the uses with the same types of uses
as previously established. Furthermore, the project has no impact on historic resources or
hazards and hazardous materials. Attachment I includes a Categorical Exemption Report that
details the findings for the exemption.
Public Notification, Outreach & Comments
The Palo Alto Municipal Code requires notice of this public hearing be published in a local paper
and mailed to owners and occupants of property within 600 feet of the subject property at least
ten days in advance. Notice of a public hearing for this project was published in the Palo Alto
Weekly on February 3, 2017, which is 13 days in advance of the meeting. Postcard mailing
occurred on January 31, 2017 which is 16 days in advance of the meeting.
Public Comments
As of the writing of this report, no project-related, public comments were received.
Alternative Actions
In addition to the recommended action, the Architectural Review Board may:
1. Approve the project with modified findings or conditions;
2. Continue the project to a date (un)certain; or
3. Recommend project denial based on revised findings.
City of Palo Alto
Planning & Community Environment Department Page 5
Report Author & Contact Information ARB2 Liaison & Contact Information
Sheldon S. Ah Sing, AICP, Consultant. Jodie Gerhardt, AICP, Planning Manager
(408) 340-5642 (650) 329-2575
sahsing@m-group.us jodie.gerhardt@cityofpaloalto.org
Attachments:
Attachment A: Location Map (PDF)
Attachment B: ARB Findings and Context-Based Design Criteria (DOCX)
Attachment C: Performance Criteria (DOCX)
Attachment D: Conditions of Approval (DOCX)
Attachment E: Applicant's Project Narrative (PDF)
Attachment F: Zoning Comparison (DOCX)
Attachment G: Comprehensive Plan Table (DOCX)
Attachment H: December 15, 2016 ARB Staff Report (Minutes available online) (PDF)
Attachment I: Environmental Documents (DOCX)
Attachment J: Project Plans (DOCX)
2 Emails may be sent directly to the ARB using the following address: arb@cityofpaloalto.org
Attachment A
ATTACHMENT B
ARB FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL
2600 El Camino Real
16PLN-00022
The design and architecture of the proposed improvements, as conditioned, complies with the
Findings for Architectural Review as required in Chapter 18.76 of the PAMC.
Finding #1: The design is consistent with applicable provisions of the Palo Alto
Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Code, coordinated area plans (including compatibility
requirements), and any relevant design guides.
The project is consistent with Finding #1 because:
In conformance with the following Comp Plan Goals and Policies, the project will include high
quality design compatible with surrounding development.
Policy L-18: Encourage the upgrading and revitalization of selected Centers in a manner
that is compatible with the character of surrounding neighborhoods.
Policy L-42: Encourage Employment Districts to develop in a way that encourages
transit, pedestrian and bicycle travel and reduces the number of auto trips for daily
errands.
Policy L-43: Provide sidewalks, pedestrian paths, and connections to the citywide
bikeway system within Employment Districts. Pursue opportunities to build sidewalks
and paths in renovation and expansion projects.
Policy L-48: Promote high quality, creative design and site planning that is compatible
with surrounding development and public spaces.
Policy L-49: Design buildings to revitalize streets and public spaces and to enhance a
sense of community and personal safety. Provide an ordered variety of entries, porches,
windows, bays and balconies along public ways where it is consistent with
neighborhood character; avoid blank or solid walls at street level; and include human-
scale details and massing.
Policy L-73: Consider public art and cultural facilities as a public benefit in connection
with new connection with new development projects. Consider incentives for including
public art in large development projects.
Policy L-75: Minimize the negative physical impacts of parking lots. Locate parking
behind buildings or underground wherever possible.
Policy L-76: Require trees and other landscaping within parking lots.
Policy L-77: Encourage alternatives to surface parking lots to minimize the amount of
land that must be devoted to parking, provided that economic and traffic safety goals
can still be achieved.
Policy N-21: Reduce non-point source pollution in urban runoff from residential,
commercial, industrial, municipal, and transportation land uses and activities.
The project is consistent with a variety of goals and policies. The project provides a high-quality
designed office/commercial building that includes the use of a variety of materials, color and
provides public open spaces.
The project is consistent with the Zoning Code requirements, including but not limited to
setbacks, height, parking, lot coverage and performance standards. In accordance with the non-
complying code, the project replaces the existing square footage, but does not increase the
gross floor area.
Finding #2: The project has a unified and coherent design, that:
a. creates an internal sense of order and desirable environment for occupants, visitors,
and the general community,
b. preserves, respects and integrates existing natural features that contribute positively
to the site and the historic character including historic resources of the area when
relevant,
c. is consistent with the context-based design criteria of the applicable zone district,
d. provides harmonious transitions in scale, mass and character to adjacent land uses
and land use designations,
e. enhances living conditions on the site (if it includes residential uses) and in adjacent
residential areas.
The project is consistent with Finding #2 because:
The area is comprised of various commercial buildings of differing heights and size. The project
proposes to construct a building that has reduced height than the existing building to comply
with the requirements of the zoning district. In doing so, the project provides transitions
between the soccer fields and the adjacent new mixed-use building along El Camino Real.
The project’s design of the parking garage provides visual consistency with the main building by
using similar materials. The garage is consistent with the surrounding properties and does not
detract from the adjacent land uses.
The project is consistent with the context-based design criteria for the applicable zone district
as described in the following:
(1) Pedestrian and Bicycle Environment. The design of new projects shall promote
pedestrian walkability, a bicycle friendly environment, and connectivity through design
elements. This finding can be made in the affirmative in that the project provides bike
racks near the building entrances for short term use as well bike lockers in the garage
to support the bicycle environment. The project meets the requirements for vehicular
egress along El Camino Real that limits conflicts with pedestrians. As required, the
project creates a 12-foot sidewalk along the frontage of the building.
(2) Street Building Facades. Street facades shall be designed to provide a strong
relationship with the sidewalk and the street(s), to create an environment that supports
and encourages pedestrian activity through design elements. This finding can be made
in the affirmative in that project provides a 12-foot sidewalk and maintains a build-to
line setback (50% of the property frontage). The entry plaza is designed with varied
elements to guide pedestrians to the building entry.
(3) Massing and Setbacks. Buildings shall be designed to minimize massing and conform to
proper setbacks. This finding can be made in the affirmative in that the proposed
project complies with the CS zoning development standards and the design is
consistent with the South El Camino Real Design Guidelines since the project complies
with the height and setback requirements and the performance standards for projects
adjacent to different land uses. Additionally, the use of balconies, light colored
materials and appropriate fenestration facilitates the appearance of reducing the mass
of the building.
(4) Low-Density Residential Transitions. Where new projects are built abutting existing
lower scale residential development, care shall be taken to respect the scale and privacy
of neighboring properties. This finding is not applicable to the project since there is no
low-density residential development adjacent to the site.
(5) Project Open Space. Private and public open space shall be provided so that it is usable
for residents, visitors, and/or employees of the site. This finding can be made in the
affirmative in that the project provides a plaza near the entry of the building and
between the building and the parking structure. In addition, the project provides
balconies for the enjoyment of the employees.
(6) Parking Design. Parking needs shall be accommodated but shall not be allowed to
overwhelm the character of the project or detract from the pedestrian environment.
This finding can be made in the affirmative in that the project maintains the existing
driveways, adds more landscaping for the surface parking, maintains the basement
parking and adds a two-level structured parking at the rear of the building. In
summary, the parking for the project is designed to not detract from the character of
the building or the pedestrian environment.
(7) Large (Multi-Acre) Sites. Large sites (over one acre) shall be designed so that street,
block, and building patterns are consistent with those of the surrounding neighborhood.
This finding can be made in the affirmative in that the project is consistent with the
contemporary development patterns of the vicinity. The project is adjacent to the
newly constructed mixed-use project that has similar design themes. Other similar
development is considered across El Camino Real.
(8) Sustainability and Green Building Design. Project design and materials to achieve
sustainability and green building design should be incorporated into the project. This
finding can be made in the affirmative in that the project is subject to the California
Green Building Code (CalGreen, Tier 2).
Finding #3: The design is of high aesthetic quality, using high quality, integrated materials and
appropriate construction techniques, and incorporating textures, colors, and other details
that are compatible with and enhance the surrounding area.
The project includes lockers and showers on-site, will meet the bicycle parking standards, and is
near a bus stop. The project will include a 12-foot sidewalk in compliance with the City’s
minimum requirements. The project fronts El Camino Real, where the City’s Bicycle &
Pedestrian Transportation Plan indicates a Class III shared arterial lane exists. The project
proposes a contemporary style that is compatible with recent development along El Camino
Real, including the adjacent mixed-use site currently under construction. The project concept
includes a patio along El Camino Real as an outdoor gathering place, which would activate the
street. In addition, the project includes a private public space on the interior of the site
between the building and the parking structure. The project includes a patio along El Camino
Real that provides interest and a gathering place along El Camino Real. The project could
include other design elements that would increase human-scale details and massing. Decks are
proposed for the upper floors along El Camino Real. The project proposes public art integrated
into the outdoor patio area along El Camino Real. The project maintains the same parking
footprint and circulation, including the underground parking. However, the project does add
structured parking behind the proposed building. The project maintains two mature Chinese
Elm trees and provides new trees and other landscaping within the parking areas. In addition,
the project provides additional landscaped fingers to support trees, making the project
compliant with the parking lot shading requirement.
The project’s design of the parking garage provides visual consistency with the main building by
using similar materials. The garage is consistent with the surrounding properties and does not
detract from the adjacent land uses.
Finding #4: The design is functional, allowing for ease and safety of pedestrian and bicycle
traffic and providing for elements that support the building’s necessary operations (e.g.
convenient vehicle access to property and utilities, appropriate arrangement and amount of
open space and integrated signage, if applicable, etc.).
The project is consistent with Finding #4 because:
The design of the new building is consistent with contemporary development within the City
and the use of the space as office and retail on the ground floor. The site layout provides
common areas for employees, and patrons, and enlivens El Camino Real with the outdoor patio
space adjacent to the building entry. Public art is proposed at the patio adjacent to the
sidewalk, which provides visual interest.
The parking garage design includes two stairwells that lead to the plaza at the rear entrance to
the building. On either side of the garage includes walkways.
Finding #5: The landscape design complements and enhances the building design and its
surroundings, is appropriate to the site’s functions, and utilizes to the extent practical,
regional indigenous drought resistant plant material capable of providing desirable habitat
that can be appropriately maintained.
The project is consistent with Finding #5 because:
The project preserves two large mature trees on-site within the parking lot. The project meets
the requirements of parking lot landscaping (landscaped fingers, parking lot shading, etc.). The
landscape plan for the project includes an entry plaza at the building’s lobby entrance off El
Camino Real. The plaza consists of accent paving materials (colored paves and concrete bands)
and public art elements in planting. These elements serve to define the plaza and guide
pedestrians to the building entry. The proposed garden space at the rear of the building is
multi-purposed. It provides pedestrian access to the rear lobby door, and includes raised storm
water treatment planters with plantings and seating. The new trees require medium to low
watering, while the shrubs require low watering.
Finding #6: The project incorporates design principles that achieve sustainability in areas
related to energy efficiency, water conservation, building materials, landscaping, and site
planning.
The project is consistent with Finding #6 because:
In accordance with the City’s Green Building Regulations, the building will satisfy the
requirements for CALGreen Mandatory + Tier 2. To meet this requirement the project includes
bicycle parking, light pollution reduction, reduction in water use in irrigation, electric vehicle
charging, diverting construction waste (80%), and using low odor-emitting materials.
Performance Criteria 18.23
2600 El Camino Real
16PLN-00022
These performance criteria are intended to provide additional standards to be used in the design and
evaluation of developments in the multi-family, commercial, and industrial zones. The purpose is to balance
the needs of the uses within these zones with the need to minimize impacts to surrounding neighborhoods
and businesses. The criteria are intended to make new developments and major architectural review
projects compatible with nearby residential and business areas, and to enhance the desirability of the
proposed developments for the site residents and users, and for abutting neighbors and businesses.
Assure that development provides adequate and accessible
interior areas or exterior enclosures for the storage of trash
and recyclable materials in appropriate containers, and that
trash disposal and recycling areas are located as far from
abutting residences as is reasonably possible.
The project ‘s trash enclosure is located on the
east side of the property on the opposite of
the adjacent mixed-use site. The project’s
garage is obscures the view and will attenuate
the noise of servicing the facility.
To minimize the visual impacts of lighting on abutting or
nearby residential sites and from adjacent roadways.
As demonstrated on the photometric plan, the
project’s site lighting will be contained with
the project site. As conditioned, the project
will include window shades on the windows on
the west balconies.
The purpose is to restrict retail or service commercial
businesses abutting (either directly or across the street) or
within 50 feet of residentially zoned properties or properties
with existing residential uses located within nonresidential
zones, with operations or activities between the hours of
10:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. Operations subject to this code may
include, but are not limited to, deliveries, parking lot and
sidewalk cleaning, and/or clean up or set up operations, but
does not include garbage pick up.
Current project proposal does not include
late night uses or activities. Future
commercial tenants that would like this will
need to file for a Conditional Use Permit, as
required per the Zoning Code.
Privacy of abutting residential properties or properties with
existing residential uses located within nonresidential zones
(residential properties) should be protected by screening
from public view all mechanical equipment and service areas.
Landscaping should be used to integrate a project design into
the surrounding neighborhood, and to provide privacy
screening between properties where appropriate.
There is significant distance between the
project building and the adjacent mixed-
use building. Within this distance
includes existing landscaping. The
building uses have opposite occupancy
hours as the residential uses. As
conditioned, the project will install
window shades on the windows on the
west balconies facing the residential
project. In addition, the third floor
balcony glass guard is sandblasted glass
to reduce the view.
18.23.020 Trash Disposal and Recycling Project Consistency
18.23.030 Lighting
18.23.040 Late Night Uses and Activities
18.23.050 Visual, Screening and Landscaping
The requirements and guidelines regarding noise and
vibration impacts are intended to protect residentially zoned
properties or properties with existing residential uses located
within nonresidential zones (residential properties) from
excessive and unnecessary noises and/or vibrations from any
sources in abutting industrial or commercially zoned
properties. Design of new projects should reduce noise from
parking, loading, and refuse storage areas and from heating,
ventilation, air conditioning apparatus, and other machinery
on nearby residential properties. New equipment, whether
mounted on the exterior of the building or located interior to
a building, which requires only a building permit, shall also be
subject to these requirements.
The project is in compliance with the noise
thresholds established by the City. The trash
enclosure is located opposite of the adjacent
mixed-use building. Roof top equipment is
located centrally and a screen is provided
that will further attenuate sound emissions.
The visual impact of parking shall be minimized on adjacent
residentially zoned properties or properties with existing
residential uses located within nonresidential zones.
The project site complies with the City’s
landscaping requirement for parking lots.
The guidelines regarding site access impacts are intended to
minimize conflicts between residential vehicular, pedestrian,
and bicycle uses and more intensive traffic associated with
commercial and industrial districts, and to facilitate
pedestrian and bicycle connections through and adjacent to
the project site.
The site circulation facilitates easy access for
all modes of transportation. The project
includes short-term and long-term bike
parking. The sidewalk along El Camino
will be consistent with the South El
Camino Real Design Guidelines. The on-
site pedestrian circulation provides for
an orderly and safe connections
between parking, public spaces and the
building.
The requirements for air quality are intended to buffer
residential uses from potential sources of odor and/or toxic
air contaminants.
No proposed uses on the project site would
produce odor or toxic air. Future uses are
required to comply with these performance
standards.
In accordance with Titles 15 and 17 of the Palo Alto
Municipal Code, minimize the potential hazards of any use on
a development site that will entail the storage, use or
handling of hazardous materials (including hazardous wastes)
on-site in excess of the exempt quantities prescribed in
Health and Safety Code Division 20, Chapter 6.95, and Title
15 of this code.
This is not applicable to the proposed uses
associated with the project.
18.23.060 Noise and Vibration Project Consistency
18.23.070 Parking
18.23.080 Vehicular, Pedestrian and Bicycle Site Access
18.23.090 Air Quality
18.23.100 Hazardous Materials
Page 1 of 28
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
2600 El Camino Real
16PLN-0022
Planning Division
1. CONFORMANCE WITH PLANS. The plans submitted for Building Permit shall be in
substantial conformance with plans dated received on November 29, 2016, except as
modified to incorporate the following conditions of approval and any additional
conditions placed on the project by the Planning Commission, Architectural Review
Board, or City Council.
2. BUILDING PERMIT. Apply for a building permit and meet any and all conditions of the
Planning, Fire, Public Works, and Building Departments.
3. BUILDING PERMIT PLAN SET. This complete approval document shall be printed on the
cover sheet of the plan set submitted with the Building Permit application.
4. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS. All modifications to the approved project shall be submitted
for review and approval prior to construction. If during the Building Permit review and
construction phase, the project is modified by the applicant, it is the responsibility of the
applicant to contact the Planning Division/project planner directly to obtain approval of
the project modification. It is the applicant’s responsibility to highlight any proposed
changes to the project and to bring it to the project planner’s attention.
5. DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES. While the project consists mainly of replacement square
footage, it does include a small amount of new amenity space for which the estimated
Development Impact Fees are $40,316.22. These fees along with any applicable public art
fee (PAMC 16.61.040), shall be paid prior to the issuance of the related building permit.
6. INDEMNITY. To the extent permitted by law, the Applicant shall indemnify and hold
harmless the City, its City Council, its officers, employees and agents (the “indemnified
parties”) from and against any claim, action, or proceeding brought by a third party
against the indemnified parties and the applicant to attack, set aside or void, any permit
or approval authorized hereby for the Project, including (without limitation) reimbursing
the City for its actual attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in defense of the litigation. The
City may, in its sole discretion, elect to defend any such action with attorneys of its own
choice.
7. FINAL INSPECTION. A Planning Division Final Inspection will be required to determine
substantial compliance with the approved plans prior to the scheduling of a Building
Division final. Any revisions during the building process must be approved by Planning,
including but not limited to; materials, landscaping and hard surface locations. Contact
Page 2 of 28
your Project Planner, Sheldon S. Ah Sing at sahsing@m-group.us (408) 340.5642 to
schedule this inspection.
Public Works – Urban Forestry
PRIOR TO DEMOLITION, BUILDING OR GRADING PERMIT ISSUANCE
8. BUILDING PERMIT SUBMITTAL- PROJECT ARBORIST CERTIFICATION LETTER. Prior to
submittal for staff review, attach a Project Arborist Certification Letter that he/she has; (a)
reviewed the entire building permit plan set submittal and, (b)* verified all his/her updated
TPR mitigation measures and changes are incorporated in the plan set, (c) affirm that
ongoing Contractor/Project Arboristsite monitoring inspections and reporting have been
arranged with the contractor or owner (seeSheet T-1) and, (d) understands that design
revisions (site or plan changes) within a TPZ will be routed to Project Arborist/Contractor
for review prior to approval from City. The Building Permit submittal set shall be
accompanied by the project site arborist’s certification letter that the plans have
incorporated said design changes and are consistent with City Tree Technical Manual
Standards, Regulations and information:
a. Provide a project arborist’s Updated Tree Protection Report (TPR) with building permit
level mitigation measures, (e.g., resolve grading proximity issues with Public trees;
exact TPZ scaled in feet). Provide plan revision directions to minimize root cutting
conflicts that are obvious in the civil, basement, sidewalk improvement sheets. See
TPR below.
b. Palo Alto Tree Technical Manual Construction Standards, Section 2.00 and PAMC
8.10.080.
9. PLAN SET REQUIREMENTS. The final Plans submitted for building permit shall include the
following information and notes on relevant plan sheets:
c. SHEET T-1, BUILDING PERMIT. The building permit plan set will include the City’s full-
sized, Sheet T-1 (Tree Protection-it's Part of the Plan!), available on the Development
Center website at http://www.cityofpaloalto.org/civicax/filebank/documents/31783.
The Applicant shall complete and sign the Tree Disclosure Statement and recognize the
Project Arborist Tree Activity Inspection Schedule. Monthly reporting to Urban
Forestry/Contractor is mandatory. (Insp. #1: applies to all projects; with tree
preservation report: Insp. #1-7 applies)
d. The Tree Preservation Report (TPR). All sheets of the Applicant’s construction level TPR
approved by the City for full implementation by Contractor, (David Babby, April 27, 2016
shall be printed on numbered Sheet T-1 (T-2, T-3, etc) and added to the sheet index.
e. Plans to show protective tree fencing. The Plan Set (esp. site, demolition, grading &
drainage, foundation, irrigation, tree disposition, utility sheets, etc.) must
delineate/show the correct configuration of Type I, Type II or Type III fencing
Page 3 of 28
around each Regulated Tree, using a bold dashed line enclosing the Tree Protection Zone
(Standard Dwg. #605, Sheet T-1; City Tree Technical Manual, Section 6.35-Site Plans); or
by using the Project Arborist’s unique diagram for each Tree Protection Zone
enclosure.
10. SITE PLAN REQUIREMENTS: In addition to showing TPZ fencing, add the following Notes on
the specified Plan Sheets.
f. Note #1. Apply to the site plan stating, "All tree protection and inspection schedule
measures, design recommendations, watering and construction scheduling shall be
implemented in full by owner and contractor, as stated on Sheet T-1, in the Tree
Protection Report and the approved plans”.
g. Note #2. All civil plans, grading plans, irrigation plans, site plans and utility plans and
relevant sheets shall add a note applying to the trees to be protected,
including neighboring trees stating: "Regulated Tree--before working in this area
contact the Project Site Arborist at 650-321-0202";
h. Note #3. Utility (sanitary sewer/gas/water/backflow/electric/storm drain) plan sheets
shall include the following note: “Utility trenching shall not occur within the TPZ of the
protected tree. Contractor shall be responsible for ensuring that no trenching occurs
within the TPZ of the protected tree by contractors, City crews or final landscape
workers. See sheet T-1 for instructions.”
i. Note #4. “Basement or foundation plan. Soils Report and Excavation for basement
construction within the TPZ of a protected tree shall specify a vertical cut (stitch piers
may be necessary) in order to avoid over-excavating into the tree root zone. Any
variance from this procedure requires Urban Forestry approval, please call (650) 496-
5953.”
j. Note #5. “Pruning Restrictions. No pruning or clearance cutting of branches is
permitted on City trees. Contractor shall obtain a Public Tree Permit from Urban
Forestry (650-496-5953) for any work on Public Trees”
11. TREE REMOVAL—PROTECTED & RIGHT-OF-WAY TREES. Existing trees (Publicly-owned or
Protected) to be removed as shown accurately located on all site plans, require approval
by the Urban Forestry Tree Care Permit prior to issuance of any building, demolition or
grading permit. Must also be referenced in the required Street Work Permit from Public
Works Engineering.
k. Add plan note for each tree to be removed, “Tree Removal. Contractor shall obtain a
completed Urban Forestry Tree Care Permit # _____________ (contractor to complete)
separate from the Building or Street Work Permit. Permit notice hanger and conditions
apply. Contact (650-496-5953).”
12. NEW RIGHT-OF-WAY TREES--PLAN REQUIREMENTS. New trees shall be shown on all
relevant plans: site, utility, irrigation, landscape, etc. in a location 10’ clear radius from any
(new or existing) underground utility or curb cut (see Note #4 above).
Page 4 of 28
a. Add note on the Planting Plan that states, “Tree Planting. Prior to in-ground
installation, Urban Forestry inspection/approval required for tree stock, planting
conditions and irrigation adequacy. Contact (650-496-5953).”
b. Landscape Plans shall state the Urban Forestry approved species, size and include
relevant Standard Planting Dwg. #603, #603a or #604 (reference which), and shall
note the tree pit dug at least twice the diameter of the root ball.
c. Landscape plan shall include planting preparation details for trees specifying digging
the soil to at least 30-inches deep, backfilled with a quality topsoil and dressing with 2-
inches of wood or bark mulch on top of the root ball keeping clear of the trunk by 1-
inch.
d. Add note on the Planting & Irrigation Plan that states, “Irrigation and tree planting in
the right-of-way requires a street work permit per CPA Public Works standards.”
e. Automatic irrigation shall be provided for each tree. Standard Dwg. #513 shall be
included on the irrigation plans and show two bubbler heads mounted on flexible
tubing placed at the edge of the root ball. Bubblers mounted inside an aeration tube
are prohibited. The tree irrigation system shall be connected to a separate valve from
other shrubbery and ground cover, pursuant to the City's Landscape Water Efficiency
Standards.
13. NEW TREES—SOIL VOLUME. Unless otherwise approved, four new right-of-way trees each
new tree shall be provided with 800 cubic feet of rootable soil area, utilizing Standard Dwg.
#604/513. Rootable soil shall mean compaction less than 90% over the area, not including
sidewalk base areas except when mitigated. Sidewalk or asphalt base underlayment [in lieu
of compacted base rock] shall use an Alternative Base Material method such as structural
grid (Silva Cell) or engineered soil mix. Design and manufacturer details shall be added to
relevant civil and landscape sheets. Each parking lot tree in small islands and all public
trees shall be provided adequate rootable soil commensurate to mature tree size. Note:
this expectation requires coordination with the engineer, arborist and landscape architect.
a. Minimum soil volume for tree size growth performance (in cubic feet): Large: 1,200
cu.ft. Medium: 800 cu.ft. Small: 400 cu.ft.
b. Landscape Plan. When qualifying for parking area shade ordinance compliance (PAMC
18.40.130) trees shall be labeled (as S, M or L).
c. Engineered Soil Mix (ESM). When approved, Engineered Soil Mix base material shall
be utilized in specified areas, such as a sidewalk base or channeling to a landscape
area, to achieve expected shade tree rooting potential and maximum service life of
the sidewalk, curb, parking surfaces and compacted areas. Plans and Civil Drawings
shall use CPA Public Works Engineering ESM Specifications, Section 30 and Standard
Dwg. #603a. Designated areas will be identified by cross-hatch or other symbol, and
specify a minimum of 24" depth. The technology may be counted toward any credits
awarded for LEED or Sustainable Sites certification ratings.
Page 5 of 28
14. LANDSCAPE PLANS
a. Include all changes recommended from civil engineer, architect and staff, including
planting specifications if called for by the project arborist.
b. Add Planting notes to include the following mandatory criteria:
• Prior to any planting, all plantable areas shall be tilled to 12” depth, and all
construction rubble and stones over 1” or larger shall be removed from the
site.
• A turf-free zone around trees 36” diameter (18” radius) required for best
tree performance.
c. Add note: “Mandatory Landscape Architect (LA) Inspections and Verification to the
City. The LA shall verify the performance measurements are achieved with a letter of
verification to City Planning staff, in addition to owner’s representative for the
following:
• All the above landscape plan and tree requirements are in the Building
Permit set of plans.
• Percolation & drainage checks have been performed and are acceptable.
• Fine grading inspection of all plantable areas has been personally inspected
for tilling depth, rubble removal, soil test amendments are mixed and
irrigation trenching will not cut through any tree roots.
• Tree and Shrub Planting Specifications, including delivered stock, meets
Standards in the CPA Tree Technical Manual, Section 3.30-3.50. Girdling
roots and previously topped trees are subject to rejection.
DURING CONSTRUCTION
15. TREE PROTECTION VERIFICATION. Prior to any site work a written verification from the
contractor that the required protective fencing is in place shall be submitted to the Urban
Forestry Section (derek.sproat@cityofpaloalto.org). The fencing shall contain required
warning sign and remain in place until final inspection of the project.
16. EXCAVATION RESTRICTIONS APPLY (TTM, Sec. 2.20 C & D). Any approved grading, digging
or trenching beneath a tree canopy shall be performed using ‘air-spade’ method as a
preference, with manual hand shovel as a backup. For utility trenching, including sewer
line, roots exposed with diameter of 1.5 inches and greater shall remain intact and not be
damaged. If directional boring method is used to tunnel beneath roots, then Table 2-1,
Trenching and Tunneling Distance, shall be printed on the final plans to be implemented by
Contractor.
17. PLAN CHANGES. Revisions and/or changes to plans before or during construction shall be
reviewed and responded to by the (a) project site arborist, David Babby (650) 654.3351), or
(b) landscape architect with written letter of acceptance before submitting the revision to
the Building Department for review by Planning, PW or Urban Forestry.
Page 6 of 28
18. CONDITIONS. All Planning Department conditions of approval for the project shall be
printed on the plans submitted for building permit.
19. TREE PROTECTION COMPLIANCE. The owner and contractor shall implement all protection
and inspection schedule measures, design recommendations and construction scheduling
as stated in the TPR & Sheet T-1, and is subject to code compliance action pursuant to
PAMC 8.10.080. The required protective fencing shall remain in place until final
landscaping and inspection of the project. Project arborist approval must be obtained and
documented in the monthly activity report sent to the City. The mandatory Contractor and
Arborist Monthly Tree Activity Report shall be sent monthly to the City
(pwps@cityofpaloalto.org) beginning with the initial verification approval, using the
template in the Tree Technical Manual, Addendum 11.
20. TREE DAMAGE. Tree Damage, Injury Mitigation and Inspections apply to Contractor.
Reporting, injury mitigation measures and arborist inspection schedule (1-5) apply
pursuant to TTM, Section 2.20-2.30. Contractor shall be responsible for the repair or
replacement of any publicly owned or protected trees that are damaged during the course
of construction, pursuant to Title 8 of the Palo Alto Municipal Code, and city Tree Technical
Manual, Section 2.25.
21. GENERAL. The following general tree preservation measures apply to all trees to be
retained: No storage of material, topsoil, vehicles or equipment shall be permitted within
the tree enclosure area. The ground under and around the tree canopy area shall not be
altered. Trees to be retained shall be irrigated, aerated and maintained as necessary to
ensure survival.
PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY
22. URBAN FORESTRY DIGITAL FILE & INSPECTION. The applicant or architect shall provide a
digital file of the landscape plan, including new off-site trees in the publicly owned right-of-
way. A USB Flash Drive, with CAD or other files that show species, size and exact scaled
location of each tree on public property, shall be delivered to Urban Forestry at a tree and
landscape inspection scheduled by Urban Forestry (650-496-5953).
23. LANDSCAPE CERTIFICATION LETTER. The Planning Department shall be in receipt of a
verification letter that the Landscape Architect has inspected all trees, shrubs, planting and
irrigation and that they are installed and functioning as specified in the approved plans.
24. FINAL ARBORIST INSPECTION LETTER. Prior to written request for temporary or final
occupancy, the contractor shall provide to the Planning Department and property owner a
final inspection letter by the Project Arborist. The inspection shall evaluate the success or
needs of Regulated tree protection, including new landscape trees, as indicated on the
approved plans. The written acceptance of successful tree preservation shall include a
photograph record and/or recommendations for the health, welfare, mitigation remedies
for injuries (if any). The final report may be used to navigate any outstanding issues,
concerns or security guarantee return process, when applicable.
Page 7 of 28
25. PLANNING INSPECTION. Prior to final sign off, contractor or owner shall contact the city
planner (650-329-2441) to inspect and verify Special Conditions relating to the conditions
for structures, fixtures, colors and site plan accessories.
POST CONSTRUCTION
26. MAINTENANCE. All landscape and trees shall be maintained, watered, fertilized, and
pruned according to Best Management Practices-Pruning (ANSI A300-2008 or current
version) and the City Tree Technical Manual, Section 5.00. Any vegetation that dies shall
be replaced or failed automatic irrigation repaired by the current property owner within 30
days of discovery.
UTILITIES – WATER, GAS & WASTEWATER
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A DEMOLITION PERMIT
38. Prior to demolition, the applicant shall submit the existing water/wastewater fixture unit
loads (and building as-built plans to verify the existing loads) to determine the capacity
fee credit for the existing load. If the applicant does not submit loads and plans they may
not receive credit for the existing water/wastewater fixtures.
39. The applicant shall submit a request to disconnect all utility services and/or meters
including a signed affidavit of vacancy. Utilities will be disconnected or removed within
10 working days after receipt of request. The demolition permit will be issued by the
building inspection division after all utility services and/or meters have been
disconnected and removed.
FOR BUILDING PERMIT
40. The applicant shall submit a completed water-gas-wastewater service connection
application- load sheet for each unit with separate metering for City of Palo Alto Utilities.
The applicant must provide all the information requested for utility service demands
(water in fixture units/g.p.m., gas in b.t.u.p.h, and sewer in fixture units/g.p.d.). The
applicant shall provide the existing (prior) loads, the new loads, and the combined/total
loads (the new loads plus any existing loads to remain).
41. The applicant shall submit improvement plans for utility construction. The plans must show
the size and location of all underground utilities and new fire services within the
development and the public right of way including meters, backflow preventers, fire
service requirements, sewer mains, sewer cleanouts, sewer lift stations and any other
required utilities. Plans for new wastewater laterals and mains need to include new
wastewater pipe profiles showing existing potentially conflicting utilities especially electric,
communication duct banks, and storm lines need to be daylighted by potholing from top to
bottom to verify cross section prior to plan approval and starting lateral installation.
42. The applicant must show on the site plan the existence of any auxiliary water supply, (i.e.
water well, gray water, recycled water, rain catchment, water storage tank, etc).
Page 8 of 28
43. The applicant shall be responsible for installing and upgrading the existing utility mains
and/or services as necessary to handle anticipated peak loads. This responsibility includes
all costs associated with the design and construction for the installation/upgrade of the
utility mains and/or services.
44. The applicant’s engineer shall submit flow calculations and system capacity study showing
that the on-site and off-site water and sanitary sewer mains and services will provide the
domestic, irrigation, fire flows, and wastewater capacity needed to service the
development and adjacent properties during anticipated peak flow demands. Field testing
may be required to determined current flows and water pressures on existing water main.
Calculations must be signed and stamped by a registered civil engineer. The applicant is
required to perform, at his/her expense, a flow monitoring study 'of the existing sewer
main to determine the remaining capacity. The report must include existing peak flows or
depth of flow based on a minimum monitoring period of seven continuous days or as
determined by the senior wastewater engineer. The study shall meet the requirements
and the approval of the WGW engineering section. No downstream overloading of existing
sewer main will be permitted.
45. For contractor installed water and wastewater mains or services, the applicant shall submit
to the WGW engineering section of the Utilities Department four copies of the installation
of water and wastewater utilities off-site improvement plans in accordance with the
utilities department design criteria. All utility work within the public right-of-way shall be
clearly shown on the plans that are prepared, signed and stamped by a registered civil
engineer. The contractor shall also submit a complete schedule of work, method of
construction and the manufacture's literature on the materials to be used for approval by
the utilities engineering section. The applicant’s contractor will not be allowed to begin
work until the improvement plan and other submittals have been approved by the water,
gas and wastewater engineering section. After the work is complete but prior to sign off,
the applicant shall provide record drawings (as-builts) of the contractor installed water
and wastewater mains and services per City of Palo Alto Utilities record drawing
procedures. For contractor installed services the contractor shall install 3M marker balls at
each water or wastewater service tap to the main and at the City clean out for wastewater
laterals.
46. An approved reduced pressure principle assembly (RPPA backflow preventer device) is
required for all existing and new water connections from Palo Alto Utilities to comply with
requirements of California administrative code, title 17, sections 7583 through 7605
inclusive. The RPPA shall be installed on the owner's property and directly behind the
water meter within 5 feet of the property line. RPPA's for domestic service shall be lead
free. Show the location of the RPPA on the plans.
47. An approved reduced pressure detector assembly is required for the existing or new water
connection for the fire system to comply with requirements of California administrative
code, title 17, sections 7583 through 7605 inclusive (a double detector assembly may be
allowed for existing fire sprinkler systems upon the CPAU’s approval)). Reduced pressure
Page 9 of 28
detector assemblies shall be installed on the owner's property adjacent to the property
line, within 5' of the property line. Show the location of the reduced pressure detector
assembly on the plans.
48. All backflow preventer devices shall be approved by the WGW engineering division.
Inspection by the utilities cross connection inspector is required for the supply pipe
between the meter and the assembly.
49. Existing wastewater laterals that are not plastic (ABS, PVC, or PE) shall be replaced at the
applicant's expense.
50. Existing water services that are not a currently standard material shall be replaced at the
applicant's expense.
51. The applicant shall pay the capacity fees and connection fees associated with new utility
service/s or added demand on existing services. The approved relocation of services,
meters, hydrants, or other facilities will be performed at the cost of the person/entity
requesting the relocation.
52. A separate water meter and backflow preventer is required to irrigate the approved
landscape plan. Show the location of the irrigation meter on the plans. This meter shall be
designated as an irrigation account an no other water service will be billed on the account.
The irrigation and landscape plans submitted with the application for a grading or building
permit shall conform to the City of Palo Alto water efficiency standards.
53. The applicant shall secure a public utilities easement for facilities installed in private
property. The applicant's engineer shall obtain, prepare, record with the county of Santa
Clara, and provide the utilities engineering section with copies of the public utilities
easement across the adjacent parcels as is necessary to serve the development.
54. Where public mains are installed in private streets/PUEs for condominium and town home
projects the CC&Rs and final map shall include the statement "Public Utility Easements: If
the City's reasonable use of the Public Utility Easements, which are shown as P.U.E on the
Map, results in any damage to the Common Area, then it shall be the responsibility of the
Association, and not of the City, to Restore the affected portion(s) of the Common Area.
This Section may not be amended without the prior written consent of the City”.
55. All existing water and wastewater services that will not be reused shall be abandoned at
the main per WGW utilities procedures.
56. Utility vaults, transformers, utility cabinets, concrete bases, or other structures cannot be
placed over existing water, gas or wastewater mains/services. Maintain 1' horizontal clear
separation from the vault/cabinet/concrete base to existing utilities as found in the field. If
there is a conflict with existing utilities, Cabinets/vaults/bases shall be relocated from the
plan location as needed to meet field conditions. Trees may not be planted within 10
feet of existing water, gas or wastewater mains/services or meters. New water, gas or
Page 10 of 28
wastewater services/meters may not be installed within 10’ or existing trees. Maintain 1O'
between new trees and new water, gas and wastewater services/mains/meters.
57. All utility installations shall be in accordance with the City of Palo Alto utility standards for
water, gas & wastewater.
58. The applicant shall obtain an encroachment permit from Caltrans for all utility work in the
El Camino Real right-of-way. The applicant must provide a copy of the permit to the WGW
engineering section.
59. The applicant shall obtain an encroachment permit from Santa Clara county department of
transportation for all utility work in the county road right-of-way. The applicant must
provide a copy of the permit to the WGW engineering section.
60. The applicant shall obtain a construction permit from Santa Clara county valley water
district for the utility service line to be installed by the City of Palo Alto Utilities.
FIRE DEPARTMENT
61. Install a NFPA 13 fire sprinkler, NFPA 14 Standpipe, NFPA 24 underground fire service,
NFPA 72 fire alarm and Emergency Responder Radio system under separate fire permit.
62. Onsite Fire Department roadway widths shall be min 20 ft wide and turning radius shall
meet PAFD standards.
PUBLIC WORKS – WATERSHED PROTECTION
63. PAMC 16.09.170, 16.09.040 Discharge of Groundwater. The project is located in an area of
suspected or known groundwater contamination with Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs).
If groundwater is encountered then the plans must include the following procedure for
construction dewatering:
Prior to discharge of any water from construction dewatering, the water shall be tested for
volatile organic compounds (VOCs) using EPA Method 601/602 or Method 624. The
analytical results of the VOC testing shall be transmitted to the Regional Water Quality
Control Plant (RWQCP) 650-329-2598. Contaminated ground water that exceeds state or
federal requirements for discharge to navigable waters may not be discharged to the
storm drain system or creeks. If the concentrations of pollutants exceed the applicable
limits for discharge to the storm drain system then an Exceptional Discharge Permit must
be obtained from the RWQCP prior to discharge to the sanitary sewer system. If the VOC
concentrations exceed the toxic organics discharge limits contained in the Palo Alto
Municipal Code (16.09.040(m)) a treatment system for removal of VOCs will also be
required prior to discharge to the sanitary sewer. Additionally, any water discharged to the
sanitary sewer system or storm drain system must be free of sediment.
Page 11 of 28
64. PAMC 16.09.055 Unpolluted Water. Unpolluted water shall not be discharged through
direct or indirect connection to the sanitary sewer system. Unpolluted water shall not be
discharged through direct or indirect connection to the sanitary sewer system.
And PAMC 16.09.175 (b) General prohibitions and practices Exterior (outdoor) drains may
be connected to the sanitary sewer system only if the area in which the drain is located is
covered or protected from rainwater run-on by berms and/or grading, and appropriate
wastewater treatment approved by the Superintendent is provided. For additional
information regarding loading docks, see section 16.09.175(k)
65. PAMC 16.09.180(b)(9) Covered Parking. Drain plumbing for parking garage floor drains
must be connected to an oil/water separator with a minimum capacity of 100 gallons, and
to the sanitary sewer system.
66. PAMC 16.09.180(b)(14) Architectural Copper. On and after January 1, 2003, copper metal
roofing, copper metal gutters, copper metal down spouts, and copper granule containing
asphalt shingles shall not be permitted for use on any residential, commercial or industrial
building for which a building permit is required. Copper flashing for use under tiles or
slates and small copper ornaments are exempt from this prohibition. Replacement roofing,
gutters and downspouts on historic structures are exempt, provided that the roofing
material used shall be prepatinated at the factory. For the purposes of this exemption, the
definition of "historic" shall be limited to structures designated as Category 1 or Category 2
buildings in the current edition of the Palo Alto Historical and Architectural Resources
Report and Inventory.
67. PAMC 16.09.180(b)(5) Condensate from HVAC. Condensate lines shall not be connected or
allowed to drain to the storm drain system.
68. PAMC 16.09.180(b)(b) Copper Piping. Copper, copper alloys, lead and lead alloys, including
brass, shall not be used in sewer lines, connectors, or seals coming in contact with sewage
except for domestic waste sink traps and short lengths of associated connecting pipes
where alternate materials are not practical. The plans must specify that copper piping will
not be used for wastewater plumbing.
69. 16.09.180(12) Mercury Switches. Mercury switches shall not be installed in sewer or storm
drain sumps.
70. PAMC 16.09.205(a) Cooling Systems, Pools, Spas, Fountains, Boilers and Heat Exchangers.
It shall be unlawful to discharge water from cooling systems, pools, spas, fountains boilers
and heat exchangers to the storm drain system.
71. PAMC 16.09.165(h) Storm Drain Labeling. Storm drain inlets shall be clearly marked with
the words "No dumping - Flows to Bay," or equivalent.
Undesignated Retail Space:
Page 12 of 28
72. PAMC 16.09. Newly constructed or improved buildings with all or a portion of the space
with undesignated tenants or future use will need to meet all requirements that would
have been applicable during design and construction. If such undesignated retail space
becomes a food service facility the FSE requirements must be met.
UTILITIES – ELECTRICAL
73. The applicant shall provide an easement to include the moved electric load break and the
new pad-mount transformer. This will be the final condition prior to energization of the
building.
74. The applicant will provide spare street lights per Public Works specification to the CPAU.
75. The applicant shall coordinate with CPAU to remove the existing transformer.
76. The main building switch gear is an outdoor unit as shown in the plan.
PUBLIC WORKS - ENGINEERING
77. LOGISTICS PLAN: The contractor must submit a logistics plan to the Public Works Department
prior to building permit demolition that addresses all impacts to the City’s right-of-way, including,
but not limited to: pedestrian control, traffic control, truck routes, material deliveries,
contractor’s parking, concrete pours, crane lifts, work hours, noise control, dust control, storm
water pollution prevention, contractor’s contact, noticing of affected businesses, and schedule of
work. Plan shall include the following, but not limited to, construction fence, construction
entrance and exit, stockpile areas, equipment and material storage area, workers parking area,
construction office trailer, temporary bathroom, measures for dewatering if needed, crane
location, working hours, contractor’s contact information, truck traffic route, setbacks from
environmentally sensitive areas, erosion and sediment control measures to be implemented
during construction.
Due to the number of projects in this vicinity there have been a number of complaints from
neighbors and concerns from PD associated with the construction traffic or equipment
interrupting the flow of traffic on El Camino Real. This project will increase to the construction
related traffic. What measures are the general contractor and developer implementing to manage
subs, control deliveries to eliminate staging in the public right-of-way?
As described on a comment from Watershed protection, there is a potential for PCB’s in the
existing building material. Provide a note on the logistics plan to clearly indicate if PCB’s were or
were not found. If found provide a copy of permits, if any from other agencies, include permit
number on the Logistics Plan. Describe or plot and label how the PCB’s will be managed according
to OSHA and EPA regulations.
78. DEMOLITION PLAN: Place the following note adjacent to an affected tree on the Site Plan
and Demolition Plan: “Excavation activities associated with the proposed scope of work
shall occur no closer than 10-feet from the existing street tree, or as approved by the
Page 13 of 28
Urban Forestry Division contact 650-496-5953. Any changes shall be approved by the
same”.
79. CALTRANS: Caltrans review and approval of this project is required. Caltrans right-of-way
across El Camino Real extends from back-of-walk to back-of walk. The City has a
maintenance agreement with Caltrans that requires the City to maintain the sidewalk and
to issue Street Work Permits for work done on the sidewalks by private contractors.
Caltrans has retained the right to review and permit new ingress/egress driveways off El
Camino Real as well as the installation of Traffic Control devices as part of this project.
Submit a permit from Caltrans to perform the proposed work.
80. SIDEWALK, CURB & GUTTER: As part of this project, the applicant must replace all existing
sidewalk, curbs, gutters and driveway approaches in the public right-of-way along the
frontage(s) of the property. The site plan submitted with the building permit plan set must
show the extent of the replacement work (at a minimum all curb and gutter and sidewalk
along the project frontage). The plan must note that any work in the right-of-way must be
done per Public Works’ standards by a licensed contractor who must first obtain a Street
Work Permit from Public Works at the Development Center. Include the 12-foot wide
dimension on the plans and verify that the sidewalk is unobstructed.
81. PUBLIC ACCESS EASEMENT: Owner shall create a public access easement for the additional
area behind the property line needed to create a 12-foot wide sidewalk along El Camino
Real. Submit a plat and legal to public works for review.
82. EL CAMINO REAL STREETSCAPE: The applicant shall install new decorative pedestrian scale
and roadway lighting along the property frontage within the El Camino Real right of way.
Existing roadway lighting poles, foundations, and luminaires shall be substituted with
decorative roadway poles, foundations, and luminaires. New pedestrian scale lighting shall
be roughly centered between the locations of the existing roadway fixtures resulting in
approximately 60’ O.C. between the two fixture styles. Provide a reference the
specifications and call-outs directly on the plans.
83. STREET TREES: The applicant may be required to replace existing and/or add new street
trees in the public right-of-way along the property’s frontage(s). Call the Public Works’
arborist at 650-496-5953 to arrange a site visit so he can determine what street tree work,
if any, will be required for this project. The site plan submitted with the building permit
plan set must show the street tree work that the arborist has determined, including the
tree species, size, location, staking and irrigation requirements, or include a note that
Public Works’ arborist has determined no street tree work is required. The plan must note
that in order to do street tree work, the applicant must first obtain a Permit for Street Tree
Work in the Public Right-of-Way from Public Works’ Arborist (650-496-5953)
84. GRADING PERMIT: The site plan must include an earthworks table showing cut and fill
volumes. If the total is more than 100 cubic yards, a grading permit will be required. An
application and plans for a grading permit are submitted to Public Works separately from
Page 14 of 28
the building permit plan set. The application and guidelines are available at the
Development Center and on our website.
85. GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN: Provide a separate Grading and Drainage Plan prepared by a
qualified licensed engineer, surveyor or architect. Plan shall be wet-stamped and signed by
the same. Plan shall include the following: existing and proposed spot elevations,
earthwork volumes (cut and fill in CY), pad, finished floor, garage elevation, base flood
elevation (if applicable) grades along the project conforms, property lines, or back of walk.
See PAMC Section 16.28.110 for additional items. Projects that front directly into the
public sidewalk, shall include grades at the doors or building entrances. Provide drainage
flow arrows to demonstrate positive drainage away from building foundations at minimum
of 2% or 5% for 10-feet per 2013 CBC Section 1804.3. Label the downspouts, splashblocks
(2-feet long min) and any site drainage features such as swales, area drains, bubble-up
locations. Include grate elevations, low points and grade breaks. Provide dimensions
between the bubblers and property lines. In no case shall drainage across property lines
exceed that which existed prior to grading per 2013 CBC Section J109.4. In particular,
runoff from the new garage shall not drain into neighboring property. For additional
grading and drainage detail design, see Grading and Drainage Plan Guidelines for
Residential Development.
http://www.cityofpaloalto.org/civicax/filebank/documents/2717
Provide grades, slopes, grade breaks, drains, etc., within the covered at grade parking area
to shown how the covered parking areas will drain into the sanitary sewer. Uncovered
portions of the parking area shall be designed to drain into the bio-treatment areas and
ultimately into the storm drain system. Plan shall also clarify how rain runoff from the
parking deck will be managed.
As shown on the conceptual plans the bio-retention areas are immediately adjacent to the
property lines. The construction documents shall clearly indicate how the runoff will not
cross into neighboring properties. If any barrier cut-off walls are needed these shall be
located completely within the project site. Plot and label the walls and provide the
associated details.
86. STAIRWELLS: Due to high groundwater throughout much of the City and Public Works
prohibiting the pumping and discharging of groundwater, perforated pipe drainage
systems at the exterior of the basement walls or under the slab are not allowed for this
site. A drainage system is, however, required for all exterior basement-level spaces, such
as lightwells, patios or stairwells. This system consists of a sump, a sump pump, a
backflow preventer, and a closed pipe from the pump to a dissipation device onsite at
least 10 feet from the property line, such as a bubbler box in a landscaped area, so that
water can percolate into the soil and/or sheet flow across the site. The device must not
allow stagnant water that could become mosquito habitat. Additionally, the plans must
show that exterior basement-level spaces are at least 7-3/4” below any adjacent
windowsills or doorsills to minimize the potential for flooding the basement. Public Works
recommends a waterproofing consultant be retained to design and inspect the vapor
barrier and waterproofing systems for the basement.
Page 15 of 28
The stairs to the proposed deck do not appear to be covered, provide an area drain or
grades at the bottom of the stairs to capture runoff or discharge into the storm drain
system instead of the sewer system.
87. BIO-RETENTION AREAS: It’s not clear how the runoff will be entering the bio-retention
areas or the planters on the podium. Update the plans to show how runoff will be
directed into these areas. In addition, treatment areas shall be designed to use the full
swale length for treatment, place the bubbler (outlet) and catch basin (inlet) at the ends
of the swale. The conceptual plans provided only referenced plumbing plans which were
not available for review. Plumbing plans shall clearly address the drainage into the
treatment areas.
88. UTILITIES AND BIO-RETENTION AREAS: Due to maintenance and inspection requirements
associated with the bio-retention areas, utilities that are not associated with the bio-
retention design, shall not be installed within the bio-retention areas. It’s not clear if
there are any existing or proposed utilities within the bio-retention areas. Plot and label
any existing lines and proposed lines to determine if these lines should be relocated or
relocate the treatment areas if necessary.
89. STORM WATER TREATMENT: This project shall comply with the storm water regulations
contained in provision C.3 of the NPDES municipal storm water discharge permit issued
by the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (and incorporated into
Palo Alto Municipal Code Chapter 16.11). These regulations apply to land development
projects that create or replace 10,000 square feet or more of impervious surface, and
restaurants, retail gasoline outlets, auto service facilities, and uncovered parking lots that
create and/or replace 5,000 square feet or more of impervious surface. In order to
address the potential permanent impacts of the project on storm water quality, the
applicant shall incorporate into the project a set of permanent site design measures,
source controls, and treatment controls that serve to protect storm water quality, subject
to the approval of the Public Works Department. The applicant shall identify, size, design
and incorporate permanent storm water pollution prevention measures (preferably
landscape-based treatment controls such as bio-swales, filter strips, and permeable
pavement rather than mechanical devices that require long-term maintenance) to treat
the runoff from a “water quality storm” specified in PAMC Chapter 16.11 prior to
discharge to the municipal storm drain system. Regulated projects, must contract with a
qualified third-party reviewer during the planning application review process to certify
that the proposed permanent storm water pollution prevention measures comply with
the requirements of Palo Alto Municipal Code Chapter 16.11. The certification form, 2
copies of approved storm water treatment plan, and a description of Maintenance Task
and Schedule must be received by the City from the third-party reviewer prior to approval
of the planning application by the Public Works department.
90. BASEMENT SHORING: Shoring for the basement excavation, including tiebacks, must not
extend onto adjacent private property or into the City right-of-way without having first
obtained written permission from the private property owners and/or an encroachment
permit from Public Works. DEWATERING: Basement excavations may require dewatering
Page 16 of 28
during construction. Public Works only allows groundwater drawdown well dewatering.
Open pit groundwater dewatering is disallowed. Dewatering is only allowed from April
through October due to inadequate capacity in our storm drain system. The geotechnical
report for this site must list the highest anticipated groundwater level. We recommend a
piezometer to be installed in the soil boring. The contractor must determine the depth to
groundwater immediately prior to excavation by using the piezometer or by drilling an
exploratory hole if the deepest excavation will be within 3 feet of the highest anticipated
groundwater level. If groundwater is found within 2 feet of the deepest excavation, a
drawdown well dewatering system must be used, or alternatively, the contractor can
excavate for the basement and hope not to hit groundwater, but if he does, he must
immediately stop all work and install a drawdown well system before he continues to
excavate. Public Works may require the water to be tested for contaminants prior to
initial discharge and at intervals during dewatering. If testing is required, the contractor
must retain an independent testing firm to test the discharge water for the contaminants
Public Works specifies and submit the results to Public Works. Applicant shall install a
water station for the reuse of dewatering water. This water station shall be constructed
next to the right-of-way and shall be accessible 24 hours a day for the filling of water
carrying vehicles (i.e. street sweepers, etc.). The water station shall also be sued for
onsite dust control. Applicant shall meet with Public Works to coordinate the design
details. Public Works reviews and approves dewatering plans as part of a Street Work
Permit.
The applicant can include a dewatering plan in the building permit plan set in order to
obtain approval of the plan during the building permit review, but the contractor will still
be required to obtain a street work permit prior to dewatering. Alternatively, the
applicant must include the above dewatering requirements in a note on the site plan.
Public Works has a sample dewatering plan sheet and dewatering guidelines available at
the Development Center and on our website.
http://www.cityofpaloalto.org/gov/depts/pwd/forms_and_permits.asp
The following links are included to assist the applicant with dewatering requirements.
http://www.cityofpaloalto.org/civicax/filebank/documents/30978
http://www.cityofpaloalto.org/civicax/filebank/documents/51366
http://www.cityofpaloalto.org/civicax/filebank/documents/47388.
91. WATER FILLING STATION: Due to the California drought, applicant shall install a water
station for the non-potable reuse of the dewatering water. This water station shall be
constructed within private property, next to the right-of-way, (typically, behind the
sidewalk). The station shall be accessible 24 hours a day for the filling of water carrying
vehicles (i.e. street sweepers, etc.). The water station may also be used for onsite dust
control. Before a discharge permit can be issued, the water supply station shall be
installed, ready for operational and inspected by Public Works. The groundwater will also
need to be tested for contaminants and chemical properties for the non-potable use. The
discharge permit cannot be issued until the test results are received. Additional
information regarding the station will be made available on the City’s website under
Public Works.
Page 17 of 28
92. STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION: The City's full-sized "Pollution Prevention - It's
Part of the Plan" sheet must be included in the plan set. The sheet is available here:
http://www.cityofpaloalto.org/civicax/filebank/documents/2732
93. SWPPP: The proposed development will disturb more than one acre of land. Accordingly,
the applicant will be required to comply with the State of California’s General Permit for
Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction Activity. This entails filing a Notice
of Intent to Comply (NOI), paying a filing fee, and preparing and implementing a site
specific storm water pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) that addresses both construction-
stage and post-construction BMP’s for storm water quality protection. Provide the WDID
# directly on the Grading and Drainage Plan.
94. WORK IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY: The plans must clearly indicate any work that is proposed
in the public right-of-way, such as sidewalk replacement, driveway approach, or utility
laterals. The plans must include notes that the work must be done per City standards and
that the contractor performing this work must first obtain a Street Work Permit from
Public Works at the Development Center. If a new driveway is in a different location than
the existing driveway, then the sidewalk associated with the new driveway must be
replaced with a thickened (6” thick instead of the standard 4” thick) section. Additionally,
curb cuts and driveway approaches for abandoned driveways must be replaced with new
curb, gutter and planter strip.
95. IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA: The project will be creating or replacing 500 square feet or
more of impervious surface. Accordingly, the applicant shall provide calculations of the
existing and proposed impervious surface areas with the building permit application. The
Impervious Area Worksheet for Land Developments form and instructions are available at
the Development Center or on our website.
PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT FINAL
96. STORM WATER TREATMENT: At the time of installation of the required storm water
treatment measures and prior to the issuance of any occupancy permit, a third-party
reviewer shall also submit to the City a certification for approval that the project’s
permanent measures were constructed and installed in accordance to the approved permit
drawings.
97. STORMWATER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT: The applicant shall designate a party to
maintain the control measures for the life of the improvements and must enter into a
maintenance agreement with the City to guarantee the ongoing maintenance of the
permanent C.3 storm water discharge compliance measures. The maintenance agreement
shall be executed prior to the first building occupancy sign-off. The City will inspect the
treatment measures yearly and charge an inspection fee. There is currently a $381 (FY
2015) C.3 plan check fee that will be collected upon submittal for a grading or building
permit.
Public Art
Page 18 of 28
98. If the applicant chooses to commission art on site, Public Art Commission approval is
required prior to issuance of a building permit.
Building
99. A demolition permit shall be required for the removal of the existing building on site.
100. Demolition of entire structures shall include the termination of utilities in an approved manner, in
approved locations on the site.
101. Provisions shall be made to provide a means on the site for control of dust during demolition and
construction work.
102. An analysis of the existing parking structure will be required to verify compliance with current
codes.
103. The stair and elevator lobby at the garage level exit on the El Camino Real side of the
underground parking structure appears to have a configuration that will put the truncated
domes at the door into the vehicular traffic lane. A redesign may be required to warn visually
impaired people exiting these doors prior to entering this traffic lane.
104. Electric vehicle charger stations and Photovoltaic systems are required to be submitted and
permitted separately. This deferred item shall be noted on the plans. Glass panels as
proposed on the plan shall include engineering for an impact load in addition to all other
loads.
*** End of Conditions of Approval ***
SHPDM, LLC
January 6, 2017
To: City of Palo Alto Planning Division
Mr. Sheldon Ah Sing
Ms. Jodie Gerhardt
Architectural Review Board
Chair Lew, Vice Chair Kim,and fellow Architectural Review Board Members
RE: Application for 16PLN-00022-2600 El Camino
Dear Chair Lew, Vice Chair Kim, and fellow Architectural Review Board Members:
Thank you for reviewing our project on December 15, 2016. We appreciated your comments and found your
suggestions beneficial towards creating ultimately a better project for Palo Alto. We have carefully taken your
comments and wanted to indicate how we are addressing your comments and concerns.
Just as a quick recap of the project, the 2600 El Camino project consists of the redevelopment of 1.67 acre parcel
located in the Stanford Research Park. The site is located just west of the major intersection of Page Mill and El
Camino in between Stanford’s existing Soccer Fields and future multi-family housing development. The project
proposal is to replace the existing obsolete office building, built in the 60’s, with a new office of the same exact
floor area square footage that will serve to activate that section of El Camino.
The existing project has various features that will be made code compliant with the proposed project. The height
of the existing project is nearly 81 feet high with 6 above ground floors. The proposed project will be compliant
with the CS zoning and will comply with the 50 foot height limit and be reduced to only 4 above ground floors.
The existing project also has 56 deficient parking spaces on the site per code requirements. The new project will
bring the entire site into code compliant parking at 258 stalls.The existing site does not meet current landscape
and shading requirements. The proposed project will be fully compliant with landscaping requirements and the
50% shading requirement and a 22% landscape area (whereas only 10% is required by code).
During the motion to bring the project back for Board review, a few items were particularly referenced and
attached to the final motion adopted by the Board.
1.Parking Deck
a.Design and Integration of the Parking Deck with the Office Building
There was a request from multiple Board Members to understand the parking structure design further
and to understand the integration of the design of the parking structure with the main building. We
have significantly developed the parking structure architecturally to relate to the office building by
echoing similar materials and architectural vocabulary as the office building. This includes the
application of white metal panels along the north side facing the office and enclosing the garden
courtyard. These panels return around the two sides with a two-story punched opening accent similar
to the office building northwest corner. The elevator is also sheathed in metal panel with an “L” shaped
planar element with wood paneling integrated at soffits similar to the El Camino office frontage. The
planter starting from the elevator base is limestone to reflect the office wall limestone on the other side
and create a cohesive high quality courtyard setting.The metal panel continues along the slab edges
along the sides and rear with cable rails above to accentuate the planar elements and maximize the
natural light and create a safer garage. Finally, the light standards at the top level are shown are
SHPDM, LLC
directed away from the housing project and utilize house side shields to eliminate any light spillover
towards the housing.With these further developed architectural details,we believe that the garage
structure now clearly ties with the main building and actually acts as an extension of the main building in
the project.The details of the garage materials can be seen on sheet A1.1a, A1.1b and rendering on
A5.3a.
b.Circulation and Design of the Parking Deck
The parking deck is designed to meet code requirements for drive aisles and turning radius’of 14’-6”.
The garage remains a two-tier structure, but now has been revised to be a one-way drive aisle with
single two-way ramps to allow complete clockwise circulation.The two one-way entry ramps on either
side have been replaced by a single two-way ramp that continues to the top and is easily navigated by a
car.See details in A1.1a and A1.1b.
c.Parking Sections and Elevations
See section 1/A3.
2.Two Chinese Elms in raised planters on El Camino Real
Multiple Board Members brought up the concern with the preservation of the two existing Chinese Elms
(non-heritage trees) in the two raised planters on El Camino Real.There were comments relating to the idea
that the trees might hamper visibility from the driveways in relation to the pedestrians using the El Camino
sidewalk. Jarrett Mullen, Associate Transportation Planner, did issue a comment on August 8, 2016 stating
SHPDM, LLC
that the trees were allowed given that, the site, because of the wider 12-foot sidewalks, “creates a zero
setback for the purposes of clear sight triangle assessment……Accordingly, the smaller “zero setback zone”
clear sight triangle shown in 18.54.070 Figure 6 applies to this project, and the current site plan meets this
standard.” Consequently, Staff was requiring the addition of stop signs. However, as a result of Board
Member comments and further discussions with Staff, we have eliminated completely the two Chinese Elms
and the related raised planters to improve visibility and safety of pedestrians from the driveway. Our plans
reflect this change.
3.Pedestrian Connection and Circulation
Board Members commented on the pedestrian connection from the parking stair to the building as well as
the surface parking lot to the building. We have revised the site plan and the garage, as shown on A1.1 to
provide a tree-lined walkway on both sides of the parking deck to clearly indicate the pedestrian path on the
site. The 5 foot wide pedestrian pathway is further distinguished by the use of special paving that will also
match the pavers used around the main building. From the stairways leading down to the surface level from
the parking garage, the stairs drop nicely into the courtyard is in the back of the building. The courtyard area
also has clear walkways that lead and direct individuals to the building lobby entrance.These changes
effectively provide a clear guide for both pedestrians and cars on the site.
4.Hardscape and Paving on El Camino Sidewalk
Board Members indicated that more detail was required on the hardscape plan and that the sidewalk should
ideally match the sidewalk in front of the adjacent, newly constructed Stanford housing project at 2500 El
Camino Real. On A1.1, our Site Plan shows alignment with the Stanford sidewalk which has a 13 foot
setback.Also, more detail on the hardscape design can be seen on sheets L1.1 and L4.2 which incorporate
the same concrete scoring pattern and accent stone around the trees as the adjacent residential project.
5.Privacy of the Adjacent Residential Property
Board Members brought up a concern about the privacy of the residential units in the adjacent residential
project. There is just under a 54 foot distance from the building to the property line on the residential side.
Then there is a line of trees on the residential side than a further 23’foot setback to the face of the
residential project. The 77 foot space between the two adjacent buildings distance provides a substantial
distance between the properties.
SHPDM, LLC
Further, likely the business hours of the building will be opposite the residential hours so the hours of
overlapping occupancy will be minimal given that office hours are generally 9am-5pm whereas residents will
likely be home after 5pm.The windows along the residential project façade facing the building are also
rather small in size, so the visibility is limited due to the sheer size of the windows (see illustration below).
However, to adequately address the issue, we will install window shades on the windows on the west
balconies facing the residential project. These shades can be deployed in the building to prevent any
occupants of the building from looking over at the residential units after business hours. The third floor
balcony glass guard has also been changed to a sandblasted glass to reduce the view toward the residential
project. See detail on sheets A2.2, A2.3, and 3/A3b.
In addition to the above addressed comments, we also wanted to address other minor comments that Board
Members brought up as described below.
6.Bird Friendly Glass
Fretted bird friendly glass has been included and is detailed on sheet A4.
7.Light Poles in the Garage
Light poles are shown on 1/A3b and 2/A3b. House side shields are provided to prevent spillover towards the
adjacent residential project. A revised photometric plan will also reflect this item.
8.Landscaping and Planters on El Camino Real
To address the concern of gravel coming out of the planters on the sidewalk on El Camino Real, we have
replaced the gravel with pavers as shown on L1.1.
SHPDM, LLC
9.Pigeon Proofing Ledges
The ledges have been redesigned to be at a substantial angle to prevent bird sitting. See 1/A3b and 2/A3b.
10.Native Planting
The landscaping plans have been revised to native Palo Alto planting as reflected on sheet L2.1.
11.Retail Canopy Detail
The canopy detail has been called out on 4/A3.
12.Street Trees not reflected
The street trees have been updated and are reflected on sheets A5 and A5.1.
13.Correct Labeling of Figure 25 in Historic Resources Evaluation
The figure has been corrected to reference the First United Methodist Church.
14.Size of Locker Rooms
The locker rooms were originally designed to have a slightly larger women’s locker room versus men’s locker
room. However, the locker rooms have now been designed to be of equal size at 300 SF each. There is also
no privacy issues between the gym and the locker rooms because the locker rooms have separate entrances
off the gym space; the interior of the locker space will not be visible from the gym.
15.Access from the lobby to the ground floor office
Doors have been added from the ground floor office to the lobby area.
16.Retail Access and Connection to the Lobby
The ground floor retail is a public amenity that is open to both employees of the main building as well as the
public. Therefore, the ideal retail location for visibility and access would be on the corner of the building
since it has presence and its own entrance. The retail space will only be accessed from the two exterior
entrances off El Camino Real.
17.Sizes of Decks and Usability
SHPDM, LLC
The decks range from 5’-6”feet wide along the El Camino side of the property to over 14 feet wide in
various locations. The decks have been designed to match the scales along the various facades and are
wider where applicable. The range also allows for a variety of uses, from small tables to larger outdoor
meeting areas where applicable.
18.Deck Trees
The trees along the decks have been eliminated from the renderings.
19.Outdoor space along El Camino Real
This project has been designed to support the goals of the Comprehensive Plan and also the Grand
Boulevard Initiative. The project brings retail down to the ground floor and creates an urban landscape
design that activates the sidewalk and creates a more pedestrian friendly environment. In particular, it is
particularly aligned with the following policies and goals:
GOAL L-4: Inviting, Pedestrian-scale Centers That Offer a Variety of Retail and Commercial Services and
Provide Focal Points and Community Gathering Places.
POLICY L-21:Provide all Centers with centrally located gathering spaces that create a sense of identity
and encourage economic revitalization. Encourage public amenities such as benches, street trees,
kiosks, restrooms and public art.
PROGRAM L-33:Study ways to make South El Camino Real more pedestrian-friendly, including
redesigning the street to provide wider sidewalks, safe pedestrian crossings at key intersections, street
trees, and streetscape improvements.
POLICY L-36: Allow a full range of office and retail uses on parcels along South El Camino Real.
The seating area outside of the retail space is designed in alignment with the above-referenced policies and
is created to activate El Camino Real and create a pedestrian friendly environment. While El Camino Real
does have car traffic, other locations along El Camino Real do also have successful outdoor seating that
encourages use. In particular, Chipotle at 2675 El Camion and the Starbucks at 2000 El Camino Real both
have outdoors seating areas in similar locations with similar noise levels as is proposed with the project.In
the adjacent residential project, they also have a ground floor retail café, (Fambrini’s Café) with a significant
amount of outdoor seating area. Nearly identical noise levels, and exactly identical as in the case of
Fambrini’s Café, has not deterred the placement of use of outdoor seating areas.
20.Outdoor Courtyard Space along the East Side of the Building
The outdoor courtyard space has been designed thoughtfully to maximize user use. The space is insulated
from the parking lot with the building to the north and 22 foot high garage façade that has been carefully
treated with metal panels and stepped limestone planters. The first floor of the garage structure is a solid
wall so as to avoid any vision of the cars.The courtyard is also surrounded by various landscape elements
and planter boxes that provide a tranquil setting for outdoor seating.
We have greatly appreciated all of your comments and feel this has become a better project.
We look forward to your review.
Sincerely,
SHPDM, LLC
Allison Koo
SHPDM, LLC
ATTACHMENT F
ZONING COMPARISON TABLE
2600 El Camino Real, 16PLN-00022
Table 1: COMPARISON WITH CHAPTER 18.16 (CS DISTRICT)
Exclusively Non-residential Development Standards
Regulation Required Existing Proposed
Minimum Site Area, width and
depth
None
72,427 square feet
72,427 square feet
Minimum Front Yard
0-10 feet to create an
8-12 foot effective
sidewalk width (1), (2), (8)
9 feet 9 feet
Rear Yard
None 156 feet
Interior Side Yard
None 40 feet (east) and 69
feet (west)
50 feet (east) and 54
feet (west)
Street Side Yard None Not Applicable Not Applicable
Min. yard for lot lines abutting
or opposite residential
districts or residential PC
districts
10 feet (2) 69 feet 54 feet
Build-to-lines
50% of frontage built
to setback on El
Camino Real
33% of side street built
to setback (7)
(49%) 126 feet 50% (129’-4”)
Special Setback 24 feet – see Chapter
20.08 & zoning maps
Not Applicable Not Applicable
Max. Site Coverage None
23% (16,658 sf) 44% (31,868 sf)
Max. Building Height 50 ft or
35 ft within 150 ft. of a
residential district
(other than an RM-40
or PC zone) abutting or
located within 50 feet
of the site
88’-3” 50 feet
Max. Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 0.4:1 (28,970 sf)
18.18.060(e)
90% (62,616 sf) 90% (62,616 sf + 1,480
sf sf amenity space not
included in FAR)
Daylight Plane for lot lines
abutting one or more
residential zone districts other
than an RM-40 or PC Zone
None (6)
(1) No parking or loading space, whether required or optional, shall be located in the first 10 feet adjoining the street property line of
any required yard.
(2) Any minimum front, street side, or interior yard shall be planted and maintained as a landscaped screen excluding areas required
for access to the site. A solid wall or fence between 5 and 8 feet in height shall be constructed along any common interior lot line..
(6) The initial height and slope shall be identical to those of the most restrictive residential zone abutting the site line in question.
(7) 25 foot driveway access permitted regardless of frontage, build-to requirement does not apply to CC district.
(8) A 12 foot sidewalk width is required along El Camino Real frontage
Table 1: COMPARISON WITH CHAPTER 18.16 (CS DISTRICT) continued
Exclusively Non-residential Development Standards
Topic Requirement Proposed
Hours of Operation
(18.16.040 (b))
Businesses with activities any time between the hours
of 10:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. shall be required to obtain
a conditional use permit. The director may apply
conditions of approval as are deemed necessary to
assure compatibility with the nearby residentially
zoned property
Not Applicable
Special Use
Requirements in the
Charleston and
Midtown Shopping
Centers (18.16.040 (c))
Outdoor Sales and
Storage (18.16.040 (h))
Recycling Storage
(18.16.040 (i))
Employee Showers
(18.16.040 (j))
Four showers Amenity space includes
six showers.
Office Use Restrictions
(18.16.050)
Total floor area of permitted office uses on a lot shall
not exceed 25% of the lot area, provided a lot is
permitted between 2,500 and 5,000 sf of office use.
The maximum size may be increased with a CUP issued
by the Director.
The project is a non-
complying facility
replacement project.
18.16.080 Performance Standards. All development in the CS district shall comply with the performance
criteria outlined in Chapter 18.23 of the Zoning Ordinance, including all mixed use development.
18.16.090 Context-Based Design Criteria. As further described in a separate attachment, development in a
commercial district shall be responsible to its context and compatible with adjacent development, and shall
promote the establishment of pedestrian oriented design.
Table 2: CONFORMANCE WITH CHAPTER 18.52 (Off-Street Parking and Loading)
for Office/Bank & Food Retail Services*
Type Required Existing Proposed
Vehicle Parking Office: 1/250 sf of
gross floor area for a
total of 246 parking
spaces
Food Retail: 1/60 sf of
dining gross floor area
for a total of 10 parking
spaces.
Food Retail: 1/200 sf of
kitchen gross floor area
for a total of 2 parking
195 spaces
258 spaces
spaces.
Bicycle Parking 1/2,500 sf (20% long
term and 80% short
term) equals 26 spaces
Four spaces 28 spaces (20 long
term, 8 short term)
Loading Space 2 loading spaces for
30,000 - 69,999 sf
* On-site employee amenity space is exempted from the parking requirements
ATTACHMENT F
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TABLE
2600 El Camino Real / File No. 16PLN-00022
Comp Plan Goals and Policies How project adheres or does not adhere
to Comp Plan
The Comprehensive Plan land use designation for the
site is Service Commercial.
The project continues the Service Commercial land
use.
Land Use and Community Design Element
Goal L-4: Inviting, pedestrian-scale centers that offer a
variety of retail and commercial services and provide
focal points and community gathering places for the
City’s residential neighborhoods and Employment
Districts.
The project renovates a site and develops a new
office/commercial building that is consistent with
the current green building standards. The project
provides a high-quality designed office/commercial
building that includes the use of a variety of
materials, color and provides public open spaces.
Policy L-18: Encourage the upgrading and
revitalization of selected Centers in a manner that is
compatible with the character of surrounding
neighborhoods.
Policy L-42: Encourage Employment Districts to
develop in a way that encourages transit, pedestrian
and bicycle travel and reduces the number of auto
trips for daily errands.
The project provides an attractive contemporary
design for office and commercial use. The
streetscape is consistent with the South El Camino
Real Design Guidelines. The project provides bicycle
parking and on-site pedestrian paths. Policy L-43: Provide sidewalks, pedestrian paths, and
connections to the citywide bikeway system within
Employment Districts. Pursue opportunities to build
sidewalks and paths in renovation and expansion
projects.
Policy L-48: Promote high quality, creative design and
site planning that is compatible with surrounding
development and public spaces.
Goal L-9: Attractive, inviting public spaces and streets
that enhance the image and character of the City.
The project includes public art along El Camino Real
within the plaza area.
Policy L-73: Consider public art and cultural facilities
as a public benefit in connection with new connection
with new development projects. Consider incentives
for including public art in large development projects.
Natural Environment Element
Goal N-4: Water Resources that are Prudently
Managed to Sustain Plant and Animal Life,
Support Urban Activities, and Protect Public
Health and Safety.
The project is required to comply with the
NPDES Stormwater Permit and includes bio-
retention areas for stormwater management.
Policy N-21: Reduce non-point source
pollution in urban runoff from residential,
commercial, industrial, municipal, and
transportation land uses and activities.
Architectural Review Board
Staff Report (ID # 7516)
Report Type: Action Items Meeting Date: 12/15/2016
City of Palo Alto
Planning & Community Environment
250 Hamilton Avenue
Palo Alto, CA 94301
(650) 329-2442
Summary Title: 2600 El Camino Real: New Commercial Building
Title: PUBLIC HEARING / QUASI-JUDICIAL MATTER. 2600 El Camino
Real [16PLN-00022]: Recommendation to the Director of
Planning and Community Environment for Approval of an
Architectural Review Application to Allow the Demolition of an
Existing Six-Story Commercial Building and Construction of a
New Four-Story, 62,616 Square Foot Commercial Building; no
new Floor Area is Being Requested. Environmental
Assessment: Consistent With the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) the Project is Exempt From Further
Environmental Review Pursuant to Section 15302 (Class 2),
Which Allows for the Replacement of Structures With
Substantially the Same Purpose and Capacity. Zoning District:
CS
From: Hillary Gitelman
Recommendation
Staff recommends the Architectural Review Board (ARB) take the following action(s):
1. Recommend approval of the proposed project to the Director of Planning and
Community Environment based on findings and subject to conditions of approval.
Report Summary
Applicant proposes a four story commercial project on El Camino Boulevard (50’-0” and
0.86:1 Floor Area Ratio, or FAR). The project replaces a non-complying six-story (88’-3” tall),
62,616 square feet (0.86:1 FAR) commercial building built in 1967. The applicant proposes to
replace the existing noncomplying facility in accordance with PAMC Section 18.70.100, which
allows a building to be reconstructed if all current development standards are met, with the
exception of FAR. This FAR may be reinstated in a new building as long as there is no increase
in gross floor area and the project otherwise complies with applicable development
standards. The project is subject to architectural review findings, context-based design
City of Palo Alto
Planning & Community Environment Department Page 2
criteria and conformance with the El Camino Real Guidelines. As designed, the project meets
the applicable zoning requirements, will maintain the existing basement parking facility, and
four mature trees on-site.
Background
Project Information
Owner: The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University
Architect: Chang Architecture
Representative: Allison Koo, Sand Hill Properties
Legal Counsel: Not Applicable
Property Information
Address: 2600 El Camino
Neighborhood: Stanford Research Park
Lot Dimensions & Area: 280’ x 259’ (1.66 acres) (72,427 square feet)
Housing Inventory Site: No
Located w/in a Plume: Yes
Protected/Heritage Trees: None
Historic Resource(s): None
Existing Improvement(s): 62,616 square feet; six stories; 88’-3” in height; built in 1967
Existing Land Use(s): Commercial and office
Adjacent Land Uses &
Zoning:
North: CN-Neighborhood Commercial (Restaurant)
West: CS- Service Commercial (Mixed Use)
East: CN-Neighborhood Commercial (Restaurant)
South: PF-AS3 Public Facilities, Alternative Standards (Soccer fields)
Aerial View of Property:
City of Palo Alto
Planning & Community Environment Department Page 3
Source: Google
Land Use Designation & Applicable Plans
Zoning Designation: CS-Service Commercial
Comp. Plan Designation: Service Commercial
Context-Based
Design Criteria: Yes. Palo Alto Municipal Code 18.16.090
Downtown Urban
Design Guide: Not Applicable
South of Forest Avenue
Coordinated Area Plan: Not Applicable
Baylands Master Plan: Not Applicable
El Camino Real Design
Guidelines (1976 / 2002): Yes
Proximity to Residential
Uses or Districts (150'): Adjacent to Mixed-Use project
Located w/in the Airport
Influence Area: No
City of Palo Alto
Planning & Community Environment Department Page 4
Prior City Reviews & Action
City Council: None
PTC: None
HRB: None
ARB: Preliminary Review hearing conducted on September 17, 2015
https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/civicax/filebank/documents/49016
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P0u5oDVqbTI&start=270&width=420&hei
ght=315
Project Description
The applicant proposes to demolish the existing building and site improvements, except for the
underground parking facility and four mature trees along the perimeter of the property. The
applicant proposes to replace the existing noncomplying facility in accordance with PAMC
Section 18.70.100, Non-complying Facility – Replacement, which allows a building to be
reconstructed if all current development standards are met, with the exception of FAR. This
FAR may be reinstated in a new building as long as there is no increase in gross floor area and
the new project complies with existing development standards. The applicant proposes to
construct a four-story, 62,616 square foot building over the underground parking facility and
improve the on-site surface parking facility with the addition of a parking structure in two
parking levels above grade to provide additional parking spaces.
The existing office building on the project site that will be replaced has substantially the same
size and use as the proposed new building.
Table 1
Proposed Gross Floor Area
Area Summary Retail/Service Uses
(Square feet)
Office (Square feet)
1st Floor 1,000 12,713
2nd Floor 0 16,384
3rd Floor 0 17,209
4th Floor 0 15,310
Sub-Total 1,000 61,616
Total 62,616
The existing site has a parking deficit of 56 vehicle spaces and eight bicycle spaces based on
current PAMC requirements. The applicant proposes to retain the underground parking facility,
renovate the surface parking lot and add a new parking structure with two levels over a portion
of the surface parking lot at the rear of the proposed building. According to PAMC Section
18.52.040, Table 3, one loading space is required for the project, which is provided on the
southeastern portion of the surface parking lot. With the addition of the parking structure and
modifications to the surface lot, the project meets the City’s parking requirements.
City of Palo Alto
Planning & Community Environment Department Page 5
Table 2
Vehicle Parking Summary
Use Parking
Requirement
Proposed Square
Footage
Parking Required Parking
Provided
Bank/Office 1:250 sf 61,616 246 246
Eating and
Drinking
Services
1:200 sf (kitchen)
1:60 sf (dining
area)
400
600
2
10
12
Total 62,616 258 258
Table 3
Bicycle Parking Summary
Use Parking
Requirement
Square foot Bike
Parking
Long Term Short
Term
Provided
Office 1:2,500 SF 61,616 25 80% 20 20% 5
Eating and
Drinking
Services
1 per 600 sf
of public
service area,
plus 1 per
2,000 sf for
other areas
1,000 1 20% 80% 1
Total 62,616 26 20 6 20 long
term and
8 short
term
Requested Entitlements, Findings and Purview:
The following discretionary applications are being requested:
Architectural Review – Major (AR): The process for evaluating this type of application is
set forth in PAMC 18.77.070. AR applications are reviewed by the ARB and
recommendations are forwarded to the Planning & Community Development Director
for action within five business days of the Board’s recommendation. Action by the
Director is appealable to the City Council if filed within 14 days of the decision. AR
projects are evaluated against specific findings. All findings must be made in the
affirmative to approve the project. Failure to make any one finding requires project
redesign or denial. The findings to approve an AR application are provided in
Attachment B.
City of Palo Alto
Planning & Community Environment Department Page 6
Analysis1
Neighborhood Setting and Character
The project site (site) consists of a 72,427 square foot parcel (1.66 acres), located southwesterly
of the Page Mill Road and El Camino Real intersection (see location map, Attachment A). The
site is within the Commercial Service (CS) zoning designation and is owned by Stanford
University, as are the adjacent properties. Presently, the site includes a six-story, 62,616 square
foot commercial building with one level of underground parking, an outdoor plaza and surface
parking. The bank is on the first floor, with a small café and offices on the second floor. The
remaining upper floors are occupied by offices. The building was constructed in 1966, prior to
the imposition of the City’s citywide, 50-foot height limit. The existing architecture of the site
and building are characteristic of mid-century modern architecture. The site is considered to
contain a “non-complying facility” governed under Palo Alto Municipal Code Section (PAMC)
18.70.100. The building is a non-complying facility because it does not meet present-day
development standards for the CS district, including height, setbacks, parking and FAR.
However, as explained later in the report under the PAMC, non-complying facility provisions,
the site may replace the building, maintaining the FAR, so long as the project does not increase
floor area and meets other current development standards.
Zoning Compliance2
A detailed review of the proposed project’s consistency with applicable zoning standards has
been performed. A summary table is provided in Attachment E. The proposed project complies
with all applicable codes.
Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan, Area Plans and Guidelines3
The Comprehensive Plan encourages the upgrading and revitalization of selected Centers in a
manner that is compatible with the character of surrounding neighborhoods. A detailed review
of the proposed project’s consistency with applicable Comp Plan standards has been
performed. A summary table is provided in Attachment F. On balance, the proposed project is
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
South El Camino Real Design Guidelines
The project is subject to the South El Camino Real Guidelines. The Guidelines consider the site a
part of the California Avenue Pedestrian-Oriented Node. The project is consistent with various
1 The information provided in this section is based on analysis prepared by the report author prior to the public
hearing. The Architectural Review Board in its review of the administrative record and based on public testimony
may reach a different conclusion from that presented in this report and may choose to make alternative findings. A
change to the findings may result in a final action that is different from the staff recommended action in this
report.
2 The Palo Alto Zoning Code is available online: http://www.amlegal.com/codes/client/palo-alto_ca
3 The Palo Alto Comprehensive Plan is available online:
http://www.cityofpaloalto.org/gov/topics/projects/landuse/compplan.asp
City of Palo Alto
Planning & Community Environment Department Page 7
guidelines contained with the document as further described in the ARB findings Attachment B,
Section C.
Multi-Modal Access & Parking
A transportation memo was completed for the project applicant by Hexagon Transportation
Consultants (Attachment G) and was reviewed by the City’s Transportation Division. The memo
confirms that since the proposed square footage and uses are not changing from the existing
condition, there is no change to the amount of trips generated by the project. In addition, the
memo confirms on-site circulation safety and summarizes the transportation demand
management (TDM) strategies proposed by the project. When implemented, these TDM
strategies would reduce the amount of vehicle miles traveled for the project by 15 percent.
The project is located within the Escondido Elementary suggested safe routes to school (El
Camino Real). The site maintains the existing two vehicular driveways fronting El Camino Real
and maintains the shared access at the rear through the neighboring property to California
Avenue. The project also maintains two mature Chinese Elm trees adjacent to these driveways.
Staff evaluated the planters to the city’s clear sight triangle and found that there were no
conflicts at the driveway locations. Nevertheless, as an added precaution, staff recommends a
condition of approval requiring stop signs for exiting vehicles.
Parking and Loading
Table 2 summarizes the parking for the site. The project provides a sufficient amount of parking
on-site and meets the City’s parking facility design standards (landscaping, parking lot shading,
etc.). Table 3 summarizes the bicycle parking for the site, in which the project exceeds the
minimum requirements. The project also includes on-site 1,480 square feet of amenity space
for lockers and gym to support the bicycle commuters. One loading space is required for the
project, which is provided on the southeastern portion of the surface parking lot.
Consistency with Application Findings
The project is subject to two sets of findings. Architectural Review findings are pursuant to
PAMC Section 18.76.020 and Context-Based findings are pursuant to PAMC Section
18.16.090(b). As described in Attachment B, the project meets the findings.
Environmental Review
The subject project has been assessed in accordance with the authority and criteria contained
in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State CEQA Guidelines, and the
environmental regulations of the City. Specifically, the project is considered categorically
exempt pursuant to CEQA Section 15302, Replacement or Reconstruction. The Class 2
exemption consists of replacement or reconstruction of existing structures and facilities where
the new structure will be located on the same site as the structure replaced and will have
substantially the same purpose and capacity as the structure replaced.
As detailed in the project description, the project substantially replaces the same amount of
building gross floor area. The project as proposed replaces the uses with the same types of uses
City of Palo Alto
Planning & Community Environment Department Page 8
as previously established. Furthermore, the project has no impact on historic resources or
hazards and hazardous materials. Attachment H includes a Categorical Exemption Report that
details the findings for the exemption.
Public Notification, Outreach & Comments
The Palo Alto Municipal Code requires notice of this public hearing be published in a local paper
and mailed to owners and occupants of property within 600 feet of the subject property at least
ten days in advance. Notice of a public hearing for this project was published in the Palo Alto
Weekly on December 4, 2016, which is 12 days in advance of the meeting. Postcard mailing
occurred on December 5, 2016, which is 10 in advance of the meeting.
Public Comments
During the course of the review of the project, staff has received telephone correspondence in
opposition of the project. The complaint is from an existing tenant in the building who
questioned the redevelopment of the building, which in his opinion is adequate. As of the
writing of this report, no project-related, written public comments were received.
Alternative Actions
In addition to the recommended action, the Architectural Review Board may:
1. Approve the project with modified findings or conditions;
2. Continue the project to a date (un)certain; or
3. Recommend project denial based on revised findings.
Report Author & Contact Information ARB4 Liaison & Contact Information
Sheldon S. Ah Sing, AICP, Contract Planner Jodie Gerhardt, AICP, Planning Manager
(408) 340-5642 (650) 329-2575
sahsing@m-group.us jodie.gerhardt@cityofpaloalto.org
Attachments:
Attachment A: Location Map (PDF)
Attachment B: ARB and Context-Based Design Criteria Findings (DOCX)
Attachment C: Conditions of Approval (DOCX)
Attachment D: Applicant's Project Description (PDF)
Attachment E: Zoning Comparison Table (DOCX)
Attachment F: Comprehensive Plan Analysis (DOCX)
Attachment G: Circulation Analysis (PDF)
Attachment H: CEQA Exemption Report (PDF)
Attachment I: Project Plans (DOCX)
4 Emails may be sent directly to the ARB using the following address: arb@cityofpaloalto.org
Attachment I
CEQA
A printed version of the environmental documents is available to the public by visiting
the Planning and Community Environmental Department on the 5th floor of City Hall at
250 Hamilton Avenue.
These documents may also be reviewed on online:
1. Go to: http://www.cityofpaloalto.org/planningprojects
2. Go to the “Commercial and Mix Use projects” webpage
3. Search for “2600 El Camino Real”
4. Review the record details and click on the address for more details
A direct link to the project page is also provided here:
http://www.cityofpaloalto.org/news/displaynews.asp?NewsID=3235&TargetID=319
Attachment I
Project Plans
Hardcopies of project plans are provided to ARB Sub-Committee Members. These plans are
available to the public by visiting the Planning and Community Environmental Department on
the 5th floor of City Hall at 250 Hamilton Avenue.
Directions to review Project plans online:
1. Go to: https://paloalto.buildingeye.com/planning
2. Search for “2600 El Camino Real” and open record by clicking on the green dot
3. Review the record details and open the “more details” option
4. Use the “Records Info” drop down menu and select “Attachments”
5. Open the attachment named “ARB Package 010917 rev”