Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2019-05-20 City Council Agenda Packet
City Council 1 MATERIALS RELATED TO AN ITEM ON THIS AGENDA SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL AFTER DISTRIBUTION OF THE AGENDA PACKET ARE AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION IN THE CITY CLERK’S OFFICE AT PALO ALTO CITY HALL, 250 HAMILTON AVE. DURING NORMAL BUSINESS HOURS. Monday, May 20, 2019 Special Meeting Council Chambers 5:00 PM COUNCIL MEMBER DUBOIS IS PARTICIPATING REMOTELY FROM 44 HERON CIRCLE, CORTLAND, OH 44410 Agenda posted according to PAMC Section 2.04.070. Supporting materials are available in the Council Chambers on the Thursday 11 days preceding the meeting. PUBLIC COMMENT Members of the public may speak to agendized items; up to three minutes per speaker, to be determined by the presiding officer. If you wish to address the Council on any issue that is on this agenda, please complete a speaker request card located on the table at the entrance to the Council Chambers, and deliver it to the City Clerk prior to discussion of the item. You are not required to give your name on the speaker card in order to speak to the Council, but it is very helpful. Public comment may be addressed to the full City Council via email at City.Council@cityofpaloalto.org. TIME ESTIMATES Time estimates are provided as part of the Council's effort to manage its time at Council meetings. Listed times are estimates only and are subject to change at any time, including while the meeting is in progress. The Council reserves the right to use more or less time on any item, to change the order of items and/or to continue items to another meeting. Particular items may be heard before or after the time estimated on the agenda. This may occur in order to best manage the time at a meeting or to adapt to the participation of the public. To ensure participation in a particular item, we suggest arriving at the beginning of the meeting and remaining until the item is called. HEARINGS REQUIRED BY LAW Applicants and/or appellants may have up to ten minutes at the outset of the public discussion to make their remarks and up to three minutes for concluding remarks after other members of the public have spoken. Call to Order Special Orders of the Day 5:00-5:15 PM 1.Introduction of Gunn High School BEAM Students 2.Appointment of two Candidates to the Human Relations Commission, two Candidates to the Library Advisory Commission and Three Candidates to the Utilities Advisory Commission for Three-year Terms Ending May 31, 2022; one Candidate to the Utilities Advisory Commission for an Unfinished Term Ending May 31, 2021; and Three Candidates to the Storm Water Management Oversight Committee for Four-year Terms Ending May 31, 2023 REVISED 2 May 20, 2019 MATERIALS RELATED TO AN ITEM ON THIS AGENDA SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL AFTER DISTRIBUTION OF THE AGENDA PACKET ARE AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION IN THE CITY CLERK’S OFFICE AT PALO ALTO CITY HALL, 250 HAMILTON AVE. DURING NORMAL BUSINESS HOURS. Study Session 5:15-6:15 PM 3.788-796 San Antonio Road [19PLN-00079]: Prescreening Request to Amend the Zoning Code in Connection With a Proposed Mixed-use Housing Project Being Considered at the Subject Property That Includes 64 Housing Units (10 Below Market Rate Units) in a Four- story Building With Approximately 68,000 Square Feet. Requested Zoning Code Amendments Include: Extending the Housing Incentive Program and Other Incentives Related to Unit Density, Lot Coverage, Rooftop Gardens, and Parking Exceptions for CS Zoned Properties Adjacent to San Antonio Avenue Between Middlefield Road and East Charleston Avenue; Amending the Definition of Gross Floor Area; and Adjustments to Retail Preservation Requirements. No Formal City Council Action Will be Taken at This Meeting. Environmental Assessment: Not a Project; any Subsequent Formal Application Would be Subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Zoning District: CS (Service Commercial) Agenda Changes, Additions and Deletions City Manager Comments 6:15-6:25 PM Oral Communications 6:25-6:40 PM Members of the public may speak to any item NOT on the agenda. Council reserves the right to limit the duration of Oral Communications period to 30 minutes. Minutes Approval 6:40-6:45 PM 4.Approval of Action Minutes for the May 6, 2019 Council Meeting Consent Calendar 6:45-6:50 PM Items will be voted on in one motion unless removed from the calendar by three Council Members. 5.Adoption of an Ordinance Amending Title 16 (Building Regulations) of the Palo Alto Municipal Code to Require Management of PCBs During Building Demolition in Compliance With the Municipal Regional Stormwater Permit 6.Adoption of a Resolution Adopting the 2019 San Francisco Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan 7.Approval of Contract Number C19174910 With JJR Construction Inc., in the Amount of $1,250,993 for the 2019 Sidewalk, Curb and Gutter Repairs Project, Capital Improvement Program Projects PO-89003 and PO-12001; Authorization for the City Manager or his Designee to Negotiate and Execute Related Change Orders Not-to-Exceed Q&A 3 May 20, 2019 MATERIALS RELATED TO AN ITEM ON THIS AGENDA SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL AFTER DISTRIBUTION OF THE AGENDA PACKET ARE AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION IN THE CITY CLERK’S OFFICE AT PALO ALTO CITY HALL, 250 HAMILTON AVE. DURING NORMAL BUSINESS HOURS. $125,099 in Total Value; and Approval of a Budget Amendment in the Capital Improvement Fund 8.Adoption of a Resolution of the City Council Expressing Appreciation to Ron Arp Upon his Retirement 9.Adoption of an Ordinance Amending Title 12 of the Palo Alto Municipal Code to Set a 120 Day Statute of Limitations for Challenges to the City’s Gas Rates Action Items Include: Reports of Committees/Commissions, Ordinances and Resolutions, Public Hearings, Reports of Officials, Unfinished Business and Council Matters. 6:50-7:15 PM 10.Adoption of: (1) a Resolution of Intent, and (2) an Ordinance to Amend the Contract Between the Board of Administration of the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) and the City of Palo Alto to Implement the Share of Employer Contribution in Accordance With Section 20516 of the California Government Code, and the Memorandum of Agreement Between the City of Palo Alto and Utilities Management and Professional Association of Palo Alto 7:15-9:00 PM 11.Discussion of Airplane Noise and Community Impacts; Direction to Staff Regarding the Star Pirat 2 Procedure Announced by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on April 25, 2019 State/Federal Legislation Update/Action Council Member Questions, Comments and Announcements Members of the public may not speak to the item(s) Adjournment AMERICANS WITH DISABILITY ACT (ADA) Persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids or services in using City facilities, services or programs or who would like information on the City’s compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990, may contact (650) 329-2550 (Voice) 24 hours in advance. Closed Session 12.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORSProperties: (1) 321 California Avenue (APN 124-33-001); (2) 361 California Avenue(APN 124-33-029); (3) 341 California Avenue (APN 124-33-030); and (4) 2453 Ash Street (APN 124-33-027) Agency Negotiators: Ed Shikada, Brad Eggleston Negotiating Parties: City of Palo Alto; and (1) D.H. and M.A. Edwards Company for 321California Ave, (2) 361 California Ave, LP for 361 California Ave, (3) 341 Cal PartnersLLC for 341 California Ave, and (4) Ash Street Partners LP for 2453 Ash Street Under Negotiation: Price and Terms of Payment for Subsurface Easements Related to Construction of the California Avenue Garage Authority: Government Code Section 54956.8 MEMO MEMO MEMO 4 May 20, 2019 MATERIALS RELATED TO AN ITEM ON THIS AGENDA SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL AFTER DISTRIBUTION OF THE AGENDA PACKET ARE AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION IN THE CITY CLERK’S OFFICE AT PALO ALTO CITY HALL, 250 HAMILTON AVE. DURING NORMAL BUSINESS HOURS. Additional Information Standing Committee Meetings Sp. Finance Committee Meeting-Budget May 23, 2019 Schedule of Meetings Schedule of Meetings Tentative Agenda Tentative Agenda Informational Report 1st Quarter 2019 Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) Development Activity Report Proclamation Recognizing National Public Works Week May 19-25, 2019 Proclamation Recognizing May 2019 as Building Safety Month Public Letters to Council 5-20-2019 - Set 1 5-27-2019 - Set 1 CITY OF PALO ALTO OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK May 20, 2019 The Honorable City Council Palo Alto, California Appointment of two Candidates to the Human Relations Commission, two Candidates to the Library Advisory Commission and Three Candidates to the Utilities Advisory Commission for Three-year Terms Ending May 31, 2022; one Candidate to the Utilities Advisory Commission for an Unfinished Term Ending on May 31, 2021; and Three Candidates to the Storm Water Management Oversight Committee for Four-year Terms Ending May 31, 2023 On Monday, May 20, 2019, the Council is scheduled to appoint; two (2) candidates to the Human Relations Commission (HRC), two (2) candidates to the Library Advisory Commission (LAC), and three (3) candidates to the Utilities Advisory Commission (UAC) for three-year terms ending May 31, 2022; one (1) candidate to the Utilities Advisory Commission (UAC) for an unfinished term ending May 31, 2021; and three (3) candidates to the Storm Water Management Oversight (SWMOC) for four-year terms ending May 31, 2023. Voting will be by paper ballot. Background On April 29, 2019 the Council interviewed applicants for the HRC, LAC, SWMOC, and UAC. Information about the interviews can be viewed in the April 29, 2019 Meeting Staff Report. A recording of the interviews can be viewed online via the City Council Agenda and Minutes Webpage. Copies of all applications can be found HERE. Some applications may be redacted at the request of the applicant. A full set of nonredacted applications will be provided to Council Members directly. Human Relations Commission Vote to appoint two (2) positions on the HRC for three-year terms ending May 31, 2022. The first two candidates to receive at least 4 votes (required) will be appointed. The 3 HRC Candidates are as follows: 1. Daryl Savage 2. Patricia Regehr 3. Adriana Stone Page 2 Library Advisory Commission Vote to appoint two (2) positions on the LAC for three-year terms ending May 31, 2022. The first two candidates to receive at least 4 votes (required) will be appointed. The 8 LAC Candidates are as follows: 1. Alan Bennett 2. Kimberly Blanding 3. Pancho Chang 4. Nosheen Gothard 5. Sarina Grewal 6. Robert Moss (Incumbent) 7. Vidya Pradhan 8. Susan Wolfe Storm Water Management Oversight Committee Vote to appoint three (3) positions on the SWMOC for four-year terms ending May 31, 2023. The first three candidates to receive at least 4 votes (required) will be appointed. The 5 SWMOC Candidates are as follows: 1. David Bower (Incumbent) 2. Claire Elliott 3. Marilyn Keller (Incumbent) 4. Ron Owes 5. Richard Whaley (Incumbent) Utilities Advisory Commission Vote to appoint three (3) positions on the UAC for three-year terms ending May 31, 2022 and one (1) position for an unfinished term ending May 31, 2021. The first three candidates to receive at least 4 votes (required) will be appointed to the positions with full three-year terms. A second round of voting will occur, with the top candidate being appointed to the position with the unfinished term. The 11 UAC Candidates are as follows: 1. Hogene Choi 2. Rebecca Eisenberg 3. Claude Ezran 4. Robert Hinden 5. David Hsieh 6. Donald Jackson 7. A.C. Johnston (Incumbent) 8. Mathhew McCullough Page 3 9. Greg Scharff 10. Judith Schwartz (Incumbent) 11. Loren Smith Department Head: Beth Minor, City Clerk Page 4 City of Palo Alto (ID # 10330) City Council Staff Report Report Type: Study Session Meeting Date: 5/20/2019 City of Palo Alto Page 1 Summary Title: Prescreening Meeting: 788 San Antonio Road (64 Unit Mixed- Use Project) Title: 788-796 San Antonio Road [19PLN-00079]: Prescreening Request to Amend the Zoning Code in Connection with a Proposed Mixed Use Housing Project Being Considered at the Subject Property That Includes 64 Housing Units (10 Below Market Rate Units) in a Four Story Building With Approximately 68,000 Square Feet. Requested Zoning Code Amendments Include: Extending the Housing Incentive Program and Other Incentives Related to Unit Density, Lot Coverage, Rooftop Gardens, and Parking Exceptions for CS Zoned Properties Adjacent to San Antonio Avenue Between Middlefield Road and East Charleston Avenue; Amending the Definition of Gross Floor Area; and Adjustments to Retail Preservation Requirements. No Formal City Council Action Will be Taken at this Meeting. Environmental Assessment: Not a Project; any Subsequent Formal Application Would be Subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Zoning District: CS (Service Commercial) From: City Manager Lead Department: Planning and Community Environment Recommendation Staff recommends the City Council conduct a prescreening study session and provide comments regarding the following topics: 1. Extend recently adopted housing incentives to the subject property and more broadly to CS zoned property adjacent to San Antonio Road between Middlefield Road and East Charleston Avenue, including: a. Establish a Housing Incentive Program that includes a waiver to allow up to a 1.5 or higher FAR for housing projects and changes to lot coverage restrictions, b. Eliminate maximum housing density requirements, City of Palo Alto Page 2 c. Allow rooftop gardens to count towards required open space, d. Exclude the first 1,500 square feet of retail or retail-like floor area from parking requirements. 2. Amend the (citywide) definition of gross floor area to exempt certain area in subterranean garages from counting toward the floor area ratio; 3. Amend the (citywide) retail preservation requirement to: a. Modify the standard for a waiver from the retail preservation ordinance to allow exceptions for housing projects; or b. Establish a minimum retail floor area requirement for housing projects required to replace retail or retail-like uses, but not require full replacement; or c. Waive all or a portion of the required replacement retail floor area from the maximum floor area ratio for housing projects. No formal Council action is requested. Comments provided during the course of a prescreening are not binding on the City or the applicant. Executive Summary There is an application on file to redevelop the subject property for housing with some retail space. This application was filed following the Council’s review of a prescreening application to change the underlying zoning from CS to RM-40, which allows greater unit density. The prescreening occurred in October 2018. The applicant has recently modified its request preferring now to apply the recently adopted Housing Incentive Program to the subject property. Presently this program only applies to CS and CN zoned property along El Camino Real and in the CC2 and CD zoning districts. The Housing Incentive Program creates a process to increase the floor area ratio up to 1.5 in the CS zone along El Camino Real and a reduction to the lot coverage requirements (currently maximum lot coverage is 50% of the lot area). The applicant requests other provisions of the recently approved Housing Ordinance apply to the project, including: No limit to housing density Exclude the first 1,500 square feet of retail from the retail parking requirement. The applicant seeks changes to the municipal code that would exclude certain subterranean floor area and the ground floor retail space from the counting toward the floor area ratio. The applicant also anticipates requesting a waiver from the retail preservation ordinance. Staff supports exploring the possibility of extending components of the Housing Ordinance to San Antonio Road for CS zoned properties between Middlefield Road and East Charleston Avenue. Staff also supports reviewing the gross floor area definition to explicitly exclude area in City of Palo Alto Page 3 subterranean spaces such as mechanical or utility rooms, access ways, and other building and land use support facilities such as laundry rooms, supply closets and ancillary storage, but not excluding any useable space designed for continuous occupancy. A broader Council discussion on the retail preservation ordinance could be helpful either for this project or future code amendments as this policy objective is at times at odds with the City’s other interests to produce more housing units. Some options the Council may consider for housing projects include: adjusting the standard to grant a waiver from the retail preservation requirements; establishing a minimum floor area replacement for retail or retail-like uses, but not require full replacement; or exempting some or all of the required retail or retail-like space from the floor area ratio (but parked, beyond the 1,500 square foot exemption) For the subject project, not exempting retail or some of the subterranean floor area means less floor area available for housing units and likely fewer units, however, this may be an acceptable tradeoff depending on how these policy interests are balanced. Background Last year the Council held a prescreening study session to consider a conceptual state-density bonus project that would have required a zone change for the subject property from the current CS zoning to RM-401. Fifty-four (54) housing units were proposed including eight below market rate units. The site contains approximately 12,000 square feet of existing retail or retail- like uses that if redeveloped under commercial zoning, would be required to be incorporated into the new project. With the zone change, the retail preservation requirement would not apply. In its prescreening review, however, Council encouraged the applicant to incorporate a retail or retail-like component into a future project. Since the prescreening study session, the City Council adopted a number of code amendments with the intent of making housing projects more attractive to developers and to advance the City closer to its goal of adding 300+ housing units each year. These amendments, however, did not extend to San Antonio Road2. 1 The October 2018 staff report with more background information regarding the subject property, zoning and land uses is available online: https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/civicax/filebank/blobdload.aspx?BlobID=67090. 2 San Antonio Road is identified in the Housing Element as an area to promote housing. The subject property is included on the City’s list of housing opportunity and inventory sites. With the comprehensive plan adoption in 2017, a program was included with the direction to amend the Housing Element to eliminate housing sites along San Antonio Road and increase residential densities in Downtown and near California Avenue area to replace potential units from the sites eliminated (Program L2.4.1). The Housing Element is still several years away from being amended and the City will have an opportunity to implement or revisit this policy objective. City of Palo Alto Page 4 The applicant filed the subject application on March 5, 2019. Because this application was different from to the previous prescreening request (in terms of the requested legislative changes) staff scheduled the subject study session discussion so the Council can learn more about the proposal and offer any non-binding comments regarding the legislative aspects of the project. The procedure for prescreening review is set forth in the City’s municipal code section 18.79.030(a). The proposed project is now larger in size and floor area containing 64 units, including 10 below market rate units; approximately 1,730 square feet of retail space is included on the ground floor. Parking spaces (91) are provided in a subterranean garage that also includes other incidental storage and building support area that count toward overall floor area. The building is four stories tall and extends up to 50 feet in height, consistent with CS zoning. The total floor area is approximately 65,200 square feet, which is a floor area ratio of 1.58. Service Commercial zoning allows up to 0.6 and 0.4 floor area ratio, respectively for residential and commercial uses for a combined floor area ratio of 1.0. To implement the project, the applicant seeks a number of code amendments many of which mirror the housing incentives recently adopted and applied to portions of El Camino Real and near fixed transit centers. Specifically, the applicant requests the Housing Incentive Program, which establishes a waiver process to allow housing developments to have a floor area ratio up to 1.5, be applied to the property. These are the same standards that apply to CS zoned property adjacent to El Camino Real. Additionally, the applicant requests incentives that eliminate housing density restrictions and allows for parking exemptions for the first 1,500 square feet of retail floor area. The applicant seeks other changes to the code that would exempt portions of the subterranean garage and the ground floor retail area from counting toward the project’s total floor area. Lastly, the applicant has indicated their interest to seek a waiver from the retail preservation requirements of code since the property would retain its current commercial zoning and is therefore subject to retail preservation ordinance. Discussion Staff is reviewing the applicant’s request for compliance with code and city policies, however, because this project includes several legislative requests and since the Council is not taking any action on this project during its study session review, this report does not provide detailed project analysis. At this stage in the process, learning the Council’s initial impressions on the legislative considerations – and areas where the Council would like to see more analysis as staff evaluates this application, may by more beneficial. Each of the legislative requests being considered at the study session are expanded upon below. City of Palo Alto Page 5 Extension of Housing Incentives to CS Zoned Properties Along San Antonio Road The applicant requests extending the recently adopted housing incentives to the subject property. This approach would require consideration of a combining district (which does not presently exist) or application of the Planned Community zoning process, which the Council has not been interested in using for a variety of reasons. Alternatively, if there were interest in extending housing incentives to the property, staff recommends the Council consider applying these incentives to all CS zoned property adjacent to San Antonio Road between Middlefield Avenue and East Charleston Road. San Antonio Road at this location is a divided roadway that contains a variety of land uses and zoning. The CS zoned properties extends along the eastern portion of the roadway and borders the City of Mountain View. Heights up to 50 feet are allowed and hotels are incentivized with a 2.0 floor area ratio. Near the project site, a dual branded Marriott hotel is being constructed. Last year, staff considered making a recommendation to Council to extend housing incentives to the CS zoned properties along San Antonio Road. This idea was ultimately abandoned to focus on transit rich areas, but it’s worth noting that the City’s adopted Housing Element encourages housing in this corridor and identifies a number of opportunity sites, including the subject property, where housing is appropriate. The more recently adopted Comprehensive Plan, however, includes a program that would have the City amend the Housing Element to eliminate housing sites along San Antonio Road and focus housing opportunities in the California Avenue area and Downtown.3 While this policy may still have support, staff considers San Antonio Road at this location a reasonable location for housing and anticipates, with the right incentives, that this area could see more housing development. Housing Incentives Should there be interest in extending housing incentives to San Antonio Road as described immediately above, the Council may want to consider which incentives should be offered. Staff generally supports the same changes that were recently adopted along El Camino Real be considered for this part of town with added consideration of extending the floor area ratio to 2.0 due to the higher height limits and surrounding land uses. While there are residential properties across San Antonio Road, the immediate area does not have other sensitive land uses and generally backs up to light industrial and commercial uses in Mountain View. City records show north of this area as having contaminated groundwater or soil, this would be explored further and as necessary, appropriate mitigations incorporated into future regulations. The types of incentives that were recently approved by Council that could apply to 3 Comprehensive Plan Program L2.4.1 Amend the Housing Element to eliminate housing sites along San Antonio Road and increase housing densities in Downtown and the California Avenue area to replace potential units from the sites eliminated. City of Palo Alto Page 6 this area include the following: Waive FAR up to 1.5 or 2.0 and lot coverage through the Housing Incentive Program, which would be an alternative to the State Density Bonus law, Eliminate the 30 units per acre density limit and rely instead on existing height, setbacks and other development standards, Allow rooftop garden area to count up to 60% of the required open space, Exclude the first 1,500 square feet of retail from the retail parking requirement, and Extend provisions that support 100% affordable housing projects. Retail Preservation The City’s retail preservation ordinance was discussed during the Planning and Transportation Commission’s and Council’s deliberation of the Housing Ordinance. This is an area where the City’s interests to support physical retail and retail like uses makes it challenging for a housing developer. The Housing Ordinance recognizes this challenge and does not require parking for the first 1,500 square feet of floor area provided in a mixed use housing project. For sites with substantially more retail or retail-like space, redevelopment for housing becomes less attractive for two primary reasons. First it reduces the amount of floor area that can be dedicated toward housing units, and second, retail area is parked at four spaces per thousand square feet, which adds to the project’s overall construction costs. Staff anticipates that further refinement to the retail presevation ordinance may be needed to stimulate more interest in housing development in areas where the Housing Ordinance currently applies, and along San Antonio Road if extended to this part of the city. There are a variety of options the Council could consider if there were interest in updating this policy, including, establishing a minimum retail floor area requirement; exempting some or all of the retail floor area from the floor area ratio calculation,4 though some other development standard concessions may be required depending on the amount of existing retail floor area; or, expanding the options to request a waiver from all or a portion of the retail preservation requirements for housing projects. The bar to grant a waiver from the retail preservation ordinance is presently fairly high. Given the newness of the Housing Ordinance, it may also be appropriate to collect more information and evaluate how many housing units are being built under the Housing Incentive Program before making any changes. The applicant for the subject property has plans that show the retention of approximately 1,700 square feet of retail floor area, but seeks to exempt this area from the floor area ratio calculation. The applicant has also indicated their interest in requesting a waiver from the retail preservation ordinance to exempt another (approximately) 10,300 square feet of retail or 4 Even if retail floor area were exempt from counting toward the site’s maximum floor area ratio, parking beyond the 1,500 square foot exemption would still be required. City of Palo Alto Page 7 retail-like area existing on the property. Gross Floor Area Definition The City uses the term gross floor area to help regulate the size of buildings on property. The definition states what is included and excluded from this determination. Basements are generally are exempt from gross floor area unless this space is deemed useable by the planning director. The term useable is overly broad and can lead to confusion among planners, applicants, and the public. The applicant’s request to exempt storage facilities and other incental space in the basement from floor area highlights this challenge. Staff supports opportunties to add more objective standards to the code and would consider making some refinements to this code section if this project advances, otherwise it may be addressed when the departments works on its next round of code updates. Next Steps Following prescreening review, the applicant will consider options and determine how they want to proceed. Formal applications and public hearings before the Architectural Review Board, Planning Commission and City Council would be required to advance the proposed conceptual project. Environmental Review This prescreening is a preliminary review process in which Councilmembers may provide comment, but no formal action will be taken. Therefore, no review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) is required at this time. Attachments: Attachment A: Location Map (PDF) Attachment B: Aerial Photograph of Site (PDF) Attachment C: Zoning Comparison Table (PDF) Attachment D: Comprehensive Plan Policies (DOCX) Attachment E: Applicant's Project Description (PDF) Attachment F: Project Plans (DOCX) Building 6 Building 5 Building 3 Building 8 OFFICES Building 9 Building 1 Building 2 Building 10 Building 10 Building 4 Building 7 Building 7 Building 12 Building 11 Building 8 Building 6 Building 9 Building 6 Building 5 Building 13 Building 5 Building 2 Building 14 Building 2 Building 4 Building 3 Building 4 Building 15 Building 1 Building 1 Building 3 H J G M F D E CS CS(AD) CS CS PC-2711 CS RM-15 PC 1 4 1 7 RM-15 -2 CN PC - 4918 SAN A NTO NIO ROAD MIDDLEFIELD ROAD FABIAN STREET SAN ANTON IO ROAD LEGHORN STREET FA EAST CHARLESTON ROAD SAN ANTONIO ROAD COMMERCIAL ST INDU STRIAL AV EAST CHARLESTON ROAD O A D This map is a product of the City of Palo Alto GIS This document is a graphic representation only of best available sources. Legend City of Mountain View Zone Districts abc Zone District Notes abc Known Structures abc Zone District Labels Curb Edge 788 - 796 San Antonio Rd City Jurisdictional Limits (PL), boundary 0'292' 788 - 796 San Antonio Road CITY O F PALO A L TO I N C O R P O R ATE D C ALIFOR N IA P a l o A l t oT h e C i t y o f A P RIL 16 1894 The City of Palo Alto assumes no responsibility for any errors ©1989 to 2016 City of Palo Alto gowen, 2018-08-27 14:54:35 (\\cc-maps\Encompass\Admin\Personal\gowen.mdb) GM CS City of Mountain View Page 1 of 3 ATTACHMENT C ZONING COMPARISON TABLE 788 San Antonio Road Table 1: CS ZONING DISTRICT COMPARISON TABLE Zoning District CS (Existing Zoning) Housing Incentive Program (HIP) Proposed Project With HIP Regulation Required Required Proposed Minimum Site Area (ft2) None Required Not Applicable 43,390 sf Site Width (ft) None Required Not Applicable 234-255 feet (varies) Site Depth (ft) None Required Not Applicable 147-187 feet (varies) Min. Front Yard (Leghorn Street) 0 – 10 feet to create an 8 – 12 feet effective sidewalk width (1) Not Applicable 25 feet Min. Rear Yard 10 feet for residential portion; no requirement for commercial portion Not Applicable 10 feet Min. Interior Side Yard 10 feet (for lots abutting a residential zone district) Not Applicable 10 feet Min. Street Side Yard (San Antonio Road) 5 feet Not Applicable 25 feet Special Setback Yes, 24 feet along San Antonio Road and 15 feet along Leghorn Street Not Applicable 25 feet along San Antonio Road and 15 feet along Leghorn Street Build-to-Lines 50 percent of frontage built to setback; 33 percent of side street built to setback (1) Not Applicable N/A Maximum Site Coverage 50 percent May be waived by the Director of Planning 41 percent (17,887.5 sf) Maximum Height 50 feet Not Applicable 50 feet Maximum Residential Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 0.6:1 May be waived by the Director of Planning 1.5:1 (65,207 sf) 0.02:1 (Basement area not exempted: 852 sf) Maximum Non-Residential Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 0.4:1 Not Applicable 0.04:1 (1,729 sf) 0.02:1 (Basement area not exempted: 852 sf) Page 2 of 3 Table 1: CS ZONING DISTRICT COMPARISON TABLE Zoning District CS (Existing Zoning) Housing Incentive Program (HIP) Proposed Project With HIP Regulation Required Required Proposed Maximum Combined Residential and Commercial Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 1.0:1 1.5:1 1.58:1 (68,641.1 sf) Minimum Mixed-Use Ground Floor Commercial FAR 0.15:1 Not Applicable 0.04:1 (1,729 sf) Daylight Plane for lot lines abutting one or more residential zone districts Daylight plane height and slope shall be identical to those of the most restrictive residential zoning district abutting the lot line Not Applicable Not Applicable Maximum Residential Density per Acre Sites on El Camino Real 30 units/per acre No Maximum Not Applicable 67.8 units per acre Minimum Site Open Space (percent) 30 percent Not Applicable 17,330.5 sf (40%) Minimum Usable Open Space (sf per unit) 150 sf per unit (9,600 sf) Not Applicable 270.8 sf per unit (17,330.5 sf) CS Zoning Notes for Mixed Use Projects (1) Twenty-five-foot driveway access permitted regardless of frontage; build-to requirement does not apply to CC district. (2) Required usable open space: (1) may be any combination of private and common open spaces; (2) does not need to be located on the ground (but rooftop gardens are not included as open space); (3) minimum private open space dimension six feet; and (4) minimum common open space dimension twelve feet. (k) Housing Incentive Program (1) For an exclusively residential or residential mixed-use project in the CC(2) zone or on CN or CS zoned sites on El Camino Real, the Director may waive the residential floor area ratio (FAR) limit and the maximum site coverage requirement after the project with the proposed waiver or waivers is reviewed by the Architectural Review Board, if the Director finds that a project exceeding these standards is consistent with the required architectural review findings. In no event shall the Director approve a commercial FAR that exceeds the standard in Table 4 of Section 18.16.060(b) or a total FAR (including both residential and commercial FAR) in excess of 2.0 in the CC(2) zone or 1.5 in the CN or CS zone. Page 3 of 3 (2) For a 100% affordable housing project in the CC(2) zone or on CN or CS zoned sites on El Camino Real, the Director may waive any development standard including parking after the project with the proposed waiver or waivers is reviewed by the Architectural Review Board, if the Director finds that a project with such waiver or waivers is consistent with the required architectural review findings. In no event shall the Director approve development standards more permissive than the standards applicable to the Affordable Housing (AH) Combining District in Chapter 18.30(J). A "100% affordable housing project" as used herein means a multiple-family housing or mixed-use project in which the residential component consists entirely of affordable units, as defined in Section 16.65.020 of this code, available only to households with income levels at or below 120% of the area median income, as defined in Section 16.65.020, and where the average household income does not exceed 60% of the area median income level, except for a building manager's unit. (3) This program is a local alternative to the state density bonus law, and therefore, a project utilizing this program shall not be eligible for a density bonus under Chapter 18.15 (Residential Density Bonus). Type Required Proposed Conforms? Multiple-Family Off-Street Parking Requirement PAMC 18.15.050 1 space per studio and one-bedroom; 2 spaces per two- bedroom unit 82 spaces (Proposed - 46 one-bedroom units, 18 two- bedroom units) 47 spaces w/out mechanical lifts; 44 spaces w/mechanical lifts 91 total / 84 residential and 7 retail Yes, with use of mechanical lifts Commercial 1 space per 350 square feet 5 spaces 47 spaces w/out mechanical lifts; 44 spaces w/mechanical lifts 91 total / 84 residential and 7 retail Yes Bicycle Parking PAMC 18.52.040 Table 1 1 space per unit/ 100% Long Term (LT) 1 space per 10 units (ST) 1 space per 3,500 square feet (20% LT/80%ST) 64 LT spaces 7 ST spaces 1 ST space 70 LT Spaces 8 ST Spaces Yes Policy B-7.7: Seek to balance increases in costs for business space with the need for rehabilitation and replacement of outdated space in the San Antonio Road and East Bayshore areas. Attachment D - Applicable Comprehensive Plan Policies – 788 San Antonio Land Use Element Policy L-2.4: Use a variety of strategies to stimulate housing, near retail, employment, and transit, in a way that connects to and enhances existing neighborhoods. Policy L-3.4: Ensure that new multi-family buildings, entries and outdoor spaces are designed and arranged so that each development has a clear relationship to a public street. Policy L-4.2: Preserve ground-floor retail, limit the displacement of existing retail from neighborhood centers and explore opportunities to expand retail. Policy L-5.4: Maintain the East Bayshore and San Antonio Road/Bayshore Corridor areas as diverse business and light industrial districts. Housing Element Housing Program H2.1.1: To allow for higher density residential development, consider amending the zoning code to permit high-density residential in mixed use or single use projects in commercial area within one-half mile of fixed rail stations and to allow limited exceptions to the 50-foot height limit for Housing Element sites within one – quarter mile of fixed rail stations. Housing Program H2.2.8: Assess the potential of removing maximum residential densities (i.e. dwelling units per acre) in mixed use zoning districts to encourage the creation of smaller housing units within the allowable Floor Area Ratio (FAR), and adopt standards as appropriate. Housing Program H3.1.5: Encourage the use of flexible development standards, including floor-area ratio limits, creative architectural solutions, and green building practices in the design of projects with a substantial BMR component. Program L2.4.1: Amend the Housing Element to eliminate housing sites along San Antonio Road and increase residential densities in Downtown and the California Avenue area to replace potential units from the sites eliminated. Housing Program H3.1.12: Amend the Zoning Code to provide additional incentives to developers who provide extremely low-income (ELI), very low-income, and low income housing units, above and beyond what is required by the Below Market Rate program, such as reduced parking requirements for smaller units, reduced landscaping requirements, and reduced fees. Page 1 of 4 Explore Real Estate 2625 Middlefield Rd, #101 Palo Alto, CA 94306 650.813.1077 May 2, 2019 Jonathan Lait, Director of Planning Planning and Community Environment Department 250 Hamilton Avenue Palo Alto, CA 94301 650.329.2679 jonathan.lait@cityofpaloalto.org Subject: 788-796 San Antonio Road Letter of Application for a Zoning Text Amendment Request for City Council Project Pre-Screening Mr. Lait: On behalf of the owners of the property located at 788-796 San Antonio Road (Property), we are formally request a Project Pre-Screening by the City Council for a Zoning Text Amendment. Project Summary The proposed project would redevelop the approximately 1.0 acre Property with 64 for-sale 1 and 2 bedroom residential units. Of these, 15% or 10 units would be dedicated for Below Market Rate (BMR) households. The 4-story structure measures less than 50’ above grade. Based on a previous City Council suggestion, the project would provide a 1,729 square foot ground floor retail space. A single level below grade space would provide a total of 91 vehicle parking spaces and room for 70 total bicycles. This residential project would replace two existing buildings with a mix of uses. One building, which is approximately 6,200 square feet, is currently leased by a general contractor to store equipment and materials. The other building, which is approximately 11,500 square feet is shared by a moving company for administrative offices and storage and an exercise/training facility. Page 2 of 4 HIP Discussion With the City’s recent passage of the Housing Incentive Program (HIP) for El Camino Real, we are requesting that City Council consider utilizing the HIP on this Property on San Antonio Road with a Zoning Text Amendment. In 2018, we presented to the City of Palo Alto a pre-screening application for a fully residential project on the Property. The application proposed a zone change from Commercial Service (CS) to Residential Multi-family, 40 units per acre (RM-40). The application also proposed to utilize State Density Bonus Law (SDBL) to maximize the number of housing units. On October 15, 2018, a 54-unit (46 market rate and 8 below market rate, BMR) project was well-received by City Council and the applicant was encouraged to submit a subsequent application that also included ground floor commercial. In January 2019, City Council passed and effective May 1, 2019, various zoning changes to promote the creation of greatly wanted and needed residential units in Downtown Palo Alto and on the El Camino Real (ECR) corridor These changes, including the HIP, are the most significant response to date to the November 2017 Colleagues’ Memo Regarding Zoning Updates to Encourage Diverse Housing Near Jobs, Transit and Services. Specifically, the HIP encourages housing and provides an alternative to SDBL that retains more local control to the City in approving housing developments. The HIP has been called an important step to address the jobs-housing imbalance at a time where the City needs to aggressively adopt pro-housing policies. To avoid falling short of the City’s adopted goal of generating 300 housing units this year (and it is currently anticipated that the City will fall short), the applicant respectfully requests that the City consider a zoning text amendment to apply the HIP more broadly and include the Property. The Property is located on San Antonio Road which is similar to El Camino Real in that each are classified as “Principal Arterials” by Caltrans and each connecting Palo Alto with Mountain View (see embedded image). This Property and others on San Antonio are near transit and employment centers and provide an opportunity to create more housing for the City under locally created rules. El Camino Real San Antonio Rd Page 3 of 4 In fact, the Housing Element identifies the Property as an opportunity site for mixed-use development with 30 dwelling units per acre. This proposal for a zoning text amendment to apply the HIP to this Property creates a greater opportunity for housing in the City. To avoid falling short of its housing goals, the City can do more to “go big” as recommended in the Draft Housing Work Plan by approving a zoning text amendment to apply the HIP to the Property. If the HIP is applied to the Property, we are proposing the new site plan that includes 64 residential units (including 10 BMR total or 2 more BMR than previously proposed) and a 1,729 square foot ground floor retail space. By unit count this is 34 more units than the existing zoning might allow and based on the previous zone change and SDBL proposal, 10 more units total. This represents a 113% greater yield in housing units than existing zoning and 18.5% more than a zone change and SDBL utilization while the site fully conforms to the ECR HIP ordinance. This creates both more market rate and below market rate units to achieve the City’s housing production goals, while the fully complying with the City’s locally created HIP ordinance. Project Details The building presents itself as a four-story form to both public streets with a 29,531 square foot below grade garage level. Following the HIP parking requirements, the project would require 84 total parking spaces. The proposed project provides 91 total parking spaces, 44 of which are accessed with tested and proven CityLift of Oakland stackers intended for residents and the other 47 surface parking spaces include required retail, van accessible, standard accessible and EVSE parking spaces. The residential units are a mix of 46 one-bedroom and 18 two-bedroom units, for a total of 64 units. Of these, 10 will be below market rate (BMR) units. Total residential and common space areas are 65,207 square feet, a total Residential FAR of 1.50. When including the retail space of 1,729 square feet and below grade non-parking spaces (mechanical, retail and residential trash areas, electrical, storage, elevator shaft and stairwells) of 1,705 square feet, the total FAR of the project yields a 1.58 FAR. Based on the descriptions herein, we request the following for consideration from the Pre-Screening of this project: Extension of the HIP to the Property to create greatly needed housing units, one that Palo Alto can accomplish without involvement from State law. FAR Exceptions (2): First, request the Director of Planning’s discretion as outlined in the Municipal Code to omit the below grade spaces from FAR calculations. Second, request to omit the retail space from FAR calculations as a requested community amenity pursuant to the previous Pre-Screening. A reduction in FAR will most likely result in a reduction of residential units. Grant a Waiver to the Retail Preservation Ordinance, a request of such to be submitted independent of this project description. Page 4 of 4 Outline a process to efficiently maneuver the project through entitlements including Architectural Review Board and the Planning & Transportation Committee. We look forward to further engaging the City of Palo Alto on this project and devising an excellent opportunity to address the housing crisis. Best Regards Ted O’Hanlon cc: Yurong Han, 788 SAPA Land LLC Leigh F. Price, Jorgenson, Siegel, McClure & Flegel, LLP Sheldon Ah-Sing, M-Group Attachment F Project Plans Hardcopies of the project plans were provided to Council members. These project plans are available to the public online and/or by visiting the Planning and Community Environmental Department on the 5th floor of City Hall at 250 Hamilton Avenue. Directions to review Project plans online: 1. Go to: bit.ly/PApendingprojects 2. Scroll down to find “788 San Antonio Road” and click the address link 3. On this project specific webpage you will find a link to the project plans and other important information Direct Link to Project Webpage: https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/news/displaynews.asp?NewsID=4575&TargetID=319 CITY OF PALO ALTO OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK May 20, 2019 The Honorable City Council Attention: Finance Committee Palo Alto, California Approval of Action Minutes for the May 6, 2019 Council Meeting Staff is requesting Council review and approve the attached Action Minutes. ATTACHMENTS: • Attachment A: 05-06-19 DRAFT Action Minutes (DOCX) Department Head: Beth Minor, City Clerk Page 2 CITY OF PALO ALTO CITY COUNCIL DRAFT ACTION MINUTES Page 1 of 4 Special Meeting May 6, 2019 The City Council of the City of Palo Alto met on this date in the Council Chambers at 5:08 P.M. Present: Palo Alto: Cormack, DuBois, Filseth, Kniss, Kou, Tanaka EPA: Abrica, Gauthier, Moody, Romero; Wallace-Jones arrived at 6:04 P.M. Menlo Park: Combs; Mueller participated at 6:00 P.M., Nash, Taylor Absent: Fine (Palo Alto), Carlton (Menlo Park) Special Orders of the Day 1. Proclamation Recognizing Public Employees and Individual Service Accomplishments in Alignment With National Public Service Recognition Week, May 5-11, 2019. Mayor Filseth read the proclamation into the record. 2. Resolution 9828 Entitled “Resolution of the Council of the City of Palo Alto Expressing Appreciation to Mr. Menter "Bud" Starmer Upon his Retirement.” MOTION: Council Member Kniss moved, seconded by Council Member Cormack to approve a Resolution Expressing Appreciation to Mr. Menter "Bud" Starmer Upon his Retirement. MOTION PASSED: 6-0 Fine absent Study Session 3. Joint Study Session of the City Councils of Palo Alto, Menlo Park and East Palo Alto Regarding Housing and Other 2019 State Legislation: (a) Update From Palo Alto’s State Lobbyist (b) Discussion of the Councils NO ACTION TAKEN DRAFT ACTION MINUTES Page 2 of 4 City Council Meeting Draft Action Minutes: 05/06/2019 Council took a break at 7:28 P.M. and returned at 7:49 P.M. 4. Joint Study Session With the Parks and Recreation Commission. NO ACTION TAKEN Council took a break at 8:50 P.M. and returned at 8:57 P.M. Council Member Tanaka left the meeting at 8:58 P.M. Agenda Changes, Additions and Deletions None. Minutes Approval 5. Approval of Action Minutes for the April 15 and April 22, 2019 Council Meetings. MOTION: Council Member DuBois moved, seconded by Council Member Kniss to approve the Action Minutes for the April 15 and April 22, 2019 Council Meetings. MOTION PASSED: 5-0 Fine, Tanaka absent Consent Calendar Council Member Kou registered a no vote on Agenda Item Number 11. MOTION: Council Member DuBois moved, seconded by Council Member Kniss to approve Agenda Item Numbers 6-11, including the change as described in the at-places memo provided by Staff for Agenda Item Number 10. 6. Approval of Contract Number C19174560 With R&S Construction Management, Inc. in the Amount of $2,421,544 for the Fiscal Year (FY) 2019 Street Resurfacing Project, Capital Improvement Program Projects PE-86070, and PE-09003. 7. Resolution 9829 Entitled “Resolution of the Council of the City of Palo Alto Approving a Termination Agreement With Hecate Energy Palo Alto, LLC and Approving a Long-term Power Purchase Agreement With Golden Fields Solar III, LLC for the Purchase of Solar Electricity.” 8. Approval and Authorization for the City Manager or his Designee to Execute the Utility Program Services Contract, Number C19171513 With DRAFT ACTION MINUTES Page 3 of 4 City Council Meeting Draft Action Minutes: 05/06/2019 CLEAResult Consulting, Inc. for a Total Compensation of $737,000 and a Maximum Term of Five Years (Continued From April 15, 2019). 9. Approval of the Appointment of Kiely Nose as Director of Administrative Services (Chief Financial Officer), Dean Batchelor as Director of Utilities, and Kristen O'Kane as Director of Community Services. 10. Approval of Amendment Number 1 to the Employment Agreement Between the City of Palo Alto and Police Chief Robert Jonsen. 11. Ordinance 5463 Entitled “Ordinance of the Council of the City of Palo Alto Amending Title 16 of the Palo Alto Municipal Code to Modify and Increase the Citywide Transportation Impact Fee (Chapter 16.59) and Suspend Application of the Existing Area Specific Transportation Impact Fees for the Stanford Research Park/El Camino Real CS Zone (Chapter 16.45) and the San Antonio/West Bayshore Area (Chapter 16.46), and Amending the Municipal Fee Schedule to Update the City’s Transportation Impact Fees in Accordance With These Changes, all in Furtherance of Implementation of the Comprehensive Plan. The Citywide Transportation Impact Fee is a one-Time fee on new Development and Redevelopment Throughout Palo Alto to Fund Transportation Improvements to Accommodate and Mitigate the Impacts of Future Development in the City. This Ordinance is Within the Scope of the Comprehensive Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Certified and Adopted on November 13, 2017 by Council Resolution No. 9720 (FIRST READING: April 22, 2019, PASSED: 5-2 DuBois, Kou no).” MOTION PASSED FOR AGENDA ITEM NUMBERS 6-10: 5-0 Fine, Tanaka absent MOTION PASSED FOR AGENDA ITEM NUMBERS 11: 4-1 Kou no, Fine, Tanaka absent Action Items 12. PUBLIC HEARING: Finance Committee Recommends Adoption of the Fiscal Year 2019-20 Action Plan and Associated 2019-20 Funding Allocations; and Adoption of a Resolution 9830 Entitled “Resolution of the Council of the City of Palo Alto Approving the use of Community Development Block Grant Funds for Fiscal Year 2019-20 Consistent With the Human Relations Commission's Recommendation.” Public Hearing opened and closed without public comment at 9:30 P.M. DRAFT ACTION MINUTES Page 4 of 4 City Council Meeting Draft Action Minutes: 05/06/2019 MOTION: Council Member DuBois moved, seconded by Council Member Kou to: A. Adopt a Resolution allocating CDBG funding as recommended in the draft Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Action Plan and as described in the Staff Report including the contingency plan policies recommended by the Finance Committee; B. Authorize the City Manager to execute the Fiscal Year 2019-2020 CDBG application and Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Action Plan for CDBG funds, any other necessary documents concerning the application, and to otherwise bind the City with respect to the applications and commitment of funds; and C. Authorize Staff to submit the Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Action Plan to HUD by the May 15, 2019 deadline. MOTION PASSED: 5-0 Fine, Tanaka absent Adjournment: The meeting was adjourned at 9:44 P.M. City of Palo Alto (ID # 10153) City Council Staff Report Report Type: Consent Calendar Meeting Date: 5/20/2019 City of Palo Alto Page 1 Council Priority: Climate/Sustainability and Climate Action Plan Summary Title: Adoption of Ordinance to Amend Title 16 (PCBs in Building Materials During Demolitions) Title: Adoption of an Ordinance Amending Title 16 (Building Regulations) of the Palo Alto Municipal Code to Require Management of PCBs During Building Demolition in Compliance With the Municipal Regional Stormwater Permit From: City Manager Lead Department: Public Works Recommendation Staff recommends that City Council: 1. Adopt the attached ordinance (Attachment A) amending Title 16 (Building Regulations) to establish requirements for applicants seeking building demolition permits to manage building materials that potentially contain polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs); and 2. Find the proposed ordinance to be categorically exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15308, Actions by Regulatory Agencies for Protection of the Environment, and Section 15301(b)(3). Background Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) have been detected in elevated levels in certain sport fish in the San Francisco Bay (Bay). To make the fish safer to eat, PCBs sources to the Bay need to be identified and controlled. Urban stormwater runoff is considered a significant pathway for PCBs into the Bay. Accordingly, the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (Regional Water Board) is requiring that Bay Area municipalities address sources of PCBs in stormwater runoff discharged to the Bay from municipal separate storm sewers systems (referred to as “MS4s” or “storm drain systems”). This regulation targets selected Priority Building Materials that may contain relatively high levels of PCBs (due the time of production of materials containing PCBs), especially in buildings constructed or remodeled from January 1, 1950 to December 31, 1980. During demolition, these building materials and associated PCBs may be released to the environment and transported to the Bay by stormwater runoff. CITY OF PALO ALTO City of Palo Alto Page 2 In 2015, the Regional Water Board reissued the San Francisco Bay Municipal Regional Permit (MRP), a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit that regulates municipal discharges of stormwater runoff from storm drain systems of 76 Permittees to the Bay, including those of Palo Alto. The MRP includes provisions that implement the requirements in the PCBs Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) to reduce discharges of PCBs in stormwater runoff to the Bay. The PCBs TMDL estimates that 20 kilograms per year (kg/year) of PCBs enters the Bay in stormwater runoff and requires that this input be reduced to 2 kg/year by 2030, a 90% reduction. The MRP also includes Provision C.12.f., which requires Permittees to develop new programs to manage PCBs–containing building materials during demolition1 to prevent the materials and associated PCBs from potentially being released to the environment and transported to the Bay by stormwater runoff. Although federal and state requirements exist regarding PCBs abatement and disposal, sampling for PCB-containing building materials is not currently required. This MRP requirement fills a regulatory gap in the Bay Area to ensure that PCBs are not released to the environment (analogous to existing asbestos and lead paint programs). The MRP requires that this new program be adopted and implemented by July 1, 2019 (MRP deadline). Discussion To address the MRP requirement, City staff have developed a PCBs in Priority Building Materials Program (Program) based on a model regulation and other documents developed as part of a project by the Bay Area Stormwater Management Agencies Association (BASMAA). This project developed guidance and template materials to assist each of the 76 municipalities around the Bay Area, which make up BASMAA and that must meet MRP requirements to establish this Program. These materials have been reviewed by municipal representatives and members of a Technical Advisory Group, which include industry representatives. Consequently, the City of Palo Alto’s Program will mirror those of other municipalities in the Silicon Valley and remainder of the Bay Area. Program implementation will require submittal of a PCBs Program applicant package and associated components, which involves a Palo Alto Municipal Code update. Staff recommends an update to the Palo Alto Municipal Code Title 16 (Building Regulations) to establish requirements for projects involving the complete demolition of a building or structure. This Program is analogous in some ways to the process currently implemented for asbestos– containing materials. In fall 2018, the City began notifying applicants during the planning entitlement process regarding the new Program requirements to be conducted in tandem with the demolition permit process. The first step is for demolition permit applicants to fill out a Program Compliance Form as part of the Planning Application to determine if the building that will be completely demolished is a 1 Wood-framed structures and single-family residence demolition projects are exempt. City of Palo Alto Page 3 “covered structure2” based on the building age, use, and construction type. It is anticipated that many projects will not meet the criteria to be determined covered structures. Demolition permit applicants for projects that are not considered covered structures will only need to address the initial screening questions and certify that the answers provided in the form are compliant with the City’s Program. This step will be completed during the Planning application process. If a project includes a covered structure, the applicant shall follow the directions provided in the Applicant Package (Attachment B), which includes an overview of the process, applicant instructions and form, a process flow chart, and references a required sampling protocol, Assessing Priority PCBs-Containing Materials before Building Demolition (Protocol). Per the Applicant Package for covered structures, the applicant must conduct an assessment to determine whether or not PCBs are present at concentrations ≥ 50ppm3 in any of the Priority Building Materials. The Priority Building Materials are caulking, thermal/fiberglass insulation, adhesive/mastic, and rubber window gaskets, which were found to have the highest PCB concentrations of all published reports of removal of PCB-containing building materials during demolition activities (BASMAA 2018).4 The determination of PCB concentrations in the materials is made via existing data on specific product formulations (if available), or more likely, via conducting representative sampling of the Priority Building Materials and having the samples analyzed for PCBs at a certified analytical laboratory. Any representative sampling and analysis must be conducted in accordance with the Protocol, and the results of the screening must be submitted for documentation. Sampling results must be submitted as part of the Applicant package with the Demolition Permit application, and a certification statement must be signed by the building owner or legal representative as well as the consultant (if any) completing the Application package. When the assessment identifies one or more Priority Building Materials with PCBs beyond the allowable threshold, the applicant must comply with all related applicable federal and state laws, including potential notification of and reporting to appropriate regulatory agencies, including the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (Regional Water Board), and/or the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC). Additional sampling for and abatement of PCBs may be required. Depending on the approach for sampling and removing building materials containing PCBs, the applicant may need to notify or seek advance approval from USEPA before building demolition. Even in circumstances where advance notification to or approval from USEPA is not required 2 For the City of Palo Alto, covered structures are defined as structures to be entirely demolished and were built or remodeled from January 1, 1950 to December 31, 1980. Wood- framed structures and single-family and two-family residence demolition projects being exempt. 3 MRP Provision C.12.f states: “Permittees shall develop and implement or cause to be developed and implemented an effective protocol for managing materials with PCBs concentrations of 50 ppm or greater in applicable structures at the time such structures undergo demolition so that PCBs do not enter MS4s (also known as storm drain systems).” 4 BASMAA 2018. Protocol for Evaluating Priority PCBs–Containing Materials before Building Demolition. Prepared for Bay Area Stormwater Management Agencies Association (BASMAA). August 2018. City of Palo Alto Page 4 before the demolition activity, the disposal of PCBs waste is regulated under Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). Additionally, the disposal of PCBs waste is subject to California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 22 Section 66262. The focus of this regulation is on PCBs runoff prevention to protect water quality. This means that the materials containing PCBs must be removed before the building is demolished to avoid potentially releasing PCBs to the air or settling on other surfaces, where the PCBs may be blown around or picked up by water, thereby entering the storm drain system and reaching creeks and the San Francisco Bay. The regulation does not: • Ask for municipal oversight or enforcement of human health protection standards. • Ask for municipal oversight of PCBs abatement or remediation of materials or lands contaminated by PCBs. • Establish remediation standards. Accordingly, the City’s program imposes a screening requirement to identify covered structures, require subsequent sampling and obtain a certified applicant package that the requirements were met. It does not include additional PCB-specific oversight beyond the applicant’s completion of the screening assessment. At all demolition sites (whether a partial or complete demolition of a structure), applicants, property owners and contractors must implement routine construction controls, including erosion and sediment controls, per the existing requirements of the MRP and the statewide Construction General Permit issued by the California State Water Resources Control Board, as applicable. Stakeholder Feedback City staff recently received feedback via email communications from Stanford University staff regarding this new Program and associated requirements (Attachment C). City staff subsequently met with Stanford staff regarding their concerns, which include the required sampling requirements and associated sampling protocol; choice of building materials that may contain PCBs; and the requirement to remove PCB-containing materials before conducting the demolition. City staff explained the background of how the Program was developed – through a regional effort led by an experienced project team that involved over a year of meetings with the technical group and municipal representatives as well as outreach workshops and informational presentations at professional association events. Stakeholders, including industry professionals, were invited to provide feedback to all regional template documents, and comments and feedback were integrated before the documents were finalized. In particular, the sampling protocol (protocol) and choice of priority building materials were based on a thorough literature review, and feedback and guidance from the technical advisory group. Regional Water Board staff was involved during the entire process and have reviewed and approved all regional program documents to be used by Bay Area municipalities. City staff intends to make minor adjustments to the documents to make them City-specific and to City of Palo Alto Page 5 provide clarity regarding the application process; however, City staff chose not to create its own protocol and program that would differ from the rest of the region. City staff transmitted Stanford’s concerns to Regional Water Board staff and suggested to Stanford that they contact the Regional Water Board (Board) directly regarding their concerns. At the same time, City staff contacted Board staff directly to help facilitate discussions with Stanford and relay Stanford’s concerns. Board staff wrote back to the City addressing the Stanford concerns. A change was not made by the Board, however, regarding the most fundamental of the concerns – sampling for PCBs. Rather, Board staff acknowledged the concern and stated that they would work with another State agency to resolve it. Should the regional sampling protocol be modified by the Regional Water Board, the proposed ordinance allows the Public Works Director to implement changes to the sampling protocol. The City intends to remain in conformance with the regional program. Stanford did not indicate that they faced an immediate implementation issue when the Ordinance would become effective in July. City Staff will continue to help facilitate a resolution as quickly as practical. Resource Impact The new ordinance requires staff time for the review process. A new municipal fee is under consideration through the fiscal year 2020 budget process to achieve cost recovery. The fee is intended to cover the expected staff time involved in providing guidance to applicants, reviewing submitted materials associated with this Program, and documenting received materials and data. The fee amount will be evaluated and refined periodically. Environmental Review The proposed ordinance is categorically exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15308, Actions by Regulatory Agencies for Protection of the Environment. This exemption provision applies to actions taken by regulatory agencies, as authorized by state or local ordinance, to assure the maintenance, restoration, enhancement, or protection of the environment where the regulatory process involves procedures for protection of the environment as discussed above. The ordinance is also exempt from CEQA pursuant to Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the ordinance will have a significant effect on the environment. Attachments: Attachment A: ORD Regulating PCBs to Implement Stormwater MRP Requirement - Amending PAMC Chapter 16.11 to Add (KRV FINAL Edits) Attachment B: PCBs Applicant Package Attachment C: Stanford feedback 2019050102 1 Not Yet Adopted Ordinance No. _____ Ordinance of the Council of the City of Palo Alto Amending Chapter 16.11 of Title 16 of the Palo Alto Municipal Code to Add Regulations for Management of Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) During Demolition to Implement Stormwater Management and Pollution Prevention Measures in Compliance With the Municipal Regional Stormwater Permit The Council of the City of Palo Alto ORDAINS as follows: SECTION 1. Findings and Declarations. The City Council finds and declares as follows: A.Elevated levels of PCBs have been detected in fish in the San Francisco Bay, making them less safe for consumption. B.Urban stormwater runoff is considered a significant pathway for PCBs into the Bay, and the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Board (“Regional Water Board”), through the Municipal Regional Stormwater Permit (MRP) now in effect, has required Bay Area municipalities to address sources of PCBs in stormwater runoff discharged to the Bay from municipal separate storm sewers (referred to as “MS4s” or “storm drain systems”). C.The MRP requires that permittees, including the City of Palo Alto, adopt an effective protocol and implement a program focused on the demolition of buildings likely to contain building materials with relatively high levels of PCBs. Under the MRP, the program must be implemented by July 1, 2019. D.Consistent with the MRP and a screening protocol resulting from a coordinated regional effort to implement this MRP requirement, the regulations established by this Ordinance focus on projects that involve the demolition of an entire building constructed or remodeled between January 1, 1950 and December 31, 1980 (except single-family homes, two- family homes, and wood-framed structures), as projects that are high priority for PCBs- containing building materials based on structure age, use, and construction. SECTION 2. Chapter 16.11 of Title 16 is hereby amended to add a new Section 16.11.060 to read as follows: 16.11.060 Management of PCBs During Building Demolition. (a)Purpose and Intent. The purpose of this Section is to establish regulations related to the management of building materials containing polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) during building demolition activities in order to reduce the discharge of PCBs into the San Francisco Bay through stormwater runoff. This Section implements the requirements of the Attachment A 2019050102 2 municipal regional stormwater permit (MRP) issued by the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Board applicable to the City. (b) Definitions. For the purposes of this Section, the following terms shall have the following meaning. 1. “Covered project” means a project that involves the demolition of an entire building constructed or remodeled between January 1, 1950 and December 31, 1980, inclusive. A covered project does not include a single-family residence, two-family residence or any wood-framed structure. 2. “PCBs” means polychlorinated biphenyls. 3. “PCB Assessment Applicant Package” means a document package approved by the Director of Public Works and provided by the City that includes an overview of the screening process, applicant instructions, a process flow chart, a screening assessment form, and a protocol for assessing Priority Building Materials before building demolition. 4. “Priority Building Materials” means the following: (i) Caulking (i.e., around windows and doors, at structure/walkway interfaces, in expansion joints); (ii) Thermal or fiberglass insulation (i.e., around HVAC systems, boilers, or heating transfer piping, and inside walls or crawl spaces); (iii) Adhesive/mastic (i.e., below carpet and floor tiles, under roofing materials, under flashing); and (iv) Rubber window gaskets (i.e., used in lieu of caulking to seal around windows in steel-framed buildings). (c) Screening Assessment Requirement. Any person undertaking a project that involves the demolition of an entire building shall submit a complete screening assessment for PCBs in Priority Building Materials with the building demolition permit application. The screening assessment shall be completed in compliance with the PCB Assessment Applicant Package, in a form approved by the Director, and shall provide information documenting the results of the screening, including: 1. Owner and project information, including location, year building was constructed and remodeled (if applicable), description of building construction type and use, and anticipated demolition date. 2019050102 3 2. Determination of whether the project is a covered project. 3. If the project is a covered project, the concentration of PCBs in each Priority Building Material present in the building or buildings proposed for demolition. If PCBs concentrations are determined through representative sampling and analysis, the applicant shall include a contractor’s report documenting the assessment and the analytical laboratory reports. 4. For each Priority Building Material present with a PCBs concentration equal to or greater than 50 ppm, the approximate amount (linear feet or square feet) of that material in the building. 5. Applicant’s certification of the accuracy of the information submitted. (d) Agency Notification, Abatement, and Disposal of Identified PCBs. 1. Applicant shall comply with the requirements set forth in the PCB Assessment Applicant Package including, but not limited to, requirements regarding the notification of other regulatory agencies, as applicable, prior to building demolition. 2. Applicant shall determine if additional agency notification or approvals, or additional sampling for and abatement of PCBs, is required under other applicable law. Applicant shall comply with all Federal and State laws and regulations, including but not limited to health, safety, and environmental laws and regulations, that relate to management and cleanup of any and all PCBs, including but not limited to PCBs in Priority Building Materials, other PCBs-contaminated materials, PCBs- contaminated liquids, and PCBs waste. The requirements of this Section do not replace or supplant the requirements of State or Federal law, including but not limited to the Toxic Substances Control Act, 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 761, and California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 22. (f) Obligation to Notify City of Changes. Applicants shall submit written notifications documenting any changes in the information submitted in compliance with this Section to the Director when changes in project conditions affect the information submitted with the permit application. (e) Recordkeeping. Applicants shall maintain documentation of the results of the Priority Building Materials Screening Assessment for a minimum of five years after submittal to the City. 2019050102 4 (f) Liability. Applicant is responsible for safely and legally complying with the requirements of this Section. Neither the issuance of a permit under the requirements of the Director or Building Department, nor the compliance with the requirements of this Section or with any condition imposed by the City, shall relieve any person from responsibility for damage to persons or property resulting therefrom, or as otherwise imposed by law, nor impose any liability upon the City for damages to persons or property. SECTION 3. If any section, subsection, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion or sections of the Ordinance. The Council hereby declares that it should have adopted the Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. SECTION 4. The Council finds that this Ordinance is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15308, Actions by Regulatory Agencies for Protection of the Environment. This exemption applies to actions taken by regulatory agencies, as authorized by state or local ordinance, to assure the maintenance, restoration, enhancement, or protection of the environment where the regulatory process involves procedures for protection of the environment. The Ordinance is also exempt from CEQA pursuant to Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the Ordinance will have a significant effect on the environment. // // // // // // // // // // 2019050102 5 SECTION 5. This Ordinance shall be effective on the thirty-first day after the date of its adoption. This Ordinance shall not apply to any project for which a complete building demolition permit application has been submitted as of the effective date of the Ordinance. INTRODUCED: PASSED: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTENTIONS: ATTEST: ____________________________ ____________________________ City Clerk Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED: ____________________________ ____________________________ Assistant City Attorney City Manager ____________________________ Director of Public Works Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) Applicant Package DRAFT May 2019 PCBs in Priority Building Materials Program Managing PCBs During Whole Building Demolitions Attachment B 1 Table of Contents Disclaimer ........................................................................................................................................ 1 Overview of Screening Assessment Process ................................................................................... 2 PCBs in Priority Building Materials Screening Assessment Process Flow Chart ............................ 3 Application Instructions for Completing the PCBs Screening Assessment Form ............................. 4 Part 1. Owner and Project Information ................................................................................... 4 Part 2. PCBs Screening Requirement Criteria ........................................................................ 4 Part 3. Report of Concentrations of PCBs in Priority Building Materials ................................. 5 Part 4. Certification ................................................................................................................. 6 PCBs Screening Assessment Form ................................................................................................. 7 Contractor’s Report ................................................................................................................ 9 QA/QC Checklist .................................................................................................................. 10 Priority Building Material Tables ........................................................................................... 11 Notice to Applicants ....................................................................................................................... 17 Agency Contacts ............................................................................................................................ 18 Questions? Please visit: <Future PCBs URL> or contact: Pam Boyle Rodriguez, Stormwater Compliance Program Manager Email: Pamela.BoyleRodriguez@CityofPaloAlto.org Phone: (650) 329-2421 Isabel Zacharczuk, Stormwater Compliance Program Associate Engineer Email: Isabel.Zacharczuk@CityofPaloAlto.org Phone: (650) 329-2585 1 Disclaimer Please be advised that new requirements regarding stormwater control during building demolition for polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) will be in effect starting July 1st, 2019, in accordance with the San Francisco Bay Municipal Regional Stormwater NPDES Permit, Order No. R2-2015-0049. The material presented in this document is intended solely for the implementation of the City of Palo Alto’s regulatory program required by the San Francisco Bay Area Regional Water Quality Control Board Municipal Regional Stormwater Permit for the protection of water quality under the Clean Water Act. Sampling may trigger remediation as regulated by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) or other federal or state agencies. Advanced approval from EPA or other regulatory agencies may be required prior to building demolition. It is recommended that applicants begin the PCBs assessment as early as possible during the planning entitlement stage. This document does not address other environmental programs or regulations, including, but not limited to, the following: polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) regulations under the Toxic Substances Control Act; federal, state, or local regulations for hazardous material handling and hazardous waste disposal; health and safety practices to mitigate human exposure to PCBs or other hazardous materials; recycling mandates; and abatement at sites with PCBs (or other contaminants). The applicant is responsible for knowing and complying with all relevant laws and regulations. 2 Overview of Screening Assessment Process This screening process is part of a program for water quality protection and was designed in accordance with requirements in the MRP. 1 Follow all applicable federal and state laws if PCBs are found in priority building materials. Sampling may trigger remediation as regulated by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) or other federal, state, or local agencies. Advanced approval from EPA or other regulatory agencies may be required prior to building demolition. It is recommended that applicants begin the PCBs assessment as early as possible. See the Notice to Applicants section for important additional information. This document describes a PCBs in Priority Building Materials Screening Assessment process to be conducted by applicants applying for a whole building demolition. A flow chart illustrating this process is provided on page 3. Applicants proposing to conduct a complete demolition of a building must conduct the PCBs screening assessment described in this application package. Through the PCBs screening assessment, applicants will: 1) Determine if the structure to be demolished is likely to have building materials containing PCBs. (see discussion of covered structure in Part 2 of the Form); 2) Determine if PCBs are present in priority building materials at a concentration ≥50 parts per million (ppm); and if so, 3) Follow all federal and state laws if PCBs are found in priority building materials. Sampling may trigger remediation as regulated by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Use the PCBs Screening Assessment Form (page 7) to summarize and certify the information required for a City of Palo Alto building/demolition permit. The form is divided into four parts: • Part 1: Owner and project information—provide as requested. • Part 2: PCBs Screening Criteria—complete the questions to identify whether the project involves a covered structure. If the demolition does not involve a covered structure, the form may be certified and submitted without completing Part 3. • Part 3: PCBs Concentrations—complete the questions to provide the concentrations of PCBs in any priority building materials. Applicants can use the sampling protocol per the Form instructions for reference. • Part 4 certify the information being submitted. 1 A National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit, Order No. R2-2015-0049, issued to municipalities in the counties of Alameda, Contra Costa, San Mateo, and Santa Clara, and the Cities of Fairfield, Suisun City, and Vallejo. San Francisco Bay water quality is regulated by the San Francisco Bay Area Regional Water Quality Control Board (Regional Water Board). In 2015, the Regional Water Board reissued the Municipal Regional Stormwater Permit (MRP)1 that regulates discharges of stormwater runoff. The MRP includes provisions for reducing discharges of PCBs in stormwater runoff and requires municipalities to develop a program to identify priority PCBs–containing building materials during demolition. The City must implement this program by July 1, 2019. Existing federal and state regulations create the framework for managing the removal of PCBs- containing building materials once those PCBs are identified through this program and for disposing of wastes containing PCBs. Note that fluorescent light ballasts, polyurethane foam furniture, and Askarel fluid used in transformers, all of which may contain PCBs, are typically managed during pre-demolition activities under current regulations and programs that require removal of universal waste and outdated transformers. For this process, it is assumed that those materials will be evaluated and managed under those existing programs. 4 Applicant Instructions for Completing the PCBs Screening Assessment Form Applicants applying for a building/demolition permit of a whole building must conduct an assessment to screen for PCBs in priority building materials. The PCBs Screening Assessment Form on page 7 must be filled out and certified in order for the applicant to receive a building/demolition permit from the City of Palo Alto. If the project includes the demolition of multiple buildings, complete one form for each building to be demolished. Part 1. Owner and Project Information Fill out the information for the owner and consultant as well as the project location. For the section regarding Type of Construction, write in one of the following options that best matches the type by which the building is constructed: Wood Frame (lumber or timbers, which make up the studs, plates, joists, and rafters) Masonry Construction (concrete blocks or bricks as the load bearing walls typically with the floors and ceilings constructed with wooden joists) Steel Frame Construction (steel studs or steel columns and steel joists or trusses to support floors and roofs. Includes light gauge steel construction and high-rise steel construction) Concrete Frame (reinforced concrete columns, concrete beams, and concrete slabs) Pre-Engineered (pre-engineered parts bolted together) Part 2. PCBs Screening Requirement Criteria Part 2 documents the determination of whether the proposed complete demolition will affect a covered structure in regard to the building’s age, type and use. If the demolition does not affect a covered structure, then the assessment is complete, and the form can be certified. This determination screens out buildings that are a lower priority with regard to PCBs-containing materials, therefore providing an off-ramp from the rest of the screening process. Question 2.a: Is the building to be demolished wood framed, single family residential and/or two- family (duplex) residential? If YES, the PCBs Screening Assessment is complete. Skip to the certification in Part 4. If NO, continue to Question 2.b. KEY DEFINITIONS DEMOLITION means the wrecking, razing, dismantling or tearing down of a building. The definition is intended to be consistent with the demolition activities undertaken by contractors with a C-21 Building Moving/Demolition Contractor’s License. PRIORITY BUILDING MATERIALS are: 1. Caulk; 2. Thermal insulation; 3. Fiberglass insulation; 4. Adhesive mastics; and 5. Rubber window gaskets. BUILDINGS are structures with a roof and walls standing more or less permanently in one place. Buildings are intended for human habitation or occupancy. COVERED STRUCTURES are defined as buildings constructed or remodeled between January 1, 1950 and December 31, 1980, inclusive. Buildings that are either wood-framed, single-family residential, or two-family residential (duplex) are exempt and not considered COVERED structures regardless of the age of the building. 5 Question 2.b: Was the building (to be demolished) constructed or remodeled between January 1, 1950 and December 31, 1980, inclusive? If YES, continue to Question 2.c. If NO, the PCBs Screening Assessment is complete. Skip to the certification in Part 4. Question 2.c: Is the proposed demolition a complete demolition of the building (as defined in key definitions of this document)? If YES, continue to Part 3. If NO, the PCBs Screening Assessment is complete. Skip to the certification in Part 4. Part 3. Report of Concentrations of PCBs in Priority Building Materials Part 3 documents the results of the assessment of PCBs concentrations in priority building materials. Part 3 is only required for a proposed demolition of a covered structure, as determined in Part 2. Check the option used. Option 1. Conduct representative sampling and analysis of the priority building materials per Bay Area Stormwater Management Agencies Association’s (BASMAA) Protocol for Evaluating Priority PCBs-Containing Materials before Building Demolition (dated August 2018) (hereinafter referred to as the Protocol). Option 2. Use existing sampling results of the priority building materials. Applicants who have conducted sampling prior to the publication of the Protocol may use that data provided it is consistent with the Protocol (e.g., analytical methods, sample collection frequency, Quality Assurance and Quality Control). It is anticipated that prior sampling results will rarely be available, and that most Applicants will need to use Option 1. 3.a Option 1 – Conduct representative sampling Check this box if representative sampling and analysis of the priority building materials was conducted per the Protocol. Complete the applicable tables for each priority building material. Attach the contractor’s report3 documenting the evaluation results. Attach (or include in the contractor’s report) the QA/QC checklist (see page 12 of this packet and Protocol, Section 3.2.4, page 19). Attach copies of the analytical data reports. 3.a Option 2 – Use existing sampling records In some cases, a property owner may have conducted sampling of the priority building materials for PCBs. If such data exist, the applicant may use these data to demonstrate the concentration of PCBs in the priority building materials for the PCBs screening. However, the sampling must be consistent with the Protocol. Complete the applicable tables for each priority building material. Attach the contractor’s report/statement that the results are consistent with the Protocol. 2 See City of Palo Alto’s Online Parcel Reports (http://xmap.cityofpaloalto.org/parcelreports/) 3 See section 3 of the Protocol for the contractor’s report of the findings of the PCBs building material evaluation. Studies have found the highest concentrations of PCBs in building materials in structures that were built or remodeled from 1950 to 1980. For this process, the date that the building was constructed will be used to determine applicability. Applicants can verify the age of the building using the Santa Clara County Assessor’s data found on the City of Palo Alto’s Online Parcel Reports database2. 6 Attach copies of the analytical data reports. Part 3 Tables – Summarize concentrations of PCBs in priority building materials Use these tables to summarize the concentrations of PCBs in the priority building materials. Each page of the table is for a different material. Duplicate the pages as needed to report all concentration data. A blank page is provided. Applicants have the option of submitting PCBs concentration data on other materials in addition to the priority building materials. Testing of other building materials may be beneficial to detect levels of PCBs that may not be accounted for while testing the mandatory priority building materials. Column 1: required for all priority building material PCBs concentrations Use Column 1 to report all PCBs concentrations in the priority building materials. Provide short description of the sample location and concentration. Column 2: only required for PCBs concentrations ≥50 ppm Use Column 2 to estimate the amount of material associated with each sample. Part 4. Certification Complete the certification on page 8. The certification must be signed by the property owner or the owner’s agent or legal representatives and the consultant who completed the application form. 7 PCBs Screening Assessment Form This screening process is part of a program for water quality protection and was designed in accordance with requirements in the Bay Area regional municipal stormwater NPDES permit (referred to as the Municipal Regional Permit). This process does not address other environmental programs or regulations (e.g., PCBs regulations under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA); federal, state, or local regulations for hazardous material handling and hazardous waste disposal; health and safety practices to mitigate human exposure to PCBs or other hazardous materials; recycling mandates; or abatement at sites with PCBs or other contaminants). The applicant is responsible for knowing and complying with all relevant laws and regulations. See Notices to Applicants section in the Applicant Instructions and at the end of this form. Complete all applicable parts of the PCBs Screening Assessment Form, and submit with the building/demolition permit application. All Applicants must complete Part 1, Part 2, and Part 4. Part 3 must be filled out by those applicants required to sample priority building materials per the Protocol. Part 1. Owner/Consultant and Project Information Owner Information Name Address City State Zip Code Contact (Agent) Phone Email Consultant Information Firm Name Address City State Zip Code Contact Name Phone Email Project Location Address City State Zip Code APN (s) Year Building was Built Type of Construction Estimated Demolition Date For City Staff Use Only Date Received Permit # 8 All applicants deemed to be demolishing covered structures (per Part 2) must complete Part 3 and provide required supporting documents. Part 3. Report of Concentrations of PCBs in Priority Building Materials Option 1. Applicants conducted representative sampling and analysis of the priority building materials per the Protocol (BASMAA, August 2018). Option 2. Applicants possess existing sample results that are consistent with the Protocol. 3.a Select option from above and report PCBs concentrations in the priority building materials and the source of data for each of the priority building materials. Provide the required supporting information. Option 1. Conduct Representative Sampling Summarize results in the Part 3 Tables; and Attach the following supporting information: Contractor’s report documenting the assessment results; QA/QC checklist (see page 12); and Copies of the analytical data reports. Option 2. Use Existing Sampling Records Summarize results in the Part 3 Tables; and Attach the following supporting information: Contractor’s report/statement that the results are consistent with the Protocol for Evaluating Priority PCBs-Containing Materials before Building Demolitions Copies of the analytical data reports. All Applicants must complete Part 4. Part 4. Certification I certify that the information provided in this form is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I further certify that I understand my responsibility for knowing and complying with all relevant laws and regulations related to reporting, abating, and handing and disposing of PCBs materials and wastes. I understand there are significant penalties for submitting false information. I will retain a copy of this form and the supporting documentation for at least 5 years. Signature: Date: (Property Owner/Agent/Legal Representative) Print/Type: (Property Owner/Agent/Legal Representative Name) Signature: Date: (Consultant Completing Application Form) Print/Type: (Consultant Completing Application Form) Part 2. PCBs Screening Requirement Criteria 2.a Is the building to be demolished wood framed, single family, and/or two-family residential? Yes No If the answer to Questions 2.a is Yes, the PCBs Screening Assessment is complete, skip to Part 4. If the answer is No, continue to Question 2.b. 2.b Was the building (to be demolished) constructed or remodeled between January 1, 1950 and December 31, 1980, inclusive? Yes No If the answer is Yes, continue to Question 2.c. If the answer to Questions 2.b is No, the PCBs Screening Assessment is complete, skip to Part 4. 2.c Is the proposed demolition a complete demolition of the building? Yes No If the answer to Questions 2.c is No, the PCBs Screening Assessment is complete, skip to Part 4. If the answer is Yes, continue to Part 3. 9 Contractor’s Report from Pre-demolition Building Survey for PCBs PROJECT INFORMATION Property Address: ______________________________________ Construction Type: Concrete frame Masonry Steel frame Pre-engineered Wood frame Other: ________________ __________ Year of construction start: _______ APN (List all if there are multiple): ______________ Contractor/Consultant Information: Name: __________________________________________ Address: _________________________________________ Telephone: ___________________ ____________________ Email: ________________________ ___________________ Property Owner/Representative Information: Name: __________________________________________ Address: ________________________________________ Telephone: ________________________ ______________ Email: ____________________________ ______________ PCBS SCREENING ASSESSMENT AND SURVEY Date(s) that the PCBs building survey was conducted: __________________________________ Certified laboratory name: ____________________________________ Location of lab: _____________________________________________ Contact name: _____________________________________________ Telephone: _______________________________________________ Email: ___________________________________________________ Description of the survey methods, including sampling procedures, number of samples collected, sample identification numbers, types of materials sampled, and descriptions of sample locations (attach maps): ___________________________________________________________________________________ __ _________________________________________________________________________________ ___ ________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________ Summary of the testing results, including PCBs concentration in each sample of priority building material that was collected. Also include the estimated amount of material (1. linear feet for caulking or rubber window gaskets; 2. square feet for mastics/adhesives or insulation) associated with each sample with a PCBs concentration ≥ 50 ppm (this information may be provided by completing and attaching the Part 3 Tables from the Applicant Package): Check boxes to indicate that the following documents are attached: Analytical laboratory reports. QA/QC checklist If filled out by contractor, Part 3 Tables from this Applicant Package (as applicable). Otherwise, applicant shall submit Part 3 Tables. 10 Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QA/QC) Checklist For this program, general QA/QC procedures will be utilized. The following checklist shall be used by the contractor performing the evaluation: Proper specified sampling equipment was used (e.g., pre-cleaned or other, stainless steel); Proper decontamination procedures were followed; Sampling collection spatial frequency was met; A National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (NELAP) laboratory was utilized; Samples were received by the laboratory within proper temperature range; Samples were extracted and analyzed within the method holding time for EPA Method 8082/8082A; and Sample reporting limit met data quality objectives. 11 Duplicate page if additional space is needed. Part 3. Priority Building Material: Caulk Column 1. Report all PCBs concentrations for each homogeneous area of caulking area (see Page 31 of Protocol, Section 2.2.2). Use sample designators/descriptions from laboratory report. Column 2. Complete for each concentration ≥ 50 ppm Caulk Application Sample Description Concentration (mg/kg) Estimate Amount of Material (in Linear Feet) Example: Caulk Sample 1 320 48 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 12 Part 3. Priority Building Material: Fiberglass Insulation Column 1. Report all PCBs concentrations for each homogeneous area of caulking area (see Page 31, Section 2.2.2). Use sample designators/descriptions from laboratory report. Column 2. Complete for each concentration ≥ 50 mg/kg Fiberglass Insulation Application Sample Description Concentration (mg/kg) Estimate Amount of Material (in Square Feet) Example: Fiberglass Insulation Sample 1 78 86 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. The area of insulation wrapped around a pipe may be estimated using the following formula: Area (square feet) = 2πrh, where r is the pipe radius (feet) and h is the pipe length (feet). Duplicate page if additional space is needed. 13 Part 3. Priority Building Material: Thermal Insulation Column 1. Report all PCBs concentrations for each homogeneous area of caulking area (see Page 31, Section 2.2.2). Use sample designators/descriptions from laboratory report. Column 2. Complete for each concentration ≥ 50 mg/kg Thermal Insulation Application Sample Description Concentration (mg/kg) Estimate Amount of Material (in Square Feet) Example: Thermal Insulation Sample 1 20 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. The area of insulation wrapped around a pipe may be estimated using the following formula: Area (square feet) = 2πrh, where r is the pipe radius (feet) and h is the pipe length (feet). Duplicate page if additional space is needed. 14 Part 3. Priority Building Material Applications Table: Adhesive Mastic Insulation Column 1. Report all PCBs concentrations for each homogeneous area of caulking area (see Page 31, Section 2.2.2). Use sample designators/descriptions from laboratory report. Column 2. Complete for each concentration ≥ 50 mg/kg Adhesive Mastic Insulation Application Sample Description Concentration (mg/kg) Estimate Amount of Material (in Square Feet) Example: Adhesive Mastic Insulation Sample 1 87.4 800 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Duplicate page if additional space is needed. 15 Part 3. Priority Building Material Applications Table: Rubber Window Gasket Column 1. Report all PCBs concentrations for each homogeneous area of caulking area (see Page 31, Section 2.2.2). Use sample designators/descriptions from laboratory report. Column 2. Complete for each concentration ≥ 50 mg/kg Rubber Window Gasket Application Sample Description Concentration (mg/kg) Estimate Amount of Material (in Linear Feet) Example: Window Gasket Insulation Sample 1 70 75 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Duplicate page if additional space is needed. 16 Part 3. Priority Building Materials Table: Other Column 1. Optional: Use this form to report PCBs concentration data from materials other than priority building materials. Report PCBs concentrations for each material and homogeneous area. Use sample designators/descriptions from laboratory report. Column 2. Complete for each concentration ≥ 50 mg/kg Material Sample Description Concentration (mg/kg) Estimate Amount of Material (units vary) Example: Wall paint Sample 1 228 1500 Square Feet 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Duplicate page if additional space is needed. 17 Notice to Applicants Regarding Federal and State PCBs Regulations Applicants that determine PCBs exist in priority building materials must follow applicable federal and state laws. This may include reporting to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board, and the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC). These agencies may require additional sampling and abatement of PCBs. Depending on the approach for sampling and removing building materials containing PCBs, applicants may need to notify or seek advance approval from EPA before building demolition. Even in circumstances where advance notification to or approval from EPA is not required before the demolition activity, the disposal of PCBs waste is regulated under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). Additionally, the disposal of PCBs waste is subject to California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 22, Section Division 4.5, Chapter 12: Standards Applicable to Hazardous Waste Generators. Building owners and employers should consider worker and public safety during work involving hazardous materials and wastes including PCBs. The following is information provided as a reference for applicants. Please note that this does not describe all details an applicant or legal representative is responsible for regarding compliance with all regional, state, and federal regulations. Federal and State Regulations Building materials containing PCBs at or above 50 ppm that were manufactured with PCBs (e.g., caulk, joint sealants, paint) fall under the category of PCBs bulk product wastes. See 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 761.3 for a definition of PCBs bulk product wastes. Building materials such as concrete, brick, metal contaminated with PCBs are PCBs remediation wastes (e.g., concrete contaminated with PCBs from caulk that contains PCBs). 40 CFR 761.3 defines PCBs remediation wastes. Disposal of PCBs wastes are subject to TSCA requirements, such as manifesting of the waste for transportation and disposal. See 40 CFR 761 and 40 CFR 761, Subpart K. TSCA-regulated does not equate solely to materials containing PCBs at or above 50 ppm. There are circumstances in which materials containing PCBs below 50 ppm are subject to regulation under TSCA. See 40 CFR 761.61(a)(5)(i)(B)(2)(ii). Disposal of PCBs wastes are subject to California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 22, Section Division 4.5, Chapter 12, Standards Applicable to Hazardous Waste Generators. California hazardous waste regulatory levels for PCBs are 5 ppm based on the Soluble Threshold Limit Concentration test and 50 ppm based on the Total Threshold Limit Concentration test. See CCR, Title 22, Section 66261.24, Table III. 18 Agency Contacts Applicants should contact the appropriate agencies and review the relevant guidance and information about PCBs in building materials. City of Palo Alto staff are not able to advise applicants on the requirements of the applicable federal and state laws. Agency Contacts & Useful Links US Environmental Protection Agency EPA PCB website (epa.gov/pcbs) PCBs in Building Materials Fact Sheet and Q/A Document USEPA PCB Facility Approval Streamlining Toolbox (PCB FAST) See Information for Contractors Working in Older Buildings that May Contain PCBs San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board Water Boards San Francisco Bay PCBs TMDL Project Water Boards Site Cleanup Program Department of Toxic Substances Control Regulatory Assistance Office o 1-800-72TOXIC o RAO@dtsc.ca.gov EPA Guide to Selecting a Consultant California Division of Occupational Safety and Health (known as Cal/OSHA) CalOSHA Consultations Services o 1-800-963-9424 Cal/OSHA Consultation Services Branch ATTACHMENT C. Submittals from Stanford and Bay Area Council letter and technical critique that Stanford supports Pamela and Phil, Thank you so very much to agreeing to meet with Stanford on this important issue. Stanford is very committed to finding ways to eliminate discharges of PCBs in storm water, waterways and the bay. In advance of our meeting on the 29th, attached are Stanford’s discussion points on this topic as well as a redline version of the proposed ordinance as it relates to the subject matter. We believe it is critical that your proposed ordinance be consistent with industry standards, current state and federal laws and eventually ensure that the screening assessment protocol document is effective and in-line with those requirements. We are asking you not to adopt your ordinance as-is; we understand you have to comply with the July 2019 deadline per the NPDES requirement. We are asking you to modify the ordinance without the screening protocol for now until the screening assessment is reworked and vetted by developers, business owners, building owners, environmental professionals, etc. We noticed that none of these entities were included in the development of the Model Language for Municipal Adoption Programs, where by only municipalities and a remediation and demolition contractors were authors of the document. The screening protocol as written, is unacceptable in many ways and we would like the opportunity to help revise the document so that the ordinance and screening document complement each other under current law. We strongly believe our changes to this ordinance is a good compromise for now. Once the screening protocol is modified hopefully Palo Alto can revise/amend its ordinance to include the revised screening protocol. Please take our changes to the model ordinance under serious consideration before placing your draft in front of council for adoption. We will also provide you with a separate letter for submission to council for their consideration within the next day or so. Please present all of the documents submitted to date by me to you before council as well. Finally, please confirm if your attorney will attend so that we can make similar arrangements. Thank you in advance for your cooperation as we work towards a workable solution in this matter. Respectfully, Annette Walton Attachment C PCBs and Building Demolitions Background: Palo Alto and other Bay Area cities are planning to adopt new requirements for management of priority PCB building materials, such as caulking around windows and doors, adhesive/mastic under carpet and floor tiles, rubber window gaskets, and thermal/fiberglass insulation, during demolitions. The requirements would apply to buildings built or renovated between 1950 and 1980. Some cities will require representative PCB sampling and analysis of these PCB building materials prior to application for a demolition permit. Management of any PCB building materials identified must be in accordance with existing law. The cities tasked the Bay Area Stormwater Management Agencies Association (BASMAA) to develop a model ordinance and screening assessment protocol. The proposed model ordinance and screening assessment protocol seem to presume that PCBs building materials must be removed prior to demolition of the building. Issues of concern: • Under existing law, sampling and analysis is not necessarily required for proper management of PCB building materials. • Under existing federal law, PCB building materials can be disposed of at solid waste landfills and may not require sampling and laboratory analysis prior to disposal. • The categories of materials identified as “priority PCB building materials” for sampling and analysis may not be PCB suspect materials, e.g., adhesive/mastic under carpet and floor tiles, rubber window gaskets, and thermal/fiberglass insulation. • BASMAA sampling and analysis protocol may not be consistent with acceptable industry standards for PCB sampling and analysis. • New requirements include building owner certification of survey sampling methods, but require use of BASMAA sampling and analysis protocol that may not be acceptable industry standard. • These new demolition requirements could affect over approximately 48 buildings within Stanford’s main campus and 52 within the research park (excluding SLAC and the shopping center). Anticipated cost to implement could add tens of thousands for sampling cost and potentially hundreds of thousands in added costs for abatement and disposal. Project delays unknown. Potential Solutions: 1. Focus on best management practices during demolition and PCB sampling of soil after demolition to determine if PCBs are present. 2. Revise the Screening Protocol to be consistent with existing law and industry standards. 3. Change certification to statement on application for demolition permit that demolition will comply with federal and state PCB requirements. 4. Eliminate sampling and analysis of PCB building materials for demolition permit. 5. Consider effectiveness of existing Stormwater controls on controlling runoff, including any runoff containing PCBs, if present. 6. Focus PCB abatement activities on spills/releases at utilities (transformers, substations, caulking in city owned lines, etc.) as the main source and transport mechanism of PCB migration into the bay. Note: Previously provided copies of Critique by Mike Van Brunt and Bay Area Council letter to BASMAA. Other Stormwater Permit PCB Issue: Cities are to create a cumulative listing of all potentially PCB contaminated sites discovered and refer to the Water Board with a brief summary description of each site and where to obtain future information. Concern: This provisions runs the risk of reopening closed cases that have were previously addressed under the oversight of either the RWQCB or DTSC. 1 Not Yet Adopted Ordinance No. _____ Ordinance of the Council of the City of Palo Alto Amending Chapter 16.11 of Title 16 of the Palo Alto Municipal Code to Add Regulations for Management of Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) During Demolition to Implement Stormwater Management and Pollution Prevention Measures in Compliance With the Municipal Regional Stormwater Permit The Council of the City of Palo Alto ORDAINS as follows: SECTION 1. Findings and Declarations. The City Council finds and declares as follows: A.Elevated levels of PCBs have been detected in fish in the San Francisco Bay, making them less safe for consumption. B. Urban stormwater runoff is considered a significant pathway for PCBs into the Bay, and the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Board (“Regional Water Board”), through the Municipal Regional Stormwater Permit (MRP) now in effect, has required Bay Area municipalities to address sources of PCBs in stormwater runoff discharged to the Bay from municipal separate storm sewers (referred to as “MS4s” or “storm drain systems”). C.The MRP requires that permittees, including the City of Palo Alto, adopt effective protocol and implement a program focused on the demolition of buildings likely to contain building materials with relatively high levels of PCBs. Under the MRP, the program must be implemented by July 1, 2019. SECTION 2. Chapter 16.11 of Title 16 is hereby amended to add a new Section 16.11.060 to read as follows: 16.11.060 Management of PCBs During Building Demolition. (a)Purpose and Intent. The purpose of this Section is to establish regulations related to the management of building materials containing polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) during building demolition activities in order to reduce the discharge of PCBs into the San Francisco Bay through stormwater runoff. This Section implements the requirements of the municipal regional stormwater permit (MRP) issued by the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Board applicable to the City. (b)Definitions. For the purposes of this Section, the following terms shall have the following meaning. 1.“Applicable project” means a project subject to the requirements of Section 16.11.060, as described in subsection (c) herein. 2 2.“Demolition” means the wrecking, razing, dismantling or tearing down of an entire building. This definition is intended to be consistent with the demolition activities undertaken by contractors with a C-21 Building Moving/Demolition Contractor’s License. 3. “DTSC” means the State of California Department of Toxic Substances Control. 4.“PCBs” means polychlorinated biphenyls. 5.“Priority Building Materials” means the following: (i)Caulking (i.e., around windows and doors, at structure/walkway interfaces, in expansion joints); (ii)Thermal or fiberglass insulation (i.e., around HVAC systems, boilers, or heating transfer piping, and inside walls or crawl spaces); (iii)Adhesive/mastic (i.e., below carpet and floor tiles, under roofing materials, under flashing); and (iv)Rubber window gaskets (i.e., used in lieu of caulking to seal around windows in steel-framed buildings). 6.“Priority Building Materials Screening Assessment Applicant Package (Applicant Package)” means a document package provided by the City that includes an overview of the screening process, applicant instructions, a process flow chart, a screening assessment form, and a Protocol for Assessing Priority PCBs-Containing Materials before Building Demolition. (c)Applicability. The provisions of this Section 16.11.060 shall apply to any project that involves the demolition of a building constructed or remodeled between January 1, 1950 and December 31, 1980, inclusive. This Section shall not apply to a single-family residence, two-family residence or any wood-framed structure. (d)Screening Assessment Requirement. Any person undertaking an applicable project (“Applicant”) shall submit a complete screening assessment for PCBs in Priority Building Materials with the building demolition permit application. The screening assessment shall be completed in accordance with state or federal lawin compliance with the PCBs in Priority Building Materials Screening Assessment Applicant Package, in a form approved by the Director, and shall provide information documenting the results of the screening, including: Commented [A1]: In years of sampling these types of materials, our experience is that they do not contain PCBs. Where we have found PCBs are in transformers, transformer oil, elevator fluids and exterior caulking. Commented [A2]: The Screening Assessment Package is a tool that need not be specifically identified in the Ordinance, and the Package has problems that need to be addressed to make it consistent with applicable law and industry practice. Commented [A3]: Allow screening assessment consistent with state or federal law. EPA has sampling methods specific to PCBs and guidance for sampling PCB building materials. https://www.epa.gov/pcbs/how-test-pcbs-and-characterize-suspect-materials BASMAA Assessment package can be revised to be consistent with applicable law. 3 1.Owner and project information, including location, year building was constructed and remodeled (if applicable), description of building construction type, and anticipated demolition date. 2.Determination of whether the building proposed for demolition is high priority for PCBs-containing building materials based on the structure age, use, and construction. 3.If the building is determined to be high priority for PCBs-containing building materials based on the structure age, use, and construction, the concentration of PCBs in each Priority Building Material present based on sampling and analysis of the Priority Building Material or application of a general knowledge of the building material (or similar material) which is known to contain PCBs equal to or greater than 50 ppm. If PCBs concentrations are determined through representative sampling and analysis, the Applicant shall include a contractor’s report documenting the assessment which includes the completed QA/QC checklist from the Protocol for Assessing Priority PCBs-Containing Materials before Building Demolition and the analytical laboratory reports. 4.For each Priority Building Material present with a PCBs concentration equal to or greater than 50 ppm, the approximate amount (linear feet or square feet) of that material in the building (see Applicant Package for more details). 5.Applicant’s certification of the accuracy of the information submitted. (e)Agency Notification, Abatement, and Disposal for Identified PCBs. 1.Applicant shall comply with applicable state and federal lawthe requirements set forth in the Applicant Package including, but not limited to, requirements regarding the notification of other regulatory agencies, as applicable, prior to building demolition. 2.Applicant shall determine if additional agency notification or approvals, or additional sampling for and abatement of PCBs, is required under other applicable law. Applicant shall comply with all Federal and State laws and regulations, including but not limited to health, safety, and environmental laws and regulations, that relate to management and cleanup of any and all PCBs, including but not limited to PCBs in Priority Building Materials, other PCBs-contaminated materials, PCBs- contaminated liquids, and PCBs waste. The requirements of this Section do not replace or supplant the requirements of State or Federal law, including but not limited to the Toxic Substances Control Act, 40 Code of Commented [A4]: Insert language from federal PCB bulk waste regulations at 40 CFR 761.62. Federal PCB bulk waste regulations apply to PCB building materials. Commented [A5]: Remove reference to BASMAA Protocol, allow assessment based on existing law and guidance specific to PCBs. 4 Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 761, and California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 22. (f) Obligation to Notify City of Changes. Applicants shall submit written notifications documenting any changes in the information submitted in compliance with this Section to the Director when changes in project conditions affect the information submitted with the permit application. (g) Recordkeeping. Applicants shall maintain documentation of the results of the PCBs in Priority Building Materials Screening Assessment for a minimum of five years after submittal to the City. (h) Liability. Applicant is responsible for safely and legally complying with the requirements of this Section. Neither the issuance of a permit under the requirements of the Director or Building Department, nor the compliance with the requirements of this Section or with any condition imposed by the issuing authority, shall relieve any person from responsibility for damage to persons or property resulting there from, or as otherwise imposed by law, nor impose any liability upon the City for damages to persons or property. SECTION 3. If any section, subsection, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion or sections of the Ordinance. The Council hereby declares that it should have adopted the Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. SECTION 4. The Council finds that this Ordinance is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15308, Actions by Regulatory Agencies for Protection of the Environment. This exemption applies to actions taken by regulatory agencies, as authorized by state or local ordinance, to assure the maintenance, restoration, enhancement, or protection of the environment where the regulatory process involves procedures for protection of the environment. The Ordinance is also exempt from CEQA pursuant to Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the Ordinance will have a significant effect on the environment. SECTION 5. This Ordinance shall be effective on July 1, 2019. This Ordinance shall not apply to any project for which a complete building demolition permit application has been submitted as of the effective date of the Ordinance. INTRODUCED: PASSED: AYES: 6 ABSENT: ABSTENTIONS: ATTEST: _________________________________ _________________________________ City Clerk Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED: _________________________________ _________________________________ Assistant City Attorney City Manager _________________________________ Director of Public Works _________________________________ Director of Administrative Services March 25, 2019 James Scanlin Chair Bay Area Stormwater Management Agencies Association 399 Elmhurst Street Hayward, CA 94544 Re: PCBs in Priority Building Materials: Model Screening Assessment Applicant Package” Dear Chair Scanlin, The draft Model Language for “PCBs in Priority Building Materials: Model Screening Assessment Applicant Package” and “Managing PCBs- Containing Building Materials during Demolition” (“Model Language”) was recently brought to our attention. We urge you to modify the means by which PCBs in building materials may be identified to include all procedures authorized under State and Federal law, including “general knowledge of the waste stream (or similar material) which is known to contain PCBs…”, as provided under U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations and permitted under state law. See 40 CFR 761.62(b)(4). By way of background the Bay Area Council has been at the intersection of business and civic leadership in the region since 1945. The Bay Area Council is focused on ensuring the Bay Area is the best place to live and work in the world, including enhancing our environment. In 2016, the Bay Area Council proudly co-chaired the successful Measure AA campaign to raise $500 million for wetland restoration, flood protection, and pollution prevention projects along the San Francisco Bay shoreline. Today, the Council is active in various efforts to improve the health and safety of San Francisco Bay, including participating in the San Francisco Bay Restoration Advisory Committee, the San Francisco Estuary Partnership Implementation Committee, and the Executive Board of the Resilient by Design Bay Area Challenge. The Model Language was drafted to help municipalities implement the requirements of Provision C.12.f. of the Bay Area Municipal Regional Stormwater Permit, established by the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (Water Board) in 2015.1 Among other things, provision C.12.f requires permittees to develop “[a] method for identifying applicable structures prior to their demolition…”. The Model Language under Section 5 of the proposed ordinance, addresses this requirement by establishing a “Materials Screening Assessment” process. 1 Provision C.12.f requires Permittees to develop a new program by June 30, 2019 that includes: “the necessary authority to ensure that PCBs do not enter MS4s from PCB-containing materials in applicable structures at the time such structures undergo demolition.” The proposed Materials Screening Assessment goes well beyond what is required by the Water Board, would create confusion with existing law and would be highly burdensome. Provision C.12.f does not preclude the PCB assessment methods authorized under State or Federal law. Therefore, rather than the highly prescriptive Materials Screening Assessment included under the Model Language, we recommend adhering and conforming to the full range of legal authorized assessment practices. This approach would avoid creating a conflict with longstanding practices and creating confusion if municipal ordinances are not aligned with existing State and Federal law. The proposed sampling requirements under the Model Language are also costly and would be time consuming to implement. The sampling methodology required under the Model Language would add significant cost and time to revitalization projects involving demolition. This burden would fall hardest on non-profit organizations, schools, municipalities and other public entities. The burden would also create a disincentive to revitalization projects that involve even the partial demolition of structures containing PCB building materials. Thus, not only would the Model Language add time and cost to projects, but the burdensome assessment process would act as a disincentive for an owner to demolish a structure containing PCB building materials. EPA recognized this potential in its PCB Bulk Product Waste Reinterpretation and modified its policy to streamline the removal and disposal of PCB building materials in schools and other structures.2 Modification of the Model Language to include assessment based on “general knowledge of the waste stream,” as authorized under EPA regulation and state law, would in no way reduce the effectiveness of the Model Language in preventing PCBs from entering the Bay. Through the Model Language “certification” provisions (Section 8) and state and Federal authority, powerful enforcement tools would ensure the accuracy of the assessment. For example, under Section 8 of the Model Language, if the applicant were to submit incorrect information, the applicant would be subject to the municipality’s authority to “red-tag” a project, bring enforcement actions, or refer the matter to the State Attorney General. Moreover, the applicant could be subject to Federal enforcement if it created an inaccurate assessment. If the applicant failed to make required notifications to EPA or if it disposed of the waste improperly based on the applicant’s incorrect assessment of the waste stream, the applicant would be subject to the full range of penalties under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). Under TSCA penalties may be assessed up to $39,873 per day for non-intentional violations and criminal penalties in the event of “willful or knowing” violations (i.e., penalties and/or imprisonment of up to one year). Therefore, inclusion of the “general knowledge of the waste stream” assessment methodology would in no way reduce the efficacy of the Model Language. 2 In EPA’s PCB Bulk Product Waste Reinterpretation (October 24, 2012), EPA directs management of most PCB building materials and related building components as PCB bulk product waste, rather than remediation waste. In particular, EPA states that “this reinterpretation will allow for accelerated cleanups of PCB-contaminated building material by providing a more straightforward path for disposal pursuant to the 40 CFR part 761 PCB regulations. Speeding up removal and disposal of the PCB-contaminated material is critical for reducing exposure potential, such as in schools or other locations where such PCB-contaminated building materials are currently in place. . . . This reinterpretation maintains existing environmental and human health protections, while it removes unnecessary burdens to allow for more expedient cleanups, thus reducing potential exposures, for example, in schools and commercial buildings.” For the reasons stated above, we urge modification of the Model Language’s PCB assessment procedures to conform them to what is required under State and Federal law. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Jim Wunderman President & CEO Bay Area Council March 20, 2019 TECHNICAL CRITIQUE OF BASMAA WORK PRODUCT TITLED “PCB’S in Priority Building Materials: Model Screening Assessment Applicant Package” And “Protocol for Evaluating Priority PCBs-Containing Materials before Building Demolition” By Mike Van Brunt, Principal, Van Brunt Associates Inc. mike@vanbruntassociates.com 1 The presence of inspection and sampling protocols for Asbestos and Lead shown on pages 3-10 is irrelevant. It doubles the document length and is not important. 2 Reference page 2 key definitions. The 5 listed Priority Building materials show “Thermal insulation and Fiberglass insulation” as separate materials. This is not correct. Fiberglass is one type of thermal insulation. Rock wool and foam are other types of insulation. 3 Reference 3.2.2 Sample Collection Frequency. There are 4 listed building materials: Caulking Thermal/Fiberglass Insulation Adhesives/Mastic Rubber Window Seals /Gaskets These descriptive terms confusingly combine building materials (a product applied to a building component) with uses (sealant, waterproofing membrane, insulation) Building nomenclature is a repeating problem in these documents. The industry needs clear and unambiguous terminology to describe the work and what samples we take. For example, a building component should be a part of a building: Wall, doorframe, window frame, sidewalk, and glazing. A building material is what the building part is made of- Concrete, stone, wood, stucco, metal, glass, rock wool, and fiberglass. 4 Reference 3.2.2 Sample Collection Frequency. There are 4 listed “types of Caulk”. This list is confusing and not accurate. Caulk is a suspect PCB containing material, where the caulk is applied is not important. Window caulk and doorframe caulk should NOT be separated into different types. The most important factors with caulk are if the caulk is applied to a porous or non-porous substrate, and if backerod is present or not. 5 The protocol requires that samples be specially distributed. For exterior caulking or compression gaskets this is generally not feasible for high-rise buildings. The cost of swing stage or other high reach equipment is very burdensome. Recommend the inspector be permitted to sample from accessible elevations or surfaces. Swing stage or high reach equipment may be used at later stages of an exterior repair project. 6 The sampling protocol over relies on the term homogenous. Color and texture are helpful, but other descriptors must be used. For caulks, the width and cross sectional area are important. Many compression gasket window and spandrel seals are wet sealed on building exteriors. Wet seals can mask or hide an original PCB compression gasket. 7 The use of the AHERA field mixed building materials sampling strategy (3,5,7 Rule) does make sense for PCB’s. PCB source materials are manufactured in factories in bulk with QA/QC. 8 Measurements for component content. I recommend the sampling protocol use language such as “sufficient to determine”. 9 The recommended lab accreditation needs to be refined. National accreditation may not be needed warranted. 10 Building components, assemblies and building materials have specific specialized terms to accurately describe them. It is important that the sampling protocol have an illustrated and photographic glossary. This is to ensure that all inspectors call building components and materials generally the same name. 11 I recommend that a PCB lab result database be set up. A database could be used to exclude those building materials/products that are routinely found NOT to contain PCB’s. For example, fiberglass insulation and air cell asbestos pipe insulation, are not, in my experience, suspect PCB building materials. This database could influence regulators to remove these materials from the suspect PCB “list”. I have discussed this concept with three labs and each will consider such a program. One idea is to have all labs charge a nominal fee to input sample results to share with their clients. Another idea is that consulting/inspecting firms could request, and pay for the nominal charge of a lab database. A third idea is that consultants could share basic lab result through trade organization such as ANCEC or the SF Chapter of the EIA. After accumulating 100’s or 1,000’s of negative results for a specific material, the BASMAA protocol can be updated to exclude what has been found NOT to contain PCB’s. 12 Bedding sealants are prevalent in exterior window construction however this type of material use is not addressed in your protocol. 13 Reference section 3.2.1 Sampling Equipment. Distilled water and detergent are not effective for cleaning sticky, tar like caulk and beading sealants from tools or substrates. Solvents such as 2 proponol or Hexane are much better. Recommend the protocol leave cleaning product choice up to the inspector. 14 The requirement for the use of laboratory glass jars is burdensome and not necessary. Glass easily breaks and is difficult to use on a job site. Plastic containers should be permitted. Recommend the protocol leave the choice of sample containers up to the inspector. 15. Reference section 3.2. Similar terms are used to describe 1. Caulks and Sealants and 4. Rubber Window Seals/Gaskets. Refine the term sealant and seal. 16. Reference section 3.2.2 Sample Analysis and Preservation. The requirement to place the sample(s) on ice “immediately” is burdensome and not necessary. PCB’s are very stable and the building materials sampled have been subject to weather conditions over decades. The use of an ice chest on the jobsite is burdensome and not necessary. Recommend that the inspector be allowed to use discretion on when to place the samples on ice. 17. Reference Appendix A- PCB Building Materials Prioritization spreadsheet. This spreadsheet lists wood, soil, sand, sediment, doorframe, concrete, and glazing as a suspect material. These are building materials, but not suspect PCB materials. Certainly these materials can become contaminated, but are not suspect to contain PCB’s. 18. Reference Appendix A- PCB Building Materials Prioritization spreadsheet. “Air Handling systems” are listed as both a “Material” and a “Materials class”. Air handling systems may have suspect materials, but are not suspect materials themselves. 19. Reference Appendix A- PCB Building Materials Prioritization spreadsheet. The “material class” column inputs are confusing and not consistent. The spreadsheet groups caulk, sealant, tape and glue as a class. The spreadsheet groups “Gaskets, rubber” as a class. The spreadsheet lists “electrical” as a class. 20. Reference Appendix A- PCB Building Materials Prioritization spreadsheet. The spreadsheet lists “Ceiling Tiles coated with a flame retardant” as a “Material”. It is not possible during an inspection to know if an acoustical ceiling tile has been coated with a flame retardant. Accordingly, should the inspector consider all ceiling tiles suspect? What is the sampling strategy for this building material? It is considered a miscellaneous material in the AHERA sampling protocol. 21. Reference Appendix A - PCB Building Materials Prioritization spreadsheet How can Concrete, Soil, Sand, Sediment, Wood and Door Frame be assigned a prioritization score when each of these items do not contain PCB’s? 22. Reference Appendix B-Priority Building Materials Photographic log. Photo 4 appears to use incorrect terminology to describe a caulk or sealant joint in a concrete cold joint, or Control joint. 23. Reference Appendix B-Priority Building Materials Photographic log. Photo 5 appears to use incorrect terminology to describe batt insulation in an attic. 24. Reference Appendix B-Priority Building Materials Photographic log. Photo 6 appears to use incorrect terminology to describe batt insulation in a floor assembly. 26. Reference Appendix B-Priority Building Materials Photographic log. Photograph 7 appears to use incorrect terminology to describe rock wool pipe insulation. 27. Reference Appendix B-Priority Building Materials Photographic log. Photos 8 and 10 appear to show air cell asbestos insulation. By its color, texture, and appearance, this pipe insulation would predate the manufacture of PCB’s. Accordingly, in my view, this would not be suspect to contain PCB. 28. Reference Appendix B-Priority Building Materials Photographic log. Photograph 11 appears to incorrectly identify roofing patching material or mastic on a concrete surface. This photo appears to show the black mastic on a mineral cap sheet roofing membrane. 29. Reference Appendix B-Priority Building Materials Photographic log. Phographic 11 uses the term Friable in the material description. Friability is not a typical descriptive term used for PCB’s. The use of a condition assessment term would seem to have little value in the context of this protocol. Clearly a demolition or renovation is triggering the sampling. The PCB containing materials will be removed as part of that process. 30. Reference Appendix B-Priority Building Materials Photographic log. Photographs 15 and 16 use the descriptive words “sealant and gasket” to describe the shown building materials. Gaskets and sealants are different. City of Palo Alto (ID # 10243) City Council Staff Report Report Type: Consent Calendar Meeting Date: 5/20/2019 City of Palo Alto Page 1 Summary Title: Resolution Adopting the San Francisco Bay Area Integrated Regional Water management Plan Title: Adoption of a Resolution Adopting the 2019 San Francisco Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan From: City Manager Lead Department: Utilities Recommendation Staff recommends the Council adopt a resolution adopting the 2013 San Francisco Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan. Background The development of the Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan (IRWMP) is a nine-county effort to coordinate and improve water supply reliability, protect water quality, manage flood protection, maintain public health standards, protect habitat and watershed resources, and enhance the overall health of the San Francisco Bay. On September 12, 2005, Council approved and authorized the mayor to sign the Letter of Mutual Understandings (LOMU) for the development of the IRWMP [CMR:359:05]. The LOMU identified the goals of the IRWMP and outlined the working relationships for a diverse group of water suppliers, water quality agencies, wastewater agencies, storm water agencies, flood management agencies, watershed and habitat agencies, local governments, environmental groups, business groups, and other interested parties. The LOMU partners include: Alameda County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, Alameda County Water District, Association of Bay Area Governments, Bay Area Clean Water Agencies, Bay Area Water Supply and Conservation Agency, City of Napa, City of Palo Alto, Contra Costa Water District, Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, East Bay Municipal Utility District, Marin Municipal Water District, North Bay Watershed Association, San Francisco Estuary Project, San Francisco Public Utilities Commission, Santa Clara Basin Watershed Management Initiative, Valley Water, Solano County Water Agency, Sonoma County Water Agency, State Coastal Conservancy, and Zone 7 Water Agency. City of Palo Alto Page 2 The first plan was finalized on November 1, 2006 and was adopted by Palo Alto via Resolution 8672 on November 20, 2006. The IRWMP participants updated the plan in 2013. The Bay Area IRWMP: • Provides a valuable venue for regional collaboration across agencies • Improves responsiveness to regional needs and priorities • Helps to effectively integrate water resources management activities • Serves as a platform to secure state and federal funding The five overarching goals of the Bay Area IRWMP are to: 1. Promote environmental, economic and social sustainability 2. Improve water supply reliability and quality 3. Protect and improve watershed health and function and Bay water quality 4. Improve regional flood management 5. Create, protect, enhance, and maintain environmental resources and habitats The Bay Area IRWMP document can be viewed: http://bayareairwmp.org/ and the Executive Summary is provided as Attachment B. Securing state and federal funding for water-related projects is of upmost importance to Palo Alto. Funding for the recycled water trunk line from the Palo Alto Regional Water Quality Control Plant (RWQCP) south to Mountain View was acquired through the IRWMP process. Discussion The development of the Bay Area IRWMP was in response to the state’s requirement that grant funds are only provided for projects included in an adopted integrated water management plan. Currently, the Bay Area IRWM Coordinating Committee (CC) is soliciting projects for the region’s response to a forthcoming draft Proposal Solicitation Package (PSP) from the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) for Proposition 1 (The Water Quality, Supply, and Infrastructure Improvement Act of 2014) IRWM Implementation funding. The Bay Area funding allotment for Prop. 1 Implementation is $47,450,000 and will be split between 2 or more rounds. In order to enable current funding from the Department of Water Resources’ Proposition 84 IRWM Grant Program for the downstream work on the San Francisquito Creek, and potential future funding from a new proposal under DWR's 2019 Prop. 1 solicitation, all partner agencies to the San Francisquito Creek Joint Powers Agency (SFCJPA) are required to adopt the updated, 2013 Bay Area IRWMP. The SFCJPA is planning to apply for funding for the upstream project under DWR's 2019 solicitation that is expected to be released in early April. Two other projects benefitting Palo Alto are on the Bay Area IRWMP list. The first is the expansion of Palo Alto’s recycled water distribution system focused on customers located within the Stanford Research Park; the other is a small salt-removal facility which would City of Palo Alto Page 3 improve the quality of the recycled water produced by the Regional Water Quality Control Plant. Resource Impact Adoption of the IRWMP requires no financial commitment. Any project in which Palo Alto may participate would require Council consideration, at which time the resources for such a commitment would be identified. Adoption of the Bay Area IRWMP will enable Palo Alto to be eligible for certain state and federal funding opportunities. Policy Implications Adopting the Bay Area IRWMP is consistent with the Urban Water Management Plan, the Water Integrated Resources Plan, and the Sustainability/Climate Action Plan. Environmental Review The Council’s adoption of the 2013 Bay Area IRWMP does not meet the definition of a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21065. Environmental review will be completed, if required, prior to implementation of any projects developed via the IRWMP. Attachments: • Attachment A: Resolution Adopting Bay Area IRWMP • Attachment B: Executive Summary * NOT YET APPROVED * 6055199 Resolution No. _________ Resolution of the Council of the City of Palo Alto Adopting the 2019 San Francisco Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan A. The State electorate approved multiple statewide bond measures since 2000, including Propositions 50, 84, and 1, to fund water and natural resource projects and programs, including Integrated Regional Water Management (IRWM). B. The benefits of integrated planning for water resources management activities include increased efficiency or effectiveness, enhanced collaboration across agencies and stakeholders, and improved responsiveness to regional needs and priorities. C. State statute and guidelines require that an IRWM Plan be adopted by the governing boards of participating agencies before IRWM grant funds would be provided for water resources management projects that are part of the IRWM Plan. D. More recent state statutes and guidelines require that the Bay Area IRWM Plan be updated before agencies may receive future IRWM grant funding. E. The Bay Area IRWM Plan, most recent updated in September 2013, provides an implementation framework for tracking accomplishments, developing lists of prioritized projects and periodically updating the Bay Area IRWM Plan as conditions warrant, providing funding and resources are available to carry out these activities. F. Adoption of the Bay Area IRWM Plan does not entail a direct commitment of resources and implementation of each project, as such will be the responsibility of the project proponent and any applicable project partners, and there is no joint commitment or responsibility by the Bay Area IRWM Plan participants to implement any or all of the projects. G. The IRWM Plan is meant to be complementary to participating agencies’ individual plans and programs and does not supersede such plans and programs, and adoption of the IRWM Plan does not prohibit or effect in any way a participating agencies’ planning efforts separate from the IRWM Plan. The Council of the City of Palo Alto does RESOLVE as follows: SECTION 1. The Council hereby adopts the 2019 Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan, which can be viewed here. * NOT YET APPROVED * 6055199 SECTION 2. The Council’s adoption of this resolution does not meet the definition of a “project” under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), under to Public Resources Code Section 21065, so environmental review is not required. Environmental review of future projects developed as part of the Plan will be completed, as needed, prior to implementation. INTRODUCED AND PASSED: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTENTIONS: ATTEST: ___________________________ ___________________________ City Clerk Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED: ___________________________ ___________________________ Assistant City Attorney City Manager ___________________________ Interim Utilities General Manager ___________________________ Director of Administrative Services Integrated Regional Water Management Plan San Francisco Bay Area September 2013 San Francisco Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan September 2013 Prepared by: in association with Environmental Science Associates Kearns & West Zentraal 2013 Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan Acknowledgements Acknowledgements Participating Agencies: Alameda County Water District Association of Bay Area Governments Bay Area Water Supply and Conservation Agency California Coastal Conservancy California Department of Water Resources Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Contra Costa Water District East Bay Municipal Utility District Marin County Department of Public Works Marin Municipal Water District Napa County Resource and Conservation District North Bay Watershed Association San Francisco Estuary Partnership San Francisco Public Utilities Commission Santa Clara Valley Water District Solano County Water Agency Sonoma County Water Agency Stop Waste.org Zone 7 Water Agency 2013 Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan i Table of Contents Table of Contents Executive Summary Chapter 1: Governance Chapter 2: San Francisco Bay Area Region Description Chapter 3: Goals and Objectives Chapter 4: Resource Management Strategies Chapter 5: Integration of Supporting Activities Chapter 6: Project Review Process Chapter 7: Impacts and Benefits Chapter 8: Performance and Monitoring Chapter 9: Data Management Chapter 10: Financing Chapter 11: Technical Analysis Chapter 12: Relation to Local Water Planning Chapter 13: Relation to Local Land Use Planning Chapter 14: Stakeholder Engagement Chapter 15: Coordination Chapter 16: Climate Change Table of Contents (cont'd) List of Appendices A- 1: Coordinating Committee Chair and Vice Chair Roles A-2: Coordinating Committee Voting Principles B- 1: Guidance Document for Salt and Nutrient Management Plans B-2: Sonoma Valley Salt and Nutrient Management Plan B-3: Sample Integration Policies B-4: BAIRWMP Climate Change Adaptation: Resources for Policy Development C: Project Template D: Local and Regional Water Resource Plan Inventory E-1: Master Stakeholder List and Sample Messages E-2: Stakeholder Assessment E-3: Agenda for April 17, 2012 Stakeholder Engagement Planning Workshop E-4: Stakeholder Engagement Plan E-5: Summary of Subregional Activities E-6: General Outreach Materials E-7: Materials from Public Workshops E-8: Disadvantaged Community Outreach Materials E-9: Materials for Outreach to Bay Area Native American Tribes F-1: Projects Added to the 2013 Bay Area IRWMP by the Coordinating Committee on May 28, 2014 F-2: Projects Added to the 2013 Bay Area IRWMP by the Coordinating Committee on May 26, 2015 G-1: Storm Water Resource Plans Added to the 2013 Bay Area IRWMP by the Coordinating Committee on April 25, 2016 G-2: Storm Water Resource Plans Added to the 2013 Bay Area IRWMP by the Coordinating Committee on February 27, 2017 2013 Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan ii Table of Contents Table of Contents (cont'd) 2013 Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan iii Table of Contents List of Acronyms ABAG Association of Bay Area Governments ACRCD Alameda County Resources Conservation District ACWD Alameda County Water District AF Acre-feet AFY acre-feet per year APG Adaptation Planning Guide ARB Air Resources ARRA American Recovery and Reinvestment Act ASBS Area of Special Biological Significance AWWARF American Water Works Association Research Foundation BAAQMD Bay Area Air Quality Management District BACWA Bay Area Clean Water Agencies BAECCC Bay Area Ecosystems Climate Change Consortium BAFPAA Bay Area Flood Protection Agencies Association BAFPAA Bay Area Flood Protection Agency Association BAMBI Bay Area Macroinvertebrate Bioassessment Information Network BART Bay Area Rapid Transit BARWC San Francisco Bay Area Recycled Water Coalition BARWRP Bay Area Regional Water Recycling Program BASMAA Bay Area Stormwater Management Agencies Association BAWAC Bay Area Water Agencies Coalition BAWN Bay Area Watershed Network BAWP Bay Area Watershed Plan BAWSCA Bay Area Water Supply and Conservation Agency Bay San Francisco Bay Bay Area San Francisco Bay Area Bay-Delta San Francisco Bay/Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta watershed Bay-Delta San Francisco Bay/Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta watershed BBID Byron Bethany Irrigation District Table of Contents (cont'd) 2013 Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan iv Table of Contents BCDC San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission BDCP Bay Delta Conservation Plan BMPs Best Management Practices CALEPA California Environmental Protection Agency CalPIF California Partners in Flight CAP Climate Action Plan CARCD California Association of Resource Conservation Districts CAS Climate Adaptation Strategy CASGEM California Statewide Groundwater Elevation Monitoring CBOD Carbonaceous Biochemical Oxygen Demand CC Coordinating Committee CCA Critical Coastal Area CCC FCWCD Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District CCCSD Central Contra Costa Sanitary District CCWD Contra Costa Water District CDFG California Department of Fish & Game CDFW California Department of Fish and Wildlife CDPH California Department of Public Health CEDEN California Environmental Data Exchange Network CEP Clean Estuary Partnership CERES California Environmental Resources Evaluation System CEQA California Environmental Quality Act CFS cubic feet per second CIMIS California Irrigation Management Information System CIP Capital Improvement Program CMS Content Management System CNDDB California Natural Diversity Database CNRM French Centre National de Researches Meterologiques Corps U.S. Army Corps of Engineers CPUC California Public Utility Commission CRS Community Rating System Table of Contents (cont'd) 2013 Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan v Table of Contents CUP Conditional Use Permit CUWCC California Urban Water Conservation Council CVP Central Valley Project CWA Federal Clean Water Act CWC California Water Code CWP California Water Plan DAC Disadvantaged Community DAU Detailed Analysis Unit DBP Disinfection byproducts DDSD Delta Diablo Sanitation District DMC Delta-Mendota Canal DMS Data Management System DOC Dissolved Oxygen Content DOT Department of Transportation DSOD California Division of Safety of Dams DSRSD Dublin San Ramon Services District DSS Decision Support System DWD Diablo Water District DWP Drinking Water Program DWR Department of Water Resources DWSAP Drinking Water Source Assessment and Protection Program EBMUD East Bay Municipal Utility District ECCID East Contra Costa Irrigation District ECCID East Contra Costa Irrigation District EDCs endocrine disrupting compounds ELPH Equivalent level of public health protection ENSO El Niño-Southern Oscillation EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ET evapotranspiration EWMPs Efficient Water Management Practices FA Functional Areas Table of Contents (cont'd) 2013 Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan vi Table of Contents FADs functional area documents FCWCD Flood Control and Water Conservation District FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency FGDC Federal Geographic Data Consortium FGDC-XML FGDC’s XML data-sharing standard FIGR Federated Indians of Grayton Rancheria FOB Field Operations Branch FP-SM Flood Protection and Stormwater Management FRWP Freeport Regional Water Project FSSD Fairfield Suisun Sewer District GAMA Groundwater Ambient Monitoring and Assessment GCMs global climate models GDP Gross Domestic Product GFDL Geophysical Fluids Dynamic Laboratory GHG Greenhouse Gas GIS geographical information system HET High Efficiency Toilet HUC Hydrologic Unit Code IOU Investor Owned Utility IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change IRWM Integrated Regional Water Management IRWMP Integrated Regional Water Management Plan JPA Joint Powers Authority JPC Joint Policy Committee LAFCO Local Agency Formation Commission LHMP Local Hazard Management Plan LID Low Impact Development LOMU Letter of Mutual Understanding LTMS Long Term Management Strategy LUD Land Use Unit Demand M&I municipal and industrial Table of Contents (cont'd) 2013 Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan vii Table of Contents MAPS Monitoring Avian Productivity and Survivorship MCL Maximum Contaminant Level MCSTOPPP Marin County Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program mgd Million gallons per day MHI median household income MMWD Marin Municipal Water District MOU memorandum of understanding MPA Marine Protected Area MRP Municipal Regional Permit MS4 Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System MTC Metropolitan Transportation Commission MWA Mojave Water Agency NBA North Bay Aqueduct NBWA North Bay Watershed Association NBWA North Bay Watershed Association NBWRA North Bay Water Reuse Authority NCAR National Center for Atmospheric Research NCCWD North Coast County Water District NCSC Northern California Salinity Coalition NEPA National Environmental Policy Act NFIP National Flood Insurance Program NGO Non-Governmental Organization NMFS National Marine Fisheries Service NMWD North Marin Water District NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NPS Non-point source NRC National Research Council NRCS Natural Resources Conservation Service NSD Napa Sanitation District PCBs Polychlorinated biphenyls Table of Contents (cont'd) 2013 Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan viii Table of Contents PDA Priority Development Area PDO Pacific Decadal Oscillation PIER Public Interest Energy Research Program POTW Publicly Owned Treatment Works PRBO Point Reyes Bird Observatory PSC Project Screening Committee PUT Project Update Team RAP Region Acceptance Process RARE Richmond Advanced Recycled Expansion RCD Resource Conservation District RMP Regional Monitoring Program RMS Resource Management Strategy RO reverse osmosis ROD Record of Decision RWC Recycled Water Committee RWMG Regional Water Management Group RWQCB Regional Water Quality Control Board SAR Sodium Adsorption Ratio SB Senate Bill SBA South Bay Aqueduct SCADA Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition SCBWMI Santa Clara Basin Watershed Management Initiative SCC State Coastal Conservancy SCRWA South County Regional Wastewater Authority SCS Sustainable Communities Strategy SCVWD Santa Clara Valley Water District SDWA Safe Drinking Water Act SFDPW San Francisco Department of Public Works SF RWQCB San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board SFBWQIF San Francisco Bay Area Water Quality Improvement Fund SFEI San Francisco Estuary Institute Table of Contents (cont'd) 2013 Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan ix Table of Contents SFEP San Francisco Estuary Partnership SFJV San Francisco Joint Venture SFPUC San Francisco Public Utilities Commission SLR Sea Level Rise SMCA State Marine Conservation Area SMR State Marine Reserve SNMP Salt and Nutrient Management Plan Solano CWA Solano County Water Agency Sonoma CWA Sonoma County Water Agency SPUR San Francisco Planning and Urban Research Association SRES Special Report on Emissions Scenarios SRF State Revolving Fund SSIP Sewer System Improvement Program STRAW Students and Teachers Restoring a Watershed Project SVCSD Sonoma Valley County Sanitation District SWAMP Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program SWP State Water Project SWPPP Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan SWRCB State Water Resources Control Board TCC Technical Coordinating Committee TDS Total dissolved solids THM trihalomethanes TMDL Total Maximum Daily Load TMDLs total maximum daily loads TOC Total organic carbon ULFT ultra-low flow toilet USACE U.S. Army Corps of Engineers USBR U.S. Bureau of Reclamation USD Union Sanitary District USDA U.S. Department of Agriculture USFWS U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Table of Contents (cont'd) 2013 Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan x Table of Contents USGS U.S. Geological Survey UST Underground Storage Tank UV Ultraviolet UWMP Urban Water Management Plan VOC Volatile Organic Compound VPW Vallejo Permit Water WDR Waste Discharge Requirement WEMAP Western Pilot Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program WICC Watershed Information Center & Conservancy of Napa County WM-HP&R Watershed Management, Habitat Protection and Restoration WMI Watershed Management Initiative WPCP water pollution control plant WRDA Water Resources Development Act WRWC Western Recycled Water Coalition WSIP Water System Improvement Program WS-WQ Water Supply and Water Quality WTP water treatment plant WUE Water Use Efficiency WW-RW Wastewater and Recycled Water WWTP wastewater treatment plant XML Extensible Markup Language Zone 7 Zone 7 Water Agency 2013 Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan i Executive Summary Table of Contents List of Tables ................................................................................................................................ i List of Figures.............................................................................................................................. ii Executive Summary ........................................................................................... I 1.1 Introduction and Background................................................................. I 1.2 Governance (Chapter 1) ....................................................................... II 1.2.1 Coordinating Committee ........................................................... IV 1.2.2 Stakeholders ............................................................................. V 1.3 Region Description (Chapter 2) ............................................................ V 1.3.1 Demographics ......................................................................... VII 1.3.2 Biologic Resources and Water Quality .................................... VII 1.3.3 Reliability: Water Supply - Water Quality - Wastewater Integration ............................................................................. VIII 1.3.4 Regional Challenges ................................................................ IX 1.4 Objectives (Chapter 3) ......................................................................... X 1.5 Resource Management Strategies (Chapter 4) .................................. XII 1.6 Integration of Supporting Activities (Chapter 5) ................................. XIII 1.7 Regional Priorities (Chapter 6) .......................................................... XIV 1.8 Impacts and Benefits (Chapter 7) ....................................................... XV 1.9 Performance and Monitoring (Chapter 8) ......................................... XXII 1.10 Data Management (Chapter 9) ....................................................... XXIV 1.11 Financing (Chapter 10)................................................................... XXIV 1.12 Technical Analysis (Chapter 11) ...................................................... XXV 1.13 Relation to Local Water Planning (Chapter 12) .............................. XXVI 1.14 Relation to Local Land Use Planning (Chapter 13) ....................... XXVIII 1.15 Stakeholder Involvement (Chapter 14) ............................................ XXX 1.16 Coordination (Chapter 15) .............................................................. XXXI 1.17 Climate Change (Chapter 16) ....................................................... XXXIII 1.18 Conclusion ................................................................................... XXXIV List of Tables Table ES-1: Threatened and Endangered Species in the Bay-Delta ...................................... VIII Table ES-2: Selected 2013 Bay Area IRWMP Resource Management Strategies(a) ............... XIII Table ES-3: Potential IRWMP Environmental Impacts by Project Type .................................. XVI Table ES-4: Potential IRWMP Benefits by Project Type ....................................................... XVIII Table ES-5: Bay Area Water Resource Plan types by Water Management Activity and Functional Area ............................................................................................ XXVII Table of Contents (cont’d) Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan ii Executive Summary Table ES-6: Changes in Regional Boundaries since 2006 Plan ......................................... XXXII Table ES-7: Relative Sea-Level Rise Projections for San Francisco Bay .......................... XXXIII List of Figures Figure ES-1: Bay Area IRWM Region ...................................................................................... III Figure ES-2: IRWMP Governance Structure ............................................................................ IV Figure ES-3: Major Cities of the Bay Area ................................................................................ VI Figure ES-4: Development of Regional Goals, Objectives and Suggested Measures .............. XII Figure ES-5: Bay Area IRWMP Implementation and Performance Assessment ................... XXIII Figure ES-6: Water Resources Policies Contained In Bay Area General Plans ................... XXIX Figure ES-7: Stakeholder-based Plan Development ............................................................. XXX 2013 Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan Executive Summary - I Executive Summary Executive Summary 1.1 Introduction and Background The San Francisco Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan (IRWMP or Plan) represents a significant accomplishment in regional water resources planning. The collective vision presented in this Plan aims to address the major challenges and opportunities related to managing water and associated natural resources within the Bay Area IRWM region (Region). It outlines the Region’s water resources management needs and objectives, and presents innovative strategies and important actions to help achieve these objectives. The IRWMP was first completed and adopted in 2006 (2006 IRWMP). This Plan updates and expands upon the 2006 IRWMP, documents progress towards meeting IRWMP objectives, and identifies ongoing regional needs and issues. This IRWMP is not intended to duplicate existing and ongoing plans, but to better integrate these efforts, and utilize the results and findings of existing plans to put forward the projects needed to address IRWMP goals and objectives. This Plan provides a framework to improve collective understanding and to take actions to collaboratively address the many major water-related challenges, needs and conflicts within the Region through the 20-year planning horizon (2013-2033). The array of goals, objectives, selected resource management strategies, and prioritized projects of this Plan represents a collective view of how to improve integrated water resources management throughout the Region. As regional goals, objectives, and priorities evolve over time, this IRWMP will be adapted to meet the changing needs of the region. The IRWMP complies with the 2012 Integrated Regional Water Management Guidelines for Proposition 84 and 1E (DWR Guidelines) published by the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) in November 2012. Financial assistance from DWR and contributions from the participating Bay Area groups and entities funded the development of this Plan. Proposition 84 identified 11 funding areas throughout the state, including the Bay Area Region. Each Funding Area is allocated, based on population, a portion of the $1 billion approved by the voters under Proposition 84 in 2006. Predecessor bonds, including Propositions 13 and 50, also provided incentives for development of IRWM Plans. DWR designed the IRWM planning process to be consistent with the California Water Plan, a statewide water resources planning document which is updated periodically, and intends that IRWM Plans and future updates of the California Water Plan, be integrated further in the future. The Bay Area IRWMP: Provides a valuable venue for regional collaboration across agencies Improves responsiveness to regional needs and priorities Helps to effectively integrate water resources management activities Serves as a platform to secure state and federal funding 2013 Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan Executive Summary - II Executive Summary 1.2 Governance (Chapter 1) Developing an Integrated Regional Water Management Plan that covers all aspects of water resources management across a geographic region as large as the Bay Area poses many institutional challenges. Chapter 1 describes the Bay Area’s IRWMP governance structure, including participating agencies and organizations and their management responsibilities related to water. This chapter also covers the evolution of the governance structure and function since 2004 through to the current update process. During the 2006 IRWMP process, the participants developed and organized themselves into four Functional Areas (FA): 1. Water Supply & Water Quality 2. Wastewater & Recycled Water 3. Flood Protection & Stormwater Management 4. Watershed Management & Habitat Protection and Restoration During the formation of the Bay Area IRWM region, a 2004 Letter of Mutual Understanding (LOMU) was created to allow groups to join the planning effort. Signatories included state and regional organizations, cities, counties, local agencies, special districts, and non-governmental organizations. A full list of organizations can be found in Section 1.2.3. Organizations that adopt the Bay Area IRWMP, similar to the original signatories of the LOMU, are furthering the Region’s efforts to better collaborate and enhance integration of water resources and management. The IRWMP is meant to be complementary to participating agencies’ individual plans and programs and does not supersede such plans and programs, and adoption of the IRWMP is intended to complement participating agencies’ planning efforts. During the development of the Region Acceptance Process (RAP) initiated by DWR to establish each region in 2009, an additional organizational structure was developed based on demographic and geographic divisions. This “subregional” approach was developed to facilitate truly integrated projects with smaller geographical areas and better address the diversity of needs and ideas across the SF Bay Area Region, and provide better local access to the IRWM process. Four subregions were defined—East, West, South, and North— which have since become the focal points for outreach, project solicitation, and integration in the Plan Update. Figure ES-1 provides a map of the Region and the four Subregions. 2013 Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan Executive Summary - III Executive Summary Figure ES-1: Bay Area IRWM Region 2013 Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan Executive Summary - IV Executive Summary 1.2.1 Coordinating Committee The IRWMP Coordinating Committee (CC) serves as the governing body for the Plan, providing oversight of the process, guiding development, and supporting implementation. The CC is composed of representatives from the four FAs—Bay Area water supply agencies, wastewater agencies, flood control agencies, ecosystem management and restoration agencies—regulatory and planning agencies, as well as nongovernmental organizations (NGOs). Meetings are noticed on the IRWMP website (bairwmp.org). Figure ES-2 shows the overall governance structure. The CC operates through consensus-based decision making and has succeeded in reaching consensus on all decisions during the past. If an issue needing a firm decision cannot be resolved via consensus, the Chair or Vice Chair of the CC shall call for a vote (See Appendix A-2: Voting Principles). Figure ES-2: IRWMP Governance Structure To date, various subcommittees of the CC have been established to undertake specific tasks and to develop recommendations that are then forwarded to the full CC for discussion and consideration. These include: 1. The Plan Update Team (PUT) is a subset of the CC, committed to day-to-day management of the Plan Update process. The PUT served as the primary “work group” for the Plan Update. 2013 Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan Executive Summary - V Executive Summary 2. The Project Screening Committee (PSC) was established to facilitate the process of incorporating new project ideas and processing/updating existing projects. They also make recommendations to the CC related to the IRWMP and to future funding applications, such as the Round 2 IRWM Implementation Grant. 3. The Website Subcommittee is tasked with ensuring that the website functions as a reasonable communication and information tool, and is appropriately updated. 4. The Planning and Process subcommittee was established to analyze issues, perform specific work tasks as needed, and recommend potential actions to the CC. 1.2.2 Stakeholders Broad stakeholder involvement is crucial to ensure that the Plan identifies local issues, reflects local needs, promotes the formation of partnerships, and encourages coordination with state and federal agencies. One of the benefits of the IRWM planning process is that it brings a broad array of groups together into a forum to discuss and better understand shared needs and opportunities. A full list of stakeholders that have been a part of the original and updated IRWMP process can be found in Sections 1.2.2.1 and 1.2.6. 1.3 Region Description (Chapter 2) Chapter 2 describes the physical, environmental, social and demographic characteristics of the Region, provides an overview of its water systems, and identifies key issues and challenges facing the Region. The Region is defined by the jurisdiction of the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board Region 2. The Region is expansive, diverse and complex. It includes all or portions of nine counties (Marin, Sonoma, Napa, Solano, Contra Costa, Alameda, Santa Clara, San Mateo and San Francisco), numerous water, wastewater, flood protection and land use agencies, and many NGO and non‐profit organizations. With a population of 7.2 million (in 2010), the San Francisco Bay metropolitan region is the second largest in California, and the fifth largest in the nation. The Region includes three major metropolitan cities and approximately 100 smaller cities and towns (Figure ES-3). Bay Area Fast Facts: Includes 9 counties and 101 cities 5th largest metropolitan area in the United States Home to 7.2 million people 24th largest economy in the world with 3.5 million jobs Home to over 105 animal and plant species that have been designated as threatened or endangered 2013 Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan Executive Summary - VI Executive Summary Figure ES-3: Major Cities of the Bay Area 2013 Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan Executive Summary - VII Executive Summary 1.3.1 Demographics The San Francisco Bay Area consists of 9 counties (whole and partial), 101 municipalities, 2.6 million households and a population of 7.15 million (Bay Area Census, 2010), making the metropolitan region the second largest in California (U.S. Census Bureau, 2011). Currently, almost half of the region’s population resides in Santa Clara and Alameda counties. North Bay counties, including Marin, Sonoma, and Napa, have the lowest population densities and are also projected to change the least in the 20-year planning horizon. During this planning effort, additional research into disadvantaged and environmental justice communities was undertaken. The distribution of such communities was mapped along with the locations of wastewater treatment facilities and flood-prone areas. This effort helped to better identify and understand the environmental burden that these communities may endure. Mapping the locations of environmental justice communities and environmental burdens assists water and flood agencies to identify water resources management projects that may reduce or relieve potential water-related adverse impacts to these communities. Efforts to effectively involve and collaborate with disadvantaged and environmental justice communities are discussed in Chapters 12 and 14. 1.3.2 Biologic Resources and Water Quality The San Francisco Bay Area is a complex network of watersheds, marshes, rivers, creeks, reservoirs, and bays predominantly draining into the San Francisco Bay and Pacific Ocean. The largest bodies of water in the Bay Area Region are the San Francisco Bay, San Pablo Bay, and Suisun Bay. The largest rivers are the Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers which drain into the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta and then to Suisun Bay. Other major rivers include the Napa River and the Petaluma River in the North Bay and the Guadalupe River in the South Bay. The Bay estuary is the largest estuary of the West Coast and one of North America’s most important. It is an environmentally sensitive and biologically diverse ecosystem made up of freshwater streams, tidelands, marshlands, wetlands, mudflats, farmland and other unique systems. The estuary has been designated by US EPA as an estuary of national significance, one of 28 in the US. Bay Area watersheds and their associated habitats provide a myriad of water resource and ecological benefits to both humans and wildlife. Watersheds provide freshwater sources for humans and wildlife; floodplains and wetlands can reduce flood impacts and improve water quality and groundwater resources; diverse habitats allow wildlife to flourish; and vegetation can reduce water temperatures and minimize erosion and sedimentation. The Bay Estuary and its supporting local watersheds, host a distinct natural environment and ecology that includes many important habitats for species of regional, national and international significance. Bay Area watershed habitats include ephemeral and perennial rivers and streams, montane and valley foothill riparian areas, lakes and ponds, freshwater and tidal wetlands, and associated uplands habitats. The Region is an internationally recognized biodiversity hotspot, recognized for its abundance of birds, plants, insects and other species, and known for a high diversity of endemic species which thrive in the Mediterranean-type climate. The Bay Area is home to over 90 animal and plant species that have been designated by state and federal agencies as threatened or endangered (sfbaywildlifeinfo.org 2012, Center for Biological Diversity 2012), including the ones listed in Table ES-1. 2013 Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan Executive Summary - VIII Executive Summary Table ES-1: Threatened and Endangered Species in the Bay-Delta Classification Species Mammals San Joaquin kit fox, Salt-marsh harvest mouse Birds California least tern, California clapper rail, Western snowy plover, Marbled Murrelet, Northern spotted owl Reptiles Giant garter snake, Alameda whipsnake, Green sea turtle, Leatherback sea turtle, Olive ridley sea turtle Fish Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, Steelhead trout, Delta smelt, Tidewater goby Amphibian California red-legged frog, California tiger salamander Crustaceans California freshwater shrimp, Conservancy fairy shrimp, Longhorn fairy shrimp, Vernal pool tadpole shrimp Insects Calippe silverspot butterfly, Delta green ground beetle, Lange’s metalmark butterfly, Mission blue butterfly, Myrtle’s silverspot butterfly, San Bruno elfin butterfly Plants Antioch Dunes evening-primrose, Baker’s larkspur, Beach layia, Calistoga allocarya, Clara Hunt’s milk-vetch, Clousa grass, Contra Costa wallflower, Coyote ceanothus, Few-flowered naverretia, Fountain thistle, Keck’s Checker- mallow, Lake County stonecrop, Loch Lomond coyote thistle, Many-flowered navarretia, Marin dwarf-flax, Metcalf Canyon jewelflower, Bapa bluegrass, Pallid Manzanita, Palmate-braced bird’s beak, Pennel’s bird’s beak, Pitkin Marsh lily, Presidio clarkia, Presidio Manzanita, San Francisco lessingia, San Joaquin Orcutt grass, San Mateo thornmint, San Mateo woolly sunflower, Santa Clara Valley dudleya, Sebastapol meadowfoam, Soft bird’s-beak, Solano grass, Sonoma alopecurus, Sonoma spineflower, Sonoma sunshine, Suisun thistle, Tiburon jewelflower, Tiburon mariposa lily, Tiburon paintbrush, Vine Hill clarkia, White sedge, White-rayed pentachaeta, Yellow larkspur Source: USFWS 2012, sfbaywildlifeinfo.org 2012. In the Bay Area Region, surface water and groundwater quality is regulated by the SF RWQCB. The SF RWQCB classifies the San Francisco Bay and many of its tributaries as impaired for various water quality constituents. The SF RWQCB staff is currently developing more than 30 water quality improvement plans, known as Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDL), to address the impaired water bodies. Water bodies in the Region are listed for pollutants including sediment, mercury, pathogens, PCBs, pesticide toxicity, nutrients, selenium, and bacteria. 1.3.3 Reliability: Water Supply - Water Quality - Wastewater Integration Bay Area water supply agencies manage a diverse portfolio of water sources to meet the needs of the Region: Local Supplies: Local groundwater and surface water (31%) Sierra Nevada Supplies: Tuolumne and Mokelumne River supplies (38%) 2013 Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan Executive Summary - IX Executive Summary Delta Supplies: State Water Project, Central Valley Project, and other delta supplies (28%) Other: Desalination, recycled water, water transfers, and other supplies (3%) The quality of water supplies used within the Bay Area Region varies greatly by source. Mokelumne River and Tuolumne River surface water supplies are of very good quality, with low concentrations of total dissolved solids (TDS), total organic carbon (TOC), chloride, bromide, microbial contaminants, and other water quality parameters. Delta supplies exhibit elevated concentrations of several water quality parameters including TDS, chloride, bromide, and TOC. Delta supplies also exhibit significant water quality variability by location, season, and hydrologic year type. TDS and hardness of groundwater supplies, similarly, vary significantly by basin. Bay Area water agencies are continually striving to address drinking water contaminants of concern through source water protection and advanced treatment strategies. Recycled water, desalination, transfers, interties, groundwater banking, as well as other supply sources are used by many Bay Area agencies to supplement their water supplies. Over 30 agencies in the Bay Area have developed recycled water programs, providing the water for irrigation, commercial, industrial, agricultural, municipal and residential uses. In 2010, the Bay Area recycled almost 10% of the wastewater effluent generated, and supply is expected to more than double over the next 20 years. Bay Area water agencies continue to seek to protect the reliability and quality of existing supplies through innovative water management strategies and regional cooperation. 1.3.4 Regional Challenges Bay Area water management agencies and organizations pursue a variety of different resource management objectives to balance the water needs of sensitive habitats with customer water demands, provide a reliable supply of high quality water, protect and improve water quality in creeks and the Bay, provide flood management, restore watershed habitats and natural hydrologic functions, and ensure that natural resources and habitats are shielded from potential adverse impacts associated with land and water management. Meeting multiple objectives comes with challenges. In addition to the water supply quality and reliability challenges mentioned above, the key issues, needs, and priorities for the Bay Area Region with respect to water resource management include: Regulatory Compliance Challenges: Challenges to achieving and maintaining compliance with applicable regulatory requirements such as stormwater requirements, flood protection permitting and more. Flood Protection Challenges: The Region includes flat and highly developed valleys and bayside alluvial plains surrounded by steep terrain, a geography conducive to sudden flooding. This natural physical setting, and the increase in impervious surfaces due to urban development, puts many locales in the Bay Area at risk for flooding. Financial and Funding Challenges: Water resources management entities in the Bay Area face several financial challenges for regional projects including, among other things, competing costs between existing operating costs and improvement projects, lack of funding 2013 Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan Executive Summary - X Executive Summary to maintain or replace aging infrastructure, and lack of funding to comply with stormwater permit obligations. Environmental and Watershed Challenges: The Region’s water resource management and environmental stewardship challenges often occur when resources are managed for conflicting uses, such as instream flows and municipal water supplies, or land use development and habitat conservation. Effective management requires ongoing communication and collaboration between land and water resources managers and stewards. Dependence on the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta: Many Bay Area water agencies purchase imported water that flows through the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, where long-term reliability is impacted by a variety of issues including infrastructure reliability, endangered species, water quality, sea level rise, ecosystem restoration, political interests and more. Interagency Coordination: Inter-jurisdictional coordination is a major challenge facing water resource management. Municipal boundaries, water supply service areas, and the boundaries of county flood protection agencies rarely coincide with watershed boundaries and can impede implementation of projects. Expanding Recycled Water Use: Expanding recycling water use is important for meeting future demands in the Bay Area; however, some of the challenges include increasing salinity in recycled water supplies, and the cost per acre-foot of water for expanding non-potable distribution systems. Potable reuse is another option for expanding recycled water, but requires extensive public engagement and regulatory support. Climate Change: Climate change is driven by increasing concentrations of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases that cause an increase in temperature and stress natural systems, such as oceans and the hydrologic cycle, resulting in environmental changes that may include sea level rise, changes in precipitation, and increasingly extreme storm events. Coordination with Other Regions: Representatives from other regions are invited to participate in the development of the Bay Area’s IRWMP to provide a linkage between the Bay Area and IRWMPs from other areas, enabling information sharing and communication between the planning efforts. 1.4 Objectives (Chapter 3) Chapter 3 presents the goals and objectives for the Plan, and describes how they were developed. The goals and objectives represent what the stakeholders and the CC have determined they would like the IRWMP to accomplish when its projects are implemented. Formulating meaningful and relevant goals and objectives for the Region required collaboration and collective interaction amongst the PUT, CC and stakeholders. The process for developing goals and objectives for the Plan included review, confirmation and/or modification of the goals and objectives identified in the 2006 Plan, and development of “new” goals and objectives through a collaborative and iterative process. As a result of the process, the following changes were made to the 2006 IRWM: 2013 Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan Executive Summary - XI Executive Summary The number of goals was reduced from six to five. The number of objectives was consolidated from 65 to 35. Objectives that address climate change and integration were added. Objectives for the Bay Area Region were developed to support the goals and are categorized accordingly, as is shown in Figure ES-4. The goals of the Bay Area IRWMP are to: 1. Promote environmental, economic and social sustainability 2. Improve water supply reliability and quality 3. Protect and improve watershed health and function and Bay water quality 4. Improve regional flood management 5. Create, protect, enhance, and maintain environmental resources and habitats 2013 Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan Executive Summary - XII Executive Summary Figure ES-4: Development of Regional Goals, Objectives and Suggested Measures The objectives generally apply to the Region as a whole and are meant to focus attention on the primary needs of the Region. Once the list of goals was developed, suggested measures for each objective were identified to provide a framework for measuring project outcomes and to gauge successful implementation of the IRWMP projects (See Chapter 3, Table 3-2). 1.5 Resource Management Strategies (Chapter 4) A resource management strategy (RMS) is a project, program or policy that helps local agencies manage their water and related resources. Chapter 4 describes how the CC and its subcommittees developed an updated set of RMS for the IRWMP based on the strategies included in the 2006 IRWMP and the most recent set of statewide RMS developed by DWR as part of the California Water Plan Update processes for both 2009 and 2013 (now underway). The intent of this chapter is to encourage diversification of water management approaches as a way to mitigate for future uncertainties, including the effects of climate change. The IRWMP incorporates an extensive range of RMS that includes most of the RMS on DWR’s most recent list, along with some additional Bay Area-specific RMS. The chapter provides a 2013 Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan Executive Summary - XIII Executive Summary brief description of each RMS, along with examples of how these strategies are being implemented in the Bay Area. Table ES-2 shows the RMS that were selected for inclusion in the IRWMP. Table ES-2: Selected 2013 Bay Area IRWMP Resource Management Strategies(a) Reduce Water Demand • Agricultural Water Use Efficiency • Urban Water Use Efficiency Improve Operational Efficiency • Conveyance – Delta • Conveyance – Regional/Local • Imported Water* • Infrastructure Reliability* • System Reoperation Increase Water Supply • Conjunctive Use and Groundwater Management • Water Recycling • Desalination – Brackish and Seawater • Surface Storage – CALFED • Surface Storage – Regional / Local • Water Transfers • Stormwater Capture and Management* Improve Water Quality • Pollution Prevention • Urban Runoff Management • Water Quality Protection and Improvement* • Salt and Salinity Management • Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation • Monitoring and Modeling • Drinking Water Treatment/Distribution • Matching Water Quality to Use • Wastewater Treatment* Improve Flood Management • Integrated Flood Management Practice Resources Stewardship • Environmental and Habitat Protection and Improvement* • Ecosystem Restoration • Sediment Management • Recharge Areas Protection • Agricultural Lands Stewardship • Watershed Management and Planning • Land Use Planning and Management People and Water • Economic Incentives • Outreach and Education • Regional Cooperation* • Recreation and Public Access* • Water-dependent Recreation • Water-dependent Cultural Resources Note: (a) The Selected RMS are from DWR draft California Water Plan Update 2013, except those marked by the “*”, which were carried forward from the 2006 Bay Area IRWMP. 1.6 Integration of Supporting Activities (Chapter 5) Chapter 5 presents potential activities, including planning efforts and efforts to establish policies, that may be undertaken to support integrated water resources management in the Bay Area. An example of a planning activity includes Salt and Nutrient Management Plans (SNMP) developed by stakeholders to manage salts and nutrients on a basin- or watershed-wide basis, 2013 Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan Executive Summary - XIV Executive Summary as stipulated in the Recycled Water Policy (2009). An example of a SNMP preparation process is described in this section of the IRWMP, with the final SNMP and Guidance documents provided in Appendices B-1 and B-2. In addition, policies adopted or implemented by individual organizations throughout the Region can support integrated water resources management by focusing attention on specific important elements. This section of the Plan describes policies supporting integration and development of integrated, multi-benefit projects, and various policy approaches that agencies throughout the Region have undertaken. Example documents which may be useful to organizations in the Region are Sample Integration Policies provided in Appendix B-3, Climate Change Adaptation Resources for Policy Development in Appendix B-4. 1.7 Regional Priorities (Chapter 6) Chapter 6 describes the project solicitation, development, and review process that was used to select and prioritize projects for inclusion in the Plan, and provides the ranked project list. During a “Call for Projects,” stakeholders were invited to submit any projects, programs, and action ideas they thought could help contribute to fulfilling the Plan goals and objectives irrespective of the project’s current funding, level of development, or readiness to proceed. The process to decide which projects to include in the Plan, and how to score them, relied on information submitted by the proponents that addressed a standard list of project criteria based on DWR guidelines. The solicitation yielded 332 projects, which included some projects from the 2006 IRWMP and its appendices, and “new” projects that were submitted and subsequently added to the list by the CC. Of this list of projects, 30 were regional and 123 indicated DAC benefits. A total of 315 projects were ranked and 17 did not comply with IRWM goals and guidelines and were not considered eligible for ranking and evaluation. The CC developed a scoring methodology that assigned projects into three tiers. The review and ranking process was developed to reflect DWR guidelines, limit ambiguity, and be consistent and transparent to participants and stakeholders. The prioritization of projects was based on a detailed two-phase screening process consisting of an initial screening by the sub-region leads, followed by project evaluation and ranking. The process encouraged subregional integration while ranking at a regional level. The review and scoring process was available on the website so that project proponents could be informed about the process and how the The scoring criteria include: Addressing Multiple Goals Integrating Multiple Resource Management Strategies Strategic Considerations for IRWM Plan implementation (regionalism, partnerships and integration) Project Status Technical Feasibility Benefits to DAC Water Issues Benefits to Native American Tribal Community Water Issues Environmental Justice Considerations Project Costs and Financing Economic Feasibility Climate Change Adaptation Reducing GHG Emissions Reducing Dependence on the Delta 2013 Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan Executive Summary - XV Executive Summary projects would be ranked as they completed their templates for project submittal. All projects that were submitted are included on a list that will be updated as projects are developed, or modified over time and re-prioritized. The ranked list is presented in Chapter 6, Table 6-2 or can be found at: http://bairwmp.org/docs/2013-bairwm-plan-update/Active%20Project%20List_scored_2012.pdf 1.8 Impacts and Benefits (Chapter 7) Chapter 7 describes the potential impacts and benefits of IRWMP implementation. This includes impacts and benefits within and between regions, and those potentially affecting disadvantaged and Native American Tribal communities. The chapter provides a screening-level analysis of the impacts and benefits of implementing the IRWMP, which will serve as a benchmark to help IRWM planners assess whether the anticipated benefits of the IRWMP have been realized, and/or unanticipated impacts have occurred. For the purposes of characterizing potential impacts and benefits of IRWMP implementation, a list of project categories and types (based in part on RMS identified in Chapter 4 and projects submitted for consideration as part of the IRWMP update process) was developed. Potential impacts, benefits, and interregional effects were identified for each project type within each category. Table ES-3 and Table ES-4 list the impacts and benefits identified by the Region and associated with the project types identified in Chapter 7. Impacts and benefits will be analyzed in more detail prior to implementation of specific projects. As project concepts are further developed and advanced for approval, detailed environmental impact assessments will be conducted in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and, if applicable, the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). 2013 Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan Executive Summary - XVI Executive Summary Table ES-3: Potential IRWMP Environmental Impacts by Project Type Impact Category Land Use Water Resources Biological Resources Air and Energy De l t a w a t e r a n d b i o l o g i c a l re s o u r c e s Project Categories and Type Ag r i c u l t u r e La n d U s e C o m p a t i b i l i t y Re c r e a t i o n Ha z a r d o u s M a t e r i a l s Cu l t u r a l R e s o u r c e s Gr o w t h I n d u c e m e n t Po t e n t i a l Su r f a c e W a t e r Gr o u n d w a t e r Wa t e r Q u a l i t y Fl o o d i n g Aq u a t i c R e s o u r c e s Te r r e s t r i a l R e s o u r c e s Po l l u t a n t E m i s s i o n s Gr e e n h o u s e G a s Em i s s i o n s En e r g y U s e Water Conservation and Demand Management Agricultural and Urban Water Use Efficiency Water Supply Enhancement Infrastructure Reliability Surface Water Supply Groundwater Management Water Reuse Stormwater Capture Desalination Water Quality Protection and Improvement Water, Wastewater Treatment Facilities Pollution Prevention and Runoff Management Aquifer Remediation Salt and Salinity Management Watershed Management Watershed Erosion Control, Land Stewardship Habitat Protection and Restoration Habitat Protection and Improvement Ecosystem Restoration and Wetland Creation 2013 Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan Executive Summary - XVII Executive Summary Impact Category Land Use Water Resources Biological Resources Air and Energy De l t a w a t e r a n d b i o l o g i c a l re s o u r c e s Project Categories and Type Ag r i c u l t u r e La n d U s e C o m p a t i b i l i t y Re c r e a t i o n Ha z a r d o u s M a t e r i a l s Cu l t u r a l R e s o u r c e s Gr o w t h I n d u c e m e n t Po t e n t i a l Su r f a c e W a t e r Gr o u n d w a t e r Wa t e r Q u a l i t y Fl o o d i n g Aq u a t i c R e s o u r c e s Te r r e s t r i a l R e s o u r c e s Po l l u t a n t E m i s s i o n s Gr e e n h o u s e G a s Em i s s i o n s En e r g y U s e Flood and SLR Hazard Management Flood Hazard Management SLR Hazard Management Public Access, Recreation and Uses Water Dependant Recreation, Trails, etc. 2013 Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan Executive Summary - XVIII Executive Summary Table ES-4: Potential IRWMP Benefits by Project Type Project Categories and Type Benefit Category Water Supply Reliability Water Quality Integrated Flood Management Climate Change Response Environmental Stewardship Community Involvement and Public Use Re d u c e t o t a l w a t e r d e m a n d t h r o u g h w a t e r us e ef f i c i e n c y Re d u c e p o t a b l e w a t e r d e m a n d Ex p a n d u s e o f r e c y c l e d w a t e r Ex p a n d s t o r m w a t e r r e u s e Di v e r s i t y r e g i o n a l w a t e r m g m t p o r t f o l i o In c r e a s e s t o r a g e o r c o n v e y a n c e c a p a c i t y In c r e a s e a q u i f e r r e c h a r g e Pr o t e c t o r i m p r o v e s u r f a c e w a t e r q u a l i t y Pr o t e c t o r im p r o v e g r o u n d w a t e r q u a l i t y Im p r o v e d r i n k i n g w a t e r q u a l i t y Im p r o v e w a s t e w a t e r t r e a t m e n t Im p r o v e s t o r m w a t e r q u a l i t y Re s p o n d t o s a l i n i t y i s s u e s Pr e v e n t n u t r i e n t l o a d i n g Re d u c e r i s k o f f l o o d i n g Re s t o r e f l o o d p l a i n s Im p r o v e f l o o d c t r l t h r o u g h w e t l a n d re s t o r a t i o n, p r o t e c t i o n Re d u c e s t o r m w a t e r r u n o f f t h r o u g h i m p r o v e d in f i l t r a t i o n Re d u c e e n e r g y c o n s u m p t i o n a n d G H G em i s s i o n s Pr e p a r e f o r s e a l e v e l r i s e , h i g h e r t i d a l s u r g e s Pr e p a r e f o r e x t r e m e c l i m a t e e v e n t s , a n d dr o u g h t Co n t r i b u t e t o c a r b o n s e q u e s t r a t i o n Pr o t e c t e x i st i n g h i g h q u a l i t y h a b i t a t Re s t o r e i m p a i r e d h a b i t a t Pr o m o t e r e c o v e r y o f t h r e a t e n e d a n d en d a n g e r e d s p e c i e s Pr o v i d e w a t e r f o r a q u a t i c h a b i t a t Ma n a g e p e s t s a n d i n v a s i v e s p e c i e s Pr o m o t e e n e r g y e f f i c i e n c y , u s e o f r e n e w a b l e en e r g y Po t e n t i a l t o b e n e f i t a d i s a d v a n ta g e d co m m u n i t y Pr o t e c t c u l t u r a l r e s o u r c e s Pr o m o t e c o m m u n i t y o u t r e a c h , e d u c a t i o n an d s t e w a r d s h i p Pr o m o t e p u b l i c a c c e s s , w a t e r -or i e n t e d re c r e a t i o n Water Conservation and Demand Management Agricultural and urban use efficiency Water Supply Enhancement Infrastructure Reliability Surface Water Supply Groundwater Management Water Reuse Stormwater Capture Desalination 2013 Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan Executive Summary - XIX Executive Summary Project Categories and Type Benefit Category Water Supply Reliability Water Quality Integrated Flood Management Climate Change Response Environmental Stewardship Community Involvement and Public Use Re d u c e t o t a l w a t e r d e m a n d t h r o u g h w a t e r us e ef f i c i e n c y Re d u c e p o t a b l e w a t e r d e m a n d Ex p a n d u s e o f r e c y c l e d w a t e r Ex p a n d s t o r m w a t e r r e u s e Di v e r s i t y r e g i o n a l w a t e r m g m t p o r t f o l i o In c r e a s e s t o r a g e o r c o n v e y a n c e c a p a c i t y In c r e a s e a q u i f e r r e c h a r g e Pr o t e c t o r i m p r o v e s u r f a c e w a t e r q u a l i t y Pr o t e c t o r im p r o v e g r o u n d w a t e r q u a l i t y Im p r o v e d r i n k i n g w a t e r q u a l i t y Im p r o v e w a s t e w a t e r t r e a t m e n t Im p r o v e s t o r m w a t e r q u a l i t y Re s p o n d t o s a l i n i t y i s s u e s Pr e v e n t n u t r i e n t l o a d i n g Re d u c e r i s k o f f l o o d i n g Re s t o r e f l o o d p l a i n s Im p r o v e f l o o d c t r l t h r o u g h w e t l a n d re s t o r a t i o n, p r o t e c t i o n Re d u c e s t o r m w a t e r r u n o f f t h r o u g h i m p r o v e d in f i l t r a t i o n Re d u c e e n e r g y c o n s u m p t i o n a n d G H G em i s s i o n s Pr e p a r e f o r s e a l e v e l r i s e , h i g h e r t i d a l s u r g e s Pr e p a r e f o r e x t r e m e c l i m a t e e v e n t s , a n d dr o u g h t Co n t r i b u t e t o c a r b o n s e q u e s t r a t i o n Pr o t e c t e x i st i n g h i g h q u a l i t y h a b i t a t Re s t o r e i m p a i r e d h a b i t a t Pr o m o t e r e c o v e r y o f t h r e a t e n e d a n d en d a n g e r e d s p e c i e s Pr o v i d e w a t e r f o r a q u a t i c h a b i t a t Ma n a g e p e s t s a n d i n v a s i v e s p e c i e s Pr o m o t e e n e r g y e f f i c i e n c y , u s e o f r e n e w a b l e en e r g y Po t e n t i a l t o b e n e f i t a d i s a d v a n ta g e d co m m u n i t y Pr o t e c t c u l t u r a l r e s o u r c e s Pr o m o t e c o m m u n i t y o u t r e a c h , e d u c a t i o n an d s t e w a r d s h i p Pr o m o t e p u b l i c a c c e s s , w a t e r -or i e n t e d re c r e a t i o n Water Quality Protection and Improvement Water, Wastewater Treatment Facilities Pollution Prevention and Runoff Management Aquifer remediation Salt and salinity management Watershed Management Watershed protection, sediment management, erosion control, land stewardship 2013 Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan Executive Summary - XX Executive Summary Project Categories and Type Benefit Category Water Supply Reliability Water Quality Integrated Flood Management Climate Change Response Environmental Stewardship Community Involvement and Public Use Re d u c e t o t a l w a t e r d e m a n d t h r o u g h w a t e r us e ef f i c i e n c y Re d u c e p o t a b l e w a t e r d e m a n d Ex p a n d u s e o f r e c y c l e d w a t e r Ex p a n d s t o r m w a t e r r e u s e Di v e r s i t y r e g i o n a l w a t e r m g m t p o r t f o l i o In c r e a s e s t o r a g e o r c o n v e y a n c e c a p a c i t y In c r e a s e a q u i f e r r e c h a r g e Pr o t e c t o r i m p r o v e s u r f a c e w a t e r q u a l i t y Pr o t e c t o r im p r o v e g r o u n d w a t e r q u a l i t y Im p r o v e d r i n k i n g w a t e r q u a l i t y Im p r o v e w a s t e w a t e r t r e a t m e n t Im p r o v e s t o r m w a t e r q u a l i t y Re s p o n d t o s a l i n i t y i s s u e s Pr e v e n t n u t r i e n t l o a d i n g Re d u c e r i s k o f f l o o d i n g Re s t o r e f l o o d p l a i n s Im p r o v e f l o o d c t r l t h r o u g h w e t l a n d re s t o r a t i o n, p r o t e c t i o n Re d u c e s t o r m w a t e r r u n o f f t h r o u g h i m p r o v e d in f i l t r a t i o n Re d u c e e n e r g y c o n s u m p t i o n a n d G H G em i s s i o n s Pr e p a r e f o r s e a l e v e l r i s e , h i g h e r t i d a l s u r g e s Pr e p a r e f o r e x t r e m e c l i m a t e e v e n t s , a n d dr o u g h t Co n t r i b u t e t o c a r b o n s e q u e s t r a t i o n Pr o t e c t e x i st i n g h i g h q u a l i t y h a b i t a t Re s t o r e i m p a i r e d h a b i t a t Pr o m o t e r e c o v e r y o f t h r e a t e n e d a n d en d a n g e r e d s p e c i e s Pr o v i d e w a t e r f o r a q u a t i c h a b i t a t Ma n a g e p e s t s a n d i n v a s i v e s p e c i e s Pr o m o t e e n e r g y e f f i c i e n c y , u s e o f r e n e w a b l e en e r g y Po t e n t i a l t o b e n e f i t a d i s a d v a n ta g e d co m m u n i t y Pr o t e c t c u l t u r a l r e s o u r c e s Pr o m o t e c o m m u n i t y o u t r e a c h , e d u c a t i o n an d s t e w a r d s h i p Pr o m o t e p u b l i c a c c e s s , w a t e r -or i e n t e d re c r e a t i o n Habitat Protection and Restoration Existing Habitat Protection and Improvement Ecosystem Restoration Flood and SLR Hazard Management Flood management facilities, floodplain protection SLR hazard management 2013 Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan Executive Summary - XXI Executive Summary Project Categories and Type Benefit Category Water Supply Reliability Water Quality Integrated Flood Management Climate Change Response Environmental Stewardship Community Involvement and Public Use Re d u c e t o t a l w a t e r d e m a n d t h r o u g h w a t e r us e ef f i c i e n c y Re d u c e p o t a b l e w a t e r d e m a n d Ex p a n d u s e o f r e c y c l e d w a t e r Ex p a n d s t o r m w a t e r r e u s e Di v e r s i t y r e g i o n a l w a t e r m g m t p o r t f o l i o In c r e a s e s t o r a g e o r c o n v e y a n c e c a p a c i t y In c r e a s e a q u i f e r r e c h a r g e Pr o t e c t o r i m p r o v e s u r f a c e w a t e r q u a l i t y Pr o t e c t o r im p r o v e g r o u n d w a t e r q u a l i t y Im p r o v e d r i n k i n g w a t e r q u a l i t y Im p r o v e w a s t e w a t e r t r e a t m e n t Im p r o v e s t o r m w a t e r q u a l i t y Re s p o n d t o s a l i n i t y i s s u e s Pr e v e n t n u t r i e n t l o a d i n g Re d u c e r i s k o f f l o o d i n g Re s t o r e f l o o d p l a i n s Im p r o v e f l o o d c t r l t h r o u g h w e t l a n d re s t o r a t i o n, p r o t e c t i o n Re d u c e s t o r m w a t e r r u n o f f t h r o u g h i m p r o v e d in f i l t r a t i o n Re d u c e e n e r g y c o n s u m p t i o n a n d G H G em i s s i o n s Pr e p a r e f o r s e a l e v e l r i s e , h i g h e r t i d a l s u r g e s Pr e p a r e f o r e x t r e m e c l i m a t e e v e n t s , a n d dr o u g h t Co n t r i b u t e t o c a r b o n s e q u e s t r a t i o n Pr o t e c t e x i st i n g h i g h q u a l i t y h a b i t a t Re s t o r e i m p a i r e d h a b i t a t Pr o m o t e r e c o v e r y o f t h r e a t e n e d a n d en d a n g e r e d s p e c i e s Pr o v i d e w a t e r f o r a q u a t i c h a b i t a t Ma n a g e p e s t s a n d i n v a s i v e s p e c i e s Pr o m o t e e n e r g y e f f i c i e n c y , u s e o f r e n e w a b l e en e r g y Po t e n t i a l t o b e n e f i t a d i s a d v a n ta g e d co m m u n i t y Pr o t e c t c u l t u r a l r e s o u r c e s Pr o m o t e c o m m u n i t y o u t r e a c h , e d u c a t i o n an d s t e w a r d s h i p Pr o m o t e p u b l i c a c c e s s , w a t e r -or i e n t e d re c r e a t i o n Public Access, Recreation and Use Trails, water- based recreation, water- dependant cultural uses (fisheries) Modeling and Monitoring Tools Decision support systems (DSS) and technical data collection Education, Outreach, and Incentives Student and community programs, school projects, financing programs 2013 Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan Executive Summary - XXII Executive Summary Plan Performance and Monitoring is designed to ensure that: Progress is being made towards meeting the objectives in the Plan. Projects listed in the Plan are being implemented. Projects are monitored to comply with all applicable rules, laws, and permit requirements. Disadvantaged and Environmental Justice Communities Section 7.11 provides an overview of IRWMP projects potentially benefitting disadvantaged communities, impacts resulting from implementation of disadvantaged community based projects, and effects on Native American Tribal communities. The IRWMP currently includes 123 projects that were identified by project proponents as providing DAC benefits. A majority of projects identified as providing DAC benefits are aimed at implementing low impact design features to control stormwater, improving levees and other flood control facilities, developing climate change adaptation strategies, restoring habitat or providing education and outreach to involve the community (including DACs) in watershed stewardship and protection efforts. In addition, a considerable number of wastewater treatment and recycled water projects were identified during the review process as providing DAC benefits. Examples of projects that would provide environmental justice and DAC benefits include: Retrofit streets in DACs with low impact development features to control stormwater Conduct outreach to involve DAC communities in watershed stewardship activities Install stormwater retention and groundwater recharge facilities to improve flood protection Fund trash capture infrastructure and tracking tools for DACs Create seasonal wetlands to provide habitat and flood control benefits to a DAC Improve water supply reliability through the development of local groundwater and recycled water supplies 1.9 Performance and Monitoring (Chapter 8) Chapter 8 documents the institutional structure and parties responsible for plan implementation and monitoring, ongoing data management, and how performance data will be used to improve future versions of the Plan. The IRWMP is a dynamic document and its success is related to how well its goals and objectives are accomplished, at both the Plan and project levels. IRWMP objectives and regional priorities will continue to be reviewed for relevance and modified as needed to ensure the Plan reflects changing regional needs and continues to be effective. The list of projects will be reviewed and evaluated every five years, or as needed, to ensure that Plan objectives will be met, that the Plan projects offer the greatest benefit possible, and that the list of Plan projects continues to 2013 Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan Executive Summary - XXIII Executive Summary address IRWMP objectives as well as state and regional priorities. Ongoing review and update will allow the plan to evolve in response to changing conditions and as better data is developed. As noted above, the institutional structure for overseeing IRWMP development and implementation is the CC, which will continue to be responsible for Plan management and oversight. Once the Plan is adopted, the focus of the CC will shift toward implementation and tracking of progress. Each project identified in the Plan has a lead project proponent that has agreed to oversee project implementation. Therefore, implementation of the Plan will rely on actions taken by existing agencies and organizations within the Region. The project proponent will be responsible for ensuring that project operations are adjusted as appropriate based on the changing needs of the Region. As work is completed and the Plan is implemented, the CC will recommend whether changes to the Region’s goals, objectives, and needs should be considered. In response to the CC assessment, and considering the project’s performance with respect to its performance measures, project proponents will be responsible for identifying and adjusting project operations as appropriate and feasible. The relationships between project performance, Plan performance, and adjustments to the regional goals are illustrated in Figure ES-5. Figure ES-5: Bay Area IRWMP Implementation and Performance Assessment 2013 Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan Executive Summary - XXIV Executive Summary 1.10 Data Management (Chapter 9) Chapter 9 discusses data management needs associated with the IRWMP. This section provides an overview of data needs in the Region, discusses data collection techniques, and the approach to data management and dissemination. Existing data collection and monitoring efforts are described, and data gaps with potential new data collection programs are identified. This section also discusses supporting statewide data needs via the abundance of information collected by Bay Area agencies and water resource programs. As part of IRWMP implementation, data will be collected and compiled at several levels: the project level, the functional area and sub-region level, and the Regional, or Plan level. At each of these levels, effective data management and dissemination is critical to successful implementation of the IRWMP, and the Region’s approach to managing this data is described in Chapter 9. A wealth of information is collected by individual Bay Area agencies and water resource programs. While a limited number of programs compile and assess water resources data for the Bay Area region, it is not clear whether new regional assessments versus more efficient coordination of existing efforts would lead to more useful regional information. As future work is completed, the Bay Area’s data library of relevant water resources information and data that have been collected by projects funded through IRWM grants will grow. Whether the library can become a more comprehensive resource throughout the region has yet to be determined. As such, the process represents an important first step toward developing a regional perspective on water resources management information. The data and conclusions developed through the Bay Area IRWMP assessment process may be used by state agencies for developing regional fact sheets and determining regional funding priorities. In addition, DWR may use the information developed through future work to support updates to the California Water Plan. In addition to compiling water resources data and information about Bay Area IRWM Projects, the Bay Area data will support statewide data activities by retaining data collected to support project performance assessment in a manner consistent with continuing statewide data collection programs. Consistency with statewide monitoring programs is critical to ensure that regional projects contribute to efficient, uniform, and comprehensive study design and data collection. 1.11 Financing (Chapter 10) Chapter 10 identifies various funding sources, including their associated requirements and guidelines, which may be available to assist with implementation of Plan projects. The chapter also provides a summary of funding opportunities by local, state, and federal funding sources. The 332 projects identified in this Plan have total capital costs of approximately $4.1 billion, with individual project costs ranging from $27,500 to $292 million, and averaging $13.9 million. Securing adequate funding for program planning and implementation is one of the biggest challenges facing integrated regional planning efforts. Successful IRWMP implementation requires capital and planning expenditures associated with project implementation, as well as ongoing funding to support operation, maintenance and administration costs. 2013 Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan Executive Summary - XXV Executive Summary The Bay Area Region looked beyond state and federal funding sources to find examples of Innovative Local Funding Mechanisms. These included such efforts as setting up watershed trusts, enacting drainage fees, local voter initiatives, public-private partnerships, local grant programs, spending-offset projects, as well as private sources such as foundations and educational institutions. 1.12 Technical Analysis (Chapter 11) Chapter 11 documents that the IRWMP is based on sound technical information, analyses, and methods, and provides a description of studies, models, or other methodologies used to analyze the technical information and data sets, and how they have shaped the CC and stakeholders’ understanding of water management in the Region. The Bay Area IRWMP builds on the data and technical analysis completed as part of other planning efforts. A wide variety of technical studies have been developed at the local level and the subregional level, and used in development and support of the IRWMP. Table 11-1 provides examples of studies and analyses completed by local agencies, including some developed in conjunction with state and/or federal agencies. Many studies are also being conducted in parallel with IRWMP development. The Plan was prepared using information and guidance provided by agencies representing all four FAs, and to varying degrees, municipalities, town councils, regulatory, environmental and land use planning entities that represent the CC and stakeholders. The IRWMP, in turn, will be used by these same entities to guide and support their future regional water resources management efforts. During the course of preparing this IRWMP, data needs were identified by stakeholders and resource specialists working on the plan. Data needs identified for the Region include: Updated climate change projections to reflect new data, methods, and improved understanding of climate change Regional hydroclimate (hydrology and weather), including projections of microclimatic change and fog Statewide hydroclimate data on imported water supplies that show influence of climate change Data on sea level rise Weather variability (e.g., monthly averages of maximum and minimum daily air temperatures monthly precipitation and ET, etc.) in the Region and subregions Market saturation of water efficient fixtures Projections of future habitat change Improved projections of wetland response to sea level rise 2013 Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan Executive Summary - XXVI Executive Summary 1.13 Relation to Local Water Planning (Chapter 12) Chapter 12 discusses the relationship between the IRWMP and local water planning efforts, and documents the local water plans on which the Plan Update is based. The intent of coordinating the IRWMP with local water planning efforts is: to ensure that the IRWMP is consistent with local water plans and reflects current, relevant elements of local water planning; to describe how the IRWMP relates to local planning efforts (including how regional planning feeds back into local planning, and how any inconsistencies between local and regional plans are identified and resolved), and; to incorporate climate mitigation and adaptation strategies from local plans into the IRWMP. The IRWMP coordinates with local planning efforts by using local water plans as a basis for developing a regional view of water supply, water quality, wastewater, recycled water, flood protection, stormwater management, watershed management, habitat protection/restoration and climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies. The CC relied on local and regional plans, and information provided by local water managers, as a basis for developing all aspects of the IRWMP. To facilitate future coordination with local planning efforts, a comprehensive inventory containing over 100 local and regional water resource plans was developed and will be used for future IRWMP updates. Any inconsistencies that arise between the IRWMP and local water plans will be resolved on a case-by-case basis through consultation with the agency that prepared the plan. Chapter 12 also incorporates climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies from regional plans and local planning efforts. Table ES-5 shows the Resource Plan types used within the Region for water management planning. 2013 Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan Executive Summary - XXVII Executive Summary Table ES-5: Bay Area Water Resource Plan types by Water Management Activity and Functional Area Water Management Activity (2012 Guidelines)a Corresponding Functional Area Plans in Bay Area IRWMP Water Plan Inventory b Addressing these Topics General Specific Multi-Purpose Program Planning City and County General Planning Emergency Response, Disaster Plans • Groundwater Management • Urban Water Management • Water Supply Assessments • Agricultural Water Management • Salt and Salinity Management Water Supply & Water Quality • Water Supply Management Programs • Urban Water Management Plans • Clean Water Programs • Groundwater Management Plans • Salt Management Plans • Salt/Nutrient Management Plans • Water Supply Evaluations • Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program • Integrated Resource Management Plan • Water Supply Strategies Action Plans • Water Supply Infrastructure Master Plan Wastewater & Recycled Water • Recycled Water Master and Strategic Plans • Sewer System Master Plans • Wastewater Treatment Plant Master Plan • Water Reuse Programs • Flood Protection • Stormwater Management • Low Impact Development Flood Protection & Stormwater Management • Stormwater Management Plans • Flood Management Plans • Sediment Management Studies/Plans • Stream Management Master Plans • Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program • Stream Maintenance Plans • Watershed Management Watershed Management - Habitat Protection & Restoration • Habitat Restoration Plans • Watershed Management and Stewardship Plans • Habitat Conservation Plans • Conservation Strategy Plans • Habitat and Species Recovery Plans • Historical Ecology Studies • Vegetation Management Plans • Habitat Stewardship Plans • Stream Maintenance Plans • Coastal Waters Management Plans • Watershed Action Plan • Invasive Species Studies/Plans 2013 Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan Executive Summary - XXVIII Executive Summary The Bay Area also benefits from several existing forums that promote regional planning and allow for coordination and collaboration of ideas. These include: Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) Joint Policy Committee Bay Area Clean Water Agencies (BACWA) Bay Area Water Supply and Conservation Agency (BAWSCA) Bay Area Water Agencies Coalition (BAWAC) Bay Area Flood Protection Agencies Association (BAFPAA) Bay Area Watershed Network (BAWN) North Bay Watershed Association (NBWA) City/county councils of government Low Impact Development Leadership Group Watershed Information Center & Conservancy (WICC) of Napa County Santa Clara County Basin Watershed Management Initiative (WMI) Bay-Delta Region of Resource Conservation Districts (RCDs) 1.14 Relation to Local Land Use Planning (Chapter 13) Chapter 13 describes the processes that foster communication between land use managers and regional water management groups with the intent of effectively integrating water management and land use planning. The chapter documents land use planning processes currently in place in the Bay Area Region, describes the current relationship between land use and water resources managers (including coordination with land use planning agencies undertaken as part of the IRWMP), and identifies opportunities to facilitate a better working relationship between water resources managers and land use decision makers in the future. Figure ES-6 presents the results of a survey (described in Section 13.2.2) of the prevalence of water resources policies contained in city and county general plans. Coordination between land use planners and water resources managers in the Bay Area Region occurs during long-term planning, at the project level, and in association with a variety of specific initiatives and regulatory drivers. As part of the development of the IRWMP, the San Francisco Estuary Partnership (SFEP) convened discussions on collaboration between water agencies and land use agencies, and conducted a survey of local governments to establish a baseline inventory of local watershed policies and to assess the current degree of inter-agency collaboration. Telephone surveys with water resources managers also were conducted. These outreach efforts helped to identify constraints that may inhibit opportunities to facilitate improved collaboration among local land use planning and water resources managers. These constraints and opportunities in turn informed development of a draft plan for improving collaboration between land use and water resources managers in the future. The intent of the draft 2013 Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan Executive Summary - XXIX Executive Summary collaboration plan presented in Chapter 13 is to promote a shared understanding of the effects of climate change on the Region, and to cultivate inter-agency ties to support implementation of integrated land-use and water resources related adaptation strategies. Figure ES-6: Water Resources Policies Contained In Bay Area General Plans Note: (a) “Other sustainable development" includes green building, density increase, water recycling, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, open space conservation, green government, climate change and sea level rise plans, complete streets, transit oriented development, and rainwater and greywater reuse. Source: San Francisco Estuary Partnership, Local Governments Watershed Inventory, September 12, 2012. 62% 35% 75% 56% 85% 81% 35% 69% 46% 33% Watershed Conservation Watershed restoration Creek or riparian conservation Creek or riparian restoration Flood control Stormwater management Green streets/Low impact development policies Water quality Litter or trash management Other sustainable development Water Resources Policies included in City General Plans (a) 100% 63% 75% 50% 88% 88% 38% 100% 0% 63% Watershed conservation Watershed restoration Creek or riparian conservation Creek or riparian restoration Flood control Stormwater management Green streets/Low impact development policies Water quality Litter or trash management Other Sustainable development Water Resources Policies included in County General Plans (a) 2013 Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan Executive Summary - XXX Executive Summary 1.15 Stakeholder Involvement (Chapter 14) Chapter 14 identifies the approach to stakeholder engagement and specific activities to involve a range of interests in development of the Plan and submission of proposed projects as shown in Figure ES-7 It also describes next steps to encourage ongoing participation in IRWMP activities, including outreach to Disadvantaged Communities (DACs) and Native American tribes. Figure ES-7: Stakeholder-based Plan Development The Plan Update outreach process was augmented by the consolidation of numerous existing IRWMP contact lists, and the addition of potentially interested water-related agencies and organizations, land use agencies, public policy organizations, and NGOs. At 1,500 contacts, this nearly tripled the stakeholder list that existed at the beginning of the planning process. Particular attention was paid to identifying DAC and tribal representatives and encouraging their participation. This effort included producing one regional, and four subregional 2010 U.S. Census-based maps showing locations of DACs, producing DAC-specific informational materials including information in Spanish, collaborating with the San Francisco Estuary Partnership to help with outreach, and providing guidance to organizations and Public Workshop #2 2013 Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan Executive Summary - XXXI Executive Summary agencies interested in submitting DAC-serving projects. The outreach resulted in the submission of numerous DAC-serving projects. General outreach materials included a flyer, a set of Frequently Asked Questions, CC meeting materials, and website information (http://bairwmp.org/). The website features a forum for linking potential project partners and an online project submission form. Forums for stakeholder outreach included meetings in the four subregions, presentations to 20 local government and land use planning agencies, and two public workshops. These workshops attracted 60 to 80 participants each, a fourth of whom represented environmental, community, environmental justice and agricultural organizations. 1.16 Coordination (Chapter 15) Chapter 15 describes how the CC has taken steps forward to improve coordination of water resources related matters in the Region. As described in previous sections of this Plan, management of water and other related resources within this Region is complex and has many interdependencies. Furthermore, the authorities and responsibilities for managing water and related resources within the Region are spread across many different agencies, organizations, and other stakeholders. This level of complexity, and the distributed network of shared responsibilities, creates the need for robust and effective coordination. This chapter also outlines how the CC coordinates with neighboring IRWM regions, local, state, and federal agencies and other stakeholders to improve integrated water management throughout the Region and neighboring areas. Developing this Plan involved a diverse group of water supply, water quality, wastewater, stormwater, flood protection, watershed, municipal, environmental, and regulatory groups whose input played a key role in defining water resources management goals and objectives, identifying and selecting priority projects to help meet those goals and objectives, and coordinating IRWM related activities and efforts. The outreach and coordination process of the IRWMP brings together a broad array of groups into a forum to help ensure that the Plan reflects the water-related needs of the entire Region, promotes the formation of regional partnerships, and encourages increased coordination with local, state and federal agencies. Coordination efforts within the Bay Area Region are facilitated by the following regional groups: Bay Area Water Agencies Coalition (BAWAC), Bay Area Clean Water Agencies (BACWA), Bay Area Stormwater Management Agencies Association (BASMAA), Bay Area Flood Protection Agencies Association (BAFPAA), Bay Area Water Supply and Conservation District (BAWSCD), and Bay Area Watershed Network (BAWN). Many of these groups also have representatives on the CC and act as representatives to the Functional Areas. Multiple IRWM planning efforts, as individual regions, were initiated during 2005-2006 creating significant overlap among regions in the Bay Area. Several of the individual regions were consolidated into the Bay Area IRWMP during the plan update process. Since the IRWMP was first adopted in 2006, additional consolidation and clarification has occurred. Table ES-6 summarizes the historic overlaps in the San Francisco Bay Area region that have been consolidated since the 2006 Plan. 2013 Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan Executive Summary - XXXII Executive Summary Table ES-6: Changes in Regional Boundaries since 2006 Plan The CC and the leaders from other regions listed in Table ES-6 resolved the overlapping boundaries listed in the table through direct communication in writing, in phone conversations, and through invitations and participation in CC meetings. Through direct communication, individual regions could determine for themselves if partnering and integrating with the Bay Area IRWMP was beneficial to them. Each region reached their decision independently after attending CC meetings and discussing the proposed mergers of the boundaries with their respective organizing committees. Representatives from neighboring regions are invited to participate and to provide a linkage between the Bay Area and other IRWMPs, enabling information sharing and communication between the regional planning efforts. Region Description of Previous Region Overlap Boundary Resolution Tomales Bay Watershed Integrated Coastal Water Management Plan Complete overlap The Tomales Bay Watershed Council decided not to pursue its Integrated Coastal Watershed Management Plan independently of the Bay Area IRWMP. IRWM efforts in the Tomales Bay watershed are now included in the San Francisco Bay Area IRWM effort. East Contra Costa County (ECCC) IRWM Plan Overlap of northwestern triangular area Integration of northwestern portion into the Bay Area Region. Efforts with the San Joaquin IRWM region to be coordinated under East Contra Costa County region’s governance Napa-Berryessa IRWM Plan Overlap of southwestern portion Complete integration of southwestern portion into the Bay Area Region. The rest of their original region is coordinating with the Westside IRWM Region. Solano IRWM Plan Overlap of southwestern portion Complete integration of southwestern portion into the Bay Area Region. The rest of their original region is coordinating with the Westside IRWM Region. Sonoma County Agencies Overlap of southeastern- portion Integration of southeastern portion into the Bay Area Region through Sonoma County Water Agency. The rest of the county is involved in the North Coast IRWM efforts. 2013 Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan Executive Summary - XXXIII Executive Summary 1.17 Climate Change (Chapter 16) The climate change standard is new to the 2012 DWR guidelines, and the topic is addressed throughout the Bay Area IRWMP including in Chapter 3 - Goals and Objectives, and Chapter 12 – Relation to Local Water Planning. Chapter 16 focuses on assessing the potential climate change vulnerability areas of the Region’s water resources and identifying climate change adaptation strategies with the overall goal of making climate change adaptation an overarching theme throughout the Plan. “Climate change is already affecting California and is projected to continue to do so well into the foreseeable future. Current and projected climate changes include increased temperatures, sea-level rise, a reduced winter snowpack, altered precipitation patterns, and more frequent storm events. These changes have the potential for a wide variety of impacts such as altered agricultural productivity, wildfire risk, water supply, public health, public safety, ecosystem function and economic continuity.”1 The recent sea-level rise publication from the National Research Council titled Sea-Level Rise for the Coasts of California, Oregon, and Washington: Past, Present, and Future (NRC 2012) provided estimates of relative sea-level rise for San Francisco Bay and is shown in Table ES-7. The “Projection” represents the mid-range estimate with an estimated accuracy of (i.e., +2 inches), and the “Range” represents the high and low estimates from the models. Table ES-7: Relative Sea-Level Rise Projections for San Francisco Bay Year Projection (in) Range (in) 2030 6 (± 2) 2-12 2050 11 (± 4) 5-24 2100 36 (± 10) 17-66 Source: Table 5.3, NRC (2012). The climate change assessment is consistent with DWR’s Climate Change Handbook for Regional Water Planning and with the climate change requirements in the Proposition 84 IRWMP Guidelines (October 2012). The Vulnerabilities Areas from the Handbook were discussed and prioritized by the IRWMP’s climate change Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) comprised of local agency climate change specialists. The prioritized six vulnerability areas were: 1. Sea-Level Rise 2. Flooding 3. Water Supply and Hydropower 4. Water Quality 5. Ecosystem and Habitat 6. Water Demand The potential impacts of each vulnerability area were discussed at the Bay Area level, and at each of the four subregional levels (North, East, South and West). Additional information on regional and local mitigation and adaptation strategies can be found in Chapter 12, Tables 12-2 1 California Climate Adaptation Planning Guide, 2012, Executive Summary. 2013 Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan Executive Summary - XXXIV Executive Summary and 12-3. Regional adaptation strategies and performance metrics were identified for each vulnerability area. The next steps for future IRWMP updates were identified, including a discussion of needed research, models, and data. In addition, it is recognized that analysis needs to be done at the project level including: GHG baseline calculations, adaptation strategies, mitigation strategies and performance metrics. 1.18 Conclusion The Bay Area IRWMP presents information and a water resources management plan for a diverse and complex region with many challenges. However, in the intervening years between the original 2006 Plan and this update, many advances have been made. A new “Subregional” strategy was developed to improve coordination and broaden participation throughout the region. Clarification of boundaries, and the roles of other Regions have been sought, and more communication among these external Regions was facilitated. Plan objectives were scrutinized and reorganized to better reflect the current needs. The Region examined various ways to enhance the resource management strategies, and selected specific strategies for inclusion. For the first time, supporting activities, like an example Salt and Nutrient Management Plan, are provided for others as resources. Projects were considered through Regional priorities that address multiple goals, not only at the Regional level, but also at the Subregional level. This shift allowed for initiation of the Subregional Process. From the new list of projects, impacts and benefits to the Region were assessed, and performance and monitoring criteria were established along with recommendations for data management and improvements to the website. Also, the Region explored options for addressing climate change and identified projects that may provide adaptation options. Innovative local water funding mechanisms were shared among the Region’s participants and discussed as options to augment the state and federal funding for implementing the IRWMP. The CC continued to foster collaboration and coordination of land-use and water planning efforts. Efforts to engage the pubic included several public workshops and stakeholders were encouraged to participate, review and comment on the IRWM Plan update. New research into local disadvantaged and environmental justice communities added to an already extensive project list and provided additional information on community needs. This IRWMP update addresses the critical needs of the Bay Area IRWM Region and provides a framework for continued collaboration. City of Palo Alto (ID # 10258) City Council Staff Report Report Type: Consent Calendar Meeting Date: 5/20/2019 City of Palo Alto Page 1 Summary Title: Award of Contract for 2019 Sidewalk, Curb and Gutter Repairs Project Title: Approval of Contract C19174910 with JJR Construction Inc. in the amount of $1,250,993 for the 2019 Sidewalk, Curb and Gutter Repairs Project, Capital Improvement Program projects PO-89003 and PO-12001; Authorization for the City Manager or his Designee to Negotiate and Execute Related Change Orders Not-to-Exceed $125,099 in Total Value; and Approval of a Budget Amendment in the Capital Improvement Fund. From: City Manager Lead Department: Public Works Recommendation Staff recommends that Council: 1. Approve and authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute the attached contract with JJR Construction, Inc. (Attachment A) in the amount of $1,250,993 for the 2019 Sidewalk, Curb and Gutter Repairs Project; Capital Improvement Program projects PO-89003 and PO-12001; 2. Authorize the City Manager or his designee to negotiate and execute one or more change orders to the contract with JJR Construction, Inc. for related, additional unforeseen work that may develop during the project, the total value of which shall not exceed $125,099; and 3. Amend the Fiscal Year 2019 Budget Appropriation for the Capital Improvement Fund by: a. Increasing the Sidewalk Repairs Project PO-89003 appropriation by $184,000; and b. Decreasing the Infrastructure Reserve by $184,000. Background CITY OF PALO ALTO City of Palo Alto Page 2 The City has over 250 miles of existing sidewalk. In 1985 a sidewalk survey was conducted by Public Works staff to determine the existing sidewalk conditions and amount of damaged sidewalk requiring repair. Following the 1985 survey, the City was divided into 23 sidewalk districts and each district was ranked (from high to low) based on the amount of damaged sidewalk. The City’s annual sidewalk repair program started in 1986. The program objectives were to alleviate the existing sidewalk repair backlog, eliminate pedestrian hazards and enhance pedestrian safety; improve sidewalk conditions and reduce potential sidewalk-related injury. In 2017, the City completed its 30-year, district by district sidewalk, curb and gutter repair program. That same year, the City contracted with Nichols Consulting Engineers, Chtd. (NCE) to evaluate the program and assess potential improvements (ID# 8611). The study was completed in Spring 2019 and included surveying 20 percent of the City’s sidewalk network and nearly 60 percent of the curb ramps. This data was used to determine trends for future repairs and determine funding needs, including the annual funding level included in the proposed FY 2020 capital improvement program budget to maintain the thirty-year district sidewalk program. Discussion Staff assembled a list of sidewalk locations, based on the study, to repair in this year’s project. The list prioritizes areas that require prompt action. The locations for the work are on varying streets throughout Palo Alto. Project Description The sidewalk portion of the project includes repairs to sidewalks with tree root uplift and deteriorated sidewalks due to age. The project also provides for the construction of 16 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)-compliant curb ramps with standardized detectable warning surfaces to alert visually impaired pedestrians of where to cross. The ramps will include street names stamped on the curb ramp. Detectable warning surfaces used in this project will consist of a surface of truncated domes aligned in a square grid pattern and are yellow in color at yellow crosswalks and dark grey in color at all other locations. The domes comply with the 2018 Public Works Standard Drawings and Specifications and the Federal Highway Administration which requires the use of truncated domes on federal, state, and local level projects. Work in downtown areas will not be permitted during lunch hours to minimize the inconvenience to restaurants, merchants, and the public. Staff will send out timely notifications to the surrounding areas utilizing sidewalk postings, fliers, and online via Nextdoor and the City of Palo Alto website. In addition, Staff will coordinate with the Palo Alto Downtown Business and Professional Association, neighborhood associations, organizations, and businesses as appropriate. City of Palo Alto Page 3 The City will prohibit the contractor from using potable water, using recycled water instead. The Palo Alto Regional Water Quality Control Plant (RWQCP) will provide tertiary recycled water at no charge to the permitted contractor. The contractor will obtain a recycled water permit before obtaining water from RWQCP and shall be responsible for the permit fee. Bid Process On March 19, 2019, an invitation for bids (IFB) for the 2019 Sidewalk, Curb and Gutter Repairs Project (IFB #174910) was posted online through PlanetBids and 806 notifications were sent to general contractors, subcontractors, consultants, and builder’s exchanges through the City’s eProcurement system. The bidding period was 21 days. Bids were received from five (5) qualified contractors on April 9, 2019, as listed on the Bid Summary (Attachment B). City of Palo Alto Page 4 Summary of Bid Process Bid Name/Number 2019 Sidewalk, Curb & Gutter Repairs IFB #174910 Proposed Length of Project 210 calendar days Number of Bid Packages Downloaded by Builder’s Exchanges 7 Number of Bid Packages Downloaded by Contractors 13 Total Days to Respond to Bid 21 Pre-Bid Meeting? No Number of Bids Received: 5 Base Bid Price Range $1,250,993 to $2,030,038 Bids ranged from $1,250,993 to $2,030,038. The low bid is 24% above the engineer’s estimate of $1,009,100 while the high bid is 101% above the engineer’s estimate. Staff determined that the bids came in higher due to the city-wide repair locations, compared to more typical contracts that focus on one or two districts. Staff has reviewed all bids and recommends the bid of $1,250,993 submitted by JJR Construction, Inc. be accepted and JJR Construction, Inc. be declared the lowest responsible bidder. Funding is not available to award Add Alternates #1 and #2. Per the instructions on the IFB, the Add Alternates were not considered in the basis for award. The contingency amount of $125,099 which equals 10 percent of the total contract, is requested for related, additional but unforeseen work which may develop during the project. Staff checked references supplied by the contractor for previous work performed and found no significant complaints. Staff also checked with the Contractor’s State License Board and found that the contractor has an active license on file and has no outstanding complaints. Project Coordination The work included in this contract was coordinated with other capital projects at the monthly Utilities/Public Works department street work coordination meetings and by use of the GIS project coordination program. The purpose of the monthly street work coordination meeting is to coordinate the installation, replacement, and repairs of the City’s subsurface infrastructure (utilities) and street and sidewalk improvements with the annual street maintenance plan. The 2019 Sidewalk, Curb and Gutter Repairs Project has no conflicts with other upcoming Public Works and Utility projects. Resource Impact The majority of funding for the 2019 Sidewalk, Curb and Gutter Repairs Project is available in the following Capital Improvement Program (CIP) projects P0-89003 Sidewalk Repairs and PO- 12001 Curb and Gutter Repairs. An additional appropriation of $184,000 is required for CIP project PO-89003. With the additional appropriation, funding allocations are as follows: City of Palo Alto Page 5 Funding Source Contract Contingency Total Encumbrance PO-89003 $981,968 $98,197 $1,080,165 PO-12001 $269,025 $26,902 $295,927 Totals $1,250,993 $125,099 $1,376,092 Environmental Review This project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Section 15301c of the CEQA guidelines as repair, maintenance and/or minor alteration of the existing facilities and no further environmental review is necessary. Attachments Attachment A: Contract Attachment B: Bid Summary Attachments: Attachment A - Contract C19174910 2019 Sidewalk Curb and Gutter Repairs Attachment B - Bid Summary Invitation for Bid (IFB) Package 1 Rev. March 17, 2017 CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT Contract No. C19174910 City of Palo Alto 2019 Sidewalk, Curb and Gutter Repairs Project (CIP: PO-89003 and PO-12001) Attachment A Invitation for Bid (IFB) Package 2 Rev. March 17, 2017 CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1 INCORPORATION OF RECITALS AND DEFINITIONS…………………………………….…………..6 1.1 Recitals…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….6 1.2 Definitions……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….6 SECTION 2 THE PROJECT………………………………………………………………………………………………………...6 SECTION 3 THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS………………………………………………………………………………..7 3.1 List of Documents…………………………………………………………………………………………….........7 3.2 Order of Precedence……………………………………………………………………………………………......7 SECTION 4 CONTRACTOR’S DUTY…………………………………………………………………………………………..8 4.1 Contractor's Duties…………………………………………………………………………………………………..8 SECTION 5 PROJECT TEAM……………………………………………………………………………………………………..8 5.1 Contractor's Co-operation………………………………………………………………………………………..8 SECTION 6 TIME OF COMPLETION…………………………………………………………………………………….......8 6.1 Time Is of Essence…………………………………………………………………………………………………….8 6.2 Commencement of Work…………………………………………………………………………………………8 6.3 Contract Time…………………………………………………………………………………………………………..8 6.4 Liquidated Damages…………………………………………………………………………………………………8 6.4.1 Other Remedies……………………………………………………………………………………………………..9 6.5 Adjustments to Contract Time………………………………………………………………………………….9 SECTION 7 COMPENSATION TO CONTRACTOR……………………………………………………………………….9 7.1 Contract Sum……………………………………………………………………………………………………………9 7.2 Full Compensation……………………………………………………………………………………………………9 SECTION 8 STANDARD OF CARE……………………………………………………………………………………………..9 8.1 Standard of Care…………………………………………………………………………………..…………………9 SECTION 9 INDEMNIFICATION…………………………………………………………………………………………..…10 9.1 Hold Harmless……………………………………………………………………………………………………….10 9.2 Survival…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………10 SECTION 10 NON-DISCRIMINATION……..………………………………………………………………………………10 10.1 Municipal Code Requirement…………….………………………………..……………………………….10 SECTION 11 INSURANCE AND BONDS.…………………………………………………………………………………10 Invitation for Bid (IFB) Package 3 Rev. March 17, 2017 CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT 11.1 Evidence of Coverage…………………………………………………………………………………………..10 SECTION 12 PROHIBITION AGAINST TRANSFERS…………………………………………………………….…11 12.1 Assignment………………………………………………………………………………………………………….11 12.2 Assignment by Law.………………………………………………………………………………………………11 SECTION 13 NOTICES …………………………………………………………………………………………………………….11 13.1 Method of Notice …………………………………………………………………………………………………11 13.2 Notice Recipents ………………………………………………………………………………………………….11 13.3 Change of Address……………………………………………………………………………………………….12 SECTION 14 DEFAULT…………………………………………………………………………………………………………...12 14.1 Notice of Default………………………………………………………………………………………………….12 14.2 Opportunity to Cure Default…………………………………………………………………………………12 SECTION 15 CITY'S RIGHTS AND REMEDIES…………………………………………………………………………..13 15.1 Remedies Upon Default……………………………………………………………………………………….13 15.1.1 Delete Certain Services…………………………………………………………………………………….13 15.1.2 Perform and Withhold……………………………………………………………………………………..13 15.1.3 Suspend The Construction Contract…………………………………………………………………13 15.1.4 Terminate the Construction Contract for Default………………………………………………13 15.1.5 Invoke the Performance Bond………………………………………………………………………….13 15.1.6 Additional Provisions……………………………………………………………………………………….13 15.2 Delays by Sureties……………………………………………………………………………………………….13 15.3 Damages to City…………………………………………………………………………………………………..14 15.3.1 For Contractor's Default…………………………………………………………………………………..14 15.3.2 Compensation for Losses…………………………………………………………………………………14 15.4 Suspension by City……………………………………………………………………………………………….14 15.4.1 Suspension for Convenience……………………………………………………………………………..14 15.4.2 Suspension for Cause………………………………………………………………………………………..14 15.5 Termination Without Cause…………………………………………………………………………………14 15.5.1 Compensation………………………………………………………………………………………………….15 15.5.2 Subcontractors………………………………………………………………………………………………..15 15.6 Contractor’s Duties Upon Termination………………………………………………………………...15 SECTION 16 CONTRACTOR'S RIGHTS AND REMEDIES……………………………………………………………16 16.1 Contractor’s Remedies……………………………………..………………………………..………………….16 Invitation for Bid (IFB) Package 4 Rev. March 17, 2017 CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT 16.1.1 For Work Stoppage……………………………………………………………………………………………16 16.1.2 For City's Non-Payment…………………………………………………………………………………….16 16.2 Damages to Contractor………………………………………………………………………………………..16 SECTION 17 ACCOUNTING RECORDS………………………………………………………………………………….…16 17.1 Financial Management and City Access………………………………………………………………..16 17.2 Compliance with City Requests…………………………………………………………………………….17 SECTION 18 INDEPENDENT PARTIES……………………………………………………………………………………..17 18.1 Status of Parties……………………………………………………………………………………………………17 SECTION 19 NUISANCE……………………………………………………………………………………………………….…17 19.1 Nuisance Prohibited……………………………………………………………………………………………..17 SECTION 20 PERMITS AND LICENSES…………………………………………………………………………………….17 20.1 Payment of Fees…………………………………………………………………………………………………..17 SECTION 21 WAIVER…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….17 21.1 Waiver………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….17 SECTION 22 GOVERNING LAW AND VENUE; COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS……………………………….18 22.1 Governing Law…………………………………………………………………………………………………….18 22.2 Compliance with Laws…………………………………………………………………………………………18 22.2.1 Palo Alto Minimum Wage Ordinance…………….………………………………………………….18 SECTION 23 COMPLETE AGREEMENT……………………………………………………………………………………18 23.1 Integration………………………………………………………………………………………………………….18 SECTION 24 SURVIVAL OF CONTRACT…………………………………………………………………………………..18 24.1 Survival of Provisions……………………………………………………………………………………………18 SECTION 25 PREVAILING WAGES………………………………………………………………………………………….18 SECTION 26 NON-APPROPRIATION……………………………………………………………………………………….19 26.1 Appropriation………………………………………………………………………………………………………19 SECTION 27 AUTHORITY……………………………………………………………………………………………………….19 27.1 Representation of Parties…………………………………………………………………………………….19 SECTION 28 COUNTERPARTS………………………………………………………………………………………………..19 28.1 Multiple Counterparts………………………………………………………………………………………….19 SECTION 29 SEVERABILITY……………………………………………………………………………………………………19 29.1 Severability………………………………………………………………………………………………………….19 SECTION 30 STATUTORY AND REGULATORY REFERENCES …………………………………………………..19 Invitation for Bid (IFB) Package 5 Rev. March 17, 2017 CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT 30.1 Amendments of Laws…………………………………………………………………………………………..19 SECTION 31 WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CERTIFICATION………………………………………………….….19 31.1 Workers Compensation…………………………………………………………………………………….19 SECTION 32 DIR REGISTRATION AND OTHER SB 854 REQUIREMENTS………………………………..…20 32.1 General Notice to Contractor…………………………………………………………………………….20 32.2 Labor Code section 1771.1(a)…………………………………………………………………………….20 32.3 DIR Registration Required…………………………………………………………………………………20 32.4 Posting of Job Site Notices…………………………………………………………………………………20 32.5 Payroll Records…………………………………………………………………………………………………20 Invitation for Bid (IFB) Package 6 Rev. March 17, 2017 CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT THIS CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT entered into on May 20, 2019 (“Execution Date”) by and between the CITY OF PALO ALTO, a California chartered municipal corporation ("City"), and JJR Construction, Inc. ("Contractor"), is made with reference to the following: R E C I T A L S: A. City is a municipal corporation duly organized and validly existing under the laws of the State of California with the power to carry on its business as it is now being conducted under the statutes of the State of California and the Charter of City. B. Contractor is a Corporation duly organized and in good standing in the State of California, Contractor’s License Number 665645 and Department of Industrial Relations Registration Number 1000004118. Contractor represents that it is duly licensed by the State of California and has the background, knowledge, experience and expertise to perform the obligations set forth in this Construction Contract. C. On March 19, 2019, City issued an Invitation for Bids (IFB) to contractors for the 2019 Sidewalk, Curb and Gutter Repairs Project (“Project”). In response to the IFB, Contractor submitted a Bid. D. City and Contractor desire to enter into this Construction Contract for the Project, and other services as identified in the Contract Documents for the Project upon the following terms and conditions. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and undertakings hereinafter set forth and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, it is mutually agreed by and between the undersigned parties as follows: SECTION 1 INCORPORATION OF RECITALS AND DEFINITIONS. 1.1 Recitals. All of the recitals are incorporated herein by reference. 1.2 Definitions. Capitalized terms shall have the meanings set forth in this Construction Contract and/or in the General Conditions. If there is a conflict between the definitions in this Construction Contract and in the General Conditions, the definitions in this Construction Contract shall prevail. SECTION 2 THE PROJECT. The Project is the 2019 Sidewalk, Curb and Gutter Repairs Project, located at various streets, Palo Alto, CA. 94301 ("Project"). Invitation for Bid (IFB) Package 7 Rev. March 17, 2017 CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT SECTION 3 THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. 3.1 List of Documents. The Contract Documents (sometimes collectively referred to as “Agreement” or “Bid Documents”) consist of the following documents which are on file with the Purchasing Division and are hereby incorporated by reference. 1) Change Orders 2) Field Orders 3) Contract 4) Bidding Addenda 5) Special Provisions 6) General Conditions 7) Project Plans and Drawings 8) Technical Specifications 9) Instructions to Bidders 10) Invitation for Bids 11) Contractor's Bid/Non-Collusion Declaration 12) Reports listed in the Contract Documents 13) Public Works Department’s Standard Drawings and Specifications (most current version at time of Bid) 14) Utilities Department’s Water, Gas, Wastewater, Electric Utilities Standards (most current version at time of Bid) 15) City of Palo Alto Traffic Control Requirements 16) City of Palo Alto Truck Route Map and Regulations 17) Notice Inviting Pre-Qualification Statements, Pre-Qualification Statement, and Pre- Qualification Checklist (if applicable) 18) Performance and Payment Bonds 3.2 Order of Precedence. For the purposes of construing, interpreting and resolving inconsistencies between and among the provisions of this Contract, the Contract Documents shall have the order of precedence as set forth in the preceding section. If a claimed inconsistency cannot be resolved through the order of precedence, the City shall have the sole power to decide which document or provision shall govern as may be in the best interests of the City. Invitation for Bid (IFB) Package 8 Rev. March 17, 2017 CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT SECTION 4 CONTRACTOR’S DUTY. 4.1 Contractor’s Duties Contractor agrees to perform all of the Work required for the Project, as specified in the Contract Documents, all of which are fully incorporated herein. Contractor shall provide, furnish, and supply all things necessary and incidental for the timely performance and completion of the Work, including, but not limited to, provision of all necessary labor, materials, equipment, transportation, and utilities, unless otherwise specified in the Contract Documents. Contractor also agrees to use its best efforts to complete the Work in a professional and expeditious manner and to meet or exceed the performance standards required by the Contract Documents. SECTION 5 PROJECT TEAM. 5.1 Contractor’s Co-operation. In addition to Contractor, City has retained, or may retain, consultants and contractors to provide professional and technical consultation for the design and construction of the Project. The Contract requires that Contractor operate efficiently, effectively and cooperatively with City as well as all other members of the Project Team and other contractors retained by City to construct other portions of the Project. SECTION 6 TIME OF COMPLETION. 6.1 Time Is of Essence. Time is of the essence with respect to all time limits set forth in the Contract Documents. 6.2 Commencement of Work. Contractor shall commence the Work on the date specified in City’s Notice to Proceed. 6.3 Contract Time. Work hereunder shall begin on the date specified on the City’s Notice to Proceed and shall be completed not later than . within Two Hundred Ten calendar days (210) after the commencement date specified in City’s Notice to Proceed. By executing this Construction Contract, Contractor expressly waives any claim for delayed early completion. 6.4 Liquidated Damages. Pursuant to Government Code Section 53069.85, if Contractor fails to achieve Substantial Completion of the entire Work within the Contract Time, including any approved extensions thereto, City may assess liquidated damages on a daily basis for each day of Unexcused Delay in achieving Substantial Completion, based on the amount of Five hundred Dollars ($500) per day, or as otherwise specified in the Special Provisions. Liquidated damages may also be separately assessed for failure to meet milestones specified elsewhere in the Contract Documents, regardless of impact on the time for achieving Substantial Completion. The assessment of liquidated damages is not a penalty but considered to be a reasonable estimate of the amount of damages City will suffer by delay in completion of the Work. The City is entitled to setoff the amount of liquidated damages assessed against any payments otherwise due to Contractor, Invitation for Bid (IFB) Package 9 Rev. March 17, 2017 CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT including, but not limited to, setoff against release of retention. If the total amount of liquidated damages assessed exceeds the amount of unreleased retention, City is entitled to recover the balance from Contractor or its sureties. Occupancy or use of the Project in whole or in part prior to Substantial Completion, shall not operate as a waiver of City’s right to assess liquidated damages. 6.4.1 Other Remedies. City is entitled to any and all available legal and equitable remedies City may have where City’s Losses are caused by any reason other than Contractor’s failure to achieve Substantial Completion of the entire Work within the Contract Time. 6.5 Adjustments to Contract Time. The Contract Time may only be adjusted for time extensions approved by City and memorialized in a Change Order approved in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Documents. SECTION 7 COMPENSATION TO CONTRACTOR. 7.1 Contract Sum. Contractor shall be compensated for satisfactory completion of the Work in compliance with the Contract Documents the Contract Sum of One Million Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Nine Hundred Ninety Three Dollars ($1,250,993.00). [This amount includes the Base Bid and Additive Alternates .] 7.2 Full Compensation. The Contract Sum shall be full compensation to Contractor for all Work provided by Contractor and, except as otherwise expressly permitted by the terms of the Contract Documents, shall cover all Losses arising out of the nature of the Work or from the acts of the elements or any unforeseen difficulties or obstructions which may arise or be encountered in performance of the Work until its Acceptance by City, all risks connected with the Work, and any and all expenses incurred due to suspension or discontinuance of the Work, except as expressly provided herein. The Contract Sum may only be adjusted for Change Orders approved in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Documents. SECTION 8 STANDARD OF CARE. 8.1 Standard of Care. Contractor agrees that the Work shall be performed by qualified, experienced and well-supervised personnel. All services performed in connection with this Construction Contract shall be performed in a manner consistent with the standard of care under California law applicable to those who specialize in providing such services for projects of the type, scope and complexity of the Project. Invitation for Bid (IFB) Package 10 Rev. March 17, 2017 CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT SECTION 9 INDEMNIFICATION. 9.1 Hold Harmless. To the fullest extent allowed by law, Contractor will defend, indemnify, and hold harmless City, its City Council, boards and commissions, officers, agents, employees, representatives and volunteers (hereinafter individually referred to as an “Indemnitee” and collectively referred to as "Indemnitees"), through legal counsel acceptable to City, from and against any and liability, loss, damage, claims, expenses (including, without limitation, attorney fees, expert witness fees, paralegal fees, and fees and costs of litigation or arbitration) (collectively, “Liability”) of every nature arising out of or in connection with the acts or omissions of Contractor, its employees, Subcontractors, representatives, or agents, in performing the Work or its failure to comply with any of its obligations under the Contract, except such Liability caused by the active negligence, sole negligence, or willful misconduct of an Indemnitee. Contractor shall pay City for any costs City incurs to enforce this provision. Except as provided in Section 9.2 below, nothing in the Contract Documents shall be construed to give rise to any implied right of indemnity in favor of Contractor against City or any other Indemnitee. Pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 9201, City shall timely notify Contractor upon receipt of any third-party claim relating to the Contract. 9.2 Survival. The provisions of Section 9 shall survive the termination of this Construction Contract. SECTION 10 NON-DISCRIMINATION. 10.1 Municipal Code Requirement. As set forth in Palo Alto Municipal Code section 2.30.510, Contractor certifies that in the performance of this Agreement, it shall not discriminate in the employment of any person because of the race, skin color, gender, age, religion, disability, national origin, ancestry, sexual orientation, housing status, marital status, familial status, weight or height of such person. Contractor acknowledges that it has read and understands the provisions of Section 2.30.510 of the Palo Alto Municipal Code relating to Nondiscrimination Requirements and the penalties for violation thereof, and will comply with all requirements of Section 2.30.510 pertaining to nondiscrimination in employment. SECTION 11 INSURANCE AND BONDS. 11.1 Evidence of coverage. Within ten (10) business days following issuance of the Notice of Award, Contractor shall provide City with evidence that it has obtained insurance and shall submit Performance and Payment Bonds satisfying all requirements in Article 11 of the General Conditions. Invitation for Bid (IFB) Package 11 Rev. March 17, 2017 CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT SECTION 12 PROHIBITION AGAINST TRANSFERS. 12.1 Assignment. City is entering into this Construction Contract in reliance upon the stated experience and qualifications of the Contractor and its Subcontractors set forth in Contractor’s Bid. Accordingly, Contractor shall not assign, hypothecate or transfer this Construction Contract or any interest therein directly or indirectly, by operation of law or otherwise without the prior written consent of City. Any assignment, hypothecation or transfer without said consent shall be null and void, and shall be deemed a substantial breach of contract and grounds for default in addition to any other legal or equitable remedy available to the City. 12.2 Assignment by Law. The sale, assignment, transfer or other disposition of any of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Contractor or of any general partner or joint venturer or syndicate member of Contractor, if the Contractor is a partnership or joint venture or syndicate or co-tenancy shall result in changing the control of Contractor, shall be construed as an assignment of this Construction Contract. Control means more than fifty percent (50%) of the voting power of the corporation or other entity. SECTION 13 NOTICES. 13.1 Method of Notice. All notices, demands, requests or approvals to be given under this Construction Contract shall be given in writing and shall be deemed served on the earlier of the following: (i) On the date delivered if delivered personally; (ii) On the third business day after the deposit thereof in the United States mail, postage prepaid, and addressed as hereinafter provided; (iii) On the date sent if sent by facsimile transmission; (iv) On the date sent if delivered by electronic mail; or (v) On the date it is accepted or rejected if sent by certified mail. 13.2 Notice to Recipients. All notices, demands or requests (including, without limitation, Change Order Requests and Claims) from Contractor to City shall include the Project name and the number of this Construction Contract and shall be addressed to City at: To City: City of Palo Alto City Clerk 250 Hamilton Avenue P.O. Box 10250 Palo Alto, CA 94303 Copy to: City of Palo Alto Public Works Administration 250 Hamilton Avenue Palo Alto, CA 94301 Attn: Holly Boyd AND [Include Construction Manager, If Applicable.] Invitation for Bid (IFB) Package 12 Rev. March 17, 2017 CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT City of Palo Alto Utilities Engineering 250 Hamilton Avenue Palo Alto, CA 94301 Attn: In addition, copies of all Claims by Contractor under this Construction Contract shall be provided to the following: Palo Alto City Attorney’s Office 250 Hamilton Avenue P.O. Box 10250 Palo Alto, California 94303 All Claims shall be sent by registered mail or certified mail with return receipt requested. All notices, demands, requests or approvals from City to Contractor shall be addressed to: JJR Construction, Inc. Attn: Carlos Raposo 1120 Ninth Avenue San Mateo, CA 94402 13.3 Change of Address. In advance of any change of address, Contractor shall notify City of the change of address in writing. Each party may, by written notice only, add, delete or replace any individuals to whom and addresses to which notice shall be provided. SECTION 14 DEFAULT. 14.1 Notice of Default. In the event that City determines, in its sole discretion, that Contractor has failed or refused to perform any of the obligations set forth in the Contract Documents, or is in breach of any provision of the Contract Documents, City may give written notice of default to Contractor in the manner specified for the giving of notices in the Construction Contract, with a copy to Contractor’s performance bond surety. 14.2 Opportunity to Cure Default. Except for emergencies, Contractor shall cure any default in performance of its obligations under the Contract Documents within two (2) Days (or such shorter time as City may reasonably require) after receipt of written notice. However, if the breach cannot be reasonably cured within such time, Contractor will commence to cure the breach within two (2) Days (or such shorter time as City may reasonably require) and will diligently and continuously prosecute such cure to completion within a reasonable time, which shall in no event be later than ten (10) Days after receipt of such written notice. Invitation for Bid (IFB) Package 13 Rev. March 17, 2017 CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT SECTION 15 CITY'S RIGHTS AND REMEDIES. 15.1 Remedies Upon Default. If Contractor fails to cure any default of this Construction Contract within the time period set forth above in Section 14, then City may pursue any remedies available under law or equity, including, without limitation, the following: 15.1.1 Delete Certain Services. City may, without terminating the Construction Contract, delete certain portions of the Work, reserving to itself all rights to Losses related thereto. 15.1.2 Perform and Withhold. City may, without terminating the Construction Contract, engage others to perform the Work or portion of the Work that has not been adequately performed by Contractor and withhold the cost thereof to City from future payments to Contractor, reserving to itself all rights to Losses related thereto. 15.1.3 Suspend The Construction Contract. City may, without terminating the Construction Contract and reserving to itself all rights to Losses related thereto, suspend all or any portion of this Construction Contract for as long a period of time as City determines, in its sole discretion, appropriate, in which event City shall have no obligation to adjust the Contract Sum or Contract Time, and shall have no liability to Contractor for damages if City directs Contractor to resume Work. 15.1.4 Terminate the Construction Contract for Default. City shall have the right to terminate this Construction Contract, in whole or in part, upon the failure of Contractor to promptly cure any default as required by Section 14. City’s election to terminate the Construction Contract for default shall be communicated by giving Contractor a written notice of termination in the manner specified for the giving of notices in the Construction Contract. Any notice of termination given to Contractor by City shall be effective immediately, unless otherwise provided therein. 15.1.5 Invoke the Performance Bond. City may, with or without terminating the Construction Contract and reserving to itself all rights to Losses related thereto, exercise its rights under the Performance Bond. 15.1.6 Additional Provisions. All of City’s rights and remedies under this Construction Contract are cumulative, and shall be in addition to those rights and remedies available in law or in equity. Designation in the Contract Documents of certain breaches as material shall not waive the City’s authority to designate other breaches as material nor limit City’s right to terminate the Construction Contract, or prevent the City from terminating the Agreement for breaches that are not material. City’s determination of whether there has been noncompliance with the Construction Contract so as to warrant exercise by City of its rights and remedies for default under the Construction Contract, shall be binding on all parties. No termination or action taken by City after such termination shall prejudice any other rights or remedies of City provided by law or equity or by the Contract Documents upon such termination; and City may proceed against Contractor to recover all liquidated damages and Losses suffered by City. 15.2 Delays by Sureties. Time being of the essence in the performance of the Work, if Contractor’s surety fails to arrange for completion of the Work in accordance with the Performance Bond, within seven (7) calendar days from the date of the notice of termination, Contractor’s surety shall be deemed to have waived its right to complete the Work under the Contract, and City may immediately make arrangements for the completion of the Work through use of its own forces, by hiring a replacement contractor, or by any other means that City determines advisable under the circumstances. Contractor and its surety shall be jointly and severally Invitation for Bid (IFB) Package 14 Rev. March 17, 2017 CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT liable for any additional cost incurred by City to complete the Work following termination. In addition, City shall have the right to use any materials, supplies, and equipment belonging to Contractor and located at the Worksite for the purposes of completing the remaining Work. 15.3 Damages to City. 15.3.1 For Contractor's Default. City will be entitled to recovery of all Losses under law or equity in the event of Contractor’s default under the Contract Documents. 15.3.2 Compensation for Losses. In the event that City's Losses arise from Contractor’s default under the Contract Documents, City shall be entitled to deduct the cost of such Losses from monies otherwise payable to Contractor. If the Losses incurred by City exceed the amount payable, Contractor shall be liable to City for the difference and shall promptly remit same to City. 15.4 Suspension by City 15.4.1 Suspension for Convenience. City may, at any time and from time to time, without cause, order Contractor, in writing, to suspend, delay, or interrupt the Work in whole or in part for such period of time, up to an aggregate of fifty percent (50%) of the Contract Time. The order shall be specifically identified as a Suspension Order by City. Upon receipt of a Suspension Order, Contractor shall, at City’s expense, comply with the order and take all reasonable steps to minimize costs allocable to the Work covered by the Suspension Order. During the Suspension or extension of the Suspension, if any, City shall either cancel the Suspension Order or, by Change Order, delete the Work covered by the Suspension Order. If a Suspension Order is canceled or expires, Contractor shall resume and continue with the Work. A Change Order will be issued to cover any adjustments of the Contract Sum or the Contract Time necessarily caused by such suspension. A Suspension Order shall not be the exclusive method for City to stop the Work. 15.4.2 Suspension for Cause. In addition to all other remedies available to City, if Contractor fails to perform or correct work in accordance with the Contract Documents, City may immediately order the Work, or any portion thereof, suspended until the cause for the suspension has been eliminated to City’s satisfaction. Contractor shall not be entitled to an increase in Contract Time or Contract Price for a suspension occasioned by Contractor’s failure to comply with the Contract Documents. City’s right to suspend the Work shall not give rise to a duty to suspend the Work, and City’s failure to suspend the Work shall not constitute a defense to Contractor’s failure to comply with the requirements of the Contract Documents. 15.5 Termination Without Cause. City may, at its sole discretion and without cause, terminate this Construction Contract in part or in whole upon written notice to Contractor. Upon receipt of such notice, Contractor shall, at City’s expense, comply with the notice and take all reasonable steps to minimize costs to close out and demobilize. The compensation allowed under this Paragraph 15.5 shall be the Contractor’s sole and exclusive compensation for such termination and Contractor waives any claim for other compensation or Losses, including, but not limited to, loss of anticipated profits, loss of revenue, lost opportunity, or other consequential, direct, indirect or incidental damages of any kind resulting from termination without cause. Termination pursuant to this provision does not relieve Contractor or its sureties from any of their obligations for Losses arising from or related to the Work performed by Contractor. Invitation for Bid (IFB) Package 15 Rev. March 17, 2017 CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT 15.5.1 Compensation. Following such termination and within forty-five (45) Days after receipt of a billing from Contractor seeking payment of sums authorized by this Paragraph 15.5.1, City shall pay the following to Contractor as Contractor’s sole compensation for performance of the Work : .1 For Work Performed. The amount of the Contract Sum allocable to the portion of the Work properly performed by Contractor as of the date of termination, less sums previously paid to Contractor. .2 For Close-out Costs. Reasonable costs of Contractor and its Subcontractors: (i) Demobilizing and (ii) Administering the close-out of its participation in the Project (including, without limitation, all billing and accounting functions, not including attorney or expert fees) for a period of no longer than thirty (30) Days after receipt of the notice of termination. .3 For Fabricated Items. Previously unpaid cost of any items delivered to the Project Site which were fabricated for subsequent incorporation in the Work. .4 Profit Allowance. An allowance for profit calculated as four percent (4%) of the sum of the above items, provided Contractor can prove a likelihood that it would have made a profit if the Construction Contract had not been terminated. 15.5.2 Subcontractors. Contractor shall include provisions in all of its subcontracts, purchase orders and other contracts permitting termination for convenience by Contractor on terms that are consistent with this Construction Contract and that afford no greater rights of recovery against Contractor than are afforded to Contractor against City under this Section. 15.6 Contractor’s Duties Upon Termination. Upon receipt of a notice of termination for default or for convenience, Contractor shall, unless the notice directs otherwise, do the following: (i) Immediately discontinue the Work to the extent specified in the notice; (ii) Place no further orders or subcontracts for materials, equipment, services or facilities, except as may be necessary for completion of such portion of the Work that is not discontinued; (iii) Provide to City a description in writing, no later than fifteen (15) days after receipt of the notice of termination, of all subcontracts, purchase orders and contracts that are outstanding, including, without limitation, the terms of the original price, any changes, payments, balance owing, the status of the portion of the Work covered and a copy of the subcontract, purchase order or contract and any written changes, amendments or modifications thereto, together with such other information as City may determine necessary in order to decide whether to accept assignment of or request Contractor to terminate the subcontract, purchase order or contract; (iv) Promptly assign to City those subcontracts, purchase orders or contracts, or portions thereof, that City elects to accept by assignment and cancel, on the most favorable terms reasonably possible, all subcontracts, purchase orders or contracts, or portions thereof, that City does not elect to accept by assignment; and (v) Thereafter do only such Work as may be necessary to preserve and protect Work already in progress and to protect materials, plants, and equipment on the Project Site or in transit thereto. Upon termination, whether for cause or for convenience, the provisions of the Contract Documents remain in effect as to any Claim, indemnity obligation, warranties, guarantees, Invitation for Bid (IFB) Package 16 Rev. March 17, 2017 CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT submittals of as-built drawings, instructions, or manuals, or other such rights and obligations arising prior to the termination date. SECTION 16 CONTRACTOR'S RIGHTS AND REMEDIES. 16.1 Contractor’s Remedies. Contractor may terminate this Construction Contract only upon the occurrence of one of the following: 16.1.1 For Work Stoppage. The Work is stopped for sixty (60) consecutive Days, through no act or fault of Contractor, any Subcontractor, or any employee or agent of Contractor or any Subcontractor, due to issuance of an order of a court or other public authority other than City having jurisdiction or due to an act of government, such as a declaration of a national emergency making material unavailable. This provision shall not apply to any work stoppage resulting from the City’s issuance of a suspension notice issued either for cause or for convenience. 16.1.2 For City's Non-Payment. If City does not make pay Contractor undisputed sums within ninety (90) Days after receipt of notice from Contractor, Contractor may terminate the Construction Contract (30) days following a second notice to City of Contractor’s intention to terminate the Construction Contract. 16.2 Damages to Contractor. In the event of termination for cause by Contractor, City shall pay Contractor the sums provided for in Paragraph 15.5.1 above. Contractor agrees to accept such sums as its sole and exclusive compensation and agrees to waive any claim for other compensation or Losses, including, but not limited to, loss of anticipated profits, loss of revenue, lost opportunity, or other consequential, direct, indirect and incidental damages, of any kind. SECTION 17 ACCOUNTING RECORDS. 17.1 Financial Management and City Access. Contractor shall keep full and detailed accounts and exercise such controls as may be necessary for proper financial management under this Construction Contract in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and practices. City and City's accountants during normal business hours, may inspect, audit and copy Contractor's records, books, estimates, take-offs, cost reports, ledgers, schedules, correspondence, instructions, drawings, receipts, subcontracts, purchase orders, vouchers, memoranda and other data relating to this Project. Contractor shall retain these documents for a period of three (3) years after the later of (i) Final Payment or (ii) final resolution of all Contract Disputes and other disputes, or (iii) for such longer period as may be required by law. Invitation for Bid (IFB) Package 17 Rev. March 17, 2017 CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT 17.2 Compliance with City Requests. Contractor's compliance with any request by City pursuant to this Section 17 shall be a condition precedent to filing or maintenance of any legal action or proceeding by Contractor against City and to Contractor's right to receive further payments under the Contract Documents. City many enforce Contractor’s obligation to provide access to City of its business and other records referred to in Section 17.1 for inspection or copying by issuance of a writ or a provisional or permanent mandatory injunction by a court of competent jurisdiction based on affidavits submitted to such court, without the necessity of oral testimony. SECTION 18 INDEPENDENT PARTIES. 18.1 Status of parties. Each party is acting in its independent capacity and not as agents, employees, partners, or joint ventures’ of the other party. City, its officers or employees shall have no control over the conduct of Contractor or its respective agents, employees, subconsultants, or subcontractors, except as herein set forth. SECTION 19 NUISANCE. 19.1 Nuisance Prohibited. Contractor shall not maintain, commit, nor permit the maintenance or commission of any nuisance in connection in the performance of services under this Construction Contract. SECTION 20 PERMITS AND LICENSES. 20.1 Payment of Fees. Except as otherwise provided in the Special Provisions and Technical Specifications, The Contractor shall provide, procure and pay for all licenses, permits, and fees, required by the City or other government jurisdictions or agencies necessary to carry out and complete the Work. Payment of all costs and expenses for such licenses, permits, and fees shall be included in one or more Bid items. No other compensation shall be paid to the Contractor for these items or for delays caused by non-City inspectors or conditions set forth in the licenses or permits issued by other agencies. SECTION 21 WAIVER. 21.1 Waiver. A waiver by either party of any breach of any term, covenant, or condition contained herein shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any subsequent breach of the same or any other term, covenant, or condition contained herein, whether of the same or a different character. Invitation for Bid (IFB) Package 18 Rev. March 17, 2017 CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT SECTION 22 GOVERNING LAW AND VENUE; COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS. 22.1 Governing Law. This Construction Contract shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of California, and venue shall be in a court of competent jurisdiction in the County of Santa Clara, and no other place. 22.2 Compliance with Laws. Contractor shall comply with all applicable federal and California laws and city laws, including, without limitation, ordinances and resolutions, in the performance of work under this Construction Contract. 22.2.1 Palo Alto Minimum Wage Ordinance. Contractor shall comply with all requirements of the Palo Alto Municipal Code Chapter 4.62 (Citywide Minimum Wage), as it may be amended from time to time. In particular, for any employee otherwise entitled to the State minimum wage, who performs at least two (2) hours of work in a calendar week within the geographic boundaries of the City, Contractor shall pay such employees no less than the minimum wage set forth in Palo Alto Municipal Code section 4.62.030 for each hour worked within the geographic boundaries of the City of Palo Alto. In addition, Contractor shall post notices regarding the Palo Alto Minimum Wage Ordinance in accordance with Palo Alto Municipal Code section 4.62.060. SECTION 23 COMPLETE AGREEMENT. 23.1 Integration. This Agreement represents the entire and integrated agreement between the parties and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations, and contracts, either written or oral. This Agreement may be amended only by a written instrument, which is signed by the parties. SECTION 24 SURVIVAL OF CONTRACT. 24.1 Survival of Provisions. The provisions of the Construction Contract which by their nature survive termination of the Construction Contract or Final Completion, including, without limitation, all warranties, indemnities, payment obligations, and City’s right to audit Contractor’s books and records, shall remain in full force and effect after Final Completion or any termination of the Construction Contract. SECTION 25 PREVAILING WAGES. This Project is not subject to prevailing wages. Contractor is not required to pay prevailing wages in the performance and implementation of the Project in accordance with SB 7, if the public works contract does not include a project of $25,000 or less, when the project is for construction work, or the contract does not include a project of $15,000 or less, when the project is for alteration, demolition, repair, or maintenance (collectively, ‘improvement’) work. Or Contractor is required to pay general prevailing wages as defined in Subchapter 3, Title 8 of the California Code of Regulations and Section 16000 et seq. and Section 1773.1 of the California Labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work Invitation for Bid (IFB) Package 19 Rev. March 17, 2017 CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT in this locality for each craft, classification, or type of worker needed to execute the contract for this Project from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations (“DIR”). Copies of these rates may be obtained at the Purchasing Division’s office of the City of Palo Alto. Contractor shall provide a copy of prevailing wage rates to any staff or subcontractor hired, and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. Contractor shall comply with the provisions of all sections, including, but not limited to, Sections 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1782, 1810, and 1813, of the Labor Code pertaining to prevailing wages. SECTION 26 NON-APPROPRIATION. 26.1 Appropriations. This Agreement is subject to the fiscal provisions of the Charter of the City of Palo Alto and the Palo Alto Municipal Code. This Agreement will terminate without any penalty (a) at the end of any fiscal year in the event that the City does not appropriate funds for the following fiscal year for this event, or (b) at any time within a fiscal year in the event that funds are only appropriated for a portion of the fiscal year and funds for this Construction Contract are no longer available. This section shall take precedence in the event of a conflict with any other covenant, term, condition, or provision of this Agreement. SECTION 27 AUTHORITY. 27.1 Representation of Parties. The individuals executing this Agreement represent and warrant that they have the legal capacity and authority to do so on behalf of their respective legal entities. SECTION 28 COUNTERPARTS 28.1 Multiple Counterparts. This Agreement may be signed in multiple counterparts, which shall, when executed by all the parties, constitute a single binding agreement. SECTION 29 SEVERABILITY. 29.1 Severability. In case a provision of this Construction Contract is held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, the validity, legality and enforceability of the remaining provisions shall not be affected. SECTION 30 STATUTORY AND REGULATORY REFERENCES. 30.1 Amendments to Laws. With respect to any amendments to any statutes or regulations referenced in these Contract Documents, the reference is deemed to be the version in effect on the date that the Contract was awarded by City, unless otherwise required by law. SECTION 31 WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CERTIFICATION. 31.1 Workers Compensation. Pursuant to Labor Code Section 1861, by signing this Contract, Contractor certifies as follows: Invitation for Bid (IFB) Package 20 Rev. March 17, 2017 CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT “I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for workers’ compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the Work on this Contract.” SECTION 32 DIR REGISTRATION AND OTHER SB 854 REQUIREMENTS. 32.1 General Notice to Contractor. City requires Contractor and its listed subcontractors to comply with the requirements of SB 854. 32.2 Labor Code section 1771.1(a) City provides notice to Contractor of the requirements of California Labor Code section 1771.1(a), which reads: “A contractor or subcontractor shall not be qualified to bid on, be listed in a bid proposal, subject to the requirements of Section 4104 of the Public Contract Code, or engage in the performance of any contract for public work, as defined in this chapter, unless currently registered and qualified to perform public work pursuant to Section 1725.5. It is not a violation of this section for an unregistered contractor to submit a bid that is authorized by Section 7029.1 of the Business and Professions Code or Section 10164 or 20103.5 of the Public Contract Code, provided the contactor is registered to perform public work pursuant to Section 1725.5 at the time the contract is awarded.” 32.3 DIR Registration Required. City will not accept a bid proposal from or enter into this Construction Contract with Contractor without proof that Contractor and its listed subcontractors are registered with the California Department of Industrial Relations (“DIR”) to perform public work, subject to limited exceptions. 32.4 Posting of Job Site Notices. City gives notice to Contractor and its listed subcontractors that Contractor is required to post all job site notices prescribed by law or regulation and Contractor is subject to SB 854-compliance monitoring and enforcement by DIR. 32.5 Payroll Records. City requires Contractor and its listed subcontractors to comply with the requirements of Labor Code section 1776, including: (i) Keep accurate payroll records, showing the name, address, social security number, work classification, straight time and overtime hours worked each day and week, and the actual per diem wages paid to each journeyman, apprentice, worker, or other employee employed by, respectively, Contractor and its listed subcontractors, in connection with the Project. (ii) The payroll records shall be verified as true and correct and shall be certified and made available for inspection at all reasonable hours at the principal office of Contractor and its listed subcontractors, respectively. Invitation for Bid (IFB) Package 21 Rev. March 17, 2017 CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT (iii) At the request of City, acting by its project manager, Contractor and its listed subcontractors shall make the certified payroll records available for inspection or furnished upon request to the project manager within ten (10) days of receipt of City’s request. City requests Contractor and its listed subcontractors to submit the certified payroll records to the project manager at the end of each week during the Project. (iv) If the certified payroll records are not produced to the project manager within the 10-day period, then Contractor and its listed subcontractors shall be subject to a penalty of one hundred dollars ($100.00) per calendar day, or portion thereof, for each worker, and City shall withhold the sum total of penalties from the progress payment(s) then due and payable to Contractor. This provision supplements the provisions of Section 15 hereof. (v)Inform the project manager of the location of contractor’s and its listed subcontractors’ payroll records (street address, city and county) at the commencement of the Project, and also provide notice to the project manager within five (5) business days of any change of location of those payroll records. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Construction Contract to be executed the date and year first above written. CITY OF PALO ALTO ____________________________ Purchasing Manager City Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM: ____________________________ City Attorney or designee APPROVED: ____________________________ Public Works Director CONTRACTOR Officer 1 By:___________________________ Name:________________________ Title:__________________________ Date: _________________________ Officer 2 By:____________________________ Name:_________________________ Title:___________________________ Date:____________________________ 2019 SIDEWALK, CURB and GUTTER REPAIRS PROJECT IFB NO. 174910 BID SUMMARY ATTACHMENT B Base Bid: BID DESCRIPTION BID UNIT BID UNIT BID UNIT BID UNIT BID UNIT BID UNIT BID ITEM QTY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT 1 Sidewalk, 4" thick 29,300 SF $16 $468,800 $17.00 $498,100.00 $20.50 $600,650.00 $17.00 $498,100.00 $23.00 $673,900.00 $33.00 $966,900.00 2 Driveway, 6" thick 4,000 SF $18 $72,000 $26.00 $104,000.00 $23.50 $94,000.00 $17.00 $68,000.00 $26.00 $104,000.00 $43.00 $172,000.00 3 Curb 1,650 LF $30 $49,500 $46.50 $76,725.00 $58.00 $95,700.00 $75.00 $123,750.00 $55.00 $90,750.00 $53.00 $87,450.00 4 Gutter pan 4,200 SF $18 $75,600 $26.00 $109,200.00 $21.00 $88,200.00 $16.00 $67,200.00 $28.00 $117,600.00 $43.00 $180,600.00 5 Rolled curb & gutter, Type B 450 LF $65 $29,250 $105.00 $47,250.00 $88.00 $39,600.00 $180.00 $81,000.00 $125.00 $56,250.00 $123.00 $55,350.00 6 Curb ramp 16 EA $5,500 $88,000 $5,500.00 $88,000.00 $5,888.00 $94,208.00 $4,800.00 $76,800.00 $6,200.00 $99,200.00 $10,333.00 $165,328.00 7 Detectable warning surface only 35 EA $600 $21,000 $450.00 $15,750.00 $605.00 $21,175.00 $1,200.00 $42,000.00 $850.00 $29,750.00 $539.00 $18,865.00 8 Asphalt pavement 4,200 SF $10 $42,000 $12.00 $50,400.00 $25.00 $105,000.00 $22.00 $92,400.00 $22.00 $92,400.00 $20.00 $84,000.00 9 Special sawcutting 200 LF $4 $800 $20.00 $4,000.00 $4.00 $800.00 $13.50 $2,700.00 $9.00 $1,800.00 $8.00 $1,600.00 10 Adjust utility boxes (lid>24" long)30 EA $500 $15,000 $300.00 $9,000.00 $275.00 $8,250.00 $166.00 $4,980.00 $950.00 $28,500.00 $290.00 $8,700.00 11 Catch basin 3 EA $6,000 $18,000 $3,500.00 $10,500.00 $4,800.00 $14,400.00 $8,000.00 $24,000.00 $4,500.00 $13,500.00 $5,553.00 $16,659.00 12 Reset existing catch basin 3 EA $800 $2,400 $2,000.00 $6,000.00 $1,285.00 $3,855.00 $1,100.00 $3,300.00 $2,000.00 $6,000.00 $353.00 $1,059.00 13 Reinforced concrete pipe 70 LF $150 $10,500 $300.00 $21,000.00 $230.00 $16,100.00 $530.00 $37,100.00 $225.00 $15,750.00 $363.00 $25,410.00 14 Sidewalk with base rock shoulders 400 SF $25 $10,000 $17.00 $6,800.00 $27.00 $10,800.00 $22.00 $8,800.00 $30.00 $12,000.00 $40.00 $16,000.00 15 Rubber sidewalk 650 SF $65 $42,250 $45.00 $29,250.00 $51.00 $33,150.00 $27.00 $17,550.00 $50.00 $32,500.00 $73.00 $47,450.00 16 Inert solid recycling 1,800 Ton $5 $9,000 $0.01 $18.00 $0.10 $180.00 $5.50 $9,900.00 $5.00 $9,000.00 $0.33 $594.00 17 Notifications & Traffic control 1 LS $30,000 $30,000 $150,000.00 $150,000.00 $6,608.00 $6,608.00 $300,000.00 $300,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $157,073.00 $157,073.00 18 Miscellaneous improvements 1 LS $25,000 $25,000 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 Base Bid Total (Basis of Award):$1,009,100 $1,250,993.00 $1,257,676.00 $1,482,580.00 $1,417,900.00 $2,030,038.00 Add Alternate 1: 19 Sidewalk, 4" thick 2,500 SF $16.00 $40,000 $17.00 $42,500.00 $21.10 $52,750.00 $17.00 $42,500.00 $50.00 $125,000.00 $25.00 $62,500.00 Add Alternate 1 Bid Total:$40,000 $42,500.00 $52,750.00 $42,500.00 $125,000.00 $62,500.00 Add Alternate 2: 20 Sidewalk, 4" thick 3,000 SF $16.00 $48,000 $17.00 $51,000.00 $20.50 $61,500.00 $17.00 $51,000.00 $50.00 $150,000.00 $23.00 $69,000.00 Add Alternate 2 Bid Total:$48,000 $51,000.00 $61,500.00 $51,000.00 $150,000.00 $69,000.00 CONTRACT TOTAL AMOUNT:$1,097,100 $1,344,493.00 $1,371,926.00 $1,576,080.00 $1,692,900.00 $2,161,538.00 PERCENTAGE OVER ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE:24.0%24.6%46.9%40.5%101.2% FBD Vanguard Construction, Inc.J.J.R. Construction, Inc.Engineer's Estimate Golden Bay Construction, Inc.R&S Construction Management Inc.Spencon Construction Attachment B City of Palo Alto (ID # 10356) City Council Staff Report Report Type: Consent Calendar Meeting Date: 5/20/2019 City of Palo Alto Page 1 Summary Title: Adoption of a Resolution for Ron Arp Title: Adoption of a Resolution of the City Council Expressing Appreciation to Ron Arp Upon his Retirement From: City Manager Lead Department: Public Works Attachments: Attachment A: Resolution Expressing Appreciation to Ron Arp Upon his Retirement CITY OF PALO ALTO Resolution EXPRESSING APPRECIATION FOR OUTSTANDING PUBLIC SERVICE TO THE PALO ALTO COMMUNITY BY RON ARP WHEREAS, after two decades of outstanding service to the City of Palo Alto, Zero Waste Manager, Ron Arp is Retiring on June 7, 2019; he was hired in 1999 and has held multiple positions in Public Works Environmental Services, culminating in his appointment as the Zero Waste Manager in 2012; and WHEREAS, Ron Arp managed the 130-acre Palo Alto Landfill and successfully protected the air, surface water and groundwater from potential releases of pollutants from the landfill. Mr. Arp oversaw the design, construction and management of the methane collection, leachate collection, and storm water management systems. He completely upgraded previous systems and created maintenance systems for the next 30 years or more; and WHEREAS, Ron Arp managed a $5 million landfill closure effort, after the landfill had existed for close to 100 years. He made numerous improvements to standard closure techniques which saved the City a substantial amount of money and resulted in a superior design for the arid west. Rather than a plastic liner with a limited life, he focused on removal of rain water through evapotranspiration, which will work indefinitely; and WHEREAS, Ron Arp oversaw the design and construction of the most sophisticated Household Hazardous Waste drop-off station in the Bay Area for a City the size of Palo Alto, keeping 250,000 pounds of toxic materials per year out of local ecosystems; and WHEREAS, Ron Arp led the implementation of countless new Zero Waste programs which increased the City’s diversion rate from landfills from 60 percent to 80 percent, as well as the implementation of a new commercial facility enforcement program to keep recyclables, food and other compostables out of landfills; and WHEREAS, Ron Arp oversaw the creation of a new 2018 Zero Waste Plan designed to deal with the reduction of disposable plastics and protection of ecosystems. The Plan also dealt with demolition and construction materials, food rescue, and other hard to address materials; and WHEREAS, Ron Arp returned the Refuse Fund Finances to operating in the black and re-established sufficient Fund Reserves, led the amendment and extension for the GreenWaste of Palo Alto contract, and shaped deconstruction initiatives; and WHEREAS, Ron Arp molded a collaborative, positive and professional Zero Waste team through active contribution, consensus, and the pursuit of the ultimate goal of zero waste to landfills. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Council of the City of Palo Alto hereby gratefully records and extends its sincere appreciation to Ron Arp for his long, dedicated, and exceptional service to the Palo Alto community and thanks him for his many contributions to improving the quality of life of Palo Alto residents. INTRODUCED AND PASSED: May 20, 2019 ATTEST: APPROVED: ___________________ _________________ City Clerk Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: ___________________ _________________ City Manager City Attorney Attachment A City of Palo Alto (ID # 10358) City Council Staff Report Report Type: Consent Calendar Meeting Date: 5/20/2019 City of Palo Alto Page 1 Council Priority: Fiscal Sustainability Summary Title: Gas Statute of Limitations Ordinance Title: Adoption of an Ordinance Amending Title 12 of the Palo Alto Municipal Code to Set a 120 Day Statute of Limitations for Challenges to the City’s Gas Rates From: City Manager Lead Department: Utilities Recommendation Staff recommends that Council adopt the attached ordinance (Attachment A) amending the Palo Alto Municipal Code to set a 120 day statute of limitations for challenges to the City’s gas rates. Background In 2000, the California State Legislature enacted a 120 day statute of limitations for challenges to municipal electric rates or charges. This statute applies to electric rate challenges in Palo Alto. But the Legislature did not enact a similar statute of limitations for challenges to gas rates or charges, most likely because there are only three municipal gas utilities in California, including Palo Alto’s gas utility. To remain consistent with state law, Palo Alto can enact its own statute of limitations for challenges to gas rates or charges. Discussion Public Utilities Code Section 10004.5 sets a 120 day statute of limitations for challenges to municipal electric rates or charges. Challenges to water and sewer capacity and connection fees, development impact fees, and certain building and zoning fees must also be brought within 120 days, under Government Code Section 66022. Adopting a similar statute of limitations for challenges to gas rates and charges aims to balance the interests of the City with the interests of the City’s utility customers, by allowing customers to bring challenges to gas rates and charges within a reasonable, but limited, period of time. Without a statute of limitations, customers may seek a refund years after a charge has been collected, making it difficult for the City of Palo Alto Utilities Department to maintain the stable budget necessary to operate effectively, while keeping rates as low as possible. By establishing a reasonable period of time beyond which the City will not face exposure to challenges to the validity of gas rates or City of Palo Alto Page 2 charges, a statute of limitations minimizes the fiscal uncertainty that results when there is no clearly established closure on such challenges, and provides clear guidance to customers considering a challenge. These are the same public policy concerns which underlie the state statutes applicable to electric rates and the capacity, connection and development fees described above. Policy Implications The proposed ordinance is consistent with the City’s policy of fiscal sustainability. Resource Impact The approval of the ordinance as recommended would allow Customers to bring challenges to gas rates and charges within 120 days after the effective date of the applicable rates. Adoption of this statute of limitations will facilitate stable budgeting and planning necessary to operate effectively and keep rates as low as possible. Environmental Review The Council finds that the adoption of this ordinance setting a statute of limitations for challenges to gas rates does not meet the definition of a project under Public Resources Code section 21065, therefore California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) review is not required. Attachments: • Attachment A: ORDINANCE Gas Rate Challenges Attachment A Not Yet Approved 6055163 Ordinance No. _____ Ordinance of the Council of the City of Palo Alto Adding Section 12.20.030 (Statute of Limitations for Challenges to Gas Rates) to Chapter 12.20 (Utility Rules and Regulations) of the Palo Alto Municipal Code to Set a 120-Day Statute of Limitations for Challenges to Gas Rates The Council of the City of Palo Alto ORDAINS as follows: SECTION 1. Findings and Declarations. The City Council finds and declares as follows: A. A statute of limitations for challenges to gas rates and charges aims to balance the interests of the City of Palo Alto (“City”) with the interests of City of Palo Alto Utilities Customers (“Customers”), by allowing Customers to bring challenges to gas rates and charges within a reasonable, but limited, period of time. B. Without a statute of limitations, Customers may argue that they are able to request a refund years after a charge has been collected, making it difficult for the City of Palo Alto Utilities Department to maintain the stable budget necessary to operate effectively, while keeping rates as low as possible. C. By establishing a reasonable period of time beyond which the City will not face exposure to challenges to the validity of gas rates or charges, a statute of limitations minimizes the fiscal uncertainty that results when there is no clearly established closure on such challenges, and provides clear guidance to customers considering a challenge. D. The California State Legislature enacted a similar 120-day statute of limitations for challenges to electric rates or charges in 2000, which is codified in Public Utilities Code Section 10004.5. This rule applies to electric rate challenges in Palo Alto. E. The California State Legislature did not enact a similar statute of limitations for challenges to gas rates or charges, because there are only a few municipal gas utilities in the State. As one of the few municipal gas utilities in the State of California, it is incumbent upon the City of Palo Alto to enact its own statute of limitations for challenges to gas rates or charges, which reflects the same public policy concerns underlying Public Utilities Code Section 10004.5. SECTION 2. Section 12.20.030 (Statute of Limitations for Challenges to Gas Rates) of Chapter 12.20 (Utility Rules and Regulations) is hereby added to read as follows: 12.20.030 Statute of Limitations for Challenges to Gas Rates. Any judicial action or proceeding against the City, to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul an ordinance, resolution, or motion fixing or changing a rate or charge for a gas commodity or a gas service furnished by City and adopted on or after June 1, 2019, shall be commenced within 120 days of the effective date of that ordinance, resolution, or motion. Attachment A Not Yet Approved 2 SECTION 3. If any section, subsection, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion or sections of the ordinance. The Council hereby declares that it should have adopted the ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. SECTION 4. The Council finds that the adoption of this ordinance setting a statute of limitations for challenges to gas rates does not meet the definition of a project under Public Resources Code section 21065, therefore California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) review is not required. SECTION 5. This ordinance shall be effective on the thirty-first day after the date of its adoption. INTRODUCED: PASSED: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTENTIONS: ATTEST: ____________________________ ____________________________ City Clerk Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED: ____________________________ ____________________________ Assistant City Attorney City Manager ____________________________ General Manager, Utilities City of Palo Alto (ID # 10284) City Council Staff Report Report Type: Action Items Meeting Date: 5/20/2019 City of Palo Alto Page 1 Summary Title: Amend the Contract Between CalPERS and the City of Palo Alto Title: Adoption of: (1) a Resolution of Intent, and (2) an Ordinance to Amend the Contract Between the Board of Administration of the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) and the City of Palo Alto to Implement the Share of Employer Contribution in Accordance With Section 20516 of the California Government Code and the Memorandum of Agreement Between the City of Palo Alto and Utilities Management and Professional Association of Palo Alto (UMPAPA) From: City Manager Lead Department: Human Resources Recommendation Staff recommends the City Council: (1) Adopt the attached Resolution of Intention of the Council of the City of Palo Alto stating its intent to amend the contract between the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) and the City of Palo Alto in order to implement the pension cost share provision in accordance with California Government Code section 20516 and the Memorandum of Agreement between the City of Palo Alto and Utilities Management and Professional Association of Palo Alto (UMPAPA). (2) Adopt, on first reading, the attached ordinance amending the City’s contract with CalPERS. This ordinance will return to the Council on second reading in accordance with state law. Background In the most recent Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) with the Utilities Management and Professional Associations of Palo Alto (UMPAPA) approved on December 10, 2018 (CMR id#9843), provisions were included for employees to accept a greater share of pension costs to assist in curtailing the City’s growing pension contributions. While Council has already approved these provisions in the MOA, approval of this resolution to amend the pension City of Palo Alto Page 2 contracts is an administrative step required by CalPERS. This action results in UMPAPA employees paying an additional 1% of pension that would otherwise be paid by the City. UMPAPA is the final union to complete this process and all other unions have already completed the necessary administrative actions to shift a portion of the City’s pension contribution to the employee. Discussion The union agreement ratified by the City and UMPAPA requires employees to pay an additional 1% of pension that would otherwise be paid by the City. The administrative action required by CalPERS to implement this change is for Council to adopt a Resolution of Intent and conduct a first reading of the ordinance amending the contract. An amendment to the contract, which changes the employees’ rate of contribution. In addition, CalPERS requires a secret ballot election among the affected employees. This election must follow the adoption of the Resolution of Intention and precede adoption of the final documents. The final ordinance will return to Council for approval of the second reading and adoption on June 10, 2019. The contract amendment will become effective during the payroll period 31 days after this ordinance is adopted. With the employer contribution of pension costs continuing to rise, it was in the City’s best interest to negotiate a cost share arrangement with all bargaining units and implement for the non-represented groups as well. Once all steps of this administrative process are complete, UMPAPA employees will pay 9%, 8% or 7.25% toward their pension, based upon their date of hire and retirement tier. Although this change has already been agreed upon through the MOA, CalPERS requires this administrative step for Council to adopt a resolution in order to amend the pension contracts. Thus, this amendment seeks to bring the CalPERS contract in alignment with the current adopted MOA. Policy Implications This recommendation supports the City Council’s goal of reducing pension costs to the City and is consistent with existing City policies. Resource Impact Per the adopted MOA, the additional employee contribution to CalPERS employer contribution as outlined in this staff report is anticipated to save approximately $81,000 in the enterprise funds in FY 2020. This savings is factored into the development of the annual budget process per the terms in the MOA and brings UMPAPA into alignment with other bargaining units to pick-up a portion of the employer share. City of Palo Alto Page 3 Attachment A: Resolution of Intention Attachment B: Ordinance amending CalPERS contract Attachment C: CalPERS Sample amendment (referenced as Exhibit A in the Ordinance) Attachments: Attachment A: Resolution of Intention Attachment B: Ordinance amending CalPERS contract Attachment C: CalPERS Sample Amendment (Exhibit A) RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO APPROVE AN AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT BETWEEN THE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM AND THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF PALO ALTO WHEREAS, the Public Employees' Retirement Law permits the participation of public agencies and their employees in the Public Employees' Retirement System by the execution of a contract, and sets forth the procedure by which said public agencies may elect to subject themselves and their employees to amendments to said Law; and WHEREAS, one of the steps in the procedures to amend this contract is the adoption by the governing body of the public agency of a resolution giving notice of its intention to approve an amendment to said contract, which resolution shall contain a summary of the change proposed in said contract; and WHEREAS, the following is a statement of the proposed change: To provide Section 20516 (Employees Sharing Additional Cost) of 1% for local miscellaneous members in Utilities Management and Professional Association of Palo Alto. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the governing body of the above agency does hereby give notice of intention to approve an amendment to the contract between said public agency and the Board of Administration of the Public Employees' Retirement System, a copy of said amendment being attached hereto, as an "Exhibit" and by this reference made a part hereof. By: _________________________________ Presiding Officer _________________________________ Title ________________________________ Date adopted and approved (Amendment) CON-302 (Rev. 3/9/2016 rc) Not Yet Approved 1 AY/HR/2017-07-26 Ord Amending CalPERS Contract Ordinance No. Ordinance of the Council of the City of Palo Alto Authorizing an Amendment to the Contract between the City of Palo Alto and the Board of Administration of the California Public Employees’ Retirement System to Add Cost-Sharing Pursuant to Government Code Section 20516 The Council of the City of Palo Alto ORDAINS as follows: SECTION 1. That an amendment to the contract between the City of Palo Alto and the Board of Administration, California Employees’ System is hereby authorized, a copy of said amendment hereto, marked Exhibit A, and such reference made a part hereof as though herein set out in full. SECTION 2. The City Manager, or his designee is authorized, empowered, and directed to execute said amendment for and on behalf of the City of Palo Alto. adoption. SECTION 3. This ordinance shall be effective on the thirty-first day after the date of its INTRODUCED: PASSED: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTENTIONS: ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED: City Attorney City Manager Director of Human Resources Director of Administrative Service Not Yet Approved 2 AY/HR/2017-07-26 Ord Amending CalPERS Contract A A . Cal PERS EXHIBIT California Public Employees' Retirement System ----..... ~+----~-- AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT Between the Board of Administration California Public Employees' Retirement System and the City Council City of Palo Alto --------·-------- The Board of Administration, California Public Employees' Retirement System, hereinafter referred to as Board, and the governing body of the above public agency, hereinafter referred to as Public Agency, having entered into a contract effective January 1, 1942, and witnessed March 91 1942, and as amended effective January 1, 1948, April 1, 1949, January 1, 1952, July 1, 1954, February 1, 1956, November 1, 1964, September 23, 1968, December 14, 1970, February 1 , 197 4, July 8, 197 4, January 5, 1975, April 1, 1975, September 11, 1977, July 1, 1979, February 21, 1981, July 11, 1981, December 12, 1981, June 12, 1982, September 17, 1983, November 12, 1983, February 11, 1991, October 15, 1994, December 10, 1994, February 27, 1996, October 15, 1998, January 1, 1999, October 14, 1999, July 1, 2000, October 20, 2001, March 9, 2002, September 16, 2006, January 6, 2007, July 17, 2010, June 8, 2012, December 7, 20121 October 14, 2017, June 9, 2018 and October 13, 2018 which provides for participation of Public Agency in said System, Board and Public Agency hereby agree as follows: A. Paragraphs 1 through 18 are hereby stricken from said contract as executed effective October 13, 2018, and hereby replaced by the following paragraphs numbered 1 through 18 inclusive: PLEASE DO NOT SIGN "EXHIBlT ON LY" 1. All words and terms used herein which are defined in the Public Employees' Retirement Law shall have the meaning as defined therein unless otherwise specifically provided. 11Normal retirement age" shall mean age 55 for classic local miscellaneous members entering membership in the miscellaneous classification on or prior to July 17, 2010, age 60 for classic local miscellaneous members entering membership for the first time in the miscellaneous classification after July 17, 2010, age 62 for new local miscellaneous members, age 50 for classic local fire members entering membership in the fire classification on or prior to June 8, 2012 and for those classic local police members entering membership in the police classification on or prior to December 7, 2012, age 55 for classic local fire members entering membership for the first time in the fire classification after June 8, 2012 and for those classic local police members entering membership for the first time in the police classification after December 7, 2012 and 57 for new local safety members 2. Public Agency shall participate in the Public Employees' Retirement System from and after January 1 , 1942 making its employees as hereinafter provided, members of said System subject to all provisions of the Public Employees' Retirement Law except such as apply only on election of a contracting agency and are not provided for herein and to all amendments to said Law hereafter enacted except those, which by express provisions thereof, apply only on the election of a contracting agency. 3. Public Agency agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS) and its trustees, agents and employees, the CalPERS Board of Administration, and the California Public Employees' Retirement Fund from any claims, demands, actions, losses, liabilities, damages, judgments, expenses and costs, including but not limited to interest, penalties and attorney fees that may arise as a result of any of the following: (a) Public Agency's election to provide retirement benefits, provisions or formulas under this Contract that are different than the retirement benefits, provisions or formulas provided under the Public Agency's prior non-CalPERS retirement program. (b) Any dispute, disagreement, claim, or proceeding (including without limitation arbitration, administrative hearing, or litigation) between Public Agency and its employees (or their representatives) which relates to Public Agency's election to amend this Contract to provide retirement benefits, provisions or formulas that are different than such employees' existing retirement benefits, provisions or formulas. (c) Public Agency's agreement with a third party other than CalPERS to provide retirement benefits, provisions, or formulas that are different than the retirement benefits, provisions or formulas provided under this Contract and provided for under the California Public Employees' Retirement Law. PLEASE DO NOT SIGN UEXHIBIT ONLY0 4. Employees of Public Agency in the following classes shall become members of said Retirement System except such in each such class as are excluded by law or this agreement: a. Local Fire Fighters (herein referred to as local safety members); b. Local Police Officers (herein referred to as local safety members); c. Employees other than local safety members (herein referred to as local miscellaneous members). 5. In addition to the classes of employees excluded from membership by said Retirement Law, the following classes of employees shall not become members of said Retirement System: a. PROJECT PROFESSIONAL; PROJECT MANAGER; PROJECT TECHNICIAN; PROJECT ASSISTANT; PROJECT LABORER; LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE TRAINEE; LIBRARY PAGE; WATER SAFETY INSTRUCTOR /LIFEGUARD; RECREATION LEADER; AND POOL MANAGER HIRED ON OR AFTER OCTOBER 14, 1999. 6. The percentage of final compensation to be provided for each year of credited prior and current service as a classic local miscellaneous member in employment before and not on or after January 6, 2007 shall be determined in accordance with Section 21354 of said Retirement Law (2% at age 55 Full). 7. The percentage of final compensation to be provided for each year of credited prior and current service as a classic local miscellaneous member in employment on or after January 6, 2007 and not entering membership for the first time in the miscellaneous classification after July 17, 2010 shall be determined in accordance with Section 21354.5 of said Retirement Law. 8. The percentage of final compensation to be provided for each year of credited current service as a classic local miscellaneous member entering membership for the first time with this agency in the miscellaneous classification after July 17, 201 O shall be determined in accordance with Section 21353 of said Retirement Law (2% at age 60 Full). 9. The percentage of final compensation to be provided for each year of credited prior and current service as a new local miscellaneous member shall be determined in accordance with Section 7522.20 of said Retirement Law (2% at age 62 Full). 10. The percentage of final compensation to be provided for each year of credited prior and current service as a classic local fire member entering membership in the fire classification on or prior to June 8, 2012 and for those classic local police members entering membership in the police classification on or prior to December 7, 2012 shall be determined in accordance with Section 21362.2 of said Retirement Law (3% at age 50 Full). PLEAS E DO NOT SIGN "EXHIBIT ONLY" 11 . The percentage of final compensation to be provided for each year of credited current service as a classic local fire member entering membership for the first time with this agency in the fire classification after June 8, 2012 and for those classic local police members entering membership for the first time with this agency in the police classification after December 7, 2012 shall be determined in accordance with Section 21363.1 of said Retirement Law (3% at age 55 Full). 12. The percentage of final compensation to be provided for each year of credited prior and current service as a new local safety member shall be determined in accordance with Section 7522.25(d) of said Retirement Law (2. 7% at age 57 Full). 13. Public Agency elected and elects to be subject to the following optional provisions: a. Section 21571 (Basic Level of 1959 Survivor Benefits). b. Section 21222.1 (One-Time 5% Increase -1970). Legislation repealed said Section effective January 1, 1980. c. Section 21222.2 (One-Time 5% Increase -1971). Legislation repealed said Section effective January 1, 1980. d. Section 21319 (One-Time 15% Increase for Local Miscellaneous Members Who Retired or Died Prior to July 1, 1971 ). Legislation repealed said Section effective January 1, 2002. e. Section 21325 (One-Time 3% to 15% Increase For Local Miscellaneous Members and Local Safety Members Who Retired or Died Prior to January 1, 1974). Legislation repealed said Section effective January 1 , 2002. f. Section 20042 (One-Year Final Compensation) for classic local miscellaneous members, those classic local fire members entering membership on or prior to June 8, 2012 and for classic local police members entering membership on or prior to December 7, 2012. g. Section 21317 (One-Time 15% Increase for Certain Local Safety Members Who Retired for Service Retirement). Legislation repealed said Section effective January 1 , 2002. h. Section 21326 (One-Time 1% to 7% Increase For Local Miscellaneous Members and Local Safety Members Who Retired or Died Prior to July 1, 1974). Legislation repealed said Section effective January 1 , 2002. i. Section 21024 (Military Service Credit as Public Service). '"' :-SE OQ NOT S\GN 11EXH\BlT Of\Jl Yn j. Section 20692 (Employer Paid Member Contributions Converted to Payrate During the Final Compensation Period) for classic local miscellaneous members and classic local safety members in the following groups: Local miscellaneous members who are Management and confidential employees; Local police members who are Management and confidential employees; Local fire members entering membership on or prior to June 8, 2012 who are Management and confidential employees; Local miscellaneous members represented by local 715, SEIU AFL- CIO and CLC; and Local police members represented by the Palo Alto Peace Officers' Association.). k. Section 20434.5 ("Local Fire Fighter" shall include any officer or employee of a fire department employed to perform hazardous materials services as described in Government Code Section 20434.5). I. Section 21548 (Pre-Retirement Option 2W Death Benefit) for local fire members only. m. Section 20475 (Different Level of Benefits). Section 21353 (2% @ 60 Full formula) is applicable to classic local miscellaneous members entering membership for the first time with this agency in the miscellaneous classification after July 17, 201 O. Section 21363.1 (3% @ 55 Full formula) and Section 20037 (Three- Year Final Compensation) without Section 20692 (Employer Paid Member Contributions Converted to Payrate During the Final Comp~nsation Period) are applicable to classic local fire members entering membership for the first time with this agency in the fire classification after June 8, 2012. Section 21363.1 (3% @ 55 Full formula) and Section 20037 (Three- Year Final Compensation) are applicable to classic local police members entering membership for the first time with this agency in the police classification after December 7, 2012. · PLEASE: DO NOT SIGN "EXHIBIT ONLY" n. Section 20516 (Employees Sharing Additional Cost): From October 14, 2017 and until June 9, 2018, .5% for local miscellaneous members in the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) Local 521 . From and after October 14, 2017, 3% for local safety members in the International Association of Fire Fighters, Palo Alto Fire Chief's Association, Palo Alto Peace Officers' Association and Palo Alto Police Management Association. From and after June 9, 2018, 1 % for local miscellaneous members in the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) Local 521. From June 9, 2018 and until October 13, 2018, .5% for local miscellaneous members in the Unrepresented Management group. From June 9, 2018 and until October 13, 2018, 1.5% for local safety members in the Unrepresented Safety Management group. From and after October 13, 2018, 1% for local miscellaneous members in the Unrepresented Management group. From and after October 13, 2018, 3% for local safety members in the Unrepresented Safety Management group. From and after the effective date of this amendment to contract, 1 % for local miscellaneous members in the Utilities Management and Professional Association of Palo Alto. The portion of the employer's contribution that the member agrees to contribute from his or her compensation, over and above the member's normal contribution ("Cost Sharing Percentage"), shall not exceed the Employer Normal Cost Rate, as that rate is defined in the CalPERS Actuarial Valuation for the relevant fiscal year. If the Cost Sharing Percentage will exceed the relevant Employer Normal Cost Rate, the Cost Sharing Percentage shall automatically be reduced to an amount equal to, and not to exceed, the Employer Normal Cost Rate for the relevant fiscal year. 14. Public Agency, in accordance with Government Code Section 20790, ceased to be an •employer" for purposes of Section 20834 effective on September 11, 1977. ·Accumulated contributions of Public Agency shall be fixed and determined as provided in Government Code Section 20834, and accumulated contributions thereafter shall be held by the Board as provided in Government Code Section 20834. 15. Public Agency shall contribute to said Retirement System the contributions determined by actuarial valuations of prior and future service liability with respect to local miscellaneous members and local safety members of said Retirement System. 16. Public Agency shall also contribute to said Retirement System as follows: a. A reasonable amount, as fixed by the Board, payable in one installment within 60 days of date of contract to cover the costs of administering said System as it affects the employees of Public Agency, not including the costs of special valuations or of the periodic investigation and valuations required by law. b. A reasonable amount, as fixed by the Board, payable in one installment as the occasions arise, to cover the costs of special valuations on account of employees of Public Agency, and costs of the periodic investigation and valuations required by law. 17. Contributions required of Public Agency and its employees shall be subject to adjustment by Board on account of amendments to the Public Employees' Retirement Law, and on account of the experience under the Retirement System as determined by the periodic investigation and valuation required by said Retirement Law. 18. Contributions required of Public Agency and its employees shall be paid by Public Agency to the Retirement System within fifteen days after the end of the period to which said contributions refer or as may be prescribed by Board regulation. If more or less than the correct amount of contributions is paid for any period, proper adjustment shall be made in connection with subsequent remittances. Adjustments on account of errors in contributions required of any employee may be made by direct payments between the employee and the Board. B. This amendment shall be effective on the __ day of _________ _ ~ ~ BOARD OF ADMINISTRATIO~ PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIR ENT SYSTEM {:;: -~ BY ~- ARNITA PAIGE, CHIEF ~l..t..; PENSION CONTRACT~ND PREFUNDING PROGRAMS DIVISIO~ PUBLIC EMPLOYE~..fiETIREMENT SYSTEM ~ ~ fy (JS Q:' AMENDMENT CalPERS ID #6373437857 PEAS·CON-702A CITY COUNCIL CITY OF PALO AL TO ~ ~ BY ~ PRESIDING OFFICER ~<:;) ~ ~ ~l..t.J ~ Witness Date~ ~ Attest: ~ ~ ~ Clerk ~ «' City of Palo Alto (ID # 9608) City Council Staff Report Report Type: Action Items Meeting Date: 5/20/2019 City of Palo Alto Page 1 Summary Title: Discussion of Airplane Noise and Community Impacts Title: Discussion of Airplane Noise and Community Impacts; Direction to Staff Regarding the Star Pirat two Procedure Announced by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on April 25, 2019 From: City Manager Lead Department: City Manager Recommendation 1. Discussion of developments relating to airplane noise and community impacts. 2. Discussion and potential direction to staff regarding the STAR PIRAT TWO procedure announced by the FAA on April 25, 2019. Background At the Council Meeting of May 7, 2018, Council Member Kou moved, seconded by Council Member DuBois to: Direct the Mayor to regularly assign one or more Council Members to actively participate on available community roundtables related to aircraft impacts; and direct Staff to: A. Request temporary noise monitoring from San Francisco International Airport (SFO); B. Provide support to Palo Alto Council Members participating on available community roundtables related to aircraft impacts; C. Continue to include the health impacts of aircraft noise and emissions in the City’s regional, state and federal legislative priorities and engage with policy makers and associated advocacy groups as appropriate; D. Include in the above efforts Palo Alto’s support for: i. Improvements to SFO’s Fly Quiet Program; ii. Adherence to the agreement to, whenever able, increase the altitude of aircraft over the Peninsula; iii. Maximizing the use of the BDEGA East Arrival route to SFO when possible; iv. Collaboration with other jurisdictions to develop a regional position in support system-wide solutions by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA); v. Development of a noise-monitoring plan in concert with other jurisdictions; City of Palo Alto Page 2 vi. Maximizing sequencing under current conditions and prioritizing the application of air traffic control technology to improve sequencing and aircraft management to minimize community impacts; vii. Adoption of improved metrics for airplane noise and related impacts; viii. Greater community engagement by the FAA, SFO and the San Jose International Airport (SJC); E. Bring to Council as fast as possible a plan for a litigation strategy in support of procedural changes affecting Palo Alto and investigate the best approach for filing timely lawsuits within 60 days of an appropriate new event: i. Work on forming a multi-city legal alliance; ii. Define a process to monitor FAA flight path changes; iii. Evaluate retaining technical and legal expertise; and F. Develop a system to evaluate and respond to the FAA Update on Phase Two report, November 2017 and April 2018 and future FAA Reports. MOTION AS AMENDED PASSED: 8-0 Scharff absent Staff provided an interim update on Airplane Noise Issues as an informational item with the agenda for the August 13, 2018 City Council meeting. This staff report provides Council and the community with a more detailed and up-to-date description of activities and issues. Discussion A status update regarding the above direction to staff follows. A. Temporary Noise Monitoring: City staff coordinated with the San Francisco International Airport (SFO) staff for SFO to install four temporary noise monitors in the City of Palo Alto during late October 2018 through late December 2018. While the airport typically installs such monitors for one to two weeks, SFO agreed to extend the monitoring period closer to nearly eight weeks for the City of Palo Alto. The resulting data has been made available on the City’s open data portal. SFO contracted with BridgeNet International to provide the monitoring service and an associated analytical report. SFO will provide the report to the City as soon as it is complete. B. Support to Council Members: City Manager’s Office staff members have routinely discussed issues related to the Santa Clara/Santa Cruz Counties Airport/Community Roundtable with Council Member Kou in her capacity as the City’s representative on that body. Staff also is available to support Council Member Kou in keeping the rest of the City Council informed of any community roundtable developments of significance to Palo Alto. C. Legislative and Administrative Advocacy: City of Palo Alto Page 3 The City of Palo Alto continues to advocate with federal policy makers regarding the significance of the quality of life and health impacts of aircraft noise and emissions on our community. Our legislative advocacy representatives in Washington, D.C., Van Scoyoc Associates, monitored the progress of the recent FAA Reauthorization bill and advocated for favorable noise provisions that were under consideration, including by coordinating with the National League of Cities and other community advocates. Unfortunately, the more favorable amendments were not adopted into the bill as finally approved in October 2018. The City also has formally joined the National Association to Insure a Sound Controlled Environment (N.O.I.S.E.), which advocates at the federal level for reducing the impact of aircraft on local communities. Congresswoman Eshoo, working together with neighboring Members of Congress, has been pivotal in the formation of the Santa Clara/Santa Cruz Counties Airport/ Community Roundtable as a vehicle for local stakeholders to have direct access to the FAA. The City has repeatedly raised concerns to the FAA through formal, written correspondence, which is posted to the City’s website for public access. Links to recent correspondence with the FAA are provided below. • 9/10/2018 letter regarding the November 2017 Update and April 2018 Further Update on Phase Two of the FAA initiative to Address Noise Concerns of Santa Cruz/Santa Clara/San Mateo/San Francisco Counties • 11/13/2018 letter regarding the PIRAT ONE STAR • 12/17/2018 letter regarding the SFO Noise Compatibility Program – 14 CFR Part 150 Update • 3/29/2019 letter requesting an extension of the comment period on STAR PIRAT TWO and providing comments regarding STAR PIRAT TWO • 5/6/2019 letter regarding the December 2018 and April 2019 Further Updates on Phase Two of the FAA Initiative to Address Noise Concerns of Santa Cruz/Santa Clara/San Mateo/San Francisco Counties In addition, on 1/31/2019, the City submitted comments to SJC regarding the Environmental Impact Report Scope for the Amendment to their Airport Master Plan. D. Palo Alto Policy Positions: The City Council’s eight-part policy guidance continues to direct staff’s ongoing work on airplane impacts and enable staff to coordinate timely policy responses to developments as they arise. The letters available via the links provided in item C above provide multiple examples. iv. Regional Collaboration, and viii. Engagement by/with the FAA and Airports: City of Palo Alto Page 4 With respect to item iv regarding regional collaboration and item viii regarding greater engagement by and with the airports and the FAA, the formation by the Cities Association of a Santa Clara/Santa Cruz Airport/Community Roundtable (also known as the SC/SC Roundtable) provides a venue for Palo Alto to actively pursue these priorities. On August 13, 2018, the Palo Alto City Council voted unanimously to join the Roundtable (see staff report #9495). The Roundtable membership roster formally includes: • • • • v. Noise Monitoring in Collaboration with Other Jurisdictions: With respect to item v regarding the development of a noise monitoring plan in concert with other jurisdictions, staff has begun reaching out to neighboring jurisdictions, beginning with the cities of Mountain View and Sunnyvale, to explore the feasibility of collaborative approaches to noise monitoring. Staff contacted these cities in September 2018 and again in January and February of 2019. While the City of Mountain View has not decided to pursue noise monitors, their staff expressed interested in being updated should the City of Palo Alto move forward or obtain more detailed information. Sunnyvale’s City Council had directed staff to explore noise monitoring. They are considering issuing a request for proposals for noise monitoring but have not done so to date. Staff has also researched options for ongoing city sponsored noise monitoring. Continuing the type of monitoring recently sponsored by SFO would cost approximately $180,000 per year. This model includes a contractor providing their equipment, professional service, and some level of analysis. If the City were to purchase its own monitors, the cost for high-quality, professional monitors ranges from $1,000 to $16,000 per unit. The purchase price does not include installation, maintenance, and the analysis of results. However, City staff is not currently aware of a clearly identified need for additional or permanent noise monitoring at this time. E. “Fast Track” Process: The City Manager’s Office and the City Attorney’s Office have partnered to develop a plan for monitoring procedural changes that could potentially affect aircraft impacts on Palo Alto and develop responses including contacting the proper authorities with our concerns and, if appropriate, preparing to file a lawsuit within the appropriate statute of City of Palo Alto Page 5 limitations period (typically 60 days from the issuance of an FAA order). i. The nature of any multi-city legal alliance is likely to vary, depending on the issue in question and which jurisdictions might be affected by a particular matter. ii. With input from community stakeholders, staff has developed a “Fast Track” process for identifying and acting on potential changes to aircraft impacts on Palo Alto. See Attachment A for a description of the process. Staff plans to use technical experts to track and evaluate the sources for these types of changes, as discussed below in item E.iii. iii. Staff has researched the estimated costs associated with this level of tracking and evaluation as feasible through the City’s three existing contracts for support on issues related to aircraft impacts with Freytag & Associates, LLC; Richards Aviation Consultants; and Kaplan, Kirsch & Rockwell, LLP. Those costs are incorporated into the Resource Impact section of this memo. F. Responses to FAA Updates are reported under item C above. POTENTIAL DIRECTION TO STAFF REGARDING THE STAR PIRAT TWO PROCEDURE On April 25, 2019, the FAA published the STAR PIRAT TWO procedure regarding arrivals on the Oceanic route. The City of Palo Alto is on record as expressing concerns to the FAA regarding the potential impacts of this procedure in our letters to the FAA dated 11/13/2018 and 3/29/2019 (Attachments B and C). It is important to note that this procedure represented a positive improvement for Peninsula communities by formalizing the practice of requiring planes to fly at a minimum of approximately 8,000 feet in the Woodside area. The City of Palo Alto is on record as supporting proposals to fly higher over the Peninsula and similar positions that were formally adopted by the Select Committee on South Bay Aircraft Noise, and we join with our neighboring communities in applauding Congresswoman Eshoo for her work to reduce the impacts of aircraft overflights – including her leadership in advocating on behalf of the mid-Peninsula to raise the height of flights whenever and wherever possible. Unfortunately, the STAR PIRAT TWO also presents concerns for the quality of life in Palo Alto and neighboring communities. Simply put, it opens up a procedure that was previously limited to specific airlines and now makes the procedure available to all airlines, thereby introducing a likely increase in the volume of aircraft traffic on the route. Furthermore, it opens a procedure previously used only for SFO approaches to also be used for OAK approaches – again, introducing the likelihood of an increase in volume of aircraft traffic on the route. Oceanic arrivals approach from the west; this is the route that accommodates the flights arriving from across the Pacific Ocean at extremely early hours of the morning. Increases in volume on the route, particularly during night time and early morning hours, may have negative impacts on the communities affected by the route. City of Palo Alto Page 6 The specifics of the STAR PIRAT TWO procedure end at the ARGGG waypoint to the west of Palo Alto. Aircraft are then directed generally across the skies of Palo Alto and our neighboring communities on their way toward the final approach to SFO. The procedure is silent on this portion of the route’s impacts and does not mitigate the impacts of flights from this route on our communities. Please see the City’s letters regarding PIRAT for more information about the City’s concerns regarding the impacts of PIRAT and the process by which the FAA has produced it. In keeping with the spirit of the “Fast Track” process developed by staff as described in item E above, staff is using this opportunity to bring to the City Council’s attention in a timely fashion the final publication of the STAR PIRAT TWO procedure on April 25, 2019. Should the Council wish to pursue further action regarding this matter, Council may consider directing staff to research or pursue additional actions and/or approach neighboring communities to explore whether they have similar concerns or interests. Resource Impact For the Fiscal Year 2020 Budget, the City Manager is proposing up to $100,000 in funds to be budgeted for airplane noise. This is a departure from previous years, in which no City funds have been budgeted for projects or programs related to aircraft impacts. As no City department is delegated with responsibility for this topic, all workload demands are anticipated to continue to directly impact the senior staff of the City Manager’s Office and the City Attorney’s Office. In addition, a considerable portion of the City’s ongoing investment in federal lobbying is dedicated to issues related to aircraft impacts. Some of the annual cost estimates associated with addressing airplane noise include: • Membership in the Santa Clara/Santa Cruz Counties Airport/Community Roundtable at $33,466 • Technical and Legal Consulting at $65,000 or more • Membership in the National Association to Insure a Sound Controlled Environment (N.O.I.S.E.) at $1,155 These estimates reflect ongoing efforts as described above. They do not include legal and expert costs that would be incurred should the City decide to initiate formal legal action. Current department budgets do not include sufficient resources for projects of this nature and scope; additional budget action would be needed. Legal counsel will evaluate potential costs with Council in conjunction with advising on possible initiation of formal legal action. Attachments: • Attachment A - Fast Track Process • Attachment B - Comment Letter PIRAT STAR 11-13-18 • Attachment C - Comment Letter PIRAT STAR TWO 3-29-19 Attachment A: FAST-TRACK PROCESS AIRPLANE NOISE * Time frames may be extended if legal counsel advises more time is available. The “Fast Track Process” documents the steps City staff will take to identify information of potential concern to the city (such as new flight procedures or proposed changes to airspace) and prepare an appropriate response in a timely and transparent manner. Responses might range from preparation of a letter to the FAA from the Mayor, to preparation of a recommendation to City Council regarding possible legal action. Timely action is important, particularly when public comment periods have tight deadlines or some legal actions may be limited by a 60-day window of opportunity. Transparency is equally important given the level of community interest in these issues in Palo Alto. Sharing of information with the community will be done through postings on the City’s Airplane Noise webpage, to which community members may subscribe in order to receive timely email notifications This Fast Track Process supports a balanced commitment to transparency and timeliness by setting targets for the amount of time allotted to various potential steps that may apply to any given circumstance. This document is intended to guide and inform staff work and engagement with the community on airplane noise issues. Staff will follow the steps below to the extent applicable and feasible, and may make adjustments if appropriate depending on particular facts and circumstances. It is not intended to create rights or obligations enforceable in a legal proceeding against the City. 0. Information becomes publicly available through a posting, announcement, etc. 1. Information is detected through ongoing monitoring of FAA postings, public information from key airports, etc. a. Monthly reports prepared and interim flagging as needed 2. Item of concern is flagged (e.g., by consultants or community) a. If consultants flag item, inform community of item of possible concern under review 3. Assessment of significance of #2 is prepared by consultants for city staff a. Depending on nature of #2, #3 may range from oral discussion to recommended bullet points to map/diagram illustration, etc. b. Staff may conduct iterative process with consultants to revise/strengthen #3 c. Staff may provide information to City Council at this time as appropriate 4. Engage with community a. Share information generated through #3 process b. Welcome input from community stakeholders about strategy/messaging regarding next steps 5. Staff consults with legal counsel on next steps 6. Staff consults with other jurisdictions/roundtable(s) as appropriate 7. Staff prepares City response to #2 a. Council is consulted/informed as appropriate (including scheduling of closed session if necessary) b. #7 (non-confidential) is shared with community St e p s 0 – 4: 30 da y s or l e s s * St e p s 5 – 7: 20 d a y s or l e s s * Attachment B - Comment Letter PIRAT STAR 11-13-18 Attachment C - Comment Letter PIRAT STAR TWO 3-29-19 May 16, 2019 THE MONA (METROPLEX OVERFLIGHT NOISE ANALYSIS) PROJECT Thomas Rindfleisch, Juan Alonso, Donald Jackson Open-source data collection, analysis and mitigation of aviation environmental impacts PROJECT DESCRIPTION The MONA project (Metroplex Overflight Noise Analysis) started approximately 1.5 years ago with the main objective of providing real-time and objective data, analyses, and reports for key stakeholders and policy makers to help in mitigating the noise impacts of the deployment of new NextGen procedures. It is a result of the joint efforts of community contributions and academic support. Since then, we have put together a preliminary open-source system that (a) collects, archives, and makes available air traffic data using a series of networked antennas and receivers 24/7, (b) analyzes noise impacts using a variety of metrics (based on both a MONA-developed noise prediction tool and the noise predictions tools within AEDT), (c) visualizes resulting large-scale datasets in a simple, user-friendly fashion, and (d) is beginning to use a small network of low-cost sound-level monitors scattered across the Bay Area to enhance noise predictions so they describe exactly the actual noise levels experienced. The longer-term objectives of the MONA project are to (a) make all results web-accessible for in-depth interpretations of historical and proposed changes, (b) study potential alternative traffic patterns in complex metroplexes to mitigate aviation environmental impacts, and (c) export the proven/validated MONA technology to other metroplexes via open-source software. Over the coming year, we plan to focus on three fundamental aspects that still need detailed attention: (1) the completion of the development of a full prototype of the MONA software/hardware system that can be deployed cost-effectively in any metroplex in the US or abroad, (2) the development of novel information fusion methods to combine wide-area noise predictions and strategically-located noise measurements (including comparisons of fused predictions using the MONA-developed, AEDT, and ANOPP2 approaches) and full validation of all alternatives, and (3) the development of an air traffic pattern modification module that can be used to assess the impacts of alternative traffic patterns (e.g. different waypoint location and approach/departure routes, traffic dispersion, and altitude / descent rate changes.) IMPACT STATEMENT The MONA project believes that both the analysis of the environmental impact of aviation on overflown communities and the development of mitigation approaches should be first-order considerations in the implementation of future NextGen procedures. We also believe that, today, such considerations are difficult to account for, require too much user interaction, and are typically not well validated, especially at significant distances beyond the boundaries of airports. By automating the more difficult parts of these processes and archiving data for future comparative analyses our approach can provide real-time information across large geographical areas and have substantial impact to improve the likelihood of success in the deployment of airspace redesign efforts across the NAS, while considering the values (safety, noise, emissions, fuel burn, etc.) of the complex set of stakeholders involved. KEY DELIVERABLES • Low-cost, real-time, open-source software & hardware system to monitor, understand, and mitigate aviation noise environmental impacts. • Validation of noise prediction methodologies for a variety of metrics across large geographical areas. Understanding or errors and uncertainties in these models to suggest potential improvements • Methodology to assess multi-dimensional impacts of implementation of new NextGen procedures May 16, 2019 Figure 1. MONA visualization (using kepler.gl and deck.gl) of traffic patterns in Bay Area. Figure 2. Current MONA web-access prototype for real-time aircraft location and 24-hr DNL contours. Figure 3. Before/after example of MONA automated analysis. DNL noise changes as a result of BSR to SERFR transition in Mar ‘15. Red/orange: May ‘15/May ‘18. Green/purple/blue: May ‘14/Aug ‘14/Jan ’15 1 Report#2016-001 1/15/2016 Report #2019-007 May 15, 2019 Palo Alto Aircraft Noise Measurements San Francisco International Airport PO Box 8097 San Francisco, CA 94128-8097 20201 SW Birch Street, Suite 250 Newport Beach, CA 92660 T: 949-250-1222 | F: 949-250-1225 Airports@AirportNetwork.com 2 Report#2019-007 05/15/2019 Table of Contents Report 1. Background 3 2. Noise Monitoring Locations 3 3. Methodology 4 4. Definition of Terms 5 5. Radar Data 7 6. Ambient Noise Monitoring Results 8 7. Correlated Noise Events 10 8. Measured Single Event Noise Levels 11 9. Measured CNEL Noise Levels 13 10. Conclusion 14 Tables Table 1 – Ambient Noise Measurement Results 9 Table 2 – Measure Average Lmax Noise Level at Noise Measurement Location 11 Table 3 – Average Daily Measured Noise Events 12 Table 4 – CNEL Measurement Results 13 Appendix Figure 1 – Measurement Site Map A-1 Figure 2 – Arrival Procedures A-1 Figure 3a – SERFR Arrival Flight Tracks A-3 Figure 3b – SERFR Straight Arrival Flight Tracks A-4 Figure 3c – BDEGA West Arrival Flight Tracks A-5 Figure 3d – OCEANIC Arrival Flight Tracks A-6 Figure 3e – Missed and Other Landing Flight Tracks A-7 Figure 4 – All SFO Arrival Flight Tracks (within 2nm of any sites) A-8 Figure 5a – SFO Aircraft Performance Data at Noise Measurement Sites (Part A) A-9 Figure 5b – SFO Aircraft Performance Data at Noise Measurement Sites (Part B) A-10 Figure 5c – Aircraft Altitude and Path Dispersion (Site 401) A-11 Figure 5d – Aircraft Altitude and Path Dispersion (Site 402) A-12 Figure 5e – Aircraft Altitude and Path Dispersion (Site 403) A-13 Figure 5f – Aircraft Altitude and Path Dispersion (Site 404) A-14 Figure 6a – Palo Alto Airport (PAO) Flight Tracks A-15 Figure 6b – Other Airport Overflight Flight Tracks A-16 Figure 7a – PAO Aircraft Altitude and Path Dispersion (Site 401) A-17 Figure 7b – PAO Aircraft Altitude and Path Dispersion (Site 402) A-18 Figure 7c – PAO Aircraft Altitude and Path Dispersion (Site 403) A-19 Figure 7d – PAO Aircraft Altitude and Path Dispersion (Site 404) A-20 Figure 8a – Example Time History Noise Plots (Part A) A-21 Figure 8b – Example Time History Noise Plots (Part B) A-22 Figure 9a – Correlated Noise Event Report (Site 401) A-23 Figure 9b – Correlated Noise Event Report (Site 402) A-27 Figure 9c – Correlated Noise Event Report (Site 403) A-30 Figure 9d – Correlated Noise Event Report (Site 404) A-34 3 Report#2019-007 05/15/2019 1. Background BridgeNet International was contracted by the San Francisco International Airport (SFO) Aircraft Noise Abatement Office to evaluate noise levels in the Palo Alto community. Four noise monitoring locations, identified by the City of Palo Alto, were selected near the arrival paths into SFO. The study includes portable noise monitoring and an evaluation of flight track data correlated to noise event results. The goals of the measurement program were as follows: • Conduct Noise Monitoring. Continuously collect noise data at four locations within the Palo Alto community. This data was used to determine noise levels related to SFO Airport operations, noise due to operations from other airports, and ambient noise sources. The measurements included the continuous collection of one-second A-weighted noise data, along with frequency data and the audio signal. • Correlate with Radar Data. Radar track data for flights that operated near the study area were analyzed and correlated to the measured noise data. The flight track analysis included determining the aircraft type, path location, altitude, and other flight parameters that are factors in noise generation. • Calculate Noise metrics. The primary metric used in airport noise is the Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) metric. This is the metric used by the State of California and the FAA (for airports in California) to assess airport noise. In this study, it was determined from measured noise data. In addition, the measurements were used to calculate ambient background noise and a number of single event noise metrics. These single event metrics included the Maximum Noise Level (Lmax), Sound Exposure Level (SEL), and duration of the noise events. • Support Side by Side Measurements. Residents of the City of Palo Alto are developing their own measurement system, and they wish to compare their measurements with the portable measurements collected in this study. The raw measured noise data has been provided to the City for their use. 2. Noise Monitoring Locations Four locations in Palo Alto were measured as part of this study. These sites were selected by the City of Palo Alto staff with input and assistance from SFO Noise Abatement staff and members of the consulting team. These sites are described below, with the locations presented in Figure 1. • Site 401 (Rinconada Library) was a short-term monitoring location placed in the north patio in the Rinconada Library. The site was exposed to traffic noise from Newell Drive. This is a lightly used road, but during the daytime hours there are measurable traffic events as cars travel on the road. The measurement and analysis cover arrivals from SFO as well as aircraft operating from other airports in the region. 4 Report#2019-007 05/15/2019 • Site 402 (Gamble House Garden) was a short-term monitoring location placed in the garden on the south side of the Gamble House building. The site was exposed to traffic noise from Embarcadero Road, Waverley Road and activities on the garden property. This site had more exposure to other ambient sources that could make measurements of SFO aircraft operations in the daytime period more difficult. The measurement and analysis cover arrivals from SFO as well as aircraft operating from other airports in the region. • Site 403 (Hoover Park/Matadaro Creek) was a short-term monitoring location placed in the Matadaro Creek right-away adjacent to Hoover Park. The site was exposed to light traffic noise from Cowpers Road and activities within the park. The measurement and analysis cover arrivals from SFO as well as aircraft operating from other airports in the region. This site was farther from the primary arrival patterns into SFO. • Site 404 (Tevis Place) was a short-term monitoring location located in a backyard of a residential home. The site had minimal exposure to other noise sources such as roadway traffic. This location is closest to Palo Alto Airport then the other sites. The measurement and analysis cover arrivals from SFO as well as aircraft operating from other airports in the region. 3. Methodology Noise Monitoring Durations The measurement program was originally scheduled for a 1-month period but was extended by the Airport to collect data for over 2 months. The noise monitoring equipment was setup on October 30, 2018 and operated continuously through January 4, 2019. The equipment was operating unattended using battery power and was checked and calibrated approximately every 2 weeks. The measurements were continuous, except for a period at Site 401 were the battery power was disconnected and at Site 403 where the battery was stolen. Noise Monitoring Equipment During the entire duration of the noise measurements, the sound level meters were mounted on tripods five feet above the ground and equipped with windscreens at all locations. State-of-the-art sound level meters were used to continuously measure the noise and record a measured noise value once every second (continuous one-second noise levels). The measures used 01dB DUO and 01dB FUSION family of sound level meters. The equipment used meets the International Standard IEC 61672 specification for Class 1 precision sound level meters. The microphones were calibrated before the tests with a Brüel & Kjær Type 4231 sound level calibrator that meets International Standard IEC 60942. Calibration is traceable to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). 5 Report#2019-007 05/15/2019 Noise Measurement Data The noise measurements continuously measured and stored noise data. The data measured and stored includes: • A-weighted noise level • 1/3 octave frequency levels • Continuous audio signal The A-weighted noise level is the level used to calculate the CNEL noise metric and the Lmax and SEL noise metrics (described in the next section of the report). The A-weighed measurement is the primary measure used in aircraft noise and is used to calculate CNEL, Lmax, and SEL. Radar Data Radar data from October 30th, 2018 through January 4th, 2019 was collected from the airport noise monitoring system. This includes data from the airspace surrounding SFO and other airports in the region. The data includes the raw radar tracking data (position, altitude, speed) and associated aircraft type, date, time, runway, descent rate, and aircraft performance. The radar data was reviewed and correlated with noise event data to accurately identify sources of noise. Data Analysis The measured noise data was used to calculate noise metrics of interest. This was accomplished through BridgeNet’s software tool Volans™. The tool uses radar data and the measurements to determine aircraft noise events and calculate noise metrics. The system determines noise events and calculated noise metrics in an automated process that uses the radar information to identify potential noise events. In addition to the automated system, the software also allows the user to manually determine noise events and correlations to aircraft. 4. Definition of Terms Characteristics of Sound Sound can be described technically in terms of amplitude (loudness), frequency (pitch), or duration (time). Frequency (or pitch) is measured in hertz (Hz). The standard unit of measurement for the loudness of sound is the decibel (dB). Decibels are based on a logarithmic scale. The logarithmic scale compresses the wide range in sound pressure levels to a more usable range of numbers (in a manner similar to the Richter scale used to measure earthquakes). Human hearing is not equally sensitive to sound at all frequencies. Sound waves below 16 Hz are not heard at all and are “felt” more as a vibration. Similarly, while people with extremely sensitive hearing can hear sounds as high as 20,000 Hz, most people cannot hear above 15,000 Hz. In all cases, hearing acuity falls off rapidly above about 10,000 Hz and below about 200 Hz. Since the 6 Report#2019-007 05/15/2019 human ear is not equally sensitive to sound at all frequencies, a special frequency-dependent rating scale has been devised to measure loudness in a way that reflects how the human ear actually perceives sound. Community noise levels are measured in terms of this A-weighted decibel scale (or dBA), which is widely used in industrial and environmental noise-management contexts. Propagation of Noise Outdoor sound levels decrease as a result of several factors, including increased distance from the sound source, atmospheric absorption (characteristics in the atmosphere that absorb sound), and ground attenuation (characteristics on the ground that absorb sound). If sound radiates from a source in a homogeneous and undisturbed manner, the sound travels in spherical waves. As the sound wave travels away from the source, the sound energy is spread over a greater area dispersing the power of the sound wave. Atmospheric temperature and humidity also influence the sound levels received by the observer. How much sound is absorbed by the atmosphere depends on the frequency of the sound as well as the humidity and air temperature. For example, when the air is cold and humid, and therefore denser, atmospheric absorption is lowest and sound travels farther. Higher frequencies are more readily absorbed than the lower frequencies. The fluctuations in sound levels created by atmospheric conditions increase with distance and become particularly important at distances greater than 1,000 feet. Over large distances, lower frequency sounds become dominant as the higher frequencies are attenuated. Noise propagation is one of the reasons that aircraft noise will be higher one day than other days even when the same aircraft are flying the same path and altitude. Noise Metrics The description, analysis, and reporting of noise levels around communities is made difficult by the complexity of human response to noise and the variety of metrics that have been developed for describing noise impacts. Each of these metrics attempts to quantify noise levels with respect to community impact. Noise metrics can be divided into two categories: single event and cumulative. Single event metrics describe the noise levels from an individual event such as an aircraft flyover. Cumulative metrics average the total noise over a specific time period, typically from one to 24 hours. This study presents single event measurement results. • Maximum Noise Level, or Lmax, is the maximum or peak sound level during an aircraft noise event. The metric accounts only for the peak intensity of the sound and not for the duration of the event. As an aircraft passes by an observer, the sound level increases to a maximum level and then decreases. Typical single event noise levels range from over 90 dBA close to the airport to the low 50s dBA at more distant locations. • Single Event Noise Exposure Level (SEL) - The duration of a noise event, or an aircraft flyover, is an important factor in assessing annoyance and is measured most typically as SEL. The effective duration of a sound starts when a sound rises above the background sound level and ends when it drops back below the background level. An SEL is calculated 7 Report#2019-007 05/15/2019 by summing the dB level at each second during a noise event and compressing that noise into one second. It is the level the noise would be if it all occurred in one second. The SEL value is the integration of all the acoustic energy contained within the event. This metric takes into account the maximum noise level of the event and the duration of the event. For aircraft flyovers, the SEL value is numerically about 10 dBA higher than the maximum noise level. • Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) is a measure of not just one event like Lmax but of average noise over twenty-four hours; it applies a weighting factor that penalizes noise events occurring during the evening and night hours (when humans are typically more sensitive to noise and sleep disturbance is a concern). More specifically, noises occurring during the evening (from 7 PM to 10 PM) are penalized by 5 dB, while noises occurring during the night (10 PM to 7 AM) are penalized by 10 dB. CNEL noise levels near airports range from 70 CNEL directly next to an airport to less than 45 CNEL at more distant locations. 5. Radar Data The radar data for the study period was collected and analyzed. An example of one day of SFO arrival radar tracks is presented in Figure 2. This figure shows each of the primary jet arrival procedures that fly into SFO Airport when operating in primary flow (i.e., landing on Runways 28L and 28R). The flight procedures that primarily overfly the study area are the SERFR and BDEGA (west leg) STARs (Standard Terminal Arrival Route) and the OCEANIC route. Procedures from the east, DYAMD and YOSEM STARs rarely fly over the study area. Also, the BDEGA (east Leg) procedure that directs the aircraft on the BDEGA procedure to fly downwind to the east also rarely overflies the study area. Radar track data during the measurement period is presented in Figure 3 (a through e) for the different flight procedures that fly near the study area. These figures are described in more detail below. • Figure 3a – SERFR STAR radar tracks for those flights that have some portion of the flight that is radar vectored. Radar vector is when controllers direct pilots to turn, change altitude or change speed to separate and space aircraft prior to landing. This is roughly half of the total SERFR flight tracks. There were 4,707 radar tracks in the study period. • Figure 3b – SERFR STAR radar tracks for those flights that were not radar vectored and the aircraft flew straight to final approach. There were 4,403 radar tracks in the study period. For the purposes of this study this is called SERFR-ST. • Figure 3c – BDEGA STAR tracks that are radar vectored by controllers to the approach. There were 6,800 radar tracks in the study period. • Figure 3d – OCEANIC route tracks that are radar vectored by controllers to the approach. There were 1,866 radar tracks in the study period. 8 Report#2019-007 05/15/2019 • Figure 3e – Missed approach and other radar tracks that are radar vectored by controllers back to the approach for landing. Missed approaches are those aircraft that were on final approach but did not land and the aircraft is flying back to be sequenced back into the arrival pattern for a second landing attempt. There were 233 missed approach radar tracks in the study period. Of Those tracks, 35% were flying the DYAMD, 33% the SERFR, 21% the BDEGA West, 6% the BDEGA East, and 3% the OCEANIC. In evaluating the radar data, the majority of the SFO arriving aircraft that generated a measurable event (97%) passed within 2 nautical miles of one of the four sites. Thus, the radar data for these flights are presented in Figure 4. This data was also analyzed with respect to the altitude, dispersion, and aircraft flight parameters when the aircraft flew closest to each site. This data is presented in Figure 5 (a through f). These figures present information on the altitude of the aircraft on each flight for each procedure, the dispersion of the tracks when it flew closest to each site, the descent rate and descent angle, and aircraft speed. In general, the aircraft are flying at a similar altitude and descending when flying any of the different procedures. The aircraft average just under 5,000 feet MSL and are descending at 2 to 3 degrees. When aircraft are being radar vectored, the dispersion is mostly equal over the study area. Besides the aircraft from SFO landing on Runways 28L/R, there are other aircraft operations that overfly the study area. This includes departures at SFO and OAK that can cross back over the study area at high altitudes, arrivals to OAK, arrivals to SJC in reverse flow configuration, operations at Palo Alto Airport (PAO), medical helicopter flights into Stanford Medical Center, military, and other general aviation activities. As an example, Figure 6a presents departure and arrival radar tracks at PAO Airport. The airport is within 2 miles of Site 404. Figure 6b presents overflight radar tracks from other General Aviation airports around the region. This includes helicopter aircraft from the helipad located at Stanford Medical Center located less than 2 nautical miles from the closest site. The altitude and dispersion of these tracks was also determined. Figure 7 presents the altitude and dispersion of the arrivals and departures into PAO as well as from other airport overflights that flew within 1 nautical mile of Site 404. The data shows that these aircraft are around 1,000 feet MSL for arrivals and 1,500 feet MSL for departures. 6. Ambient Noise Monitoring Results The ambient background noise during the time of the measurements was also determined. Ambient background noise represents the typical residual noise that exists in the area independent of the aircraft noise. These results are presented in Table 1 below. The results are presented in terms of the L% statistical noise levels. The L% is the percent of time that the noise is above that level. The L50 or mean noise level, which is defined as the point at which half the time the noise is above that value and half below that value. These results show that the ambient noise ranged from 42 dBA at the Tevis site (404) to 48 dBA at the Gamble site (402). The Tevis and Hoover location are a quieter setting with minimum other traffic, whereas Gamble and Rinconada are closer to roadways with more vehicle traffic and urban noise. When ambient 9 Report#2019-007 05/15/2019 noise levels are higher, then it becomes difficult to separate the aircraft noise events from other noise sources. When the ambient noise level is lower, then quieter aircraft events are more easily measured. Ambient noise varies throughout the day; typically, ambient noise is reduced at night, are lower than the daytime. When ambient noise is low, the sound of an aircraft may be distinct, while when ambient noise is higher the same aircraft emitting the same noise may be not audible at all. The data in Table 1 shows the ambient noise during the daytime hours (7am to 10pm) and the nighttime hours (10 pm to 7 am). The ambient noise levels at night are roughly 5 dBA quieter than in the daytime hours. Table 1 Ambient Noise Measurement Results Site Description Measured Ambient Noise Levels (dBA) Lmax L1 L10 L50 L90 L99 Lmin All Hours 401 Rinconada Library 97 61 54 47 40 35 29 402 Gamble House 93 62 55 48 40 36 32 403 Hoover Park 91 60 51 44 38 34 30 404 Tevis Residence 95 61 51 42 36 32 26 Daytime Hours 401 Rinconada Library 97 62 55 49 43 39 33 402 Gamble House 93 63 57 50 45 41 33 403 Hoover Park 91 61 53 45 40 36 31 404 Tevis Residence 95 62 53 44 38 34 27 Nighttime Hours 401 Rinconada Library 83 58 50 43 37 34 29 402 Gamble House 84 59 50 43 37 35 32 403 Hoover Park 89 57 47 41 36 33 30 404 Tevis Residence 75 57 47 40 35 30 26 10 Report#2019-007 05/15/2019 7. Correlated Noise Events An automated process was used to calculate noise events and when possible, correlated to an aircraft that generated the noise event when. An example is shown in the top part of Figure 8a that shows the continuous measured 1-second noise for a 15-minute period (dark blue) at the Gamble House. The background noise at the time of the event is below 40 dBA. The noise event period is shown in dark red with the red box showing the calculated single event metrics with a peak Lmax value of nearly 70 dBA. The black parabolic line from the top of the chart shows the second Y access the slant range distance from the aircraft as it passes near the site. An orange parabolic line from the bottom shows the predicted noise associated with that flight based upon an approximate noise model prediction. The bottom part of Figure 8a graphic shows a second 15-minute period from the Gamble House where there are 3 aircraft events showing the same data as described above. Note the short duration peaks during this period are vehicle traffic on the nearby road. The same information described in the above paragraph is presented in these graphics. Note that the lower the ambient, the greater possibility to measure lower noise level events. When the ambient is higher, or other noise sources are present, the more difficult it is to measure and separate aircraft events from other sources of noise. As an example, the top portion of Figure 8b shows a busy period of operations from the Gamble House site that includes both SFO and PAO noise events. Because they occurred separately it was possible to measure these separate noise events. The bottom of Figure 8b shows a busy period where the ambient conditions interfered with the measurements of aircraft noise. Vehicle traffic noise was higher than the aircraft noise, making it difficult to measure the aircraft noise separate from other sources. Both the Gamble House and the Rinconada Library site had higher background environments that made measurements of lower noise level events difficult during busy times of the day. The Hoover Park and Tevis sites had lower ambient that allowed for the ability to separate quieter noise events from the background. The automated process was supplemented with the ability to manually create, edit and correlate noise events. This was used for a number of days of the measurements. This can be used to fix missed or wrong correlations and create noise events that are closer to the ambient where it is more difficult to do automatically. 11 Report#2019-007 05/15/2019 8. Measured Single Event Noise Levels The noise event calculation and correlation process were completed for the 2 months of measured noise data. This was completed for all potential aircraft operations, with the dominant number of events coming from SFO arrivals and PAO operations. This automatic process was supplemented with the ability to complete a manual review and edit the events and correlation. The results of one day of SFO events is presented in Figure 9. This figure lists all the correlated noise events with the measured noise metrics (Lmax, SEL) and information on the aircraft that was correlated to the event. This data is for December 1st, 2018 at Site 401, 402, 403 and 404. This data showed a wide range of measured single event noise levels for SFO arrivals that varied primarily with distance away from the measurement location, type of aircraft and altitude of the aircraft. Those aircraft that flew directly overhead generated the loudest events. These events often generated Lmax noise levels greater than 60 dBA. The average noise level of these events for SFO arrivals for each of the different flight procedures is presented in Table 2. This table presents the average Lmax noise level of all SFO Runway 28L/R arrivals that flew within 2 nautical miles within any one of the sites. The data is presented for each of the arrival procedures that fly near or over the study area. Generally, the aircraft generate similar noise levels from all procedures, with the highest from the SERFR tracks that fly straight on the procedure without radar vectoring. This is because these sites are very close to that path. Note that this is an average level, with the Lmax of the noise events ranging from the 40s to low 70s. Table 2 Measure Average Lmax Noise Level at Noise Measurement Location SITE DESCRIPTION AVERAGE LMAX NOISE LEVEL (DBA) SERFR SERFR-ST BDEGA OCEANIC OTHER ALL 401 Rinconada Library 56 59 57 57 56 57 402 Gamble House 59 60 59 58 59 59 403 Hoover Park 56 57 56 57 56 56 404 Tevis Residence 55 60 56 57 57 57 12 Report#2019-007 05/15/2019 The average daily number of measured aircraft events was also determined. These results are presented in Table 3. This table gives a count of the number of average daily events detected for each flight procedure. This data is presented for higher noise levels events (60 dBA or greater) and for all detected events. At night and at sites with lower background noise then the other measurement sites more low-level events can be detected. Noise events are measurable from more distant operations then when the ambient is higher. This results in some noise events generated noise levels at or near the ambient level that existed at the time of the event. The level of 60 dBA was used to identify higher noise level events from those that were close to the ambient. Events above 60 dBA are typically close to the minimum threshold used by permanent monitoring systems in that events. Noise events above 60 dBA were generally from aircraft that flew directly over the site. Table 3 Average Daily Measured Noise Events SITE DESCRIPTION AVERAGE DAILY EVENTS SERFR SERFR-ST BDEGA OCEANIC OTHER TOTAL Events Greater than 60 dBA 401 Rinconada Library 14 30 24 8 1 77 402 Gamble House 15 28 27 8 1 80 403 Hoover Park 13 19 18 6 1 56 404 Tevis Residence 11 35 22 8 1 78 All Measured Events 401 Rinconada Library 67 72 98 25 5 274 402 Gamble House 49 53 78 22 3 206 403 Hoover Park 56 65 82 22 3 229 404 Tevis Residence 53 71 91 24 4 244 13 Report#2019-007 05/15/2019 9. Measured CNEL Noise Levels CNEL is a measure of cumulative noise throughout the day. CNEL noise levels typically range from 70 CNEL very close to an airport to less than 55 CNEL at communities a number of miles away. Note that measuring CNEL at levels below 55 CNEL becomes less precise because the noise from aircraft events can be close to existing ambient noise, and it is not always technically possible to separate the two. (Note that CNEL differs from the Lmax values presented previously. Lmax values are numerically higher than CNEL values because the CNEL represents an average that includes both peak sounds [like the Lmax] and lower values when aircraft noise is not present.) Aircraft noise events and the time when aircraft noise was present were calculated for identified aircraft events above the ambient threshold and correlated with an aircraft that caused that event. The CNEL metric can be calculated by summing the noise energy from the aircraft events and applying the evening and night weighting penalty. The results are presented in Table 4 for the measurement period from October 30th through January 3rd. The results show that the measured SFO aircraft CNEL levels were in the low 50s CNEL for all the sites. Daily noise levels ranged from 49 to 55 CNEL. CNEL levels from aircraft operating at airports other than SFO also in the low 50s CNEL, but less than the SFO CNEL. The noise from aircraft operating at the other airports also had more variability than SFO in that the number of operations and the pattern of the flights varied much more widely than the more precise SFO arrival procedures. Note the Total CNEL is a measure of all the noise throughout the day including aircraft, traffic and background sounds. It also includes the evening and nighttime noise penalty. Table 4 CNEL Measurement Results SITE DESCRIPTION ENERGY AVERAGE MEASURED CNEL SFO Aircraft Events Other Airports Potential Events Total All Noise 401 Rinconada Library 52 51 56 402 Gamble House 53 52 57 403 Hoover Park 51 50 54 404 Tevis Residence 52 50 55 14 Report#2019-007 05/15/2019 10. Conclusion BridgeNet International was contracted by the SFO Aircraft Noise Abatement Office to evaluate noise levels in the Palo Alto community. The study included portable noise monitoring near the arrival paths into SFO at four locations identified by the City of Palo Alto. Noise measurements were correlated with flight track data and cumulative and single event noise metrics were calculated for aircraft operating at SFO, aircraft from other airports, and ambient sources of noise. This data will be provided to the City for their use in side by side noise measurements using their own system. 15 Report#2019-007 05/15/2019 APPENDIX Report Figures SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL –PALO ALTO NOISE MONITORING REPORT Source: BridgeNet International 2019 PSRC --NextGen Airspace Optimization Study Figure 1 Measurement Site Map 401 402 403 404 401 402 403 404 SFO PAO H PAO A-1 SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL –PALO ALTO NOISE MONITORING REPORT Source: BridgeNet International 2019 PSRC --NextGen Airspace Optimization Study Figure 2 Arrival Procedures SERFR DYAMD YOSEM OCEANIC BDEGA BDEGA EAST Sites SFO SFO Runways 28L/R Arrival Tracks on December 1st, 2018 532 Tracks A-2 BDEGA WEST SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL –PALO ALTO NOISE MONITORING REPORT Source: BridgeNet International 2019 PSRC --NextGen Airspace Optimization Study Figure 3a SERFR Arrival Flight Tracks (SERFR Tracks with Radar Vectoring) SERFR Sites SFO SFO Runways 28L/R Arrival Tracks between October 30th 2018 and January 4th 2019.4707 Tracks A-3 SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL –PALO ALTO NOISE MONITORING REPORT Source: BridgeNet International 2019 PSRC --NextGen Airspace Optimization Study Figure 3b SERFR Straight Arrival Flight Tracks (SERFR Tracks Flying Procedure Straight without Radar Vectoring) SERFR Sites SFO SFO Runways 28L/R Arrival Tracks between October 30th 2018 and January 4th 2019.4403 Tracks A-4 SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL –PALO ALTO NOISE MONITORING REPORT Source: BridgeNet International 2019 PSRC --NextGen Airspace Optimization Study Figure 3c BDEGA West Arrival Flight Tracks Sites SFO BDEGA SFO Runways 28L/R Arrival Tracks between October 30th 2018 and January 4th 2019.6800 Tracks A-5 BDEGA WEST SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL –PALO ALTO NOISE MONITORING REPORT Source: BridgeNet International 2019 PSRC --NextGen Airspace Optimization Study Figure 3d OCEANIC Arrival Flight Tracks Sites SFO OCEANIC SFO Runways 28L/R Arrival Tracks between October 30th 2018 and January 4th 2019.1866 Tracks A-6 SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL –PALO ALTO NOISE MONITORING REPORT Source: BridgeNet International 2019 PSRC --NextGen Airspace Optimization Study Figure 3e Missed and Other Landing Flight Tracks Sites SFO OCEANIC DYAMD YOSEM BDEGA BDEGA EAST SFO Runways 28L/R Arrival Tracks between October 30th 2018 and January 4th 2019. SERFR 233 Tracks A-7 SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL –PALO ALTO NOISE MONITORING REPORT Source: BridgeNet International 2019 PSRC --NextGen Airspace Optimization Study Figure 4 All SFO Arrival Flight Tracks (within 2nm of any sites) Sites SFO Runways 28L/R Arrival Tracks between October 30th 2018 and January 4th 2019.16,552 Tracks A-8 SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL –PALO ALTO NOISE MONITORING REPORT Source: BridgeNet International 2019 PSRC --NextGen Airspace Optimization Study Figure 5a (Part A) SFO Aircraft Performance Data at Noise Measurement Sites (within 2 Nautical Miles) (SERFR Procedure with Radar Vector and SERFR flying straight without Radar Vector) SERFR Radar Vector SERFR Straight SFO Runways 28L/R Arrival Tracks between October 30th 2018 and January 4th 2019 Within 2 Nautical Miles of each Measurement Site. A-9 SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL –PALO ALTO NOISE MONITORING REPORT Source: BridgeNet International 2019 PSRC --NextGen Airspace Optimization Study Figure 5b (Part B) SFO Aircraft Performance Data at Noise Measurement Sites (within 2 Nautical Miles) (BDEGA Procedure and OCEANIC) SFO Runways 28L/R Arrival Tracks between October 30th 2018 and January 4th 2019 Within 2 Nautical Miles of each Measurement Site. OCEANIC BDEGA A-10 SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL –PALO ALTO NOISE MONITORING REPORT Source: BridgeNet International 2019 PSRC --NextGen Airspace Optimization Study Figure 5c Aircraft Altitude and Path Dispersion (Site 401 Rinconada Library) (within 2 Nautical Miles) SFO Runways 28L/R Arrival Tracks between October 30th 2018 and January 4th 2019 Within 2 Nautical Miles of Site 404. OCEANIC BDEGA SERFR Radar Vector SERFR Straight L RSite A-11 SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL –PALO ALTO NOISE MONITORING REPORT Source: BridgeNet International 2019 PSRC --NextGen Airspace Optimization Study Figure 5d Aircraft Altitude and Path Dispersion (Site 402 Gamble House) (within 2 Nautical Miles) SFO Runways 28L/R Arrival Tracks between October 30th 2018 and January 4th 2019 Within 2 Nautical Miles of Site 404. OCEANIC BDEGA SERFR Radar Vector SERFR Straight L RSite A-12 SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL –PALO ALTO NOISE MONITORING REPORT Source: BridgeNet International 2019 PSRC --NextGen Airspace Optimization Study Figure 5e Aircraft Altitude and Path Dispersion (Site 403 Hoover Park) (within 2 Nautical Miles) SFO Runways 28L/R Arrival Tracks between October 30th 2018 and January 4th 2019 Within 2 Nautical Miles of Site 404. OCEANIC BDEGA SERFR Radar Vector SERFR Straight L RSite A-13 SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL –PALO ALTO NOISE MONITORING REPORT Source: BridgeNet International 2019 PSRC --NextGen Airspace Optimization Study Figure 5f Aircraft Altitude and Path Dispersion (Site 404 Tevis Residence) (within 2 Nautical Miles) SFO Runways 28L/R Arrival Tracks between October 30th 2018 and January 4th 2019 Within 2 Nautical Miles of Site 404. OCEANIC BDEGA SERFR Radar Vector SERFR Straight L RSite A-14 SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL –PALO ALTO NOISE MONITORING REPORT Source: BridgeNet International 2019 PSRC --NextGen Airspace Optimization Study Figure 6a Palo Alto Airport (PAO) Flight Tracks SFO Runways 28L/R Arrival Tracks between October 30th 2018 and January 4th 2019.13,065 Tracks PAO A-15 403 404 402 401 SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL –PALO ALTO NOISE MONITORING REPORT Source: BridgeNet International 2019 PSRC --NextGen Airspace Optimization Study Figure 6b Other Airport Overflight Flight Tracks Stanford Medical Center SFO Runways 28L/R Arrival Tracks between October 30th 2018 and January 4th 2019.911 Tracks PAO H A-16 404 402 401 403 SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL –PALO ALTO NOISE MONITORING REPORT Source: BridgeNet International 2019 PSRC --NextGen Airspace Optimization Study Figure 7a PAO Aircraft Altitude and Path Dispersion (Site 401 Rinconada Library) (within 1 Nautical Miles) SFO Runways 28L/R Arrival Tracks between October 30th 2018 and January 4th 2019 Within 2 Nautical Miles of Site 404. PAO Arrivals PAO Departures L RSite A-17 SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL –PALO ALTO NOISE MONITORING REPORT Source: BridgeNet International 2019 PSRC --NextGen Airspace Optimization Study Figure 7b PAO Aircraft Altitude and Path Dispersion (Site 402 Gamble House) (within 1 Nautical Miles) SFO Runways 28L/R Arrival Tracks between October 30th 2018 and January 4th 2019 Within 2 Nautical Miles of Site 404. PAO Arrivals PAO Departures L RSite A-18 SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL –PALO ALTO NOISE MONITORING REPORT Source: BridgeNet International 2019 PSRC --NextGen Airspace Optimization Study Figure 7c PAO Aircraft Altitude and Path Dispersion (Site 403 Hoover Park) (within 1 Nautical Miles) SFO Runways 28L/R Arrival Tracks between October 30th 2018 and January 4th 2019 Within 2 Nautical Miles of Site 404. PAO Arrivals PAO Departures L RSite A-19 SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL –PALO ALTO NOISE MONITORING REPORT Source: BridgeNet International 2019 PSRC --NextGen Airspace Optimization Study Figure 7d PAO Aircraft Altitude and Path Dispersion (Site 404 Tevis Residence)(within 1 Nautical Miles) SFO Runways 28L/R Arrival Tracks between October 30th 2018 and January 4th 2019 Within 2 Nautical Miles of Site 404. PAO Arrivals PAO Departures L RSite A-20 SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL –PALO ALTO NOISE MONITORING REPORT Source: BridgeNet International 2019 PSRC --NextGen Airspace Optimization Study Figure 8a Example Time History Noise Plots 402 –Gamble House (Dec, 1st 2018) A-21 Vehicle Traffic SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL –PALO ALTO NOISE MONITORING REPORT Source: BridgeNet International 2019 PSRC --NextGen Airspace Optimization Study Figure 8b Example Time History Noise Plots 402 –Gamble House (Dec, 1st 2018) A-22 Figure 9a Correlated Noise Event Report Site 401 ‐ December 1st 2018 Site Event Max Operation Airport Aircraft Flight Airline Procedure Runway Lmax SEL Closest Lateral Dist.Altitude Speed Pitch Alt Delta Heading ID Time Type ID Code dBA (Feet) (ft msl) (Kts) (Degrees) (ft/min) (True) 401 12/1/2018 0:03:16 A SFO B738 ASA762 ASA OCEANIC 28R 62 74 (641) 6,623 213 ‐3.0 (1,140) 38 401 12/1/2018 0:10:04 A SFO B738 AMX664 AMX SERFR‐ST 28R 64 76 (935) 4,774 200 ‐3.7 (1,294) 345 401 12/1/2018 0:12:42 A SFO E75L CPZ6020 CPZ SERFR‐ST 28R 59 72 (941) 5,000 186 ‐2.1 (671) 345 401 12/1/2018 0:17:09 A SFO B748 KAL213 KAL SERFR‐ST 28R 70 81 (1,012) 5,118 270 ‐2.4 (1,128) 346 401 12/1/2018 0:23:01 A SFO B738 AMX662 AMX SERFR‐ST 28R 60 73 (1,034) 4,812 183 ‐2.3 (746) 346 401 12/1/2018 0:37:08 A SFO A320 ASA1949 ASA SERFR‐ST 28R 62 75 (1,341) 4,182 178 ‐3.8 (1,185) 346 401 12/1/2018 1:19:15 A SFO C750 U U SERFR 28R 53 65 (4,219) 4,030 245 ‐1.2 (518) 337 401 12/1/2018 2:12:29 D PAO EC35 CMD12 CMD U H 47 58 8,952 98 7 0.0 ‐ 344 401 12/1/2018 2:51:29 A SFO B744 AAR284 AAR SERFR‐ST 28R 71 81 (1,026) 4,771 215 ‐2.7 (1,035) 346 401 12/1/2018 3:25:30 A SFO B739 UAL2550 UAL BDEGA 28R 56 67 7,545 3,989 216 ‐0.1 (38) 61 401 12/1/2018 3:46:29 A SFO B738 UAL1639 UAL OCEANIC 28L 63 72 3,789 6,658 245 ‐1.8 (755) 61 401 12/1/2018 3:58:11 A SFO B738 UAL1724 UAL OCEANIC 28R 63 75 2,113 5,786 250 ‐3.6 (1,602) 64 401 12/1/2018 4:09:28 A SFO B772 UAL396 UAL OCEANIC 28R 57 69 (7,329) 6,502 265 ‐1.1 (522) 27 401 12/1/2018 4:10:56 A SFO B738 UAL1746 UAL OCEANIC 28R 59 70 4,059 7,472 243 ‐2.5 (1,069) 69 401 12/1/2018 4:38:19 A SFO B753 UAL2553 UAL BDEGA 28R 53 64 14,060 4,776 173 ‐2.4 (727) 339 401 12/1/2018 5:13:22 A SFO B789 UAL955 UAL BDEGA 28R 61 71 5,725 4,319 282 ‐3.1 (1,525) 97 401 12/1/2018 5:36:56 A SFO B738 UAL1557 UAL OCEANIC 28R 66 75 4,773 5,698 270 ‐4.8 (2,270) 78 401 12/1/2018 5:39:10 A SFO B77W AIC173 AIC OTHER 28R 55 68 401 12/1/2018 5:46:45 A SFO B753 UAL1575 UAL OCEANIC 28R 54 66 8,578 6,734 258 ‐2.7 (1,230) 80 401 12/1/2018 5:49:28 A SFO B77W UAL916 UAL OCEANIC 28R 60 71 6,814 6,164 254 ‐4.1 (1,815) 79 401 12/1/2018 6:04:11 A SFO B77W EVA008 EVA BDEGA 28R 59 74 668 5,851 229 ‐3.1 (1,253) 114 401 12/1/2018 6:12:17 A SJC GALX U U U 12R 52 64 11,336 2,133 219 ‐2.0 (791) 17 401 12/1/2018 6:21:11 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5738 SKW BDEGA 28R 50 63 (10,317) 4,074 256 ‐5.7 (2,573) 46 401 12/1/2018 6:28:42 A SFO P28A UAL872 UAL BDEGA 28R 57 70 7,116 5,533 264 ‐2.7 (1,241) 99 401 12/1/2018 6:40:14 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5276 SKW BDEGA 28R 55 68 4,266 4,421 260 ‐3.3 (1,489) 34 401 12/1/2018 6:57:42 A SFO E75L SKW5358 SKW BDEGA 28R 50 64 (11,311) 3,884 251 ‐4.6 (2,055) 63 401 12/1/2018 6:59:13 A SFO CRJ7 SKW5802 SKW BDEGA 28L 54 65 (10,152) 3,454 228 ‐3.5 (1,425) 77 401 12/1/2018 7:01:15 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5631 SKW SERFR‐ST 28R 55 66 (1,024) 4,547 221 ‐1.7 (647) 345 401 12/1/2018 7:03:47 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5667 SKW SERFR‐ST 28R 54 67 (932) 4,755 226 ‐3.3 (1,328) 345 401 12/1/2018 7:06:01 A SFO E75L SKW5601 SKW SERFR‐ST 28R 58 69 (952) 4,800 236 ‐3.1 (1,299) 345 401 12/1/2018 7:08:01 A SFO A320 UAL2350 UAL SERFR‐ST 28R 61 70 (864) 4,754 231 ‐1.2 (506) 346 401 12/1/2018 7:10:21 A SFO A319 UAL295 UAL SERFR‐ST 28R 63 74 (1,054) 4,697 212 ‐3.2 (1,182) 345 401 12/1/2018 7:11:38 A SFO B738 UAL805 UAL BDEGA 28R 59 71 (5,067) 5,247 224 ‐3.3 (1,291) 46 401 12/1/2018 7:13:41 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5496 SKW BDEGA 28R 59 69 (1,844) 5,311 205 ‐2.9 (1,057) 67 401 12/1/2018 7:15:19 A SFO A359 SIA32 SIA BDEGA 28R 57 71 1,894 5,664 219 ‐2.3 (900) 110 401 12/1/2018 7:34:44 A SFO E75L CPZ6034 CPZ SERFR‐ST 28L 63 76 (930) 4,920 195 ‐2.3 (795) 345 401 12/1/2018 7:36:49 A SFO A320 ASA1925 ASA SERFR‐ST 28L 60 72 (1,071) 4,097 241 ‐1.7 (739) 346 401 12/1/2018 7:37:43 A SFO B789 UAL858 UAL BDEGA 28R 65 76 724 5,396 247 ‐3.3 (1,425) 44 401 12/1/2018 7:49:39 A SFO B77W UAL862 UAL BDEGA 28R 57 69 10,308 5,134 189 ‐2.7 (887) 348 401 12/1/2018 7:50:58 A SFO A320 UAL618 UAL BDEGA 28L 66 76 (1,012) 5,373 230 ‐4.5 (1,830) 115 401 12/1/2018 7:55:00 A SFO A320 UAL612 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 67 78 (978) 4,493 186 ‐3.5 (1,159) 345 401 12/1/2018 7:58:45 A SFO A320 JBU1136 JBU SERFR‐ST 28L 69 77 (914) 3,982 217 ‐0.3 (104) 346 401 12/1/2018 8:02:21 A SJC A320 JBU826 JBU U 12R 57 67 8,206 1,994 209 ‐1.3 (495) 11 401 12/1/2018 8:04:44 A SJC B737 SWA2630 SWA U 12R 59 69 5,748 2,985 161 0.2 60 3 401 12/1/2018 8:07:29 A SFO CRJ7 SKW5464 SKW BDEGA 28L 59 70 4,155 5,596 242 ‐3.8 (1,628) 59 401 12/1/2018 8:13:14 A SFO A320 ASA1951 ASA SERFR 28L 67 78 (822) 4,293 182 ‐3.9 (1,235) 343 401 12/1/2018 8:15:49 A SFO A21N ASA1591 ASA SERFR‐ST 28L 59 71 (1,149) 5,037 202 ‐4.0 (1,414) 345 401 12/1/2018 8:18:34 A SFO B739 UAL1294 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 61 73 (910) 4,647 242 ‐2.9 (1,221) 345 401 12/1/2018 8:20:59 A SFO B77W UAL838 UAL OCEANIC 28R 64 77 730 6,187 225 ‐3.3 (1,320) 32 401 12/1/2018 8:24:09 A SFO B77W ANA8 ANA BDEGA 28R 62 74 (3,744) 5,442 255 ‐3.6 (1,601) 38 401 12/1/2018 8:26:34 A SFO B77W CES589 CES BDEGA 28L 62 74 1,071 4,596 203 ‐2.5 (890) 33 401 12/1/2018 8:33:08 A SFO E75L SKW5642 SKW BDEGA 28L 58 71 (4,127) 4,953 232 ‐1.5 (600) 64 401 12/1/2018 8:35:06 A SFO B739 UAL662 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 61 74 (954) 4,438 180 ‐4.2 (1,332) 345 401 12/1/2018 8:36:43 A SFO A332 CES767 CES BDEGA 28R 58 73 6,026 6,632 215 ‐3.8 (1,433) 79 401 12/1/2018 8:40:39 A SFO E75L QXE2283 QXE BDEGA 28L 56 69 4,907 6,538 243 ‐2.2 (965) 70 401 12/1/2018 8:42:48 A SFO B737 SWA3330 SWA SERFR 28L 56 69 14,462 5,961 216 ‐2.2 (836) 37 401 12/1/2018 8:44:47 A SFO B77W CPA870 CPA BDEGA 28R 61 72 (7,263) 6,963 234 ‐3.9 (1,622) 115 401 12/1/2018 8:49:29 A SFO B77W KAL023 KAL BDEGA 28R 67 77 1,139 4,011 218 ‐0.5 (184) 30 401 12/1/2018 8:52:10 A SFO A320 ACA574 ACA BDEGA 28L 56 70 (12,048) 6,152 257 ‐0.6 (289) 113 401 12/1/2018 8:52:49 A SFO A320 ACA574 ACA BDEGA 28L 52 61 (12,048) 6,152 257 ‐0.6 (289) 113 401 12/1/2018 8:54:10 D SFO A320 UAL234 UAL U 28L 57 71 (1,653) 14,746 431 2.4 1,790 106 401 12/1/2018 8:56:16 A SJC E75L CPZ5772 CPZ U 12R 54 64 6,701 2,038 214 ‐2.1 (809) 15 401 12/1/2018 8:58:07 A SJC B788 ANA172 ANA U 12R 55 65 8,858 2,759 189 ‐2.5 (840) 19 401 12/1/2018 9:01:03 A SJC E75L QXE2810 QXE U 12R 55 65 8,342 2,927 183 ‐2.3 (736) 14 401 12/1/2018 9:02:33 A SJC GLF6 N240CX GA U 12R 52 61 6,964 2,812 181 ‐3.7 (1,171) 6 401 12/1/2018 9:05:37 A SJC B737 SWA921 SWA U 12R 55 67 8,002 2,683 194 ‐4.3 (1,470) 9 401 12/1/2018 9:07:47 A SJC E75L QXE2259 QXE U 12R 50 60 9,318 2,837 212 ‐2.8 (1,035) 8 401 12/1/2018 9:11:44 A SFO B738 UAL1615 UAL BDEGA 28L 62 73 (3,294) 6,631 263 ‐3.8 (1,773) 114 401 12/1/2018 9:16:00 A SFO B738 UAL2055 UAL BDEGA 28L 55 65 6,218 5,032 208 ‐1.6 (597) 59 401 12/1/2018 9:22:17 A SFO A319 ASA1751 ASA BDEGA 28L 55 66 11,024 4,923 250 ‐3.8 (1,680) 37 401 12/1/2018 9:22:52 A SJC B739 ASA346 ASA U 12R 57 68 8,206 2,008 156 ‐1.0 (260) 13 401 12/1/2018 9:25:36 A SFO B789 UAL2 UAL BDEGA 28R 58 71 6,112 5,918 234 ‐2.5 (1,035) 27 401 12/1/2018 9:28:17 A SFO A319 UAL820 UAL SERFR 28L 57 69 7,147 4,998 223 ‐0.5 (194) 61 401 12/1/2018 9:33:00 A SFO B789 UAL876 UAL BDEGA 28R 62 74 (3,315) 4,774 211 ‐0.6 (240) 3 401 12/1/2018 9:43:50 A SFO CRJ9 JZA579 JZA BDEGA 28L 54 66 (2,614) 5,001 217 ‐0.5 (184) 3 401 12/1/2018 9:45:16 D PAO U U U U 31 58 69 6,150 997 87 1.8 280 157 401 12/1/2018 9:48:33 A SFO B739 UAL274 UAL SERFR 28L 55 67 7,757 5,019 216 ‐0.8 (300) 60 401 12/1/2018 9:52:54 A SFO A319 ASA1935 ASA SERFR 28L 51 60 401 12/1/2018 9:56:21 A SQL PC12 N903PJ GA U 30 63 71 (3,868) 1,943 135 ‐1.0 (231) 316 401 12/1/2018 10:01:07 A SJC B737 SWA3249 SWA U 12R 56 66 6,433 2,670 201 ‐2.8 (975) 10 401 12/1/2018 10:04:35 A SFO A321 JBU133 JBU MISSED 28L 56 69 7,737 5,016 199 0.1 25 65 401 12/1/2018 10:07:52 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5982 SKW SERFR 28L 57 71 401 12/1/2018 10:16:39 D SQL BE20 N840CP GA U 30 61 75 (12,439) 1,994 219 0.1 42 84 401 12/1/2018 10:23:22 A SFO B77W CSN659 CSN BDEGA 28R 58 71 7,915 4,995 197 ‐0.4 (141) 23 401 12/1/2018 10:25:21 D SQL SR20 N321SL GA U 30 64 77 (3,370) 2,693 99 3.9 690 198 401 12/1/2018 10:27:26 D OAK CRJ9 ASH5796 ASH U 30 57 67 (1,701) 16,807 402 3.1 2,220 134 401 12/1/2018 10:34:44 A SJC E75L QXE2224 QXE U 30L 59 73 9,660 2,998 202 0.0 ‐ 17 401 12/1/2018 10:52:22 A SFO B77W ANZ8 ANZ OCEANIC 28R 57 71 7,713 4,081 206 ‐1.3 (475) 13 A-23 Figure 9a Correlated Noise Event Report Site 401 ‐ December 1st 2018 Site Event Max Operation Airport Aircraft Flight Airline Procedure Runway Lmax SEL Closest Lateral Dist.Altitude Speed Pitch Alt Delta Heading ID Time Type ID Code dBA (Feet) (ft msl) (Kts) (Degrees) (ft/min) (True) 401 12/1/2018 10:54:23 A SFO E75L QXE2267 QXE BDEGA 28L 55 66 8,488 4,074 182 ‐3.4 (1,078) 355 401 12/1/2018 10:59:06 A SFO A332 FJI870 FJI OCEANIC 28R 63 75 6,701 4,941 257 ‐4.2 (1,920) 52 401 12/1/2018 11:02:27 A SFO B788 ACA737 ACA BDEGA 28R 56 70 8,495 5,466 271 ‐1.7 (799) 91 401 12/1/2018 11:09:37 D SQL S22T N173CK GA U 30 58 70 7,937 2,391 168 3.7 1,101 108 401 12/1/2018 11:19:59 A SQL BE35 N8366D GA U 30 57 65 (3,475) 2,119 96 ‐3.2 (535) 314 401 12/1/2018 11:31:06 A SFO B739 ASA484 ASA OCEANIC 28L 56 69 (12,713) 6,019 251 0.1 30 101 401 12/1/2018 11:36:33 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5899 SKW BDEGA 28L 52 63 6,371 4,990 221 ‐0.9 (350) 88 401 12/1/2018 11:38:26 A SFO A320 ASA1027 ASA SERFR 28L 55 68 10,867 6,000 252 0.0 ‐ 87 401 12/1/2018 11:44:32 A SFO B737 SWA4146 SWA SERFR 28L 50 60 401 12/1/2018 11:47:59 A SFO A320 UAL708 UAL SERFR 28L 49 59 11,716 4,054 162 ‐1.7 (491) 327 401 12/1/2018 11:50:17 A SFO B738 UAL1763 UAL BDEGA 28L 53 64 (9,514) 8,102 241 ‐2.4 (1,028) 113 401 12/1/2018 11:57:36 A SFO B752 UAL207 UAL BDEGA 28R 54 64 401 12/1/2018 11:58:30 A SFO B738 SWA3582 SWA BDEGA 28L 53 63 14,412 4,740 169 ‐4.0 (1,185) 9 401 12/1/2018 12:00:22 A SFO A319 ASA1332 ASA BDEGA 28L 57 71 8,477 4,056 218 ‐1.0 (376) 53 401 12/1/2018 12:05:40 A SFO B744 QFA73 QFA OCEANIC 28R 60 72 11,851 4,805 204 ‐6.4 (2,297) 12 401 12/1/2018 12:11:23 A SFO A388 UAE225 UAE BDEGA 28R 66 76 3,699 4,938 220 ‐1.0 (383) 28 401 12/1/2018 12:17:24 A SFO B789 KLM281 KLM BDEGA 28R 56 69 14,146 5,940 218 ‐1.0 (370) 30 401 12/1/2018 12:19:14 A SFO A321 AAL1956 AAL BDEGA 28L 60 69 401 12/1/2018 12:23:14 A SFO B772 UAL949 UAL BDEGA 28L 62 73 8,511 5,145 198 ‐2.8 (983) 32 401 12/1/2018 12:25:00 D SFO A319 UAL1830 UAL U 28L 58 66 2,764 15,859 458 2.3 1,875 108 401 12/1/2018 12:26:42 A SFO E75L SKW5586 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 62 74 (936) 4,255 208 ‐2.2 (821) 345 401 12/1/2018 12:29:20 A SFO E75L SKW5446 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 59 70 (934) 5,181 201 ‐0.3 (113) 344 401 12/1/2018 12:32:57 A SFO A320 AIJ820 AIJ SERFR‐ST 28L 67 77 (1,128) 5,022 185 0.0 ‐ 344 401 12/1/2018 12:35:14 O UNK CRJ2 SKW5332 SKW U U 56 70 401 12/1/2018 12:37:17 A SFO A321 AAL789 AAL SERFR‐ST 28L 66 77 (805) 4,287 202 ‐3.2 (1,140) 345 401 12/1/2018 12:40:23 A SFO E75L SKW5203 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 59 71 (958) 4,757 204 ‐3.4 (1,218) 345 401 12/1/2018 12:47:11 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5655 SKW SERFR 28L 55 67 (1,531) 5,967 235 ‐3.4 (1,424) 345 401 12/1/2018 12:59:17 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5476 SKW SERFR 28L 56 67 3,256 5,000 242 ‐0.3 (109) 21 401 12/1/2018 13:00:09 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5476 SKW SERFR 28L 55 66 3,256 5,000 242 ‐0.3 (109) 21 401 12/1/2018 13:00:24 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5476 SKW SERFR 28L 54 62 3,256 5,000 242 ‐0.3 (109) 21 401 12/1/2018 13:01:43 A SFO B738 ASA621 ASA SERFR 28L 56 69 9,959 4,988 219 0.2 93 8 401 12/1/2018 13:03:22 A SFO A346 DLH454 DLH BDEGA 28L 58 70 10,594 6,016 202 0.2 84 49 401 12/1/2018 13:06:41 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5416 SKW SERFR‐ST 28R 56 68 (1,328) 5,039 206 ‐4.2 (1,515) 346 401 12/1/2018 13:08:51 A SFO B737 SWA4136 SWA SERFR‐ST 28L 67 77 (992) 4,282 201 ‐5.1 (1,803) 344 401 12/1/2018 13:11:39 A SFO A320 ASA1804 ASA BDEGA 28L 62 73 (4,445) 4,855 210 ‐3.7 (1,362) 1 401 12/1/2018 13:13:52 A SFO CRJ7 SKW5697 SKW BDEGA 28L 61 72 (2,747) 4,668 212 ‐4.5 (1,665) 22 401 12/1/2018 13:16:45 A SFO B77W KAL025 KAL BDEGA 28L 63 75 3,840 6,007 232 ‐4.8 (1,967) 20 401 12/1/2018 13:19:08 D PAO U U U U 31 58 69 9,189 9 38 0.0 ‐ 322 401 12/1/2018 13:20:04 A SFO A319 UAL1745 UAL BDEGA 28L 59 70 6,941 4,449 225 ‐3.2 (1,284) 37 401 12/1/2018 13:22:47 A SFO E75L SKW5967 SKW BDEGA 28L 57 67 (10,459) 5,794 229 ‐1.7 (668) 107 401 12/1/2018 13:23:18 A SFO E75L SKW5967 SKW BDEGA 28L 57 70 (10,459) 5,794 229 ‐1.7 (668) 107 401 12/1/2018 13:29:30 A SFO B77W AFR084 AFR BDEGA 28L 68 79 1,205 4,904 215 ‐3.7 (1,395) 21 401 12/1/2018 13:33:35 A SFO B744 BAW11M BAW BDEGA 28L 62 73 (7,486) 4,782 214 ‐3.5 (1,325) 27 401 12/1/2018 13:35:52 D PAO U U U U 31 55 67 9,187 9 33 0.0 ‐ 321 401 12/1/2018 13:37:37 A SFO A320 ASA1957 ASA SERFR 28L 54 64 13,695 4,208 226 ‐2.1 (832) 339 401 12/1/2018 13:41:58 A SFO B738 UAL390 UAL SERFR 28L 66 76 784 4,375 217 ‐3.1 (1,201) 30 401 12/1/2018 13:44:38 A SFO B737 SWA974 SWA SERFR 28L 57 70 7,946 5,258 221 ‐4.7 (1,830) 11 401 12/1/2018 13:46:23 A SFO CRJ7 SKW5615 SKW BDEGA 28L 67 75 (735) 4,001 213 ‐0.9 (349) 38 401 12/1/2018 13:51:43 A SFO A319 ASA1340 ASA BDEGA 28R 66 78 (1,586) 4,344 235 ‐4.2 (1,732) 48 401 12/1/2018 13:58:06 A SFO A320 UAL2383 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 66 77 (949) 4,031 202 ‐4.6 (1,635) 344 401 12/1/2018 14:05:55 D PAO U U U U 31 56 67 9,187 9 33 0.0 ‐ 322 401 12/1/2018 14:07:33 A SFO B39M CMP208 CMP SERFR‐ST 28L 63 71 (920) 4,747 216 ‐2.9 (1,121) 344 401 12/1/2018 14:08:26 A SFO B39M CMP208 CMP SERFR‐ST 28L 55 63 (920) 4,747 216 ‐2.9 (1,121) 344 401 12/1/2018 14:10:08 A SFO B739 UAL444 UAL SERFR 28L 60 69 987 4,593 231 ‐3.0 (1,229) 340 401 12/1/2018 14:12:38 A SFO E75L CPZ6007 CPZ SERFR‐ST 28L 68 78 (1,002) 4,755 219 ‐2.2 (864) 344 401 12/1/2018 14:14:34 A SFO B738 SWA3950 SWA SERFR‐ST 28L 64 75 (947) 4,210 233 ‐3.8 (1,575) 345 401 12/1/2018 14:17:03 A SFO B739 UAL372 UAL OCEANIC 28L 67 77 (899) 4,873 212 ‐2.7 (991) 345 401 12/1/2018 14:18:40 A SFO A359 AAR212 AAR BDEGA 28L 54 68 5,791 4,754 212 ‐2.8 (1,063) 19 401 12/1/2018 14:20:21 D PAO U U U U 31 58 70 (3,480) 1,600 110 ‐0.7 (138) 55 401 12/1/2018 14:25:39 A SFO B772 UAL900 UAL BDEGA 28L 67 72 (5,754) 4,965 216 ‐0.5 (174) 52 401 12/1/2018 14:28:05 A SFO B77W EVA018 EVA OCEANIC 28L 65 77 106 5,200 224 ‐4.0 (1,575) 31 401 12/1/2018 14:30:14 A SFO B752 UAL477 UAL BDEGA 28L 63 73 3,809 5,567 206 ‐5.8 (2,115) 29 401 12/1/2018 14:47:15 A SFO B738 UAL2148 UAL SERFR 28L 56 65 7,414 4,789 204 ‐3.6 (1,275) 346 401 12/1/2018 14:51:24 A SFO A320 ASA1388 ASA BDEGA 28L 54 62 10,606 4,091 206 ‐1.4 (523) 346 401 12/1/2018 14:59:13 D SFO B738 AMX669 AMX U 01L 55 68 (13,952) 15,714 405 2.8 1,992 133 401 12/1/2018 15:02:49 A PAO C172 N733ZK GA U 31 54 67 9,201 9 15 0.0 ‐ 321 401 12/1/2018 15:04:03 D SQL SR20 N345BS GA U 30 59 69 8,991 2,747 140 2.6 645 114 401 12/1/2018 15:06:51 D PAO U U U U 31 59 71 9,132 39 50 ‐2.7 (240) 327 401 12/1/2018 15:08:55 A SFO A332 EIN147 EIN BDEGA 28L 63 73 6,394 5,034 228 ‐3.5 (1,414) 1 401 12/1/2018 15:11:51 A SFO E75L QXE2042 QXE SERFR‐ST 28L 55 67 (922) 5,166 238 ‐5.1 (2,130) 344 401 12/1/2018 15:14:13 D PAO U U U U 31 58 66 9,187 9 41 0.0 ‐ 321 401 12/1/2018 15:18:00 A SFO E75L SKW5617 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 57 70 (973) 5,034 202 ‐4.3 (1,546) 344 401 12/1/2018 15:28:07 D PAO U U U U 31 59 67 9,188 9 36 0.0 ‐ 321 401 12/1/2018 15:29:19 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5362 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 57 67 (864) 4,787 228 ‐2.5 (990) 344 401 12/1/2018 15:31:53 A SFO B739 UAL2351 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 62 73 (909) 4,352 229 ‐2.6 (1,047) 343 401 12/1/2018 15:34:00 A SFO E75L SKW5954 SKW BDEGA 28R 62 74 2,066 4,454 201 ‐1.4 (507) 350 401 12/1/2018 15:36:08 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5870 SKW SERFR 28L 57 67 786 4,798 214 ‐3.3 (1,252) 357 401 12/1/2018 15:40:08 D PAO U U U U 31 54 68 2,549 893 127 ‐1.3 (294) 129 401 12/1/2018 15:41:04 A SFO B738 UAL1919 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 67 76 (909) 4,716 208 ‐1.8 (674) 343 401 12/1/2018 15:43:58 A SFO GLEX TWY468 TWY SERFR‐ST 28R 62 73 (905) 4,045 239 ‐1.7 (726) 344 401 12/1/2018 15:45:54 D SJC C421 N700LC GA U 30L 58 71 3,836 1,615 128 1.0 214 301 401 12/1/2018 15:47:27 D PAO U U U U 31 57 69 9,187 9 19 0.0 ‐ 321 401 12/1/2018 15:50:49 A SFO E55P EJA406 EJA SERFR‐ST 28R 61 72 (961) 5,016 239 ‐0.5 (207) 345 401 12/1/2018 15:51:25 A SFO A319 UAL1620 UAL SERFR 28L 60 71 3,099 5,501 215 ‐3.5 (1,335) 10 401 12/1/2018 15:52:20 A SQL BE9L N530CH GA U 30 58 68 (3,852) 2,242 160 ‐2.7 (772) 312 401 12/1/2018 15:55:23 D PAO U U U U 31 53 64 5,155 896 103 ‐0.3 (62) 134 401 12/1/2018 15:58:22 A SQL PC12 N903PJ GA U 30 60 71 (3,853) 1,886 151 ‐0.5 (137) 308 401 12/1/2018 16:05:49 A SFO A320 ASA1959 ASA SERFR 28L 65 74 5,588 4,041 204 ‐0.5 (184) 11 A-24 Figure 9a Correlated Noise Event Report Site 401 ‐ December 1st 2018 Site Event Max Operation Airport Aircraft Flight Airline Procedure Runway Lmax SEL Closest Lateral Dist.Altitude Speed Pitch Alt Delta Heading ID Time Type ID Code dBA (Feet) (ft msl) (Kts) (Degrees) (ft/min) (True) 401 12/1/2018 16:09:03 A SFO B712 DAL2356 DAL SERFR 28L 67 76 (135) 3,991 218 ‐0.4 (134) 25 401 12/1/2018 16:09:31 D PAO C172 N172EL GA U 31 65 74 134 841 97 1.4 236 76 401 12/1/2018 16:12:29 A SFO A321 AAL1983 AAL SERFR 28L 66 78 550 4,177 194 ‐3.0 (1,043) 37 401 12/1/2018 16:14:33 A SFO E75L SKW5861 SKW SERFR 28L 53 65 9,450 5,054 211 ‐4.1 (1,530) 82 401 12/1/2018 16:19:28 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5347 SKW BDEGA 28L 55 64 4,753 5,160 198 ‐5.6 (1,965) 26 401 12/1/2018 16:31:50 D SFO CRJ2 SKW391Z SKW U 01L 53 65 (7,510) 16,354 398 1.6 1,136 105 401 12/1/2018 16:34:21 A PAO P20P N231KD GA U 31 54 67 4,926 710 103 ‐2.9 (526) 139 401 12/1/2018 16:40:04 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5286 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 59 70 (936) 4,608 228 ‐3.2 (1,295) 345 401 12/1/2018 16:42:34 A SFO A320 UAL1243 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 57 70 (804) 4,634 235 ‐1.8 (752) 344 401 12/1/2018 16:45:44 A SFO E75L CPZ6045 CPZ SERFR‐ST 28L 62 75 (986) 3,904 216 ‐3.7 (1,412) 345 401 12/1/2018 16:54:46 D PAO U U U U 31 53 64 5,603 1,000 106 0.0 ‐ 136 401 12/1/2018 16:58:34 A SFO B789 QFA49 QFA OCEANIC 28L 59 71 6,361 4,762 194 ‐2.3 (786) 347 401 12/1/2018 17:00:45 A SFO B737 SWA4139 SWA SERFR‐ST 28L 58 71 (1,060) 4,768 193 ‐3.2 (1,080) 344 401 12/1/2018 17:08:19 A PAO DA40 N202LS GA U 31 60 74 (1,708) 1,205 121 ‐1.4 (296) 51 401 12/1/2018 17:11:33 A SFO E75L SKW5248 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 57 69 (930) 4,970 226 ‐1.4 (540) 345 401 12/1/2018 17:22:02 A SFO B737 SWA3308 SWA SERFR 28L 55 69 5,553 4,888 226 ‐3.7 (1,470) 16 401 12/1/2018 17:23:13 A PAO U U U U H 53 65 2,222 2,037 148 ‐1.4 (356) 79 401 12/1/2018 17:24:56 A SFO A319 UAL1051 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 63 75 (849) 5,142 195 ‐3.8 (1,302) 345 401 12/1/2018 17:30:23 D PAO U U U U 31 60 70 (474) 925 110 ‐2.0 (391) 61 401 12/1/2018 17:34:54 A SFO E75L SKW3460 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 64 74 (975) 3,376 236 ‐5.4 (2,231) 345 401 12/1/2018 17:35:38 A SFO B739 DAL1889 DAL BDEGA 28L 63 75 (1,176) 5,323 210 ‐3.3 (1,206) 42 401 12/1/2018 17:44:21 A SFO A359 FBU711 FBU OCEANIC 28L 61 71 (4,633) 4,082 183 ‐3.2 (1,028) 35 401 12/1/2018 17:47:14 A SFO A320 ASA1933 ASA SERFR‐ST 28L 62 73 (1,144) 4,022 236 0.4 150 344 401 12/1/2018 17:49:10 A SFO B738 DAL1720 DAL SERFR‐ST 28L 64 76 (1,046) 5,042 198 ‐2.1 (736) 344 401 12/1/2018 17:51:12 A SFO A320 ASA1271 ASA SERFR 28L 65 77 (1,097) 5,105 197 ‐1.6 (560) 344 401 12/1/2018 17:53:01 A PAO U U U U H 72 81 156 1,439 133 ‐5.1 (1,195) 84 401 12/1/2018 17:55:43 A SFO B738 UAL1124 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 68 76 (964) 4,682 218 ‐1.6 (621) 343 401 12/1/2018 17:57:58 A SFO B739 UAL632 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 62 75 (946) 4,676 172 ‐2.1 (638) 344 401 12/1/2018 18:06:04 A SFO A319 ASA1273 ASA SERFR 28L 67 77 2,708 4,055 202 ‐1.1 (407) 30 401 12/1/2018 18:09:48 A SFO CRJ9 JZA743 JZA BDEGA 28L 60 67 7,570 4,583 211 ‐3.5 (1,313) 28 401 12/1/2018 18:11:14 A SFO B738 AAL1454 AAL SERFR 28L 54 64 10,296 4,307 205 ‐3.0 (1,080) 14 401 12/1/2018 18:15:49 D PAO U U U U H 64 76 (3,838) 1,598 104 0.1 26 253 401 12/1/2018 18:17:38 A SFO A319 UAL1240 UAL SERFR 28L 53 65 11,862 4,297 164 ‐3.4 (990) 8 401 12/1/2018 18:20:48 A SFO B752 UAL560 UAL BDEGA 28L 56 67 11,854 4,013 157 ‐1.6 (445) 324 401 12/1/2018 18:22:31 A SFO B77W CAL004 CAL OCEANIC 28L 54 67 13,394 6,019 242 ‐1.0 (418) 79 401 12/1/2018 18:26:46 A SFO B77W EVA028 EVA OCEANIC 28L 54 66 401 12/1/2018 18:29:25 A SFO A320 ASA1747 ASA BDEGA 28L 56 68 10,373 3,933 155 ‐1.0 (265) 324 401 12/1/2018 18:39:23 A SFO A320 UAL587 UAL BDEGA 28L 58 70 5,889 6,505 273 ‐1.8 (857) 100 401 12/1/2018 18:41:57 A SFO B737 SWA2989 SWA SERFR 28L 51 65 10,493 5,877 226 ‐4.6 (1,826) 20 401 12/1/2018 18:43:50 A SFO A319 ASA1923 ASA SERFR‐ST 28L 69 80 (831) 3,706 195 ‐4.0 (1,380) 344 401 12/1/2018 18:46:22 A SFO A319 UAL2016 UAL SERFR 28L 54 67 12,546 4,239 195 ‐1.0 (345) 336 401 12/1/2018 18:48:09 A SFO B737 SWA4050 SWA SERFR 28L 60 71 3,320 5,731 197 ‐1.8 (639) 359 401 12/1/2018 18:53:04 A SFO E35L N84AW GA SERFR‐ST 28L 55 67 (985) 5,761 236 ‐4.6 (1,912) 345 401 12/1/2018 18:55:02 A SFO CRJ7 SKW5765 SKW BDEGA 28L 61 71 4,682 3,997 198 ‐0.3 (91) 357 401 12/1/2018 18:55:35 A SFO A321 JBU915 JBU BDEGA 28L 55 66 (10,472) 5,088 291 ‐4.3 (2,220) 113 401 12/1/2018 19:03:17 A SFO B737 SWA3361 SWA SERFR‐ST 28L 59 72 (841) 4,360 217 ‐1.9 (740) 344 401 12/1/2018 19:05:35 A SFO B738 UAL2352 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 65 75 (889) 4,277 227 ‐3.9 (1,575) 344 401 12/1/2018 19:08:08 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5700 SKW BDEGA 28L 56 67 (4,532) 4,056 208 ‐1.4 (527) 38 401 12/1/2018 19:10:58 A SFO A320 TAI564 TAI SERFR‐ST 28L 67 79 (978) 4,288 200 ‐3.5 (1,225) 345 401 12/1/2018 19:12:23 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5457 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 56 68 (990) 4,784 214 ‐2.5 (940) 343 401 12/1/2018 19:14:01 A SFO B739 UAL1604 UAL OCEANIC 28L 57 71 7,176 4,279 211 ‐3.4 (1,274) 33 401 12/1/2018 19:16:45 A SFO B77W SIA2 SIA OCEANIC 28L 59 73 3,402 4,438 220 ‐3.1 (1,197) 31 401 12/1/2018 19:18:07 A SFO A321 AAL686 AAL SERFR 28R 56 70 10,535 5,068 176 ‐5.8 (1,793) 346 401 12/1/2018 19:19:52 A SFO A319 ASA1279 ASA SERFR 28L 60 74 3,066 5,667 207 ‐3.9 (1,422) 12 401 12/1/2018 19:22:00 A SFO A388 DLH458 DLH BDEGA 28R 59 69 10,582 4,041 196 ‐1.9 (644) 344 401 12/1/2018 19:26:47 A SFO E75L SKW5592 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 57 70 (981) 4,238 195 ‐3.3 (1,145) 344 401 12/1/2018 19:28:47 A SFO B737 SWA4154 SWA SERFR 28L 59 71 5,019 4,598 204 ‐4.5 (1,606) 11 401 12/1/2018 19:42:58 A SFO E75L CPZ6015 CPZ SERFR‐ST 28L 60 71 (905) 5,327 176 ‐3.5 (1,098) 344 401 12/1/2018 19:44:43 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5718 SKW BDEGA 28L 52 65 5,687 4,770 219 ‐4.1 (1,598) 30 401 12/1/2018 19:46:01 D SFO B739 UAL394 UAL U 01L 54 67 (2,050) 15,937 430 2.7 2,011 106 401 12/1/2018 19:47:18 A SFO A319 ASA1595 ASA SERFR‐ST 28R 66 78 (1,017) 4,418 166 ‐3.7 (1,095) 345 401 12/1/2018 19:48:50 A SFO B772 UAL340 UAL BDEGA 28L 57 68 4,879 5,772 202 ‐2.9 (1,029) 60 401 12/1/2018 19:53:31 D SFO A320 ASA1940 ASA U 01L 53 66 (5,710) 16,792 451 2.7 2,142 105 401 12/1/2018 19:54:27 A SFO E75L SKW5440 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 58 71 (975) 4,674 234 ‐2.8 (1,140) 345 401 12/1/2018 19:55:57 A SFO B752 UAL1584 UAL BDEGA 28L 59 74 (851) 5,381 176 ‐6.4 (1,975) 37 401 12/1/2018 19:58:59 A SFO B739 UAL2201 UAL SERFR 28L 62 75 4,994 4,012 197 ‐0.1 (47) 346 401 12/1/2018 20:00:23 A SFO B38M ACA781 ACA BDEGA 28L 62 74 1,279 4,143 176 ‐4.1 (1,275) 345 401 12/1/2018 20:03:01 A SFO B739 UAL384 UAL SERFR 28L 64 76 (188) 4,594 201 ‐3.8 (1,356) 355 401 12/1/2018 20:05:52 A SFO E75L QXE2271 QXE BDEGA 28L 62 74 6,121 5,285 213 ‐8.2 (3,090) 32 401 12/1/2018 20:11:00 A SFO B789 UAL28 UAL OCEANIC 28L 62 74 (4,304) 4,038 202 ‐1.5 (525) 29 401 12/1/2018 20:13:38 A SFO A320 ASA1963 ASA SERFR‐ST 28L 69 80 (1,095) 4,064 201 ‐1.8 (628) 344 401 12/1/2018 20:18:44 A SFO A332 HAL12 HAL OCEANIC 28L 54 64 14,595 4,176 181 ‐1.7 (540) 344 401 12/1/2018 20:22:35 A SFO A321 AAL547 AAL BDEGA 28L 66 76 4,515 4,800 221 ‐5.3 (2,069) 86 401 12/1/2018 20:25:21 A SFO B738 UAL1152 UAL OCEANIC 28L 55 69 7,613 4,005 189 0.0 ‐ 351 401 12/1/2018 20:28:58 A SFO A320 ASA1945 ASA SERFR‐ST 28L 65 77 (1,994) 4,533 197 ‐3.5 (1,230) 343 401 12/1/2018 20:32:09 A SFO B789 ACA739 ACA BDEGA 28L 51 62 (13,325) 3,934 193 ‐0.9 (304) 31 401 12/1/2018 20:34:40 A SFO B739 UAL643 UAL OCEANIC 28L 58 67 (7,888) 3,819 205 ‐3.7 (1,321) 22 401 12/1/2018 20:35:09 A SFO B77W CPA872 CPA BDEGA 28L 53 64 9,755 5,588 221 ‐2.6 (1,022) 48 401 12/1/2018 20:41:31 A SFO B738 UAL1722 UAL OCEANIC 28L 64 73 (3,646) 5,212 194 ‐4.5 (1,530) 357 401 12/1/2018 20:58:53 D SFO B752 UAL349 UAL U 01L 50 64 (2,307) 16,086 464 2.8 2,310 106 401 12/1/2018 21:03:32 A SFO GLF4 WWI31 WWI SERFR‐ST 28L 63 74 (1,142) 4,357 198 ‐3.4 (1,190) 343 401 12/1/2018 21:05:48 A SFO B738 UAL2132 UAL BDEGA 28L 54 67 (11,194) 3,969 212 0.0 ‐ 33 401 12/1/2018 21:13:05 A SFO E75L QXE2038 QXE SERFR‐ST 28L 60 70 (966) 4,026 215 ‐1.8 (680) 345 401 12/1/2018 21:14:28 A SFO A320 UAL1217 UAL BDEGA 28L 57 69 5,565 5,223 221 ‐3.1 (1,212) 15 401 12/1/2018 21:16:50 A SFO E75L SKW5681 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 61 74 (952) 4,603 184 ‐4.2 (1,352) 344 401 12/1/2018 21:19:15 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5366 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 58 70 (996) 4,192 210 ‐4.5 (1,680) 346 401 12/1/2018 21:20:40 D SFO A20N FFT1998 FFT U 01L 55 66 4,431 17,096 452 2.9 2,295 107 401 12/1/2018 21:26:33 A SFO B737 SWA485 SWA SERFR‐ST 28L 62 71 (954) 4,718 219 ‐2.5 (984) 344 A-25 Figure 9a Correlated Noise Event Report Site 401 ‐ December 1st 2018 Site Event Max Operation Airport Aircraft Flight Airline Procedure Runway Lmax SEL Closest Lateral Dist.Altitude Speed Pitch Alt Delta Heading ID Time Type ID Code dBA (Feet) (ft msl) (Kts) (Degrees) (ft/min) (True) 401 12/1/2018 21:28:44 A SFO GLF4 U U SERFR‐ST 28R 62 72 (1,033) 4,230 238 ‐3.2 (1,355) 343 401 12/1/2018 21:30:32 A SFO CRJ7 SKW5873 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 55 68 (891) 4,796 208 ‐2.3 (827) 344 401 12/1/2018 21:32:17 A SFO B739 UAL1568 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 64 75 (926) 5,136 206 ‐2.4 (885) 343 401 12/1/2018 21:35:08 A SFO B738 AMX664 AMX SERFR‐ST 28L 60 71 (946) 5,043 202 ‐1.5 (545) 344 401 12/1/2018 21:38:17 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5616 SKW SERFR 28L 53 63 7,440 5,102 205 ‐3.8 (1,380) 9 401 12/1/2018 21:40:01 A SFO E75L SKW5483 SKW SERFR 28L 57 68 1,915 5,637 229 ‐3.4 (1,359) 8 401 12/1/2018 21:42:48 A SFO A332 HAL42 HAL OCEANIC 28L 59 69 11,103 4,044 169 ‐1.0 (300) 348 401 12/1/2018 21:46:06 A SFO E75L SKW3381 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 60 73 (964) 4,744 192 ‐2.7 (917) 345 401 12/1/2018 21:49:26 A SFO A320 ASA1776 ASA BDEGA 28L 65 74 3,577 4,842 213 ‐4.4 (1,648) 41 401 12/1/2018 21:51:56 A SFO A320 ACA568 ACA BDEGA 28L 69 78 (1,586) 4,199 203 ‐2.2 (780) 3 401 12/1/2018 21:53:49 A SFO A321 JBU833 JBU BDEGA 28L 55 67 (8,898) 4,090 175 ‐2.5 (774) 17 401 12/1/2018 21:56:06 D OAK B38M SWA6868 SWA U 30 54 64 (1,329) 15,998 407 3.2 2,306 139 401 12/1/2018 22:01:56 A SFO A320 AIJ830 AIJ SERFR‐ST 28L 60 72 (940) 4,735 224 ‐3.3 (1,300) 345 401 12/1/2018 22:04:03 A SFO B738 DAL1700 DAL SERFR‐ST 28L 66 77 (956) 4,330 197 ‐4.0 (1,387) 344 401 12/1/2018 22:14:27 A SFO B739 UAL650 UAL OCEANIC 28L 61 73 (3,834) 5,176 215 ‐4.5 (1,725) 31 401 12/1/2018 22:34:20 A SFO CRJ7 SKW5461 SKW SERFR‐ST 28R 55 67 (633) 5,114 198 ‐2.6 (914) 346 401 12/1/2018 22:38:24 A SFO E75L CPZ6085 CPZ SERFR‐ST 28R 60 73 (942) 5,084 202 ‐2.4 (840) 344 401 12/1/2018 22:40:37 A SFO B738 UAL1712 UAL SERFR‐ST 28R 61 74 (954) 4,937 186 ‐3.2 (1,035) 343 401 12/1/2018 22:42:28 A SFO B738 ASA759 ASA OCEANIC 28R 61 73 3,786 5,204 182 ‐4.2 (1,335) 4 401 12/1/2018 22:45:32 A SFO B738 UAL1288 UAL OCEANIC 28R 61 72 (2,666) 6,083 232 ‐1.9 (787) 26 401 12/1/2018 22:59:18 D SFO B752 UAL2360 UAL U 01R 51 64 9,230 14,190 444 1.9 1,462 122 401 12/1/2018 23:05:05 A SFO B738 CMP382 CMP SERFR‐ST 28R 64 76 (945) 4,797 204 ‐2.4 (874) 344 401 12/1/2018 23:10:01 A SFO A321 AAL2374 AAL BDEGA 28R 61 70 (4,859) 4,201 203 ‐3.5 (1,243) 67 401 12/1/2018 23:15:43 D SFO B752 UAL308 UAL U 01L 50 64 12,980 16,979 394 1.4 981 107 401 12/1/2018 23:17:35 A SFO B738 UAL435 UAL OCEANIC 28R 57 69 6,082 5,869 232 ‐3.3 (1,365) 32 401 12/1/2018 23:21:00 A SFO B738 AMX662 AMX SERFR‐ST 28R 66 76 (821) 4,284 237 ‐3.5 (1,470) 345 401 12/1/2018 23:21:37 A SFO B752 DAL2344 DAL BDEGA 28R 58 72 3,920 5,708 216 ‐5.5 (2,096) 39 401 12/1/2018 23:25:24 A SFO B752 UAL1056 UAL BDEGA 28R 56 69 (2,703) 5,580 213 ‐2.5 (930) 120 401 12/1/2018 23:38:20 A SFO A320 TAI560 TAI SERFR‐ST 28R 65 75 (991) 4,682 226 ‐1.8 (710) 345 BridgeNet International 2019 A-26 Figure 9b Correlated Noise Event Report Site 402 ‐ December 1st 2018 Site Event Max Operation Airport Aircraft Flight Airline Procedure Runway Lmax SEL Closest Lateral Dist.Altitude Speed Pitch Alt Delta Heading ID Time Type ID Code dBA (Feet) (ft msl) (Kts) (Degrees) (ft/min) (True) 402 12/1/2018 0:03:08 A SFO B738 ASA762 ASA OCEANIC 28R 61 72 (229) 6,774 230 ‐2.3 (925) 52 402 12/1/2018 0:10:05 A SFO B738 AMX664 AMX SERFR‐ST 28R 63 75 1,971 4,856 203 ‐3.7 (1,305) 345 402 12/1/2018 0:12:38 A SFO E75L CPZ6020 CPZ SERFR‐ST 28R 60 72 1,960 5,045 191 ‐2.3 (763) 345 402 12/1/2018 0:17:07 A SFO B748 KAL213 KAL SERFR‐ST 28R 67 80 1,868 5,178 288 ‐2.1 (1,048) 346 402 12/1/2018 0:22:59 A SFO B738 AMX662 AMX SERFR‐ST 28R 60 73 1,850 4,865 183 ‐2.4 (783) 346 402 12/1/2018 0:37:06 A SFO A320 ASA1949 ASA SERFR‐ST 28R 61 75 1,536 4,261 179 ‐3.8 (1,185) 346 402 12/1/2018 1:19:03 A SFO C750 U U SERFR 28R 57 69 (1,174) 4,046 244 ‐1.4 (613) 336 402 12/1/2018 2:12:17 D PAO EC35 CMD12 CMD U H 48 58 12,034 98 7 0.0 ‐ 344 402 12/1/2018 2:51:31 A SFO B744 AAR284 AAR SERFR‐ST 28R 70 80 1,858 4,833 217 ‐2.7 (1,043) 345 402 12/1/2018 3:25:16 A SFO B739 UAL2550 UAL BDEGA 28R 58 69 6,902 3,997 215 ‐0.1 (52) 66 402 12/1/2018 3:46:24 A SFO B738 UAL1639 UAL OCEANIC 28L 63 73 3,087 6,763 258 ‐1.6 (724) 68 402 12/1/2018 3:58:04 A SFO B738 UAL1724 UAL OCEANIC 28R 66 75 1,289 5,990 256 ‐3.5 (1,561) 69 402 12/1/2018 4:09:10 A SFO B772 UAL396 UAL OCEANIC 28R 57 69 (6,103) 6,551 267 ‐0.9 (410) 32 402 12/1/2018 4:10:37 A SFO B738 UAL1746 UAL OCEANIC 28R 61 71 3,054 7,602 247 ‐2.5 (1,080) 69 402 12/1/2018 4:39:21 A SFO B753 UAL2553 UAL BDEGA 28R 45 61 402 12/1/2018 5:13:14 A SFO B789 UAL955 UAL BDEGA 28R 64 74 3,348 4,479 289 ‐3.6 (1,815) 105 402 12/1/2018 5:36:50 A SFO B738 UAL1557 UAL OCEANIC 28R 65 77 3,266 5,947 276 ‐5.1 (2,460) 80 402 12/1/2018 5:38:17 A SFO B77W AIC173 AIC OTHER 28R 52 64 402 12/1/2018 5:46:47 A SFO B753 UAL1575 UAL OCEANIC 28R 59 70 7,023 6,867 264 ‐2.5 (1,149) 80 402 12/1/2018 5:49:12 A SFO B77W UAL916 UAL OCEANIC 28R 60 73 5,310 6,348 256 ‐3.9 (1,746) 79 402 12/1/2018 6:03:48 A SFO B77W EVA008 EVA BDEGA 28R 59 72 2,163 5,927 227 ‐3.2 (1,285) 114 402 12/1/2018 6:11:59 A SJC GALX U U U 12R 47 62 13,025 2,155 217 ‐2.2 (825) 13 402 12/1/2018 6:20:55 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5738 SKW BDEGA 28R 46 58 (10,086) 4,313 261 ‐5.7 (2,610) 52 402 12/1/2018 6:28:39 A SFO P28A UAL872 UAL BDEGA 28R 61 73 4,710 5,652 266 ‐2.8 (1,316) 105 402 12/1/2018 6:40:11 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5276 SKW BDEGA 28R 52 66 5,094 4,617 255 ‐3.7 (1,675) 38 402 12/1/2018 6:57:47 A SFO E75L SKW5358 SKW BDEGA 28R 58 69 (12,043) 4,021 248 ‐4.7 (2,070) 71 402 12/1/2018 7:01:13 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5631 SKW SERFR‐ST 28R 57 70 1,874 4,584 219 ‐2.3 (892) 345 402 12/1/2018 7:03:52 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5667 SKW SERFR‐ST 28R 59 71 1,965 4,829 227 ‐3.4 (1,371) 345 402 12/1/2018 7:06:00 A SFO E75L SKW5601 SKW SERFR‐ST 28R 60 71 1,946 4,872 232 ‐3.0 (1,230) 345 402 12/1/2018 7:08:08 A SFO A320 UAL2350 UAL SERFR‐ST 28R 58 70 2,017 4,783 234 ‐1.3 (521) 346 402 12/1/2018 7:10:20 A SFO A319 UAL295 UAL SERFR‐ST 28R 61 73 1,847 4,770 214 ‐2.8 (1,048) 345 402 12/1/2018 7:11:31 A SFO B738 UAL805 UAL BDEGA 28R 60 72 (4,753) 5,437 227 ‐3.6 (1,451) 45 402 12/1/2018 7:13:47 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5496 SKW BDEGA 28R 57 69 (2,978) 5,429 210 ‐3.6 (1,335) 81 402 12/1/2018 7:15:15 A SFO A359 SIA32 SIA BDEGA 28R 63 71 4,621 5,724 222 ‐2.7 (1,073) 112 402 12/1/2018 7:34:47 A SFO E75L CPZ6034 CPZ SERFR‐ST 28L 60 74 1,974 4,964 199 ‐1.7 (585) 345 402 12/1/2018 7:37:02 A SFO A320 ASA1925 ASA SERFR‐ST 28L 62 72 1,812 4,136 243 ‐1.9 (824) 346 402 12/1/2018 7:37:25 A SFO B789 UAL858 UAL BDEGA 28R 63 74 1,032 5,570 259 ‐3.6 (1,653) 47 402 12/1/2018 7:50:48 A SFO A320 UAL618 UAL BDEGA 28L 65 76 1,835 5,495 233 ‐4.3 (1,770) 116 402 12/1/2018 7:54:58 A SFO A320 UAL612 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 67 77 1,922 4,572 185 ‐3.4 (1,104) 345 402 12/1/2018 7:58:44 A SFO A320 JBU1136 JBU SERFR‐ST 28L 64 76 1,946 3,989 222 ‐0.2 (92) 346 402 12/1/2018 8:02:10 A SJC A320 JBU826 JBU U 12R 52 68 10,242 2,027 209 ‐1.7 (630) 2 402 12/1/2018 8:04:23 A SJC B737 SWA2630 SWA U 12R 57 68 7,991 2,982 158 ‐0.2 (46) 351 402 12/1/2018 8:07:16 A SFO CRJ7 SKW5464 SKW BDEGA 28L 60 71 3,099 5,913 239 ‐4.0 (1,707) 85 402 12/1/2018 8:13:12 A SFO A320 ASA1951 ASA SERFR 28L 66 78 2,105 4,373 182 ‐4.1 (1,298) 344 402 12/1/2018 8:15:15 A SFO A21N ASA1591 ASA SERFR‐ST 28L 60 73 1,739 5,124 212 ‐4.2 (1,572) 345 402 12/1/2018 8:18:31 A SFO B739 UAL1294 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 61 72 1,984 4,711 243 ‐3.0 (1,266) 345 402 12/1/2018 8:20:54 A SFO B77W UAL838 UAL OCEANIC 28R 65 77 1,691 6,365 238 ‐3.0 (1,271) 34 402 12/1/2018 8:24:07 A SFO B77W ANA8 ANA BDEGA 28R 63 76 (3,134) 5,611 251 ‐3.7 (1,633) 43 402 12/1/2018 8:26:25 A SFO B77W CES589 CES BDEGA 28L 64 75 1,897 4,744 209 ‐3.2 (1,161) 40 402 12/1/2018 8:33:14 A SFO E75L SKW5642 SKW BDEGA 28L 61 73 (5,021) 5,003 238 ‐0.3 (135) 77 402 12/1/2018 8:35:03 A SFO B739 UAL662 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 60 74 1,934 4,534 181 ‐4.1 (1,310) 345 402 12/1/2018 8:36:07 A SFO A332 CES767 CES BDEGA 28R 62 73 4,106 6,908 228 ‐3.3 (1,344) 96 402 12/1/2018 8:40:25 A SFO E75L QXE2283 QXE BDEGA 28L 59 72 3,749 6,669 270 ‐2.2 (1,052) 76 402 12/1/2018 8:44:40 A SFO B77W CPA870 CPA BDEGA 28R 59 74 (4,426) 7,051 236 ‐4.1 (1,704) 114 402 12/1/2018 8:49:28 A SFO B77W KAL023 KAL BDEGA 28R 65 77 2,200 4,046 231 ‐1.0 (412) 36 402 12/1/2018 8:52:14 A SFO A320 ACA574 ACA BDEGA 28L 57 70 (9,235) 6,165 254 ‐0.6 (268) 113 402 12/1/2018 8:56:08 A SJC E75L CPZ5772 CPZ U 12R 51 64 8,636 2,086 206 ‐2.7 (975) 5 402 12/1/2018 8:58:13 A SJC B788 ANA172 ANA U 12R 53 67 10,533 2,814 187 ‐2.4 (798) 10 402 12/1/2018 9:01:04 A SJC E75L QXE2810 QXE U 12R 55 66 10,192 2,955 179 ‐1.9 (600) 8 402 12/1/2018 9:02:32 A SJC GLF6 N240CX GA U 12R 50 65 9,240 2,880 170 ‐2.9 (885) 354 402 12/1/2018 9:05:30 A SJC B737 SWA921 SWA U 12R 53 64 10,059 2,781 190 ‐3.8 (1,290) 358 402 12/1/2018 9:11:35 A SFO B738 UAL1615 UAL BDEGA 28L 61 74 476 6,741 261 ‐4.0 (1,830) 113 402 12/1/2018 9:15:57 A SFO B738 UAL2055 UAL BDEGA 28L 62 73 5,759 5,119 217 ‐1.7 (639) 59 402 12/1/2018 9:19:26 A SFO B752 UAL433 UAL BDEGA 28R 49 61 (11,878) 7,140 232 ‐2.4 (973) 116 402 12/1/2018 9:23:04 A SFO A319 ASA1751 ASA BDEGA 28L 51 64 11,657 5,201 246 ‐4.0 (1,717) 44 402 12/1/2018 9:25:31 D SFO A319 UAL1406 UAL U 28L 63 73 (336) 17,004 465 1.8 1,443 106 402 12/1/2018 9:27:44 A SFO A319 UAL820 UAL SERFR 28L 59 69 6,240 5,064 238 ‐1.4 (583) 77 402 12/1/2018 9:32:46 A SFO B789 UAL876 UAL BDEGA 28R 66 78 (940) 4,800 215 ‐0.8 (317) 1 402 12/1/2018 9:43:41 A SFO CRJ9 JZA579 JZA BDEGA 28L 59 70 (249) 5,017 215 ‐0.2 (77) 3 402 12/1/2018 9:56:16 A SQL PC12 N903PJ GA U 30 69 79 (712) 1,939 133 ‐0.9 (217) 316 402 12/1/2018 9:57:40 A SJC C56X U U U 12R 53 67 9,932 3,047 178 ‐1.2 (390) 13 402 12/1/2018 10:01:02 A SJC B737 SWA3249 SWA U 12R 55 66 8,480 2,735 200 ‐2.9 (1,035) 1 402 12/1/2018 10:04:16 A SFO A321 JBU133 JBU MISSED 28L 56 68 6,781 5,011 196 0.1 45 73 402 12/1/2018 10:24:03 A SFO B77W CSN659 CSN BDEGA 28R 61 72 9,417 5,015 203 ‐0.9 (309) 21 402 12/1/2018 10:25:37 D SFO B737 SWA4698 SWA U 28R 69 78 (8,832) 19,002 460 3.5 2,805 105 402 12/1/2018 10:51:57 A SFO B77W ANZ8 ANZ OCEANIC 28R 55 67 9,682 4,141 207 ‐1.9 (682) 12 402 12/1/2018 10:54:25 A SFO E75L QXE2267 QXE BDEGA 28L 52 62 11,103 4,178 179 ‐3.2 (1,005) 355 402 12/1/2018 10:58:50 A SFO A332 FJI870 FJI OCEANIC 28R 66 76 6,646 5,170 257 ‐4.2 (1,903) 51 402 12/1/2018 11:09:26 D SQL S22T N173CK GA U 30 60 70 10,595 2,281 174 3.3 1,000 107 402 12/1/2018 11:20:10 A SQL BE35 N8366D GA U 30 61 72 (343) 2,098 94 ‐3.1 (516) 312 402 12/1/2018 11:27:00 A SFO A319 UAL698 UAL OCEANIC 28R 59 71 11,413 5,972 226 ‐0.6 (230) 65 402 12/1/2018 11:29:46 D SFO B738 UAL2128 UAL U 28R 56 66 (1,532) 16,348 452 1.2 990 106 402 12/1/2018 11:31:04 A SFO B739 ASA484 ASA OCEANIC 28L 56 67 (10,273) 6,017 255 0.1 45 102 402 12/1/2018 11:33:23 D SQL SR20 N321SL GA U 30 55 71 (648) 2,128 84 ‐2.6 (390) 312 402 12/1/2018 11:35:54 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5899 SKW BDEGA 28L 57 69 4,474 5,040 223 ‐1.9 (752) 88 402 12/1/2018 11:38:22 A SFO A320 ASA1027 ASA SERFR 28L 61 74 9,010 6,000 259 0.0 ‐ 87 402 12/1/2018 11:59:59 A SFO A319 ASA1332 ASA BDEGA 28L 75 82 8,382 4,111 227 ‐1.6 (641) 51 402 12/1/2018 12:05:29 A SFO B744 QFA73 QFA OCEANIC 28R 56 68 13,836 5,081 195 ‐7.1 (2,430) 12 A-27 Figure 9b Correlated Noise Event Report Site 402 ‐ December 1st 2018 Site Event Max Operation Airport Aircraft Flight Airline Procedure Runway Lmax SEL Closest Lateral Dist.Altitude Speed Pitch Alt Delta Heading ID Time Type ID Code dBA (Feet) (ft msl) (Kts) (Degrees) (ft/min) (True) 402 12/1/2018 12:11:14 A SFO A388 UAE225 UAE BDEGA 28R 63 75 4,914 4,987 238 ‐1.1 (450) 30 402 12/1/2018 12:17:32 D PAO U U U U 31 60 71 6,878 1,003 109 ‐0.5 (98) 133 402 12/1/2018 12:23:06 A SFO B772 UAL949 UAL BDEGA 28L 61 71 9,555 5,276 197 ‐2.7 (937) 30 402 12/1/2018 12:26:41 A SFO E75L SKW5586 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 63 75 1,953 4,308 206 ‐1.9 (703) 345 402 12/1/2018 12:29:37 A SFO E75L SKW5446 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 61 72 1,973 5,188 203 ‐0.3 (97) 345 402 12/1/2018 12:32:59 A SFO A320 AIJ820 AIJ SERFR‐ST 28L 66 76 1,792 5,022 186 ‐0.1 (28) 344 402 12/1/2018 12:35:00 O UNK CRJ2 SKW5332 SKW U U 62 72 402 12/1/2018 12:37:05 A SFO A321 AAL789 AAL SERFR‐ST 28L 67 76 2,096 4,346 203 ‐3.1 (1,128) 345 402 12/1/2018 12:40:21 A SFO E75L SKW5203 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 60 71 1,933 4,836 209 ‐2.9 (1,073) 345 402 12/1/2018 12:46:46 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5655 SKW SERFR 28L 61 72 1,355 6,059 238 ‐3.3 (1,380) 345 402 12/1/2018 12:59:10 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5476 SKW SERFR 28L 54 68 4,883 5,012 239 ‐0.3 (114) 15 402 12/1/2018 13:01:41 A SFO B738 ASA621 ASA SERFR 28L 55 69 12,138 4,978 218 0.0 (6) 7 402 12/1/2018 13:03:05 A SFO A346 DLH454 DLH BDEGA 28L 55 68 10,632 5,990 214 0.4 144 51 402 12/1/2018 13:06:47 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5416 SKW SERFR‐ST 28R 59 68 1,554 5,108 205 ‐4.2 (1,525) 346 402 12/1/2018 13:08:49 A SFO B737 SWA4136 SWA SERFR‐ST 28L 66 76 1,921 4,393 200 ‐5.1 (1,786) 344 402 12/1/2018 13:11:37 A SFO A320 ASA1804 ASA BDEGA 28L 64 74 (1,993) 5,002 211 ‐3.9 (1,440) ‐ 402 12/1/2018 13:13:42 A SFO CRJ7 SKW5697 SKW BDEGA 28L 62 74 (1,132) 4,894 218 ‐4.5 (1,725) 19 402 12/1/2018 13:16:39 A SFO B77W KAL025 KAL BDEGA 28L 63 72 5,541 6,215 229 ‐5.1 (2,070) 16 402 12/1/2018 13:20:00 A SFO A319 UAL1745 UAL BDEGA 28L 60 70 7,533 4,681 233 ‐3.2 (1,320) 43 402 12/1/2018 13:23:44 A SFO E75L SKW5967 SKW BDEGA 28L 56 68 (7,839) 5,846 237 ‐2.2 (915) 107 402 12/1/2018 13:29:24 A SFO B77W AFR084 AFR BDEGA 28L 68 78 2,757 5,085 222 ‐4.0 (1,565) 22 402 12/1/2018 13:33:15 A SFO B744 BAW11M BAW BDEGA 28L 62 74 (6,262) 4,924 216 ‐3.4 (1,275) 31 402 12/1/2018 13:41:48 A SFO B738 UAL390 UAL SERFR 28L 63 76 1,930 4,538 215 ‐3.4 (1,296) 29 402 12/1/2018 13:44:51 A SFO B737 SWA974 SWA SERFR 28L 54 67 9,992 5,427 214 ‐4.1 (1,555) 10 402 12/1/2018 13:46:16 A SFO CRJ7 SKW5615 SKW BDEGA 28L 67 75 (223) 4,066 213 ‐2.0 (766) 49 402 12/1/2018 13:51:34 A SFO A319 ASA1340 ASA BDEGA 28R 67 76 (1,621) 4,586 228 ‐5.5 (2,205) 61 402 12/1/2018 13:58:02 A SFO A320 UAL2383 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 69 77 1,968 4,140 201 ‐4.8 (1,710) 345 402 12/1/2018 14:07:33 A SFO B39M CMP208 CMP SERFR‐ST 28L 60 71 1,990 4,813 217 ‐2.7 (1,035) 344 402 12/1/2018 14:09:51 A SFO B739 UAL444 UAL SERFR 28L 58 71 3,990 4,646 231 ‐2.8 (1,141) 341 402 12/1/2018 14:12:42 A SFO E75L CPZ6007 CPZ SERFR‐ST 28L 61 71 1,907 4,805 222 ‐2.0 (768) 345 402 12/1/2018 14:14:37 A SFO B738 SWA3950 SWA SERFR‐ST 28L 60 73 1,957 4,294 233 ‐3.8 (1,570) 345 402 12/1/2018 14:17:06 A SFO B739 UAL372 UAL OCEANIC 28L 65 75 2,002 4,934 215 ‐2.7 (1,020) 345 402 12/1/2018 14:19:57 D PAO U U U U 31 57 67 (3,756) 1,634 109 ‐3.0 (576) 53 402 12/1/2018 14:25:43 A SFO B772 UAL900 UAL BDEGA 28L 63 72 (5,914) 4,979 213 0.0 ‐ 61 402 12/1/2018 14:27:55 A SFO B77W EVA018 EVA OCEANIC 28L 67 77 988 5,404 239 ‐3.7 (1,575) 31 402 12/1/2018 14:30:01 A SFO B752 UAL477 UAL BDEGA 28L 61 72 4,955 5,866 216 ‐5.2 (1,969) 31 402 12/1/2018 14:59:23 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5984 SKW SERFR 28L 56 65 2,106 5,215 213 ‐3.7 (1,374) 343 402 12/1/2018 15:06:57 A SFO B789 UAL892 UAL OCEANIC 28L 60 71 9,995 4,753 238 ‐2.1 (875) 19 402 12/1/2018 15:09:04 A SFO A332 EIN147 EIN BDEGA 28L 60 70 8,818 5,152 222 ‐3.5 (1,380) ‐ 402 12/1/2018 15:11:39 A SFO E75L QXE2042 QXE SERFR‐ST 28L 57 69 1,989 5,308 235 ‐5.2 (2,160) 345 402 12/1/2018 15:12:44 A SFO E75L QXE2042 QXE SERFR‐ST 28L 57 68 1,989 5,308 235 ‐5.2 (2,160) 345 402 12/1/2018 15:17:53 A SFO E75L SKW5617 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 61 71 1,934 5,129 202 ‐4.2 (1,495) 345 402 12/1/2018 15:29:17 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5362 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 66 74 2,057 4,845 230 ‐2.4 (990) 344 402 12/1/2018 15:31:48 A SFO B739 UAL2351 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 62 74 2,022 4,405 229 ‐2.8 (1,146) 344 402 12/1/2018 15:34:08 A SFO E75L SKW5954 SKW BDEGA 28R 62 74 4,855 4,490 199 ‐0.7 (242) 349 402 12/1/2018 15:35:57 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5870 SKW SERFR 28L 56 68 3,342 4,911 214 ‐3.3 (1,230) 357 402 12/1/2018 15:41:03 A SFO B738 UAL1919 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 65 76 2,022 4,757 210 ‐1.5 (545) 344 402 12/1/2018 15:43:52 A SFO GLEX TWY468 TWY SERFR‐ST 28R 62 73 2,004 4,081 239 ‐2.0 (836) 345 402 12/1/2018 15:45:47 D SJC C421 N700LC GA U 30L 60 67 6,816 1,624 126 0.4 86 301 402 12/1/2018 15:50:50 A SFO E55P EJA406 EJA SERFR‐ST 28R 61 72 1,925 5,027 238 ‐0.5 (222) 345 402 12/1/2018 15:52:25 A SQL BE9L N530CH GA U 30 64 75 (732) 2,216 159 ‐2.7 (748) 311 402 12/1/2018 15:55:51 D PAO U U U U 31 60 70 8,303 898 103 ‐0.5 (93) 134 402 12/1/2018 15:58:19 A SFO B739 UAL1687 UAL SERFR 28L 67 77 13,558 6,026 184 0.3 80 22 402 12/1/2018 15:59:40 D SFO A321 AAL1844 AAL U 01L 60 71 (3,819) 15,783 415 3.7 2,745 134 402 12/1/2018 16:05:44 A SFO A320 ASA1959 ASA SERFR 28L 65 72 7,606 4,068 198 ‐1.1 (393) 11 402 12/1/2018 16:09:06 A SFO B712 DAL2356 DAL SERFR 28L 64 76 1,249 4,002 218 0.3 108 23 402 12/1/2018 16:09:47 D PAO C172 N172EL GA U 31 60 69 (387) 806 110 ‐0.6 (121) 43 402 12/1/2018 16:12:25 A SFO A321 AAL1983 AAL SERFR 28L 66 78 1,349 4,359 190 ‐4.3 (1,440) 33 402 12/1/2018 16:14:24 A SFO E75L SKW5861 SKW SERFR 28L 54 67 7,833 5,248 210 ‐4.4 (1,611) 82 402 12/1/2018 16:19:35 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5347 SKW BDEGA 28L 59 70 6,001 5,469 192 ‐5.2 (1,766) 32 402 12/1/2018 16:34:14 A PAO P20P N231KD GA U 31 59 67 8,094 711 103 ‐2.9 (530) 139 402 12/1/2018 16:40:00 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5286 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 59 71 1,965 4,678 226 ‐3.4 (1,354) 345 402 12/1/2018 16:42:31 A SFO A320 UAL1243 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 57 70 2,108 4,672 231 ‐2.2 (898) 344 402 12/1/2018 16:45:46 A SFO E75L CPZ6045 CPZ SERFR‐ST 28L 62 73 1,906 3,987 218 ‐3.6 (1,398) 345 402 12/1/2018 16:54:26 D PAO U U U U 31 61 69 8,761 1,000 106 0.0 ‐ 136 402 12/1/2018 16:58:39 A SFO B789 QFA49 QFA OCEANIC 28L 57 70 9,199 4,825 193 ‐2.4 (822) 349 402 12/1/2018 17:00:37 A SFO B737 SWA4139 SWA SERFR‐ST 28L 58 72 1,852 4,836 193 ‐3.1 (1,069) 344 402 12/1/2018 17:07:35 A PAO DA40 N202LS GA U 31 58 70 (1,579) 1,308 111 ‐2.6 (512) 46 402 12/1/2018 17:11:28 A SFO E75L SKW5248 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 59 71 1,971 4,999 218 ‐0.9 (340) 345 402 12/1/2018 17:19:55 D PAO U U U U 31 55 67 12,356 9 54 0.0 ‐ 322 402 12/1/2018 17:22:43 A PAO U U U U H 56 69 741 2,097 108 ‐1.3 (243) 82 402 12/1/2018 17:24:42 A SFO A319 UAL1051 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 61 73 2,050 5,228 197 ‐3.5 (1,213) 345 402 12/1/2018 17:30:05 D PAO U U U U 31 55 67 (1,000) 1,033 111 ‐4.0 (780) 63 402 12/1/2018 17:34:49 A SFO E75L SKW3460 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 63 73 1,927 3,493 233 ‐5.5 (2,262) 345 402 12/1/2018 17:35:34 A SFO B739 DAL1889 DAL BDEGA 28L 64 73 (807) 5,500 204 ‐3.9 (1,395) 50 402 12/1/2018 17:38:52 D SFO B712 DAL1048 DAL U 01L 57 69 (9,570) 12,678 377 2.8 1,835 137 402 12/1/2018 17:44:16 A SFO A359 FBU711 FBU OCEANIC 28L 62 72 (3,908) 4,205 192 ‐1.7 (583) 44 402 12/1/2018 17:47:21 A SFO A320 ASA1933 ASA SERFR‐ST 28L 62 74 1,777 4,014 234 0.2 61 344 402 12/1/2018 17:49:08 A SFO B738 DAL1720 DAL SERFR‐ST 28L 67 77 1,867 5,088 200 ‐2.1 (745) 344 402 12/1/2018 17:51:07 A SFO A320 ASA1271 ASA SERFR 28L 65 76 1,820 5,139 197 ‐1.7 (590) 345 402 12/1/2018 17:52:38 A PAO U U U U H 67 78 (1,567) 1,611 122 ‐0.3 (58) 84 402 12/1/2018 17:55:44 A SFO B738 UAL1124 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 66 78 1,977 4,714 221 ‐1.8 (718) 344 402 12/1/2018 17:57:45 A SFO B739 UAL632 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 63 76 1,970 4,722 176 ‐1.9 (585) 345 402 12/1/2018 18:06:01 A SFO A319 ASA1273 ASA SERFR 28L 65 77 3,836 4,117 202 ‐1.7 (598) 30 402 12/1/2018 18:09:22 A SFO CRJ9 JZA743 JZA BDEGA 28L 58 68 7,311 5,374 234 ‐5.0 (2,070) 81 402 12/1/2018 18:16:09 D PAO U U U U H 62 76 (4,675) 1,607 115 ‐1.0 (197) 243 402 12/1/2018 18:39:42 A SFO A320 UAL587 UAL BDEGA 28L 55 69 3,431 6,580 284 ‐1.9 (961) 106 402 12/1/2018 18:43:48 A SFO A319 ASA1923 ASA SERFR‐ST 28L 67 79 2,075 3,796 195 ‐4.0 (1,380) 345 A-28 Figure 9b Correlated Noise Event Report Site 402 ‐ December 1st 2018 Site Event Max Operation Airport Aircraft Flight Airline Procedure Runway Lmax SEL Closest Lateral Dist.Altitude Speed Pitch Alt Delta Heading ID Time Type ID Code dBA (Feet) (ft msl) (Kts) (Degrees) (ft/min) (True) 402 12/1/2018 18:48:06 A SFO B737 SWA4050 SWA SERFR 28L 58 69 5,814 5,790 198 ‐2.0 (690) 358 402 12/1/2018 18:53:11 A SFO E35L N84AW GA SERFR‐ST 28L 55 69 1,913 5,882 242 ‐4.1 (1,770) 345 402 12/1/2018 18:54:51 A SFO CRJ7 SKW5765 SKW BDEGA 28L 58 71 7,250 4,007 200 ‐0.4 (147) 357 402 12/1/2018 18:55:50 A SFO A321 JBU915 JBU BDEGA 28L 57 70 (7,664) 5,232 296 ‐4.3 (2,220) 116 402 12/1/2018 19:03:12 A SFO B737 SWA3361 SWA SERFR‐ST 28L 59 71 2,077 4,399 220 ‐2.4 (936) 344 402 12/1/2018 19:05:33 A SFO B738 UAL2352 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 63 73 2,023 4,363 226 ‐4.0 (1,580) 345 402 12/1/2018 19:07:50 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5700 SKW BDEGA 28L 60 71 (4,060) 4,120 215 ‐2.3 (875) 55 402 12/1/2018 19:10:52 A SFO A320 TAI564 TAI SERFR‐ST 28L 65 77 1,920 4,366 199 ‐3.3 (1,170) 345 402 12/1/2018 19:12:25 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5457 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 54 67 1,952 4,835 217 ‐2.6 (991) 343 402 12/1/2018 19:14:03 A SFO B739 UAL1604 UAL OCEANIC 28L 58 67 8,043 4,498 215 ‐4.3 (1,621) 36 402 12/1/2018 19:16:21 A SFO B77W SIA2 SIA OCEANIC 28L 60 73 4,516 4,585 209 ‐3.9 (1,454) 28 402 12/1/2018 19:18:09 A SFO A321 AAL686 AAL SERFR 28R 56 64 13,426 5,170 175 ‐6.0 (1,862) 345 402 12/1/2018 19:19:37 A SFO A319 ASA1279 ASA SERFR 28L 61 73 5,087 5,846 206 ‐2.7 (975) 9 402 12/1/2018 19:21:57 A SFO A388 DLH458 DLH BDEGA 28R 53 67 13,498 4,080 194 ‐2.3 (781) 344 402 12/1/2018 19:26:26 A SFO E75L SKW5592 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 56 70 1,927 4,309 197 ‐3.8 (1,320) 345 402 12/1/2018 19:28:32 A SFO B737 SWA4154 SWA SERFR 28L 60 73 7,043 4,802 206 ‐4.0 (1,471) 12 402 12/1/2018 19:42:57 A SFO E75L CPZ6015 CPZ SERFR‐ST 28L 60 73 2,022 5,404 177 ‐3.1 (968) 344 402 12/1/2018 19:43:53 D SFO CRJ2 SKW5696 SKW U 01L 58 67 7,685 15,078 403 1.1 795 108 402 12/1/2018 19:44:38 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5718 SKW BDEGA 28L 56 67 6,450 5,135 239 ‐3.6 (1,514) 49 402 12/1/2018 19:46:08 D SFO B739 UAL394 UAL U 01L 58 72 (536) 15,853 428 2.6 1,985 105 402 12/1/2018 19:47:19 A SFO A319 ASA1595 ASA SERFR‐ST 28R 65 78 1,885 4,491 166 ‐3.8 (1,125) 345 402 12/1/2018 19:48:10 A SFO B772 UAL340 UAL BDEGA 28L 59 68 3,567 5,995 202 ‐0.4 (123) 99 402 12/1/2018 19:54:35 A SFO E75L SKW5440 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 58 71 1,929 4,726 241 ‐2.6 (1,099) 345 402 12/1/2018 19:55:53 A SFO B752 UAL1584 UAL BDEGA 28L 61 74 (317) 5,773 173 ‐7.0 (2,130) 46 402 12/1/2018 19:59:00 A SFO B739 UAL2201 UAL SERFR 28L 59 71 7,860 4,015 198 0.0 ‐ 349 402 12/1/2018 20:00:13 A SFO B38M ACA781 ACA BDEGA 28L 59 72 4,173 4,228 173 ‐4.4 (1,335) 345 402 12/1/2018 20:02:57 A SFO B739 UAL384 UAL SERFR 28L 63 76 2,419 4,716 201 ‐3.9 (1,385) 357 402 12/1/2018 20:05:49 A SFO E75L QXE2271 QXE BDEGA 28L 61 72 7,167 5,691 211 ‐8.3 (3,105) 34 402 12/1/2018 20:11:08 A SFO B789 UAL28 UAL OCEANIC 28L 66 76 (3,136) 4,123 198 ‐2.5 (865) 29 402 12/1/2018 20:13:42 A SFO A320 ASA1963 ASA SERFR‐ST 28L 68 78 1,811 4,102 203 ‐2.0 (717) 345 402 12/1/2018 20:14:39 A SFO B772 UAL724 UAL OCEANIC 28L 58 72 9,752 6,701 245 ‐5.7 (2,480) 84 402 12/1/2018 20:22:38 A SFO A321 AAL547 AAL BDEGA 28L 66 77 2,341 5,107 233 ‐5.5 (2,265) 102 402 12/1/2018 20:25:11 A SFO B738 UAL1152 UAL OCEANIC 28L 53 65 10,358 4,005 193 ‐0.1 (32) 354 402 12/1/2018 20:28:54 A SFO A320 ASA1945 ASA SERFR‐ST 28L 66 78 948 4,588 198 ‐3.4 (1,200) 343 402 12/1/2018 20:32:07 A SFO B789 ACA739 ACA BDEGA 28L 54 66 (12,263) 3,964 199 ‐1.0 (358) 34 402 12/1/2018 20:34:19 A SFO B739 UAL643 UAL OCEANIC 28L 60 70 (6,346) 4,008 207 ‐4.2 (1,549) 20 402 12/1/2018 20:34:39 A SFO B77W CPA872 CPA BDEGA 28L 62 69 9,307 5,946 226 ‐2.5 (1,010) 79 402 12/1/2018 20:41:27 A SFO B738 UAL1722 UAL OCEANIC 28L 62 75 (1,173) 5,330 195 ‐4.5 (1,537) 6 402 12/1/2018 20:44:36 A OAK B738 ASA840 ASA U 30 57 69 14,120 3,924 266 ‐0.6 (299) 74 402 12/1/2018 21:03:29 A SFO GLF4 WWI31 WWI SERFR‐ST 28L 63 74 1,786 4,428 199 ‐3.5 (1,231) 344 402 12/1/2018 21:05:42 A SFO B738 UAL2132 UAL BDEGA 28L 59 68 (10,315) 3,969 206 ‐0.5 (195) 41 402 12/1/2018 21:13:06 A SFO E75L QXE2038 QXE SERFR‐ST 28L 63 73 1,932 4,064 218 ‐2.3 (894) 345 402 12/1/2018 21:14:24 A SFO A320 UAL1217 UAL BDEGA 28L 58 70 6,920 5,572 222 ‐3.9 (1,512) 43 402 12/1/2018 21:16:48 A SFO E75L SKW5681 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 61 74 1,953 4,689 190 ‐4.0 (1,335) 345 402 12/1/2018 21:19:07 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5366 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 59 70 1,876 4,304 214 ‐4.7 (1,770) 346 402 12/1/2018 21:26:22 A SFO B737 SWA485 SWA SERFR‐ST 28L 60 72 1,955 4,774 220 ‐2.6 (1,010) 345 402 12/1/2018 21:28:55 A SFO GLF4 U U SERFR‐ST 28R 61 70 1,908 4,291 239 ‐3.6 (1,529) 344 402 12/1/2018 21:30:30 A SFO CRJ7 SKW5873 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 58 68 2,032 4,844 209 ‐2.3 (835) 344 402 12/1/2018 21:32:25 A SFO B739 UAL1568 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 61 74 2,007 5,187 206 ‐2.4 (885) 344 402 12/1/2018 21:35:13 A SFO B738 AMX664 AMX SERFR‐ST 28L 57 71 1,966 5,078 205 ‐2.0 (735) 344 402 12/1/2018 21:38:00 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5616 SKW SERFR 28L 59 67 9,550 5,248 208 ‐4.0 (1,466) 9 402 12/1/2018 21:39:39 A SFO E75L SKW5483 SKW SERFR 28L 56 67 4,076 5,772 229 ‐3.0 (1,223) 8 402 12/1/2018 21:43:03 A SFO A332 HAL42 HAL OCEANIC 28L 56 67 13,934 4,064 175 ‐1.1 (345) 347 402 12/1/2018 21:46:05 A SFO E75L SKW3381 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 61 71 1,935 4,804 192 ‐2.6 (867) 345 402 12/1/2018 21:49:16 A SFO A320 ASA1776 ASA BDEGA 28L 66 74 3,284 5,218 233 ‐4.4 (1,822) 70 402 12/1/2018 21:51:59 A SFO A320 ACA568 ACA BDEGA 28L 67 78 651 4,277 206 ‐1.9 (688) 16 402 12/1/2018 21:53:31 A SFO A321 JBU833 JBU BDEGA 28L 63 71 (7,176) 4,186 186 ‐2.3 (743) 20 402 12/1/2018 21:56:09 D OAK B38M SWA6868 SWA U 30 50 62 1,841 15,992 407 3.2 2,299 139 402 12/1/2018 22:01:54 A SFO A320 AIJ830 AIJ SERFR‐ST 28L 61 72 1,966 4,805 224 ‐3.6 (1,439) 345 402 12/1/2018 22:04:00 A SFO B738 DAL1700 DAL SERFR‐ST 28L 64 77 1,954 4,415 199 ‐4.2 (1,485) 345 402 12/1/2018 22:14:05 A SFO B739 UAL650 UAL OCEANIC 28L 60 72 (2,754) 5,403 212 ‐4.7 (1,770) 30 402 12/1/2018 22:34:09 A SFO CRJ7 SKW5461 SKW SERFR‐ST 28R 55 68 2,230 5,176 198 ‐2.7 (952) 347 402 12/1/2018 22:38:16 A SFO E75L CPZ6085 CPZ SERFR‐ST 28R 61 73 1,969 5,130 205 ‐2.2 (803) 344 402 12/1/2018 22:40:33 A SFO B738 UAL1712 UAL SERFR‐ST 28R 61 73 1,992 5,001 187 ‐3.1 (1,003) 343 402 12/1/2018 22:42:08 A SFO B738 ASA759 ASA OCEANIC 28R 56 69 5,824 5,465 196 ‐3.9 (1,355) 18 402 12/1/2018 22:45:36 A SFO B738 UAL1288 UAL OCEANIC 28R 59 72 (1,423) 6,179 238 ‐2.4 (1,005) 34 402 12/1/2018 23:04:53 A SFO B738 CMP382 CMP SERFR‐ST 28R 63 75 1,963 4,849 205 ‐2.4 (885) 344 402 12/1/2018 23:09:55 A SFO A321 AAL2374 AAL BDEGA 28R 56 68 (5,873) 4,333 220 ‐4.4 (1,725) 82 402 12/1/2018 23:17:49 A SFO B738 UAL435 UAL OCEANIC 28R 56 67 7,179 5,979 239 ‐3.3 (1,370) 27 402 12/1/2018 23:20:52 A SFO B738 AMX662 AMX SERFR‐ST 28R 64 75 2,084 4,360 238 ‐3.6 (1,516) 345 402 12/1/2018 23:21:19 A SFO B752 DAL2344 DAL BDEGA 28R 62 72 3,894 6,205 219 ‐3.9 (1,511) 73 402 12/1/2018 23:23:15 A SFO A321 JBU1415 JBU BDEGA 28R 55 65 (9,020) 6,879 242 ‐1.6 (690) 126 402 12/1/2018 23:25:30 A SFO B752 UAL1056 UAL BDEGA 28R 59 68 245 5,628 213 ‐2.4 (895) 120 402 12/1/2018 23:38:18 A SFO A320 TAI560 TAI SERFR‐ST 28R 62 74 1,902 4,720 229 ‐1.9 (783) 345 402 12/1/2018 23:58:47 D SFO B753 UAL2237 UAL U 01R 52 65 (8,210) 14,063 427 2.1 1,571 105 BridgeNet International 2019 A-29 Figure 9c Correlated Noise Event Report Site 403‐ December 1st 2018 Site Event Max Operation Airport Aircraft Flight Airline Procedure Runway Lmax SEL Closest Lateral Dist.Altitude Speed Pitch Alt Delta Heading ID Time Type ID Code dBA (Feet) (ft msl) (Kts) (Degrees) (ft/min) (True) 403 12/1/2018 0:03:13 A SFO B738 ASA762 ASA OCEANIC 28R 57 68 (6,800) 6,706 222 ‐2.7 (1,065) 46 403 12/1/2018 0:09:59 A SFO B738 AMX664 AMX SERFR‐ST 28R 58 72 (2,429) 5,167 212 ‐3.2 (1,212) 345 403 12/1/2018 0:12:30 A SFO E75L CPZ6020 CPZ SERFR‐ST 28R 57 70 (2,464) 5,250 207 ‐2.4 (864) 345 403 12/1/2018 0:16:46 A SFO B748 KAL213 KAL SERFR‐ST 28R 65 77 (2,652) 5,386 245 ‐3.6 (1,575) 346 403 12/1/2018 0:22:36 A SFO B738 AMX662 AMX SERFR‐ST 28R 59 72 (2,621) 5,084 185 ‐2.8 (900) 344 403 12/1/2018 0:36:49 A SFO A320 ASA1949 ASA SERFR‐ST 28R 58 72 (2,945) 4,576 190 ‐3.4 (1,138) 345 403 12/1/2018 0:56:22 A PAO EC35 CMD12 CMD U H 43 52 10,365 98 3 0.0 ‐ 199 403 12/1/2018 1:18:53 A SFO C750 U U SERFR 28R 52 64 (4,714) 4,262 243 ‐3.2 (1,385) 335 403 12/1/2018 2:12:51 D PAO EC35 CMD12 CMD U H 44 55 10,602 98 7 0.0 ‐ 344 403 12/1/2018 2:47:44 D NUQ PC12 N562NA GA U 32L 45 61 403 12/1/2018 2:51:24 A SFO B744 AAR284 AAR SERFR‐ST 28R 67 78 (2,515) 5,084 223 ‐3.0 (1,185) 344 403 12/1/2018 3:25:19 A SFO B739 UAL2550 UAL BDEGA 28R 63 75 987 3,990 217 ‐0.1 (45) 61 403 12/1/2018 3:46:28 A SFO B738 UAL1639 UAL OCEANIC 28L 62 72 (2,771) 6,660 245 ‐1.8 (756) 61 403 12/1/2018 3:58:13 A SFO B738 UAL1724 UAL OCEANIC 28R 61 71 (4,447) 5,779 250 ‐3.6 (1,605) 63 403 12/1/2018 4:09:01 A SFO B772 UAL396 UAL OCEANIC 28R 49 62 (12,838) 6,559 267 ‐0.8 (394) 33 403 12/1/2018 4:10:54 A SFO B738 UAL1746 UAL OCEANIC 28R 61 71 (2,440) 7,430 243 ‐2.6 (1,127) 69 403 12/1/2018 4:37:49 A SFO B753 UAL2553 UAL BDEGA 28R 51 65 12,052 5,291 200 ‐3.7 (1,290) 2 403 12/1/2018 5:13:33 A SFO B789 UAL955 UAL BDEGA 28R 68 78 160 4,177 281 ‐2.1 (1,061) 84 403 12/1/2018 5:36:52 A SFO B738 UAL1557 UAL OCEANIC 28R 66 76 (1,568) 5,558 265 ‐4.7 (2,184) 75 403 12/1/2018 5:38:13 A SFO B77W AIC173 AIC OTHER 28R 54 67 10,997 6,561 254 ‐3.4 (1,539) 71 403 12/1/2018 5:46:40 A SFO B753 UAL1575 UAL OCEANIC 28R 59 72 2,306 6,636 250 ‐2.9 (1,290) 78 403 12/1/2018 5:49:32 A SFO B77W UAL916 UAL OCEANIC 28R 60 73 462 5,998 248 ‐4.2 (1,821) 74 403 12/1/2018 6:04:14 A SFO B77W EVA008 EVA BDEGA 28R 59 70 3,508 5,604 227 ‐2.9 (1,148) 109 403 12/1/2018 6:10:22 D PAO U U U U 13 48 57 10,185 436 83 4.4 645 135 403 12/1/2018 6:11:56 A SJC GALX U U U 12R 56 65 6,787 2,210 219 ‐2.4 (945) 2 403 12/1/2018 6:14:18 D PAO U U U U 13 49 58 10,649 399 78 4.6 630 135 403 12/1/2018 6:21:13 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5738 SKW BDEGA 28R 48 63 403 12/1/2018 6:28:55 A SFO P28A UAL872 UAL BDEGA 28R 63 75 1,358 5,327 255 ‐2.8 (1,240) 85 403 12/1/2018 6:40:10 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5276 SKW BDEGA 28R 56 67 (1,645) 4,592 257 ‐3.6 (1,650) 38 403 12/1/2018 6:46:30 A SFO B789 UAL870 UAL OCEANIC 28R 50 66 13,164 5,260 233 ‐2.9 (1,205) 13 403 12/1/2018 6:57:14 A SFO E75L SKW5358 SKW BDEGA 28R 50 62 403 12/1/2018 7:01:07 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5631 SKW SERFR‐ST 28R 55 67 (2,483) 4,881 213 ‐5.2 (1,937) 344 403 12/1/2018 7:03:29 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5667 SKW SERFR‐ST 28R 53 68 (2,480) 5,137 231 ‐3.6 (1,466) 345 403 12/1/2018 7:05:52 A SFO E75L SKW5601 SKW SERFR‐ST 28R 57 69 (2,484) 5,132 236 ‐2.4 (1,017) 345 403 12/1/2018 7:07:43 A SFO A320 UAL2350 UAL SERFR‐ST 28R 56 68 (2,473) 4,911 240 ‐1.9 (805) 345 403 12/1/2018 7:09:53 A SFO A319 UAL295 UAL SERFR‐ST 28R 62 72 (2,579) 4,977 226 ‐1.4 (563) 345 403 12/1/2018 7:11:23 A SFO B738 UAL805 UAL BDEGA 28R 50 61 (11,385) 5,360 228 ‐3.5 (1,388) 45 403 12/1/2018 7:13:48 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5496 SKW BDEGA 28R 49 62 (8,401) 5,300 204 ‐2.8 (1,023) 65 403 12/1/2018 7:15:27 A SFO A359 SIA32 SIA BDEGA 28R 56 67 (6,798) 5,539 218 ‐2.4 (912) 99 403 12/1/2018 7:34:20 A SFO E75L CPZ6034 CPZ SERFR‐ST 28L 61 72 (2,455) 5,100 205 ‐2.3 (826) 345 403 12/1/2018 7:36:29 A SFO A320 ASA1925 ASA SERFR‐ST 28L 59 71 (2,655) 4,316 251 ‐2.2 (988) 345 403 12/1/2018 7:37:42 A SFO B789 UAL858 UAL BDEGA 28R 59 73 (5,565) 5,491 255 ‐3.5 (1,575) 46 403 12/1/2018 7:41:28 D PAO U U U U 13 56 71 10,538 413 88 6.7 1,035 142 403 12/1/2018 7:49:49 A SFO B77W UAL862 UAL BDEGA 28R 56 69 7,161 5,716 191 ‐3.1 (1,058) 18 403 12/1/2018 7:51:07 A SFO A320 UAL618 UAL BDEGA 28L 65 74 3,330 4,996 216 ‐5.0 (1,920) 106 403 12/1/2018 7:53:09 D SFO B38M SWA4128 SWA U 28R 57 67 7,879 18,198 432 2.8 2,129 106 403 12/1/2018 7:54:40 A SFO A320 UAL612 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 67 76 (2,487) 4,879 182 ‐3.9 (1,253) 344 403 12/1/2018 7:58:26 A SFO A320 JBU1136 JBU SERFR‐ST 28L 62 75 (2,571) 4,006 244 ‐0.1 (46) 345 403 12/1/2018 8:02:08 A SJC A320 JBU826 JBU U 12R 66 75 4,553 2,081 208 ‐2.2 (790) 352 403 12/1/2018 8:04:31 A SJC B737 SWA2630 SWA U 12R 65 74 3,186 2,988 168 ‐0.2 (45) 330 403 12/1/2018 8:07:32 A SFO CRJ7 SKW5464 SKW BDEGA 28L 58 70 (2,377) 5,659 241 ‐3.8 (1,620) 64 403 12/1/2018 8:12:52 A SFO A320 ASA1951 ASA SERFR 28L 64 77 (2,276) 4,786 179 ‐4.9 (1,530) 345 403 12/1/2018 8:15:33 A SFO A21N ASA1591 ASA SERFR‐ST 28L 55 69 (2,673) 5,465 241 ‐2.7 (1,125) 344 403 12/1/2018 8:18:07 A SFO B739 UAL1294 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 63 76 (2,437) 4,969 243 ‐2.9 (1,230) 345 403 12/1/2018 8:20:56 A SFO B77W UAL838 UAL OCEANIC 28R 62 73 (5,061) 6,361 238 ‐3.0 (1,275) 34 403 12/1/2018 8:24:14 A SFO B77W ANA8 ANA BDEGA 28R 54 66 (9,821) 5,579 251 ‐3.6 (1,617) 42 403 12/1/2018 8:26:32 A SFO B77W CES589 CES BDEGA 28L 58 71 (4,824) 4,717 208 ‐3.1 (1,125) 39 403 12/1/2018 8:33:12 A SFO E75L SKW5642 SKW BDEGA 28L 57 67 (10,683) 4,953 232 ‐1.5 (600) 64 403 12/1/2018 8:34:40 A SFO B739 UAL662 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 60 72 (2,531) 4,875 176 ‐3.2 (989) 345 403 12/1/2018 8:36:29 A SFO A332 CES767 CES BDEGA 28R 64 75 399 6,526 210 ‐3.9 (1,429) 71 403 12/1/2018 8:40:38 A SFO E75L QXE2283 QXE BDEGA 28L 58 68 (1,604) 6,506 239 ‐2.3 (950) 69 403 12/1/2018 8:42:30 A SFO B737 SWA3330 SWA SERFR 28L 51 64 8,458 6,065 230 ‐2.1 (840) 37 403 12/1/2018 8:45:02 A SFO B77W CPA870 CPA BDEGA 28R 60 73 (3,326) 6,628 230 ‐3.5 (1,425) 113 403 12/1/2018 8:49:33 A SFO B77W KAL023 KAL BDEGA 28R 61 74 (4,549) 4,044 230 ‐1.0 (393) 36 403 12/1/2018 8:52:45 A SFO A320 ACA574 ACA BDEGA 28L 60 72 (8,118) 6,098 269 ‐0.6 (288) 114 403 12/1/2018 8:54:01 D SFO A320 UAL234 UAL U 28L 54 68 2,987 14,937 434 2.4 1,815 106 403 12/1/2018 8:56:04 A SJC E75L CPZ5772 CPZ U 12R 65 75 2,977 2,208 185 ‐4.0 (1,302) 344 403 12/1/2018 8:57:55 A SJC B788 ANA172 ANA U 12R 63 74 4,323 2,875 182 ‐2.2 (704) 1 403 12/1/2018 9:00:47 A SJC E75L QXE2810 QXE U 12R 64 74 4,388 3,004 183 0.0 ‐ 348 403 12/1/2018 9:02:24 A SJC GLF6 N240CX GA U 12R 58 69 4,491 2,975 169 ‐1.0 (300) 334 403 12/1/2018 9:05:27 A SJC B737 SWA921 SWA U 12R 60 72 4,491 2,867 188 ‐3.1 (1,035) 348 403 12/1/2018 9:07:41 A SJC E75L QXE2259 QXE U 12R 55 66 5,746 2,962 209 ‐2.0 (735) 348 403 12/1/2018 9:12:02 A SFO B738 UAL1615 UAL BDEGA 28L 62 75 666 6,292 266 ‐3.7 (1,732) 114 403 12/1/2018 9:16:00 A SFO B738 UAL2055 UAL BDEGA 28L 63 74 (339) 5,038 208 ‐1.6 (595) 59 403 12/1/2018 9:22:02 A SFO A319 ASA1751 ASA BDEGA 28L 65 77 4,978 5,144 248 ‐3.9 (1,710) 42 403 12/1/2018 9:25:13 A SFO B789 UAL2 UAL BDEGA 28R 65 76 615 6,079 231 ‐2.5 (1,031) 32 403 12/1/2018 9:27:58 A SFO A319 UAL820 UAL SERFR 28L 67 77 595 5,000 223 ‐0.6 (222) 62 403 12/1/2018 9:32:46 A SFO B789 UAL876 UAL BDEGA 28R 61 72 (6,590) 4,861 218 ‐1.6 (600) ‐ 403 12/1/2018 9:35:57 A SFO B739 DAL1275 DAL BDEGA 28L 57 70 6,496 5,174 193 ‐3.7 (1,245) 11 403 12/1/2018 9:43:33 A SFO CRJ9 JZA579 JZA BDEGA 28L 52 64 (6,030) 5,019 216 0.2 72 2 403 12/1/2018 9:45:24 A SFO B739 UAL501 UAL SERFR 28L 56 70 8,717 5,691 211 ‐2.5 (936) 30 403 12/1/2018 9:48:27 A SFO B739 UAL274 UAL SERFR 28L 62 74 1,196 5,021 216 ‐0.8 (300) 60 403 12/1/2018 9:51:01 A SFO B739 UAL392 UAL BDEGA 28L 56 69 7,224 5,983 226 ‐0.6 (225) 64 403 12/1/2018 9:53:11 A SFO A319 ASA1935 ASA SERFR 28L 55 67 11,264 6,031 232 0.4 150 59 403 12/1/2018 9:53:57 D PAO U U U U 31 52 63 9,551 285 48 ‐6.9 ‐ 288 403 12/1/2018 9:55:59 A SFO E75L CPZ6041 CPZ SERFR 28L 63 73 10,730 6,000 217 0.0 ‐ 70 403 12/1/2018 9:57:30 A SJC C56X U U U 12R 56 66 3,744 3,082 170 ‐1.7 (516) 359 403 12/1/2018 9:59:05 A SFO B739 UAL2123 UAL SERFR 28L 53 67 10,624 6,013 234 0.1 49 85 A-30 Figure 9c Correlated Noise Event Report Site 403‐ December 1st 2018 Site Event Max Operation Airport Aircraft Flight Airline Procedure Runway Lmax SEL Closest Lateral Dist.Altitude Speed Pitch Alt Delta Heading ID Time Type ID Code dBA (Feet) (ft msl) (Kts) (Degrees) (ft/min) (True) 403 12/1/2018 10:00:45 A SJC B737 SWA3249 SWA U 12R 60 72 2,902 2,838 201 ‐2.5 (880) 349 403 12/1/2018 10:03:59 A SJC B738 SWA4630 SWA U 12R 58 69 6,030 2,045 161 ‐2.2 (623) 2 403 12/1/2018 10:04:25 A SFO A321 JBU133 JBU MISSED 28L 61 73 1,180 5,016 199 0.0 13 64 403 12/1/2018 10:07:41 A SJC E75L CPZ5686 CPZ U 12R 56 66 7,442 2,998 198 0.0 ‐ 345 403 12/1/2018 10:23:11 A SFO B77W CSN659 CSN BDEGA 28R 61 74 2,838 5,035 205 ‐1.3 (479) 20 403 12/1/2018 10:35:09 A SJC E75L QXE2224 QXE U 30L 55 69 5,352 2,998 195 0.0 ‐ 358 403 12/1/2018 10:51:53 A SFO B77W ANZ8 ANZ OCEANIC 28R 61 74 3,390 4,225 210 ‐2.3 (840) 13 403 12/1/2018 10:53:56 A SFO E75L QXE2267 QXE BDEGA 28L 55 68 5,895 4,395 184 ‐2.9 (945) 354 403 12/1/2018 10:55:46 A SFO B738 UAL209 UAL SERFR 28L 57 70 4,745 4,348 195 ‐1.8 (632) 25 403 12/1/2018 10:59:02 A SFO A332 FJI870 FJI OCEANIC 28R 70 80 227 5,018 257 ‐4.2 (1,920) 52 403 12/1/2018 11:03:01 A SFO B788 ACA737 ACA BDEGA 28R 63 74 2,524 5,360 263 ‐1.8 (811) 84 403 12/1/2018 11:08:45 A SFO B748 CCA985 CCA BDEGA 28L 56 67 11,626 5,616 220 ‐3.4 (1,335) 32 403 12/1/2018 11:12:02 A SFO B737 SWA360 SWA SERFR 28L 51 61 12,282 5,997 207 0.2 60 65 403 12/1/2018 11:19:31 A SQL BE35 N8366D GA U 30 61 69 (2,209) 2,454 102 ‐4.1 (735) 326 403 12/1/2018 11:27:02 A SFO A319 UAL698 UAL OCEANIC 28R 60 74 5,601 5,884 220 ‐1.6 (633) 63 403 12/1/2018 11:31:18 A SFO B739 ASA484 ASA OCEANIC 28L 59 70 7,678 6,014 244 ‐0.1 (45) 101 403 12/1/2018 11:32:10 D SQL SR20 N321SL GA U 30 54 67 (1,672) 2,519 81 ‐2.7 (390) 313 403 12/1/2018 11:36:05 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5899 SKW BDEGA 28L 55 66 492 4,976 220 ‐0.1 (21) 88 403 12/1/2018 11:38:33 A SFO A320 ASA1027 ASA SERFR 28L 62 74 4,939 5,997 246 ‐0.1 (22) 87 403 12/1/2018 11:46:22 A SFO A320 UAL708 UAL SERFR 28L 57 68 8,763 5,574 222 ‐3.6 (1,412) 79 403 12/1/2018 11:47:35 A SFO B77W JAL2 JAL OCEANIC 28R 52 66 11,387 5,792 249 ‐1.9 (826) 23 403 12/1/2018 11:50:23 A SFO B738 UAL1763 UAL BDEGA 28L 53 66 (5,432) 7,863 240 ‐2.9 (1,230) 113 403 12/1/2018 12:00:10 A SFO A319 ASA1332 ASA BDEGA 28L 65 77 1,980 4,071 221 ‐1.2 (469) 53 403 12/1/2018 12:04:50 A SFO B744 QFA73 QFA OCEANIC 28R 56 70 7,568 5,379 189 ‐6.8 (2,285) 12 403 12/1/2018 12:11:13 A SFO A388 UAE225 UAE BDEGA 28R 67 77 (1,816) 4,998 239 ‐1.1 (450) 31 403 12/1/2018 12:22:57 A SFO B772 UAL949 UAL BDEGA 28L 66 76 2,812 5,292 197 ‐2.7 (941) 30 403 12/1/2018 12:26:06 A SFO E75L SKW5586 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 60 73 (2,473) 4,539 201 ‐3.7 (1,315) 345 403 12/1/2018 12:28:47 A SFO E75L SKW5446 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 59 69 (2,458) 5,251 217 ‐1.1 (429) 345 403 12/1/2018 12:32:51 A SFO A320 AIJ820 AIJ SERFR‐ST 28L 67 77 (2,563) 5,071 180 ‐1.5 (478) 345 403 12/1/2018 12:36:46 A SFO A321 AAL789 AAL SERFR‐ST 28L 65 75 (2,358) 4,620 206 ‐3.2 (1,171) 345 403 12/1/2018 12:39:54 A SFO E75L SKW5203 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 55 69 (2,483) 5,062 218 ‐2.6 (997) 345 403 12/1/2018 12:46:56 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5655 SKW SERFR 28L 54 66 (3,104) 6,357 249 ‐3.8 (1,680) 345 403 12/1/2018 12:49:59 A SFO B712 DAL1514 DAL SERFR 28L 54 68 13,005 6,000 199 0.1 37 22 403 12/1/2018 12:58:57 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5476 SKW SERFR 28L 56 68 (1,514) 5,021 236 ‐0.1 (52) 9 403 12/1/2018 13:01:28 A SFO B738 ASA621 ASA SERFR 28L 63 74 6,089 4,988 216 ‐0.6 (234) 9 403 12/1/2018 13:02:49 A SFO A346 DLH454 DLH BDEGA 28L 65 76 4,170 6,009 207 0.5 196 50 403 12/1/2018 13:06:30 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5416 SKW SERFR‐ST 28R 54 69 (2,979) 5,476 201 ‐4.2 (1,494) 346 403 12/1/2018 13:08:34 A SFO B737 SWA4136 SWA SERFR‐ST 28L 64 75 (2,478) 4,838 202 ‐4.8 (1,725) 345 403 12/1/2018 13:11:16 A SFO A320 ASA1804 ASA BDEGA 28L 57 68 (7,555) 5,264 214 ‐4.3 (1,626) 358 403 12/1/2018 13:13:32 A SFO CRJ7 SKW5697 SKW BDEGA 28L 53 65 (7,652) 5,009 218 ‐4.4 (1,680) 19 403 12/1/2018 13:16:27 A SFO B77W KAL025 KAL BDEGA 28L 62 75 (836) 6,410 226 ‐5.4 (2,160) 12 403 12/1/2018 13:20:04 A SFO A319 UAL1745 UAL BDEGA 28L 66 77 852 4,612 232 ‐3.3 (1,365) 42 403 12/1/2018 13:24:02 A SFO E75L SKW5967 SKW BDEGA 28L 55 68 (5,825) 5,689 216 ‐1.7 (630) 107 403 12/1/2018 13:29:18 A SFO B77W AFR084 AFR BDEGA 28L 65 77 (3,858) 5,176 223 ‐4.3 (1,694) 22 403 12/1/2018 13:32:58 A SFO B744 BAW11M BAW BDEGA 28L 56 68 (13,008) 4,942 215 ‐3.3 (1,265) 32 403 12/1/2018 13:36:01 D OAK B737 SWA3839 SWA U 30 53 67 2,311 18,144 455 3.0 2,415 135 403 12/1/2018 13:41:45 A SFO B738 UAL390 UAL SERFR 28L 62 72 (4,801) 4,568 216 ‐3.5 (1,317) 29 403 12/1/2018 13:44:19 A SFO B737 SWA974 SWA SERFR 28L 67 74 3,835 5,613 210 ‐3.7 (1,353) 9 403 12/1/2018 13:46:17 A SFO CRJ7 SKW5615 SKW BDEGA 28L 55 66 (6,854) 4,038 214 ‐1.7 (635) 45 403 12/1/2018 13:51:43 A SFO A319 ASA1340 ASA BDEGA 28R 56 68 (7,962) 4,455 231 ‐4.8 (1,965) 54 403 12/1/2018 13:57:51 A SFO A320 UAL2383 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 65 75 (2,456) 4,539 203 ‐4.6 (1,650) 345 403 12/1/2018 14:07:20 A SFO B39M CMP208 CMP SERFR‐ST 28L 59 70 (2,409) 5,048 237 ‐2.7 (1,145) 345 403 12/1/2018 14:09:41 A SFO B739 UAL444 UAL SERFR 28L 63 72 (235) 4,905 239 ‐2.7 (1,144) 345 403 12/1/2018 14:12:28 A SFO E75L CPZ6007 CPZ SERFR‐ST 28L 55 69 (2,492) 4,945 224 ‐1.0 (382) 344 403 12/1/2018 14:14:20 A SFO B738 SWA3950 SWA SERFR‐ST 28L 65 76 (2,429) 4,621 235 ‐3.4 (1,408) 344 403 12/1/2018 14:16:59 A SFO B739 UAL372 UAL OCEANIC 28L 61 72 (2,440) 5,180 215 ‐3.2 (1,203) 346 403 12/1/2018 14:18:18 A SFO A359 AAR212 AAR BDEGA 28L 59 72 854 4,996 222 ‐3.4 (1,319) 23 403 12/1/2018 14:19:59 D PAO U U U U 31 50 62 (10,006) 1,608 109 0.1 21 56 403 12/1/2018 14:25:49 A SFO B772 UAL900 UAL BDEGA 28L 55 64 (12,192) 4,970 215 ‐0.4 (135) 55 403 12/1/2018 14:28:03 A SFO B77W EVA018 EVA OCEANIC 28L 60 73 (5,755) 5,428 241 ‐3.7 (1,575) 31 403 12/1/2018 14:30:08 A SFO B752 UAL477 UAL BDEGA 28L 63 75 (1,790) 5,895 218 ‐5.1 (1,956) 32 403 12/1/2018 14:32:27 A SFO B738 DAL2971 DAL SERFR 28L 59 69 8,320 3,956 212 ‐0.7 (250) 31 403 12/1/2018 14:35:32 A SFO A346 VIR19Z VIR BDEGA 28L 61 75 14,635 6,108 201 0.1 25 80 403 12/1/2018 14:38:40 A SFO B738 ASA534 ASA BDEGA 28L 54 65 11,125 5,111 206 ‐1.7 (604) 44 403 12/1/2018 14:47:09 A SFO B738 UAL2148 UAL SERFR 28L 55 70 5,694 5,199 201 ‐3.7 (1,324) 349 403 12/1/2018 14:51:09 A SFO A320 ASA1388 ASA BDEGA 28L 55 69 8,894 4,348 208 ‐3.8 (1,405) 349 403 12/1/2018 14:59:02 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5984 SKW SERFR 28L 55 66 (2,296) 5,548 215 ‐3.7 (1,395) 346 403 12/1/2018 15:06:40 A SFO B789 UAL892 UAL OCEANIC 28L 69 78 3,413 4,829 249 ‐2.2 (963) 25 403 12/1/2018 15:08:44 A SFO A332 EIN147 EIN BDEGA 28L 68 78 3,304 5,376 201 ‐3.6 (1,290) 355 403 12/1/2018 15:11:29 A SFO E75L QXE2042 QXE SERFR‐ST 28L 56 69 (2,442) 5,731 221 ‐4.8 (1,860) 345 403 12/1/2018 15:17:39 A SFO E75L SKW5617 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 53 68 (2,472) 5,482 193 ‐3.4 (1,153) 345 403 12/1/2018 15:28:53 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5362 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 54 66 (2,348) 5,068 236 ‐2.7 (1,135) 345 403 12/1/2018 15:31:33 A SFO B739 UAL2351 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 59 72 (2,404) 4,676 234 ‐3.4 (1,380) 346 403 12/1/2018 15:33:33 A SFO E75L SKW5954 SKW BDEGA 28R 61 73 132 4,547 190 ‐1.3 (438) 348 403 12/1/2018 15:35:31 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5870 SKW SERFR 28L 55 66 (2,098) 5,130 212 ‐3.2 (1,180) 358 403 12/1/2018 15:40:59 A SFO B738 UAL1919 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 62 73 (2,353) 4,869 221 ‐1.5 (588) 345 403 12/1/2018 15:43:38 A SFO GLEX TWY468 TWY SERFR‐ST 28R 63 70 (2,442) 4,291 237 ‐3.2 (1,353) 345 403 12/1/2018 15:45:17 D SJC C421 N700LC GA U 30L 54 64 6,870 1,543 141 ‐1.4 (345) 312 403 12/1/2018 15:50:41 A SFO E55P EJA406 EJA SERFR‐ST 28R 61 71 (2,532) 5,093 238 ‐1.7 (705) 345 403 12/1/2018 15:51:07 A SFO A319 UAL1620 UAL SERFR 28L 65 74 (933) 5,819 212 ‐3.9 (1,449) 6 403 12/1/2018 15:51:58 A SQL BE9L N530CH GA U 30 59 70 (1,755) 2,530 151 ‐3.0 (786) 312 403 12/1/2018 15:57:33 A SFO B739 UAL1687 UAL SERFR 28L 60 67 6,947 6,017 184 0.6 195 23 403 12/1/2018 15:57:51 A SQL PC12 N903PJ GA U 30 66 75 (1,392) 1,904 160 ‐0.4 (109) 312 403 12/1/2018 16:05:44 A SFO A320 ASA1959 ASA SERFR 28L 68 80 1,360 4,128 197 ‐2.3 (783) 11 403 12/1/2018 16:09:10 A SFO B77W SWR38 SWR BDEGA 28R 58 68 10,703 5,562 194 ‐3.3 (1,120) ‐ 403 12/1/2018 16:10:12 D PAO C172 N172EL GA U 31 63 69 1,946 877 109 ‐1.1 (208) 143 403 12/1/2018 16:12:03 A SFO B77W THY79K THY BDEGA 28R 63 73 12,980 6,805 208 ‐2.3 (827) 64 403 12/1/2018 16:14:57 A SFO E75L SKW5861 SKW SERFR 28L 57 68 3,288 4,899 202 ‐3.9 (1,380) 81 A-31 Figure 9c Correlated Noise Event Report Site 403‐ December 1st 2018 Site Event Max Operation Airport Aircraft Flight Airline Procedure Runway Lmax SEL Closest Lateral Dist.Altitude Speed Pitch Alt Delta Heading ID Time Type ID Code dBA (Feet) (ft msl) (Kts) (Degrees) (ft/min) (True) 403 12/1/2018 16:19:16 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5347 SKW BDEGA 28L 53 66 (746) 5,544 190 ‐5.0 (1,665) 34 403 12/1/2018 16:34:29 A PAO P20P N231KD GA U 31 64 66 6,297 700 114 0.1 13 136 403 12/1/2018 16:39:39 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5286 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 54 67 (2,439) 5,006 223 ‐3.6 (1,425) 345 403 12/1/2018 16:42:19 A SFO A320 UAL1243 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 56 69 (2,257) 4,924 219 ‐3.7 (1,425) 345 403 12/1/2018 16:45:20 A SFO E75L CPZ6045 CPZ SERFR‐ST 28L 59 71 (2,500) 4,309 224 ‐3.6 (1,428) 344 403 12/1/2018 16:48:53 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5535 SKW BDEGA 28L 51 62 8,504 4,986 216 ‐4.0 (1,520) 32 403 12/1/2018 16:51:03 A SFO BE20 DLX622 DLX SERFR 28L 54 65 8,953 6,082 173 ‐0.1 (26) 49 403 12/1/2018 16:52:52 A SFO B712 DAL525 DAL BDEGA 28L 68 79 403 12/1/2018 16:55:18 A SFO A319 UAL718 UAL SERFR 28L 57 68 9,187 4,691 179 ‐4.2 (1,320) 29 403 12/1/2018 16:58:07 A SFO B789 QFA49 QFA OCEANIC 28L 62 73 3,739 5,089 201 ‐2.5 (885) 10 403 12/1/2018 17:00:19 A SFO B737 SWA4139 SWA SERFR‐ST 28L 56 69 (2,520) 5,106 196 ‐2.7 (933) 345 403 12/1/2018 17:11:28 A SFO E75L SKW5248 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 57 70 (2,455) 5,107 249 ‐2.6 (1,126) 345 403 12/1/2018 17:21:39 A SFO B737 SWA3308 SWA SERFR 28L 59 70 978 5,173 209 ‐3.2 (1,172) 14 403 12/1/2018 17:24:29 A SFO A319 UAL1051 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 60 72 (2,338) 5,514 200 ‐2.7 (935) 344 403 12/1/2018 17:31:07 D PAO U U U U 31 47 60 6,285 603 105 ‐1.1 (195) 140 403 12/1/2018 17:34:31 A SFO E75L SKW3460 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 59 71 (2,531) 3,982 239 ‐6.0 (2,527) 345 403 12/1/2018 17:35:41 A SFO B739 DAL1889 DAL BDEGA 28L 57 67 (7,396) 5,433 207 ‐3.7 (1,336) 46 403 12/1/2018 17:44:21 A SFO A359 FBU711 FBU OCEANIC 28L 51 64 (10,600) 4,179 189 ‐2.1 (690) 41 403 12/1/2018 17:47:02 A SFO A320 ASA1933 ASA SERFR‐ST 28L 60 72 (2,651) 4,041 227 ‐1.2 (461) 346 403 12/1/2018 17:48:48 A SFO B738 DAL1720 DAL SERFR‐ST 28L 67 77 (2,573) 5,268 217 ‐2.1 (790) 346 403 12/1/2018 17:50:45 A SFO A320 ASA1271 ASA SERFR 28L 62 74 (2,649) 5,295 202 ‐1.8 (642) 346 403 12/1/2018 17:53:12 A PAO U U U U H 61 69 (5,873) 1,122 128 ‐7.6 (1,726) 85 403 12/1/2018 17:55:20 A SFO B738 UAL1124 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 59 72 (2,408) 4,915 229 ‐3.0 (1,226) 345 403 12/1/2018 17:57:27 A SFO B739 UAL632 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 65 75 (2,443) 4,903 193 ‐2.7 (931) 345 403 12/1/2018 18:06:00 A SFO A319 ASA1273 ASA SERFR 28L 65 76 (2,899) 4,129 203 ‐1.8 (652) 30 403 12/1/2018 18:09:14 A SFO CRJ9 JZA743 JZA BDEGA 28L 54 67 1,380 4,885 223 ‐4.6 (1,802) 53 403 12/1/2018 18:11:00 A SFO B738 AAL1454 AAL SERFR 28L 58 72 6,051 4,556 195 ‐4.5 (1,530) 8 403 12/1/2018 18:13:37 A SFO A388 BAW287 BAW BDEGA 28R 55 67 12,236 5,341 191 ‐3.4 (1,133) 356 403 12/1/2018 18:15:29 D PAO U U U U H 51 64 (10,161) 1,558 77 4.4 600 263 403 12/1/2018 18:17:14 A SFO A319 UAL1240 UAL SERFR 28L 61 71 7,929 4,628 170 ‐3.6 (1,090) 10 403 12/1/2018 18:20:18 A SFO B752 UAL560 UAL BDEGA 28L 48 61 12,864 4,228 160 ‐3.7 (1,035) 320 403 12/1/2018 18:22:21 A SFO B77W CAL004 CAL OCEANIC 28L 55 69 7,202 5,982 241 ‐1.1 (478) 81 403 12/1/2018 18:27:39 A SFO A320 ASA1747 ASA BDEGA 28L 53 66 9,564 5,247 219 ‐2.2 (851) 90 403 12/1/2018 18:39:49 A SFO A320 UAL587 UAL BDEGA 28L 55 69 121 6,384 256 ‐1.6 (735) 85 403 12/1/2018 18:41:20 A SFO B737 SWA2989 SWA SERFR 28L 56 68 5,562 6,220 219 ‐4.3 (1,657) 20 403 12/1/2018 18:43:31 A SFO A319 ASA1923 ASA SERFR‐ST 28L 65 77 (2,501) 4,169 194 ‐4.2 (1,425) 347 403 12/1/2018 18:46:12 A SFO A319 UAL2016 UAL SERFR 28L 55 66 11,024 4,704 205 ‐3.5 (1,258) 9 403 12/1/2018 18:47:42 A SFO B737 SWA4050 SWA SERFR 28L 58 71 354 5,937 199 ‐2.4 (840) 357 403 12/1/2018 18:52:54 A SFO E35L N84AW GA SERFR‐ST 28L 51 66 (2,491) 6,200 256 ‐2.5 (1,119) 345 403 12/1/2018 18:54:35 A SFO CRJ7 SKW5765 SKW BDEGA 28L 63 74 1,882 4,042 197 ‐0.7 (244) 355 403 12/1/2018 18:56:21 A SFO A321 JBU915 JBU BDEGA 28L 58 70 5,439 4,554 271 ‐3.9 (1,890) 91 403 12/1/2018 19:03:03 A SFO B737 SWA3361 SWA SERFR‐ST 28L 61 70 (2,312) 4,658 228 ‐3.7 (1,500) 345 403 12/1/2018 19:05:19 A SFO B738 UAL2352 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 61 72 (2,422) 4,715 227 ‐4.1 (1,645) 345 403 12/1/2018 19:08:09 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5700 SKW BDEGA 28L 48 59 (10,617) 4,084 210 ‐2.0 (735) 48 403 12/1/2018 19:10:36 A SFO A320 TAI564 TAI SERFR‐ST 28L 63 76 (2,522) 4,694 197 ‐4.4 (1,530) 346 403 12/1/2018 19:12:01 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5457 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 57 68 (2,409) 5,091 232 ‐3.0 (1,230) 346 403 12/1/2018 19:14:06 A SFO B739 UAL1604 UAL OCEANIC 28L 64 76 1,294 4,497 215 ‐4.3 (1,620) 36 403 12/1/2018 19:16:26 A SFO B77W SIA2 SIA OCEANIC 28L 60 72 (2,205) 4,629 208 ‐4.2 (1,523) 27 403 12/1/2018 19:18:04 A SFO A321 AAL686 AAL SERFR 28R 54 67 9,202 5,688 174 ‐7.4 (2,265) 342 403 12/1/2018 19:19:39 A SFO A319 ASA1279 ASA SERFR 28L 62 75 (1,007) 5,948 203 ‐1.5 (533) 5 403 12/1/2018 19:21:28 A SFO A388 DLH458 DLH BDEGA 28R 62 74 8,612 4,471 204 ‐3.2 (1,147) 3 403 12/1/2018 19:26:29 A SFO E75L SKW5592 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 53 66 (2,504) 4,635 198 ‐2.7 (932) 345 403 12/1/2018 19:28:27 A SFO B737 SWA4154 SWA SERFR 28L 62 75 772 4,975 206 ‐3.8 (1,380) 12 403 12/1/2018 19:34:01 D SFO E75L SKW5960 SKW U 01L 47 60 (13,393) 16,233 413 2.4 1,725 105 403 12/1/2018 19:40:48 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5872 SKW BDEGA 28L 52 64 403 12/1/2018 19:42:24 A SFO E75L CPZ6015 CPZ SERFR‐ST 28L 56 70 (2,310) 5,597 181 ‐1.0 (306) 344 403 12/1/2018 19:44:47 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5718 SKW BDEGA 28L 54 65 (221) 5,032 240 ‐3.6 (1,530) 43 403 12/1/2018 19:46:59 A SFO A319 ASA1595 ASA SERFR‐ST 28R 64 76 (2,628) 4,809 172 ‐3.4 (1,029) 346 403 12/1/2018 19:48:37 A SFO B772 UAL340 UAL BDEGA 28L 56 70 (1,678) 5,803 202 ‐2.8 (990) 63 403 12/1/2018 19:54:07 A SFO E75L SKW5440 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 57 68 (2,504) 4,956 231 ‐2.9 (1,164) 345 403 12/1/2018 19:56:09 A SFO B752 UAL1584 UAL BDEGA 28L 54 68 (6,964) 5,636 173 ‐6.8 (2,055) 43 403 12/1/2018 19:58:33 A SFO B739 UAL2201 UAL SERFR 28L 67 78 2,995 4,002 198 0.6 194 350 403 12/1/2018 19:59:47 A SFO B38M ACA781 ACA BDEGA 28L 63 74 (245) 4,601 167 ‐3.1 (919) 342 403 12/1/2018 20:02:32 A SFO B739 UAL384 UAL SERFR 28L 62 74 (2,996) 5,004 197 ‐4.5 (1,575) 357 403 12/1/2018 20:05:52 A SFO E75L QXE2271 QXE BDEGA 28L 67 78 422 5,691 211 ‐8.3 (3,105) 34 403 12/1/2018 20:11:07 A SFO B789 UAL28 UAL OCEANIC 28L 56 65 (9,868) 4,143 197 ‐2.7 (934) 29 403 12/1/2018 20:13:12 A SFO A320 ASA1963 ASA SERFR‐ST 28L 66 77 (2,666) 4,311 207 ‐3.1 (1,123) 346 403 12/1/2018 20:15:35 A SFO B772 UAL724 UAL OCEANIC 28L 66 76 5,321 6,154 233 ‐6.3 (2,565) 80 403 12/1/2018 20:17:27 A SFO A332 HAL12 HAL OCEANIC 28L 55 70 10,413 4,612 220 ‐2.7 (1,057) 32 403 12/1/2018 20:22:40 A SFO A321 AAL547 AAL BDEGA 28L 69 77 (1,813) 4,651 219 ‐5.1 (1,980) 76 403 12/1/2018 20:24:58 A SFO B738 UAL1152 UAL OCEANIC 28L 60 72 4,962 4,061 196 ‐1.9 (659) 2 403 12/1/2018 20:28:38 A SFO A320 ASA1945 ASA SERFR‐ST 28L 62 74 (3,339) 4,878 207 ‐2.7 (983) 344 403 12/1/2018 20:34:17 A SFO B739 UAL643 UAL OCEANIC 28L 49 59 (12,906) 4,141 209 ‐4.6 (1,702) 19 403 12/1/2018 20:35:03 A SFO B77W CPA872 CPA BDEGA 28L 59 72 3,321 5,672 221 ‐2.7 (1,035) 54 403 12/1/2018 20:36:17 A SFO B77W CPA872 CPA BDEGA 28L 50 60 3,321 5,672 221 ‐2.7 (1,035) 54 403 12/1/2018 20:41:23 A SFO B738 UAL1722 UAL OCEANIC 28L 56 68 (7,412) 5,521 209 ‐4.3 (1,575) 24 403 12/1/2018 20:44:32 A OAK B738 ASA840 ASA U 30 55 65 8,789 3,867 244 ‐0.8 (326) 68 403 12/1/2018 20:59:23 D SFO B752 UAL349 UAL U 01L 50 65 2,380 16,321 457 2.9 2,310 106 403 12/1/2018 21:03:21 A SFO GLF4 WWI31 WWI SERFR‐ST 28L 60 70 (2,561) 4,769 203 ‐3.7 (1,335) 345 403 12/1/2018 21:05:54 A SFO B738 UAL2132 UAL BDEGA 28L 44 58 403 12/1/2018 21:12:54 A SFO E75L QXE2038 QXE SERFR‐ST 28L 59 68 (2,474) 4,340 215 ‐4.3 (1,620) 345 403 12/1/2018 21:14:10 A SFO A320 UAL1217 UAL BDEGA 28L 62 74 206 5,515 223 ‐3.7 (1,454) 39 403 12/1/2018 21:16:38 A SFO E75L SKW5681 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 59 71 (2,459) 4,983 204 ‐2.8 (1,004) 345 403 12/1/2018 21:19:00 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5366 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 56 68 (2,655) 4,678 227 ‐4.2 (1,665) 346 403 12/1/2018 21:26:07 A SFO B737 SWA485 SWA SERFR‐ST 28L 60 70 (2,480) 5,025 223 ‐2.9 (1,140) 345 403 12/1/2018 21:28:23 A SFO GLF4 U U SERFR‐ST 28R 52 66 (2,504) 4,651 241 ‐4.8 (2,028) 346 403 12/1/2018 21:29:57 A SFO CRJ7 SKW5873 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 57 67 (2,377) 5,064 211 ‐2.9 (1,095) 346 403 12/1/2018 21:32:08 A SFO B739 UAL1568 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 63 73 (2,384) 5,404 208 ‐2.3 (831) 345 A-32 Figure 9c Correlated Noise Event Report Site 403‐ December 1st 2018 Site Event Max Operation Airport Aircraft Flight Airline Procedure Runway Lmax SEL Closest Lateral Dist.Altitude Speed Pitch Alt Delta Heading ID Time Type ID Code dBA (Feet) (ft msl) (Kts) (Degrees) (ft/min) (True) 403 12/1/2018 21:34:55 A SFO B738 AMX664 AMX SERFR‐ST 28L 58 70 (2,417) 5,282 215 ‐2.5 (930) 345 403 12/1/2018 21:37:39 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5616 SKW SERFR 28L 51 63 3,461 5,442 210 ‐3.7 (1,375) 8 403 12/1/2018 21:39:38 A SFO E75L SKW5483 SKW SERFR 28L 55 66 (1,956) 5,934 230 ‐1.9 (749) 1 403 12/1/2018 21:42:23 A SFO A332 HAL42 HAL OCEANIC 28L 57 70 9,404 4,205 193 ‐2.6 (892) 349 403 12/1/2018 21:45:54 A SFO E75L SKW3381 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 61 70 (2,486) 5,036 219 ‐3.1 (1,183) 345 403 12/1/2018 21:49:13 A SFO A320 ASA1776 ASA BDEGA 28L 63 74 (2,774) 4,997 221 ‐4.5 (1,755) 55 403 12/1/2018 21:51:49 A SFO A320 ACA568 ACA BDEGA 28L 61 71 (5,851) 4,331 214 ‐1.6 (601) 28 403 12/1/2018 21:53:20 A SFO A321 JBU833 JBU BDEGA 28L 48 61 (13,754) 4,232 191 ‐2.1 (721) 23 403 12/1/2018 21:56:29 D OAK B38M SWA6868 SWA U 30 50 61 (87) 16,380 415 3.4 2,460 139 403 12/1/2018 22:01:49 A SFO A320 AIJ830 AIJ SERFR‐ST 28L 59 70 (2,461) 5,160 228 ‐3.9 (1,575) 345 403 12/1/2018 22:03:36 A SFO B738 DAL1700 DAL SERFR‐ST 28L 64 76 (2,453) 4,845 202 ‐5.1 (1,815) 345 403 12/1/2018 22:14:31 A SFO B739 UAL650 UAL OCEANIC 28L 51 65 (9,494) 5,415 212 ‐4.7 (1,770) 30 403 12/1/2018 22:34:15 A SFO CRJ7 SKW5461 SKW SERFR‐ST 28R 54 65 (2,295) 5,411 206 ‐2.3 (824) 345 403 12/1/2018 22:38:02 A SFO E75L CPZ6085 CPZ SERFR‐ST 28R 58 71 (2,406) 5,329 196 ‐2.4 (815) 344 403 12/1/2018 22:40:16 A SFO B738 UAL1712 UAL SERFR‐ST 28R 61 73 (2,339) 5,275 191 ‐2.8 (930) 345 403 12/1/2018 22:42:16 A SFO B738 ASA759 ASA OCEANIC 28R 61 74 (726) 5,616 201 ‐3.8 (1,335) 24 403 12/1/2018 22:45:38 A SFO B738 UAL1288 UAL OCEANIC 28R 58 66 (8,170) 6,190 239 ‐2.5 (1,035) 35 403 12/1/2018 22:59:42 D SFO B752 UAL2360 UAL U 01R 54 65 12,599 14,351 447 1.8 1,380 120 403 12/1/2018 23:04:46 A SFO B738 CMP382 CMP SERFR‐ST 28R 63 75 (2,419) 5,083 207 ‐2.9 (1,050) 344 403 12/1/2018 23:10:20 A SFO A321 AAL2374 AAL BDEGA 28R 50 62 (11,419) 4,196 202 ‐3.4 (1,221) 67 403 12/1/2018 23:17:23 A SFO B738 UAL435 UAL OCEANIC 28R 62 74 462 6,019 240 ‐3.2 (1,351) 26 403 12/1/2018 23:20:43 A SFO B738 AMX662 AMX SERFR‐ST 28R 63 74 (2,358) 4,694 237 ‐3.8 (1,575) 346 403 12/1/2018 23:21:31 A SFO B752 DAL2344 DAL BDEGA 28R 65 74 (2,335) 5,928 212 ‐5.3 (1,965) 49 403 12/1/2018 23:23:39 A SFO A321 JBU1415 JBU BDEGA 28R 58 69 8,187 4,712 162 ‐3.9 (1,110) 344 403 12/1/2018 23:25:51 A SFO A321 JBU1415 JBU BDEGA 28R 54 68 8,187 4,712 162 ‐3.9 (1,110) 344 403 12/1/2018 23:37:59 A SFO A320 TAI560 TAI SERFR‐ST 28R 57 70 (2,522) 4,908 236 ‐2.8 (1,163) 345 403 12/1/2018 23:59:26 D SFO B753 UAL2237 UAL U 01R 50 64 (6,055) 14,314 425 2.3 1,755 105 BridgeNet International 2019 A-33 Figure 9d Correlated Noise Event Report Site 404 (Tevis) ‐ December 1st 2018 Site Event Max Operation Airport Aircraft Flight Airline Procedure Runway Lmax SEL Closest Lateral Dist.Altitude Speed Pitch Alt Delta Heading ID Time Type ID Code dBA (Feet) (ft msl) (Kts) (Degrees) (ft/min) (True) 404 12/1/2018 0:03:10 Arrival SFO B738 ASA762 ASA OCEANIC 28R 60 74 1,466 6,576 209 ‐3.2 (1,167) 33 404 12/1/2018 0:10:20 Arrival SFO B738 AMX664 AMX SERFR‐ST 28R 63 76 (27) 4,636 196 ‐4.0 (1,377) 345 404 12/1/2018 0:12:59 Arrival SFO E75L CPZ6020 CPZ SERFR‐ST 28R 59 72 (28) 4,941 185 ‐1.6 (510) 344 404 12/1/2018 0:17:12 Arrival SFO B748 KAL213 KAL SERFR‐ST 28R 73 83 (80) 5,000 230 ‐3.5 (1,394) 345 404 12/1/2018 0:23:16 Arrival SFO B738 AMX662 AMX SERFR‐ST 28R 61 73 (85) 4,727 182 ‐2.5 (793) 345 404 12/1/2018 0:37:22 Arrival SFO A320 ASA1949 ASA SERFR‐ST 28R 64 75 (380) 4,059 178 ‐3.3 (1,046) 346 404 12/1/2018 1:19:19 Arrival SFO C750 U U SERFR 28R 55 67 (3,567) 4,004 247 ‐0.6 (264) 337 404 12/1/2018 2:51:37 Arrival SFO B744 AAR284 AAR SERFR‐ST 28R 70 81 (60) 4,684 211 ‐2.7 (990) 346 404 12/1/2018 3:25:22 Arrival SFO B739 UAL2550 UAL BDEGA 28R 51 61 9,716 3,991 217 ‐0.1 (45) 62 404 12/1/2018 3:46:29 Arrival SFO B738 UAL1639 UAL OCEANIC 28L 59 69 5,961 6,671 247 ‐1.8 (762) 62 404 12/1/2018 3:58:07 Arrival SFO B738 UAL1724 UAL OCEANIC 28R 62 73 4,272 5,816 251 ‐3.6 (1,590) 65 404 12/1/2018 4:09:20 Arrival SFO B772 UAL396 UAL OCEANIC 28R 63 72 (5,310) 6,487 264 ‐1.2 (557) 26 404 12/1/2018 4:10:39 Arrival SFO B738 UAL1746 UAL OCEANIC 28R 56 67 6,143 7,507 244 ‐2.4 (1,041) 69 404 12/1/2018 4:38:12 Arrival SFO B753 UAL2553 UAL BDEGA 28R 43 59 14,643 4,624 168 ‐2.7 (813) 334 404 12/1/2018 5:13:23 Arrival SFO B789 UAL955 UAL BDEGA 28R 57 70 (7,179) 4,443 287 ‐3.5 (1,772) 104 404 12/1/2018 5:36:50 Arrival SFO B738 UAL1557 UAL OCEANIC 28R 60 71 6,716 5,799 273 ‐4.9 (2,360) 80 404 12/1/2018 5:38:01 Arrival SFO B77W AIC173 AIC OTHER 28R 43 59 404 12/1/2018 5:46:48 Arrival SFO B753 UAL1575 UAL OCEANIC 28R 53 64 10,495 6,785 262 ‐2.7 (1,230) 80 404 12/1/2018 5:49:16 Arrival SFO B77W UAL916 UAL OCEANIC 28R 56 69 8,750 6,221 255 ‐4.0 (1,793) 79 404 12/1/2018 6:03:48 Arrival SFO B77W EVA008 EVA BDEGA 28R 59 71 (1,631) 5,957 226 ‐3.2 (1,280) 113 404 12/1/2018 6:16:40 Departure PAO U U U U 13 45 59 9,188 117 77 ‐4.7 (645) 143 404 12/1/2018 6:20:53 Arrival SFO CRJ2 SKW5738 SKW BDEGA 28R 52 62 (8,123) 4,048 255 ‐5.7 (2,582) 45 404 12/1/2018 6:28:41 Arrival SFO P28A UAL872 UAL BDEGA 28R 57 69 (8,538) 5,640 266 ‐2.8 (1,307) 104 404 12/1/2018 6:40:24 Arrival SFO CRJ2 SKW5276 SKW BDEGA 28R 48 61 6,379 4,386 259 ‐3.2 (1,450) 34 404 12/1/2018 6:57:45 Arrival SFO E75L SKW5358 SKW BDEGA 28R 53 65 (9,157) 3,892 251 ‐4.6 (2,055) 63 404 12/1/2018 6:59:15 Arrival SFO CRJ7 SKW5802 SKW BDEGA 28L 58 67 (8,167) 3,469 228 ‐3.5 (1,417) 78 404 12/1/2018 7:01:26 Arrival SFO CRJ2 SKW5631 SKW SERFR‐ST 28R 59 67 (93) 4,512 221 ‐1.0 (395) 345 404 12/1/2018 7:03:52 Arrival SFO CRJ2 SKW5667 SKW SERFR‐ST 28R 53 66 (17) 4,641 225 ‐3.2 (1,286) 345 404 12/1/2018 7:06:03 Arrival SFO E75L SKW5601 SKW SERFR‐ST 28R 58 70 (33) 4,678 235 ‐3.5 (1,457) 345 404 12/1/2018 7:08:05 Arrival SFO A320 UAL2350 UAL SERFR‐ST 28R 60 71 79 4,703 227 ‐1.5 (600) 345 404 12/1/2018 7:10:27 Arrival SFO A319 UAL295 UAL SERFR‐ST 28R 62 75 (134) 4,586 210 ‐3.4 (1,275) 345 404 12/1/2018 7:11:43 Arrival SFO B738 UAL805 UAL BDEGA 28R 62 73 (2,863) 5,245 224 ‐3.3 (1,290) 46 404 12/1/2018 7:13:41 Arrival SFO CRJ2 SKW5496 SKW BDEGA 28R 56 68 306 5,335 205 ‐3.1 (1,134) 71 404 12/1/2018 7:15:05 Arrival SFO A359 SIA32 SIA BDEGA 28R 59 71 800 5,739 222 ‐2.8 (1,110) 112 404 12/1/2018 7:34:47 Arrival SFO E75L CPZ6034 CPZ SERFR‐ST 28L 62 76 (27) 4,813 190 ‐2.8 (930) 344 404 12/1/2018 7:37:04 Arrival SFO A320 ASA1925 ASA SERFR‐ST 28L 60 71 (113) 4,044 236 ‐1.5 (624) 346 404 12/1/2018 7:37:42 Arrival SFO B789 UAL858 UAL BDEGA 28R 65 73 2,921 5,371 245 ‐3.3 (1,412) 44 404 12/1/2018 7:50:04 Arrival SFO B77W UAL862 UAL BDEGA 28R 49 60 11,321 5,058 189 ‐2.2 (739) 348 404 12/1/2018 7:50:46 Arrival SFO A320 UAL618 UAL BDEGA 28L 67 76 (1,936) 5,522 233 ‐4.3 (1,759) 116 404 12/1/2018 7:52:59 Departure SFO B38M SWA4128 SWA U 28R 52 63 (1,988) 17,891 417 2.7 1,999 106 404 12/1/2018 7:55:13 Arrival SFO A320 UAL612 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 66 78 (64) 4,376 185 ‐3.8 (1,230) 344 404 12/1/2018 7:58:53 Arrival SFO A320 JBU1136 JBU SERFR‐ST 28L 70 78 67 3,970 212 ‐0.4 (145) 347 404 12/1/2018 8:02:24 Arrival SJC A320 JBU826 JBU U 12R 47 61 10,086 1,991 209 ‐1.3 (479) 12 404 12/1/2018 8:04:49 Arrival SJC B737 SWA2630 SWA U 12R 55 65 7,567 2,995 172 0.5 146 15 404 12/1/2018 8:07:31 Arrival SFO CRJ7 SKW5464 SKW BDEGA 28L 53 68 6,341 5,670 240 ‐3.8 (1,624) 65 404 12/1/2018 8:10:28 Departure SQL PC12 PXT494 PXT U 30 47 60 13,995 2,698 229 4.3 1,748 103 404 12/1/2018 8:13:29 Arrival SFO A320 ASA1951 ASA SERFR 28L 66 78 (48) 4,176 182 ‐3.4 (1,080) 343 404 12/1/2018 8:14:52 Arrival SFO A21N ASA1591 ASA SERFR‐ST 28L 50 62 (180) 4,917 188 ‐3.4 (1,130) 346 404 12/1/2018 8:15:51 Arrival SFO A21N ASA1591 ASA SERFR‐ST 28L 61 73 (180) 4,917 188 ‐3.4 (1,130) 346 404 12/1/2018 8:18:40 Arrival SFO B739 UAL1294 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 63 73 (23) 4,549 242 ‐2.8 (1,203) 345 404 12/1/2018 8:21:04 Arrival SFO B77W UAL838 UAL OCEANIC 28R 65 76 2,807 6,132 221 ‐3.5 (1,354) 30 404 12/1/2018 8:24:10 Arrival SFO B77W ANA8 ANA BDEGA 28R 62 76 (1,588) 5,412 256 ‐3.6 (1,613) 38 404 12/1/2018 8:26:41 Arrival SFO B77W CES589 CES BDEGA 28L 62 73 3,160 4,565 202 ‐2.3 (829) 31 404 12/1/2018 8:33:04 Arrival SFO E75L SKW5642 SKW BDEGA 28L 62 72 (1,980) 4,966 232 ‐1.2 (497) 67 404 12/1/2018 8:33:26 Arrival SJC E145 DYN101 DYN U 12R 50 60 9,192 2,815 216 ‐2.3 (879) 7 404 12/1/2018 8:35:28 Arrival SFO B739 UAL662 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 63 74 (33) 4,296 177 ‐4.1 (1,282) 345 404 12/1/2018 8:36:13 Departure PAO U U U U 13 57 67 9,228 87 77 ‐2.6 (355) 141 404 12/1/2018 8:40:39 Arrival SFO E75L QXE2283 QXE BDEGA 28L 54 65 6,978 6,578 251 ‐2.2 (979) 72 404 12/1/2018 8:44:46 Arrival SFO B77W CPA870 CPA BDEGA 28R 56 69 (8,220) 7,091 236 ‐4.2 (1,736) 113 404 12/1/2018 8:49:47 Arrival SFO B77W KAL023 KAL BDEGA 28R 63 76 3,188 4,006 217 ‐0.3 (127) 28 404 12/1/2018 8:51:57 Arrival SFO A320 ACA574 ACA BDEGA 28L 51 64 (13,039) 6,171 253 ‐0.6 (251) 113 404 12/1/2018 8:53:57 Departure SFO A320 UAL234 UAL U 28L 50 65 (2,878) 14,671 430 2.3 1,751 106 404 12/1/2018 8:56:11 Arrival SJC E75L CPZ5772 CPZ U 12R 45 60 8,588 2,033 215 ‐2.1 (795) 16 404 12/1/2018 8:59:12 Departure SFO A319 UAL580 UAL U 28L 49 62 (4,532) 17,469 447 2.5 1,955 106 404 12/1/2018 9:01:11 Arrival SJC E75L QXE2810 QXE U 12R 49 61 10,273 2,896 188 ‐2.7 (885) 21 404 12/1/2018 9:02:46 Departure SFO A319 UAL2229 UAL U 28L 46 58 404 12/1/2018 9:05:36 Arrival SJC B737 SWA921 SWA U 12R 49 59 9,891 2,621 199 ‐4.4 (1,556) 15 404 12/1/2018 9:07:50 Arrival SJC E75L QXE2259 QXE U 12R 44 58 11,178 2,804 215 ‐2.8 (1,075) 13 404 12/1/2018 9:11:44 Arrival SFO B738 UAL1615 UAL BDEGA 28L 60 72 (4,279) 6,759 262 ‐4.0 (1,834) 113 404 12/1/2018 9:16:03 Arrival SFO B738 UAL2055 UAL BDEGA 28L 53 64 8,398 5,042 209 ‐1.6 (593) 59 404 12/1/2018 9:22:24 Arrival SFO A319 ASA1751 ASA BDEGA 28L 50 62 13,143 4,844 247 ‐3.7 (1,603) 34 404 12/1/2018 9:23:12 Departure PAO U U U U 31 46 59 9,285 9 64 0.0 ‐ 322 404 12/1/2018 9:25:45 Arrival SFO B789 UAL2 UAL BDEGA 28R 56 67 8,168 5,890 235 ‐2.6 (1,074) 28 404 12/1/2018 9:28:03 Arrival SFO A319 UAL820 UAL SERFR 28L 56 68 9,333 5,000 223 ‐0.6 (219) 62 404 12/1/2018 9:33:09 Arrival SFO B789 UAL876 UAL BDEGA 28R 64 75 (1,782) 4,755 207 ‐0.7 (244) 4 404 12/1/2018 9:34:22 Departure SFO B739 ASA710 ASA U 28R 55 66 (3,391) 17,155 433 2.3 1,771 106 404 12/1/2018 9:36:43 Arrival SFO B739 DAL1275 DAL BDEGA 28L 51 63 12,586 4,884 196 ‐2.5 (879) 13 404 12/1/2018 9:43:44 Arrival SFO CRJ9 JZA579 JZA BDEGA 28L 55 68 (1,117) 4,978 218 ‐0.8 (316) 3 404 12/1/2018 9:45:56 Arrival SFO B739 UAL501 UAL SERFR 28L 49 62 404 12/1/2018 9:48:13 Arrival SFO B739 UAL274 UAL SERFR 28L 50 64 9,929 5,025 217 ‐0.8 (300) 60 404 12/1/2018 9:51:07 Departure PAO U U U U 31 48 64 6,600 988 60 4.2 452 160 404 12/1/2018 9:56:31 Arrival SQL PC12 N903PJ GA U 30 60 72 (4,050) 1,912 122 ‐0.7 (158) 315 404 12/1/2018 10:01:03 Arrival SJC B737 SWA3249 SWA U 12R 50 62 8,315 2,619 203 ‐2.8 (986) 17 404 12/1/2018 10:04:22 Arrival SFO A321 JBU133 JBU MISSED 28L 51 66 9,883 5,015 197 0.1 43 68 404 12/1/2018 10:08:05 Arrival SFO CRJ2 SKW5982 SKW SERFR 28L 52 63 404 12/1/2018 10:08:22 Arrival SFO CRJ2 SKW5982 SKW SERFR 28L 47 62 404 12/1/2018 10:16:43 Departure SQL BE20 N840CP GA U 30 53 67 (10,498) 1,991 218 0.0 ‐ 90 404 12/1/2018 10:19:49 Departure PAO S22T N222BA GA U 31 56 67 9,200 275 86 10.6 1,597 321 A-34 Figure 9d Correlated Noise Event Report Site 404 (Tevis) ‐ December 1st 2018 Site Event Max Operation Airport Aircraft Flight Airline Procedure Runway Lmax SEL Closest Lateral Dist.Altitude Speed Pitch Alt Delta Heading ID Time Type ID Code dBA (Feet) (ft msl) (Kts) (Degrees) (ft/min) (True) 404 12/1/2018 10:23:35 Arrival SFO B77W CSN659 CSN BDEGA 28R 55 64 9,907 4,993 194 ‐0.1 (45) 24 404 12/1/2018 10:25:22 Departure SQL SR20 N321SL GA U 30 70 80 (1,408) 2,653 108 3.6 690 190 404 12/1/2018 10:27:32 Departure OAK CRJ9 ASH5796 ASH U 30 57 69 (1,925) 16,665 412 3.2 2,349 134 404 12/1/2018 10:35:23 Arrival SJC E75L QXE2224 QXE U 30L 48 62 11,601 2,998 203 0.0 ‐ 20 404 12/1/2018 10:42:44 Departure PAO U U U U 31 49 63 9,274 103 76 8.1 1,124 323 404 12/1/2018 10:51:57 Arrival SFO B77W ANZ8 ANZ OCEANIC 28R 56 69 9,466 4,054 205 ‐1.2 (421) 13 404 12/1/2018 10:54:51 Arrival SFO E75L QXE2267 QXE BDEGA 28L 50 63 9,666 4,005 176 ‐0.6 (199) 350 404 12/1/2018 10:56:46 Arrival SFO B738 UAL209 UAL SERFR 28L 51 63 10,372 4,018 167 ‐0.2 (45) 327 404 12/1/2018 10:58:58 Arrival SFO A332 FJI870 FJI OCEANIC 28R 58 70 8,909 4,947 257 ‐4.2 (1,920) 52 404 12/1/2018 11:02:53 Arrival SFO B788 ACA737 ACA BDEGA 28R 54 64 10,166 5,519 270 ‐1.8 (840) 93 404 12/1/2018 11:06:09 Departure PAO BE36 N100JB GA U 31 44 61 9,285 9 83 0.0 ‐ 322 404 12/1/2018 11:09:14 Departure SQL S22T N173CK GA U 30 55 67 6,764 2,271 175 3.2 978 106 404 12/1/2018 11:16:27 Departure PAO BE36 N100JB GA U 31 52 65 9,268 183 112 8.5 1,680 316 404 12/1/2018 11:20:23 Arrival SQL BE35 N8366D GA U 30 58 67 (3,856) 2,018 89 ‐3.4 (533) 308 404 12/1/2018 11:26:44 Arrival SFO A319 UAL698 UAL OCEANIC 28R 54 64 14,308 5,916 224 ‐1.3 (502) 64 404 12/1/2018 11:29:47 Departure SFO B738 UAL2128 UAL U 28R 53 62 (5,369) 16,348 452 1.2 990 106 404 12/1/2018 11:33:24 Arrival SFO B753 UAL2042 UAL BDEGA 28R 53 64 404 12/1/2018 11:36:04 Arrival SFO CRJ2 SKW5899 SKW BDEGA 28L 46 59 8,120 5,011 221 ‐1.5 (580) 88 404 12/1/2018 11:38:17 Arrival SFO A320 ASA1027 ASA SERFR 28L 55 66 12,638 6,000 256 0.0 ‐ 87 404 12/1/2018 11:48:14 Arrival SFO A320 UAL708 UAL SERFR 28L 51 65 12,067 4,021 166 ‐0.8 (219) 330 404 12/1/2018 11:50:11 Arrival SFO B738 UAL1763 UAL BDEGA 28L 49 61 (10,541) 8,182 244 ‐2.2 (928) 112 404 12/1/2018 11:59:14 Arrival SFO B738 SWA3582 SWA BDEGA 28L 54 67 404 12/1/2018 12:00:15 Arrival SFO A319 ASA1332 ASA BDEGA 28L 54 67 10,683 4,058 219 ‐1.0 (389) 53 404 12/1/2018 12:05:37 Arrival SFO B744 QFA73 QFA OCEANIC 28R 50 63 13,593 4,674 208 ‐5.9 (2,147) 12 404 12/1/2018 12:10:28 Arrival SFO A388 UAE225 UAE BDEGA 28R 50 63 5,751 4,925 215 ‐1.0 (390) 28 404 12/1/2018 12:11:30 Arrival SFO A388 UAE225 UAE BDEGA 28R 62 73 5,751 4,925 215 ‐1.0 (390) 28 404 12/1/2018 12:17:36 Departure PAO U U U U 31 51 66 3,455 1,039 105 ‐2.3 (418) 132 404 12/1/2018 12:23:23 Arrival SFO B772 UAL949 UAL BDEGA 28L 54 64 10,620 5,111 198 ‐3.0 (1,035) 33 404 12/1/2018 12:26:49 Arrival SFO E75L SKW5586 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 65 74 (13) 4,153 210 ‐2.9 (1,084) 345 404 12/1/2018 12:29:24 Arrival SFO E75L SKW5446 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 59 71 (47) 5,148 199 ‐1.1 (389) 344 404 12/1/2018 12:33:30 Arrival SFO A320 AIJ820 AIJ SERFR‐ST 28L 66 78 (231) 5,020 181 ‐0.1 (35) 344 404 12/1/2018 12:35:14 Overflight UNK CRJ2 SKW5332 SKW U U 56 68 404 12/1/2018 12:37:22 Arrival SFO A321 AAL789 AAL SERFR‐ST 28L 68 78 (72) 4,141 199 ‐3.7 (1,316) 343 404 12/1/2018 12:40:28 Arrival SFO E75L SKW5203 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 58 70 (61) 4,645 205 ‐3.2 (1,164) 344 404 12/1/2018 12:47:18 Arrival SFO CRJ2 SKW5655 SKW SERFR 28L 56 67 (598) 5,837 233 ‐3.7 (1,509) 345 404 12/1/2018 12:54:46 Arrival SFO CRJ2 SKW5349 SKW BDEGA 28L 56 65 404 12/1/2018 12:57:55 Arrival SFO CRJ2 SKW5279 SKW BDEGA 28L 60 69 404 12/1/2018 12:59:19 Arrival SFO CRJ2 SKW5476 SKW SERFR 28L 53 66 5,235 4,997 241 ‐0.2 (99) 23 404 12/1/2018 13:01:49 Arrival SFO B738 ASA621 ASA SERFR 28L 56 68 11,614 4,995 220 0.3 125 8 404 12/1/2018 13:02:58 Arrival SFO A346 DLH454 DLH BDEGA 28L 54 68 12,803 6,016 202 0.2 81 49 404 12/1/2018 13:06:41 Arrival SFO CRJ2 SKW5416 SKW SERFR‐ST 28R 57 69 (399) 4,869 205 ‐4.1 (1,499) 345 404 12/1/2018 13:08:57 Arrival SFO B737 SWA4136 SWA SERFR‐ST 28L 67 78 (91) 4,107 203 ‐5.1 (1,815) 344 404 12/1/2018 13:11:42 Arrival SFO A320 ASA1804 ASA BDEGA 28L 65 75 (3,002) 4,750 210 ‐3.6 (1,331) 1 404 12/1/2018 13:13:46 Arrival SFO CRJ7 SKW5697 SKW BDEGA 28L 64 75 (768) 4,569 208 ‐4.6 (1,678) 24 404 12/1/2018 13:16:56 Arrival SFO B77W KAL025 KAL BDEGA 28L 59 70 5,766 5,932 233 ‐4.7 (1,939) 21 404 12/1/2018 13:20:07 Arrival SFO A319 UAL1745 UAL BDEGA 28L 55 67 9,066 4,376 221 ‐3.1 (1,196) 33 404 12/1/2018 13:22:21 Arrival SFO A320 ASA1899 ASA SERFR 28L 54 66 404 12/1/2018 13:29:24 Arrival SFO B77W AFR084 AFR BDEGA 28L 66 79 3,103 4,822 209 ‐3.7 (1,380) 19 404 12/1/2018 13:33:41 Arrival SFO B744 BAW11M BAW BDEGA 28L 64 78 (5,468) 4,747 212 ‐3.5 (1,320) 26 404 12/1/2018 13:37:37 Arrival SFO A320 ASA1957 ASA SERFR 28L 57 70 14,188 4,069 219 ‐1.7 (673) 330 404 12/1/2018 13:41:56 Arrival SFO B738 UAL390 UAL SERFR 28L 65 79 2,862 4,346 217 ‐3.1 (1,185) 30 404 12/1/2018 13:46:23 Arrival SFO CRJ7 SKW5615 SKW BDEGA 28L 63 75 1,406 3,995 213 ‐0.8 (308) 37 404 12/1/2018 13:51:37 Arrival SFO A319 ASA1340 ASA BDEGA 28R 67 78 621 4,340 235 ‐4.2 (1,725) 47 404 12/1/2018 13:58:15 Arrival SFO A320 UAL2383 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 69 78 (66) 3,865 202 ‐4.3 (1,538) 344 404 12/1/2018 14:07:38 Arrival SFO B39M CMP208 CMP SERFR‐ST 28L 62 72 (16) 4,651 228 ‐3.1 (1,230) 344 404 12/1/2018 14:10:09 Arrival SFO B739 UAL444 UAL SERFR 28L 59 71 1,674 4,476 229 ‐3.1 (1,265) 338 404 12/1/2018 14:12:50 Arrival SFO E75L CPZ6007 CPZ SERFR‐ST 28L 56 69 (136) 4,655 213 ‐2.9 (1,076) 343 404 12/1/2018 14:14:41 Arrival SFO B738 SWA3950 SWA SERFR‐ST 28L 62 73 (32) 4,072 232 ‐4.0 (1,619) 345 404 12/1/2018 14:17:12 Arrival SFO B739 UAL372 UAL OCEANIC 28L 67 77 (21) 4,785 206 ‐2.5 (913) 345 404 12/1/2018 14:18:19 Arrival SFO A359 AAR212 AAR BDEGA 28L 49 63 7,675 4,698 215 ‐2.7 (1,035) 18 404 12/1/2018 14:20:23 Departure PAO U U U U 31 64 74 (1,280) 1,604 110 ‐0.5 (104) 55 404 12/1/2018 14:25:44 Arrival SFO B772 UAL900 UAL BDEGA 28L 64 74 (3,545) 4,964 216 ‐0.5 (180) 52 404 12/1/2018 14:28:07 Arrival SFO B77W EVA018 EVA OCEANIC 28L 63 76 1,979 5,157 221 ‐4.0 (1,575) 30 404 12/1/2018 14:30:07 Arrival SFO B752 UAL477 UAL BDEGA 28L 58 70 5,868 5,473 204 ‐5.9 (2,115) 29 404 12/1/2018 14:40:01 Arrival SFO B738 ASA534 ASA BDEGA 28L 53 65 404 12/1/2018 14:42:15 Departure PAO U U U U 31 49 57 9,285 9 47 0.0 ‐ 322 404 12/1/2018 14:43:09 Arrival SFO CRJ2 SKW5657 SKW SERFR 28L 48 56 404 12/1/2018 14:47:30 Arrival SFO B738 UAL2148 UAL SERFR 28L 51 64 8,368 4,658 205 ‐3.6 (1,304) 346 404 12/1/2018 14:48:36 Arrival SFO BE20 N654FM GA BDEGA 28R 52 59 (11,411) 4,110 170 ‐0.7 (195) 56 404 12/1/2018 14:50:03 Departure PAO U U U U 31 50 62 9,275 106 66 8.3 961 323 404 12/1/2018 14:51:33 Arrival SFO A320 ASA1388 ASA BDEGA 28L 51 64 11,569 4,055 205 ‐1.0 (372) 346 404 12/1/2018 14:59:32 Arrival SFO CRJ2 SKW5984 SKW SERFR 28L 55 67 (8) 5,025 211 ‐3.6 (1,335) 342 404 12/1/2018 15:03:57 Departure SQL SR20 N345BS GA U 30 58 65 8,013 2,638 138 2.8 690 112 404 12/1/2018 15:07:00 Arrival SFO B789 UAL892 UAL OCEANIC 28L 54 66 9,396 4,420 214 ‐3.2 (1,222) 358 404 12/1/2018 15:08:57 Arrival SFO A332 EIN147 EIN BDEGA 28L 60 71 7,858 4,933 230 ‐3.5 (1,425) 2 404 12/1/2018 15:12:00 Arrival SFO E75L QXE2042 QXE SERFR‐ST 28L 58 69 (49) 5,002 239 ‐4.6 (1,936) 343 404 12/1/2018 15:12:19 Arrival PAO C152 N152UF GA U 31 55 65 (1,159) 1,414 100 ‐1.4 (254) 78 404 12/1/2018 15:18:06 Arrival SFO E75L SKW5617 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 57 68 (83) 4,882 201 ‐4.3 (1,525) 344 404 12/1/2018 15:29:24 Arrival SFO CRJ2 SKW5362 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 56 67 (11) 4,704 226 ‐2.4 (942) 343 404 12/1/2018 15:32:03 Arrival SFO B739 UAL2351 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 62 73 (66) 4,271 227 ‐2.2 (896) 342 404 12/1/2018 15:34:18 Arrival SFO E75L SKW5954 SKW BDEGA 28R 62 72 3,174 4,387 202 ‐2.1 (738) 350 404 12/1/2018 15:36:09 Arrival SFO CRJ2 SKW5870 SKW SERFR 28L 51 65 2,136 4,692 212 ‐3.5 (1,307) 358 404 12/1/2018 15:40:02 Departure PAO U U U U 31 62 67 2,155 956 128 ‐1.6 (363) 140 404 12/1/2018 15:41:16 Arrival SFO B738 UAL1919 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 65 76 (54) 4,632 206 ‐2.6 (930) 343 404 12/1/2018 15:44:10 Arrival SFO GLEX TWY468 TWY SERFR‐ST 28R 63 72 (18) 4,002 240 ‐1.2 (502) 344 404 12/1/2018 15:45:57 Departure SJC C421 N700LC GA U 30L 60 71 3,121 1,625 123 0.0 5 301 404 12/1/2018 15:51:02 Arrival SFO E55P EJA406 EJA SERFR‐ST 28R 60 70 (19) 4,992 240 ‐0.7 (296) 345 404 12/1/2018 15:51:31 Arrival SFO A319 UAL1620 UAL SERFR 28L 59 69 4,785 5,419 214 ‐3.3 (1,230) 10 A-35 Figure 9d Correlated Noise Event Report Site 404 (Tevis) ‐ December 1st 2018 Site Event Max Operation Airport Aircraft Flight Airline Procedure Runway Lmax SEL Closest Lateral Dist.Altitude Speed Pitch Alt Delta Heading ID Time Type ID Code dBA (Feet) (ft msl) (Kts) (Degrees) (ft/min) (True) 404 12/1/2018 15:52:25 Arrival SQL BE9L N530CH GA U 30 56 67 (4,238) 2,148 154 ‐2.9 (795) 309 404 12/1/2018 15:55:25 Departure PAO U U U U 31 51 57 4,914 896 102 1.4 241 133 404 12/1/2018 15:56:28 Departure PAO U U U U H 60 69 8,663 918 40 9.9 ‐ 315 404 12/1/2018 15:58:24 Arrival SQL PC12 N903PJ GA U 30 62 71 (4,347) 1,845 148 ‐1.4 (369) 307 404 12/1/2018 16:04:27 Arrival SFO B738 UAL1268 UAL SERFR 28L 51 63 404 12/1/2018 16:04:59 Arrival SFO A320 ASA1959 ASA SERFR 28L 49 60 7,303 4,035 209 ‐0.2 (86) 11 404 12/1/2018 16:05:57 Arrival SFO A320 ASA1959 ASA SERFR 28L 59 70 7,303 4,035 209 ‐0.2 (86) 11 404 12/1/2018 16:09:12 Arrival SFO B712 DAL2356 DAL SERFR 28L 66 76 1,862 3,983 217 ‐0.5 (172) 25 404 12/1/2018 16:12:29 Arrival SFO A321 AAL1983 AAL SERFR 28L 66 76 2,711 4,155 195 ‐2.8 (975) 38 404 12/1/2018 16:14:42 Arrival SFO E75L SKW5861 SKW SERFR 28L 47 57 11,333 5,136 214 ‐4.1 (1,539) 82 404 12/1/2018 16:34:03 Arrival SFO B738 UAL222 UAL DYAMD 28R 47 58 404 12/1/2018 16:40:12 Arrival SFO CRJ2 SKW5286 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 59 71 (18) 4,502 230 ‐3.0 (1,230) 345 404 12/1/2018 16:41:52 Arrival PAO U U U U H 57 64 4,155 2,062 128 ‐1.1 (259) 79 404 12/1/2018 16:42:51 Arrival SFO A320 UAL1243 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 58 69 100 4,586 239 ‐1.3 (560) 344 404 12/1/2018 16:45:53 Arrival SFO E75L CPZ6045 CPZ SERFR‐ST 28L 62 74 (56) 3,771 208 ‐3.8 (1,411) 345 404 12/1/2018 16:56:21 Arrival SFO A319 UAL718 UAL SERFR 28L 53 63 404 12/1/2018 16:58:58 Arrival SFO B789 QFA49 QFA OCEANIC 28L 54 68 7,351 4,684 195 ‐2.4 (840) 347 404 12/1/2018 17:00:55 Arrival SFO B737 SWA4139 SWA SERFR‐ST 28L 59 70 (151) 4,652 192 ‐3.3 (1,123) 345 404 12/1/2018 17:02:55 Departure PAO U U U U 31 48 60 9,395 227 55 11.7 1,125 327 404 12/1/2018 17:07:49 Arrival PAO DA40 N202LS GA U 31 66 73 499 1,206 121 ‐1.4 (295) 51 404 12/1/2018 17:08:24 Departure SQL C172 N606LP GA U 30 62 69 6,419 2,995 139 1.2 300 110 404 12/1/2018 17:11:36 Arrival SFO E75L SKW5248 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 58 69 (14) 4,896 238 ‐2.0 (847) 345 404 12/1/2018 17:19:17 Departure PAO U U U U 31 56 68 9,338 177 83 10.1 1,466 326 404 12/1/2018 17:22:07 Arrival SFO B737 SWA3308 SWA SERFR 28L 53 63 7,377 4,800 228 ‐3.8 (1,521) 16 404 12/1/2018 17:24:59 Arrival SFO A319 UAL1051 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 64 75 (85) 5,009 194 ‐3.8 (1,316) 345 404 12/1/2018 17:30:24 Departure PAO U U U U 31 54 64 1,696 939 111 ‐1.9 (371) 61 404 12/1/2018 17:34:55 Arrival SFO E75L SKW3460 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 64 74 (75) 3,193 239 ‐5.3 (2,220) 344 404 12/1/2018 17:35:43 Arrival SFO B739 DAL1889 DAL BDEGA 28L 63 74 1,007 5,305 210 ‐3.2 (1,185) 41 404 12/1/2018 17:38:58 Overflight UNK U U U U U 49 65 404 12/1/2018 17:44:15 Arrival SFO A359 FBU711 FBU OCEANIC 28L 63 74 (2,526) 4,041 182 ‐3.5 (1,140) 32 404 12/1/2018 17:47:21 Arrival SFO A320 ASA1933 ASA SERFR‐ST 28L 60 72 (275) 4,039 236 0.5 195 343 404 12/1/2018 17:49:21 Arrival SFO B738 DAL1720 DAL SERFR‐ST 28L 67 77 (153) 4,962 195 ‐2.3 (786) 344 404 12/1/2018 17:51:19 Arrival SFO A320 ASA1271 ASA SERFR 28L 65 77 (217) 5,055 195 ‐1.4 (495) 344 404 12/1/2018 17:52:37 Arrival SFO A320 ASA1271 ASA SERFR 28L 67 77 (217) 5,055 195 ‐1.4 (495) 344 404 12/1/2018 17:55:46 Arrival SFO B738 UAL1124 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 66 77 (126) 4,632 215 ‐1.4 (540) 342 404 12/1/2018 17:58:07 Arrival SFO B739 UAL632 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 64 75 (72) 4,579 167 ‐2.9 (846) 343 404 12/1/2018 18:04:02 Arrival SFO B788 UAL890 UAL OCEANIC 28L 52 61 404 12/1/2018 18:06:16 Arrival SFO A319 ASA1273 ASA SERFR 28L 61 73 4,790 4,043 202 ‐1.0 (350) 30 404 12/1/2018 18:10:15 Arrival SFO CRJ9 JZA743 JZA BDEGA 28L 50 63 8,088 4,097 201 ‐1.7 (618) 324 404 12/1/2018 18:11:36 Arrival SFO B738 AAL1454 AAL SERFR 28L 48 62 12,100 4,252 208 ‐2.6 (946) 15 404 12/1/2018 18:14:01 Arrival SFO A388 BAW287 BAW BDEGA 28R 48 62 404 12/1/2018 18:16:06 Departure PAO U U U U H 68 81 (1,767) 1,612 113 1.0 200 250 404 12/1/2018 18:17:31 Arrival SFO A319 UAL1240 UAL SERFR 28L 50 63 13,539 4,235 164 ‐3.2 (930) 10 404 12/1/2018 18:20:43 Arrival SFO B752 UAL560 UAL BDEGA 28L 48 61 11,950 3,941 158 ‐1.7 (469) 322 404 12/1/2018 18:22:27 Arrival SFO B77W CAL004 CAL OCEANIC 28L 47 61 404 12/1/2018 18:27:23 Arrival SFO B77W EVA028 EVA OCEANIC 28L 48 62 404 12/1/2018 18:30:01 Arrival SFO A320 ASA1747 ASA BDEGA 28L 56 67 10,494 3,887 158 ‐1.2 (326) 323 404 12/1/2018 18:39:07 Arrival SFO A320 UAL587 UAL BDEGA 28L 56 68 (7,265) 6,576 283 ‐1.9 (960) 106 404 12/1/2018 18:44:00 Arrival SFO A319 ASA1923 ASA SERFR‐ST 28L 70 81 (21) 3,566 195 ‐4.0 (1,380) 342 404 12/1/2018 18:46:45 Arrival SFO A319 UAL2016 UAL SERFR 28L 50 64 13,123 4,206 197 ‐0.7 (245) 335 404 12/1/2018 18:48:08 Arrival SFO B737 SWA4050 SWA SERFR 28L 57 69 4,731 5,679 196 ‐1.8 (610) ‐ 404 12/1/2018 18:53:17 Arrival SFO E35L N84AW GA SERFR‐ST 28L 56 68 (50) 5,619 228 ‐5.0 (2,025) 345 404 12/1/2018 18:55:00 Arrival SFO CRJ7 SKW5765 SKW BDEGA 28L 61 71 5,968 3,993 196 ‐0.1 (33) 355 404 12/1/2018 19:03:27 Arrival SFO B737 SWA3361 SWA SERFR‐ST 28L 58 70 (37) 4,313 212 ‐1.3 (467) 344 404 12/1/2018 19:05:37 Arrival SFO B738 UAL2352 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 65 75 (20) 4,140 229 ‐3.9 (1,575) 343 404 12/1/2018 19:08:10 Arrival SFO CRJ2 SKW5700 SKW BDEGA 28L 56 67 (2,394) 4,051 208 ‐1.4 (495) 37 404 12/1/2018 19:11:02 Arrival SFO A320 TAI564 TAI SERFR‐ST 28L 67 78 (46) 4,158 203 ‐3.7 (1,326) 345 404 12/1/2018 19:12:35 Arrival SFO CRJ2 SKW5457 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 57 67 (159) 4,701 211 ‐2.3 (866) 342 404 12/1/2018 19:14:03 Arrival SFO B739 UAL1604 UAL OCEANIC 28L 50 65 9,275 4,240 210 ‐3.2 (1,201) 32 404 12/1/2018 19:16:36 Arrival SFO B77W SIA2 SIA OCEANIC 28L 55 68 5,507 4,405 222 ‐2.9 (1,140) 32 404 12/1/2018 19:18:32 Arrival SFO A321 AAL686 AAL SERFR 28R 52 66 11,518 4,911 176 ‐5.4 (1,665) 347 404 12/1/2018 19:19:47 Arrival SFO A319 ASA1279 ASA SERFR 28L 60 72 4,810 5,562 207 ‐4.4 (1,612) 12 404 12/1/2018 19:22:18 Arrival SFO A388 DLH458 DLH BDEGA 28R 55 67 11,505 3,998 200 ‐1.3 (462) 345 404 12/1/2018 19:26:55 Arrival SFO E75L SKW5592 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 57 68 (88) 4,141 193 ‐2.7 (928) 344 404 12/1/2018 19:28:46 Arrival SFO B737 SWA4154 SWA SERFR 28L 55 68 6,705 4,476 203 ‐4.6 (1,656) 10 404 12/1/2018 19:40:31 Arrival SFO CRJ2 SKW5872 SKW BDEGA 28L 46 60 (11,685) 3,926 232 ‐3.7 (1,530) 34 404 12/1/2018 19:43:07 Arrival SFO E75L CPZ6015 CPZ SERFR‐ST 28L 59 71 (43) 5,196 174 ‐4.2 (1,275) 343 404 12/1/2018 19:45:34 Arrival SFO CRJ2 SKW5718 SKW BDEGA 28L 52 60 7,717 4,657 208 ‐4.4 (1,606) 25 404 12/1/2018 19:46:20 Departure SFO B739 UAL394 UAL U 01L 52 65 (3,301) 15,854 428 2.6 1,986 105 404 12/1/2018 19:47:33 Arrival SFO A319 ASA1595 ASA SERFR‐ST 28R 67 78 (132) 4,277 163 ‐3.6 (1,035) 343 404 12/1/2018 19:48:55 Arrival SFO B772 UAL340 UAL BDEGA 28L 56 66 7,036 5,827 201 ‐2.6 (931) 65 404 12/1/2018 19:53:14 Departure SFO A320 ASA1940 ASA U 01L 50 62 (6,992) 16,728 448 2.8 2,205 105 404 12/1/2018 19:54:41 Arrival SFO E75L SKW5440 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 59 70 (67) 4,554 222 ‐3.1 (1,229) 344 404 12/1/2018 19:55:52 Arrival SFO B752 UAL1584 UAL BDEGA 28L 63 75 1,305 5,367 176 ‐6.3 (1,965) 37 404 12/1/2018 19:58:48 Arrival SFO B739 UAL2201 UAL SERFR 28L 60 72 5,782 4,001 197 ‐0.3 (93) 339 404 12/1/2018 20:00:25 Arrival SFO B38M ACA781 ACA BDEGA 28L 62 73 2,192 4,044 170 ‐2.4 (735) 344 404 12/1/2018 20:03:10 Arrival SFO B739 UAL384 UAL SERFR 28L 63 76 1,016 4,476 203 ‐3.6 (1,296) 352 404 12/1/2018 20:06:28 Arrival SFO E75L QXE2271 QXE BDEGA 28L 57 71 8,223 5,118 212 ‐8.4 (3,137) 32 404 12/1/2018 20:11:07 Arrival SFO B789 UAL28 UAL OCEANIC 28L 67 77 (2,244) 4,021 202 ‐1.3 (450) 29 404 12/1/2018 20:13:46 Arrival SFO A320 ASA1963 ASA SERFR‐ST 28L 67 79 (202) 4,022 196 ‐1.2 (398) 344 404 12/1/2018 20:15:20 Arrival SFO B772 UAL724 UAL OCEANIC 28L 55 67 13,321 6,562 246 ‐5.7 (2,479) 84 404 12/1/2018 20:18:44 Arrival SFO A332 HAL12 HAL OCEANIC 28L 52 60 404 12/1/2018 20:22:40 Arrival SFO A321 AAL547 AAL BDEGA 28L 65 72 6,162 5,075 232 ‐5.5 (2,265) 101 404 12/1/2018 20:25:55 Arrival SFO B738 UAL1152 UAL OCEANIC 28L 53 66 8,632 4,005 182 0.0 ‐ 347 404 12/1/2018 20:29:16 Arrival SFO A320 ASA1945 ASA SERFR‐ST 28L 66 78 (1,146) 4,379 195 ‐3.8 (1,296) 343 404 12/1/2018 20:32:28 Arrival SFO B789 ACA739 ACA BDEGA 28L 56 64 (11,270) 3,920 191 ‐1.0 (333) 29 404 12/1/2018 20:34:24 Arrival SFO B739 UAL643 UAL OCEANIC 28L 60 71 (5,940) 3,760 204 ‐3.5 (1,275) 22 404 12/1/2018 20:41:33 Arrival SFO B738 UAL1722 UAL OCEANIC 28L 64 75 (2,484) 5,114 198 ‐4.2 (1,470) 350 A-36 Figure 9d Correlated Noise Event Report Site 404 (Tevis) ‐ December 1st 2018 Site Event Max Operation Airport Aircraft Flight Airline Procedure Runway Lmax SEL Closest Lateral Dist.Altitude Speed Pitch Alt Delta Heading ID Time Type ID Code dBA (Feet) (ft msl) (Kts) (Degrees) (ft/min) (True) 404 12/1/2018 20:58:51 Departure SFO B752 UAL349 UAL U 01L 51 64 (3,558) 16,013 466 2.8 2,310 105 404 12/1/2018 21:03:43 Arrival SFO GLF4 WWI31 WWI SERFR‐ST 28L 63 74 (262) 4,252 193 ‐3.0 (1,011) 344 404 12/1/2018 21:05:53 Arrival SFO B738 UAL2132 UAL BDEGA 28L 61 69 (9,122) 3,970 212 0.0 3 33 404 12/1/2018 21:11:12 Arrival SFO A319 DAL752 DAL BDEGA 28L 48 59 404 12/1/2018 21:13:11 Arrival SFO E75L QXE2038 QXE SERFR‐ST 28L 58 71 (68) 3,998 209 ‐0.7 (275) 344 404 12/1/2018 21:14:59 Arrival SFO A320 UAL1217 UAL BDEGA 28L 59 69 7,108 4,985 201 ‐3.3 (1,180) 353 404 12/1/2018 21:17:03 Arrival SFO E75L SKW5681 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 62 73 (68) 4,495 187 ‐2.9 (972) 343 404 12/1/2018 21:19:22 Arrival SFO CRJ2 SKW5366 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 60 71 (69) 4,040 209 ‐4.1 (1,527) 345 404 12/1/2018 21:20:16 Departure SFO A20N FFT1998 FFT U 01L 49 60 3,232 17,030 463 2.9 2,355 107 404 12/1/2018 21:26:31 Arrival SFO B737 SWA485 SWA SERFR‐ST 28L 62 72 (56) 4,630 217 ‐2.5 (952) 344 404 12/1/2018 21:28:52 Arrival SFO GLF4 U U SERFR‐ST 28R 65 74 (207) 4,138 236 ‐2.5 (1,054) 342 404 12/1/2018 21:30:52 Arrival SFO CRJ7 SKW5873 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 55 69 (25) 4,714 207 ‐2.3 (840) 343 404 12/1/2018 21:32:40 Arrival SFO B739 UAL1568 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 63 75 (68) 5,052 203 ‐2.4 (845) 343 404 12/1/2018 21:35:15 Arrival SFO B738 AMX664 AMX SERFR‐ST 28L 58 71 (36) 5,024 197 ‐0.5 (172) 344 404 12/1/2018 21:37:58 Arrival SFO CRJ2 SKW5616 SKW SERFR 28L 47 54 9,123 5,016 204 ‐3.7 (1,331) 10 404 12/1/2018 21:40:02 Arrival SFO E75L SKW5483 SKW SERFR 28L 56 67 3,563 5,542 231 ‐3.7 (1,493) 8 404 12/1/2018 21:43:13 Arrival SFO A332 HAL42 HAL OCEANIC 28L 52 62 12,169 4,021 165 ‐0.7 (213) 349 404 12/1/2018 21:46:20 Arrival SFO E75L SKW3381 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 61 74 (50) 4,651 188 ‐2.7 (885) 345 404 12/1/2018 21:49:40 Arrival SFO A320 ASA1776 ASA BDEGA 28L 61 72 5,712 4,743 210 ‐4.1 (1,512) 32 404 12/1/2018 21:52:04 Arrival SFO A320 ACA568 ACA BDEGA 28L 68 80 (271) 4,127 205 ‐2.4 (864) 356 404 12/1/2018 21:53:57 Arrival SFO A321 JBU833 JBU BDEGA 28L 60 72 (7,057) 4,031 171 ‐2.8 (833) 16 404 12/1/2018 21:56:11 Departure OAK B38M SWA6868 SWA U 30 51 64 (1,376) 15,901 404 3.1 2,205 139 404 12/1/2018 22:01:59 Arrival SFO A320 AIJ830 AIJ SERFR‐ST 28L 63 74 (30) 4,639 222 ‐2.7 (1,070) 344 404 12/1/2018 22:04:13 Arrival SFO B738 DAL1700 DAL SERFR‐ST 28L 66 78 (66) 4,209 195 ‐3.5 (1,195) 344 404 12/1/2018 22:14:28 Arrival SFO B739 UAL650 UAL OCEANIC 28L 65 75 (1,737) 5,098 217 ‐4.3 (1,648) 32 404 12/1/2018 22:34:34 Arrival SFO CRJ7 SKW5461 SKW SERFR‐ST 28R 54 67 310 5,031 200 ‐2.3 (827) 345 404 12/1/2018 22:38:42 Arrival SFO E75L CPZ6085 CPZ SERFR‐ST 28R 63 73 (41) 4,994 199 ‐2.5 (861) 344 404 12/1/2018 22:40:48 Arrival SFO B738 UAL1712 UAL SERFR‐ST 28R 63 74 (98) 4,828 184 ‐3.0 (983) 343 404 12/1/2018 22:43:02 Arrival SFO B738 ASA759 ASA OCEANIC 28R 61 71 5,090 5,006 173 ‐4.1 (1,233) 350 404 12/1/2018 22:45:39 Arrival SFO B738 UAL1288 UAL OCEANIC 28R 64 74 (699) 6,055 230 ‐1.9 (765) 23 404 12/1/2018 22:59:14 Departure SFO B752 UAL2360 UAL U 01R 49 64 8,541 14,124 443 2.0 1,598 123 404 12/1/2018 23:05:15 Arrival SFO B738 CMP382 CMP SERFR‐ST 28R 65 76 (36) 4,717 201 ‐2.3 (797) 345 404 12/1/2018 23:09:59 Arrival SFO A321 AAL2374 AAL BDEGA 28R 63 72 (2,698) 4,225 206 ‐3.7 (1,361) 71 404 12/1/2018 23:17:39 Arrival SFO B738 UAL435 UAL OCEANIC 28R 55 66 8,220 5,818 230 ‐3.5 (1,427) 34 404 12/1/2018 23:21:07 Arrival SFO B738 AMX662 AMX SERFR‐ST 28R 65 76 (94) 4,170 235 ‐3.3 (1,351) 345 404 12/1/2018 23:21:52 Arrival SFO B752 DAL2344 DAL BDEGA 28R 58 68 6,077 5,662 216 ‐5.5 (2,110) 38 404 12/1/2018 23:25:17 Arrival SFO B752 UAL1056 UAL BDEGA 28R 55 68 (3,468) 5,668 213 ‐2.4 (885) 120 404 12/1/2018 23:38:32 Arrival SFO A320 TAI560 TAI SERFR‐ST 28R 65 76 (55) 4,623 220 ‐1.7 (650) 345 404 12/1/2018 23:58:45 Departure SFO B753 UAL2237 UAL U 01R 48 64 (12,047) 14,064 427 2.1 1,572 105 BridgeNet International 2019 A-37 1 Report#2016-001 1/15/2016 Report #2019-007 May 15, 2019 Palo Alto Aircraft Noise Measurements San Francisco International Airport PO Box 8097 San Francisco, CA 94128-8097 20201 SW Birch Street, Suite 250 Newport Beach, CA 92660 T: 949-250-1222 | F: 949-250-1225 Airports@AirportNetwork.com 2 Report#2019-007 05/15/2019 Table of Contents Report 1. Background 3 2. Noise Monitoring Locations 3 3. Methodology 4 4. Definition of Terms 5 5. Radar Data 7 6. Ambient Noise Monitoring Results 8 7. Correlated Noise Events 10 8. Measured Single Event Noise Levels 11 9. Measured CNEL Noise Levels 13 10. Conclusion 14 Tables Table 1 – Ambient Noise Measurement Results 9 Table 2 – Measure Average Lmax Noise Level at Noise Measurement Location 11 Table 3 – Average Daily Measured Noise Events 12 Table 4 – CNEL Measurement Results 13 Appendix Figure 1 – Measurement Site Map A-1 Figure 2 – Arrival Procedures A-1 Figure 3a – SERFR Arrival Flight Tracks A-3 Figure 3b – SERFR Straight Arrival Flight Tracks A-4 Figure 3c – BDEGA West Arrival Flight Tracks A-5 Figure 3d – OCEANIC Arrival Flight Tracks A-6 Figure 3e – Missed and Other Landing Flight Tracks A-7 Figure 4 – All SFO Arrival Flight Tracks (within 2nm of any sites) A-8 Figure 5a – SFO Aircraft Performance Data at Noise Measurement Sites (Part A) A-9 Figure 5b – SFO Aircraft Performance Data at Noise Measurement Sites (Part B) A-10 Figure 5c – Aircraft Altitude and Path Dispersion (Site 401) A-11 Figure 5d – Aircraft Altitude and Path Dispersion (Site 402) A-12 Figure 5e – Aircraft Altitude and Path Dispersion (Site 403) A-13 Figure 5f – Aircraft Altitude and Path Dispersion (Site 404) A-14 Figure 6a – Palo Alto Airport (PAO) Flight Tracks A-15 Figure 6b – Other Airport Overflight Flight Tracks A-16 Figure 7a – PAO Aircraft Altitude and Path Dispersion (Site 401) A-17 Figure 7b – PAO Aircraft Altitude and Path Dispersion (Site 402) A-18 Figure 7c – PAO Aircraft Altitude and Path Dispersion (Site 403) A-19 Figure 7d – PAO Aircraft Altitude and Path Dispersion (Site 404) A-20 Figure 8a – Example Time History Noise Plots (Part A) A-21 Figure 8b – Example Time History Noise Plots (Part B) A-22 Figure 9a – Correlated Noise Event Report (Site 401) A-23 Figure 9b – Correlated Noise Event Report (Site 402) A-27 Figure 9c – Correlated Noise Event Report (Site 403) A-30 Figure 9d – Correlated Noise Event Report (Site 404) A-34 3 Report#2019-007 05/15/2019 1. Background BridgeNet International was contracted by the San Francisco International Airport (SFO) Aircraft Noise Abatement Office to evaluate noise levels in the Palo Alto community. Four noise monitoring locations, identified by the City of Palo Alto, were selected near the arrival paths into SFO. The study includes portable noise monitoring and an evaluation of flight track data correlated to noise event results. The goals of the measurement program were as follows: • Conduct Noise Monitoring. Continuously collect noise data at four locations within the Palo Alto community. This data was used to determine noise levels related to SFO Airport operations, noise due to operations from other airports, and ambient noise sources. The measurements included the continuous collection of one-second A-weighted noise data, along with frequency data and the audio signal. • Correlate with Radar Data. Radar track data for flights that operated near the study area were analyzed and correlated to the measured noise data. The flight track analysis included determining the aircraft type, path location, altitude, and other flight parameters that are factors in noise generation. • Calculate Noise metrics. The primary metric used in airport noise is the Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) metric. This is the metric used by the State of California and the FAA (for airports in California) to assess airport noise. In this study, it was determined from measured noise data. In addition, the measurements were used to calculate ambient background noise and a number of single event noise metrics. These single event metrics included the Maximum Noise Level (Lmax), Sound Exposure Level (SEL), and duration of the noise events. • Support Side by Side Measurements. Residents of the City of Palo Alto are developing their own measurement system, and they wish to compare their measurements with the portable measurements collected in this study. The raw measured noise data has been provided to the City for their use. 2. Noise Monitoring Locations Four locations in Palo Alto were measured as part of this study. These sites were selected by the City of Palo Alto staff with input and assistance from SFO Noise Abatement staff and members of the consulting team. These sites are described below, with the locations presented in Figure 1. • Site 401 (Rinconada Library) was a short-term monitoring location placed in the north patio in the Rinconada Library. The site was exposed to traffic noise from Newell Drive. This is a lightly used road, but during the daytime hours there are measurable traffic events as cars travel on the road. The measurement and analysis cover arrivals from SFO as well as aircraft operating from other airports in the region. 4 Report#2019-007 05/15/2019 • Site 402 (Gamble House Garden) was a short-term monitoring location placed in the garden on the south side of the Gamble House building. The site was exposed to traffic noise from Embarcadero Road, Waverley Road and activities on the garden property. This site had more exposure to other ambient sources that could make measurements of SFO aircraft operations in the daytime period more difficult. The measurement and analysis cover arrivals from SFO as well as aircraft operating from other airports in the region. • Site 403 (Hoover Park/Matadaro Creek) was a short-term monitoring location placed in the Matadaro Creek right-away adjacent to Hoover Park. The site was exposed to light traffic noise from Cowpers Road and activities within the park. The measurement and analysis cover arrivals from SFO as well as aircraft operating from other airports in the region. This site was farther from the primary arrival patterns into SFO. • Site 404 (Tevis Place) was a short-term monitoring location located in a backyard of a residential home. The site had minimal exposure to other noise sources such as roadway traffic. This location is closest to Palo Alto Airport then the other sites. The measurement and analysis cover arrivals from SFO as well as aircraft operating from other airports in the region. 3. Methodology Noise Monitoring Durations The measurement program was originally scheduled for a 1-month period but was extended by the Airport to collect data for over 2 months. The noise monitoring equipment was setup on October 30, 2018 and operated continuously through January 4, 2019. The equipment was operating unattended using battery power and was checked and calibrated approximately every 2 weeks. The measurements were continuous, except for a period at Site 401 were the battery power was disconnected and at Site 403 where the battery was stolen. Noise Monitoring Equipment During the entire duration of the noise measurements, the sound level meters were mounted on tripods five feet above the ground and equipped with windscreens at all locations. State-of-the-art sound level meters were used to continuously measure the noise and record a measured noise value once every second (continuous one-second noise levels). The measures used 01dB DUO and 01dB FUSION family of sound level meters. The equipment used meets the International Standard IEC 61672 specification for Class 1 precision sound level meters. The microphones were calibrated before the tests with a Brüel & Kjær Type 4231 sound level calibrator that meets International Standard IEC 60942. Calibration is traceable to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). 5 Report#2019-007 05/15/2019 Noise Measurement Data The noise measurements continuously measured and stored noise data. The data measured and stored includes: • A-weighted noise level • 1/3 octave frequency levels • Continuous audio signal The A-weighted noise level is the level used to calculate the CNEL noise metric and the Lmax and SEL noise metrics (described in the next section of the report). The A-weighed measurement is the primary measure used in aircraft noise and is used to calculate CNEL, Lmax, and SEL. Radar Data Radar data from October 30th, 2018 through January 4th, 2019 was collected from the airport noise monitoring system. This includes data from the airspace surrounding SFO and other airports in the region. The data includes the raw radar tracking data (position, altitude, speed) and associated aircraft type, date, time, runway, descent rate, and aircraft performance. The radar data was reviewed and correlated with noise event data to accurately identify sources of noise. Data Analysis The measured noise data was used to calculate noise metrics of interest. This was accomplished through BridgeNet’s software tool Volans™. The tool uses radar data and the measurements to determine aircraft noise events and calculate noise metrics. The system determines noise events and calculated noise metrics in an automated process that uses the radar information to identify potential noise events. In addition to the automated system, the software also allows the user to manually determine noise events and correlations to aircraft. 4. Definition of Terms Characteristics of Sound Sound can be described technically in terms of amplitude (loudness), frequency (pitch), or duration (time). Frequency (or pitch) is measured in hertz (Hz). The standard unit of measurement for the loudness of sound is the decibel (dB). Decibels are based on a logarithmic scale. The logarithmic scale compresses the wide range in sound pressure levels to a more usable range of numbers (in a manner similar to the Richter scale used to measure earthquakes). Human hearing is not equally sensitive to sound at all frequencies. Sound waves below 16 Hz are not heard at all and are “felt” more as a vibration. Similarly, while people with extremely sensitive hearing can hear sounds as high as 20,000 Hz, most people cannot hear above 15,000 Hz. In all cases, hearing acuity falls off rapidly above about 10,000 Hz and below about 200 Hz. Since the 6 Report#2019-007 05/15/2019 human ear is not equally sensitive to sound at all frequencies, a special frequency-dependent rating scale has been devised to measure loudness in a way that reflects how the human ear actually perceives sound. Community noise levels are measured in terms of this A-weighted decibel scale (or dBA), which is widely used in industrial and environmental noise-management contexts. Propagation of Noise Outdoor sound levels decrease as a result of several factors, including increased distance from the sound source, atmospheric absorption (characteristics in the atmosphere that absorb sound), and ground attenuation (characteristics on the ground that absorb sound). If sound radiates from a source in a homogeneous and undisturbed manner, the sound travels in spherical waves. As the sound wave travels away from the source, the sound energy is spread over a greater area dispersing the power of the sound wave. Atmospheric temperature and humidity also influence the sound levels received by the observer. How much sound is absorbed by the atmosphere depends on the frequency of the sound as well as the humidity and air temperature. For example, when the air is cold and humid, and therefore denser, atmospheric absorption is lowest and sound travels farther. Higher frequencies are more readily absorbed than the lower frequencies. The fluctuations in sound levels created by atmospheric conditions increase with distance and become particularly important at distances greater than 1,000 feet. Over large distances, lower frequency sounds become dominant as the higher frequencies are attenuated. Noise propagation is one of the reasons that aircraft noise will be higher one day than other days even when the same aircraft are flying the same path and altitude. Noise Metrics The description, analysis, and reporting of noise levels around communities is made difficult by the complexity of human response to noise and the variety of metrics that have been developed for describing noise impacts. Each of these metrics attempts to quantify noise levels with respect to community impact. Noise metrics can be divided into two categories: single event and cumulative. Single event metrics describe the noise levels from an individual event such as an aircraft flyover. Cumulative metrics average the total noise over a specific time period, typically from one to 24 hours. This study presents single event measurement results. • Maximum Noise Level, or Lmax, is the maximum or peak sound level during an aircraft noise event. The metric accounts only for the peak intensity of the sound and not for the duration of the event. As an aircraft passes by an observer, the sound level increases to a maximum level and then decreases. Typical single event noise levels range from over 90 dBA close to the airport to the low 50s dBA at more distant locations. • Single Event Noise Exposure Level (SEL) - The duration of a noise event, or an aircraft flyover, is an important factor in assessing annoyance and is measured most typically as SEL. The effective duration of a sound starts when a sound rises above the background sound level and ends when it drops back below the background level. An SEL is calculated 7 Report#2019-007 05/15/2019 by summing the dB level at each second during a noise event and compressing that noise into one second. It is the level the noise would be if it all occurred in one second. The SEL value is the integration of all the acoustic energy contained within the event. This metric takes into account the maximum noise level of the event and the duration of the event. For aircraft flyovers, the SEL value is numerically about 10 dBA higher than the maximum noise level. • Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) is a measure of not just one event like Lmax but of average noise over twenty-four hours; it applies a weighting factor that penalizes noise events occurring during the evening and night hours (when humans are typically more sensitive to noise and sleep disturbance is a concern). More specifically, noises occurring during the evening (from 7 PM to 10 PM) are penalized by 5 dB, while noises occurring during the night (10 PM to 7 AM) are penalized by 10 dB. CNEL noise levels near airports range from 70 CNEL directly next to an airport to less than 45 CNEL at more distant locations. 5. Radar Data The radar data for the study period was collected and analyzed. An example of one day of SFO arrival radar tracks is presented in Figure 2. This figure shows each of the primary jet arrival procedures that fly into SFO Airport when operating in primary flow (i.e., landing on Runways 28L and 28R). The flight procedures that primarily overfly the study area are the SERFR and BDEGA (west leg) STARs (Standard Terminal Arrival Route) and the OCEANIC route. Procedures from the east, DYAMD and YOSEM STARs rarely fly over the study area. Also, the BDEGA (east Leg) procedure that directs the aircraft on the BDEGA procedure to fly downwind to the east also rarely overflies the study area. Radar track data during the measurement period is presented in Figure 3 (a through e) for the different flight procedures that fly near the study area. These figures are described in more detail below. • Figure 3a – SERFR STAR radar tracks for those flights that have some portion of the flight that is radar vectored. Radar vector is when controllers direct pilots to turn, change altitude or change speed to separate and space aircraft prior to landing. This is roughly half of the total SERFR flight tracks. There were 4,707 radar tracks in the study period. • Figure 3b – SERFR STAR radar tracks for those flights that were not radar vectored and the aircraft flew straight to final approach. There were 4,403 radar tracks in the study period. For the purposes of this study this is called SERFR-ST. • Figure 3c – BDEGA STAR tracks that are radar vectored by controllers to the approach. There were 6,800 radar tracks in the study period. • Figure 3d – OCEANIC route tracks that are radar vectored by controllers to the approach. There were 1,866 radar tracks in the study period. 8 Report#2019-007 05/15/2019 • Figure 3e – Missed approach and other radar tracks that are radar vectored by controllers back to the approach for landing. Missed approaches are those aircraft that were on final approach but did not land and the aircraft is flying back to be sequenced back into the arrival pattern for a second landing attempt. There were 233 missed approach radar tracks in the study period. Of Those tracks, 35% were flying the DYAMD, 33% the SERFR, 21% the BDEGA West, 6% the BDEGA East, and 3% the OCEANIC. In evaluating the radar data, the majority of the SFO arriving aircraft that generated a measurable event (97%) passed within 2 nautical miles of one of the four sites. Thus, the radar data for these flights are presented in Figure 4. This data was also analyzed with respect to the altitude, dispersion, and aircraft flight parameters when the aircraft flew closest to each site. This data is presented in Figure 5 (a through f). These figures present information on the altitude of the aircraft on each flight for each procedure, the dispersion of the tracks when it flew closest to each site, the descent rate and descent angle, and aircraft speed. In general, the aircraft are flying at a similar altitude and descending when flying any of the different procedures. The aircraft average just under 5,000 feet MSL and are descending at 2 to 3 degrees. When aircraft are being radar vectored, the dispersion is mostly equal over the study area. Besides the aircraft from SFO landing on Runways 28L/R, there are other aircraft operations that overfly the study area. This includes departures at SFO and OAK that can cross back over the study area at high altitudes, arrivals to OAK, arrivals to SJC in reverse flow configuration, operations at Palo Alto Airport (PAO), medical helicopter flights into Stanford Medical Center, military, and other general aviation activities. As an example, Figure 6a presents departure and arrival radar tracks at PAO Airport. The airport is within 2 miles of Site 404. Figure 6b presents overflight radar tracks from other General Aviation airports around the region. This includes helicopter aircraft from the helipad located at Stanford Medical Center located less than 2 nautical miles from the closest site. The altitude and dispersion of these tracks was also determined. Figure 7 presents the altitude and dispersion of the arrivals and departures into PAO as well as from other airport overflights that flew within 1 nautical mile of Site 404. The data shows that these aircraft are around 1,000 feet MSL for arrivals and 1,500 feet MSL for departures. 6. Ambient Noise Monitoring Results The ambient background noise during the time of the measurements was also determined. Ambient background noise represents the typical residual noise that exists in the area independent of the aircraft noise. These results are presented in Table 1 below. The results are presented in terms of the L% statistical noise levels. The L% is the percent of time that the noise is above that level. The L50 or mean noise level, which is defined as the point at which half the time the noise is above that value and half below that value. These results show that the ambient noise ranged from 42 dBA at the Tevis site (404) to 48 dBA at the Gamble site (402). The Tevis and Hoover location are a quieter setting with minimum other traffic, whereas Gamble and Rinconada are closer to roadways with more vehicle traffic and urban noise. When ambient 9 Report#2019-007 05/15/2019 noise levels are higher, then it becomes difficult to separate the aircraft noise events from other noise sources. When the ambient noise level is lower, then quieter aircraft events are more easily measured. Ambient noise varies throughout the day; typically, ambient noise is reduced at night, are lower than the daytime. When ambient noise is low, the sound of an aircraft may be distinct, while when ambient noise is higher the same aircraft emitting the same noise may be not audible at all. The data in Table 1 shows the ambient noise during the daytime hours (7am to 10pm) and the nighttime hours (10 pm to 7 am). The ambient noise levels at night are roughly 5 dBA quieter than in the daytime hours. Table 1 Ambient Noise Measurement Results Site Description Measured Ambient Noise Levels (dBA) Lmax L1 L10 L50 L90 L99 Lmin All Hours 401 Rinconada Library 97 61 54 47 40 35 29 402 Gamble House 93 62 55 48 40 36 32 403 Hoover Park 91 60 51 44 38 34 30 404 Tevis Residence 95 61 51 42 36 32 26 Daytime Hours 401 Rinconada Library 97 62 55 49 43 39 33 402 Gamble House 93 63 57 50 45 41 33 403 Hoover Park 91 61 53 45 40 36 31 404 Tevis Residence 95 62 53 44 38 34 27 Nighttime Hours 401 Rinconada Library 83 58 50 43 37 34 29 402 Gamble House 84 59 50 43 37 35 32 403 Hoover Park 89 57 47 41 36 33 30 404 Tevis Residence 75 57 47 40 35 30 26 10 Report#2019-007 05/15/2019 7. Correlated Noise Events An automated process was used to calculate noise events and when possible, correlated to an aircraft that generated the noise event when. An example is shown in the top part of Figure 8a that shows the continuous measured 1-second noise for a 15-minute period (dark blue) at the Gamble House. The background noise at the time of the event is below 40 dBA. The noise event period is shown in dark red with the red box showing the calculated single event metrics with a peak Lmax value of nearly 70 dBA. The black parabolic line from the top of the chart shows the second Y access the slant range distance from the aircraft as it passes near the site. An orange parabolic line from the bottom shows the predicted noise associated with that flight based upon an approximate noise model prediction. The bottom part of Figure 8a graphic shows a second 15-minute period from the Gamble House where there are 3 aircraft events showing the same data as described above. Note the short duration peaks during this period are vehicle traffic on the nearby road. The same information described in the above paragraph is presented in these graphics. Note that the lower the ambient, the greater possibility to measure lower noise level events. When the ambient is higher, or other noise sources are present, the more difficult it is to measure and separate aircraft events from other sources of noise. As an example, the top portion of Figure 8b shows a busy period of operations from the Gamble House site that includes both SFO and PAO noise events. Because they occurred separately it was possible to measure these separate noise events. The bottom of Figure 8b shows a busy period where the ambient conditions interfered with the measurements of aircraft noise. Vehicle traffic noise was higher than the aircraft noise, making it difficult to measure the aircraft noise separate from other sources. Both the Gamble House and the Rinconada Library site had higher background environments that made measurements of lower noise level events difficult during busy times of the day. The Hoover Park and Tevis sites had lower ambient that allowed for the ability to separate quieter noise events from the background. The automated process was supplemented with the ability to manually create, edit and correlate noise events. This was used for a number of days of the measurements. This can be used to fix missed or wrong correlations and create noise events that are closer to the ambient where it is more difficult to do automatically. 11 Report#2019-007 05/15/2019 8. Measured Single Event Noise Levels The noise event calculation and correlation process were completed for the 2 months of measured noise data. This was completed for all potential aircraft operations, with the dominant number of events coming from SFO arrivals and PAO operations. This automatic process was supplemented with the ability to complete a manual review and edit the events and correlation. The results of one day of SFO events is presented in Figure 9. This figure lists all the correlated noise events with the measured noise metrics (Lmax, SEL) and information on the aircraft that was correlated to the event. This data is for December 1st, 2018 at Site 401, 402, 403 and 404. This data showed a wide range of measured single event noise levels for SFO arrivals that varied primarily with distance away from the measurement location, type of aircraft and altitude of the aircraft. Those aircraft that flew directly overhead generated the loudest events. These events often generated Lmax noise levels greater than 60 dBA. The average noise level of these events for SFO arrivals for each of the different flight procedures is presented in Table 2. This table presents the average Lmax noise level of all SFO Runway 28L/R arrivals that flew within 2 nautical miles within any one of the sites. The data is presented for each of the arrival procedures that fly near or over the study area. Generally, the aircraft generate similar noise levels from all procedures, with the highest from the SERFR tracks that fly straight on the procedure without radar vectoring. This is because these sites are very close to that path. Note that this is an average level, with the Lmax of the noise events ranging from the 40s to low 70s. Table 2 Measure Average Lmax Noise Level at Noise Measurement Location SITE DESCRIPTION AVERAGE LMAX NOISE LEVEL (DBA) SERFR SERFR-ST BDEGA OCEANIC OTHER ALL 401 Rinconada Library 56 59 57 57 56 57 402 Gamble House 59 60 59 58 59 59 403 Hoover Park 56 57 56 57 56 56 404 Tevis Residence 55 60 56 57 57 57 12 Report#2019-007 05/15/2019 The average daily number of measured aircraft events was also determined. These results are presented in Table 3. This table gives a count of the number of average daily events detected for each flight procedure. This data is presented for higher noise levels events (60 dBA or greater) and for all detected events. At night and at sites with lower background noise then the other measurement sites more low-level events can be detected. Noise events are measurable from more distant operations then when the ambient is higher. This results in some noise events generated noise levels at or near the ambient level that existed at the time of the event. The level of 60 dBA was used to identify higher noise level events from those that were close to the ambient. Events above 60 dBA are typically close to the minimum threshold used by permanent monitoring systems in that events. Noise events above 60 dBA were generally from aircraft that flew directly over the site. Table 3 Average Daily Measured Noise Events SITE DESCRIPTION AVERAGE DAILY EVENTS SERFR SERFR-ST BDEGA OCEANIC OTHER TOTAL Events Greater than 60 dBA 401 Rinconada Library 14 30 24 8 1 77 402 Gamble House 15 28 27 8 1 80 403 Hoover Park 13 19 18 6 1 56 404 Tevis Residence 11 35 22 8 1 78 All Measured Events 401 Rinconada Library 67 72 98 25 5 274 402 Gamble House 49 53 78 22 3 206 403 Hoover Park 56 65 82 22 3 229 404 Tevis Residence 53 71 91 24 4 244 13 Report#2019-007 05/15/2019 9. Measured CNEL Noise Levels CNEL is a measure of cumulative noise throughout the day. CNEL noise levels typically range from 70 CNEL very close to an airport to less than 55 CNEL at communities a number of miles away. Note that measuring CNEL at levels below 55 CNEL becomes less precise because the noise from aircraft events can be close to existing ambient noise, and it is not always technically possible to separate the two. (Note that CNEL differs from the Lmax values presented previously. Lmax values are numerically higher than CNEL values because the CNEL represents an average that includes both peak sounds [like the Lmax] and lower values when aircraft noise is not present.) Aircraft noise events and the time when aircraft noise was present were calculated for identified aircraft events above the ambient threshold and correlated with an aircraft that caused that event. The CNEL metric can be calculated by summing the noise energy from the aircraft events and applying the evening and night weighting penalty. The results are presented in Table 4 for the measurement period from October 30th through January 3rd. The results show that the measured SFO aircraft CNEL levels were in the low 50s CNEL for all the sites. Daily noise levels ranged from 49 to 55 CNEL. CNEL levels from aircraft operating at airports other than SFO also in the low 50s CNEL, but less than the SFO CNEL. The noise from aircraft operating at the other airports also had more variability than SFO in that the number of operations and the pattern of the flights varied much more widely than the more precise SFO arrival procedures. Note the Total CNEL is a measure of all the noise throughout the day including aircraft, traffic and background sounds. It also includes the evening and nighttime noise penalty. Table 4 CNEL Measurement Results SITE DESCRIPTION ENERGY AVERAGE MEASURED CNEL SFO Aircraft Events Other Airports Potential Events Total All Noise 401 Rinconada Library 52 51 56 402 Gamble House 53 52 57 403 Hoover Park 51 50 54 404 Tevis Residence 52 50 55 14 Report#2019-007 05/15/2019 10. Conclusion BridgeNet International was contracted by the SFO Aircraft Noise Abatement Office to evaluate noise levels in the Palo Alto community. The study included portable noise monitoring near the arrival paths into SFO at four locations identified by the City of Palo Alto. Noise measurements were correlated with flight track data and cumulative and single event noise metrics were calculated for aircraft operating at SFO, aircraft from other airports, and ambient sources of noise. This data will be provided to the City for their use in side by side noise measurements using their own system. 15 Report#2019-007 05/15/2019 APPENDIX Report Figures SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL –PALO ALTO NOISE MONITORING REPORT Source: BridgeNet International 2019 PSRC --NextGen Airspace Optimization Study Figure 1 Measurement Site Map 401 402 403 404 401 402 403 404 SFO PAO H PAO A-1 SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL –PALO ALTO NOISE MONITORING REPORT Source: BridgeNet International 2019 PSRC --NextGen Airspace Optimization Study Figure 2 Arrival Procedures SERFR DYAMD YOSEM OCEANIC BDEGA BDEGA EAST Sites SFO SFO Runways 28L/R Arrival Tracks on December 1st, 2018 532 Tracks A-2 BDEGA WEST SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL –PALO ALTO NOISE MONITORING REPORT Source: BridgeNet International 2019 PSRC --NextGen Airspace Optimization Study Figure 3a SERFR Arrival Flight Tracks (SERFR Tracks with Radar Vectoring) SERFR Sites SFO SFO Runways 28L/R Arrival Tracks between October 30th 2018 and January 4th 2019.4707 Tracks A-3 SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL –PALO ALTO NOISE MONITORING REPORT Source: BridgeNet International 2019 PSRC --NextGen Airspace Optimization Study Figure 3b SERFR Straight Arrival Flight Tracks (SERFR Tracks Flying Procedure Straight without Radar Vectoring) SERFR Sites SFO SFO Runways 28L/R Arrival Tracks between October 30th 2018 and January 4th 2019.4403 Tracks A-4 SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL –PALO ALTO NOISE MONITORING REPORT Source: BridgeNet International 2019 PSRC --NextGen Airspace Optimization Study Figure 3c BDEGA West Arrival Flight Tracks Sites SFO BDEGA SFO Runways 28L/R Arrival Tracks between October 30th 2018 and January 4th 2019.6800 Tracks A-5 BDEGA WEST SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL –PALO ALTO NOISE MONITORING REPORT Source: BridgeNet International 2019 PSRC --NextGen Airspace Optimization Study Figure 3d OCEANIC Arrival Flight Tracks Sites SFO OCEANIC SFO Runways 28L/R Arrival Tracks between October 30th 2018 and January 4th 2019.1866 Tracks A-6 SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL –PALO ALTO NOISE MONITORING REPORT Source: BridgeNet International 2019 PSRC --NextGen Airspace Optimization Study Figure 3e Missed and Other Landing Flight Tracks Sites SFO OCEANIC DYAMD YOSEM BDEGA BDEGA EAST SFO Runways 28L/R Arrival Tracks between October 30th 2018 and January 4th 2019. SERFR 233 Tracks A-7 SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL –PALO ALTO NOISE MONITORING REPORT Source: BridgeNet International 2019 PSRC --NextGen Airspace Optimization Study Figure 4 All SFO Arrival Flight Tracks (within 2nm of any sites) Sites SFO Runways 28L/R Arrival Tracks between October 30th 2018 and January 4th 2019.16,552 Tracks A-8 SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL –PALO ALTO NOISE MONITORING REPORT Source: BridgeNet International 2019 PSRC --NextGen Airspace Optimization Study Figure 5a (Part A) SFO Aircraft Performance Data at Noise Measurement Sites (within 2 Nautical Miles) (SERFR Procedure with Radar Vector and SERFR flying straight without Radar Vector) SERFR Radar Vector SERFR Straight SFO Runways 28L/R Arrival Tracks between October 30th 2018 and January 4th 2019 Within 2 Nautical Miles of each Measurement Site. A-9 SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL –PALO ALTO NOISE MONITORING REPORT Source: BridgeNet International 2019 PSRC --NextGen Airspace Optimization Study Figure 5b (Part B) SFO Aircraft Performance Data at Noise Measurement Sites (within 2 Nautical Miles) (BDEGA Procedure and OCEANIC) SFO Runways 28L/R Arrival Tracks between October 30th 2018 and January 4th 2019 Within 2 Nautical Miles of each Measurement Site. OCEANIC BDEGA A-10 SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL –PALO ALTO NOISE MONITORING REPORT Source: BridgeNet International 2019 PSRC --NextGen Airspace Optimization Study Figure 5c Aircraft Altitude and Path Dispersion (Site 401 Rinconada Library) (within 2 Nautical Miles) SFO Runways 28L/R Arrival Tracks between October 30th 2018 and January 4th 2019 Within 2 Nautical Miles of Site 404. OCEANIC BDEGA SERFR Radar Vector SERFR Straight L RSite A-11 SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL –PALO ALTO NOISE MONITORING REPORT Source: BridgeNet International 2019 PSRC --NextGen Airspace Optimization Study Figure 5d Aircraft Altitude and Path Dispersion (Site 402 Gamble House) (within 2 Nautical Miles) SFO Runways 28L/R Arrival Tracks between October 30th 2018 and January 4th 2019 Within 2 Nautical Miles of Site 404. OCEANIC BDEGA SERFR Radar Vector SERFR Straight L RSite A-12 SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL –PALO ALTO NOISE MONITORING REPORT Source: BridgeNet International 2019 PSRC --NextGen Airspace Optimization Study Figure 5e Aircraft Altitude and Path Dispersion (Site 403 Hoover Park) (within 2 Nautical Miles) SFO Runways 28L/R Arrival Tracks between October 30th 2018 and January 4th 2019 Within 2 Nautical Miles of Site 404. OCEANIC BDEGA SERFR Radar Vector SERFR Straight L RSite A-13 SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL –PALO ALTO NOISE MONITORING REPORT Source: BridgeNet International 2019 PSRC --NextGen Airspace Optimization Study Figure 5f Aircraft Altitude and Path Dispersion (Site 404 Tevis Residence) (within 2 Nautical Miles) SFO Runways 28L/R Arrival Tracks between October 30th 2018 and January 4th 2019 Within 2 Nautical Miles of Site 404. OCEANIC BDEGA SERFR Radar Vector SERFR Straight L RSite A-14 SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL –PALO ALTO NOISE MONITORING REPORT Source: BridgeNet International 2019 PSRC --NextGen Airspace Optimization Study Figure 6a Palo Alto Airport (PAO) Flight Tracks SFO Runways 28L/R Arrival Tracks between October 30th 2018 and January 4th 2019.13,065 Tracks PAO A-15 403 404 402 401 SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL –PALO ALTO NOISE MONITORING REPORT Source: BridgeNet International 2019 PSRC --NextGen Airspace Optimization Study Figure 6b Other Airport Overflight Flight Tracks Stanford Medical Center SFO Runways 28L/R Arrival Tracks between October 30th 2018 and January 4th 2019.911 Tracks PAO H A-16 404 402 401 403 SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL –PALO ALTO NOISE MONITORING REPORT Source: BridgeNet International 2019 PSRC --NextGen Airspace Optimization Study Figure 7a PAO Aircraft Altitude and Path Dispersion (Site 401 Rinconada Library) (within 1 Nautical Miles) SFO Runways 28L/R Arrival Tracks between October 30th 2018 and January 4th 2019 Within 2 Nautical Miles of Site 404. PAO Arrivals PAO Departures L RSite A-17 SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL –PALO ALTO NOISE MONITORING REPORT Source: BridgeNet International 2019 PSRC --NextGen Airspace Optimization Study Figure 7b PAO Aircraft Altitude and Path Dispersion (Site 402 Gamble House) (within 1 Nautical Miles) SFO Runways 28L/R Arrival Tracks between October 30th 2018 and January 4th 2019 Within 2 Nautical Miles of Site 404. PAO Arrivals PAO Departures L RSite A-18 SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL –PALO ALTO NOISE MONITORING REPORT Source: BridgeNet International 2019 PSRC --NextGen Airspace Optimization Study Figure 7c PAO Aircraft Altitude and Path Dispersion (Site 403 Hoover Park) (within 1 Nautical Miles) SFO Runways 28L/R Arrival Tracks between October 30th 2018 and January 4th 2019 Within 2 Nautical Miles of Site 404. PAO Arrivals PAO Departures L RSite A-19 SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL –PALO ALTO NOISE MONITORING REPORT Source: BridgeNet International 2019 PSRC --NextGen Airspace Optimization Study Figure 7d PAO Aircraft Altitude and Path Dispersion (Site 404 Tevis Residence)(within 1 Nautical Miles) SFO Runways 28L/R Arrival Tracks between October 30th 2018 and January 4th 2019 Within 2 Nautical Miles of Site 404. PAO Arrivals PAO Departures L RSite A-20 SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL –PALO ALTO NOISE MONITORING REPORT Source: BridgeNet International 2019 PSRC --NextGen Airspace Optimization Study Figure 8a Example Time History Noise Plots 402 –Gamble House (Dec, 1st 2018) A-21 Vehicle Traffic SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL –PALO ALTO NOISE MONITORING REPORT Source: BridgeNet International 2019 PSRC --NextGen Airspace Optimization Study Figure 8b Example Time History Noise Plots 402 –Gamble House (Dec, 1st 2018) A-22 Figure 9a Correlated Noise Event Report Site 401 ‐ December 1st 2018 Site Event Max Operation Airport Aircraft Flight Airline Procedure Runway Lmax SEL Closest Lateral Dist.Altitude Speed Pitch Alt Delta Heading ID Time Type ID Code dBA (Feet) (ft msl) (Kts) (Degrees) (ft/min) (True) 401 12/1/2018 0:03:16 A SFO B738 ASA762 ASA OCEANIC 28R 62 74 (641) 6,623 213 ‐3.0 (1,140) 38 401 12/1/2018 0:10:04 A SFO B738 AMX664 AMX SERFR‐ST 28R 64 76 (935) 4,774 200 ‐3.7 (1,294) 345 401 12/1/2018 0:12:42 A SFO E75L CPZ6020 CPZ SERFR‐ST 28R 59 72 (941) 5,000 186 ‐2.1 (671) 345 401 12/1/2018 0:17:09 A SFO B748 KAL213 KAL SERFR‐ST 28R 70 81 (1,012) 5,118 270 ‐2.4 (1,128) 346 401 12/1/2018 0:23:01 A SFO B738 AMX662 AMX SERFR‐ST 28R 60 73 (1,034) 4,812 183 ‐2.3 (746) 346 401 12/1/2018 0:37:08 A SFO A320 ASA1949 ASA SERFR‐ST 28R 62 75 (1,341) 4,182 178 ‐3.8 (1,185) 346 401 12/1/2018 1:19:15 A SFO C750 U U SERFR 28R 53 65 (4,219) 4,030 245 ‐1.2 (518) 337 401 12/1/2018 2:12:29 D PAO EC35 CMD12 CMD U H 47 58 8,952 98 7 0.0 ‐ 344 401 12/1/2018 2:51:29 A SFO B744 AAR284 AAR SERFR‐ST 28R 71 81 (1,026) 4,771 215 ‐2.7 (1,035) 346 401 12/1/2018 3:25:30 A SFO B739 UAL2550 UAL BDEGA 28R 56 67 7,545 3,989 216 ‐0.1 (38) 61 401 12/1/2018 3:46:29 A SFO B738 UAL1639 UAL OCEANIC 28L 63 72 3,789 6,658 245 ‐1.8 (755) 61 401 12/1/2018 3:58:11 A SFO B738 UAL1724 UAL OCEANIC 28R 63 75 2,113 5,786 250 ‐3.6 (1,602) 64 401 12/1/2018 4:09:28 A SFO B772 UAL396 UAL OCEANIC 28R 57 69 (7,329) 6,502 265 ‐1.1 (522) 27 401 12/1/2018 4:10:56 A SFO B738 UAL1746 UAL OCEANIC 28R 59 70 4,059 7,472 243 ‐2.5 (1,069) 69 401 12/1/2018 4:38:19 A SFO B753 UAL2553 UAL BDEGA 28R 53 64 14,060 4,776 173 ‐2.4 (727) 339 401 12/1/2018 5:13:22 A SFO B789 UAL955 UAL BDEGA 28R 61 71 5,725 4,319 282 ‐3.1 (1,525) 97 401 12/1/2018 5:36:56 A SFO B738 UAL1557 UAL OCEANIC 28R 66 75 4,773 5,698 270 ‐4.8 (2,270) 78 401 12/1/2018 5:39:10 A SFO B77W AIC173 AIC OTHER 28R 55 68 401 12/1/2018 5:46:45 A SFO B753 UAL1575 UAL OCEANIC 28R 54 66 8,578 6,734 258 ‐2.7 (1,230) 80 401 12/1/2018 5:49:28 A SFO B77W UAL916 UAL OCEANIC 28R 60 71 6,814 6,164 254 ‐4.1 (1,815) 79 401 12/1/2018 6:04:11 A SFO B77W EVA008 EVA BDEGA 28R 59 74 668 5,851 229 ‐3.1 (1,253) 114 401 12/1/2018 6:12:17 A SJC GALX U U U 12R 52 64 11,336 2,133 219 ‐2.0 (791) 17 401 12/1/2018 6:21:11 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5738 SKW BDEGA 28R 50 63 (10,317) 4,074 256 ‐5.7 (2,573) 46 401 12/1/2018 6:28:42 A SFO P28A UAL872 UAL BDEGA 28R 57 70 7,116 5,533 264 ‐2.7 (1,241) 99 401 12/1/2018 6:40:14 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5276 SKW BDEGA 28R 55 68 4,266 4,421 260 ‐3.3 (1,489) 34 401 12/1/2018 6:57:42 A SFO E75L SKW5358 SKW BDEGA 28R 50 64 (11,311) 3,884 251 ‐4.6 (2,055) 63 401 12/1/2018 6:59:13 A SFO CRJ7 SKW5802 SKW BDEGA 28L 54 65 (10,152) 3,454 228 ‐3.5 (1,425) 77 401 12/1/2018 7:01:15 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5631 SKW SERFR‐ST 28R 55 66 (1,024) 4,547 221 ‐1.7 (647) 345 401 12/1/2018 7:03:47 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5667 SKW SERFR‐ST 28R 54 67 (932) 4,755 226 ‐3.3 (1,328) 345 401 12/1/2018 7:06:01 A SFO E75L SKW5601 SKW SERFR‐ST 28R 58 69 (952) 4,800 236 ‐3.1 (1,299) 345 401 12/1/2018 7:08:01 A SFO A320 UAL2350 UAL SERFR‐ST 28R 61 70 (864) 4,754 231 ‐1.2 (506) 346 401 12/1/2018 7:10:21 A SFO A319 UAL295 UAL SERFR‐ST 28R 63 74 (1,054) 4,697 212 ‐3.2 (1,182) 345 401 12/1/2018 7:11:38 A SFO B738 UAL805 UAL BDEGA 28R 59 71 (5,067) 5,247 224 ‐3.3 (1,291) 46 401 12/1/2018 7:13:41 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5496 SKW BDEGA 28R 59 69 (1,844) 5,311 205 ‐2.9 (1,057) 67 401 12/1/2018 7:15:19 A SFO A359 SIA32 SIA BDEGA 28R 57 71 1,894 5,664 219 ‐2.3 (900) 110 401 12/1/2018 7:34:44 A SFO E75L CPZ6034 CPZ SERFR‐ST 28L 63 76 (930) 4,920 195 ‐2.3 (795) 345 401 12/1/2018 7:36:49 A SFO A320 ASA1925 ASA SERFR‐ST 28L 60 72 (1,071) 4,097 241 ‐1.7 (739) 346 401 12/1/2018 7:37:43 A SFO B789 UAL858 UAL BDEGA 28R 65 76 724 5,396 247 ‐3.3 (1,425) 44 401 12/1/2018 7:49:39 A SFO B77W UAL862 UAL BDEGA 28R 57 69 10,308 5,134 189 ‐2.7 (887) 348 401 12/1/2018 7:50:58 A SFO A320 UAL618 UAL BDEGA 28L 66 76 (1,012) 5,373 230 ‐4.5 (1,830) 115 401 12/1/2018 7:55:00 A SFO A320 UAL612 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 67 78 (978) 4,493 186 ‐3.5 (1,159) 345 401 12/1/2018 7:58:45 A SFO A320 JBU1136 JBU SERFR‐ST 28L 69 77 (914) 3,982 217 ‐0.3 (104) 346 401 12/1/2018 8:02:21 A SJC A320 JBU826 JBU U 12R 57 67 8,206 1,994 209 ‐1.3 (495) 11 401 12/1/2018 8:04:44 A SJC B737 SWA2630 SWA U 12R 59 69 5,748 2,985 161 0.2 60 3 401 12/1/2018 8:07:29 A SFO CRJ7 SKW5464 SKW BDEGA 28L 59 70 4,155 5,596 242 ‐3.8 (1,628) 59 401 12/1/2018 8:13:14 A SFO A320 ASA1951 ASA SERFR 28L 67 78 (822) 4,293 182 ‐3.9 (1,235) 343 401 12/1/2018 8:15:49 A SFO A21N ASA1591 ASA SERFR‐ST 28L 59 71 (1,149) 5,037 202 ‐4.0 (1,414) 345 401 12/1/2018 8:18:34 A SFO B739 UAL1294 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 61 73 (910) 4,647 242 ‐2.9 (1,221) 345 401 12/1/2018 8:20:59 A SFO B77W UAL838 UAL OCEANIC 28R 64 77 730 6,187 225 ‐3.3 (1,320) 32 401 12/1/2018 8:24:09 A SFO B77W ANA8 ANA BDEGA 28R 62 74 (3,744) 5,442 255 ‐3.6 (1,601) 38 401 12/1/2018 8:26:34 A SFO B77W CES589 CES BDEGA 28L 62 74 1,071 4,596 203 ‐2.5 (890) 33 401 12/1/2018 8:33:08 A SFO E75L SKW5642 SKW BDEGA 28L 58 71 (4,127) 4,953 232 ‐1.5 (600) 64 401 12/1/2018 8:35:06 A SFO B739 UAL662 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 61 74 (954) 4,438 180 ‐4.2 (1,332) 345 401 12/1/2018 8:36:43 A SFO A332 CES767 CES BDEGA 28R 58 73 6,026 6,632 215 ‐3.8 (1,433) 79 401 12/1/2018 8:40:39 A SFO E75L QXE2283 QXE BDEGA 28L 56 69 4,907 6,538 243 ‐2.2 (965) 70 401 12/1/2018 8:42:48 A SFO B737 SWA3330 SWA SERFR 28L 56 69 14,462 5,961 216 ‐2.2 (836) 37 401 12/1/2018 8:44:47 A SFO B77W CPA870 CPA BDEGA 28R 61 72 (7,263) 6,963 234 ‐3.9 (1,622) 115 401 12/1/2018 8:49:29 A SFO B77W KAL023 KAL BDEGA 28R 67 77 1,139 4,011 218 ‐0.5 (184) 30 401 12/1/2018 8:52:10 A SFO A320 ACA574 ACA BDEGA 28L 56 70 (12,048) 6,152 257 ‐0.6 (289) 113 401 12/1/2018 8:52:49 A SFO A320 ACA574 ACA BDEGA 28L 52 61 (12,048) 6,152 257 ‐0.6 (289) 113 401 12/1/2018 8:54:10 D SFO A320 UAL234 UAL U 28L 57 71 (1,653) 14,746 431 2.4 1,790 106 401 12/1/2018 8:56:16 A SJC E75L CPZ5772 CPZ U 12R 54 64 6,701 2,038 214 ‐2.1 (809) 15 401 12/1/2018 8:58:07 A SJC B788 ANA172 ANA U 12R 55 65 8,858 2,759 189 ‐2.5 (840) 19 401 12/1/2018 9:01:03 A SJC E75L QXE2810 QXE U 12R 55 65 8,342 2,927 183 ‐2.3 (736) 14 401 12/1/2018 9:02:33 A SJC GLF6 N240CX GA U 12R 52 61 6,964 2,812 181 ‐3.7 (1,171) 6 401 12/1/2018 9:05:37 A SJC B737 SWA921 SWA U 12R 55 67 8,002 2,683 194 ‐4.3 (1,470) 9 401 12/1/2018 9:07:47 A SJC E75L QXE2259 QXE U 12R 50 60 9,318 2,837 212 ‐2.8 (1,035) 8 401 12/1/2018 9:11:44 A SFO B738 UAL1615 UAL BDEGA 28L 62 73 (3,294) 6,631 263 ‐3.8 (1,773) 114 401 12/1/2018 9:16:00 A SFO B738 UAL2055 UAL BDEGA 28L 55 65 6,218 5,032 208 ‐1.6 (597) 59 401 12/1/2018 9:22:17 A SFO A319 ASA1751 ASA BDEGA 28L 55 66 11,024 4,923 250 ‐3.8 (1,680) 37 401 12/1/2018 9:22:52 A SJC B739 ASA346 ASA U 12R 57 68 8,206 2,008 156 ‐1.0 (260) 13 401 12/1/2018 9:25:36 A SFO B789 UAL2 UAL BDEGA 28R 58 71 6,112 5,918 234 ‐2.5 (1,035) 27 401 12/1/2018 9:28:17 A SFO A319 UAL820 UAL SERFR 28L 57 69 7,147 4,998 223 ‐0.5 (194) 61 401 12/1/2018 9:33:00 A SFO B789 UAL876 UAL BDEGA 28R 62 74 (3,315) 4,774 211 ‐0.6 (240) 3 401 12/1/2018 9:43:50 A SFO CRJ9 JZA579 JZA BDEGA 28L 54 66 (2,614) 5,001 217 ‐0.5 (184) 3 401 12/1/2018 9:45:16 D PAO U U U U 31 58 69 6,150 997 87 1.8 280 157 401 12/1/2018 9:48:33 A SFO B739 UAL274 UAL SERFR 28L 55 67 7,757 5,019 216 ‐0.8 (300) 60 401 12/1/2018 9:52:54 A SFO A319 ASA1935 ASA SERFR 28L 51 60 401 12/1/2018 9:56:21 A SQL PC12 N903PJ GA U 30 63 71 (3,868) 1,943 135 ‐1.0 (231) 316 401 12/1/2018 10:01:07 A SJC B737 SWA3249 SWA U 12R 56 66 6,433 2,670 201 ‐2.8 (975) 10 401 12/1/2018 10:04:35 A SFO A321 JBU133 JBU MISSED 28L 56 69 7,737 5,016 199 0.1 25 65 401 12/1/2018 10:07:52 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5982 SKW SERFR 28L 57 71 401 12/1/2018 10:16:39 D SQL BE20 N840CP GA U 30 61 75 (12,439) 1,994 219 0.1 42 84 401 12/1/2018 10:23:22 A SFO B77W CSN659 CSN BDEGA 28R 58 71 7,915 4,995 197 ‐0.4 (141) 23 401 12/1/2018 10:25:21 D SQL SR20 N321SL GA U 30 64 77 (3,370) 2,693 99 3.9 690 198 401 12/1/2018 10:27:26 D OAK CRJ9 ASH5796 ASH U 30 57 67 (1,701) 16,807 402 3.1 2,220 134 401 12/1/2018 10:34:44 A SJC E75L QXE2224 QXE U 30L 59 73 9,660 2,998 202 0.0 ‐ 17 401 12/1/2018 10:52:22 A SFO B77W ANZ8 ANZ OCEANIC 28R 57 71 7,713 4,081 206 ‐1.3 (475) 13 A-23 Figure 9a Correlated Noise Event Report Site 401 ‐ December 1st 2018 Site Event Max Operation Airport Aircraft Flight Airline Procedure Runway Lmax SEL Closest Lateral Dist.Altitude Speed Pitch Alt Delta Heading ID Time Type ID Code dBA (Feet) (ft msl) (Kts) (Degrees) (ft/min) (True) 401 12/1/2018 10:54:23 A SFO E75L QXE2267 QXE BDEGA 28L 55 66 8,488 4,074 182 ‐3.4 (1,078) 355 401 12/1/2018 10:59:06 A SFO A332 FJI870 FJI OCEANIC 28R 63 75 6,701 4,941 257 ‐4.2 (1,920) 52 401 12/1/2018 11:02:27 A SFO B788 ACA737 ACA BDEGA 28R 56 70 8,495 5,466 271 ‐1.7 (799) 91 401 12/1/2018 11:09:37 D SQL S22T N173CK GA U 30 58 70 7,937 2,391 168 3.7 1,101 108 401 12/1/2018 11:19:59 A SQL BE35 N8366D GA U 30 57 65 (3,475) 2,119 96 ‐3.2 (535) 314 401 12/1/2018 11:31:06 A SFO B739 ASA484 ASA OCEANIC 28L 56 69 (12,713) 6,019 251 0.1 30 101 401 12/1/2018 11:36:33 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5899 SKW BDEGA 28L 52 63 6,371 4,990 221 ‐0.9 (350) 88 401 12/1/2018 11:38:26 A SFO A320 ASA1027 ASA SERFR 28L 55 68 10,867 6,000 252 0.0 ‐ 87 401 12/1/2018 11:44:32 A SFO B737 SWA4146 SWA SERFR 28L 50 60 401 12/1/2018 11:47:59 A SFO A320 UAL708 UAL SERFR 28L 49 59 11,716 4,054 162 ‐1.7 (491) 327 401 12/1/2018 11:50:17 A SFO B738 UAL1763 UAL BDEGA 28L 53 64 (9,514) 8,102 241 ‐2.4 (1,028) 113 401 12/1/2018 11:57:36 A SFO B752 UAL207 UAL BDEGA 28R 54 64 401 12/1/2018 11:58:30 A SFO B738 SWA3582 SWA BDEGA 28L 53 63 14,412 4,740 169 ‐4.0 (1,185) 9 401 12/1/2018 12:00:22 A SFO A319 ASA1332 ASA BDEGA 28L 57 71 8,477 4,056 218 ‐1.0 (376) 53 401 12/1/2018 12:05:40 A SFO B744 QFA73 QFA OCEANIC 28R 60 72 11,851 4,805 204 ‐6.4 (2,297) 12 401 12/1/2018 12:11:23 A SFO A388 UAE225 UAE BDEGA 28R 66 76 3,699 4,938 220 ‐1.0 (383) 28 401 12/1/2018 12:17:24 A SFO B789 KLM281 KLM BDEGA 28R 56 69 14,146 5,940 218 ‐1.0 (370) 30 401 12/1/2018 12:19:14 A SFO A321 AAL1956 AAL BDEGA 28L 60 69 401 12/1/2018 12:23:14 A SFO B772 UAL949 UAL BDEGA 28L 62 73 8,511 5,145 198 ‐2.8 (983) 32 401 12/1/2018 12:25:00 D SFO A319 UAL1830 UAL U 28L 58 66 2,764 15,859 458 2.3 1,875 108 401 12/1/2018 12:26:42 A SFO E75L SKW5586 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 62 74 (936) 4,255 208 ‐2.2 (821) 345 401 12/1/2018 12:29:20 A SFO E75L SKW5446 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 59 70 (934) 5,181 201 ‐0.3 (113) 344 401 12/1/2018 12:32:57 A SFO A320 AIJ820 AIJ SERFR‐ST 28L 67 77 (1,128) 5,022 185 0.0 ‐ 344 401 12/1/2018 12:35:14 O UNK CRJ2 SKW5332 SKW U U 56 70 401 12/1/2018 12:37:17 A SFO A321 AAL789 AAL SERFR‐ST 28L 66 77 (805) 4,287 202 ‐3.2 (1,140) 345 401 12/1/2018 12:40:23 A SFO E75L SKW5203 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 59 71 (958) 4,757 204 ‐3.4 (1,218) 345 401 12/1/2018 12:47:11 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5655 SKW SERFR 28L 55 67 (1,531) 5,967 235 ‐3.4 (1,424) 345 401 12/1/2018 12:59:17 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5476 SKW SERFR 28L 56 67 3,256 5,000 242 ‐0.3 (109) 21 401 12/1/2018 13:00:09 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5476 SKW SERFR 28L 55 66 3,256 5,000 242 ‐0.3 (109) 21 401 12/1/2018 13:00:24 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5476 SKW SERFR 28L 54 62 3,256 5,000 242 ‐0.3 (109) 21 401 12/1/2018 13:01:43 A SFO B738 ASA621 ASA SERFR 28L 56 69 9,959 4,988 219 0.2 93 8 401 12/1/2018 13:03:22 A SFO A346 DLH454 DLH BDEGA 28L 58 70 10,594 6,016 202 0.2 84 49 401 12/1/2018 13:06:41 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5416 SKW SERFR‐ST 28R 56 68 (1,328) 5,039 206 ‐4.2 (1,515) 346 401 12/1/2018 13:08:51 A SFO B737 SWA4136 SWA SERFR‐ST 28L 67 77 (992) 4,282 201 ‐5.1 (1,803) 344 401 12/1/2018 13:11:39 A SFO A320 ASA1804 ASA BDEGA 28L 62 73 (4,445) 4,855 210 ‐3.7 (1,362) 1 401 12/1/2018 13:13:52 A SFO CRJ7 SKW5697 SKW BDEGA 28L 61 72 (2,747) 4,668 212 ‐4.5 (1,665) 22 401 12/1/2018 13:16:45 A SFO B77W KAL025 KAL BDEGA 28L 63 75 3,840 6,007 232 ‐4.8 (1,967) 20 401 12/1/2018 13:19:08 D PAO U U U U 31 58 69 9,189 9 38 0.0 ‐ 322 401 12/1/2018 13:20:04 A SFO A319 UAL1745 UAL BDEGA 28L 59 70 6,941 4,449 225 ‐3.2 (1,284) 37 401 12/1/2018 13:22:47 A SFO E75L SKW5967 SKW BDEGA 28L 57 67 (10,459) 5,794 229 ‐1.7 (668) 107 401 12/1/2018 13:23:18 A SFO E75L SKW5967 SKW BDEGA 28L 57 70 (10,459) 5,794 229 ‐1.7 (668) 107 401 12/1/2018 13:29:30 A SFO B77W AFR084 AFR BDEGA 28L 68 79 1,205 4,904 215 ‐3.7 (1,395) 21 401 12/1/2018 13:33:35 A SFO B744 BAW11M BAW BDEGA 28L 62 73 (7,486) 4,782 214 ‐3.5 (1,325) 27 401 12/1/2018 13:35:52 D PAO U U U U 31 55 67 9,187 9 33 0.0 ‐ 321 401 12/1/2018 13:37:37 A SFO A320 ASA1957 ASA SERFR 28L 54 64 13,695 4,208 226 ‐2.1 (832) 339 401 12/1/2018 13:41:58 A SFO B738 UAL390 UAL SERFR 28L 66 76 784 4,375 217 ‐3.1 (1,201) 30 401 12/1/2018 13:44:38 A SFO B737 SWA974 SWA SERFR 28L 57 70 7,946 5,258 221 ‐4.7 (1,830) 11 401 12/1/2018 13:46:23 A SFO CRJ7 SKW5615 SKW BDEGA 28L 67 75 (735) 4,001 213 ‐0.9 (349) 38 401 12/1/2018 13:51:43 A SFO A319 ASA1340 ASA BDEGA 28R 66 78 (1,586) 4,344 235 ‐4.2 (1,732) 48 401 12/1/2018 13:58:06 A SFO A320 UAL2383 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 66 77 (949) 4,031 202 ‐4.6 (1,635) 344 401 12/1/2018 14:05:55 D PAO U U U U 31 56 67 9,187 9 33 0.0 ‐ 322 401 12/1/2018 14:07:33 A SFO B39M CMP208 CMP SERFR‐ST 28L 63 71 (920) 4,747 216 ‐2.9 (1,121) 344 401 12/1/2018 14:08:26 A SFO B39M CMP208 CMP SERFR‐ST 28L 55 63 (920) 4,747 216 ‐2.9 (1,121) 344 401 12/1/2018 14:10:08 A SFO B739 UAL444 UAL SERFR 28L 60 69 987 4,593 231 ‐3.0 (1,229) 340 401 12/1/2018 14:12:38 A SFO E75L CPZ6007 CPZ SERFR‐ST 28L 68 78 (1,002) 4,755 219 ‐2.2 (864) 344 401 12/1/2018 14:14:34 A SFO B738 SWA3950 SWA SERFR‐ST 28L 64 75 (947) 4,210 233 ‐3.8 (1,575) 345 401 12/1/2018 14:17:03 A SFO B739 UAL372 UAL OCEANIC 28L 67 77 (899) 4,873 212 ‐2.7 (991) 345 401 12/1/2018 14:18:40 A SFO A359 AAR212 AAR BDEGA 28L 54 68 5,791 4,754 212 ‐2.8 (1,063) 19 401 12/1/2018 14:20:21 D PAO U U U U 31 58 70 (3,480) 1,600 110 ‐0.7 (138) 55 401 12/1/2018 14:25:39 A SFO B772 UAL900 UAL BDEGA 28L 67 72 (5,754) 4,965 216 ‐0.5 (174) 52 401 12/1/2018 14:28:05 A SFO B77W EVA018 EVA OCEANIC 28L 65 77 106 5,200 224 ‐4.0 (1,575) 31 401 12/1/2018 14:30:14 A SFO B752 UAL477 UAL BDEGA 28L 63 73 3,809 5,567 206 ‐5.8 (2,115) 29 401 12/1/2018 14:47:15 A SFO B738 UAL2148 UAL SERFR 28L 56 65 7,414 4,789 204 ‐3.6 (1,275) 346 401 12/1/2018 14:51:24 A SFO A320 ASA1388 ASA BDEGA 28L 54 62 10,606 4,091 206 ‐1.4 (523) 346 401 12/1/2018 14:59:13 D SFO B738 AMX669 AMX U 01L 55 68 (13,952) 15,714 405 2.8 1,992 133 401 12/1/2018 15:02:49 A PAO C172 N733ZK GA U 31 54 67 9,201 9 15 0.0 ‐ 321 401 12/1/2018 15:04:03 D SQL SR20 N345BS GA U 30 59 69 8,991 2,747 140 2.6 645 114 401 12/1/2018 15:06:51 D PAO U U U U 31 59 71 9,132 39 50 ‐2.7 (240) 327 401 12/1/2018 15:08:55 A SFO A332 EIN147 EIN BDEGA 28L 63 73 6,394 5,034 228 ‐3.5 (1,414) 1 401 12/1/2018 15:11:51 A SFO E75L QXE2042 QXE SERFR‐ST 28L 55 67 (922) 5,166 238 ‐5.1 (2,130) 344 401 12/1/2018 15:14:13 D PAO U U U U 31 58 66 9,187 9 41 0.0 ‐ 321 401 12/1/2018 15:18:00 A SFO E75L SKW5617 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 57 70 (973) 5,034 202 ‐4.3 (1,546) 344 401 12/1/2018 15:28:07 D PAO U U U U 31 59 67 9,188 9 36 0.0 ‐ 321 401 12/1/2018 15:29:19 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5362 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 57 67 (864) 4,787 228 ‐2.5 (990) 344 401 12/1/2018 15:31:53 A SFO B739 UAL2351 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 62 73 (909) 4,352 229 ‐2.6 (1,047) 343 401 12/1/2018 15:34:00 A SFO E75L SKW5954 SKW BDEGA 28R 62 74 2,066 4,454 201 ‐1.4 (507) 350 401 12/1/2018 15:36:08 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5870 SKW SERFR 28L 57 67 786 4,798 214 ‐3.3 (1,252) 357 401 12/1/2018 15:40:08 D PAO U U U U 31 54 68 2,549 893 127 ‐1.3 (294) 129 401 12/1/2018 15:41:04 A SFO B738 UAL1919 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 67 76 (909) 4,716 208 ‐1.8 (674) 343 401 12/1/2018 15:43:58 A SFO GLEX TWY468 TWY SERFR‐ST 28R 62 73 (905) 4,045 239 ‐1.7 (726) 344 401 12/1/2018 15:45:54 D SJC C421 N700LC GA U 30L 58 71 3,836 1,615 128 1.0 214 301 401 12/1/2018 15:47:27 D PAO U U U U 31 57 69 9,187 9 19 0.0 ‐ 321 401 12/1/2018 15:50:49 A SFO E55P EJA406 EJA SERFR‐ST 28R 61 72 (961) 5,016 239 ‐0.5 (207) 345 401 12/1/2018 15:51:25 A SFO A319 UAL1620 UAL SERFR 28L 60 71 3,099 5,501 215 ‐3.5 (1,335) 10 401 12/1/2018 15:52:20 A SQL BE9L N530CH GA U 30 58 68 (3,852) 2,242 160 ‐2.7 (772) 312 401 12/1/2018 15:55:23 D PAO U U U U 31 53 64 5,155 896 103 ‐0.3 (62) 134 401 12/1/2018 15:58:22 A SQL PC12 N903PJ GA U 30 60 71 (3,853) 1,886 151 ‐0.5 (137) 308 401 12/1/2018 16:05:49 A SFO A320 ASA1959 ASA SERFR 28L 65 74 5,588 4,041 204 ‐0.5 (184) 11 A-24 Figure 9a Correlated Noise Event Report Site 401 ‐ December 1st 2018 Site Event Max Operation Airport Aircraft Flight Airline Procedure Runway Lmax SEL Closest Lateral Dist.Altitude Speed Pitch Alt Delta Heading ID Time Type ID Code dBA (Feet) (ft msl) (Kts) (Degrees) (ft/min) (True) 401 12/1/2018 16:09:03 A SFO B712 DAL2356 DAL SERFR 28L 67 76 (135) 3,991 218 ‐0.4 (134) 25 401 12/1/2018 16:09:31 D PAO C172 N172EL GA U 31 65 74 134 841 97 1.4 236 76 401 12/1/2018 16:12:29 A SFO A321 AAL1983 AAL SERFR 28L 66 78 550 4,177 194 ‐3.0 (1,043) 37 401 12/1/2018 16:14:33 A SFO E75L SKW5861 SKW SERFR 28L 53 65 9,450 5,054 211 ‐4.1 (1,530) 82 401 12/1/2018 16:19:28 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5347 SKW BDEGA 28L 55 64 4,753 5,160 198 ‐5.6 (1,965) 26 401 12/1/2018 16:31:50 D SFO CRJ2 SKW391Z SKW U 01L 53 65 (7,510) 16,354 398 1.6 1,136 105 401 12/1/2018 16:34:21 A PAO P20P N231KD GA U 31 54 67 4,926 710 103 ‐2.9 (526) 139 401 12/1/2018 16:40:04 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5286 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 59 70 (936) 4,608 228 ‐3.2 (1,295) 345 401 12/1/2018 16:42:34 A SFO A320 UAL1243 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 57 70 (804) 4,634 235 ‐1.8 (752) 344 401 12/1/2018 16:45:44 A SFO E75L CPZ6045 CPZ SERFR‐ST 28L 62 75 (986) 3,904 216 ‐3.7 (1,412) 345 401 12/1/2018 16:54:46 D PAO U U U U 31 53 64 5,603 1,000 106 0.0 ‐ 136 401 12/1/2018 16:58:34 A SFO B789 QFA49 QFA OCEANIC 28L 59 71 6,361 4,762 194 ‐2.3 (786) 347 401 12/1/2018 17:00:45 A SFO B737 SWA4139 SWA SERFR‐ST 28L 58 71 (1,060) 4,768 193 ‐3.2 (1,080) 344 401 12/1/2018 17:08:19 A PAO DA40 N202LS GA U 31 60 74 (1,708) 1,205 121 ‐1.4 (296) 51 401 12/1/2018 17:11:33 A SFO E75L SKW5248 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 57 69 (930) 4,970 226 ‐1.4 (540) 345 401 12/1/2018 17:22:02 A SFO B737 SWA3308 SWA SERFR 28L 55 69 5,553 4,888 226 ‐3.7 (1,470) 16 401 12/1/2018 17:23:13 A PAO U U U U H 53 65 2,222 2,037 148 ‐1.4 (356) 79 401 12/1/2018 17:24:56 A SFO A319 UAL1051 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 63 75 (849) 5,142 195 ‐3.8 (1,302) 345 401 12/1/2018 17:30:23 D PAO U U U U 31 60 70 (474) 925 110 ‐2.0 (391) 61 401 12/1/2018 17:34:54 A SFO E75L SKW3460 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 64 74 (975) 3,376 236 ‐5.4 (2,231) 345 401 12/1/2018 17:35:38 A SFO B739 DAL1889 DAL BDEGA 28L 63 75 (1,176) 5,323 210 ‐3.3 (1,206) 42 401 12/1/2018 17:44:21 A SFO A359 FBU711 FBU OCEANIC 28L 61 71 (4,633) 4,082 183 ‐3.2 (1,028) 35 401 12/1/2018 17:47:14 A SFO A320 ASA1933 ASA SERFR‐ST 28L 62 73 (1,144) 4,022 236 0.4 150 344 401 12/1/2018 17:49:10 A SFO B738 DAL1720 DAL SERFR‐ST 28L 64 76 (1,046) 5,042 198 ‐2.1 (736) 344 401 12/1/2018 17:51:12 A SFO A320 ASA1271 ASA SERFR 28L 65 77 (1,097) 5,105 197 ‐1.6 (560) 344 401 12/1/2018 17:53:01 A PAO U U U U H 72 81 156 1,439 133 ‐5.1 (1,195) 84 401 12/1/2018 17:55:43 A SFO B738 UAL1124 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 68 76 (964) 4,682 218 ‐1.6 (621) 343 401 12/1/2018 17:57:58 A SFO B739 UAL632 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 62 75 (946) 4,676 172 ‐2.1 (638) 344 401 12/1/2018 18:06:04 A SFO A319 ASA1273 ASA SERFR 28L 67 77 2,708 4,055 202 ‐1.1 (407) 30 401 12/1/2018 18:09:48 A SFO CRJ9 JZA743 JZA BDEGA 28L 60 67 7,570 4,583 211 ‐3.5 (1,313) 28 401 12/1/2018 18:11:14 A SFO B738 AAL1454 AAL SERFR 28L 54 64 10,296 4,307 205 ‐3.0 (1,080) 14 401 12/1/2018 18:15:49 D PAO U U U U H 64 76 (3,838) 1,598 104 0.1 26 253 401 12/1/2018 18:17:38 A SFO A319 UAL1240 UAL SERFR 28L 53 65 11,862 4,297 164 ‐3.4 (990) 8 401 12/1/2018 18:20:48 A SFO B752 UAL560 UAL BDEGA 28L 56 67 11,854 4,013 157 ‐1.6 (445) 324 401 12/1/2018 18:22:31 A SFO B77W CAL004 CAL OCEANIC 28L 54 67 13,394 6,019 242 ‐1.0 (418) 79 401 12/1/2018 18:26:46 A SFO B77W EVA028 EVA OCEANIC 28L 54 66 401 12/1/2018 18:29:25 A SFO A320 ASA1747 ASA BDEGA 28L 56 68 10,373 3,933 155 ‐1.0 (265) 324 401 12/1/2018 18:39:23 A SFO A320 UAL587 UAL BDEGA 28L 58 70 5,889 6,505 273 ‐1.8 (857) 100 401 12/1/2018 18:41:57 A SFO B737 SWA2989 SWA SERFR 28L 51 65 10,493 5,877 226 ‐4.6 (1,826) 20 401 12/1/2018 18:43:50 A SFO A319 ASA1923 ASA SERFR‐ST 28L 69 80 (831) 3,706 195 ‐4.0 (1,380) 344 401 12/1/2018 18:46:22 A SFO A319 UAL2016 UAL SERFR 28L 54 67 12,546 4,239 195 ‐1.0 (345) 336 401 12/1/2018 18:48:09 A SFO B737 SWA4050 SWA SERFR 28L 60 71 3,320 5,731 197 ‐1.8 (639) 359 401 12/1/2018 18:53:04 A SFO E35L N84AW GA SERFR‐ST 28L 55 67 (985) 5,761 236 ‐4.6 (1,912) 345 401 12/1/2018 18:55:02 A SFO CRJ7 SKW5765 SKW BDEGA 28L 61 71 4,682 3,997 198 ‐0.3 (91) 357 401 12/1/2018 18:55:35 A SFO A321 JBU915 JBU BDEGA 28L 55 66 (10,472) 5,088 291 ‐4.3 (2,220) 113 401 12/1/2018 19:03:17 A SFO B737 SWA3361 SWA SERFR‐ST 28L 59 72 (841) 4,360 217 ‐1.9 (740) 344 401 12/1/2018 19:05:35 A SFO B738 UAL2352 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 65 75 (889) 4,277 227 ‐3.9 (1,575) 344 401 12/1/2018 19:08:08 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5700 SKW BDEGA 28L 56 67 (4,532) 4,056 208 ‐1.4 (527) 38 401 12/1/2018 19:10:58 A SFO A320 TAI564 TAI SERFR‐ST 28L 67 79 (978) 4,288 200 ‐3.5 (1,225) 345 401 12/1/2018 19:12:23 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5457 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 56 68 (990) 4,784 214 ‐2.5 (940) 343 401 12/1/2018 19:14:01 A SFO B739 UAL1604 UAL OCEANIC 28L 57 71 7,176 4,279 211 ‐3.4 (1,274) 33 401 12/1/2018 19:16:45 A SFO B77W SIA2 SIA OCEANIC 28L 59 73 3,402 4,438 220 ‐3.1 (1,197) 31 401 12/1/2018 19:18:07 A SFO A321 AAL686 AAL SERFR 28R 56 70 10,535 5,068 176 ‐5.8 (1,793) 346 401 12/1/2018 19:19:52 A SFO A319 ASA1279 ASA SERFR 28L 60 74 3,066 5,667 207 ‐3.9 (1,422) 12 401 12/1/2018 19:22:00 A SFO A388 DLH458 DLH BDEGA 28R 59 69 10,582 4,041 196 ‐1.9 (644) 344 401 12/1/2018 19:26:47 A SFO E75L SKW5592 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 57 70 (981) 4,238 195 ‐3.3 (1,145) 344 401 12/1/2018 19:28:47 A SFO B737 SWA4154 SWA SERFR 28L 59 71 5,019 4,598 204 ‐4.5 (1,606) 11 401 12/1/2018 19:42:58 A SFO E75L CPZ6015 CPZ SERFR‐ST 28L 60 71 (905) 5,327 176 ‐3.5 (1,098) 344 401 12/1/2018 19:44:43 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5718 SKW BDEGA 28L 52 65 5,687 4,770 219 ‐4.1 (1,598) 30 401 12/1/2018 19:46:01 D SFO B739 UAL394 UAL U 01L 54 67 (2,050) 15,937 430 2.7 2,011 106 401 12/1/2018 19:47:18 A SFO A319 ASA1595 ASA SERFR‐ST 28R 66 78 (1,017) 4,418 166 ‐3.7 (1,095) 345 401 12/1/2018 19:48:50 A SFO B772 UAL340 UAL BDEGA 28L 57 68 4,879 5,772 202 ‐2.9 (1,029) 60 401 12/1/2018 19:53:31 D SFO A320 ASA1940 ASA U 01L 53 66 (5,710) 16,792 451 2.7 2,142 105 401 12/1/2018 19:54:27 A SFO E75L SKW5440 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 58 71 (975) 4,674 234 ‐2.8 (1,140) 345 401 12/1/2018 19:55:57 A SFO B752 UAL1584 UAL BDEGA 28L 59 74 (851) 5,381 176 ‐6.4 (1,975) 37 401 12/1/2018 19:58:59 A SFO B739 UAL2201 UAL SERFR 28L 62 75 4,994 4,012 197 ‐0.1 (47) 346 401 12/1/2018 20:00:23 A SFO B38M ACA781 ACA BDEGA 28L 62 74 1,279 4,143 176 ‐4.1 (1,275) 345 401 12/1/2018 20:03:01 A SFO B739 UAL384 UAL SERFR 28L 64 76 (188) 4,594 201 ‐3.8 (1,356) 355 401 12/1/2018 20:05:52 A SFO E75L QXE2271 QXE BDEGA 28L 62 74 6,121 5,285 213 ‐8.2 (3,090) 32 401 12/1/2018 20:11:00 A SFO B789 UAL28 UAL OCEANIC 28L 62 74 (4,304) 4,038 202 ‐1.5 (525) 29 401 12/1/2018 20:13:38 A SFO A320 ASA1963 ASA SERFR‐ST 28L 69 80 (1,095) 4,064 201 ‐1.8 (628) 344 401 12/1/2018 20:18:44 A SFO A332 HAL12 HAL OCEANIC 28L 54 64 14,595 4,176 181 ‐1.7 (540) 344 401 12/1/2018 20:22:35 A SFO A321 AAL547 AAL BDEGA 28L 66 76 4,515 4,800 221 ‐5.3 (2,069) 86 401 12/1/2018 20:25:21 A SFO B738 UAL1152 UAL OCEANIC 28L 55 69 7,613 4,005 189 0.0 ‐ 351 401 12/1/2018 20:28:58 A SFO A320 ASA1945 ASA SERFR‐ST 28L 65 77 (1,994) 4,533 197 ‐3.5 (1,230) 343 401 12/1/2018 20:32:09 A SFO B789 ACA739 ACA BDEGA 28L 51 62 (13,325) 3,934 193 ‐0.9 (304) 31 401 12/1/2018 20:34:40 A SFO B739 UAL643 UAL OCEANIC 28L 58 67 (7,888) 3,819 205 ‐3.7 (1,321) 22 401 12/1/2018 20:35:09 A SFO B77W CPA872 CPA BDEGA 28L 53 64 9,755 5,588 221 ‐2.6 (1,022) 48 401 12/1/2018 20:41:31 A SFO B738 UAL1722 UAL OCEANIC 28L 64 73 (3,646) 5,212 194 ‐4.5 (1,530) 357 401 12/1/2018 20:58:53 D SFO B752 UAL349 UAL U 01L 50 64 (2,307) 16,086 464 2.8 2,310 106 401 12/1/2018 21:03:32 A SFO GLF4 WWI31 WWI SERFR‐ST 28L 63 74 (1,142) 4,357 198 ‐3.4 (1,190) 343 401 12/1/2018 21:05:48 A SFO B738 UAL2132 UAL BDEGA 28L 54 67 (11,194) 3,969 212 0.0 ‐ 33 401 12/1/2018 21:13:05 A SFO E75L QXE2038 QXE SERFR‐ST 28L 60 70 (966) 4,026 215 ‐1.8 (680) 345 401 12/1/2018 21:14:28 A SFO A320 UAL1217 UAL BDEGA 28L 57 69 5,565 5,223 221 ‐3.1 (1,212) 15 401 12/1/2018 21:16:50 A SFO E75L SKW5681 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 61 74 (952) 4,603 184 ‐4.2 (1,352) 344 401 12/1/2018 21:19:15 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5366 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 58 70 (996) 4,192 210 ‐4.5 (1,680) 346 401 12/1/2018 21:20:40 D SFO A20N FFT1998 FFT U 01L 55 66 4,431 17,096 452 2.9 2,295 107 401 12/1/2018 21:26:33 A SFO B737 SWA485 SWA SERFR‐ST 28L 62 71 (954) 4,718 219 ‐2.5 (984) 344 A-25 Figure 9a Correlated Noise Event Report Site 401 ‐ December 1st 2018 Site Event Max Operation Airport Aircraft Flight Airline Procedure Runway Lmax SEL Closest Lateral Dist.Altitude Speed Pitch Alt Delta Heading ID Time Type ID Code dBA (Feet) (ft msl) (Kts) (Degrees) (ft/min) (True) 401 12/1/2018 21:28:44 A SFO GLF4 U U SERFR‐ST 28R 62 72 (1,033) 4,230 238 ‐3.2 (1,355) 343 401 12/1/2018 21:30:32 A SFO CRJ7 SKW5873 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 55 68 (891) 4,796 208 ‐2.3 (827) 344 401 12/1/2018 21:32:17 A SFO B739 UAL1568 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 64 75 (926) 5,136 206 ‐2.4 (885) 343 401 12/1/2018 21:35:08 A SFO B738 AMX664 AMX SERFR‐ST 28L 60 71 (946) 5,043 202 ‐1.5 (545) 344 401 12/1/2018 21:38:17 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5616 SKW SERFR 28L 53 63 7,440 5,102 205 ‐3.8 (1,380) 9 401 12/1/2018 21:40:01 A SFO E75L SKW5483 SKW SERFR 28L 57 68 1,915 5,637 229 ‐3.4 (1,359) 8 401 12/1/2018 21:42:48 A SFO A332 HAL42 HAL OCEANIC 28L 59 69 11,103 4,044 169 ‐1.0 (300) 348 401 12/1/2018 21:46:06 A SFO E75L SKW3381 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 60 73 (964) 4,744 192 ‐2.7 (917) 345 401 12/1/2018 21:49:26 A SFO A320 ASA1776 ASA BDEGA 28L 65 74 3,577 4,842 213 ‐4.4 (1,648) 41 401 12/1/2018 21:51:56 A SFO A320 ACA568 ACA BDEGA 28L 69 78 (1,586) 4,199 203 ‐2.2 (780) 3 401 12/1/2018 21:53:49 A SFO A321 JBU833 JBU BDEGA 28L 55 67 (8,898) 4,090 175 ‐2.5 (774) 17 401 12/1/2018 21:56:06 D OAK B38M SWA6868 SWA U 30 54 64 (1,329) 15,998 407 3.2 2,306 139 401 12/1/2018 22:01:56 A SFO A320 AIJ830 AIJ SERFR‐ST 28L 60 72 (940) 4,735 224 ‐3.3 (1,300) 345 401 12/1/2018 22:04:03 A SFO B738 DAL1700 DAL SERFR‐ST 28L 66 77 (956) 4,330 197 ‐4.0 (1,387) 344 401 12/1/2018 22:14:27 A SFO B739 UAL650 UAL OCEANIC 28L 61 73 (3,834) 5,176 215 ‐4.5 (1,725) 31 401 12/1/2018 22:34:20 A SFO CRJ7 SKW5461 SKW SERFR‐ST 28R 55 67 (633) 5,114 198 ‐2.6 (914) 346 401 12/1/2018 22:38:24 A SFO E75L CPZ6085 CPZ SERFR‐ST 28R 60 73 (942) 5,084 202 ‐2.4 (840) 344 401 12/1/2018 22:40:37 A SFO B738 UAL1712 UAL SERFR‐ST 28R 61 74 (954) 4,937 186 ‐3.2 (1,035) 343 401 12/1/2018 22:42:28 A SFO B738 ASA759 ASA OCEANIC 28R 61 73 3,786 5,204 182 ‐4.2 (1,335) 4 401 12/1/2018 22:45:32 A SFO B738 UAL1288 UAL OCEANIC 28R 61 72 (2,666) 6,083 232 ‐1.9 (787) 26 401 12/1/2018 22:59:18 D SFO B752 UAL2360 UAL U 01R 51 64 9,230 14,190 444 1.9 1,462 122 401 12/1/2018 23:05:05 A SFO B738 CMP382 CMP SERFR‐ST 28R 64 76 (945) 4,797 204 ‐2.4 (874) 344 401 12/1/2018 23:10:01 A SFO A321 AAL2374 AAL BDEGA 28R 61 70 (4,859) 4,201 203 ‐3.5 (1,243) 67 401 12/1/2018 23:15:43 D SFO B752 UAL308 UAL U 01L 50 64 12,980 16,979 394 1.4 981 107 401 12/1/2018 23:17:35 A SFO B738 UAL435 UAL OCEANIC 28R 57 69 6,082 5,869 232 ‐3.3 (1,365) 32 401 12/1/2018 23:21:00 A SFO B738 AMX662 AMX SERFR‐ST 28R 66 76 (821) 4,284 237 ‐3.5 (1,470) 345 401 12/1/2018 23:21:37 A SFO B752 DAL2344 DAL BDEGA 28R 58 72 3,920 5,708 216 ‐5.5 (2,096) 39 401 12/1/2018 23:25:24 A SFO B752 UAL1056 UAL BDEGA 28R 56 69 (2,703) 5,580 213 ‐2.5 (930) 120 401 12/1/2018 23:38:20 A SFO A320 TAI560 TAI SERFR‐ST 28R 65 75 (991) 4,682 226 ‐1.8 (710) 345 BridgeNet International 2019 A-26 Figure 9b Correlated Noise Event Report Site 402 ‐ December 1st 2018 Site Event Max Operation Airport Aircraft Flight Airline Procedure Runway Lmax SEL Closest Lateral Dist.Altitude Speed Pitch Alt Delta Heading ID Time Type ID Code dBA (Feet) (ft msl) (Kts) (Degrees) (ft/min) (True) 402 12/1/2018 0:03:08 A SFO B738 ASA762 ASA OCEANIC 28R 61 72 (229) 6,774 230 ‐2.3 (925) 52 402 12/1/2018 0:10:05 A SFO B738 AMX664 AMX SERFR‐ST 28R 63 75 1,971 4,856 203 ‐3.7 (1,305) 345 402 12/1/2018 0:12:38 A SFO E75L CPZ6020 CPZ SERFR‐ST 28R 60 72 1,960 5,045 191 ‐2.3 (763) 345 402 12/1/2018 0:17:07 A SFO B748 KAL213 KAL SERFR‐ST 28R 67 80 1,868 5,178 288 ‐2.1 (1,048) 346 402 12/1/2018 0:22:59 A SFO B738 AMX662 AMX SERFR‐ST 28R 60 73 1,850 4,865 183 ‐2.4 (783) 346 402 12/1/2018 0:37:06 A SFO A320 ASA1949 ASA SERFR‐ST 28R 61 75 1,536 4,261 179 ‐3.8 (1,185) 346 402 12/1/2018 1:19:03 A SFO C750 U U SERFR 28R 57 69 (1,174) 4,046 244 ‐1.4 (613) 336 402 12/1/2018 2:12:17 D PAO EC35 CMD12 CMD U H 48 58 12,034 98 7 0.0 ‐ 344 402 12/1/2018 2:51:31 A SFO B744 AAR284 AAR SERFR‐ST 28R 70 80 1,858 4,833 217 ‐2.7 (1,043) 345 402 12/1/2018 3:25:16 A SFO B739 UAL2550 UAL BDEGA 28R 58 69 6,902 3,997 215 ‐0.1 (52) 66 402 12/1/2018 3:46:24 A SFO B738 UAL1639 UAL OCEANIC 28L 63 73 3,087 6,763 258 ‐1.6 (724) 68 402 12/1/2018 3:58:04 A SFO B738 UAL1724 UAL OCEANIC 28R 66 75 1,289 5,990 256 ‐3.5 (1,561) 69 402 12/1/2018 4:09:10 A SFO B772 UAL396 UAL OCEANIC 28R 57 69 (6,103) 6,551 267 ‐0.9 (410) 32 402 12/1/2018 4:10:37 A SFO B738 UAL1746 UAL OCEANIC 28R 61 71 3,054 7,602 247 ‐2.5 (1,080) 69 402 12/1/2018 4:39:21 A SFO B753 UAL2553 UAL BDEGA 28R 45 61 402 12/1/2018 5:13:14 A SFO B789 UAL955 UAL BDEGA 28R 64 74 3,348 4,479 289 ‐3.6 (1,815) 105 402 12/1/2018 5:36:50 A SFO B738 UAL1557 UAL OCEANIC 28R 65 77 3,266 5,947 276 ‐5.1 (2,460) 80 402 12/1/2018 5:38:17 A SFO B77W AIC173 AIC OTHER 28R 52 64 402 12/1/2018 5:46:47 A SFO B753 UAL1575 UAL OCEANIC 28R 59 70 7,023 6,867 264 ‐2.5 (1,149) 80 402 12/1/2018 5:49:12 A SFO B77W UAL916 UAL OCEANIC 28R 60 73 5,310 6,348 256 ‐3.9 (1,746) 79 402 12/1/2018 6:03:48 A SFO B77W EVA008 EVA BDEGA 28R 59 72 2,163 5,927 227 ‐3.2 (1,285) 114 402 12/1/2018 6:11:59 A SJC GALX U U U 12R 47 62 13,025 2,155 217 ‐2.2 (825) 13 402 12/1/2018 6:20:55 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5738 SKW BDEGA 28R 46 58 (10,086) 4,313 261 ‐5.7 (2,610) 52 402 12/1/2018 6:28:39 A SFO P28A UAL872 UAL BDEGA 28R 61 73 4,710 5,652 266 ‐2.8 (1,316) 105 402 12/1/2018 6:40:11 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5276 SKW BDEGA 28R 52 66 5,094 4,617 255 ‐3.7 (1,675) 38 402 12/1/2018 6:57:47 A SFO E75L SKW5358 SKW BDEGA 28R 58 69 (12,043) 4,021 248 ‐4.7 (2,070) 71 402 12/1/2018 7:01:13 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5631 SKW SERFR‐ST 28R 57 70 1,874 4,584 219 ‐2.3 (892) 345 402 12/1/2018 7:03:52 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5667 SKW SERFR‐ST 28R 59 71 1,965 4,829 227 ‐3.4 (1,371) 345 402 12/1/2018 7:06:00 A SFO E75L SKW5601 SKW SERFR‐ST 28R 60 71 1,946 4,872 232 ‐3.0 (1,230) 345 402 12/1/2018 7:08:08 A SFO A320 UAL2350 UAL SERFR‐ST 28R 58 70 2,017 4,783 234 ‐1.3 (521) 346 402 12/1/2018 7:10:20 A SFO A319 UAL295 UAL SERFR‐ST 28R 61 73 1,847 4,770 214 ‐2.8 (1,048) 345 402 12/1/2018 7:11:31 A SFO B738 UAL805 UAL BDEGA 28R 60 72 (4,753) 5,437 227 ‐3.6 (1,451) 45 402 12/1/2018 7:13:47 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5496 SKW BDEGA 28R 57 69 (2,978) 5,429 210 ‐3.6 (1,335) 81 402 12/1/2018 7:15:15 A SFO A359 SIA32 SIA BDEGA 28R 63 71 4,621 5,724 222 ‐2.7 (1,073) 112 402 12/1/2018 7:34:47 A SFO E75L CPZ6034 CPZ SERFR‐ST 28L 60 74 1,974 4,964 199 ‐1.7 (585) 345 402 12/1/2018 7:37:02 A SFO A320 ASA1925 ASA SERFR‐ST 28L 62 72 1,812 4,136 243 ‐1.9 (824) 346 402 12/1/2018 7:37:25 A SFO B789 UAL858 UAL BDEGA 28R 63 74 1,032 5,570 259 ‐3.6 (1,653) 47 402 12/1/2018 7:50:48 A SFO A320 UAL618 UAL BDEGA 28L 65 76 1,835 5,495 233 ‐4.3 (1,770) 116 402 12/1/2018 7:54:58 A SFO A320 UAL612 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 67 77 1,922 4,572 185 ‐3.4 (1,104) 345 402 12/1/2018 7:58:44 A SFO A320 JBU1136 JBU SERFR‐ST 28L 64 76 1,946 3,989 222 ‐0.2 (92) 346 402 12/1/2018 8:02:10 A SJC A320 JBU826 JBU U 12R 52 68 10,242 2,027 209 ‐1.7 (630) 2 402 12/1/2018 8:04:23 A SJC B737 SWA2630 SWA U 12R 57 68 7,991 2,982 158 ‐0.2 (46) 351 402 12/1/2018 8:07:16 A SFO CRJ7 SKW5464 SKW BDEGA 28L 60 71 3,099 5,913 239 ‐4.0 (1,707) 85 402 12/1/2018 8:13:12 A SFO A320 ASA1951 ASA SERFR 28L 66 78 2,105 4,373 182 ‐4.1 (1,298) 344 402 12/1/2018 8:15:15 A SFO A21N ASA1591 ASA SERFR‐ST 28L 60 73 1,739 5,124 212 ‐4.2 (1,572) 345 402 12/1/2018 8:18:31 A SFO B739 UAL1294 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 61 72 1,984 4,711 243 ‐3.0 (1,266) 345 402 12/1/2018 8:20:54 A SFO B77W UAL838 UAL OCEANIC 28R 65 77 1,691 6,365 238 ‐3.0 (1,271) 34 402 12/1/2018 8:24:07 A SFO B77W ANA8 ANA BDEGA 28R 63 76 (3,134) 5,611 251 ‐3.7 (1,633) 43 402 12/1/2018 8:26:25 A SFO B77W CES589 CES BDEGA 28L 64 75 1,897 4,744 209 ‐3.2 (1,161) 40 402 12/1/2018 8:33:14 A SFO E75L SKW5642 SKW BDEGA 28L 61 73 (5,021) 5,003 238 ‐0.3 (135) 77 402 12/1/2018 8:35:03 A SFO B739 UAL662 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 60 74 1,934 4,534 181 ‐4.1 (1,310) 345 402 12/1/2018 8:36:07 A SFO A332 CES767 CES BDEGA 28R 62 73 4,106 6,908 228 ‐3.3 (1,344) 96 402 12/1/2018 8:40:25 A SFO E75L QXE2283 QXE BDEGA 28L 59 72 3,749 6,669 270 ‐2.2 (1,052) 76 402 12/1/2018 8:44:40 A SFO B77W CPA870 CPA BDEGA 28R 59 74 (4,426) 7,051 236 ‐4.1 (1,704) 114 402 12/1/2018 8:49:28 A SFO B77W KAL023 KAL BDEGA 28R 65 77 2,200 4,046 231 ‐1.0 (412) 36 402 12/1/2018 8:52:14 A SFO A320 ACA574 ACA BDEGA 28L 57 70 (9,235) 6,165 254 ‐0.6 (268) 113 402 12/1/2018 8:56:08 A SJC E75L CPZ5772 CPZ U 12R 51 64 8,636 2,086 206 ‐2.7 (975) 5 402 12/1/2018 8:58:13 A SJC B788 ANA172 ANA U 12R 53 67 10,533 2,814 187 ‐2.4 (798) 10 402 12/1/2018 9:01:04 A SJC E75L QXE2810 QXE U 12R 55 66 10,192 2,955 179 ‐1.9 (600) 8 402 12/1/2018 9:02:32 A SJC GLF6 N240CX GA U 12R 50 65 9,240 2,880 170 ‐2.9 (885) 354 402 12/1/2018 9:05:30 A SJC B737 SWA921 SWA U 12R 53 64 10,059 2,781 190 ‐3.8 (1,290) 358 402 12/1/2018 9:11:35 A SFO B738 UAL1615 UAL BDEGA 28L 61 74 476 6,741 261 ‐4.0 (1,830) 113 402 12/1/2018 9:15:57 A SFO B738 UAL2055 UAL BDEGA 28L 62 73 5,759 5,119 217 ‐1.7 (639) 59 402 12/1/2018 9:19:26 A SFO B752 UAL433 UAL BDEGA 28R 49 61 (11,878) 7,140 232 ‐2.4 (973) 116 402 12/1/2018 9:23:04 A SFO A319 ASA1751 ASA BDEGA 28L 51 64 11,657 5,201 246 ‐4.0 (1,717) 44 402 12/1/2018 9:25:31 D SFO A319 UAL1406 UAL U 28L 63 73 (336) 17,004 465 1.8 1,443 106 402 12/1/2018 9:27:44 A SFO A319 UAL820 UAL SERFR 28L 59 69 6,240 5,064 238 ‐1.4 (583) 77 402 12/1/2018 9:32:46 A SFO B789 UAL876 UAL BDEGA 28R 66 78 (940) 4,800 215 ‐0.8 (317) 1 402 12/1/2018 9:43:41 A SFO CRJ9 JZA579 JZA BDEGA 28L 59 70 (249) 5,017 215 ‐0.2 (77) 3 402 12/1/2018 9:56:16 A SQL PC12 N903PJ GA U 30 69 79 (712) 1,939 133 ‐0.9 (217) 316 402 12/1/2018 9:57:40 A SJC C56X U U U 12R 53 67 9,932 3,047 178 ‐1.2 (390) 13 402 12/1/2018 10:01:02 A SJC B737 SWA3249 SWA U 12R 55 66 8,480 2,735 200 ‐2.9 (1,035) 1 402 12/1/2018 10:04:16 A SFO A321 JBU133 JBU MISSED 28L 56 68 6,781 5,011 196 0.1 45 73 402 12/1/2018 10:24:03 A SFO B77W CSN659 CSN BDEGA 28R 61 72 9,417 5,015 203 ‐0.9 (309) 21 402 12/1/2018 10:25:37 D SFO B737 SWA4698 SWA U 28R 69 78 (8,832) 19,002 460 3.5 2,805 105 402 12/1/2018 10:51:57 A SFO B77W ANZ8 ANZ OCEANIC 28R 55 67 9,682 4,141 207 ‐1.9 (682) 12 402 12/1/2018 10:54:25 A SFO E75L QXE2267 QXE BDEGA 28L 52 62 11,103 4,178 179 ‐3.2 (1,005) 355 402 12/1/2018 10:58:50 A SFO A332 FJI870 FJI OCEANIC 28R 66 76 6,646 5,170 257 ‐4.2 (1,903) 51 402 12/1/2018 11:09:26 D SQL S22T N173CK GA U 30 60 70 10,595 2,281 174 3.3 1,000 107 402 12/1/2018 11:20:10 A SQL BE35 N8366D GA U 30 61 72 (343) 2,098 94 ‐3.1 (516) 312 402 12/1/2018 11:27:00 A SFO A319 UAL698 UAL OCEANIC 28R 59 71 11,413 5,972 226 ‐0.6 (230) 65 402 12/1/2018 11:29:46 D SFO B738 UAL2128 UAL U 28R 56 66 (1,532) 16,348 452 1.2 990 106 402 12/1/2018 11:31:04 A SFO B739 ASA484 ASA OCEANIC 28L 56 67 (10,273) 6,017 255 0.1 45 102 402 12/1/2018 11:33:23 D SQL SR20 N321SL GA U 30 55 71 (648) 2,128 84 ‐2.6 (390) 312 402 12/1/2018 11:35:54 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5899 SKW BDEGA 28L 57 69 4,474 5,040 223 ‐1.9 (752) 88 402 12/1/2018 11:38:22 A SFO A320 ASA1027 ASA SERFR 28L 61 74 9,010 6,000 259 0.0 ‐ 87 402 12/1/2018 11:59:59 A SFO A319 ASA1332 ASA BDEGA 28L 75 82 8,382 4,111 227 ‐1.6 (641) 51 402 12/1/2018 12:05:29 A SFO B744 QFA73 QFA OCEANIC 28R 56 68 13,836 5,081 195 ‐7.1 (2,430) 12 A-27 Figure 9b Correlated Noise Event Report Site 402 ‐ December 1st 2018 Site Event Max Operation Airport Aircraft Flight Airline Procedure Runway Lmax SEL Closest Lateral Dist.Altitude Speed Pitch Alt Delta Heading ID Time Type ID Code dBA (Feet) (ft msl) (Kts) (Degrees) (ft/min) (True) 402 12/1/2018 12:11:14 A SFO A388 UAE225 UAE BDEGA 28R 63 75 4,914 4,987 238 ‐1.1 (450) 30 402 12/1/2018 12:17:32 D PAO U U U U 31 60 71 6,878 1,003 109 ‐0.5 (98) 133 402 12/1/2018 12:23:06 A SFO B772 UAL949 UAL BDEGA 28L 61 71 9,555 5,276 197 ‐2.7 (937) 30 402 12/1/2018 12:26:41 A SFO E75L SKW5586 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 63 75 1,953 4,308 206 ‐1.9 (703) 345 402 12/1/2018 12:29:37 A SFO E75L SKW5446 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 61 72 1,973 5,188 203 ‐0.3 (97) 345 402 12/1/2018 12:32:59 A SFO A320 AIJ820 AIJ SERFR‐ST 28L 66 76 1,792 5,022 186 ‐0.1 (28) 344 402 12/1/2018 12:35:00 O UNK CRJ2 SKW5332 SKW U U 62 72 402 12/1/2018 12:37:05 A SFO A321 AAL789 AAL SERFR‐ST 28L 67 76 2,096 4,346 203 ‐3.1 (1,128) 345 402 12/1/2018 12:40:21 A SFO E75L SKW5203 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 60 71 1,933 4,836 209 ‐2.9 (1,073) 345 402 12/1/2018 12:46:46 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5655 SKW SERFR 28L 61 72 1,355 6,059 238 ‐3.3 (1,380) 345 402 12/1/2018 12:59:10 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5476 SKW SERFR 28L 54 68 4,883 5,012 239 ‐0.3 (114) 15 402 12/1/2018 13:01:41 A SFO B738 ASA621 ASA SERFR 28L 55 69 12,138 4,978 218 0.0 (6) 7 402 12/1/2018 13:03:05 A SFO A346 DLH454 DLH BDEGA 28L 55 68 10,632 5,990 214 0.4 144 51 402 12/1/2018 13:06:47 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5416 SKW SERFR‐ST 28R 59 68 1,554 5,108 205 ‐4.2 (1,525) 346 402 12/1/2018 13:08:49 A SFO B737 SWA4136 SWA SERFR‐ST 28L 66 76 1,921 4,393 200 ‐5.1 (1,786) 344 402 12/1/2018 13:11:37 A SFO A320 ASA1804 ASA BDEGA 28L 64 74 (1,993) 5,002 211 ‐3.9 (1,440) ‐ 402 12/1/2018 13:13:42 A SFO CRJ7 SKW5697 SKW BDEGA 28L 62 74 (1,132) 4,894 218 ‐4.5 (1,725) 19 402 12/1/2018 13:16:39 A SFO B77W KAL025 KAL BDEGA 28L 63 72 5,541 6,215 229 ‐5.1 (2,070) 16 402 12/1/2018 13:20:00 A SFO A319 UAL1745 UAL BDEGA 28L 60 70 7,533 4,681 233 ‐3.2 (1,320) 43 402 12/1/2018 13:23:44 A SFO E75L SKW5967 SKW BDEGA 28L 56 68 (7,839) 5,846 237 ‐2.2 (915) 107 402 12/1/2018 13:29:24 A SFO B77W AFR084 AFR BDEGA 28L 68 78 2,757 5,085 222 ‐4.0 (1,565) 22 402 12/1/2018 13:33:15 A SFO B744 BAW11M BAW BDEGA 28L 62 74 (6,262) 4,924 216 ‐3.4 (1,275) 31 402 12/1/2018 13:41:48 A SFO B738 UAL390 UAL SERFR 28L 63 76 1,930 4,538 215 ‐3.4 (1,296) 29 402 12/1/2018 13:44:51 A SFO B737 SWA974 SWA SERFR 28L 54 67 9,992 5,427 214 ‐4.1 (1,555) 10 402 12/1/2018 13:46:16 A SFO CRJ7 SKW5615 SKW BDEGA 28L 67 75 (223) 4,066 213 ‐2.0 (766) 49 402 12/1/2018 13:51:34 A SFO A319 ASA1340 ASA BDEGA 28R 67 76 (1,621) 4,586 228 ‐5.5 (2,205) 61 402 12/1/2018 13:58:02 A SFO A320 UAL2383 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 69 77 1,968 4,140 201 ‐4.8 (1,710) 345 402 12/1/2018 14:07:33 A SFO B39M CMP208 CMP SERFR‐ST 28L 60 71 1,990 4,813 217 ‐2.7 (1,035) 344 402 12/1/2018 14:09:51 A SFO B739 UAL444 UAL SERFR 28L 58 71 3,990 4,646 231 ‐2.8 (1,141) 341 402 12/1/2018 14:12:42 A SFO E75L CPZ6007 CPZ SERFR‐ST 28L 61 71 1,907 4,805 222 ‐2.0 (768) 345 402 12/1/2018 14:14:37 A SFO B738 SWA3950 SWA SERFR‐ST 28L 60 73 1,957 4,294 233 ‐3.8 (1,570) 345 402 12/1/2018 14:17:06 A SFO B739 UAL372 UAL OCEANIC 28L 65 75 2,002 4,934 215 ‐2.7 (1,020) 345 402 12/1/2018 14:19:57 D PAO U U U U 31 57 67 (3,756) 1,634 109 ‐3.0 (576) 53 402 12/1/2018 14:25:43 A SFO B772 UAL900 UAL BDEGA 28L 63 72 (5,914) 4,979 213 0.0 ‐ 61 402 12/1/2018 14:27:55 A SFO B77W EVA018 EVA OCEANIC 28L 67 77 988 5,404 239 ‐3.7 (1,575) 31 402 12/1/2018 14:30:01 A SFO B752 UAL477 UAL BDEGA 28L 61 72 4,955 5,866 216 ‐5.2 (1,969) 31 402 12/1/2018 14:59:23 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5984 SKW SERFR 28L 56 65 2,106 5,215 213 ‐3.7 (1,374) 343 402 12/1/2018 15:06:57 A SFO B789 UAL892 UAL OCEANIC 28L 60 71 9,995 4,753 238 ‐2.1 (875) 19 402 12/1/2018 15:09:04 A SFO A332 EIN147 EIN BDEGA 28L 60 70 8,818 5,152 222 ‐3.5 (1,380) ‐ 402 12/1/2018 15:11:39 A SFO E75L QXE2042 QXE SERFR‐ST 28L 57 69 1,989 5,308 235 ‐5.2 (2,160) 345 402 12/1/2018 15:12:44 A SFO E75L QXE2042 QXE SERFR‐ST 28L 57 68 1,989 5,308 235 ‐5.2 (2,160) 345 402 12/1/2018 15:17:53 A SFO E75L SKW5617 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 61 71 1,934 5,129 202 ‐4.2 (1,495) 345 402 12/1/2018 15:29:17 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5362 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 66 74 2,057 4,845 230 ‐2.4 (990) 344 402 12/1/2018 15:31:48 A SFO B739 UAL2351 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 62 74 2,022 4,405 229 ‐2.8 (1,146) 344 402 12/1/2018 15:34:08 A SFO E75L SKW5954 SKW BDEGA 28R 62 74 4,855 4,490 199 ‐0.7 (242) 349 402 12/1/2018 15:35:57 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5870 SKW SERFR 28L 56 68 3,342 4,911 214 ‐3.3 (1,230) 357 402 12/1/2018 15:41:03 A SFO B738 UAL1919 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 65 76 2,022 4,757 210 ‐1.5 (545) 344 402 12/1/2018 15:43:52 A SFO GLEX TWY468 TWY SERFR‐ST 28R 62 73 2,004 4,081 239 ‐2.0 (836) 345 402 12/1/2018 15:45:47 D SJC C421 N700LC GA U 30L 60 67 6,816 1,624 126 0.4 86 301 402 12/1/2018 15:50:50 A SFO E55P EJA406 EJA SERFR‐ST 28R 61 72 1,925 5,027 238 ‐0.5 (222) 345 402 12/1/2018 15:52:25 A SQL BE9L N530CH GA U 30 64 75 (732) 2,216 159 ‐2.7 (748) 311 402 12/1/2018 15:55:51 D PAO U U U U 31 60 70 8,303 898 103 ‐0.5 (93) 134 402 12/1/2018 15:58:19 A SFO B739 UAL1687 UAL SERFR 28L 67 77 13,558 6,026 184 0.3 80 22 402 12/1/2018 15:59:40 D SFO A321 AAL1844 AAL U 01L 60 71 (3,819) 15,783 415 3.7 2,745 134 402 12/1/2018 16:05:44 A SFO A320 ASA1959 ASA SERFR 28L 65 72 7,606 4,068 198 ‐1.1 (393) 11 402 12/1/2018 16:09:06 A SFO B712 DAL2356 DAL SERFR 28L 64 76 1,249 4,002 218 0.3 108 23 402 12/1/2018 16:09:47 D PAO C172 N172EL GA U 31 60 69 (387) 806 110 ‐0.6 (121) 43 402 12/1/2018 16:12:25 A SFO A321 AAL1983 AAL SERFR 28L 66 78 1,349 4,359 190 ‐4.3 (1,440) 33 402 12/1/2018 16:14:24 A SFO E75L SKW5861 SKW SERFR 28L 54 67 7,833 5,248 210 ‐4.4 (1,611) 82 402 12/1/2018 16:19:35 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5347 SKW BDEGA 28L 59 70 6,001 5,469 192 ‐5.2 (1,766) 32 402 12/1/2018 16:34:14 A PAO P20P N231KD GA U 31 59 67 8,094 711 103 ‐2.9 (530) 139 402 12/1/2018 16:40:00 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5286 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 59 71 1,965 4,678 226 ‐3.4 (1,354) 345 402 12/1/2018 16:42:31 A SFO A320 UAL1243 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 57 70 2,108 4,672 231 ‐2.2 (898) 344 402 12/1/2018 16:45:46 A SFO E75L CPZ6045 CPZ SERFR‐ST 28L 62 73 1,906 3,987 218 ‐3.6 (1,398) 345 402 12/1/2018 16:54:26 D PAO U U U U 31 61 69 8,761 1,000 106 0.0 ‐ 136 402 12/1/2018 16:58:39 A SFO B789 QFA49 QFA OCEANIC 28L 57 70 9,199 4,825 193 ‐2.4 (822) 349 402 12/1/2018 17:00:37 A SFO B737 SWA4139 SWA SERFR‐ST 28L 58 72 1,852 4,836 193 ‐3.1 (1,069) 344 402 12/1/2018 17:07:35 A PAO DA40 N202LS GA U 31 58 70 (1,579) 1,308 111 ‐2.6 (512) 46 402 12/1/2018 17:11:28 A SFO E75L SKW5248 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 59 71 1,971 4,999 218 ‐0.9 (340) 345 402 12/1/2018 17:19:55 D PAO U U U U 31 55 67 12,356 9 54 0.0 ‐ 322 402 12/1/2018 17:22:43 A PAO U U U U H 56 69 741 2,097 108 ‐1.3 (243) 82 402 12/1/2018 17:24:42 A SFO A319 UAL1051 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 61 73 2,050 5,228 197 ‐3.5 (1,213) 345 402 12/1/2018 17:30:05 D PAO U U U U 31 55 67 (1,000) 1,033 111 ‐4.0 (780) 63 402 12/1/2018 17:34:49 A SFO E75L SKW3460 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 63 73 1,927 3,493 233 ‐5.5 (2,262) 345 402 12/1/2018 17:35:34 A SFO B739 DAL1889 DAL BDEGA 28L 64 73 (807) 5,500 204 ‐3.9 (1,395) 50 402 12/1/2018 17:38:52 D SFO B712 DAL1048 DAL U 01L 57 69 (9,570) 12,678 377 2.8 1,835 137 402 12/1/2018 17:44:16 A SFO A359 FBU711 FBU OCEANIC 28L 62 72 (3,908) 4,205 192 ‐1.7 (583) 44 402 12/1/2018 17:47:21 A SFO A320 ASA1933 ASA SERFR‐ST 28L 62 74 1,777 4,014 234 0.2 61 344 402 12/1/2018 17:49:08 A SFO B738 DAL1720 DAL SERFR‐ST 28L 67 77 1,867 5,088 200 ‐2.1 (745) 344 402 12/1/2018 17:51:07 A SFO A320 ASA1271 ASA SERFR 28L 65 76 1,820 5,139 197 ‐1.7 (590) 345 402 12/1/2018 17:52:38 A PAO U U U U H 67 78 (1,567) 1,611 122 ‐0.3 (58) 84 402 12/1/2018 17:55:44 A SFO B738 UAL1124 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 66 78 1,977 4,714 221 ‐1.8 (718) 344 402 12/1/2018 17:57:45 A SFO B739 UAL632 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 63 76 1,970 4,722 176 ‐1.9 (585) 345 402 12/1/2018 18:06:01 A SFO A319 ASA1273 ASA SERFR 28L 65 77 3,836 4,117 202 ‐1.7 (598) 30 402 12/1/2018 18:09:22 A SFO CRJ9 JZA743 JZA BDEGA 28L 58 68 7,311 5,374 234 ‐5.0 (2,070) 81 402 12/1/2018 18:16:09 D PAO U U U U H 62 76 (4,675) 1,607 115 ‐1.0 (197) 243 402 12/1/2018 18:39:42 A SFO A320 UAL587 UAL BDEGA 28L 55 69 3,431 6,580 284 ‐1.9 (961) 106 402 12/1/2018 18:43:48 A SFO A319 ASA1923 ASA SERFR‐ST 28L 67 79 2,075 3,796 195 ‐4.0 (1,380) 345 A-28 Figure 9b Correlated Noise Event Report Site 402 ‐ December 1st 2018 Site Event Max Operation Airport Aircraft Flight Airline Procedure Runway Lmax SEL Closest Lateral Dist.Altitude Speed Pitch Alt Delta Heading ID Time Type ID Code dBA (Feet) (ft msl) (Kts) (Degrees) (ft/min) (True) 402 12/1/2018 18:48:06 A SFO B737 SWA4050 SWA SERFR 28L 58 69 5,814 5,790 198 ‐2.0 (690) 358 402 12/1/2018 18:53:11 A SFO E35L N84AW GA SERFR‐ST 28L 55 69 1,913 5,882 242 ‐4.1 (1,770) 345 402 12/1/2018 18:54:51 A SFO CRJ7 SKW5765 SKW BDEGA 28L 58 71 7,250 4,007 200 ‐0.4 (147) 357 402 12/1/2018 18:55:50 A SFO A321 JBU915 JBU BDEGA 28L 57 70 (7,664) 5,232 296 ‐4.3 (2,220) 116 402 12/1/2018 19:03:12 A SFO B737 SWA3361 SWA SERFR‐ST 28L 59 71 2,077 4,399 220 ‐2.4 (936) 344 402 12/1/2018 19:05:33 A SFO B738 UAL2352 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 63 73 2,023 4,363 226 ‐4.0 (1,580) 345 402 12/1/2018 19:07:50 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5700 SKW BDEGA 28L 60 71 (4,060) 4,120 215 ‐2.3 (875) 55 402 12/1/2018 19:10:52 A SFO A320 TAI564 TAI SERFR‐ST 28L 65 77 1,920 4,366 199 ‐3.3 (1,170) 345 402 12/1/2018 19:12:25 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5457 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 54 67 1,952 4,835 217 ‐2.6 (991) 343 402 12/1/2018 19:14:03 A SFO B739 UAL1604 UAL OCEANIC 28L 58 67 8,043 4,498 215 ‐4.3 (1,621) 36 402 12/1/2018 19:16:21 A SFO B77W SIA2 SIA OCEANIC 28L 60 73 4,516 4,585 209 ‐3.9 (1,454) 28 402 12/1/2018 19:18:09 A SFO A321 AAL686 AAL SERFR 28R 56 64 13,426 5,170 175 ‐6.0 (1,862) 345 402 12/1/2018 19:19:37 A SFO A319 ASA1279 ASA SERFR 28L 61 73 5,087 5,846 206 ‐2.7 (975) 9 402 12/1/2018 19:21:57 A SFO A388 DLH458 DLH BDEGA 28R 53 67 13,498 4,080 194 ‐2.3 (781) 344 402 12/1/2018 19:26:26 A SFO E75L SKW5592 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 56 70 1,927 4,309 197 ‐3.8 (1,320) 345 402 12/1/2018 19:28:32 A SFO B737 SWA4154 SWA SERFR 28L 60 73 7,043 4,802 206 ‐4.0 (1,471) 12 402 12/1/2018 19:42:57 A SFO E75L CPZ6015 CPZ SERFR‐ST 28L 60 73 2,022 5,404 177 ‐3.1 (968) 344 402 12/1/2018 19:43:53 D SFO CRJ2 SKW5696 SKW U 01L 58 67 7,685 15,078 403 1.1 795 108 402 12/1/2018 19:44:38 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5718 SKW BDEGA 28L 56 67 6,450 5,135 239 ‐3.6 (1,514) 49 402 12/1/2018 19:46:08 D SFO B739 UAL394 UAL U 01L 58 72 (536) 15,853 428 2.6 1,985 105 402 12/1/2018 19:47:19 A SFO A319 ASA1595 ASA SERFR‐ST 28R 65 78 1,885 4,491 166 ‐3.8 (1,125) 345 402 12/1/2018 19:48:10 A SFO B772 UAL340 UAL BDEGA 28L 59 68 3,567 5,995 202 ‐0.4 (123) 99 402 12/1/2018 19:54:35 A SFO E75L SKW5440 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 58 71 1,929 4,726 241 ‐2.6 (1,099) 345 402 12/1/2018 19:55:53 A SFO B752 UAL1584 UAL BDEGA 28L 61 74 (317) 5,773 173 ‐7.0 (2,130) 46 402 12/1/2018 19:59:00 A SFO B739 UAL2201 UAL SERFR 28L 59 71 7,860 4,015 198 0.0 ‐ 349 402 12/1/2018 20:00:13 A SFO B38M ACA781 ACA BDEGA 28L 59 72 4,173 4,228 173 ‐4.4 (1,335) 345 402 12/1/2018 20:02:57 A SFO B739 UAL384 UAL SERFR 28L 63 76 2,419 4,716 201 ‐3.9 (1,385) 357 402 12/1/2018 20:05:49 A SFO E75L QXE2271 QXE BDEGA 28L 61 72 7,167 5,691 211 ‐8.3 (3,105) 34 402 12/1/2018 20:11:08 A SFO B789 UAL28 UAL OCEANIC 28L 66 76 (3,136) 4,123 198 ‐2.5 (865) 29 402 12/1/2018 20:13:42 A SFO A320 ASA1963 ASA SERFR‐ST 28L 68 78 1,811 4,102 203 ‐2.0 (717) 345 402 12/1/2018 20:14:39 A SFO B772 UAL724 UAL OCEANIC 28L 58 72 9,752 6,701 245 ‐5.7 (2,480) 84 402 12/1/2018 20:22:38 A SFO A321 AAL547 AAL BDEGA 28L 66 77 2,341 5,107 233 ‐5.5 (2,265) 102 402 12/1/2018 20:25:11 A SFO B738 UAL1152 UAL OCEANIC 28L 53 65 10,358 4,005 193 ‐0.1 (32) 354 402 12/1/2018 20:28:54 A SFO A320 ASA1945 ASA SERFR‐ST 28L 66 78 948 4,588 198 ‐3.4 (1,200) 343 402 12/1/2018 20:32:07 A SFO B789 ACA739 ACA BDEGA 28L 54 66 (12,263) 3,964 199 ‐1.0 (358) 34 402 12/1/2018 20:34:19 A SFO B739 UAL643 UAL OCEANIC 28L 60 70 (6,346) 4,008 207 ‐4.2 (1,549) 20 402 12/1/2018 20:34:39 A SFO B77W CPA872 CPA BDEGA 28L 62 69 9,307 5,946 226 ‐2.5 (1,010) 79 402 12/1/2018 20:41:27 A SFO B738 UAL1722 UAL OCEANIC 28L 62 75 (1,173) 5,330 195 ‐4.5 (1,537) 6 402 12/1/2018 20:44:36 A OAK B738 ASA840 ASA U 30 57 69 14,120 3,924 266 ‐0.6 (299) 74 402 12/1/2018 21:03:29 A SFO GLF4 WWI31 WWI SERFR‐ST 28L 63 74 1,786 4,428 199 ‐3.5 (1,231) 344 402 12/1/2018 21:05:42 A SFO B738 UAL2132 UAL BDEGA 28L 59 68 (10,315) 3,969 206 ‐0.5 (195) 41 402 12/1/2018 21:13:06 A SFO E75L QXE2038 QXE SERFR‐ST 28L 63 73 1,932 4,064 218 ‐2.3 (894) 345 402 12/1/2018 21:14:24 A SFO A320 UAL1217 UAL BDEGA 28L 58 70 6,920 5,572 222 ‐3.9 (1,512) 43 402 12/1/2018 21:16:48 A SFO E75L SKW5681 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 61 74 1,953 4,689 190 ‐4.0 (1,335) 345 402 12/1/2018 21:19:07 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5366 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 59 70 1,876 4,304 214 ‐4.7 (1,770) 346 402 12/1/2018 21:26:22 A SFO B737 SWA485 SWA SERFR‐ST 28L 60 72 1,955 4,774 220 ‐2.6 (1,010) 345 402 12/1/2018 21:28:55 A SFO GLF4 U U SERFR‐ST 28R 61 70 1,908 4,291 239 ‐3.6 (1,529) 344 402 12/1/2018 21:30:30 A SFO CRJ7 SKW5873 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 58 68 2,032 4,844 209 ‐2.3 (835) 344 402 12/1/2018 21:32:25 A SFO B739 UAL1568 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 61 74 2,007 5,187 206 ‐2.4 (885) 344 402 12/1/2018 21:35:13 A SFO B738 AMX664 AMX SERFR‐ST 28L 57 71 1,966 5,078 205 ‐2.0 (735) 344 402 12/1/2018 21:38:00 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5616 SKW SERFR 28L 59 67 9,550 5,248 208 ‐4.0 (1,466) 9 402 12/1/2018 21:39:39 A SFO E75L SKW5483 SKW SERFR 28L 56 67 4,076 5,772 229 ‐3.0 (1,223) 8 402 12/1/2018 21:43:03 A SFO A332 HAL42 HAL OCEANIC 28L 56 67 13,934 4,064 175 ‐1.1 (345) 347 402 12/1/2018 21:46:05 A SFO E75L SKW3381 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 61 71 1,935 4,804 192 ‐2.6 (867) 345 402 12/1/2018 21:49:16 A SFO A320 ASA1776 ASA BDEGA 28L 66 74 3,284 5,218 233 ‐4.4 (1,822) 70 402 12/1/2018 21:51:59 A SFO A320 ACA568 ACA BDEGA 28L 67 78 651 4,277 206 ‐1.9 (688) 16 402 12/1/2018 21:53:31 A SFO A321 JBU833 JBU BDEGA 28L 63 71 (7,176) 4,186 186 ‐2.3 (743) 20 402 12/1/2018 21:56:09 D OAK B38M SWA6868 SWA U 30 50 62 1,841 15,992 407 3.2 2,299 139 402 12/1/2018 22:01:54 A SFO A320 AIJ830 AIJ SERFR‐ST 28L 61 72 1,966 4,805 224 ‐3.6 (1,439) 345 402 12/1/2018 22:04:00 A SFO B738 DAL1700 DAL SERFR‐ST 28L 64 77 1,954 4,415 199 ‐4.2 (1,485) 345 402 12/1/2018 22:14:05 A SFO B739 UAL650 UAL OCEANIC 28L 60 72 (2,754) 5,403 212 ‐4.7 (1,770) 30 402 12/1/2018 22:34:09 A SFO CRJ7 SKW5461 SKW SERFR‐ST 28R 55 68 2,230 5,176 198 ‐2.7 (952) 347 402 12/1/2018 22:38:16 A SFO E75L CPZ6085 CPZ SERFR‐ST 28R 61 73 1,969 5,130 205 ‐2.2 (803) 344 402 12/1/2018 22:40:33 A SFO B738 UAL1712 UAL SERFR‐ST 28R 61 73 1,992 5,001 187 ‐3.1 (1,003) 343 402 12/1/2018 22:42:08 A SFO B738 ASA759 ASA OCEANIC 28R 56 69 5,824 5,465 196 ‐3.9 (1,355) 18 402 12/1/2018 22:45:36 A SFO B738 UAL1288 UAL OCEANIC 28R 59 72 (1,423) 6,179 238 ‐2.4 (1,005) 34 402 12/1/2018 23:04:53 A SFO B738 CMP382 CMP SERFR‐ST 28R 63 75 1,963 4,849 205 ‐2.4 (885) 344 402 12/1/2018 23:09:55 A SFO A321 AAL2374 AAL BDEGA 28R 56 68 (5,873) 4,333 220 ‐4.4 (1,725) 82 402 12/1/2018 23:17:49 A SFO B738 UAL435 UAL OCEANIC 28R 56 67 7,179 5,979 239 ‐3.3 (1,370) 27 402 12/1/2018 23:20:52 A SFO B738 AMX662 AMX SERFR‐ST 28R 64 75 2,084 4,360 238 ‐3.6 (1,516) 345 402 12/1/2018 23:21:19 A SFO B752 DAL2344 DAL BDEGA 28R 62 72 3,894 6,205 219 ‐3.9 (1,511) 73 402 12/1/2018 23:23:15 A SFO A321 JBU1415 JBU BDEGA 28R 55 65 (9,020) 6,879 242 ‐1.6 (690) 126 402 12/1/2018 23:25:30 A SFO B752 UAL1056 UAL BDEGA 28R 59 68 245 5,628 213 ‐2.4 (895) 120 402 12/1/2018 23:38:18 A SFO A320 TAI560 TAI SERFR‐ST 28R 62 74 1,902 4,720 229 ‐1.9 (783) 345 402 12/1/2018 23:58:47 D SFO B753 UAL2237 UAL U 01R 52 65 (8,210) 14,063 427 2.1 1,571 105 BridgeNet International 2019 A-29 Figure 9c Correlated Noise Event Report Site 403‐ December 1st 2018 Site Event Max Operation Airport Aircraft Flight Airline Procedure Runway Lmax SEL Closest Lateral Dist.Altitude Speed Pitch Alt Delta Heading ID Time Type ID Code dBA (Feet) (ft msl) (Kts) (Degrees) (ft/min) (True) 403 12/1/2018 0:03:13 A SFO B738 ASA762 ASA OCEANIC 28R 57 68 (6,800) 6,706 222 ‐2.7 (1,065) 46 403 12/1/2018 0:09:59 A SFO B738 AMX664 AMX SERFR‐ST 28R 58 72 (2,429) 5,167 212 ‐3.2 (1,212) 345 403 12/1/2018 0:12:30 A SFO E75L CPZ6020 CPZ SERFR‐ST 28R 57 70 (2,464) 5,250 207 ‐2.4 (864) 345 403 12/1/2018 0:16:46 A SFO B748 KAL213 KAL SERFR‐ST 28R 65 77 (2,652) 5,386 245 ‐3.6 (1,575) 346 403 12/1/2018 0:22:36 A SFO B738 AMX662 AMX SERFR‐ST 28R 59 72 (2,621) 5,084 185 ‐2.8 (900) 344 403 12/1/2018 0:36:49 A SFO A320 ASA1949 ASA SERFR‐ST 28R 58 72 (2,945) 4,576 190 ‐3.4 (1,138) 345 403 12/1/2018 0:56:22 A PAO EC35 CMD12 CMD U H 43 52 10,365 98 3 0.0 ‐ 199 403 12/1/2018 1:18:53 A SFO C750 U U SERFR 28R 52 64 (4,714) 4,262 243 ‐3.2 (1,385) 335 403 12/1/2018 2:12:51 D PAO EC35 CMD12 CMD U H 44 55 10,602 98 7 0.0 ‐ 344 403 12/1/2018 2:47:44 D NUQ PC12 N562NA GA U 32L 45 61 403 12/1/2018 2:51:24 A SFO B744 AAR284 AAR SERFR‐ST 28R 67 78 (2,515) 5,084 223 ‐3.0 (1,185) 344 403 12/1/2018 3:25:19 A SFO B739 UAL2550 UAL BDEGA 28R 63 75 987 3,990 217 ‐0.1 (45) 61 403 12/1/2018 3:46:28 A SFO B738 UAL1639 UAL OCEANIC 28L 62 72 (2,771) 6,660 245 ‐1.8 (756) 61 403 12/1/2018 3:58:13 A SFO B738 UAL1724 UAL OCEANIC 28R 61 71 (4,447) 5,779 250 ‐3.6 (1,605) 63 403 12/1/2018 4:09:01 A SFO B772 UAL396 UAL OCEANIC 28R 49 62 (12,838) 6,559 267 ‐0.8 (394) 33 403 12/1/2018 4:10:54 A SFO B738 UAL1746 UAL OCEANIC 28R 61 71 (2,440) 7,430 243 ‐2.6 (1,127) 69 403 12/1/2018 4:37:49 A SFO B753 UAL2553 UAL BDEGA 28R 51 65 12,052 5,291 200 ‐3.7 (1,290) 2 403 12/1/2018 5:13:33 A SFO B789 UAL955 UAL BDEGA 28R 68 78 160 4,177 281 ‐2.1 (1,061) 84 403 12/1/2018 5:36:52 A SFO B738 UAL1557 UAL OCEANIC 28R 66 76 (1,568) 5,558 265 ‐4.7 (2,184) 75 403 12/1/2018 5:38:13 A SFO B77W AIC173 AIC OTHER 28R 54 67 10,997 6,561 254 ‐3.4 (1,539) 71 403 12/1/2018 5:46:40 A SFO B753 UAL1575 UAL OCEANIC 28R 59 72 2,306 6,636 250 ‐2.9 (1,290) 78 403 12/1/2018 5:49:32 A SFO B77W UAL916 UAL OCEANIC 28R 60 73 462 5,998 248 ‐4.2 (1,821) 74 403 12/1/2018 6:04:14 A SFO B77W EVA008 EVA BDEGA 28R 59 70 3,508 5,604 227 ‐2.9 (1,148) 109 403 12/1/2018 6:10:22 D PAO U U U U 13 48 57 10,185 436 83 4.4 645 135 403 12/1/2018 6:11:56 A SJC GALX U U U 12R 56 65 6,787 2,210 219 ‐2.4 (945) 2 403 12/1/2018 6:14:18 D PAO U U U U 13 49 58 10,649 399 78 4.6 630 135 403 12/1/2018 6:21:13 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5738 SKW BDEGA 28R 48 63 403 12/1/2018 6:28:55 A SFO P28A UAL872 UAL BDEGA 28R 63 75 1,358 5,327 255 ‐2.8 (1,240) 85 403 12/1/2018 6:40:10 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5276 SKW BDEGA 28R 56 67 (1,645) 4,592 257 ‐3.6 (1,650) 38 403 12/1/2018 6:46:30 A SFO B789 UAL870 UAL OCEANIC 28R 50 66 13,164 5,260 233 ‐2.9 (1,205) 13 403 12/1/2018 6:57:14 A SFO E75L SKW5358 SKW BDEGA 28R 50 62 403 12/1/2018 7:01:07 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5631 SKW SERFR‐ST 28R 55 67 (2,483) 4,881 213 ‐5.2 (1,937) 344 403 12/1/2018 7:03:29 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5667 SKW SERFR‐ST 28R 53 68 (2,480) 5,137 231 ‐3.6 (1,466) 345 403 12/1/2018 7:05:52 A SFO E75L SKW5601 SKW SERFR‐ST 28R 57 69 (2,484) 5,132 236 ‐2.4 (1,017) 345 403 12/1/2018 7:07:43 A SFO A320 UAL2350 UAL SERFR‐ST 28R 56 68 (2,473) 4,911 240 ‐1.9 (805) 345 403 12/1/2018 7:09:53 A SFO A319 UAL295 UAL SERFR‐ST 28R 62 72 (2,579) 4,977 226 ‐1.4 (563) 345 403 12/1/2018 7:11:23 A SFO B738 UAL805 UAL BDEGA 28R 50 61 (11,385) 5,360 228 ‐3.5 (1,388) 45 403 12/1/2018 7:13:48 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5496 SKW BDEGA 28R 49 62 (8,401) 5,300 204 ‐2.8 (1,023) 65 403 12/1/2018 7:15:27 A SFO A359 SIA32 SIA BDEGA 28R 56 67 (6,798) 5,539 218 ‐2.4 (912) 99 403 12/1/2018 7:34:20 A SFO E75L CPZ6034 CPZ SERFR‐ST 28L 61 72 (2,455) 5,100 205 ‐2.3 (826) 345 403 12/1/2018 7:36:29 A SFO A320 ASA1925 ASA SERFR‐ST 28L 59 71 (2,655) 4,316 251 ‐2.2 (988) 345 403 12/1/2018 7:37:42 A SFO B789 UAL858 UAL BDEGA 28R 59 73 (5,565) 5,491 255 ‐3.5 (1,575) 46 403 12/1/2018 7:41:28 D PAO U U U U 13 56 71 10,538 413 88 6.7 1,035 142 403 12/1/2018 7:49:49 A SFO B77W UAL862 UAL BDEGA 28R 56 69 7,161 5,716 191 ‐3.1 (1,058) 18 403 12/1/2018 7:51:07 A SFO A320 UAL618 UAL BDEGA 28L 65 74 3,330 4,996 216 ‐5.0 (1,920) 106 403 12/1/2018 7:53:09 D SFO B38M SWA4128 SWA U 28R 57 67 7,879 18,198 432 2.8 2,129 106 403 12/1/2018 7:54:40 A SFO A320 UAL612 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 67 76 (2,487) 4,879 182 ‐3.9 (1,253) 344 403 12/1/2018 7:58:26 A SFO A320 JBU1136 JBU SERFR‐ST 28L 62 75 (2,571) 4,006 244 ‐0.1 (46) 345 403 12/1/2018 8:02:08 A SJC A320 JBU826 JBU U 12R 66 75 4,553 2,081 208 ‐2.2 (790) 352 403 12/1/2018 8:04:31 A SJC B737 SWA2630 SWA U 12R 65 74 3,186 2,988 168 ‐0.2 (45) 330 403 12/1/2018 8:07:32 A SFO CRJ7 SKW5464 SKW BDEGA 28L 58 70 (2,377) 5,659 241 ‐3.8 (1,620) 64 403 12/1/2018 8:12:52 A SFO A320 ASA1951 ASA SERFR 28L 64 77 (2,276) 4,786 179 ‐4.9 (1,530) 345 403 12/1/2018 8:15:33 A SFO A21N ASA1591 ASA SERFR‐ST 28L 55 69 (2,673) 5,465 241 ‐2.7 (1,125) 344 403 12/1/2018 8:18:07 A SFO B739 UAL1294 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 63 76 (2,437) 4,969 243 ‐2.9 (1,230) 345 403 12/1/2018 8:20:56 A SFO B77W UAL838 UAL OCEANIC 28R 62 73 (5,061) 6,361 238 ‐3.0 (1,275) 34 403 12/1/2018 8:24:14 A SFO B77W ANA8 ANA BDEGA 28R 54 66 (9,821) 5,579 251 ‐3.6 (1,617) 42 403 12/1/2018 8:26:32 A SFO B77W CES589 CES BDEGA 28L 58 71 (4,824) 4,717 208 ‐3.1 (1,125) 39 403 12/1/2018 8:33:12 A SFO E75L SKW5642 SKW BDEGA 28L 57 67 (10,683) 4,953 232 ‐1.5 (600) 64 403 12/1/2018 8:34:40 A SFO B739 UAL662 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 60 72 (2,531) 4,875 176 ‐3.2 (989) 345 403 12/1/2018 8:36:29 A SFO A332 CES767 CES BDEGA 28R 64 75 399 6,526 210 ‐3.9 (1,429) 71 403 12/1/2018 8:40:38 A SFO E75L QXE2283 QXE BDEGA 28L 58 68 (1,604) 6,506 239 ‐2.3 (950) 69 403 12/1/2018 8:42:30 A SFO B737 SWA3330 SWA SERFR 28L 51 64 8,458 6,065 230 ‐2.1 (840) 37 403 12/1/2018 8:45:02 A SFO B77W CPA870 CPA BDEGA 28R 60 73 (3,326) 6,628 230 ‐3.5 (1,425) 113 403 12/1/2018 8:49:33 A SFO B77W KAL023 KAL BDEGA 28R 61 74 (4,549) 4,044 230 ‐1.0 (393) 36 403 12/1/2018 8:52:45 A SFO A320 ACA574 ACA BDEGA 28L 60 72 (8,118) 6,098 269 ‐0.6 (288) 114 403 12/1/2018 8:54:01 D SFO A320 UAL234 UAL U 28L 54 68 2,987 14,937 434 2.4 1,815 106 403 12/1/2018 8:56:04 A SJC E75L CPZ5772 CPZ U 12R 65 75 2,977 2,208 185 ‐4.0 (1,302) 344 403 12/1/2018 8:57:55 A SJC B788 ANA172 ANA U 12R 63 74 4,323 2,875 182 ‐2.2 (704) 1 403 12/1/2018 9:00:47 A SJC E75L QXE2810 QXE U 12R 64 74 4,388 3,004 183 0.0 ‐ 348 403 12/1/2018 9:02:24 A SJC GLF6 N240CX GA U 12R 58 69 4,491 2,975 169 ‐1.0 (300) 334 403 12/1/2018 9:05:27 A SJC B737 SWA921 SWA U 12R 60 72 4,491 2,867 188 ‐3.1 (1,035) 348 403 12/1/2018 9:07:41 A SJC E75L QXE2259 QXE U 12R 55 66 5,746 2,962 209 ‐2.0 (735) 348 403 12/1/2018 9:12:02 A SFO B738 UAL1615 UAL BDEGA 28L 62 75 666 6,292 266 ‐3.7 (1,732) 114 403 12/1/2018 9:16:00 A SFO B738 UAL2055 UAL BDEGA 28L 63 74 (339) 5,038 208 ‐1.6 (595) 59 403 12/1/2018 9:22:02 A SFO A319 ASA1751 ASA BDEGA 28L 65 77 4,978 5,144 248 ‐3.9 (1,710) 42 403 12/1/2018 9:25:13 A SFO B789 UAL2 UAL BDEGA 28R 65 76 615 6,079 231 ‐2.5 (1,031) 32 403 12/1/2018 9:27:58 A SFO A319 UAL820 UAL SERFR 28L 67 77 595 5,000 223 ‐0.6 (222) 62 403 12/1/2018 9:32:46 A SFO B789 UAL876 UAL BDEGA 28R 61 72 (6,590) 4,861 218 ‐1.6 (600) ‐ 403 12/1/2018 9:35:57 A SFO B739 DAL1275 DAL BDEGA 28L 57 70 6,496 5,174 193 ‐3.7 (1,245) 11 403 12/1/2018 9:43:33 A SFO CRJ9 JZA579 JZA BDEGA 28L 52 64 (6,030) 5,019 216 0.2 72 2 403 12/1/2018 9:45:24 A SFO B739 UAL501 UAL SERFR 28L 56 70 8,717 5,691 211 ‐2.5 (936) 30 403 12/1/2018 9:48:27 A SFO B739 UAL274 UAL SERFR 28L 62 74 1,196 5,021 216 ‐0.8 (300) 60 403 12/1/2018 9:51:01 A SFO B739 UAL392 UAL BDEGA 28L 56 69 7,224 5,983 226 ‐0.6 (225) 64 403 12/1/2018 9:53:11 A SFO A319 ASA1935 ASA SERFR 28L 55 67 11,264 6,031 232 0.4 150 59 403 12/1/2018 9:53:57 D PAO U U U U 31 52 63 9,551 285 48 ‐6.9 ‐ 288 403 12/1/2018 9:55:59 A SFO E75L CPZ6041 CPZ SERFR 28L 63 73 10,730 6,000 217 0.0 ‐ 70 403 12/1/2018 9:57:30 A SJC C56X U U U 12R 56 66 3,744 3,082 170 ‐1.7 (516) 359 403 12/1/2018 9:59:05 A SFO B739 UAL2123 UAL SERFR 28L 53 67 10,624 6,013 234 0.1 49 85 A-30 Figure 9c Correlated Noise Event Report Site 403‐ December 1st 2018 Site Event Max Operation Airport Aircraft Flight Airline Procedure Runway Lmax SEL Closest Lateral Dist.Altitude Speed Pitch Alt Delta Heading ID Time Type ID Code dBA (Feet) (ft msl) (Kts) (Degrees) (ft/min) (True) 403 12/1/2018 10:00:45 A SJC B737 SWA3249 SWA U 12R 60 72 2,902 2,838 201 ‐2.5 (880) 349 403 12/1/2018 10:03:59 A SJC B738 SWA4630 SWA U 12R 58 69 6,030 2,045 161 ‐2.2 (623) 2 403 12/1/2018 10:04:25 A SFO A321 JBU133 JBU MISSED 28L 61 73 1,180 5,016 199 0.0 13 64 403 12/1/2018 10:07:41 A SJC E75L CPZ5686 CPZ U 12R 56 66 7,442 2,998 198 0.0 ‐ 345 403 12/1/2018 10:23:11 A SFO B77W CSN659 CSN BDEGA 28R 61 74 2,838 5,035 205 ‐1.3 (479) 20 403 12/1/2018 10:35:09 A SJC E75L QXE2224 QXE U 30L 55 69 5,352 2,998 195 0.0 ‐ 358 403 12/1/2018 10:51:53 A SFO B77W ANZ8 ANZ OCEANIC 28R 61 74 3,390 4,225 210 ‐2.3 (840) 13 403 12/1/2018 10:53:56 A SFO E75L QXE2267 QXE BDEGA 28L 55 68 5,895 4,395 184 ‐2.9 (945) 354 403 12/1/2018 10:55:46 A SFO B738 UAL209 UAL SERFR 28L 57 70 4,745 4,348 195 ‐1.8 (632) 25 403 12/1/2018 10:59:02 A SFO A332 FJI870 FJI OCEANIC 28R 70 80 227 5,018 257 ‐4.2 (1,920) 52 403 12/1/2018 11:03:01 A SFO B788 ACA737 ACA BDEGA 28R 63 74 2,524 5,360 263 ‐1.8 (811) 84 403 12/1/2018 11:08:45 A SFO B748 CCA985 CCA BDEGA 28L 56 67 11,626 5,616 220 ‐3.4 (1,335) 32 403 12/1/2018 11:12:02 A SFO B737 SWA360 SWA SERFR 28L 51 61 12,282 5,997 207 0.2 60 65 403 12/1/2018 11:19:31 A SQL BE35 N8366D GA U 30 61 69 (2,209) 2,454 102 ‐4.1 (735) 326 403 12/1/2018 11:27:02 A SFO A319 UAL698 UAL OCEANIC 28R 60 74 5,601 5,884 220 ‐1.6 (633) 63 403 12/1/2018 11:31:18 A SFO B739 ASA484 ASA OCEANIC 28L 59 70 7,678 6,014 244 ‐0.1 (45) 101 403 12/1/2018 11:32:10 D SQL SR20 N321SL GA U 30 54 67 (1,672) 2,519 81 ‐2.7 (390) 313 403 12/1/2018 11:36:05 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5899 SKW BDEGA 28L 55 66 492 4,976 220 ‐0.1 (21) 88 403 12/1/2018 11:38:33 A SFO A320 ASA1027 ASA SERFR 28L 62 74 4,939 5,997 246 ‐0.1 (22) 87 403 12/1/2018 11:46:22 A SFO A320 UAL708 UAL SERFR 28L 57 68 8,763 5,574 222 ‐3.6 (1,412) 79 403 12/1/2018 11:47:35 A SFO B77W JAL2 JAL OCEANIC 28R 52 66 11,387 5,792 249 ‐1.9 (826) 23 403 12/1/2018 11:50:23 A SFO B738 UAL1763 UAL BDEGA 28L 53 66 (5,432) 7,863 240 ‐2.9 (1,230) 113 403 12/1/2018 12:00:10 A SFO A319 ASA1332 ASA BDEGA 28L 65 77 1,980 4,071 221 ‐1.2 (469) 53 403 12/1/2018 12:04:50 A SFO B744 QFA73 QFA OCEANIC 28R 56 70 7,568 5,379 189 ‐6.8 (2,285) 12 403 12/1/2018 12:11:13 A SFO A388 UAE225 UAE BDEGA 28R 67 77 (1,816) 4,998 239 ‐1.1 (450) 31 403 12/1/2018 12:22:57 A SFO B772 UAL949 UAL BDEGA 28L 66 76 2,812 5,292 197 ‐2.7 (941) 30 403 12/1/2018 12:26:06 A SFO E75L SKW5586 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 60 73 (2,473) 4,539 201 ‐3.7 (1,315) 345 403 12/1/2018 12:28:47 A SFO E75L SKW5446 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 59 69 (2,458) 5,251 217 ‐1.1 (429) 345 403 12/1/2018 12:32:51 A SFO A320 AIJ820 AIJ SERFR‐ST 28L 67 77 (2,563) 5,071 180 ‐1.5 (478) 345 403 12/1/2018 12:36:46 A SFO A321 AAL789 AAL SERFR‐ST 28L 65 75 (2,358) 4,620 206 ‐3.2 (1,171) 345 403 12/1/2018 12:39:54 A SFO E75L SKW5203 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 55 69 (2,483) 5,062 218 ‐2.6 (997) 345 403 12/1/2018 12:46:56 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5655 SKW SERFR 28L 54 66 (3,104) 6,357 249 ‐3.8 (1,680) 345 403 12/1/2018 12:49:59 A SFO B712 DAL1514 DAL SERFR 28L 54 68 13,005 6,000 199 0.1 37 22 403 12/1/2018 12:58:57 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5476 SKW SERFR 28L 56 68 (1,514) 5,021 236 ‐0.1 (52) 9 403 12/1/2018 13:01:28 A SFO B738 ASA621 ASA SERFR 28L 63 74 6,089 4,988 216 ‐0.6 (234) 9 403 12/1/2018 13:02:49 A SFO A346 DLH454 DLH BDEGA 28L 65 76 4,170 6,009 207 0.5 196 50 403 12/1/2018 13:06:30 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5416 SKW SERFR‐ST 28R 54 69 (2,979) 5,476 201 ‐4.2 (1,494) 346 403 12/1/2018 13:08:34 A SFO B737 SWA4136 SWA SERFR‐ST 28L 64 75 (2,478) 4,838 202 ‐4.8 (1,725) 345 403 12/1/2018 13:11:16 A SFO A320 ASA1804 ASA BDEGA 28L 57 68 (7,555) 5,264 214 ‐4.3 (1,626) 358 403 12/1/2018 13:13:32 A SFO CRJ7 SKW5697 SKW BDEGA 28L 53 65 (7,652) 5,009 218 ‐4.4 (1,680) 19 403 12/1/2018 13:16:27 A SFO B77W KAL025 KAL BDEGA 28L 62 75 (836) 6,410 226 ‐5.4 (2,160) 12 403 12/1/2018 13:20:04 A SFO A319 UAL1745 UAL BDEGA 28L 66 77 852 4,612 232 ‐3.3 (1,365) 42 403 12/1/2018 13:24:02 A SFO E75L SKW5967 SKW BDEGA 28L 55 68 (5,825) 5,689 216 ‐1.7 (630) 107 403 12/1/2018 13:29:18 A SFO B77W AFR084 AFR BDEGA 28L 65 77 (3,858) 5,176 223 ‐4.3 (1,694) 22 403 12/1/2018 13:32:58 A SFO B744 BAW11M BAW BDEGA 28L 56 68 (13,008) 4,942 215 ‐3.3 (1,265) 32 403 12/1/2018 13:36:01 D OAK B737 SWA3839 SWA U 30 53 67 2,311 18,144 455 3.0 2,415 135 403 12/1/2018 13:41:45 A SFO B738 UAL390 UAL SERFR 28L 62 72 (4,801) 4,568 216 ‐3.5 (1,317) 29 403 12/1/2018 13:44:19 A SFO B737 SWA974 SWA SERFR 28L 67 74 3,835 5,613 210 ‐3.7 (1,353) 9 403 12/1/2018 13:46:17 A SFO CRJ7 SKW5615 SKW BDEGA 28L 55 66 (6,854) 4,038 214 ‐1.7 (635) 45 403 12/1/2018 13:51:43 A SFO A319 ASA1340 ASA BDEGA 28R 56 68 (7,962) 4,455 231 ‐4.8 (1,965) 54 403 12/1/2018 13:57:51 A SFO A320 UAL2383 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 65 75 (2,456) 4,539 203 ‐4.6 (1,650) 345 403 12/1/2018 14:07:20 A SFO B39M CMP208 CMP SERFR‐ST 28L 59 70 (2,409) 5,048 237 ‐2.7 (1,145) 345 403 12/1/2018 14:09:41 A SFO B739 UAL444 UAL SERFR 28L 63 72 (235) 4,905 239 ‐2.7 (1,144) 345 403 12/1/2018 14:12:28 A SFO E75L CPZ6007 CPZ SERFR‐ST 28L 55 69 (2,492) 4,945 224 ‐1.0 (382) 344 403 12/1/2018 14:14:20 A SFO B738 SWA3950 SWA SERFR‐ST 28L 65 76 (2,429) 4,621 235 ‐3.4 (1,408) 344 403 12/1/2018 14:16:59 A SFO B739 UAL372 UAL OCEANIC 28L 61 72 (2,440) 5,180 215 ‐3.2 (1,203) 346 403 12/1/2018 14:18:18 A SFO A359 AAR212 AAR BDEGA 28L 59 72 854 4,996 222 ‐3.4 (1,319) 23 403 12/1/2018 14:19:59 D PAO U U U U 31 50 62 (10,006) 1,608 109 0.1 21 56 403 12/1/2018 14:25:49 A SFO B772 UAL900 UAL BDEGA 28L 55 64 (12,192) 4,970 215 ‐0.4 (135) 55 403 12/1/2018 14:28:03 A SFO B77W EVA018 EVA OCEANIC 28L 60 73 (5,755) 5,428 241 ‐3.7 (1,575) 31 403 12/1/2018 14:30:08 A SFO B752 UAL477 UAL BDEGA 28L 63 75 (1,790) 5,895 218 ‐5.1 (1,956) 32 403 12/1/2018 14:32:27 A SFO B738 DAL2971 DAL SERFR 28L 59 69 8,320 3,956 212 ‐0.7 (250) 31 403 12/1/2018 14:35:32 A SFO A346 VIR19Z VIR BDEGA 28L 61 75 14,635 6,108 201 0.1 25 80 403 12/1/2018 14:38:40 A SFO B738 ASA534 ASA BDEGA 28L 54 65 11,125 5,111 206 ‐1.7 (604) 44 403 12/1/2018 14:47:09 A SFO B738 UAL2148 UAL SERFR 28L 55 70 5,694 5,199 201 ‐3.7 (1,324) 349 403 12/1/2018 14:51:09 A SFO A320 ASA1388 ASA BDEGA 28L 55 69 8,894 4,348 208 ‐3.8 (1,405) 349 403 12/1/2018 14:59:02 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5984 SKW SERFR 28L 55 66 (2,296) 5,548 215 ‐3.7 (1,395) 346 403 12/1/2018 15:06:40 A SFO B789 UAL892 UAL OCEANIC 28L 69 78 3,413 4,829 249 ‐2.2 (963) 25 403 12/1/2018 15:08:44 A SFO A332 EIN147 EIN BDEGA 28L 68 78 3,304 5,376 201 ‐3.6 (1,290) 355 403 12/1/2018 15:11:29 A SFO E75L QXE2042 QXE SERFR‐ST 28L 56 69 (2,442) 5,731 221 ‐4.8 (1,860) 345 403 12/1/2018 15:17:39 A SFO E75L SKW5617 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 53 68 (2,472) 5,482 193 ‐3.4 (1,153) 345 403 12/1/2018 15:28:53 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5362 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 54 66 (2,348) 5,068 236 ‐2.7 (1,135) 345 403 12/1/2018 15:31:33 A SFO B739 UAL2351 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 59 72 (2,404) 4,676 234 ‐3.4 (1,380) 346 403 12/1/2018 15:33:33 A SFO E75L SKW5954 SKW BDEGA 28R 61 73 132 4,547 190 ‐1.3 (438) 348 403 12/1/2018 15:35:31 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5870 SKW SERFR 28L 55 66 (2,098) 5,130 212 ‐3.2 (1,180) 358 403 12/1/2018 15:40:59 A SFO B738 UAL1919 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 62 73 (2,353) 4,869 221 ‐1.5 (588) 345 403 12/1/2018 15:43:38 A SFO GLEX TWY468 TWY SERFR‐ST 28R 63 70 (2,442) 4,291 237 ‐3.2 (1,353) 345 403 12/1/2018 15:45:17 D SJC C421 N700LC GA U 30L 54 64 6,870 1,543 141 ‐1.4 (345) 312 403 12/1/2018 15:50:41 A SFO E55P EJA406 EJA SERFR‐ST 28R 61 71 (2,532) 5,093 238 ‐1.7 (705) 345 403 12/1/2018 15:51:07 A SFO A319 UAL1620 UAL SERFR 28L 65 74 (933) 5,819 212 ‐3.9 (1,449) 6 403 12/1/2018 15:51:58 A SQL BE9L N530CH GA U 30 59 70 (1,755) 2,530 151 ‐3.0 (786) 312 403 12/1/2018 15:57:33 A SFO B739 UAL1687 UAL SERFR 28L 60 67 6,947 6,017 184 0.6 195 23 403 12/1/2018 15:57:51 A SQL PC12 N903PJ GA U 30 66 75 (1,392) 1,904 160 ‐0.4 (109) 312 403 12/1/2018 16:05:44 A SFO A320 ASA1959 ASA SERFR 28L 68 80 1,360 4,128 197 ‐2.3 (783) 11 403 12/1/2018 16:09:10 A SFO B77W SWR38 SWR BDEGA 28R 58 68 10,703 5,562 194 ‐3.3 (1,120) ‐ 403 12/1/2018 16:10:12 D PAO C172 N172EL GA U 31 63 69 1,946 877 109 ‐1.1 (208) 143 403 12/1/2018 16:12:03 A SFO B77W THY79K THY BDEGA 28R 63 73 12,980 6,805 208 ‐2.3 (827) 64 403 12/1/2018 16:14:57 A SFO E75L SKW5861 SKW SERFR 28L 57 68 3,288 4,899 202 ‐3.9 (1,380) 81 A-31 Figure 9c Correlated Noise Event Report Site 403‐ December 1st 2018 Site Event Max Operation Airport Aircraft Flight Airline Procedure Runway Lmax SEL Closest Lateral Dist.Altitude Speed Pitch Alt Delta Heading ID Time Type ID Code dBA (Feet) (ft msl) (Kts) (Degrees) (ft/min) (True) 403 12/1/2018 16:19:16 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5347 SKW BDEGA 28L 53 66 (746) 5,544 190 ‐5.0 (1,665) 34 403 12/1/2018 16:34:29 A PAO P20P N231KD GA U 31 64 66 6,297 700 114 0.1 13 136 403 12/1/2018 16:39:39 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5286 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 54 67 (2,439) 5,006 223 ‐3.6 (1,425) 345 403 12/1/2018 16:42:19 A SFO A320 UAL1243 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 56 69 (2,257) 4,924 219 ‐3.7 (1,425) 345 403 12/1/2018 16:45:20 A SFO E75L CPZ6045 CPZ SERFR‐ST 28L 59 71 (2,500) 4,309 224 ‐3.6 (1,428) 344 403 12/1/2018 16:48:53 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5535 SKW BDEGA 28L 51 62 8,504 4,986 216 ‐4.0 (1,520) 32 403 12/1/2018 16:51:03 A SFO BE20 DLX622 DLX SERFR 28L 54 65 8,953 6,082 173 ‐0.1 (26) 49 403 12/1/2018 16:52:52 A SFO B712 DAL525 DAL BDEGA 28L 68 79 403 12/1/2018 16:55:18 A SFO A319 UAL718 UAL SERFR 28L 57 68 9,187 4,691 179 ‐4.2 (1,320) 29 403 12/1/2018 16:58:07 A SFO B789 QFA49 QFA OCEANIC 28L 62 73 3,739 5,089 201 ‐2.5 (885) 10 403 12/1/2018 17:00:19 A SFO B737 SWA4139 SWA SERFR‐ST 28L 56 69 (2,520) 5,106 196 ‐2.7 (933) 345 403 12/1/2018 17:11:28 A SFO E75L SKW5248 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 57 70 (2,455) 5,107 249 ‐2.6 (1,126) 345 403 12/1/2018 17:21:39 A SFO B737 SWA3308 SWA SERFR 28L 59 70 978 5,173 209 ‐3.2 (1,172) 14 403 12/1/2018 17:24:29 A SFO A319 UAL1051 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 60 72 (2,338) 5,514 200 ‐2.7 (935) 344 403 12/1/2018 17:31:07 D PAO U U U U 31 47 60 6,285 603 105 ‐1.1 (195) 140 403 12/1/2018 17:34:31 A SFO E75L SKW3460 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 59 71 (2,531) 3,982 239 ‐6.0 (2,527) 345 403 12/1/2018 17:35:41 A SFO B739 DAL1889 DAL BDEGA 28L 57 67 (7,396) 5,433 207 ‐3.7 (1,336) 46 403 12/1/2018 17:44:21 A SFO A359 FBU711 FBU OCEANIC 28L 51 64 (10,600) 4,179 189 ‐2.1 (690) 41 403 12/1/2018 17:47:02 A SFO A320 ASA1933 ASA SERFR‐ST 28L 60 72 (2,651) 4,041 227 ‐1.2 (461) 346 403 12/1/2018 17:48:48 A SFO B738 DAL1720 DAL SERFR‐ST 28L 67 77 (2,573) 5,268 217 ‐2.1 (790) 346 403 12/1/2018 17:50:45 A SFO A320 ASA1271 ASA SERFR 28L 62 74 (2,649) 5,295 202 ‐1.8 (642) 346 403 12/1/2018 17:53:12 A PAO U U U U H 61 69 (5,873) 1,122 128 ‐7.6 (1,726) 85 403 12/1/2018 17:55:20 A SFO B738 UAL1124 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 59 72 (2,408) 4,915 229 ‐3.0 (1,226) 345 403 12/1/2018 17:57:27 A SFO B739 UAL632 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 65 75 (2,443) 4,903 193 ‐2.7 (931) 345 403 12/1/2018 18:06:00 A SFO A319 ASA1273 ASA SERFR 28L 65 76 (2,899) 4,129 203 ‐1.8 (652) 30 403 12/1/2018 18:09:14 A SFO CRJ9 JZA743 JZA BDEGA 28L 54 67 1,380 4,885 223 ‐4.6 (1,802) 53 403 12/1/2018 18:11:00 A SFO B738 AAL1454 AAL SERFR 28L 58 72 6,051 4,556 195 ‐4.5 (1,530) 8 403 12/1/2018 18:13:37 A SFO A388 BAW287 BAW BDEGA 28R 55 67 12,236 5,341 191 ‐3.4 (1,133) 356 403 12/1/2018 18:15:29 D PAO U U U U H 51 64 (10,161) 1,558 77 4.4 600 263 403 12/1/2018 18:17:14 A SFO A319 UAL1240 UAL SERFR 28L 61 71 7,929 4,628 170 ‐3.6 (1,090) 10 403 12/1/2018 18:20:18 A SFO B752 UAL560 UAL BDEGA 28L 48 61 12,864 4,228 160 ‐3.7 (1,035) 320 403 12/1/2018 18:22:21 A SFO B77W CAL004 CAL OCEANIC 28L 55 69 7,202 5,982 241 ‐1.1 (478) 81 403 12/1/2018 18:27:39 A SFO A320 ASA1747 ASA BDEGA 28L 53 66 9,564 5,247 219 ‐2.2 (851) 90 403 12/1/2018 18:39:49 A SFO A320 UAL587 UAL BDEGA 28L 55 69 121 6,384 256 ‐1.6 (735) 85 403 12/1/2018 18:41:20 A SFO B737 SWA2989 SWA SERFR 28L 56 68 5,562 6,220 219 ‐4.3 (1,657) 20 403 12/1/2018 18:43:31 A SFO A319 ASA1923 ASA SERFR‐ST 28L 65 77 (2,501) 4,169 194 ‐4.2 (1,425) 347 403 12/1/2018 18:46:12 A SFO A319 UAL2016 UAL SERFR 28L 55 66 11,024 4,704 205 ‐3.5 (1,258) 9 403 12/1/2018 18:47:42 A SFO B737 SWA4050 SWA SERFR 28L 58 71 354 5,937 199 ‐2.4 (840) 357 403 12/1/2018 18:52:54 A SFO E35L N84AW GA SERFR‐ST 28L 51 66 (2,491) 6,200 256 ‐2.5 (1,119) 345 403 12/1/2018 18:54:35 A SFO CRJ7 SKW5765 SKW BDEGA 28L 63 74 1,882 4,042 197 ‐0.7 (244) 355 403 12/1/2018 18:56:21 A SFO A321 JBU915 JBU BDEGA 28L 58 70 5,439 4,554 271 ‐3.9 (1,890) 91 403 12/1/2018 19:03:03 A SFO B737 SWA3361 SWA SERFR‐ST 28L 61 70 (2,312) 4,658 228 ‐3.7 (1,500) 345 403 12/1/2018 19:05:19 A SFO B738 UAL2352 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 61 72 (2,422) 4,715 227 ‐4.1 (1,645) 345 403 12/1/2018 19:08:09 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5700 SKW BDEGA 28L 48 59 (10,617) 4,084 210 ‐2.0 (735) 48 403 12/1/2018 19:10:36 A SFO A320 TAI564 TAI SERFR‐ST 28L 63 76 (2,522) 4,694 197 ‐4.4 (1,530) 346 403 12/1/2018 19:12:01 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5457 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 57 68 (2,409) 5,091 232 ‐3.0 (1,230) 346 403 12/1/2018 19:14:06 A SFO B739 UAL1604 UAL OCEANIC 28L 64 76 1,294 4,497 215 ‐4.3 (1,620) 36 403 12/1/2018 19:16:26 A SFO B77W SIA2 SIA OCEANIC 28L 60 72 (2,205) 4,629 208 ‐4.2 (1,523) 27 403 12/1/2018 19:18:04 A SFO A321 AAL686 AAL SERFR 28R 54 67 9,202 5,688 174 ‐7.4 (2,265) 342 403 12/1/2018 19:19:39 A SFO A319 ASA1279 ASA SERFR 28L 62 75 (1,007) 5,948 203 ‐1.5 (533) 5 403 12/1/2018 19:21:28 A SFO A388 DLH458 DLH BDEGA 28R 62 74 8,612 4,471 204 ‐3.2 (1,147) 3 403 12/1/2018 19:26:29 A SFO E75L SKW5592 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 53 66 (2,504) 4,635 198 ‐2.7 (932) 345 403 12/1/2018 19:28:27 A SFO B737 SWA4154 SWA SERFR 28L 62 75 772 4,975 206 ‐3.8 (1,380) 12 403 12/1/2018 19:34:01 D SFO E75L SKW5960 SKW U 01L 47 60 (13,393) 16,233 413 2.4 1,725 105 403 12/1/2018 19:40:48 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5872 SKW BDEGA 28L 52 64 403 12/1/2018 19:42:24 A SFO E75L CPZ6015 CPZ SERFR‐ST 28L 56 70 (2,310) 5,597 181 ‐1.0 (306) 344 403 12/1/2018 19:44:47 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5718 SKW BDEGA 28L 54 65 (221) 5,032 240 ‐3.6 (1,530) 43 403 12/1/2018 19:46:59 A SFO A319 ASA1595 ASA SERFR‐ST 28R 64 76 (2,628) 4,809 172 ‐3.4 (1,029) 346 403 12/1/2018 19:48:37 A SFO B772 UAL340 UAL BDEGA 28L 56 70 (1,678) 5,803 202 ‐2.8 (990) 63 403 12/1/2018 19:54:07 A SFO E75L SKW5440 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 57 68 (2,504) 4,956 231 ‐2.9 (1,164) 345 403 12/1/2018 19:56:09 A SFO B752 UAL1584 UAL BDEGA 28L 54 68 (6,964) 5,636 173 ‐6.8 (2,055) 43 403 12/1/2018 19:58:33 A SFO B739 UAL2201 UAL SERFR 28L 67 78 2,995 4,002 198 0.6 194 350 403 12/1/2018 19:59:47 A SFO B38M ACA781 ACA BDEGA 28L 63 74 (245) 4,601 167 ‐3.1 (919) 342 403 12/1/2018 20:02:32 A SFO B739 UAL384 UAL SERFR 28L 62 74 (2,996) 5,004 197 ‐4.5 (1,575) 357 403 12/1/2018 20:05:52 A SFO E75L QXE2271 QXE BDEGA 28L 67 78 422 5,691 211 ‐8.3 (3,105) 34 403 12/1/2018 20:11:07 A SFO B789 UAL28 UAL OCEANIC 28L 56 65 (9,868) 4,143 197 ‐2.7 (934) 29 403 12/1/2018 20:13:12 A SFO A320 ASA1963 ASA SERFR‐ST 28L 66 77 (2,666) 4,311 207 ‐3.1 (1,123) 346 403 12/1/2018 20:15:35 A SFO B772 UAL724 UAL OCEANIC 28L 66 76 5,321 6,154 233 ‐6.3 (2,565) 80 403 12/1/2018 20:17:27 A SFO A332 HAL12 HAL OCEANIC 28L 55 70 10,413 4,612 220 ‐2.7 (1,057) 32 403 12/1/2018 20:22:40 A SFO A321 AAL547 AAL BDEGA 28L 69 77 (1,813) 4,651 219 ‐5.1 (1,980) 76 403 12/1/2018 20:24:58 A SFO B738 UAL1152 UAL OCEANIC 28L 60 72 4,962 4,061 196 ‐1.9 (659) 2 403 12/1/2018 20:28:38 A SFO A320 ASA1945 ASA SERFR‐ST 28L 62 74 (3,339) 4,878 207 ‐2.7 (983) 344 403 12/1/2018 20:34:17 A SFO B739 UAL643 UAL OCEANIC 28L 49 59 (12,906) 4,141 209 ‐4.6 (1,702) 19 403 12/1/2018 20:35:03 A SFO B77W CPA872 CPA BDEGA 28L 59 72 3,321 5,672 221 ‐2.7 (1,035) 54 403 12/1/2018 20:36:17 A SFO B77W CPA872 CPA BDEGA 28L 50 60 3,321 5,672 221 ‐2.7 (1,035) 54 403 12/1/2018 20:41:23 A SFO B738 UAL1722 UAL OCEANIC 28L 56 68 (7,412) 5,521 209 ‐4.3 (1,575) 24 403 12/1/2018 20:44:32 A OAK B738 ASA840 ASA U 30 55 65 8,789 3,867 244 ‐0.8 (326) 68 403 12/1/2018 20:59:23 D SFO B752 UAL349 UAL U 01L 50 65 2,380 16,321 457 2.9 2,310 106 403 12/1/2018 21:03:21 A SFO GLF4 WWI31 WWI SERFR‐ST 28L 60 70 (2,561) 4,769 203 ‐3.7 (1,335) 345 403 12/1/2018 21:05:54 A SFO B738 UAL2132 UAL BDEGA 28L 44 58 403 12/1/2018 21:12:54 A SFO E75L QXE2038 QXE SERFR‐ST 28L 59 68 (2,474) 4,340 215 ‐4.3 (1,620) 345 403 12/1/2018 21:14:10 A SFO A320 UAL1217 UAL BDEGA 28L 62 74 206 5,515 223 ‐3.7 (1,454) 39 403 12/1/2018 21:16:38 A SFO E75L SKW5681 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 59 71 (2,459) 4,983 204 ‐2.8 (1,004) 345 403 12/1/2018 21:19:00 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5366 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 56 68 (2,655) 4,678 227 ‐4.2 (1,665) 346 403 12/1/2018 21:26:07 A SFO B737 SWA485 SWA SERFR‐ST 28L 60 70 (2,480) 5,025 223 ‐2.9 (1,140) 345 403 12/1/2018 21:28:23 A SFO GLF4 U U SERFR‐ST 28R 52 66 (2,504) 4,651 241 ‐4.8 (2,028) 346 403 12/1/2018 21:29:57 A SFO CRJ7 SKW5873 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 57 67 (2,377) 5,064 211 ‐2.9 (1,095) 346 403 12/1/2018 21:32:08 A SFO B739 UAL1568 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 63 73 (2,384) 5,404 208 ‐2.3 (831) 345 A-32 Figure 9c Correlated Noise Event Report Site 403‐ December 1st 2018 Site Event Max Operation Airport Aircraft Flight Airline Procedure Runway Lmax SEL Closest Lateral Dist.Altitude Speed Pitch Alt Delta Heading ID Time Type ID Code dBA (Feet) (ft msl) (Kts) (Degrees) (ft/min) (True) 403 12/1/2018 21:34:55 A SFO B738 AMX664 AMX SERFR‐ST 28L 58 70 (2,417) 5,282 215 ‐2.5 (930) 345 403 12/1/2018 21:37:39 A SFO CRJ2 SKW5616 SKW SERFR 28L 51 63 3,461 5,442 210 ‐3.7 (1,375) 8 403 12/1/2018 21:39:38 A SFO E75L SKW5483 SKW SERFR 28L 55 66 (1,956) 5,934 230 ‐1.9 (749) 1 403 12/1/2018 21:42:23 A SFO A332 HAL42 HAL OCEANIC 28L 57 70 9,404 4,205 193 ‐2.6 (892) 349 403 12/1/2018 21:45:54 A SFO E75L SKW3381 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 61 70 (2,486) 5,036 219 ‐3.1 (1,183) 345 403 12/1/2018 21:49:13 A SFO A320 ASA1776 ASA BDEGA 28L 63 74 (2,774) 4,997 221 ‐4.5 (1,755) 55 403 12/1/2018 21:51:49 A SFO A320 ACA568 ACA BDEGA 28L 61 71 (5,851) 4,331 214 ‐1.6 (601) 28 403 12/1/2018 21:53:20 A SFO A321 JBU833 JBU BDEGA 28L 48 61 (13,754) 4,232 191 ‐2.1 (721) 23 403 12/1/2018 21:56:29 D OAK B38M SWA6868 SWA U 30 50 61 (87) 16,380 415 3.4 2,460 139 403 12/1/2018 22:01:49 A SFO A320 AIJ830 AIJ SERFR‐ST 28L 59 70 (2,461) 5,160 228 ‐3.9 (1,575) 345 403 12/1/2018 22:03:36 A SFO B738 DAL1700 DAL SERFR‐ST 28L 64 76 (2,453) 4,845 202 ‐5.1 (1,815) 345 403 12/1/2018 22:14:31 A SFO B739 UAL650 UAL OCEANIC 28L 51 65 (9,494) 5,415 212 ‐4.7 (1,770) 30 403 12/1/2018 22:34:15 A SFO CRJ7 SKW5461 SKW SERFR‐ST 28R 54 65 (2,295) 5,411 206 ‐2.3 (824) 345 403 12/1/2018 22:38:02 A SFO E75L CPZ6085 CPZ SERFR‐ST 28R 58 71 (2,406) 5,329 196 ‐2.4 (815) 344 403 12/1/2018 22:40:16 A SFO B738 UAL1712 UAL SERFR‐ST 28R 61 73 (2,339) 5,275 191 ‐2.8 (930) 345 403 12/1/2018 22:42:16 A SFO B738 ASA759 ASA OCEANIC 28R 61 74 (726) 5,616 201 ‐3.8 (1,335) 24 403 12/1/2018 22:45:38 A SFO B738 UAL1288 UAL OCEANIC 28R 58 66 (8,170) 6,190 239 ‐2.5 (1,035) 35 403 12/1/2018 22:59:42 D SFO B752 UAL2360 UAL U 01R 54 65 12,599 14,351 447 1.8 1,380 120 403 12/1/2018 23:04:46 A SFO B738 CMP382 CMP SERFR‐ST 28R 63 75 (2,419) 5,083 207 ‐2.9 (1,050) 344 403 12/1/2018 23:10:20 A SFO A321 AAL2374 AAL BDEGA 28R 50 62 (11,419) 4,196 202 ‐3.4 (1,221) 67 403 12/1/2018 23:17:23 A SFO B738 UAL435 UAL OCEANIC 28R 62 74 462 6,019 240 ‐3.2 (1,351) 26 403 12/1/2018 23:20:43 A SFO B738 AMX662 AMX SERFR‐ST 28R 63 74 (2,358) 4,694 237 ‐3.8 (1,575) 346 403 12/1/2018 23:21:31 A SFO B752 DAL2344 DAL BDEGA 28R 65 74 (2,335) 5,928 212 ‐5.3 (1,965) 49 403 12/1/2018 23:23:39 A SFO A321 JBU1415 JBU BDEGA 28R 58 69 8,187 4,712 162 ‐3.9 (1,110) 344 403 12/1/2018 23:25:51 A SFO A321 JBU1415 JBU BDEGA 28R 54 68 8,187 4,712 162 ‐3.9 (1,110) 344 403 12/1/2018 23:37:59 A SFO A320 TAI560 TAI SERFR‐ST 28R 57 70 (2,522) 4,908 236 ‐2.8 (1,163) 345 403 12/1/2018 23:59:26 D SFO B753 UAL2237 UAL U 01R 50 64 (6,055) 14,314 425 2.3 1,755 105 BridgeNet International 2019 A-33 Figure 9d Correlated Noise Event Report Site 404 (Tevis) ‐ December 1st 2018 Site Event Max Operation Airport Aircraft Flight Airline Procedure Runway Lmax SEL Closest Lateral Dist.Altitude Speed Pitch Alt Delta Heading ID Time Type ID Code dBA (Feet) (ft msl) (Kts) (Degrees) (ft/min) (True) 404 12/1/2018 0:03:10 Arrival SFO B738 ASA762 ASA OCEANIC 28R 60 74 1,466 6,576 209 ‐3.2 (1,167) 33 404 12/1/2018 0:10:20 Arrival SFO B738 AMX664 AMX SERFR‐ST 28R 63 76 (27) 4,636 196 ‐4.0 (1,377) 345 404 12/1/2018 0:12:59 Arrival SFO E75L CPZ6020 CPZ SERFR‐ST 28R 59 72 (28) 4,941 185 ‐1.6 (510) 344 404 12/1/2018 0:17:12 Arrival SFO B748 KAL213 KAL SERFR‐ST 28R 73 83 (80) 5,000 230 ‐3.5 (1,394) 345 404 12/1/2018 0:23:16 Arrival SFO B738 AMX662 AMX SERFR‐ST 28R 61 73 (85) 4,727 182 ‐2.5 (793) 345 404 12/1/2018 0:37:22 Arrival SFO A320 ASA1949 ASA SERFR‐ST 28R 64 75 (380) 4,059 178 ‐3.3 (1,046) 346 404 12/1/2018 1:19:19 Arrival SFO C750 U U SERFR 28R 55 67 (3,567) 4,004 247 ‐0.6 (264) 337 404 12/1/2018 2:51:37 Arrival SFO B744 AAR284 AAR SERFR‐ST 28R 70 81 (60) 4,684 211 ‐2.7 (990) 346 404 12/1/2018 3:25:22 Arrival SFO B739 UAL2550 UAL BDEGA 28R 51 61 9,716 3,991 217 ‐0.1 (45) 62 404 12/1/2018 3:46:29 Arrival SFO B738 UAL1639 UAL OCEANIC 28L 59 69 5,961 6,671 247 ‐1.8 (762) 62 404 12/1/2018 3:58:07 Arrival SFO B738 UAL1724 UAL OCEANIC 28R 62 73 4,272 5,816 251 ‐3.6 (1,590) 65 404 12/1/2018 4:09:20 Arrival SFO B772 UAL396 UAL OCEANIC 28R 63 72 (5,310) 6,487 264 ‐1.2 (557) 26 404 12/1/2018 4:10:39 Arrival SFO B738 UAL1746 UAL OCEANIC 28R 56 67 6,143 7,507 244 ‐2.4 (1,041) 69 404 12/1/2018 4:38:12 Arrival SFO B753 UAL2553 UAL BDEGA 28R 43 59 14,643 4,624 168 ‐2.7 (813) 334 404 12/1/2018 5:13:23 Arrival SFO B789 UAL955 UAL BDEGA 28R 57 70 (7,179) 4,443 287 ‐3.5 (1,772) 104 404 12/1/2018 5:36:50 Arrival SFO B738 UAL1557 UAL OCEANIC 28R 60 71 6,716 5,799 273 ‐4.9 (2,360) 80 404 12/1/2018 5:38:01 Arrival SFO B77W AIC173 AIC OTHER 28R 43 59 404 12/1/2018 5:46:48 Arrival SFO B753 UAL1575 UAL OCEANIC 28R 53 64 10,495 6,785 262 ‐2.7 (1,230) 80 404 12/1/2018 5:49:16 Arrival SFO B77W UAL916 UAL OCEANIC 28R 56 69 8,750 6,221 255 ‐4.0 (1,793) 79 404 12/1/2018 6:03:48 Arrival SFO B77W EVA008 EVA BDEGA 28R 59 71 (1,631) 5,957 226 ‐3.2 (1,280) 113 404 12/1/2018 6:16:40 Departure PAO U U U U 13 45 59 9,188 117 77 ‐4.7 (645) 143 404 12/1/2018 6:20:53 Arrival SFO CRJ2 SKW5738 SKW BDEGA 28R 52 62 (8,123) 4,048 255 ‐5.7 (2,582) 45 404 12/1/2018 6:28:41 Arrival SFO P28A UAL872 UAL BDEGA 28R 57 69 (8,538) 5,640 266 ‐2.8 (1,307) 104 404 12/1/2018 6:40:24 Arrival SFO CRJ2 SKW5276 SKW BDEGA 28R 48 61 6,379 4,386 259 ‐3.2 (1,450) 34 404 12/1/2018 6:57:45 Arrival SFO E75L SKW5358 SKW BDEGA 28R 53 65 (9,157) 3,892 251 ‐4.6 (2,055) 63 404 12/1/2018 6:59:15 Arrival SFO CRJ7 SKW5802 SKW BDEGA 28L 58 67 (8,167) 3,469 228 ‐3.5 (1,417) 78 404 12/1/2018 7:01:26 Arrival SFO CRJ2 SKW5631 SKW SERFR‐ST 28R 59 67 (93) 4,512 221 ‐1.0 (395) 345 404 12/1/2018 7:03:52 Arrival SFO CRJ2 SKW5667 SKW SERFR‐ST 28R 53 66 (17) 4,641 225 ‐3.2 (1,286) 345 404 12/1/2018 7:06:03 Arrival SFO E75L SKW5601 SKW SERFR‐ST 28R 58 70 (33) 4,678 235 ‐3.5 (1,457) 345 404 12/1/2018 7:08:05 Arrival SFO A320 UAL2350 UAL SERFR‐ST 28R 60 71 79 4,703 227 ‐1.5 (600) 345 404 12/1/2018 7:10:27 Arrival SFO A319 UAL295 UAL SERFR‐ST 28R 62 75 (134) 4,586 210 ‐3.4 (1,275) 345 404 12/1/2018 7:11:43 Arrival SFO B738 UAL805 UAL BDEGA 28R 62 73 (2,863) 5,245 224 ‐3.3 (1,290) 46 404 12/1/2018 7:13:41 Arrival SFO CRJ2 SKW5496 SKW BDEGA 28R 56 68 306 5,335 205 ‐3.1 (1,134) 71 404 12/1/2018 7:15:05 Arrival SFO A359 SIA32 SIA BDEGA 28R 59 71 800 5,739 222 ‐2.8 (1,110) 112 404 12/1/2018 7:34:47 Arrival SFO E75L CPZ6034 CPZ SERFR‐ST 28L 62 76 (27) 4,813 190 ‐2.8 (930) 344 404 12/1/2018 7:37:04 Arrival SFO A320 ASA1925 ASA SERFR‐ST 28L 60 71 (113) 4,044 236 ‐1.5 (624) 346 404 12/1/2018 7:37:42 Arrival SFO B789 UAL858 UAL BDEGA 28R 65 73 2,921 5,371 245 ‐3.3 (1,412) 44 404 12/1/2018 7:50:04 Arrival SFO B77W UAL862 UAL BDEGA 28R 49 60 11,321 5,058 189 ‐2.2 (739) 348 404 12/1/2018 7:50:46 Arrival SFO A320 UAL618 UAL BDEGA 28L 67 76 (1,936) 5,522 233 ‐4.3 (1,759) 116 404 12/1/2018 7:52:59 Departure SFO B38M SWA4128 SWA U 28R 52 63 (1,988) 17,891 417 2.7 1,999 106 404 12/1/2018 7:55:13 Arrival SFO A320 UAL612 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 66 78 (64) 4,376 185 ‐3.8 (1,230) 344 404 12/1/2018 7:58:53 Arrival SFO A320 JBU1136 JBU SERFR‐ST 28L 70 78 67 3,970 212 ‐0.4 (145) 347 404 12/1/2018 8:02:24 Arrival SJC A320 JBU826 JBU U 12R 47 61 10,086 1,991 209 ‐1.3 (479) 12 404 12/1/2018 8:04:49 Arrival SJC B737 SWA2630 SWA U 12R 55 65 7,567 2,995 172 0.5 146 15 404 12/1/2018 8:07:31 Arrival SFO CRJ7 SKW5464 SKW BDEGA 28L 53 68 6,341 5,670 240 ‐3.8 (1,624) 65 404 12/1/2018 8:10:28 Departure SQL PC12 PXT494 PXT U 30 47 60 13,995 2,698 229 4.3 1,748 103 404 12/1/2018 8:13:29 Arrival SFO A320 ASA1951 ASA SERFR 28L 66 78 (48) 4,176 182 ‐3.4 (1,080) 343 404 12/1/2018 8:14:52 Arrival SFO A21N ASA1591 ASA SERFR‐ST 28L 50 62 (180) 4,917 188 ‐3.4 (1,130) 346 404 12/1/2018 8:15:51 Arrival SFO A21N ASA1591 ASA SERFR‐ST 28L 61 73 (180) 4,917 188 ‐3.4 (1,130) 346 404 12/1/2018 8:18:40 Arrival SFO B739 UAL1294 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 63 73 (23) 4,549 242 ‐2.8 (1,203) 345 404 12/1/2018 8:21:04 Arrival SFO B77W UAL838 UAL OCEANIC 28R 65 76 2,807 6,132 221 ‐3.5 (1,354) 30 404 12/1/2018 8:24:10 Arrival SFO B77W ANA8 ANA BDEGA 28R 62 76 (1,588) 5,412 256 ‐3.6 (1,613) 38 404 12/1/2018 8:26:41 Arrival SFO B77W CES589 CES BDEGA 28L 62 73 3,160 4,565 202 ‐2.3 (829) 31 404 12/1/2018 8:33:04 Arrival SFO E75L SKW5642 SKW BDEGA 28L 62 72 (1,980) 4,966 232 ‐1.2 (497) 67 404 12/1/2018 8:33:26 Arrival SJC E145 DYN101 DYN U 12R 50 60 9,192 2,815 216 ‐2.3 (879) 7 404 12/1/2018 8:35:28 Arrival SFO B739 UAL662 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 63 74 (33) 4,296 177 ‐4.1 (1,282) 345 404 12/1/2018 8:36:13 Departure PAO U U U U 13 57 67 9,228 87 77 ‐2.6 (355) 141 404 12/1/2018 8:40:39 Arrival SFO E75L QXE2283 QXE BDEGA 28L 54 65 6,978 6,578 251 ‐2.2 (979) 72 404 12/1/2018 8:44:46 Arrival SFO B77W CPA870 CPA BDEGA 28R 56 69 (8,220) 7,091 236 ‐4.2 (1,736) 113 404 12/1/2018 8:49:47 Arrival SFO B77W KAL023 KAL BDEGA 28R 63 76 3,188 4,006 217 ‐0.3 (127) 28 404 12/1/2018 8:51:57 Arrival SFO A320 ACA574 ACA BDEGA 28L 51 64 (13,039) 6,171 253 ‐0.6 (251) 113 404 12/1/2018 8:53:57 Departure SFO A320 UAL234 UAL U 28L 50 65 (2,878) 14,671 430 2.3 1,751 106 404 12/1/2018 8:56:11 Arrival SJC E75L CPZ5772 CPZ U 12R 45 60 8,588 2,033 215 ‐2.1 (795) 16 404 12/1/2018 8:59:12 Departure SFO A319 UAL580 UAL U 28L 49 62 (4,532) 17,469 447 2.5 1,955 106 404 12/1/2018 9:01:11 Arrival SJC E75L QXE2810 QXE U 12R 49 61 10,273 2,896 188 ‐2.7 (885) 21 404 12/1/2018 9:02:46 Departure SFO A319 UAL2229 UAL U 28L 46 58 404 12/1/2018 9:05:36 Arrival SJC B737 SWA921 SWA U 12R 49 59 9,891 2,621 199 ‐4.4 (1,556) 15 404 12/1/2018 9:07:50 Arrival SJC E75L QXE2259 QXE U 12R 44 58 11,178 2,804 215 ‐2.8 (1,075) 13 404 12/1/2018 9:11:44 Arrival SFO B738 UAL1615 UAL BDEGA 28L 60 72 (4,279) 6,759 262 ‐4.0 (1,834) 113 404 12/1/2018 9:16:03 Arrival SFO B738 UAL2055 UAL BDEGA 28L 53 64 8,398 5,042 209 ‐1.6 (593) 59 404 12/1/2018 9:22:24 Arrival SFO A319 ASA1751 ASA BDEGA 28L 50 62 13,143 4,844 247 ‐3.7 (1,603) 34 404 12/1/2018 9:23:12 Departure PAO U U U U 31 46 59 9,285 9 64 0.0 ‐ 322 404 12/1/2018 9:25:45 Arrival SFO B789 UAL2 UAL BDEGA 28R 56 67 8,168 5,890 235 ‐2.6 (1,074) 28 404 12/1/2018 9:28:03 Arrival SFO A319 UAL820 UAL SERFR 28L 56 68 9,333 5,000 223 ‐0.6 (219) 62 404 12/1/2018 9:33:09 Arrival SFO B789 UAL876 UAL BDEGA 28R 64 75 (1,782) 4,755 207 ‐0.7 (244) 4 404 12/1/2018 9:34:22 Departure SFO B739 ASA710 ASA U 28R 55 66 (3,391) 17,155 433 2.3 1,771 106 404 12/1/2018 9:36:43 Arrival SFO B739 DAL1275 DAL BDEGA 28L 51 63 12,586 4,884 196 ‐2.5 (879) 13 404 12/1/2018 9:43:44 Arrival SFO CRJ9 JZA579 JZA BDEGA 28L 55 68 (1,117) 4,978 218 ‐0.8 (316) 3 404 12/1/2018 9:45:56 Arrival SFO B739 UAL501 UAL SERFR 28L 49 62 404 12/1/2018 9:48:13 Arrival SFO B739 UAL274 UAL SERFR 28L 50 64 9,929 5,025 217 ‐0.8 (300) 60 404 12/1/2018 9:51:07 Departure PAO U U U U 31 48 64 6,600 988 60 4.2 452 160 404 12/1/2018 9:56:31 Arrival SQL PC12 N903PJ GA U 30 60 72 (4,050) 1,912 122 ‐0.7 (158) 315 404 12/1/2018 10:01:03 Arrival SJC B737 SWA3249 SWA U 12R 50 62 8,315 2,619 203 ‐2.8 (986) 17 404 12/1/2018 10:04:22 Arrival SFO A321 JBU133 JBU MISSED 28L 51 66 9,883 5,015 197 0.1 43 68 404 12/1/2018 10:08:05 Arrival SFO CRJ2 SKW5982 SKW SERFR 28L 52 63 404 12/1/2018 10:08:22 Arrival SFO CRJ2 SKW5982 SKW SERFR 28L 47 62 404 12/1/2018 10:16:43 Departure SQL BE20 N840CP GA U 30 53 67 (10,498) 1,991 218 0.0 ‐ 90 404 12/1/2018 10:19:49 Departure PAO S22T N222BA GA U 31 56 67 9,200 275 86 10.6 1,597 321 A-34 Figure 9d Correlated Noise Event Report Site 404 (Tevis) ‐ December 1st 2018 Site Event Max Operation Airport Aircraft Flight Airline Procedure Runway Lmax SEL Closest Lateral Dist.Altitude Speed Pitch Alt Delta Heading ID Time Type ID Code dBA (Feet) (ft msl) (Kts) (Degrees) (ft/min) (True) 404 12/1/2018 10:23:35 Arrival SFO B77W CSN659 CSN BDEGA 28R 55 64 9,907 4,993 194 ‐0.1 (45) 24 404 12/1/2018 10:25:22 Departure SQL SR20 N321SL GA U 30 70 80 (1,408) 2,653 108 3.6 690 190 404 12/1/2018 10:27:32 Departure OAK CRJ9 ASH5796 ASH U 30 57 69 (1,925) 16,665 412 3.2 2,349 134 404 12/1/2018 10:35:23 Arrival SJC E75L QXE2224 QXE U 30L 48 62 11,601 2,998 203 0.0 ‐ 20 404 12/1/2018 10:42:44 Departure PAO U U U U 31 49 63 9,274 103 76 8.1 1,124 323 404 12/1/2018 10:51:57 Arrival SFO B77W ANZ8 ANZ OCEANIC 28R 56 69 9,466 4,054 205 ‐1.2 (421) 13 404 12/1/2018 10:54:51 Arrival SFO E75L QXE2267 QXE BDEGA 28L 50 63 9,666 4,005 176 ‐0.6 (199) 350 404 12/1/2018 10:56:46 Arrival SFO B738 UAL209 UAL SERFR 28L 51 63 10,372 4,018 167 ‐0.2 (45) 327 404 12/1/2018 10:58:58 Arrival SFO A332 FJI870 FJI OCEANIC 28R 58 70 8,909 4,947 257 ‐4.2 (1,920) 52 404 12/1/2018 11:02:53 Arrival SFO B788 ACA737 ACA BDEGA 28R 54 64 10,166 5,519 270 ‐1.8 (840) 93 404 12/1/2018 11:06:09 Departure PAO BE36 N100JB GA U 31 44 61 9,285 9 83 0.0 ‐ 322 404 12/1/2018 11:09:14 Departure SQL S22T N173CK GA U 30 55 67 6,764 2,271 175 3.2 978 106 404 12/1/2018 11:16:27 Departure PAO BE36 N100JB GA U 31 52 65 9,268 183 112 8.5 1,680 316 404 12/1/2018 11:20:23 Arrival SQL BE35 N8366D GA U 30 58 67 (3,856) 2,018 89 ‐3.4 (533) 308 404 12/1/2018 11:26:44 Arrival SFO A319 UAL698 UAL OCEANIC 28R 54 64 14,308 5,916 224 ‐1.3 (502) 64 404 12/1/2018 11:29:47 Departure SFO B738 UAL2128 UAL U 28R 53 62 (5,369) 16,348 452 1.2 990 106 404 12/1/2018 11:33:24 Arrival SFO B753 UAL2042 UAL BDEGA 28R 53 64 404 12/1/2018 11:36:04 Arrival SFO CRJ2 SKW5899 SKW BDEGA 28L 46 59 8,120 5,011 221 ‐1.5 (580) 88 404 12/1/2018 11:38:17 Arrival SFO A320 ASA1027 ASA SERFR 28L 55 66 12,638 6,000 256 0.0 ‐ 87 404 12/1/2018 11:48:14 Arrival SFO A320 UAL708 UAL SERFR 28L 51 65 12,067 4,021 166 ‐0.8 (219) 330 404 12/1/2018 11:50:11 Arrival SFO B738 UAL1763 UAL BDEGA 28L 49 61 (10,541) 8,182 244 ‐2.2 (928) 112 404 12/1/2018 11:59:14 Arrival SFO B738 SWA3582 SWA BDEGA 28L 54 67 404 12/1/2018 12:00:15 Arrival SFO A319 ASA1332 ASA BDEGA 28L 54 67 10,683 4,058 219 ‐1.0 (389) 53 404 12/1/2018 12:05:37 Arrival SFO B744 QFA73 QFA OCEANIC 28R 50 63 13,593 4,674 208 ‐5.9 (2,147) 12 404 12/1/2018 12:10:28 Arrival SFO A388 UAE225 UAE BDEGA 28R 50 63 5,751 4,925 215 ‐1.0 (390) 28 404 12/1/2018 12:11:30 Arrival SFO A388 UAE225 UAE BDEGA 28R 62 73 5,751 4,925 215 ‐1.0 (390) 28 404 12/1/2018 12:17:36 Departure PAO U U U U 31 51 66 3,455 1,039 105 ‐2.3 (418) 132 404 12/1/2018 12:23:23 Arrival SFO B772 UAL949 UAL BDEGA 28L 54 64 10,620 5,111 198 ‐3.0 (1,035) 33 404 12/1/2018 12:26:49 Arrival SFO E75L SKW5586 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 65 74 (13) 4,153 210 ‐2.9 (1,084) 345 404 12/1/2018 12:29:24 Arrival SFO E75L SKW5446 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 59 71 (47) 5,148 199 ‐1.1 (389) 344 404 12/1/2018 12:33:30 Arrival SFO A320 AIJ820 AIJ SERFR‐ST 28L 66 78 (231) 5,020 181 ‐0.1 (35) 344 404 12/1/2018 12:35:14 Overflight UNK CRJ2 SKW5332 SKW U U 56 68 404 12/1/2018 12:37:22 Arrival SFO A321 AAL789 AAL SERFR‐ST 28L 68 78 (72) 4,141 199 ‐3.7 (1,316) 343 404 12/1/2018 12:40:28 Arrival SFO E75L SKW5203 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 58 70 (61) 4,645 205 ‐3.2 (1,164) 344 404 12/1/2018 12:47:18 Arrival SFO CRJ2 SKW5655 SKW SERFR 28L 56 67 (598) 5,837 233 ‐3.7 (1,509) 345 404 12/1/2018 12:54:46 Arrival SFO CRJ2 SKW5349 SKW BDEGA 28L 56 65 404 12/1/2018 12:57:55 Arrival SFO CRJ2 SKW5279 SKW BDEGA 28L 60 69 404 12/1/2018 12:59:19 Arrival SFO CRJ2 SKW5476 SKW SERFR 28L 53 66 5,235 4,997 241 ‐0.2 (99) 23 404 12/1/2018 13:01:49 Arrival SFO B738 ASA621 ASA SERFR 28L 56 68 11,614 4,995 220 0.3 125 8 404 12/1/2018 13:02:58 Arrival SFO A346 DLH454 DLH BDEGA 28L 54 68 12,803 6,016 202 0.2 81 49 404 12/1/2018 13:06:41 Arrival SFO CRJ2 SKW5416 SKW SERFR‐ST 28R 57 69 (399) 4,869 205 ‐4.1 (1,499) 345 404 12/1/2018 13:08:57 Arrival SFO B737 SWA4136 SWA SERFR‐ST 28L 67 78 (91) 4,107 203 ‐5.1 (1,815) 344 404 12/1/2018 13:11:42 Arrival SFO A320 ASA1804 ASA BDEGA 28L 65 75 (3,002) 4,750 210 ‐3.6 (1,331) 1 404 12/1/2018 13:13:46 Arrival SFO CRJ7 SKW5697 SKW BDEGA 28L 64 75 (768) 4,569 208 ‐4.6 (1,678) 24 404 12/1/2018 13:16:56 Arrival SFO B77W KAL025 KAL BDEGA 28L 59 70 5,766 5,932 233 ‐4.7 (1,939) 21 404 12/1/2018 13:20:07 Arrival SFO A319 UAL1745 UAL BDEGA 28L 55 67 9,066 4,376 221 ‐3.1 (1,196) 33 404 12/1/2018 13:22:21 Arrival SFO A320 ASA1899 ASA SERFR 28L 54 66 404 12/1/2018 13:29:24 Arrival SFO B77W AFR084 AFR BDEGA 28L 66 79 3,103 4,822 209 ‐3.7 (1,380) 19 404 12/1/2018 13:33:41 Arrival SFO B744 BAW11M BAW BDEGA 28L 64 78 (5,468) 4,747 212 ‐3.5 (1,320) 26 404 12/1/2018 13:37:37 Arrival SFO A320 ASA1957 ASA SERFR 28L 57 70 14,188 4,069 219 ‐1.7 (673) 330 404 12/1/2018 13:41:56 Arrival SFO B738 UAL390 UAL SERFR 28L 65 79 2,862 4,346 217 ‐3.1 (1,185) 30 404 12/1/2018 13:46:23 Arrival SFO CRJ7 SKW5615 SKW BDEGA 28L 63 75 1,406 3,995 213 ‐0.8 (308) 37 404 12/1/2018 13:51:37 Arrival SFO A319 ASA1340 ASA BDEGA 28R 67 78 621 4,340 235 ‐4.2 (1,725) 47 404 12/1/2018 13:58:15 Arrival SFO A320 UAL2383 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 69 78 (66) 3,865 202 ‐4.3 (1,538) 344 404 12/1/2018 14:07:38 Arrival SFO B39M CMP208 CMP SERFR‐ST 28L 62 72 (16) 4,651 228 ‐3.1 (1,230) 344 404 12/1/2018 14:10:09 Arrival SFO B739 UAL444 UAL SERFR 28L 59 71 1,674 4,476 229 ‐3.1 (1,265) 338 404 12/1/2018 14:12:50 Arrival SFO E75L CPZ6007 CPZ SERFR‐ST 28L 56 69 (136) 4,655 213 ‐2.9 (1,076) 343 404 12/1/2018 14:14:41 Arrival SFO B738 SWA3950 SWA SERFR‐ST 28L 62 73 (32) 4,072 232 ‐4.0 (1,619) 345 404 12/1/2018 14:17:12 Arrival SFO B739 UAL372 UAL OCEANIC 28L 67 77 (21) 4,785 206 ‐2.5 (913) 345 404 12/1/2018 14:18:19 Arrival SFO A359 AAR212 AAR BDEGA 28L 49 63 7,675 4,698 215 ‐2.7 (1,035) 18 404 12/1/2018 14:20:23 Departure PAO U U U U 31 64 74 (1,280) 1,604 110 ‐0.5 (104) 55 404 12/1/2018 14:25:44 Arrival SFO B772 UAL900 UAL BDEGA 28L 64 74 (3,545) 4,964 216 ‐0.5 (180) 52 404 12/1/2018 14:28:07 Arrival SFO B77W EVA018 EVA OCEANIC 28L 63 76 1,979 5,157 221 ‐4.0 (1,575) 30 404 12/1/2018 14:30:07 Arrival SFO B752 UAL477 UAL BDEGA 28L 58 70 5,868 5,473 204 ‐5.9 (2,115) 29 404 12/1/2018 14:40:01 Arrival SFO B738 ASA534 ASA BDEGA 28L 53 65 404 12/1/2018 14:42:15 Departure PAO U U U U 31 49 57 9,285 9 47 0.0 ‐ 322 404 12/1/2018 14:43:09 Arrival SFO CRJ2 SKW5657 SKW SERFR 28L 48 56 404 12/1/2018 14:47:30 Arrival SFO B738 UAL2148 UAL SERFR 28L 51 64 8,368 4,658 205 ‐3.6 (1,304) 346 404 12/1/2018 14:48:36 Arrival SFO BE20 N654FM GA BDEGA 28R 52 59 (11,411) 4,110 170 ‐0.7 (195) 56 404 12/1/2018 14:50:03 Departure PAO U U U U 31 50 62 9,275 106 66 8.3 961 323 404 12/1/2018 14:51:33 Arrival SFO A320 ASA1388 ASA BDEGA 28L 51 64 11,569 4,055 205 ‐1.0 (372) 346 404 12/1/2018 14:59:32 Arrival SFO CRJ2 SKW5984 SKW SERFR 28L 55 67 (8) 5,025 211 ‐3.6 (1,335) 342 404 12/1/2018 15:03:57 Departure SQL SR20 N345BS GA U 30 58 65 8,013 2,638 138 2.8 690 112 404 12/1/2018 15:07:00 Arrival SFO B789 UAL892 UAL OCEANIC 28L 54 66 9,396 4,420 214 ‐3.2 (1,222) 358 404 12/1/2018 15:08:57 Arrival SFO A332 EIN147 EIN BDEGA 28L 60 71 7,858 4,933 230 ‐3.5 (1,425) 2 404 12/1/2018 15:12:00 Arrival SFO E75L QXE2042 QXE SERFR‐ST 28L 58 69 (49) 5,002 239 ‐4.6 (1,936) 343 404 12/1/2018 15:12:19 Arrival PAO C152 N152UF GA U 31 55 65 (1,159) 1,414 100 ‐1.4 (254) 78 404 12/1/2018 15:18:06 Arrival SFO E75L SKW5617 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 57 68 (83) 4,882 201 ‐4.3 (1,525) 344 404 12/1/2018 15:29:24 Arrival SFO CRJ2 SKW5362 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 56 67 (11) 4,704 226 ‐2.4 (942) 343 404 12/1/2018 15:32:03 Arrival SFO B739 UAL2351 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 62 73 (66) 4,271 227 ‐2.2 (896) 342 404 12/1/2018 15:34:18 Arrival SFO E75L SKW5954 SKW BDEGA 28R 62 72 3,174 4,387 202 ‐2.1 (738) 350 404 12/1/2018 15:36:09 Arrival SFO CRJ2 SKW5870 SKW SERFR 28L 51 65 2,136 4,692 212 ‐3.5 (1,307) 358 404 12/1/2018 15:40:02 Departure PAO U U U U 31 62 67 2,155 956 128 ‐1.6 (363) 140 404 12/1/2018 15:41:16 Arrival SFO B738 UAL1919 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 65 76 (54) 4,632 206 ‐2.6 (930) 343 404 12/1/2018 15:44:10 Arrival SFO GLEX TWY468 TWY SERFR‐ST 28R 63 72 (18) 4,002 240 ‐1.2 (502) 344 404 12/1/2018 15:45:57 Departure SJC C421 N700LC GA U 30L 60 71 3,121 1,625 123 0.0 5 301 404 12/1/2018 15:51:02 Arrival SFO E55P EJA406 EJA SERFR‐ST 28R 60 70 (19) 4,992 240 ‐0.7 (296) 345 404 12/1/2018 15:51:31 Arrival SFO A319 UAL1620 UAL SERFR 28L 59 69 4,785 5,419 214 ‐3.3 (1,230) 10 A-35 Figure 9d Correlated Noise Event Report Site 404 (Tevis) ‐ December 1st 2018 Site Event Max Operation Airport Aircraft Flight Airline Procedure Runway Lmax SEL Closest Lateral Dist.Altitude Speed Pitch Alt Delta Heading ID Time Type ID Code dBA (Feet) (ft msl) (Kts) (Degrees) (ft/min) (True) 404 12/1/2018 15:52:25 Arrival SQL BE9L N530CH GA U 30 56 67 (4,238) 2,148 154 ‐2.9 (795) 309 404 12/1/2018 15:55:25 Departure PAO U U U U 31 51 57 4,914 896 102 1.4 241 133 404 12/1/2018 15:56:28 Departure PAO U U U U H 60 69 8,663 918 40 9.9 ‐ 315 404 12/1/2018 15:58:24 Arrival SQL PC12 N903PJ GA U 30 62 71 (4,347) 1,845 148 ‐1.4 (369) 307 404 12/1/2018 16:04:27 Arrival SFO B738 UAL1268 UAL SERFR 28L 51 63 404 12/1/2018 16:04:59 Arrival SFO A320 ASA1959 ASA SERFR 28L 49 60 7,303 4,035 209 ‐0.2 (86) 11 404 12/1/2018 16:05:57 Arrival SFO A320 ASA1959 ASA SERFR 28L 59 70 7,303 4,035 209 ‐0.2 (86) 11 404 12/1/2018 16:09:12 Arrival SFO B712 DAL2356 DAL SERFR 28L 66 76 1,862 3,983 217 ‐0.5 (172) 25 404 12/1/2018 16:12:29 Arrival SFO A321 AAL1983 AAL SERFR 28L 66 76 2,711 4,155 195 ‐2.8 (975) 38 404 12/1/2018 16:14:42 Arrival SFO E75L SKW5861 SKW SERFR 28L 47 57 11,333 5,136 214 ‐4.1 (1,539) 82 404 12/1/2018 16:34:03 Arrival SFO B738 UAL222 UAL DYAMD 28R 47 58 404 12/1/2018 16:40:12 Arrival SFO CRJ2 SKW5286 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 59 71 (18) 4,502 230 ‐3.0 (1,230) 345 404 12/1/2018 16:41:52 Arrival PAO U U U U H 57 64 4,155 2,062 128 ‐1.1 (259) 79 404 12/1/2018 16:42:51 Arrival SFO A320 UAL1243 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 58 69 100 4,586 239 ‐1.3 (560) 344 404 12/1/2018 16:45:53 Arrival SFO E75L CPZ6045 CPZ SERFR‐ST 28L 62 74 (56) 3,771 208 ‐3.8 (1,411) 345 404 12/1/2018 16:56:21 Arrival SFO A319 UAL718 UAL SERFR 28L 53 63 404 12/1/2018 16:58:58 Arrival SFO B789 QFA49 QFA OCEANIC 28L 54 68 7,351 4,684 195 ‐2.4 (840) 347 404 12/1/2018 17:00:55 Arrival SFO B737 SWA4139 SWA SERFR‐ST 28L 59 70 (151) 4,652 192 ‐3.3 (1,123) 345 404 12/1/2018 17:02:55 Departure PAO U U U U 31 48 60 9,395 227 55 11.7 1,125 327 404 12/1/2018 17:07:49 Arrival PAO DA40 N202LS GA U 31 66 73 499 1,206 121 ‐1.4 (295) 51 404 12/1/2018 17:08:24 Departure SQL C172 N606LP GA U 30 62 69 6,419 2,995 139 1.2 300 110 404 12/1/2018 17:11:36 Arrival SFO E75L SKW5248 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 58 69 (14) 4,896 238 ‐2.0 (847) 345 404 12/1/2018 17:19:17 Departure PAO U U U U 31 56 68 9,338 177 83 10.1 1,466 326 404 12/1/2018 17:22:07 Arrival SFO B737 SWA3308 SWA SERFR 28L 53 63 7,377 4,800 228 ‐3.8 (1,521) 16 404 12/1/2018 17:24:59 Arrival SFO A319 UAL1051 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 64 75 (85) 5,009 194 ‐3.8 (1,316) 345 404 12/1/2018 17:30:24 Departure PAO U U U U 31 54 64 1,696 939 111 ‐1.9 (371) 61 404 12/1/2018 17:34:55 Arrival SFO E75L SKW3460 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 64 74 (75) 3,193 239 ‐5.3 (2,220) 344 404 12/1/2018 17:35:43 Arrival SFO B739 DAL1889 DAL BDEGA 28L 63 74 1,007 5,305 210 ‐3.2 (1,185) 41 404 12/1/2018 17:38:58 Overflight UNK U U U U U 49 65 404 12/1/2018 17:44:15 Arrival SFO A359 FBU711 FBU OCEANIC 28L 63 74 (2,526) 4,041 182 ‐3.5 (1,140) 32 404 12/1/2018 17:47:21 Arrival SFO A320 ASA1933 ASA SERFR‐ST 28L 60 72 (275) 4,039 236 0.5 195 343 404 12/1/2018 17:49:21 Arrival SFO B738 DAL1720 DAL SERFR‐ST 28L 67 77 (153) 4,962 195 ‐2.3 (786) 344 404 12/1/2018 17:51:19 Arrival SFO A320 ASA1271 ASA SERFR 28L 65 77 (217) 5,055 195 ‐1.4 (495) 344 404 12/1/2018 17:52:37 Arrival SFO A320 ASA1271 ASA SERFR 28L 67 77 (217) 5,055 195 ‐1.4 (495) 344 404 12/1/2018 17:55:46 Arrival SFO B738 UAL1124 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 66 77 (126) 4,632 215 ‐1.4 (540) 342 404 12/1/2018 17:58:07 Arrival SFO B739 UAL632 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 64 75 (72) 4,579 167 ‐2.9 (846) 343 404 12/1/2018 18:04:02 Arrival SFO B788 UAL890 UAL OCEANIC 28L 52 61 404 12/1/2018 18:06:16 Arrival SFO A319 ASA1273 ASA SERFR 28L 61 73 4,790 4,043 202 ‐1.0 (350) 30 404 12/1/2018 18:10:15 Arrival SFO CRJ9 JZA743 JZA BDEGA 28L 50 63 8,088 4,097 201 ‐1.7 (618) 324 404 12/1/2018 18:11:36 Arrival SFO B738 AAL1454 AAL SERFR 28L 48 62 12,100 4,252 208 ‐2.6 (946) 15 404 12/1/2018 18:14:01 Arrival SFO A388 BAW287 BAW BDEGA 28R 48 62 404 12/1/2018 18:16:06 Departure PAO U U U U H 68 81 (1,767) 1,612 113 1.0 200 250 404 12/1/2018 18:17:31 Arrival SFO A319 UAL1240 UAL SERFR 28L 50 63 13,539 4,235 164 ‐3.2 (930) 10 404 12/1/2018 18:20:43 Arrival SFO B752 UAL560 UAL BDEGA 28L 48 61 11,950 3,941 158 ‐1.7 (469) 322 404 12/1/2018 18:22:27 Arrival SFO B77W CAL004 CAL OCEANIC 28L 47 61 404 12/1/2018 18:27:23 Arrival SFO B77W EVA028 EVA OCEANIC 28L 48 62 404 12/1/2018 18:30:01 Arrival SFO A320 ASA1747 ASA BDEGA 28L 56 67 10,494 3,887 158 ‐1.2 (326) 323 404 12/1/2018 18:39:07 Arrival SFO A320 UAL587 UAL BDEGA 28L 56 68 (7,265) 6,576 283 ‐1.9 (960) 106 404 12/1/2018 18:44:00 Arrival SFO A319 ASA1923 ASA SERFR‐ST 28L 70 81 (21) 3,566 195 ‐4.0 (1,380) 342 404 12/1/2018 18:46:45 Arrival SFO A319 UAL2016 UAL SERFR 28L 50 64 13,123 4,206 197 ‐0.7 (245) 335 404 12/1/2018 18:48:08 Arrival SFO B737 SWA4050 SWA SERFR 28L 57 69 4,731 5,679 196 ‐1.8 (610) ‐ 404 12/1/2018 18:53:17 Arrival SFO E35L N84AW GA SERFR‐ST 28L 56 68 (50) 5,619 228 ‐5.0 (2,025) 345 404 12/1/2018 18:55:00 Arrival SFO CRJ7 SKW5765 SKW BDEGA 28L 61 71 5,968 3,993 196 ‐0.1 (33) 355 404 12/1/2018 19:03:27 Arrival SFO B737 SWA3361 SWA SERFR‐ST 28L 58 70 (37) 4,313 212 ‐1.3 (467) 344 404 12/1/2018 19:05:37 Arrival SFO B738 UAL2352 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 65 75 (20) 4,140 229 ‐3.9 (1,575) 343 404 12/1/2018 19:08:10 Arrival SFO CRJ2 SKW5700 SKW BDEGA 28L 56 67 (2,394) 4,051 208 ‐1.4 (495) 37 404 12/1/2018 19:11:02 Arrival SFO A320 TAI564 TAI SERFR‐ST 28L 67 78 (46) 4,158 203 ‐3.7 (1,326) 345 404 12/1/2018 19:12:35 Arrival SFO CRJ2 SKW5457 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 57 67 (159) 4,701 211 ‐2.3 (866) 342 404 12/1/2018 19:14:03 Arrival SFO B739 UAL1604 UAL OCEANIC 28L 50 65 9,275 4,240 210 ‐3.2 (1,201) 32 404 12/1/2018 19:16:36 Arrival SFO B77W SIA2 SIA OCEANIC 28L 55 68 5,507 4,405 222 ‐2.9 (1,140) 32 404 12/1/2018 19:18:32 Arrival SFO A321 AAL686 AAL SERFR 28R 52 66 11,518 4,911 176 ‐5.4 (1,665) 347 404 12/1/2018 19:19:47 Arrival SFO A319 ASA1279 ASA SERFR 28L 60 72 4,810 5,562 207 ‐4.4 (1,612) 12 404 12/1/2018 19:22:18 Arrival SFO A388 DLH458 DLH BDEGA 28R 55 67 11,505 3,998 200 ‐1.3 (462) 345 404 12/1/2018 19:26:55 Arrival SFO E75L SKW5592 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 57 68 (88) 4,141 193 ‐2.7 (928) 344 404 12/1/2018 19:28:46 Arrival SFO B737 SWA4154 SWA SERFR 28L 55 68 6,705 4,476 203 ‐4.6 (1,656) 10 404 12/1/2018 19:40:31 Arrival SFO CRJ2 SKW5872 SKW BDEGA 28L 46 60 (11,685) 3,926 232 ‐3.7 (1,530) 34 404 12/1/2018 19:43:07 Arrival SFO E75L CPZ6015 CPZ SERFR‐ST 28L 59 71 (43) 5,196 174 ‐4.2 (1,275) 343 404 12/1/2018 19:45:34 Arrival SFO CRJ2 SKW5718 SKW BDEGA 28L 52 60 7,717 4,657 208 ‐4.4 (1,606) 25 404 12/1/2018 19:46:20 Departure SFO B739 UAL394 UAL U 01L 52 65 (3,301) 15,854 428 2.6 1,986 105 404 12/1/2018 19:47:33 Arrival SFO A319 ASA1595 ASA SERFR‐ST 28R 67 78 (132) 4,277 163 ‐3.6 (1,035) 343 404 12/1/2018 19:48:55 Arrival SFO B772 UAL340 UAL BDEGA 28L 56 66 7,036 5,827 201 ‐2.6 (931) 65 404 12/1/2018 19:53:14 Departure SFO A320 ASA1940 ASA U 01L 50 62 (6,992) 16,728 448 2.8 2,205 105 404 12/1/2018 19:54:41 Arrival SFO E75L SKW5440 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 59 70 (67) 4,554 222 ‐3.1 (1,229) 344 404 12/1/2018 19:55:52 Arrival SFO B752 UAL1584 UAL BDEGA 28L 63 75 1,305 5,367 176 ‐6.3 (1,965) 37 404 12/1/2018 19:58:48 Arrival SFO B739 UAL2201 UAL SERFR 28L 60 72 5,782 4,001 197 ‐0.3 (93) 339 404 12/1/2018 20:00:25 Arrival SFO B38M ACA781 ACA BDEGA 28L 62 73 2,192 4,044 170 ‐2.4 (735) 344 404 12/1/2018 20:03:10 Arrival SFO B739 UAL384 UAL SERFR 28L 63 76 1,016 4,476 203 ‐3.6 (1,296) 352 404 12/1/2018 20:06:28 Arrival SFO E75L QXE2271 QXE BDEGA 28L 57 71 8,223 5,118 212 ‐8.4 (3,137) 32 404 12/1/2018 20:11:07 Arrival SFO B789 UAL28 UAL OCEANIC 28L 67 77 (2,244) 4,021 202 ‐1.3 (450) 29 404 12/1/2018 20:13:46 Arrival SFO A320 ASA1963 ASA SERFR‐ST 28L 67 79 (202) 4,022 196 ‐1.2 (398) 344 404 12/1/2018 20:15:20 Arrival SFO B772 UAL724 UAL OCEANIC 28L 55 67 13,321 6,562 246 ‐5.7 (2,479) 84 404 12/1/2018 20:18:44 Arrival SFO A332 HAL12 HAL OCEANIC 28L 52 60 404 12/1/2018 20:22:40 Arrival SFO A321 AAL547 AAL BDEGA 28L 65 72 6,162 5,075 232 ‐5.5 (2,265) 101 404 12/1/2018 20:25:55 Arrival SFO B738 UAL1152 UAL OCEANIC 28L 53 66 8,632 4,005 182 0.0 ‐ 347 404 12/1/2018 20:29:16 Arrival SFO A320 ASA1945 ASA SERFR‐ST 28L 66 78 (1,146) 4,379 195 ‐3.8 (1,296) 343 404 12/1/2018 20:32:28 Arrival SFO B789 ACA739 ACA BDEGA 28L 56 64 (11,270) 3,920 191 ‐1.0 (333) 29 404 12/1/2018 20:34:24 Arrival SFO B739 UAL643 UAL OCEANIC 28L 60 71 (5,940) 3,760 204 ‐3.5 (1,275) 22 404 12/1/2018 20:41:33 Arrival SFO B738 UAL1722 UAL OCEANIC 28L 64 75 (2,484) 5,114 198 ‐4.2 (1,470) 350 A-36 Figure 9d Correlated Noise Event Report Site 404 (Tevis) ‐ December 1st 2018 Site Event Max Operation Airport Aircraft Flight Airline Procedure Runway Lmax SEL Closest Lateral Dist.Altitude Speed Pitch Alt Delta Heading ID Time Type ID Code dBA (Feet) (ft msl) (Kts) (Degrees) (ft/min) (True) 404 12/1/2018 20:58:51 Departure SFO B752 UAL349 UAL U 01L 51 64 (3,558) 16,013 466 2.8 2,310 105 404 12/1/2018 21:03:43 Arrival SFO GLF4 WWI31 WWI SERFR‐ST 28L 63 74 (262) 4,252 193 ‐3.0 (1,011) 344 404 12/1/2018 21:05:53 Arrival SFO B738 UAL2132 UAL BDEGA 28L 61 69 (9,122) 3,970 212 0.0 3 33 404 12/1/2018 21:11:12 Arrival SFO A319 DAL752 DAL BDEGA 28L 48 59 404 12/1/2018 21:13:11 Arrival SFO E75L QXE2038 QXE SERFR‐ST 28L 58 71 (68) 3,998 209 ‐0.7 (275) 344 404 12/1/2018 21:14:59 Arrival SFO A320 UAL1217 UAL BDEGA 28L 59 69 7,108 4,985 201 ‐3.3 (1,180) 353 404 12/1/2018 21:17:03 Arrival SFO E75L SKW5681 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 62 73 (68) 4,495 187 ‐2.9 (972) 343 404 12/1/2018 21:19:22 Arrival SFO CRJ2 SKW5366 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 60 71 (69) 4,040 209 ‐4.1 (1,527) 345 404 12/1/2018 21:20:16 Departure SFO A20N FFT1998 FFT U 01L 49 60 3,232 17,030 463 2.9 2,355 107 404 12/1/2018 21:26:31 Arrival SFO B737 SWA485 SWA SERFR‐ST 28L 62 72 (56) 4,630 217 ‐2.5 (952) 344 404 12/1/2018 21:28:52 Arrival SFO GLF4 U U SERFR‐ST 28R 65 74 (207) 4,138 236 ‐2.5 (1,054) 342 404 12/1/2018 21:30:52 Arrival SFO CRJ7 SKW5873 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 55 69 (25) 4,714 207 ‐2.3 (840) 343 404 12/1/2018 21:32:40 Arrival SFO B739 UAL1568 UAL SERFR‐ST 28L 63 75 (68) 5,052 203 ‐2.4 (845) 343 404 12/1/2018 21:35:15 Arrival SFO B738 AMX664 AMX SERFR‐ST 28L 58 71 (36) 5,024 197 ‐0.5 (172) 344 404 12/1/2018 21:37:58 Arrival SFO CRJ2 SKW5616 SKW SERFR 28L 47 54 9,123 5,016 204 ‐3.7 (1,331) 10 404 12/1/2018 21:40:02 Arrival SFO E75L SKW5483 SKW SERFR 28L 56 67 3,563 5,542 231 ‐3.7 (1,493) 8 404 12/1/2018 21:43:13 Arrival SFO A332 HAL42 HAL OCEANIC 28L 52 62 12,169 4,021 165 ‐0.7 (213) 349 404 12/1/2018 21:46:20 Arrival SFO E75L SKW3381 SKW SERFR‐ST 28L 61 74 (50) 4,651 188 ‐2.7 (885) 345 404 12/1/2018 21:49:40 Arrival SFO A320 ASA1776 ASA BDEGA 28L 61 72 5,712 4,743 210 ‐4.1 (1,512) 32 404 12/1/2018 21:52:04 Arrival SFO A320 ACA568 ACA BDEGA 28L 68 80 (271) 4,127 205 ‐2.4 (864) 356 404 12/1/2018 21:53:57 Arrival SFO A321 JBU833 JBU BDEGA 28L 60 72 (7,057) 4,031 171 ‐2.8 (833) 16 404 12/1/2018 21:56:11 Departure OAK B38M SWA6868 SWA U 30 51 64 (1,376) 15,901 404 3.1 2,205 139 404 12/1/2018 22:01:59 Arrival SFO A320 AIJ830 AIJ SERFR‐ST 28L 63 74 (30) 4,639 222 ‐2.7 (1,070) 344 404 12/1/2018 22:04:13 Arrival SFO B738 DAL1700 DAL SERFR‐ST 28L 66 78 (66) 4,209 195 ‐3.5 (1,195) 344 404 12/1/2018 22:14:28 Arrival SFO B739 UAL650 UAL OCEANIC 28L 65 75 (1,737) 5,098 217 ‐4.3 (1,648) 32 404 12/1/2018 22:34:34 Arrival SFO CRJ7 SKW5461 SKW SERFR‐ST 28R 54 67 310 5,031 200 ‐2.3 (827) 345 404 12/1/2018 22:38:42 Arrival SFO E75L CPZ6085 CPZ SERFR‐ST 28R 63 73 (41) 4,994 199 ‐2.5 (861) 344 404 12/1/2018 22:40:48 Arrival SFO B738 UAL1712 UAL SERFR‐ST 28R 63 74 (98) 4,828 184 ‐3.0 (983) 343 404 12/1/2018 22:43:02 Arrival SFO B738 ASA759 ASA OCEANIC 28R 61 71 5,090 5,006 173 ‐4.1 (1,233) 350 404 12/1/2018 22:45:39 Arrival SFO B738 UAL1288 UAL OCEANIC 28R 64 74 (699) 6,055 230 ‐1.9 (765) 23 404 12/1/2018 22:59:14 Departure SFO B752 UAL2360 UAL U 01R 49 64 8,541 14,124 443 2.0 1,598 123 404 12/1/2018 23:05:15 Arrival SFO B738 CMP382 CMP SERFR‐ST 28R 65 76 (36) 4,717 201 ‐2.3 (797) 345 404 12/1/2018 23:09:59 Arrival SFO A321 AAL2374 AAL BDEGA 28R 63 72 (2,698) 4,225 206 ‐3.7 (1,361) 71 404 12/1/2018 23:17:39 Arrival SFO B738 UAL435 UAL OCEANIC 28R 55 66 8,220 5,818 230 ‐3.5 (1,427) 34 404 12/1/2018 23:21:07 Arrival SFO B738 AMX662 AMX SERFR‐ST 28R 65 76 (94) 4,170 235 ‐3.3 (1,351) 345 404 12/1/2018 23:21:52 Arrival SFO B752 DAL2344 DAL BDEGA 28R 58 68 6,077 5,662 216 ‐5.5 (2,110) 38 404 12/1/2018 23:25:17 Arrival SFO B752 UAL1056 UAL BDEGA 28R 55 68 (3,468) 5,668 213 ‐2.4 (885) 120 404 12/1/2018 23:38:32 Arrival SFO A320 TAI560 TAI SERFR‐ST 28R 65 76 (55) 4,623 220 ‐1.7 (650) 345 404 12/1/2018 23:58:45 Departure SFO B753 UAL2237 UAL U 01R 48 64 (12,047) 14,064 427 2.1 1,572 105 BridgeNet International 2019 A-37 City of Palo Alto (ID # 10235) City Council Staff Report Report Type: Informational Report Meeting Date: 5/20/2019 City of Palo Alto Page 1 Summary Title: 1st Quarter 2019 ADU Development Activity Report Title: 1st Quarter 2019 ADU Development Activity Report From: City Manager Lead Department: Planning and Community Environment Recommendation This is an informational report and no action is requested. Background In June 2017, the City amended the Zoning Code (Title 18) to adopt Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) regulations to comply with State adopted requirements. At the time of the adoption of the regulations, the City Council directed staff to provide quarterly reports on the number of permits filed for the construction of ADUs. The City Council received the last development report for 4th Quarter 2018 on March 4, 2019 (Report #100001). Following the implementation of the State regulations in 2017, the City experienced a significant increase in the number of ADU permits filed, far exceeding the prior year’s average of four ADU permits. The City has received a total of 100 ADU building permit applications since June 2017. Table 1 below provides a summary of ADU permit activity since June 2017, when the new State laws became effective. Discussion In the first quarter of 2019, a total of 18 ADU building permit applications were filed. All the ADU applications were located within the R-1 single family zone district and approximately 56percent of the applications filed were in the South Palo Alto neighborhood. Twelve of the 1 Staff Report #10000: https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/civicax/filebank/blobdload.aspx?t=54023.3&BlobID=69486 City of Palo Alto Page 2 ADU applications were for construction of new units, while the remaining six applications were for conversions of existing spaces, namely detached garages. In this reporting quarter, the majority of the ADU applications filed were for one-bedroom units. The unit sizes ranged from 230 to 900 square feet, with an average unit size of 520 square feet. None of the projects proposed utilized the floor area bonus allowed under the City’s ordinance. The City has not yet received an application for a Junior Accessory Dwelling Unit (JADU). Additional details about the applications received are provided in Attachment A. With the implementation of the State regulations in 2017, the City experienced a significant increase in the number of ADU permits filed, far exceeding the prior year’s average of four ADU permits. The City received a total of 100 ADU building permit applications to date. Table 1 provides a status summary of ADU permit activity since January of 2017. Table 1: Summary of ADU Permit Activity since 2017 Number of ADU Applications Filed Building Permits Issued Building Permits Finaled 2017 28 6 16 2018 54 29 3 January 1 - March 31 (Q1-2019) 18 0 0 Total Number Including Q1 2019 100 35 19 Source: Planning Department Accela Data 2019. Includes Building Permit applications filed from January 1, 2017 through March 31, 2019. Attachments: Attachment A: List of ADU Building Permit Applications Q1, 2019 (PDF) Page 1 of 1 Attached Detached Attached Detached Garage Other Accessory Structure/ Space 1 North Palo Alto R-1 01/02/2019 Not Yet In Plan Check x 1 660 2 North Palo Alto R-1 01/11/2019 Not Yet In Plan Check x 1 468 3 North Palo Alto R-1 01/18/2019 Not Yet In Plan Check x 1 230 4 South Palo Alto R-1 02/07/2019 Not Yet In Plan Check x Detached Garage 1 400 5 North Palo Alto R-1 02/12/2019 Not Yet In Plan Check x 1 899 6 North Palo Alto R-1 02/14/2019 Not Yet In Plan Check x Detached Garage 2 572 7 North Palo Alto R-1 02/15/2019 Not Yet In Plan Check x 1 368 8 South Palo Alto R-1 (8000) 02/27/2019 Not Yet In Plan Check x 1 420 9 South Palo Alto R-1 02/27/2019 Not Yet In Plan Check x 2 900 10 South Palo Alto R-1 03/06/2019 Not Yet In Plan Check x Detached Garage 1 500 11 South Palo Alto R-1 (8000) 03/06/2019 Not Yet In Plan Check x 1 696 12 South Palo Alto R-1 03/06/2019 Not Yet In Plan Check x 1 295 13 South Palo Alto R-1 03/07/2019 Not Yet In Plan Check x Detached Garage 1 371 14 North Palo Alto R-1 03/08/2019 Not Yet In Plan Check x Attached Garage 0 235 15 South Palo Alto R-1 (8000) 03/12/2019 Not Yet In Plan Check x 1 435 16 North Palo Alto R-1 (10000) 03/15/2019 Not Yet In Plan Check x 1 866 17 South Palo Alto R-1 03/19/2019 Not Yet In Plan Check x 1 656 18 South Palo Alto R-1 03/28/2019 Not Yet In Plan Check x Attached Garage 1 383 # of Bedrooms ADU Size (SQFT) Source: Planning Department Accela Data 2019. Includes Building Permit applications filed from January 1, 2019 through March 31, 2019 Building Permits Applied in 2019(Q1) Number of Applications Project Location Zoning Date Filed Building Permit Issued Application Status New Construction Conversion Type of Conversion City of Palo Alto (ID # 10293) City Council Informational Report Report Type: Informational Report Meeting Date: 5/20/2019 May 20, 2019 Page 1 of 1 (ID # 10293) Title: Public Works Week May 19-25, 2019 Proclamation Subject: Proclamation Recognizing National Public Works Week May 19-25, 2019 From: City Manager Lead Department: Public Works Attachments: A: Proclamation (DOCX) Q CITY OF PALO ALTO Proclamation NATIONAL PUBLIC WORKS WEEK MAY 19-25, 2019 Whereas, Public Works services provided in Palo Alto are an integral part of our citizens' everyday lives; and Whereas, the support of an understanding and informed citizenry is vital to the efficient implementation and operation of public works systems and programs such as streets, public buildings, storm drains, wastewater treatment, solid waste collection, environmental programs, and airport management and operations; and Whereas, the health, safety and comfort of Palo Alto greatly depends on these facilities and services; and Whereas, the quality and effectiveness of these facilities, as well as their planning, design, construction and maintenance are vitally dependent upon the efforts and skill of Public Works staff; and Whereas, the efficiency of the qualified and dedicated personnel who staff the Public Works Department is influenced by the community’s attitude and understanding of the importance of the work they perform. Now, Therefore, I, Eric Filseth Mayor of the City of Palo Alto, on behalf of the City Council do hereby proclaim the week of May 19, 2019, as "National Public Works Week" within the City of Palo Alto, and I call upon all citizens and civic organizations to acquaint themselves with the issues involved in providing our public works and to recognize the contributions which Public Works staff make every day to our health, safety, comfort and quality of life. Presented: May 20, 2019 _____________________________________ Eric Filseth Mayor Attachment A City of Palo Alto (ID # 10350) City Council Staff Report Report Type: Informational Report Meeting Date: 5/20/2019 City of Palo Alto Page 1 Summary Title: Building Safety Month Proclamation Title: Proclamation Recognizing May 2019 as Building Safety Month From: City Manager Lead Department: Development Services Department Attachments: Attachment A: Building Safety Month Proclamation Proclamation BUILDING SAFETY MONTH Whereas, the City of Palo Alto is committed to recognizing that our growth and strength depends on the safety and economic value of the homes, buildings and infrastructure that serve our citizens, both in everyday life and in times of natural disaster; and Whereas, our confidence in the structural integrity of these buildings that make up our community is achieved through the devotion of vigilant guardians––building safety and fire prevention officials, architects, engineers, builders, tradespeople, design professionals, laborers, plumbers and others in the construction industry––who work year-round to ensure the safe construction of buildings; and Whereas, our city benefits economically and technologically from using the California Code of Regulations, Title 24 based on the International Codes® that are developed by a national, voluntary consensus codes and standards developing organization and uniform our government to be able to avoid the high cost and complexity of developing and maintaining these codes, which are the most widely adopted building safety and fire prevention codes in the world; and Whereas, these modern building codes include safeguards to protect the public from natural disasters such as snowstorms, wildland fires, floods and earthquake; which, according to a FEMA-commissioned study by the National Institute of Building Sciences, provide $11 in future mitigation benefits for every dollar invested, and; Whereas, Building Safety Month is sponsored by the International Code Council to remind the public about the critical role of our communities’ largely unknown protectors of public safety––our local code officials––who assure us of safe, efficient and livable buildings that are essential to America’s prosperity, and; Whereas, “No Code. No Confidence.” the theme for Building Safety Month 2019, encourages all Americans to raise awareness of the importance of safe and resilient construction; fire prevention; disaster mitigation, and new technologies in the construction industry. Building Safety Month 2019 recognizes that the implementation of safety codes by local and state agencies has saved lives and protected homes and business; and Whereas, each year, in observance of Building Safety Month, Americans are asked to consider the commitment to improve building safety and economic investment at home and in the community, and to acknowledge the essential service provided to all of us by local and state building departments, fire prevention bureaus and federal agencies in protecting lives and property. NOW, THEREFORE, I, Eric Filseth, Mayor, of the City of Palo Alto, do hereby proclaim the month of May 2019 as Building Safety Month. Accordingly, I encourage our citizens to join with their communities in participation in Building Safety Month activities. Presented: May 20, 2019 ______________________________ Eric Filseth Mayor