HomeMy WebLinkAbout2017-01-30 City Council Agenda PacketCity Council
1
MATERIALS RELATED TO AN ITEM ON THIS AGENDA SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL AFTER DISTRIBUTION OF THE AGENDA
PACKET ARE AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION IN THE CITY CLERK’S OFFICE AT PALO ALTO CITY HALL, 250 HAMILTON AVE.
DURING NORMAL BUSINESS HOURS.
January 30, 2017
Special Meeting
Council Chambers
5:00 PM
Agenda posted according to PAMC Section 2.04.070. Supporting materials are available in the Council Chambers on the Thursday 10 days preceding the meeting.
PUBLIC COMMENT Members of the public may speak to agendized items; up to three minutes per speaker, to be determined by the presiding officer. If you wish to address the Council on any issue that is on this agenda, please complete a speaker
request card located on the table at the entrance to the Council Chambers, and deliver it to the City Clerk prior to discussion of the item. You are not required to give your name on the speaker card in order to speak to the Council, but it is very helpful.
TIME ESTIMATES Time estimates are provided as part of the Council's effort to manage its time at Council meetings. Listed times are estimates only and are subject to change at any time, including while the meeting is in progress. The Council
reserves the right to use more or less time on any item, to change the order of items and/or to continue items to another meeting. Particular items may be heard before or after the time estimated on the agenda. This may occur in order to best manage the time at a meeting or to adapt to the participation of the public. To ensure participation in a particular item, we suggest arriving at the beginning of the meeting and remaining until the item is called.
HEARINGS REQUIRED BY LAW
Applicants and/or appellants may have up to ten minutes at the outset of the public discussion to make their remarks and up to three minutes for concluding remarks after other members of the public have spoken.
Call to Order
Closed SessionPublic Comments: Members of the public may speak to the Closed Session item(s); three minutes per speaker.
1.CONFERENCE WITH CITY ATTORNEY-EXISTING LITIGATION
Subject: Buena Vista MHP Residents Association v.
City of Palo Alto, Santa Clara County
Superior Court, Case No. 115-CV-284763
Subject Authority: Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1)
Special Orders of the Day 5:30-5:40 PM
2.Selection of Applicants to Interview on February 1, 2017 for the
Historic Resources Board, the Parks and Recreation Commission, and
the Planning and Transportation Commission
REVISED
5:00-5:30 PM
2 January 30, 2017
MATERIALS RELATED TO AN ITEM ON THIS AGENDA SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL AFTER DISTRIBUTION OF THE AGENDA
PACKET ARE AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION IN THE CITY CLERK’S OFFICE AT PALO ALTO CITY HALL, 250 HAMILTON AVE.
DURING NORMAL BUSINESS HOURS.
Agenda Changes, Additions and Deletions
City Manager Comments 5:40-5:50 PM
Oral Communications 5:50-6:10 PM
Members of the public may speak to any item NOT on the agenda. Council reserves the right to limit the duration of Oral Communications period to 30 minutes.
Consent Calendar 6:10-6:15 PM
Items will be voted on in one motion unless removed from the calendar by three Council Members.
3.Approval of the Acceptance and Expenditure of Citizens Options for
Public Safety (COPS) Funds on Various Law Enforcement Equipment
and Approval of a Budget Amendment in the Law Enforcement
Services Fund
4.Adoption of a Resolution of the Council of the City of Palo Alto in
Collaboration With the Cities of Redwood City, Menlo Park, and
Mountain View Directing Staff to Participate in Sub-regional Planning
on Bike Routes
Action Items 6:15-10:00 PM Include: Reports of Committees/Commissions, Ordinances and Resolutions, Public Hearings, Reports of Officials,
Unfinished Business and Council Matters.
5.Comprehensive Plan Update: City Council Review & Direction
Regarding the Draft Land Use & Community Design Element and the
Revised Draft Transportation Element
Inter-Governmental Legislative Affairs
Council Member Questions, Comments and Announcements Members of the public may not speak to the item(s)
Adjournment
AMERICANS WITH DISABILITY ACT (ADA) Persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids or services in using City facilities, services or programs or who would like information on the City’s compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990, may contact (650) 329-2550 (Voice) 24 hours in advance.
3 January 30, 2017
MATERIALS RELATED TO AN ITEM ON THIS AGENDA SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL AFTER DISTRIBUTION OF THE AGENDA
PACKET ARE AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION IN THE CITY CLERK’S OFFICE AT PALO ALTO CITY HALL, 250 HAMILTON AVE.
DURING NORMAL BUSINESS HOURS.
Additional Information
Council and Standing Committee Meetings
Sp. City Council Meeting February 1, 2017
(Board and Commission Interviews)
Schedule of Meetings
Schedule of Meetings
Tentative Agenda
Tentative Agenda
Public Letters to Council
Set 1
CITY OF PALO ALTO OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
January 30, 2017
The Honorable City Council
Palo Alto, California
Selection of Applicants to Interview on February 1, 2017 for the
Historic Resources Board, the Parks and Recreation Commission, and
the Planning and Transportation Commission
Staff is requesting the City Council select the candidates to be interviewed for:
Three terms (Bower, Bunnenberg, and DiCicco), on the Historic Resources Board, ending on December 15, 2019;
Four terms (Hetterly, Knopper, Lauing, and Reckdahl) on the Parks and Recreation Commission, ending on December 15, 2019;
One unexpired term (Cowie) on the Parks and Recreation Commission, ending on December 15, 2018; and
One unexpired term (Fine) on the Planning and Transportation Commission, ending December 15, 2018.
Interviews are scheduled for Wednesday, February 1, 2017 at 6:00 P.M. Each Council Member will receive a selection sheet to use in determining who will be interviewed. Copies of all applications are attached. Some applications may be redacted at the request of the applicant. A full set of non-redacted applications will be emailed to Council Members directly. Recommendation The requested action is for each Council Member to fill out the selection sheet indicating which of the candidates they wish to interview. The City Clerk will announce who will be interviewed at the same meeting. Candidates who receive five or more votes will be scheduled for an interview. Background On January 9, 2017, Council directed Staff to reopen recruitments for the Historic Resources Board and the Parks & Recreation Commission (PRC) and initiate a special recruitment for the Planning and Transportation Commission (PTC). On December 19 2016, the Clerk’s Office learned that Jim Cowie resigned from the PRC. His unexpired term on the PRC expires December 15, 2018. On November 17, 2016, the Clerk’s Office learned that Andres Mediavilla withdrew his application for the PRC. On November 28, 2016, the Clerk’s Office learned that Kevin Mayer withdrew his application for the PRC. On November 8, 2016, Adrian Fine was elected to the City Council. Pursuant to
Page 2
Municipal Code Section 2.20.010, Council Member-Elect Fine’s unexpired term on the PTC is made vacant by his election and assumption of office to the City Council on January 3, 2017. His unexpired term on the PTC expires December 15, 2018. Applicants Historic Resources Board (Three Terms)
1. David Bower (Incumbent) 2. Beth Bunnenberg (Incumbent) 3. Brandon Corey 4. Patt DiCicco (Incumbent) Parks and Recreation Commission (Four Full Terms/One Unexpired Term) 1. Grant Dasher 2. Rebecca Eisenberg 3. Jeff Greenfield 4. Doug Hagan 5. Jeff LaMere 6. Steven Lee 7. Alice Mansell 8. Ryan McCauley 9. Don McDougall 10. Keith Reckdahl (Incumbent) 11. Ellen Turbow Planning and Transportation Commission (One Unexpired Term)
1. Hope Chang
2. Dexter Dawes
3. Claude Ezran
4. Brian Hamachek
5. Tracy Herrick
6. David Hirsch
7. Natasha Kachenko
8. Gabriel Kralik
9. Susan Monk
10. Christian Pease
11. Jessica Resmini
12. Reshma Singh
13. Curtis Smolar
14. Greer Stone
15. Srinivasan Subramanian
Please note that the City is testing DocuSign electronic signatures as a method for
individuals to submit applications for Boards and Commissions. Formatting irregularities
present in the attached applications are the result of this testing.
Page 3
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment A: HRB - Bower, David (PDF)
Attachment B: HRB - Bunnenberg, Beth (PDF)
Attachment C: HRB - Corey, Brandon (PDF)
Attachment D: HRB - DiCicco, Patt (PDF)
Attachment E: PRC - Dasher, Grant (PDF)
Attachment F: PRC - Eisenberg, Rebecca (PDF)
Attachment G: PRC - Greenfield, Jeff (PDF)
Attachment H: PRC - Hagan, Doug (PDF)
Attachment I: PRC - LaMere, Jeff (PDF)
Attachment J: PRC - Lee, Steven (PDF)
Attachment K: PRC - Mansell, Alice (PDF)
Attachment L: PRC - McCauley, Ryan (PDF)
Attachment M: PRC - McDougall, Don (PDF)
Attachment N: PRC - Reckdahl, Keith (PDF)
Attachment O: PRC - Turbow, Ellen (PDF)
Attachment P: PTC - Chang, Hope (PDF)
Attachment Q: PTC - Dawes, Dexter (PDF)
Attachment R: PTC - Ezran, Claude (PDF)
Attachment S: PTC - Hamachek, Brian (PDF)
Attachment T: PTC - Herrick, Tracy (PDF)
Attachment U: PTC - Hirsch, David (PDF)
Attachment V: PTC - Kachenko, Natasha (PDF)
Attachment W: PTC - Kralik, Gabriel (PDF)
Attachment X: PTC - Monk, Susan (PDF)
Attachment Y: PTC - Pease, Christian (PDF)
Attachment Z: PTC - Resmini, Jessica (PDF)
Attachment AA: PTC - Singh, Reshma (PDF)
Attachment BB - PTC - Smolar, Curtis (PDF)
Attachment CC - PTC - Stone, Greer (PDF)
Attachment DD: PTC - Subramanian, Srinivasan (PDF)
Department Head: Beth Minor, City Clerk
Page 4
Historic Resources Board Application
1 of 5
Personal Information
Name:
Address:
Cell Phone:
____ Home / ____ Office Phone:
E-mail:
Are you a Palo Alto Resident? ____ Yes ____ No
Do you have any relatives or members of your household who are employed by the City of Palo Alto, who
are currently serving on the City Council, or who are Commissioners or Board Members?
____ Yes ____ No
Are you available and committed to complete the term applied for? ____ Yes ____ No
California state law and the Ci Conflict of Interest Code require appointed board and
commission members to file a detailed disclosure of their financial interests, Fair Political Practices
Commission, Conflict of Interest, Form 700.
Do you have an investment in, or do you serve as an officer or director of, a company doing business in
Palo Alto which you believe is likely to;
1) engage in business with the City,
2) provide products or services for City projects, or
3)be affected by decisions of the board or commission you are applying for? ____ Yes ____ No
Excluding your principal residence, do you own real property in Palo Alto? ____ Yes ____ No
How did you learn about this vacancy?
____ Community Group
____ Email from City Clerk
____ Palo Alto Weekly
____ Daily Post
____ City Website
____ Flyer
Other:
List relevant education, training, experience, certificates of training, licenses, or professional
registration:
DocuSign Envelope ID: B0785A6B-D436-4D60-8732-4C5AD86AE27A
Historic Resources Board Application
2 of 5
Employment
Present or Last Employer:
Occupation:
Describe your involvement in community activities, volunteer and civic organizations:
1. What is it about the Historic Resources Board that is compatible with your experience and
of specific interest to you, and why?
DocuSign Envelope ID: B0785A6B-D436-4D60-8732-4C5AD86AE27A
Historic Resources Board Application
3 of 5
2. Please describe an issue that recently came before the Board that is of particular interestto you and describe why you are interested in it. If you have never been to a Board
meeting you can view an archived video from the Midpen Media Center:
3. If appointed, what specific goals would you like to see the Historic Resources Board
achieve, and why? How would you suggest accomplishing this?
DocuSign Envelope ID: B0785A6B-D436-4D60-8732-4C5AD86AE27A
Historic Resources Board Application
4 of 5
4. Please identify a project or projects that you find to be examples of good historic
architecture, and explain why. You may attach samples, identify project addresses, or
provide links. If you attach samples, Staff may request that you bring hard copy print outs
to the interviews.
5. Historic Resources Board Members work with the documents listed below. If you have
experience with any of these documents, please describe that experience. Experience with
these documents is not required for selection.
Palo Alto Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element
Palo Alto Municipal Code Chapter 16.49
Secretary of the Interiors Standards for: Preserving, Rehabilitating, Restoring, and Reconstructing Historic Buildings
California Environmental Quality Act
DocuSign Envelope ID: B0785A6B-D436-4D60-8732-4C5AD86AE27A
Historic Resources Board Application
5 of 5
Consent to Publish Personal Information on the City of Palo Alto Website
California Government Code Section 6254.21 states, in part,
This consent form will not be redacted and will be attached
The full code can be read here:
Read the code, and check only ONE option below:
_
Commission Application intact. I have read and understand my rights under Government Code
Section 6254.21. I may revoke this permission at any time by providing written notice to the
Palo Alto City Clerk.
OR
I request that the City of Palo Alto redact my home address, phone numbers, and email address
providing the following alternate information and request that they use the following contact
information instead.
Address:
Cell Phone:
____ Home / ____ Office Phone: ______
E-mail: ____________________________________________
The phone number / address can be non-public and different than the address collected on page one.
Signature: Date:
(Optional) Additional Attachment(s)
If you would like to submit a resume, work sample, etc. along with your
DocuSign Envelope ID: B0785A6B-D436-4D60-8732-4C5AD86AE27A
September 8, 2016
David Bower
Birth Date
February, 1951, Palo Alto, California
Education
San Francisco State University, San Francisco, California 1973-1975 B.A. in Communications,
May 1975
Foothill College, Los Altos, California 1970-1973 Liberal Arts Major
Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri 1969-1970 Liberal Arts Major
Honors
Professional Experience
President, David Bower Incorporated, Palo Alto, California. Residential construction and consulting
2007 to present
President, Bower Loops Builders, Palo Alto, California. Residential construction company.
2001 to 2007
President, David Bower Builders, Palo Alto, California. Residential construction company.
1979 to 2001
President, Designs In Wood, Palo Alto, California. Residential construction company.
1975-1979
Licensed contractor in the State of California 1979 to present
Community Activities
Board of Directors, Treasurer, Western Ballet, Mountain View, California. 1989-1993
Board of Directors, Treasurer, Palo Alto Chamber Orchestra, Palo Alto, California. 1995-1997
Board of Directors, Pelican Homeowners Association, Pajaro Dunes, Watsonville, California.
2005 to present. Current President
Chairman, Design Committee, Pajaro Dunes Association, Watsonville, California. April 2006 to January 2015
Board member, Palo Alto Historic Resources Board, Palo Alto, California June 2007 to present
Chairman, Palo Alto Historic Resources Board, Palo Alto, California June 2009 to October 2011
Board member, City of Palo Alto Infrastructure Blue Ribbon Commission, November 2010 to December 2011
Board member, Pajaro Dunes Geologic Hazard Abatement District, July 2014 to present
Committee Member, City of Palo Alto Storm Drain Drain Blue Ribbon Committee, April-July 2016
Memberships
NARI (National Association of the Remodeling Industry), 1993 to 2013
International Conference of Building Officials, 2004 to 2014
Build It Green, 2009 to 2014
DocuSign Envelope ID: B0785A6B-D436-4D60-8732-4C5AD86AE27A
Historic Resources Board Application
1 of 5
Personal Information
Name:
Address:
Cell Phone:
____ Home / ____ Office Phone:
E-mail:
Are you a Palo Alto Resident? ____ Yes ____ No
Do you have any relatives or members of your household who are employed by the City of Palo Alto, who
are currently serving on the City Council, or who are Commissioners or Board Members?
____ Yes ____ No
Are you available and committed to complete the term applied for? ____ Yes ____ No
California state law and the Ci Conflict of Interest Code require appointed board and
commission members to file a detailed disclosure of their financial interests, Fair Political Practices
Commission, Conflict of Interest, Form 700.
Do you have an investment in, or do you serve as an officer or director of, a company doing business in
Palo Alto which you believe is likely to;
1) engage in business with the City,
2) provide products or services for City projects, or
3)be affected by decisions of the board or commission you are applying for? ____ Yes ____ No
Excluding your principal residence, do you own real property in Palo Alto? ____ Yes ____ No
How did you learn about this vacancy?
____ Community Group
____ Email from City Clerk
____ Palo Alto Weekly
____ Daily Post
____ City Website
____ Flyer
Other:
List relevant education, training, experience, certificates of training, licenses, or professional
registration:
DocuSign Envelope ID: 9F73D1A9-0709-4E09-81AD-708322A2489A
Historic Resources Board Application
2 of 5
Employment
Present or Last Employer:
Occupation:
Describe your involvement in community activities, volunteer and civic organizations:
1. What is it about the Historic Resources Board that is compatible with your experience and
of specific interest to you, and why?
DocuSign Envelope ID: 9F73D1A9-0709-4E09-81AD-708322A2489A
Historic Resources Board Application
3 of 5
2. Please describe an issue that recently came before the Board that is of particular interestto you and describe why you are interested in it. If you have never been to a Board
meeting you can view an archived video from the Midpen Media Center:
3. If appointed, what specific goals would you like to see the Historic Resources Board
achieve, and why? How would you suggest accomplishing this?
DocuSign Envelope ID: 9F73D1A9-0709-4E09-81AD-708322A2489A
Historic Resources Board Application
4 of 5
4. Please identify a project or projects that you find to be examples of good historic
architecture, and explain why. You may attach samples, identify project addresses, or
provide links. If you attach samples, Staff may request that you bring hard copy print outs
to the interviews.
5. Historic Resources Board Members work with the documents listed below. If you have
experience with any of these documents, please describe that experience. Experience with
these documents is not required for selection.
Palo Alto Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element
Palo Alto Municipal Code Chapter 16.49
Secretary of the Interiors Standards for: Preserving, Rehabilitating, Restoring, and Reconstructing Historic Buildings
California Environmental Quality Act
DocuSign Envelope ID: 9F73D1A9-0709-4E09-81AD-708322A2489A
Historic Resources Board Application
5 of 5
Consent to Publish Personal Information on the City of Palo Alto Website
California Government Code Section 6254.21 states, in part,
This consent form will not be redacted and will be attached
The full code can be read here:
Read the code, and check only ONE option below:
_
Commission Application intact. I have read and understand my rights under Government Code
Section 6254.21. I may revoke this permission at any time by providing written notice to the
Palo Alto City Clerk.
OR
I request that the City of Palo Alto redact my home address, phone numbers, and email address
providing the following alternate information and request that they use the following contact
information instead.
Address:
Cell Phone:
____ Home / ____ Office Phone: ______
E-mail: ____________________________________________
The phone number / address can be non-public and different than the address collected on page one.
Signature: Date:
(Optional) Additional Attachment(s)
If you would like to submit a resume, work sample, etc. along with your
DocuSign Envelope ID: 9F73D1A9-0709-4E09-81AD-708322A2489A
Historic Resources Board Application
1 of 5
Personal Information
Name:
Address:
Cell Phone:
____ Home / ____ Office Phone:
E-mail:
Are you a Palo Alto Resident? ____ Yes ____ No
Do you have any relatives or members of your household who are employed by the City of Palo Alto, who
are currently serving on the City Council, or who are Commissioners or Board Members?
____ Yes ____ No
Are you available and committed to complete the term applied for? ____ Yes ____ No
California state law and the Ci Conflict of Interest Code require appointed board and
commission members to file a detailed disclosure of their financial interests, Fair Political Practices
Commission, Conflict of Interest, Form 700.
Do you have an investment in, or do you serve as an officer or director of, a company doing business in
Palo Alto which you believe is likely to;
1) engage in business with the City,
2) provide products or services for City projects, or
3)be affected by decisions of the board or commission you are applying for? ____ Yes ____ No
Excluding your principal residence, do you own real property in Palo Alto? ____ Yes ____ No
How did you learn about this vacancy?
____ Community Group
____ Email from City Clerk
____ Palo Alto Weekly
____ Daily Post
____ City Website
____ Flyer
Other:
List relevant education, training, experience, certificates of training, licenses, or professional
registration:
DocuSign Envelope ID: 6D46859B-68C3-43C5-93D1-B9F791017462
Historic Resources Board Application
2 of 5
Employment
Present or Last Employer:
Occupation:
Describe your involvement in community activities, volunteer and civic organizations:
1. What is it about the Historic Resources Board that is compatible with your experience and
of specific interest to you, and why?
DocuSign Envelope ID: 6D46859B-68C3-43C5-93D1-B9F791017462
Historic Resources Board Application
3 of 5
2. Please describe an issue that recently came before the Board that is of particular interestto you and describe why you are interested in it. If you have never been to a Board
meeting you can view an archived video from the Midpen Media Center:
3. If appointed, what specific goals would you like to see the Historic Resources Board
achieve, and why? How would you suggest accomplishing this?
DocuSign Envelope ID: 6D46859B-68C3-43C5-93D1-B9F791017462
Historic Resources Board Application
4 of 5
4. Please identify a project or projects that you find to be examples of good historic
architecture, and explain why. You may attach samples, identify project addresses, or
provide links. If you attach samples, Staff may request that you bring hard copy print outs
to the interviews.
5. Historic Resources Board Members work with the documents listed below. If you have
experience with any of these documents, please describe that experience. Experience with
these documents is not required for selection.
Palo Alto Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element
Palo Alto Municipal Code Chapter 16.49
Secretary of the Interiors Standards for: Preserving, Rehabilitating, Restoring, and Reconstructing Historic Buildings
California Environmental Quality Act
DocuSign Envelope ID: 6D46859B-68C3-43C5-93D1-B9F791017462
Historic Resources Board Application
5 of 5
Consent to Publish Personal Information on the City of Palo Alto Website
California Government Code Section 6254.21 states, in part,
This consent form will not be redacted and will be attached
The full code can be read here:
Read the code, and check only ONE option below:
_
Commission Application intact. I have read and understand my rights under Government Code
Section 6254.21. I may revoke this permission at any time by providing written notice to the
Palo Alto City Clerk.
OR
I request that the City of Palo Alto redact my home address, phone numbers, and email address
providing the following alternate information and request that they use the following contact
information instead.
Address:
Cell Phone:
____ Home / ____ Office Phone: ______
E-mail: ____________________________________________
The phone number / address can be non-public and different than the address collected on page one.
Signature: Date:
(Optional) Additional Attachment(s)
If you would like to submit a resume, work sample, etc. along with your
DocuSign Envelope ID: 6D46859B-68C3-43C5-93D1-B9F791017462
Personal Information Note: The PARC regularly meets the fourth Tuesday of the month at 7:00 p.m.
Parks and Recreation Commission Application
1 of 5
Name:
Address:
Cell Phone:
____ Home / ____ Office Phone:
E-mail:
Are you a Palo Alto Resident? ____ Yes ____ No
Do you have any relatives or members of your household who are employed by the City of Palo Alto, who
are currently serving on the City Council, or who are Commissioners or Board Members?
____ Yes ____ No
Are you available and committed to complete the term applied for? ____ Yes ____ No
California state law and the Ci require appointed board and commission
members to file a detailed disclosure of their financial interests, Fair Political Practices Commission,
Conflict of Interest, Form 700.
Do you or your spouse have an investment in, or do you or your spouse serve as an officer or director of, a
company doing business in Palo Alto which you believe is likely to;
1) engage in business with the City,
2) provide products or services for City projects, or
3) be affected by decisions of the board or commission you are applying for? ____ Yes ____ No
Excluding your principal residence, do you or your spouse own real property in Palo Alto? ___ Yes ___ No
How did you learn about this vacancy?
____ Community Group
____ Email from City Clerk
____ Palo Alto Weekly
____ Daily Post
____ City Website
____ Flyer
Other:
List relevant education, training, experience, certificates of training, licenses, or professional
registration:
DocuSign Envelope ID: FFAE8F7E-0242-4ED9-8997-573C184C1DD3
Parks and Recreation Commission Application
2 of 5
Employment
Present or Last Employer:
Occupation:
Describe your involvement in community activities, volunteer and civic organizations:
1. What is it about the Parks and Recreation Commission that is compatible with your
experience and of specific interest to you, and why?
DocuSign Envelope ID: FFAE8F7E-0242-4ED9-8997-573C184C1DD3
Parks and Recreation Commission Application
3 of 5
2. Please describe an issue that recently came before the Commission that is of particularinterest to you and describe why you are interested in it. If you have never been to a
Commission meeting you can view an archived video from the Midpen Media Center:
3. If appointed, what specific goals would you like to see the Parks and Recreation
Commission achieve, and why? How would you suggest accomplishing this?
DocuSign Envelope ID: FFAE8F7E-0242-4ED9-8997-573C184C1DD3
Parks and Recreation Commission Application
4 of 5
4. Parks and Recreation Commission Members work with the documents listed below. If you
have experience with any of these documents, please describe that experience.
Experience with these documents is not required for selection.
Palo Alto Comprehensive Plan:
Community Services and Facilities Element
Natural Environment Element
Baylands Master Plan
Park Dedication Ordinance (Municipal Code)
Bicycle - Pedestrian Transportation Plan
Youth Master Plan
Cubberley Community Advisory Committee Report
DocuSign Envelope ID: FFAE8F7E-0242-4ED9-8997-573C184C1DD3
Parks and Recreation Commission Application
5 of 5
Consent to Publish Personal Information on the City of Palo Alto Website
California Government Code Section 6254.21 states, in part,
This consent form will not be redacted and will be attached
The full code can be read here:
Read the code, and check only ONE option below:
_ I give permission for the City of Palo Alto
Commission Application intact. I have read and understand my rights under Government Code
Section 6254.21. I may revoke this permission at any time by providing written notice to the
Palo Alto City Clerk.
OR
I request that the City of Palo Alto redact my home address, phone numbers, and email address
providing the following alternate information and request that they use the following contact
information instead.
Address:
Cell Phone:
____ Home / ____ Office Phone: ___________________________________________________
E-mail: ____________________________________________
The phone number / address can be non-public and different than the address collected on page one.
Signature: Date:
(Optional) Additional Attachment(s)
If you would like to submit a resume, work sample, etc. along with your
DocuSign Envelope ID: FFAE8F7E-0242-4ED9-8997-573C184C1DD3
DocuSign Envelope ID: FFAE8F7E-0242-4ED9-8997-573C184C1DD3
Grant Woodson Dasher
3085 Middlefield Rd. tn.
Palo Alto, CA 94306
Edycatjon: AB. Mathematics, magna cum /aude. Harvard College, 2009. Phi Beta Kappa.
Secondary field in Computer Science.
Work Experience:
The White House. Digital Services Expert
Washington, DC 2015
• Worked in the Obama administration while on leave from Google on implementation of a
new computer system for processing immigration benefits
• Collaborated with USCIS agency personnel and White House personnel on digitizing the
naturalization and green card renewal processes.
• Key player in deploying smart card authentication for the Department of Homeland
Security, which significantly reduces the chance of phishing attacks that can compromise
sensitive citizen data.
• Consulted for other agencies such as the Office of Personnel Management and the
Department of Education on authentication and identity issues.
Google, Inc. Staff Software Engineer
Mountain View, CA 2015-present; Cambridge, MA 2009-2015 (full time); New York, NY 2007,
2008 (intern)
• Software engineer on Cloud Authentication and identity, working on helping large
organizations transition to the Cloud and avoid security issues like phishing.
• Currently, manage a team of 5 focused on Identity issues in the Google Cloud Platform
• Previously, software engineer on google.com search, working on providing the best
search results to users with a focus on multimedia content (images, videos).
• Played a key leadership role in many major Google launches and products such as
Knowledge Graph and Universal Search.
• Point person for ranking issues involving multimedia and scanned book content on
google.com.
• Promoted three times in four years (one of only a handful people at the company were
promoted three times in that period).
• Previously, managed a team of about seven people working on multimedia features on
google.com.
• Completed two internships on local search and Google docs; both led to launches.
• For last three years, volunteered time in a unique MIT-industry collaboration to offer
"industry experience" to MIT students taking class on performance optimization.
DocuSign Envelope ID: FFAE8F7E-0242-4ED9-8997-573C184C1DD3
Volunteer activities:
Silicon Valley Urban Debate League. Volunteer
Palo Alto, CA 2015-present
• Run the "tab room" for every SVUDL tournament
• SVUDL helps students who primarily live in lower income parts of Silicon Valley gain
valuable policy and advocacy skills through weekend debate activities.
Boston Urban Debate League. Volunteer, Judge
Boston, MA 2009-2014
• Volunteered judging and tab room support for urban inner city debate in the Boston area
at several tournaments per year.
• Ran weekly "practice" for UDL students in 2010 experimental program to get kids off the
streets and into classrooms.
Harvard Computer Society
Cambridge, MA 2005-2009
• President and key leader of organization in 2008.
• Key player in negotiating with university to secure long-term support relationship and
funds.
• Key architect in designing new infrastructure that still serves all underground mailing lists
and most student group websites five years later.
Patents:
• Dynamic image display area and image display within web search results. US 8346815
82. Assigned to Google, Inc.
• Images For Query Answers. US 20170017668. Assigned to Google, Inc.
Parks and Recreation Commission Application
1 of 5
Personal Information
Name:
Address:
Cell Phone:
____ Home / ____ Office Phone:
E-mail:
Are you a Palo Alto Resident? ____ Yes ____ No
Do you have any relatives or members of your household who are employed by the City of Palo Alto, who
are currently serving on the City Council, or who are Commissioners or Board Members?
____ Yes ____ No
Are you available and committed to complete the term applied for? ____ Yes ____ No
California state law and the Ci require appointed board and commission
members to file a detailed disclosure of their financial interests, Fair Political Practices Commission,
Conflict of Interest, Form 700.
Do you have an investment in, or do you serve as an officer or director of, a company doing business in
Palo Alto which you believe is likely to;
1) engage in business with the City,
2) provide products or services for City projects, or
3) be affected by decisions of the board or commission you are applying for? ____ Yes ____ No
Excluding your principal residence, do you own real property in Palo Alto? ____ Yes ____ No
How did you learn about this vacancy?
____ Community Group
____ Email from City Clerk
____ Palo Alto Weekly
____ Daily Post
____ City Website
____ Flyer
Other:
List relevant education, training, experience, certificates of training, licenses, or professional
registration:
DocuSign Envelope ID: 1AF7E9E8-F34E-42F5-8AC8-6C1B992BBF7E
Parks and Recreation Commission Application
2 of 5
Employment
Present or Last Employer:
Occupation:
Describe your involvement in community activities, volunteer and civic organizations:
1. What is it about the Parks and Recreation Commission that is compatible with your
experience and of specific interest to you, and why?
DocuSign Envelope ID: 1AF7E9E8-F34E-42F5-8AC8-6C1B992BBF7E
Parks and Recreation Commission Application
3 of 5
2. Please describe an issue that recently came before the Commission that is of particularinterest to you and describe why you are interested in it. If you have never been to a
Commission meeting you can view an archived video from the Midpen Media Center:
3. If appointed, what specific goals would you like to see the Parks and Recreation
Commission achieve, and why? How would you suggest accomplishing this?
DocuSign Envelope ID: 1AF7E9E8-F34E-42F5-8AC8-6C1B992BBF7E
Parks and Recreation Commission Application
4 of 5
4. Parks and Recreation Commission Members work with the documents listed below. If you
have experience with any of these documents, please describe that experience.
Experience with these documents is not required for selection.
Palo Alto Comprehensive Plan:
Community Services and Facilities Element
Natural Environment Element
Baylands Master Plan
Park Dedication Ordinance (Municipal Code)
Bicycle - Pedestrian Transportation Plan
Youth Master Plan
Cubberley Community Advisory Committee Report
DocuSign Envelope ID: 1AF7E9E8-F34E-42F5-8AC8-6C1B992BBF7E
Parks and Recreation Commission Application
5 of 5
Consent to Publish Personal Information on the City of Palo Alto Website
California Government Code Section 6254.21 states, in part,
This consent form will not be redacted and will be attached
The full code can be read here:
Read the code, and check only ONE option below:
_
Commission Application intact. I have read and understand my rights under Government Code
Section 6254.21. I may revoke this permission at any time by providing written notice to the
Palo Alto City Clerk.
OR
I request that the City of Palo Alto redact my home address, phone numbers, and email address
providing the following alternate information and request that they use the following contact
information instead.
Address:
Cell Phone:
____ Home / ____ Office Phone: ___________________________________________________
E-mail: ____________________________________________
The phone number / address can be non-public and different than the address collected on page one.
Signature: Date:
(Optional) Additional Attachment(s)
If you would like to submit a resume, work sample, etc. along with your
Application,
DocuSign Envelope ID: 1AF7E9E8-F34E-42F5-8AC8-6C1B992BBF7E
Rebecca L. Eisenberg, Esq.
2345 Waverley St.
Palo Alto, CA 94301
(415) 235-8078
rebecca@privateclientlegal.com
OVERVIEW:
Effective attorney and general counsel for organizations & individuals. Detail-oriented, empathetic, efficient. Problem-solver.
EDUCATION:
Harvard Law School, J.D., June 1993
Editor, Harvard Law Review.
Harvard Law Record, journalist and columnist.
contributor and editor.
ABA, President of Harvard Law Chapter.
Graduated Cum Laude.
Stanford University, B.A. Psychology/Decision Sciences, June 1990
Phi Beta Kappa elected junior year.
Departmental distinction.
Boothe Prize for Excellence in Writing.
Cap & Gown Honor Society; Phi Psi Honor Society.
President, Stanford Undergraduate Psychology Association (SUPA).
Peer Tutor, Calculus, Stanford Center for Teaching & Learning.
Orientation Coordinator, Transfer Students, Stanford Office of Residential Education, 1989.
Program Advisor, Ujamaa and Naranja, Stanford Office of Residential Education, 1987-1988.
Peer Counselor, the Bridge, 1987-1990.
Teaching Assistant, Prof. Philip Zimbardo, Psychology 1, 1987-1990.
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE:
Private Client Legal Advisors, San Francisco, CA
Principal & Founder, 1/2013 - Present
Operate boutique legal services firm, providing following services:
Serve as outside GC for nonprofit organizations, technology companies, angel funds, entrepreneurs and executives.
Locate, hire and manage specialized outside counsel; serve as intermediary between client and firms.
Assist a variety of clients with matters involving regulatory compliance, employment matters, compensation, Fair Pay
Act compliance, HR policies, financings and corporate transactions, as well as commercial agreements, licensing,
employment disputes, litigation management, dispute resolution, public relations, and other business and legal
affairs on behalf of founders, executives, non-profits, companies and start-ups.
Analyze, negotiate and advise firms, companies and individuals on their real estate and finance-related documents
warrants, convertible notes, stock purchase agreements, articles of incorporation and related corporate documents;
provide actionable advice for stakeholders regarding different options and potential outcomes based on quantitative
analysis of liquidity flowing through cap tables, interest accruing over time, types of collateral, and otherwise.
Handle governance issues on behalf of a variety of organizations, including Board Meetings, public filings, and
regulatory and legal compliance; ensure compliance with privacy laws and disclosure mandates.
Provide legal consulting on Human Resources issues, including compensation, compliance and risk reduction.
Vouch Financial Inc., San Francisco, CA
General Counsel, Head of Human Resources & Corporate Secretary 5/14 to 3/15
first GC & Head of HR (4th employee), handled all legal & HR matters, including:
Built and established legal department and legal function, including budget and hiring plan.
Served as Board Secretary, drafted board resolutions, shareholder consents and board meeting minutes.
Ensured compliance with all governance regulatory compliance including privacy and disclosure requirements.
Secured new company office space, negotiated real estate transactions, handled office improvements and
renovations in cost-effective and efficient, yet highly successful manner.
Handled 2 rounds of venture capital financing, as well as venture debt line; advised on all financial transactions.
Established compliant HR system & structure, with a focus on risk reduction, recruiting & retention; established all
legal and HR form agreements, company manuals and policies; trained employees on compliance.
Created compensation programs with focus on compliance, recruiting and retention.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 1AF7E9E8-F34E-42F5-8AC8-6C1B992BBF7E
Ensured regulatory and legal compliance with lending regulations (state and federal).
Drafted company outward- and inward-facing policies, including privacy policies, user agreements, loan agreements,
guarantor agreements, terms of use, license agreements, electronic communications agreements, credit consents
and other legal agreements for website users, borrowers and guarantors.
Negotiated all contracts with strategic business partners, investors, lenders, customers, and vendors.
reddit Inc., San Francisco, CA
General Counsel, Head of Finance and Head of Human Resources, 1/12 to 1/13
andled all legal, finance and HR matters for reddit, including:
Negotiated and executed successful spin-off of reddit Inc. from Advance/Conde Nast.
Served as Board Secretary; drafted & distributed resolutions, consents and board minutes.
Legal, Human Resources and Finance departments.
ensured regulatory
and legal compliance, trained employees, drafted all employee agreements and policies.
Handled, managed and trained staff members to respond to all Subpoenas, DMCA requests, infringement letters and
other inbound legal communications.
Established compensation systems and ensured compliance and consistency.
Create .
handled investment round and all corporate legal matters.
Negotiated all commercial agreements; drafted all standard contracts; handled all other legal matters.
Trulia, Inc., San Francisco, CA
General Counsel, 3/10 to 12/11
andled all legal issues for this fast-paced Internet start-up in the real estate industry, including:
Handled M & A transactions, including acquisition of start-up Movity.
Handled financial transactions, including closing high-figure loan financing.
Handled, drafted, negotiated all other corporate and commercial transactions, including business development,
sales, licensing, co-marketing and other commercial contracts, as well as real estate leases and transactions.
Handled human resources issues, including handbooks, terminations, separation agreements and stock issues.
Managed IP portfolio, including patents and trademarks.
Managed litigation, including several patent infringement lawsuits; obtained very favorable settlement.
Handled legal issues in product development, including terms of use, privacy policies and issuing associated with
User Generated Content.
Served on Senior Management Team, contribute to corporate strategy.
Pure Digital Technologies, Inc., San Francisco, CA
General Counsel, 9/08-9/09
Handled all legal issues for this consumer electronics technology company that provides the popular line of Flip Video
handheld digital video camcorders. Handled successful Exit: Merger of Pure Digital with Cisco Systems, Inc in $615 million
transaction.
Led $630 Million merger with Cisco, in addition to all other corporate transactions.
Successfully settled multi-million dollar (claimed) patent suit, managed all other litigation and threatened litigation.
Handled all commercial transactions, licensing, sales and business development deal support (technology, software,
content, co-marketing), including with Facebook, Product (RED), YouTube, MySpace, AOL and other industry leaders.
Led HR legal organization, provided advice, contracts, separations, consulting, conflict management.
Handled intellectual property portfolio: patents, trademarks, copyrights.
Leader on executive management team, provided strategic decision making, interfaced with Board of Directors.
Managed and hired resources, handled legal budget of approximately $4 million.
AdBrite, Inc., San Francisco, CA
Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary of the Board, 3/07-9/08
andled all legal matters for this Internet startup in the online advertising space.
Handled corporate governance/securities: minutes, resolutions
Negotiated/drafted all commercial transactions: licensing, sales, real estate
Handled Intellectual Property: Managed IP portfolio, all patents, copyrights, trademarks, DMCA.
Successfully avoided litigation/managed risk: disposed of issues before they lead to lawsuits; create policies.
Provided executive management, leadership.
PayPal, Inc., an eBay Company, San Jose, CA
DocuSign Envelope ID: 1AF7E9E8-F34E-42F5-8AC8-6C1B992BBF7E
Senior Counsel,Senior Director, Assistant Secretary 7/01-3/07
Joined company as second attorney, and assisted with IPO, Secondary Offering and Public Company Merger.
Corporate development: assisted with IPO, secondary offering and public company merger with eBay Inc.
Commercial Transactions: Handled all commercial transactions for the company.
Sales: Supported sales team for $1.5 billion revenue company; create standardized documents and train salesforce.
Intellectual property: Advised executives on intellectual property matters & compliance, handle IP licenses and
strategy.
International: supported business clients in Asia, Europe and Canada.
Product Development: Analyzed all product specifications; drafted licenses and terms.
User Agreement and Privacy Policy: drafting and maintenance, enforcement.
Marketing and Content: Reviewed all marketing and other content; advised company on issues and risks.
Management: Build and managed commercial legal team comprised of ten attorneys and staff.
Risk management, litigation management, departmental processes.
Ecast, Inc. (Internet-based music and games company), San Francisco, CA
Vice President of Legal and New Market Development, 9/99-6/01
Helped raise more than $18 M for the company, worked with investors.
Managed strategic and business development as well as most legal and corporate development.
Successfully closed deals including: digital music licensing with all 5 major labels, film/gaming licenses, wireless
distribution deals , $7 million dollar software license/equity investment agreement with UK company.
As the first licensed attorney to join the executive team of this fast-paced start-up, also served as lead on risk
management, compliance and marketing review, as well as delivered competitive analysis and business strategy.
Cole Valley Group Consulting, San Francisco, CA
Consultant: Internet business strategy, M&A advising & marketing, 10/95-10/99
Provided strategic, technical marketing and business development services for numerous clients including Pixar,
Quokka, Yoga Journal, Adjacency, Inc. (now Sapient), StarMine, Cyborganic Media, MediaCast, Sound Exchange
Records, Electric Minds, Verbum and ChemisTree, among other start-ups and new media companies.
Wrote over 10 business plans for start-ups, which as a group raised over $30M in venture financing; consulted start-
ups and established companies on mergers & acquisitions and other exit strategies; advised on intellectual property
strategies.
Consulted on intellectual property and strategic legal matters, including contributing to Rembrandts in the Closet,
book on IP business strategies written by SmartPatents CEO (now Aurigin).
CBS MarketWatch, San Francisco, CA
-4/01
ews site; contributed over 100 columns.
Columns covered both technology strategic issues as well as high tech legal issues, including a high profile series on
Awarded WELL journalism award for column which revealed privacy strategy behind WebMD/Healtheon merger.
The San Francisco Examiner
Internet business columnist, 6/97-10/99
Wrote Net Skink, a bi-s Business Section.
Cyborganic Media
Director, Product Management and Corporate Development, 11/95-10/97
Very early member of start-up team on this too-early MYSPACE-like company (community and content aggregator)
Web product, GeekCereal.com.
Hired, trained, managed and edited group of 12 individuals creating, updating and managing Web site
GeekCereal.com.
Contributed to Cyborganic business plan, helped raise angel funding.
U.S. Court of Appeals, 5th Circuit, Houston, TX
Judicial Law Clerk, Chief Judge Carolyn Dineen King, 8/95-11/95.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 1AF7E9E8-F34E-42F5-8AC8-6C1B992BBF7E
U.S. District Court, District of Columbia, Washington, DC
Judicial Law Clerk, Honorable Gladys Kessler, 8/94-7/95.
U.S. District Court, Central District of California, Los Angeles, CA
Judicial Law Clerk, Honorable A. Andrew Hauk, 8/93-8/94.
Morrison & Foerster, San Francisco, CA
Summer Associate, business law and litigation, 1992.
Ross & Hardies, Chicago, IL
Summer Associate, business law and litigation, 1991.
BAR:
Active Member of the California Bar and the Federal Bar, Central District of California, sworn in 1993.
BOARD MEMBERSHIPS:
Board of Directors, Legal Momentum (formerly known as the National Organization for Women Legal Defense Fund
national board), 2009-2012.
Board of Directors, Craigslist Foundation, Treasurer, Founding member, 1999-2007.
Board of Advisors, Kiva.org (Microfinance Nonprofit), 2006-2009.
Board of Advisors, The Webby Awards, and Member, International Academy of Arts and Sciences, 2003-present.
Board of Advisors, Skinny Scoop www.theskinnyscoop.com
-present.
PUBLICATIONS:
Regulatory Affairs:
Rebecca Eisenberg, Proposed Rule Amendments to Regulation D, Form D and Rule 156 Under the Securities Act,
https://www.sec.gov/comments/s7-06-13/s70613-460.pdf
Rebecca Eisenberg, Nordlinger v. Hahn: the , Harvard Law Review,
1992 (available upon request).
Academic Writing:
Rebecca Eisenberg, Beyond Bray: Obtaining Federal Jurisdiction to Stop Anti-Abortion Violence, 6 Yale Journal of Law
and Feminism 155 (1994). http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1086&context=yjlf
Note, Pornography, Equality, and a Discrimination-Free Workplace: A Comparative Perspective, 106 Harvard Law
Review 1075 (1993). http://www.omino.com/~dom/clips/porno.html
Book Note, An Unladylike Response to Legal Conceptions of Women (reviewing Faludi, Backlash), 105 Harvard Law
Review 2104 (1992). http://www.omino.com/~dom/clips/faludi.html
Popular Media Writing:
Weekly column, Net Skink, San Francisco Chronicle 1996-1999.
Weekly column, Nouveau Geek, CBS MarketWatch, 1997-2000.
Regular contributor, Wired, Red Herring, Upside, Fast Company, Time Daily, Entertainment Weekly, Ms. Magazine.
List of published clips available by request and online: http://www.omino.com/~dom/clips/
EDUCATION / VOLUNTEER ROLES:
Special Gifts / Fundraising / Development Committee, Stanford Homecoming Reunion 1995, 2000, 2005, 2010, 2015.
Harvard Law School Celebration 55 Committee; Harvard Law School Celebration 60 Committee.
Reunion and Fundraising Coordinator, Whitefish Bay High School, Whitefish Bay, WI.
Development Committee, Brandeis Hillel Day School, San Francisco, CA
Room Parent, Brandeis Hillel Day School, San Francisco, CA
Parent Volunteer, Walter Hays Elementary School, Palo Alto, CA
Parent Volunteer, Jordan Middle School, Palo Alto, CA
DocuSign Envelope ID: 1AF7E9E8-F34E-42F5-8AC8-6C1B992BBF7E
AWARDS & SPEAKING ROLES:
Award Winner, Top 25 Women on the Web, 1999 (Judge, Top 25 Women on the Web 2000, 2001).
Award Winner, WELL Writing Award, Journalism and Overall Grand Prize, 2000.
s Hardball with Chris Matthews, and PBS Computer Chronicles and Internet Café.
Expert on consumer protection online; featured in full-length chapter interview in the 2000 book, Web Rules: How the
Internet is Changing the Way Consumers Make Choices by Tom Murphy.
Harvard Law School, 2013; Panelist, 2008, led by
United States Supreme Court Associate Justice Elena Kagan.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 1AF7E9E8-F34E-42F5-8AC8-6C1B992BBF7E
Parks and Recreation Commission
Application 1 of 6
Personal Information
Name:
Address:
Cell Phone:
____ Home / ____ Office Phone:
E-mail:
Are you a Palo Alto Resident? ____ Yes ____ No
Do you have any relatives or members of your household who are employed by the City of Palo Alto, who
are currently serving on the City Council, or who are Commissioners or Board Members?
____ Yes ____ No
Are you available and committed to complete the term applied for? ____ Yes ____ No
California state law and the Ci require appointed board and commission
members to file a detailed disclosure of their financial interests, Fair Political Practices Commission,
Conflict of Interest, Form 700.
Do you have an investment in, or do you serve as an officer or director of, a company doing business in
Palo Alto which you believe is likely to;
1) engage in business with the City,
2) provide products or services for City projects, or
3)be affected by decisions of the board or commission you are applying for? ____ Yes ____ No
Excluding your principal residence, do you own real property in Palo Alto? ____ Yes ____ No
How did you learn about this vacancy?
____ Community Group
____ Email from City Clerk
____ Palo Alto Weekly
____ Daily Post
____ City Website
____ Flyer
Other:
List relevant education, training, experience, certificates of training, licenses, or professional
registration:
DocuSign Envelope ID: 8EE6D56B-01FC-4263-BB53-4450236D5D97
• BS Engineering, Harvey Mudd College
Parks and Recreation Commission
Application 2 of 6
Employment
Present or Last Employer:
Occupation:
Describe your involvement in community activities, volunteer and civic organizations:
DocuSign Envelope ID: 8EE6D56B-01FC-4263-BB53-4450236D5D97
Current Recreation Activities:
• Hiking: I enjoy frequent 7-10+ mile hikes in the local open spaces. I typically hike the
Foothills Park – Los Trancos Trail (my favorite) a couple times per month.
• Soccer: PAASL player for the past 18 years.
• Biking: My preferred method of transportation around town is bicycle.
• Trees and Plants: a new passion is learning to identify botanical species.
• Gardening: I enjoy vegetable and landscape gardening at home.
Parks and Recreation Commission Application
3 of 6
1. What is it about the Parks and Recreation Commission that is compatible with your
experience and of specific interest to you, and why?
I have resided in South Palo Alto for the past eighteen years with my wife. We have
raised our two daughters here in the Palo Alto School system. Over the years, my family
and I have been fortunate to enjoy many wonderful resources and services that our
community offers. From “Story Time” at the library and dance recitals at Cubberley to
Mitchell Park “gopher holes” and May Fete parades; from swimming and art lessons to Kidz
Love Soccer and Hi-Fives Camps; from block parties and Foothills Park picnics to family
bike outings for “Hot Dog” shows and the Jr. Museum and Zoo; from soccer games and
street fairs to Canopy Tree Walks and watching pelicans soar in the Baylands, my family
and I truly appreciate and understand many special aspects of Palo Alto. My family also
has a track record of contributing within our community.
I am very passionate about Palo Alto and many of my pursuits connect directly with our
community’s resources and services. My personal passions include soccer, hiking, trees
and plants, biking around town, and general environmentalism and sustainability. While I
have outlined goals below that I am interested in accomplishing as a Parks and Rec
Commissioner, this is not an agenda. These are goals aligned with the in-progress Master
Plan. My ultimate aspiration is to give back to and contribute to our community.
I have worked directly with the Community Services staff for many years on soccer and
field-related matters. I have tremendous respect for this team and would look forward to
working with them more closely. More recently, as part of my efforts with Canopy, I have
also worked with Public Works staff, and would look forward to broadening this
relationship as well. Having worked as a systems engineer and project manager for 30+
years developing professional video products, I thrive on collaborating with others to
find creative solutions to difficult problems. I am very detail oriented and organized,
and I envision many opportunities to “dig in” if I am selected for this role.
I feel privileged to have time and energy to offer. I would be honored to serve our
city, contribute to the implementation of our new Master Plan, and learn and grow along
the way.
Parks and Recreation Commission Application
4 of 6
2. Please describe an issue that recently came before the Commission that is of particularinterest to you and describe why you are interested in it. If you have never been to a
Commission meeting you can view an archived video from the Midpen Media Center:
3. If appointed, what specific goals would you like to see the Parks and Recreation
Commission achieve, and why? How would you suggest accomplishing this?
DocuSign Envelope ID: 8EE6D56B-01FC-4263-BB53-4450236D5D97
Parks and Recreation Commission Application
5 of 6
4. Parks and Recreation Commission Members work with the documents listed below. If you
have experience with any of these documents, please describe that experience.
Experience with these documents is not required for selection.
Palo Alto Comprehensive Plan:
Community Services and Facilities Element
Natural Environment Element
Baylands Master Plan
Park Dedication Ordinance (Municipal Code)
Bicycle - Pedestrian Transportation Plan
Youth Master Plan
Cubberley Community Advisory Committee Report
DocuSign Envelope ID: 8EE6D56B-01FC-4263-BB53-4450236D5D97
Parks and Recreation Commission Application
6 of 6
Consent to Publish Personal Information on the City of Palo Alto Website
California Government Code Section 6254.21 states, in part,
This consent form will not be redacted and will be attached
The full code can be read here:
Read the code, and check only ONE option below:
_
Commission Application intact. I have read and understand my rights under Government Code
Section 6254.21. I may revoke this permission at any time by providing written notice to the
Palo Alto City Clerk.
OR
I request that the City of Palo Alto redact my home address, phone numbers, and email address
providing the following alternate information and request that they use the following contact
information instead.
Address:
Cell Phone:
____ Home / ____ Office Phone: ___________________________________________________
E-mail: ____________________________________________
The phone number / address can be non-public and different than the address collected on page one.
Signature: Date:
(Optional) Additional Attachment(s)
If you would like to submit a resume, work sample, etc. along with your
Application,
DocuSign Envelope ID: 8EE6D56B-01FC-4263-BB53-4450236D5D97
Parks and Recreation Commission Application
1 of 5
Personal Information
Name:
Address:
Cell Phone:
____ Home / ____ Office Phone:
E-mail:
Are you a Palo Alto Resident? ____ Yes ____ No
Do you have any relatives or members of your household who are employed by the City of Palo Alto, who
are currently serving on the City Council, or who are Commissioners or Board Members?
____ Yes ____ No
Are you available and committed to complete the term applied for? ____ Yes ____ No
California state law and the Ci require appointed board and commission
members to file a detailed disclosure of their financial interests, Fair Political Practices Commission,
Conflict of Interest, Form 700.
Do you have an investment in, or do you serve as an officer or director of, a company doing business in
Palo Alto which you believe is likely to;
1) engage in business with the City,
2) provide products or services for City projects, or
3) be affected by decisions of the board or commission you are applying for? ____ Yes ____ No
Excluding your principal residence, do you own real property in Palo Alto? ____ Yes ____ No
How did you learn about this vacancy?
____ Community Group
____ Email from City Clerk
____ Palo Alto Weekly
____ Daily Post
____ City Website
____ Flyer
Other:
List relevant education, training, experience, certificates of training, licenses, or professional
registration:
DocuSign Envelope ID: 41E55154-BDCE-401D-A26C-C096EFA3D176
Parks and Recreation Commission Application
2 of 5
Employment
Present or Last Employer:
Occupation:
Describe your involvement in community activities, volunteer and civic organizations:
1. What is it about the Parks and Recreation Commission that is compatible with your
experience and of specific interest to you, and why?
DocuSign Envelope ID: 41E55154-BDCE-401D-A26C-C096EFA3D176
Parks and Recreation Commission Application
3 of 5
2. Please describe an issue that recently came before the Commission that is of particularinterest to you and describe why you are interested in it. If you have never been to a
Commission meeting you can view an archived video from the Midpen Media Center:
3. If appointed, what specific goals would you like to see the Parks and Recreation
Commission achieve, and why? How would you suggest accomplishing this?
DocuSign Envelope ID: 41E55154-BDCE-401D-A26C-C096EFA3D176
Parks and Recreation Commission Application
4 of 5
4. Parks and Recreation Commission Members work with the documents listed below. If you
have experience with any of these documents, please describe that experience.
Experience with these documents is not required for selection.
Palo Alto Comprehensive Plan:
Community Services and Facilities Element
Natural Environment Element
Baylands Master Plan
Park Dedication Ordinance (Municipal Code)
Bicycle - Pedestrian Transportation Plan
Youth Master Plan
Cubberley Community Advisory Committee Report
DocuSign Envelope ID: 41E55154-BDCE-401D-A26C-C096EFA3D176
Parks and Recreation Commission Application
5 of 5
Consent to Publish Personal Information on the City of Palo Alto Website
California Government Code Section 6254.21 states, in part,
This consent form will not be redacted and will be attached
The full code can be read here:
Read the code, and check only ONE option below:
_
Commission Application intact. I have read and understand my rights under Government Code
Section 6254.21. I may revoke this permission at any time by providing written notice to the
Palo Alto City Clerk.
OR
I request that the City of Palo Alto redact my home address, phone numbers, and email address
providing the following alternate information and request that they use the following contact
information instead.
Address:
Cell Phone:
____ Home / ____ Office Phone: ___________________________________________________
E-mail: ____________________________________________
The phone number / address can be non-public and different than the address collected on page one.
Signature: Date:
(Optional) Additional Attachment(s)
If you would like to submit a resume, work sample, etc. along with your
Application,
DocuSign Envelope ID: 41E55154-BDCE-401D-A26C-C096EFA3D176
Parks and Recreation Commission Application
1 of 5
Personal Information Note: The PARC regularly meets the fourth Tuesday of the month at 7:00 p.m.
Name:
Address:
Cell Phone:
____ Home / ____ Office Phone:
E-mail:
Are you a Palo Alto Resident? ____ Yes ____ No
Do you have any relatives or members of your household who are employed by the City of Palo Alto, who
are currently serving on the City Council, or who are Commissioners or Board Members?
____ Yes ____ No
Are you available and committed to complete the term applied for? ____ Yes ____ No
California state law and the Ci require appointed board and commission
members to file a detailed disclosure of their financial interests, Fair Political Practices Commission,
Conflict of Interest, Form 700.
Do you or your spouse have an investment in, or do you or your spouse serve as an officer or director of, a
company doing business in Palo Alto which you believe is likely to;
1) engage in business with the City,
2) provide products or services for City projects, or
3) be affected by decisions of the board or commission you are applying for? ____ Yes ____ No
Excluding your principal residence, do you or your spouse own real property in Palo Alto? ___ Yes ___ No
How did you learn about this vacancy?
____ Community Group
____ Email from City Clerk
____ Palo Alto Weekly
____ Daily Post
____ City Website
____ Flyer
Other:
List relevant education, training, experience, certificates of training, licenses, or professional
registration:
DocuSign Envelope ID: 1C5157BF-4776-4AA0-97E6-5BB97FE90936
Parks and Recreation Commission Application
2 of 5
Employment
Present or Last Employer:
Occupation:
Describe your involvement in community activities, volunteer and civic organizations:
1. What is it about the Parks and Recreation Commission that is compatible with your
experience and of specific interest to you, and why?
DocuSign Envelope ID: 1C5157BF-4776-4AA0-97E6-5BB97FE90936
Parks and Recreation Commission Application
3 of 5
2. Please describe an issue that recently came before the Commission that is of particularinterest to you and describe why you are interested in it. If you have never been to a
Commission meeting you can view an archived video from the Midpen Media Center:
3. If appointed, what specific goals would you like to see the Parks and Recreation
Commission achieve, and why? How would you suggest accomplishing this?
DocuSign Envelope ID: 1C5157BF-4776-4AA0-97E6-5BB97FE90936
Parks and Recreation Commission Application
4 of 5
4. Parks and Recreation Commission Members work with the documents listed below. If you
have experience with any of these documents, please describe that experience.
Experience with these documents is not required for selection.
Palo Alto Comprehensive Plan:
Community Services and Facilities Element
Natural Environment Element
Baylands Master Plan
Park Dedication Ordinance (Municipal Code)
Bicycle - Pedestrian Transportation Plan
Youth Master Plan
Cubberley Community Advisory Committee Report
DocuSign Envelope ID: 1C5157BF-4776-4AA0-97E6-5BB97FE90936
Parks and Recreation Commission Application
5 of 5
Consent to Publish Personal Information on the City of Palo Alto Website
California Government Code Section 6254.21 states, in part,
This consent form will not be redacted and will be attached
The full code can be read here:
Read the code, and check only ONE option below:
_ I give permission for the City of Palo Alto
Commission Application intact. I have read and understand my rights under Government Code
Section 6254.21. I may revoke this permission at any time by providing written notice to the
Palo Alto City Clerk.
OR
I request that the City of Palo Alto redact my home address, phone numbers, and email address
providing the following alternate information and request that they use the following contact
information instead.
Address:
Cell Phone:
____ Home / ____ Office Phone: ___________________________________________________
E-mail: ____________________________________________
The phone number / address can be non-public and different than the address collected on page one.
Signature: Date:
(Optional) Additional Attachment(s)
If you would like to submit a resume, work sample, etc. along with your
DocuSign Envelope ID: 1C5157BF-4776-4AA0-97E6-5BB97FE90936
DocuSign Envelope ID: 1C5157BF-4776-4AA0-97E6-5BB97FE90936
DocuSign Envelope ID: 1C5157BF-4776-4AA0-97E6-5BB97FE90936
Parks and Recreation Commission Application
1 of 5
Personal Information
Name:
Address:
Cell Phone:
____ Home / ____ Office Phone:
E-mail:
Are you a Palo Alto Resident? ____ Yes ____ No
Do you have any relatives or members of your household who are employed by the City of Palo Alto, who
are currently serving on the City Council, or who are Commissioners or Board Members?
____ Yes ____ No
Are you available and committed to complete the term applied for? ____ Yes ____ No
California state law and the Ci require appointed board and commission
members to file a detailed disclosure of their financial interests, Fair Political Practices Commission,
Conflict of Interest, Form 700.
Do you have an investment in, or do you serve as an officer or director of, a company doing business in
Palo Alto which you believe is likely to;
1) engage in business with the City,
2) provide products or services for City projects, or
3) be affected by decisions of the board or commission you are applying for? ____ Yes ____ No
Excluding your principal residence, do you own real property in Palo Alto? ____ Yes ____ No
How did you learn about this vacancy?
____ Community Group
____ Email from City Clerk
____ Palo Alto Weekly
____ Daily Post
____ City Website
____ Flyer
Other:
List relevant education, training, experience, certificates of training, licenses, or professional
registration:
DocuSign Envelope ID: 527D431E-ED9A-4C70-8EF0-8EEE2D4FADF2
Parks and Recreation Commission Application
2 of 5
Employment
Present or Last Employer:
Occupation:
Describe your involvement in community activities, volunteer and civic organizations:
1. What is it about the Parks and Recreation Commission that is compatible with your
experience and of specific interest to you, and why?
DocuSign Envelope ID: 527D431E-ED9A-4C70-8EF0-8EEE2D4FADF2
Parks and Recreation Commission Application
3 of 5
2. Please describe an issue that recently came before the Commission that is of particularinterest to you and describe why you are interested in it. If you have never been to a
Commission meeting you can view an archived video from the Midpen Media Center:
3. If appointed, what specific goals would you like to see the Parks and Recreation
Commission achieve, and why? How would you suggest accomplishing this?
DocuSign Envelope ID: 527D431E-ED9A-4C70-8EF0-8EEE2D4FADF2
Parks and Recreation Commission Application
4 of 5
4. Parks and Recreation Commission Members work with the documents listed below. If you
have experience with any of these documents, please describe that experience.
Experience with these documents is not required for selection.
Palo Alto Comprehensive Plan:
Community Services and Facilities Element
Natural Environment Element
Baylands Master Plan
Park Dedication Ordinance (Municipal Code)
Bicycle - Pedestrian Transportation Plan
Youth Master Plan
Cubberley Community Advisory Committee Report
DocuSign Envelope ID: 527D431E-ED9A-4C70-8EF0-8EEE2D4FADF2
Parks and Recreation Commission Application
5 of 5
Consent to Publish Personal Information on the City of Palo Alto Website
California Government Code Section 6254.21 states, in part,
This consent form will not be redacted and will be attached
The full code can be read here:
Read the code, and check only ONE option below:
_
Commission Application intact. I have read and understand my rights under Government Code
Section 6254.21. I may revoke this permission at any time by providing written notice to the
Palo Alto City Clerk.
OR
I request that the City of Palo Alto redact my home address, phone numbers, and email address
providing the following alternate information and request that they use the following contact
information instead.
Address:
Cell Phone:
____ Home / ____ Office Phone: ___________________________________________________
E-mail: ____________________________________________
The phone number / address can be non-public and different than the address collected on page one.
Signature: Date:
(Optional) Additional Attachment(s)
If you would like to submit a resume, work sample, etc. along with your
Application,
DocuSign Envelope ID: 527D431E-ED9A-4C70-8EF0-8EEE2D4FADF2
Parks and Recreation Commission Application
1 of 5
Personal Information Note: The PARC regularly meets the fourth Tuesday of the month at 7:00 p.m.
Name:
Address:
Cell Phone:
____ Home / ____ Office Phone:
E-mail:
Are you a Palo Alto Resident? ____ Yes ____ No
Do you have any relatives or members of your household who are employed by the City of Palo Alto, who
are currently serving on the City Council, or who are Commissioners or Board Members?
____ Yes ____ No
Are you available and committed to complete the term applied for? ____ Yes ____ No
California state law and the Ci require appointed board and commission
members to file a detailed disclosure of their financial interests, Fair Political Practices Commission,
Conflict of Interest, Form 700.
Do you or your spouse have an investment in, or do you or your spouse serve as an officer or director of, a
company doing business in Palo Alto which you believe is likely to;
1) engage in business with the City,
2) provide products or services for City projects, or
3) be affected by decisions of the board or commission you are applying for? ____ Yes ____ No
Excluding your principal residence, do you or your spouse own real property in Palo Alto? ___ Yes ___ No
How did you learn about this vacancy?
____ Community Group
____ Email from City Clerk
____ Palo Alto Weekly
____ Daily Post
____ City Website
____ Flyer
Other:
List relevant education, training, experience, certificates of training, licenses, or professional
registration:
DocuSign Envelope ID: 27D9C1F1-6C1D-4307-AF4E-041E17B40165
Parks and Recreation Commission Application
2 of 5
Employment
Present or Last Employer:
Occupation:
Describe your involvement in community activities, volunteer and civic organizations:
1. What is it about the Parks and Recreation Commission that is compatible with your
experience and of specific interest to you, and why?
DocuSign Envelope ID: 27D9C1F1-6C1D-4307-AF4E-041E17B40165
Parks and Recreation Commission Application
3 of 5
2. Please describe an issue that recently came before the Commission that is of particularinterest to you and describe why you are interested in it. If you have never been to a
Commission meeting you can view an archived video from the Midpen Media Center:
3. If appointed, what specific goals would you like to see the Parks and Recreation
Commission achieve, and why? How would you suggest accomplishing this?
DocuSign Envelope ID: 27D9C1F1-6C1D-4307-AF4E-041E17B40165
Parks and Recreation Commission Application
4 of 5
4. Parks and Recreation Commission Members work with the documents listed below. If you
have experience with any of these documents, please describe that experience.
Experience with these documents is not required for selection.
Palo Alto Comprehensive Plan:
Community Services and Facilities Element
Natural Environment Element
Baylands Master Plan
Park Dedication Ordinance (Municipal Code)
Bicycle - Pedestrian Transportation Plan
Youth Master Plan
Cubberley Community Advisory Committee Report
DocuSign Envelope ID: 27D9C1F1-6C1D-4307-AF4E-041E17B40165
Parks and Recreation Commission Application
5 of 5
Consent to Publish Personal Information on the City of Palo Alto Website
California Government Code Section 6254.21 states, in part,
This consent form will not be redacted and will be attached
The full code can be read here:
Read the code, and check only ONE option below:
_ I give permission for the City of Palo Alto
Commission Application intact. I have read and understand my rights under Government Code
Section 6254.21. I may revoke this permission at any time by providing written notice to the
Palo Alto City Clerk.
OR
I request that the City of Palo Alto redact my home address, phone numbers, and email address
providing the following alternate information and request that they use the following contact
information instead.
Address:
Cell Phone:
____ Home / ____ Office Phone: ___________________________________________________
E-mail: ____________________________________________
The phone number / address can be non-public and different than the address collected on page one.
Signature: Date:
(Optional) Additional Attachment(s)
If you would like to submit a resume, work sample, etc. along with your
DocuSign Envelope ID: 27D9C1F1-6C1D-4307-AF4E-041E17B40165
Parks and Recreation Commission Application
1 of 5
Personal Information
Name:
Address:
Cell Phone:
____ Home / ____ Office Phone:
E-mail:
Are you a Palo Alto Resident? ____ Yes ____ No
Do you have any relatives or members of your household who are employed by the City of Palo Alto, who
are currently serving on the City Council, or who are Commissioners or Board Members?
____ Yes ____ No
Are you available and committed to complete the term applied for? ____ Yes ____ No
California state law and the Ci require appointed board and commission
members to file a detailed disclosure of their financial interests, Fair Political Practices Commission,
Conflict of Interest, Form 700.
Do you have an investment in, or do you serve as an officer or director of, a company doing business in
Palo Alto which you believe is likely to;
1) engage in business with the City,
2) provide products or services for City projects, or
3)be affected by decisions of the board or commission you are applying for? ____ Yes ____ No
Excluding your principal residence, do you own real property in Palo Alto? ____ Yes ____ No
How did you learn about this vacancy?
____ Community Group
____ Email from City Clerk
____ Palo Alto Weekly
____ Daily Post
____ City Website
____ Flyer
Other:
List relevant education, training, experience, certificates of training, licenses, or professional
registration:
DocuSign Envelope ID: A147EBCC-FB60-40AC-9559-C19DA7AA2697
Parks and Recreation Commission Application
2 of 5
Employment
Present or Last Employer:
Occupation:
Describe your involvement in community activities, volunteer and civic organizations:
1. What is it about the Parks and Recreation Commission that is compatible with your
experience and of specific interest to you, and why?
DocuSign Envelope ID: A147EBCC-FB60-40AC-9559-C19DA7AA2697
Parks and Recreation Commission Application
3 of 5
2. Please describe an issue that recently came before the Commission that is of particularinterest to you and describe why you are interested in it. If you have never been to a
Commission meeting you can view an archived video from the Midpen Media Center:
3. If appointed, what specific goals would you like to see the Parks and Recreation
Commission achieve, and why? How would you suggest accomplishing this?
DocuSign Envelope ID: A147EBCC-FB60-40AC-9559-C19DA7AA2697
Parks and Recreation Commission Application
4 of 5
4. Parks and Recreation Commission Members work with the documents listed below. If you
have experience with any of these documents, please describe that experience.
Experience with these documents is not required for selection.
Palo Alto Comprehensive Plan:
Community Services and Facilities Element
Natural Environment Element
Baylands Master Plan
Park Dedication Ordinance (Municipal Code)
Bicycle - Pedestrian Transportation Plan
Youth Master Plan
Cubberley Community Advisory Committee Report
DocuSign Envelope ID: A147EBCC-FB60-40AC-9559-C19DA7AA2697
Parks and Recreation Commission Application
5 of 5
Consent to Publish Personal Information on the City of Palo Alto Website
California Government Code Section 6254.21 states, in part,
This consent form will not be redacted and will be attached
The full code can be read here:
Read the code, and check only ONE option below:
_
Commission Application intact. I have read and understand my rights under Government Code
Section 6254.21. I may revoke this permission at any time by providing written notice to the
Palo Alto City Clerk.
OR
I request that the City of Palo Alto redact my home address, phone numbers, and email address
providing the following alternate information and request that they use the following contact
information instead.
Address:
Cell Phone:
____ Home / ____ Office Phone: ______
E-mail: ____________________________________________
The phone number / address can be non-public and different than the address collected on page one.
Signature: Date:
(Optional) Additional Attachment(s)
If you would like to submit a resume, work sample, etc. along with your
Application,
DocuSign Envelope ID: A147EBCC-FB60-40AC-9559-C19DA7AA2697
-2-
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE (continued)
Judge Mary Ellen Coster Williams, United States Court of Federal Claims, Washington, DC Judicial Extern September to December 2007 and January to May 2009 My primary responsibilities included researching and preparing draft opinions regarding federal
procurement, tax and non-tort litigation claims against the U.S. Government.
Federal Trade Commission, Seattle, WA
Law Clerk July and August 2007
I researched and prepared antitrust and consumer protection cases, interviewed fraud victims, assisted in a Hart-Scott-Rodino review and drafted affidavits and memos.
CrowleyFleck PLLP, Helena, MT
Summer Associate May to July 2007
I completed regulatory analyses for two large cross-border power transmission projects and worked on
several employment and professional malpractice cases.
Gonzaga University, Spokane, WA and Florence, Italy Student Life Coordinator, Gonzaga-in-Florence Program August 2005 to July 2006
As part of the leadership
life programs, including large-scale travel excursions in Europe and Africa.
Adjunct Instructor of Political Science Fall 2004
government institutions and fiscal policy. I researched and prepared lesson plans, lectured three times
per week, wrote the final exam and evaluated student performance.
Student Body President May 2003 to May 2004
Following a lively campaign, I was elected to serve as student body president during my senior year at Gonzaga. I led a staff of 17 people, designed and implemented comprehensive policy initiatives and
served on numerous faculty, administration and board committees.
San Diego, CA
Paralegal Specialist Major Frauds Division January to August 2005
Assistant U.S. Attorneys and FBI agents to investigate, organize and prepare large corporate fraud
and public corruption cases for presentation to a grand jury and trial.
United States Forest Service, Townsend, MT
Forestry Aide Wildland Firefighter Summer 2002
I served as an initial responder on a fire engine and battled several significant wildfires as part of a 20-person fire crew deployed in Montana, Colorado and Yellowstone National Park.
Office of United States Senator Max Baucus, Washington, D.C.
Senate Intern Spring 2002
As an intern during college, I covered the Environment and Public Works Committee and researched the
economic impact of NAFTA on U.S. workers.
COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES AND INTERESTS
Santa Clara County Historical Heritage Commission member, Silicon Valley Campaign for Legal
Services Amicus Committee member; past middle school mentor and high school youth group teacher;
outdoors enthusiast and an avid runner. My academic interests are centered on national security law, the intersection of antitrust and intellectual property regimes and immigration policy.
DocuSign Envelope ID: A147EBCC-FB60-40AC-9559-C19DA7AA2697
Parks and Recreation Commission Application
1 of 5
Personal Information Note: The PARC regularly meets the fourth Tuesday of the month at 7:00 p.m.
Name:
Address:
Cell Phone:
____ Home / ____ Office Phone:
E-mail:
Are you a Palo Alto Resident? ____ Yes ____ No
Do you have any relatives or members of your household who are employed by the City of Palo Alto, who
are currently serving on the City Council, or who are Commissioners or Board Members?
____ Yes ____ No
Are you available and committed to complete the term applied for? ____ Yes ____ No
California state law and the Ci require appointed board and commission
members to file a detailed disclosure of their financial interests, Fair Political Practices Commission,
Conflict of Interest, Form 700.
Do you or your spouse have an investment in, or do you or your spouse serve as an officer or director of, a
company doing business in Palo Alto which you believe is likely to;
1) engage in business with the City,
2) provide products or services for City projects, or
3) be affected by decisions of the board or commission you are applying for? ____ Yes ____ No
Excluding your principal residence, do you or your spouse own real property in Palo Alto? ___ Yes ___ No
How did you learn about this vacancy?
____ Community Group
____ Email from City Clerk
____ Palo Alto Weekly
____ Daily Post
____ City Website
____ Flyer
Other:
List relevant education, training, experience, certificates of training, licenses, or professional
registration:
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0E5D4247-D0B6-4A6B-8CA8-9878BEDDDC6A
Parks and Recreation Commission Application
2 of 5
Employment
Present or Last Employer:
Occupation:
Describe your involvement in community activities, volunteer and civic organizations:
1. What is it about the Parks and Recreation Commission that is compatible with your
experience and of specific interest to you, and why?
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0E5D4247-D0B6-4A6B-8CA8-9878BEDDDC6A
Parks and Recreation Commission Application
3 of 5
2. Please describe an issue that recently came before the Commission that is of particularinterest to you and describe why you are interested in it. If you have never been to a
Commission meeting you can view an archived video from the Midpen Media Center:
3. If appointed, what specific goals would you like to see the Parks and Recreation
Commission achieve, and why? How would you suggest accomplishing this?
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0E5D4247-D0B6-4A6B-8CA8-9878BEDDDC6A
Parks and Recreation Commission Application
4 of 5
4. Parks and Recreation Commission Members work with the documents listed below. If you
have experience with any of these documents, please describe that experience.
Experience with these documents is not required for selection.
Palo Alto Comprehensive Plan:
Community Services and Facilities Element
Natural Environment Element
Baylands Master Plan
Park Dedication Ordinance (Municipal Code)
Bicycle - Pedestrian Transportation Plan
Youth Master Plan
Cubberley Community Advisory Committee Report
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0E5D4247-D0B6-4A6B-8CA8-9878BEDDDC6A
Parks and Recreation Commission Application
5 of 5
Consent to Publish Personal Information on the City of Palo Alto Website
California Government Code Section 6254.21 states, in part,
This consent form will not be redacted and will be attached
The full code can be read here:
Read the code, and check only ONE option below:
_
Commission Application intact. I have read and understand my rights under Government Code
Section 6254.21. I may revoke this permission at any time by providing written notice to the
Palo Alto City Clerk.
OR
I request that the City of Palo Alto redact my home address, phone numbers, and email address
providing the following alternate information and request that they use the following contact
information instead.
Address:
Cell Phone:
____ Home / ____ Office Phone: ___________________________________________________
E-mail: ____________________________________________
The phone number / address can be non-public and different than the address collected on page one.
Signature: Date:
(Optional) Additional Attachment(s)
If you would like to submit a resume, work sample, etc. along with your
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0E5D4247-D0B6-4A6B-8CA8-9878BEDDDC6A
Parks and Recreation Commission Application
1 of 5
Application deadline: January 27, 2017 at Personal Information Note: The PARC regularly meets the fourth Tuesday of the month at 7:00 p.m.
Name:
Address:
Cell Phone:
____ Home / ____ Office Phone:
E-mail:
Are you a Palo Alto Resident? ____ Yes ____ No
Do you have any relatives or members of your household who are employed by the City of Palo Alto, who
are currently serving on the City Council, or who are Commissioners or Board Members?
____ Yes ____ No
Are you available and committed to complete the term applied for? ____ Yes ____ No
California state law and the Ci require appointed board and commission
members to file a detailed disclosure of their financial interests, Fair Political Practices Commission,
Conflict of Interest, Form 700.
Do you or your spouse have an investment in, or do you or your spouse serve as an officer or director of, a
company doing business in Palo Alto which you believe is likely to;
1) engage in business with the City,
2) provide products or services for City projects, or
3) be affected by decisions of the board or commission you are applying for? ____ Yes ____ No
Excluding your principal residence, do you or your spouse own real property in Palo Alto? ___ Yes ___ No
How did you learn about this vacancy?
____ Community Group
____ Email from City Clerk
____ Palo Alto Weekly
____ Daily Post
____ City Website
____ Flyer
Other:
List relevant education, training, experience, certificates of training, licenses, or professional
registration:
DocuSign Envelope ID: 06CD49F9-CD7B-4D07-8F34-66AE90AC3D9A
Parks and Recreation Commission Application
2 of 5
Employment
Present or Last Employer:
Occupation:
Describe your involvement in community activities, volunteer and civic organizations:
1. What is it about the Parks and Recreation Commission that is compatible with your
experience and of specific interest to you, and why?
DocuSign Envelope ID: 06CD49F9-CD7B-4D07-8F34-66AE90AC3D9A
Parks and Recreation Commission Application
3 of 5
2. Please describe an issue that recently came before the Commission that is of particularinterest to you and describe why you are interested in it. If you have never been to a
Commission meeting you can view an archived video from the Midpen Media Center:
3. If appointed, what specific goals would you like to see the Parks and Recreation
Commission achieve, and why? How would you suggest accomplishing this?
DocuSign Envelope ID: 06CD49F9-CD7B-4D07-8F34-66AE90AC3D9A
Parks and Recreation Commission Application
4 of 5
4. Parks and Recreation Commission Members work with the documents listed below. If you
have experience with any of these documents, please describe that experience.
Experience with these documents is not required for selection.
Palo Alto Comprehensive Plan:
Community Services and Facilities Element
Natural Environment Element
Baylands Master Plan
Park Dedication Ordinance (Municipal Code)
Bicycle - Pedestrian Transportation Plan
Youth Master Plan
Cubberley Community Advisory Committee Report
DocuSign Envelope ID: 06CD49F9-CD7B-4D07-8F34-66AE90AC3D9A
Parks and Recreation Commission Application
5 of 5
Application deadline: January 27, 2017 at Consent to Publish Personal Information on the City of Palo Alto Website
California Government Code Section 6254.21 states, in part,
This consent form will not be redacted and will be attached
The full code can be read here:
Read the code, and check only ONE option below:
_ I give permission for the City of Palo Alto
Commission Application intact. I have read and understand my rights under Government Code
Section 6254.21. I may revoke this permission at any time by providing written notice to the
Palo Alto City Clerk.
OR
I request that the City of Palo Alto redact my home address, phone numbers, and email address
providing the following alternate information and request that they use the following contact
information instead.
Address:
Cell Phone:
____ Home / ____ Office Phone: ___________________________________________________
E-mail: ____________________________________________
The phone number / address can be non-public and different than the address collected on page one.
Signature: Date:
(Optional) Additional Attachment(s)
If you would like to submit a resume, work sample, etc. along with your
DocuSign Envelope ID: 06CD49F9-CD7B-4D07-8F34-66AE90AC3D9A
Planning and Transportation Commission Application
1 of 5
Personal Information
Name:
Address:
Cell Phone:
____ Home / ____ Office Phone:
E-mail:
Are you a Palo Alto Resident? ____ Yes ____ No
Do you have any relatives or members of your household who are employed by the City of Palo Alto, who are
currently serving on the City Council, or who are Commissioners or Board Members?
____ Yes ____ No
Are you available and committed to complete the term applied for? ____ Yes ____ No
require appointed board and commission
members to file a detailed disclosure of their financial interests, Fair Political Practices Commission, Conflict of
Interest, Form 700.
Do you have an investment in, or do you serve as an officer or director of, a company doing business in Palo
Alto which you believe is likely to;
1) engage in business with the City,
2) provide products or services for City projects, or
3)be affected by decisions of the board or commission you are applying for? ____ Yes ____ No
Excluding your principal residence, do you own real property in Palo Alto? ____ Yes ____ No
How did you learn about this vacancy?
____ Community Group
____ Email from City Clerk
____ Palo Alto Weekly
____ Daily Post
____ City Website
____ Flyer
Other:
List relevant education, training, experience, certificates of training, licenses, or professional
registration:
DocuSign Envelope ID: B8DBE831-A932-4DC1-8032-7EB6BE786E98
Planning and Transportation Commission Application
2 of 5
Employment
Present or Last Employer:
Occupation:
Describe your involvement in community activities, volunteering or with civic organizations:
1. What is it about the Planning and Transportation Commission that is compatible with your
experience and of specific interest to you, and why?
DocuSign Envelope ID: B8DBE831-A932-4DC1-8032-7EB6BE786E98
Planning and Transportation Commission Application
3 of 5
2. Please describe an issue that recently came before the Commission that is of particular interest
to you and describe why you are interested in it. If you have never been to a Commissionmeeting you can view an archived video from the Midpen Media Center:
3. If appointed, what specific goals would you like to see the Planning and Transportation
Commission achieve, and why? How would you suggest accomplishing this?
DocuSign Envelope ID: B8DBE831-A932-4DC1-8032-7EB6BE786E98
Planning and Transportation Commission Application
4 of 5
4. Planning and Transportation Commission Members work with the documents listed below. If
you have experience with any of these documents, please describe that experience. Experience
with these documents is not required for selection.
Palo Alto Comprehensive Plan
Zoning Code
City Charter
California Environmental Quality Act
El Camino Real Design Guidelines
El Camino Real Master Plan Study and Appendices
Area Plans such as the South of Forest Avenue (SOFA) I and II Plans
Baylands Master Plan
DocuSign Envelope ID: B8DBE831-A932-4DC1-8032-7EB6BE786E98
Planning and Transportation Commission Application
5 of 5
Consent to Publish Personal Information on the City of Palo Alto Website
California Government Code Section 6254.21 states, in part,
This consent form will not be redacted and will be attached
The full code can be read here:
Read the code, and check only ONE option below:
_
Commission Application intact. I have read and understand my rights under Government Code
Section 6254.21. I may revoke this permission at any time by providing written notice to the Palo Alto
City Clerk.
OR
I request that the City of Palo Alto redact my home address, phone numbers, and email address from
roviding
the following alternate information and request that they use the following contact information
instead.
Address:
Cell Phone:
____ Home / ____ Office Phone: ______
E-mail: ____________________________________________
The phone number / address can be non-public and different than the address collected on page one.
Signature: Date:
(Optional) Additional Attachment(s)
If you would like to submit a resume, work sample, etc. along with your
DocuSign Envelope ID: B8DBE831-A932-4DC1-8032-7EB6BE786E98
Planning and Transportation Commission Application
1 of 5
Personal Information
Name:
Address:
Cell Phone:
____ Home / ____ Office Phone:
E-mail:
Are you a Palo Alto Resident? ____ Yes ____ No
Do you have any relatives or members of your household who are employed by the City of Palo Alto, who are
currently serving on the City Council, or who are Commissioners or Board Members?
____ Yes ____ No
Are you available and committed to complete the term applied for? ____ Yes ____ No
require appointed board and commission
members to file a detailed disclosure of their financial interests, Fair Political Practices Commission, Conflict of
Interest, Form 700.
Do you have an investment in, or do you serve as an officer or director of, a company doing business in Palo
Alto which you believe is likely to;
1) engage in business with the City,
2) provide products or services for City projects, or
3) be affected by decisions of the board or commission you are applying for? ____ Yes ____ No
Excluding your principal residence, do you own real property in Palo Alto? ____ Yes ____ No
How did you learn about this vacancy?
____ Community Group
____ Email from City Clerk
____ Palo Alto Weekly
____ Daily Post
____ City Website
____ Flyer
Other:
List relevant education, training, experience, certificates of training, licenses, or professional
registration:
DocuSign Envelope ID: 28BAC6C2-FA06-49B2-86FB-36CA1856D094
Planning and Transportation Commission Application
2 of 5
Employment
Present or Last Employer:
Occupation:
Describe your involvement in community activities, volunteering or with civic organizations:
1. What is it about the Planning and Transportation Commission that is compatible with your
experience and of specific interest to you, and why?
DocuSign Envelope ID: 28BAC6C2-FA06-49B2-86FB-36CA1856D094
Planning and Transportation Commission Application
3 of 5
2. Please describe an issue that recently came before the Commission that is of particular interest
to you and describe why you are interested in it. If you have never been to a Commissionmeeting you can view an archived video from the Midpen Media Center:
3. If appointed, what specific goals would you like to see the Planning and Transportation
Commission achieve, and why? How would you suggest accomplishing this?
DocuSign Envelope ID: 28BAC6C2-FA06-49B2-86FB-36CA1856D094
Planning and Transportation Commission Application
4 of 5
4. Planning and Transportation Commission Members work with the documents listed below. If
you have experience with any of these documents, please describe that experience. Experience
with these documents is not required for selection.
Palo Alto Comprehensive Plan
Zoning Code
City Charter
California Environmental Quality Act
El Camino Real Design Guidelines
El Camino Real Master Plan Study and Appendices
Area Plans such as the South of Forest Avenue (SOFA) I and II Plans
Baylands Master Plan
DocuSign Envelope ID: 28BAC6C2-FA06-49B2-86FB-36CA1856D094
Planning and Transportation Commission Application
5 of 5
Consent to Publish Personal Information on the City of Palo Alto Website
California Government Code Section 6254.21 states, in part,
This consent form will not be redacted and will be attached
The full code can be read here:
Read the code, and check only ONE option below:
_
Commission Application intact. I have read and understand my rights under Government Code
Section 6254.21. I may revoke this permission at any time by providing written notice to the Palo Alto
City Clerk.
OR
I request that the City of Palo Alto redact my home address, phone numbers, and email address from
roviding
the following alternate information and request that they use the following contact information
instead.
Address:
Cell Phone:
____ Home / ____ Office Phone: ___________________________________________________
E-mail: ____________________________________________
The phone number / address can be non-public and different than the address collected on page one.
Signature: Date:
(Optional) Additional Attachment(s)
If you would like to submit a resume, work sample, etc. along with your
DocuSign Envelope ID: 28BAC6C2-FA06-49B2-86FB-36CA1856D094
DEXTER B. DAWES
June 2016RESUME
1997-Present Independent Investor and DirectorCurrently serve on the following corporate, non-profit and community boards:Paterson Paper Company, Sparks, Nevada Director. Paterson manufactures paper products primarily for the restaurant trade.Foothill-DeAnza Community College Audit and Finance Committee, Oversees the finances of a 45,000 student junior college district. Meredith Vineyard Estates, Forestville, CA Director. Produces and markets award winning Pinot Noir and Sauvignon Blanc.
Previous Board assignments include: 2007-2016 Channing House Retirement Community, Director of a 188 unit total care facility (a Community Care Retirement Community) including full medical facility. Chairman of the Board, Chairman of Contract Dispute Committee. 2001-2015 SteriFx Corp, Shreveport, LA Director. SteriFx is a specialty chemical manufacturer producing a unique antimicrobial safe for use
on humans. Member Audit Committee 1989-2014 Lester Electrical, Lincoln, Nebraska Director. Lester is a leading manufacturer of battery chargers for the mobile equipment market, including golf carts, wheel chairs, construction equipment. Member of Audit Committee: Chair of Compensation Committee1987-2013 Embarcadero Publications, Palo Alto, California - Director. Embarcadero is the publisher of five community newspapers including the Palo Alto Weekly. 2006-2008 Foothill-De Anza Bond Oversight Committee, Serve on citizens committee to oversee a $500 million bonded capital program. Chair FY 2008.1998-2009 Taraval LLC, Menlo Park, California Director. Taraval is the management company for Taraval Seed Capital Fund, L.P.2001-2002 Chairman of the Board and CEO - SteriFx, Inc., Shreveport, LA. A startup specialty chemical company organized by Taraval Associates Seed Capital Fund. SteriFx has a patented anti-microbial compound that is safe for humans. It is used in food processing plants and has important uses for the military and homeland defense. 1997-2000 Chairman of the Board and Director Puffin Designs, Inc., Sausalito, CA Co-founded and guided this producer of software for production of special effects for video and film. Sold to Pinnacle Systems, Inc.(later Avid Technologies) in May, 2000. City of Palo Alto Utilities, Commissioner for 11 years. The $170 million per year operation supplies all electric, water, sewer and gas to the
business and citizens of Palo Alto.National Association of Corporate Directors. Served on a Blue Ribbon Committee to develop a policy on the Role of the Boards of Directors in Strategic Planning in 2001.Moto Photo, Inc., Dayton Ohio Director. Moto was a NASDAQ listed franchiser of one hour photo processing labs. Chair of Audit CommitteeHGP Industries, Dallas, Texas. HGP was manufacturer of glass for commercial buildings and for the automobile trade.Lucas Brothers, Inc., Baltimore, Maryland. Lucas distributed office supplies and office furniture.Regan National Advertising, Baltimore, Maryland. Regan was an operator of billboards in several states.American Elgin, Inc, Union City, New Jersey. AE was a manufacturer of HVAC products for the building trades.U.S Souvenir, Inc. Honolulu, Hawaii A marketer of souvenir items in the Pacific region.Dickshire Distributing, El Paso, Texas. Dickshire distributed Coors and other beers in the El Paso region.Fold Pak Corporation, Newark, New York. Fold Pak was a manufacturer of folding cartons for the food industry.
Employment History 1989-1996 President and CEO-John Hancock Capital Growth Management, Inc.Wholly owned subsidiary of John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co.Managing General Partner of Capital Growth Funds One, II and IIIManaged all phases of the private Investment Funds with subscribed capital of $250 million. Valued potential acquisitions and investments in portfolio companies, structured and closed investments, served on boards of directors to assist in growth and development of the companies, conceived and executed strategies for exiting investments which have included initial public offerings, sale of the company or sale of the position in the company to another investor. 1975-1998 Chairman and CEO-Bangert, Dawes, Reade, Davis & Thom, Inc. Investment Bankers- San Francisco and New York
Organized an investment/merchant bank with four partners (from the former firm) to perform services for clients and invest pasmall capitalization buy-outs. 1972-1975 President and CEO- Bangert and Company Investment Bankers- New York and San Francisco. Specialists in ESOP financing.1963-1972 Various financial positions with manufacturers in the San Francisco Bay Area, including Ford Aerospace, Applied Radiation and Consolidated Fibres.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 28BAC6C2-FA06-49B2-86FB-36CA1856D094
Education MBA Harvard Business School 1963- Concentration in FinanceAB Harvard College 1958- Majored in Applied Sciences
Military Lt. USN serving aboard two aircraft carriers in the Pacific.Assistant Navigator and Senior Watch Officer
Personal Married with three grown children. Enjoy outdoors, woodworking and extensive family travel in Asia, South America, Europe and Africa
DocuSign Envelope ID: 28BAC6C2-FA06-49B2-86FB-36CA1856D094
Planning and Transportation Commission Application
1 of 5
Personal Information
Name:
Address:
Cell Phone:
____ Home / ____ Office Phone:
E-mail:
Are you a Palo Alto Resident? ____ Yes ____ No
Do you have any relatives or members of your household who are employed by the City of Palo Alto, who are
currently serving on the City Council, or who are Commissioners or Board Members?
____ Yes ____ No
Are you available and committed to complete the term applied for? ____ Yes ____ No
require appointed board and commission
members to file a detailed disclosure of their financial interests, Fair Political Practices Commission, Conflict of
Interest, Form 700.
Do you have an investment in, or do you serve as an officer or director of, a company doing business in Palo
Alto which you believe is likely to;
1) engage in business with the City,
2) provide products or services for City projects, or
3) be affected by decisions of the board or commission you are applying for? ____ Yes ____ No
Excluding your principal residence, do you own real property in Palo Alto? ____ Yes ____ No
How did you learn about this vacancy?
____ Community Group
____ Email from City Clerk
____ Palo Alto Weekly
____ Daily Post
____ City Website
____ Flyer
Other:
List relevant education, training, experience, certificates of training, licenses, or professional
registration:
DocuSign Envelope ID: C4A7E229-AF1D-46D7-B739-7EB444287606
Planning and Transportation Commission Application
2 of 5
Employment
Present or Last Employer:
Occupation:
Describe your involvement in community activities, volunteering or with civic organizations:
1. What is it about the Planning and Transportation Commission that is compatible with your
experience and of specific interest to you, and why?
DocuSign Envelope ID: C4A7E229-AF1D-46D7-B739-7EB444287606
Planning and Transportation Commission Application
3 of 5
2. Please describe an issue that recently came before the Commission that is of particular interest
to you and describe why you are interested in it. If you have never been to a Commissionmeeting you can view an archived video from the Midpen Media Center:
3. If appointed, what specific goals would you like to see the Planning and Transportation
Commission achieve, and why? How would you suggest accomplishing this?
DocuSign Envelope ID: C4A7E229-AF1D-46D7-B739-7EB444287606
Planning and Transportation Commission Application
4 of 5
4. Planning and Transportation Commission Members work with the documents listed below. If
you have experience with any of these documents, please describe that experience. Experience
with these documents is not required for selection.
Palo Alto Comprehensive Plan
Zoning Code
City Charter
California Environmental Quality Act
El Camino Real Design Guidelines
El Camino Real Master Plan Study and Appendices
Area Plans such as the South of Forest Avenue (SOFA) I and II Plans
Baylands Master Plan
DocuSign Envelope ID: C4A7E229-AF1D-46D7-B739-7EB444287606
Planning and Transportation Commission Application
5 of 5
Consent to Publish Personal Information on the City of Palo Alto Website
California Government Code Section 6254.21 states, in part,
This consent form will not be redacted and will be attached
The full code can be read here:
Read the code, and check only ONE option below:
_
Commission Application intact. I have read and understand my rights under Government Code
Section 6254.21. I may revoke this permission at any time by providing written notice to the Palo Alto
City Clerk.
OR
I request that the City of Palo Alto redact my home address, phone numbers, and email address from
roviding
the following alternate information and request that they use the following contact information
instead.
Address:
Cell Phone:
____ Home / ____ Office Phone: ___________________________________________________
E-mail: ____________________________________________
The phone number / address can be non-public and different than the address collected on page one.
Signature: Date:
(Optional) Additional Attachment(s)
If you would like to submit a resume, work sample, etc. along with your
DocuSign Envelope ID: C4A7E229-AF1D-46D7-B739-7EB444287606
__
__
__
__
__
__
PersonalInformation
Name:
Address:
Cell Phone:
Home / Office Phone:
E-mail:
Are you a Palo Alto Resident?Yes No
Do you have any relatives or members of your household who are employed by the City of Palo Alto, who
are currently serving on the City Council, or who are Commissioners or Board Members?Yes No
Are you available and committed to complete the term applied for?Yes No
California state law requires appointed board and commission members to file a detailed disclosure oftheir financial interests, Fair Political Practices Commission, Conflict of Interest (Form 700).
Do you have an investment in, or do you serve as an officer or director of, a company doing business inPalo Alto which you believe is likely to:
1) engage in business with the City;
2) provide products or services for City projects; or
3) be affected by decisions of the board or commission you are applying for?Yes No
Excluding your principal residence, do you own real property in Palo Alto?Yes No
How did you Learn about the vacancy on the Planning and Transportation Commission?
CommunityGroup
Email from City Clerk
Palo Alto Weekly
Daily Post
CityWebsite
Flyer
Other:_ _
List relevant education, training, experience, certificates of training, licenses, or professional
registration:
Page 1 Planning & Transportation Commission
160 Lowell Avenue
Brian Hamachek
650-556-4141
650-556-4141
brian@brianhama.com
University of California at Santa Barbara, Computer Science
DocuSign Envelope ID: BA92A7BA-1B75-44AE-B08B-21848D8139B3
Employment
Present or Last Employer:
Occupation:
Describe your involvement in community activities, volunteer and civic organizations:
Page 2Planning & Transportation Commission
Nearby
CEO
Expert Judge - Palo Alto Civic Hackathon
Program Participant - Palo Alto Community Emergency Response Team
Alumni Advisor - Stanford StartX
Student Mentor - Stanford Technology Ventures Program
Volunteer - Hack Palo Alto
Captain - Palo Alto USTA TeamMember - Palo Alto Tennis ClubFounder - Palo Alto Tennis Meetup
DocuSign Envelope ID: BA92A7BA-1B75-44AE-B08B-21848D8139B3
1. What is it about the Planning and Transportation Commission that is compatible with yourexperience and of specific interest to you, and why?
2. Please describe an issue that recently came before the Commission that is of particular interestto you and describe why you are interested in it. If you have never been to a Commission meetingyou can view an archive here:LINK.
Page 3Planning & Transportation Commission
I am very interested in phase 2 of the Embarcadero Road Improvement Project. I grew
up a few blocks from Town and Country, attended Palo Alto High School, and later lived
in a home only a block off Embarcadero Road. I have driven, walked, and biked the
length of Embarcadero Road thousands of times over the past three decades. I have
seen the amount of traffic on it explode. I have experienced the anxiety of riding a bike
along the underpass at Alma. I have stood at the corner of Emerson while waiting for a
break in traffic so I could quickly dart across as a pedestrian. I think that this experience
gives me a very unique perspective in understanding the pain points and evaluating theproposed solutions.
I have lived in Palo Alto nearly my entire life, so this commission is of particular interest to
me because of the direct role it's members have on protecting and guiding Palo Alto's
future. My professional experience as a technology executive has given me many
relevant skills, but it is my extensive personal history and deep affection for our city thatmakes me such a valuable resource to this commission.
DocuSign Envelope ID: BA92A7BA-1B75-44AE-B08B-21848D8139B3
3. If appointed, what specific goals would you like to see the Planning and TransportationCommission achieve, and why? How would you suggest accomplishing this?
4. Planning and Transportation Commission Members work with the documents listed below. Ifyou have experience with any of these documents, please describe that experience. Experiencewith these documents is not required for selection.
Palo Alto Comprehensive Plan LINK
Zoning Code LINK
CityCharter LINK
California Environmental QualityAct LINK
El Camino Real Design Guidelines LINK
El Camino Real Master Plan Study LINK and Appendices LINK
Area Plans such as the South of Forest Avenue (SOFA) I and II Plans LINK
Baylands Master Plan LINK
Page 4Planning & Transportation Commission
Ultimately, I would like to see the commission continue to preserve the unique character
of Palo Alto. This city is at a critical point in time, and the decisions made by this
commission will determine the type of city Palo Alto becomes. There is no denying that
many aspects of the city need to change to accommodate the changing reality of thelarger Bay Area, but the changes need to be done thoughtfully and always with the goalof preserving what makes the city so amazing. I think my first-hand experience growing
up, studying, working, starting a business, and living in both an apartment and homes
here allows me to understand many different point of views and develop the best
solutions for everyone.
Having attended/watched many PTC meetings and in order to better understand theissues of the city, I have, over the years, become somewhat familiar with the Palo Alto
Comprehensive Plan, the City Charter, and the El Camino Real Master Plan. I am
currently far less familiar with the other documents.
DocuSign Envelope ID: BA92A7BA-1B75-44AE-B08B-21848D8139B3
Consent to Publish Personal Information on the City of Palo Alto Website
California Government Code Section 6254.21 states, in part, “No state or local agency shall post the
home address or telephone number of any elected or appointed official on the Internet without firstobtaining the written permission of that individual.” The full code is attached. This consent form will notbe redacted and will be attached to the Application and posted to the City’s website.
The full code can be read here:LINK
Read the code, and check only ONE option below:
I give permission for the City of Palo Alto to post to the City’s website the attached Board andCommission Application intact. I have read and understand my rights under Government CodeSection 6254.21. I may revoke this permission at any time by providing written notice to the Palo
Alto City Clerk.
OR
I request that the City of Palo Alto redact my home address, phone numbers, and email addressfrom the attached Board and Commission Application prior to posting to the City’s website. I amproviding the following alternate information and request that they use the following contactinformationinstead.
Address:
Cell Phone:
Home / Office Phone:
E-mail:
Signature: _ _ _ Date:
Page 5 Planning & Transportation Commission
DocuSign Envelope ID: BA92A7BA-1B75-44AE-B08B-21848D8139B3
Planning and Transportation Commission Application
1 of 5
Personal Information Note: The PTC regularly meets the second and last Wednesdays of the month at 6:00 p.m.
Name:
Address:
Cell Phone:
____ Home / ____ Office Phone:
E-mail:
Are you a Palo Alto Resident? ____ Yes ____ No
Do you have any relatives or members of your household who are employed by the City of Palo Alto, who are
currently serving on the City Council, or who are Commissioners or Board Members?
____ Yes ____ No
Are you available and committed to complete the term applied for? ____ Yes ____ No
require appointed board and commission
members to file a detailed disclosure of their financial interests, Fair Political Practices Commission, Conflict of
Interest, Form 700.
Do you or your spouse have an investment in, or do you or your spouse serve as an officer or director of, a
company doing business in Palo Alto which you believe is likely to;
1) engage in business with the City,
2) provide products or services for City projects, or
3) be affected by decisions of the board or commission you are applying for? ____ Yes ____ No
Excluding your principal residence, do you or your spouse own real property in Palo Alto? ____ Yes ____ No
How did you learn about this vacancy?
____ Community Group
____ Email from City Clerk
____ Palo Alto Weekly
____ Daily Post
____ City Website
____ Flyer
Other:
List relevant education, training, experience, certificates of training, licenses, or professional
registration:
DocuSign Envelope ID: 18B109B1-9D89-452E-8869-A7EF2DC7ABEC
Planning and Transportation Commission Application
2 of 5
Employment
Present or Last Employer:
Occupation:
Describe your involvement in community activities, volunteering or with civic organizations:
1. What is it about the Planning and Transportation Commission that is compatible with your
experience and of specific interest to you, and why?
DocuSign Envelope ID: 18B109B1-9D89-452E-8869-A7EF2DC7ABEC
al area viability.
Planning and Transportation Commission Application
3 of 5
2. Please describe an issue that recently came before the Commission that is of particular interest
to you and describe why you are interested in it. If you have never been to a Commission meeting you can view an archived video from the Midpen Media Center:
3. If appointed, what specific goals would you like to see the Planning and Transportation
Commission achieve, and why? How would you suggest accomplishing this?
DocuSign Envelope ID: 18B109B1-9D89-452E-8869-A7EF2DC7ABEC
Planning and Transportation Commission Application
4 of 5
4. Planning and Transportation Commission Members work with the documents listed below. If
you have experience with any of these documents, please describe that experience. Experience
with these documents is not required for selection.
Palo Alto Comprehensive Plan
Zoning Code
City Charter
California Environmental Quality Act
El Camino Real Design Guidelines
El Camino Real Master Plan Study and Appendices
Area Plans such as the South of Forest Avenue (SOFA) I and II Plans
Baylands Master Plan
DocuSign Envelope ID: 18B109B1-9D89-452E-8869-A7EF2DC7ABEC
Planning and Transportation Commission Application
5 of 5
Consent to Publish Personal Information on the City of Palo Alto Website
California Government Code Section 6254.21 states, in part,
This consent form will not be redacted and will be attached
The full code can be read here:
Read the code, and check only ONE option below:
_ I give permission for the City of Palo Alto
Commission Application intact. I have read and understand my rights under Government Code
Section 6254.21. I may revoke this permission at any time by providing written notice to the Palo Alto
City Clerk.
OR
I request that the City of Palo Alto redact my home address, phone numbers, and email address from
the following alternate information and request that they use the following contact information
instead.
Address:
Cell Phone:
____ Home / ____ Office Phone: ___________________________________________________
E-mail: ____________________________________________
The phone number / address can be non-public and different than the address collected on page one.
Signature: Date:
(Optional) Additional Attachment(s)
If you would like to submit a resume, work sample, etc. along with your
DocuSign Envelope ID: 18B109B1-9D89-452E-8869-A7EF2DC7ABEC
Additional Information
DocuSign Envelope ID: 18B109B1-9D89-452E-8869-A7EF2DC7ABEC
Planning and Transportation Commission Application
1 of 5
Personal Information
Name:
Address:
Cell Phone:
____ Home / ____ Office Phone:
E-mail:
Are you a Palo Alto Resident? ____ Yes ____ No
Do you have any relatives or members of your household who are employed by the City of Palo Alto, who are
currently serving on the City Council, or who are Commissioners or Board Members?
____ Yes ____ No
Are you available and committed to complete the term applied for? ____ Yes ____ No
require appointed board and commission
members to file a detailed disclosure of their financial interests, Fair Political Practices Commission, Conflict of
Interest, Form 700.
Do you have an investment in, or do you serve as an officer or director of, a company doing business in Palo
Alto which you believe is likely to;
1) engage in business with the City,
2) provide products or services for City projects, or
3)be affected by decisions of the board or commission you are applying for? ____ Yes ____ No
Excluding your principal residence, do you own real property in Palo Alto? ____ Yes ____ No
How did you learn about this vacancy?
____ Community Group
____ Email from City Clerk
____ Palo Alto Weekly
____ Daily Post
____ City Website
____ Flyer
Other:
List relevant education, training, experience, certificates of training, licenses, or professional
registration:
DocuSign Envelope ID: F180A914-14E1-4DFC-ABCD-F659CB86C2D4
Planning and Transportation Commission Application
2 of 5
Employment
Present or Last Employer:
Occupation:
Describe your involvement in community activities, volunteering or with civic organizations:
1. What is it about the Planning and Transportation Commission that is compatible with your
experience and of specific interest to you, and why?
DocuSign Envelope ID: F180A914-14E1-4DFC-ABCD-F659CB86C2D4
Planning and Transportation Commission Application
3 of 5
2. Please describe an issue that recently came before the Commission that is of particular interest
to you and describe why you are interested in it. If you have never been to a Commissionmeeting you can view an archived video from the Midpen Media Center:
3. If appointed, what specific goals would you like to see the Planning and Transportation
Commission achieve, and why? How would you suggest accomplishing this?
DocuSign Envelope ID: F180A914-14E1-4DFC-ABCD-F659CB86C2D4
Planning and Transportation Commission Application
4 of 5
4. Planning and Transportation Commission Members work with the documents listed below. If
you have experience with any of these documents, please describe that experience. Experience
with these documents is not required for selection.
Palo Alto Comprehensive Plan
Zoning Code
City Charter
California Environmental Quality Act
El Camino Real Design Guidelines
El Camino Real Master Plan Study and Appendices
Area Plans such as the South of Forest Avenue (SOFA) I and II Plans
Baylands Master Plan
DocuSign Envelope ID: F180A914-14E1-4DFC-ABCD-F659CB86C2D4
Planning and Transportation Commission Application
5 of 5
Consent to Publish Personal Information on the City of Palo Alto Website
California Government Code Section 6254.21 states, in part,
This consent form will not be redacted and will be attached
The full code can be read here:
Read the code, and check only ONE option below:
_
Commission Application intact. I have read and understand my rights under Government Code
Section 6254.21. I may revoke this permission at any time by providing written notice to the Palo Alto
City Clerk.
OR
I request that the City of Palo Alto redact my home address, phone numbers, and email address from
roviding
the following alternate information and request that they use the following contact information
instead.
Address:
Cell Phone:
____ Home / ____ Office Phone: ______
E-mail: ____________________________________________
The phone number / address can be non-public and different than the address collected on page one.
Signature: Date:
(Optional) Additional Attachment(s)
If you would like to submit a resume, work sample, etc. along with your
DocuSign Envelope ID: F180A914-14E1-4DFC-ABCD-F659CB86C2D4
Planning and Transportation Commission Application
1 of 5
Personal Information
Name:
Address:
Cell Phone:
____ Home / ____ Office Phone:
E-mail:
Are you a Palo Alto Resident? ____ Yes ____ No
Do you have any relatives or members of your household who are employed by the City of Palo Alto, who are
currently serving on the City Council, or who are Commissioners or Board Members?
____ Yes ____ No
Are you available and committed to complete the term applied for? ____ Yes ____ No
require appointed board and commission
members to file a detailed disclosure of their financial interests, Fair Political Practices Commission, Conflict of
Interest, Form 700.
Do you have an investment in, or do you serve as an officer or director of, a company doing business in Palo
Alto which you believe is likely to;
1) engage in business with the City,
2) provide products or services for City projects, or
3)be affected by decisions of the board or commission you are applying for? ____ Yes ____ No
Excluding your principal residence, do you own real property in Palo Alto? ____ Yes ____ No
How did you learn about this vacancy?
____ Community Group
____ Email from City Clerk
____ Palo Alto Weekly
____ Daily Post
____ City Website
____ Flyer
Other:
List relevant education, training, experience, certificates of training, licenses, or professional
registration:
DocuSign Envelope ID: ABED7E65-893F-4303-8034-9161889A24DF
Planning and Transportation Commission Application
2 of 5
Employment
Present or Last Employer:
Occupation:
Describe your involvement in community activities, volunteering or with civic organizations:
1. What is it about the Planning and Transportation Commission that is compatible with your
experience and of specific interest to you, and why?
DocuSign Envelope ID: ABED7E65-893F-4303-8034-9161889A24DF
Planning and Transportation Commission Application
3 of 5
2. Please describe an issue that recently came before the Commission that is of particular interest
to you and describe why you are interested in it. If you have never been to a Commissionmeeting you can view an archived video from the Midpen Media Center:
3. If appointed, what specific goals would you like to see the Planning and Transportation
Commission achieve, and why? How would you suggest accomplishing this?
DocuSign Envelope ID: ABED7E65-893F-4303-8034-9161889A24DF
Planning and Transportation Commission Application
4 of 5
4. Planning and Transportation Commission Members work with the documents listed below. If
you have experience with any of these documents, please describe that experience. Experience
with these documents is not required for selection.
Palo Alto Comprehensive Plan
Zoning Code
City Charter
California Environmental Quality Act
El Camino Real Design Guidelines
El Camino Real Master Plan Study and Appendices
Area Plans such as the South of Forest Avenue (SOFA) I and II Plans
Baylands Master Plan
DocuSign Envelope ID: ABED7E65-893F-4303-8034-9161889A24DF
Planning and Transportation Commission Application
5 of 5
Consent to Publish Personal Information on the City of Palo Alto Website
California Government Code Section 6254.21 states, in part,
This consent form will not be redacted and will be attached
The full code can be read here:
Read the code, and check only ONE option below:
_
Commission Application intact. I have read and understand my rights under Government Code
Section 6254.21. I may revoke this permission at any time by providing written notice to the Palo Alto
City Clerk.
OR
I request that the City of Palo Alto redact my home address, phone numbers, and email address from
roviding
the following alternate information and request that they use the following contact information
instead.
Address:
Cell Phone:
____ Home / ____ Office Phone: ______
E-mail: ____________________________________________
The phone number / address can be non-public and different than the address collected on page one.
Signature: Date:
(Optional) Additional Attachment(s)
If you would like to submit a resume, work sample, etc. along with your
DocuSign Envelope ID: ABED7E65-893F-4303-8034-9161889A24DF
GABRIEL PATRICK KRALIK
PAGE 2
Created, with outside corporate counsel, model agreements for the conversion of foreign research and development teams into separate corporate entities with contract-based milestones for the development of product maintenance
and software version iterations adding incremental feature sets. Utilizing this model, converted Shanghai development operations into a third-party service provider.
Directed post-divestiture representation of Corel in a dispute over the novation of U.S. Government defense contracts.
Co-negotiated post-transaction modifications to global revenue sharing agreement for WinDVD software including to resolve industry standard royalty obligations.
PPC Syracuse, NY October 2008 to June 2012
Global designer, manufacturer, and supplier of connector technology products for telecommunications industries, including broadband, satellite, and wireless sectors; privately-owned company has operations in the U.S., Denmark, China, and St. Kitts. Broadband division
was sold to Belden in 2012 for $517 Million.
VICE PRESIDENT, GENERAL COUNSEL, CHIEF PATENT COUNSEL & CORPORATE SECRETARY
portfolio. Built and managed an internal and external legal framework to advance corporate objectives of growth, profitability, and innovation.
Grew $25M in annual broadband connector product revenue by obtaining and enforcing two General Exclusion orders
through successful litigation of coaxial cable connector patents in proceedings before the International Trade Commission, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and through Customs import detention proceedings.
revenue gains in the broadband, satellite and wireless divisions;
attained a #18 global ranking in the 2011 Institute of atent Power survey for telecom equipment and in the 2008 Wall Street Journal rankings for Excellence in Technology Strength.
Saved $3M in annual legal costs through negotiated alternative-fee arrangements with outside legal firms and the establishment of a seven-person internal legal department responsible for handling corporate, commercial, litigation
support and worldwide patent prosecution practice areas.
Directed legal representation to support and protect the U.S., Denmark, St. Kitts, and mainland China.
Participated in the creation and updating of -year strategic plan together with business, finance and manufacturing leads.
the Custom Electronic Design
and Installation Association market sector, devising and executing successful trademark registrations and designing form agreements for product distribution.
Steered corporate acquisition of Evolution Broadband, conducting intellectual property due diligence to inform
acquisition strategy. India, Brazil and China, and the dissolution and consolidation of certain U.S. (real-estate holding companies), the U.K.
and St. Kitts entities. Coordinated representation of leading to the construction and expansion of its Upstate New York research, development and production operations.
Represented PPC in local government hearings to obtain zoning variances needed for approval of facility construction projects in East Syracuse, New York.
Served as Secretary to the Board of Directors, drafting minutes and resolutions and managing corporate governance. Served as a director of multiple international affiliate entities.
Managed Employment disputes including EEOC Complaint matters. Provided
oversight to the resolution of workplace disputes. Developed management training modules for anti-harassment and Defended PPC in a
federal district court trade secret misappropriation case brought by competitor subsequent to the hiring of a C-level sales executive, winning dismissal of the allegations.
Defended PPC in State Court landlord-tenant dispute concerning rent obligations due in the context of a roof collapse that had necessitated transfer of manufacturing and finished product warehouse operations.
Litigated to favorable conclusion a commercial dispute with the supplier of automated product assembly equipment based on failure to achieve contract milestones and operation requirements related to output, versatility and quality.
DocuSign Envelope ID: ABED7E65-893F-4303-8034-9161889A24DF
GABRIEL PATRICK KRALIK
PAGE 5
MORGAN & FINNEGAN New York, NY 1989 to 1996
LITIGATION ASSOCIATE
behalf of RVI in the District of Delaware for patent rights
covering ibuprofen-pseudoephedrine combination over-the-counter medication (verdict later overturned on appeal on obviousness grounds).
Represented clients on intellectual property litigation and prosecution matters, including Procter & Gamble, W.L. Gore, Syva, Brown & Williamson, Richardson-Vicks, Beam-Tech, AccuScan and Sibjet.
EDUCATION
Notre Dame Law School Notre Dame, IN
Juris Doctor - 1989
University of Notre Dame Notre Dame, IN
Bachelor of Science in Chemical Engineering 1982
ADMISSIONS
State Bars of New York, New Jersey and California; Supreme Court of the United States; U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal and Second Circuits; U.S. District Courts of New Jersey, Southern District of New York, Eastern
District of New York, Western District of New York, Northern District of New York; .United States Court of International Trade; and United States Patent & Trademark Office (Registration No. 34,855).
PROFESSIONAL TRAINING, PROJECTS AND PUBLIC SERVICE
2015 Program Mediator and Case Developer, Santa Clara County Office of Human Relations
2015 Vice President, Saint Frances Cabrini Foundation 2014 Graduate of the County of Santa Clara Dispute Resolution Mediation Skills Program;
2012 Graduate of the Pepperdine University School of Law STAR Mediation Program; 2004 Candidate for Mayor, City of Pleasanton, CA.; and 2000 Candidate for Justice, New York Supreme Ct, 9th District.
DocuSign Envelope ID: ABED7E65-893F-4303-8034-9161889A24DF
Planning and Transportation Commission Application
1 of 5
Personal Information
Name:
Address:
Cell Phone:
____ Home / ____ Office Phone:
E-mail:
Are you a Palo Alto Resident? ____ Yes ____ No
Do you have any relatives or members of your household who are employed by the City of Palo Alto, who are
currently serving on the City Council, or who are Commissioners or Board Members?
____ Yes ____ No
Are you available and committed to complete the term applied for? ____ Yes ____ No
require appointed board and commission
members to file a detailed disclosure of their financial interests, Fair Political Practices Commission, Conflict of
Interest, Form 700.
Do you have an investment in, or do you serve as an officer or director of, a company doing business in Palo
Alto which you believe is likely to;
1) engage in business with the City,
2) provide products or services for City projects, or
3) be affected by decisions of the board or commission you are applying for? ____ Yes ____ No
Excluding your principal residence, do you own real property in Palo Alto? ____ Yes ____ No
How did you learn about this vacancy?
____ Community Group
____ Email from City Clerk
____ Palo Alto Weekly
____ Daily Post
____ City Website
____ Flyer
Other:
List relevant education, training, experience, certificates of training, licenses, or professional
registration:
DocuSign Envelope ID: 62F27E7A-1A96-4720-B5FA-C1B4A710DD66
Planning and Transportation Commission Application
2 of 5
Employment
Present or Last Employer:
Occupation:
Describe your involvement in community activities, volunteering or with civic organizations:
1. What is it about the Planning and Transportation Commission that is compatible with your
experience and of specific interest to you, and why?
DocuSign Envelope ID: 62F27E7A-1A96-4720-B5FA-C1B4A710DD66
Planning and Transportation Commission Application
3 of 5
2. Please describe an issue that recently came before the Commission that is of particular interest
to you and describe why you are interested in it. If you have never been to a Commissionmeeting you can view an archived video from the Midpen Media Center:
3. If appointed, what specific goals would you like to see the Planning and Transportation
Commission achieve, and why? How would you suggest accomplishing this?
DocuSign Envelope ID: 62F27E7A-1A96-4720-B5FA-C1B4A710DD66
Planning and Transportation Commission Application
4 of 5
4. Planning and Transportation Commission Members work with the documents listed below. If
you have experience with any of these documents, please describe that experience. Experience
with these documents is not required for selection.
Palo Alto Comprehensive Plan
Zoning Code
City Charter
California Environmental Quality Act
El Camino Real Design Guidelines
El Camino Real Master Plan Study and Appendices
Area Plans such as the South of Forest Avenue (SOFA) I and II Plans
Baylands Master Plan
DocuSign Envelope ID: 62F27E7A-1A96-4720-B5FA-C1B4A710DD66
Planning and Transportation Commission Application
5 of 5
Consent to Publish Personal Information on the City of Palo Alto Website
California Government Code Section 6254.21 states, in part,
This consent form will not be redacted and will be attached
The full code can be read here:
Read the code, and check only ONE option below:
_
Commission Application intact. I have read and understand my rights under Government Code
Section 6254.21. I may revoke this permission at any time by providing written notice to the Palo Alto
City Clerk.
OR
I request that the City of Palo Alto redact my home address, phone numbers, and email address from
roviding
the following alternate information and request that they use the following contact information
instead.
Address:
Cell Phone:
____ Home / ____ Office Phone: ___________________________________________________
E-mail: ____________________________________________
The phone number / address can be non-public and different than the address collected on page one.
Signature: Date:
(Optional) Additional Attachment(s)
If you would like to submit a resume, work sample, etc. along with your
DocuSign Envelope ID: 62F27E7A-1A96-4720-B5FA-C1B4A710DD66
Planning and Transportation Commission Application
1 of 5
Personal Information
Name:
Address:
Cell Phone:
____ Home / ____ Office Phone:
E-mail:
Are you a Palo Alto Resident? ____ Yes ____ No
Do you have any relatives or members of your household who are employed by the City of Palo Alto, who are
currently serving on the City Council, or who are Commissioners or Board Members?
____ Yes ____ No
Are you available and committed to complete the term applied for? ____ Yes ____ No
require appointed board and commission
members to file a detailed disclosure of their financial interests, Fair Political Practices Commission, Conflict of
Interest, Form 700.
Do you have an investment in, or do you serve as an officer or director of, a company doing business in Palo
Alto which you believe is likely to;
1) engage in business with the City,
2) provide products or services for City projects, or
3)be affected by decisions of the board or commission you are applying for? ____ Yes ____ No
Excluding your principal residence, do you own real property in Palo Alto? ____ Yes ____ No
How did you learn about this vacancy?
____ Community Group
____ Email from City Clerk
____ Palo Alto Weekly
____ Daily Post
____ City Website
____ Flyer
Other:
List relevant education, training, experience, certificates of training, licenses, or professional
registration:
DocuSign Envelope ID: 5F7C374C-54BD-4AB5-A773-D92AA77CC305
Planning and Transportation Commission Application
2 of 5
Employment
Present or Last Employer:
Occupation:
Describe your involvement in community activities, volunteering or with civic organizations:
1. What is it about the Planning and Transportation Commission that is compatible with your
experience and of specific interest to you, and why?
DocuSign Envelope ID: 5F7C374C-54BD-4AB5-A773-D92AA77CC305
Planning and Transportation Commission Application
4 of 5
4. Planning and Transportation Commission Members work with the documents listed below. If
you have experience with any of these documents, please describe that experience. Experience
with these documents is not required for selection.
Palo Alto Comprehensive Plan
Zoning Code
City Charter
California Environmental Quality Act
El Camino Real Design Guidelines
El Camino Real Master Plan Study and Appendices
Area Plans such as the South of Forest Avenue (SOFA) I and II Plans
Baylands Master Plan
DocuSign Envelope ID: 5F7C374C-54BD-4AB5-A773-D92AA77CC305
Planning and Transportation Commission Application
5 of 5
Consent to Publish Personal Information on the City of Palo Alto Website
California Government Code Section 6254.21 states, in part,
This consent form will not be redacted and will be attached
The full code can be read here:
Read the code, and check only ONE option below:
_
Commission Application intact. I have read and understand my rights under Government Code
Section 6254.21. I may revoke this permission at any time by providing written notice to the Palo Alto
City Clerk.
OR
I request that the City of Palo Alto redact my home address, phone numbers, and email address from
roviding
the following alternate information and request that they use the following contact information
instead.
Address:
Cell Phone:
____ Home / ____ Office Phone: ______
E-mail: ____________________________________________
The phone number / address can be non-public and different than the address collected on page one.
Signature: Date:
(Optional) Additional Attachment(s)
If you would like to submit a resume, work sample, etc. along with your
DocuSign Envelope ID: 5F7C374C-54BD-4AB5-A773-D92AA77CC305
Planning and Transportation Commission Application
1 of 5
Personal Information Note: The PTC regularly meets the second and last Wednesdays of the month at 6:00 p.m.
Name:
Address:
Cell Phone:
____ Home / ____ Office Phone:
E-mail:
Are you a Palo Alto Resident? ____ Yes ____ No
Do you have any relatives or members of your household who are employed by the City of Palo Alto, who are
currently serving on the City Council, or who are Commissioners or Board Members?
____ Yes ____ No
Are you available and committed to complete the term applied for? ____ Yes ____ No
require appointed board and commission
members to file a detailed disclosure of their financial interests, Fair Political Practices Commission, Conflict of
Interest, Form 700.
Do you or your spouse have an investment in, or do you or your spouse serve as an officer or director of, a
company doing business in Palo Alto which you believe is likely to;
1) engage in business with the City,
2) provide products or services for City projects, or
3) be affected by decisions of the board or commission you are applying for? ____ Yes ____ No
Excluding your principal residence, do you or your spouse own real property in Palo Alto? ____ Yes ____ No
How did you learn about this vacancy?
____ Community Group
____ Email from City Clerk
____ Palo Alto Weekly
____ Daily Post
____ City Website
____ Flyer
Other:
List relevant education, training, experience, certificates of training, licenses, or professional
registration:
DocuSign Envelope ID: F22C0405-E248-4426-962E-44D377D8DAF8
Planning and Transportation Commission Application
2 of 5
Employment
Present or Last Employer:
Occupation:
Describe your involvement in community activities, volunteering or with civic organizations:
1. What is it about the Planning and Transportation Commission that is compatible with your
experience and of specific interest to you, and why?
DocuSign Envelope ID: F22C0405-E248-4426-962E-44D377D8DAF8
Planning and Transportation Commission Application
3 of 5
2. Please describe an issue that recently came before the Commission that is of particular interest
to you and describe why you are interested in it. If you have never been to a Commission meeting you can view an archived video from the Midpen Media Center:
3. If appointed, what specific goals would you like to see the Planning and Transportation
Commission achieve, and why? How would you suggest accomplishing this?
DocuSign Envelope ID: F22C0405-E248-4426-962E-44D377D8DAF8
Planning and Transportation Commission Application
4 of 5
4. Planning and Transportation Commission Members work with the documents listed below. If
you have experience with any of these documents, please describe that experience. Experience
with these documents is not required for selection.
Palo Alto Comprehensive Plan
Zoning Code
City Charter
California Environmental Quality Act
El Camino Real Design Guidelines
El Camino Real Master Plan Study and Appendices
Area Plans such as the South of Forest Avenue (SOFA) I and II Plans
Baylands Master Plan
DocuSign Envelope ID: F22C0405-E248-4426-962E-44D377D8DAF8
Planning and Transportation Commission Application
5 of 5
Consent to Publish Personal Information on the City of Palo Alto Website
California Government Code Section 6254.21 states, in part,
This consent form will not be redacted and will be attached
The full code can be read here:
Read the code, and check only ONE option below:
_ I give permission for the City of Palo Alto
Commission Application intact. I have read and understand my rights under Government Code
Section 6254.21. I may revoke this permission at any time by providing written notice to the Palo Alto
City Clerk.
OR
I request that the City of Palo Alto redact my home address, phone numbers, and email address from
the following alternate information and request that they use the following contact information
instead.
Address:
Cell Phone:
____ Home / ____ Office Phone: ___________________________________________________
E-mail: ____________________________________________
The phone number / address can be non-public and different than the address collected on page one.
Signature: Date:
(Optional) Additional Attachment(s)
If you would like to submit a resume, work sample, etc. along with your
DocuSign Envelope ID: F22C0405-E248-4426-962E-44D377D8DAF8
Planning and Transportation Commission Application
1 of 5
Personal Information
Name:
Address:
Cell Phone:
____ Home / ____ Office Phone:
E-mail:
Are you a Palo Alto Resident? ____ Yes ____ No
Do you have any relatives or members of your household who are employed by the City of Palo Alto, who are
currently serving on the City Council, or who are Commissioners or Board Members?
____ Yes ____ No
Are you available and committed to complete the term applied for? ____ Yes ____ No
require appointed board and commission
members to file a detailed disclosure of their financial interests, Fair Political Practices Commission, Conflict of
Interest, Form 700.
Do you have an investment in, or do you serve as an officer or director of, a company doing business in Palo
Alto which you believe is likely to;
1) engage in business with the City,
2) provide products or services for City projects, or
3) be affected by decisions of the board or commission you are applying for? ____ Yes ____ No
Excluding your principal residence, do you own real property in Palo Alto? ____ Yes ____ No
How did you learn about this vacancy?
____ Community Group
____ Email from City Clerk
____ Palo Alto Weekly
____ Daily Post
____ City Website
____ Flyer
Other:
List relevant education, training, experience, certificates of training, licenses, or professional
registration:
DocuSign Envelope ID: AB9CA60A-9495-4B78-888E-99227AC1BC5F
Planning and Transportation Commission Application
2 of 5
Employment
Present or Last Employer:
Occupation:
Describe your involvement in community activities, volunteering or with civic organizations:
1. What is it about the Planning and Transportation Commission that is compatible with your
experience and of specific interest to you, and why?
DocuSign Envelope ID: AB9CA60A-9495-4B78-888E-99227AC1BC5F
Planning and Transportation Commission Application
3 of 5
2. Please describe an issue that recently came before the Commission that is of particular interest
to you and describe why you are interested in it. If you have never been to a Commissionmeeting you can view an archived video from the Midpen Media Center:
3. If appointed, what specific goals would you like to see the Planning and Transportation
Commission achieve, and why? How would you suggest accomplishing this?
DocuSign Envelope ID: AB9CA60A-9495-4B78-888E-99227AC1BC5F
Planning and Transportation Commission Application
4 of 5
4. Planning and Transportation Commission Members work with the documents listed below. If
you have experience with any of these documents, please describe that experience. Experience
with these documents is not required for selection.
Palo Alto Comprehensive Plan
Zoning Code
City Charter
California Environmental Quality Act
El Camino Real Design Guidelines
El Camino Real Master Plan Study and Appendices
Area Plans such as the South of Forest Avenue (SOFA) I and II Plans
Baylands Master Plan
DocuSign Envelope ID: AB9CA60A-9495-4B78-888E-99227AC1BC5F
Planning and Transportation Commission Application
5 of 5
Consent to Publish Personal Information on the City of Palo Alto Website
California Government Code Section 6254.21 states, in part,
This consent form will not be redacted and will be attached
The full code can be read here:
Read the code, and check only ONE option below:
_
Commission Application intact. I have read and understand my rights under Government Code
Section 6254.21. I may revoke this permission at any time by providing written notice to the Palo Alto
City Clerk.
OR
I request that the City of Palo Alto redact my home address, phone numbers, and email address from
roviding
the following alternate information and request that they use the following contact information
instead.
Address:
Cell Phone:
____ Home / ____ Office Phone: ___________________________________________________
E-mail: ____________________________________________
The phone number / address can be non-public and different than the address collected on page one.
Signature: Date:
(Optional) Additional Attachment(s)
If you would like to submit a resume, work sample, etc. along with your
DocuSign Envelope ID: AB9CA60A-9495-4B78-888E-99227AC1BC5F
Planning and Transportation Commission Application
2 of 5
Employment
Present or Last Employer:
Occupation:
Describe your involvement in community activities, volunteering or with civic organizations:
1. What is it about the Planning and Transportation Commission that is compatible with your
experience and of specific interest to you, and why?
DocuSign Envelope ID: 574C15A4-26E6-414B-9156-2E0A4D2E2282
Planning and Transportation Commission Application
3 of 5
2. Please describe an issue that recently came before the Commission that is of particular interest
to you and describe why you are interested in it. If you have never been to a Commission meeting you can view an archived video from the Midpen Media Center:
3. If appointed, what specific goals would you like to see the Planning and Transportation
Commission achieve, and why? How would you suggest accomplishing this?
DocuSign Envelope ID: 574C15A4-26E6-414B-9156-2E0A4D2E2282
Planning and Transportation Commission Application
4 of 5
4. Planning and Transportation Commission Members work with the documents listed below. If
you have experience with any of these documents, please describe that experience. Experience
with these documents is not required for selection.
Palo Alto Comprehensive Plan
Zoning Code
City Charter
California Environmental Quality Act
El Camino Real Design Guidelines
El Camino Real Master Plan Study and Appendices
Area Plans such as the South of Forest Avenue (SOFA) I and II Plans
Baylands Master Plan
DocuSign Envelope ID: 574C15A4-26E6-414B-9156-2E0A4D2E2282
Planning and Transportation Commission Application
1 of 5
Personal Information Note: The PTC regularly meets the second and last Wednesdays of the month at 6:00 p.m.
Name:
Address:
Cell Phone:
____ Home / ____ Office Phone:
E-mail:
Are you a Palo Alto Resident? ____ Yes ____ No
Do you have any relatives or members of your household who are employed by the City of Palo Alto, who are
currently serving on the City Council, or who are Commissioners or Board Members?
____ Yes ____ No
Are you available and committed to complete the term applied for? ____ Yes ____ No
require appointed board and commission
members to file a detailed disclosure of their financial interests, Fair Political Practices Commission, Conflict of
Interest, Form 700.
Do you or your spouse have an investment in, or do you or your spouse serve as an officer or director of, a
company doing business in Palo Alto which you believe is likely to;
1) engage in business with the City,
2) provide products or services for City projects, or
3) be affected by decisions of the board or commission you are applying for? ____ Yes ____ No
Excluding your principal residence, do you or your spouse own real property in Palo Alto? ____ Yes ____ No
How did you learn about this vacancy?
____ Community Group
____ Email from City Clerk
____ Palo Alto Weekly
____ Daily Post
____ City Website
____ Flyer
Other:
List relevant education, training, experience, certificates of training, licenses, or professional
registration:
DocuSign Envelope ID: 3AC443F5-FC1A-4204-AF13-7D03C082D982
Planning and Transportation Commission Application
2 of 5
Employment
Present or Last Employer:
Occupation:
Describe your involvement in community activities, volunteering or with civic organizations:
1. What is it about the Planning and Transportation Commission that is compatible with your
experience and of specific interest to you, and why?
DocuSign Envelope ID: 3AC443F5-FC1A-4204-AF13-7D03C082D982
Planning and Transportation Commission Application
3 of 5
2. Please describe an issue that recently came before the Commission that is of particular interest
to you and describe why you are interested in it. If you have never been to a Commission meeting you can view an archived video from the Midpen Media Center:
3. If appointed, what specific goals would you like to see the Planning and Transportation
Commission achieve, and why? How would you suggest accomplishing this?
DocuSign Envelope ID: 3AC443F5-FC1A-4204-AF13-7D03C082D982
Planning and Transportation Commission Application
4 of 5
4. Planning and Transportation Commission Members work with the documents listed below. If
you have experience with any of these documents, please describe that experience. Experience
with these documents is not required for selection.
Palo Alto Comprehensive Plan
Zoning Code
City Charter
California Environmental Quality Act
El Camino Real Design Guidelines
El Camino Real Master Plan Study and Appendices
Area Plans such as the South of Forest Avenue (SOFA) I and II Plans
Baylands Master Plan
DocuSign Envelope ID: 3AC443F5-FC1A-4204-AF13-7D03C082D982
Planning and Transportation Commission Application
5 of 5
Consent to Publish Personal Information on the City of Palo Alto Website
California Government Code Section 6254.21 states, in part,
This consent form will not be redacted and will be attached
The full code can be read here:
Read the code, and check only ONE option below:
_ I give permission for the City of Palo Alto
Commission Application intact. I have read and understand my rights under Government Code
Section 6254.21. I may revoke this permission at any time by providing written notice to the Palo Alto
City Clerk.
OR
I request that the City of Palo Alto redact my home address, phone numbers, and email address from
the following alternate information and request that they use the following contact information
instead.
Address:
Cell Phone:
____ Home / ____ Office Phone: ___________________________________________________
E-mail: ____________________________________________
The phone number / address can be non-public and different than the address collected on page one.
Signature: Date:
(Optional) Additional Attachment(s)
If you would like to submit a resume, work sample, etc. along with your
DocuSign Envelope ID: 3AC443F5-FC1A-4204-AF13-7D03C082D982
Planning and Transportation Commission Application
1 of 5
Personal Information
Name:
Address:
Cell Phone:
____ Home / ____ Office Phone:
E-mail:
Are you a Palo Alto Resident? ____ Yes ____ No
Do you have any relatives or members of your household who are employed by the City of Palo Alto, who are
currently serving on the City Council, or who are Commissioners or Board Members?
____ Yes ____ No
Are you available and committed to complete the term applied for? ____ Yes ____ No
require appointed board and commission
members to file a detailed disclosure of their financial interests, Fair Political Practices Commission, Conflict of
Interest, Form 700.
Do you have an investment in, or do you serve as an officer or director of, a company doing business in Palo
Alto which you believe is likely to;
1) engage in business with the City,
2) provide products or services for City projects, or
3) be affected by decisions of the board or commission you are applying for? ____ Yes ____ No
Excluding your principal residence, do you own real property in Palo Alto? ____ Yes ____ No
How did you learn about this vacancy?
____ Community Group
____ Email from City Clerk
____ Palo Alto Weekly
____ Daily Post
____ City Website
____ Flyer
Other:
List relevant education, training, experience, certificates of training, licenses, or professional
registration:
DocuSign Envelope ID: 39FFCA30-D3A0-43D2-B66A-202E6C0F6E9B
Planning and Transportation Commission Application
2 of 5
Employment
Present or Last Employer:
Occupation:
Describe your involvement in community activities, volunteering or with civic organizations:
1. What is it about the Planning and Transportation Commission that is compatible with your
experience and of specific interest to you, and why?
DocuSign Envelope ID: 39FFCA30-D3A0-43D2-B66A-202E6C0F6E9B
Planning and Transportation Commission Application
3 of 5
2. Please describe an issue that recently came before the Commission that is of particular interest
to you and describe why you are interested in it. If you have never been to a Commissionmeeting you can view an archived video from the Midpen Media Center:
3. If appointed, what specific goals would you like to see the Planning and Transportation
Commission achieve, and why? How would you suggest accomplishing this?
DocuSign Envelope ID: 39FFCA30-D3A0-43D2-B66A-202E6C0F6E9B
Planning and Transportation Commission Application
4 of 5
4. Planning and Transportation Commission Members work with the documents listed below. If
you have experience with any of these documents, please describe that experience. Experience
with these documents is not required for selection.
Palo Alto Comprehensive Plan
Zoning Code
City Charter
California Environmental Quality Act
El Camino Real Design Guidelines
El Camino Real Master Plan Study and Appendices
Area Plans such as the South of Forest Avenue (SOFA) I and II Plans
Baylands Master Plan
DocuSign Envelope ID: 39FFCA30-D3A0-43D2-B66A-202E6C0F6E9B
Planning and Transportation Commission Application
5 of 5
Consent to Publish Personal Information on the City of Palo Alto Website
California Government Code Section 6254.21 states, in part,
This consent form will not be redacted and will be attached
The full code can be read here:
Read the code, and check only ONE option below:
_
Commission Application intact. I have read and understand my rights under Government Code
Section 6254.21. I may revoke this permission at any time by providing written notice to the Palo Alto
City Clerk.
OR
I request that the City of Palo Alto redact my home address, phone numbers, and email address from
roviding
the following alternate information and request that they use the following contact information
instead.
Address:
Cell Phone:
____ Home / ____ Office Phone: ___________________________________________________
E-mail: ____________________________________________
The phone number / address can be non-public and different than the address collected on page one.
Signature: Date:
(Optional) Additional Attachment(s)
If you would like to submit a resume, work sample, etc. along with your
DocuSign Envelope ID: 39FFCA30-D3A0-43D2-B66A-202E6C0F6E9B
City of Palo Alto (ID # 7609)
City Council Staff Report
Report Type: Consent Calendar Meeting Date: 1/30/2017
City of Palo Alto Page 1
Summary Title: Approval of Acceptance of COPS Funds
Title: Approval of the Acceptance and Expenditure of Citizens Options for
Public Safety (COPS) Funds on Various Law Enforcement Equipment and
Approval of a Budget Amendment in the Law Enforcement Services Fund
From: City Manager
Lead Department: Police
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council:
1. Approve the acceptance and expenditure of Citizens Options for Public Safety (COPS)
funds from the State of California; and
2. Amend the Fiscal Year 2017 Budget Appropriation Ordinance for the Law Enforcement
Services Fund (SLESF) by:
a. Increasing the estimate for Revenue from Other Agencies - State by $105,042; and,
b. Increasing the Police Department Facilities and Equipment appropriation by
$105,042.
BACKGROUND
Since 1997, the California State Budget Act has included allocations to counties and cities for
the COPS program. This funding is intended to fill the need for additional resources at the local
level to ensure public safety. Under the provisions of Government Code Section 30061, a
percentage of the funds are allocated to counties and cities, based upon population, for law
enforcement services. Funds must supplement existing services and cannot be used to supplant
any existing funds. Each city is also required to deposit the funds into a separate Supplemental
Law Enforcement Services Fund so that these funds are not intermingled with General Fund
dollars.
Previous uses of COPS funds have included the purchase of a replacement K-9 unit, crime scene
evidence collection vehicle, firearm instructor hearing protection, surveillance equipment,
interview recording system, mobile data terminals, youth program activities, upgrades to the
telecommunications infrastructure, upgrades to the patrol vehicle and traffic motorcycle
programs, and property and evidence operational and security improvements.
City of Palo Alto Page 2
The Police Department has received funds each year under this program since its inception in
1998. Annual allocations have averaged $100,000 over the last few years.
DISCUSSION
Staff proposes to use the COPS funds in the following manner:
Privacy Barrier ($11,000)
This is a weighted, adjustable, 22 screen panel privacy screen system which functions on
adjustable heavy weight tripods with wheeled travel bags that is easily transportable,
easily assembly and easily adjusted to crime scene needs. This system shields the public
from serious accidents or crime scenes and protects involved parties from an early
release of their personal information, such as license plates or photos. The system also
protects from aerial media footage. The CSI team does not have an adequate way to
protect and shield the public from serious crimes scenes, particularly some of note
include train-related incidents and fatal accidents.
FLIR Units ($8,000)
Forward Looking Infrared Radar (FLIR) units are handheld thermal night vision
monocular built specifically for law enforcement. This powerful, yet simple, imager gives
Law Enforcement an advantage when searching for evidence or pursuing a suspect
during darkness. A person can be detected based on heat sources left in their wake,
although the image is not detailed, or able to specifically identify someone. The newest
technology features enhanced resolution displays, extended zoom capabilities, and
video output.
Ballistic Helmets with Shields ($20,000)
Level IIIA Ballistic helmets are critical to protecting officers during critical incident
response and patrol officers carry them with them every day. Officers are also required
to train with these helmets several times a year. The current helmets are heavy and
cumbersome. New technology has reduced the weight of the helmet by 2/3 the original
weight and improved the ballistic technology. This purchase would allow the
department to purchase these newer helmets for all patrol officers.
Fit Test Machine ($12,000)
The police department requires full time and reserve officers to wear full face respirators
and N95 particulate masks when exposed to certain environments. Due to the annual fit
testing requirements, we are seeking to purchase a Quantitative fit testing machine to
perform required annual tests. Quantitative fit testing (QNFT) uses an instrument to
determine the amount of leakage between the sealing surface of the respirator and the face
by measuring the concentration of a test agent both inside and outside of the respirator
during a series of test exercises and then calculating an overall fit factor. The OHD Quantifit
City of Palo Alto Page 3
machine is accepted by OSHA and complies with federal testing regulations. This is the
newest, most accurate technology for fit testing.
Long Range Acoustical Device ($8,000)
The Long Range Acoustical Device (LRAD) allows Crisis Negotiators to send a focused
beam of sound 600 yards away which allows the person on the other end can hear clear,
concise instructions. CNT currently uses older technology which consists of a loud
speaker to negotiate, exposing the officer to unnecessary danger. The LRAD would allow
negotiators to communicate remotely with it via Bluetooth thereby not placing our
negotiators in harm’s way. The LRAD system has applicability in the crowd control realm
as well.
FARO 3D Scanner System ($35,000)
Handheld laser scanner that allows the user to scan a crime scene in 3D in a matter of
minutes. It provides the ability to measure and scan in hard to reach areas as well as
the ability to process an entire room. This will solve two current time consuming tasks
that the Crime Scene Investigation team is faced with on every scene. Processing a
scene currently requires us to photograph the scene and then measure the scene which
usually requires at least two people with varying degrees of accuracy. This would allow
one person to scan the scene and create an end product that not only looks professional
but will also be highly accurate. This is the newest version of this technology and would
directly benefit first responders.
Gun Boxes ($10,000)
California requires the safe storage of firearms in both vehicles and homes. Negligent
storage can result in criminal prosecution. Officers frequently take their department
issued firearm to and from home, as well as to training and classes. There is new, more
reasonable technology on the market which allows a small, locked security box to be
mounted in vehicles. This law is new to California and resulted primarily from firearm
thefts from vehicles. The department would purchase one small security box for each
officer for both home and vehicle and require mandatory usage of the box when their
department issued firearm whenever they were not in physical custody of it.
RESOURCE IMPACT
A total of $105,042 of expenditures are anticipated, all of which will be covered by grant
funding. There will be no impact to the General Fund as ongoing maintenance costs for the
items purchased by the SLESF will be absorbed in the Department’s existing non-salary budget.
The City received the official notice (http://www.sco.ca.gov/Files-ARD-
Payments/copsdofletter_1617.pdf) from the California Department of Finance in September
2016 that the City’s COPS allocation for Fiscal Year 2016 is $105,042. Revenues and
expenditures of $105,042 are recommended to be appropriated in the City’s Law Enforcement
Services Fund.
City of Palo Alto Page 4
POLICY IMPLICATIONS
Expenditures of funds associated with COPS funds are consistent with City Policy.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
Acceptance of COPS funding and the proposed expenditures for public safety equipment are
not projects subject to CEQA requirements.
City of Palo Alto (ID # 7691)
City Council Staff Report
Report Type: Consent Calendar Meeting Date: 1/30/2017
City of Palo Alto Page 1
Summary Title: Resolution on Sub-regional Planning on Bike Routes
Title: Adoption of a Resolution of the Council of the City of Palo Alto in
Collaboration With the Cities of Redwood City, Menlo Park, and Mountain
View Directing Staff to Participate in Sub-Regional Planning on Bike Routes
From: City Manager
Lead Department: City Manager
Recommendation and Staff Motion
I move the Council adopt the attached resolution to allow our staff under the direction
of the City Manager to participate in a collaborative planning process between Palo Alto,
Mountain View, Menlo Park, and Redwood City to identify and plan for a safe and
accessible bicycle route for travel across and between our jurisdictions.
Background
Attached is a draft resolution for your proposed adoption, which will authorize our
participation a multi-city visioning process to identify a North-South bicycle route.
You will recall that the city managers of Menlo Park, Redwood City, Palo Alto, and
Mountain View (and the senior land officials at Stanford) have entered into a
partnership (the “Managers Mobility Partnership”) to address our shared transportation
challenges.
This group has made bicycle infrastructure a priority. Given the ease of implementation,
the low cost relative to other transportation projects, and the potential to make
significant improvements in a short time, upgrading the bike infrastructure in our
communities makes practical sense. For this reason, the group is in ongoing discussions
about the need for a North-South corridor traversing our four cities.
All four cities are bringing this resolution to our respective Councils in late January-early
February. The Managers Mobility Partnership is requesting a resolution from each of our
cities to do two things:
1.Carry out a shorter-term project to delineate existing North-South routes more
City of Palo Alto Page 2
effectively, with common signage across the four cities, and improvements
made where there are gaps and difficulties for the cyclist.
2. Initiate a longer-term creative process to identify new, more linear and more
continuous north-south route(s). The resolution supports a planning process for
a high-quality, protected, potential Class IV bike route, one that is safe for use
by cyclists from age 8 to age 80.
The resolution anticipates thorough, systematic, and broad-based community
engagement processes to identify the route(s). This project will require regular progress
reports to City Council and return for adoption of designation/creation of any new route
within Palo Alto.
Resource Impact
Staff impact could be significant, but worthwhile and within the goals of our
Bike/Pedestrian Plan and goals.
Budget Impact
Moderate related to our participation in the planning process but available funding is in
our budget is enough to support our participation.
Actual creation of a bike corridor as envisioned may have significant costs (and
benefits). We will need to identify funding in the future, when an approved project
exists. Those costs would be borne by each jurisdiction for its section. The passage of
Measure B by the voters of Santa Clara County makes $250 million available for bicycle
infrastructure projects. Other regional and state funds are also available on a
competitive basis.
Environmental Review
The proposed resolution would commit the City to participate in regional planning.
Non-binding planning and feasibility studies are exempt from review under the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per Section 15262 of the State CEQA
Guidelines. Any specific projects that are identified for funding and implementation as a
result of these planning studies will be subject to review.
Attachments:
Attachment A: Reso re Bike Routes
NOT YET APPROVED
1
170119 th 0140174
RESOLUTION No. ____
Resolution of the Council of the City of Palo Alto, in collaboration
with the Cities of Redwood City, Menlo Park, and Mountain View
Direction to Participate in Sub-Regional Planning on Bike Routes
A. The cities of Menlo Park, Mountain View, Palo Alto and Redwood City face
transportation and mobility challenges in our communities in the wake of regional population
growth and economic expansion; and
B. The managers of these four cities have agreed to work jointly to address these
challenges, through the Managers’ Mobility Partnership; and
C. Enhancing the bicycle network and associated infrastructure is a crucial
component of comprehensive transportation planning; and
D. Data shows biking collisions disproportionately affect disadvantaged people in
our region, and
E. Increasing the number of bicycle commuters is a shared goal of the four cities in
the Managers Mobility Partnership; and
F. An interconnected regional network of bicycle routes is necessary to increase the
number of people who choose to bicycle as a form of transportation;
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council does hereby RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The City of Palo Alto will participate in a collaborative process of identifying
a high-quality, safe, north-south Mid-Peninsula bicycle corridor which traverses the four
partner cities of the Managers’ Mobility Partnership.
SECTION 2. Each city will engage in its own public outreach process and coordinate
closely with the other Partnership cities to identify the potential route[s] for that north-south
bicycle corridor.
SECTION 3. The bicycle corridor will be one that is:
a. suitable for riders of all ages and abilities;
b. direct, and serves as an artery linking the partner cities;
c. identified by suitable signage;
NOT YET APPROVED
2
170119 th 0140174
d. provides access to downtown areas, job centers, and other intense land
uses as much as possible.
SECTION 4. In the short term, the cities will collaborate to address gaps, enhance
signage, and explore other improvements to the existing bicycle network between
communities.
INTRODUCED AND PASSED:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTENTIONS:
ABSENT:
ATTEST: APPROVED:
______________________________ _______________________________
City Clerk Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ________________________________
City Attorney Director of Planning & Community
Environment
City of Palo Alto (ID # 7452)
City Council Staff Report
Report Type: Action Items Meeting Date: 1/30/2017
City of Palo Alto Page 1
Summary Title: Comp Plan Update - Land Use and Transportation Elements
Title: Comprehensive Plan Update: City Council Review & Direction
Regarding the Draft Land Use & Community Design Element and the Revised
Draft Transportation Element
From: City Manager
Lead Department: Planning and Community Environment
Recommendation
Staff recommends that the City Council review the November 28, 2016 Draft Land Use &
Community Design Element in Attachment A and the January 30, 2017 Draft Transportation
Element in Attachment B, and provide the following direction to staff in order to facilitate
preparation of a final draft of the Comprehensive Plan Update:
(Note: These policy questions are generally organized by page number in the tracked changes
version of each draft element. Those potentially affecting Stanford University interests are
listed in subsection A, B, C, and D so they can be segregated and decided first if necessary due to
a potential conflict of interest. If consultations with the state conflicts agency, which are
pending at the time of publication of this report, result in an opinion that a conflict exists, staff
will provide additional information explaining the requirements for segmentation and options to
address the policy issues in a segmented manner.)
A. Cumulative Cap (pp. L-33 through 34). Please select one or more of the following
policies to carry forward into the final draft:
1. Policy L-1.9 and associated programs would eliminate the cumulative cap found in
existing policy L-8 and focus on monitoring and controlling the impacts of
development.
2. Policy L-1.10 would maintain a cumulative cap of 1.7 Million square feet, which is the
square footage remaining under the existing cap, focus the cap on office/R&D uses
and apply it citywide rather than only in “monitored areas.” It would also exempt
medical office uses in the SUMC area (the current cap does not apply to this
geographic area), and require annual monitoring to assess the effectiveness of
City of Palo Alto Page 2
development requirements and determine whether the cap and the development
requirements should be adjusted.
3. Policy L-1.11 and the associated program are similar to Policy-L1.10, but would also
apply a cap (the amount to be determined later) to hotel uses.
4. Policy L-1.12 addresses additional exemptions to the cap and could be combined
with either Policy L-1.10 or Policy L-1.11 to exempt medical, governmental and
institutional uses (which are yet to be defined) from the cumulative cap.
B. Annual Limit (Page L-35). Please select one or more of the following policies to carry
forward into the final draft:
1. Policy L-1.13 would eliminate the annual limit of 50,000 square feet of office/R&D
established via interim ordinance in the fall of 2015.
2. Policy L-1.14 would perpetuate the interim annual limit of 50,000 square feet of
office/R&D and expand it to apply citywide, except that an additional (unspecified)
square footage allocation would be provided for the Stanford Research Park, and that
allocation could be carried forward to future years if unused. SUMC would be exempt
from the annual limit. This exemption could be clarified to apply only to approved uses
only if desired.
3. Policy L-1.15 is the same as Policy L-1.14 except the Stanford Research Park would be
exempted “if a cap on peak period trips is established and enforced.”
4. Policy L-1.16 could be combined with either Policy L-1.14 or Policy L-1.15 to perpetuate
exemptions in the interim office limit that apply to public facilities, offices less than
5,000 square feet, and medical offices less than 2,000 square feet.
(Note: Stanford University has submitted an alternative to Policy L-1.14 and L-1.15
which would perpetuate the 50,000 square foot annual limit on office/R&D citywide,
minus development at SUMC, and would provide another 50,000 square feet annual
limit in the Stanford Research Park unless the City and Stanford agree on performance
standards related to addressing auto trips. Under their proposal, unused annual
allocations could be carried forward to future years indefinitely.)
C. Housing Sites (pp. L-31, L-52 and L-58). Please indicate one or more of the following
options if you would like to modify sites for multifamily housing in the final draft:
1. Pursue multifamily housing at the Stanford Shopping Center, provided adequate
parking is maintained, as alluded to in Policy L-4.7 (the language could be
strengthened)
2. Pursue multifamily housing in the Stanford Research Park, particularly along the El
Camino Real frontage as alluded to in Program L5.4.1 (the language could be
strengthened)
City of Palo Alto Page 3
3. Include a new program to eliminate housing sites along San Antonio Road and
increase residential densities in Downtown and the California Avenue Area to replace
potential units on the sites eliminated
4. Reinstate the language in previous Policy L-33 (now Policy L-4.12 and Program
L1.12.3) about housing potential in the Town & Country area.
5. Include a new program to pursue multifamily housing near SUMC and/or in the
western part of the Stanford Research Park.
D. Building Heights (pp. L-60 through 61). Please select one of the following options to
carry forward into the final draft:
1. Policy L-6.7 would maintain the current 50 foot height limit.
2. Policy L-6.8 would retain the current 50 foot height limit but allow heights up to 55
(or potentially) 60 feet for retail and residential mixed-use projects to allow
increased floor-to-ceiling heights.
3. Policy L-6.9 would allow building heights up to 65 feet to facilitate a mix of
multifamily housing in areas served by transit, services, and retail.
4. Policy L-6.10 would allow (unspecified) building heights over 50 feet to facilitate a
mix of multifamily housing in areas served by transit, services, and retail.
(Note: On November 28, 2016, individual councilmembers suggested that the
Comprehensive Plan remain silent on the height limit, that the height limit be expressed
in terms of the number of stories, that height increases be subject to a vote of the
people, and that current height exceptions allowed by the code be reevaluated.)
E. Downtown Cap (pp. L-36 through 37). Please select one of the following programs to
carry forward into the final draft:
1. Program L1.16.1 would eliminate the downtown cap found in existing program L-8
and focus on monitoring development and parking demand.
2. Program L1.16.2 would retain a downtown cap of about 45,000 square feet, which is
the square footage remaining under the existing cap, and focus the cap on
office/R&D uses.
3. Program L1.16.3 would be the same as Program L1.16.2 except that it would exempt
offices that are less than 5,000 square feet.
4. Program L1.16.4 would retain a downtown cap of about 45,000 square feet for
office/R&D similar to Program L1.16.2, and would also cap new hotel development
at 50,000 square feet.
F. Development Requirements and Community Indicators (pp. L-37 through 43). Please
select one of the following options:
City of Palo Alto Page 4
1. The first option would articulate the purposes and topics for development
requirements in the Comp Plan, but develop details later via an implementation
program;
2. The second option would provide detail and specificity regarding development
requirements in the Comp Plan as shown in Table L-1; and
3. The third option would not address development requirements in the Comp Plan.
(Note: all three options relate to the development requirements, which would apply to
new development. Under all three options, separate community indicators would be
developed to monitor and evaluate the livability of the community over time. These
community indicators would be used to inform revisions to – or elimination of – growth
caps as provided for in Policy L-1.18 and Program L.1.18.2)
G. Child Care (Page L-25). Please select one of the child care options to carry forward into
the final draft:
1. The first option includes child care in the list of “typical uses” in neighborhood
commercial areas, and
2. the second excludes child care from this list.
H. Land Use Element Content based on a Councilmember comments on November 28,
2016 (summarized in Attachment C). Please confirm your support for the following
items that appear to have the potential for consensus:
1. Reduce the number of programs overall and use the implementation section of the
plan to indicate the relative cost and priority of each.
2. Create new opportunities for retail/residential mixed use and pursue conversion of
some non-retail commercial FAR to residential FAR as alluded to in Policy L-6.12 (this
policy will be separated into two…), Program L1.16.5, and Program L1.12.3.
3. Include Policy L-2.3 about encouraging a mix of housing types and sizes designed for
greater affordability and Policy 3.4 about encouraging a mix of smaller housing types.
4. Include Policy L-3.5 and associated programs L3.5.1 regarding ways to minimize
displacement of existing residents.
5. Include policies and programs like Policy L-4.1, Program L3.2.1, and Program L6.12.4
about preserving ground floor retail space.
6. Maintain Policy L-3.3 and/or Policy L-3.6 (some repetition can be eliminated) and
associated program L3.3.1 about preserving existing housing that is affordable, such
as small cottage clusters.
7. Include program L1.16-5 (we will fix the numbering problem here) or L7.12.1 (some
repetition can be eliminated) to revise or consider revising the TDR program
downtown to create bonus residential rather than commercial square footage.
City of Palo Alto Page 5
8. Include a program to explore reducing hotel FAR from 2.0 to 1.75 or 1.5 in areas
outside of downtown.
9. Maintain Policy L-4.10 regarding enhancing the pedestrian environment along El
Camino Real and Program L9.4.1 specific to sidewalk widths and building design.
10. Eliminate Program L4.2.1 regarding preparation of a coordinated area plan for South
El Camino (pp. L-48 through 49).
11. Restore existing Policy L-6 language about preserving neighborhood character
(“Where possible, avoid abrupt changes in scale and density between residential and
non-residential areas and between residential areas of different densities. To
promote compatibility and gradual transitions between land uses, place zoning
district boundaries at mid-block locations rather than along streets wherever
possible.”) This is in lieu of the new language proposed in Policy L-6.11.
I. Alignment of the Land Use & Transportation Elements and changes based on
Councilmember comments on September 19, 2016. Please consider the extent to
which policies of the Land Use Element (with the policy choices selected above) and the
Transportation Element are in alignment and identify any needed adjustments.
Also, please confirm your support for the tracked changes in the Draft Transportation
Element included as Attachment B or identify needed revisions. The tracked changes are
based on Councilmember comments summarized in Attachment D and also include
clarifying editorial changes and a list of capital improvements expected during the
planning period.
Executive Summary
Within the draft Land Use & Community Design Element of the Comprehensive Plan Update in
Attachment A, the Comprehensive Plan Update Citizens Advisory Committee identified a
number of policy options requiring City Council guidance before a final draft of the element can
be prepared. Tonight’s Council meeting is intended to obtain the City Council’s guidance on
these policy options and staff is hoping the Council’s initial focus will be on the options outlined
in the Recommendation section above.
The City Council is also invited to review the balance of the draft Land Use & Community Design
Element and the revised draft Transportation Element in Attachment B. The draft
Transportation Element has been modified to reflect the City Council’s input on September 19,
2016. Tracked changes identify changes since then, and the Council’s September 19th
comments are summarized in Attachment D. The draft Land Use element in Attachment A has
not been modified since the Council’s introductory discussion on November 28, 2016, however
the Council’s initial input is summarized in Attachment C.
Following the City Council’s review of these draft elements and three others (Safety, Natural
Environment, and Business & Economics), staff will be asking the City Council to refer a full
City of Palo Alto Page 6
draft of the Comprehensive Plan Update to the Planning & Transportation Commission for a
recommendation, facilitating the City Council’s consideration and adoption of a final version in
the fall. Separately, the City will shortly be circulating a supplement to the Draft Environmental
Impact Report (EIR) prepared in early 2016, and staff will be seeking the Council’s input on that
supplement and their preferred scenario(s) prior to preparing a Final EIR. The final draft
Comprehensive Plan will synthesize the Council selected policies and programs, the Council
selected EIR scenarios (i.e. 1-6 or hybrid thereof), as well as descriptive and explanatory text,
photographs, maps and tables. The Comprehensive Plan Update may not be adopted until the
Council has certified the Final EIR. (See the Background section below for further a discussion
of the relationship between policy options and EIR scenarios.)
Background & Discussion
As described in the staff reports for September 19, 2016 and November 28, 2016, which are
available at the links below, the Draft Land Use and Transportation Elements are the products of
many, many meetings and substantial efforts by the full Comp Plan CAC, subcommittees of the
CAC, staff and consultants. They were based on a close reading of the exiting Comprehensive
Plan and the changes recommended by the Planning & Transportation Commission in early
2014, as well as public input received throughout the planning process.
Prior staff reports are located here:
http://www.cityofpaloalto.org/civicax/filebank/documents/53793, and
http://www.cityofpaloalto.org/civicax/filebank/documents/54761.
The Comp Plan and these specific elements are requirements of State law, and the drafts
provided here have been crafted to meet State requirements. They are also intended to express
the community’s collective vision for Palo Alto, and the various perspectives reflected in the
policy options identified will have to be reconciled to the extent feasible. That is the focus of
tonight’s discussion and further information is provided below to assist with the Council’s
consideration of these policy options.
(Please note that the Council’s direction this evening is just that – direction – and is not a final
decision on the Comp Plan Update. The Council’s direction will allow the staff and consultants to
prepare a final draft review by the Planning & Transportation Commission and consideration for
final edits/changes and adoption by the City Council later this year. The Council’s direction will
also start to inform its selection of a preferred EIR scenario.)
The Cumulative Cap on Non-Residential Development
As the Council is aware, the City’s cumulative cap on non-residential development is expressed
in the Current Comp Plan as Policy L-8 and currently applies to “monitored areas” of the City
identified on Map L-6 in the current Comprehensive Plan. The SUMC area was specifically
excluded from the “monitored areas” via a Comprehensive Plan amendment in 2011.
City of Palo Alto Page 7
The original cap of approximately 3.2 Million square feet in “monitored areas” has been tracked
over time, as has development in the non-monitored areas. A description of this was provided
to inform the City Council’s deliberations regarding the interim annual limit on office/R&D and
can be found in Attachment B from March 2, 2015 at:
https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/civicax/filebank/documents/45984.
As explained here, the original cap of approximately 3.2 Million square feet was measured from
a baseline of 1989, and about 1.7 million square feet are remaining. The Comp Plan CAC
recommended using the amount remaining and using the baseline of 2015 going forward if the
cumulative cap is maintained. If the cap is maintained, they also recommended that it apply
Citywide minus SUMC, and focus on uses that the City wishes to monitor (office/R&D or
office/R&D plus hotel). A summary of the existing and proposed cumulative cap is provided
below:
Table 1. Cumulative Cap: Existing and Options Proposed
Existing Options Proposed
Baseline 1989 2015
Square Footage Approx. 3.2 Million Approx. 1.7 Million
Uses Monitored All Non-Residential Uses Office/R&D only or
Office/R&D plus Hotel
Exemptions Non-monitored areas SUMC area
Square Footage Used
(as of 2015)
1.4 Million in Monitored Areas
(about 1 Million in non-monitored areas)
N/A
Source: Palo Alto Planning & Community Environment, January 2017
The Interim Annual Limit
The City Council reviewed the cumulative cap in early 2015 and understood that it was an
outward limit on development that did not control the pace of growth. In fact, monitoring data
showed the pace of growth varied greatly from year to year, with an average of about 38,000
square feet per year between 1989 and 2007, and an average of about 100,000 square feet per
year between 2008 and 2015.
As a result, the Council adopted an interim ordinance establishing a 50,000 square foot annual
limit on the amount of office/R&D space that could be approved in a given fiscal year within a
subset of the City’s commercial districts (including downtown, the California Avenue Area, and
much of the El Camino Corridor). This interim annual limit is set to expire in November 2017
and some of the policy options presented by the CAC would institute a permanent limit and
expand it to include all of the City’s commercial districts minus the SUMC area, or all of the
City’s commercial districts minus the SUMC area and the Stanford Research Park.
The City Council’s direction on the policy options articulated by the CAC will start to define the
Council’s “preferred” EIR scenario, because the annual limit is likely to control the pace of
development and therefore influence the pace of job growth over the planning period. Options
City of Palo Alto Page 8
which extend the annual limit citywide will tend to align with EIR Scenarios 2, 5, and 6, which
have the lowest job growth. Options which exempt the Stanford Research Park from the annual
limit or provide a separate annual limit in the Research Park where unused square footage can
roll forward will tend to align with EIR Scenario 3, which has job growth in the mid-range. And
options with no annual limit will tend to align with Scenario 4, which has job growth at the high
end of the range.
Housing Sites
The recommendation section above poses policy options regarding housing sites that are not
explicit in the CAC’s work product, but that are alluded to in some of the draft policies, and that
are inherent in the planning scenarios being analyzed in the EIR that is currently being prepared.
City Council direction on these policy options would be appreciated at this time if feasible, and
would start to define the Council’s “preferred” EIR scenario.
Eliminating housing sites on San Antonio and South El Camino in exchange for increased
residential densities in the downtown and California Avenue area is included in EIR Scenarios 3
and 5. Eliminating housing sites on San Antonio and South El Camino in exchange for increased
residential densities in the downtown and California Avenue area and adding new housing sites
along the El Camino corridor is included in EIR Scenario 4. Preserving housing sites on San
Antonio and South El Camino is included in EIR Scenarios 2 and 6. Adding new housing sites
along the El Camino corridor and near SUMC and possibly in the western part of the Research
Park is included in EIR Scenarios 6.
(Please note that in addition to policy options related to housing sites, the draft Land Use
Element includes policies and programs that would tend to increase housing production in the
City, and these have been highlighted for the Council’s consideration by including them on the
list in Recommendation H, above.)
Building Heights
The current Comprehensive Plan does not contain a specific building height limit (although it is
mentioned in the text under Program L-3), and instead contains policies regarding the scale of
development and transitions between residential and commercial areas. Building heights are
currently regulated in the Municipal Code (zoning ordinance) and the maximum height allowed
is 50 feet (not including some permitted exceptions for mechanical space etc.).
Some of the policy options suggested by the CAC would insert an explicit height limit in the
Comprehensive Plan and some would allow flexibility for design (to increase floor-to-ceiling
heights for retail and residential mixed use) and for desired uses like multifamily housing.
Allowing for increased floor-to-ceiling heights would reflect contemporary design and practice,
as shown in the diagram below.
City of Palo Alto Page 9
Source: David Baker, FAIA. “Why Can’t New Buildings be As Nice As Old Buildings? It’s the Ceiling Heights
for One Thing” from a SPUR publication, May 2004.
Allowing for increased height for multifamily housing would provide a valuable incentive -- that
could be subject to City Council approval -- for a desired use.
Downtown Cap
The current cap on non-residential development in downtown is found in existing Comp Plan
Program L-8 and progress towards the cap is monitored annually. The most recent annual
report can be found at the link below and demonstrates that there is very little “room” left
under the cap (about 45,000 square feet), even though there is estimated to be about 53,400 to
146,000 square feet in zoned capacity left, taking into account constraints like historic buildings,
the value of current improvements, parking requirements, etc.1
Link to the April 2016 downtown cap report:
http://www.cityofpaloalto.org/civicax/filebank/documents/51729
Some of the policy options presented by the CAC would carry forward the remaining square
footage under the downtown cap and use 2015 as the baseline going forward. These options
would also modify the cap to apply to office/R&D square footage only (or office/R&D plus
hotel), and would potentially include some exemptions for small offices. Other policy options
1 Dyett & Bhatia and EPS, Downtown Cap Evaluation, prepared for the City of Palo Alto, November 2014.
City of Palo Alto Page 10
would continue to monitor but not “cap” non-residential development downtown, which might
be a desirable approach if there is an annual limit on office/R&D development and available
non-residential FAR downtown is converted to residential FAR as discussed in proposed Program
L1.16.5.
Current Development Requirements & Community Indicators
The Municipal Code includes regulations that shape new development, and the City routinely
imposes additional requirements by imposing conditions of approval and mitigation measures
resulting from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). One of the policy
options proposed by the CAC (Policy L-17.1 option two) would make the list of existing and new
development requirements explicit in the Comprehensive Plan (Table L-1). One option (option
three) would omit development requirements from the Comp Plan because of some CAC
members concern that these could be used to avoid more appropriate project-specific
mitigation measures in the future. The compromise approach (in Policy L-17.1 option one)
would articulate the purpose of development requirements and list some examples, but leave
the definition of specific requirements to another day.
All of the policy options presented by the CAC embrace the concept of community indicators
(Policy L-1.18), which are growing in popularity as an approach to illustrating the connectedness
of planning issues and how they contribute to community livability. A good example of
community indicators has developed by the Metropolitan Transportation Commission and can
be seen at www.vitalsigns.mtc.ca.gov. Importantly, community indicators allow policy makers
to assess how changes in behavior by all current and future residents and businesses and
technological advancements are manifesting themselves in a community, and recognize that
real change cannot be accomplished solely by imposing requirements on new development.
These community indicators would also be used to periodically consider whether to modify or
eliminate growth caps.
Changes to the Draft Transportation Element
The tracked changes version of the draft transportation element in Attachment B has been
prepared to address City Council comments received in September 2016, as well as some
corrections/additions necessary to reflect ongoing initiatives and capital projects. For example,
as requested by Councilmembers, existing Comprehensive Plan Policy T-47 “Protect residential
areas from the parking impacts of nearby business districts” has been reinstituted (Policy T-
5.10), recognizing that it will still take a number of years to reduce spillover employee parking
demand in the Downtown and Evergreen Park/Mayfield Residential Preferential Parking
districts.
Policy revisions include the addition of some specificity to the TDM requirements in Program
T1.1.2, which is where the “no net trips” idea is advanced, and strong support for the Palo Alto
TMA in Policy T-1.2. (Note that we have not incorporated a reference to the TMA’s explicit goal
City of Palo Alto Page 11
for reducing single occupant vehicles since the TMA may change their goal over time. The
Council may wish to weigh in on whether this is desired.)
Revisions to the Element’s background information (page T-14 in Attachment B) also include an
updated list of capital projects expected during the life of the plan, and this list should be
reviewed carefully. The capital projects that are included here will help to determine which of
the planning scenarios in the EIR the Council prefers.
There were a number of City Council comments requesting additional information. These are
responded to below:
Lane Splitting. AB 51, which was effective January 1, authorizes the CHP to adopt
“educational guidelines” about “lane splitting.” In general, the State Vehicle Code
preempts cities ability to adopt traffic regulations in conflict with State law. However we
do not know whether the State will adopt regulations that apply to local streets or just
to highways.
East Meadow. Staff has confirmed that roadway designations have not been proposed
for change.
Also there were Council comments on policies that have not been incorporated, either because
staff was unsure whether there was Council agreement, or it was not clear how the comment
could/should be incorporated. These are described below:
Revisions do not include a specific threshold of significance for intersection Level of
Service, but the element does include a program to develop one. This approach
recognizes that due to changes in State law, the City Council will be asked to adopt new
significance thresholds for CEQA purposes by resolution in the next two years, and that
same resolution could contain desired policy thresholds (Program T-2.3.1). This
approach will allow for further deliberations regarding the potential impacts to City
projects like the recent effort to address traffic on Middlefield North if changes are made
to the intersection LOS threshold that Palo Alto has used for many years.
Revisions also do not address the old underpass at El Camino Real near Page Mill Road
because of concerns that the underpass is not safe or accessible to persons with
disabilities.
We also did not delete the policy (Policy T-6.2) reference to “vision zero,” which is a goal
more and more communities are embracing related to traffic safety. The ten year time
frame to achieve this goal was deleted.
City of Palo Alto Page 12
Finally, the revisions attempt to streamline the text somewhat and have eliminated
some programs, but do not reduce the size of the element as much as some
Councilmembers might wish. As explained in the section on Next Steps, below, there
will still be an opportunity to consider elimination or consolidation of programs once an
Implementation section is assembled with programs from all of the elements of the
Comp Plan.
Timeline/Next Steps
Completing the Comp Plan Update has been a priority of the City for many years now, and the
current schedule anticipates adoption in 2017. To make this possible, City Council direction on
the policy options included in the draft Land Use Element in Attachment A will be required this
spring, along with City Council input on drafts of the Natural Environment, Safety, and
Business/Economics Elements, which will be coming to the Council in March or April. A
summary schedule is provided in Table 2, below.
The Citizen’s Advisory Committee will be completing their work in May with a review of the
Governance section of the plan, and an Implementation section containing all of the programs
from each of the draft elements. The Implementation section will attempt to communicate the
relative level of effort and priority associated with each of the programs. (Typically general
plans will identify programs for implementation in the first five years, the first ten years, and
after the first ten years.) Given the number of programs included in the update thus far, staff
expects that the list will be “unconstrained” in the sense that it will include programs that may
prove to be too expensive to implement, or that will have to be deferred due to the number of
higher priority items. The list of programs and the introductory text explaining how the list will
be used will be important for the City Council to review.
Once City staff and consultants have received the City Council’s direction on all of the draft
elements and the citizens group has completed their work, the next step will be to prepare a
complete, revised draft of the Comprehensive Plan Update for the City Council to refer to the
Planning and Transportation Commission for review prior to the Council’s summer break.
Chapter 19.04 of the Palo Alto Municipal Code establishes requirements for the Commission’s
review.
In addition to completing the process of referring and reviewing proposed revisions to the
Comprehensive Plan, the City must complete the CEQA process to enable consideration and
adoption of a final Comprehensive Plan Update. In February or March, the analysis of the EIR
Scenarios 5&6 requested by the City Council will be circulated for public review in the form of a
Supplement to the February 2016 Draft EIR. A public hearing will be scheduled at the Planning
& Transportation Commission and the City Council, allowing the City Council to select their
preferred scenario prior to preparation of the Final EIR.
City of Palo Alto Page 13
The Final EIR will respond to all substantive comments on the February 2016 Draft EIR and the
forthcoming Supplement, and must be certified prior to adoption of the final Comprehensive
Plan Update.
Table 2. Summary of Steps Required for Completion of the Comprehensive Plan Update
Citizens Advisory Committee Forward the City Council a recommendation on the Business/Economics
Element (February)
Forward the City Council comments on a draft Governance/Users Guide
section and a draft Implementation section (May)
City Council Provide direction to staff on draft Land Use Element policy options and draft
Transportation Element changes (January)
Public hearing on the Supplement to the Draft EIR and identification of a
preferred scenario (February/March)
Provide direction to staff on draft Natural Environment, Safety, and
Business/Economics Elements (March /April)
Receive a draft of the Governance/Users Guide and Implementation
sections and refer a final draft of the Comprehensive Plan Update to the
Planning & Transportation Commission for review (May/June)
Receive the PTC’s recommendation and the Final EIR for consideration and
action (August/September).
Planning & Transportation
Commission
Public hearing on the Supplement to the Draft EIR and identification of a
preferred scenario (February/March)
Review the completed draft of the Comprehensive Plan Update at a series of
public hearings and forward a recommendation on the Plan and the Final
EIR to the City Council (July/August)
Re-review following City Council action & report back to the Council
(November/December)
Note: See Palo Alto Municipal Code Chapter 19.04 for requirements associated with the Planning &
Transportation Commission’s review and re-referral of changes made by the City Council.
Source: Palo Alto Planning & Community Environment, January 2017
Resource Impacts
Comprehensive plan updates are significant undertakings for any jurisdiction and the City of
Palo Alto has invested time and resources in the project since 2008. The need to allocate
multiple members of City staff, significant time on the City Council’s agenda, and financial
City of Palo Alto Page 14
resources for consultant assistance and event/meeting programming will continue until the
adoption of the updated Comprehensive Plan and its companion environmental document.
Environmental Review
A Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) on the Comprehensive Plan Update was published
on February 5, 2016 and the public comment period closed on June 8, 2016. Council has
directed staff and the consultant team to prepare a supplemental analysis of a 5th and 6th
planning scenario, which will be circulated for public review starting in February 2017. A
Final EIR incorporating the DEIR, the supplemental analysis, substantive comments on the
DEIR and supplemental analysis, as well as written responses to those comments, and needed
changes to the text and analysis of the DEIR will be prepared for consideration concurrent
with the final draft of the Comprehensive Plan Update. This Final EIR must be certified prior to
adoption of the Comprehensive Plan Update.
Attachments:
Attachment A: Draft Land Use Element (Tracked) Presented to Council November 2016
Attachment B: Revised Draft Transportation Element (Tracked_no_photos)
Attachment C: Summary of City Council Comments on Land Use Element November
2016
Attachment D: Council Direction on the Draft Transportation Element
Attachment E: Draft Land Use Element from 11_28_16 CLEAN
Attachment F: Revised Draft Transportation Element CLEAN
LAND USE AND
COMMUNITY DESIGN
LAND USE DRAFT – NOVEMBER 28, 2016 L-1
3
This preliminary draft element was prepared by City staff on the basis of input from the
CAC and members of the public received from December 2015 through July 2016. The
Element will be reviewed by the full CAC ion August and September16, 2016 and
presented as a draft to Palo Alto City Council in September the fall of 2016.
INTRODUCTION
The Land Use and Community Design Element sets the foundation for future
preservation, growth, and change in Palo Alto and serves as the blueprint for the
development of public and private property in the city. It includes policies and
programs intended to balance natural resources with future community needs in a
way that makes optimal use of available land, to create attractive buildings and
public spaces that reinforce Palo Alto’s sense of place and community, to preserve
and enhance quality of life and services in Palo Alto neighborhoods and districts, and
to maintain Palo Alto's role in the success of the surrounding region.
This Element meets the State-mandated requirements for a Land Use Element. It
defines categories for the location and type of public and privates uses of land under
the City's jurisdiction; it recommends standards for population density and building
intensity on land covered by the Comprehensive Plan; and it includes a Land Use
Map (Map L-6) and Goals, Policies, and Programs to guide land use distribution in
the city. By satisfying these requirements, the Land Use and Community Design
Element lays out the basic guidelines and standards upon which all of the other
Comprehensive Plan elements rely and build. Other elements of the Plan
correspond with the land use categories and policy direction contained in this
Element, while providing more specialized guidance focused on particular topics,
such as transportation or conservation.
VISION: Palo Alto’s land use decisions shall balance our future growth needs
with the preservation of our neighborhoods, address climate protection priorities
through sustainable development near neighborhood services, and enhance
the quality of life of all neighborhoods.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
L-2 LAND USE DRAFT – NOVEMBER 28, 2016
CONNECTIONS TO OTHER ELEMENTS
The Land Use and Community Design Element is replete with direct connections to
all of the other elements of the Comprehensive Plan. Its guidance for land uses is
strongly linked to the Housing Element’s prescriptions for residential development,
even though the Housing Element is cyclically updated on a separate State-
mandated timetable. The inextricable tie between land use and transportation is
clearly apparent both in this Element and the Transportation Element, as the co-
location of land uses significantly affects the ability of transit, walking, and biking to
replace vehicle travel, in addition to capitalizing on the presence of rail service in
Palo Alto. The success of programs in the Natural and Urban Environment and Safety
Element is largely dependent on land uses decisions that protect the environment as
well as people and property. The Land Use Element dovetails with both the quality
of life initiatives in the Community Services and Facilities Element, and the prosperity
objectives of the Business and Economics Element.
PLANNING CONTEXT
NATURAL ENVIRONMENT
With a backdrop sweeping from forested hills to the Bay, Palo Alto is framed by
natural beauty. Views of the foothills contribute a sense of enclosure and a reminder
of the close proximity of open space and nature. Views of the baylands provide a
strong connection to the marine environment and the East Bay hills. Together with
the city’s marshland, salt ponds, sloughs, creeks, and riparian corridors, these natural
resources, clearly visible in the aerial photograph in Map L-1, are a major defining
feature of Palo Alto’s character.
Preserving the city’s attractive and valuable natural features is important for a
number of reasons. Ecologically, these areas provide key habitat for wildlife, create a
buffer from developed areas, and act as a natural filtration system for storm water
runoff. For the community, they represent an important facet of the look and feel of
Palo Alto, contributing to a sense of place both through direct public access to
natural areas and the views that establish Palo Alto’s local scenic routes.
Foo
t
h
i
l
l
E
x
p
r
e
s
s
w
a
y
Mountain View
East Palo Alto
Stanford
University
Los Altos Hills
Menlo Park
S A N
F R A N C I S C O
B A Y
Mid
d
l
e
f
i
e
l
d
R
o
a
d
Los Altos
£¤101
§¨¦280
·|}þ85
Sunnyvale
Atherton
Redwood City
OregonExpressway
Em bar ca der o R oad
ElCa
mino
Real
PageMillRoad
UniversityAvenue
Lo
u
i
s
R
o
a
d
ChanningAvenue
Stanford
Lands
AlmaStreet
Hawthorne Avenue
ChanningAvenue
EmersonStreet
§¨¦280
Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community
MA P L- 1
P A L O A L T O A E R I A L V I E W
P A L O A L T O C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A NL A N D U S E
0 1 2 Miles
Source: City of Palo Alto, 2013; ESRI, 2016; PlaceWorks, 2016.
Railroads
City Boundary
Sphere of Influence
PALO
ALTO
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
L-4 LAND USE DRAFT – NOVEMBER 28, 2016
REGIONAL PLANNING
Palo Alto cooperates with numerous regional partners on a range of issues of
common interest. Regional planning partners include the California Department of
Transportation (Caltrans) and other State agencies, Metropolitan Transportation
Commission and Association of Bay Area Governments, Santa Clara Valley
Transportation Authority, San Mateo County Transit District, Santa Clara County, San
Mateo County, and neighboring cities. The City of Palo Alto works together with the
cities of East Palo Alto and Menlo Park on a variety of shared programs relating to
economic development, social services, education, public safety, and housing.
Palo Alto also works with Mountain View, Los Altos, and Los Altos Hills on joint
ventures such as fire protection and water quality control. In addition, Palo Alto
elected officials and staff participate in numerous countywide and regional planning
efforts, including via both advisory and decision-making boards and commissions.
Palo Alto also maintains a strong relationship with Stanford University. Although the
campus lies outside of the city limits, as shown in Map L-2, important Stanford-
owned lands are within Palo Alto, including Stanford Shopping Center, Stanford
Research Park, and the Stanford University Medical Center. The City, Santa Clara
County, and Stanford maintain an inter-jurisdictional agreement regarding
development on unincorporated Stanford lands and collaborate on selected land use
and transportation projects.
CITY EVOLUTION
EARLY HISTORY
There is evidence in the archaeological record of people living along San
Francisquito Creek as far back as 4000 BC, and the first widely recognized inhabitants
are the Costanoan people starting in about 1500 BC. The Costanoan are Ohlone-
speaking Native Americans who lived near the water from San Francisco Bay to
Carmel. Costanoan and earlier artifacts have been identified in the city, particularly
along the banks of San Francisquito Creek. Preservation of these resources is a high
priority for the City and essential to defining the character of the community.
Foot
h
i
l
l
E
x
p
r
e
s
s
w
a
y
Mountain View
East Palo Alto
Stanford
University
Los Altos Hills
Menlo Park
S A N
F R A N C I S C O
B A Y
Mid
d
l
e
f
i
e
l
d
R
o
a
d
Los Altos
£¤101
§¨¦280
·|}þ85
Sunnyvale
Atherton
Redwood City
OregonExpressway
Emb a rc a dero Road
ElCaminoReal
PageMillRoad
UniversityAvenue
Lou
i
s
R
o
a
d
ChanningAvenue
Stanford
Lands
AlmaStreet
Hawthorne Avenue
ChanningAvenue
EmersonStreet
§¨¦280
MA P L - 2
S P H E R E O F I N F L U E N C E , U R B A N S E R V I C E A R E A , A N D S T A N F O R D U N I V E R S I T Y L A N D S
P A L O A L T O C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A NL A N D U S E
0 1 2 Miles
Source: City of Palo Alto, 2013; USGS, 2010; NHD 2013; ESRI, 2010; Tiger Lines, 2010; Stanford University, 2000; PlaceWorks, 2014.
City Limit
Sphere of Influence
Stanford Academic Growth Boundary
Railroads
^_Potential Future School Site
Stanford University Land Use Designations
Academic Campus
Campus Residential - Low Density
Campus Residential - Moderate Density
Open Space and Field Research
Campus Open Space
Special Conservation
Lake/Reservoir
Urban Service Boundary
!Caltrain Stations
^_
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
L-6 LAND USE DRAFT – NOVEMBER 28, 2016
CITY DEVELOPMENT
From its earliest days, Palo Alto has been a world-class center of knowledge and
innovation. The city incorporated in 1894 on land purchased with the specific intent
of serving the newly established Stanford University. Originally centered on
University Avenue, Palo Alto grew south and east, incorporating the older town of
Mayfield and its California Avenue district in 1925. By the 1970s, the city had almost
doubled in size, stretching into the foothills and south to Mountain View, with
commercial centers along Middlefield Road in Midtown and El Camino Real through
formerly unincorporated Barron Park, and research and development areas at the
city’s outskirts.
Today, Palo Alto covers almost 26 square miles (16,627 acres) of land, about a third
of which is open space, including 34 city-owned parks and 1,700 acres of protected
baylands. Ensuring that activities in and around the baylands, including airport
operations, occur with minimal environmental impacts is of major importance to the
City and region.
COMPACT DEVELOPMENT
Palo Alto was an early adopter of compact development principles, as embodied in
the Urban Service Area designated to manage growth in the current Comprehensive
Plan. Through this strategy, the City has endeavored to direct new development into
appropriate locations –— such as along transit corridors and near employment
centers— – while protecting and preserving neighborhoods as well as the open space
lands that comprise about half of the city.
SUSTAINABILITY AND RESILIENCE
Palo Alto is regarded as a leader in sustainability, having adopted its first Climate
Action Plan in 2007 and continuing through the City’s multi-faceted efforts to
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
LAND USE DRAFT – NOVEMBER 28, 2016 L-7
eliminate the community’s dependence on fossil fuels and adapt to the potential
effects of climate change. Through the direct provision of public utility services by the
City to the community, Palo Alto is able to achieve truly outstanding energy efficiency
and water conservation. The City and community also are leaders in promoting non-
automobile transportation, waste reduction and diversion, and high-quality, low-
impact development.
Together, all of these efforts make Palo Alto a more resilient community, able to
adjust behaviors and actions in an effort to protect and preserve environmental
resources.
CITY STRUCTURE
COMPONENTS
The city is composed of unique neighborhoods and distinct but connected places.
Understanding how these different components of the city structure support one
another and connect to the region can help inform land use planning. By reflecting
the existing structure in its policies, Palo Alto will ensure that it remains a community
that encourages social contact and public life and also maintains quality urban
design.
RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS
Palo Alto’s 35 neighborhoods are characterized by housing, parks, and public
facilities. Their boundaries are based on land use and street patterns and community
perceptions. Most of the residential neighborhoods have land use classifications of
single-family residential with some also including multiple-family residential, and
transitions in scale and use often signify neighborhood boundaries.
Each neighborhood is a living reminder of the unique blend of architectural styles,
building materials, scale, and street patterns that were typical at the time of its
development. These characteristics are more intact in some neighborhoods than in
others. The City strives to complement neighborhood character when installing
streets or public space improvements and to preserve neighborhoods through
thoughtful development review to ensure that new construction, additions, and
remodels reflect neighborhood character.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
L-8 LAND USE DRAFT – NOVEMBER 28, 2016
Neighborhoods built prior to the mid-1940s generally have a traditional pattern of
development with relatively narrow streets, curbside parking, vertical curbs, and
street trees between the curb and sidewalk. Many homes are oriented to the street
with parking often located to the rear of the lot.
Many later neighborhoods were shaped by Modernist design ideas popularized by
builder Joseph Eichler. The houses are intentionally designed with austere facades
and oriented towards private backyards and interior courtyards, where expansive
glass walls “bring the outside in.” Curving streets and cul-de-sacs further the sense of
house as private enclave, and flattened curbs joined to the sidewalk with no planting
strip create an uninterrupted plane on which to display the house. Some
neighborhoods built during this period contain other home styles such as California
ranch.
Both traditional and modern Palo Alto neighborhoods have fine examples of multi-
unit housing that are very compatible with surrounding single-family homes,
primarily because of their high-quality design characteristics, such as entrances and
gardens that face the street rather than the interior of the development. Examples
include duplexes and small apartment buildings near Downtown, as well as second
units and cottage courts in other areas of the city.
DOWNTOWN
Downtown Palo Alto is widely recognized for its mix of culture, architecture, and
atmosphere of innovation, which make it a uniquely special place. Downtown plays
a key role in concentrating housing, employment, shopping, and entertainment near
each other and regional rail and other transit, exemplifying and supporting citywide
sustainability and resiliency.
CENTERS
Centers are commercial and mixed use areas that serve as focal points of community
life. These commercial centers are distributed throughout the city, within walking or
bicycling distance of virtually all Palo Alto residents, as shown in Map L-3. There are
three basic types of Centers in Palo Alto:
Fo
o
t
h
i
l
l
E
x
p
r
e
s
s
w
a
y
Mountain View
East Palo Alto
Stanford
University
Los Altos Hills
Menlo Park
S A N
F R A N C I S C O
B A Y
Mi
d
d
l
e
f
i
e
l
d
R
o
a
d
Los Altos
£¤101
§¨¦280
OregonExpresswayEmbarcaderoRoad
AlmaStreetElCaminoReal
Page MillRoad
UniversityAvenue
Lo
u
i
s
R
o
a
d
Channing Avenue
Stanford
Lands
Ø
Ø
Ø
Ø
Ø
Ø
Ø
Ø
3
1
1
3
2
1
2
2
2
1
2
3
4
1
Source: City of Palo Alto, 2013; USGS, 2010; NHD 2013; ESRI, 2010; Tiger Lines, 2010; PlaceWorks, 2014.
P A L O A L T O G E N E R A L P L A N U P D A T EL A N D U S E E L E M E N T
0 0.5 1 Miles
MA P L - 3
C I T Y S T R U C T U R E
!Caltrain Stations
Sphere of Influence
City Boundary
Railroads
Park/Open Space
Regional Centers
1. University Avenue/Downtown
2. Stanford Shopping Center
Commercial Districts
1. South of Forest Area (SOFA)
2. California Avenue
3. Alma Village
1. Stanford Research Park
2. Stanford Medical Center
3. East Bayshore
4. San Antonio Road/Bayshore Corridor
"Ø
Mixed Use Areas
Employment Centersl
³³lo×
Employment Districts
1. California Avenue
2. Town & Country Village
3. South El Camino Real
Multi-Neighborhood Centers"Ø
1. Charleston Center
2. Edgewood Plaza
3. Midtown
Neighborhood Centers"Ø
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
L-10 LAND USE DRAFT – NOVEMBER 28, 2016
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
LAND USE DRAFT – NOVEMBER 28, 2016 L-11
Regional Centers include University Avenue/Downtown and Stanford
Shopping Center. These areas are commercial activity hubs of citywide and
regional significance, with a mix of shopping, offices, and some housing.
Downtown is characterized by two- and three-story buildings with ground
floor shops. Trees, benches, outdoor seating areas, sidewalks, plazas, and
other amenities make the streets pedestrian-friendly. Transit is highly
accessible and frequent. Stanford Shopping Center has evolved from its
original auto-oriented design into a premier open-air pedestrian environment
known for extensive landscaped areas surrounded by retail and dining.
Multi-Neighborhood Centers, including California Avenue, Town and
Country Village, and South El Camino Real, are retail districts that serve more
than one neighborhood with a diverse mix of uses including retail, office, and
residential. They feature one- to three--story buildings with storefront windows
and outdoor seating areas that create a pedestrian-friendly atmosphere.
These centers also contain retail uses clustered around plazas and parks that
provide public gathering spaces. They can be linked to other city Centers via
transit.
Neighborhood Centers, such as Charleston Shopping Center, Edgewood
Plaza and Midtown Shopping Center, are small retail areas drawing customers
from the immediately surrounding area. These centers are often anchored by
a grocery or drug store and may include a variety of smaller retail shops and
offices oriented toward the everyday needs of local residents. Adjacent streets
provide walking, biking, and transit connections.
EMPLOYMENT DISTRICTS
Palo Alto’s employment districts, such as Stanford Research Park, Stanford Medical
Center, East Bayshore, and San Antonio Road/Bayshore Corridor, represent a
development type not found in other parts of the city. These Districts are
characterized by large one- to four-story buildings, with some taller buildings,
separated by parking lots and landscaped areas. The Districts are accessed primarily
by automobile or employer-supported transit, though future changes in land use and
tenancy could support a shift toward transit, pedestrian, and bicycle travel.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
L-12 LAND USE DRAFT – NOVEMBER 28, 2016
GROWTH MANAGEMENT
(Note to readers: this section reflects the range of options being reviewed by the
CAC as of September 2016. It will be updated as those options evolve, and will
ultimately be refined to accurately describe the suite of growth management tools
selected by the City Council. Text shown [in brackets] represents possible choices still
under consideration.)
The pace of non-residential growth and development in Palo Alto has been
moderated by a citywide cap on non-residential development first adopted by the
City Council in 1989. Based on the demonstrated and continuous strength of the
city’s economy, and recent changes in the approach to growth management
throughout California, this Plan presents an updated cumulative growth
management and monitoring system. This system moderates the overall amount of
new office/R&D [option: and hotel] development, the pace of development, and its
impacts on Palo Alto’s livability.
CUMULATIVE GROWTH CAP
This updated approach uses 2015 as the baseline from which to monitor new
development and establishes a cumulative, citywide] cap on office/R&D [option: and
hotel] uses, including conversions of existing square footage to office/R&D space. It
also establishes clear guidance to address what the City should do as the cap is
approached. The cumulative cap would restrict development to less than what would
otherwise be allowed under the existing Service Commercial (CS) and Community
Commercial (CC) zoning designations. To address this issue, the City will assess non-
residential development potential in these zones and consider converting some of
the non-residential development potential into residential capacity.
ANNUAL LIMITS
[Option: No annual limits will be applied, and this section would be omitted.]
In addition to regulating the overall amount of development, community consensus
has emerged that it is important to regulate the pace of development to avoid sharp
spikes in construction and resulting rapid changes in the urban fabric and natural
environment. In 2015, the City Council adopted an interim ordinance that
established annual limits on new office/R&D space in the City’s fastest-changing
commercial districts to 50,000 square feet per year. This plan expands that cap to
encompass the entire City, excluding the Stanford University Medical Center, which is
subject to a development agreement. Stanford Research Park is subject to a separate
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
LAND USE DRAFT – NOVEMBER 28, 2016 L-13
annual limit of ______ square feet per year, but may carry unused capacity forward
to future years. [Option: Stanford Research Park is subject to a trip cap rather than an
annual limit on development.]
DEVELOPMENT PERFORMANCE MEASURES REQUIREMENTS
For many years, the City has carefully regulated new development in Palo Alto; the
sidebar on page LU-38Error! Unknown switch argument. lists examples of
ordinances and requirements. This Plan adds [a program to create] new “better,
stronger, and faster” development performance measuresrequirements, applied to
proposed projects at the time of City review and approval, which will help the City be
ensure the highest quality development with the least environmental impacts.
Development performance measuresrequirements will require new projects to
reduce trips, preserve affordable housing, and protect the urban forest and other
natural vegetation. The development requirements performance measures will be
regularly re-evaluated in order to monitor their effectiveness, and may be adjusted or
removed as necessary.
COMMUNITY PERFORMANCE MEASURES INDICATORS
Maintaining and improving Palo Alto’s livability will require demand more than
applying measures requirements to and evaluating the performance of new
development in Palo Alto, because new development represents a small proportion
of the buildings that will be on the ground in 2030. Existing businesses, institutions
and residents also play a role in creating a more sustainable Palo Alto. These efforts
will involve changes in behavior and new technologies as current conditions evolve
over the planning period. In response to these anticipated changes, and in parallel
with the development performance measuresrequirements, this Element introduces
[a program to develop] a group of community performance measuresindicators that
will measure progress towards stated targets and will inform the City’s decision-
making process on growth management. Each community performance
measureindicator is [would be] monitored either annually or every four
yearsregularly, based on the specific identified target and the data available.
DOWNTOWN CAP
A recent cycle of economic growth has brought increased pressure for additional
office space in Downtown Palo Alto, which combines a desirable address with a
beautiful urban environment, access to transit, and proximity to dining and
shopping. In recent years, the demand has become so strong that other important
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
L-14 LAND USE DRAFT – NOVEMBER 28, 2016
uses that contribute to Downtown’s vitality, such as storefront retail, are at risk of
being pushed out. To ensure that Downtown remains a regional center with a
diversity of destinations, new office development Downtown is limited to just over
45,000 square feet. This is the amount remaining in a cap originally established in
the 1998 Comprehensive Plan. “New” development includes conversions from
another use to an office use, so it is likely that the cap will be reached within the
horizon of this Plan. In addition to capping office development, the City will monitor
parking demand and commute trips by single-occupant vehicle. [Option: To ensure
that Downtown remains a regional center with a diversity of destinations, non-
residential development, single-occupant vehicle commute trips, and parking
demand Downtown will be monitored annually.]
URBAN DESIGN
The look and feel of Palo Alto is shaped by urban design, which encompasses the
wide variety of features that together form the visual character of the city. These
elements range from aesthetic to functional and include the design of buildings, the
historic character of structures and places, public spaces where people gather,
gateways or entrances to the city, street trees lining neighborhoods, art decorating
public spaces, as well as parking lots and essential infrastructure. Key community
design features are illustrated on Map L-4.
BUILDINGS
Palo Alto has many buildings of outstanding architectural merit representing a variety
of styles and periods. The best examples of these buildings are constructed with
quality materials, show evidence of craftsmanship, fit with their surroundings, and
help make neighborhoods comfortable and appealing. To help achieve quality
design, the Architectural Review Board reviews buildings and site design for
commercial and multi-family residential projects. Palo Alto’s commercial and
residential buildings have received regional and national design recognition. Design
issues in residential neighborhoods include sympathetic restoration and renovation
of homes, protection of privacy if second stories are added, and efforts to make
streets more inviting to pedestrians.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
LAND USE DRAFT – NOVEMBER 28, 2016 L-15
HISTORIC RESOURCES
Palo Alto has a rich stock of historic structures and places that are important to the
city’s heritage and preserving and reusing these historic resources contributes to the
livability of Palo Alto. The City’s Historic Inventory lists approximately 400 buildings of
Foo
t
h
i
l
l
E
x
p
r
e
s
s
w
a
y
Mountain View
East Palo Alto
Stanford
University
Los Altos Hills
Menlo Park
S A N
F R A N C I S C O
B A Y
Mi
d
d
l
e
f
i
e
l
d
R
o
a
d
Los Altos
£¤101
§¨¦280
·|}þ85
Atherton
Redwood City
OregonExpresswayEmbarcaderoRoad
AlmaStreetElCaminoReal
Page MillRoad
UniversityAvenue
Lou
i
s
R
o
a
d
Channing Avenue
Stanford
Lands§¨¦280
Source: City of Palo Alto, 2013; USGS, 2010; NHD 2013; ESRI, 2010; Tiger Lines, 2010; PlaceWorks, 2014.
P A L O A L T O G E N E R A L P L A N U P D A T EL A N D U S E E L E M E N T
0 1 2 Miles
MA P L - 4
C O M M U N I T Y D E S I G N F E A T U R E S
Major View Corridors
k Primary Gateways
! !Scenic Routes in Palo Alto
!Caltrain Stations
Railroads
Park/Open Space
City Boundary
Sphere of Influence
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
LAND USE DRAFT – NOVEMBER 28, 2016 L-17
!!!!!!!
!!!
!
!!
!
!!!!!!!!!
!
!
!
!!!!
!
!
!!!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!!
!
!
!
!!!!!!!!!
!
!
!
!
!
!!!!
!!!
!
!!!
!
!
!!!!!!
!!!!!!
!!
!!!!!!
!
!!!!!
!
!
!
!!! !!!!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!! !
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!!
!!
!!!
!
!
!
!
!!!!!!!!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!!
!!!!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!!!
!
!!
!
!!!!!!!!
!
!!!!!!
!!
!!
!!!!
!
!!!
!!!
!
!!
!!
!!!!
!!!
!
!
!!!!
!!!!
!
!
!!!
!!!
!!!
!!!!!
!!!!!
!
!
!!!!!!
!!
!
!!
!!!!!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!!
!!
!!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!!
!!!
!
!
!
!
!
!!!!
!!!!!
!!!!!
!!
!
!!!
!
!!
!
!
!
!!
!!!
!
!
!!!!!!
!
!!
!
!!!!
!
!
!
!!!
!
!
!
!
!
Foot
h
i
l
l
E
x
p
r
e
s
s
w
a
y
Mountain View
Stanford
University
Los Altos Hills
Menlo Park
Mid
d
l
e
f
i
e
l
d
R
o
a
d
Los Altos
£¤101
§¨¦280
·|}þ85
·|}þ237
Sunnyvale
Atherton
OregonExpressway
Embarcadero Road
ElCaminoReal
PageMillRoad
UniversityAvenue
Loui
s
R
o
a
d
ChanningAvenue
Stanford
Lands
MiddlefieldRoad
AlmaStreet
Hawthorne Avenue
ChanningAvenue
EmersonStreet
LouisRoad
Professorville
Historic District
Green Gables
Historic District
Greenmeadow
Historic District
Ramona Street
Architectural District
§¨¦280
M A P L - 5
!!!!!!!
!!!
!
!!
!
!!!!!!!!!
!
!
!
!!!!
!
!
!!!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!!
!
!
!
!!!!!!!!!
!
!
!
!
!
!!!!
!
!!
!
!!!
!
!
!!!!!!
!!!!
!!
!!
!!!!!!
!!!!!!
!
!
!
!
!!!!!!!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!!
!
!!!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!!!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!
!
!!
!!!
!
!
!
!
!!!!!!!!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!!
!!!!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!!!
!
!!
!
!
!!!
!!!!
!
!!!!!!
!!
!!
!!!
!
!
!!!
!!!
!
!!
!!
!!!!
!!!
!
!
!!!!
!!!
!
!
!
!!!
!!!
!!!
!! !
!!
!!!!!
!
!
!!!!!!
!!
!
!!
!!!!!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!!
!!
!!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!!
!!!
!
!
!
!
!
!!!!
!!!!
!!!!!!
!!
!
!!!
!
!!
!
!
!
!!
!!!
!
!!!!!!!
!
!!
!
!!!!
!
!
!
!!!
!
!
!
H I S T O R I C R E S O U R C E S
Source: PlaceWorks, 2016; The City of Palo Alto, 2013.
0 1 2 Miles
*Cultural and historic resources include Historic Structures on the City of Palo Alto Historic Inventory
(categories I, II, III, or IV), and/or Buildings on the National Register of Historic Places, and/or California
Registered Historic Landmarks, and/or Points of Historical Interest.
This map is for illustrative purposes only and does not depict the full inventory of historic
structures, landmarks, or other cultural resources in Palo Alto. For a more complete listing,
please refer to the content of the Palo Alto Comprehensive Plan and the
associated environmental review documents.
P A L O A L T O G E N E R A L P L A N U P D A T EL A N D U S E E L E M E N T
!Cultural or historic resource*
Highways
City Limit
Professorville
Historic District
Ramona StreetArchitectural District
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
LAND USE DRAFT – NOVEMBER 28, 2016 L-19
historical merit, with more than a dozen buildings on the National Register of
Historic Places, as well as two historic districts: Ramona Street and Professorville.
Map L-5 illustrates historic resources in Palo Alto.
Historic sites include the El Palo Alto redwood, believed to be the site of a 1776
encampment of the Portola Expedition and one of 19 California Points of Historical
Interest in the city. The garage at 367 Addison that was the birthplace of Hewlett-
Packard is one of seven sites or structures listed on the California Register of Historic
Landmarks. The length of El Camino Real from San Francisco to San Diego, including
the section that passes through Palo Alto, is a State Historic Landmark. Many historic
buildings in the city have been rehabilitated and adaptively reused as office or
commercial spaces, including former single-family homes in and near downtown.
PUBLIC SPACES, STREETS, AND PARKING
Throughout Palo Alto are a variety of public spaces from parks and schools to plazas
and sidewalks, to cultural, religious, and civic facilities. Each of these can increasingly
serve as centers for public life with gathering places, bicycle and pedestrian access,
safety-enhancing night-time lighting and clear visual access, and, in some cases,
small-scale retail uses such as cafes.
Well-designed streets also invite public use and enhance quality of life. Palo Alto’s
reputation as a gracious residential community is due not only to its fine street trees
and attractive planting areas, but also to appropriate street width for neighborhood
character, accommodation of pedestrians and bicycles, height and setbacks of
buildings, and color and texture of paving materials. These components help to
ensure that streets are pleasant and safe for all travelers.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
L-20 LAND USE DRAFT – NOVEMBER 28, 2016
Parking lots occupy large amounts of surface area in the city. Well-designed parking
lots make efficient use of space while contributing positively to the appearance of the
surrounding area. A parking lot can provide an opportunity for open space and
outdoor amenities rather than just a repository for cars. Many parking lots in Palo
Alto include trees, landscaping and public art.
GATEWAYS
Community identity is strengthened when the entrances to the city are clear and
memorable. In Palo Alto, these entrances or gateways include University Avenue, El
Camino Real, Middlefield Road, Oregon Expressway/Page Mill Road, San Antonio
Road and Embarcadero Road, and the Palo Alto and California Avenue Caltrain
stations. Well-designed gateways are defined by natural and urban landmarks that
complement the character and identity of the neighborhood.
URBAN FOREST
Palo Alto’s urban forest—including both public and privately owned trees—is a key
part of the community’s history, identity, and quality of life. It offers enormous social,
environmental, and financial benefits and is a fundamental part of Palo Alto’s sense
of place. Regular spacing of trees that are similar in form and texture provides order
and coherence and gives scale to the street. A canopy of branches and leaves
provides shade for pedestrians and creates a sense of enclosure and comfort. On the
city’s most memorable streets, trees of a single species extend historic character to
the corners of blocks, reducing the apparent width of streets and intersections and
defining the street as a continuous space. Protecting, maintaining, and enhancing the
urban forest, as called for in the 2015 Urban Forest Master Plan, is among the most
effective ways to preserve Palo Alto’s character.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
LAND USE DRAFT – NOVEMBER 28, 2016 L-21
PUBLIC ART
Public art helps create an inviting atmosphere for gathering, fosters economic
development, and contributes to vital public spaces. Palo Alto’s public art program
reflects the City’s tradition of enriching public spaces with works of art, ranging from
the subtle inclusion of handcrafted artifacts into building architecture to more
traditional displays of sculpture at civic locations. The Municipal Code requires both
public and private projects to incorporate public art.
UTILITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE
A city is supported by its infrastructure—features such as paving, signs, and utilities.
These features represent substantial public investments and are meant to serve all
community members. Infrastructure improvements must meet current needs and
keep pace with growth and development. While the purpose of infrastructure is
usually utilitarian or functional, attention to design details can add beauty or even
improve urban design. For example, replacing a sidewalk can provide an opportunity
to create larger tree wells and provide new street trees.
PALO ALTO AIRPORT
Palo Alto Airport (PAO) is a general aviation airport owned and operated by the City
of Palo Alto. PAO occupies 102 acres of land east of Highway 101 in the baylands
and has one paved runway. The airport functions as a reliever to three Bay Area
airports. PAO facilities include an air traffic control tower operated by the Federal
Aviation Administration and a terminal building. Flight clubs and fixed base operators
operate on-site, offering fuel sales, flight lessons, pilot training, and aircraft sales,
rentals, maintenance, and repair. From 1967 to 2015, PAO was operated by Santa
Clara County under a lease agreement. Operations and control have since been
transferred to the City and key challenges ahead include addressing deterioration of
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
L-22 LAND USE DRAFT – NOVEMBER 28, 2016
runway conditions, addressing noise impacts and hours of operation, and the
relationship between the Airport and the Baylands Master Plan.
LAND USE MAP AND LAND USE DESIGNATIONS
Map L-6 shows each land use designation within the city of Palo Alto. The land use
designations translate the elements of city structure into a detailed map that presents
the community’s vision for future land use development and conservation on public
and private land in Palo Alto through the year 2030. Residential densities are
expressed in terms of dwelling units per acre.
Building intensities for non-residential uses are expressed in terms of floor area ratio
(FAR), which is the ratio of gross building floor area (excluding areas designated for
parking, etc.) to net lot area, both expressed in square feet. FAR does not regulate
building placement or form, only the spatial relationship between building size and
lot size; it represents an expectation of the overall intensity of future development.
!
!
FOO
T
H
I
L
L
E
X
P
Y
FA
B
I
A
N
W
A
Y
SAND
H
I
L
L
R
D
AL
M
A
S
T
SEA
L
E
A
V
E
SAN
A
N
T
O
N
I
O
R
D
OREG
O
N
E
X
P
Y
QU
A
R
R
Y
R
D
LOMA
V
E
R
D
E
A
V
E
ARA
S
T
R
A
D
E
R
O
R
D
E CH
A
R
L
E
S
T
O
N
R
D
EMBARCA
D
E
R
O
W
A
Y
PASTE
U
R
D
R
CAL
I
F
O
R
N
I
A
A
V
E
LI
N
C
O
L
N
A
V
E
UNI
V
E
R
S
I
T
Y
A
V
E
JU
N
I
P
E
R
O
S
E
R
R
A
B
L
V
D
PA
G
E
M
I
L
L
R
D
§¨¦280
|ÿ82
£¤101
Mountain View
East Palo Alto
Stanford
University
Los Altos Hills
Menlo Park
S A N
F R A N C I S C O
B A Y
Los Altos
Arastradero Preserve
Baylands
Preserve
Byxbee
Park
SOFA II CAP
SOFA I CAP
Baylands Master Plan
East Charleston Road
S A N
F R A N C I S C O
B A Y
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 10.125
Miles
Source: ESRI, 2010; Tiger Lines, 2010; USGS, 2010; NHD, 2013; City of Palo Alto, 2013; PlaceWorks, 2015.
Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designations
Residential
Single Family Res
Multi-Family Res
Multi-Family Res (w/Hotel Overlay)
Mixed Use
Commercial
Hotel Commercial
Service Commercial
Neighborhood Commercial
Regional/Community Commercial
Business/Industrial
Light Industrial
Research/Office Park
Other
SOFA II CAP
SOFA I CAP
School District Land
Major Institution/Special Facility
Streamside Open Space
Public Park
Open Space/Controlled Development
Public Conservation Land
Stanford University Land Use Designations
Academic Campus
Campus Residential - Low Density
Campus Residential - Moderate Density
Open Space/Field Research
Campus Open Space
Special Conservation
Lake/Reservoir
!Caltrain Stations
Urban Service Area
City Boundary
Sphere of Influence
Railroads
P A L O A L T O G E N E R A L P L A N U P D A T E
L A N D U S E E L E M E N T
MA P L -6
C O M P R E H E N S I V E L A N D U S E D E S I G N A T I O N S
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
L-24 LAND USE DRAFT –NOVEMBER 28, 2016
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
LAND USE DRAFT –NOVEMBER 28, 2016 L-25
The maximums assigned to the land use designations below do not constitute
entitlements, nor are property owners or developers guaranteed that an individual
project, when tested against the General Plan’s policies, will be able or permitted to
achieve these maximums.
LAND USE DEFINITIONS
OPEN SPACE
Publicly Owned Conservation Land: Open lands whose primary purpose is the
preservation and enhancement of the natural state of the land and its plants and
animals. Only resource management, recreation, and educational activities
compatible with resource conservation are allowed.
Public Park: Open lands whose primary purpose is public access for active
recreation and whose character is essentially urban. These areas, which may have
been planted with non-indigenous landscaping, may provide access to nature within
the urban environment and require a concerted effort to maintain recreational
facilities and landscaping.
Streamside Open Space: This designation is intended to preserve and enhance
corridors of riparian vegetation along streams. Hiking, biking, and riding trails may be
developed in the streamside open space. The corridor will generally vary in width up
to 200 feet either side of the center line of the creek. However, along San
Francisquito Creek between El Camino Real and the Sand Hill Road bridge over the
creek, the open space corridor varies in width between approximately 80 and 310
feet from the center line of the creek. The aerial delineation of the open space in this
segment of the corridor, as opposed to other segments of the corridor, is shown to
approximate scale on the Proposed Land Use and Circulation Map.
Open Space/Controlled Development: Land having all the characteristics of open
space but where some development may be allowed on private properties. Open
space amenities must be retained in these areas. Residential densities range from 0.1
to 1 dwelling unit per acre but may rise to a maximum of 2 units per acre where
second units are allowed, and population densities range from 1 to 4 persons per
acre.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
L-26 LAND USE DRAFT – NOVEMBER 28, 2016
RESIDENTIAL
Single-Family Residential: This designation applies to residential neighborhoods
primarily characterized by detached single-family homes, typically with one dwelling
unit on each lot. Private and public schools and churches are conditional uses
requiring permits. Second units or duplexes may be allowed in select, limited areas
where they would be compatible with neighborhood character and do not create
traffic and parking problems. The net density in single family areas will range from 1
to 7 units per acre, but rises to a maximum of 14 units on parcels where second
units or duplexes are allowed. Population densities will range from 1 to 30 persons
per acre.
Multiple -Family Residential: The permitted number of housing units will vary by
area, depending on existing land use, proximity to major streets and public transit,
distance to shopping, and environmental problems. Net densities will range from 8
to 40 units and 8 to 90 persons per acre. Density should be on the lower end of the
scale next to single- family residential areas. Densities higher than what is permitted
by zoning may be allowed where measurable community benefits will be derived,
services and facilities are available, and the net effect will be compatible with the
overall Comprehensive Plan.
Village Residential: Allows residential dwellings that are designed to contribute to
the harmony and pedestrian orientation of a street or neighborhood. Housing types
include single- family houses on small lots, second units, cottage clusters, courtyard
housing, duplexes, fourplexes, and small apartment buildings. Design standards will
be prepared for each housing type to ensure that development successfully
contributes to the street and neighborhood and minimizes potential negative
impacts. Net densities will range up to 20 units per acre.
Transit-oOriented Residential: Allows higher density residential dwellings in the
University Avenue/Downtown and California Avenue commercial centers within a
walkable distance, approximately 2,5000 feet, of the City’s two multi-modal transit
stations. The land use category is intended to generate residential densities that
support substantial use of public transportation and especially the use of Caltrain.
Design standards will be prepared to ensure that development successfully
contributes to the street and minimizes potential negative impacts. Individual project
performance standardsrequirements will be developed, including parking, to ensure
that a significant portion of the residents will use alternative modes of transportation.
Net density will range up to 50 units per acre, with minimum densities to be
considered during development of new City zoning regulations.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
LAND USE DRAFT –NOVEMBER 28, 2016 L-27
COMMERCIAL
Neighborhood Commercial: Includes shopping centers with off-street parking or a
cluster of street-front stores that serve the immediate neighborhood. Examples
include Alma Plaza, Charleston Center, Edgewood Center, and Midtown. Typical uses
include supermarkets, bakeries, drugstores, variety stores, barber shops, restaurants,
self-service laundries, dry cleaners, child care and hardware stores. In some locations
along El Camino Real and Alma Street, residential and mixed use projects may also
locate in this category. Non-residential floor area ratios will range up to 0.4.
Child Care Options – Choose One to Carry Forward
Typical uses include supermarkets, bakeries, drugstores, variety stores, barber
shops, restaurants, self-service laundries, dry cleaners, child care and hardware
stores.
Typical uses include supermarkets, bakeries, drugstores, variety stores, barber
shops, restaurants, self-service laundries, dry cleaners, child care and hardware
stores. Child care is an acceptable use except in Charleston Center, Edgewood
Center, and Midtown.
Regional/Community Commercial: Larger shopping centers and districts that have
a wider variety of goods and services than the neighborhood shopping areas. They
rely on larger trade areas and include such uses as department stores, bookstores,
furniture stores, toy stores, apparel shops, restaurants, theaters, and non-retail
services such as offices and banks. Non-retail uses such as medical and dental offices
may also locate in this designation. Examples include Stanford Shopping Center,
Town and Country Village, and University Avenue/Downtown. In some locations,
residential and mixed use projects may also locate in this category. Non-residential
floor area ratios range from 0.35 to 2.
Service Commercial: Facilities providing citywide and regional services and relying
on customers arriving by car. These uses do not necessarily benefit from being in
high volume pedestrian areas such as shopping centers or Downtown. Typical uses
include auto services and dealerships, motels, lumberyards, appliance stores, and
restaurants, including fast service types. In almost all cases, these uses require good
automobile and service access so that customers can safely load and unload without
impeding traffic. In some locations, residential and mixed use projects may be
appropriate in this land use category. Examples of Service Commercial areas include
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
L-28 LAND USE DRAFT – NOVEMBER 28, 2016
San Antonio Road, El Camino Real, and Embarcadero Road northeast of the
Bayshore Freeway. Non-residential floor area ratios will range up to 0.4.
Mixed Use: The Mixed Use designation is intended to promote pedestrian-oriented
places that layer compatible land uses, public amenities and utilities together at
various scales and intensities. The designation allows for multiple functions within
the same building or adjacent to one another in the same general vicinity to foster a
mix of uses that encourages people to live, work, play, and shop in close proximity.
Most typically, mixed use developments have retail on the ground floor and
residences above. This category includes Live/Work, Retail/Office, Residential/Retail
and Residential/Office development. Its purpose is to increase the types of spaces
available for living and working to encourage a mix of compatible uses in certain
areas, and to encourage the upgrading of certain areas with buildings designed to
provide a high quality pedestrian-oriented street environment. Mixed Use may
include permitted activities mixed within the same building or within separate
buildings on the same site or on nearby sites. Live/Work refers to one or more
individuals living in the same building where they earn their livelihood, usually in
professional or light industrial activities. Retail/Office, Residential/Retail, and
Residential/Office provide other variations to Mixed Use with Retail typically on the
ground floor and Residential on upper floors. Design standards will be developed to
ensure that development is compatible and contributes to the character of the street
and neighborhood. Floor area ratios will range up to 1.15, although Residential/
Retail and Residential/Office development located along transit corridors or near
multi-modal centers will range up to 2.0 FAR with up to 3.0 FAR possible in areas
resistant to revitalizationwhere higher FAR would be an incentive to meet community
goals such as providing affordable housing. The FAR above 1.15 will must be used
for residential purposes. FAR between 0.15 and 1.15 may be used for residential
purposes. As of the adoption of this Comprehensive Plan, the Mixed Use designation
is currently only applied in the SOFA area.
Commercial Hotel: This category allows facilities for use by temporary overnight
occupants on a transient basis, such as hotels and motels, with associated
conference centers and similar uses. Restaurants and other eating facilities, meeting
rooms, small retail shops, personal services, and other services ancillary to the hotel
are also allowed. This category can be applied in combination with another land use
category. Floor area ratio will range up to 2.01.5 for the hotel portion of the site.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
LAND USE DRAFT –NOVEMBER 28, 2016 L-29
Research/Office Park: Office, research, and manufacturing establishments whose
operations are buffered from adjacent residential uses. Stanford Research Park is an
example. Other uses that may be included are educational institutions and child care
facilities. Compatible commercial service uses such as banks and restaurants, and
residential or mixed uses that would benefit from the proximity to employment
centers, will also be allowed. Additional uses, including retail services, restaurants,
commercial recreation, churches, and private clubs may also be located in
Research/Office Park areas, but only if they are found to be compatible with the
surrounding area through the conditional use permit process. In some locations,
residential and mixed-use projects may also locate in this category. Maximum
allowable floor area ratio ranges from 0.3 to 0.5, depending on site conditions.
Light Industrial: Wholesale and storage warehouses and the manufacturing,
processing, repairing, and packaging of goods. Emission of fumes, noise, smoke, or
other pollutants is strictly controlled. Examples include portions of the area south of
Oregon Avenue between El Camino Real and Alma Street that historically have
included these land uses, and the San Antonio Road industrial area. Compatible
residential and mixed use projects may also be located in this category. Floor area
ratio will range up to 0.5.
*INSTITUTIONAL
School District Lands: Properties owned or leased by public school districts and
used for educational, recreational, or other non-commercial, non-industrial purposes.
Floor area ratio may not exceed 1.0.
Major Institution/Special Facilities: Institutional, academic, governmental, and
community service uses and lands that are either publicly owned or operated as
non-profit organizations. Examples are hospitals and City facilities.
Major Institution/University Lands: Academic and academic reserve areas of
Stanford University. Population density and building intensity limits are established
by conditional use permit with Santa Clara County. These lands are further
designated by the following sub-categories of land use:
Major Institution/University Lands/Campus Single- Family Residential:
Single- family areas where the occupancy of the units is significantly or totally
limited to individuals or families affiliated with the institution.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
L-30 LAND USE DRAFT – NOVEMBER 28, 2016
Major Institution/University Lands/Campus Multiple Family Residential:
Multiple family areas where the occupancy of the units is significantly or totally
limited to individuals or families affiliated with the institution.
Major Institution/University Lands/Campus Educational Facilities:
Academic lands with a full complement of activities and densities that give
them an urban character. Allowable uses are academic institutions and
research facilities, student and faculty housing, and support services. Increases
in student enrollment and faculty/ staff size must be accompanied by
measures that mitigate traffic and housing impacts.
Major Institution/University Lands/Academic Reserve and Open Space:
Academic lands having all the characteristics of open space but upon which
some academic development may be allowed provided that open space
amenities are retained. These lands are important for their aesthetic and
ecological value as well as their potential for new academic uses.
GOALS, POLICIES, AND PROGRAMS
LOCAL LAND USE AND GROWTH MANAGEMENT
GOAL L-1 A Well-Designed, compact, and resilient city, providing
residents aand visitors with attractive neighborhoods, work
places, shopping districts, public facilities, and open spaces.
EXTENT OF URBANCONCENTRATING DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE URBAN SERVICE
AREA
Policy L-1.1 Continue current City policy limiting Limit future urban development
to currently developed lands within the urban service area. The
boundary of the urban service area is otherwise known as the urban
growth boundary. Retain undeveloped land west of Foothill
Expressway and Junipero Serra as open space, with allowances made
for very low-intensity development consistent with the open space
character of the area. Retain undeveloped Baylands land northeast of
Highway 101 as open space. [Previous Policy L-1] [L1]
Policy L-1.2 Maintain and strengthen Palo Alto’s varied residential neighborhoods
while sustaining the vitality of its commercial areas and public facilities.
Use the Zoning Ordinance as a tool to enhance Palo Alto’s desirable
qualities.[Previous Policy L-4] [L2]
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
LAND USE DRAFT –NOVEMBER 28, 2016 L-31
Policy L-1.3 Promote infill development in the urban service area that is,
compatible with its surroundings and the overall scale and character of
the city to ensure a compact, efficient development pattern. Maintain
the scale and character of the City Avoid land uses that are
overwhelming and unacceptable due to their size and scale. [(Previous
Policy L-5 )(PTC Policy L1.7)] [L3]
Program L1.3.1 Maintain a list of vacant and underutilized
properties. Work with property owners and
developers, and neighbors, and neighborhood
associations, property owners, and developers to
identify barriers to infill development of affordable,
below market rate and more affordable market
rate housing on these properties and actions that
addressto remove these barriers. Work with these
same stakeholders to identify sites and facilitate
opportunities for below market rate housing and
housing that is affordable [(PTC Program L1.7.10)
(Edited)] [L4]
Policy L-1.4 Ensure that future development addresses potential risks from climate
change and sea level rise. [Note: the revised Safety Element will
include a much more extensive discussion of this issue along with
policies and programs to respond.] [NEW POLICY] [L5]
Program L1.3.1Program L1.4.1 Review development
standards applicable in areas susceptible to
flooding from sea level rise, including east of
Highway 101, West Bayshore and East Meadow
Circle, and the area east of San Antonio Road and
north of East Charleston, and update requirements
as needed to ensure that new development is
designed and located to provide protection from
potential flooding impacts. [(NEW
PROGRAM)(Comp Plan Draft EIR Mitigation
Measure GHG-3.)] [Note: The revised Safety
Element will include additional mitigation
measures to address sea level rise and climate
change adaptation] [L6]
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
L-32 LAND USE DRAFT – NOVEMBER 28, 2016
REGIONAL COOPERATION
Policy L-1.4Policy L-1.5 Maintain an active cooperative working relationship
engagement with Santa Clara County, San Mateo County, neighboring
cities,, other public agencies including school districts and Stanford
University regarding land use and transportation issues. [Previous
Policy L-2] [L7]
Program L1.4.1 Maintain and update as appropriate the 1985 Land
Use Policies Agreement that sets forth the land use
policies of the City, Santa Clara County, and
Stanford University with regard to Stanford
unincorporated lands. [Previous Program L-1] [L8]
Program L1.4.2 City staff will monitor Stanford development
proposals and traffic conditions within the Sand Hill
Road Corridor and annually report to the Planning
Com- mission and City Council.[Note: Conflicts with
current City practice - annual Mayfield and SUMC
reporting requirements] [Previous Program L-2A]
Program L1.4.3 City staff will review development proposals within
the Airport Influence Area to ensure consistency
with the guidelines of the Palo Alto Airport
Comprehensive Land Use Plan, and when
appropriate, will refer development proposals to
the Santa Clara County Airport Land Use
Commission for review and comment. [Previous
Program L-2B]
Program L1.5.1 Evaluate changes in land use in the context of
regional needs, overall City welfare and objectives,
as well as the desires of surrounding
neighborhoods.[Previous Policy L-7]
Policy L-1.5Policy L-1.6 Participate in regional strategies to address the interaction of
jobs, housing balance and transportation issues. [NEW POLICY] [L9]
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
LAND USE DRAFT –NOVEMBER 28, 2016 L-33
MAINTAIN AND STRENGTHEN CITY CHARACTER[NOTE: THIS SECTION RENAMED
“GUIDING BUILDING DESIGN,” AND MOVED TO GOAL L-6 PER 6/24/16 LAND USE
SUBCOMMITTEE DISCUSSION.]
COMMERCIAL GROWTH LIMITS GROWTH MANAGEMENT AND MONITORING
Policy L-1.6Policy L-1.7 Encourage land uses that address the needs of the
community and manage change and development to benefit the
community. [NEW POLICY] [L10]
Program L1.7.1 Review regulatory tools available to the City and
identify actions to enhance and preserve the
livability of residential neighborhoods and the
vitality of commercial and employment districts,
including improved code enforcement practices.
[NEW PROGRAM] [L11]
Policy L-1.7Policy L-1.8 Sites within or adjacent to existing commercial areas and
corridors are suitable for hotels. Give preference to housing versus
hotel use on sites adjacent to predominantly single family
neighborhoods. [NEW POLICY] [L12]
CUMULATIVE CAP OPTIONS CHOOSE ONE OR MORE TO CARRY FORWARD
Policy L-1.9 (no cumulative cap on non-residential uses) A well designed,
compact, and resilient City maintains a healthy mix of non-residential
uses. The City will monitor non-residential development over time in
addition to applying development requirements and community
indicators designed to ensure the highest quality of development with
the least possible impacts. [NEW POLICY] [L13]
Program L1.9.1 (no cumulative cap; trigger for evaluation of
development requirements)When new Office &
R&D development approved since January 1, 2015
reaches 500,000 square feet citywide, evaluate the
success of adopted development requirements and
community indicators. [NEW PROGRAM] [L14]
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
L-34 LAND USE DRAFT – NOVEMBER 28, 2016
Policy L-1.10 (citywide cap on office/R&D minus SUMC plus development
requirements) Maintain a citywide cap of 1.7 million new square feet
of office/R&D development, exempting medical office uses associated
with SUMC. Use January 1, 2015 as the baseline and monitor
development towards the cap on an annual basis. Regularly assess the
effectiveness of requirements applied to development and other
community performance measures and remove or adjust the cap
and/or development requirements accordingly. [NEW POLICY] [L15]
Policy L-1.11 (citywide cap on office/R&D and hotel, minus SUMC, plus
development requirements) Maintain a citywide cap of 1.7 million
new square feet of office/R&D and an appropriate additional amount
of hotel development using January 1, 2015 as the baseline and
monitor development towards this cap on an annual basis. Regularly
assess the effectiveness of development requirements applied to
development and community indicators and remove or adjust the cap
and/or development requirements accordingly. [NEW POLICY] [L16]
Program L1.11.1 (possible Citywide hotel cap) Study demand and
potential impacts in order to determine whether the
Citywide cap should include a cap on hotel
development and what an appropriate
development cap would be. [NEW PROGRAM]
[L17]
Policy L-1.12 (cumulative cap exemptions) Exempt medical, governmental, and
institutional uses from the cap on office/R&D development. [NEW
POLICY] [L18]
CUMULATIVE CAP AND DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS – IMPLEMENTATION
PROGRAMS
Program L1.12.1 (citywide cap re-evaluation) Reevaluate the
cumulative cap when the amount of new
office/R&D [and hotel] square footage entitled since
January 1, 2015 reaches 67 percent of the allowed
square footage, or 1,139,000 square feet.
Concurrently consider removal or potential changes
to the cap and/or to the amount of additional
development permitted by the City’s zoning
ordinance. [NEW PROGRAM] [L19]
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
LAND USE DRAFT –NOVEMBER 28, 2016 L-35
Program L1.12.2 (development requirements reevaluation) Regularly
assess the effectiveness of development
requirements and revise them as necessary. [NEW
PROGRAM] [L20]
Program L1.12.3 (adjust development potential to reflect citywide
cap) Assess non-residential development potential
in the CC, CN, and CS zoning districts, and convert
non-retail commercial FAR to residential FAR, where
appropriate. Conversion to residential capacity
should not be considered in Town and Country
Village. [NEW PROGRAM] [L21]
ANNUAL LIMIT OPTIONS – CHOOSE ONE OR MORE TO CARRY FORWARD
Policy L-1.13 (no annual limit) Use performance requirements to assure that new
development adds to the quality of the community and addresses or
avoids new impacts. [NEW POLICY] [L22]
Policy L-1.14 (citywide annual limit) Limit the amount of new office/R&D square
footage permitted in the City on an annual basis to 50,000 square feet
outside the Stanford Research Park and ___ square feet inside
Stanford Research Park. Allow unused development capacity within
Stanford Research Park only to be carried forward to future years.
Stanford University Medical Center shall be exempt from this annual
limit. [NEW POLICY] [L23]
Policy L-1.15 (citywide annual limit with SRP exemption) Limit the amount of new
office/R&D square footage permitted in the City on an annual basis to
50,000 square feet, exempting new square footage in Stanford
University Medical Center, and exempting the Stanford Research Park
if a cap on peak period auto trips to the Research Park is established
and enforced. [NEW POLICY] [L24]
Policy L-1.16 (annual limit exemptions) Exempt public facilities, offices less than
5,000 square feet., and medical offices of less than 2,000 square feet
from the annual limit. [NEW POLICY] [L25]
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
L-36 LAND USE DRAFT – NOVEMBER 28, 2016
DOWNTOWN CAP – CHOOSE ONE OR MORE TO CARRY FORWARD
Program L1.16.1 (no downtown cap) Monitor non-residential
development in Downtown on an annual basis,
tracking new square footage by use, as well as
commute trips by SOV and parking demand. [NEW
PROGRAM] [L26]
Program L1.16.2 (retain downtown cap) Limit new office
development in Downtown to 45,619 square feet,
using January 1, 2015 as the baseline. Monitor this
development on an annual basis, tracking new
square footage as well as commute trips by SOV
and parking demand. Reevaluate this Downtown
development cap when the amount of new office
and hotel square footage entitled since January 1,
2015 reaches 67 percent of the remaining allowed
square footage and concurrently consider potential
changes to the cap and/or to the amount of
additional development permitted by the City’s
zoning ordinance. [NEW PROGRAM] [L27]
Program L1.16.3 (exempt small offices from downtown cap) Limit
new office development in Downtown to 45,619
square feet, using January 1, 2015 as the baseline.
Small offices, where the design clearly
demonstrates that the space is intended for use by
one or more tenants that occupy less than 5,000
square feet total, shall be exempt. Monitor this
development on an annual basis, tracking new
square footage as well as commute trips by SOV
and parking demand. Reevaluate this Downtown
development cap when the amount of new office
square footage entitled since January 1, 2015
reaches 67 percent of the remaining allowed
square footage, or 30,564 square feet. Concurrently
consider potential changes to the cap and/or to the
amount of additional development permitted by
the City’s zoning ordinance. [NEW PROGRAM] [L28]
Program L1.16.4 (limit both office and hotels Downtown) Limit new
office development in Downtown to 45,619 square
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
LAND USE DRAFT –NOVEMBER 28, 2016 L-37
feet square feet and limit new hotel development
to 50,000 square feet, using January 1, 2015 as the
baseline. Monitor this development on an annual
basis, tracking new square footage as well as
commute trips by SOV and parking demand.
Reevaluate this Downtown development cap when
the amount of new office and hotel square footage
entitled since January 1, 2015 reaches 67 percent of
the remaining allowed square footage, or 30,564
square feet. Concurrently consider potential
changes to the cap and/or to the amount of
additional development permitted by the City’s
zoning ordinance. [NEW PROGRAM] [L29]
DOWNTOWN CAP – IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAMS
Program L1.7.1 (adjust downtown development potential to reflect
the cap) Update the CD district zoning to convert
some non-retail commercial FAR to residential FAR
Downtown and consider revising the TDR program
to create bonus residential, rather than commercial
square footage.[NEW PROGRAM] [L30]
Program L1.16.5
Program L1.16.6 (character of downtown) Evaluate and adjust the
zoning definition of office uses allowed in
downtown to and consider ways to prioritize for
small business and startups. [NEW PROGRAM]
[L31]
DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS AND COMMUNITY INDICATORS
Option 1 – Articulate the Purpose and the Topics for the development
requirements in the Comp Plan but develop details through a later program.
Policy L-1.17 (development requirements) Hold new development to the highest
development standards in order to maintain Palo Alto’s livability and
achieve the highest quality development with the least impacts. These
development requirements are intended to promote sustainability, a
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
L-38 LAND USE DRAFT – NOVEMBER 28, 2016
high quality of life and ensure that the City consists of well-designed
and livable neighborhoods and centers. [NEW POLICY] [L32]
Program L1.17.1 Review and refine both new and existing
development requirements that address topics such
as energy, water and other natural resource
conservation, parking, open space and parkland,
landscaping, tree protection and neighborhood
compatibility to ensure they are effective at
achieving the highest quality development with the
least impacts. Publish the results of the review in a
clear and readable document. [NEW PROGRAM]
[L33]
Program L1.17.2 Create development requirements that protect
livability and the environment by addressing
additional topics such as reducing trips, preserving
and facilitating affordable housing and preservation
of the tree canopy. [NEW PROGRAM] [L34]
Policy L-1.18 (community indicators) The city will monitor key community
indicators on a regular basis to determine whether the policies of this
plan and the efforts of the Palo Alto residents and businesses are
effective at promoting livability. Collect the data on the community
indicators in a transparent manner, and publish the results in a clear,
user-friendly, easy-to-understand document. [NEW POLICY] [L35]
Program L1.18.1 Develop community indicators for topics such as
greenhouse gas emissions, transportation, jobs,
housing, schools, parks, the tree canopy, the natural
environment and diversity. Create a list of
community indicators and a schedule for
monitoring these indicators. [NEW PROGRAM] [L36]
Program L1.18.2 Based on monitoring the community indicators
data over time, periodically consider whether to
retain, revise downward or upward, or eliminate the
annual limits on growth, the growth caps in
individual areas, and/or the Citywide cumulative
growth caps in this Land Use and Community
Design Element. [NEW PROGRAM] [L37]
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
LAND USE DRAFT –NOVEMBER 28, 2016 L-39
Option 2 – Provide detail and specificity of the Development Requirements in
the Comp Plan.
Policy L-1.17 (development requirements) Hold new development to the highest
development standards in order to maintain Palo Alto’s livability and
achieve the highest quality development with the least impacts. These
development requirements are intended to promote sustainability, a
high quality of life and ensure that the City consists of well-designed
and livable neighborhoods and centers. [NEW POLICY] [L38]
Program L1.17.1 Review and refine both new and existing
development requirements that address topics such
as energy, water and other natural resource
conservation, parking, open space and parkland,
landscaping, tree protection and neighborhood
compatibility in Table L-1 to ensure they are
effective at achieving the highest quality
development with the least impacts. Publish the
results of the review in a clear and readable
document. [NEW PROGRAM] [L39]
Program L1.7.2Program L1.17.2 Create development
requirements that protect livability and the
environment by addressing additional topics such
as reducing trips, preserving and facilitating
affordable housing and preservation of the tree
canopy as shown on Table L-1. [NEW PROGRAM]
[L40]
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
L-40 LAND USE DRAFT – NOVEMBER 28, 2016
TABLE L-1 DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS
These requirements are new tools strongly focused on ensuring the highest quality development
with the least impacts. .
1. Reducing Trips: a specific percent of typical single-occupant vehicle (SOV) commuter trips.
2. Alleviating Traffic Congestion: minimize impact on intersection Level of Service (LOS)
3. Connectivity: enhancing connections to transportation infrastructure or services.
4. Reserving Affordable Housing: no net loss of affordable dwelling units, no displacement of
residents of Below Market Rate (BMR) units, and discouraging loss of smaller homes such as cottages. .
5. Facilitating Affordable Housing: Facilitate a mix of multi-family housing, including affordable
units, and housing for seniors and people with special needs.
6. Protecting the Natural Environment: Create a resilient landscape by preserving or increasing the tree canopy and natural understory, landscaped/open space areas planted with native plantings, creating or restoring a resilient landscape, and bird-friendly design.
7. Providing Parking: do not allow parking spillover onto residential neighborhood streets.
8. Preserving Affordable Office Space: Encourage the provision of new small office space and the preservation of existing low-cost office space.
EXISTING DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
The City already regulates many aspects of development. The City will review these existing regulations to ensure they are consistent with current targets and effective in achieving the
highest quality development with the least impacts.
Green Building: Conserving energy, water, and resources through meeting specific requirements in the City’s mandatory green building ordinance, as periodically amended. It covers topics such as:
• Energy Efficiency and Conservation
• Materials and Waste
• Light Pollution Reduction
• Emissions • Electric Vehicle Charging
• Water Efficiency, Conservation, and Reuse
• Permeable Surface Area For Groundwater Recharge
• Native, Drought-Tolerant Planting • Indoor Air Quality
Parking: Meeting need without providing excess:
• Bike Parking
• Vehicle Parking
Parkland: Providing common open space and contributing to Citywide park need:
• Provision of parkland or payment of fees
• Private open space
Landscaping and Amenities: Making Palo Alto more beautiful:
• Tree protection and retention
• Public Art
Neighborhood compatibility and building design: Avoiding negative impacts and improving the surroundings: • Glare
• Noise
• Shade
• Utility Undergrounding • High-quality architecture
• Support for historic resources
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
LAND USE DRAFT –NOVEMBER 28, 2016 L-41
TABLE L-2 COMMUNITY INDICATORS (SEPTEMBER 6TH VERSION)
Measure Metric
Recommended
Monitoring
Frequency
Greenhouse Gas
Emissions
80% below 1990 emissions by 2030
(S/CAP goal) At least every 2 years
Vehicle Miles Traveled
(VMT) per Capita 5% decrease per year At least every 2 years
Percent of Commute Trips
to Employment Centers by
Single Occupant Vehicle
(SOV)
50% trips by SOV, based on employee
survey responses Annually
Number of Commute Trips
to Employment Centers
40% below ITE standards for
Downtown and 30% below ITE
standards for SRP.
Annually
Corridor Travel Times
Typical PM peak hour travel time along
2 major north-south corridors and 2
major east-west corridors
At least every 2 years
Commercial District
Parking Overflow into
Neighborhoods
Non-resident parking on sampled
residential neighborhood streets Annually
Air Pollutant Levels
Maximum 24-hour concentrations of
criteria pollutants identified by the Bay
Area Air Quality Management District,
as reported at the monitoring stations
closest to Palo Alto
Annually
Groundwater
Contamination
Acres of City underlain by shallow
groundwater contamination Every 4 years
Jobs/Housing Balance
(Expressed as a Ratio of
Jobs to Employed
Residents)
Ratio of jobs to employed residents Every 4 years
Housing Cost Burden
Percentage of owners and renters
paying more than 50% of household
income for housing
Every 4 years
Affordability of Housing
Stock
Number of housing units affordable to
moderate-income, low-income, and
very-low-income households
Every 4 years
Economic Diversity
Percentage of households at various
household income levels [see Fig. 2-3
in adopted 2015 HE]
Every 4 years
Below Market Rate (BMR)
Units Number of units Every 4 years
Progress toward Housing
Element goals
Annual Report to State Housing and
Community Development Department Annually
Existing Resident
Displacement Number of existing units demolished Every 4 years
Comment [PW1]: M Note: has been slightly re-
ordered per CAC direction to group like topics.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
L-42 LAND USE DRAFT – NOVEMBER 28, 2016
TABLE L-2 COMMUNITY INDICATORS (SEPTEMBER 6TH VERSION)
Measure Metric
Recommended
Monitoring
Frequency
Unoccupied Homes Number of homes vacant/unoccupied
for longer than 3 months per year Annually
Age Diversity Percentage of population in various age
cohorts Every 4 years
PAUSD Class Size Class size Annually
PAUSD Satisfaction with
Schools
Satisfaction ratings as reported by
Strategic Plan Survey Annually
Park Acreage per Capita Ratio of district and neighborhood
parks per 1,000 population Every 4 years
Urban Tree Canopy Canopy cover – percent of city covered
by trees Every 4 years
Biodiversity Species counted in spring and fall bird
counts Biannually
Infrastructure or Acres
Affected by Sea Level Rise
Number of key facilities, major
infrastructure, and/or acres of land
within the City limits directly affected by
sea level rise
Every 4 years
Wastewater Reuse Percent of wastewater recycled Every 4 years
Impermeable Surfaces and
Stormwater Infiltration in
Urbanized Area
(Need to determine how this can be
measured) Every 4 years
Policy L-1.18 (community indicators) The city will monitor key community
indicators on a regular basis to determine whether the policies of this
plan and the efforts of the Palo Alto residents and businesses are
effective at promoting livability by using community indicators.
Suggested indicators and monitoring frequency are listed in Table L-2
related to greenhouse gas emissions, vehicle miles traveled, commute
trips by single occupant vehicle, jobs/housing balance, and
community diversity. Collect the data on the community indicators in
a transparent manner, and publish the results in a clear, user-friendly,
easy-to-understand document. [NEW POLICY] [L41]
Program L1.18.1 Develop community indicators for topics such as
greenhouse gas emissions, transportation, jobs,
housing, schools, parks, the tree canopy, the natural
environment and diversity as shown in Table L-2.
Comme
Note: has been
slightly
re-
ordered
per CAC direction
to group
like
topics.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
LAND USE DRAFT –NOVEMBER 28, 2016 L-43
Create a list of community indicators and a
schedule for monitoring these indicators. [NEW
PROGRAM] [L42]
Program L1.7.3Program L1.18.2 Based on monitoring the
community indicators data over time, periodically
consider whether to retain, revise downward or
upward, or eliminate the annual limits on growth,
the growth caps in individual areas, and/or the
Citywide cumulative growth caps in this Land Use
and Community Design Element. [NEW PROGRAM]
[L43]
Option 3: Use community indicators along with a cumulative cap, annual limit,
and downtown cap, but do not use development requirements.
Maintain a limit of 3,257,900 square feet of new non-residential
development for the nine planning areas evaluated in the 1989 Citywide
Land Use and Transportation Study, with the understanding that the City
Council may make modifications for specific properties that allow modest
additional growth. Such additional growth will count towards the 3,257,900
maximum. [Previous Policy L-8]
Establish a system to monitor the rate of non-residential development and
traffic conditions related to both residential and non-residential
development at key intersections including those identified in the 1989
Citywide Study and additional intersections identified in the
Comprehensive Plan EIR. If the rate of growth reaches the point where the
citywide development maximum might be reached, the City will reevaluate
development policies and regulations. [Previous Program L-7]
Limit new non-residential development in the Downtown area to 350,000
square feet, or 10 percent above the amount of development existing or
approved as of May 1986. Reevaluate this limit when non-residential
development approvals reach 235,000 square feet of floor area. [Previous
Program L-8]
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
L-44 LAND USE DRAFT – NOVEMBER 28, 2016
Continue to monitor development, including the effectiveness of the
ground floor retail requirement, in the University Avenue/Downtown area.
Keep the Planning Commission and City Council advised of the findings on
an annual basis. [Previous Program L-9]
GOAL L-2 An enhanced sense of “community” with development
designed to foster public life, and meet citywide needs, and
embrace the principles of sustainability.
Policy L-2.1 Maintain a citywide structure of Residential Neighborhoods, Centers,
and Employment Districts. Integrate these areas with the City’s and the
region’s transit and street system. [Previous Policy L-10] [L44]
Policy L-2.2 Promote increased compatibility, interdependence, and
supportEnhance connections between commercial and mixed use
centers and the surrounding residential neighborhoods by promoting
walkable and bikable connections and a diverse range of retail and
services that caters to the daily needs of residents. [Previous Policy L-
11] [L45]
Program L2.2.1 Consider sitingExplore whether there are
appropriate locations to allow small-scale
neighborhood-serving retail facilities such as coffee
shops and corner stores in existing or new
residential areas. [(Previous Policy L-16) (Converted
to Program)] [L46]
Policy L-2.3 As a key component of a diverse, inclusive community, allow and
encourage a mix of housing types and sizes, designed for greater
affordability, particularly smaller units and senior housing. [NEW
POLICY] [L47]
Policy L-2.3Policy L-2.4 Facilitate reuse of existing buildings. [Previous Program L 20]
[NEW POLICY] [L48]
Policy L-2.5 Encourage In conjunction with new development and redevelopment
to incorporate greenery and natural features through the use of
features such as green rooftops, pocket proposals, pursue creation of
parks, plazas, or other public gathering places that meet
neighborhood needand rain gardens.[(NEW POLICY) (Combined with
Previous Program C26)] [L49]
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
LAND USE DRAFT –NOVEMBER 28, 2016 L-45
RESIDENTIAL DISTINCT NEIGHBORHOODS
GOAL L-3 Safe, attractive residential neighborhoods, each with its
own distinct character and within walking distance of
shopping, services, schools, and/or other public gathering
places.
NEIGHBORHOOD COMPATIBILITY
Policy L-3.1 Preserve the character of residential neighborhoods by
encouragingEnsure that new or remodeled structures to beare
compatible with the neighborhood and adjacent structures. [(Previous
Policy L-12) (Comp Plan Draft EIR Mitigation Measure AES-1)] [L50]
Policy L-3.2 Establish pedestrian-oriented design guidelines for residences that
encourage features that enliven the street. [(Previous Program L-
11)(Complete)]
Policy L-3.3Policy L-3.1 Where compatible with neighborhood character, use
Zoning and the Home Improvement Exception process to create
incentives or eliminate obstacles to remodel houses with features
that add street life and vitality. [Previous Program L-12]
Policy L-3.2 Preserve residential uses from conversion to office or short-term
rentals. [NEW POLICY] [L51]
Program L3.2.1 Evaluate and implement strategies to prevent
conversion of residential and neighborhood-serving
retail space to office or short-term vacation rentals.
[NEW PROGRAM] [L52]
Policy L-3.3 Support efforts to retain and encourage housing units that are more
affordable, such as cottages, other small homes, and rental housing
units in existing neighborhoods. [NEW POLICY] [L53]
Program L3.3.1 Review development standards to discourage the
loss of housing units, and the replacement of rental
housing units with ownership housing units. [NEW
PROGRAM] [L54]
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
L-46 LAND USE DRAFT – NOVEMBER 28, 2016
Policy L-3.4 Support the creation of affordable housing units for middle to lower
income level earners, such as City and school district employees, as
feasible. [NEW POLICY] [L55]
Program L3.4.1 Collaborate with PAUSD in exploring opportunities
to build housing that is affordable to school district
employees. [NEW PROGRAM] [L56]
Policy L-3.5 When considering infill redevelopment, work to minimize
displacement of existing residents. [NEW POLICY] [L57]
Program L3.5.1 Conduct a study to evaluate various possible tools
for preventing displacement of existing residents.
[NEW PROGRAM] [L58]
Program L3.5.2 Develop and implement a system to inventory the
characteristics of existing housing units and track
changes in those characteristics on a regular basis.
Make the information publicly available. [NEW
PROGRAM] [L59]
MIX OF HOUSING TYPES
Policy L-3.4 Evaluate alternative types of housing that increase density andIn
appropriate locations, encourage a mix of smaller housing types such
as studios, co-housing, cottage, clustered housing and secondary
dwelling units, to provide a more diverse range of housing
opportunities and preserve existing housing units of these types.
[(Previous Policy L-13) (Note: Program H3.3.5 of the adopted Housing
Element is to explore modifications to development standards to
further encourage second unit development.)] [L60]Create and apply
zoning standards for Village Residential housing prototypes. Develop
design guidelines for duplexes, townhouses, courtyard housing,
second units, and small lot single family homes that ensure that such
housing is compatible with single family neighborhoods and other
areas where it may be permitted. [Previous Program L-13]
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
LAND USE DRAFT –NOVEMBER 28, 2016 L-47
Create and apply zoning standards for Transit-Oriented Residential
housing prototypes, including consideration of minimum density
standards. Develop design guidelines that ensure that such housing is
compatible with the University Avenue/Downtown and California
Avenue centers where it may be permitted. [(Previous Program L-14)
(Replaced by new Programs L67 and L68 calling for Coordinated Area
Plans)]
Policy L-3.6 Recognize the contribution of cottage cluster housing to the character
of Palo Alto and retain and encourage this type of development. [NEW
POLICY] [L61]
RESIDENTIAL DESIGN
Policy L-3.5Policy L-3.7 Design and arrangeEnsure that new multifamily buildings,
including entries and outdoor spaces are designed and arranged, so
that each unit development has a clear relationship to a public street.
[Previous Policy L-14] [L62]
Policy L-3.8 Avoid negative impacts of basement construction for single-family
homes on adjacent properties public resources and the natural
environment. [NEW POLICY] [L63]
Program L3.8.1 Develop a program to assess and manage both the
positive and negative impacts of basement
construction in single family homes on the
community and the environment, including:
Land use issues. Evaluate the City’s policy of
excluding basements from the gross floor area
and maximum floor area ratio limits in the
zoning ordinance. Consider zoning revisions,
including greater setbacks, to limit basement
size and increase basement setbacks from
adjacent properties.
Impacts to the natural environment, such as
potential impacts to the tree canopy,
groundwater supply or quality, and soil
compaction.
Safety issues such as increased surface
flooding, increased groundwater intrusion with
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
L-48 LAND USE DRAFT – NOVEMBER 28, 2016
sea level rise, emergency access and egress, or
sewage backflows. [NEW PROGRAM] [L64]
COMMERCIAL CENTERS
GOAL L-4 Inviting pedestrian scale centers that offer a variety of retail
and commercial services and provide focal points and
community gathering places for the city’s residential
neighborhoods and employment districts.
COMMERCIAL CENTERS AND MIXED USE AREAS
Policy L-4.1 Encourage the upgrading and revitalization of selected Centers in a
manner that is compatible with the character of surrounding
neighborhoods, without loss of retail and existing small, local
businesses. [Previous Policy L-18] [L65]
Policy L-4.2Policy L-4.1 Establish a planning process for Centers that identifies the
desired character of the area, its role within the City, the locations of
public gathering spaces, appropriate land uses and building forms,
and important street and pedestrian connections to surrounding
Residential Neighborhoods. [Previous Program L-15]
Program L4.2.1 Evaluate the effectiveness of formula retail limits
adopted for California Avenue and consider
whether these limits should be applied in other
Centers. Develop incentives for local small
businesses where warranted. [NEW PROGRAM]
[L66]
Encourage a mix of land uses in all Centers, including housing and an appropriate mix of
small-scale local businesses. [Previous Policy L-19]
Policy L-4.2 Use coordinated area plans to guide development in areas of Palo Alto
where significant change is foreseeable. Address both land use and
transportation, define the desired character and urban design traits of
the areas, identify opportunities for public open space, parks and
recreational opportunities, and address connectivity to and
compatibility with adjacent residential areas; include broad community
involvement in the planning process. [NEW POLICY] [L67]
Program L4.2.2Program L4.2.1 Prepare a coordinated area
plan for the South El Camino corridor from Curtner
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
LAND USE DRAFT –NOVEMBER 28, 2016 L-49
Avenue to West Charleston Road, as shown in the
diagram below. The plan should articulate a vision
for the corridor as a well-designed complete street
with an enhanced pedestrian environment
including wider sidewalks, increased building
setbacks, public open spaces, safe pedestrian
crossings at key intersections, trees and streetscape
improvements. Mixed use residential and retail
development on shallow parcels should be
encouraged to support a more walkable and
bikable environment along the corridor, with
appropriate transitions to the surrounding single-
family neighborhoods. The plan should also foster
improved connections to surrounding destinations.
[NEW PROGRAM] [L68]
Program L4.2.3 Prepare a coordinated area plan for the Fry's site
and surrounding California Avenue area. The plan
should describe a vision for the future of the Fry's
site as a walkable neighborhood with multi‐family
housing, ground floor retail, a public park, creek
improvements, and an interconnected street grid.
[NEW PROGRAM] [L69]
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
L-50 LAND USE DRAFT – NOVEMBER 28, 2016
Policy L-4.3 Encourage street frontages that contribute to retail vitality in all
Centers. Reinforce street corners with buildings that come up to the
sidewalkin a way that enhances the pedestrian realm or that form
corner plazas. Include trees and landscaping. [Previous Policy L-20]
[L70]
Policy L-4.3Policy L-4.4 Provide Ensure all Regional Centers and Multi-Neighborhood
Centers provide with centrally located gathering spaces that create a
sense of identity and encourage economic revitalization. Encourage
public amenities such as benches, street trees, kiosks, restrooms and
public art. [Previous Policy L-21] [L71]
Program L4.3.1Program L4.4.1 Study the feasibility of using
public and private funds to provide and maintain
landscaping and public spaces such as parks,
plazas, and sidewalks and public art within
commercial areas. [Previous Program L-16] [L72]
Program L4.3.2Program L4.4.2 Through public/private
cooperation, provide obviouswell-signed, clean, and
accessible restrooms available for use during
normal business hours. [Previous Program L-17]
[L73]
Program L4.3.3Program L4.4.3 Collaborate with merchants to
eEnhance the appearance of streets and sidewalks
within all Centers. Encourage the formation of
business improvement districts and undertake a
proactive program of through an aggressive
maintenance, repair, landscaping and
enhancement. and cleaning program; street
improvements; and the use of a variety of paving
materials and landscaping. [Previous Policy L-22]
[L74]
Program L4.3.4Program L4.4.4 Identify priority street
improvements that could make a substantial
contribution to the character of Centers, including
such as widening sidewalks, narrowing travel lanes,
creating medians, restriping to allow diagonal
parking, and planting street trees. [Previous
Program L-18] [L75]
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
LAND USE DRAFT –NOVEMBER 28, 2016 L-51
REGIONAL CENTERS
University Avenue/Downtown
Policy L-4.5 Maintain and enhance the University Avenue/Downtown area as the
centrala major business district commercial center of the City, with a
mix of commercial, civic, cultural, recreational and residential uses.
Promote quality design that recognizes the regional and historical
importance of the area and reinforces its pedestrian character. [
(Previous Policy L-23) (Comp Plan Draft EIR Mitigation Measure AES-
1)] [L76]
Support implementation of the Downtown Urban Design Guide. [
(Previous Program L-19)
Policy L-4.6 Ensure that University Avenue/Downtown is pedestrian-friendly and
supports bicycle use. Use public art, trees, bicycle racks and other
amenities to create an environment that is inviting to pedestrians and
bicyclists. [Previous Policy L-24] [L77]
Program L4.3.5 Improve the University Avenue/Downtown area by
adding landscaping and bicycle parking and
encouraging large development projects to benefit
the public by incorporating public art. [Previous
Program L-21]
Policy L-4.4 Enhance the character of the South of Forest Area (SOFA) as a mixed
use area. [Previous Policy L-25]
Program L4.4.1 Prepare a Coordinated Area Plan for the SOFA and
the Palo Alto Medical Foundation (PAMF) site.
[(Previous Program L-22)(Completed)]
Program L4.6.1 Pursue redevelopment of pedestrian, bicycle, and
transit connections to and from between the
University Avenue Multi-modal Transit Station area,
to establish a link between University
Avenue/Downtown, and the Stanford Shopping
Center. [Previous Policy L-27] [L78]
Program L4.6.2 Prepare a Coordinated Area Plan for Downtown,
encompassing the University Avenue Multi-modal
Transit Station Area. [Previous Program L-25][L79]
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
L-52 LAND USE DRAFT – NOVEMBER 28, 2016
Establish the following unranked community design priorities for the
University Avenue Multi-modal Transit Station Area:
Improving pedestrian, bicycle, transit, and auto connections to create
an urban link between University Avenue/Downtown and Stanford
Shopping Center.
Creating a major civic space at the Caltrain Station that links University
Avenue/Downtown and Palm Drive.
Infilling underutilized parcels with a mix of uses such as shopping,
housing, office, hotel, and medical facilities.
Improving public park space.
Protecting views of the foothills by guiding building heights and
massing. [Previous Program L-26]
Stanford Shopping Center
Policy L-4.7 Maintain Stanford Shopping Center as one of the Bay Area’s premiere
regional shopping centers. Promote Encourage bicycle and pedestrian
use and encourage any new development at the Center to occur
through infill, potentially including housing and mixed use
development on existing surface parking lots, while continuing to
supply adequate parking. [Previous Policy L-26] [L80]
Program L4.7.1 While preserving adequate parking to meet
demand, iIdentify strategies to reuse surface
parking lots and improve pedestrian and transit
connections at Stanford Shopping Center.
[(Previous Program L-23)(Merged with Previous
Policy L-27)] [L81] Maintain a Stanford Shopping
Center development cap of 80,000 square feet of
additional development beyond that existing on
June 14, 1996. [Previous Program L-24]
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
LAND USE DRAFT –NOVEMBER 28, 2016 L-53
MULTI-NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS
California Avenue
Policy L-4.8 Maintain the existing scale, character, and function of the California
Avenue business district as a shopping, service, and office center
intermediate in function and scale between Downtown and the
smaller neighborhood business areas. [Previous Policy L-28] [L82]
Program L4.8.1 Create a Coordinated Area Plan for Develop the
Cal-Venturaifornia Avenue area to guide its
development as a well-designed mixed use district
with diverse land uses , two- to three-story
buildings, and a network of pedestrian-oriented
streets providing links to California Avenue.
[(Previous Policy L-31) (Converted to Program)]
[L83]
Program L4.8.2 Create regulations for the California Avenue area
that encourage the retention of smaller buildings to
provide spaces for existing retail, particularly local,
small businesses, including to allow for their re-
placement or rehabilitation of smaller buildings
while preventing buildings that are out of scale with
existing buildings. [Previous Program L-27] [L84]
Policy L-4.5 Work with merchants, property owners, and City representatives to
create an urban design guide for the California Avenue business
district. [Previous Program L-28]
Encourage residential and mixed use residential development in the
California Avenue area. [Previous Policy L-29]
Revise the zoning of the California Avenue business district to reduce
the non- residential development potential to levels comparable to
other commercial areas in the City while retaining substantial
residential development potential. [Previous Program L-29]
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
L-54 LAND USE DRAFT – NOVEMBER 28, 2016
Policy L-4.6 Improve the transition between the California-Cambridge area and the
single family residential neighborhood of Evergreen Park. Avoid abrupt
changes in scale and density between the two areas. [Previous Policy
L-30] [L85] Prepare a Coordinated Area Plan for the Cal-Ventura area.
Use the landuse diagram from the Community Design Workshop as
the starting point for preparing this Plan. [Previous Program L-30]
Policy L-4.7 Establish the following unranked priorities for redevelopment within
the Cal-Ventura area:
Policy L-4.8 Connect the Cal-Ventura area with the Multi-modal Transit Station and
California Avenue. Provide new streets and pedestrian connections
that complete the street grid and create a walkable neighborhood.
Policy L-4.9 Fry’s Electronics site (300 Portage): Continued retail activity is
anticipated for this site until 2019. A program should be developed for
the future use of the site for mixed density multi- family housing and a
park or other open space.
Policy L-4.10 Hewlett-Packard: Uses that are compatible with the surrounding area
and a site plan that facilitates pedestrian use of Park Boulevard.
Policy L-4.11 North of Sheridan Avenue: Development of one or more of the City-
owned parking lots with primarily residential uses, provided that public
parking spaces are replaced.
Policy L-4.12Policy L-4.9 Park Boulevard: Streetscape improvements. [Previous Program
L-31]
South El Camino Real
Policy L-4.13 Establish the South El Camino Real area as a well-designed, compact,
vital, Multi-neighborhood Center with diverse uses, a mix of one-, two-
, and three-story buildings, and a network of pedestrian-oriented
streets and ways. [Previous Policy L-35]
Policy L-4.14 Prepare a Coordinated Area Plan for the South El Camino Real area.
Use the land use map from the Community Design Workshop as a
starting point for preparing this Plan. [Previous Program L-32]
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
LAND USE DRAFT –NOVEMBER 28, 2016 L-55
Policy L-4.10 Study ways to make Enhance the pedestrian environment along South
El Camino Real more pedestrian-friendly, including redesigning the
street to provide wider sidewalks, increased building setbacks, safe
pedestrian crossings at key intersections, street trees, and streetscape
improvements, consistent with the recommendations in the Grand
Boulevard Design Guidelines. [(Previous Program L-33) (Converted to
Policy) (Consistent with Comp Plan Draft EIR Mitigation Measure
AES-1)] [L86]
Program L4.10.1 Provide better east-west connections across El
Camino Real to bring the Ventura and Barron Park
neighborhoods together and to improve linkages to
local schools and parks. [Previous Program L-34]
[L87]
Allow a full range of office and retail uses on shallow parcels along
South El Camino Real, subject to adequate buffering from adjacent
residential uses. [Previous Policy L-36]
Consider Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) as a tool to
encourage re-development and/or community-serving amenities
along South El Camino Real. [Previous Program L-35]
Town and Country Village
Policy L-4.11 Recognize and preserve Maintain Town and Country Village as an
attractive community-serving retail center serving Palo Altans and
residents of the wider region. Future development at this site should
preserve its existing amenities, pedestrian scale, and architectural
character while also improving safe access for bicyclists and
pedestrians and increasing the amount of bicycle parking. [Previous
Policy L-32] [L88]
Policy L-4.12 In Town and Country Village, encourage housing development
consistent with a vibrant business retail environment and urban
greening. [Previous Policy L-33] [L89]
Policy L-4.13 In Town and Country Village, eEncourage improvement of
pedestrian, bicycle, and auto circulation and landscaping
improvements, including maintenance of existing oak trees and
planting additional oak trees. [Previous Policy L-34] [L90]
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
L-56 LAND USE DRAFT – NOVEMBER 28, 2016
NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS
Policy L-4.14 Maintain the scale, Improve the and local-serving focus, and provide
safe pedestrian, bicycle, and multimodal access to all three Palo Alto’s
four Neighborhood Centers – Charleston Shopping Center, Edgewood
Plaza, and Midtown Shopping Center. Support their continued
improvement and vitality. [Previous Policy L-37] [L91]
Evaluate current zoning to determine if it supports the types of uses
and scale of buildings considered appropriate in Neighborhood
Centers. [Previous Program L-36]
Policy L-4.15 Encourage property owners within Neighborhood Centers to prepare
master plans, with the participation of local businesses, property
owners, and nearby residents. [Previous Program L-37]
Policy L-4.15 Encourage maximum use of Neighborhood Centers by ensuring that
the publicly maintained areas are clean, well-lit, and attractively
landscaped. [Previous Policy L-38] [L92]
Facilitate opportunities to improve pedestrian-oriented commercial
activity within Neighborhood Centers. [Previous Policy L-39]
Revise land use and zoning designations as needed to encourage
medium- density housing (20 to 25 units per acre) within or near
Neighborhood Centers served by public transportation to support a
more vital mix of commercial activities. [Previous Program L-38]
Policy L-4.16 Revitalize Maintain Midtown Shopping Center as an attractive,
compact Neighborhood Center with diverse local-serving uses, a mix
of one- and two-story buildings, adequate parking, and a network of
pedestrian-oriented streets, ways and gathering places. Encourage
retention of Midtown’s grocery stores and encourage a variety of
neighborhood retail shops and services. [Previous Policy L-40] [L93]
Prepare a plan for Midtown with the participation of property owners,
local businesses, and nearby residents. Consider the Midtown
Economic Study and the land use concepts identified during the 1994
Community Design Workshop in developing the plan. The plan
should have a special emphasis on public improvements, including
parking, street furniture and signage. [Previous Program L-39]
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
LAND USE DRAFT –NOVEMBER 28, 2016 L-57
Policy L-4.17Policy L-4.16 Make improvements to Middlefield Road in Midtown that
slow traffic, encourage commercial vitality, make the street more
pedestrian-friendly, and unify the northeast and southwest sides of the
commercial area, with consideration given to traffic impacts on the
residential neighborhood. (Previous Program L-40)]
Support bicycle and pedestrian trail improvements along a restored
Matadero Creek within Hoover Park. [Previous Program L-41]
Maintain existing residential uses within the Midtown area and
encourage additional residential development. [Previous Policy L-41]
Retain the existing housing along Colorado Avenue and consider
increasing the density to allow townhouses, co-housing, and/or
housing for the disabled. [(Previous Program L-42) (Complete)]
EMPLOYMENT DISTRICTS
GOAL L-5 High quality employment districts, each with their own
distinctive character and each contributing to the character
of the city as a whole.
Policy L-5.1 Encourage Employment Districts to develop in a way that encourages
facilitates transit, pedestrian and bicycle travel. and Pprovide mixed
uses to reduces the number of auto trips for daily errands. [Previous
Policy L-42] [L94]
Policy L-5.2 Modify existing zoning regulations and create incentives for employers
to pro- vide employee services in their existing buildings—for example,
office support services, restaurants, convenience stores, public
gathering places, and child care facilities—to reduce the need for
employees to drive to these services. [Previous Program L-43]
Policy L-5.2 Provide landscaping, trees, sidewalks, pedestrian paths, and
connections to the citywide bikeway system within Employment
Districts. Pursue opportunities to build include sidewalks, paths, low
water use landscaping, reclaimed water, and trees and remove grass
turf in renovation and expansion projects. [Previous Policy L-43] [L95]
Policy L-5.3 Design the paths and sidewalks to be attractive and comfortable and
consistent with the character of the area where they are located.
[(Previous Program L-44) (Converted to Policy)] [L96]
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
L-58 LAND USE DRAFT – NOVEMBER 28, 2016
Policy L-5.4 Develop the Stanford Research Park as a Foster compact employment
centers served by a variety of transportation modes. [Previous Policy
L-44] [L97]
Program L5.4.1 Create and apply zoning standards and design
guidelines for commercial hotels, and conference
centers, and possible residential or mixed-use
projects in Stanford Research Park, particularly near
El Camino Real. [Previous Program L-45] [L98]
Program L5.3.1Program L5.4.2 Evaluate the optimum number
of future hotel rooms for Palo Alto and consider
reductions in the allowable floor area ratio as
appropriate. [NEW PROGRAM] [L99]
Policy L-5.4 Develop Stanford Medical Center in a manner that recognizes the
citywide goal of compact, pedestrian-oriented development as well as
the functional needs of the Medical Center. [Previous Policy L-45]
Policy L-5.5 Work with Stanford to prepare an area plan for the Stanford Medical
Center. [(Previous Program L-46)(Complete)]
Policy L-5.6Policy L-5.5 Maintain the East Bayshore and San Antonio Road/Bayshore
Corridor areas as diverse business and light industrial districts,
consistent with the approved East Meadow Circle Concept Plan
(Appendix Y of this Comprehensive Plan). [Previous Policy L-46] [L100]
Consider the East Meadow Circle Area as a potential site for higher
density housing that provides a transition between existing housing
and nearby industrial development. [Previous Policy L-47]
Undertake a Community Design Workshop for the
East Meadow Circle Area. [Previous Program L-47]
Program L5.6.1 Implement the 2012 East Meadow Circle Concept
Plan (Appendix Y of this Comprehensive Plan)
when approving new development or other
improvements within the Plan area. [NEW
PROGRAM] [L101]
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
LAND USE DRAFT –NOVEMBER 28, 2016 L-59
GOAL L-6 Well-designed buildings that create coherent development
patterns and enhance city streets and public spaces.
DESIGN OF BUILDINGS AND PUBLIC SPACE
Policy L-6.1 Promote high quality, creative design and site planning that is
compatible with surrounding development and public spaces. [(Comp
Plan Draft EIR Mitigation Measure AES-1) (Previous Policy L-48)]
[L102]
Program L6.1.1 Promote awards programs and other forms of
public recognition for projects of architectural merit
that contribute positively to the community.
[Previous Program L-53] [L103]
Policy L-6.2 Use the Zoning Ordinance, design review process, design
guidelines, and Coordinated Area Plans to ensure high quality
residential and commercial design and architectural compatibility.
[Previous Program L-48] [L104]
Policy L-6.3 Require bird-friendly design. [NEW POLICY] [L105]
Program L6.2.1Program L6.3.1 Develop guidelines for bird-
friendly building design that minimizes hazards for
birds and reduces the potential for collisions. [NEW
PROGRAM] [L106]
Policy L-6.3Policy L-6.4 In areas of the City having a historic or consistent design
character, encourage the design of new development to maintain and
support the existing character. [Note: This is labeled as a program in
the existing Comp Plan but should more accurately be a policy since
it is an ongoing statement to guide design.] [(Previous Program L-49)
(Converted to Policy) (Comp Plan Draft EIR as Mitigation Measure
AES-1.)] [L107]
Policy L-6.4Policy L-6.5 Guide development to respect views of the foothills and East
Bay hills from public streets in the developed portions of the
City.[Previous Policy L-3] [L108]
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
L-60 LAND USE DRAFT – NOVEMBER 28, 2016
Policy L-6.5Policy L-6.6 Design buildings to revitalize complement streets and public
spaces; and to promote personal safety, public health and well-being;
and to enhance a sense of community and personal safety. Provide an
ordered variety of entries, porches, windows, bays and balconies along
public ways where it is consistent with neighborhood character; avoid
blank or solid walls at street level; and include human-scale details
and massing. [Previous Policy L-49] [L109]
Program L6.5.1Program L6.6.1 Ensure that the zoning
ordinance encourages an ordered variety of entries,
porches, windows, bays and balconies along public
ways where it is consistent with neighborhood
character; avoid blank or solid walls at street level;
and include human-scale details and massing.
[NEW PROGRAM] [L110]
Undertake a comprehensive review of residential and commercial
zoning requirements to identify additional architectural standards that
should be incorporated to implement Policy L-49. [(Previous Program
L-50) (Complete)]
Use illustrations and form code methods for simplifying the Zoning
Ordinance and to promote well-designed buildings. [(Previous
Program L-51) (Complete)]
Program L6.5.2 Maintain and periodically review height and density
limits to discourage single uses that are
inappropriate in size and scale to the surrounding
uses. [Previous Program L-3]
Policy L-6.7 (BUILDING HEIGHTS - OPTION 1-7 “approval” votes) Maintain the
current 50-foot height limit on building heights in Palo Alto. [NEW
POLICY] [L111]
Policy L-6.8 (BUILDING HEIGHTS - OPTION 2-4 “approval” votes) Maintain a 50-
foot height limit on building heights in Palo Alto, but allow heights up
to a maximum of 55 feet for residential and retail mixed use projects
to allow flexibility in floor to ceiling heights and enhance the livability
in multi-family residential units. [NEW POLICY] [L112]
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
LAND USE DRAFT –NOVEMBER 28, 2016 L-61
Policy L-6.9 (BUILDING HEIGHTS - OPTION 3-7 “approval” votes) Building height
limits up to a maximum of 65 feet may be considered for areas well-
served by transit, services and retail as a way to facilitate a mix of
multifamily housing, including affordable units, units targeted to
seniors and other special needs populations, and micro-units designed
to accommodate younger members of the workforce. [NEW POLICY]
[L113]
Program L6.9.1 Revise the Zoning ordinance to establish criteria
and conditions that must be met in order to allow
building heights up to 65 feet. Criteria shall address
affordability of the residential units; compatibility
with surrounding land uses; sensitivity to context;
proximity to transit, services and retail; and
mitigation or avoidance of adverse impacts on
traffic and parking conditions. [NEW PROGRAM]
[L114]
Policy L-6.10 (BUILDING HEIGHTS - OPTION 4-10 “approval” votes) Building height
limits over 50 feet may be considered for areas well-served by transit,
services and retail as a way to facilitate a mix of multi-family housing,
including affordable units, units targeted to seniors and other special
needs populations, and micro-units designed to accommodate
younger members of the workforce. [NEW POLICY] [L115]
Program L6.10.1 Revise the Zoning Ordinance to establish criteria
and conditions that must be met in order to allow
building heights higher than 50 feet. Criteria shall
address affordability of the residential units;
compatibility with surrounding land uses; sensitivity
to context; proximity to transit, services and retail;
and mitigation or avoidance of adverse impacts on
traffic and parking conditions. [NEW PROGRAM]
[L116]
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
L-62 LAND USE DRAFT – NOVEMBER 28, 2016
Policy L-6.6Policy L-6.11 Promote gradual transitions in the scale of development
where residential districts abut more intense uses in order to minimize
negative impacts where land use transitions occur. Where possible,
aAvoid abrupt changes in scale and density between residential and
non-residential areas and between residential areas of different
densities. To promote compatibility and gradual transitions between
land uses, place zoning district boundaries at mid-block locations
rather than along streets wherever possible. [Previous Policy L-6]
[L117]
Program L6.6.1 Implement architectural standards to assure they
effectively address land use transitions. [NEW
PROGRAM] [L118]
Program L6.6.2 Review and change zoning regulations promote
gradual transitions in the scale of development
where residential districts abut more intense uses.
[Previous Program L-4]
Program L6.6.3 Establish new performance and architectural
standards that minimize negative impacts where
land use transitions occur. [Previous Program L-5]
Program L6.6.4Program L6.11.1 Revise the City’s
Neighborhood Commercial (CN) and Service
Commercial (CS) zoning requirements to better
address land use transitions. [(Previous Program L-
6) (Complete)]
Policy L-6.7 Support existing regulations that preserve exposure to natural light for
single-family residences. [NEW POLICY] [L119]
Policy L-6.8Policy L-6.12 Enhance desirable characteristics in Create mixed use areas.
Use the planning and zoning process to create opportunities for new
mixed use development that includesconsisting of housing and retail.
[Previous Policy L-9] [L120]
Program L6.8.1Program L6.12.1 Update the municipal code to
include zoning changes that allow a mix of retail
and residential uses but no office uses. The intent
of these changes would be to encourage a mix of
land uses that contributes to the vitality and
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
LAND USE DRAFT –NOVEMBER 28, 2016 L-63
walkability of commercial centers and transit
corridors. [NEW PROGRAM] [L121]
Program L6.8.2Program L6.12.2 Create and apply the following
four new Mixed Use zoning standards: A
“Live/Work” designation that permits individuals to
live on the same site where they work by allowing
housing and other uses such as office, retail, and
light industrial to co-exist in the same building
space; and “Retail/ Office, “Residential/Retail,” and
“Residential/Office” designations that permit a mix
of uses on the same site or nearby sites. Develop
Modify design standards for all mixed use projects
designations providing for to promote a
pedestrian-friendly relationship to the street,
including elements such as buildings with one to
three stories, screened rear parking or underground
parking, street-facing windows and entries, and
landscaping, and trees along the streetzero setback
along the street, except that front gardens may be
provided for ground floor residential uses. [Previous
Program L-10] [L122]
Program L6.12.3 Consider revising development standards in the
Community Commercial, Service Commercial, and
Downtown Commercial Districts (CC, CS, and CD)
and the Neighborhood Commercial District (CN)
along El Camino Real to incentivize the conversion
of non-retail commercial FAR to residential use.
[NEW PROGRAM] [L123]
Program L6.8.3Program L6.12.4 Update the zoning code to
preserve ground-floor retail and limit the
displacement of existing retail from neighborhood
centers. [NEW PROGRAM] [L124]
Program L6.8.4 Discourage the use of fences that obscure the view
of houses. [Previous Program L-52]
Policy L-6.9Policy L-6.13 Discourage the use of fences that obscure the view of the
front of houses from the street. [(Previous Program L-52)(Converted
to Policy)] [L125]
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
L-64 LAND USE DRAFT – NOVEMBER 28, 2016
Policy L-6.10Policy L-6.14 Encourage high quality signage that is attractive, energy-
efficient, appropriate for the location and balances visibility needs with
aesthetic needs. [Previous Policy L-50] [L126]
GOAL L-7 Conservation and preservation of Palo Alto’s
historic buildings, sites, and districts.
HISTORIC CHARACTERRESOURCES
Policy L-7.1 Encourage public and private upkeep and preservation of resources
that have historic merit, including residences listed in the City’s
Historic Resource Inventory, the California Register of Historical
Resources, or the National Register of Historic Places. [Previous Policy
L-51] [L127]
Program L7.1.1 Review and update the City’s Inventory of historic
resources including City-owned structures. Update
and maintain the City’s Historic Resource Inventory
to determine all historic resources that are eligible
for the California Register as well as important
examples of California history or prehistory. Historic
resources may consist of a single building or
structure or a district. [(Previous Program L-54)(
Draft EIR Mitigation Measure CULT-1b)] [L128]
Program L7.1.2 Reassess the Historic Preservation Ordinance to
ensure its effectiveness in the maintenance and
preservation of historic resources, particularly in the
University Avenue/Downtown area. [Previous
Program L-55] [L129]
Seek additional innovative ways to apply current codes and ordinances
to older buildings. Use the State Historical Building Code for
designated historic buildings. [Previous Program L-65]
Policy L-7.2 If a proposed development would affect a potential historic resource
that has not been evaluated for inclusion into the City’s Historic
Resources Inventory, consider whether it is eligible for inclusion in the
City’s Inventory prior to the issuance of a demolition or alterations
permit. [(NEW POLICY) (Comp Plan Draft EIR Mitigation Measure
CULT-1b)] [L130]
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
LAND USE DRAFT –NOVEMBER 28, 2016 L-65
Maintain and strengthen the design review procedure for exterior
remodeling or demolition of historic resources. Discourage demolition
of historic resources and severely restrict demolition of Landmark
resources. [Previous Program L-56]
Policy L-7.3 Actively seek state and federal funding for the preservation of
buildings of historical merit and consider public/private partnerships
for capital and program improvements. [Previous Policy L-53] [L131]
Support the goals and objectives of the Statewide Comprehensive
Historic Preservation Plan for California. [Previous Policy L-54]
Policy L-7.4 Relocation may be considered as a preservation strategy when
consistent with State and National Standards regarding the relocation
of historic resources. [Previous Policy L-55] [L132]
Policy L-7.5 To reinforce the scale and character of University Avenue/Downtown,
promote the preservation of significant historic buildings. [Previous
Policy L-56] [L133]
Policy L-7.6 Promote awards programs and other forms of public recognition for
exemplary Historic Preservation projects. [(Previous Program L-
62)(Converted to Policy)] [L134]
Policy L-7.7 Streamline, to the maximum extent feasible, any future processes for
design review of historic structures to eliminate unnecessary delay and
uncertainty for the applicant and to encourage historic preservation.
[(Previous Program L-63) (Converted to Policy)] [L135]
Follow the procedures established in the State Public Resources Code
for the protection of designated historic buildings damaged by
earthquake or other natural disaster. [Previous Policy L-59]
REHABILITATION AND REUSE
Policy L-7.8 Promote adaptive reuse of old buildings. [Previous Policy L-58] [L136]
Program L7.8.1 Revise existing zoning and permit regulations as
needed to minimize constraints to adaptive reuse,
particularly in retail areas. [Previous Program L-66]
Program L7.8.2Program L7.8.1 Develop incentives for the
retention and rehabilitation of buildings with
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
L-66 LAND USE DRAFT – NOVEMBER 28, 2016
historic merit in all zones and revise existing zoning
and permit regulations as needed to minimize
constraints to adaptive reuse, particularly in retail
areas [(Previous Policy L-57) (Converted to
Program)] [L137]
Program L7.8.3Program L7.8.2 Create incentives to
eEncourage salvage and reuse of discarded historic
building materials. [Previous Program L-57] [L138]
Program L7.8.4Program L7.8.3 For proposed exterior
alterations or additions to designated Historic
Landmarks, require design review findings that the
proposed changes are in compliance with the
Secretary of the Interior Standards for
Rehabilitation. [Previous Program L-58] [L139]
Policy L-7.9 Allow compatible nonconforming uses for the life of historic buildings.
[(Previous Program L-61) (Converted to Policy)] [L140]
Policy L-7.10 Ensure encourage the preservation of significant historic resources
owned by the City of Palo Alto. Allow such resources to be altered
to meet contemporary needs consistent with the Secretary of the
Interior Standards for Rehabilitationonly if, provided that the
preservation standards adopted by the City Council are satisfied.
[Previous Policy L-52] [L141]
Policy L-7.11 Maintain the historic integrity of building exteriors. Allow Consider
parking exceptions for historic buildings to encourage rehabilitation.
Require design review findings that the historic integrity of the building
exterior will be maintained. [(Previous Program L-59)(Converted to
Policy)] [L142]
Program L7.11.1 Review parking exceptions for historic buildings in
the Zoning Code to determine if there is an
effective balance between historic preservation and
meeting parking needs [NEW PROGRAM] [L143]
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
LAND USE DRAFT –NOVEMBER 28, 2016 L-67
Policy L-7.12 Encourage and assist owners of historically significant buildings in
finding ways to adapt and restore rehabilitate these buildings,
including participation in state and federal tax relief
programs.[(Previous Program L-64) (Converted to Policy)] [L144]
Program L7.12.1 Continue to use a TDR Ordinance to allow the
transfer of development rights from designated
buildings of historic significance in the Commercial
Downtown (CD) zone to non-historic receiver sites
in the CD zone. Revise the TDR Ordinance so that
transferred development rights may be used only
for residential development on the receiver sites.
Planned Community (PC) zone properties in the
Downtown also qualify for this program. [Previous
Program L-60] [L145]
ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Policy L-7.13 Protect Palo Alto’s archaeological resources, including natural land
formations, sacred sites, the historical landscape, historic habitats, and
remains of settlements here before the founding of Palo Alto in the
nineteenth century. [(Previous Policy L-60)(Comp Plan Draft EIR
Mitigation Measure CULT-1c)] [L146]
Policy L-7.14 Continue to consult with tribes as required by California Government
Code Section 65352.3. In doing so, use appropriate procedures to
accommodate tribal concerns when a tribe has a religious prohibition
against revealing precise information about the location or previous
practice at a particular sacred site. [(NEW POLICY) (Comp Plan Draft
EIR Mitigation Measure CULT-3)] [L147]
Policy L-7.15 Using the archaeological sensitivity map in the Comprehensive Plan as
a guide, continue to aAssess the need for archaeological surveys and
mitigation plans on a project-by-project basis, consistent with the
California Environmental Quality Act and the National Historic
Preservation Act. [Note: the referenced figure will likely be removed
from the Comp Plan to protect the integrity of known and
undiscovered archaeological resources.] [(Previous Program L-67)
(Converted to Policy)] [L148]
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
L-68 LAND USE DRAFT – NOVEMBER 28, 2016
Policy L-7.15Policy L-7.16 Ensure that developers understand their obligation to meet
state codes regarding the identification and protection of
archaeological and paleontological deposits. [NEW POLICY] [L149]
GOAL L-8 Attractive and safe civic and cultural facilities provided in all
neighborhoods and maintained and used in ways that foster
and enrich public life.
Policy L-8.1 Facilitate creation of new parkland to serve Palo Alto's residential
neighborhoods, as consistent with the Parks, Trails, Open Space and
Recreation Master Plan. [NEW POLICY] [L150]
Program L8.1.1 Encourage dedication of new land for parks
through regulations and incentives for new
development and programs to solicit bequests of
land within the city. [NEW PROGRAM] [L151]
Program L8.1.2 Pursue opportunities to create linear parks over the
Caltrain tracks in the event the tracks are moved
below grade. [NEW PROGRAM] [L152]
Program L8.1.3 Explore ways to dedicate a portion of in-lieu fees
towards acquisition of parkland, not just
improvements. [NEW PROGRAM] [L153]
Program L8.1.1 Explore opportunities to dedicate City‐owned land
as parkland to protect and preserve its community
serving purpose into the future. [NEW PROGRAM]
[L154]
Program L8.1.2 Promote the use of community and cultural
centers, libraries, local schools, parks, and other
community facilities as gathering places. Ensure that
they are inviting and safe places that can deliver a
variety of community services during both daytime
and evening hours. [Previous Policy L-61]
Program L8.1.3 To help satisfy present and future community use
needs, coordinate with the School District to
educate the public about and to plan for the future
use of school sites, including providing space for
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
LAND USE DRAFT –NOVEMBER 28, 2016 L-69
public gathering places for neighborhoods lacking
space. [Previous Program L-68]
Program L8.1.4 Enhance all entrances to Mitchell Park Community
Center so that they are more inviting and facilitate
public gatherings. [(Previous Program L-69)
(Complete)]
Program L8.1.5Program L8.1.4 Study the potential for
landscaping or park furniture that would promote
neighborhood parks as outdoor gathering places
and centers of neighborhood activity. [Previous
Program L-70]
Policy L-8.2 Encourage use of data driven, innovative design methods tactics and
use data to understand to evaluate how different community
members use public space. [NEW POLICY] [L155]
Policy L-8.2 Use the work of artists, craftspeople, architects, and landscape
architects in the design and improvement of public spaces. [Previous
Policy L-74]
Policy L-8.3 Provide comfortable seating areas and plazas with places for public art
adjacent to library and community center entrances. [Previous Policy
L-62] [L156]
Policy L-8.4 Encourage small-scale local-serving retail services, such as small cafes,
delicatessens, and coffee carts, in cCivic cCenters: Mitchell Park,
Rinconada Library, and Cubberly Community Center. [Previous Policy
L-63] [L157]
Policy L-8.5 Create facilities for civic and intellectual life, such as better urban
public spaces for civic programs and speakers, cultural, musical and
artistic events. [NEW POLICY] [L158]
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
L-70 LAND USE DRAFT – NOVEMBER 28, 2016
Policy L-8.6 Promote and maintain Recognize public art and cultural facilities as a
community benefit. Encourage the development of new and the
enhancement of existing public and private art and cultural facilities
throughout Palo Alto. Ensure that such projects are compatible with
the character and identity of the surrounding neighborhood. [Previous
Policy L-72] [L159]
Policy L-8.7 Seek potential new sites for art and cultural facilities, public spaces,
open space, and community gardens that encourage and support
pedestrian and bicycle travel and person-to-person contact, particularly
in neighborhoods that lack these amenities. [Previous Policy L-64]
[L160]
Policy L-8.8 Encourage religious and private institutions to provide facilities that
promote a sense ofcollaborate with the community and are
compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. [Previous Policy L-65]
[L161]Public Ways
GOAL L-9 Attractive, inviting public spaces and streets that enhance
the image and character of the city.
GOAL L-10 Maintain an aesthetically pleasing street network that helps
frame and define the community while meeting the needs
of pedestrians, bicyclists, and motorists.[(Previous Policy L-
66]
GOAL L-11GOAL L-9 Balance traffic circulation needs with the
goal of creating walkable neighborhoods that are designed
and oriented towards pedestrians. [Previous Policy L-67]
[Covered in Transportation Element]
[Note: concepts above covered in more detail in the Transportation
Element under Goal T-3: Streets. To avoid redundancy, extra length,
and potential confusion, we suggest keeping them in Transportation
and deleting here].
Integrate creeks and green spaces with the street and
pedestrian/bicycle path system. [Previous Policy L-68] [Covered in
Transportation Element Policy T-1.18]
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
LAND USE DRAFT –NOVEMBER 28, 2016 L-71
STREETS AND PARKING
Preserve the scenic qualities of Palo Alto roads and trails for motorists,
cyclists, pedestrians, and equestrians. [Previous Policy L69]
Policy L-9.1 Recognize Sand Hill Road, University Avenue between Middlefield
Road and San Francisquito Creek, Embarcadero Road, Page Mill Road,
Oregon Expressway, Interstate 280, Arastradero Road (west of Foothill
Expressway), Junipero Serra Boulevard/Foothill Expressway, and
Skyline Boulevard as scenic routes and preserve their scenic qualities.
[(Previous Policy L-69) (Previous Program L-71)] [L162]
Program L11.1.1Program L9.1.1 Evaluate existing zoning code
setback requirements to ensure they are
appropriate for scenic routes. [NEW PROGRAM]
[L163]
Policy L-9.2 Encourage development that creatively integrates parking into the
project, including by locating it behind buildings or underground
wherever possible, or by providing for shared use of parking areas.
Encourage other alternatives to surface parking lots that minimize the
amount of land devoted to parking while still maintaining safe streets,
street trees, a vibrant local economy, and sufficient parking to meet
demand. [Previous Policy L-78] [L164]
Policy L-11.2Policy L-9.3 Require new or redesigned parking lots to optimize pedestrian
and bicycle safety. [NEW POLICY] [L165]
Policy L-11.3Policy L-9.4 Enhance tree health and the appearance of streets and other
public spaces through regular by expanding and
maintainmaintenanceing as well as Palo Alto’s street tree and
landscape planting and care of the existing canopy. system.. [Previous
Policy L-70] [L166]
Program L9.4.1 Continue to use the El Camino Real Design
Guidelines and the Zoning Ordinance to enhance
the visual character of this corridor by addressing
appropriate sidewalk widths and encouraging
building forms, massing, and setbacks that relate to
the street and the pedestrian, whether through
traditional architectural forms or innovative new
designs. Consider whether sidewalk widths and
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
L-72 LAND USE DRAFT – NOVEMBER 28, 2016
building setback should also be addressed along
other major thoroughfares such as Alma Street and
Charleston Road. [(NEW PROGRAM) (Comp Plan
Draft EIR Mitigation Measure AES-1)] [L167]
Program L9.4.2 Involve tree owners in tree maintenance programs.
[NEW PROGRAM] [L168]
PUBLIC SPACES
Policy L-11.4Policy L-9.5 Maintain and enhance existing public gathering places and
open spaces and integrate new public spaces at a variety of scales.
[NEW POLICY] [L169]
[Note: This Section Moved From Goal L-3 Residential Design]
Policy L-11.5Policy L-9.6 Create, pPreserve and enhance parks and publicly accessible,
shared outdoor the public gathering spaces within walking and biking
distance of residential neighborhoods. Ensure that each residential
neighborhood has such spaces. [Previous Policy L-15] [L170]
Program L11.5.1Program L9.6.1 Analyze existing
neighborhoods and determine where publicly
accessible shared, outdoor gathering spaces are
below the citywide average. Create new public
spaces, including public squares, parks and
informal gathering spaces in these neighborhoods.
[NEW PROGRAM] [L171]
Policy L-9.7 Treat residential streets as both public ways and neighborhood
amenities. Provide and maintain continuous sidewalks, healthy street
trees, benches, and other amenities that promote walking and “active”
transportation. favor pedestrians. [Previous Policy L-17] [L172]
Program L11.5.2Program L9.7.1 Review standards for streets
and signage and update as needed to foster
natural, tree-lined streets with a minimum of
signage. [NEW PROGRAM] [L173]
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
LAND USE DRAFT –NOVEMBER 28, 2016 L-73
GATEWAYS
Policy L-11.6Policy L-9.8 Strengthen the identity of important community-wide
gateways, including the entrances to the City at Highway 101, El
Camino Real and Middlefield Road; the Caltrain stations; entries to
commercial districts; and Embarcadero Road at El Camino Real, and
between Palo Alto and Stanford.[Previous Policy L-71] [L174]
Program L11.6.1Program L9.8.1 Develop a strategy to enhance
gateway sites with special landscaping, art, public
spaces, and/or public buildings. Emphasize the
creek bridges and riparian settings at the entrances
to the City over Adobe Creek and San Francisquito
Creek. [Previous Program L-72] [L175]
Consider public art and cultural facilities as a public benefit in
connection with new development projects. Consider incentives for
including public art in large development projects. [Previous Policy L-
73]
Minimize the negative physical impacts of parking lots. Locate parking
behind buildings or underground wherever possible. [Previous Policy
L-75]
Revise the Zoning Ordinance to require the location of parking lots
behind buildings rather than in front of them, under appropriate
conditions. [Previous Program L-73]
Modify zoning standards pertaining to parking lot layout and
landscaping for land uses within Employment Districts. [Previous
Program L-74]
URBAN FOREST
Policy L-11.7Policy L-9.9 Incorporate the goals of the Urban Forest Master Plan, as
periodically amended, into the Comprehensive Plan by reference in
order to assure that new land uses recognize the many benefits of
trees in the urban context and foster a healthy and robust tree canopy
throughout the City. [NEW POLICY] [L176]
Program L11.7.1Program L9.9.1 Establish incentives to
encourage native trees, and low water use plantings
Photo by Scott Haefner—Courtesy of Canopy
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
L-74 LAND USE DRAFT – NOVEMBER 28, 2016
in new development throughout the city. [NEW
PROGRAM] [L177]
Program L11.7.2Program L9.9.2 Require Update City
requirements regarding trees and other landscaping
that capture and filter stormwater within surface
parking lots to take advantage of new technology.
[(Previous Policy L-76) (Converted to Program)]
[L178]
Policy L-9.10 Involve the Urban Forester, or appropriate City staff, in development
review. [NEW POLICY] [L179]
Policy L-11.8 Recognize the urban forest as City infrastructure to be maintained in
accordance with applicable guidelines and requirements. [NEW
POLICY] [L180]
Policy L-11.9 Consider Zoning Ordinance amendments for parking lot landscaping,
including requiring a variety of drought-tolerant, relatively litter-free
tree species capable of forming a 50 percent tree canopy within 10 to
15 years. Consider further amendments that would require existing
nonconforming lots to come into compliance wherever possible.
[(Previous Program L-75) (Complete)]
Policy L-11.10 Encourage alternatives to surface parking lots to minimize the amount
of land that must be devoted to parking, provided that economic
and traffic safety goals can still be achieved. [Previous Policy L-77]
Policy L-11.11 Evaluate parking requirements and actual parking needs for specific
uses. Develop design criteria based on a standard somewhere
between average and peak conditions. [Previous Program L-76]
Policy L-11.12Policy L-9.11 Revise parking requirements to encourage creative solutions
such as valet parking, landscaped parking reserves, satellite parking,
and others that minimize the use of open land for parking. [Previous
Program L-77]
[Note: Concepts above such as Parking requirements and creative
parking solutions addressed in Transportation Element under Goal T-
5: Motor Vehicle and Bicycle Parking]
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
LAND USE DRAFT –NOVEMBER 28, 2016 L-75
Encourage the use of Planned Community (PC) zoning for parking
structures Downtown and in the California Avenue area. [(Previous
Program L-78) (inconsistent with current City practice)]
UTILITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE
Design public infrastructure, including paving, signs, utility structures,
parking garages and parking lots to meet high quality urban design
standards and embrace technological advances. Look for opportunities
to use art and artists in the design of public infrastructure. Remove or
mitigate elements of existing infrastructure that are unsightly or
visually disruptive. [Previous Policy L-79] [L181]
Policy L-11.13Policy L-9.12 Undertake a coordinated effort by the Public Works, Utilities,
and Planning Departments to establish design standards for public
infrastructure and examine the effectiveness of City street, sidewalk
and street tree maintenance programs. [(Previous Program L-79)
(Complete)]
Program L11.13.1Program L9.12.1 Continue the citywide
undergrounding of utility wires. Minimize the
impacts of undergrounding on street tree root
systems and planting areas. [Previous Program L-
80] [L182]
Program L11.13.2Program L9.12.2 Encourage the use of compact
and well-designed utility elements, such as
transformers, switching devices, and backflow
preventers, and telecommunications infrastructure.
Place these elements in locations that will minimize
their visual intrusion. [Previous Program L-81]
[L183]
Policy L-9.13 Provide utilities and service systems to serve all urbanized areas of
Palo Alto and plan infrastructure maintenance and improvements to
adequately serve existing and planned development. [(NEW POLICY)
(PTC Policy L2.9, edited)] [L184]
Program L9.13.1 Develop an Infrastructure Master Plan that projects
the future needs of streets, underground utilities,
and all City assets and plans for the incorporation
of new technology that improves efficiency and
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
L-76 LAND USE DRAFT – NOVEMBER 28, 2016
effectiveness. [(NEW PROGRAM) (PTC Program
L2.9.1)] [L185]
Program L9.13.2 Implement the findings of the City’s Infrastructure
Blue Ribbon Committee and its emphasis for
rebuilding our civic spaces. [(NEW PROGRAM) (PTC
Program L2.9.8)] [L186]
Program L11.13.3Program L9.13.3 Identify City-owned properties
where combinations of wireless facilities can be co-
located, assuming appropriate lease agreements
are in place. [(NEW PROGRAM)(PTC Program
L2.9.5)] [L187]
BAYLANDS
Policy L-9.14 Regulate land uses in the Airport Influence Area to ensure consistency
with the Palo Alto Airport Comprehensive Land Use Plan and the
Baylands Master Plan. [NEW POLICY] [L188]
Policy L-11.14Policy L-9.15 Palo Alto is committed to preservation of the Baylands as
called for in the Baylands Master Plan, which is incorporated here by
reference. [NEW POLICY] [L189]
GOAL L-12GOAL L-10 Maintain an economically viable local
airport with minimal environmental impacts.
PALO ALTO AIRPORT
Policy L-12.1Policy L-10.1 Support the continued Operate Palo Alto Airport (PAO) as a
vitality and efficientectiveness facility at its current level of operation of
the Palo Alto Airport without significantly increasing its intensity or
intruding into open space areas. PAO The Airport should remain
limited to a single runway and two fixed base operatorsminor
expansion shall only be allowed in order to meet federal and State
airport design and safety standards. [(Previous Policy T-57)] [L190]
Program L12.1.1Program L10.1.1 Encourage Santa Clara County
to Rrelocate the terminal building away from the
Runway 31 clear zone and closer to the hangars,
allowing for construction of a new replacement
terminal. [(Previous Program T-58)] [L191]
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
LAND USE DRAFT –NOVEMBER 28, 2016 L-77
Program L10.1.2 Update the Airport Layout Plan in accordance with
Federal Aviation Administration requirements, as
needed, while ensuring conformance with the
Baylands Master Plan to the maximum extent
feasible. [NEW PROGRAM] [L192]
Program L12.1.2Program L10.1.3 Identify and pursue funding to
address maintenance, safety and security
improvements needed at PAO. [NEW PROGRAM]
[L193]
Policy L-10.2 Minimize the environmental impacts associated with PAO operations,
including adverse effects on the character of surrounding open space,
noise levels, and the quality of life in residential areas, as required by
federal and State requirements. [NEW POLICY] [L194]
Program L10.2.1 Establish and implement a system for processing,
tracking and reporting noise complaints regarding
local airport operations on an annual basis,. [NEW
PROGRAM] [L195]
Program L10.2.2 Work with the airport to pursue opportunities to
enhance the open space and habitat value of the
airport. These include:
maintaining native grasses;
reconstructing levees to protect the airport
from sea level rise while enhancing public
access and habitat conservation; and
evaluating the introduction of burrowing owl
habitat. This program is subject to federal
wildlife hazard requirements and guidelines
for airports. [NEW PROGRAM] [L196]
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
L-78 LAND USE DRAFT – NOVEMBER 28, 2016
Policy L-12.2Policy L-10.3 Provide public access to the Airport for bicyclists and
pedestrians. [NEW POLICY] [L197]
Program L12.2.1Program L10.3.1 Continue to pProvide a
planting strip and bicycle/pedestrian path adjacent
to Embarcadero Road, that is consistent with the
Baylands Master Plan and open space character of
the baylands subject to airport federal and State
regulations. [(Previous Program T-57)] [L198]
Policy L-10.4 Address the potential impacts of future sea level rise through
reconstruction of the Bayfront levee in a manner that provides
protection for the Airport and greater habitat along the San Francisco
Bay frontage. [NEW POLICY] [L199]
Policy L-10.5 Encourage the use of alternatives to leaded fuel in aircraft operating in
and out of Palo Alto Airport. [NEW POLICY] [L200]
TRANSPORTATION
REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JULY 19, 2016ANUARY 31, 2017 T-1
2
This Element has been prepared by City staff on the basis of input from the CAC, the
Transportation subcommittee and members of the public received between October
2015 and July 2016. Additionally, this revised draft Element presents changes made
in response to City Council review on September 19, 2016.
INTRODUCTION
Meeting the transportation needs of residents, visitors, and businesses will demand
innovative and forward-looking solutions. The Transportation Element provides a
policy framework for these solutions, recognizing that future growth in transportation
needs cannot be met by the automobile alone. Strong dependence on the
automobile has resulted in air and water pollution, excess noise, increased energy
use, and visual degradation in Palo Alto and throughout the San Francisco Bay Area.
There have also been impacts on Palo Alto neighborhoods, as motorists have used
local streets as alternatives to overcrowded arterials.
This Element addresses transportation and mobility these issues comprehensively
and acknowledges that the future will be different than the present and the past.
Recognizing changing demographics and travel preferences, new technologies, and
new opportunities, the Element provides a policy framework which includes
VISION: Palo Alto will build and maintain a sustainable network
of safe, accessible and efficient transportation and parking
solutions for all users and modes, while protecting and
enhancing the quality of life in Palo Alto neighborhoods.
Programs will include alternative and innovate transportation
processes, and the adverse impacts of automobile traffic on the
environment in general and residential streets in particular will be
reduced. Streets will be safe, attractive and designed to
enhance the quality and aesthetics of Palo Alto neighborhoods.
Palo Alto recognizes the regional nature of our transportation
system, and will be a leader in seeking regional transportation
solutions, prioritizing Caltrain service improvements and railroad
grade separations.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
T-2 REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JULY 19, 2016ANUARY 31, 2017
solutions for implementation today in order to lay the groundwork for the future.
Together with investments in infrastructure, these solutions policy framework seeks
to reduce reliance on single occupant vehicles, address congestion, and reduce
through traffic and non-resident parking in Palo Alto neighborhoods, leading will
lead to an integrated transportation system that serves local, regional, and intercity
travel.
This Element meets the State requirement for a Circulation Element, addressing the
various aspects of circulation, including complete streets, expressways and freeways,
transit, walking, bicycling, parking, and special transportation needs.
CONNECTIONS TO OTHER ELEMENTS
Transportation choices and options are shaped by many factors including land use,
economics, and community values. TAs such, the Transportation Element is strongly
influenced by the Land Use Element and Housing Element because the distribution
and density of residential, commercial, and office uses have a direct correlation to
the type, frequency, and use of transportation options a community employs. In a
jobs-rich community like Palo Alto that imports significant numbers of workers,
adding housing could be one strategy to reduce the number of people who have to
drive into the city each day. The Transportation Element also supports the objectives
of the Business and Economics Element, the Community Services and Facilities
Element, and the Natural Environment Element, and the Safety and Noise Element
by paving the way for a transportation system that supports economic development,
helps people get to and from community gathering places, emphasizes walkable
neighborhoods and access services in a manner that limits impacts to the natural
environment.
SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORTATION
In 2014, more than 60 percent of all trips made each day in Palo Alto involved
single-occupant motor vehicles. Although the drive alone rate this ratio is a lower
than in many other Bay Area communities, road travel to, from, and within the city is
still the greatest single largest source of local greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and
derives from local (internal) trips as well as commute trips. As a major regional
employment center, Palo Alto attracts commuters from throughout the Bay Area on
a daily basis, but US Census data also show that Palo Alto residents make most of
their trips by car. Building a more sustainable transportation system will require
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JULY 19, 2016ANUARY 31, 2017 T-3
addressing regional and local travel patterns, as well as trips made for work, school,
errands or entertainment.
The key to a sustainable transportation system lies in providing more options and
more convenience so that people will more readily choose not to drive. Palo Altans
recognize that, at times, driving is necessary, but to address congestion, keep
neighborhood streets safe, reduce air quality and noise impacts, lessen the effects of
climate change, and improve overall quality of life, the policies and programs in this
Element must focus on providing convenient, affordable alternatives to the
automobile.
Facilitating a shift to alternative modes of transportation will require creative
collaboration among transit agencies, employers, and local jurisdictions as well as
residents and commuters themselves. Technology also has a role to play, whether
providing up-to-the minute information to inform choices or in delivering new and
better modes of travel. Improvements to the bicycling and pedestrian environment
will help encourage more people to bike and walk on a regular basis.
INNOVATION AND COLLABORATION
Palo Alto is currently pursuing a number of innovative tools to increase
transportation options for residents and workers.
TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT
Transportation dDemand mManagement (TDM) refers to strategies that improve
transportation system efficiency and reduce congestion by shifting trips from single-
occupant vehicles to collective forms of transport, including mass transit, carpools
and private shuttles. TDM is a critical component of a comprehensive strategy to
reduce traffic congestion. TDM programs are typically required of new development
and can include a range of requirements infrastructure investments and incentives
for the use of alternatives to the automobile, as well as parking management
strategies initiatives and marketing. Employers and local governments often
collaborate in developing and implementing TDM area-wide TDM programs aimed
at reducing single occupant vehicle use by existing employees. These, and activities
can be coordinated through a tTransportation mManagement aAssociation (TMA)
made up of local businesses in a commercial district or industrial park. Stanford
University operates one of the most a comprehensive and successful TDM programs
in the country for the University, Hospital and the Medical Center, and a program is
in development for the and Research Park campuses. The program includes a
61% 23%
5% 3%
8%
PALO ALTO DAILY MODE SHARE -
ALL TRIPS (2014)
Drive Alone
Carpool
Transit
Bike
Walk
50%
21%
4%
3%
23%
Palo Alto Daily Mode Share -
Internal Trips (2014)
Drive Alone
Carpool
Transit
Bike
Walk
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
T-4 REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JULY 19, 2016ANUARY 31, 2017
commute club, the Marguerite Shuttle, EcoPass/GoPass and bicycle and vehicle
rentals, among others, and encourages more efficient use of transportation
infrastructure. In January 2015, the City of Palo Alto supported began the process to
establishment aof a TMA for the downtown area, in collaboration with local
businesses and residents. The success of this effort and its potential to expand to
other areas of the City will depend on securing ongoing funding and on the
committed participation of employers who face parking and traffic challenges in
downtown.
ALTERNATIVE FUEL VEHICLES
Alternative fuel vehicles—those that run on electricity, biodiesel, compressed natural
gas and other alternatives to petroleum fuels—help reduce GHG emissions by
utilizing cleaner fuels or zero emission alternatives. In 2014, the City of Palo Alto
adopted an ordinance that requires electric vehicle (EV) – ready infrastructure for all
new commercial construction to encourage the use of electric vehicles and develop
the infrastructure for this growing market. As the City continues this effort, additional
infrastructure may be necessary. However, while alternative fuel vehicles do reduce
GHGs, they are still a contributor to congestion and delay.
MOBILITY AS A SERVICE
In this context mobility refers to the options that Palo Alto residents, employees and
visitors have for getting to and from their destinations. The use of transportation
services is beginning to replace private vehicle ownership in the region, led by a
number of prominent ride sharing and e-hailing car services like Uber and Lyft (the
process of ordering transportation services via mobile device). Originating in Europe,
the concept of “Mobility as a Service” (MaaS), allows on-demand trip planning
enabled by smartphones and mobile devices and provided by "pop up" bus-, car-,
and bike-sharing services. Palo Alto is partnering with Joint Venture Silicon Valley, the
Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA), and the City of San Jose to
develop a MaaS/smartphone app (Commuter Wallet) that combines access to
multiple transportation modes and employer commute benefits, incentivizing non-
single-occupant vehicle travel.
PUBLIC TRANSIT
Residents, workers, and visitors to Palo Alto have an array of transit options within
the city and to the surrounding region. Maps T-1 and T-2 show the range of
I2
I2
§¨¦280
|ÿ82
£¤101
Fo
o
t
h
i
l
l
E
x
p
r
e
s
s
w
a
y
Mountain View
East Palo Alto
Stanford
Los Altos Hills
Menlo Park
S A N
F R A N C I S C O
B A Y
Mi
d
d
l
e
f
i
e
l
d
R
o
a
d
Los Altos
Arastradero Preserve
Baylands Preserve
Byxbee Park
Alm
a
S
t
r
e
e
t
El
C
a
m
i
n
o
R
e
a
l
Oreg
o
n
E
x
p
r
e
s
s
w
a
y
Embarcad
e
r
o
R
o
a
d
East Charleston Road
Lou
i
s
R
o
a
d
Wa
v
e
r
l
y
S
t
r
e
e
t
Seal
e
A
v
e
n
u
e
Loma
V
e
r
d
e
A
v
e
n
u
e
Chan
n
i
n
g
A
v
e
n
u
e
East M
e
a
d
o
w
D
r
i
v
e
San
A
n
t
o
n
i
o
R
o
a
d
Color
a
d
o
A
v
e
n
u
e
Willow
R
o
a
d
Lin
c
o
l
n
A
v
e
n
u
e
Hamilto
n
A
v
e
n
u
e
West
C
h
a
r
l
e
s
t
o
n
R
o
a
d
Univ
e
r
s
i
t
y
A
v
e
n
u
e
P A L O A L T O C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
T R A N S P O R T A T I O N E L E M E N T
PR EL IM INA RY DR A FT M AP T- 1
R E G I O N A L T R A N S I T C O N N E C T I O N S I N P A L O A L T O
0 0.5 1 Miles
Source: City of Palo Alto, 2016; Santa Clara VTA, 2016; SamTrans, 2016; PlaceWorks, 2016.
Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District (AC Transit)
Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA)
San Mateo County Transit (SamTrans)
Caltrain
I2 Caltrain Stations
Employment Districts
Railroads
Park/Open Space
Public Conservation Land
City Limit
35
34
40
120
88
81
522
101
102
103
DB
DB1
86
82
83
22
32
32
89
182 104
824
52
California Ave
Station
Palo Alto Station
To S
a
n
J
o
s
e
To
S
a
n
F
r
a
n
c
i
s
c
o
Stanford
Medical
Center
San Antonio Rd/
Bayshore Corridor
Stanford Research
Park
East Bayshore
522
296 297 280
281
81
U
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
"X
"X
Terman Middle
Palo Alto High
Greendell School
Ohlone Elementary
Hoover Elementary
Henry M. Gunn High
Addison Elementary
Duveneck Elementary
Escondido Elementary
Palo Verde Elementary
Fairmeadow Elementary
El Carmelo Elementary
Walter Hays Elementary
Barron Park Elementary
Lucille Nixon Elementary
Juana Briones Elementary
David Starr Jordan Middle
Jane Lathrop Stanford Middle
§¨¦280
|ÿ82
£¤101
Foo
t
h
i
l
l
E
x
p
r
e
s
s
w
a
y
Mountain View
East Palo Alto
Stanford
Los Altos Hills
Menlo Park
S A N
F R A N C I S C O
B A Y
Mi
d
d
l
e
f
i
e
l
d
R
o
a
d
Los Altos
Baylands Preserve
Byxbee Park
California Ave
Station
Palo Alto
Station
Pag
e
M
i
l
l
R
o
a
d
Al
m
a
S
t
r
e
e
t
El
C
a
m
i
n
o
R
e
a
l
Oreg
o
n
E
x
p
r
e
s
s
w
a
y
Embarcad
e
r
o
R
o
a
d
East Charleston Road
Lo
u
i
s
R
o
a
d
Wa
v
e
r
l
y
S
t
r
e
e
t
Seal
e
A
v
e
n
u
e
Loma
V
e
r
d
e
A
v
e
n
u
e
Chan
n
i
n
g
A
v
e
n
u
e
East M
e
a
d
o
w
D
r
i
v
e
San
A
n
t
o
n
i
o
R
o
a
d
Colora
d
o
A
v
e
n
u
e
Willow
R
o
a
d
Lin
c
o
l
n
A
v
e
n
u
e
Hamilto
n
A
v
e
n
u
e
West
C
h
a
r
l
e
s
t
o
n
R
o
a
d
Univ
e
r
s
i
t
y
A
v
e
n
u
e
P A L O A L T O C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
T R A N S P O R T A T I O N E L E M E N T
PR EL IM INA RY DR A FT M AP T- 2
P A L O A L T O L O C A L T R A N S I T C O N N E C T I O N S
Source: Palo Alto Unified School District, 2012; Santa Clara VTA, 2015; SamTrans, 2015; City of Palo Alto, 2015; Caltrain, 2015; PlaceWorks, 2015.Crosstown Shuttle
Embarcadero Shuttle
East Palo Alto Caltrain Shuttle
Stanford Marguerite Shuttle
Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA)
San Mateo County Transit (SamTrans)
"X Caltrain Stations
5 Schools
Railroads
Employment Districts
Commercial Centers
Park/Open Space
Public Conservation Land
City Limit
0 0.5 1 Miles
182
297
102
103 88
22
824
32
35
522
89
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JULY 19, 2016ANUARY 31, 2017 T-7
transit services in Palo Alto. Map T-1 focuses on regional transit options, which and
Map T-2 illustrates local transit options. Overall, regional transit is heavily used, while
public transit services serving the local area are below capacity levels. Policies in this
Element support iImproving local services like shuttles to increase ridership and
support traditional transit providers with first and last mile connectionsbetter match
ridership needs could be one strategy to increase ridership and make more effective
use of available capacity.
RAIL SERVICE
Caltrain is Palo Alto’s primary regional transit service, with riders traveling between
San Francisco and Gilroy. Since introduction of the baby bullet limited express trains
in 2003, ridership has more than doubled and today, Palo Alto’s University Avenue
station is the second largest generator of weekday Caltrain trips, behind San
Francisco’s 4th and King Street station. Long-range plans for the Palo Alto Station and
the adjacent University Avenue underpass area will enhance the pedestrian
experience and improve circulation and access for all modesthe station’s visibility of
the transit station. The planned Caltrain extension to the Transbay Terminal in
downtown San Francisco will improve regional transit connections, and Caltrain
electrification will speed service and increase capacity while decreasing noise and air
pollution.
As of late 2015, the San Mateo County Transit District (SamTrans) has re-initiated
study of possible future railtransit service along the Dumbarton corridor, to link the
Alameda County communities of Newark, Union City and Fremont with the San
Mateo and Santa Clara Counties.y communities of Redwood City, Menlo Park, and
East Palo Alto via an existing, unused rail bridge across the San Francisco Bay. The
study will also evaluate connections to Palo Alto and other cities in Santa Clara
County.
BUS SERVICE
Three transit providers, VTA, SamTrans, and AC Transit, provide bus service in Palo
Alto, connecting residents to both local and regional destinations. The VTA operates
local bus service within the city, with 14 bus routes in Palo Alto and an express bus
network that serves the Stanford Research Park. VTA, and also offers connections to
VTA light rail, Caltrain, Altamont Corridor Express (ACE) and AMTRAK Capitol
Corridor. SamTrans operates bus service throughout San Mateo, San Francisco, and
Santa Clara counties, helping to connect Palo Alto to other parts of the Peninsula and
In November 2015, Palo Alto City Council
adopted a cComplete sStreets resolution
affirming the City’s longstanding
commitment to design and construction
of a comprehensive, integrated
transportation network that allows safe
and convenient travel along and across
streets for all users, including pedestrians,
bicyclists, persons with disabilities,
motorists, movers of commercial goods,
users and operators of public
transportation, emergency vehicles,
seniors, children, youth, and families.
Council also adopted National
Association of City Transportation Officials
(NACTO) guidelines for bikeway and
urban street design, which incorporate
cComplete sStreets best practices.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
T-8 REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JULY 19, 2016ANUARY 31, 2017
Silicon Valley. AC Transit’s Dumbarton Express provides express bus service between
the East Bay and communities on the Peninsula.
The VTA’s proposed El Camino Real Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) project aims to improve
transit operations and increase transit ridership along the El Camino Real Corridor.
Policies in this Element support enhanced bus service in shared travel lanes wWith
curbside stations and signal priority with (“queue jump lanes ing”), BRT in shared
travel lanes will to provide faster, more reliable service with target stops and
specialized transit vehicles and facilities. The El Camino Real BRT Corridor extends
from Downtown San Jose (Arena Station) to Downtown Palo Alto (Palo Alto Transit
Center) passing through the cities of Santa Clara, Sunnyvale, Mountain View and Los
Altos.
SHUTTLE SERVICE
There are four types of shuttle services operating in Palo Alto, including the Stanford
University Marguerite shuttle, the VTA shuttle, the City-operated Palo Alto Shuttle,
and private employee shuttles which transit through Palo Alto offering transportation
for employees to other job centers on the Peninsula. The Marguerite, run by
Stanford University Parking and Transportation Services, is a free public service that
connects the Stanford campus to the Palo Alto Caltrain StationTransit Center and
Downtown. The VTA provides low cost fare based service for residents of Santa Clara
County. The Palo Alto Free Shuttle is free wheelchair-accessible shuttle provided by
the City to connect important destinations in the community, including Caltrain
stations; the City is developing plans for enhanced service in response to community
input. Marguerite and Palo Alto Shuttle routes are shown on Map T-1.
FIRST/LAST MILE CONNECTIONS
The concept of first/last mile connections refers to the level of accessibility to and
from transit stations. Many people live or work within a mile from a transit station or,
bus stop; however, distance, perception of safety, and inconvenience may deter
them from using transit, so the entire trip is made by single-occupant vehicle simply
for lack of convenience of a small but crucial segment of the trip. Currently, Tthe Palo
Alto shuttle, biking, and walking are also provides first/last mile connections to and
from Caltrain stations, as does the provision of bike share facilities. For now, walking
and biking remain the best first/last mile option for most of Palo Alto. Future
improvements should focus on making walking, and bicycling, shuttle service, and
ridesharing more efficient, comfortable and safe. In addition, improved shuttle
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JULY 19, 2016ANUARY 31, 2017 T-9
service, ridesharing and other on-demand transportation services could be integrated
into the City’s overall first/last mile connection strategy and beyond, through MaaS.
BICYCLING AND WALKING
California’s Complete Streets Act requires local jurisdictions to plan for land use
transportation policies that reflect a “complete streets” approach to mobility.
Complete streets policies and street design principles provide for the needs of all
road users, including pedestrians, bicyclists, transit operators and riders, children, the
elderly, and people of all ability levels.
BIKING
Palo Alto dedicated its formal bikeway system—one of the nation’s first—in 1972.
Bikeways have since become commonplace and considerable progress has been
made in overcoming barriers to bicycle travel in and around Palo Alto. Palo Alto’s
bikeway network consists of on-road bicycle lanes, bicycle boulevards and bicycle
routes, off-roadway shared-use paths and bridges, and bicycle parking facilities.
Fourteen underpasses and bridges span barriers such as freeways, creeks, and
railroad tracks. Map T-3 shows the existing and planned bikeway network in Palo
Alto.
Palo Alto is in a position to build on the existing network, significantly increasing its
proportion of travel by bicycle and is actively pursuing an expanded bike share
program.
The Palo Alto Bicycle + Pedestrian Transportation Plan, adopted in 2012 (BPTP
2012), contains a policy framework, design guidance, and specific recommendations
to increase walking and biking rates over the next decade and beyond. BPTP 2012
encourages planning, construction, and maintenance of complete streets that are
safe and accessible to all modes and people of all ages and abilities., incorporating
best practices from the National Association of Transportation Officials (NACTO)
Bikeway Design Guide. Future challenges include more routes for northeast-
southwest travel and overcoming physical barriers like railroads and freeways. Better
provisions for bicycles on transit enables bicycles as a first/last mile option,
promoting the use both modes by increasing convenience and accessibility of
destinations.
"X
"X|ÿ82
£¤101
Foo
t
h
i
l
l
E
x
p
r
e
s
s
w
a
y
Mountain View
East Palo Alto
Stanford
Menlo Park
Mi
d
d
l
e
f
i
e
l
d
R
o
a
d
Baylands Preserve
Byxbee ParkEa
s
t
B
a
y
s
h
o
r
e
R
o
a
d
Page
M
i
l
l
R
o
a
d
Mi
d
d
l
e
f
i
e
l
d
R
o
a
d
Charle
s
t
o
n
R
o
a
d
Junipe
r
o
S
e
r
r
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
Arbore
t
u
m
R
d
Quar
r
y
R
o
a
d
Sa
n
t
a
C
r
u
z
A
v
e
Alm
a
S
t
r
e
e
t
El
C
a
m
i
n
o
R
e
a
l
Oreg
o
n
E
x
p
r
e
s
s
w
a
y
Embarcade
r
o
R
o
a
d
Lou
i
s
R
o
a
d
Wa
v
e
r
l
y
S
t
r
e
e
t
Seal
e
A
v
e
n
u
e
Loma
V
e
r
d
e
A
v
e
n
u
e
Chan
n
i
n
g
A
v
e
n
u
e
East M
e
a
d
o
w
D
r
i
v
e
San
A
n
t
o
n
i
o
R
o
a
d
Colora
d
o
A
v
e
n
u
e
Sand
H
i
l
l
R
o
a
d
Lin
c
o
l
n
A
v
e
n
u
e
Hamilto
n
A
v
e
n
u
e
Aras
t
r
a
d
e
r
o
R
o
a
d
Univ
e
r
s
i
t
y
A
v
e
n
u
e
P A L O A L T O C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
T R A N S P O R T A T I O N E L E M E N T
MA P T - 3
B I K E W A Y S I N P A L O A L T O
Source: City of Palo Alto, 2016; PlaceWorks, 2016.
0 0.5 1 Mile
Class I Multi-Use Path
Park Trails
Private Pathways
Across Barrier Connection (ABC)
Class II Bicycle Lane
One-Way Bicycle Lane
Enhanced Bikeway
Class III Shared Roadway
Class III Shared Arterial
Bicycle Boulevard
"X Caltrain Stations
Park/Open Space
Public Conservation Land
Railroads
City Limit
Commercial
"X
Downtown Inset
Existing Proposed Off-Street
Dedicated On-Street
Shared On-Street
Center
Al
m
a
S
t
Bry
a
n
t
S
t
Mi
d
d
l
e
f
i
e
l
d
R
d
We
b
s
t
e
r
S
t
Univ
e
r
s
i
t
y
A
v
e
Ever
e
t
t
A
v
e
Hom
e
r
A
v
e
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JULY 19, 2016ANUARY 31, 2017 T-11
WALKING
Mode share data indicate that walking accounts for more trips than public transit in
Palo Alto each day, yet is an often overlooked means of transportation. As shown on
Map T-4, Palo Alto's pedestrians are generally well served by current facilities and will
benefit from the attention given to street trees, walkable neighborhoods, and
pedestrian- oriented design. The most needed improvements are to fill in the gaps in
the sidewalk system, make intersection crossings “friendlier,” and overcome barriers
to northeast-southwest travel.
FUNDING IMPROVEMENTS
Transportation infrastructure in Palo Alto is supported through the City’s Capital
Improvement Program (CIP) and impact fees on new development. The CIP is
approved on an annual basis by the City Council and may include projects such as
roadway and other improvements to the circulation system. The Citywide
Transportation Impact Fee, adopted in 2007 and in effect through 2025, is designed
to recover a portion of the costs associated with relieving traffic congestion
associated with new development; the fee is calculated based on the number of
additional vehicle trips generated. Three area-specific transportation impact fees also
apply to portions of the city where high traffic volumes occur. These areas include
San Antonio/West Bayshore, Stanford Research Park/El Camino Real CS Zone, and
Charleston/Arastradero. A separate fee is charged in the Downtown Parking
Assessment District (for parking impacts).
The goals, policies and programs contained in this Element seek to mitigate the
impacts of future development, protect Palo Alto residents’ quality of life, and
address region-wide transportation issues. In order to implement these policies and
programs, the City is committed to evaluating additional funding options on a
regular basis. Regular evaluation and assessment of transportation-related needs and
resources can help ensure that Palo Alto achieves these goals.
STREETS
All modes of transportation in Palo Alto depend to some degree on the street
network. The City’s street network has remained essentially unchanged since the
1960s, except for projects along the Sand Hill Road corridor., yet overall traffic
volumes have increased. In the future, prioritizing multimodal transportation
solutions and traffic calming can support a shift towards alternative transportation,
thus increasing walking and biking on local streets.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION
Source: City of Palo Alto, 2012.
MAP T-4
EXISTING PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES
Downtown Inset
Existing Facilities and Programs | 3-5
Alta Planning + Design
Chapter 3
Map 3-2: Existing Pedestrian Conditions
Existing Facilities and Programs | 3-5
Alta Planning + Design
Chapter 3
Map 3-2: Existing Pedestrian Conditions
Existing Facilities and Programs | 3-5
Alta Planning + Design
Chapter 3
Map 3-2: Existing Pedestrian Conditions
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JULY 19, 2016ANUARY 31, 2017 T-13
STREET CLASSIFICATIONS
Palo Alto’s streets are categorized according to purpose, design and the volume of
traffic they carry. This street hierarchy is defined below and is illustrated on Map T-5.
Improvements to road surfaces, curbs, crossings, signage, landscaping, and sight
lines must make streets safer for vehicles, but must consider the needs and safety of
pedestrians and cyclists as well.
ROADWAY AND INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS
[To be updated when Preferred Alternative and associated roadway
improvements are identified]. Efficient traffic circulation on major streets is a
priority in Palo Alto, as is minimizing the diversion of through-traffic onto local
residential streets. Intersections are the most constricted points on the network and
tend to see the highest levels of congestion during the peak morning and afternoon
commute periods. For that purpose, several key intersections and roadways
segments, as shown on Map T-6, have been identified for monitoring.
A challenge is to balance the free flow of traffic with the safety of pedestrians and
cyclists of all abilities, as well as with residents’ desire to maintain low traffic speeds
on residential arterials. Most future improvements will be made within existing rights-
of-way at intersections and will provide for traffic calming or relatively small increases
in roadway capacity by adding turn lanes or making other intersection . adjustments.
Intersection improvements are planned only at the major intersections noted below.
PALO ALTO’S STREET HIERARCHY
Freeway: Major roadway with controlled access; devoted exclusively to
traffic movement, mainly of a through or regional nature.
Expressway: Major roadway with limited access to adjacent properties;
devoted almost exclusively to traffic movement, mainly serving through-
traffic.
Arterial: Major roadway mainly serving through-traffic; takes traffic to and
from expressways and freeways; provides access to adjacent properties.
Residential Arterial: Major roadway mainly serving through-traffic; takes
traffic to and from express- ways and freeways; provides access to adjacent
properties, most of which are residential properties located on both sides of
the roadway with direct frontages and driveways on that roadway.
Collector: Roadway that collects and distributes local traffic to and from
arterial streets, and provides access to adjacent properties.
Local: Minor roadway that provides access to adjacent properties only.
Vehicle miles traveled (VMT) is an
indicator of the level of traffic on the
roadway system by motor vehicles. VMT is
estimated for the given period of time - for
example daily or annually. The estimate is
based on both traffic volume counts and
roadway length. As population increases,
so does VMT; however, other factors that
contribute to a rise in VMT include
economic growth, relatively affordable
auto travel costs, tourism, low levels of
public transit, and sprawl. As the amount
of auto travel increases, the time wasted
on congested roadways, the energy used
by the vehicles and total costs of auto
travel increase accordingly.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
T-14 REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JULY 19, 2016ANUARY 31, 2017
Additional turning lanes and other related changes are proposed at the following
major intersections in Palo Alto: [list to be determined based on final decisions about
the locations of future development]
Most future improvements will be made within existing rights-of-way and will
provide for traffic calming or relatively small increases in roadway capacity by adding
turn lanes or making other intersection adjustments. Other, specific local and
regional transportation investments envisioned are:
Full grade separations for automobiles, pedestrians, and bicyclists at Caltrain
crossings,
Retrofit/improvements to existing grade separated Caltrain crossings for
pedestrians and bicyclists at California Avenue and University Avenue,
Construction of new pedestrian and bicycle grade separated crossing of Caltrain
in South Palo Alto and in North Palo Alto,
Pedestrian and bicycle improvements derived from the 2012 Bicycle and
Pedestrian Plan as amended over time,
The US 101/Adobe Creek bicycle and pedestrian bridge,
El Camino Real intersection and pedestrian safety/streetscape improvements,
Downtown mobility and safety improvements,
Geng Road extension to Laura Lane,
Middlefield Road corridor improvements.
Other agencies, including Santa Clara County, VTA, and Caltrans, are responsible for
other major roadway projects that will directly affect Palo Alto streets, but are not
under the jurisdiction of the City. Specifically:
The County will implement elements of Expressway Plan 2040 in or near Palo
Alto, including widening Oregon-Page Mill with HOV lanes and a
bicycle/pedestrian trail between I-280 and Foothill Expressway, intersection
improvements along Oregon-Page Mill between Porter and Hansen and at El
Camino Real, reconfiguration of the interchange at I-280/Oregon-Page Mill
Road, and an ITS/signal system Countywide,
US 101 southbound improvements from San Antonio Road and Rengstorff
Avenue.
"X
"X
§¨¦280
|ÿ82
£¤101
Mountain View
East Palo Alto
Stanford
Los Altos Hills
Menlo Park
S A N
F R A N C I S C O
B A Y
Los Altos
El
C
a
m
i
n
o
R
e
a
l
Fo
o
t
h
i
l
l
E
x
p
r
e
s
s
w
a
y
Oreg
o
n
E
x
p
r
e
s
s
w
a
y
Embarcad
e
r
o
R
o
a
d
Univ
e
r
s
i
t
y
A
v
e
n
u
e
East Charleston Road
San
A
n
t
o
n
i
o
R
o
a
d
Al
m
a
S
t
r
e
e
t
Mi
d
d
l
e
f
i
e
l
d
R
o
a
d
California Ave Station
Palo Alto Station
Source: City of Palo Alto, 2013; PlaceWorks, 2014.
PR EL I MI N A R Y D RA F T MA P T -5R O A D W A Y N E T W O R K
P A L O A L T O C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A NT R A N S P O R T A T I O N E L E M E N T
0 0.25 0.5 Miles
Local/Collector Residential Arterial Arterial Expressway Freeway Railroads
"X Caltrain Stations Parks Public Conservation Land Sphere of Influence City Boundary
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
T-16 REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JULY 19, 2016ANUARY 31, 2017
§¨¦280
|ÿ82
£¤101
Foo
t
h
i
l
l
E
x
p
r
e
s
s
w
a
y
Mountain View
East Palo Alto
Stanford
Menlo Park
Mi
d
d
l
e
f
i
e
l
d
R
o
a
d
Baylands Preserve
Byxbee Park
Ea
s
t
B
a
y
s
h
o
r
e
R
o
a
d
Page
M
i
l
l
R
o
a
d
Mi
d
d
l
e
f
i
e
l
d
R
o
a
d
Charle
s
t
o
n
R
o
a
d
Junipe
r
o
S
e
r
r
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
Arbore
t
u
m
R
d
Quar
r
y
R
o
a
d
Sa
n
t
a
C
r
u
z
A
v
e
Alm
a
S
t
r
e
e
t
El
C
a
m
i
n
o
R
e
a
l
Oreg
o
n
E
x
p
r
e
s
s
w
a
y
Embarcade
r
o
R
o
a
d
Lou
i
s
R
o
a
d
Wa
v
e
r
l
y
S
t
r
e
e
t
Seal
e
A
v
e
n
u
e
Loma
V
e
r
d
e
A
v
e
n
u
e
Chan
n
i
n
g
A
v
e
n
u
e
East M
e
a
d
o
w
D
r
i
v
e
San
A
n
t
o
n
i
o
R
o
a
d
Colora
d
o
A
v
e
n
u
e
Sand
H
i
l
l
R
o
a
d
Lin
c
o
l
n
A
v
e
n
u
e
Hamilto
n
A
v
e
n
u
e
Aras
t
r
a
d
e
r
o
R
o
a
d
Univ
e
r
s
i
t
y
A
v
e
n
u
e
!6
!1
!20
!18
!15
!9
!8
!7
!5
!4
!3
!2
!19
!17
!16
!14
!13
!12
!11
!10
P A L O A L T O C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
T R A N S P O R T A T I O N E L E M E N T
MA P T - 6
M O N I T O R E D I N T E R S E C T I O N S
Source: City of Palo Alto, 2016; PlaceWorks, 2016.Park/Open Space
Public Conservation Land
Railroads
City Limit
0 0.5 1 Mile
1. Middlefield/University2. Middlefield/Embarcadero3. Middlefield/Oregon (CMP)4. Middlefield/Colorado5. Middlefield/Charleston6. Middlefield/San Antonio (CMP)7. El Camino Real/Alma/Sand Hill (CMP)8. El Camino Real/University/Palm9. El Camino Real/Embarcadero (CMP)10. El Camino Real/Page Mill (CMP)11. El Camino Real/Arastradero/Charleston (CMP)12. El Camino Real/San Antonio (CMP) (Mountain View)13. Santa Cruz/Sand Hill Road (Menlo Park)14. Foothill/Junipero Serra/Page Mill (CMP)15. Foothill/Arastradero (CMP)16. Alma/Charleston17. Arboretum/Quarry18. San Antonio/Charleston(CMP)19. Embarcadero/East Bayshore20. University/Woodland (East Palo Alto)
Palo Alto Monitored Intersections
(CMP) denotes Santa Clara County VTA Congestion Management Plan intersection.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
T-18 REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JULY 19, 2016ANUARY 31, 2017
These investments would be complemented by local and regional investments in
transit and transportation demand management, as well as parking supply and
parking management.
LEVEL OF SERVICE &AND VEHICLE MILES TRAVELLED
Motor vehicle lLevel of sService (LOS) is a way of measuring traffic congestion based
on average control delay per vehicle, and in some analyses, based on the ratio of the
volume of traffic to the capacity of the road. LOS A is a free-flowing condition for cars
and LOS F is an extreme congestion condition, with traffic volumes at or over
capacity. LOS definitions for signalized intersections are shown in Table T-1. Policies
in the Element ensure that Intersections in the city are subject to its LOS standards,
and the City will continue to use vehicular LOS at local intersections when evaluating
development applications, including a project’s potential contribution to cumulative
overall LOS.
TABLE T-1 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION LOS
DEFINITIONS BASED ON AVERAGE DELAY
LOS
Average Control Delay
Per Vehicle (Seconds)
A 10.0 or less
B 10.1 to 20.0
C 20.1 to 35.0
D 35.1 to 55.0
E 55.1 to 80.0
F Greater than 80.0
Source: Transportation Research Board, 2000 Highway Capacity Manual.
Washington, D.C. 2000.
VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED (VMT)
Transportation planning analyses used by cities to describe traffic and roadway and
intersection operation, both for infrastructure planning and for new development
projects, are evolving away from the traditional Vehicle Level of Service (LOS) metric
towards a multi-modal perspective based on Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT). California
Senate Bill 743, passed in 2013, requires impacts from new development on
transportation network performance to be viewed through a filter that promotes the
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JULY 19, 2016ANUARY 31, 2017 T-19
reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, the development of multi-modal
transportation networks, and a diversity of land uses. This evolution acknowledges
the fact that designing roadways primarily to serve vehicle travel is not a sustainable
transportation approach and can have negative consequences for those travelling by
other modes. This Bill will also shift the State away from LOS as the metric for
evaluating transportation impacts under the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) and towards use of vehicle miles travelled (VMT) or VMT per capita. This
shift recognizes that prioritizing the free flow of cars over any other roadway user
contradicts State goals to reduce GHGs.
Utilizing both LOS and VMT metrics provides the City with a comprehensive view to
address traffic and to reflect its sustainability goals. Shorter and fewer vehicle trips to,
from and within Palo Alto become an important measure in relation to greenhouse
gas emissions. While LOS describes local-level impacts at a specific location, VMT
describes network-wide impacts by measuring the number of miles traveled by
motor vehicles within an area. VMT per capita divides the total amount of VMT by
the population living and working in a community. In the Bay Area, a common
pattern in jobs-rich communities like Palo Alto is that community-wide VMT is high
because many workers must travel into the City from far away, and not all can meet
their needs by using transit. VMT per capita is used to account for changes in
population and employment over time and helps measure how far people travel to
get to work, get home, and meet daily needs, while adjusting for increases in VMT
due only to increased housing or employment. In summary, VMT can help identify
how new development projects may influence accessibility and emissions, while
vehicle LOS can still help identify impacts on users of the local roadway network.
Together, these measures can inform efforts to reduce commute lengths and
enhance the availability of alternative transportation options.
MULTIMODAL LEVEL OF SERVICE
Some communities are exploring how to apply the concept of level of service, which
has focused exclusively on cars for the past several decades, to transit, bikes, and
pedestrians in order to better understand and support alternative modes of
transportation. Multi-modal level of service (MMLOS) is another analytical approach
endorsed by policies in this Element, and applies the concept of LOS to all modes of
travel. Within Santa Clara County, in response to State laws that require planning for
complete streets and deprioritize vehicular LOS as a metric for transportation
analysis, VTA is developing guidelines for multi-modal transportation planning to
include in all transportation studies, and the City of Palo Alto will have an
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
T-20 REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JULY 19, 2016ANUARY 31, 2017
opportunity to participate in this effort. One possible outcome could be the adoption
of metrics for safety, convenience, and delay for transit, bicycles, and pedestrians
similar to the LOS standards the City has adopted for motor vehiclescars.
RAIL CORRIDOR
Palo Alto is bisected by the Caltrain rail corridor, which provides important
connections to the wider Bay Area; however, it also creates a significant barrier to
local connectivity and circulation. Policies in this Element address these issues as well
as safety and desired service expansions to better serve the California Avenue
Caltrain station.
GRADE SEPARATION
To enhance local connectivity, improve pedestrian and bicycle circulation, and
increase safety, the City of Palo Alto is also committed to pursuing grade separation
for pedestrians, bicyclists, and automobiles at Caltrain crossings within the City and is
considering conceptual grade separation alternatives for a portion of the Caltrain
right-of-way. Recent studies have focused on three existing at-grade crossings at
West Charleston Road, Meadow Drive, and Churchill ,Avenue; however there is
significant interest in analyzing and pursuing grade separations at Alma Street as
well, in addition to possible establishment of a “quiet zones” for the near term.
Trenching the Caltrain corridor from San Antonio to the Oregon Expressway is the
City’s preferred option for grade separation. Although the potential cost of this
option to reroute existing creeks and add infrastructure pump stations would be
higher than the option of submerging the roadway at key intersections, grade
separation would prevent the taking of existing homes and partial property
acquisitions, elimination of turning movements, and would result in less visual
impacts at each intersection than submerging the roadway at key intersections due
to the large footprint of the submerged segments.
NEIGHBORHOOD IMPACTS
Most Palo Alto streets are bordered by residential land uses. Citizens’ concerns
reflect chronic problems like speeding, regional traffic on local streets, commuter
shortcutting, and too much motor vehicle traffic. The City has designated some
streets as residential arterials to recognize that they carry large volumes of through-
traffic but also have residential uses on both sides of the street. The objective is to
address the desires of residents of these streets who would like to have slower
speeds, safer conditions for bicycles and pedestrians, and aesthetic improvements.
The Traffic Infusion on Residential
Environment (TIRE) index is a measure of
the effect of traffic on the safety and
comfort of human activities, such as
walking, cycling, and playing on or near a
street and on the freedom to maneuver
vehicles in and out of residential
driveways. The TIRE index scale ranges
from 0 to 5 depending on daily traffic
volume. An index of 0 represents the least
infusion of traffic and 5 the greatest, and
thereby, the poorest residential
environment.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JULY 19, 2016ANUARY 31, 2017 T-21
This must be done economically and without appreciably reducing traffic capacity or
diverting traffic onto other local neighborhood streets.
Additionally, to address community concerns, the City has developed a Traffic
Intrusion on Residential Environments (TIRE) methodology that estimates resident
perception of traffic impacts based on anticipated average daily traffic growth.
Although not required under the California Environmental Quality Act or pursuant to
VTA guidelines, the City of Palo Alto uses the TIRE index to measure the impact of
traffic on residents along a street.
TRAFFIC CALMING
Policies in this Element support tTraffic calming, which refers to projects that make
permanent, physical changes to streets to slow traffic and/or reduce volumes, thus
improving their safety and addressing residents’ concerns. Traffic calming measures
can reduce speeds and return some through-traffic from local streets and collector
streets to nearby arterials, something that may be of increased importance given the
advent of Google Maps and Waze. Traffic calming also includes education and
enforcement measures that promote changes in driver behavior. Where warranted
by traffic conditions and residents’ desires, Palo Alto’s policy is to implement physical
changes to local and collector streets that slow traffic close to the 25 miles per hour
(mph) residential speed limit. Physical changes implemented are safe and take into
account the needs of all road users. Some examples of traffic calming measures
include:
Curb and Sidewalk Design. In many of the areas of Palo Alto built since World
War II, an integral curb and sidewalk design was used, resulting in sidewalks
immediately next to traffic lanes. Adding planting pockets and street trees would
promote pedestrian use and also provide visual cues to drivers to reduce
speeds. Curb extensions at intersections and crosswalks can also slow traffic
speeds.
Reducing and Narrowing LanesLane Reductions. In commercial areas, it may
be feasible to reduce the number of lanes for through-traffic with- out losing too
much traffic handling capacity. In these areas, curb lanes are often not very
useful for through-traffic since they may be blocked or slowed by cars turning
into and out of driveways and parking spaces. In other areas, narrowing the
travel lanes is a technique that can be used to reduce motor vehicle
speeds.Street Closures. Street closures are effective at eliminating through-
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
T-22 REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JULY 19, 2016ANUARY 31, 2017
traffic, especially when safety issues are involved. They may be a necessary
design element for a bicycle boulevard or transit mall, but closures can often be
controversial because they disrupt the traditional neighborhood street grid, and
may shift traffic to adjacent streets.
RoundaboutsTraffic Circles. A traffic circle is a raised island in the center of an
intersection that helps reduce speeding by forcing drivers to slow. Traffic circles
have been shown to dramatically reduce collisions and are considered more
bicycle-friendly than traditional two- or four-way stops controls. Because they
don’t require stops, traffic circles also reduce local air and noise pollution from
stop–and-go traffic, and offer opportunities for added landscaping and tree
planting. Traffic circles are already used in Palo Alto’s residential neighborhoods,
and the 2012 Bicycle + Pedestrian Transportation Plan calls for greater use of
traffic circles, particularly along bicycle boulevards.
PARKING
Effectively managingA comprehensive parking supply and demand can strategy is an
important component of the overall effort to reduce traffic congestion, protect the
livability of residential neighborhoods, and support local businesses. The overarching
objective of the strategy is to provide parking as needed to sustain economic vitality
in the commercial centers and employment districts, while over time implementing
initiatives to reduce motor vehicle parking demand and provide new bicycle parking
facilities.
MOTOR VEHICLE PARKING
The parking-related policies strategy articulated in this plan articulate involves a
phased approach. In the near-term, the focus will be on optimizing the use of
existing parking spaces and conducting needs assessments, which establish a
baseline for adequate parking in each of the city's commercial centers and
employment districts under current conditions, and creating parking management
strategies, which optimize the use of existing parking spaces. In the mid- to long-
term, as it becomes easier and more convenient to walk, bike, rideshare and use
transit, and as the effectiveness of parking management programs can be measured,
the focus will shift to recalibrating parking supply. Bridging between these two
phases will require identifying performance standards for transit, walking, ridesharing
and bicycling that represent the thresholds at which point mechanisms to phase in
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JULY 19, 2016ANUARY 31, 2017 T-23
updated parking requirements and reduce space allocated to parking over time
should be considered.
Parking management can be done in a number of ways, including optimizing use of
existing spaces and incentivizing use of alternatives to the automobile. Technology is
central to optimizing the use of existing spaces, and the City is already committed to
installing parking guidance systems that give drivers real-time information on the
number and location of available spaces, and to developing clear logos and
wayfinding signage to help people access public parking efficiently. Sshared parking
arrangements that allow different users to use the same spaces at alternate times -
for example, employees in the daytime and restaurant patrons at night - can also
optimize the use of existing spaces. Improving transit service, providing safe,
convenient bicycle parking and enhancing the pedestrian realm can incentivize the
use of transportation modes that don't require vehicle parking, while charging for
parking makes it more likely that people will carpool, take transit, walk or bike.
The City has already begun to pilot new programs and gauge the effectiveness of
parking management strategies in coordination with other transportation demand
management initiatives. This plan seeks to set the stage for continued innovation
and experimentation in both the public and private sectors to develop effective
solutions. Over time, carefully managing parking supply can significantly reduce the
number of parking spaces needed, moderate traffic congestion, reduce the costs of
providing parking, encourage transit and sustainable transportation choices and
support Palo Alto’s goals for livable neighborhoods.
BICYCLE PARKING
Policies also support As the City continues to implement its parking strategy over the
mid- to long-term of this plan, bicycle use will be promoted by increasing the
number of safe, attractive, and well-designed bicycle parking spaces in Palo Alto, as
well as bike share hubs and bike stations at Caltrain stations. Priority areas of the city
for enhanced bike parking include heavily travelled mixed-use areas, commercial
centers, employment districts, recreational/cultural facilities, multi-modal
transportation facilities and ride share stops. In addition, the City will identify ways to
incentivize the provision of bicycle parking near existing shops, services and places of
employment in collaboration with private sector partners, and in City-owned parking
lots and rights of ways. Further actions will be guided through implementation of the
2012 Bicycle + Pedestrian Transportation Plan.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
T-24 REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JULY 19, 2016ANUARY 31, 2017
ROAD SAFETY
Traffic safety will continue to be among the City’s top priorities in the future. City
officials, city employees and community members are committed to working
together to build better and safer streets, educate the public on traffic safety, enforce
traffic laws, and adopt policy changes that save lives. The City is undertaking a
comprehensive traffic safety program, and partners with Palo Alto Unified School
District and the Palo Alto Parent Teacher Association (PTA) on a Safe Routes to
School Program that encourages families to walk, bike, take transit and use other
alternatives to driving to school more often and to reduce the risk of collisions for
students.
A new approach to roadway safety that has proven to be successful in substantially
reducing traffic-related fatality rates without compromising mobility is the Vision Zero
Initiative, which is being implemented in cities throughout the US and
Europe.developed in Sweden. At the core of this approach is the pursuit of concept
of shifting responsibility for safety from roadway users to the design of the roadway
system. While local conditions and traffic culture in Palo Alto are different than in
Sweden, the Vision Zero Initiative could potentially offer ideas and lessons for Palo
Alto to draw on in pursuing the goal of roadway safety for all users.
TRANSIT-DEPENDENT COMMUNITIESY
Young people, seniors, people with low incomes, and people with limited mobility
all have special transportation needs. Palo Alto is committed to providing reasonable
accessibility and mobility for all members of the community, including those who
depend on transit because they cannot drive or choose not to.
SENIORS
As the baby boomer generation (i.e., those born between 1946 and 1964) ages,
more and more people will forego driving or become unable to drive. Without
proper access to affordable transit or families, friends, and/or neighbors who can
provide rides, seniors face an increased risk of social and physical isolation. VTA
offers seniors 65 and over a discounted Regional Transit Connection Card. In
addition, Outreach, a non-profit organization that serves seniors and people with
disabilities, offers transportation services in Santa Clara County, including a
subsidized transit pass and subsidized taxi rides. While Outreach provides an
important service to the community, there is a daily cap on the number of rides
offered so all user requests may not be accommodated.
Households that don’t own a car are
dependent on transit to reach work,
including evening, nighttime, and
weekend shifts, and to meet other daily
needs. At the same time, in a 2016 survey
of workers in downtown Palo Alto, 40
percent of service workers reported that
they would take transit to work if it was less
expensive. Improving mobility for low-
income residents and workers could mean
both expanding transit and shuttle service
to off-peak hours and supporting
programs to provide free or discounted
transit passes.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JULY 19, 2016ANUARY 31, 2017 T-25
PEOPLE WITH LIMITED MOBILITY
VTA’s paratransit services are also provided by Outreach. Riders may reserve
paratransit trips from one to three days in advance, between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m.
for service the next day. However, paratransit services are limited to a ¾-mile
corridor around the VTA bus routes and light rail stations. For travel outside of the
service area, customers must arrange a transfer to the paratransit operator.
UNIVERSAL DESIGN
The policies in this Element support these and other efforts to serve transit
dependent communities and also embrace the principle of universal design for
mobility is to achieve roadways and sidewalks that can accommodate people of all
abilities and all users, including automobiles, pedestrians, bicyclists. Examples of
universal design to support people with disabilities include placing pedestrian push
buttons at wheelchair level, audible pedestrian crossing systems, sidewalk curb
ramps, including wider ramps for strollers, increasing pedestrian crossing times,
sidewalk widths of 6 six feet or greater, roadway and sidewalk materials that reduce
slipping and add stability, minimizing driveway crossings and obstructions, and
avoiding steep grades and slopes.
ECONOMIC DISADVANTAGE
In 2012, HUD considered a household (family of four) earning $75,700 or less and
living in Santa Clara County to be low-income, $52,500 or less to be very low-
income, and $31,500 or less to be extremely low income. As described in the
adopted Housing Element (2014-2023), approximately 21 percent of households in
Palo Alto are low, very low, or extremely low income; 2 percent do not own a car.1
These households rely on transit to reach work, including evening, nighttime and
weekend shifts, and to meet other daily needs. Expanding access to public
transportation services in Palo Alto during off-peak hours, including the Shuttle, is
one strategy that can improve accessibility and mobility.
REGIONAL COLLABORATION
Increasing population and traffic congestion over the past 20 years have required an
increased emphasis on regional solutions to transportation issues. A regional
approach is needed to avoid local solutions that simply shift the problem elsewhere
or produce unintended results. Transportation facilities like Caltrain or the Bayshore
1 U.S Census Bureau, 2014 ACS 5-year estimate.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
T-26 REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JULY 19, 2016ANUARY 31, 2017
Freeway need to be managed on a regional basisly. Palo Alto is actively participating
with other communities and Caltrain on Caltrain electrification, formally known as
the Peninsula Corridor Electrification Project (PCEP), which will replace existing diesel
trains with electric ones along the 51-mile Caltrain corridor and enable Caltrain to
both increase the number of trains it runs and run longer trains. While these changes
offer benefits to regional commuters, they will are also expected to increase crossing
delays and congestion at rail crossings until they are grade separatedat local
intersections in Palo Alto.
Congestion Management Plan
Palo Alto has been an active participant in tThe Santa Clara County VTA Congestion
Management Program (CMP). The CMP is the primary mechanismvenue for
transportation planning in the County and the conduit for most transportationand
funding. Palo Alto representatives also participate on VTA advisory committees as
well as leadership in numerous other Bay Area regional bodies affecting
transportation, including the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC),
Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG), and the Bay Area Air Quality
Management District (BAAQMD), and the California Department of Transportation
(Caltrans).
HOV LANES
High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lanes and express lanes are regional used as a traffic
management strategiesy aimed at to reduce reducing congestion on freeways and
improvinge air quality. HOV lanes are reserved at peak travel times or longer for the
exclusive use of vehicles with a driver and one or more passengers; although
motorcycles and some alternative fuel and transit vehicles may also use the lanes.
There are about 174 miles of freeway carpool lanes in Santa Clara County, including
84 miles along US 101 between the Palo Alto and Morgan Hill.
GOALS, POLICIES, AND PROGRAMS
SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORTATION
GOAL T-1 Create a sustainable transportation system, complemented
by a mix of land uses, that emphasizes walking, bicycling,
use of public transportation, and other methods to reduce
greenhouse gas emissions and the use of single occupancy
motor vehicles.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JULY 19, 2016ANUARY 31, 2017 T-27
REDUCING RELIANCE ON SINGLE-OCCUPANT VEHICLES
Policy T-1.1 Take a comprehensive approach to reducing single-occupant vehicle
trips by involving those who live, work and shop in Palo Alto in
developing strategies that make it easier and more convenient not to
drive.
Policy T-1.2 Collaborate with Palo Alto employers and business owners to develop,
implement and expand comprehensive programs like the
Transportation Management Association (TMA) to reduce single-
occupant vehicle commute trips, including through incentives.
Create a long-term education program to change Program T1.2.1
the travel habits of residents, visitors, shoppers, and
workers by informing them about transportation
alternatives, incentives, and impacts. Work with the
Palo Alto Unified School District and with other
public and private interests, such as the Chamber of
Commerce and Commuter Wallet partners, to
develop and implement this program.
Formalize the City’s Transportation Demand Program T1.2.2
Management (TDM) program requirements by
establishing an ordinance that outlines when TDM
should be applied to new development should be
required to prepare and implement a TDM Plan,
whatand the performance standards. metrics are
required, and how compliance will be measured
and enforced. Require regular monitoring/reporting
and provide for enforcement with meaningful
penalties for non-compliance. The ordinance
should also:
Establish a list of acceptable effective TDM
measures that include transit usepromotion,
prepaid transit passes, commuter checks, car
sharing, carpooling, parking cash-out,
bicyclingbicycle lockers and showers, shuttles
to Caltrain walking, and education and
outreach to support the use of these modes.
Transportation Demand Management
Strategies are also referenced under
Program T-5.2.3.
Transportation Demand Management (TDM)
The term Transportation Demand
Management (TDM) encompasses a
coordinated set of strategies that are
designed to reduce the use of single
occupancy vehicles, and thereby reduce
both traffic and parking demand. TDM
programs include investments in alternative
transportation improvements; incentives for
local employees to take transit, walk, or bike;
parking management; and marketing. In
Palo Alto, the Transportation Management
Authority (TMA), an independent non-profit
organization that works collaboratively with
the City and the business community, is
responsible for coordinating TDM programs.
Transportation Demand Management
Strategies are also referenced under
Program T-5.2.3.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
T-28 REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JULY 19, 2016ANUARY 31, 2017
Require TMA membership and pProvide a
system for incorporating alternative measures
as new ideas for TDM are developed.
Establish a mechanism to monitor the success
of TDM measures and track the cumulative
reduction of peak period motor vehicle
tripsthrough the following methods:. TDM
measures should achieve the following
reduction in peak period motor vehicle trips
from the rates included in the Institute of
Transportation Engineers’ Trip Generation
Manual for the appropriate land use category:
- 45 percent reduction in the Downtown
district
- 35 percent reduction in the California
Avenue area
- 30 percent reduction in the Stanford
Research Park
- 30 percent reduction in the El Camino
Real Corridor
- 20 percent reduction in other areas of the
city
Establish a system that allows new
development to achieve “no net new vehicle
trips” by reducing trips to the site through
TDM measures, and then Allow contracting
between developments or organizations so
that trips to/from one site can be offsetting
remaining trips via by enforceable agreements
with other entities or organizations like the
TMA that are committed to reducing existing
vehicle tripsreductions on another for a net
reduction within Palo Alto.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JULY 19, 2016ANUARY 31, 2017 T-29
Evaluate the performance of pilot programs Program T1.2.3
implemented by the Palo Alto Downtown
Transportation Management Association and
consider pursue expanding expansion from
Downtown to California Avenue and other areas of
the city as when appropriate.
Site City facilities near high-capacity transit and Program T1.2.4
rReview revise existing regulations, policies, and
programs to identify revisions that encourage
telecommuting, satellite office concepts, and work-
at-home options.
REDUCING GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
Policy T-1.3 Reduce GHG and pollutant emissions associated with transportation
by reducing vehicle miles traveled and per-mile emissions through
increasing transit options and through the use of zero-emission
vehicle technologies to meet City and State goals for GHG reductions
by 2030.
Develop an electric vehicle promotion program that Program T1.3.1
identifies policy and technical issues, barriers and
opportunities to the expansion of electric vehicles.
Use low-emission vehicles for the Palo Alto Free Program T1.3.2
Shuttle and wWork with transit providers, including
SamTrans and VTA, to encourage the adoption of
electric, fuel cell or other zero emission vehicles.
Also work with private bus and shuttle providers,
delivery companies, and ride services.
Policy T-1.4 Ensure that electric vehicle charging infrastructure, including
infrastructure for charging e-bikes, is available citywide.
Review Update the Zoning Ordinance and update Program T1.4.1
as needed to ensure compatibility with the electric
vehicle infrastructure ordinance., including parking
technology improvements such as vehicle lifts and
electronic monitoring.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
T-30 REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JULY 19, 2016ANUARY 31, 2017
Further encourage the installation of facilities that Program T1.4.2
support alternative fuel vehicles by pPeriodically
reviewing requirements for electric and plug-in
vehicle infrastructure in new construction. Consider
and periodically review requirements for electric
and plug-in infrastructure for remodels. Consider
costs to the City, including identifying payment
options.
INCREASING TRANSIT USE
Policy T-1.5 Improve and support Encourage innovation and expanded transit
access to regional destinations, multi-modal transit stations,
employment centers and commercial centers, including those within
Palo Alto through the use of efficient public and/or private transit
options such as rideshare services, on-demand local shuttles, and
other first/last mile connections.
Collaborate with transit providers, including Program T1.5.1
Caltrain, bus operators and rideshare companies, to
develop first/last mile connection strategies that
boost the use of transit and shuttle service for local
errands and commuting. Focus on connections
to/from major corridors such as East and West
Bayshore Road, Alma Street, El Camino Real and
Embarcadero Road.
Use bike share to enhance first/last mile Program T1.5.2
connections and locate bike stations at transit hubs.
Also continue to work with Caltrain, Amtrak, and
public bus operators to expand bicycle storage on
public transit vehicles during both peak and off-
peak hours.
Policy T-1.6 Support efforts Advocate for transit providers to coordinate train, bus,
and shuttle schedules at multi-modal transit stations, and other transit
information centers, to enable efficient transfer among public transit
modes.
Policy T-1.7 Work to ensure public and private school commute patterns are
accommodated in the local transit system, including through schedule
and route coordination.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JULY 19, 2016ANUARY 31, 2017 T-31
Policy T-1.8 Continue to encourage the provision of amenities such as seating,
lighting, and signage, including real-time arrival information, at bus
and shuttle stops and train stations to increase rider comfort, safety,
and convenience.
ENHANCING RAIL AND BUS SERVICE
Policy T-1.9 Support Caltrain modernization and electrification, capacity and
service enhancements and extension to Downtown San Francisco.
Policy T-1.10 Support Encourage continued enhancement of the Caltrain stations as
important transportation nodes for the city.
Collaborate with Stanford University, VTA, Caltrain Program T1.10.1
and other agencies Stanford University, per existing
agreements with the City, to explore station
improvementspursue improvements to the Palo
Alto Station/Transit Center area aimed at enhancing
pedestrian experience and improving, including
maintenance and circulation and access
improvements for all modes.
Program T1.10.2 Work with Caltrain to address commuter parking
intrusion into surrounding neighborhoods. Prioritize
solutions such as shuttle services, considering
parking structures only as an option of last resort.
In collaboration with Caltrain and Stanford Research Program T1.10.2
Park, pursue expansion of study the feasibility of
baby bullet service to the California Avenue Caltrain
Station ,and creation of an enhanced transit center
at the Station, including connections to VTA bus
service, the Palo Alto Free Shuttle, the Marguerite,
and other private shuttles serving the Research
Park. supplemented by connections from the
station to the Stanford Research Park, as a way to
incentivize use of transit by employees commuting
to jobs in the Research Park. Baby bullet trains
stopping at California Avenue should complement
baby bullets stopping at Palo Alto Station., and be
connected to shuttle routes and other first-mile/last-
mile solutions.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
T-32 REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JULY 19, 2016ANUARY 31, 2017
Policy T-1.11 Collaborate with transit agencies in planning and implementing
convenient, efficient, coordinated and effective bus service in Palo Alto
that addresses the needs of all segments of our population.
Strongly recommend that VTA maintain existing Program T1.11.1
service and coverage levels in Palo Alto.
Work with VTA to explore VTA express bus service Program T1.11.2
routes that would serve the Stanford Research Park,
California Avenue, Stanford University, and
Downtown.
Study the feasibility of, and if warranted provide, Program T1.11.3
traffic signal prioritization for buses at Palo Alto
intersections, focusing first on regional transit
routes. Also, advocate for bus service
improvements on El Camino Real such as queue
jump lanes and curbside platforms.
SHUTTLE SERVICE, RIDESHARING AND FIRST/LAST MILE CONNECTIONS
Policy T-1.12 Encourage services that complement and enhance the transportation
options available to help Palo Alto residents and employees make
first/last mile connections and travel within the city for daily needs
without using a single occupancy vehicle, including shuttle, taxi and
ridesharing services.
Investigate a pilot program to subsidize a taxi, Program T1.12.1
rideshare, or transit program for Palo Altans to get
to/from dDowntown, including offering education
and incentives to encourage users.
Policy T-1.13 Continue the Palo Alto Free Shuttle pProgram and work with partners
to enhance service by increasing frequency and prioritizing
destinations of value to the community, including health centers,
parks, schools, senior centers, and shopping areas and other places
where residents gather.
Conduct a comprehensive study of the shuttle Program T1.13.1
system in collaboration with community members,
people with special needs, and PAUSD to:
Evaluate current routes and ridership;
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JULY 19, 2016ANUARY 31, 2017 T-33
Identify potential service improvements,
including new or modified routes; expanded
schedules that accommodate daytime,
evening, and weekend demand; facilitating
transit connections, and improvements to the
safety and appearance of shuttle stops;
Explore partnerships with other services that
could complement and supplement the Palo
Alto Shuttle;
Develop clear and engaging materials to
explain and promote shuttle use with the
purpose of reducing barriers to use; and
Establish a schedule for regular evaluation and
reporting to optimize shuttle system use and
effectiveness.
Policy T-1.14 Encourage employers to develop shared shuttle services to connect
employment areas with the multi-modal transit stations and City
amenities, and to offer employees education and information on how
to use shuttles.
BICYCLING AND WALKING
Policy T-1.15 Promote bicycle use as an alternative way to get to work, school,
shopping, recreational facilities and transit stops.
Allocate funding for regular surveys of bicycle use Program T1.15.1
across the city, by collecting bicycle counts on
important and potential bicycle corridors.
Consider marketing strategies, such as a recurring Program T1.15.2
Palo Alto Sunday Open Streets program of events,
potentially in coordination with local business
groups, which would include street closures and
programming.
Encourage private schools within the community to Program T1.15.3
develop Walk and Roll Maps as part of
Transportation Demand Management strategies to
reduce vehicle trips.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
T-34 REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JULY 19, 2016ANUARY 31, 2017
Support Participate in local and regional Program T1.15.4
encouragement events such as Palo Alto Walks &
and Rolls, Bike to Work Day, and Bike Palo Alto!
that encourages a culture of bicycling and walking
as alternatives to single occupant vehicle trips.
Policy T-1.16 Require new office, commercial, and multi-family residential
developments to provide improvements that improve bicycle and
pedestrian connectivity as called for in the 2012 Bicycle + Pedestrian
Transportation Plan.
Policy T-1.17 Increase cooperation with surrounding communities and other
agencies to establish and maintain off-roadway bicycle and pedestrian
paths and trails that are integrated with creek, utility, railroad rights-of-
way and green spaces in a manner that helps enhance and define the
community and avoids environmental impacts.
Policy T-1.18 Provide facilities that encourage and support bicycling and walking.
Adjust the street evaluation criteria of the City's Program T1.18.1
Pavement Management Program to ensure that
areas of the road used by bicyclists are maintained
at the same standards as, or at standards higher
than, areas used by motor vehicles. Include bicycle
and e-bike detection in intersection upgrades.
Prioritize investments for enhanced pedestrian Program T1.18.2
access and bicycle use within Palo Alto and to/from
surrounding communities, including by
incorporating improvements from related City
Plans, for example the 2012 Bicycle + Pedestrian
Transportation Plan and the Parks, Trails & Open
Space Master Plan, as amended, into the capital
improvements plan.
Increase the number of east-west pedestrian and Program T1.18.3
bicycle crossings along across Alma Street and the
Caltrain corridor, particularly south of Oregon
Expressway.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JULY 19, 2016ANUARY 31, 2017 T-35
Encourage the use of bike sharing, and support the Program T1.18.4
provision of bike share stationsrequired
infrastructure throughout Palo Alto, especially at
adjacent to transit stations and stops, job centers,
community centers, and other destinations.
Improve amenities such as seating, lighting, bicycle Program T1.18.5
parking, street trees, and interpretive stations along
bicycle and pedestrian paths and in City parks to
encourage walking and cycling and enhance the
feeling of safety.
Policy T-1.19 Regularly maintain off-roadway bicycle and pedestrian paths, including
sweeping, weed abatement, and surface maintenance.
Develop cooperative programs with the City and Program T1.19.1
businesses that promote good community
stewardship by keeping sidewalks clean in the
University Avenue/Downtown and California
Avenue business districts, and other centers.
Policy T-1.20 Maintain pedestrian- and bicycle-only use of alleyways Downtown and
in the California Avenue area where appropriate . to provide
connectivity between businesses and parking and transit stops, and
consider public art in the alleyways as a way to encourage walking.
MONITORING PROGRESS
Policy T-1.21 Continue to measure the effectiveness of the City’s transportation
network to make better decisions on transportation issues.
Collect, analyze and report transportation data Program T1.21.1
through surveys and other methods, to evaluate
implementation of related policies on a regular
basis. Also track progress on build-out of the Bicycle
+ Pedestrian Plan network.
Policy T-1.22 Monitor VMT per capita and citywide greenhouse gas (GHG)
emissions from mobile sources as a measure of progress toward
sustainability goalsthe City’s goal of reducing GHG 80% below 1990
levels by 2030.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
T-36 REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JULY 19, 2016ANUARY 31, 2017
Policy T-1.23 Monitor and publicly report on the level of service at critical
intersections (as shown on Map T-5) on a regular basis and consider
additional intersections to add to this list to monitor the effectiveness
of the City's growth management policies. Also monitor multi-modal
level of service for arterials and residential arterials.
FUNDING IMPROVEMENTS
Policy T-1.24 Evaluate transportation funding measures periodically for ongoing
transportation improvements that will help mitigate the impacts of
future development and protect residents’ quality of life.
As part of the effort to reduce traffic congestion, Program T1.24.1
regularly evaluate the City’s current Transportation
Impact Fee to implement transportation projects,
and consider new fees that new development
projects must pay to the City for use in reducing
motor vehicle trips to the extent feasible through
the provision of transit services, shuttles,
carpool/rideshare incentives, bicycle lanes, and
similar programs and improvements.
Policy T-1.25 Collaborate with adjacent communities to ensure that Palo Alto and its
immediate neighbors receive their fair share of regional transportation
funds, proportional to the need and demand for transportation
improvements within these communities to address region-wide
transportation issues.
In collaboration with regional agencies and Program T1.25.1
neighboring jurisdictions, identify and pursue
funding for rail corridor improvements and grade
separation.
Policy T-1.26 Collaborate with public interest groups as well as federal, State, and
local governments to study and advocate for transportation regulatory
changes, such as an increase in the gasoline tax.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JULY 19, 2016ANUARY 31, 2017 T-37
TRAFFIC DELAY AND CONGESTION
GOAL T-2 Decrease delay, congestion, and vehicle miles travelled
with a priority on our worst intersections and our peak
commute times, including school traffic.
Policy T-2.1 Working with congestion management authorities including the Valley
Transportation Authority (VTA) and the City/County Association of
Governments of San Mateo County (C/CAG), implement traffic
management strategies and technologies, such as signal coordination,
centralized traffic control, red-light, and speed enforcement cameras,
and real-time travel information, to reduce traffic congestion in and
around Palo Alto.
Implement computerized traffic management Program T2.1.1
systems to improve traffic flow when feasible.
Implement a program to monitor, coordinate, and Program T2.1.2
optimize traffic signal timing a minimum of every
five two years along arterial and residential arterial
streets.
Policy T-2.2 As part of the effort to reduce traffic congestion, seek ongoing funding
and engage employers to operate and expand support the
establishment and operation of Transportation Management
Associations (TMAs) to address transportation and parking issues as
appropriate in the City’s employment districts.
Work in partnership with the Downtown TMA and Program T2.2.1
Stanford University to aggregate data and realize
measurable reductions in single-occupant vehicle
commuting to and from Downtown and in the
Stanford Research Park.
Policy T-2.3 Use vehicular motor vehicle lLevel of sService (LOS) at signalized
intersections to evaluate the potential impact of proposed projects,
including contributions to cumulative congestion. Use signal warrants
and other metrics to evaluate impacts at unsignalized intersections.,
when evaluating development applications.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
T-38 REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JULY 19, 2016ANUARY 31, 2017
When adopting new CEQA significance thresholds Program T2.3.1
for compliance with SB 743 (2013), also adopt
desired standards for Regularly update LOS at
signalized intersections for use in evaluating the
consistency of proposed project with the
Comprehensive Plan.regulations
Policy T-2.4 Consistent with the principles of Complete Streets adopted by the City,
work to achieve and maintain acceptable levels of service for transit
vehicles, bicyclists, pedestrians and automobiles on roads in Palo Alto.
Establish and maintain thresholds for acceptable Program T2.4.1
multi-modal levels of service for intersections in
Palo Alto.
Revise protocols for office, commercial, and multi-Program T2.4.2
family residential development proposals to
evaluate multi-modal level of service and identify
gaps in the low stress bicycle and pedestrian
network. for transit vehicles, bicyclists, and
pedestrians.
SCHOOLS AND CHILDCARE FACILITY CONGESTION
Policy T-2.5 Encourage the location of childcare facilities near major employment
hubs to reduce traffic congestion associated with child pick-up and
drop-off.
Policy T-2.6 Work with PAUSD to ensure that decisions regarding school
assignments are analyzed to reduce peak period motor vehicle trips to
and from school sites.
Policy T-2.7 Work with the PAUSD to resolve traffic congestion issues associated
with student drop-off and pick-up. Address pedestrian and bicycle
access, circulation, and related issues such as coordinating bell
schedules on City rights-of-way adjacent to schools and on PAUSD
property.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JULY 19, 2016ANUARY 31, 2017 T-39
STREETS
GOAL T-3 Maintain an efficient roadway network for all users.
EFFICIENT CIRCULATION
Policy T-3.1 Maintain a hierarchy of streets that includes freeways, expressways,
arterials, residential arterials, collector streets, and local streets,
balancing the needs of all users in a safe and appropriate manner.
Identify desired routes for transit, cycling and Program T3.1.1
regional traffic as well as priorities for study and
investments.
Policy T-3.2 Enhance connections to, from and between parks, community centers,
recreation facilities, libraries and schools for all users.
Policy T-3.3 Avoid major increases in single occupant vehicle street capacity when
constructing or modifying roadways unless needed to remedy severe
congestion or critical neighborhood traffic problems. Where capacity is
increased, balance the needs of motor vehicles with those of
pedestrians and bicyclists.
Policy T-3.4 Regulate truck movements and large commercial buses in a manner
that balances the efficient movement of trucks and buses while
preserving the residential character of Palo Alto's street system.
Program T3.4.1 Evaluate the feasibility of changes to Palo Alto’s
through truck routes and weight limits to consider
such issues as relationship to neighboring
jurisdictions, lower weight limits, increased number
of routes, and economic and environmental
impacts.
STREET DESIGN AND MODIFICATION PROJECTS
Policy T-3.5 When constructing or modifying roadways, plan for use of the
roadway space by all users.
Update the comprehensive roadway design Program T3.5.1
standards and criteria to be consistent with
cComplete sStreets best practices and the Urban
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
T-40 REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JULY 19, 2016ANUARY 31, 2017
Forest Master Plan, focusing on bicycle and
pedestrian safety and multi-modal uses. Consider
opportunities to incorporate best practices from the
National Association of City Transportation Officials
guidelines for urban streets and bikeways, tailored
to the Palo Alto context.
Establish procedures for considering the effects of Program T3.5.2
street design on emergency vehicle response time.
Policy T-3.6 Consider pedestrians, and bicyclists, e-bikes, and motorcycles when
designing road surfaces, curbs, crossings, signage, landscaping, and
sight lines.
Policy T-3.7 Encourage pedestrian-friendly design features such as sidewalks, street
trees, on-street parking, gathering spaces, gardens, outdoor furniture,
art, and interesting architectural details.
Program T3.7.1 Conduct a study of Palo Alto roadways to identify
needed pedestrian improvements, including on El
Camino Real, Alma Street and other locations.
Policy T-3.8 Add planting pockets with street trees to increase the tree canopy,
provide shade, calm traffic and enhance the pedestrian realm.
Policy T-3.9 Identify and establish performance measures for the road network in
Palo Alto to support city-wide sustainability efforts, includinSupport
city-wide sustainability efforts by preserving and enhancing g the
treestreet canopy where feasible within the public right of way,
consistent with the Urban Forest Management Plan, as amended.
Policy T-3.10 Participate in the design and implementation of comprehensive
solutions to traffic problems near Stanford Shopping Center and
Stanford Medical Center.
Support increased public transit, traffic Program T3.10.1
management and parking solutions to ensure safe,
convenient access to and from the Stanford
Shopping Center/ Medical Center area.
Implement and monitor Development Agreement Program T3.10.2
traffic mitigations at Stanford Medical Center.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JULY 19, 2016ANUARY 31, 2017 T-41
Provide safe, convenient pedestrian, bicycle, and Program T3.10.3
transit connections between the Stanford Shopping
Center/Medical Center areas and housing along the
Sand Hill Road/Quarry Road corridors to Palo Alto
Station, Downtown Palo Alto, and other primary
destinations.
Study extension of Quarry Road for transit, Program T3.10.4
pedestrians and bicyclists to access the Palo Alto
Station Transit Center from El Camino Real. Also
study the feasibility of another pedestrian and
bicycle Caltrain underpass of Caltrain at Everett
Street.
Policy T-3.11 Consider the objectives of the Grand Boulevard Initiative and the
South El Camino Boulevard Design Guidelines when designing
roadway and pedestrian improvements along El Camino Real. Pursue
wide sidewalks, pedestrian friendly building design, and planting
pockets with street trees.
Policy T-3.12 Coordinate roadway improvements with other transportation and
utility infrastructure improvements such as sewer and water.
Policy T-3.13 Work with Caltrans, Santa Clara County and VTA to improve east and
west connections in Palo Alto and maintain a circulation network that
binds the city together in all directions.
Policy T-3.14 Continue to prioritize the safety of school children in street
modification projects that affect school travel routes, including during
construction.
RAIL CORRIDOR
Policy T-3.15 Pursue grade separation of rail crossings along the rail corridor as a
City priority, including a below-grade alignment between San Antonio
and the Oregon Expressway for both high speed rail and Caltrain.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
T-42 REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JULY 19, 2016ANUARY 31, 2017
Undertake studies and outreach necessary to Program T3.15.1
advance grade separation of Caltrain to become a
“shovel ready” project and strongly advocate for
adequate State, regional, and federal funding for
design and construction of railroad grade
separations.
Conduct a study to evaluate the implications of Program T3.15.2
grade separation on bicycle and pedestrian
circulation.
Policy T-3.16 Keep all four existing at-grade rail crossings open to motor vehicles,
pedestrians, and bicyclist, consistent with results of a focused
circulation study and a context sensitive alternatives analysis. vehicular
traffic.
Policy T-3.17 Until grade separation is completed, improve existing at-grade rail
crossings to ensure the highest feasible level of safety along the
corridor and provide additional safe, convenient crossings.
Commission a Palo Alto Avenuen Alma Street Program T3.17.1
crossing study to identify potential near-term safety
and accessibility opportunities to improvements,
including implementation of a “quiet zone.”
Work with Caltrain to ensure that the rail tracks are Program T3.17.2
safe and secure with adequate fencing and barriers.
Incorporate neighborhood input in planning and
implementation of crossing improvements.
Policy T-3.18 Improve safety and minimize adverse noise, vibrations and visual
impacts of operations in the Caltrain rail corridor on adjoining districts,
public facilities, schools and neighborhoods with or without the
addition of High Speed Rail.
NEIGHBORHOOD IMPACTS
GOAL T-4 Protect local neighborhood streets that contribute to
neighborhood support residential character and provide a
range of local transportation options.
Policy T-4.1 Keep all neighborhood streets open as a general rule.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JULY 19, 2016ANUARY 31, 2017 T-43
Policy T-4.2 Implement traffic calming measures to slow traffic on local and
collector residential streets, and prioritize traffic calming measures for
safety over congestion management.
Identify specific improvements that can be used to Program T4.2.1
discourage drivers from using local, neighborhood
streets to bypass traffic congestion on arterials.
Periodically review evaluate residential areas for Program T4.2.2
traffic impacts, and use the results of that review
evaluation to prioritize traffic calming measures.
Policy T-4.3 Maintain the following roadways as residential arterials, treated with
landscaping, medians, and other visual improvements to distinguish
them as residential streets, in order to improve safety:
Middlefield Road (between San Francisquito Creek and San
Antonio Road)
University Avenue (between San Francisquito Creek and
Middlefield Road)
Embarcadero Road (between Alma Street and West Bayshore
Road)
East and West Charleston Road/Arastradero Roads (between
Miranda Avenue and Fabian Way).
Use landscaping and other improvements to Program T4.3.1
establish clear “gateways” at the points where the
Oregon Expressway, University Avenue and
Embarcadero Road transition from freeways to
neighborhoods.
Policy T-4.4 Minimize the danger of increased commercial ingress/egress adjacent
to major intersections, and noticeable increases in traffic from new
development in residential neighborhoods, through traffic mitigation
measures.
Policy T-4.5 Require project proponents to eEmploy the Traffic Impact on
Residential Environments (TIRE) analysis methodology to measure
potential street impacts from proposed new development of all types
in residential neighborhoods.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
T-44 REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JULY 19, 2016ANUARY 31, 2017
Policy T-4.6 Require new residential development projects to implement best
practices for street design, stormwater management and green
infrastructure.
MOTOR VEHICLE AND BICYCLE PARKING
GOAL T-5 Encourage attractive, convenient, efficient and innovative
parking solutions for all users.
MANAGING PARKING SUPPLY
Policy T-5.1 All new development projects should meet parking demand
generated by the project, without the use of on-street parking,
consistent with the established parking regulations. As demonstrated
parking demand decreases over time, parking requirements for new
construction should decrease.
For each commercial center and employment Program T5.1.1
district in Palo Alto, conduct a parking needs
assessment in consultation with business owners,
employers and local residents to establish a
baseline for parking need. Evaluate the need to
update parking standards in the municipal code,
based on local conditions, different users’ needs
and baseline parking need. Allow the use of parking
lifts for Office/R&D and multi-family housing as
appropriate.
Consider reducing parking requirements for retail Program T5.1.2
and restaurant uses as a way to encourage new
businesses and the use of alternative modes.In
parallel with each parking needs assessment,
establish performance standards which represent
the conditions that must be met before parking
requirements for new development can be
reduced. In establishing performance standards,
consider metrics such as vehicle trips, transit
frequency, transit capacity and bicycle parking.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JULY 19, 2016ANUARY 31, 2017 T-45
Work with stakeholders in each commercial center Program T5.1.3
and employment district to monitor conditions and
determine the appropriate timing for revisions to
parking requirements.
Study the feasibility of unbundled parking for office, Program T5.1.4
commercial, and multi-family residential
developments (including senior housing
developments) that are well-served by transit and
demonstrated walking and biking connections,
including senior housing developments.
Policy T-5.2 Continue to implement a comprehensive program of parking supply
and demand management strategies citywide to optimize the use of
existing parking spaces.
Use technology to help identify parking availability Program T5.2.1
and make it easy to pay any parking fees.
In the Downtown, work with the TMA to , Program T5.2.2
implement pilot projects to that test the
effectiveness of strategies for such as employees,
such as transportation programs, including reduced
cost transit passes and ridesharing programs.
Review pilot project results and consider expanding
to other areas of the city, such as California Avenue.
Consider applying a pricing strategy to address Program T5.2.3
public parking shortages citywide that is flexible in
response to demand and supply. Conduct a
feasibility study that considers the potential impact
of a pricing strategy for retail and commercial areas,
and potential benefits for TDM.
Implement Council-adopted recommendations Program T5.2.4
from the parking management study for the
Downtown area, which included address the
feasibility of removing color-coded parking zones,
and dynamic pricing and management policies to
prioritize short-term parking spaces closest to the
commercial core for customers, garage parking for
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
T-46 REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JULY 19, 2016ANUARY 31, 2017
employees, and neighborhood parking for
residents.
Policy T-5.3 Work with merchants to when designatinge dedicated employee (long
term) parking areas in public parking lots and garages.
Policy T-5.4 Encourage shared parking where complementary demand timing is
demonstrated in order to optimize parking spaces in commercial
centers and employment districts.
Explore incentives to encourage privately initiated Program T5.4.1
shared parking among individual property owners
when developments have excess parking that can
be available for other businesses to use.
Policy T-5.5 Minimize the need for employees to park in and adjacent to
commercial centers, employment districts and schools.
PARKING INFRASTRUCTURE AND DESIGN
Policy T-5.6 Strongly encourage the use of below-grade or structured parking
instead of surface parking for new developments of all types while
minimizing negative impacts including groundwater and landscaping
where feasible.
Policy T-5.7 Promote vehicle parking areas designed to reduce stormwater runoff,
increase compatibility with street trees and add visual interest to
streets and other public locations. Encourage the use of photovoltaic
panel or tree canopies in parking lots or on top of parking structures
to provide cover, consistent with the Urban Forest Master Plan.
Study the feasibility of retrofitting City-owned Program T5.7.1
surface parking lots to implement best
management practices for stormwater management
and urban heat island mitigation, including green
infrastructure, permeable pavement and reflective
surfaces.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JULY 19, 2016ANUARY 31, 2017 T-47
Identify incentives to encourage the retrofit of Program T5.7.2
privately owned surface parking areas to
incorporate best management practices for
stormwater management and urban heat island
mitigation as well as incentives for the provision of
publicly accessible bicycle parking in privately
owned lots.
Policy T-5.8 Promote safety for pedestrians in City-owned parking lots by adopting
standards for landscaping, signage, walkways and lighting that reduce
crime and ensure a safe and orderly flow of traffic.
Policy T-5.9 Encourage the use of adaptive design strategies in new parking
facilities in order to facilitate reuse in the future if and when conditions
warrant.
RESIDENTIAL PARKING
Policy T-5.10 Protect residential areas from parking impacts of nearby businesses. In
residential neighborhoods, work with neighborhood associations to
prioritize residential street parking and minimize spill over parking
from commercial centers and employment districts.
Coordinate with neighborhood groups to evaluate Program T5.10.1
the need for a residential parking permit program
in areas outside Downtown Palo Alto and College
Terrace.
BICYCLE PARKING
Policy T-5.11 To promote bicycle use, increase the number of safe, attractive and
well-designed bicycle parking spaces available in the city, including
spots for bicycle trailers, prioritizing heavily travelled areas such as
commercial and retail centers, employment districts,
recreational/cultural facilities, multi-modal transit facilities and ride
share stops for bicycle parking infrastructure.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
T-48 REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JULY 19, 2016ANUARY 31, 2017
Work with private sector partners, including Program T5.11.1
employers, merchants and community service
providers, to identify ways to incentivize the
provisionprovide more of bicycle parking, including
e-bike parking with charging stations, near existing
shops, services and places of employment.
Consider installing secure electronic bike lockers Program T5.11.2
such as the BikeLink system, at high theft locations,
including transit stations and parking garages.
Assess the need to provide additional bicycle Program T5.11.3
parking in City-owned parking lots and rights-of-
way.
ROAD SAFETY
GOAL T-6 Provide a safe environment for motorists, pedestrians, and
bicyclists on Palo Alto streets.
Policy T-6.1 Continue to make safety the first priority of citywide transportation
planning. Prioritize pedestrian, bicycle, and automobile safety over
motor vehicle level-of-service at intersections and motor vehicle
parking.
Follow the principles of the safe routes to schools Program T6.1.1
program to implement traffic safety measures that
focus on Safe Routes to work, shopping,
downtown, community services, parks, and schools.
Develop, distribute and aggressively promote maps Program T6.1.2
and apps showing of safe routes to work, shopping,
community services, parks and schools within Palo
Alto in collaboration with stakeholders, including
PAUSD, major employers, TMAs, local businesses
and community organizations.
Address pedestrian safety along Alma Street Program T6.1.3
between University Avenue Embarcadero Road and
Lytton Street.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JULY 19, 2016ANUARY 31, 2017 T-49
Address pedestrian safety on shared-use paths Program T6.1.4
through the use of signs, pavement markings, and
outreach to users, encouraging them to be safe and
courteous. bicycle and pedestrian trails.
Policy T-6.2 Pursue the goal of zero severe injuries and roadway fatalities oin Palo
Alto city streets within 10 years.
Regularly collect severity and location data on Program T6.2.1
roadway collisions for all modes of travel, including
fatalities and severe injuries. In collaboration with
Santa Clara County, develop an up-to-date, public
database for this information.
Policy T-6.3 Continue to work with Caltrain to increase safety at train crossings,
including improving gate technology, and signal coordination.
Policy T-6.4 Continue the Safe Routes to School partnership with PAUSD and the
Palo Alto Council of PTAs.
Periodically update the Adopted School Commute Program T6.4.1
Corridors Network to include updated school
commute routes. Ensure these routes are prioritized
for safety improvements and considered in land
use planning decisions.
Establish standards and procedures for maintaining Program T6.4.2
safe bicycling routes, including signage for warnings
and detours during construction projects.
In collaboration with PAUSD, pProvide adult Program T6.4.3
crossing guards at school crossings that meet
adopted criteria.
Policy T-6.5 Support PAUSD adoption of standard Safe Routes to School policies
and regulations that address the five E’s of education, encouragement,
enforcement, engineering, and evaluation.
Policy T-6.6 Use engineering, enforcement, and educational tools to improve traffic
safety on City roadways.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
T-50 REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JULY 19, 2016ANUARY 31, 2017
Periodically evaluate safety on roadways and at Program T6.6.1
intersections and enhance conditions through the
use of signal technology and physical changes.
Consider the construction of traffic circles for
improved intersection safety.
Continue to provide educational programs for Program T6.6.2
children and adults, in partnership with community-
based educational organizations, to promote the
safe use of bicycles, including the City-sponsored
bicycle education programs in the public schools
and the bicycle traffic school program for juveniles.
Work with PAUSD and employers to promote Program T6.6.3
roadway safety for all users, including motorized
alternatives to cars and bikes such as mopeds and
e-bikes, through educational programs for children
and adults.
Complete a mobility and safety study for downtown Program T6.6.4
Palo Alto, looking at ways to improve circulation
and safety for all modes.
Identify and implement safety improvements for Program T6.6.5
underpasses, including on Embarcadero Road.
Improve pedestrian crossings by creating protected Program T6.6.6
areas and better pedestrian and traffic visibility. Use
a toolbox including bulb outs, small curb radii, high
visibility crosswalks, and landscaping.
Establish standards and procedures with Utilities Program T6.6.7
and Public Works to maintain safe bicycling routes
and adequately and safely sign warnings and
detours during construction projects.
Establish a program to educate residents to keep Program T6.6.8
sidewalks clear of parked cars, especially on narrow
local streets in neighborhoods with rolled curbs.
Survey for compliance annually.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JULY 19, 2016ANUARY 31, 2017 T-51
Policy T-6.7 Use appropriate technology to monitor and improve circulation safety
throughout the City.
Evaluate the performance of safety improvements Program T6.7.1
and identify methods to encourage alternative
transportation modes.
Policy T-6.8 Vigorously and consistently enforce speed limits and other traffic laws,
including for both motor vehicle and bicycle traffic.
TRANSIT- – DEPENDENT COMMUNITY
GOAL T-7 Provide mobility options that allow people who are transit
dependent to reach their destinations.
Policy T-7.1 Support mobility options for all groups in Palo Alto who require transit
for their transportation.
Expand transportation opportunities for transit-Program T7.1.1
dependent riders by supporting a variety of
methods, such as by funding discounts for taxi
fares, rideshare services, and transit, by
coordinating transit systems to be shared by
multiple senior housing developments, and by
maintaining supporting a volunteer program to
expand the supply of drivers, creating a database of
volunteer drivers, and other transit options.
Coordinate with social service agencies and transit Program T7.1.2
agencies to fill gaps in existing transportation routes
and services accessible to transit-dependent riders
no matter their means and design new bus routes
that enable them to access those services.
Pursue expanded evening and night time bus Program T7.1.3
service to enhance mobility for all users during off-
peak times.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
T-52 REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JULY 19, 2016ANUARY 31, 2017
Policy T-7.2 Utilize the principles of Universal Design, and local and State design
standards, to guide the planning and implementation of transportation
and parking improvement projects to ensure the needs of community
members with limited mobility, including some seniors and people
with disabilities, are addressed.
Policy T-7.3 Continue to partner with transit providers, including VTA, to support
demand-responsive paratransit service for eligible participants in Palo
Alto and maintain existing paratransit services, particularly where bus
service is discontinued. Emphasize service quality and timeliness when
contracting for paratransit services.
Policy T-7.4 Collaborate with transit and shuttle providers including VTA, AC
Transit, SamTrans, Stanford Marguerite Shuttle, Palo Alto Free Shuttle,
Dumbarton Express Bus Service and Caltrain in the provision of
service that is accessible to seniors and people with disabilities.
Policy T-7.5 Support transit providers in implementing or continuing reduced fare
or no fare voucher systems for selected populations, including seniors
and people with disabilities.
Policy T-7.6 Encourage transit service providers to provide subsidized transit
passes for low income riders and other transit-dependent
communities.
REGIONAL COLLABORATION AND COORDINATION
GOAL T-8 Influence the shape and implementation of regional
transportation policies and technologies to reduce traffic
congestion and greenhouse gas emissions.
Policy T-8.1 Engage in regional transportation planning and advocate for specific
transit improvements and investments, such as Caltrain service
enhancements and grade separations, Dumbarton Express service,
enhanced bus service on El Camino Real with queue jumping and
curbside platforms, HOV/HOT lanes, and additional VTA bus service.
Policy T-8.2 Participate in regional planning initiatives for the rail corridor and
provide a strong guiding voice.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JULY 19, 2016ANUARY 31, 2017 T-53
Policy T-8.3 Collaborate effectively with and engage in regional partnerships and
solutions with a range of stakeholders, including regional agencies,
neighboring jurisdictions and major employers, on issues of regional
importance such as traffic congestion, reduced reliance on single-
occupant vehicles, and sustainable transportation.
Continue to participate in regional efforts to Program T8.3.1
develop technological solutions that make
alternatives to the automobile more convenient and
thereby contribute to reducing congestion.
Policy T-8.4 Coordinate with local, regional agencies, and Caltrans to support
regional efforts to maintain and improve transportation infrastructure
in Palo Alto, including the Multi-Modal Transit Center.
Policy T-8.5 Support the efforts of the Metropolitan Transportation Commission
(MTC) to coordinate transportation planning and services for the Mid-
Peninsula and the Bay Area that emphasize alternatives to the
automobile. Encourage MTC to base its Regional Transportation Plan
(RTP) on compact land use development assumptions.
Policy T-8.6 Support Advocate for efforts by Caltrans and the Valley Transportation
Authority to reduce congestion and improve traffic flow on area
existing freeway facilities consistent with Statewide GHG emissions
reduction initiatives.
Support Advocate for provision of a new Program T8.6.1
southbound entrance ramp to Highway 101 from
San Antonio Road, in conjunction with the closure
of the southbound Charleston Road on-ramp at the
Rengstorff Avenue interchange in Mountain View.
Encourage Advocate for VTA to improved Program T8.6.2
connectivity to transit to serve workers who live in
the South Bay and work in Palo Alto.
Policy T-8.7 Support the application of emerging freeway information, monitoring,
and control systems that provide non-intrusive driver assistance and
reduce congestion.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
T-54 REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JULY 19, 2016ANUARY 31, 2017
Policy T-8.8 Where appropriate, support the conversion of existing traffic lanes to
exclusive bus and high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes or
Express/HOT lanes on freeways and expressways, including the
Dumbarton Bridge, and the continuation of an HOV lane from
Redwood City to San Francisco.
Policy T-8.9 Support State and federal legislation to reduce motor vehicle
emissions, noise, and fuel consumption.
Policy T-8.10 Support plans for intra-county and transbay transit systems that link
Palo Alto to the rest of Santa Clara County and adjoining counties.
Ensure that these systems and enhancements do not adversely impact
the bay.
Work with regional transportation providers, Program T8.10.1
including BART and Caltrain, to improve
connections between Palo Alto and the San
Francisco International Airport and Norman Y.
Mineta San Jose International Airport.
Policy T-8.11 Support regional plans to complete development of the Bay Trail and
Bay-to-Ridge Trail.
Policy T-8.12 Support the development of the Santa Clara County Countywide
Bicycle System, and other regional bicycle plans.
Identify and improve bicycle connections to/from Program T8.12.1
neighboring communities in Santa Clara and San
Mateo counties to support local trips that cross city
boundaries. Also advocate for reducing barriers to
bicycling and walking at freeway interchanges,
expressway intersections, and railroad grad
crossings.
1
CITY COUNCIL – REVIEW OF LAND USE ELEMENT – NOVEMBER
28, 2016
A. OVERALL ORGANIZATION AND STRUCTURE FEEDBACK
Editing will be a challenge. Many programs and policies. (DuBois)
Too much is in the Comp Plan. Concerned about number of policies and programs and that
Council has not had chance to discuss. (Scharff)
Add more to the Introduction and Planning Context regarding community character and tone
down the “city development” section. (Holman)
Socioeconomic diversity is a community value and we need a strategic approach to address and
preserve this. There is lots of work to do. (Berman)
If Palo Alto grows, we must add families, or we will become an urban center like San Francisco
with few families. (Schmid)
School impacts should be addressed in the Land Use Element instead of Community Facilities and
Services. (DuBois, Holman, Filseth)
B. LAND USE DEFINITIONS
Support the no child care option in neighborhood commercial areas and small scale retail (kiosk)
in residential areas. (Holman)
C. GOAL L-1: GROWTH MANAGEMENT
Reinstate “well-designed” in Goal L-1. (Holman)
On packet page 240 (Policy L-1.2), wording “efficient development pattern” is unclear; wording from
previous Policy L-5 regarding retaining the scale and character of the city should be reinstated.
(Holman, Filseth)
CUMULATIVE CAP ON NON-RESIDENTIAL GROWTH
1988 Citywide Land Use and Transportation Study is an important foundational document and
should be carefully considered. The intent of growth monitoring was to monitor traffic. Concern
that SUMC traffic still has impacts, even though SUMC would be exempt. (Schmid)
Intent of cap is to address traffic, parking, pollution, etc., so a citywide approach makes sense.
100% mitigation is not possible but Stanford Research Park has best chance of being able to
mitigate. (Filseth)
Does the SUMC exemption cover a specific area/site, or does it cover a specific amount of square
footage? This should be considered an open question for further discussion. (Burt)
1.7 million sf should exclude current SUMC project, not the whole area. (Holman)
OK with 1.7 million sf. (Berman)
2
Historic growth rate has been an average of 53,000 sf of office space per year. A 1.7 million sf cap
would equal twice that amount. (Schmid)
The way to achieve housing affordability is to restrict office buildings. (Schmid)
Caps should remain in place if we get close. (Filseth)
Find new sites for housing. Do not necessarily reduce commercial FAR. Add an idea of using some
land in non-residential areas such as the Stanford Shopping Center and Stanford Research Park to
support alternative transportation, such as for bike paths and transit hubs, but do not subtract
that land from the basis for calculating allowable FAR. (Burt)
More clarity on 1.7 Msf. Send them the original study. (Kniss)
How much FAR would be freed up by converting allowed FAR from office to housing? (Holman)
Data on conversions of basement/storage space to office space Downtown. (Burt)
Clarify SUMC issue, specifically the basis for excluding the SUMC area rather than the SUMC
approved development.
HOTELS
Hotels should be encouraged, especially near Stanford Shopping Center or Stanford Research
Park. Hotels are an important source of funding for infrastructure and have relatively low traffic
impacts. Hotels generate fewer peak hour trips. Comp Plan should include an explicit statement
that the City supports and wants hotels. (Scharff)
Open to a hotel at Stanford Research Park. Hotel FAR should be reduced from 2.0 to 1.5.
(Holman)
Hotels aren’t bad and should not count against office cap. (Berman)
Hotels are one of the City’s best revenue sources and lowest traffic generators, but 2.0 FAR is too
dense, except in Downtown and along Cal Ave. Maybe 1.75 or 1.5 FAR would achieve a mass and
scale that would feel better. (Burt)
Supports 1.5 FAR for hotels, except 2.0 FAR for hotels Downtown. (DuBois)
Hotels are attractive financially, but too many hotels result in people who are just passing through
and not participating in the community. (Schmid)
What percent of commercial development is hotel? (Burt)
Hotels will come downtown because office is basically over. Future development Downtown will
be mostly residential with some hotels. (Burt)
ANNUAL LIMIT ON NON-RESIDENTIAL GROWTH
The annual limit should not include Stanford Research Park or hotels. (Scharff)
Allow flexibility between office and R&D uses in the Stanford Research Park. The Research Park
should not be included in annual limit. But we do need to have serious discussions about trip
counts and discouraging SOV trips. (Scharff)
3
Stanford Research Park is under one owner and has a better likelihood of success with its TDM
Plan. (Kniss)
Agrees with excluding Stanford Research Park from annual limit as long as trips are incrementally
reduced and monitored on an annual basis. (Holman)
Does not favor allowing Stanford Research Park annual limit to rollover. (Holman)
Supports separate annual caps for Stanford Research Park and the rest of the City. Supports
annual limit in Stanford Research Park with some rollover for 3-4 years, but not unlimited rollover.
Stanford Research Park can reduce trips. (Berman)
Consider whether an annual limit is really worth it. There may be some benefit to
frontloading/concentrating new development rather than dragging out construction. (Wolbach)
Stanford Research Park doesn’t have the same impacts on parking, and character, but is not
accessible by transit or walking. Stanford Research Park should embrace trip controls; trip
reduction is feasible there. Allow a rolling annual cap that can roll over for up to 3 to 5 years to
allow flexibility. (Burt)
DOWNTOWN CAP ON NON-RESIDENTIAL GROWTH
Conversions of basements/storage space to office space Downtown should trigger parking
requirements, at the least, or should be prohibited without a CUP. (Burt, with verbal agreement
from Holman)
Clarify zoning language on allowed uses Downtown. Language regarding Downtown does
not/should not be interpreted to allow R&D type uses that are permitted in Stanford Research
Park. Downtown should be about startups and business support. We have lost Downtown as a de
facto incubator district. Grandfather in existing businesses and cap size of new businesses going
forward. (Burt)
Disagree. It’s not correct to say software development is not an allowed use Downtown. There
are startups Downtown. (Scharff)
Using numbers is awkward. In 30 years we have not reached the cap. This is a sign that the Comp
Plan should not seek to be too prescriptive. (Kniss)
Concerned about the exceptions suggested for the Downtown cap – it wouldn’t work to exempt
small offices or medical offices, although I would support limiting the size of businesses
downtown. (DuBois)
Not sure about limiting size of companies Downtown. Big companies have been there since the
1990s. What rational number could the City give a company to kick them out? (Kniss)
Unsure about regulating big companies (size) Downtown, but interested in restoring startup
culture. (Wolbach)
47,000 sf Downtown over 15 years is too little, too prescriptive. Palantir and A9 are large
companies and 70-80% of workers do not drive. Support their achievement of City’s goals to
reduce SOV trips. (Scharff)
4
Agree with Mayor Burt on land uses and basement conversions downtown. We should also not
allow business cafeterias. (Holman)
Program language on Downtown cap should reference the State Historical Building Code (packet
p. 246) (Holman)
DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS AND COMMUNITY INDICATORS
Development requirements and indicators are good. Don’t use performance-based zoning to
replace existing zoning, but measuring things is good. (Filseth)
Indicators will need to be tweaked. (DuBois)
Development requirements and community metrics look ok. (Filseth)
D. GOAL L-2: CITYWIDE STRUCTURE
MIXED USE DESIGNATION
Encourage/incentivize mixed use projects with a substantial, not token, amount of housing.
(Schmid)
Supports Mixed Use definition change to mean Residential + Retail. (DuBois, Wolbach, Scharff,
Burt, Schmid)
Look at converting a good amount of Office FAR in the Mixed Use designation to Housing.
(Holman)
Rezone to encourage retail under residential. Less office, more housing. Be flexible about FAR,
even up to 3.0, in transit-served areas, for affordable housing. (Wolbach)
E. GOAL L-3: RESIDENTIAL DESIGN
Agree on the need to preserve cottage clusters. (Holman)
There is not enough on the ages and stages of different neighborhoods. (Holman)
HOUSING SUPPLY
Require retention of existing housing that is affordable like small cottages, possibly through the
use of TDRs. (Burt)
Add something to address short-term rentals. (DuBois)
Big issue: how to create housing in the Downtown area? Add height, change the mixed use
designation, and provide development rights. PC zoning and TDRs should be reconsidered as tools
for residential development and could help retain existing affordable housing, for example by
transferring allowable density from College Terrace elsewhere to preserve quad-plexes. (Burt)
Consider PC zones for affordable housing. (DuBois)
Come up with some terminology for “housing people can afford” to distinguish from “subsidized
housing.” (Kniss)
5
There is a need for market rate housing. Supports housing that is “attainable” at the low end of
the market not just affordable housing or housing for disadvantaged groups. (Wolbach)
Need mix of unit sizes in new housing developments (Holman)
We are not producing enough housing when compared to others in the region. We are a leader
in reducing greenhouse gas emissions even though one jurisdiction alone cannot make a
difference. With housing, we shouldn’t let the argument that one jurisdiction alone cannot make
a difference stop us from leading. (Scharff)
F. GOAL L-4: COMMERCIAL CENTERS
Don’t think we should delete the policy about property owners coordinating about retail plans.
(DuBois)
We should consider utility discounts for retail uses. (Du Bois)
Why did the CAC recommend deleting the program about a downtown design guide? (Filseth)
Please be more explicit about widening of sidewalks on El Camino based on colleagues’ memo.
(Holman)
Add something about retail attraction. The City needs a strong Economic Development Manager
to help property owners. (Holman)
ADDING HOUSING IN COMMERCIAL CENTERS
Add a Program to open serious dialog with Stanford to explore mixed use opportunities, without
making any commitments. (Wolbach)
We have lots of work to do on housing. Need to increase number to make it affordable. Supports
idea of housing at Stanford Research Park and Stanford Shopping Center. (Berman)
Housing would be good in back of Town & Country. (DuBois)
Would consider housing at Town and Country, not in Alma Plaza. (Scharff)
Find areas to apply a residential overlay in non-residential areas such as Stanford Research Park,
Stanford Shopping Center, East Bayshore/along Bayshore, and the Town & Country Shopping
Center. Would not force housing here. Would apply a “sculpted approach” to target housing for
specific locations within these areas. (Burt)
COORDINATED AREA PLANS
Be realistic on how many Coordinated Area Plans the City can accomplish. Finish Cal Ave and
don’t add a lot more. Supports a Fry’s Coordinated Area Plan. (DuBois)
Be realistic about Coordinated Area Plans. Support use of Coordinated Area Plan over Planned
Community Zoning. (Wolbach)
The map and concept for the South El Camino Real Coordinated Area Plan seem incorrect.
Existing uses here should not be displaced by gentrification. (DuBois)
6
Fry’s is the largest big housing site and the City should do a Precise Plan or Specific Plan now.
(Kniss)
Coordinated Area Plans take time but can be successful. (Berman)
University Avenue is in good shape now; California Avenue should not become another University
Avenue. (Filseth)
G. GOAL L-6: URBAN DESIGN
Reinstate original wording from existing policy L-6 about character. (DuBois, Holman, Filseth)
Should be more emphasis on urban design and references to single story overlays. (Holman)
Supports improved code enforcement. (Holman)
HEIGHT LIMITS
Consider basing height limits on stories rather than on number of feet. (Scharff)
Should be regulated by stories rather than feet. High-quality retail needs higher ground-floor
ceilings. Two decisions to make: a) do we need a different height limit for ground floor retail with
residential above? And b) if so, how many stories are appropriate? (Burt)
Room to add an extra floor really matters. Mountain View recently approved a 57-foot affordable
housing project. Holding fast to the 50-foot limit and rejecting meaningful projects is
disingenuous. Allow opportunities to gently exceed 50 feet in certain areas for certain projects
where community can benefit from additional housing. Provide specific guidance and allow 55-60
feet. (Berman)
Add further restrictions on mechanical equipment if we go up to 55 feet, and require (not allow)
better use of roofs, such as solar arrays and rooftop gardens. (Burt)
Maintain 50 foot height limit or only exceed up to 55 feet for senior housing, with a vote of the
public. (DuBois)
Retain 50’ height limit with exceptions for affordable housing or senior housing. (Holman)
Keep 50-foot limit with exceptions to allow up to 55 feet limited to ground floor retail, in order to
increase quality of life through better retail. (Scharff)
50-foot limit is extremely helpful to maintaining an open environment for startups. Keep. (Schmid)
Height limit is not currently in the Comp Plan. Maybe it shouldn’t be. Going up to 55 or 60 feet
won’t make a difference. Maybe going up to 100 feet would – is there a slippery slope? (Filseth)
Not excited about change to height limit. Hasn’t heard overwhelming support from community.
(Wolbach)
H. GOAL L-7: HISTORIC RESOURCES
There are four historic districts not two (edit to packet page 228) (Holman)
7
City’s historic resources inventory should be based on resources eligible for local listing, not State
listing; (Holman)
Reinstate Program L-65 regarding applying codes to historic buildings (Holman)
There should be certainty about what is considered a historic resource and what is not so people
know before they apply for an alteration don’t want to prevent a kitchen remodel (reference to
policy L7.2). (Filseth)
Reinstate Program L-56 regarding design review procedures, but remove reference to non-
existent “Landmark” designation. (Holman)
We already have incentives – need to promote existing incentives for retention and rehabilitation
rather than add more (Program L7.8.1). (Holman)
I. GOAL L-8: CIVIC AND CULTURAL FACILITIES
Need reality on parkland acquisition. Even buying a small parcel can cost $5M, not including
maintenance. (Kniss)
Take any opportunity for new park and rec space. (Wolbach)
J. GOAL L-9: PUBLIC SPACES AND STREETS
The Urban Forest section lacks emphasis on water conservation. (Holman)
Allow housing to pay into parking in-lieu fees like commercial does. Be flexible on parking
requirements; one size does not fit all. (Wolbach)
K. GOAL L-10: AIRPORT
Expand on the issues addressing Palo Alto Airport. (Holman)
Figure out how to regulate unleaded airplane fuel. Other communities are doing it. (DuBois)
8
L. 11/28 EMAIL COMMENTS FROM COUNCILMEMBER DUBOIS
Policy L-1.5 and L-1.6 seem to be duplicates
L1.8 - Should prohibit hotels next to R1
L1.12.3 - Prohibit housing in Midtown and Charleston retail centers
L.3.31 Says we should discourage the replacement of rental housing with ownership housing. I
think that needs to be deleted and we should be encouraging home ownership.
L-4.10.1 Issue of wider sidewalks - discussion in 2014 at Council that still needs to come back on
setbacks on El Camino. Issue wasn’t resolved then - business community was concerned.
Restore policy L-4.15 on page L-56. Having property owners coordinate on Retail master plans
makes a ton of sense.
Several items are separate policies appearing as 1, should be separated as 2
L-4.2 split from L66, L67
L-6.12 split from L119
Comment on Packet page 157, intro says that “pace of non-residential growth has been
moderated by citywide cap…” I’m not sure that is true as cap has never come into effect. If our
caps are higher than our historical building rates they really haven’t come into effect.
Childcare clarification - concern about our small neighborhood retail. Encourage childcare
elsewhere, but not there.
Against L2.2.1 - Retail inside retail neighborhoods. We are doing a lot to protect retail in our
retail areas. I don’t think we should expand into R1, R2 zones.
Add Policy or Program on conversion of basements or other units with a single home to non-
conforming uses.
1
CITY COUNCIL – REVIEW OF TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT -
SEPTEMBER 19, 2016
No motion was adopted by the Council, however the following individual comments were provided to
staff together with a request that the draft element be brought back for additional review in conjunction
with the draft land use element. The Council also requested further explanation and discussion regarding
the EIR scenarios and how the final draft element will reflect the preferred scenarios.
A. OVERALL ORGANIZATION AND STRUCUTRE
Ensure the element conveys our readiness for changing technologies (“poised for change”) and
emphasize flexibility/our willingness to embrace the big transformation that’s on the horizon.
(Burt)
Need to recognize that we will need to improve the flow of vehicles and reduce congestion even
when we have electric vehicles and self-driving cars. (Du Bois)
Reduce the number of programs by half and pare down the narrative. (DuBois)
Ensure that we are advancing the idea of addressing cumulative impacts and “no net trips.”
(Holman, Filseth)
Improve correlation with the SCAP, including cross references, and explain that a livable quality of
life is aligned with our sustainability goals – they support each other. (Burt)
Include our goals for the TMA and the goal of reducing SOV and VMT in the City. (Burt)
Use concrete language about what we should do instead of “support,” review,” etc. (Burt)
B. “TO DO” ITEMS
Investigate whether local agencies have discretion regarding “lane splitting.” (Burt)
Confirm that roadway designations (est. for East Meadow) have not changed (DuBois)
Investigate reuse of the pedestrian underpass under El Camino Real at Page Mill Road. (Holman)
C. VISION AND INTRODUCTION
Eliminate the word “neighborhoods” from the vision statement. (Holman, Scharff)
Narrative description of TMA/TDM on packet p. 390 should be more assertive (Holman)
More emphasis on TDM plan in the Downtown. (Kniss)
D. GOAL T-1: SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORTATION
REDUCING RELIANCE ON SINGLE-OCCUPANT VEHICLES
Need more emphasis on TDM/TMA & Shuttle (Wolbach)
2
Should follow VTA Guidelines for strict TDM plans and ensure our traffic studies don’t give credit
for TDM plans unless they’re strict and enforceable (Schmid)
Let’s be clear that new development must address their trips through TDM plans and that existing
commute trips will be addressed through activities of the TMA. (Burt)
Program T1.2.2 regarding TDM plans: “…how compliance will be measured and enforced with
impactful consequences (teeth).” (Burt) Also “…Establish a list of acceptable effective TDM
measures…” (Holman) Also, revise wording in Program T1.2.1 “allow contracting between
developments…” on packet page 414 so the idea of offsetting is clear. “Cap and Trade” would be a
can of worms. Program T1.2.1 add “adopt effective TDM measures…” in place of “establish a list…”
(Holman)
Support the concept of off-setting new trips of new development (if they cannot be eliminated) to
achieve a “no net new trips” goal. (Wolbach, Burt)
Don’t want to lose the concept of locating high-density development near transit (Program T-3) in
the Transportation Element. (Scharff)
REDUCING GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
Program T1.3.2 – also include private busses/shuttles, UPS, FedEx, etc. (Burt)
Program T1.4.1 – don’t allow parking lifts for retail. (Holman)
INCREASING TRANSIT USE
Need to encourage innovation when it comes to transit. (DuBois)
BICYCLING AND WALKING
Policy T-1.21 – consider public art in alleys to encourage walking and provide connectivity
between businesses, parking, and transit locations. (Holman)
MONITORING PROGRESS
Policy T-1.23 – include a reference to the 80x30 SCAP goal.
E. GOAL T-2: TRAFFIC DELAY AND CONGESTION
By seeking to reduce SOV, are we agreeing to higher densities? (Schmid)
Not every street can be a complete street. Avoid over-reliance on the NACTO Guidelines (DuBois)
Policy T 2.1 – delete red light and speed enforcement cameras. (Scharff)
Add a program to reduce our LOS threshold for cumulative impacts. (DuBois)
Let’s be more explicit about extending the TMA to Cal Ave or having another TMA there. (Scharff)
Awkward wording on Goal T2 including school traffic. (Holman)
3
F. GOAL T-3: STREETS
Policy T-3.3 Include language from the existing Comp Plan, including “unless needed to remedy
severe congestion.” (DuBois, Filseth, Scharff, others)
Program T3.41. – edit so we’re clear that we’re not expanding truck routes to more streets.
(Holman)
Policy T3.3 - The previous policy, T27, was much stronger than that and clearer in intention.
(Holman)
Review Policy T3.7 through 3.11 to ensure we get three things: wider sidewalks consistent with
the Grand Boulevard, pedestrian friendly building design, and planting pockets with street trees.
Reconsider or rephrase Policy T3.9. (Holman) [Note: Also, Councilmember Filseth suggested it
was premature to embrace the Grand Boulevard Initiative in Policy T3.11.]
Clarify meaning of Policy T-3.9 “…including the street canopy” is disconnected from “Identify and
establish…” (Burt)
G. GOAL T-4: NEIGHBORHOOD IMPACTS
Use Policy T-47 from the existing Comp Plan in lieu of proposed policy T-4.1 and clarify the
wording of goal T-4. (Holman)
H. GOAL T-5: MOTOR VEHICLE AND BICYCLE PARKING
Re-evaluate parking requirements for retail to encourage retail. (Scharff)
We should have a policy about adequate bike racks, not about incentives for bike racks. (Burt)
Use Policy T-47 from the existing Comp Plan in lieu of proposed policy T-5.10 and be clearer about
the purpose of RPP programs. (Filseth)
Address charging/parking for e-bikes. (Wolbach)
I. GOAL T-6: ROAD SAFETY
We need to make sure that Caltrain Safety is addressed, without mentioning track watch
specifically. (Burt)
Not sure about committing to Vision Zero (Policy T-6.2), although we agreed to support the
League of City’s position. (Filseth)
Use apps not maps in Program T6.1.2. (Scharff)
Add “in collaboration with PAUSD” to Program T6.4.3. (Burt)
Address road safety for motorcycles, e-bikes, scooters, and skateboards. (Wolbach)
Ensure that traffic sensors are designed to recognize bicycles, motorcycles and scooters.
(Wolbach)
Adult crossing guards, add language to provide with the School District. (Scharff)
4
J. GOAL T-7: TRANSIT-DEPENDENT COMMUNITY
Consider more discounts or subsidies than those for low-income riders (Policy T-7.89). (Scharff)
Policy T7.2 doesn’t talk about taxis or ridesharing services. (Scharff)
K. GOAL T-8: REGIONAL COLLABORATION AND
COORDINATION
Eliminate encouragement of MTC from Policy T-8.5. (Scharff)
Use “Advocate” instead of “Encourage” or “support” when discussing VTA in Policy T8.6 and
related programs. (Holman)
LAND USE AND
COMMUNITY DESIGN
LAND USE DRAFT – NOVEMBER 28, 2016 L-1
3
This preliminary draft element was prepared by City staff on the basis of input from the
CAC and members of the public received from December 2015 through July 2016. The
Element will be reviewed by the full CAC in August and September, 2016 and presented
as a draft to Palo Alto City Council in the fall of 2016.
INTRODUCTION
The Land Use and Community Design Element sets the foundation for future
preservation, growth, and change in Palo Alto and serves as the blueprint for the
development of public and private property in the city. It includes policies and
programs intended to balance natural resources with future community needs in a
way that makes optimal use of available land, to create attractive buildings and
public spaces that reinforce Palo Alto’s sense of place and community, to preserve
and enhance quality of life and services in Palo Alto neighborhoods and districts, and
to maintain Palo Alto's role in the success of the surrounding region.
This Element meets the State-mandated requirements for a Land Use Element. It
defines categories for the location and type of public and privates uses of land under
the City's jurisdiction; it recommends standards for population density and building
intensity on land covered by the Comprehensive Plan; and it includes a Land Use
Map (Map L-6) and Goals, Policies, and Programs to guide land use distribution in
the city. By satisfying these requirements, the Land Use and Community Design
Element lays out the basic guidelines and standards upon which all of the other
Comprehensive Plan elements rely and build. Other elements of the Plan
correspond with the land use categories and policy direction contained in this
Element, while providing more specialized guidance focused on particular topics,
such as transportation or conservation.
VISION: Palo Alto’s land use decisions shall balance our future growth needs
with the preservation of our neighborhoods, address climate protection priorities
through sustainable development near neighborhood services, and enhance
the quality of life of all neighborhoods.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
L-2 LAND USE DRAFT – NOVEMBER 28, 2016
CONNECTIONS TO OTHER ELEMENTS
The Land Use and Community Design Element is replete with direct connections to
all of the other elements of the Comprehensive Plan. Its guidance for land uses is
strongly linked to the Housing Element’s prescriptions for residential development,
even though the Housing Element is cyclically updated on a separate State-
mandated timetable. The inextricable tie between land use and transportation is
clearly apparent both in this Element and the Transportation Element, as the co-
location of land uses significantly affects the ability of transit, walking, and biking to
replace vehicle travel, in addition to capitalizing on the presence of rail service in
Palo Alto. The success of programs in the Natural and Urban Environment and Safety
Element is largely dependent on land uses decisions that protect the environment as
well as people and property. The Land Use Element dovetails with both the quality
of life initiatives in the Community Services and Facilities Element, and the prosperity
objectives of the Business and Economics Element.
PLANNING CONTEXT
NATURAL ENVIRONMENT
With a backdrop sweeping from forested hills to the Bay, Palo Alto is framed by
natural beauty. Views of the foothills contribute a sense of enclosure and a reminder
of the close proximity of open space and nature. Views of the baylands provide a
strong connection to the marine environment and the East Bay hills. Together with
the city’s marshland, salt ponds, sloughs, creeks, and riparian corridors, these natural
resources, clearly visible in the aerial photograph in Map L-1, are a major defining
feature of Palo Alto’s character.
Preserving the city’s attractive and valuable natural features is important for a
number of reasons. Ecologically, these areas provide key habitat for wildlife, create a
buffer from developed areas, and act as a natural filtration system for storm water
runoff. For the community, they represent an important facet of the look and feel of
Palo Alto, contributing to a sense of place both through direct public access to
natural areas and the views that establish Palo Alto’s local scenic routes.
Foo
t
h
i
l
l
E
x
p
r
e
s
s
w
a
y
Mountain View
East Palo Alto
Stanford
University
Los Altos Hills
Menlo Park
S A N
F R A N C I S C O
B A Y
Mid
d
l
e
f
i
e
l
d
R
o
a
d
Los Altos
£¤101
§¨¦280
·|}þ85
Sunnyvale
Atherton
Redwood City
OregonExpressway
Em bar ca der o R oad
ElCa
mino
Real
PageMillRoad
UniversityAvenue
Lo
u
i
s
R
o
a
d
ChanningAvenue
Stanford
Lands
AlmaStreet
Hawthorne Avenue
ChanningAvenue
EmersonStreet
§¨¦280
Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community
MA P L- 1
P A L O A L T O A E R I A L V I E W
P A L O A L T O C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A NL A N D U S E
0 1 2 Miles
Source: City of Palo Alto, 2013; ESRI, 2016; PlaceWorks, 2016.
Railroads
City Boundary
Sphere of Influence
PALO
ALTO
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
L-4 LAND USE DRAFT – NOVEMBER 28, 2016
REGIONAL PLANNING
Palo Alto cooperates with numerous regional partners on a range of issues of
common interest. Regional planning partners include the California Department of
Transportation (Caltrans) and other State agencies, Metropolitan Transportation
Commission and Association of Bay Area Governments, Santa Clara Valley
Transportation Authority, San Mateo County Transit District, Santa Clara County, San
Mateo County, and neighboring cities. The City of Palo Alto works together with the
cities of East Palo Alto and Menlo Park on a variety of shared programs relating to
economic development, social services, education, public safety, and housing.
Palo Alto also works with Mountain View, Los Altos, and Los Altos Hills on joint
ventures such as fire protection and water quality control. In addition, Palo Alto
elected officials and staff participate in numerous countywide and regional planning
efforts, including via both advisory and decision-making boards and commissions.
Palo Alto also maintains a strong relationship with Stanford University. Although the
campus lies outside of the city limits, as shown in Map L-2, important Stanford-
owned lands are within Palo Alto, including Stanford Shopping Center, Stanford
Research Park, and the Stanford University Medical Center. The City, Santa Clara
County, and Stanford maintain an inter-jurisdictional agreement regarding
development on unincorporated Stanford lands and collaborate on selected land use
and transportation projects.
CITY EVOLUTION
EARLY HISTORY
There is evidence in the archaeological record of people living along San
Francisquito Creek as far back as 4000 BC, and the first widely recognized inhabitants
are the Costanoan people starting in about 1500 BC. The Costanoan are Ohlone-
speaking Native Americans who lived near the water from San Francisco Bay to
Carmel. Costanoan and earlier artifacts have been identified in the city, particularly
along the banks of San Francisquito Creek. Preservation of these resources is a high
priority for the City and essential to defining the character of the community.
Foot
h
i
l
l
E
x
p
r
e
s
s
w
a
y
Mountain View
East Palo Alto
Stanford
University
Los Altos Hills
Menlo Park
S A N
F R A N C I S C O
B A Y
Mid
d
l
e
f
i
e
l
d
R
o
a
d
Los Altos
£¤101
§¨¦280
·|}þ85
Sunnyvale
Atherton
Redwood City
OregonExpressway
Emb a rc a dero Road
ElCaminoReal
PageMillRoad
UniversityAvenue
Lou
i
s
R
o
a
d
ChanningAvenue
Stanford
Lands
AlmaStreet
Hawthorne Avenue
ChanningAvenue
EmersonStreet
§¨¦280
MA P L - 2
S P H E R E O F I N F L U E N C E , U R B A N S E R V I C E A R E A , A N D S T A N F O R D U N I V E R S I T Y L A N D S
P A L O A L T O C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A NL A N D U S E
0 1 2 Miles
Source: City of Palo Alto, 2013; USGS, 2010; NHD 2013; ESRI, 2010; Tiger Lines, 2010; Stanford University, 2000; PlaceWorks, 2014.
City Limit
Sphere of Influence
Stanford Academic Growth Boundary
Railroads
^_Potential Future School Site
Stanford University Land Use Designations
Academic Campus
Campus Residential - Low Density
Campus Residential - Moderate Density
Open Space and Field Research
Campus Open Space
Special Conservation
Lake/Reservoir
Urban Service Boundary
!Caltrain Stations
^_
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
L-6 LAND USE DRAFT – NOVEMBER 28, 2016
CITY DEVELOPMENT
From its earliest days, Palo Alto has been a world-class center of knowledge and
innovation. The city incorporated in 1894 on land purchased with the specific intent
of serving the newly established Stanford University. Originally centered on
University Avenue, Palo Alto grew south and east, incorporating the older town of
Mayfield and its California Avenue district in 1925. By the 1970s, the city had almost
doubled in size, stretching into the foothills and south to Mountain View, with
commercial centers along Middlefield Road in Midtown and El Camino Real through
formerly unincorporated Barron Park, and research and development areas at the
city’s outskirts.
Today, Palo Alto covers almost 26 square miles (16,627 acres) of land, about a third
of which is open space, including 34 city-owned parks and 1,700 acres of protected
baylands. Ensuring that activities in and around the baylands, including airport
operations, occur with minimal environmental impacts is of major importance to the
City and region.
COMPACT DEVELOPMENT
Palo Alto was an early adopter of compact development principles, as embodied in
the Urban Service Area designated to manage growth in the current Comprehensive
Plan. Through this strategy, the City has endeavored to direct new development into
appropriate locations—such as along transit corridors and near employment centers—
while protecting and preserving neighborhoods as well as the open space lands that
comprise about half of the city.
SUSTAINABILITY AND RESILIENCE
Palo Alto is regarded as a leader in sustainability, having adopted its first Climate
Action Plan in 2007 and continuing through the City’s multi-faceted efforts to
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
LAND USE DRAFT – NOVEMBER 28, 2016 L-7
eliminate the community’s dependence on fossil fuels and adapt to the potential
effects of climate change. Through the direct provision of public utility services by the
City to the community, Palo Alto is able to achieve truly outstanding energy efficiency
and water conservation. The City and community also are leaders in promoting non-
automobile transportation, waste reduction and diversion, and high-quality, low-
impact development.
Together, all of these efforts make Palo Alto a more resilient community, able to
adjust behaviors and actions in an effort to protect and preserve environmental
resources.
CITY STRUCTURE
COMPONENTS
The city is composed of unique neighborhoods and distinct but connected places.
Understanding how these different components of the city structure support one
another and connect to the region can help inform land use planning. By reflecting
the existing structure in its policies, Palo Alto will ensure that it remains a community
that encourages social contact and public life and also maintains quality urban
design.
RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS
Palo Alto’s 35 neighborhoods are characterized by housing, parks, and public
facilities. Their boundaries are based on land use and street patterns and community
perceptions. Most of the residential neighborhoods have land use classifications of
single-family residential with some also including multiple-family residential, and
transitions in scale and use often signify neighborhood boundaries.
Each neighborhood is a living reminder of the unique blend of architectural styles,
building materials, scale, and street patterns that were typical at the time of its
development. These characteristics are more intact in some neighborhoods than in
others. The City strives to complement neighborhood character when installing
streets or public space improvements and to preserve neighborhoods through
thoughtful development review to ensure that new construction, additions, and
remodels reflect neighborhood character.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
L-8 LAND USE DRAFT – NOVEMBER 28, 2016
Neighborhoods built prior to the mid-1940s generally have a traditional pattern of
development with relatively narrow streets, curbside parking, vertical curbs, and
street trees between the curb and sidewalk. Many homes are oriented to the street
with parking often located to the rear of the lot.
Many later neighborhoods were shaped by Modernist design ideas popularized by
builder Joseph Eichler. The houses are intentionally designed with austere facades
and oriented towards private backyards and interior courtyards, where expansive
glass walls “bring the outside in.” Curving streets and cul-de-sacs further the sense of
house as private enclave, and flattened curbs joined to the sidewalk with no planting
strip create an uninterrupted plane on which to display the house. Some
neighborhoods built during this period contain other home styles such as California
ranch.
Both traditional and modern Palo Alto neighborhoods have fine examples of multi-
unit housing that are very compatible with surrounding single-family homes,
primarily because of their high-quality design characteristics, such as entrances and
gardens that face the street rather than the interior of the development. Examples
include duplexes and small apartment buildings near Downtown, as well as second
units and cottage courts in other areas of the city.
DOWNTOWN
Downtown Palo Alto is widely recognized for its mix of culture, architecture, and
atmosphere of innovation, which make it a uniquely special place. Downtown plays
a key role in concentrating housing, employment, shopping, and entertainment near
each other and regional rail and other transit, exemplifying and supporting citywide
sustainability and resiliency.
CENTERS
Centers are commercial and mixed use areas that serve as focal points of community
life. These commercial centers are distributed throughout the city, within walking or
bicycling distance of virtually all Palo Alto residents, as shown in Map L-3. There are
three basic types of Centers in Palo Alto:
Regional Centers include University Avenue/Downtown and Stanford
Shopping Center. These areas are commercial activity hubs of citywide and
regional significance, with a mix of shopping, offices, and some housing.
Downtown is characterized by two- and three-story buildings with ground
Fo
o
t
h
i
l
l
E
x
p
r
e
s
s
w
a
y
Mountain View
East Palo Alto
Stanford
University
Los Altos Hills
Menlo Park
S A N
F R A N C I S C O
B A Y
Mi
d
d
l
e
f
i
e
l
d
R
o
a
d
Los Altos
£¤101
§¨¦280
OregonExpresswayEmbarcaderoRoad
AlmaStreetElCaminoReal
Page MillRoad
UniversityAvenue
Lo
u
i
s
R
o
a
d
Channing Avenue
Stanford
Lands
Ø
Ø
Ø
Ø
Ø
Ø
Ø
Ø
3
1
1
3
2
1
2
2
2
1
2
3
4
1
Source: City of Palo Alto, 2013; USGS, 2010; NHD 2013; ESRI, 2010; Tiger Lines, 2010; PlaceWorks, 2014.
P A L O A L T O G E N E R A L P L A N U P D A T EL A N D U S E E L E M E N T
0 0.5 1 Miles
MA P L - 3
C I T Y S T R U C T U R E
!Caltrain Stations
Sphere of Influence
City Boundary
Railroads
Park/Open Space
Regional Centers
1. University Avenue/Downtown
2. Stanford Shopping Center
Commercial Districts
1. South of Forest Area (SOFA)
2. California Avenue
3. Alma Village
1. Stanford Research Park
2. Stanford Medical Center
3. East Bayshore
4. San Antonio Road/Bayshore Corridor
"Ø
Mixed Use Areas
Employment Centersl
³³lo×
Employment Districts
1. California Avenue
2. Town & Country Village
3. South El Camino Real
Multi-Neighborhood Centers"Ø
1. Charleston Center
2. Edgewood Plaza
3. Midtown
Neighborhood Centers"Ø
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
L-10 LAND USE DRAFT – NOVEMBER 28, 2016
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
LAND USE DRAFT – NOVEMBER 28, 2016 L-11
floor shops. Trees, benches, outdoor seating areas, sidewalks, plazas, and
other amenities make the streets pedestrian-friendly. Transit is highly
accessible and frequent. Stanford Shopping Center has evolved from its
original auto-oriented design into a premier open-air pedestrian environment
known for extensive landscaped areas surrounded by retail and dining.
Multi-Neighborhood Centers, including California Avenue, Town and
Country Village, and South El Camino Real, are retail districts that serve more
than one neighborhood with a diverse mix of uses including retail, office, and
residential. They feature one- to three--story buildings with storefront windows
and outdoor seating areas that create a pedestrian-friendly atmosphere.
These centers also contain retail uses clustered around plazas and parks that
provide public gathering spaces. They can be linked to other city Centers via
transit.
Neighborhood Centers, such as Charleston Shopping Center, Edgewood
Plaza and Midtown Shopping Center, are small retail areas drawing customers
from the immediately surrounding area. These centers are often anchored by
a grocery or drug store and may include a variety of smaller retail shops and
offices oriented toward the everyday needs of local residents. Adjacent streets
provide walking, biking, and transit connections.
EMPLOYMENT DISTRICTS
Palo Alto’s employment districts, such as Stanford Research Park, Stanford Medical
Center, East Bayshore, and San Antonio Road/Bayshore Corridor, represent a
development type not found in other parts of the city. These Districts are
characterized by large one- to four-story buildings, with some taller buildings,
separated by parking lots and landscaped areas. The Districts are accessed primarily
by automobile or employer-supported transit, though future changes in land use and
tenancy could support a shift toward transit, pedestrian, and bicycle travel.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT
(Note to readers: this section reflects the range of options being reviewed by the
CAC as of September 2016. It will be updated as those options evolve, and will
ultimately be refined to accurately describe the suite of growth management tools
selected by the City Council. Text shown [in brackets] represents possible choices still
under consideration.)
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
L-12 LAND USE DRAFT – NOVEMBER 28, 2016
The pace of non-residential growth and development in Palo Alto has been
moderated by a citywide cap on non-residential development first adopted by the
City Council in 1989. Based on the demonstrated and continuous strength of the
city’s economy, and recent changes in the approach to growth management
throughout California, this Plan presents an updated cumulative growth
management and monitoring system. This system moderates the overall amount of
new office/R&D [option: and hotel] development, the pace of development, and its
impacts on Palo Alto’s livability.
CUMULATIVE GROWTH CAP
This updated approach uses 2015 as the baseline from which to monitor new
development and establishes a cumulative, citywide] cap on office/R&D [option: and
hotel] uses, including conversions of existing square footage to office/R&D space. It
also establishes clear guidance to address what the City should do as the cap is
approached. The cumulative cap would restrict development to less than what would
otherwise be allowed under the existing Service Commercial (CS) and Community
Commercial (CC) zoning designations. To address this issue, the City will assess non-
residential development potential in these zones and consider converting some of
the non-residential development potential into residential capacity.
ANNUAL LIMITS
[Option: No annual limits will be applied, and this section would be omitted.]
In addition to regulating the overall amount of development, community consensus
has emerged that it is important to regulate the pace of development to avoid sharp
spikes in construction and resulting rapid changes in the urban fabric and natural
environment. In 2015, the City Council adopted an interim ordinance that
established annual limits on new office/R&D space in the City’s fastest-changing
commercial districts to 50,000 square feet per year. This plan expands that cap to
encompass the entire City, excluding the Stanford University Medical Center, which is
subject to a development agreement. Stanford Research Park is subject to a separate
annual limit of ______ square feet per year, but may carry unused capacity forward
to future years. [Option: Stanford Research Park is subject to a trip cap rather than an
annual limit on development.]
DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS
For many years, the City has carefully regulated new development in Palo Alto; the
sidebar on page LU-Error! Unknown switch argument. lists examples of ordinances
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
LAND USE DRAFT – NOVEMBER 28, 2016 L-13
and requirements. This Plan adds [a program to create] new “better, stronger, and
faster” development requirements, applied to proposed projects at the time of City
review and approval, which will help the City be ensure the highest quality
development with the least environmental impacts. Development requirements will
require new projects to reduce trips, preserve affordable housing, and protect the
urban forest and other natural vegetation. The development requirements will be
regularly re-evaluated in order to monitor their effectiveness, and may be adjusted or
removed as necessary.
COMMUNITY INDICATORS
Maintaining and improving Palo Alto’s livability will demand more than applying
requirements to and evaluating the performance of new development in Palo Alto,
because new development represents a small proportion of the buildings that will be
on the ground in 2030. Existing businesses, institutions and residents also play a role
in creating a more sustainable Palo Alto. These efforts will involve changes in
behavior and new technologies as current conditions evolve over the planning
period. In response to these anticipated changes, and in parallel with the
development requirements, this Element introduces [a program to develop] a group
of community indicators that will measure progress towards stated targets and will
inform the City’s decision-making process on growth management. Each community
indicator is [would be] monitored regularly, based on the specific identified target
and the data available.
DOWNTOWN CAP
A recent cycle of economic growth has brought increased pressure for additional
office space in Downtown Palo Alto, which combines a desirable address with a
beautiful urban environment, access to transit, and proximity to dining and
shopping. In recent years, the demand has become so strong that other important
uses that contribute to Downtown’s vitality, such as storefront retail, are at risk of
being pushed out. To ensure that Downtown remains a regional center with a
diversity of destinations, new office development Downtown is limited to just over
45,000 square feet. This is the amount remaining in a cap originally established in
the 1998 Comprehensive Plan. “New” development includes conversions from
another use to an office use, so it is likely that the cap will be reached within the
horizon of this Plan. In addition to capping office development, the City will monitor
parking demand and commute trips by single-occupant vehicle. [Option: To ensure
that Downtown remains a regional center with a diversity of destinations, non-
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
L-14 LAND USE DRAFT – NOVEMBER 28, 2016
residential development, single-occupant vehicle commute trips, and parking
demand Downtown will be monitored annually.]
URBAN DESIGN
The look and feel of Palo Alto is shaped by urban design, which encompasses the
wide variety of features that together form the visual character of the city. These
elements range from aesthetic to functional and include the design of buildings, the
historic character of structures and places, public spaces where people gather,
gateways or entrances to the city, street trees lining neighborhoods, art decorating
public spaces, as well as parking lots and essential infrastructure. Key community
design features are illustrated on Map L-4.
BUILDINGS
Palo Alto has many buildings of outstanding architectural merit representing a variety
of styles and periods. The best examples of these buildings are constructed with
quality materials, show evidence of craftsmanship, fit with their surroundings, and
help make neighborhoods comfortable and appealing. To help achieve quality
design, the Architectural Review Board reviews buildings and site design for
commercial and multi-family residential projects. Palo Alto’s commercial and
residential buildings have received regional and national design recognition. Design
issues in residential neighborhoods include sympathetic restoration and renovation
of homes, protection of privacy if second stories are added, and efforts to make
streets more inviting to pedestrians.
HISTORIC RESOURCES
Palo Alto has a rich stock of historic structures and places that are important to the
city’s heritage and preserving and reusing these historic resources contributes to the
livability of Palo Alto. The City’s Historic Inventory lists approximately 400 buildings of
historical merit, with more than a dozen buildings on the National Register of
Historic Places, as well as two historic districts: Ramona Street and Professorville.
Map L-5 illustrates historic resources in Palo Alto.
Historic sites include the El Palo Alto redwood, believed to be the site of a 1776
encampment of the Portola Expedition and one of 19 California Points of Historical
Interest in the city. The garage at 367 Addison that was the birthplace of Hewlett-
Packard is one of seven sites or structures listed on the California Register of Historic
Foo
t
h
i
l
l
E
x
p
r
e
s
s
w
a
y
Mountain View
East Palo Alto
Stanford
University
Los Altos Hills
Menlo Park
S A N
F R A N C I S C O
B A Y
Mi
d
d
l
e
f
i
e
l
d
R
o
a
d
Los Altos
£¤101
§¨¦280
·|}þ85
Atherton
Redwood City
OregonExpresswayEmbarcaderoRoad
AlmaStreetElCaminoReal
Page MillRoad
UniversityAvenue
Lou
i
s
R
o
a
d
Channing Avenue
Stanford
Lands§¨¦280
Source: City of Palo Alto, 2013; USGS, 2010; NHD 2013; ESRI, 2010; Tiger Lines, 2010; PlaceWorks, 2014.
P A L O A L T O G E N E R A L P L A N U P D A T EL A N D U S E E L E M E N T
0 1 2 Miles
MA P L - 4
C O M M U N I T Y D E S I G N F E A T U R E S
Major View Corridors
k Primary Gateways
! !Scenic Routes in Palo Alto
!Caltrain Stations
Railroads
Park/Open Space
City Boundary
Sphere of Influence
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
L-16 LAND USE DRAFT –NOVEMBER 28, 2016
!!!!!!!
!!!
!
!!
!
!!!!!!!!!
!
!
!
!!!!
!
!
!!!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!!
!
!
!
!!!!!!!!!
!
!
!
!
!
!!!!
!!!
!
!!!
!
!
!!!!!!
!!!!!!
!!
!!!!!!
!
!!!!!
!
!
!
!!! !!!!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!! !
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!!
!!
!!!
!
!
!
!
!!!!!!!!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!!
!!!!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!!!
!
!!
!
!!!!!!!!
!
!!!!!!
!!
!!
!!!!
!
!!!
!!!
!
!!
!!
!!!!
!!!
!
!
!!!!
!!!!
!
!
!!!
!!!
!!!
!!!!!
!!!!!
!
!
!!!!!!
!!
!
!!
!!!!!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!!
!!
!!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!!
!!!
!
!
!
!
!
!!!!
!!!!!
!!!!!
!!
!
!!!
!
!!
!
!
!
!!
!!!
!
!
!!!!!!
!
!!
!
!!!!
!
!
!
!!!
!
!
!
!
!
Foot
h
i
l
l
E
x
p
r
e
s
s
w
a
y
Mountain View
Stanford
University
Los Altos Hills
Menlo Park
Mid
d
l
e
f
i
e
l
d
R
o
a
d
Los Altos
£¤101
§¨¦280
·|}þ85
·|}þ237
Sunnyvale
Atherton
OregonExpressway
Embarcadero Road
ElCaminoReal
PageMillRoad
UniversityAvenue
Loui
s
R
o
a
d
ChanningAvenue
Stanford
Lands
MiddlefieldRoad
AlmaStreet
Hawthorne Avenue
ChanningAvenue
EmersonStreet
LouisRoad
Professorville
Historic District
Green Gables
Historic District
Greenmeadow
Historic District
Ramona Street
Architectural District
§¨¦280
M A P L - 5
!!!!!!!
!!!
!
!!
!
!!!!!!!!!
!
!
!
!!!!
!
!
!!!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!!
!
!
!
!!!!!!!!!
!
!
!
!
!
!!!!
!
!!
!
!!!
!
!
!!!!!!
!!!!
!!
!!
!!!!!!
!!!!!!
!
!
!
!
!!!!!!!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!!
!
!!!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!!!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!
!
!!
!!!
!
!
!
!
!!!!!!!!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!!
!!!!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!!!
!
!!
!
!
!!!
!!!!
!
!!!!!!
!!
!!
!!!
!
!
!!!
!!!
!
!!
!!
!!!!
!!!
!
!
!!!!
!!!
!
!
!
!!!
!!!
!!!
!! !
!!
!!!!!
!
!
!!!!!!
!!
!
!!
!!!!!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!!
!!
!!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!!
!!!
!
!
!
!
!
!!!!
!!!!
!!!!!!
!!
!
!!!
!
!!
!
!
!
!!
!!!
!
!!!!!!!
!
!!
!
!!!!
!
!
!
!!!
!
!
!
H I S T O R I C R E S O U R C E S
Source: PlaceWorks, 2016; The City of Palo Alto, 2013.
0 1 2 Miles
*Cultural and historic resources include Historic Structures on the City of Palo Alto Historic Inventory
(categories I, II, III, or IV), and/or Buildings on the National Register of Historic Places, and/or California
Registered Historic Landmarks, and/or Points of Historical Interest.
This map is for illustrative purposes only and does not depict the full inventory of historic
structures, landmarks, or other cultural resources in Palo Alto. For a more complete listing,
please refer to the content of the Palo Alto Comprehensive Plan and the
associated environmental review documents.
P A L O A L T O G E N E R A L P L A N U P D A T EL A N D U S E E L E M E N T
!Cultural or historic resource*
Highways
City Limit
Professorville
Historic District
Ramona StreetArchitectural District
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
L-18 LAND USE DRAFT –NOVEMBER 28, 2016
Landmarks. The length of El Camino Real from San Francisco to San Diego, including
the section that passes through Palo Alto, is a State Historic Landmark. Many historic
buildings in the city have been rehabilitated and adaptively reused as office or
commercial spaces, including former single-family homes in and near downtown.
PUBLIC SPACES, STREETS, AND PARKING
Throughout Palo Alto are a variety of public spaces from parks and schools to plazas
and sidewalks, to cultural, religious, and civic facilities. Each of these can increasingly
serve as centers for public life with gathering places, bicycle and pedestrian access,
safety-enhancing night-time lighting and clear visual access, and, in some cases,
small-scale retail uses such as cafes.
Well-designed streets also invite public use and enhance quality of life. Palo Alto’s
reputation as a gracious residential community is due not only to its fine street trees
and attractive planting areas, but also to appropriate street width for neighborhood
character, accommodation of pedestrians and bicycles, height and setbacks of
buildings, and color and texture of paving materials. These components help to
ensure that streets are pleasant and safe for all travelers.
Parking lots occupy large amounts of surface area in the city. Well-designed parking
lots make efficient use of space while contributing positively to the appearance of the
surrounding area. A parking lot can provide an opportunity for open space and
outdoor amenities rather than just a repository for cars. Many parking lots in Palo
Alto include trees, landscaping and public art.
GATEWAYS
Community identity is strengthened when the entrances to the city are clear and
memorable. In Palo Alto, these entrances or gateways include University Avenue, El
Camino Real, Middlefield Road, Oregon Expressway/Page Mill Road, San Antonio
Road and Embarcadero Road, and the Palo Alto and California Avenue Caltrain
stations. Well-designed gateways are defined by natural and urban landmarks that
complement the character and identity of the neighborhood.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
LAND USE DRAFT – NOVEMBER 28, 2016 L-19
URBAN FOREST
Palo Alto’s urban forest—including both public and privately owned trees—is a key
part of the community’s history, identity, and quality of life. It offers enormous social,
environmental, and financial benefits and is a fundamental part of Palo Alto’s sense
of place. Regular spacing of trees that are similar in form and texture provides order
and coherence and gives scale to the street. A canopy of branches and leaves
provides shade for pedestrians and creates a sense of enclosure and comfort. On the
city’s most memorable streets, trees of a single species extend historic character to
the corners of blocks, reducing the apparent width of streets and intersections and
defining the street as a continuous space. Protecting, maintaining, and enhancing the
urban forest, as called for in the 2015 Urban Forest Master Plan, is among the most
effective ways to preserve Palo Alto’s character.
PUBLIC ART
Public art helps create an inviting atmosphere for gathering, fosters economic
development, and contributes to vital public spaces. Palo Alto’s public art program
reflects the City’s tradition of enriching public spaces with works of art, ranging from
the subtle inclusion of handcrafted artifacts into building architecture to more
traditional displays of sculpture at civic locations. The Municipal Code requires both
public and private projects to incorporate public art.
UTILITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE
A city is supported by its infrastructure—features such as paving, signs, and utilities.
These features represent substantial public investments and are meant to serve all
community members. Infrastructure improvements must meet current needs and
keep pace with growth and development. While the purpose of infrastructure is
usually utilitarian or functional, attention to design details can add beauty or even
improve urban design. For example, replacing a sidewalk can provide an opportunity
to create larger tree wells and provide new street trees.
PALO ALTO AIRPORT
Palo Alto Airport (PAO) is a general aviation airport owned and operated by the City
of Palo Alto. PAO occupies 102 acres of land east of Highway 101 in the baylands
and has one paved runway. The airport functions as a reliever to three Bay Area
airports. PAO facilities include an air traffic control tower operated by the Federal
Aviation Administration and a terminal building. Flight clubs and fixed base operators
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
L-20 LAND USE DRAFT –NOVEMBER 28, 2016
operate on-site, offering fuel sales, flight lessons, pilot training, and aircraft sales,
rentals, maintenance, and repair. From 1967 to 2015, PAO was operated by Santa
Clara County under a lease agreement. Operations and control have since been
transferred to the City and key challenges ahead include addressing deterioration of
runway conditions, addressing noise impacts and hours of operation, and the
relationship between the Airport and the Baylands Master Plan.
LAND USE MAP AND LAND USE DESIGNATIONS
Map L-6 shows each land use designation within the city of Palo Alto. The land use
designations translate the elements of city structure into a detailed map that presents
the community’s vision for future land use development and conservation on public
and private land in Palo Alto through the year 2030. Residential densities are
expressed in terms of dwelling units per acre.
Building intensities for non-residential uses are expressed in terms of floor area ratio
(FAR), which is the ratio of gross building floor area (excluding areas designated for
parking, etc.) to net lot area, both expressed in square feet. FAR does not regulate
building placement or form, only the spatial relationship between building size and
lot size; it represents an expectation of the overall intensity of future development.
The maximums assigned to the land use designations below do not constitute
entitlements, nor are property owners or developers guaranteed that an individual
project, when tested against the General Plan’s policies, will be able or permitted to
achieve these maximums.
!
!
FOO
T
H
I
L
L
E
X
P
Y
FA
B
I
A
N
W
A
Y
SAND
H
I
L
L
R
D
AL
M
A
S
T
SEA
L
E
A
V
E
SAN
A
N
T
O
N
I
O
R
D
OREG
O
N
E
X
P
Y
QU
A
R
R
Y
R
D
LOMA
V
E
R
D
E
A
V
E
ARA
S
T
R
A
D
E
R
O
R
D
E CH
A
R
L
E
S
T
O
N
R
D
EMBARCA
D
E
R
O
W
A
Y
PASTE
U
R
D
R
CAL
I
F
O
R
N
I
A
A
V
E
LI
N
C
O
L
N
A
V
E
UNI
V
E
R
S
I
T
Y
A
V
E
JU
N
I
P
E
R
O
S
E
R
R
A
B
L
V
D
PA
G
E
M
I
L
L
R
D
§¨¦280
|ÿ82
£¤101
Mountain View
East Palo Alto
Stanford
University
Los Altos Hills
Menlo Park
S A N
F R A N C I S C O
B A Y
Los Altos
Arastradero Preserve
Baylands
Preserve
Byxbee
Park
SOFA II CAP
SOFA I CAP
Baylands Master Plan
East Charleston Road
S A N
F R A N C I S C O
B A Y
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 10.125
Miles
Source: ESRI, 2010; Tiger Lines, 2010; USGS, 2010; NHD, 2013; City of Palo Alto, 2013; PlaceWorks, 2015.
Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designations
Residential
Single Family Res
Multi-Family Res
Multi-Family Res (w/Hotel Overlay)
Mixed Use
Commercial
Hotel Commercial
Service Commercial
Neighborhood Commercial
Regional/Community Commercial
Business/Industrial
Light Industrial
Research/Office Park
Other
SOFA II CAP
SOFA I CAP
School District Land
Major Institution/Special Facility
Streamside Open Space
Public Park
Open Space/Controlled Development
Public Conservation Land
Stanford University Land Use Designations
Academic Campus
Campus Residential - Low Density
Campus Residential - Moderate Density
Open Space/Field Research
Campus Open Space
Special Conservation
Lake/Reservoir
!Caltrain Stations
Urban Service Area
City Boundary
Sphere of Influence
Railroads
P A L O A L T O G E N E R A L P L A N U P D A T E
L A N D U S E E L E M E N T
MA P L -6
C O M P R E H E N S I V E L A N D U S E D E S I G N A T I O N S
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
L-22 LAND USE DRAFT –NOVEMBER 28, 2016
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
LAND USE DRAFT –NOVEMBER 28, 2016 L-23
LAND USE DEFINITIONS
OPEN SPACE
Publicly Owned Conservation Land: Open lands whose primary purpose is the
preservation and enhancement of the natural state of the land and its plants and
animals. Only resource management, recreation, and educational activities
compatible with resource conservation are allowed.
Public Park: Open lands whose primary purpose is public access for active
recreation and whose character is essentially urban. These areas, which may have
been planted with non-indigenous landscaping, may provide access to nature within
the urban environment and require a concerted effort to maintain recreational
facilities and landscaping.
Streamside Open Space: This designation is intended to preserve and enhance
corridors of riparian vegetation along streams. Hiking, biking, and riding trails may be
developed in the streamside open space. The corridor will generally vary in width up
to 200 feet either side of the center line of the creek. However, along San
Francisquito Creek between El Camino Real and the Sand Hill Road bridge over the
creek, the open space corridor varies in width between approximately 80 and 310
feet from the center line of the creek. The aerial delineation of the open space in this
segment of the corridor, as opposed to other segments of the corridor, is shown to
approximate scale on the Proposed Land Use and Circulation Map.
Open Space/Controlled Development: Land having all the characteristics of open
space but where some development may be allowed on private properties. Open
space amenities must be retained in these areas. Residential densities range from 0.1
to 1 dwelling unit per acre but may rise to a maximum of 2 units per acre where
second units are allowed, and population densities range from 1 to 4 persons per
acre.
RESIDENTIAL
Single-Family Residential: This designation applies to residential neighborhoods
primarily characterized by detached single-family homes, typically with one dwelling
unit on each lot. Private and public schools and churches are conditional uses
requiring permits. Second units or duplexes may be allowed in select, limited areas
where they would be compatible with neighborhood character and do not create
traffic and parking problems. The net density in single family areas will range from 1
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
L-24 LAND USE DRAFT – NOVEMBER 28, 2016
to 7 units per acre, but rises to a maximum of 14 units on parcels where second
units or duplexes are allowed. Population densities will range from 1 to 30 persons
per acre.
Multiple-Family Residential: The permitted number of housing units will vary by
area, depending on existing land use, proximity to major streets and public transit,
distance to shopping, and environmental problems. Net densities will range from 8
to 40 units and 8 to 90 persons per acre. Density should be on the lower end of the
scale next to single-family residential areas. Densities higher than what is permitted
by zoning may be allowed where measurable community benefits will be derived,
services and facilities are available, and the net effect will be compatible with the
overall Comprehensive Plan.
Village Residential: Allows residential dwellings that are designed to contribute to
the harmony and pedestrian orientation of a street or neighborhood. Housing types
include single-family houses on small lots, second units, cottage clusters, courtyard
housing, duplexes, fourplexes, and small apartment buildings. Design standards will
be prepared for each housing type to ensure that development successfully
contributes to the street and neighborhood and minimizes potential negative
impacts. Net densities will range up to 20 units per acre.
Transit-Oriented Residential: Allows higher density residential dwellings in the
University Avenue/Downtown and California Avenue commercial centers within a
walkable distance, approximately 2,500 feet, of the City’s two multi-modal transit
stations. The land use category is intended to generate residential densities that
support substantial use of public transportation and especially the use of Caltrain.
Design standards will be prepared to ensure that development successfully
contributes to the street and minimizes potential negative impacts. Individual project
requirements will be developed, including parking, to ensure that a significant
portion of the residents will use alternative modes of transportation. Net density will
range up to 50 units per acre, with minimum densities to be considered during
development of new City zoning regulations.
COMMERCIAL
Neighborhood Commercial: Includes shopping centers with off-street parking or a
cluster of street-front stores that serve the immediate neighborhood. Examples
include Charleston Center, Edgewood Center, and Midtown. Typical uses include
supermarkets, bakeries, drugstores, variety stores, barber shops, restaurants, self-
service laundries, dry cleaners, child care and hardware stores. In locations along El
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
LAND USE DRAFT –NOVEMBER 28, 2016 L-25
Camino Real and Alma Street, residential and mixed use projects may also locate in
this category. Non-residential floor area ratios will range up to 0.4.
Child Care Options – Choose One to Carry Forward
Typical uses include supermarkets, bakeries, drugstores, variety stores, barber
shops, restaurants, self-service laundries, dry cleaners, child care and hardware
stores.
Typical uses include supermarkets, bakeries, drugstores, variety stores, barber
shops, restaurants, self-service laundries, dry cleaners, and hardware stores.
Child care is an acceptable use except in Charleston Center, Edgewood
Center, and Midtown.
Regional/Community Commercial: Larger shopping centers and districts that have
a wider variety of goods and services than the neighborhood shopping areas. They
rely on larger trade areas and include such uses as department stores, bookstores,
furniture stores, toy stores, apparel shops, restaurants, theaters, and non-retail
services such as banks. Non-retail uses such as medical and dental offices may also
locate in this designation. Examples include Stanford Shopping Center, Town and
Country Village, and University Avenue/Downtown. In some locations, residential
and mixed use projects may also locate in this category. Non-residential floor area
ratios range from 0.35 to 2.
Service Commercial: Facilities providing citywide and regional services and relying
on customers arriving by car. These uses do not necessarily benefit from being in
high volume pedestrian areas such as shopping centers or Downtown. Typical uses
include auto services and dealerships, motels, lumberyards, appliance stores, and
restaurants, including fast service types. In almost all cases, these uses require good
automobile and service access so that customers can safely load and unload without
impeding traffic. In some locations, residential and mixed use projects may be
appropriate in this land use category. Examples of Service Commercial areas include
San Antonio Road, El Camino Real, and Embarcadero Road northeast of the
Bayshore Freeway. Non-residential floor area ratios will range up to 0.4.
Mixed Use: The Mixed Use designation is intended to promote pedestrian-oriented
places that layer compatible land uses, public amenities and utilities together at
various scales and intensities. The designation allows for multiple functions within
the same building or adjacent to one another in the same general vicinity to foster a
mix of uses that encourages people to live, work, play, and shop in close proximity.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
L-26 LAND USE DRAFT – NOVEMBER 28, 2016
Most typically, mixed use developments have retail on the ground floor and
residences above. This category includes Live/Work, Retail/Office, Residential/Retail
and Residential/Office development. Floor area ratios will range up to 1.15, although
development located along transit corridors or near multi-modal centers will range
up to 2.0 FAR with up to 3.0 FAR possible where higher FAR would be an incentive
to meet community goals such as providing affordable housing. The FAR above 1.15
must be used for residential purposes. FAR between 0.15 and 1.15 may be used for
residential purposes. As of the adoption of this Comprehensive Plan, the Mixed Use
designation is currently only applied in the SOFA area.
Commercial Hotel: This category allows facilities for use by temporary overnight
occupants on a transient basis, such as hotels and motels, with associated
conference centers and similar uses. Restaurants and other eating facilities, meeting
rooms, small retail shops, personal services, and other services ancillary to the hotel
are also allowed. This category can be applied in combination with another land use
category. Floor area ratio will range up to 2.0 for the hotel portion of the site.
Research/Office Park: Office, research, and manufacturing establishments whose
operations are buffered from adjacent residential uses. Stanford Research Park is an
example. Other uses that may be included are educational institutions and child care
facilities. Compatible commercial service uses such as banks and restaurants, and
residential or mixed uses that would benefit from the proximity to employment
centers, will also be allowed. Additional uses, including retail services, commercial
recreation, churches, and private clubs may also be located in Research/Office Park
areas, but only if they are found to be compatible with the surrounding area through
the conditional use permit process. In some locations, residential and mixed-use
projects may also locate in this category. Maximum allowable floor area ratio ranges
from 0.3 to 0.5, depending on site conditions.
Light Industrial: Wholesale and storage warehouses and the manufacturing,
processing, repairing, and packaging of goods. Emission of fumes, noise, smoke, or
other pollutants is strictly controlled. Examples include portions of the area south of
Oregon Avenue between El Camino Real and Alma Street that historically have
included these land uses, and the San Antonio Road industrial area. Compatible
residential and mixed use projects may also be located in this category. Floor area
ratio will range up to 0.5.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
LAND USE DRAFT –NOVEMBER 28, 2016 L-27
INSTITUTIONAL
School District Lands: Properties owned or leased by public school districts and
used for educational, recreational, or other non-commercial, non-industrial purposes.
Floor area ratio may not exceed 1.0.
Major Institution/Special Facilities: Institutional, academic, governmental, and
community service uses and lands that are either publicly owned or operated as
non-profit organizations. Examples are hospitals and City facilities.
Major Institution/University Lands: Academic and academic reserve areas of
Stanford University. Population density and building intensity limits are established
by conditional use permit with Santa Clara County. These lands are further
designated by the following sub-categories of land use:
Major Institution/University Lands/Campus Single-Family Residential:
Single-family areas where the occupancy of the units is significantly or totally
limited to individuals or families affiliated with the institution.
Major Institution/University Lands/Campus Multiple Family Residential:
Multiple family areas where the occupancy of the units is significantly or totally
limited to individuals or families affiliated with the institution.
Major Institution/University Lands/Campus Educational Facilities:
Academic lands with a full complement of activities and densities that give
them an urban character. Allowable uses are academic institutions and
research facilities, student and faculty housing, and support services. Increases
in student enrollment and faculty/staff size must be accompanied by
measures that mitigate traffic and housing impacts.
Major Institution/University Lands/Academic Reserve and Open Space:
Academic lands having all the characteristics of open space but upon which
some academic development may be allowed provided that open space
amenities are retained. These lands are important for their aesthetic and
ecological value as well as their potential for new academic uses.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
L-28 LAND USE DRAFT – NOVEMBER 28, 2016
GOALS, POLICIES, AND PROGRAMS
GROWTH MANAGEMENT
GOAL L-1 A compact and resilient city providing residents and visitors
with attractive neighborhoods, work places, shopping
districts, public facilities, and open spaces.
CONCENTRATING DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE URBAN SERVICE AREA
Policy L-1.1 Limit future urban development to currently developed lands within
the urban service area. The boundary of the urban service area is
otherwise known as the urban growth boundary. Retain undeveloped
land west of Foothill Expressway and Junipero Serra as open space,
with allowances made for very low-intensity development consistent
with the open space character of the area. Retain undeveloped land
northeast of Highway 101 as open space. [Previous Policy L-1] [L1]
Policy L-1.2 Maintain and strengthen Palo Alto’s varied residential neighborhoods
while sustaining the vitality of its commercial areas and public facilities.
[Previous Policy L-4] [L2]
Policy L-1.3 Promote infill development in the urban service area that is
compatible with its surroundings and the overall scale and character of
the city to ensure a compact, efficient development pattern. [(Previous
Policy L-5 )(PTC Policy L1.7)] [L3]
Program L1.3.1 Work with neighbors, neighborhood associations,
property owners, and developers to identify barriers
to infill development of below market rate and
more affordable market rate housing and to
remove these barriers. Work with these same
stakeholders to identify sites and facilitate
opportunities for below market rate housing and
housing that is affordable [(PTC Program L1.7.10)
(Edited)] [L4]
Policy L-1.4 Ensure that future development addresses potential risks from climate
change and sea level rise. [Note: the revised Safety Element will
include a much more extensive discussion of this issue along with
policies and programs to respond.] [NEW POLICY] [L5]
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
LAND USE DRAFT –NOVEMBER 28, 2016 L-29
Program L1.4.1 Review development standards applicable in areas
susceptible to flooding from sea level rise, including
east of Highway 101, West Bayshore and East
Meadow Circle, and the area east of San Antonio
Road and north of East Charleston, and update
requirements as needed to ensure that new
development is designed and located to provide
protection from potential flooding impacts. [(NEW
PROGRAM)(Comp Plan Draft EIR Mitigation
Measure GHG-3.)] [Note: The revised Safety
Element will include additional mitigation
measures to address sea level rise and climate
change adaptation] [L6]
REGIONAL COOPERATION
Policy L-1.5 Maintain an active engagement with Santa Clara County, San Mateo
County, neighboring cities, other public agencies including school
districts and Stanford University regarding land use and transportation
issues. [Previous Policy L-2] [L7]
Program L1.5.1 Maintain and update as appropriate the 1985 Land
Use Policies Agreement that sets forth the land use
policies of the City, Santa Clara County, and
Stanford University with regard to Stanford
unincorporated lands. [Previous Program L-1] [L8]
Policy L-1.6 Participate in regional strategies to address the interaction of jobs,
housing balance and transportation issues. [NEW POLICY] [L9]
GROWTH MANAGEMENT AND MONITORING
Policy L-1.7 Encourage land uses that address the needs of the community and
manage change and development to benefit the community. [NEW
POLICY] [L10]
Program L1.7.1 Review regulatory tools available to the City and
identify actions to enhance and preserve the
livability of residential neighborhoods and the
vitality of commercial and employment districts,
including improved code enforcement practices.
[NEW PROGRAM] [L11]
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
L-30 LAND USE DRAFT – NOVEMBER 28, 2016
Policy L-1.8 Sites within or adjacent to existing commercial areas and corridors are
suitable for hotels. Give preference to housing versus hotel use on
sites adjacent to predominantly single family neighborhoods. [NEW
POLICY] [L12]
CUMULATIVE CAP OPTIONS CHOOSE ONE OR MORE TO CARRY FORWARD
Policy L-1.9 (no cumulative cap on non-residential uses) A well designed,
compact, and resilient City maintains a healthy mix of non-residential
uses. The City will monitor non-residential development over time in
addition to applying development requirements and community
indicators designed to ensure the highest quality of development with
the least possible impacts. [NEW POLICY] [L13]
Program L1.9.1 (no cumulative cap; trigger for evaluation of
development requirements)When new Office &
R&D development approved since January 1, 2015
reaches 500,000 square feet citywide, evaluate the
success of adopted development requirements and
community indicators. [NEW PROGRAM] [L14]
Policy L-1.10 (citywide cap on office/R&D minus SUMC plus development
requirements) Maintain a citywide cap of 1.7 million new square feet
of office/R&D development, exempting medical office uses associated
with SUMC. Use January 1, 2015 as the baseline and monitor
development towards the cap on an annual basis. Regularly assess the
effectiveness of requirements applied to development and other
community performance measures and remove or adjust the cap
and/or development requirements accordingly. [NEW POLICY] [L15]
Policy L-1.11 (citywide cap on office/R&D and hotel, minus SUMC, plus
development requirements) Maintain a citywide cap of 1.7 million
new square feet of office/R&D and an appropriate additional amount
of hotel development using January 1, 2015 as the baseline and
monitor development towards this cap on an annual basis. Regularly
assess the effectiveness of development requirements applied to
development and community indicators and remove or adjust the cap
and/or development requirements accordingly. [NEW POLICY] [L16]
Program L1.11.1 (possible Citywide hotel cap) Study demand and
potential impacts in order to determine whether the
Citywide cap should include a cap on hotel
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
LAND USE DRAFT –NOVEMBER 28, 2016 L-31
development and what an appropriate
development cap would be. [NEW PROGRAM]
[L17]
Policy L-1.12 (cumulative cap exemptions) Exempt medical, governmental, and
institutional uses from the cap on office/R&D development. [NEW
POLICY] [L18]
CUMULATIVE CAP AND DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS – IMPLEMENTATION
PROGRAMS
Program L1.12.1 (citywide cap re-evaluation) Reevaluate the
cumulative cap when the amount of new
office/R&D [and hotel] square footage entitled since
January 1, 2015 reaches 67 percent of the allowed
square footage, or 1,139,000 square feet.
Concurrently consider removal or potential changes
to the cap and/or to the amount of additional
development permitted by the City’s zoning
ordinance. [NEW PROGRAM] [L19]
Program L1.12.2 (development requirements reevaluation) Regularly
assess the effectiveness of development
requirements and revise them as necessary. [NEW
PROGRAM] [L20]
Program L1.12.3 (adjust development potential to reflect citywide
cap) Assess non-residential development potential
in the CC, CN, and CS zoning districts, and convert
non-retail commercial FAR to residential FAR, where
appropriate. Conversion to residential capacity
should not be considered in Town and Country
Village. [NEW PROGRAM] [L21]
ANNUAL LIMIT OPTIONS – CHOOSE ONE OR MORE TO CARRY FORWARD
Policy L-1.13 (no annual limit) Use performance requirements to assure that new
development adds to the quality of the community and addresses or
avoids new impacts. [NEW POLICY] [L22]
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
L-32 LAND USE DRAFT – NOVEMBER 28, 2016
Policy L-1.14 (citywide annual limit) Limit the amount of new office/R&D square
footage permitted in the City on an annual basis to 50,000 square feet
outside the Stanford Research Park and ___ square feet inside
Stanford Research Park. Allow unused development capacity within
Stanford Research Park only to be carried forward to future years.
Stanford University Medical Center shall be exempt from this annual
limit. [NEW POLICY] [L23]
Policy L-1.15 (citywide annual limit with SRP exemption) Limit the amount of new
office/R&D square footage permitted in the City on an annual basis to
50,000 square feet, exempting new square footage in Stanford
University Medical Center, and exempting the Stanford Research Park
if a cap on peak period auto trips to the Research Park is established
and enforced. [NEW POLICY] [L24]
Policy L-1.16 (annual limit exemptions) Exempt public facilities, offices less than
5,000 square feet, and medical offices of less than 2,000 square feet
from the annual limit. [NEW POLICY] [L25]
DOWNTOWN CAP – CHOOSE ONE OR MORE TO CARRY FORWARD
Program L1.16.1 (no downtown cap) Monitor non-residential
development in Downtown on an annual basis,
tracking new square footage by use, as well as
commute trips by SOV and parking demand. [NEW
PROGRAM] [L26]
Program L1.16.2 (retain downtown cap) Limit new office
development in Downtown to 45,619 square feet,
using January 1, 2015 as the baseline. Monitor this
development on an annual basis, tracking new
square footage as well as commute trips by SOV
and parking demand. Reevaluate this Downtown
development cap when the amount of new office
and hotel square footage entitled since January 1,
2015 reaches 67 percent of the remaining allowed
square footage and concurrently consider potential
changes to the cap and/or to the amount of
additional development permitted by the City’s
zoning ordinance. [NEW PROGRAM] [L27]
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
LAND USE DRAFT –NOVEMBER 28, 2016 L-33
Program L1.16.3 (exempt small offices from downtown cap) Limit
new office development in Downtown to 45,619
square feet, using January 1, 2015 as the baseline.
Small offices, where the design clearly
demonstrates that the space is intended for use by
one or more tenants that occupy less than 5,000
square feet total, shall be exempt. Monitor this
development on an annual basis, tracking new
square footage as well as commute trips by SOV
and parking demand. Reevaluate this Downtown
development cap when the amount of new office
square footage entitled since January 1, 2015
reaches 67 percent of the remaining allowed
square footage, or 30,564 square feet. Concurrently
consider potential changes to the cap and/or to the
amount of additional development permitted by
the City’s zoning ordinance. [NEW PROGRAM] [L28]
Program L1.16.4 (limit both office and hotels Downtown) Limit new
office development in Downtown to 45,619 square
feet square feet and limit new hotel development
to 50,000 square feet, using January 1, 2015 as the
baseline. Monitor this development on an annual
basis, tracking new square footage as well as
commute trips by SOV and parking demand.
Reevaluate this Downtown development cap when
the amount of new office and hotel square footage
entitled since January 1, 2015 reaches 67 percent of
the remaining allowed square footage, or 30,564
square feet. Concurrently consider potential
changes to the cap and/or to the amount of
additional development permitted by the City’s
zoning ordinance. [NEW PROGRAM] [L29]
DOWNTOWN CAP – IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAMS
Program L1.16.5 (adjust downtown development potential to reflect
the cap) Update the CD district zoning to convert
some non-retail commercial FAR to residential FAR
Downtown and consider revising the TDR program
to create bonus residential, rather than commercial
square footage.[NEW PROGRAM] [L30]
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
L-34 LAND USE DRAFT – NOVEMBER 28, 2016
Program L1.16.6 (character of downtown) Evaluate and adjust the
zoning definition of office uses allowed in
downtown to and consider ways to prioritize for
small business and startups. [NEW PROGRAM]
[L31]
DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS AND COMMUNITY INDICATORS
Option 1 – Articulate the Purpose and the Topics for the development
requirements in the Comp Plan but develop details through a later program.
Policy L-1.17 (development requirements) Hold new development to the highest
development standards in order to maintain Palo Alto’s livability and
achieve the highest quality development with the least impacts. These
development requirements are intended to promote sustainability, a
high quality of life and ensure that the City consists of well-designed
and livable neighborhoods and centers. [NEW POLICY] [L32]
Program L1.17.1 Review and refine both new and existing
development requirements that address topics such
as energy, water and other natural resource
conservation, parking, open space and parkland,
landscaping, tree protection and neighborhood
compatibility to ensure they are effective at
achieving the highest quality development with the
least impacts. Publish the results of the review in a
clear and readable document. [NEW PROGRAM]
[L33]
Program L1.17.2 Create development requirements that protect
livability and the environment by addressing
additional topics such as reducing trips, preserving
and facilitating affordable housing and preservation
of the tree canopy. [NEW PROGRAM] [L34]
Policy L-1.18 (community indicators) The city will monitor key community
indicators on a regular basis to determine whether the policies of this
plan and the efforts of the Palo Alto residents and businesses are
effective at promoting livability. Collect the data on the community
indicators in a transparent manner, and publish the results in a clear,
user-friendly, easy-to-understand document. [NEW POLICY] [L35]
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
LAND USE DRAFT –NOVEMBER 28, 2016 L-35
Program L1.18.1 Develop community indicators for topics such as
greenhouse gas emissions, transportation, jobs,
housing, schools, parks, the tree canopy, the natural
environment and diversity. Create a list of
community indicators and a schedule for
monitoring these indicators. [NEW PROGRAM] [L36]
Program L1.18.2 Based on monitoring the community indicators
data over time, periodically consider whether to
retain, revise downward or upward, or eliminate the
annual limits on growth, the growth caps in
individual areas, and/or the Citywide cumulative
growth caps in this Land Use and Community
Design Element. [NEW PROGRAM] [L37]
Option 2 – Provide detail and specificity of the Development Requirements in
the Comp Plan.
Policy L-1.17 (development requirements) Hold new development to the highest
development standards in order to maintain Palo Alto’s livability and
achieve the highest quality development with the least impacts. These
development requirements are intended to promote sustainability, a
high quality of life and ensure that the City consists of well-designed
and livable neighborhoods and centers. [NEW POLICY] [L38]
Program L1.17.1 Review and refine both new and existing
development requirements that address topics such
as energy, water and other natural resource
conservation, parking, open space and parkland,
landscaping, tree protection and neighborhood
compatibility in Table L-1 to ensure they are
effective at achieving the highest quality
development with the least impacts. Publish the
results of the review in a clear and readable
document. [NEW PROGRAM] [L39]
Program L1.17.2 Create development requirements that protect
livability and the environment by addressing
additional topics such as reducing trips, preserving
and facilitating affordable housing and preservation
of the tree canopy as shown on Table L-1. [NEW
PROGRAM] [L40]
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
L-36 LAND USE DRAFT – NOVEMBER 28, 2016
TABLE L-1 DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS
These requirements are new tools strongly focused on ensuring the highest quality development
with the least impacts. .
1. Reducing Trips: a specific percent of typical single-occupant vehicle (SOV) commuter trips.
2. Alleviating Traffic Congestion: minimize impact on intersection Level of Service (LOS)
3. Connectivity: enhancing connections to transportation infrastructure or services.
4. Reserving Affordable Housing: no net loss of affordable dwelling units, no displacement of
residents of Below Market Rate (BMR) units, and discouraging loss of smaller homes such as cottages.
5. Facilitating Affordable Housing: Facilitate a mix of multi-family housing, including affordable
units, and housing for seniors and people with special needs.
6. Protecting the Natural Environment: Create a resilient landscape by preserving or increasing the tree canopy and natural understory, landscaped/open space areas planted with native plantings, creating or restoring a resilient landscape, and bird-friendly design.
7. Providing Parking: do not allow parking spillover onto residential neighborhood streets.
8. Preserving Affordable Office Space: Encourage the provision of new small office space and the preservation of existing low-cost office space.
EXISTING DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
The City already regulates many aspects of development. The City will review these existing regulations to ensure they are consistent with current targets and effective in achieving the
highest quality development with the least impacts.
Green Building: Conserving energy, water, and resources through meeting specific requirements in the City’s mandatory green building ordinance, as periodically amended. It covers topics such as:
• Energy Efficiency and Conservation
• Materials and Waste
• Light Pollution Reduction
• Emissions • Electric Vehicle Charging
• Water Efficiency, Conservation, and Reuse
• Permeable Surface Area For Groundwater Recharge
• Native, Drought-Tolerant Planting • Indoor Air Quality
Parking: Meeting need without providing excess:
• Bike Parking
• Vehicle Parking
Parkland: Providing common open space and contributing to Citywide park need:
• Provision of parkland or payment of fees
• Private open space
Landscaping and Amenities: Making Palo Alto more beautiful:
• Tree protection and retention
• Public Art
Neighborhood compatibility and building design: Avoiding negative impacts and improving the surroundings: • Glare
• Noise
• Shade
• Utility Undergrounding • High-quality architecture
• Support for historic resources
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
LAND USE DRAFT –NOVEMBER 28, 2016 L-37
TABLE L-2 COMMUNITY INDICATORS
Measure Metric
Recommended
Monitoring
Frequency
Greenhouse Gas
Emissions
80% below 1990 emissions by 2030
(S/CAP goal) At least every 2 years
Vehicle Miles Traveled
(VMT) per Capita 5% decrease per year At least every 2 years
Percent of Commute Trips
to Employment Centers by
Single Occupant Vehicle
(SOV)
50% trips by SOV, based on employee
survey responses Annually
Number of Commute Trips
to Employment Centers
40% below ITE standards for
Downtown and 30% below ITE
standards for SRP.
Annually
Corridor Travel Times
Typical PM peak hour travel time along
2 major north-south corridors and 2
major east-west corridors
At least every 2 years
Commercial District
Parking Overflow into
Neighborhoods
Non-resident parking on sampled
residential neighborhood streets Annually
Air Pollutant Levels
Maximum 24-hour concentrations of
criteria pollutants identified by the Bay
Area Air Quality Management District,
as reported at the monitoring stations
closest to Palo Alto
Annually
Groundwater
Contamination
Acres of City underlain by shallow
groundwater contamination Every 4 years
Jobs/Housing Balance
(Expressed as a Ratio of
Jobs to Employed
Residents)
Ratio of jobs to employed residents Every 4 years
Housing Cost Burden
Percentage of owners and renters
paying more than 50% of household
income for housing
Every 4 years
Affordability of Housing
Stock
Number of housing units affordable to
moderate-income, low-income, and
very-low-income households
Every 4 years
Economic Diversity
Percentage of households at various
household income levels [see Fig. 2-3
in adopted 2015 HE]
Every 4 years
Below Market Rate (BMR)
Units Number of units Every 4 years
Progress toward Housing
Element goals
Annual Report to State Housing and
Community Development Department Annually
Existing Resident
Displacement Number of existing units demolished Every 4 years
Comment [PW1]: M Note: has been slightly re-
ordered per CAC direction to group like topics.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
L-38 LAND USE DRAFT – NOVEMBER 28, 2016
TABLE L-2 COMMUNITY INDICATORS
Measure Metric
Recommended
Monitoring
Frequency
Unoccupied Homes Number of homes vacant/unoccupied
for longer than 3 months per year Annually
Age Diversity Percentage of population in various age
cohorts Every 4 years
PAUSD Class Size Class size Annually
PAUSD Satisfaction with
Schools
Satisfaction ratings as reported by
Strategic Plan Survey Annually
Park Acreage per Capita Ratio of district and neighborhood
parks per 1,000 population Every 4 years
Urban Tree Canopy Canopy cover – percent of city covered
by trees Every 4 years
Biodiversity Species counted in spring and fall bird
counts Biannually
Infrastructure or Acres
Affected by Sea Level Rise
Number of key facilities, major
infrastructure, and/or acres of land
within the City limits directly affected by
sea level rise
Every 4 years
Wastewater Reuse Percent of wastewater recycled Every 4 years
Impermeable Surfaces and
Stormwater Infiltration in
Urbanized Area
(Need to determine how this can be
measured) Every 4 years
Policy L-1.18 (community indicators) The city will monitor key community
indicators on a regular basis to determine whether the policies of this
plan and the efforts of the Palo Alto residents and businesses are
effective at promoting livability by using community indicators.
Suggested indicators and monitoring frequency are listed in Table L-2
related to greenhouse gas emissions, vehicle miles traveled, commute
trips by single occupant vehicle, jobs/housing balance, and
community diversity. Collect the data on the community indicators in
a transparent manner, and publish the results in a clear, user-friendly,
easy-to-understand document. [NEW POLICY] [L41]
Program L1.18.1 Develop community indicators for topics such as
greenhouse gas emissions, transportation, jobs,
housing, schools, parks, the tree canopy, the natural
environment and diversity as shown in Table L-2.
Create a list of community indicators and a
Comme
Note: has been
slightly
re-
ordered
per CAC direction
to group
like
topics.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
LAND USE DRAFT –NOVEMBER 28, 2016 L-39
schedule for monitoring these indicators. [NEW
PROGRAM] [L42]
Program L1.18.2 Based on monitoring the community indicators
data over time, periodically consider whether to
retain, revise downward or upward, or eliminate the
annual limits on growth, the growth caps in
individual areas, and/or the Citywide cumulative
growth caps in this Land Use and Community
Design Element. [NEW PROGRAM] [L43]
Option 3: Use community indicators along with a cumulative cap, annual limit,
and downtown cap, but do not use development requirements.
GOAL L-2 An enhanced sense of “community” with development
designed to foster public life, meet citywide needs and
embrace the principles of sustainability.
Policy L-2.1 Maintain a citywide structure of Residential Neighborhoods, Centers,
and Employment Districts. Integrate these areas with the City’s and the
region’s transit and street system. [Previous Policy L-10] [L44]
Policy L-2.2 Enhance connections between commercial and mixed use centers and
the surrounding residential neighborhoods by promoting walkable
and bikable connections and a diverse range of retail and services that
caters to the daily needs of residents. [Previous Policy L-11] [L45]
Program L2.2.1 Explore whether there are appropriate locations to
allow small-scale neighborhood-serving retail
facilities such as coffee shops and corner stores in
residential areas. [(Previous Policy L-16) (Converted
to Program)] [L46]
Policy L-2.3 As a key component of a diverse, inclusive community, allow and
encourage a mix of housing types and sizes, designed for greater
affordability, particularly smaller units and senior housing. [NEW
POLICY] [L47]
Policy L-2.4 Facilitate reuse of existing buildings. [Previous Program L 20] [NEW
POLICY] [L48]
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
L-40 LAND USE DRAFT – NOVEMBER 28, 2016
Policy L-2.5 Encourage new development and redevelopment to incorporate
greenery and natural features through the use of features such as
green rooftops, pocket parks, plazas, and rain gardens.[(NEW POLICY)
(Combined with Previous Program C26)] [L49]
DISTINCT NEIGHBORHOODS
GOAL L-3 Safe, attractive residential neighborhoods, each with its
own distinct character and within walking distance of
shopping, services, schools, and/or other public gathering
places.
NEIGHBORHOOD COMPATIBILITY
Policy L-3.1 Ensure that new or remodeled structures are compatible with the
neighborhood and adjacent structures. [(Previous Policy L-12) (Comp
Plan Draft EIR Mitigation Measure AES-1)] [L50]
Policy L-3.2 Preserve residential uses from conversion to office or short-term
rentals. [NEW POLICY] [L51]
Program L3.2.1 Evaluate and implement strategies to prevent
conversion of residential and neighborhood-serving
retail space to office or short-term vacation rentals.
[NEW PROGRAM] [L52]
Policy L-3.3 Support efforts to retain and encourage housing units that are more
affordable, such as cottages, other small homes, and rental housing
units in existing neighborhoods. [NEW POLICY] [L53]
Program L3.3.1 Review development standards to discourage the
loss of housing units, and the replacement of rental
housing units with ownership housing units. [NEW
PROGRAM] [L54]
Policy L-3.4 Support the creation of affordable housing units for middle to lower
income level earners, such as City and school district employees, as
feasible. [NEW POLICY] [L55]
Program L3.4.1 Collaborate with PAUSD in exploring opportunities
to build housing that is affordable to school district
employees. [NEW PROGRAM] [L56]
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
LAND USE DRAFT –NOVEMBER 28, 2016 L-41
Policy L-3.5 When considering infill redevelopment, work to minimize
displacement of existing residents. [NEW POLICY] [L57]
Program L3.5.1 Conduct a study to evaluate various possible tools
for preventing displacement of existing residents.
[NEW PROGRAM] [L58]
Program L3.5.2 Develop and implement a system to inventory the
characteristics of existing housing units and track
changes in those characteristics on a regular basis.
Make the information publicly available. [NEW
PROGRAM] [L59]
MIX OF HOUSING TYPES
In appropriate locations, encourage a mix of smaller housing types
such as studios, co-housing, cottage, clustered housing and secondary
dwelling units, to provide a more diverse range of housing
opportunities and preserve existing housing units of these types.
[(Previous Policy L-13) (Note: Program H3.3.5 of the adopted Housing
Element is to explore modifications to development standards to
further encourage second unit development.)] [L60]
Policy L-3.6 Recognize the contribution of cottage cluster housing to the character
of Palo Alto and retain and encourage this type of development. [NEW
POLICY] [L61]
RESIDENTIAL DESIGN
Policy L-3.7 Ensure that new multifamily buildings, entries and outdoor spaces are
designed and arranged so that each development has a clear
relationship to a public street. [Previous Policy L-14] [L62]
Policy L-3.8 Avoid negative impacts of basement construction for single-family
homes on adjacent properties public resources and the natural
environment. [NEW POLICY] [L63]
Program L3.8.1 Develop a program to assess and manage both the
positive and negative impacts of basement
construction in single family homes on the
community and the environment, including:
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
L-42 LAND USE DRAFT – NOVEMBER 28, 2016
Land use issues. Evaluate the City’s policy of
excluding basements from the gross floor area
and maximum floor area ratio limits in the
zoning ordinance. Consider zoning revisions,
including greater setbacks, to limit basement
size and increase basement setbacks from
adjacent properties.
Impacts to the natural environment, such as
potential impacts to the tree canopy,
groundwater supply or quality, and soil
compaction.
Safety issues such as increased surface
flooding, increased groundwater intrusion with
sea level rise, emergency access and egress, or
sewage backflows. [NEW PROGRAM] [L64]
COMMERCIAL CENTERS
GOAL L-4 Inviting pedestrian scale centers that offer a variety of retail
and commercial services and provide focal points and
community gathering places for the city’s residential
neighborhoods and employment districts.
COMMERCIAL CENTERS AND MIXED USE AREAS
Policy L-4.1 Encourage the upgrading and revitalization of selected Centers in a
manner that is compatible with the character of surrounding
neighborhoods, without loss of retail and existing small, local
businesses. [Previous Policy L-18] [L65]
Policy L-4.2 Evaluate the effectiveness of formula retail limits adopted for California
Avenue and consider whether these limits should be applied in other
Centers. Develop incentives for local small businesses where
warranted. [NEW PROGRAM] [L66]Use coordinated area plans to
guide development in areas of Palo Alto where significant change is
foreseeable. Address both land use and transportation, define the
desired character and urban design traits of the areas, identify
opportunities for public open space, parks and recreational
opportunities, and address connectivity to and compatibility with
adjacent residential areas; include broad community involvement in
the planning process. [NEW POLICY] [L67]
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
LAND USE DRAFT –NOVEMBER 28, 2016 L-43
Program L4.2.1 Prepare a coordinated area plan for the South El
Camino corridor from Curtner Avenue to West
Charleston Road, as shown in the diagram below.
The plan should articulate a vision for the corridor
as a well-designed complete street with an
enhanced pedestrian environment including wider
sidewalks, increased building setbacks, public open
spaces, safe pedestrian crossings at key
intersections, trees and streetscape improvements.
Mixed use residential and retail development on
shallow parcels should be encouraged to support a
more walkable and bikable environment along the
corridor, with appropriate transitions to the
surrounding single-family neighborhoods. The plan
should also foster improved connections to
surrounding destinations. [NEW PROGRAM] [L68]
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
L-44 LAND USE DRAFT – NOVEMBER 28, 2016
Program L4.2.2 Prepare a coordinated area plan for the Fry's site
and surrounding California Avenue area. The plan
should describe a vision for the future of the Fry's
site as a walkable neighborhood with multi‐family
housing, ground floor retail, a public park, creek
improvements, and an interconnected street grid.
[NEW PROGRAM] [L69]
Policy L-4.3 Encourage street frontages that contribute to retail vitality in all
Centers. Reinforce street corners in a way that enhances the
pedestrian realm or that form corner plazas. Include trees and
landscaping. [Previous Policy L-20] [L70]
Policy L-4.4 Ensure all Regional Centers and Multi-Neighborhood Centers provide
centrally located gathering spaces that create a sense of identity and
encourage economic revitalization. Encourage public amenities such
as benches, street trees, kiosks, restrooms and public art. [Previous
Policy L-21] [L71]
Program L4.4.1 Study the feasibility of using public and private
funds to provide and maintain landscaping and
public spaces such as parks, plazas, sidewalks and
public art within commercial areas. [Previous
Program L-16] [L72]
Program L4.4.2 Through public/private cooperation, provide well-
signed, clean, and accessible restrooms. [Previous
Program L-17] [L73]
Program L4.4.3 Collaborate with merchants to enhance the
appearance of streets and sidewalks within all
Centers. Encourage the formation of business
improvement districts and undertake a proactive
program of maintenance, repair, landscaping and
enhancement.[Previous Policy L-22] [L74]
Program L4.4.4 Identify priority street improvements that could
make a substantial contribution to the character of
Centers, such as widening sidewalks, narrowing
travel lanes, creating medians, restriping to allow
diagonal parking, and planting trees. [Previous
Program L-18] [L75]
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
LAND USE DRAFT –NOVEMBER 28, 2016 L-45
REGIONAL CENTERS
University Avenue/Downtown
Policy L-4.5 Maintain and enhance the University Avenue/Downtown area as a major
commercial center of the City, with a mix of commercial, civic, cultural,
recreational and residential uses. Promote quality design that
recognizes the regional and historical importance of the area and
reinforces its pedestrian character. [ (Previous Policy L-23) (Comp
Plan Draft EIR Mitigation Measure AES-1)] [L76]
Policy L-4.6 Ensure that University Avenue/Downtown is pedestrian-friendly and
supports bicycle use. Use public art, trees, bicycle racks and other
amenities to create an environment that is inviting to pedestrians and
bicyclists. [Previous Policy L-24] [L77]
Program L4.6.1 Pursue redevelopment of pedestrian, bicycle, and
transit connections to and from between the
University Avenue Multi-modal Transit Station area,
University Avenue/Downtown, and the Stanford
Shopping Center. [Previous Policy L-27] [L78]
Program L4.6.2 Prepare a Coordinated Area Plan for Downtown,
encompassing the University Avenue Multi-modal
Transit Station Area. [Previous Program L-25][L79]
Stanford Shopping Center
Policy L-4.7 Maintain Stanford Shopping Center as one of the Bay Area’s premiere
regional shopping centers. Promote bicycle and pedestrian use and
encourage any new development at the Center to occur through infill,
potentially including housing and mixed use development on existing
surface parking lots, while continuing to supply adequate parking.
[Previous Policy L-26] [L80]
Program L4.7.1 While preserving adequate parking to meet
demand, identify strategies to reuse surface parking
lots. [(Previous Program L-23)(Merged with
Previous Policy L-27)] [L81]
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
L-46 LAND USE DRAFT – NOVEMBER 28, 2016
MULTI-NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS
California Avenue
Policy L-4.8 Maintain the existing scale, character, and function of the California
Avenue business district as a shopping, service, and office center
intermediate in function and scale between Downtown and the
smaller neighborhood business areas. [Previous Policy L-28] [L82]
Program L4.8.1 Create a Coordinated Area Plan for the California
Avenue area to guide its development as a well-
designed mixed use district with diverse land uses
and a network of pedestrian-oriented streets
providing links to California Avenue. [(Previous
Policy L-31) (Converted to Program)] [L83]
Program L4.8.2 Create regulations for the California Avenue area
that encourage the retention of smaller buildings to
provide spaces for existing retail, particularly local,
small businesses, including to allow for their
replacement or rehabilitation. [Previous Program
L-27] [L84]
Policy L-4.9 Improve the transition between the California-Cambridge area and the
single family residential neighborhood of Evergreen Park. Avoid abrupt
changes in scale and density between the two areas. [Previous Policy
L-30] [L85]
South El Camino Real
Policy L-4.10 Enhance the pedestrian environment along South El Camino Real,
redesigning the street to provide wider sidewalks, increased building
setbacks, safe pedestrian crossings at key intersections, trees, and
streetscape improvements, consistent with the recommendations in
the Grand Boulevard Design Guidelines. [(Previous Program L-33)
(Converted to Policy) (Consistent with Comp Plan Draft EIR Mitigation
Measure AES-1)] [L86]
Program L4.10.1 Provide better east-west connections across El
Camino Real to bring neighborhoods together and
to improve linkages to local schools and parks.
[Previous Program L-34] [L87]
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
LAND USE DRAFT –NOVEMBER 28, 2016 L-47
Town and Country Village
Policy L-4.11 Recognize and preserve Town and Country Village as an attractive
retail center serving Palo Altans and residents of the wider region.
Future development at this site should preserve its existing amenities,
pedestrian scale, and architectural character while also improving safe
access for bicyclists and pedestrians and increasing the amount of
bicycle parking. [Previous Policy L-32] [L88]
Policy L-4.12 In Town and Country Village, encourage a vibrant retail environment
and urban greening. [Previous Policy L-33] [L89]
Policy L-4.13 In Town and Country Village, encourage improvement of
pedestrian, bicycle, and auto circulation and landscaping
improvements, including maintenance of existing oak trees and
planting additional trees. [Previous Policy L-34] [L90]
NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS
Policy L-4.14 Improve the local-serving focus, and provide safe pedestrian, bicycle,
and multimodal access to all three Palo Alto Neighborhood Centers –
Charleston Shopping Center, Edgewood Plaza, and Midtown Shopping
Center. Support their continued improvement and vitality. [Previous
Policy L-37] [L91]
Policy L-4.15 Encourage maximum use of Neighborhood Centers by ensuring that
the publicly maintained areas are clean, well-lit, and attractively
landscaped. [Previous Policy L-38] [L92]
Policy L-4.16 Maintain Midtown Shopping Center as an attractive, compact
Neighborhood Center with diverse local-serving uses, a mix of one-
and two-story buildings, adequate parking, and a network of
pedestrian-oriented streets, ways and gathering places. Encourage
retention of Midtown’s grocery store and encourage a variety of
neighborhood retail shops and services. [Previous Policy L-40] [L93]
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
L-48 LAND USE DRAFT – NOVEMBER 28, 2016
EMPLOYMENT DISTRICTS
GOAL L-5 High quality employment districts, each with their own
distinctive character and each contributing to the character
of the city as a whole.
Policy L-5.1 Encourage Employment Districts to develop in a way that facilitates
transit, pedestrian and bicycle travel. Provide mixed uses to reduce the
number of auto trips. [Previous Policy L-42] [L94]
Policy L-5.2 Provide landscaping, trees, sidewalks, pedestrian paths, and
connections to the citywide bikeway system within Employment
Districts. Pursue opportunities to include sidewalks, paths, low water
use landscaping, reclaimed water, and trees and remove grass turf in
renovation and expansion projects. [Previous Policy L-43] [L95]
Policy L-5.3 Design paths and sidewalks to be attractive and comfortable and
consistent with the character of the area where they are located.
[(Previous Program L-44) (Converted to Policy)] [L96]
Policy L-5.4 Foster compact employment centers served by a variety of
transportation modes. [Previous Policy L-44] [L97]
Program L5.4.1 Create and apply zoning standards and design
guidelines for commercial hotels, conference
centers, and possible residential or mixed-use
projects in Stanford Research Park, particularly near
El Camino Real. [Previous Program L-45] [L98]
Program L5.4.2 Evaluate the optimum number of future hotel
rooms for Palo Alto and consider reductions in the
allowable floor area ratio as appropriate. [NEW
PROGRAM] [L99]
Policy L-5.5 Maintain the East Bayshore and San Antonio Road/Bayshore Corridor
areas as diverse business and light industrial districts, consistent with
the approved East Meadow Circle Concept Plan (Appendix Y of this
Comprehensive Plan). [Previous Policy L-46] [L100]
Policy L-5.6 Implement the 2012 East Meadow Circle Concept Plan (Appendix Y of
this Comprehensive Plan) when approving new development or other
improvements within the Plan area. [NEW PROGRAM] [L101]
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
LAND USE DRAFT –NOVEMBER 28, 2016 L-49
GOAL L-6 Well-designed buildings that create coherent development
patterns and enhance city streets and public spaces.
DESIGN OF BUILDINGS AND PUBLIC SPACE
Policy L-6.1 Promote high quality design and site planning that is compatible with
surrounding development and public spaces. [(Comp Plan Draft EIR
Mitigation Measure AES-1) (Previous Policy L-48)] [L102]
Program L6.1.1 Promote awards programs and other forms of
public recognition for projects of architectural merit
that contribute positively to the community.
[Previous Program L-53] [L103]
Policy L-6.2 Use the Zoning Ordinance, design review process, design
guidelines, and Coordinated Area Plans to ensure high quality
residential and commercial design and architectural compatibility.
[Previous Program L-48] [L104]
Policy L-6.3 Require bird-friendly design. [NEW POLICY] [L105]
Program L6.3.1 Develop guidelines for bird-friendly building design
that minimizes hazards for birds and reduces the
potential for collisions. [NEW PROGRAM] [L106]
Policy L-6.4 In areas of the City having a historic or consistent design character,
encourage the design of new development to maintain and support
the existing character. [Note: This is labeled as a program in the
existing Comp Plan but should more accurately be a policy since it is
an ongoing statement to guide design.] [(Previous Program L-49)
(Converted to Policy) (Comp Plan Draft EIR as Mitigation Measure
AES-1.)] [L107]
Policy L-6.5 Guide development to respect views of the foothills and East Bay hills
from public streets in the developed portions of the City.[Previous
Policy L-3] [L108]
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
L-50 LAND USE DRAFT – NOVEMBER 28, 2016
Policy L-6.6 Design buildings to complement streets and public spaces; to
promote personal safety, public health and well-being; and to
enhance a sense of community safety. [Previous Policy L-49] [L109]
Program L6.6.1 Ensure that the zoning ordinance encourages an
ordered variety of entries, porches, windows, bays
and balconies along public ways where it is
consistent with neighborhood character; avoid
blank or solid walls at street level; and include
human-scale details and massing. [NEW
PROGRAM] [L110]
Policy L-6.7 (BUILDING HEIGHTS - OPTION 1-7 “approval” votes) Maintain the
current 50-foot height limit on building heights in Palo Alto. [NEW
POLICY] [L111]
Policy L-6.8 (BUILDING HEIGHTS - OPTION 2-4 “approval” votes) Maintain a 50-
foot height limit on building heights in Palo Alto, but allow heights up
to a maximum of 55 feet for residential and retail mixed use projects
to allow flexibility in floor to ceiling heights and enhance the livability
in multi-family residential units. [NEW POLICY] [L112]
Policy L-6.9 (BUILDING HEIGHTS - OPTION 3-7 “approval” votes) Building height
limits up to a maximum of 65 feet may be considered for areas well-
served by transit, services and retail as a way to facilitate a mix of
multifamily housing, including affordable units, units targeted to
seniors and other special needs populations, and micro-units designed
to accommodate younger members of the workforce. [NEW POLICY]
[L113]
Program L6.9.1 Revise the Zoning ordinance to establish criteria
and conditions that must be met in order to allow
building heights up to 65 feet. Criteria shall address
affordability of the residential units; compatibility
with surrounding land uses; sensitivity to context;
proximity to transit, services and retail; and
mitigation or avoidance of adverse impacts on
traffic and parking conditions. [NEW PROGRAM]
[L114]
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
LAND USE DRAFT –NOVEMBER 28, 2016 L-51
Policy L-6.10 (BUILDING HEIGHTS - OPTION 4-10 “approval” votes) Building height
limits over 50 feet may be considered for areas well-served by transit,
services and retail as a way to facilitate a mix of multi-family housing,
including affordable units, units targeted to seniors and other special
needs populations, and micro-units designed to accommodate
younger members of the workforce. [NEW POLICY] [L115]
Program L6.10.1 Revise the Zoning Ordinance to establish criteria
and conditions that must be met in order to allow
building heights higher than 50 feet. Criteria shall
address affordability of the residential units;
compatibility with surrounding land uses; sensitivity
to context; proximity to transit, services and retail;
and mitigation or avoidance of adverse impacts on
traffic and parking conditions. [NEW PROGRAM]
[L116]
Policy L-6.11 Promote gradual transitions in the scale of development where
residential districts abut more intense uses in order to minimize
negative impacts where land use transitions occur. Avoid abrupt
changes in scale and density between residential and non-residential
areas and between residential areas of different densities. [Previous
Policy L-6] [L117]
Program L6.11.1 Implement architectural standards to assure they
effectively address land use transitions. [NEW
PROGRAM] [L118]
Policy L-6.12 Support existing regulations that preserve exposure to natural light for
single-family residences. [NEW POLICY] [L119]Create opportunities for
new mixed use development consisting of housing and retail.
[Previous Policy L-9] [L120]
Program L6.12.1 Update the municipal code to include zoning
changes that allow a mix of retail and residential
uses but no office uses. The intent of these changes
would be to encourage a mix of land uses that
contributes to the vitality and walkability of
commercial centers and transit corridors. [NEW
PROGRAM] [L121]
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
L-52 LAND USE DRAFT – NOVEMBER 28, 2016
Program L6.12.2 Modify design standards for mixed use projects to
promote a pedestrian-friendly relationship to the
street, including elements such as screened
parking or underground parking, street-facing
windows and entries, and landscaping, and trees
along the street. [Previous Program L-10] [L122]
Program L6.12.3 Consider revising development standards in the
Community Commercial, Service Commercial, and
Downtown Commercial Districts (CC, CS, and CD)
and the Neighborhood Commercial District (CN)
along El Camino Real to incentivize the conversion
of non-retail commercial FAR to residential use.
[NEW PROGRAM] [L123]
Program L6.12.4 Update the zoning code to preserve ground-floor
retail and limit the displacement of existing retail
from neighborhood centers. [NEW PROGRAM]
[L124]
Policy L-6.13 Discourage the use of fences that obscure the view of the front of
houses from the street. [(Previous Program L-52)(Converted to
Policy)] [L125]
Policy L-6.14 Encourage high quality signage that is attractive, energy-efficient,
appropriate for the location and balances visibility needs with aesthetic
needs. [Previous Policy L-50] [L126]
GOAL L-7 Conservation and preservation of Palo Alto’s
historic buildings, sites, and districts.
HISTORIC RESOURCES
Policy L-7.1 Encourage public and private upkeep and preservation of resources
that have historic merit, including residences listed in the City’s
Historic Resource Inventory, the California Register of Historical
Resources, or the National Register of Historic Places. [Previous Policy
L-51] [L127]
Program L7.1.1 Update and maintain the City’s Historic Resource
Inventory to determine all historic resources that
are eligible for the California Register as well as
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
LAND USE DRAFT –NOVEMBER 28, 2016 L-53
important examples of California history or
prehistory. Historic resources may consist of a
single building or structure or a district. [(Previous
Program L-54)( Draft EIR Mitigation Measure CULT-
1b)] [L128]
Program L7.1.2 Reassess the Historic Preservation Ordinance to
ensure its effectiveness in the maintenance and
preservation of historic resources, particularly in the
University Avenue/Downtown area. [Previous
Program L-55] [L129]
Policy L-7.2 If a proposed development would affect a potential historic resource
that has not been evaluated for inclusion into the City’s Historic
Resources Inventory, consider whether it is eligible for inclusion in the
City’s Inventory prior to the issuance of a demolition or alterations
permit. [(NEW POLICY) (Comp Plan Draft EIR Mitigation Measure
CULT-1b)] [L130]
Policy L-7.3 Actively seek state and federal funding for the preservation of
buildings of historical merit and consider public/private partnerships
for capital and program improvements. [Previous Policy L-53] [L131]
Policy L-7.4 Relocation may be considered as a preservation strategy when
consistent with State and National Standards regarding the relocation
of historic resources. [Previous Policy L-55] [L132]
Policy L-7.5 To reinforce the scale and character of University Avenue/Downtown,
promote the preservation of significant historic buildings. [Previous
Policy L-56] [L133]
Policy L-7.6 Promote awards programs and other forms of public recognition for
exemplary Historic Preservation projects. [(Previous Program L-
62)(Converted to Policy)] [L134]
Policy L-7.7 Streamline, to the maximum extent feasible, any future processes for
design review of historic structures to eliminate unnecessary delay and
uncertainty for the applicant and to encourage historic preservation.
[(Previous Program L-63) (Converted to Policy)] [L135]
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
L-54 LAND USE DRAFT – NOVEMBER 28, 2016
REHABILITATION AND REUSE
Policy L-7.8 Promote adaptive reuse of old buildings. [Previous Policy L-58] [L136]
Program L7.8.1 Develop incentives for the retention and
rehabilitation of buildings with historic merit in all
zones and revise existing zoning and permit
regulations as needed to minimize constraints to
adaptive reuse, particularly in retail areas [(Previous
Policy L-57) (Converted to Program)] [L137]
Program L7.8.2 Create incentives to encourage salvage and reuse of
discarded historic building materials. [Previous
Program L-57] [L138]
Program L7.8.3 For proposed exterior alterations or additions to
designated Historic Landmarks, require design
review findings that the proposed changes are in
compliance with the Secretary of the Interior
Standards for Rehabilitation. [Previous Program L-
58] [L139]
Policy L-7.9 Allow compatible nonconforming uses for the life of historic buildings.
[(Previous Program L-61) (Converted to Policy)] [L140]
Policy L-7.10 Ensure the preservation of significant historic resources owned by the
City of Palo Alto. Allow such resources to be altered to meet
contemporary needs consistent with the Secretary of the Interior
Standards for Rehabilitation. [Previous Policy L-52] [L141]
Policy L-7.11 Maintain the historic integrity of building exteriors. Consider parking
exceptions for historic buildings to encourage rehabilitation..
[(Previous Program L-59)(Converted to Policy)] [L142]
Program L7.11.1 Review parking exceptions for historic buildings in
the Zoning Code to determine if there is an
effective balance between historic preservation and
meeting parking needs [NEW PROGRAM] [L143]
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
LAND USE DRAFT –NOVEMBER 28, 2016 L-55
Policy L-7.12 Encourage and assist owners of historically significant buildings in
finding ways to adapt and rehabilitate these buildings, including
participation in state and federal tax relief programs.[(Previous
Program L-64) (Converted to Policy)] [L144]
Program L7.12.1 Continue to use a TDR Ordinance to allow the
transfer of development rights from designated
buildings of historic significance in the Commercial
Downtown (CD) zone to non-historic receiver sites
in the CD zone. Revise the TDR Ordinance so that
transferred development rights may be used only
for residential development on the receiver sites.
[Previous Program L-60] [L145]
ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Policy L-7.13 Protect Palo Alto’s archaeological resources, including natural land
formations, sacred sites, the historical landscape, historic habitats, and
remains of settlements here before the founding of Palo Alto in the
nineteenth century. [(Previous Policy L-60)(Comp Plan Draft EIR
Mitigation Measure CULT-1c)] [L146]
Policy L-7.14 Continue to consult with tribes as required by California Government
Code Section 65352.3. In doing so, use appropriate procedures to
accommodate tribal concerns when a tribe has a religious prohibition
against revealing precise information about the location or previous
practice at a particular sacred site. [(NEW POLICY) (Comp Plan Draft
EIR Mitigation Measure CULT-3)] [L147]
Policy L-7.15 Assess the need for archaeological surveys and mitigation plans on a
project-by-project basis, consistent with the California Environmental
Quality Act and the National Historic Preservation Act. [Note: the
referenced figure will likely be removed from the Comp Plan to
protect the integrity of known and undiscovered archaeological
resources.] [(Previous Program L-67) (Converted to Policy)] [L148]
Policy L-7.16 Ensure that developers understand their obligation to meet state
codes regarding the identification and protection of archaeological and
paleontological deposits. [NEW POLICY] [L149]
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
L-56 LAND USE DRAFT – NOVEMBER 28, 2016
GOAL L-8 Attractive and safe civic and cultural facilities provided in all
neighborhoods and maintained and used in ways that foster
and enrich public life.
Policy L-8.1 Facilitate creation of new parkland to serve Palo Alto's residential
neighborhoods, as consistent with the Parks, Trails, Open Space and
Recreation Master Plan. [NEW POLICY] [L150]
Program L8.1.1 Encourage dedication of new land for parks
through regulations and incentives for new
development and programs to solicit bequests of
land within the city. [NEW PROGRAM] [L151]
Program L8.1.2 Pursue opportunities to create linear parks over the
Caltrain tracks in the event the tracks are moved
below grade. [NEW PROGRAM] [L152]
Program L8.1.3 Explore ways to dedicate a portion of in-lieu fees
towards acquisition of parkland, not just
improvements. [NEW PROGRAM] [L153]
Program L8.1.4 Explore opportunities to dedicate City‐owned land
as parkland to protect and preserve its community
serving purpose into the future. [NEW PROGRAM]
[L154]
Policy L-8.2 Encourage use of data driven, innovative design methods tactics and
use data to understand to evaluate how different community
members use public space. [NEW POLICY] [L155]
Policy L-8.3 Provide comfortable seating areas and plazas with places for public art
adjacent to library and community center entrances. [Previous Policy
L-62] [L156]
Policy L-8.4 Encourage small-scale local-serving retail services, such as small cafes,
delicatessens, and coffee carts, in civic centers: Mitchell Park,
Rinconada Library, and Cubberly Community Center. [Previous Policy
L-63] [L157]
Policy L-8.5 Create facilities for civic and intellectual life, such as better urban
public spaces for civic programs and speakers, cultural, musical and
artistic events. [NEW POLICY] [L158]
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
LAND USE DRAFT –NOVEMBER 28, 2016 L-57
Policy L-8.6 Recognize public art and cultural facilities as a community benefit.
Encourage the development of new and the enhancement of existing
public and private art and cultural facilities throughout Palo Alto.
Ensure that such projects are compatible with the character and
identity of the surrounding neighborhood. [Previous Policy L-72]
[L159]
Policy L-8.7 Seek potential new sites for art and cultural facilities, public spaces,
open space, and community gardens. [Previous Policy L-64] [L160]
Policy L-8.8 Encourage religious and private institutions to collaborate with the
community and the surrounding neighborhood. [Previous Policy L-65]
[L161]
GOAL L-9 Attractive, inviting public spaces and streets that enhance
the image and character of the city.
STREETS AND PARKING
Policy L-9.1 Recognize Sand Hill Road, University Avenue between Middlefield
Road and San Francisquito Creek, Embarcadero Road, Page Mill Road,
Oregon Expressway, Interstate 280, Arastradero Road (west of Foothill
Expressway), Junipero Serra Boulevard/Foothill Expressway, and
Skyline Boulevard as scenic routes and preserve their scenic qualities.
[(Previous Policy L-69) (Previous Program L-71)] [L162]
Program L9.1.1 Evaluate existing zoning code setback requirements
to ensure they are appropriate for scenic routes.
[NEW PROGRAM] [L163]
Policy L-9.2 Encourage development that creatively integrates parking into the
project, including by locating it behind buildings or underground
wherever possible, or by providing for shared use of parking areas.
Encourage other alternatives to surface parking lots that minimize the
amount of land devoted to parking while still maintaining safe streets,
street trees, a vibrant local economy, and sufficient parking to meet
demand. [Previous Policy L-78] [L164]
Policy L-9.3 Require new or redesigned parking lots to optimize pedestrian and
bicycle safety. [NEW POLICY] [L165]
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
L-58 LAND USE DRAFT – NOVEMBER 28, 2016
Policy L-9.4 Enhance tree health and the appearance of streets and other public
spaces through regular maintenance as well as tree and landscape
planting and care of the existing canopy.. [Previous Policy L-70] [L166]
Program L9.4.1 Continue to use the El Camino Real Design
Guidelines and the Zoning Ordinance to enhance
the visual character of this corridor by addressing
appropriate sidewalk widths and encouraging
building forms, massing, and setbacks that relate to
the street and the pedestrian, whether through
traditional architectural forms or innovative new
designs. Consider whether sidewalk widths and
building setback should also be addressed along
other major thoroughfares such as Alma Street and
Charleston Road. [(NEW PROGRAM) (Comp Plan
Draft EIR Mitigation Measure AES-1)] [L167]
Program L9.4.2 Involve tree owners in tree maintenance programs.
[NEW PROGRAM] [L168]
PUBLIC SPACES
Policy L-9.5 Maintain and enhance existing public gathering places and open
spaces and integrate new public spaces at a variety of scales. [NEW
POLICY] [L169]
[Note: This Section Moved From Goal L-3 Residential Design]
Policy L-9.6 Create, preserve and enhance parks and publicly accessible, shared
outdoor gathering spaces within walking and biking distance of
residential neighborhoods.[Previous Policy L-15] [L170]
Program L9.6.1 Analyze existing neighborhoods and determine
where publicly accessible shared, outdoor gathering
spaces are below the citywide average. Create new
public spaces, including public squares, parks and
informal gathering spaces in these neighborhoods.
[NEW PROGRAM] [L171]
Policy L-9.7 Treat residential streets as both public ways and neighborhood
amenities. Provide and maintain continuous sidewalks, healthy trees,
benches, and other amenities that promote walking and “active”
transportation. [Previous Policy L-17] [L172]
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
LAND USE DRAFT –NOVEMBER 28, 2016 L-59
Program L9.7.1 Review standards for streets and signage and
update as needed to foster natural, tree-lined
streets with a minimum of signage. [NEW
PROGRAM] [L173]
GATEWAYS
Policy L-9.8 Strengthen the identity of important community-wide gateways,
including the entrances to the City at Highway 101, El Camino Real
and Middlefield Road; the Caltrain stations; entries to commercial
districts; Embarcadero Road at El Camino Real, and between Palo Alto
and Stanford.[Previous Policy L-71] [L174]
Program L9.8.1 Develop a strategy to enhance gateway sites with
special landscaping, art, public spaces, and/or
public buildings. Emphasize the creek bridges and
riparian settings at the entrances to the City over
Adobe Creek and San Francisquito Creek. [Previous
Program L-72] [L175]
URBAN FOREST
Policy L-9.9 Incorporate the goals of the Urban Forest Master Plan, as periodically
amended, into the Comprehensive Plan by reference in order to
assure that new land uses recognize the many benefits of trees in the
urban context and foster a healthy and robust tree canopy throughout
the City. [NEW POLICY] [L176]
Program L9.9.1 Establish incentives to encourage native trees, and
low water use plantings in new development
throughout the city. [NEW PROGRAM] [L177]
Program L9.9.2 Update City requirements regarding trees and other
landscaping that capture and filter stormwater
within surface parking lots to take advantage of new
technology. [(Previous Policy L-76) (Converted to
Program)] [L178]
Policy L-9.10 Involve the Urban Forester, or appropriate City staff, in development
review. [NEW POLICY] [L179]
Photo by Scott Haefner—Courtesy of Canopy
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
L-60 LAND USE DRAFT – NOVEMBER 28, 2016
Policy L-9.11 Recognize the urban forest as City infrastructure to be maintained in
accordance with applicable guidelines and requirements. [NEW
POLICY] [L180]
UTILITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE
Policy L-9.12 Design public infrastructure, including paving, signs, utility structures,
parking garages and parking lots to meet high quality urban design
standards and embrace technological advances. Look for opportunities
to use art and artists in the design of public infrastructure. Remove or
mitigate elements of existing infrastructure that are unsightly or
visually disruptive. [Previous Policy L-79] [L181]
Program L9.12.1 Continue the citywide undergrounding of utility
wires. Minimize the impacts of undergrounding on
street tree root systems and planting areas.
[Previous Program L-80] [L182]
Program L9.12.2 Encourage the use of compact and well-designed
utility elements, such as transformers, switching
devices, backflow preventers, and
telecommunications infrastructure. Place these
elements in locations that will minimize their visual
intrusion. [Previous Program L-81] [L183]
Policy L-9.13 Provide utilities and service systems to serve all urbanized areas of
Palo Alto and plan infrastructure maintenance and improvements to
adequately serve existing and planned development. [(NEW POLICY)
(PTC Policy L2.9, edited)] [L184]
Program L9.13.1 Develop an Infrastructure Master Plan that projects
the future needs of streets, underground utilities,
and all City assets and plans for the incorporation
of new technology that improves efficiency and
effectiveness. [(NEW PROGRAM) (PTC Program
L2.9.1)] [L185]
Program L9.13.2 Implement the findings of the City’s Infrastructure
Blue Ribbon Committee and its emphasis for
rebuilding our civic spaces. [(NEW PROGRAM) (PTC
Program L2.9.8)] [L186]
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
LAND USE DRAFT –NOVEMBER 28, 2016 L-61
Program L9.13.3 Identify City-owned properties where combinations
of wireless facilities can be co-located, assuming
appropriate lease agreements are in place. [(NEW
PROGRAM)(PTC Program L2.9.5)] [L187]
BAYLANDS
Policy L-9.14 Regulate land uses in the Airport Influence Area to ensure consistency
with the Palo Alto Airport Comprehensive Land Use Plan and the
Baylands Master Plan. [NEW POLICY] [L188]
Policy L-9.15 Palo Alto is committed to preservation of the Baylands as called for in
the Baylands Master Plan, which is incorporated here by reference.
[NEW POLICY] [L189]
GOAL L-10 Maintain an economically viable local airport with minimal
environmental impacts.
PALO ALTO AIRPORT
Policy L-10.1 Operate Palo Alto Airport (PAO) as a vital and efficient facility at its
current level of operation without intruding into open space areas.
PAO should remain limited to a single runway and minor expansion
shall only be allowed in order to meet federal and State airport design
and safety standards. [(Previous Policy T-57)] [L190]
Program L10.1.1 Relocate the terminal building away from the
Runway 31 clear zone and closer to the hangars,
allowing for construction of a replacement terminal.
[(Previous Program T-58)] [L191]
Program L10.1.2 Update the Airport Layout Plan in accordance with
Federal Aviation Administration requirements, as
needed, while ensuring conformance with the
Baylands Master Plan to the maximum extent
feasible. [NEW PROGRAM] [L192]
Program L10.1.3 Identify and pursue funding to address
maintenance, safety and security improvements
needed at PAO. [NEW PROGRAM] [L193]
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
L-62 LAND USE DRAFT – NOVEMBER 28, 2016
Policy L-10.2 Minimize the environmental impacts associated with PAO operations,
including adverse effects on the character of surrounding open space,
noise levels, and the quality of life in residential areas, as required by
federal and State requirements. [NEW POLICY] [L194]
Program L10.2.1 Establish and implement a system for processing,
tracking and reporting noise complaints regarding
local airport operations on an annual basis,. [NEW
PROGRAM] [L195]
Program L10.2.2 Work with the airport to pursue opportunities to
enhance the open space and habitat value of the
airport. These include:
maintaining native grasses;
reconstructing levees to protect the airport
from sea level rise while enhancing public
access and habitat conservation; and
evaluating the introduction of burrowing owl
habitat. This program is subject to federal
wildlife hazard requirements and guidelines
for airports. [NEW PROGRAM] [L196]
Policy L-10.3 Provide public access to the Airport for bicyclists and pedestrians.
[NEW POLICY] [L197]
Program L10.3.1 Continue to provide a bicycle/pedestrian path
adjacent to Embarcadero Road, consistent with the
Baylands Master Plan and open space character of
the baylands subject to airport federal and State
regulations. [(Previous Program T-57)] [L198]
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
LAND USE DRAFT –NOVEMBER 28, 2016 L-63
Policy L-10.4 Address the potential impacts of future sea level rise through
reconstruction of the Bayfront levee in a manner that provides
protection for the Airport and greater habitat along the San Francisco
Bay frontage. [NEW POLICY] [L199]
Policy L-10.5 Encourage the use of alternatives to leaded fuel in aircraft operating in
and out of Palo Alto Airport. [NEW POLICY] [L200]
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
L-64 LAND USE DRAFT – NOVEMBER 28, 2016
TRANSPORTATION
REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JANUARY 31, 2017 T-1
2
This Element has been prepared by City staff on the basis of input from the CAC, the
Transportation subcommittee and members of the public received between October
2015 and July 2016. Additionally, this revised draft Element presents changes made
in response to City Council review on September 19, 2016.
INTRODUCTION
This Element addresses transportation and mobility issues comprehensively and
acknowledges that the future will be different than the present and the past.
Recognizing changing demographics and travel preferences, new technologies, and
new opportunities, the Element provides a policy framework which includes
solutions for implementation today in order to lay the groundwork for the future.
Together with investments in infrastructure, the policy framework seeks to reduce
reliance on single occupant vehicles, address congestion, and reduce through traffic
and non-resident parking in Palo Alto neighborhoods, leading to an integrated
transportation system that serves local, regional, and intercity travel.
This Element meets the State requirement for a Circulation Element, addressing the
various aspects of circulation, including complete streets, expressways and freeways,
transit, walking, bicycling, parking, and special transportation needs.
VISION: Palo Alto will build and maintain a sustainable network
of safe, accessible and efficient transportation and parking
solutions for all users and modes, while protecting and
enhancing the quality of life in Palo Alto. Programs will include
alternative and innovate transportation processes, and the
adverse impacts of automobile traffic on the environment in
general and residential streets in particular will be reduced.
Streets will be safe, attractive and designed to enhance the
quality and aesthetics of Palo Alto neighborhoods. Palo Alto
recognizes the regional nature of our transportation system, and
will be a leader in seeking regional transportation solutions,
prioritizing Caltrain service improvements and railroad grade
separations.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
T-2 REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JANUARY 31, 2017
CONNECTIONS TO OTHER ELEMENTS
Transportation choices and options are shaped by many factors including land use,
economics, and community values. The Transportation Element is strongly
influenced by the Land Use Element and Housing Element because the distribution
and density of residential, commercial, and office uses have a direct correlation to
the type, frequency, and use of transportation options a community employs. The
Transportation Element also supports the objectives of the Business and Economics
Element, the Community Services and Facilities Element, and the Natural
Environment Element, and the Safety Element by paving the way for a transportation
system that emphasizes walkable neighborhoods and access services in a manner
that limits impacts to the natural environment.
SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORTATION
In 2014, more than 60 percent of all trips made each day in Palo Alto involved
single-occupant motor vehicles. Although the drive alone rate is lower than in many
other Bay Area communities, road travel is still the greatest single source of local
greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and derives from local (internal) trips as well as
commute trips. Building a more sustainable transportation system will require
addressing regional and local travel patterns, as well as trips made for work, school,
errands or entertainment.
The key to a sustainable transportation system lies in providing more options and
more convenience so that people will more readily choose not to drive. Palo Altans
recognize that, at times, driving is necessary, but to address congestion, climate
change, and improve overall quality of life, the policies and programs in this Element
must focus on providing convenient, affordable alternatives to the automobile.
Facilitating a shift to alternative modes of transportation will require creative
collaboration among transit agencies, employers, and local jurisdictions as well as
residents and commuters themselves. Technology also has a role to play, whether
providing up-to-the minute information to inform choices or in delivering new and
better modes of travel. Improvements to the bicycling and pedestrian environment
will help encourage more people to bike and walk on a regular basis.
TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT
Transportation demand management (TDM) refers to strategies that improve
transportation system efficiency and reduce congestion by shifting trips from single-
61% 23%
5% 3% 8%
PALO ALTO DAILY MODE SHARE -
ALL TRIPS (2014)
Drive Alone
Carpool
Transit
Bike
Walk
50%
21%
4%
3%
23%
Palo Alto Daily Mode Share -
Internal Trips (2014)
Drive Alone
Carpool
Transit
Bike
Walk
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JANUARY 31, 2017 T-3
occupant vehicles to collective forms of transport, including mass transit, carpools
and private shuttles. TDM is a critical component of a comprehensive strategy to
reduce traffic congestion. TDM programs are typically required of new development
and can include a range of requirements and incentives for the use of alternatives to
the automobile, as well as parking management strategies and marketing. Employers
and local governments often collaborate in developing and implementing area-wide
TDM programs aimed at reducing single occupant vehicle use by existing employees.
These activities can be coordinated through a transportation management
association (TMA) made up of local businesses in a commercial district or industrial
park. Stanford University operates a comprehensive and successful TDM programs in
the country for the University, and the Medical Center, and a program is in
development for the Research Park. In January 2015, the City of Palo Alto supported
establishment of a TMA for the downtown area, in collaboration with local
businesses and residents. The success of this effort and its potential to expand to
other areas of the City will depend on securing ongoing funding and on the
committed participation of employers who face parking and traffic challenges in
downtown.
ALTERNATIVE FUEL VEHICLES
Alternative fuel vehicles—those that run on electricity, biodiesel, compressed natural
gas and other alternatives to petroleum fuels—help reduce GHG emissions by
utilizing cleaner fuels or zero emission alternatives. In 2014, the City of Palo Alto
adopted an ordinance that requires electric vehicle (EV)—ready infrastructure for all
new commercial construction to encourage the use of electric vehicles and develop
the infrastructure for this growing market. As the City continues this effort, additional
infrastructure may be necessary. However, while alternative fuel vehicles do reduce
GHGs, they are still a contributor to congestion and delay.
MOBILITY AS A SERVICE
The use of transportation services is beginning to replace private vehicle ownership
in the region, led by a number of prominent ride sharing and e-hailing car services
like Uber and Lyft (the process of ordering transportation services via mobile device).
Originating in Europe, the concept of “Mobility as a Service” (MaaS), allows on-
demand trip planning enabled by smartphones and mobile devices and provided by
"pop up" bus-, car-, and bike-sharing services. Palo Alto is partnering with Joint
Venture Silicon Valley, the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA), and the
City of San Jose to develop a MaaS/smartphone app (Commuter Wallet) that
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
T-4 REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JANUARY 31, 2017
combines access to multiple transportation modes and employer commute benefits,
incentivizing non-single-occupant vehicle travel.
PUBLIC TRANSIT
Residents, workers, and visitors to Palo Alto have an array of transit options within
the city and to the surrounding region. Maps T-1 and T-2 show the range of transit
services in Palo Alto. Map T-1 focuses on regional transit options, and Map T-2
illustrates local transit options. Overall, regional transit is heavily used, while public
transit services serving the local area are below capacity levels. Policies in this
Element support improving local services like shuttles to increase ridership and
support traditional transit providers with first and last mile connections.
RAIL SERVICE
Caltrain is Palo Alto’s primary regional transit service, with riders traveling between
San Francisco and Gilroy. Since introduction of the baby bullet limited express trains
in 2003, ridership has more than doubled and today, Palo Alto’s University Avenue
station is the second largest generator of weekday Caltrain trips, behind San
Francisco’s 4th and King Street station. Long-range plans for the Palo Alto Station and
the adjacent University Avenue underpass area will enhance the pedestrian
experience and improve circulation and access for all modes. The planned Caltrain
extension to the Transbay Terminal in downtown San Francisco will improve regional
transit connections, and Caltrain electrification will speed service and increase
capacity while decreasing noise and air pollution.
As of late 2015, the San Mateo County Transit District (SamTrans) has re-initiated
study of possible transit service along the Dumbarton corridor, to link Alameda with
San Mateo and Santa Clara Counties.
In November 2015, Palo Alto City Council
adopted a complete streets resolution
affirming the City’s longstanding
commitment to design and construction
of a comprehensive, integrated
transportation network that allows safe
and convenient travel along and across
streets for all users, including pedestrians,
bicyclists, persons with disabilities,
motorists, movers of commercial goods,
users and operators of public
transportation, emergency vehicles,
seniors, children, youth, and families.
Council also adopted National
Association of City Transportation Officials
(NACTO) guidelines for bikeway and
urban street design, which incorporate
complete streets best practices.
Visual simulation of BRT operating on El Camino Real Source: VTA
I2
I2
§¨¦280
|ÿ82
£¤101
Fo
o
t
h
i
l
l
E
x
p
r
e
s
s
w
a
y
Mountain View
East Palo Alto
Stanford
Los Altos Hills
Menlo Park
S A N
F R A N C I S C O
B A Y
Mi
d
d
l
e
f
i
e
l
d
R
o
a
d
Los Altos
Arastradero Preserve
Baylands Preserve
Byxbee Park
Alm
a
S
t
r
e
e
t
El
C
a
m
i
n
o
R
e
a
l
Oreg
o
n
E
x
p
r
e
s
s
w
a
y
Embarcad
e
r
o
R
o
a
d
East Charleston Road
Lou
i
s
R
o
a
d
Wa
v
e
r
l
y
S
t
r
e
e
t
Seal
e
A
v
e
n
u
e
Loma
V
e
r
d
e
A
v
e
n
u
e
Chan
n
i
n
g
A
v
e
n
u
e
East M
e
a
d
o
w
D
r
i
v
e
San
A
n
t
o
n
i
o
R
o
a
d
Color
a
d
o
A
v
e
n
u
e
Willow
R
o
a
d
Lin
c
o
l
n
A
v
e
n
u
e
Hamilto
n
A
v
e
n
u
e
West
C
h
a
r
l
e
s
t
o
n
R
o
a
d
Univ
e
r
s
i
t
y
A
v
e
n
u
e
P A L O A L T O C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
T R A N S P O R T A T I O N E L E M E N T
PR EL IM INA RY DR A FT M AP T- 1
R E G I O N A L T R A N S I T C O N N E C T I O N S I N P A L O A L T O
0 0.5 1 Miles
Source: City of Palo Alto, 2016; Santa Clara VTA, 2016; SamTrans, 2016; PlaceWorks, 2016.
Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District (AC Transit)
Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA)
San Mateo County Transit (SamTrans)
Caltrain
I2 Caltrain Stations
Employment Districts
Railroads
Park/Open Space
Public Conservation Land
City Limit
35
34
40
120
88
81
522
101
102
103
DB
DB1
86
82
83
22
32
32
89
182 104
824
52
California Ave
Station
Palo Alto Station
To S
a
n
J
o
s
e
To
S
a
n
F
r
a
n
c
i
s
c
o
Stanford
Medical
Center
San Antonio Rd/
Bayshore Corridor
Stanford Research
Park
East Bayshore
522
296 297 280
281
81
U
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
"X
"X
Terman Middle
Palo Alto High
Greendell School
Ohlone Elementary
Hoover Elementary
Henry M. Gunn High
Addison Elementary
Duveneck Elementary
Escondido Elementary
Palo Verde Elementary
Fairmeadow Elementary
El Carmelo Elementary
Walter Hays Elementary
Barron Park Elementary
Lucille Nixon Elementary
Juana Briones Elementary
David Starr Jordan Middle
Jane Lathrop Stanford Middle
§¨¦280
|ÿ82
£¤101
Foo
t
h
i
l
l
E
x
p
r
e
s
s
w
a
y
Mountain View
East Palo Alto
Stanford
Los Altos Hills
Menlo Park
S A N
F R A N C I S C O
B A Y
Mi
d
d
l
e
f
i
e
l
d
R
o
a
d
Los Altos
Baylands Preserve
Byxbee Park
California Ave
Station
Palo Alto
Station
Pag
e
M
i
l
l
R
o
a
d
Al
m
a
S
t
r
e
e
t
El
C
a
m
i
n
o
R
e
a
l
Oreg
o
n
E
x
p
r
e
s
s
w
a
y
Embarcad
e
r
o
R
o
a
d
East Charleston Road
Lo
u
i
s
R
o
a
d
Wa
v
e
r
l
y
S
t
r
e
e
t
Seal
e
A
v
e
n
u
e
Loma
V
e
r
d
e
A
v
e
n
u
e
Chan
n
i
n
g
A
v
e
n
u
e
East M
e
a
d
o
w
D
r
i
v
e
San
A
n
t
o
n
i
o
R
o
a
d
Colora
d
o
A
v
e
n
u
e
Willow
R
o
a
d
Lin
c
o
l
n
A
v
e
n
u
e
Hamilto
n
A
v
e
n
u
e
West
C
h
a
r
l
e
s
t
o
n
R
o
a
d
Univ
e
r
s
i
t
y
A
v
e
n
u
e
P A L O A L T O C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
T R A N S P O R T A T I O N E L E M E N T
PR EL IM INA RY DR A FT M AP T- 2
P A L O A L T O L O C A L T R A N S I T C O N N E C T I O N S
Source: Palo Alto Unified School District, 2012; Santa Clara VTA, 2015; SamTrans, 2015; City of Palo Alto, 2015; Caltrain, 2015; PlaceWorks, 2015.Crosstown Shuttle
Embarcadero Shuttle
East Palo Alto Caltrain Shuttle
Stanford Marguerite Shuttle
Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA)
San Mateo County Transit (SamTrans)
"X Caltrain Stations
5 Schools
Railroads
Employment Districts
Commercial Centers
Park/Open Space
Public Conservation Land
City Limit
0 0.5 1 Miles
182
297
102
103 88
22
824
32
35
522
89
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JANUARY 31, 2017 T-7
BUS SERVICE
Three transit providers, VTA, SamTrans, and AC Transit, provide bus service in Palo
Alto, connecting residents to both local and regional destinations. The VTA operates
local bus service within the city, with 14 bus routes in Palo Alto and an express bus
network that serves the Stanford Research Park. VTA also offers connections to VTA
light rail, Caltrain, Altamont Corridor Express (ACE) and AMTRAK Capitol Corridor.
SamTrans operates bus service throughout San Mateo, San Francisco, and Santa
Clara counties, helping to connect Palo Alto to other parts of the Peninsula and
Silicon Valley. AC Transit’s Dumbarton Express provides express bus service between
the East Bay and communities on the Peninsula.
The VTA’s proposed El Camino Real Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) project aims to improve
transit operations and increase transit ridership along the El Camino Real Corridor.
Policies in this Element support enhanced bus service in shared travel lanes with
curbside stations and signal priority with queue jump lanes to provide faster, more
reliable service with target stops and specialized transit vehicles and facilities.
SHUTTLE SERVICE
There are four types of shuttle services operating in Palo Alto, including the Stanford
University Marguerite shuttle, the VTA shuttle, the City-operated Palo Alto Shuttle,
and private employee shuttles which transit through Palo Alto offering transportation
for employees to other job centers on the Peninsula. The Marguerite, run by
Stanford University Parking and Transportation Services, is a free service that
connects the Stanford campus to the Palo Alto Transit Center and Downtown. The
VTA provides low cost fare based service for residents of Santa Clara County. The
Palo Alto Free Shuttle is free wheelchair-accessible shuttle provided by the City to
connect important destinations in the community, including Caltrain stations; the City
is developing plans for enhanced service in response to community input.
Marguerite and Palo Alto Shuttle routes are shown on Map T-1.
FIRST/LAST MILE CONNECTIONS
Many people live or work within a mile from a transit station or, bus stop; however,
distance, perception of safety, and inconvenience may deter them from using transit,
so the entire trip is made by single-occupant vehicle simply for lack of convenience
of a small but crucial segment of the trip. Currently, the Palo Alto shuttle, biking, and
walking are the best first/last mile option for most of Palo Alto. Future improvements
should focus on making walking, bicycling, shuttle service, and ridesharing more
efficient, comfortable, and safe.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
T-8 REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JANUARY 31, 2017
BIKING
Palo Alto dedicated its formal bikeway system—one of the nation’s first—in 1972.
Bikeways have since become commonplace and considerable progress has been
made in overcoming barriers to bicycle travel in and around Palo Alto. Palo Alto’s
bikeway network consists of on-road bicycle lanes, bicycle boulevards and bicycle
routes, off-roadway shared-use paths and bridges, and bicycle parking facilities.
Fourteen underpasses and bridges span barriers such as freeways, creeks, and
railroad tracks. Map T-3 shows the existing and planned bikeway network in Palo
Alto. Palo Alto is in a position to build on the existing network, significantly increasing
its proportion of travel by bicycle and is actively pursuing an expanded bike share
program.
The Palo Alto Bicycle + Pedestrian Transportation Plan, adopted in 2012 (BPTP
2012), contains a policy framework, design guidance, and specific recommendations
to increase walking and biking rates over the next decade and beyond. BPTP 2012
encourages planning, construction, and maintenance of complete streets that are
safe and accessible to all modes and people of all ages and abilities.
WALKING
Mode share data indicate that walking accounts for more trips than public transit in
Palo Alto each day, yet is an often overlooked means of transportation. As shown on
Map T-4, Palo Alto's pedestrians are generally well served by current facilities and will
benefit from the attention given to street trees, walkable neighborhoods, and
pedestrian- oriented design. The most needed improvements are to fill in the gaps in
the sidewalk system, make intersection crossings “friendlier,” and overcome barriers
to northeast-southwest travel.
"X
"X|ÿ82
£¤101
Foo
t
h
i
l
l
E
x
p
r
e
s
s
w
a
y
Mountain View
East Palo Alto
Stanford
Menlo Park
Mi
d
d
l
e
f
i
e
l
d
R
o
a
d
Baylands Preserve
Byxbee ParkEa
s
t
B
a
y
s
h
o
r
e
R
o
a
d
Page
M
i
l
l
R
o
a
d
Mi
d
d
l
e
f
i
e
l
d
R
o
a
d
Charle
s
t
o
n
R
o
a
d
Junipe
r
o
S
e
r
r
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
Arbore
t
u
m
R
d
Quar
r
y
R
o
a
d
Sa
n
t
a
C
r
u
z
A
v
e
Alm
a
S
t
r
e
e
t
El
C
a
m
i
n
o
R
e
a
l
Oreg
o
n
E
x
p
r
e
s
s
w
a
y
Embarcade
r
o
R
o
a
d
Lou
i
s
R
o
a
d
Wa
v
e
r
l
y
S
t
r
e
e
t
Seal
e
A
v
e
n
u
e
Loma
V
e
r
d
e
A
v
e
n
u
e
Chan
n
i
n
g
A
v
e
n
u
e
East M
e
a
d
o
w
D
r
i
v
e
San
A
n
t
o
n
i
o
R
o
a
d
Colora
d
o
A
v
e
n
u
e
Sand
H
i
l
l
R
o
a
d
Lin
c
o
l
n
A
v
e
n
u
e
Hamilto
n
A
v
e
n
u
e
Aras
t
r
a
d
e
r
o
R
o
a
d
Univ
e
r
s
i
t
y
A
v
e
n
u
e
P A L O A L T O C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
T R A N S P O R T A T I O N E L E M E N T
MA P T - 3
B I K E W A Y S I N P A L O A L T O
Source: City of Palo Alto, 2016; PlaceWorks, 2016.
0 0.5 1 Mile
Class I Multi-Use Path
Park Trails
Private Pathways
Across Barrier Connection (ABC)
Class II Bicycle Lane
One-Way Bicycle Lane
Enhanced Bikeway
Class III Shared Roadway
Class III Shared Arterial
Bicycle Boulevard
"X Caltrain Stations
Park/Open Space
Public Conservation Land
Railroads
City Limit
Commercial
"X
Downtown Inset
Existing Proposed Off-Street
Dedicated On-Street
Shared On-Street
Center
Al
m
a
S
t
Bry
a
n
t
S
t
Mi
d
d
l
e
f
i
e
l
d
R
d
We
b
s
t
e
r
S
t
Univ
e
r
s
i
t
y
A
v
e
Ever
e
t
t
A
v
e
Hom
e
r
A
v
e
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION
Source: City of Palo Alto, 2012.
MAP T-4
EXISTING PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES
Downtown Inset
Existing Facilities and Programs | 3-5
Alta Planning + Design
Chapter 3
Map 3-2: Existing Pedestrian Conditions
Existing Facilities and Programs | 3-5
Alta Planning + Design
Chapter 3
Map 3-2: Existing Pedestrian Conditions
Existing Facilities and Programs | 3-5
Alta Planning + Design
Chapter 3
Map 3-2: Existing Pedestrian Conditions
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JANUARY 31, 2017 T-11
STREETS
All modes of transportation in Palo Alto depend to some degree on the street
network. The City’s street network has remained essentially unchanged since the
1960s, except for projects along the Sand Hill Road corridor.
STREET CLASSIFICATIONS
Palo Alto’s streets are categorized according to purpose, design and the volume of
traffic they carry. This street hierarchy is defined below and is illustrated on Map T-5.
Improvements to road surfaces, curbs, crossings, signage, landscaping, and sight
lines must make streets safer for vehicles, but must consider the needs and safety of
pedestrians and cyclists as well.
PALO ALTO’S STREET HIERARCHY
Freeway: Major roadway with controlled access; devoted exclusively to
traffic movement, mainly of a through or regional nature.
Expressway: Major roadway with limited access to adjacent properties;
devoted almost exclusively to traffic movement, mainly serving through-
traffic.
Arterial: Major roadway mainly serving through-traffic; takes traffic to and
from expressways and freeways; provides access to adjacent properties.
Residential Arterial: Major roadway mainly serving through-traffic; takes
traffic to and from express- ways and freeways; provides access to adjacent
properties, most of which are residential properties located on both sides of
the roadway with direct frontages and driveways on that roadway.
Collector: Roadway that collects and distributes local traffic to and from
arterial streets, and provides access to adjacent properties.
Local: Minor roadway that provides access to adjacent properties only.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
T-12 REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JANUARY 31, 2017
ROADWAY AND INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS
Efficient traffic circulation on major streets is a priority in Palo Alto, as is minimizing
the diversion of through-traffic onto local residential streets. Intersections are the
most constricted points on the network and tend to see the highest levels of
congestion during the peak morning and afternoon commute periods. For that
purpose, several key intersections and roadways segments, as shown on Map T-6,
have been identified for monitoring.
A challenge is to balance the free flow of traffic with the safety of pedestrians and
cyclists of all abilities, as well as with residents’ desire to maintain low traffic speeds
on residential arterials. Most future improvements will be made within existing rights-
of-way and will provide for traffic calming or relatively small increases in roadway
capacity by adding turn lanes or making other intersection adjustments.
Most future improvements will be made within existing rights-of-way and will
provide for traffic calming or relatively small increases in roadway capacity by adding
turn lanes or making other intersection adjustments. Other, specific local and
regional transportation investments envisioned are:
Full grade separations for automobiles, pedestrians, and bicyclists at Caltrain
crossings,
Retrofit/improvements to existing grade separated Caltrain crossings for
pedestrians and bicyclists at California Avenue and University Avenue,
Construction of new pedestrian and bicycle grade separated crossing of Caltrain
in South Palo Alto and in North Palo Alto,
Pedestrian and bicycle improvements derived from the 2012 Bicycle and
Pedestrian Plan as amended over time,
The US 101/Adobe Creek bicycle and pedestrian bridge,
El Camino Real intersection and pedestrian safety/streetscape improvements,
Downtown mobility and safety improvements,
Geng Road extension to Laura Lane,
Middlefield Road corridor improvements.
"X
"X
§¨¦280
|ÿ82
£¤101
Mountain View
East Palo Alto
Stanford
Los Altos Hills
Menlo Park
S A N
F R A N C I S C O
B A Y
Los Altos
El
C
a
m
i
n
o
R
e
a
l
Fo
o
t
h
i
l
l
E
x
p
r
e
s
s
w
a
y
Oreg
o
n
E
x
p
r
e
s
s
w
a
y
Embarcad
e
r
o
R
o
a
d
Univ
e
r
s
i
t
y
A
v
e
n
u
e
East Charleston Road
San
A
n
t
o
n
i
o
R
o
a
d
Al
m
a
S
t
r
e
e
t
Mi
d
d
l
e
f
i
e
l
d
R
o
a
d
California Ave Station
Palo Alto Station
Source: City of Palo Alto, 2013; PlaceWorks, 2014.
PR EL I MI N A R Y D RA F T MA P T -5R O A D W A Y N E T W O R K
P A L O A L T O C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
T R A N S P O R T A T I O N E L E M E N T
0 0.25 0.5 Miles
Local/Collector Residential Arterial Arterial Expressway Freeway Railroads
"X Caltrain Stations Parks Public Conservation Land Sphere of Influence City Boundary
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
T-14 REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JANUARY 31, 2017
§¨¦280
|ÿ82
£¤101
Foo
t
h
i
l
l
E
x
p
r
e
s
s
w
a
y
Mountain View
East Palo Alto
Stanford
Menlo Park
Mi
d
d
l
e
f
i
e
l
d
R
o
a
d
Baylands Preserve
Byxbee Park
Ea
s
t
B
a
y
s
h
o
r
e
R
o
a
d
Page
M
i
l
l
R
o
a
d
Mi
d
d
l
e
f
i
e
l
d
R
o
a
d
Charle
s
t
o
n
R
o
a
d
Junipe
r
o
S
e
r
r
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
Arbore
t
u
m
R
d
Quar
r
y
R
o
a
d
Sa
n
t
a
C
r
u
z
A
v
e
Alm
a
S
t
r
e
e
t
El
C
a
m
i
n
o
R
e
a
l
Oreg
o
n
E
x
p
r
e
s
s
w
a
y
Embarcade
r
o
R
o
a
d
Lou
i
s
R
o
a
d
Wa
v
e
r
l
y
S
t
r
e
e
t
Seal
e
A
v
e
n
u
e
Loma
V
e
r
d
e
A
v
e
n
u
e
Chan
n
i
n
g
A
v
e
n
u
e
East M
e
a
d
o
w
D
r
i
v
e
San
A
n
t
o
n
i
o
R
o
a
d
Colora
d
o
A
v
e
n
u
e
Sand
H
i
l
l
R
o
a
d
Lin
c
o
l
n
A
v
e
n
u
e
Hamilto
n
A
v
e
n
u
e
Aras
t
r
a
d
e
r
o
R
o
a
d
Univ
e
r
s
i
t
y
A
v
e
n
u
e
!6
!1
!20
!18
!15
!9
!8
!7
!5
!4
!3
!2
!19
!17
!16
!14
!13
!12
!11
!10
P A L O A L T O C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
T R A N S P O R T A T I O N E L E M E N T
MA P T - 6
M O N I T O R E D I N T E R S E C T I O N S
Source: City of Palo Alto, 2016; PlaceWorks, 2016.Park/Open Space
Public Conservation Land
Railroads
City Limit
0 0.5 1 Mile
1. Middlefield/University2. Middlefield/Embarcadero3. Middlefield/Oregon (CMP)4. Middlefield/Colorado5. Middlefield/Charleston6. Middlefield/San Antonio (CMP)7. El Camino Real/Alma/Sand Hill (CMP)8. El Camino Real/University/Palm9. El Camino Real/Embarcadero (CMP)10. El Camino Real/Page Mill (CMP)11. El Camino Real/Arastradero/Charleston (CMP)12. El Camino Real/San Antonio (CMP) (Mountain View)13. Santa Cruz/Sand Hill Road (Menlo Park)14. Foothill/Junipero Serra/Page Mill (CMP)15. Foothill/Arastradero (CMP)16. Alma/Charleston17. Arboretum/Quarry18. San Antonio/Charleston(CMP)19. Embarcadero/East Bayshore20. University/Woodland (East Palo Alto)
Palo Alto Monitored Intersections
(CMP) denotes Santa Clara County VTA Congestion Management Plan intersection.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
T-16 REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JANUARY 31, 2017
Other agencies, including Santa Clara County, VTA, and Caltrans, are responsible for
other major roadway projects that will directly affect Palo Alto streets, but are not
under the jurisdiction of the City. Specifically:
The County will implement elements of Expressway Plan 2040 in or near Palo
Alto, including widening Oregon-Page Mill with HOV lanes and a
bicycle/pedestrian trail between I-280 and Foothill Expressway, intersection
improvements along Oregon-Page Mill between Porter and Hansen and at El
Camino Real, reconfiguration of the interchange at I-280/Oregon-Page Mill
Road, and an ITS/signal system Countywide,
US 101 southbound improvements from San Antonio Road and Rengstorff
Avenue.
These investments would be complemented by local and regional investments in
transit and transportation demand management, as well as parking supply and
parking management.
LEVEL OF SERVICE AND VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED
Motor vehicle level of service (LOS) is a way of measuring traffic congestion based
on average control delay per vehicle, and in some analyses, based on the ratio of the
volume of traffic to the capacity of the road. LOS A is a free-flowing condition for cars
and LOS F is an extreme congestion condition, with traffic volumes at or over
capacity. LOS definitions for signalized intersections are shown in Table T-1. Policies
in the Element ensure that the City will continue to use vehicular LOS at local
intersections when evaluating development applications, including a project’s
potential contribution to cumulative LOS.
TABLE T-1 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION LOS
DEFINITIONS BASED ON AVERAGE DELAY
LOS
Average Control Delay
Per Vehicle (Seconds)
A 10.0 or less
B 10.1 to 20.0
C 20.1 to 35.0
D 35.1 to 55.0
E 55.1 to 80.0
F Greater than 80.0
Source: Transportation Research Board, 2000 Highway Capacity Manual.
Washington, D.C. 2000.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JANUARY 31, 2017 T-17
VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED
Transportation planning analyses used by cities to describe traffic and roadway and
intersection operation, both for infrastructure planning and for new development
projects, are evolving away from the traditional Vehicle Level of Service (LOS) metric
towards a multi-modal perspective based on Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT). California
Senate Bill 743, passed in 2013, requires impacts from new development on
transportation network performance to be viewed through a filter that promotes the
reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, the development of multi-modal
transportation networks, and a diversity of land uses. This Bill will shift the State away
from LOS as the metric for evaluating transportation impacts under the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and towards use of vehicle miles travelled (VMT)
or VMT per capita. This shift recognizes that prioritizing the free flow of cars over any
other roadway user contradicts State goals to reduce GHGs.
While LOS describes local-level impacts at a specific location, VMT describes
network-wide impacts by measuring the number of miles traveled by motor vehicles
within an area. VMT per capita divides the total amount of VMT by the population
living and working in a community. Together, these measures can inform efforts to
reduce commute lengths and enhance the availability of alternative transportation
options.
Multi-modal level of service (MMLOS) is another analytical approach endorsed by
policies in this Element, and applies the concept of LOS to all modes of travel. Within
Santa Clara County, VTA is developing guidelines for multi-modal transportation
planning to include in all transportation studies, and the City of Palo Alto will have an
opportunity to participate in this effort. One possible outcome could be the adoption
of metrics for safety, convenience, and delay for transit, bicycles, and pedestrians
similar to the LOS standards the City has adopted for motor vehicles.
RAIL CORRIDOR
Palo Alto is bisected by the Caltrain rail corridor, which provides important
connections to the wider Bay Area; however, it also creates a significant barrier to
local connectivity and circulation. Policies in this Element address these issues as well
as safety and desired service expansions to better serve the California Avenue
Caltrain station.
To enhance local connectivity, improve pedestrian and bicycle circulation, and
increase safety, the City of Palo Alto is also committed to pursuing grade separation
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
T-18 REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JANUARY 31, 2017
for pedestrians, bicyclists, and automobiles at Caltrain crossings within the City and is
considering conceptual grade separation alternatives. Recent studies have focused
on three existing at-grade crossings at West Charleston Road, Meadow Drive, and
Churchill Avenue; however there is significant interest in analyzing and pursuing
grade separations at Alma Street as well, in addition to possible establishment of
“quiet zones” for the near term.
NEIGHBORHOOD IMPACTS
Most Palo Alto streets are bordered by residential land uses. Citizens’ concerns
reflect chronic problems like speeding, regional traffic on local streets, and too much
motor vehicle traffic. The City has designated some streets as residential arterials to
recognize that they carry large volumes of through-traffic but also have residential
uses on both sides of the street. The objective is to address the desires of residents
of these streets who would like to have slower speeds, safer conditions for bicycles
and pedestrians, and aesthetic improvements. This must be done economically and
without appreciably reducing traffic capacity or diverting traffic onto other local
neighborhood streets.
Additionally, to address community concerns, the City has developed a Traffic
Intrusion on Residential Environments (TIRE) methodology that estimates resident
perception of traffic impacts based on anticipated average daily traffic growth.
Although not required under the California Environmental Quality Act or pursuant to
VTA guidelines, the City of Palo Alto uses the TIRE index to measure the impact of
traffic on residents along a street.
Policies in this Element support traffic calming, which refers to projects that make
permanent, physical changes to streets to slow traffic and/or reduce volumes, thus
improving their safety and addressing residents’ concerns. Traffic calming measures
can reduce speeds and return some through-traffic from local streets and collector
streets to nearby arterials, something that may be of increased importance given the
advent of Google Maps and Waze. Traffic calming also includes education and
enforcement measures that promote changes in driver behavior. Some examples of
traffic calming measures include:
Curb and Sidewalk Design. In many of the areas of Palo Alto built since World
War II, an integral curb and sidewalk design was used, resulting in sidewalks
immediately next to traffic lanes. Adding planting pockets and street trees would
promote pedestrian use and also provide visual cues to drivers to reduce
The Traffic Infusion on Residential
Environment (TIRE) index is a measure of
the effect of traffic on the safety and
comfort of human activities, such as
walking, cycling, and playing on or near a
street and on the freedom to maneuver
vehicles in and out of residential
driveways. The TIRE index scale ranges
from 0 to 5 depending on daily traffic
volume. An index of 0 represents the least
infusion of traffic and 5 the greatest, and
thereby, the poorest residential
environment.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JANUARY 31, 2017 T-19
speeds. Curb extensions at intersections and crosswalks can also slow traffic
speeds.
Reducing and Narrowing Lanes. In commercial areas, it may be feasible to
reduce the number of lanes for through-traffic without losing too much traffic
handling capacity. In these areas, curb lanes are often not very useful for
through-traffic since they may be blocked or slowed by cars turning into and out
of driveways and parking spaces. In other areas, narrowing the travel lanes is a
technique that can be used to reduce motor vehicle speeds.
Traffic Circles. A traffic circle is a raised island in the center of an intersection
that helps reduce speeding by forcing drivers to slow. Traffic circles have been
shown to dramatically reduce collisions and are considered more bicycle-
friendly than traditional two- or four-way stops controls. Because they don’t
require stops, traffic circles also reduce local air and noise pollution from stop–
and-go traffic, and offer opportunities for added landscaping and tree planting.
Traffic circles are already used in Palo Alto’s residential neighborhoods, and the
2012 Bicycle + Pedestrian Transportation Plan calls for greater use of traffic
circles, particularly along bicycle boulevards.
PARKING
Effectively managing parking supply and demand can reduce traffic congestion,
protect the livability of residential neighborhoods, and support local businesses.
The parking-related policies in this plan articulate a phased approach. In the near-
term, the focus will be on conducting needs assessments, which establish a baseline
for adequate parking in each of the city's commercial centers and employment
districts under current conditions, and creating parking management strategies,
which optimize the use of existing parking spaces. In the mid- to long-term, as it
becomes easier and more convenient to walk, bike, rideshare and use transit, and as
the effectiveness of parking management programs can be measured, the focus will
shift to recalibrating parking supply. Bridging between these two phases will require
identifying performance standards for transit, walking, ridesharing and bicycling that
represent the thresholds at which point mechanisms to phase in updated parking
requirements and reduce space allocated to parking over time should be considered.
Parking management can be done in a number of ways, including optimizing use of
existing spaces and incentivizing use of alternatives to the automobile. Technology is
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
T-20 REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JANUARY 31, 2017
central to optimizing the use of existing spaces, and shared parking arrangements
that allow different users to use the same spaces at alternate times can also optimize
the use of existing spaces. Improving transit service, providing safe, convenient
bicycle parking and enhancing the pedestrian realm can incentivize the use of
transportation modes that don't require vehicle parking, while charging for parking
makes it more likely that people will carpool, take transit, walk or bike.
The City has already begun to pilot new programs and gauge the effectiveness of
parking management strategies in coordination with other transportation demand
management initiatives. This plan seeks to set the stage for continued innovation
and experimentation in both the public and private sectors to develop effective
solutions. Over time, carefully managing parking supply can significantly reduce the
number of parking spaces needed, moderate traffic congestion, reduce the costs of
providing parking, encourage transit and sustainable transportation choices and
support Palo Alto’s goals for livable neighborhoods.
Policies also support increasing the number of safe, attractive, and well-designed
bicycle parking spaces in Palo Alto, as well as bike share hubs and bike stations at
Caltrain stations. Priority areas of the city for enhanced bike parking include heavily
travelled mixed-use areas, commercial centers, employment districts,
recreational/cultural facilities, multi-modal transportation facilities and ride share
stops.
ROAD SAFETY
Traffic safety will continue to be among the City’s top priorities in the future. City
officials, city employees and community members are committed to working
together to build better and safer streets, educate the public on traffic safety, enforce
traffic laws, and adopt policy changes that save lives. The City is undertaking a
comprehensive traffic safety program, and partners with Palo Alto Unified School
District and the Palo Alto Parent Teacher Association (PTA) on a Safe Routes to
School Program that encourages families to walk, bike, take transit and use other
alternatives to driving to school more often and to reduce the risk of collisions for
students.
A new approach to substantially reducing traffic-related fatality rates without
compromising mobility is the Vision Zero Initiative, which is being implemented in
cities throughout the US and Europe.. At the core of this approach is the pursuit of
roadway safety for all users.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JANUARY 31, 2017 T-21
TRANSIT-DEPENDENT COMMUNITIES
Young people, seniors, people with low incomes, and people with limited mobility
all have special transportation needs. Palo Alto is committed to providing reasonable
accessibility and mobility for all members of the community, including those who
depend on transit because they cannot drive or choose not to.
As the baby boomer generation (i.e., those born between 1946 and 1964) ages,
more and more people will forego driving or become unable to drive. Without
proper access to affordable transit or families, friends, and/or neighbors who can
provide rides, seniors face an increased risk of social and physical isolation. VTA
offers seniors 65 and over a discounted Regional Transit Connection Card. In
addition, Outreach, a non-profit organization that serves seniors and people with
disabilities, offers transportation services in Santa Clara County, including a
subsidized transit pass and subsidized taxi rides. While Outreach provides an
important service to the community, there is a daily cap on the number of rides
offered so all user requests may not be accommodated.
VTA’s paratransit services are also provided by Outreach. Riders may reserve
paratransit trips from one to three days in advance, between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m.
for service the next day. However, paratransit services are limited to a ¾-mile
corridor around the VTA bus routes and light rail stations. For travel outside of the
service area, customers must arrange a transfer to the paratransit operator.
The policies in this Element support these and other efforts to serve transit
dependent communities and also embrace the principle of universal design to
achieve roadways and sidewalks that can accommodate people of all abilities and all
users, including automobiles, pedestrians, bicyclists. Examples of universal design to
support people with disabilities include placing pedestrian push buttons at
wheelchair level, audible pedestrian crossing systems, sidewalk curb ramps,
including wider ramps for strollers, increasing pedestrian crossing times, sidewalk
widths of six feet or greater, roadway and sidewalk materials that reduce slipping and
add stability, minimizing driveway crossings and obstructions, and avoiding steep
grades and slopes.
REGIONAL COLLABORATION
Increasing population and traffic congestion over the past 20 years have required an
increased emphasis on regional solutions to transportation issues. A regional
approach is needed to avoid local solutions that simply shift the problem elsewhere
Households that don’t own a car are
dependent on transit to reach work,
including evening, nighttime, and
weekend shifts, and to meet other daily
needs. At the same time, in a 2016 survey
of workers in downtown Palo Alto, 40
percent of service workers reported that
they would take transit to work if it was less
expensive. Improving mobility for low-
income residents and workers could mean
both expanding transit and shuttle service
to off-peak hours and supporting
programs to provide free or discounted
transit passes.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
T-22 REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JANUARY 31, 2017
or produce unintended results. Transportation facilities like Caltrain or the Bayshore
Freeway need to be managed regionally. Palo Alto is actively participating with other
communities and Caltrain on electrification, known as the Peninsula Corridor
Electrification Project (PCEP), which will replace existing diesel trains with electric
ones along the 51-mile Caltrain corridor and enable Caltrain to both increase the
number of trains it runs and run longer trains. While these changes offer benefits to
regional commuters, they will increase delays and congestion at rail crossings until
they are grade separated.
The Santa Clara County VTA Congestion Management Program (CMP) is the venue
for transportation planning in the County and the conduit for most transportation
funding. Palo Alto representatives participate on VTA advisory committees as well as
numerous other Bay Area regional bodies affecting transportation, including the
Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC), Association of Bay Area
Governments (ABAG), and the Bay Area Air Quality Management District
(BAAQMD).
High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lanes and express lanes are regional traffic
management strategies aimed at reducing congestion on freeways and improving air
quality. HOV lanes are reserved at peak travel times or longer for the exclusive use of
vehicles with a driver and one or more passengers; although motorcycles and some
alternative fuel and transit vehicles may also use the lanes. There are about 174
miles of freeway carpool lanes in Santa Clara County, including 84 miles along US
101 between the Palo Alto and Morgan Hill.
GOALS, POLICIES, AND PROGRAMS
SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORTATION
GOAL T-1 Create a sustainable transportation system, complemented
by a mix of land uses, that emphasizes walking, bicycling,
use of public transportation, and other methods to reduce
greenhouse gas emissions and the use of single occupancy
motor vehicles.
REDUCING RELIANCE ON SINGLE-OCCUPANT VEHICLES
Policy T-1.1 Take a comprehensive approach to reducing single-occupant vehicle
trips by involving those who live, work, and shop in Palo Alto in
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JANUARY 31, 2017 T-23
developing strategies that make it easier and more convenient not to
drive.
Policy T-1.2 Collaborate with Palo Alto employers and business owners to develop,
implement and expand comprehensive programs like the
Transportation Management Association (TMA) to reduce single-
occupant vehicle commute trips, including through incentives.
Create a long-term education program to change Program T1.2.1
the travel habits of residents, visitors, shoppers, and
workers by informing them about transportation
alternatives, incentives, and impacts. Work with the
Palo Alto Unified School District and with other
public and private interests, such as the Chamber of
Commerce and Commuter Wallet partners, to
develop and implement this program.
Formalize Transportation Demand Management Program T1.2.2
(TDM) requirements by establishing an ordinance
that outlines when new development should be
required to prepare and implement a TDM Plan
and the performance standards. Require regular
monitoring/reporting and provide for enforcement
with meaningful penalties for non-compliance. The
ordinance should also:
Establish a list of effective TDM measures that
include transit promotion, prepaid transit
passes, commuter checks, car sharing,
carpooling, parking cash-out, bicycle lockers
and showers, shuttles to Caltrain and education
and outreach to support the use of these
modes.
Require TMA membership and provide a
system for incorporating alternative measures
as new ideas for TDM are developed.
Establish a mechanism to monitor the success
of TDM measures and track the cumulative
reduction of peak period motor vehicle
trips.TDM measures should achieve the
following reduction in peak period motor
Transportation Demand Management (TDM)
The term Transportation Demand
Management (TDM) encompasses a
coordinated set of strategies that are
designed to reduce the use of single
occupancy vehicles, and thereby reduce
both traffic and parking demand. TDM
programs include investments in alternative
transportation improvements; incentives for
local employees to take transit, walk, or bike;
parking management; and marketing. In
Palo Alto, the Transportation Management
Authority (TMA), an independent non-profit
organization that works collaboratively with
the City and the business community, is
responsible for coordinating TDM programs.
Transportation Demand Management
Strategies are also referenced under
Program T-5.2.3.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
T-24 REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JANUARY 31, 2017
vehicle trips from the rates included in the
Institute of Transportation Engineers’ Trip
Generation Manual for the appropriate land use
category:
- 45 percent reduction in the Downtown
district
- 35 percent reduction in the California
Avenue area
- 30 percent reduction in the Stanford
Research Park
- 30 percent reduction in the El Camino Real
Corridor
- 20 percent reduction in other areas of the
city
Establish a system that allows new
development to achieve “no net new vehicle
trips” by reducing trips to the site through TDM
measures, and then offsetting remaining trips
via enforceable agreements with other entities
or organizations like the TMA that are
committed to reducing existing vehicle trips.
Evaluate the performance of pilot programs Program T1.2.3
implemented by the Palo Alto Transportation
Management Association and pursue expansion
from Downtown to California Avenue and other
areas of the city when appropriate.
Site City facilities near high-capacity transit and Program T1.2.4
revise existing regulations, policies, and programs
to encourage telecommuting, satellite office
concepts, and work-at-home options.
REDUCING GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
Policy T-1.3 Reduce GHG and pollutant emissions associated with transportation
by reducing vehicle miles traveled and per-mile emissions through
increasing transit options and through the use of zero-emission
vehicle technologies to meet City and State goals for GHG reductions
by 2030.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JANUARY 31, 2017 T-25
Develop an electric vehicle promotion program that Program T1.3.1
identifies policy and technical issues, barriers and
opportunities to the expansion of electric vehicles.
Use low-emission vehicles for the Palo Alto Free Program T1.3.2
Shuttle and work with transit providers, including
SamTrans and VTA, to encourage the adoption of
electric, fuel cell or other zero emission vehicles.
Also work with private bus and shuttle providers,
delivery companies, and ride services.
Policy T-1.4 Ensure that electric vehicle charging infrastructure, including
infrastructure for charging e-bikes, is available citywide.
Update the Zoning Ordinance to ensure Program T1.4.1
compatibility with the electric vehicle infrastructure
ordinance.
Periodically review requirements for electric and Program T1.4.2
plug-in vehicle infrastructure in new construction.
Consider and periodically review requirements for
electric and plug-in infrastructure for remodels.
Consider costs to the City, including identifying
payment options.
INCREASING TRANSIT USE
Policy T-1.5 Encourage innovation and expanded transit access to regional
destinations, multi-modal transit stations, employment centers and
commercial centers, including those within Palo Alto through the use
of efficient public and/or private transit options such as rideshare
services, on-demand local shuttles, and other first/last mile
connections.
Collaborate with transit providers, including Program T1.5.1
Caltrain, bus operators and rideshare companies, to
develop first/last mile connection strategies that
boost the use of transit and shuttle service for local
errands and commuting.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
T-26 REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JANUARY 31, 2017
Use bike share to enhance first/last mile Program T1.5.2
connections and locate bike stations at transit hubs.
Also continue to work with Caltrain, Amtrak, and
public bus operators to expand bicycle storage on
public transit vehicles during both peak and off-
peak hours.
Policy T-1.6 Advocate for transit providers to coordinate train, bus, and shuttle
schedules at multi-modal transit stations, and other transit information
centers, to enable efficient transfer among public transit modes.
Policy T-1.7 Work to ensure public and private school commute patterns are
accommodated in the local transit system, including through schedule
and route coordination.
Policy T-1.8 Continue to encourage the provision of amenities such as seating,
lighting, and signage, including real-time arrival information, at bus
and shuttle stops and train stations to increase rider comfort, safety,
and convenience.
ENHANCING RAIL AND BUS SERVICE
Policy T-1.9 Support Caltrain modernization and electrification, capacity and
service enhancements and extension to Downtown San Francisco.
Policy T-1.10 Encourage continued enhancement of the Caltrain stations as
important transportation nodes for the city.
Collaborate with Stanford University, VTA, Caltrain Program T1.10.1
and other agencies to pursue improvements to the
Palo Alto Station/Transit Center area aimed at
enhancing pedestrian experience and improving
circulation and access for all modes.
In collaboration with Caltrain and Stanford Research Program T1.10.2
Park, pursue expansion of service to the California
Avenue Caltrain Station and creation of an
enhanced transit center at the Station, including
connections to VTA bus service, the Palo Alto Free
Shuttle, the Marguerite, and other private shuttles
serving the Research Park.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JANUARY 31, 2017 T-27
Policy T-1.11 Collaborate with transit agencies in planning and implementing
convenient, efficient, coordinated and effective bus service in Palo Alto
that addresses the needs of all segments of our population.
Strongly recommend that VTA maintain existing Program T1.11.1
service and coverage levels in Palo Alto.
Work with VTA to explore VTA express bus service Program T1.11.2
routes that would serve the Stanford Research Park,
California Avenue, Stanford University, and
Downtown.
Study the feasibility of, and if warranted provide, Program T1.11.3
traffic signal prioritization for buses at Palo Alto
intersections, focusing first on regional transit
routes. Also, advocate for bus service
improvements on El Camino Real such as queue
jump lanes and curbside platforms.
SHUTTLE SERVICE, RIDESHARING AND FIRST/LAST MILE CONNECTIONS
Policy T-1.12 Encourage services that complement and enhance the transportation
options available to help Palo Alto residents and employees make
first/last mile connections and travel within the city for daily needs
without using a single occupancy vehicle, including shuttle, taxi and
ridesharing services.
Investigate a pilot program to subsidize a taxi, Program T1.12.1
rideshare, or transit program for Palo Altans to get
to/from downtown, including offering education
and incentives to encourage users.
Policy T-1.13 Continue the Palo Alto Free Shuttle program and work with partners to
enhance service by increasing frequency and prioritizing destinations
of value to the community, including health centers, parks, schools,
senior centers, and shopping areas and other places where residents
gather.
Conduct a comprehensive study of the shuttle Program T1.13.1
system in collaboration with community members,
people with special needs, and PAUSD to:
Evaluate current routes and ridership;
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
T-28 REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JANUARY 31, 2017
Identify potential service improvements,
including new or modified routes; expanded
schedules that accommodate daytime, evening,
and weekend demand; facilitating transit
connections, and improvements to the safety
and appearance of shuttle stops;
Explore partnerships with other services that
could complement and supplement the Palo
Alto Shuttle;
Develop clear and engaging materials to explain
and promote shuttle use with the purpose of
reducing barriers to use; and
Establish a schedule for regular evaluation and
reporting to optimize shuttle system use and
effectiveness.
Policy T-1.14 Encourage employers to develop shared shuttle services to connect
employment areas with the multi-modal transit stations and City
amenities, and to offer employees education and information on how
to use shuttles.
BICYCLING AND WALKING
Policy T-1.15 Promote bicycle use as an alternative way to get to work, school,
shopping, recreational facilities and transit stops.
Allocate funding for regular surveys of bicycle use Program T1.15.1
across the city, by collecting bicycle counts on
important and potential bicycle corridors.
Consider marketing strategies, such as a recurring Program T1.15.2
Palo Alto Open Streets program of events
potentially in coordination with local business
groups, which would include street closures and
programming.
Encourage private schools within the community to Program T1.15.3
develop Walk and Roll Maps as part of
Transportation Demand Management strategies to
reduce vehicle trips.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JANUARY 31, 2017 T-29
Participate in local and regional encouragement Program T1.15.4
events such as Palo Alto Walks and Rolls, Bike to
Work Day, and Bike Palo Alto! that encourages a
culture of bicycling and walking as alternatives to
single occupant vehicle trips.
Policy T-1.16 Require new office, commercial, and multi-family residential
developments to provide improvements that improve bicycle and
pedestrian connectivity as called for in the 2012 Bicycle + Pedestrian
Transportation Plan.
Policy T-1.17 Increase cooperation with surrounding communities and other
agencies to establish and maintain off-roadway bicycle and pedestrian
paths and trails that are integrated with creek, utility, railroad rights-of-
way and green spaces in a manner that helps enhance and define the
community and avoids environmental impacts.
Policy T-1.18 Provide facilities that encourage and support bicycling and walking.
Adjust the street evaluation criteria of the City's Program T1.18.1
Pavement Management Program to ensure that
areas of the road used by bicyclists are maintained
at the same standards as, or at standards higher
than, areas used by motor vehicles. Include bicycle
and e-bike detection in intersection upgrades.
Prioritize investments for enhanced pedestrian Program T1.18.2
access and bicycle use within Palo Alto and to/from
surrounding communities, including by
incorporating improvements from related City
Plans, for example the 2012 Bicycle + Pedestrian
Transportation Plan and the Parks, Trails & Open
Space Master Plan, as amended, into the capital
improvements plan.
Increase the number of east-west pedestrian and Program T1.18.3
bicycle crossings across Alma Street and the
Caltrain corridor, particularly south of Oregon
Expressway.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
T-30 REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JANUARY 31, 2017
Encourage the use of bike sharing, and the Program T1.18.4
provision of required infrastructure throughout Palo
Alto, especially at transit stations and stops, job
centers, community centers, and other destinations.
Improve amenities such as seating, lighting, bicycle Program T1.18.5
parking, street trees, and interpretive stations along
bicycle and pedestrian paths and in City parks to
encourage walking and cycling and enhance the
feeling of safety.
Policy T-1.19 Regularly maintain off-roadway bicycle and pedestrian paths, including
sweeping, weed abatement, and surface maintenance.
Develop cooperative programs with the City and Program T1.19.1
businesses that promote good community
stewardship by keeping sidewalks clean in the
University Avenue/Downtown and California
Avenue business districts, and other centers.
Policy T-1.20 Maintain pedestrian- and bicycle-only use of alleyways Downtown and
in the California Avenue area where appropriate to provide
connectivity between businesses and parking and transit stops, and
consider public art in the alleyways as a way to encourage walking.
MONITORING PROGRESS
Policy T-1.21 Continue to measure the effectiveness of the City’s transportation
network to make better decisions on transportation issues.
Collect, analyze and report transportation data Program T1.21.1
through surveys and other methods, to evaluate
implementation of related policies on a regular
basis. Also track progress on build-out of the Bicycle
+ Pedestrian Plan network.
Policy T-1.22 Monitor VMT per capita and citywide greenhouse gas (GHG)
emissions from mobile sources as a measure of progress toward the
City’s goal of reducing GHG 80% below 1990 levels by 2030.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JANUARY 31, 2017 T-31
Policy T-1.23 Monitor and publicly report on the level of service at critical
intersections (as shown on Map T-5) on a regular basis and consider
additional intersections to add to this list to monitor the effectiveness
of the City's growth management policies. Also monitor multi-modal
level of service for arterials and residential arterials.
FUNDING IMPROVEMENTS
Policy T-1.24 Evaluate transportation funding measures periodically for ongoing
transportation improvements that will help mitigate the impacts of
future development and protect residents’ quality of life.
As part of the effort to reduce traffic congestion, Program T1.24.1
regularly evaluate the City’s current Transportation
Impact Fee to implement transportation projects,
and consider new fees that new development
projects must pay to the City for use in reducing
motor vehicle trips to the extent feasible through
the provision of transit services, shuttles,
carpool/rideshare incentives, bicycle lanes, and
similar programs and improvements.
Policy T-1.25 Collaborate with adjacent communities to ensure that Palo Alto and its
immediate neighbors receive their fair share of regional transportation
funds, proportional to the need and demand for transportation
improvements within these communities to address region-wide
transportation issues.
In collaboration with regional agencies and Program T1.25.1
neighboring jurisdictions, identify and pursue
funding for rail corridor improvements and grade
separation.
Policy T-1.26 Collaborate with public interest groups as well as federal, State, and
local governments to study and advocate for transportation regulatory
changes, such as an increase in the gasoline tax.
TRAFFIC DELAY AND CONGESTION
GOAL T-2 Decrease delay, congestion, and vehicle miles travelled
with a priority on our worst intersections and our peak
commute times, including school traffic.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
T-32 REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JANUARY 31, 2017
Policy T-2.1 Working with congestion management authorities including the Valley
Transportation Authority (VTA) and the City/County Association of
Governments of San Mateo County (C/CAG), implement traffic
management strategies and technologies, such as signal coordination,
centralized traffic control, and real-time travel information, to reduce
traffic congestion in and around Palo Alto.
Implement computerized traffic management Program T2.1.1
systems to improve traffic flow when feasible.
Implement a program to monitor, coordinate, and Program T2.1.2
optimize traffic signal timing a minimum of every
two years along arterial and residential arterial
streets.
Policy T-2.2 As part of the effort to reduce traffic congestion, seek ongoing funding
and engage employers to operate and expand Transportation
Management Associations (TMAs) to address transportation and
parking issues as appropriate in the City’s employment districts.
Work in partnership with the Downtown TMA and Program T2.2.1
Stanford University to aggregate data and realize
measurable reductions in single-occupant vehicle
commuting to and from Downtown and in the
Stanford Research Park.
Policy T-2.3 Use motor vehicle level of service (LOS) at signalized intersections to
evaluate the potential impact of proposed projects, including
contributions to cumulative congestion. Use signal warrants and other
metrics to evaluate impacts at unsignalized intersections..
When adopting new CEQA significance thresholds Program T2.3.1
for compliance with SB 743 (2013), also adopt
desired standards for LOS at signalized intersections
for use in evaluating the consistency of proposed
project with the Comprehensive Plan.
Policy T-2.4 Consistent with the principles of Complete Streets adopted by the City,
work to achieve and maintain acceptable levels of service for transit
vehicles, bicyclists, pedestrians and automobiles on roads in Palo Alto.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JANUARY 31, 2017 T-33
Establish and maintain thresholds for acceptable Program T2.4.1
multi-modal levels of service for intersections in
Palo Alto.
Revise protocols for office, commercial, and multi-Program T2.4.2
family residential development proposals to
evaluate multi-modal level of service and identify
gaps in the low stress bicycle and pedestrian
network.
SCHOOLS AND CHILDCARE FACILITY CONGESTION
Policy T-2.5 Encourage the location of childcare facilities near major employment
hubs to reduce traffic congestion associated with child pick-up and
drop-off.
Policy T-2.6 Work with PAUSD to ensure that decisions regarding school
assignments are analyzed to reduce peak period motor vehicle trips to
and from school sites.
Policy T-2.7 Work with the PAUSD to resolve traffic congestion issues associated
with student drop-off and pick-up. Address pedestrian and bicycle
access, circulation, and related issues such as coordinating bell
schedules on City rights-of-way adjacent to schools and on PAUSD
property.
STREETS
GOAL T-3 Maintain an efficient roadway network for all users.
EFFICIENT CIRCULATION
Policy T-3.1 Maintain a hierarchy of streets that includes freeways, expressways,
arterials, residential arterials, collector streets, and local streets,
balancing the needs of all users in a safe and appropriate manner.
Identify desired routes for transit, cycling and Program T3.1.1
regional traffic as well as priorities for study and
investments.
Policy T-3.2 Enhance connections to, from and between parks, community centers,
recreation facilities, libraries and schools for all users.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
T-34 REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JANUARY 31, 2017
Policy T-3.3 Avoid major increases in single occupant vehicle capacity when
constructing or modifying roadways unless needed to remedy severe
congestion or critical neighborhood traffic problems. Where capacity is
increased, balance the needs of motor vehicles with those of
pedestrians and bicyclists.
Policy T-3.4 Regulate truck movements and large commercial buses in a manner
that balances the efficient movement of trucks and buses while
preserving the residential character of Palo Alto's street system.
STREET DESIGN AND MODIFICATION PROJECTS
Policy T-3.5 When constructing or modifying roadways, plan for use of the
roadway by all users.
Update the comprehensive roadway design Program T3.5.1
standards and criteria to be consistent with
complete streets best practices and the Urban
Forest Master Plan, focusing on bicycle and
pedestrian safety and multi-modal uses. Consider
opportunities to incorporate best practices from the
National Association of City Transportation Officials
guidelines for urban streets and bikeways, tailored
to the Palo Alto context.
Establish procedures for considering the effects of Program T3.5.2
street design on emergency vehicle response time.
Policy T-3.6 Consider pedestrians, bicyclists, e-bikes, and motorcycles when
designing road surfaces, curbs, crossings, signage, landscaping, and
sight lines.
Policy T-3.7 Encourage pedestrian-friendly design features such as sidewalks, street
trees, on-street parking, gathering spaces, gardens, outdoor furniture,
art, and interesting architectural details.
Policy T-3.8 Add planting pockets with street trees to provide shade, calm traffic
and enhance the pedestrian realm.
Policy T-3.9 Support city-wide sustainability efforts by preserving and enhancing
the tree canopy where feasible within the public right of way,
consistent with the Urban Forest Management Plan, as amended.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JANUARY 31, 2017 T-35
Policy T-3.10 Participate in the design and implementation of comprehensive
solutions to traffic problems near Stanford Shopping Center and
Stanford Medical Center.
Support increased public transit, traffic Program T3.10.1
management and parking solutions to ensure safe,
convenient access to and from the Stanford
Shopping Center/ Medical Center area.
Implement and monitor Development Agreement Program T3.10.2
traffic mitigations at Stanford Medical Center.
Provide safe, convenient pedestrian, bicycle, and Program T3.10.3
transit connections between the Stanford Shopping
Center/Medical Center areas and housing along the
Sand Hill Road/Quarry Road corridors to Palo Alto
Station, Downtown Palo Alto, and other primary
destinations.
Study extension of Quarry Road for transit, Program T3.10.4
pedestrians and bicyclists to access the Palo Alto
Transit Center from El Camino Real. Also study the
feasibility of another pedestrian and bicycle
underpass of Caltrain at Everett Street.
Policy T-3.11 Consider the objectives of the Grand Boulevard Initiative and the
South El Camino Boulevard Design Guidelines when designing
roadway and pedestrian improvements along El Camino Real. Pursue
wide sidewalks, pedestrian friendly building design, and planting
pockets with street trees.
Policy T-3.12 Coordinate roadway improvements with other transportation and
utility infrastructure improvements such as sewer and water.
Policy T-3.13 Work with Caltrans, Santa Clara County and VTA to improve east and
west connections in Palo Alto and maintain a circulation network that
binds the city together in all directions.
Policy T-3.14 Continue to prioritize the safety of school children in street
modification projects that affect school travel routes, including during
construction.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
T-36 REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JANUARY 31, 2017
RAIL CORRIDOR
Policy T-3.15 Pursue grade separation of rail crossings along the rail corridor as a
City priority.
Undertake studies and outreach necessary to Program T3.15.1
advance grade separation of Caltrain to become a
“shovel ready” project and strongly advocate for
adequate State, regional, and federal funding for
design and construction of railroad grade
separations.
Conduct a study to evaluate the implications of Program T3.15.2
grade separation on bicycle and pedestrian
circulation.
Policy T-3.16 Keep existing at-grade rail crossings open to motor vehicles,
pedestrians, and bicyclist, consistent with results of a focused
circulation study and a context sensitive alternatives analysis.
Policy T-3.17 Until grade separation is completed, improve existing at-grade rail
crossings to ensure the highest feasible level of safety along the
corridor and provide additional safe, convenient crossings.
Commission a Palo Alto Avenue crossing study to Program T3.17.1
identify potential near-term safety and accessibility
improvements, including implementation of a
“quiet zone.”
Work with Caltrain to ensure that the rail tracks are Program T3.17.2
safe and secure with adequate fencing and barriers.
Policy T-3.18 Improve safety and minimize adverse noise, vibrations and visual
impacts of operations in the Caltrain rail corridor on adjoining districts,
public facilities, schools and neighborhoods with or without the
addition of High Speed Rail.
NEIGHBORHOOD IMPACTS
GOAL T-4 Protect local streets that contribute to neighborhood
character and provide a range of local transportation
options.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JANUARY 31, 2017 T-37
Policy T-4.1 Keep all neighborhood streets open as a general rule.
Policy T-4.2 Implement traffic calming measures to slow traffic on local and
collector residential streets, and prioritize traffic calming measures for
safety over congestion management.
Identify specific improvements that can be used to Program T4.2.1
discourage drivers from using local, neighborhood
streets to bypass traffic congestion on arterials.
Periodically evaluate residential areas for traffic Program T4.2.2
impacts and use the results of that evaluation to
prioritize traffic calming measures.
Policy T-4.3 Maintain the following roadways as residential arterials, treated with
landscaping, medians, and other visual improvements to distinguish
them as residential streets, in order to improve safety:
Middlefield Road (between San Francisquito Creek and San
Antonio Road)
University Avenue (between San Francisquito Creek and
Middlefield Road)
Embarcadero Road (between Alma Street and West Bayshore
Road)
East and West Charleston Road/Arastradero Road (between
Miranda Avenue and Fabian Way).
Use landscaping and other improvements to Program T4.3.1
establish clear “gateways” at the points where the
Oregon Expressway, University Avenue and
Embarcadero Road transition from freeways to
neighborhoods.
Policy T-4.4 Minimize the danger of increased commercial ingress/egress adjacent
to major intersections, and noticeable increases in traffic from new
development in residential neighborhoods, through traffic mitigation
measures.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
T-38 REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JANUARY 31, 2017
Policy T-4.5 Require project proponents to employ the Traffic Impact on
Residential Environments (TIRE) methodology to measure potential
street impacts from proposed new development of all types in
residential neighborhoods.
Policy T-4.6 Require new residential development projects to implement best
practices for street design, stormwater management and green
infrastructure.
MOTOR VEHICLE AND BICYCLE PARKING
GOAL T-5 Encourage attractive, convenient, efficient and innovative
parking solutions for all users.
MANAGING PARKING SUPPLY
Policy T-5.1 All new development projects should meet parking demand
generated by the project, without the use of on-street parking,
consistent with the established parking regulations. As demonstrated
parking demand decreases over time, parking requirements for new
construction should decrease.
Evaluate the need to update parking standards in Program T5.1.1
the municipal code, based on local conditions,
different users’ needs and baseline parking need.
Allow the use of parking lifts for Office/R&D and
multi-family housing as appropriate.
Consider reducing parking requirements for retail Program T5.1.2
and restaurant uses as a way to encourage new
businesses and the use of alternative modes..
Work with stakeholders in each commercial center Program T5.1.3
and employment district to monitor conditions and
determine the appropriate timing for revisions to
parking requirements.
Study the feasibility of unbundled parking for office, Program T5.1.4
commercial, and multi-family residential
developments (including senior housing
developments) that are well-served by transit and
demonstrated walking and biking connections.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JANUARY 31, 2017 T-39
Policy T-5.2 Continue to implement a comprehensive program of parking supply
and demand management strategies citywide to optimize the use of
existing parking spaces.
Use technology to help identify parking availability Program T5.2.1
and make it easy to pay any parking fees.
In the Downtown, work with the TMA to implement Program T5.2.2
pilot projects that test the effectiveness of strategies
for employees, such as reduced cost transit passes
and ridesharing programs. Review pilot project
results and consider expanding to other areas of
the city, such as California Avenue.
Consider applying a pricing strategy to address Program T5.2.3
public parking shortages citywide that is flexible in
response to demand and supply. Conduct a
feasibility study that considers the potential impact
of a pricing strategy for retail and commercial areas,
and potential benefits for TDM.
Implement Council-adopted recommendations Program T5.2.4
from the parking management study for the
Downtown area, which address the feasibility of
removing color-coded parking zones, and dynamic
pricing and management policies to prioritize short-
term parking spaces closest to the commercial core
for customers, garage parking for employees, and
neighborhood parking for residents.
Policy T-5.3 Work with merchants when designating dedicated employee (long
term) parking areas in public parking lots and garages.
Policy T-5.4 Encourage shared parking where complementary demand timing is
demonstrated in order to optimize parking spaces in commercial
centers and employment districts.
Explore incentives to encourage privately initiated Program T5.4.1
shared parking among individual property owners
when developments have excess parking that can
be available for other businesses to use.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
T-40 REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JANUARY 31, 2017
Policy T-5.5 Minimize the need for employees to park in and adjacent to
commercial centers, employment districts and schools.
PARKING INFRASTRUCTURE AND DESIGN
Policy T-5.6 Strongly encourage the use of below-grade or structured parking
instead of surface parking for new developments of all types while
minimizing negative impacts including groundwater and landscaping
where feasible.
Policy T-5.7 Promote vehicle parking areas designed to reduce stormwater runoff,
increase compatibility with street trees and add visual interest to
streets and other public locations. Encourage the use of photovoltaic
panel or tree canopies in parking lots or on top of parking structures
to provide cover, consistent with the Urban Forest Master Plan.
Study the feasibility of retrofitting City-owned Program T5.7.1
surface parking lots to implement best
management practices for stormwater management
and urban heat island mitigation, including green
infrastructure, permeable pavement and reflective
surfaces.
Identify incentives to encourage the retrofit of Program T5.7.2
privately owned surface parking areas to
incorporate best management practices for
stormwater management and urban heat island
mitigation as well as incentives for the provision of
publicly accessible bicycle parking in privately
owned lots.
Policy T-5.8 Promote safety for pedestrians in City-owned parking lots by adopting
standards for landscaping, signage, walkways and lighting that reduce
crime and ensure a safe and orderly flow of traffic.
Policy T-5.9 Encourage the use of adaptive design strategies in new parking
facilities in order to facilitate reuse in the future if and when conditions
warrant.
RESIDENTIAL PARKING
Policy T-5.10 Protect residential areas from parking impacts of nearby businesses.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JANUARY 31, 2017 T-41
Coordinate with neighborhood groups to evaluate Program T5.10.1
the need for a residential parking permit program
in areas outside Downtown Palo Alto and College
Terrace.
BICYCLE PARKING
Policy T-5.11 To promote bicycle use, increase the number of safe, attractive and
well-designed bicycle parking spaces available in the city, including
spots for bicycle trailers, prioritizing heavily travelled areas such as
commercial and retail centers, employment districts, recreational/
cultural facilities, multi-modal transit facilities, and ride share stops for
bicycle parking infrastructure.
Work with private sector partners, including Program T5.11.1
employers, merchants and community service
providers, to identify ways to provide more bicycle
parking, including e-bike parking with charging
stations, near existing shops, services and places of
employment.
Consider installing secure electronic bike lockers Program T5.11.2
such as the BikeLink system, at high theft locations,
including transit stations and parking garages.
Assess the need to provide additional bicycle Program T5.11.3
parking in City-owned parking lots and rights-of-
way.
ROAD SAFETY
GOAL T-6 Provide a safe environment for motorists, pedestrians, and
bicyclists on Palo Alto streets.
Policy T-6.1 Continue to make safety the first priority of citywide transportation
planning. Prioritize pedestrian, bicycle, and automobile safety over
motor vehicle level-of-service at intersections and motor vehicle
parking.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
T-42 REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JANUARY 31, 2017
Follow the principles of the safe routes to schools Program T6.1.1
program to implement traffic safety measures that
focus on Safe Routes to work, shopping,
downtown, community services, parks, and schools.
Develop, distribute and aggressively promote maps Program T6.1.2
and apps showing safe routes to work, shopping,
community services, parks and schools within Palo
Alto in collaboration with stakeholders, including
PAUSD, major employers, TMAs, local businesses
and community organizations.
Address pedestrian safety along Alma Street Program T6.1.3
between Embarcadero Road and Lytton Street.
Policy T-6.2 Address pedestrian safety on shared-use paths through the use of
signs, pavement markings, and outreach to users, encouraging them
to be safe and courteous. Pursue the goal of zero severe injuries and
roadway fatalities on Palo Alto city streets.
Regularly collect severity and location data on Program T6.2.1
roadway collisions for all modes of travel, including
fatalities and severe injuries. In collaboration with
Santa Clara County, develop an up-to-date, public
database for this information.
Policy T-6.3 Continue to work with Caltrain to increase safety at train crossings,
including improving gate technology, and signal coordination.
Policy T-6.4 Continue the Safe Routes to School partnership with PAUSD and the
Palo Alto Council of PTAs.
Periodically update the Adopted School Commute Program T6.4.1
Corridors Network to include updated school
commute routes. Ensure these routes are prioritized
for safety improvements and considered in land
use planning decisions.
Establish standards and procedures for maintaining Program T6.4.2
safe bicycling routes, including signage for warnings
and detours during construction projects.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JANUARY 31, 2017 T-43
In collaboration with PAUSD, provide adult crossing Program T6.4.3
guards at school crossings that meet adopted
criteria.
Policy T-6.5 Support PAUSD adoption of standard Safe Routes to School policies
and regulations that address the five E’s of education, encouragement,
enforcement, engineering, and evaluation.
Policy T-6.6 Use engineering, enforcement, and educational tools to improve traffic
safety on City roadways.
Periodically evaluate safety on roadways and at Program T6.6.1
intersections and enhance conditions through the
use of signal technology and physical changes.
Consider the construction of traffic circles for
improved intersection safety.
Continue to provide educational programs for Program T6.6.2
children and adults, in partnership with community-
based educational organizations, to promote the
safe use of bicycles, including the City-sponsored
bicycle education programs in the public schools
and the bicycle traffic school program for juveniles.
Work with PAUSD and employers to promote Program T6.6.3
roadway safety for all users, including motorized
alternatives to cars and bikes such as mopeds and
e-bikes, through educational programs for children
and adults.
Complete a mobility and safety study for downtown Program T6.6.4
Palo Alto, looking at ways to improve circulation
and safety for all modes.
Identify and implement safety improvements for Program T6.6.5
underpasses, including on Embarcadero Road.
Improve pedestrian crossings by creating protected Program T6.6.6
areas and better pedestrian and traffic visibility. Use
a toolbox including bulb outs, small curb radii, high
visibility crosswalks, and landscaping.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
T-44 REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JANUARY 31, 2017
Establish standards and procedures to maintain safe Program T6.6.7
bicycling routes and adequately and safely sign
warnings and detours during construction projects.
Establish a program to educate residents to keep Program T6.6.8
sidewalks clear of parked cars, especially on narrow
local streets in neighborhoods with rolled curbs.
Survey for compliance annually.
Policy T-6.7 Use appropriate technology to monitor and improve circulation safety
throughout the City.
Evaluate the performance of safety improvements Program T6.7.1
and identify methods to encourage alternative
transportation modes.
Policy T-6.8 Vigorously and consistently enforce speed limits and other traffic laws
for both motor vehicle and bicycle traffic.
TRANSIT-DEPENDENT COMMUNITY
GOAL T-7 Provide mobility options that allow people who are transit
dependent to reach their destinations.
Policy T-7.1 Support mobility options for all groups in Palo Alto who require transit
for their transportation.
Expand transportation opportunities for transit-Program T7.1.1
dependent riders by supporting discounts for taxi
fares, rideshare services, and transit, by
coordinating transit systems to be shared by
multiple senior housing developments, and by
maintaining a database of volunteer drivers, and
other transit options.
Coordinate with social service agencies and transit Program T7.1.2
agencies to fill gaps in existing transportation routes
and services accessible to transit-dependent riders
no matter their means and design new bus routes
that enable them to access those services.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JANUARY 31, 2017 T-45
Pursue expanded evening and night time bus Program T7.1.3
service to enhance mobility for all users during off-
peak times.
Policy T-7.2 Utilize the principles of Universal Design, and local and State design
standards, to guide the planning and implementation of transportation
and parking improvement projects to ensure the needs of community
members with limited mobility, including some seniors and people
with disabilities, are addressed.
Policy T-7.3 Continue to partner with transit providers, including VTA, to support
demand-responsive paratransit service for eligible participants in Palo
Alto and maintain existing paratransit services, particularly where bus
service is discontinued. Emphasize service quality and timeliness when
contracting for paratransit services.
Policy T-7.4 Collaborate with transit and shuttle providers including VTA, AC
Transit, SamTrans, Stanford Marguerite Shuttle, Palo Alto Free Shuttle,
Dumbarton Express Bus Service and Caltrain in the provision of
service that is accessible to seniors and people with disabilities.
Policy T-7.5 Support transit providers in implementing or continuing reduced fare
or no fare voucher systems for selected populations, including seniors
and people with disabilities.
Policy T-7.6 Encourage transit service providers to provide subsidized transit
passes for low income riders and other transit-dependent
communities.
REGIONAL COLLABORATION AND COORDINATION
GOAL T-8 Influence the shape and implementation of regional
transportation policies and technologies to reduce traffic
congestion and greenhouse gas emissions.
Policy T-8.1 Engage in regional transportation planning and advocate for specific
transit improvements and investments, such as Caltrain service
enhancements and grade separations, Dumbarton Express service,
enhanced bus service on El Camino Real with queue jumping and
curbside platforms, HOV/HOT lanes, and additional VTA bus service.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
T-46 REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JANUARY 31, 2017
Policy T-8.2 Participate in regional planning initiatives for the rail corridor and
provide a strong guiding voice.
Policy T-8.3 Collaborate effectively with and engage in regional partnerships and
solutions with a range of stakeholders, including regional agencies,
neighboring jurisdictions and major employers, on issues of regional
importance such as traffic congestion, reduced reliance on single-
occupant vehicles, and sustainable transportation.
Continue to participate in regional efforts to Program T8.3.1
develop technological solutions that make
alternatives to the automobile more convenient and
thereby contribute to reducing congestion.
Policy T-8.4 Coordinate with local, regional agencies, and Caltrans to support
regional efforts to maintain and improve transportation infrastructure
in Palo Alto, including the Multi-Modal Transit Center.
Policy T-8.5 Support the efforts of the Metropolitan Transportation Commission
(MTC) to coordinate transportation planning and services for the Mid-
Peninsula and the Bay Area that emphasize alternatives to the
automobile.
Policy T-8.6 Advocate for efforts by Caltrans and the Valley Transportation
Authority to reduce congestion and improve traffic flow on existing
freeway facilities consistent with Statewide GHG emissions reduction
initiatives.
Advocate for provision of a new southbound Program T8.6.1
entrance ramp to Highway 101 from San Antonio
Road, in conjunction with the closure of the
southbound Charleston Road on-ramp at the
Rengstorff Avenue interchange in Mountain View.
Advocate for improved connectivity to transit to Program T8.6.2
serve workers who live in the South Bay and work
in Palo Alto.
Policy T-8.7 Support the application of emerging freeway information, monitoring,
and control systems that provide non-intrusive driver assistance and
reduce congestion.
PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
REVISED COUNCIL DRAFT – JANUARY 31, 2017 T-47
Policy T-8.8 Where appropriate, support the conversion of existing traffic lanes to
exclusive bus and high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes or
Express/HOT lanes on freeways and expressways, including the
Dumbarton Bridge, and the continuation of an HOV lane from
Redwood City to San Francisco.
Policy T-8.9 Support State and federal legislation to reduce motor vehicle
emissions, noise, and fuel consumption.
Policy T-8.10 Support plans for intra-county and transbay transit systems that link
Palo Alto to the rest of Santa Clara County and adjoining counties.
Ensure that these systems and enhancements do not adversely impact
the bay.
Work with regional transportation providers, Program T8.10.1
including BART and Caltrain, to improve
connections between Palo Alto and the San
Francisco International Airport and Norman Y.
Mineta San Jose International Airport.
Policy T-8.11 Support regional plans to complete development of the Bay Trail and
Bay-to-Ridge Trail.
Policy T-8.12 Support the development of the Santa Clara County Countywide
Bicycle System, and other regional bicycle plans.
Identify and improve bicycle connections to/from Program T8.12.1
neighboring communities in Santa Clara and San
Mateo counties to support local trips that cross city
boundaries. Also advocate for reducing barriers to
bicycling and walking at freeway interchanges,
expressway intersections, and railroad grad
crossings.